Re: [Finale] measure number question

2008-10-06 Thread Aaron Sherber

At 08:31 PM 10/6/2008, Lawrence David Eden wrote:
I am doing a transcription that needs a special measure number.  The
situation is this:

I have measure 108 and I need to add measure 108a as a safety vamp
during the show.  How is this done?  I want the measure numbers to
begin again at measure 109

You don't say what version of Finale you're using. If you're using 
Fin2007 or later, select the measure tool and double-click the 
measure you want to be 108a. Under Options, uncheck Include in 
Measure Numbering. Now Finale will skip this measure; the one before 
will be 108, and the one after will be 109.


I don't think Finale can actually display a measure number with 
numbers and letters, like 108a, so you'll probably have to create a 
measure expression and attach it to that measure.


If you're using an earlier version of Finale, you'll need to create a 
second measure number region. Select the measure tool, and do Measure 
| Measure Numbers | Edit Regions. You probably only have one region 
defined. Select it, and set it to include measures 1 through 108. 
Then click the Add button. Define this second measure to include 
measures 110 through 999, and set First Measure in Region to 109. You 
now have 2 measure regions, leaving out the 109th measure. Again, 
you'll probably need a measure expression to get 108a on that measure.


Aaron.

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] measure number question

2008-10-06 Thread Christopher Smith


On Oct 6, 2008, at 8:31 PM, Lawrence David Eden wrote:


Dear Listers,

I am doing a transcription that needs a special measure number.   
The situation is this:


I have measure 108 and I need to add measure 108a as a safety vamp  
during the show.  How is this done?  I want the measure numbers to  
begin again at measure 109


First of all, make sure everything about the measure numbers (size,  
position) is what you want.


Now create two new measure regions. You now have three regions, all  
with the same attributes. We will edit those.


Set the first region to include measures 1 through 108.

Set the second to include measures 109 through 109. Set the first  
measure in region to be 108. You will also type into the suffix  
box the letter a. Maybe you want to make sure that the Display is set  
to every 1 measure to force it to appear.


The third region will include measures 110 through 999, and the first  
measure in the region will be 109.


Done.

In this situation I usually set the program options to display  
defined measure numbers (so I can keep my place more easily) but in  
some versions of Finale this causes many strange things to break. I  
think it's all ok again in 2009.


Christopher



___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] measure number question

2008-10-06 Thread John Blane
This is good advice in theory. In reality, it is a bad idea to  
exclude measures from regions by unchecking that box in the measure  
attributes - unpredictable things can happen so you really should  
avoid that.


You absolutely can have numbers and letters in a measure region.  
Follow Aaron's advice for setting up the 2 regions (below). But  
create a 3rd region for measure 109. Set it for m 109-109, first  
number in measure is 1, below that is a pop-up menu called Style -  
choose a,b,c..., now put 108 in the prefix box and measure 109 will  
be labeled 108a.



On Oct 6, 2008, at 7:49 PM, Aaron Sherber wrote:


At 08:31 PM 10/6/2008, Lawrence David Eden wrote:
I am doing a transcription that needs a special measure number.  The
situation is this:

I have measure 108 and I need to add measure 108a as a safety vamp
during the show.  How is this done?  I want the measure numbers to
begin again at measure 109

You don't say what version of Finale you're using. If you're using  
Fin2007 or later, select the measure tool and double-click the  
measure you want to be 108a. Under Options, uncheck Include in  
Measure Numbering. Now Finale will skip this measure; the one  
before will be 108, and the one after will be 109.


I don't think Finale can actually display a measure number with  
numbers and letters, like 108a, so you'll probably have to create a  
measure expression and attach it to that measure.


If you're using an earlier version of Finale, you'll need to create  
a second measure number region. Select the measure tool, and do  
Measure | Measure Numbers | Edit Regions. You probably only have  
one region defined. Select it, and set it to include measures 1  
through 108. Then click the Add button. Define this second measure  
to include measures 110 through 999, and set First Measure in  
Region to 109. You now have 2 measure regions, leaving out the  
109th measure. Again, you'll probably need a measure expression to  
get 108a on that measure.




John Blane
Blane Music Preparation
1649 Huntington Ln.
Highland Park, IL 60035
847 579-9900
847 579-9903 fax
www.BlaneMusic.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] measure number question

2008-10-06 Thread Aaron Sherber

Ah, I missed the Prefix and Suffix boxes, right there in front of my face.

Aaron.

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Measure Number question

2005-08-25 Thread Christopher Smith


On Aug 25, 2005, at 1:04 AM, Brad Beyenhof wrote:


On 24/08/05, Christopher Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


It looks like I will be opt-clicking after every double bar in every
extracted part. Crap.


Couldn't you just set all staves to show measure numbers before you
extract parts (in your separate Part Extraction score, if you do it
that way)?



I STILL will have to double click every double bar on every staff. I am 
trying to avoid having to do that, but it looks hopeless.


Christopher


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Measure Number question

2005-08-25 Thread Hans Arktoft




Couldn't you just set all staves to show measure numbers before you
extract parts (in your separate Part Extraction score, if you do it
that way)?



I STILL will have to double click every double bar on every staff. I am 
trying to avoid having to do that, but it looks hopeless.


Christopher


How about setting Mass Edit to copy only Measure Number Enclosures, 
copy your top staff onto the other staves and then extract parts?


Hans




___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Measure Number question

2005-08-25 Thread Christopher Smith


On Aug 25, 2005, at 8:32 AM, Hans Arktoft wrote:





Couldn't you just set all staves to show measure numbers before you
extract parts (in your separate Part Extraction score, if you do it
that way)?



I STILL will have to double click every double bar on every staff. I 
am trying to avoid having to do that, but it looks hopeless.


Christopher


How about setting Mass Edit to copy only Measure Number Enclosures, 
copy your top staff onto the other staves and then extract parts?





HA! That works, even WITHOUT any measure numbers being enclosed! 
(Counterintuitive or what?) Of course, they don't show on the staves in 
the score where measure numbers are suppressed, but they DO show up on 
the extracted parts, because of 'always show on top staff!'


This is exactly what I was looking for.

Thanks a bunch.

Christopher

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Measure Number question

2005-08-25 Thread Bernard Nussbaumer
Usually, I put the measure numbers on the first staff (show on Top Staff, so that the numbers appear). Uncheck Measure numbers in the Staff Attribute Dialog Box.

Before extracting the parts, I copy ONLY the Measure Number Items) from the first staff to each of the others. (You must copy from the first staff to the second, then you may copy from both these staves to the third and fourth, and so on). 


I wish someone has a better idea, because I find this too long... but it works.

Bernard



2005/8/25, Brad Beyenhof [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 

On 24/08/05, Christopher Smith 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote: It looks like I will be opt-clicking after every double bar in every extracted part. Crap.Couldn't you just set all staves to show measure numbers before you
extract parts (in your separate Part Extraction score, if you do it that way)?--Brad Beyenhof
[EMAIL PROTECTED]my blog: http://augmentedfourth.blogspot.comLife would be so much easier if only (3/2)^12=(2/1)^7. 
___Finale mailing listFinale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale 
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Measure Number question

2005-08-25 Thread Stephen Peters
Christopher Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 I STILL will have to double click every double bar on every staff. I am 
 trying to avoid having to do that, but it looks hopeless.

It's a bit annoying, but I usually switch to Mass Edit, double-click
on the measure so that the measure gets selected for all staves, and
then switch to the Measure tool and hit show numbers.  Easier than
double-clicking on each staff, at least.

-- 
Stephen L. Peters  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  GPG fingerprint: A1BF 5A81 03E7 47CE 71E0  3BD4 8DA6 9268 5BB6 4BBE
[Freedom is] a blast of cool wind that burns your face to wake you up.
Literally?  Yes. -- Urinetown: The Musical
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Measure Number question

2005-08-25 Thread Christopher Smith


On Aug 25, 2005, at 11:59 AM, Stephen Peters wrote:


Christopher Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

I STILL will have to double click every double bar on every staff. I 
am

trying to avoid having to do that, but it looks hopeless.


It's a bit annoying, but I usually switch to Mass Edit, double-click
on the measure so that the measure gets selected for all staves, and
then switch to the Measure tool and hit show numbers.  Easier than
double-clicking on each staff, at least.



Yup, that works too!

Two good methods now, whereas yesterday I only had one lousy method.

Thanks, guys!

Christopher


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Measure Number question

2005-08-24 Thread Aaron Sherber

At 10:35 PM 08/24/2005, Christopher Smith wrote:
I can't believe I am doing this for the first time, but I want measure
numbers to appear over the staff at the beginning of each system (no
problem so far) AND where I specify, usually at double bars (this is
the problem.)

For the measure numbers at double bars, it may better to do them as 
measure-attached expressions, for the reasons you mention. These are 
much easier to place where you want them and to assign to a staff 
list for correct score/parts display.


If you would rather do them as measure numbers, you can do this very 
quickly with Robert Patterson's measure number plugin. (You can also 
use the built-in Finale Easy Measure Numbers plugin, but it doesn't 
give you nearly as much control.)


Aaron.

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Measure Number question

2005-08-24 Thread Chuck Israels

Hey Chris,

I do this all the time.  Measure number tool - edit regions - in the  
lower left of the dialog box, check Always show on top staff, and  
it's done.  Did I misunderstand something?


On Aug 24, 2005, at 7:35 PM, Christopher Smith wrote:


Greeting general knowledge base,

FinMac2005

I can't believe I am doing this for the first time, but I want  
measure numbers to appear over the staff at the beginning of each  
system (no problem so far) AND where I specify, usually at double  
bars (this is the problem.)


I can force a measure number to appear at a double bar by opt- 
clicking the measure, BUT it only appears to apply to THAT staff. I  
want ALL twenty or so extracted parts to show the measure number at  
the double bar too.



Do I have to go through and opt-click EVERY staff in the score at  
EVERY double bar? I already tried selecting the whole vertical  
stack and opt-clicking; it doesn't seem to work.


No, that's why you check always show on top staff.  That means on  
the extracted parts too, and it works reliably.


This is the way I always do it, so I don't know if I'm missing some  
issue.


Hope this helps.

Chuck



To make matters worse, not all staves are set to show numbers IN  
THE SCORE, but the top staff is forced to show numbers, so that  
they appear on all extracted parts even if the staff is set not to  
show measure numbers. This means that if I miss the measure by  
accident, I won't know about it until AFTER I extract the part.


What is usually done in this case?

Thanks a lot.

Christopher

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale



Chuck Israels
230 North Garden Terrace
Bellingham, WA 98225-5836
phone (360) 671-3402
fax (360) 676-6055
www.chuckisraels.com

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Measure Number question

2005-08-24 Thread Christopher Smith


On Aug 25, 2005, at 12:15 AM, Chuck Israels wrote:


Hey Chris,

I do this all the time.  Measure number tool - edit regions - in the 
lower left of the dialog box, check Always show on top staff, and 
it's done.  Did I misunderstand something?





This only applies to the ones that show up at the beginnings of 
systems. The ones at double bars do NOT show up on other staves.




On Aug 24, 2005, at 7:35 PM, Christopher Smith wrote:


Greeting general knowledge base,

FinMac2005

I can't believe I am doing this for the first time, but I want 
measure numbers to appear over the staff at the beginning of each 
system (no problem so far) AND where I specify, usually at double 
bars (this is the problem.)


I can force a measure number to appear at a double bar by 
opt-clicking the measure, BUT it only appears to apply to THAT staff. 
I want ALL twenty or so extracted parts to show the measure number at 
the double bar too.



Do I have to go through and opt-click EVERY staff in the score at 
EVERY double bar? I already tried selecting the whole vertical stack 
and opt-clicking; it doesn't seem to work.


No, that's why you check always show on top staff.  That means on 
the extracted parts too, and it works reliably.





Not for the measure numbers on staves set NOT to show measure numbers.

Try this.

Create with the Setup Wizard a score with Flute 1 and Flute 2. Enter 
some notes in measures 1 and 2 of both parts. By default, the staff 
attributes for Flute 2 are set to NOT show measure numbers. However, if 
you set the Measure Number region to show only at the beginning of a 
line and Always show on top staff, then even Flute 2 will show them 
in the extracted part.


BUT, opt-click on measure 2 of the FLute 1 staff, and the measure 
number will be forced to appear. All well and good. Opt-click on the 
Flute 2 staff - nothing. And furthermore (I just discovered this one!), 
if you extract the Flute 2, the measure number will NOT appear in 
measure 2, though it WILL appear at the beginning of the system.


If the above test works for you, let me know so I can figure out what I 
am doing wrong.


Christopher

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Measure Number question

2005-08-24 Thread Christopher Smith


On Aug 24, 2005, at 11:27 PM, Aaron Sherber wrote:


At 10:35 PM 08/24/2005, Christopher Smith wrote:
I can't believe I am doing this for the first time, but I want measure
numbers to appear over the staff at the beginning of each system (no
problem so far) AND where I specify, usually at double bars (this is
the problem.)

For the measure numbers at double bars, it may better to do them as 
measure-attached expressions, for the reasons you mention. These are 
much easier to place where you want them and to assign to a staff list 
for correct score/parts display.




Hmm, I am expecting to do some extensive edits to this file, including 
changing the length, which is why I wanted flexible bar numbers instead 
of measure-attached rehearsal letters, as I usually do. Measure 
expressions will not change to reflect new measure numbering, 
unfortunately.



If you would rather do them as measure numbers, you can do this very 
quickly with Robert Patterson's measure number plugin. (You can also 
use the built-in Finale Easy Measure Numbers plugin, but it doesn't 
give you nearly as much control.)




Hmm again. This is giving me trouble. I can't find a combination of 
settings in the Patterson plugin that causes the measure numbers to 
change (reflow) when I delete or add measures at the beginning of the 
work.


The Finale Easy Measure Numbers plugin will create new regions that 
always start with the same number, which doesn't help me either. Plus, 
it won't use my chosen font for the numbers, but rather defaults to the 
font that is set in the Document Options.


Thanks for the tips, though. If you have any other suggestions, let me 
know.


It looks like I will be opt-clicking after every double bar in every 
extracted part. Crap.


Christopher


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Measure Number question

2005-08-24 Thread Brad Beyenhof
On 24/08/05, Christopher Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 It looks like I will be opt-clicking after every double bar in every
 extracted part. Crap.

Couldn't you just set all staves to show measure numbers before you
extract parts (in your separate Part Extraction score, if you do it
that way)?

-- 
Brad Beyenhof
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
my blog: http://augmentedfourth.blogspot.com
Life would be so much easier if only (3/2)^12=(2/1)^7.

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale