Re: [Finale] combining files

2010-03-14 Thread Mark D Lew

On Mar 14, 2010, at 9:35 PM, Noel Stoutenburg wrote:

It is my experience with various versions of Windows Finale, that  
copying lyrics into a file which already contains lyrics produces  
results which cannot be predicted based upon Finale documentation.  
In general, when trying to copy lyrics between documents, Finale  
will not move content into a lyrics subspace that already contains  
lyrics. So if you have two files with lyrics in the lyrics subspace  
"verse 1", and you try to combine them, the lyrics of the second  
file will be moved into a different subspace, so that the lyrics in  
"verse 1" of the source file will wind up in the next available  
verse, perhaps "verse 2", in the target file.


If I were merging two files and both had lyrics, I'd make sure none  
of them are in the same verse box.  Finale allows for a ridiculous  
number of verses so it's easy to avoid overlap.  Move the lyrics in  
one piece to verse 50, 51, and 52.  I would move them within the one  
file and make sure everything is tidy BEFORE merging the two files.


I don't have experience with merging files specifically, so I don't  
know how it works, but on general principle, I think it's always a  
good idea to have lyrics in different boxes. They give you zillions  
of them, may as well make good use of them.


mdl
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] combining files

2010-03-14 Thread Noel Stoutenburg

Ray Horton wrote:


One could also try zapping all of the lyrics in the target file (go into
"edit lyrics" and erase them there), then copy the lyrics from the lyric
staves in each both source files onto the same staves in the target
file. (Change the filter under "Edit" if necessary.). I believe you will
keep formatting, etc, and only have to adjust some baselines. (This is
off the top of my head, which is pretty round and doesn't hold things
very steadily, so I could be way off.)


It is my experience with various versions of Windows Finale, that 
copying lyrics into a file which already contains lyrics produces 
results which cannot be predicted based upon Finale documentation. In 
general, when trying to copy lyrics between documents, Finale will not 
move content into a lyrics subspace that already contains lyrics. So if 
you have two files with lyrics in the lyrics subspace "verse 1", and you 
try to combine them, the lyrics of the second file will be moved into a 
different subspace, so that the lyrics in "verse 1" of the source file 
will wind up in the next available verse, perhaps "verse 2", in the 
target file.


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] combining files

2010-03-14 Thread Ray Horton

Excellent instructions, Noel.


I would add one thing:

Noel Stoutenburg wrote:
When files contain lyrics, I have had the best luck when I did not try 
to merge the lyrics by this method. Based upon my experience, if I 
were called upon to do this, between step 2 and 3 above, I would 
delete all of the lyrics from the target file (remember, the target 
file is a copy, so I still have the original). Then after the files 
were merged, I would use the text editor of my choice, and manually 
merge the lyrics from each lyric space separately in a scratch file by 
copying the contents of verse 1 in the first source file to the 
scratch file, then append the contents of verse 1 in the second file 
to the contents of the scratch file, then copy the contents of the 
scratch file to verse 1 of the target file, and use mass click 
assignment to assign the lyrics [On the Windows platform, the 
keystroke / mouse combination to do this is to use the mouse to 
position the cursor in the note where the first lyric is to be, press 
the shift key, and left click with the mouse.] for the verse. After 
the lyrics are assigned this way, I use a combination of the "shift 
lyrics" option of the lyrics tool, and "type into score", to move the 
lyrics so that they lie under the appropriate note.


One could also try zapping all of the lyrics in the target file (go into 
"edit lyrics" and erase them there), then copy the lyrics from the lyric 
staves in each both  source files onto the same staves in the target 
file.  (Change the filter under "Edit" if necessary.).  I believe you 
will keep formatting, etc, and only have to adjust some baselines.  
(This is off the top of my head, which is pretty round and doesn't hold 
things very steadily, so I could be way off.)



Raymond Horton
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] combining files

2010-03-14 Thread Noel Stoutenburg

Katherine Hoover wrote:


I'm working on a Mac OS 10, with Finale 2004.  I would like to combine
two files (parts for movements 1 & 2) into one. I couldn't find
information under "combine" or under "merge". How can i do this?


[Note: My experience is that trying to merge files involves a lot of 
fiddly work, and I don't usually bother. If I edit a work which contains 
multiple movements each in its own file, my first choice is to adjust 
the page layouts of the first and last pages of a file so if I run a 
page containing the last page of one movement through the printer again, 
the first page of the next movement prints in the correct space on the 
page. I would not bother trying to merge files except for very good reason.]


the experience of others may be different, but my experience informs me 
that this has to be a manual operation. My experience also informs me 
that lyrics do not merge well, and the steps below assume that the two 
movements do NOT have lyrics. Also, while I saw your message a couple 
days ago, I'm not now, and never have been, on MAC, but knowing that 
there are several on the list who are, I deferred to them for the 
answer, since some keystrokes and mouse actions are different between 
the two platforms.


1. Make a copy of the file you're going to be combining into. In the 
following steps, I'm going to call the copy you make the "target file".


2. Compare the staves in the two files, and if they do not match in both 
quantity and order, add the staves necessary so that they do. For 
example, suppose the work is for a string quartet, but that the viola is 
silent in movement 2, and in preparing the finale file, instead of 
optimizing out the viola part in movement 2, it was omitted entirely. In 
this event, a viola staff will be have to be added to movement 2 in the 
same place that it is in movement 1.


2. When there are the same number of staves in the two movements, and 
the staves are in the same order, add one measure at the end of target 
file, with the measure in each staff containing no "real notes".


3. Open the target file and the file containing the movement you are 
merging from in scroll view, and use the "tile horizontally" option from 
the Windows menu to make as much of both files visible on screen. You'll 
want to be able to see the last two measures in the target file (the 
last one, and the one you added in step 2) of the top staff. Again, 
using the sliders, move the file you are merging from in its window so 
that you see the last measure of the bottom staff of the movement.


4. In the "mass mover" tool, select the "measure items" option, and 
select the items from the dialog box that you want to move; then select 
the "entry items" option, and select the items from the entry items 
dialog that you want to move. Even if both movements have lyrics, I 
advise not trying to merge them at this step. Finally, from the "mass 
mover" dialog, choose the selection "copy and insert".


5. Making sure that the window containing the movement you are merging 
into the target file is the active window, click on the last movement of 
the bottom staff to highlight the measure. Now, using the sliders, move 
the file within the window so you can see the first measure of the top 
staff. Shift-click to the first measure of the top staff. [Note: this is 
the proper method to highlight a range of measures in the Windows 
implementation of Finale 2004; if it doesn't work in MAC, check your 
documentation for the proper key stroke / mouse actions.]


6. Right-clicking and holding the button on the first selected measure 
of the top staff of the file you are merging from, move the highlighted 
region into the other window, so that the top measure of the beginning 
is over the added measure of the target file. When you release the 
button, you should have merged the two files, and should have a blank 
measure at the end.


I have not had very much luck transferring page layouts, and usually 
wind up adjusting layouts of the merged file manually.


When files contain lyrics, I have had the best luck when I did not try 
to merge the lyrics by this method. Based upon my experience, if I were 
called upon to do this, between step 2 and 3 above, I would delete all 
of the lyrics from the target file (remember, the target file is a copy, 
so I still have the original). Then after the files were merged, I would 
use the text editor of my choice, and manually merge the lyrics from 
each lyric space separately in a scratch file by copying the contents of 
verse 1 in the first source file to the scratch file, then append the 
contents of verse 1 in the second file to the contents of the scratch 
file, then copy the contents of the scratch file to verse 1 of the 
target file, and use mass click assignment to assign the lyrics [On the 
Windows platform, the keystroke / mouse combination to do this is to use 
the mouse to position the cursor in the note where the first lyric is to 
be, pres

Re: [Finale] quarter note = dotted quarter note playback?

2010-03-14 Thread Noel Stoutenburg

Eric Dannewitz wrote:

Well, it is true that it will do the same thing as I want, assigning
the dotted quarter the same numeric value as the quarter, but ideally
i think in a score you'd want the graphical dotted quarter = quarter
and then when it switches back to 2/4 a graphical quarter = dotted
quarter. Just seems that it was overlooked in Finale playback, and it
is rather common I think...


The graphical version is reasonably common, and one could certainly 
define an expression


( d = d. )

and assign it to playback with a change of tempo by defining the 
playback capabilities of the expression. The reverse


( d. = d ) is equally trivial.

ns
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] quarter note = dotted quarter note playback?

2010-03-14 Thread Noel Stoutenburg

Eric,

When I want to do this, I use text expressions, defined for playback.
In this case, I'd have three expressions. One is a quarter note, which 
is not defined for playback. The other two look the similar--"(= 
000)" and "(  .  = 000)" where 000 is the value representing the tempo. 
These two have playback defined, so that one sets the tempo of the 
quarter note to the designated value, and the other sets the tempo of 
the dotted quarter note to the designated value. This works well with 
earlier playback, but should work with human playback equally well.


ns
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] quarter note = dotted quarter note playback?

2010-03-14 Thread Eric Dannewitz
Well, it is true that it will do the same thing as I want, assigning
the dotted quarter the same numeric value as the quarter, but ideally
i think in a score you'd want the graphical dotted quarter = quarter
and then when it switches back to 2/4 a graphical quarter = dotted
quarter. Just seems that it was overlooked in Finale playback, and it
is rather common I think...

On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 5:02 PM, dershem  wrote:
> On 3/14/2010 4:58 PM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
>>
>> Man, thats lamewe have all this other fluff in Finale, but
>> something like this you have to hack around to get the playback to
>> work correctly?
>
> let me actually look at it {I tend to not do that kind of tempo changes
> much...]
>
> Okay - it looks like you can easily assign 'dotted quarter note = X" in the
> Tempo pull-down, so your task should be very simple.
>
> I just had never needed that particular expression, and was not certain if
> 'dotted-quarter' was an option.  It is.
>
> In FinWin2010b, at least.  :)

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] quarter note = dotted quarter note playback?

2010-03-14 Thread dershem

On 3/14/2010 4:58 PM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:

Man, thats lamewe have all this other fluff in Finale, but
something like this you have to hack around to get the playback to
work correctly?


let me actually look at it {I tend to not do that kind of tempo changes 
much...]


Okay - it looks like you can easily assign 'dotted quarter note = X" in 
the Tempo pull-down, so your task should be very simple.


I just had never needed that particular expression, and was not certain 
if 'dotted-quarter' was an option.  It is.


In FinWin2010b, at least.  :)

cd


On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 4:56 PM, dershem  wrote:

On 3/14/2010 4:45 PM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:


Oh, so you can't just graphically have a quarter note then an = then a
dotted quarter? :-/


That's the easy part.  But if you use playback, it will change the tempo.
  If you don't use playback, it's very simple.

cd


On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 4:44 PM, dershemwrote:


On 3/14/2010 4:26 PM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:


I'm trying to get Finale to play back a piece of music that goes from
2/4 to 6/8 and I want it to do dotted quarter note = quarter
notebut the human playback doesn't seem to catch it.

ideas/


If you set your parameters right, it should be fairly straightforward.

Going from q = X to q = Y is all you have to do, and then mark Y as q. =
X.
  Just figure out what the beat is in quarter notes, and enter that in the
TEMPO part of the Playback tab, where the description is [dotted quarter
=
Y].

Should work.

cd





--
http://members.cox.net/dershem/index.html
http://dershem.livejournal.com/
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale



___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature 
database 4944 (20100314) __

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com







--
http://members.cox.net/dershem/index.html
http://dershem.livejournal.com/
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] quarter note = dotted quarter note playback?

2010-03-14 Thread Eric Dannewitz
Man, thats lamewe have all this other fluff in Finale, but
something like this you have to hack around to get the playback to
work correctly?


On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 4:56 PM, dershem  wrote:
> On 3/14/2010 4:45 PM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
>>
>> Oh, so you can't just graphically have a quarter note then an = then a
>> dotted quarter? :-/
>
> That's the easy part.  But if you use playback, it will change the tempo.
>  If you don't use playback, it's very simple.
>
> cd
>
>> On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 4:44 PM, dershem  wrote:
>>>
>>> On 3/14/2010 4:26 PM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:

 I'm trying to get Finale to play back a piece of music that goes from
 2/4 to 6/8 and I want it to do dotted quarter note = quarter
 notebut the human playback doesn't seem to catch it.

 ideas/
>>>
>>> If you set your parameters right, it should be fairly straightforward.
>>>
>>> Going from q = X to q = Y is all you have to do, and then mark Y as q. =
>>> X.
>>>  Just figure out what the beat is in quarter notes, and enter that in the
>>> TEMPO part of the Playback tab, where the description is [dotted quarter
>>> =
>>> Y].
>>>
>>> Should work.
>>>
>>> cd
>
>
>
>
> --
> http://members.cox.net/dershem/index.html
> http://dershem.livejournal.com/
> ___
> Finale mailing list
> Finale@shsu.edu
> http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
>

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] quarter note = dotted quarter note playback?

2010-03-14 Thread dershem

On 3/14/2010 4:45 PM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:

Oh, so you can't just graphically have a quarter note then an = then a
dotted quarter? :-/


That's the easy part.  But if you use playback, it will change the 
tempo.  If you don't use playback, it's very simple.


cd


On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 4:44 PM, dershem  wrote:

On 3/14/2010 4:26 PM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:


I'm trying to get Finale to play back a piece of music that goes from
2/4 to 6/8 and I want it to do dotted quarter note = quarter
notebut the human playback doesn't seem to catch it.

ideas/


If you set your parameters right, it should be fairly straightforward.

Going from q = X to q = Y is all you have to do, and then mark Y as q. = X.
  Just figure out what the beat is in quarter notes, and enter that in the
TEMPO part of the Playback tab, where the description is [dotted quarter =
Y].

Should work.

cd





--
http://members.cox.net/dershem/index.html
http://dershem.livejournal.com/
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] quarter note = dotted quarter note playback?

2010-03-14 Thread Chuck Israels
I'd try putting in a hidden expression for playback where the dotted  
quarter had the same mm values as the preceding half note.  Seems to  
me that should work.


Chuck


On Mar 14, 2010, at 4:26 PM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:


I'm trying to get Finale to play back a piece of music that goes from
2/4 to 6/8 and I want it to do dotted quarter note = quarter
notebut the human playback doesn't seem to catch it.

ideas/
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Chuck Israels
230 North Garden Terrace
Bellingham, WA 98225-5836
phone (360) 671-3402
fax (360) 676-6055
www.chuckisraels.com

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] quarter note = dotted quarter note playback?

2010-03-14 Thread Eric Dannewitz
Oh, so you can't just graphically have a quarter note then an = then a
dotted quarter? :-/

On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 4:44 PM, dershem  wrote:
> On 3/14/2010 4:26 PM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
>>
>> I'm trying to get Finale to play back a piece of music that goes from
>> 2/4 to 6/8 and I want it to do dotted quarter note = quarter
>> notebut the human playback doesn't seem to catch it.
>>
>> ideas/
>
> If you set your parameters right, it should be fairly straightforward.
>
> Going from q = X to q = Y is all you have to do, and then mark Y as q. = X.
>  Just figure out what the beat is in quarter notes, and enter that in the
> TEMPO part of the Playback tab, where the description is [dotted quarter =
> Y].
>
> Should work.
>
> cd
> --
> http://members.cox.net/dershem/index.html
> http://dershem.livejournal.com/
> ___
> Finale mailing list
> Finale@shsu.edu
> http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
>

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] quarter note = dotted quarter note playback?

2010-03-14 Thread dershem

On 3/14/2010 4:26 PM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:

I'm trying to get Finale to play back a piece of music that goes from
2/4 to 6/8 and I want it to do dotted quarter note = quarter
notebut the human playback doesn't seem to catch it.

ideas/


If you set your parameters right, it should be fairly straightforward.

Going from q = X to q = Y is all you have to do, and then mark Y as q. = 
X.  Just figure out what the beat is in quarter notes, and enter that in 
the TEMPO part of the Playback tab, where the description is [dotted 
quarter = Y].


Should work.

cd
--
http://members.cox.net/dershem/index.html
http://dershem.livejournal.com/
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


[Finale] quarter note = dotted quarter note playback?

2010-03-14 Thread Eric Dannewitz
I'm trying to get Finale to play back a piece of music that goes from
2/4 to 6/8 and I want it to do dotted quarter note = quarter
notebut the human playback doesn't seem to catch it.

ideas/
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] OT: blowing air through brass instruments

2010-03-14 Thread Andrew Stiller


On Mar 14, 2010, at 5:16 PM, dershem wrote:


On 3/14/2010 1:44 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:

On 14 Mar 2010 at 13:17, John Howell wrote:


lute with brass choir


This made me laugh out loud, and start imagining impossible
ensembles. I started with the bass lute with brass choir, and turned
it into solo lute on-stage with antiphonal brass choirs in the side
galleries.


It can't be (much) worse than the PDQ Bach piece that features Lute 
and bagpipes in the same ensemble.




I publish a piece by Orlando García for mandolin and tuba. His basic 
trick is to keep them out of each other's way, and the occasional 
overwhelming of the former by the latter is part of the esthetic--like 
an elephant trampling through the parlor.


Andrew Stiller
Kallisti Music Press
http://www.kallistimusic.com/


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] OT: blowing air through brass instruments

2010-03-14 Thread John Howell

At 4:44 PM -0400 3/14/10, David W. Fenton wrote:

On 14 Mar 2010 at 13:17, John Howell wrote:


 lute with brass choir


This made me laugh out loud, and start imagining impossible
ensembles. I started with the bass lute with brass choir, and turned
it into solo lute on-stage with antiphonal brass choirs in the side
galleries.


And it would be worse with a clavichord, the only instrument that can 
be drowned out by a lute!



Other than mixing instruments with completely contradictory sound
profiles, what other kinds of things would make for incompatibility?


Some of the things that we hear every day on recordings, like bass 
flute (a favorite of Mancini) with jazz band.  Probably similar with 
John Williams scores.  "We can fix it in the mix!"


John


--
John R. Howell, Assoc. Prof. of Music
Virginia Tech Department of Music
College of Liberal Arts & Human Sciences
Blacksburg, Virginia, U.S.A. 24061-0240
Vox (540) 231-8411  Fax (540) 231-5034
(mailto:john.how...@vt.edu)
http://www.music.vt.edu/faculty/howell/howell.html

"We never play anything the same way once."  Shelly Manne's definition
of jazz musicians.
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


[Finale] Answer to Sibelius question

2010-03-14 Thread John Howell

I'm sorry that there's no stock in the online store at the moment.  I
checked on this with my colleagues this past Friday and they assure me
that more stock is on its way to the warehouse, and it should be back in
stock on Tuesday or Wednesday.

Daniel

--
Daniel Spreadbury
Senior Product Manager | Sibelius R & D


--
John R. Howell, Assoc. Prof. of Music
Virginia Tech Department of Music
College of Liberal Arts & Human Sciences
Blacksburg, Virginia, U.S.A. 24061-0240
Vox (540) 231-8411  Fax (540) 231-5034
(mailto:john.how...@vt.edu)
http://www.music.vt.edu/faculty/howell/howell.html

"We never play anything the same way once."  Shelly Manne's definition
of jazz musicians.
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] OT: blowing air through brass instruments

2010-03-14 Thread dershem

On 3/14/2010 1:44 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:

On 14 Mar 2010 at 13:17, John Howell wrote:


lute with brass choir


This made me laugh out loud, and start imagining impossible
ensembles. I started with the bass lute with brass choir, and turned
it into solo lute on-stage with antiphonal brass choirs in the side
galleries.


It can't be (much) worse than the PDQ Bach piece that features Lute and 
bagpipes in the same ensemble.


"The lute is a nice instrument.  Very pretty with a pleasant sound. 
Think about it while you're listening to the bagpipes..."


cd
--
http://members.cox.net/dershem/index.html
http://dershem.livejournal.com/
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] OT: blowing air through brass instruments

2010-03-14 Thread David W. Fenton
On 14 Mar 2010 at 13:17, John Howell wrote:

> lute with brass choir

This made me laugh out loud, and start imagining impossible 
ensembles. I started with the bass lute with brass choir, and turned 
it into solo lute on-stage with antiphonal brass choirs in the side 
galleries.

Other than mixing instruments with completely contradictory sound 
profiles, what other kinds of things would make for incompatibility? 
Other than mixing Western and non-Western instruments with different 
tuning systems, I'm coming up blank.

I must say, though, sometimes it's quite revealing to play a piece of 
music on the wrong instrument. For my junior recital in college, my 
program included the Berg Sonata, and at the time I was also doing 
some work on fortepiano, so I gave the Berg a try on the fortepiano. 
It was quite illuminating, in fact, as the clarity of the bass made 
for some interesting sounds.

-- 
David W. Fentonhttp://dfenton.com
David Fenton Associates   http://dfenton.com/DFA/

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] glissando marking, also merging

2010-03-14 Thread Ray Horton

dershem wrote:

On 3/14/2010 10:03 AM, Katherine Hoover wrote:

Dear Finale List

Working on a mac OSX, Finale 2004.

The glissando marking comes with the word"glissando" running up its
back. How can I get rid of the word? Or is there another way to mark a
gliss?

Also - I received no answer about merging, or combining files. Perhaps
there is no answer, but then again, maybe someone on the list does know
a way to do this.

Any help is appreciated!

Katherine Hoover


Choose the Smart Shapes menu, and look for Smart Shape Options.  There 
is one there with the "Gliss" marking, and one without.


cd

And please ask your merging question again!


Raymond Horton
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Sibelius crossgrade price $129

2010-03-14 Thread toronado455
Thanks!

On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 1:15 PM, John Howell  wrote:

>  At 11:53 AM -0700 3/14/10, toronado...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> Been checking the Sibelius/Avid websites on the crossgrade frequently over
>> the last few weeks, and it is always showing as "SOLD OUT" for the boxed
>> version. I'd really rather have the shipped box than the download. The
>> offer
>> ends this Friday, the 19th. Any suggestions?
>>
>
> I will forward your note to the SibeliusList, where Daniel Spreadbury,
> Senior Product Manager, will see it.
>
>
> John
>
>
> --
> John R. Howell, Assoc. Prof. of Music
> Virginia Tech Department of Music
> College of Liberal Arts & Human Sciences
> Blacksburg, Virginia, U.S.A. 24061-0240
> Vox (540) 231-8411  Fax (540) 231-5034
> (mailto:john.how...@vt.edu)
> http://www.music.vt.edu/faculty/howell/howell.html
>
> "We never play anything the same way once."  Shelly Manne's definition
> of jazz musicians.
> ___
>  Finale mailing list
> Finale@shsu.edu
> http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
>
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] OT: blowing air through brass instruments

2010-03-14 Thread Mark D Lew

On Mar 14, 2010, at 11:17 AM, John Howell wrote:

 ... just as it would be if he tried to write for lute with brass  
choir?


That sounds like a challenge!

mdl
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] OT: blowing air through brass instruments

2010-03-14 Thread timothy . price


On Mar 14, 2010, at 2:03 PM, Robert Patterson wrote:


 reversing the mouthpiece *definitely*
does.



As radical an idea as actual experimentation may be, I tried it on my  
trumpet, and by gosh, you get a much louder sound

using the reversed mouthpiece. Imagine that !

timothy.key.price
timothy.key.pr...@valley.net



___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Sibelius crossgrade price $129

2010-03-14 Thread John Howell

At 11:53 AM -0700 3/14/10, toronado...@gmail.com wrote:

Been checking the Sibelius/Avid websites on the crossgrade frequently over
the last few weeks, and it is always showing as "SOLD OUT" for the boxed
version. I'd really rather have the shipped box than the download. The offer
ends this Friday, the 19th. Any suggestions?


I will forward your note to the SibeliusList, where Daniel 
Spreadbury, Senior Product Manager, will see it.


John


--
John R. Howell, Assoc. Prof. of Music
Virginia Tech Department of Music
College of Liberal Arts & Human Sciences
Blacksburg, Virginia, U.S.A. 24061-0240
Vox (540) 231-8411  Fax (540) 231-5034
(mailto:john.how...@vt.edu)
http://www.music.vt.edu/faculty/howell/howell.html

"We never play anything the same way once."  Shelly Manne's definition
of jazz musicians.
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Sibelius crossgrade price $129

2010-03-14 Thread toronado455
Been checking the Sibelius/Avid websites on the crossgrade frequently over
the last few weeks, and it is always showing as "SOLD OUT" for the boxed
version. I'd really rather have the shipped box than the download. The offer
ends this Friday, the 19th. Any suggestions?
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] OT: blowing air through brass instruments

2010-03-14 Thread Robert Patterson
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Aaron Rabushka
 wrote:
> All depends on who wins the power game.
>

As a composer visiting for a couple of days to a professional ensemble
that plays together all the time, you can't win the power game, and
you best not try. Orchestras are one of the most tribal institutions I
know. They may have fierce internal squabbles, but nothing unifies
them like an attack by an outsider.

This *is* the composer's problem and not the player's. Leaving aside
the question of whether blowing air through the instrument in itself
produces enough air to be heard, reversing the mouthpiece *definitely*
does. It is a definite instruction that will be followed and will
produce excellent results without any further discussion. I guess all
I'm saying is I recommend it.
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] glissando marking, also merging

2010-03-14 Thread dershem

On 3/14/2010 10:03 AM, Katherine Hoover wrote:

Dear Finale List

Working on a mac OSX, Finale 2004.

The glissando marking comes with the word"glissando" running up its
back. How can I get rid of the word? Or is there another way to mark a
gliss?

Also - I received no answer about merging, or combining files. Perhaps
there is no answer, but then again, maybe someone on the list does know
a way to do this.

Any help is appreciated!

Katherine Hoover


Choose the Smart Shapes menu, and look for Smart Shape Options.  There 
is one there with the "Gliss" marking, and one without.


cd
--
http://members.cox.net/dershem/index.html
http://dershem.livejournal.com/
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


[Finale] glissando marking, also merging

2010-03-14 Thread Katherine Hoover

Dear Finale List

Working on a mac OSX, Finale 2004.

	The glissando marking comes with the word"glissando" running up its  
back.  How can I get rid of the word?  Or is there another way to  
mark a gliss?


Also - I received no answer about merging, or combining files.   
Perhaps there is no answer, but then again, maybe someone on the list  
does know a way to do this.


Any help is appreciated!

Katherine Hoover
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] OT: blowing air through brass instruments

2010-03-14 Thread Aaron Rabushka

All depends on who wins the power game.

Aaron J. Rabushka
arabus...@austin.rr.com
- Original Message - 
From: "John Howell" 

To: 
Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2010 1:17 PM
Subject: Re: [Finale] OT: blowing air through brass instruments



At 9:52 PM -0600 3/13/10, Robert Patterson wrote:


So help me to understand. You are sitting in the audience of a large
hall listening to an ensemble with a large number of players. How do
you know whether they were reversing their mouthpieces? I ask in all
seriousness, because many players do it automatically. The fact is, as
a player you have to do *something* if you want the effect to be
heard, because freely blowing through the instrument does not produce
enough sound to be heard over much more than a harp, and then at short
distance. So you have to leak or obstruct to create a sound. Reversing
the mouthpiece provides better control of both timbre and dynamic.


Not meaning to be argumentative, but isn't this a composer's problem 
and not the player's?  If a composer calls for an unusual effect and 
it doesn't work out the way he thought/hoped/imagined/guessed that it 
would, isn't that his or her lack of skill and knowledge on display, 
just as it would be if he tried to write for lute with brass choir?


Just curious.

John


--
John R. Howell, Assoc. Prof. of Music
Virginia Tech Department of Music
College of Liberal Arts & Human Sciences
Blacksburg, Virginia, U.S.A. 24061-0240
Vox (540) 231-8411  Fax (540) 231-5034
(mailto:john.how...@vt.edu)
http://www.music.vt.edu/faculty/howell/howell.html

"We never play anything the same way once."  Shelly Manne's definition
of jazz musicians.
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale



___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] OT: blowing air through brass instruments

2010-03-14 Thread John Howell

At 9:52 PM -0600 3/13/10, Robert Patterson wrote:


So help me to understand. You are sitting in the audience of a large
hall listening to an ensemble with a large number of players. How do
you know whether they were reversing their mouthpieces? I ask in all
seriousness, because many players do it automatically. The fact is, as
a player you have to do *something* if you want the effect to be
heard, because freely blowing through the instrument does not produce
enough sound to be heard over much more than a harp, and then at short
distance. So you have to leak or obstruct to create a sound. Reversing
the mouthpiece provides better control of both timbre and dynamic.


Not meaning to be argumentative, but isn't this a composer's problem 
and not the player's?  If a composer calls for an unusual effect and 
it doesn't work out the way he thought/hoped/imagined/guessed that it 
would, isn't that his or her lack of skill and knowledge on display, 
just as it would be if he tried to write for lute with brass choir?


Just curious.

John


--
John R. Howell, Assoc. Prof. of Music
Virginia Tech Department of Music
College of Liberal Arts & Human Sciences
Blacksburg, Virginia, U.S.A. 24061-0240
Vox (540) 231-8411  Fax (540) 231-5034
(mailto:john.how...@vt.edu)
http://www.music.vt.edu/faculty/howell/howell.html

"We never play anything the same way once."  Shelly Manne's definition
of jazz musicians.
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] OT: blowing air through brass instruments

2010-03-14 Thread dhbailey

Robert Patterson wrote:

On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 7:47 PM, dhbailey
 wrote:

Perhaps the effect differs with different numbers of people doing it, but
I've heard it done quite effectively without anybody reversing mouthpieces.




So help me to understand. You are sitting in the audience of a large
hall listening to an ensemble with a large number of players. How do
you know whether they were reversing their mouthpieces? I ask in all
seriousness, because many players do it automatically. The fact is, as

[snip]

I was watching them -- and some of them were my private 
students (it was an All-State piece) and we had discussed 
what the instructions said, which was "remove mouthpiece and 
blow air through the instrument."  So I knew in advance what 
was coming, and then watching the concert, there were no 
reversed mouthpieces, which would have required a hand up 
near the mouth in addition to the hand holding the 
instrument -- quite an easy thing to see, even if it were 
done in a large symphony hall by professionals.  The posture 
when holding an instrument in one hand and a mouthpiece in 
the other hand so that the two line up is quite different 
than the posture when holding the instrument in the 
traditional way.  Try it and you'll see that you quite 
recognizably have changed your posture.



--
David H. Bailey
dhbai...@davidbaileymusicstudio.com
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] OT: blowing air through brass instruments

2010-03-14 Thread Lawrence Yates
When we used this technique, the players simply blew through the instruments
with the mouthpieces in place.  It was audible from the audience.

Cheers,

Lawrence
-- 
Lawrenceyates.co.uk
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale