Re: Tech support was Re: [Finale] Using plugins with parts

2006-08-14 Thread Christopher Smith
Never ask more than one question: apparently they stop after the  
first one. You have to open another inquiry to get any more answers  
after the first one.


The tech people do NOT get the info that you so painstakingly filled  
in at the start of the procedure: apparently this info is for  
statistics only, so you have to tell them what platform, computer,  
system, Finale version, etc., all over again in your question. This  
is just nuts.


Christopher


On Aug 14, 2006, at 2:05 PM, Don Hart wrote:

Recently I got through to tech support and received their initial  
reply
relatively easily.  I'm pretty sure I replied with an additional  
question (I
could be mistaken) but never heard anymore from them.  Looking up  
the case

archive, it ends with their first reply.

Anyway, my question to you, and anyone else who has experienced the  
problems
you're describing is where does the process actually break down?   
Is the
initial contact easy, like in my experience, and the real, nitty- 
gritty
answers hard to come by?  Or have you found the whole process  
difficult,

from start to finish?


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Using plugins with parts

2006-08-14 Thread Robert Patterson

Aaron Sherber wrote:

I think the TGTools part extraction 
plugin will cause problems because it usually results in adding staves, 
and adding staves from within a part is a bad thing for Fin07. I'm also 
not sure how JW Space Systems will work (haven't tried it).


JW Space Systems works great on parts. You must have the latest version 
of PDKTools or it will crash Finale (at least on Macs). You can get 
PDKTools at the TGTools site.


You can set up TGTools part extraction not to add staves. This you 
should do. I don't understand the need to run it in part view.  It is 
perfectly possible to run it in the full score by selecting only the 
staves you are interested in. I find this to be a much preferable 
procedure. (I'm always finished with TGTools Smart Explosion before ever 
I extract any parts, even in pre-Fin07.)


--
Robert Patterson

http://RobertGPatterson.com
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Using plugins with parts

2006-08-14 Thread Robert Patterson

Andrew Stiller wrote:

If 
I start from score  view will I  be able to shift into an individual 
part and use a) JW Space Systems, b)TGTools/Spacing/Measure Widths, 
c)Patterson/Tie Mover, d) TGTools/Parts/Intelligent Extraction of Parts?




Yes to all. However, only the latest version of Patterson Tie Mover is 
modal. Earlier versions will not allow you to shift. (I changed my 
plugins to be modeless because of the new limitation in Finale.)


If not, am I correct in understanding that the old part-extraction 
paradigm is still functional, so I could go that way and use any plugin 
I like?




Yes (essentially).

Also, it is quite easy to switch back and forth between score & part 
view, so switching back to score view to run a plugin is not necessarily 
too painful, depending on what you are doing. (Some situations are more 
painful than others.)


--
Robert Patterson

http://RobertGPatterson.com
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Using plugins with parts

2006-08-14 Thread Aaron Sherber

At 03:01 PM 8/14/2006, Andrew Stiller wrote:
>I confess I don't understand what "modal" is,

A modal window is one which must be closed before you can use the 
rest of the program. For example, the Document Options window is 
modal -- while it is open, you can't do anything else with Finale. 
Same with most of the built-in Finale plugins. The opposite of this 
is a modeless window, which can sit open on screel while you do other 
things. FinaleScript is modeless, as is the Edit System Margins dialog.


>I start from score  view will I  be able to shift into an individual
>part and use a) JW Space Systems, b)TGTools/Spacing/Measure Widths,
>c)Patterson/Tie Mover, d) TGTools/Parts/Intelligent Extraction of
>Parts?

Yes to all of these. At least, all are modeless windows and will stay 
open when you shift to a part. I think the TGTools part extraction 
plugin will cause problems because it usually results in adding 
staves, and adding staves from within a part is a bad thing for 
Fin07. I'm also not sure how JW Space Systems will work (haven't tried it).


>If not, am I correct in understanding that the old part-extraction
>paradigm is still functional, so I could go that way and use any plugin
>I like?

This is also true.

Aaron.

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Using plugins with parts

2006-08-14 Thread Andrew Stiller


On Aug 14, 2006, at 11:37 AM, Tyler Turner wrote:


While obviously not ideal from a user's perspective,
blocking plug-ins from being run while in a linked
part is a fairly effective means of protecting the
majority of users. None of the included Finale
plug-ins that would have been likely to catch
unsuspecting users are modal.


I confess I don't understand what "modal" is, so let me be specific: If 
I start from score  view will I  be able to shift into an individual 
part and use a) JW Space Systems, b)TGTools/Spacing/Measure Widths, 
c)Patterson/Tie Mover, d) TGTools/Parts/Intelligent Extraction of 
Parts?


If not, am I correct in understanding that the old part-extraction 
paradigm is still functional, so I could go that way and use any plugin 
I like?


Andrew Stiller
Kallisti Music Press
http://home.netcom.com/~kallisti/

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: Tech support was Re: [Finale] Using plugins with parts

2006-08-14 Thread Tyler Turner


> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> > Contact the techsupport people at makemusic's
> web-site, but be
> > forewarned that they designed it so as to
> discourage any but the most
> > irate and determined customers from actually
> completing the process.
> > Unless they have revamped it recently, that is.
> 

Actually they've designed it so that they don't get
completely ridiculous amounts of spam. It was getting
worse by the day when I left support 3 years ago. I'd
easily spend 30 minutes or more in the morning just
going through and deleting spam e-mails, e-mails with
virus attachments, etc. As I understand it, the
problem had become exponentially worse. The new system
is nice in that it actually assigns case numbers and
gets people to include useful information which
results in more productive support. It also ensures
that the people who are paying for products are
getting first priority - something that was never
possible to achieve with the old e-mail system. You
spend a little extra time filling out your support
request, but you get your answers faster in return.

Tyler

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Tech support was Re: [Finale] Using plugins with parts

2006-08-14 Thread Don Hart
Recently I got through to tech support and received their initial reply
relatively easily.  I'm pretty sure I replied with an additional question (I
could be mistaken) but never heard anymore from them.  Looking up the case
archive, it ends with their first reply.

Anyway, my question to you, and anyone else who has experienced the problems
you're describing is where does the process actually break down?  Is the
initial contact easy, like in my experience, and the real, nitty-gritty
answers hard to come by?  Or have you found the whole process difficult,
from start to finish?

Thanks,

Don Hart


on 8/14/06 10:02 AM, dhbailey at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Contact the techsupport people at makemusic's web-site, but be
> forewarned that they designed it so as to discourage any but the most
> irate and determined customers from actually completing the process.
> Unless they have revamped it recently, that is.

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Using plugins with parts

2006-08-14 Thread Robert Patterson

Tyler Turner wrote:



While obviously not ideal from a user's perspective,
blocking plug-ins from being run while in a linked
part is a fairly effective means of protecting the
majority of users.


Perhaps it is fairly effective for the majority of users. I doubt if it 
will be very effective for the majority of those users who use plugins.


I can count on one hand the number of plugins that add staves, including 
one of mine. It is the simplest change in the world to modify those 
plugins to hit the "Score" menu item to force the file into score view 
before executing. I submit that this would have been no more difficult 
to implement and far more effective at preventing the problem. (And 
since I could do it, it obviously didn't require any PDK changes.)


The current implementation is an annoying barrier yet utterly 
ineffectual at preventing the problem. I hope MM gets trounced for it. 
As far as I can tell, they consulted no one outside the company before 
making this fool's choice.


--
Robert Patterson

http://RobertGPatterson.com
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Using plugins with parts

2006-08-14 Thread Tyler Turner


--- dhbailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
> The fact that the plug-ins are grayed out in parts
> mode was discussed on 
> this list this past week.  Nobody on the list knows
> whether it's a bug 
> or a feature, but we're hoping that Finale will fix
> things in the 
> interim release they always bring out (some years
> sooner than others).

It was definitely intentional, and the reasoning was
because the ability for plug-ins to add staves to
linked parts could cause data corruption. If you add a
staff to a linked part, you'll see that the staff
doesn't exist in the score. It doesn't even show up in
all of the same places as normal staves in the Manage
Parts dialog. Originally they intended to disable only
the plug-ins that could add staves, but it turned out
to not be technically possible for them to do this.

I'll be surprised if we don't see more work done in
this area in a 2007 update.

While obviously not ideal from a user's perspective,
blocking plug-ins from being run while in a linked
part is a fairly effective means of protecting the
majority of users. None of the included Finale
plug-ins that would have been likely to catch
unsuspecting users are modal. FinaleScript is the only
included plug-in that can do this, and I'm guessing
the number of users that are using FinaleScript to run
an Add Staff command can probably be counted on one
hand. And even if a few people figure out that they
can sneak a staff in by starting in score view,
starting FinaleScript, switching to a part and using
an Add Staff script, as far as I can tell it's not
going to be a definite disaster for their file (I had
experimented with using added staves to create some
interesting workarounds).

-Tyler

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Using plugins with parts

2006-08-14 Thread dhbailey

Paul Copeland wrote:

G’day everyone.

 


I have just installed Finale 2007.

 


I have Windows XP Home edition.

 

When I create parts and then go to plugins for a part, none of the 
plugins are highlighted.


 


How can I get the plugins to work with parts?



The fact that the plug-ins are grayed out in parts mode was discussed on 
this list this past week.  Nobody on the list knows whether it's a bug 
or a feature, but we're hoping that Finale will fix things in the 
interim release they always bring out (some years sooner than others).


Some modeless plug-ins (I guess those are the ones which remain visible 
on screen even when not in use?) apparently will work on the parts, but 
you have to start them in score view.


Contact the techsupport people at makemusic's web-site, but be 
forewarned that they designed it so as to discourage any but the most 
irate and determined customers from actually completing the process. 
Unless they have revamped it recently, that is.


--
David H. Bailey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


[Finale] Using plugins with parts

2006-08-14 Thread Paul Copeland








G’day everyone.

 

I have just installed Finale 2007.

 

I have Windows XP Home edition.

 

When I create parts and then go to plugins for a part, none
of the plugins are highlighted.

 

How can I get the plugins to work with parts?

 

Many thanks for your help.

 

Paul Copeland

http://members.sibeliusmusic.com/pianoedition

www.mp3.com.au/paulcopeland

www.geocities.com/Vienna/1153

http://www.lulu.com/pianoedition

 

 






___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale