Re: [Finale] GPO Jazz + B. Clarinet

2005-06-24 Thread John Howell

At 3:09 PM -0400 6/23/05, Andrew Stiller wrote:

On Jun 23, 2005, at 6:47 AM, Ken Durling wrote:

  An Electric Piano I think technically has to have reeds and 
hammers, or even strings like those stubby little grands made by 
Yamaha.




Well the terminology may have changed, but back in pre-Moog times 
there were undoubted electric pianos that produced their sound by 
purely electronic means. Significantly, these were considered 
inferior to the electroacoustic kind.


Let's see.  Bob Moog did his developmental work in the 1960s.  The 
Wurlitzer electric piano came out in the late 1950s, and my Air Force 
combo lugged one all over Japan on tour.  The Rhodes, I think, was 
developed at about the same time as the original Moog.  So no, I 
can't recall any purely electronic piano pre-Moog.  The technololgy 
didn't exist.  What Bob did was take the room full of vacuum tubes 
that was the primitive RCA Mark II and shrink it down into portable 
modules.



And BTW, does the subcontrabass saxophone even exist? As an actual instrument?


I think I've seen a picture of it, but there may well only be one (or 
a handfull) in the entire world.  The bass sax, on the other hand, 
should be considered and used as a legitimate member of the sax 
section.  (I may be prejudiced because one of the members of our 
community band owns and plays one!)


John


--
John  Susie Howell
Virginia Tech Department of Music
Blacksburg, Virginia, U.S.A 24061-0240
Vox (540) 231-8411  Fax (540) 231-5034
(mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.music.vt.edu/faculty/howell/howell.html
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] GPO Jazz + B. Clarinet

2005-06-24 Thread Richard Yates
 And BTW, does the subcontrabass saxophone even exist? As an actual
instrument?

http://images.google.com/images?biw=q=%22subcontrabass+saxophone%22hl=enbtnG=Search+Images



___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] GPO Jazz + B. Clarinet

2005-06-24 Thread dhbailey

John Howell wrote:

[snip]



I think I've seen a picture of it, but there may well only be one (or a 
handfull) in the entire world.  The bass sax, on the other hand, should 
be considered and used as a legitimate member of the sax section.  (I 
may be prejudiced because one of the members of our community band owns 
and plays one!)


On the other hand, given the huge expense of owning a bass sax, 
composers/arrangers should think twice about giving a bass sax it's own, 
important part if they want the music performed by a wide number of 
groups.  :-)



--
David H. Bailey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] GPO Jazz + B. Clarinet

2005-06-24 Thread Andrew Stiller


The subcontrabass saxophone does indeed exist -- it's sometimes also 
called the tubax.  It is a relatively new and extremely rare 
instrument.


Photos and more info here:

http://www.jayeaston.com/galleries/sax_family/subcontrabass_sax.html

- Darcy



Server couldn't be found. Oh well, I'll google it someother day.

Andrew Stiller
Kallisti Music Press
http://home.netcom.com/~kallisti/

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] GPO Jazz + B. Clarinet

2005-06-24 Thread John Howell

At 8:52 AM -0400 6/24/05, dhbailey wrote:

John Howell wrote:

[snip]



I think I've seen a picture of it, but there may well only be one 
(or a handfull) in the entire world.  The bass sax, on the other 
hand, should be considered and used as a legitimate member of the 
sax section.  (I may be prejudiced because one of the members of 
our community band owns and plays one!)


On the other hand, given the huge expense of owning a bass sax, 
composers/arrangers should think twice about giving a bass sax it's 
own, important part if they want the music performed by a wide 
number of groups.


Well of course that's a given, and it's forced on us by the lack of a 
standard instrumentation for concert bands.  When I compose or 
arrange for our community band, I do write a bass sax part, but it's 
always treated as sweetening:  something that won't be missed if it 
isn't there, but will add if it is there.  We are forced to treat low 
clarinets--meaning from alto on down to BBb contrabass--in the same 
tentative way.  Our band currently has 2 (or 3) alto clarinets, 1 (or 
2) bass clarinets, but nothing lower.  Our university wind ensemble 
does have the contra clarinets and uses them when a score calls for 
them.


For the record, the bass sax player in our community band found his 
instrument on top of a trash pile, put some money into having it 
overhauled and buying a good bag for it, and had it in playing 
condition for only a few hundred dollars.  How lucky can ya get?!!!


John


--
John  Susie Howell
Virginia Tech Department of Music
Blacksburg, Virginia, U.S.A 24061-0240
Vox (540) 231-8411  Fax (540) 231-5034
(mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.music.vt.edu/faculty/howell/howell.html
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] GPO Jazz + B. Clarinet

2005-06-23 Thread Darcy James Argue

On 23 Jun 2005, at 1:09 AM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:


but who even owns a C-melody now?


Scott Robinson.  He even has a record where he only plays C-melody.  
(It's really good, too.)


http://home.earthlink.net/~smoulden/scott/melody.html

But yeah, clearly it's a niche instrument.


I'd say Tuba, French Horn, Fender Rhodes,


GPO Jazz/Big Band already has Rhodes piano.


Mallets,


It already has vibes.


 acoustic/electric guitar.


It already has 2 electric guitars (no acoustic).

Did you look at the website before posting this?  The info is here:

http://www.garritan.com/jazz.html

Honestly, there are Hammond Organ programs out there. I don't think we 
really need it, and I think it's more common in a Jazz Band setting to 
have a Fender Rhodes than a B3.


There are *lots* of classic jazz recordings with B3 -- like 
ferinstance, Larry Young's _Unity_, with Joe Henderson and Elvin Jones. 
 That said, I agree with you.  You can get good B3 samples elsewhere 
and I'm not exactly broken up about the lack of B3 organ.  I was just 
listing some instruments that would make more sense -- a *lot* more 
sense -- than subcontrabass saxophone.



Jazz violin?


Uh, yes.  More common than sopranino saxophone, right?


Solo Voice?


Ever heard Kenny Wheeler's big band recordings?  Or Maria Schneider's?  
Or John Hollenbeck's?  Anyway, I realize voice is far beyond the scope 
of the library, but basic male and female oohs and aahs would still be 
roughly a thousand times more useful than mezzo-soprano saxophone.


Remember, I wasn't listing stuff I thought *should* be included, just 
stuff that made more sense than some of what *was* included.



I think the library needs to cover the basics.


I agree.  My point was that the library covers a bunch of obscure 
saxophones *instead* of some of the basics.  Remember, before Chuck 
intervened, they hadn't planned on including bass clarinet, even!  
(Thankfully, that's been corrected.)  If you're going to start throwing 
in a bunch of extras, why not start with the most useful extras?


Trumpets with all the mutes. Saxophones (soprano, alto, tenor, bari), 
and saxophone doubles (piccolo, flute, alto flute, Bb Clarinet, Bb 
Bass Clarinet), trombones with all the mutes, Tuba, standard jazz drum 
set, a good acoustic piano, a good fender rhodes, an acoustic guitar, 
an electric guitar, acoustic and electric bass, and vibes. I think all 
the other stuff is not really necessary.


Check the website.  I think your list is a reasonable one, but from it 
the GPO Jazz/Big Band is missing tuba, mallets on the drum set, and 
acoustic guitar.  Instead, they included a bunch of saxophones nobody 
actually owns.  It's kind of cool, in a geeky way, but it's terrible 
marketing.  People are bound to say (as I did) -- Why on earth did you 
include C-melody saxophone but not [instrument X]?


- Darcy
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brooklyn, NY


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] GPO Jazz + B. Clarinet

2005-06-23 Thread Eric Dannewitz

Darcy James Argue wrote:


I'd say Tuba, French Horn, Fender Rhodes,

GPO Jazz/Big Band already has Rhodes piano.


It does not say Rhodes piano, it says, according to the site, 
http://garritan.com/jazz.html, Vintage Electric Piano. That could be 
anything. Could be a Yamaha DX7 for all I know. Vintage Electric Piano 
does not equal Fender Rhodes. It could be a RMI Electra-Piano, a 
Wurlitzer, I could go on



 acoustic/electric guitar.



It already has 2 electric guitars (no acoustic).

Did you look at the website before posting this?  The info is here:

http://www.garritan.com/jazz.html


Yeah, I did smart ass. It says TWO ELECTRIC Guitars. No acoustic. Not 
even what types of strings on the guitar, etc, etc.




There are *lots* of classic jazz recordings with B3 -- like 
ferinstance, Larry Young's _Unity_, with Joe Henderson and Elvin 
Jones.  That said, I agree with you.  You can get good B3 samples 
elsewhere and I'm not exactly broken up about the lack of B3 organ.  I 
was just listing some instruments that would make more sense -- a 
*lot* more sense -- than subcontrabass saxophone.


On this we agree. All those strange saxophones need to go.




Jazz violin?



Uh, yes.  More common than sopranino saxophone, right?


Again, it's like C-Melody. I know of no jazz saxophonist in the SF Bay 
Area that plays/records on it.


Ever heard Kenny Wheeler's big band recordings?  Or Maria 
Schneider's?  Or John Hollenbeck's?  Anyway, I realize voice is far 
beyond the scope of the library, but basic male and female oohs and 
aahs would still be roughly a thousand times more useful than 
mezzo-soprano saxophone. Remember, I wasn't listing stuff I thought 
*should* be included, just stuff that made more sense than some of 
what *was* included.


Indeed, a mezzo-soprano is a waste of space. But I think most people are 
going to use the GPO Jazz for rough sketches. When I do a vocal piece, I 
usually have a flute or something play the vocal line.




Check the website.  I think your list is a reasonable one, but from it 
the GPO Jazz/Big Band is missing tuba, mallets on the drum set, and 
acoustic guitar.  Instead, they included a bunch of saxophones nobody 
actually owns.  It's kind of cool, in a geeky way, but it's terrible 
marketing.  People are bound to say (as I did) -- Why on earth did 
you include C-melody saxophone but not [instrument X]?


Yeah, I think those saxophones need to go. A Marimba would be nice to 
have...




___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] GPO Jazz + B. Clarinet

2005-06-23 Thread Darcy James Argue

On 23 Jun 2005, at 2:28 AM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:


Darcy James Argue wrote:


I'd say Tuba, French Horn, Fender Rhodes,

GPO Jazz/Big Band already has Rhodes piano.


It does not say Rhodes piano, it says, according to the site, 
http://garritan.com/jazz.html, Vintage Electric Piano. That could be 
anything. Could be a Yamaha DX7 for all I know. Vintage Electric Piano 
does not equal Fender Rhodes. It could be a RMI Electra-Piano, a 
Wurlitzer, I could go on


95% of the time, Vintage Electric Piano is code for Rhodes (which 
they can't actually say, for trademark reasons).  Sure, theoretically, 
it _could_ be anything, but I'd be pretty surprised if it turned out to 
be anything other than a Rhodes.



 acoustic/electric guitar.


It already has 2 electric guitars (no acoustic).

Did you look at the website before posting this?  The info is here:

http://www.garritan.com/jazz.html


Yeah, I did smart ass. It says TWO ELECTRIC Guitars. No acoustic.


Um, yeah -- isn't that *exactly what I said*, immediately above?  (And 
what's with the gratuitous insults?  Chill out, already.)


There are *lots* of classic jazz recordings with B3 -- like 
ferinstance, Larry Young's _Unity_, with Joe Henderson and Elvin 
Jones.  That said, I agree with you.  You can get good B3 samples 
elsewhere and I'm not exactly broken up about the lack of B3 organ.  
I was just listing some instruments that would make more sense -- a 
*lot* more sense -- than subcontrabass saxophone.


On this we agree. All those strange saxophones need to go.


Well, I don't know that they need to go, now that they've been 
sampled and programmed.  It will actually be kind of fun to have them.  
But recording them was a very strange use of limited resources, even if 
their player already owned all these obscure saxes.



Jazz violin?



Uh, yes.  More common than sopranino saxophone, right?


Again, it's like C-Melody. I know of no jazz saxophonist in the SF Bay 
Area that plays/records on it.


Jazz violin is actually much more common than C-Melody sax.  There are 
lots of jazz violinists in NYC, so I'm sure there are at least a few in 
the Bay Area.


(Again, I'm not saying No basic jazz sample library would be complete 
without jazz violin -- just that it would be a more defensible choice 
than some of the other instruments Gary decided to include.)


 People are bound to say (as I did) -- Why on earth did you include 
C-melody saxophone but not [instrument X]?


[...]  A Marimba would be nice to have...


See what I mean? [grin]

Marimba's cool but pretty rare in jazz contexts.  [Although *I* use it 
a fair bit.]  However, I imagine anyone who really needed marimba -- 
like, say, me --  would want the Orchestral GPO as well as the Jazz 
Edition.


- Darcy
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brooklyn, NY


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] GPO Jazz + B. Clarinet

2005-06-23 Thread Ken Durling

At 12:14 AM 6/23/2005, you wrote:
 Could be a Yamaha DX7 for all I know. Vintage Electric Piano does not 
equal Fender Rhodes. It could be a RMI Electra-Piano, a Wurlitzer, I 
could go on...


As long as we're picking nits ;-)  I would never classify a DX7 as an 
Electric Piano, it's a synth.  All the Vintage EP sounds I hear on 
various units and sound sets seem to be either Rhodes or Wurlitzer, so I 
think it's a safe bet.  An Electric Piano I think technically has to have 
reeds and hammers, or even strings like those stubby little grands made by 
Yamaha.




Jazz violin?


Uh, yes.  More common than sopranino saxophone, right?

Again, it's like C-Melody. I know of no jazz saxophonist in the SF Bay 
Area that plays/records on it.


Jazz violin is actually much more common than C-Melody sax.  There are 
lots of jazz violinists in NYC, so I'm sure there are at least a few in 
the Bay Area.



Yes, a couple of quite well-known ones, too: Jeremy Cohen, Jenny 
Scheinmann, Darryl Anger... more I'm sure.


Ken


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] GPO Jazz + B. Clarinet

2005-06-23 Thread Christopher Smith


On Jun 23, 2005, at 2:05 AM, Darcy James Argue wrote:

(snip)

 the GPO Jazz/Big Band is missing tuba, mallets on the drum set, and 
acoustic guitar.


I am partial myself to the tuba (heh, heh, because I actually play jazz 
tuba. Jim Self would be the guy to sample for jazz tuba, though!) but 
acoustic guitar is so well accounted for in just about every synth, 
sample collection, and virtual instrument that it might be hard to 
justify it in this collection.


But mallets on the drum set, absolutely! That one escaped me at first.

Christopher

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] GPO Jazz + B. Clarinet

2005-06-23 Thread A-NO-NE Music
Darcy James Argue / 2005/06/23 / 03:14 AM wrote:

Jazz violin is actually much more common than C-Melody sax.  There are 
lots of jazz violinists in NYC, so I'm sure there are at least a few in 
the Bay Area.

Jazz violin trend is happening only last few years on this side of
coast.  What I mean is we started to see really capable (read groovin')
jazz violin players and they are getting good attention these days, but
it was not like this 10 years ago even after Tutu.

Which brings another question.  There got to be a distinction between
acoustic and electric jazz violin as you can't say jazz guitar without
defining electric and nylon, right?

By the way, I am still waiting Gary to respond to my GPO registration
issue but to no avail.  What's my option?

-- 

- Hiro

Hiroaki Honshuku, A-NO-NE Music, Boston, MA
http://a-no-ne.com http://anonemusic.com


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] GPO Jazz + B. Clarinet

2005-06-23 Thread Darcy James Argue

On 23 Jun 2005, at 11:52 AM, A-NO-NE Music wrote:


By the way, I am still waiting Gary to respond to my GPO registration
issue but to no avail.  What's my option?


Hiro,

You need to talk to NI about registration issues.  They handle all the 
copy protection stuff.


- Darcy
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brooklyn, NY



___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] GPO Jazz + B. Clarinet

2005-06-23 Thread A-NO-NE Music
Darcy James Argue / 2005/06/23 / 12:24 PM wrote:

You need to talk to NI about registration issues.  They handle all the 
copy protection stuff.


I know, but the only way to get response from NI is if you are
registered.  That's why I thought Gary would help me out on this as his
welcome email message said :-(


-- 

- Hiro

Hiroaki Honshuku, A-NO-NE Music, Boston, MA
http://a-no-ne.com http://anonemusic.com


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] GPO Jazz + B. Clarinet

2005-06-23 Thread Adriel
on 6/23/05 11:52 AM, A-NO-NE Music at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 
 Which brings another question.  There got to be a distinction between
 acoustic and electric jazz violin as you can't say jazz guitar without
 defining electric and nylon, right?


Wait add to that Selmer style and acoustic archtop type guitars as well.
Acoustic jazz is coming back in to style along with jazz violin. It's the
whole Gypsy Jazz craze that is fueling it.

The other jazz related crazes are ukulele and steel guitar. This is pre-bop
older jazz stuff but, that's the same fuel that is bringing back Grapelli
style violin. In fact jazz mandolin is becoming pretty hot now as well.



_Adriel

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] GPO Jazz + B. Clarinet

2005-06-23 Thread Andrew Stiller


On Jun 23, 2005, at 6:47 AM, Ken Durling wrote:

  An Electric Piano I think technically has to have reeds and 
hammers, or even strings like those stubby little grands made by 
Yamaha.




Well the terminology may have changed, but back in pre-Moog times there 
were undoubted electric pianos that produced their sound by purely 
electronic means. Significantly, these were considered inferior to the 
electroacoustic kind.


And BTW, does the subcontrabass saxophone even exist? As an actual 
instrument?


Andrew Stiller
Kallisti Music Press
http://home.netcom.com/~kallisti/

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] GPO Jazz + B. Clarinet

2005-06-23 Thread Darcy James Argue

Hey Andrew,

The subcontrabass saxophone does indeed exist -- it's sometimes also 
called the tubax.  It is a relatively new and extremely rare 
instrument.


Photos and more info here:

http://www.jayeaston.com/galleries/sax_family/subcontrabass_sax.html

- Darcy
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brooklyn, NY


On 23 Jun 2005, at 3:09 PM, Andrew Stiller wrote:



On Jun 23, 2005, at 6:47 AM, Ken Durling wrote:

  An Electric Piano I think technically has to have reeds and 
hammers, or even strings like those stubby little grands made by 
Yamaha.




Well the terminology may have changed, but back in pre-Moog times 
there were undoubted electric pianos that produced their sound by 
purely electronic means. Significantly, these were considered inferior 
to the electroacoustic kind.


And BTW, does the subcontrabass saxophone even exist? As an actual 
instrument?


Andrew Stiller
Kallisti Music Press
http://home.netcom.com/~kallisti/

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale



___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] GPO Jazz + B. Clarinet

2005-06-22 Thread Christopher Smith


On Jun 22, 2005, at 7:38 PM, Chuck Israels wrote:


I just had a quick correspondence with Gary and this was the result:

Hi Chuck,

OK.  Based on your recommendation we will include a bass clarinet.



That's terrific! I agree with Darcy and you that the bass clarinet is 
essential.


I got an education reading the forum posts about the various 
saxophones. I had never heard of the soprillo (Eb piccolo sax) the F 
mezzo-soprano sax, nor the sub-contrabass sax going to Ab a note below 
the piano! But why include these, and leave out the bass clarinet? I 
have written countless times for banjo, accordian, French horn, tuba, 
and jazz violin in jazz contexts (none of which are present in the GPO 
jazz collection) but never once in my life for even bass saxophone, and 
only once for sopranino sax. I've even written for bagpipe chanter and 
ocarina (though I wouldn't insist on having those instruments present 
in a basic collection!)


Nice to see him including some plunger brass, too, the omission of 
which I had noticed the first time around. I hope he includes a nice 
variety of open, closed, 1/2 open, wah, aow, and growls, which are 
indispensable to me (though to tell the truth, it's more important for 
OTHER people listening to my mockups, as I already know about what it 
will sound like.)


Christopher

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] GPO Jazz + B. Clarinet

2005-06-22 Thread John Bell
On 23 Jun 2005, at 00:38, Chuck Israels wrote:I just had a quick correspondence with Gary and this was the result:"Hi Chuck,OK.  Based on your recommendation we will include a bass clarinet.Well done Chuck! You made them see sense.John___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] GPO Jazz + B. Clarinet

2005-06-22 Thread Chuck Israels
That's terrific! I agree with Darcy and you that the bass clarinet is essential.Nice to see him including some plunger brass, too, the omission of which I had noticed the first time around. I hope he includes a nice variety of open, closed, 1/2 open, wah, aow, and growls, which are indispensable to me (though to tell the truth, it's more important for OTHER people listening to my mockups, as I already know about what it will sound like.)Dear Chris,Glad to have been able to help.When this library arrives, I will surely need lots of help from many of you who have been using sounds and mixers and things.  My experience with these is rudimentary, and the inclusion of better integration in 2006 will be likely to encourage me to go a little deeper.I know I can look forward to great information and plenty of patience from folks like you and Darcy.I am optimistic about all of this improving (Finale, GPO, and how easy they might be to learn and to use), even though there are some for whom the improvements don't address their particular needs, or simply don't arrive quickly enough.  This seems as if it will be a good period.Chuck Chuck Israels 230 North Garden Terrace Bellingham, WA 98225-5836 phone (360) 671-3402 fax (360) 676-6055 www.chuckisraels.com  ___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] GPO Jazz + B. Clarinet

2005-06-22 Thread Chuck Israels


On Jun 22, 2005, at 5:08 PM, Christopher Smith wrote:

 I have written countless times for banjo, accordian, French horn,  
tuba, and jazz violin in jazz contexts (none of which are present  
in the GPO jazz collection)


Of course, so have I (some, anyway - French Horn, the most often),  
but as you seem to reasonably understand things (and as I do), none  
of these are standard doubles in a normal jazz band, so I wouldn't  
think they'd need inclusion.  If those instruments are needed, then I  
understand the organization of the GPO marketing that would put them  
in the orchestra library and not include them in the jazz sounds.   
Anyway, that's how it makes sense to me.


Chuck


Chuck Israels
230 North Garden Terrace
Bellingham, WA 98225-5836
phone (360) 671-3402
fax (360) 676-6055
www.chuckisraels.com

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] GPO Jazz + B. Clarinet

2005-06-22 Thread Darcy James Argue

Hi Chuck, Chris, et al,

I think Chris's point (with which I emphatically agree) is that it's a 
little perplexing as to why Gary felt the need to include so many 
exotic saxophones -- sopranino; both curved and straight soprano 
(neither is exotic, obviously, but the difference in tone between 
them is negligible); both mezzo-soprano and C-melody; bass, contrabass, 
*and* subcontrabass saxophones -- in favor of more commonly-used 
instruments.


We all agree that bass clarinet is an absolute necessity, and so I'm 
VERY VERY grateful that Chuck was able to pull some strings to make 
that happen.  But I can think of several instruments that would make 
more sense for this library than, say, subcontrabass saxophone.  None 
of them are absolutely glaring omissions like the bass clarinet was, 
but I'd certainly be willing to forgo all of the rare saxophones (even 
sopranino, a personal favorite of mine) in exchange for any of the 
following:


• a mallet kit (it currently has only sticks and brushes)
• modern electric guitar with chorus and volume pedal
• acoustic guitar
• Hammond organ
• solo voice (oohs and aahs)
• French horn
• tuba
• solo violin (jazz player)
• accordion
• oboe/English horn

Obviously, many of these aren't a problem for me personally since I 
already own the orchestra GPO (as do Chuck and Chris), and so I can mix 
and match freely.  It's just a little -- well, *weird* -- that Gary 
thought it was worth the time and expense to track down and sample all 
those rare saxophones instead of including instruments that are much 
more useful to working jazz arrangers and composers.  (Not to mention 
much more likely to be available in a real-life playing situation!)


I know there's a certain geekish satisfaction in shipping such a 
thorough saxophone library, but it's almost like Gary believed If I 
just include mezzo-soprano saxophone, no one will notice the lack of 
bass clarinet.


But again, I'm very happy Chuck was able to set him straight on that -- 
and I'm definitely looking forward to the library.  It will certainly 
be fun to mess around with a sax quartet consisting of sopranino, 
mezzo-soprano, C-melody and subcontrabass saxophones.  Not very 
productive, but definitely fun.


- Darcy
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brooklyn, NY


On 22 Jun 2005, at 8:31 PM, Chuck Israels wrote:



On Jun 22, 2005, at 5:08 PM, Christopher Smith wrote:

 I have written countless times for banjo, accordian, French horn, 
tuba, and jazz violin in jazz contexts (none of which are present in 
the GPO jazz collection)


Of course, so have I (some, anyway - French Horn, the most often), but 
as you seem to reasonably understand things (and as I do), none of 
these are standard doubles in a normal jazz band, so I wouldn't think 
they'd need inclusion.  If those instruments are needed, then I 
understand the organization of the GPO marketing that would put them 
in the orchestra library and not include them in the jazz sounds.  
Anyway, that's how it makes sense to me.


Chuck


Chuck Israels
230 North Garden Terrace
Bellingham, WA 98225-5836
phone (360) 671-3402
fax (360) 676-6055
www.chuckisraels.com

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale




___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] GPO Jazz + B. Clarinet

2005-06-22 Thread Carl Dershem

Chuck Israels wrote:


Hi Darcy,

I haven't asked Gary, but I think what probably happened was that he  
simply ran into a saxophone player/collector who had all this stuff  and 
who convinced Gary to take the time to record them all.  All of  what 
you write below makes sense to me, but I have another concern  about 
this collection, and that is who played the instruments.  There  are so 
many variations in saxophone sound that I hope he got someone  who is at 
least actually a real jazz player.  I don't know who he  got, or what he 
sounds like, but I'd forgo some instruments in favor  of a tenor sound I 
could relate to (and there are many of them).   Imagine - Wayne Shorter, 
or Lew Tabackin - big difference, and both  beautiful, but who knows who 
Gary got.  I do not get the idea that he  is very jazz savvy.  So we 
will simply have to wait and see, and  whatever it is, it will be far 
better than what I am now saddled with  - dumb GM or GPO bassoons that 
run out of range and sound rather  wrong anyway.



Hmmm... can you imagine a sax section of all Stan Getz'?  (What's the 
plural of Getz?)  Or maybe all Steve Kupka?  Phil Woods?


We'll know the technology is mature when you can build a section from 
specific player samples.


cd

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] GPO Jazz + B. Clarinet

2005-06-22 Thread Eric Dannewitz

Darcy James Argue wrote:


Hi Chuck, Chris, et al,

I think Chris's point (with which I emphatically agree) is that it's a 
little perplexing as to why Gary felt the need to include so many 
exotic saxophones -- sopranino; both curved and straight soprano 
(neither is exotic, obviously, but the difference in tone between 
them is negligible); both mezzo-soprano and C-melody; bass, 
contrabass, *and* subcontrabass saxophones -- in favor of more 
commonly-used instruments.


Well, I think the soprano saxes are ok, as there are differences in 
tone, but who even owns a C-melody now? I've played in many, many pro 
jazz bands, and I've never seen doubles on C-Melody, bass, contrabass, 
and subcontra. The only thing I've ever seen SOME of those on was a 
production of West Side Story, where there is actually a Bb Bass 
saxophone part.


We all agree that bass clarinet is an absolute necessity, and so I'm 
VERY VERY grateful that Chuck was able to pull some strings to make 
that happen.  But I can think of several instruments that would make 
more sense for this library than, say, subcontrabass saxophone.  None 
of them are absolutely glaring omissions like the bass clarinet was, 
but I'd certainly be willing to forgo all of the rare saxophones (even 
sopranino, a personal favorite of mine) in exchange for any of the 
following:


• a mallet kit (it currently has only sticks and brushes)
• modern electric guitar with chorus and volume pedal
• acoustic guitar
• Hammond organ
• solo voice (oohs and aahs)
• French horn
• tuba
• solo violin (jazz player)
• accordion
• oboe/English horn



I'd say Tuba, French Horn, Fender Rhodes, Mallets, acoustic/electric 
guitar. Honestly, there are Hammond Organ programs out there. I don't 
think we really need it, and I think it's more common in a Jazz Band 
setting to have a Fender Rhodes than a B3. Jazz violin? Solo Voice?


I think the library needs to cover the basics. Trumpets with all the 
mutes. Saxophones (soprano, alto, tenor, bari), and saxophone doubles 
(piccolo, flute, alto flute, Bb Clarinet, Bb Bass Clarinet), trombones 
with all the mutes, Tuba, standard jazz drum set, a good acoustic piano, 
a good fender rhodes, an acoustic guitar, an electric guitar, acoustic 
and electric bass, and vibes. I think all the other stuff is not really 
necessary.


The model should be Jazz Bands. Think Toshiko, Buddy Rich, Gordon 
Goodwin, Bob Florance, and perhaps Stan Kenton.


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] GPO Jazz + B. Clarinet

2005-06-22 Thread Adriel
Steel guitar acoustic and electric. Think about 1920s-30s jazz/swing.


-Adriel


on 6/23/05 1:09 AM, Eric Dannewitz at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Darcy James Argue wrote:
 
 Hi Chuck, Chris, et al,
 
 I think Chris's point (with which I emphatically agree) is that it's a
 little perplexing as to why Gary felt the need to include so many
 exotic saxophones -- sopranino; both curved and straight soprano
 (neither is exotic, obviously, but the difference in tone between
 them is negligible); both mezzo-soprano and C-melody; bass,
 contrabass, *and* subcontrabass saxophones -- in favor of more
 commonly-used instruments.
 
 Well, I think the soprano saxes are ok, as there are differences in
 tone, but who even owns a C-melody now? I've played in many, many pro
 jazz bands, and I've never seen doubles on C-Melody, bass, contrabass,
 and subcontra. The only thing I've ever seen SOME of those on was a
 production of West Side Story, where there is actually a Bb Bass
 saxophone part.
 
 We all agree that bass clarinet is an absolute necessity, and so I'm
 VERY VERY grateful that Chuck was able to pull some strings to make
 that happen.  But I can think of several instruments that would make
 more sense for this library than, say, subcontrabass saxophone.  None
 of them are absolutely glaring omissions like the bass clarinet was,
 but I'd certainly be willing to forgo all of the rare saxophones (even
 sopranino, a personal favorite of mine) in exchange for any of the
 following:
 
 € a mallet kit (it currently has only sticks and brushes)
 € modern electric guitar with chorus and volume pedal
 € acoustic guitar
 € Hammond organ
 € solo voice (oohs and aahs)
 € French horn
 € tuba
 € solo violin (jazz player)
 € accordion
 € oboe/English horn
 
 
 I'd say Tuba, French Horn, Fender Rhodes, Mallets, acoustic/electric
 guitar. Honestly, there are Hammond Organ programs out there. I don't
 think we really need it, and I think it's more common in a Jazz Band
 setting to have a Fender Rhodes than a B3. Jazz violin? Solo Voice?
 
 I think the library needs to cover the basics. Trumpets with all the
 mutes. Saxophones (soprano, alto, tenor, bari), and saxophone doubles
 (piccolo, flute, alto flute, Bb Clarinet, Bb Bass Clarinet), trombones
 with all the mutes, Tuba, standard jazz drum set, a good acoustic piano,
 a good fender rhodes, an acoustic guitar, an electric guitar, acoustic
 and electric bass, and vibes. I think all the other stuff is not really
 necessary.
 
 The model should be Jazz Bands. Think Toshiko, Buddy Rich, Gordon
 Goodwin, Bob Florance, and perhaps Stan Kenton.
 
 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale