Re: firewall on FreeBSD
--On June 26, 2005 12:40:14 AM +0100 Alex Zbyslaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Paul Schmehl wrote: --On June 25, 2005 8:42:24 AM +0200 mess-mate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I've a firewall/router/proxy with openbsd and think to replace it with freebsd 5.4 Do you mean freebsd's PF don't support the 'quick' keyword ?? Thought PF on freebsd and openbsd was identical, isn't ? pf on freebsd does support the "quick" keyword. The "default" firewall, ipfw, does not. This makes no sense to me. The two firewalls work very differently. In pf, each rule is always processed on every packet and the last rule matching determines the action. "quick" terminates the rule matching and forces the "quick" rule to be, in effect, the final rule (assuming the packet matched it). ipfw does not match every rule for every packet, rather is processes down the rules until the packet matches one with a terminating action such as "accept" or "deny". No "quick" keyword is needed. Precisely. Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Adjunct Information Security Officer University of Texas at Dallas AVIEN Founding Member http://www.utdallas.edu/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Still trying to get my site up!
--On June 26, 2005 7:06:34 PM -0400 Gerard Seibert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The 'beerstud.us' redirects to 'www2.beerstud.us:9545' bash-2.05b# dig www.beerstud.us ; <<>> DiG 8.3 <<>> www.beerstud.us ;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch ;; got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 54693 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 5, ADDITIONAL: 5 ;; QUERY SECTION: ;; www.beerstud.us, type = A, class = IN ;; ANSWER SECTION: www.beerstud.us.12H IN CNAMEbeerstud.us. beerstud.us.5h59m37s IN A 63.208.196.110 ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: beerstud.us.23h59m37s IN NS ns2.mydyndns.org. bash-2.05b# ping beerstud.us PING beerstud.us (63.208.196.110): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 63.208.196.110: icmp_seq=0 ttl=243 time=50.902 ms 64 bytes from 63.208.196.110: icmp_seq=1 ttl=243 time=49.316 ms 64 bytes from 63.208.196.110: icmp_seq=2 ttl=243 time=50.472 ms 64 bytes from 63.208.196.110: icmp_seq=3 ttl=243 time=49.538 ms 64 bytes from 63.208.196.110: icmp_seq=4 ttl=243 time=50.056 ms 64 bytes from 63.208.196.110: icmp_seq=5 ttl=243 time=50.229 ms 64 bytes from 63.208.196.110: icmp_seq=6 ttl=243 time=49.012 ms bash-2.05b# traceroute www.beerstud.us traceroute to beerstud.us (63.208.196.110), 64 hops max, 44 byte packets 1 66.221.96.1 (66.221.96.1) 0.339 ms 0.195 ms 0.189 ms 2 f1-g1-c1.propagation.net (66.34.255.1) 0.651 ms 0.825 ms 0.594 ms 3 g0-8.na21.b000385-1.dfw01.atlas.cogentco.com (38.112.17.77) 2.164 ms 2.168 ms 2.615 ms 4 g6-1.core01.core02.dfw01.atlas.cogentco.com (66.28.6.205) 2.108 ms 1.775 ms 1.878 ms 5 p10-0.core01.dfw03.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.1.58) 2.819 ms 2.679 ms 2.547 ms 6 so-3-2-0.edge2.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.68.127.13) 2.366 ms 2.901 ms 2.820 ms 7 so-7-0-0.bbr2.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.68.96.121) 2.877 ms 3.095 ms 2.895 ms 8 so-3-0-0.mp1.Boston1.Level3.net (209.247.9.125) 49.159 ms so-2-0-0.mp2.Boston1.Level3.net (64.159.4.181) 48.916 ms so-3-0-0.mp1.Boston1.Level3.net (209.247.9.125) 49.986 ms 9 ge-11-1.hsa1.Boston1.Level3.net (4.68.100.100) 49.963 ms ge-11-0.hsa1.Boston1.Level3.net (4.68.100.36) 48.582 ms ge-10-2.hsa1.Boston1.Level3.net (4.68.100.132) 49.108 ms 10 fe-0-0-0.router1.bos.dyndns.org (63.211.169.134) 48.787 ms 49.373 ms 49.485 ms 11 firewall1.bos.dyndns.org (63.208.196.57) 48.381 ms !X 49.319 ms !X 49.009 ms !X bash-2.05b# dig www2.beerstud.us ; <<>> DiG 8.3 <<>> www2.beerstud.us ;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch ;; got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 13620 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 5, ADDITIONAL: 5 ;; QUERY SECTION: ;; www2.beerstud.us, type = A, class = IN ;; ANSWER SECTION: www2.beerstud.us. 1M IN A 216.45.232.47 ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: beerstud.us.23h57m1s IN NS ns2.mydyndns.org. bash-2.05b# ping www2.beerstud.us PING www2.beerstud.us (216.45.232.47): 56 data bytes 36 bytes from ip2.159.45.216.susc.suscom.net (216.45.159.2): Destination Host Unreachable Vr HL TOS Len ID Flg off TTL Pro cks Src Dst 4 5 00 5400 cb03 0 35 01 5173 66.221.101.248 216.45.232.47 bash-2.05b# traceroute www2.beerstud.us traceroute to www2.beerstud.us (216.45.232.47), 64 hops max, 44 byte packets 1 66.221.96.1 (66.221.96.1) 0.262 ms 0.205 ms 0.309 ms 2 f1-g1-c1.propagation.net (66.34.255.1) 0.901 ms 0.997 ms 1.139 ms 3 gige-g6-0-601.gsr12012.dal.he.net (216.218.217.181) 2.120 ms 1.831 ms 2.193 ms 4 sp0-2-DLLSTXRI.broadwing.com (206.223.118.72) 2.992 ms 2.937 ms 2.871 ms 5 216.140.5.65 (216.140.5.65) 3.366 ms 3.562 ms 3.369 ms 6 p2-1.c0.ftwo.broadwing.net (216.140.4.225) 3.956 ms 216.140.5.41 (216.140.5.41) 4.190 ms 4.163 ms 7 p4-0.c0.atln.broadwing.net (216.140.17.114) 47.602 ms s7-3-0.c1.atln.broadwing.net (216.140.17.110) 47.033 ms p4-0.c0.atln.broadwing.net (216.140.17.114) 47.114 ms 8 so7-1-0.C1.wash.broadwing.net (216.140.8.21) 48.129 ms p3-0.c0.wash.broadwing.net (216.140.8.109) 47.970 ms so7-1-0.C1.wash.broadwing.net (216.140.8.21) 46.314 ms 9 p6-0.c0.nwyk.broadwing.net (216.140.17.122) 54.416 ms 68.527 ms so-5-0-0.c1.nwyk.broadwing.net (216.140.17.118) 60.054 ms 10 p1-0-0.a1.nwyk.broadwing.net (216.140.10.14) 53.376 ms s2-0-0.a1.nwyk.broadwing.net (216.140.10.222) 51.697 ms 50.859 ms 11 65.90.201.102 (65.90.201.102) 49.940 ms 50.784 ms 50.264 ms 12 * * * 13 * ip2.159.45.216.susc.suscom.net (216.45.159.2) 49.181 ms !H * 14 * * * 15 * * * If you can't reach the host, then port 9545 is irrelevant. Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Adjunct Information Security Officer University of Texas at Dallas AVIEN Founding Member http://www.utdallas.edu/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Xvnc + inetd
duckeo wrote: I don't know anything in general to accomplish X forwarding (except paid for solutions such as Reflection X, Hummingbird, etc), so maybe going with VNC is a good idea. So I suggest setting up everything described in the HOWTO, but have SSH keys setup so then people don't have to worry about 'annoying' password based logins via SSH. Read http://www.jfitz.com/tips/ssh_for_windows.html#Automatic_login for more details on how to do this via putty. The only thing I can think of that's causing issues is maybe kdm isn't running on port 177. Have you attempted setting it up to listen on port 177, and also have you checked to see if login via the local box is possible? KDM is definately listening, UDP 177: frisbee# netstat -aln Active Internet connections (including servers) Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address(state) tcp4 0 0 *.5961 *.*LISTEN udp6 0 0 *.177 *.* 5861 being VNC, 177 being XDMCP. I can't VNC from the local box, is there a way I can test local login to KDM from the command line? I'm working on it remotely at the moment, SSH'd in from Windows. Anything X related needs to be run through a running X server; command line invocations aren't possible. You can try running vncserver though and then VNC into the server at the display as root to see if your VNC server config at least works. vncserver -localhost is your friend in this case :). Just a thought, would the fact that it's listening on UDP6 be a factor? Shouldn't be I would think. Well, as long as identd knew that it was UDP and not TCP and Xvnc was catching the listening port correctly :P. Besides, UDP[v]6 supports UDP[v]4, correct? I would sure hope so... And judging by the HOWTO it's supposed to do that. Xvnc is the binary, vncserver is a longish script I'm sifting through. It appears it just has a bunch of default settings in there, what I might do is try to modify one or two and see if the /root/.vnc/xstartup is having an effect (being invoked). Take a look in there, but not too hard. Try logging in 'single user mode' by invoking vncserver directly as root, or attempt calling vncserver from within inetd.conf as opposed to Xvnc, just for testing's sake. One thing I find interesting is that Xvnc is being called as user 'nobody' and not root, so therein may lie your issue ;). Therefore, creating an additional unprivileged user and then creating all the necessary settings for that user and configuring inetd to call Xvnc as your user may serve to be the solution you're looking for. -Garrett ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: How to go about the installation
On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 10:33 +0530, Jayesh Jayan wrote: > Hi, > > I am bit new to freebsd. I would like to install FreeBSD with below > specifications. How do I go about it. > > My Hardware -- a dell server with below configuration. > > CPU: Dual Xeon 3.0GHz/2MB Cache > RAM: 2GB (with room to grow to 12GB) > Drive: 3 x 73GB SCSI with RAID 5 config > Power: Dual power supply > Rack: 2U and the server can take 6 drives. > > > So can please let me know on how to go about installing freebsd 5.3 on the > above configuration with RAID 5 hardware. > > Thank you. > You do not want FreeBSD 5.3 , you want FreeBSD 5.4 . Make sure your RAID-controller is supported and read .. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/install.html http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.4R/hardware.html http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.4R/installation-i386.html http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/index.html Andreas -- GnuPG key : 0xD25FCC81 | http://cyb.websimplex.de/pubkey.asc Fingerprint: D182 6F22 7EEC DD4C 0F6E 564C 691B 0372 D25F CC81 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: freebsd as the basis for something better?
On 6/27/05, Kurt Buff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > > > >>-Original Message- > >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Nikolas Britton > >>Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2005 8:10 PM > >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Subject: Re: freebsd as the basis for something better? > >> > >> > >>>a project where real unix would meet real life, or where open > >>>source would meet open minds -- would have to make unix more human- > >>>oriented rather than machine-oriented. and in addition to bringing > >>>order to the chaos that was laid as the foundation for all unix > >>>variants decades ago, it should also deal with new ways of > >>>interacting with unix visually. for instance, in ways more > >>>convenient than x, and its conventional graphical user interfaces > >>>(though these won't go away any time soon). > >> > >>UNIX is user friendly. It's just selective about who its friends are. > >>New gui tools are needed. lets bring the CLI tools to the GUI, like > >>pipes, redirects, etc. some of apples ideas are nice aka NeXTSTEP. Why > >>are we trying to emulate windows when mircosoft just steals it's > >>idea's from apple? lets cut the middle man out. BeOS was cool too. > >> > > > > > > A! > > > > Why are you guys still beating the GUI interface? That is so 70's > > computing technology. The real next generation OS will be > > voice command. Until then it's just more Window dressing. It's > > like the Emperor's new clothes - the little boy said "Computer > > please get me a drink of water" and the crowd was amazed when > > the $64,000 OS stacked to the ceiling with GUI just sat there > > lifeless and dumb. Nice one ted but it would still be cool to have pipe and redirect stuff in the GUI. Basically extending the UNIX philosophy of modular tools into the GUI. I seem to remember someone talking about this in the Daemon's Advocate column @ daemonnews.org but I can't seem to find it, maybe I'm thinking of something else. > > > > Ted > > Must seriously disagree. Voice command is of very limited use - it's not > private, and difficult to use in crowded surroundings. > > Further, if you consider the space in the human brain for visual > processing vs. aural processing, I think you'll find that visual > processing wins. At least for feedback, the human visual system is much > better. > > However, the best interface for human input to machines is, IMHO, still > to be determined. I don't claim that the keyboard/mouse interface is > best, but it is, again IMHO, superior to voice command. What would be > better than keyboard/mouse? I really don't know. One SWAG would be > reading brainwaves, or perhap eyeball gestures - but that's just sheer > speculation. You forgot finger and hand gestures and touch and sound sensors. we could have a matrix style plug in the back of are head? A direct brain to computer interface would be the best interface. But it might be too much I/O for a computer to handle, If you don't believe me just "look" at what your eye's are doing in real-time 3D @ 1000 fps. anyone remember the 3 dimensional touch and hand gesture interface and GUI they used in Minority Report? that would be cool in real life. > > I'm still a partisan of the command line, however. It's simply too > flexible an interface, with too much history, to ignore. The human > species has spent far too much intellectual capital making text-based > interfaces (try explaining philosophy with pictures only) to the world > to give it up, and the interface is so much more powerful than any gui, > that I believe it will prove fruitless to try to better it with a GUI. > Electron for electron, a text interface is much more information-dense > than any GUI - for expressing commands. Note the difference. Getting > output in graphic form can be (often is) better than in text, but input > is better through the command line. So why can't we "mesh" the two environments together... The qwerty keyboard, 125 years old, is very inefficient and awkward. "point and click" = "point and grunt", it's a step backwards from the keyboard. What we need is a new interface and a new (GUI) system to exploit it. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Freebsd 5.4 cannot fetch xfree86?
perikillo wrote: > Hi to all. > I install freebsd 5.4 Release, with xorg i have problems with my > kbd, and i decide to install the old friend XFree86-4, i read the > handbook about, the example say: > test# pkg_add -r XFree86 Packages are only being built for default X - that is for XFree86 on FreeBSD 4.x and for Xorg on FreeBSD 5.x. If you want XFree86-4 you will need to build it from ports and set X_WINDOW_SYSTEM knob appropriately (see FAQ: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/x.html#XFREE86-VERSION). What kind of problem do you have with keyboard? Dejan ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Freebsd 5.4 cannot fetch xfree86?
perikillo wrote: I install freebsd 5.4 Release, with xorg i have problems with my kbd, Tell your problem. It don't think that it is unsolvable. and i decide to install the old friend XFree86-4, i read the handbook about, the example say: test# pkg_add -r XFree86 But my system dosent found nothing, the answer is something about "Cannot fetch xfree86 packages from ftp.freebsd.org. There is something else i need to do? or where i can change the default URL? OR wich URL have those pakages ? Any help i will apreciate. As far as I know there are no official XFree86 packages at ftp.freebsd.org and mirrors anymore. I suggest to build XFree86 from sources: echo X_WINDOW_SYSTEM=xfree86-4 >> /etc/make.conf cd /usr/ports/x11/XFree86-4 make install clean Björn ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Freebsd 5.4 cannot fetch xfree86?
Dejan Lesjak wrote: On Monday 27 of June 2005 10:32, you wrote: Dejan Lesjak wrote: perikillo wrote: Hi to all. I install freebsd 5.4 Release, with xorg i have problems with my kbd, and i decide to install the old friend XFree86-4, i read the handbook about, the example say: test# pkg_add -r XFree86 Packages are only being built for default X - that is for XFree86 on FreeBSD 4.x and for Xorg on FreeBSD 5.x. If you want XFree86-4 you will need to build it from ports and set X_WINDOW_SYSTEM knob appropriately (see FAQ: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/x.html#XFREE86-VERSI ON). What kind of problem do you have with keyboard? Dejan As mentioned earlier today, XFree86 project support is essentially being phased out of many open source OSes since many of the devs from XFree86 went to the Xorg project over what I believe was licensing issues. In terms of the keyboard, check the actual module name since they changed it in Xorg (either kbd -> keyboard or keyboard -> kbd). That hung me up for a while in Gentoo. -Garrett Erm, yes, thanks. I believe you wanted to tell that to original poster (perikillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) instead of to me :) Dejan Ah, shoot yes. Sorry for the unnecessary email. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
CDROM firewall
Hi I'm searching for a CDROM firewall package FreeBSD based I know there is several but I can't remember their names. Thanks a lot. -- Cordialement/Regards Frank Bonnet ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: CDROM firewall
Hello, On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 10:55:42AM +0200 or thereabouts, Frank Bonnet wrote: > Hi > > I'm searching for a CDROM firewall package FreeBSD based > I know there is several but I can't remember their names. It is called m0n0wall, it is based on FreeBSD 4.x. Go and grab it from: http://www.m0n0.ch/wall/ Cheers, Martin -- martin hudec * 421 907 303 393 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.aeternal.net "Nothing travels faster than the speed of light with the possible exception of bad news, which obeys its own special laws." Douglas Adams, "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" pgpg25Omm85dP.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: 5.4-stable vs racoon
On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 21:07:50 +0200, in sentex.lists.freebsd.questions
you wrote:
hi there,
after updating my freebsd to 5.4-stable, i can't make my racoon work as
before.
Strange error. I would start by recompiling racoon. Are you using
the latest version from the ports as well ?
I am using
5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #1: Thu Jun 2
with 20050510a using FAST_IPSEC
2005-06-27 08:34:13: INFO: main.c:172:main(): @(#)package version
freebsd-20050510a
2005-06-27 08:34:13: INFO: main.c:174:main(): @(#)internal version
20001216 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2005-06-27 08:34:13: INFO: main.c:175:main(): @(#)This product linked
OpenSSL 0.9.7e 25 Oct 2004 (http://www.openssl.org/)
2005-06-27 08:34:13: ERROR: pfkey.c:2394:pk_checkalg(): Must get supported
algorithms list first.
2005-06-27 08:34:13: ERROR: cftoken.l:494:yyerror():
/usr/local/etc/racoon/racoon.conf:129: ";" algorithm 3DES not supported
2005-06-27 08:34:13: ERROR: cfparse.y:1410:cfparse(): fatal parse failure
(1 errors)
-
FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #2: Sun Jun 26 17:53:14 CEST 2005
options IPSEC
options IPSEC_DEBUG
i get this error message:
2005-06-26 21:01:24: ERROR: pfkey.c:2394:pk_checkalg(): Must get
supported algorithms list first.
2005-06-26 21:01:24: ERROR: cftoken.l:494:yyerror():
/usr/local/etc/racoon/racoon.conf:156: ";" algorithm 3DES not supported
If you did upgrade racoon, is it something goofy like it insisting
3DES be written as 3des now ?
proposal {
encryption_algorithm 3des;
hash_algorithm sha1;
authentication_method pre_shared_key ;
dh_group 2 ;
}
it sends error message wheter i write it 3des or 3DES.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
RE: freebsd as the basis for something better?
>A! > >Why are you guys still beating the GUI interface? That is so 70's >computing technology. The real next generation OS will be >voice command. Until then it's just more Window dressing. It's >like the Emperor's new clothes - the little boy said "Computer >please get me a drink of water" and the crowd was amazed when >the $64,000 OS stacked to the ceiling with GUI just sat there >lifeless and dumb. > >Ted i'm sure we could do something innovative with: http://www.cstr.ed.ac.uk/projects/festival for instance, just having a hot voice reading my command outputs would already be darn cool to me. -- siño Concerned about your privacy? Follow this link to get secure FREE email: http://www.hushmail.com/?l=2 Free, ultra-private instant messaging with Hush Messenger http://www.hushmail.com/services-messenger?l=434 Promote security and make money with the Hushmail Affiliate Program: http://www.hushmail.com/about-affiliate?l=427 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Get mod_auth_oracle to work on Freebsd
Hi guys,
I'm desparate for some help with installing mod_auth_oracle on my Freebsd
server. I'm trying to get Apache to authenticate against u/p database held
in our Oracle database, as we are moving from single server to multiple
servers, a distributed authentication is really important for us. btw I'm
using Apache 2.0.54, Oracle client 10.1.0.3 and mod_auth_oracle 1.1.1.
First of all I've installed all three oracle instant client ports, then I've
tried to compile mod_auth_oracle from source as there's no freebsd port.
I've made the following modifications to the Makefile:
@@ -4,9 +4,9 @@
##
builddir=.
-top_srcdir=/etc/httpd
-top_builddir=/etc/httpd
-include /usr/lib/httpd/build/special.mk
+top_srcdir=/usr/local/share/apache2
+top_builddir=/usr/local/share/apache2
+include /usr/local/share/apache2/build/special.mk
# the used tools
APXS=apxs
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
DEFS=-DOCI7
INCLUDES=-I${ORACLE_HOME}/rdbms/demo
else
-INCLUDES=-I${ORACLE_HOME}/rdbms/demo -I${ORACLE_HOME}/rdbms/public
+INCLUDES=-I${ORACLE_HOME}/rdbms/demo -I${ORACLE_HOME}/rdbms/public
-I/usr/local/include/apache2
-I/compat/linux/usr/include/oracle/10.1.0.3/client
endif
SH_LIBS=-L${ORACLE_HOME}/lib/ -lclntsh
Then I added enviromental variable, compiled and installed mod_auth_oracle,
all went OK.
export ORACLE_HOME=/usr/compat/linux/usr/lib/oracle/10.1.0.3/client/
gmake && gmake install
Finally I've added the following line to httpd.conf:
LoadModule auth_oracle_modulelibexec/apache2/mod_auth_oracle.so
AddModule mod_auth_oracle.c
PassEnv ORACLE_HOME TNS_ADMIN NLS_LANG
However, when I tried to restart apache with the new module, I've got the
following error:
# apachectl -t
Syntax error on line 283 of /usr/local/etc/apache2/httpd.conf:
Cannot load /usr/local/libexec/apache2/mod_auth_oracle.so into server:
Shared object "libclntsh.so.10.1" not found, required by
"mod_auth_oracle.so"
I tried to tweak the library path as follows:
export
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/lib:/usr/lib:/usr/local/lib:/usr/compat/linux/lib:/usr/compat/linux/usr/lib/oracle/10.1.0.3/client/lib:/usr/compat/linux/usr/share/oracle/10.1.0.3/client:/usr/compat/linux/usr/include/oracle/10.1.0.3/client
and tested apache again, got even worse results:
# apachectl -t
Bus error (core dumped)
I suspect this is a result of mix and matching linux compatibility library
and native fbsd library; however I've ran out of options to fix this
problem. Here're some readable texts from the httpd.core, hope it's of any
help...
...
NIS_DEFAULTS
unable to free arguments
NIS+: callback timed out
%s.%d.%d
NIS+: failed to register callback dispatcher
NIS+: failed to read local socket info
NIS+: out of memory allocating callback
/lib/ld-linux.so.2
...
svc_unix.c - cannot getsockname or listen
svcunix_create: out of memory
svc_unix: makefd_xprt: out of memory
DST not allowed in SUID/SGID programs
empty dynamic string token substitution
opening file=%s; opencount == %u
closing file=%s; opencount == %u
RTLD_NEXT used in code not dynamically loaded
/lib/ld-linux.so.2
...
ELF file version ident does not match current one
ELF file version does not match current one
ELF file's phentsize not the expected size
only ET_DYN and ET_EXEC can be loaded
cannot open shared object file
symbol=%s; lookup in file=%s
file=%s; needed by %s (relocation dependency)
binding file %s to %s: %s symbol `%s'
%s 0x%0*Zx 0x%0*Zx -> 0x%0*Zx 0x%0*Zx
cannot make segment writable for relocation
%s: Symbol `%s' has different size in shared object, consider re-linking
%s: profiler found no PLTREL in object %s
%s: profiler out of memory shadowing PLTREL of %s
can't restore segment prot after reloc
DST not allowed in SUID/SGID programs
empty dynamics string token substitution
cannot load auxiliary `%s' because ofempty dynamic string token substitution
load auxiliary object=%s requested by file=%s
load filtered object=%s requested by file=%s
cannot allocate dependency list
cannot allocate symbol search list
error while loading shared libraries
checking for version `%s' in file %s required by file %s
no version information available (required by
cannot allocate version reference table
%s: file is no correct profile data file for `%s'
Out of memory while initializing profiler
FATAL: cannot determine library version
unexpected PLT reloc type 0x??
unexpected reloc type 0x??
Is there anyway I can compile this module with Linux compabitility library
depency to run on the native fbsd Apache? Thanks a lot for your help!
Cheers,
Hui
_
Be the first to hear what's new at MSN - sign up to our free newsletters!
http://www.msn.co.uk/newsletters
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: ndis0 dhcp question
Bryan Maynard wrote: Hello all! :-D I have a Linksys WPC11 ver.4 wireless NIC. I got it setup using ndisgen (very cool tool by the way). Now when kldload /root/rtl8180_sys.ko (the location of my wireless kernel object) dmesg shows this: ndis0: port 0x1000-0x10ff mem 0x88 00-0x880001ff irq 11 at device 0.0 on cardbus1 ndis0: NDIS API version: 5.1 ndis0: Ethernet address: 00:0f:66:cf:10:7e ndis0: 11b rates: 1Mbps 2Mbps 5.5Mbps 11Mbps and when I run ifconfig -a I get this: ::My onboard ethernet NIC xl0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 options=9 inet6 fe80::204:76ff:fe48:9301%xl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 inet 192.168.1.101 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 ether 00:04:76:48:93:01 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active ::I don't know what this is. . . plip0: flags=108810 mtu 1500 ::Loopback device lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3 ::My Linksys WPC11 ver.4 ndis0: flags=8802 mtu 1500 ether 00:0f:66:cf:10:7e media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect status: no carrier ssid "" channel -1 authmode OPEN powersavemode OFF powersavesleep 100 rtsthreshold 2312 protmode CTS wepmode OFF weptxkey 1 I have several questions, but I'll ask them one at a time. . . I have a Linksys WRT54G Wireless Router. Currently my onboard NIC is what I use to access the net and stuff. How do I assign an IP address - and any other needed parameters - to my wireless NIC, activate it, and use it instead of (or along with) my onboard ethernet NIC? I know about using ifconfig blah blah blah, but what paramaters do I pass and where do I get them? Thanks, Bryan Hi Bryan, something like this: ifconfig ndis0 ssid wepmode on wepkey 0x<1234567> I alway had to issue this command-line twice - don't know why. To automate this on boot-time using dhcp, there is /etc/dhclient.conf, where you have to add the parameters like ssid, wepmode and wepkey. I didn't try this yet. I haven't been able to use my ndis-card with dhcp (issuing "killall dhclient" && "dhclient ndis0" by hand), while my ath-card at least got a "dhcp-address" once :-). Ben ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: freebsd as the basis for something better?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i'm sure we could do something innovative with: http://www.cstr.ed.ac.uk/projects/festival for instance, just having a hot voice reading my command outputs would already be darn cool to me. I worked there for a while, and know a couple of the people who worked on this project -- certainly talented individuals, though, sadly, Richard Caley is no longer with us. That aside, one of the things I hated was being in a roomful of people coming up to demo time, all babbling away into headset mikes while another set of people had their computer babbling back to them, sounding like Steven Hawking. Enough to drive you up the wall. If I wanted that, I'd work in a call center. And, of course, much of the software I worked on was developed using good, old keyboard and mouse, running good, old CLI Unix, with maybe a GUI C/C++ development environment (though mine was mostly emacs). There are applications where speech input or output are undoubtedly useful. But as a general replacement for keyboard and mouse? No thanks. When people speak to you, they are usually capable of picking up visual and verbal clues that, for example, that tell them when to shut up. Computers are a long, long way from that. And which would you rather do to edit the last command you ran? Type "^P ESC-b ESC-b Del Del 2 SPACE" or have to say "Redo last command, substitute final 1 for a 2"? Time yourself and see which is quicker :-) Then make the example more complicated :-) On the other hand, if I could get my PC to listen in on a technical phone call, and manage to take notes (even verbatim) of what was said, that would save lots of typing up minutes afterwards trying to remember what was actually said. Of course, recognizing telephone quality, technical speech, spoken at normal speed and with the software not trained on the speakers, is, as far as I am aware, several pipe-dreams rolled into one. --Alex ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re[2]: Still trying to get my site up!
On Sunday, June 26, 2005 8:47:41 PM "John Brooks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: $>do you have any kind of firewall? from the outside world port 9545 $>is closed. so either it is being blocked, you are not actually $>listening on it, or there is no port forwarding on your gateway. $> $>run this on the box itself and post the output: $> netstat -na | grep LISTEN $> $>try to connect from another host on your network: $> http://192.168.0.4:9545 $> $>then try: $> http://192.168.0.4:80 $> $>-- $>John Brooks $>[EMAIL PROTECTED] $> $>> -Original Message- $>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] $>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gerard Seibert $>> Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2005 6:07 PM $>> To: freebsd-questions $>> Subject: Still trying to get my site up! $>> $>> $>> Thanks to several individuals, I have almost gotten my Apache2 server $>> working. Almost, but not quite. $>> $>> My ISP blocks port 80; therefore I am using a redirect from DynDNS.org to $>> redirect to an alias using port 9545. $>> $>> The 'beerstud.us' redirects to 'www2.beerstud.us:9545' $>> $>> >From my FreeBSD box, if I type: lynx http://beerstud.us, I see the $>> following message: Using http://www2.beerstud.us:9545/. The connection is $>> made and the index.htm file is displayed. $>> $>> However, I am unable to reach this site from any other computer. $>> Eventually, the request will time out and I receive an error message $>> telling me that the site is not available. $>> $>> I am not sure what I am doing wrong at this point. I have posted the $>> following files if anyone feels ambitious enough to look them over for me. $>> $>> httpd.conf = http://www.seibercom.us/FreeBSD/httpd.conf $>> $>> hosts = http://www.seibercom.us/FreeBSD/hosts $>> $>> This is the output from ifconfig -a $>> net-card.txt= http://www.seibercom.us/FreeBSD/net-card.txt $>> $>> resolv.conf = http://www.seibercom.us/FreeBSD/resolv.conf $>> $>> The 'hosts' file has a pretty good description of my network in it. I $>> double checked my router, and I believe it is configured $>> correctly to pass $>> port 9545 through. $>> $>> -- $>> Thanks! $>> $>> Gerard Seibert $>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] $>> ** Reply Separator ** Monday, June 27, 2005 6:48:35 AM The netstat -na | grep LISTEN command produces this output: tcp40 0 *.139 *.* LISTEN tcp40 0 *.445 *.* LISTEN tcp40 0 *.901 *.* LISTEN tcp46 0 0 *.9545 *.* LISTEN tcp40 0 127.0.0.1.25 *.* LISTEN Both http://192,168.0.4:9545 goes to my site. The http://192.168.0.4:80 produces this error: Looking up 192.168.0.4 Making HTTP connection to 192.168.0.4 Alert!: Unable to connect to remote host. lynx: Can't access startfile http://192.168.0.4/ -- Gerard E. Seibert [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Still trying to get my site up!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Gerard Seibert wrote: > On Sunday, June 26, 2005 8:47:41 PM "John Brooks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > $>do you have any kind of firewall? from the outside world port 9545 > $>is closed. so either it is being blocked, you are not actually > $>listening on it, or there is no port forwarding on your gateway. > $> > $>run this on the box itself and post the output: > $> netstat -na | grep LISTEN > $> > $>try to connect from another host on your network: > $> http://192.168.0.4:9545 > $> > $>then try: > $> http://192.168.0.4:80 > $> > $>-- > $>John Brooks > $>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > $> > $>> -Original Message- > $>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > $>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gerard Seibert > $>> Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2005 6:07 PM > $>> To: freebsd-questions > $>> Subject: Still trying to get my site up! > $>> > $>> > $>> Thanks to several individuals, I have almost gotten my Apache2 server > $>> working. Almost, but not quite. > $>> > $>> My ISP blocks port 80; therefore I am using a redirect from DynDNS.org to > $>> redirect to an alias using port 9545. > $>> > $>> The 'beerstud.us' redirects to 'www2.beerstud.us:9545' > $>> > $>> >From my FreeBSD box, if I type: lynx http://beerstud.us, I see the > $>> following message: Using http://www2.beerstud.us:9545/. The connection is > $>> made and the index.htm file is displayed. > $>> > $>> However, I am unable to reach this site from any other computer. > $>> Eventually, the request will time out and I receive an error message > $>> telling me that the site is not available. > $>> > $>> I am not sure what I am doing wrong at this point. I have posted the > $>> following files if anyone feels ambitious enough to look them over for me. > $>> > $>> httpd.conf = http://www.seibercom.us/FreeBSD/httpd.conf > $>> > $>> hosts = http://www.seibercom.us/FreeBSD/hosts > $>> > $>> This is the output from ifconfig -a > $>> net-card.txt = http://www.seibercom.us/FreeBSD/net-card.txt > $>> > $>> resolv.conf = http://www.seibercom.us/FreeBSD/resolv.conf > $>> > $>> The 'hosts' file has a pretty good description of my network in it. I > $>> double checked my router, and I believe it is configured > $>> correctly to pass > $>> port 9545 through. > $>> > $>> -- > $>> Thanks! > $>> > $>> Gerard Seibert > $>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > $>> > > ** Reply Separator ** > Monday, June 27, 2005 6:48:35 AM > > The netstat -na | grep LISTEN command produces this output: > > tcp40 0 *.139 *.* LISTEN > tcp40 0 *.445 *.* LISTEN > tcp40 0 *.901 *.* LISTEN > tcp46 0 0 *.9545 *.* LISTEN > tcp40 0 127.0.0.1.25 *.* LISTEN > > Both http://192,168.0.4:9545 goes to my site. The http://192.168.0.4:80 > produces this error: > > Looking up 192.168.0.4 > Making HTTP connection to 192.168.0.4 > Alert!: Unable to connect to remote host. > > lynx: Can't access startfile http://192.168.0.4/ > Dear Gerard looks like there is no server running on port 80, may we have a look into your httpd.conf file? Greetings Oliver Leitner Technical Staff http://www.shells.at -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCv91tWvEVE8MtwbgRAqETAJ9aFtJ8QCJhhrFCgADkaKK8PrAkywCgnprt U1jTSUmErKIfj+JG0MxL7nM= =VhmQ -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re[2]: Still trying to get my site up!
On Sunday, June 26, 2005 11:22:19 PM "Ted Mittelstaedt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: $>>Thanks to several individuals, I have almost gotten my Apache2 server $>>working. Almost, but not quite. $>> $>>My ISP blocks port 80; therefore I am using a redirect from $>>DynDNS.org to $>>redirect to an alias using port 9545. $>> $> $>No, you are not. You cannot redirect to a specific port using $>the DNS system. $> $>Currently dydns.org has beerstud.us pointing to IP address 63.208.196.110 $>If that is your IP address then hosts on the Internet that query $>www.beerstud.us will go to port 80 on that IP address. If that isn't $>your IP number then it must be an IP address of a webhost that will $>issue a HTTP redirect when it gets a query to port 80 on your beerstud.us $>URL. $> $>>The 'beerstud.us' redirects to 'www2.beerstud.us:9545' $>> $>>>From my FreeBSD box, if I type: lynx http://beerstud.us, I see the $>>following message: Using http://www2.beerstud.us:9545/. The $>>connection is $>>made and the index.htm file is displayed. $>> $>>However, I am unable to reach this site from any other computer. $>>Eventually, the request will time out and I receive an error message $>>telling me that the site is not available. $>> $>>I am not sure what I am doing wrong at this point. $> $>You need to contact the support department of your ISP. I don't $>understand why you think that your ISP is just blocking port 80 and $>not any other port. There are firewalls out there nowadays smart $>enough to see an incoming HTTP request and block it no matter what $>port it's coming in on. If your ISP is blocking port 80 that probably $>means you haven't paid for an enhanced account that will allow you $>to run a server. If that is the case and your ISP is making money off $>allowing ports to be open for customers, then I would think that they $>probably have one of those firewalls setup that blocks incoming $>HTTP get requests no matter what port they come in on. $> $>Ted ** Reply Separator ** Monday, June 27, 2005 7:00:20 AM I contacted DynDNS, and they stated that any requests for 'beerstud.us' were being redirected to 'www2.beerstud.us:9545'. However, the good news is that the site has suddenly come online. I have no idea why though. -- Gerard E. Seibert [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
sata raid controllers compatibility
Hi guys! That you can speak about the support of Tekram TR-822 and Adaptec AAR-1210SA SATA adapters into Free5.x? best regards, Zile ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: upgrading all ports
On Saturday 25 June 2005 12:22, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: > I want to do a portupgrade on all installed ports. > > What's the right way? > "portupgrade -arR ?" > or > "portupgrade -a" ? AFAIK there is no difference between the two; "-a" means upgrade all ports in the package database, "-Rr" means add in the dependencies and dependent ports based on what's in the database, but these are already covered by -a. New dependencies are built as a side-effect of building out-of-date ports - not through the -R option. There *is* a difference between -FRa and -Fa because -FR is translated into a "make checksum-recursive". Anyone who believes that portupgrade is slower than removing all port and reinstalling has probably been misled by watching portupgrade -FRa which runs "make checksum-recursive" for each installed port and so visits some ports many time. Portmanager is a good way to bring your ports up-to-date, but it also rebuilds all ports that depend on out-of date ports. It's a very slow process if you have a slow machine and most of your ports were up-to-date already, but try it for yourself. Portupgrade does a pretty good job if you follow UPDATING, and use the gnome script for major Gnome upgrades. If you want to force the rebuilding of all your ports then see pkg_glob(1) and portupgrade (1) for instructions on how to rebuild ports built after a given timestamp, as this gives you a restartable method. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: freebsd as the basis for something better?
On Jun 27, 2005, at 2:40 AM, Kurt Buff wrote: Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Nikolas Britton Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2005 8:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: freebsd as the basis for something better? a project where real unix would meet real life, or where open source would meet open minds -- would have to make unix more human- oriented rather than machine-oriented. and in addition to bringing order to the chaos that was laid as the foundation for all unix variants decades ago, it should also deal with new ways of interacting with unix visually. for instance, in ways more convenient than x, and its conventional graphical user interfaces (though these won't go away any time soon). UNIX is user friendly. It's just selective about who its friends are. New gui tools are needed. lets bring the CLI tools to the GUI, like pipes, redirects, etc. some of apples ideas are nice aka NeXTSTEP. Why are we trying to emulate windows when mircosoft just steals it's idea's from apple? lets cut the middle man out. BeOS was cool too. A! Why are you guys still beating the GUI interface? That is so 70's computing technology. The real next generation OS will be voice command. Until then it's just more Window dressing. It's like the Emperor's new clothes - the little boy said "Computer please get me a drink of water" and the crowd was amazed when the $64,000 OS stacked to the ceiling with GUI just sat there lifeless and dumb. Ted Must seriously disagree. Voice command is of very limited use - it's not private, and difficult to use in crowded surroundings. Further, if you consider the space in the human brain for visual processing vs. aural processing, I think you'll find that visual processing wins. At least for feedback, the human visual system is much better. However, the best interface for human input to machines is, IMHO, still to be determined. I don't claim that the keyboard/mouse interface is best, but it is, again IMHO, superior to voice command. What would be better than keyboard/mouse? I really don't know. One SWAG would be reading brainwaves, or perhap eyeball gestures - but that's just sheer speculation. Bah... The ultimate interface is one where you sit at a table and the whole table surface is a tactile interface to a computer, three dimensionally. File system navigation? The table acts like a 3D version of FSV (ever run that program? It's kind of limited and dated...could use a small overhaul...still a nice one for quickly looking at what is hogging up space in my home directory though at a glance). The table will dance with cubes and pyramids as I just "touch and drag" a cube representing a file I'm copying to another location on the table. Then tap it a couple times to open it...and a "monitor" grows from the table to display the contents. A rubbery keyboard also grows from the tabletop as well. Ow...wrists kind of sore from typing too long...tap a "customize" panel and then draw your finger through the middle of the tactile keyboard, and it splits as if cut by an invisible blade on my finger. Then grasp each half of the keyboard, pull it apart about six inches, and raise the interior pointing side of the keyboard halves about an inch up, angling the keys...instant "ergonomic" keyboard. When I'm done, you just tell the computer to log you out...the table then settles back into a flat matte surface and activates a "table saver" of gradually pulsating multicolor ripples as if looking a velvet pond while playing some light acoustic music, waiting for the next user to log in. That would be an interesting interface... And would we really want eyeball gestures? I mean, it's hard enough to deny what we're looking at on the ads and displays to our significant others without the pointer giving us away. :-) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
VHS to DVD conversion: problem with firewire, nfs, whatever
I'm trying to convert some of my old VHS cassettes to DVDs as those are more practical to hadle, and since the tape is becomming worn. I don't have a video-in intercafe on my wideo card, but I do have a digital MiniDV camcorder with the ability to do analog-digital pass-through by connection the output from my VCR tol A/V and the firewire link to my PC. I then press play on the VCR and use fwcontrol -R on my PC to cature. Peace of cake! However: The fwcontrol utility prints out "n blocks padded" once about every minute, and "fwohci0: IR DMA buffer overrun" gets printed on the console. I guess my computer is not fast enough to receive the data, and that this might have something to do with the fact that I'm saving the fwcontrol output over NFS. Problem is that my laptop don't have the needed 13 GB/hour storage space, and that my only firewire-controller is on that said laptop. However, I have a hard time grasping that this should be a problem. I need about 3.6 MB/s tranfer rate, and when dd-ing from /dev/zero to a file on the NFS-mounted filesystem, I get more than twice of that. Also the fw-bus seems fast enough, because I don't get these buffer overruns when saving to local disk (at least not as often, just once or twice an hour). Can someone please point me to where I could find some info on either tuning NFS or my firewire bus. Could I pipe the output through some kind of buffer on its way to the nfs-mount, that could help a possibly unstable network transfer rate? How would I go about doing this? Any pointers? Svein Halvor ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
[sysutils/dar] compilation error - filesystem.cpp:80:27: linux/ext2_fs.h: No such file or directory
I'm trying to install sysutils/dar, but compilation fails. What's wrong here ? Error log follows: if /bin/sh /usr/local/bin/libtool15 --tag=CXX --mode=compile c++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -DHAVE_DECL_GETOPT=0 -I/usr/local/include -pipe -funroll-loops -O2 -march=pentiumpro -MT filesystem.lo -MD -MP -MF ".deps/filesystem.Tpo" -c -o filesystem.lo filesystem.cpp; then mv -f ".deps/filesystem.Tpo" ".deps/filesystem.Plo"; else rm -f ".deps/filesystem.Tpo"; exit 1; fi c++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -DHAVE_DECL_GETOPT=0 -I/usr/local/include -pipe -funroll-loops -O2 -march=pentiumpro -MT filesystem.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/filesystem.Tpo -c filesystem.cpp -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/filesystem.o filesystem.cpp:80:27: linux/ext2_fs.h: No such file or directory filesystem.cpp: In function `bool libdar::is_nodump_flag_set(libdar::user_interaction&, const libdar::path&, const std::string&)': filesystem.cpp:1554: error: `EXT2_IOC_GETFLAGS' undeclared (first use this function) filesystem.cpp:1554: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in.) filesystem.cpp:1575: error: `EXT2_NODUMP_FL' undeclared (first use this function) *** Error code 1 Stop in /var/usr-ports-work/volumes/smallFiles/usr-ports/sysutils/dar/work/dar-2.2.2/src/libdar. *** Error code 1 After some examination, I found this: filesystem.cpp: #if LIBDAR_NODUMP_FEATURE == linux #include #else #if LIBDAR_NODUMP_FEATURE == ext2fs #include How do I make the test 'LIBDAR_NODUMP_FEATURE == linux' return true ? Where should I change it ? -- There are 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand binary and those who don't ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re[2]: Still trying to get my site up!
On Monday, June 27, 2005 7:05:17 AM Oliver Leitner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: $> $>Gerard Seibert wrote: $>> On Sunday, June 26, 2005 8:47:41 PM "John Brooks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> $>> wrote: $>> $>> $>do you have any kind of firewall? from the outside world port 9545 $>> $>is closed. so either it is being blocked, you are not actually $>> $>listening on it, or there is no port forwarding on your gateway. $>> $> $>> $>run this on the box itself and post the output: $>> $> netstat -na | grep LISTEN $>> $> $>> $>try to connect from another host on your network: $>> $> http://192.168.0.4:9545 $>> $> $>> $>then try: $>> $> http://192.168.0.4:80 $>> $> $>> $>-- $>> $>John Brooks $>> $>[EMAIL PROTECTED] $>> $> $>> $>> -Original Message- $>> $>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] $>> $>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gerard Seibert $>> $>> Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2005 6:07 PM $>> $>> To: freebsd-questions $>> $>> Subject: Still trying to get my site up! $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> Thanks to several individuals, I have almost gotten my Apache2 server $>> $>> working. Almost, but not quite. $>> $>> $>> $>> My ISP blocks port 80; therefore I am using a redirect from DynDNS.org to $>> $>> redirect to an alias using port 9545. $>> $>> $>> $>> The 'beerstud.us' redirects to 'www2.beerstud.us:9545' $>> $>> $>> $>> >From my FreeBSD box, if I type: lynx http://beerstud.us, I see the $>> $>> following message: Using http://www2.beerstud.us:9545/. The connection is $>> $>> made and the index.htm file is displayed. $>> $>> $>> $>> However, I am unable to reach this site from any other computer. $>> $>> Eventually, the request will time out and I receive an error message $>> $>> telling me that the site is not available. $>> $>> $>> $>> I am not sure what I am doing wrong at this point. I have posted the $>> $>> following files if anyone feels ambitious enough to look them over for me. $>> $>> $>> $>> httpd.conf = http://www.seibercom.us/FreeBSD/httpd.conf $>> $>> $>> $>> hosts = http://www.seibercom.us/FreeBSD/hosts $>> $>> $>> $>> This is the output from ifconfig -a $>> $>> net-card.txt= http://www.seibercom.us/FreeBSD/net-card.txt $>> $>> $>> $>> resolv.conf = http://www.seibercom.us/FreeBSD/resolv.conf $>> $>> $>> $>> The 'hosts' file has a pretty good description of my network in it. I $>> $>> double checked my router, and I believe it is configured $>> $>> correctly to pass $>> $>> port 9545 through. $>> $>> $>> $>> -- $>> $>> Thanks! $>> $>> $>> $>> Gerard Seibert $>> $>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] $>> $>> $>> $>> ** Reply Separator ** $>> Monday, June 27, 2005 6:48:35 AM $>> $>> The netstat -na | grep LISTEN command produces this output: $>> $>> tcp40 0 *.139 *.* LISTEN $>> tcp40 0 *.445 *.* LISTEN $>> tcp40 0 *.901 *.* LISTEN $>> tcp46 0 0 *.9545 *.* LISTEN $>> tcp40 0 127.0.0.1.25 *.* LISTEN $>> $>> Both http://192,168.0.4:9545 goes to my site. The http://192.168.0.4:80 $>> produces this error: $>> $>> Looking up 192.168.0.4 $>> Making HTTP connection to 192.168.0.4 $>> Alert!: Unable to connect to remote host. $>> $>> lynx: Can't access startfile http://192.168.0.4/ $>> $> $>Dear Gerard $> $>looks like there is no server running on port 80, may we have a look $>into your httpd.conf file? $> $>Greetings $>Oliver Leitner $>Technical Staff $>http://www.shells.at ** Reply Separator ** Monday, June 27, 2005 9:11:21 AM I have it working now. It just suddenly came online after five days. My new problem is how do I do an FTP into the site. I just tried using WS~Pro from a WixXP machine, but that failed. I guess I will need to read up on how to get that working correctly. Perhaps you might know where I could obtain that information from. -- Gerard E. Seibert [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: 4 GB file limit? (WAS gzip from ports vs gzip from system)
Sean Hafeez wrote: windows limit. 4gb file size limit. Hi Sean, I wish it was as simple as blaming MS for this one, but no - i tested this locally on the w2k box (dd cmd making 5 GB file), and then by actually running the dump | gzip > nfs_share (7 GB .gz) but using nfs v3, mounted by hand instead of via amd. I still dont know whether the problem was v2, which supposedly has a 2 GB limit, or amd, but mounting the share via /etc/fstab with options -3,-d,rw worked just fine. cheers, Beto ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
FreeBSD on IBM blade center
Hi, is FreeBSD 5.x running on IBM blade-center? If so, does anyone have a link about information running FreeBSD on a IBM blade-center? Thanks in advance. asg ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: PartitionMagic question
> > I am installing FreeBSD on a laptop with Windows XP Pro. I created empty > space with PartitionMagic and installed FreeBSD there making the FreeBSD > partition with the FreeBSD partition utility in the install. > > I took the drive geometry from PartitionMagic as the BIOS does not tell > it (ThinkPad X30). The installation went well and both OS boot well. > > When I run PartitionMagic it reported 3 errors - different LBA and CHS > values - the errors are on the first sector of the FreeBSD partitions > and on the first sectors of the next two partitions (seeing from the > LBA). PartitionMagic says in all 3 cases that the LBA and CHS values are > different. In all 3 cases the CHS value is the same - 15483887 (drive > geometry is 5168/240/63). After PartitionMagic repairs the errors > everything is OK. Both OS boot well. > > My questions are - > > a) does somebody know why the errors appear? I don't know why it gets errors. They each seem to see things differently. I have never modified disk geomentry for FreeBSD. I always let it do what it thinks it wants to do and it has always worked out. Of course, most of my systems are SCSI. But, on the two or three IDEs, it has worked out happily and I have used PM to squash the MS slice in each of those cases to make room for FreeBSD. So,...? > b) is the installation safe after the errors are fixed? If both OSen boot and run, disk check/fsck and shutdown happily, it is most likely safe and OK. > > PartitionMagic is listed officially as installation preparation utility > and I assume it should be safe to use it afterwards, apart from touching > the FreeBSD partition. You can use it any time to look at the disk and muck with MS type slices, but it won't know how to treat FreeBSD slices. jerry > > ___ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Newbie question about ports.
On Friday 24 June 2005 19:36, Alex Zbyslaw wrote: > Sam Ip wrote: > >I'm trying out FreeBSD for the first time for use at work. However, > >there is a corporate firewall and hence ftp traffic doesn't get > >through. I can access http sites. So if a selling point of FreeBSD is > >its ports collection > > > >1. Can you do a CVSup to update your ports via http? > > > >2. Can you install ports via http? > > Cvsup does not support http, but neither does it use ftp (see man cvsup, > especially the -p and -P options). It requires that a single port be > openable through your firewall (default 5999). There is an alternative, > which I have never used, called CTM (see handbook). See also sysutils/portsnap which uses http ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
sysinstall, ftp & proxy
I run freebsd 5.4. At office I compile my ports of interest smoothly, like a charme with a mere "make install clean" from behind a proxy which I have once and for all defined in /etc/make.conf as in these 2 lines: FETCH_ENV = HTTP_PROXY=http://userid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:8080 FETCH_ENV = FTP_PROXY=http://userid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:8080 In a nutshell: no problems! INSTEAD ... When I run sysinstall and want to download some sources from ftp.it.freebsd.org, it seems (and it is logical) that the make.conf is of no help. In fact, when I click the media, selecting FTP I'm faced with at least 3 solutions: FTP server FTP passive FTP behind a proxy and none of them seems to ask for something like userid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:8080 but at most proxy.domain:8080. What FTP server should I select and HOW should I set the proxy with userid & passwd up? Ciao Vittorio ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
sound driver - low volume problem
Hi, I have FreeBSD 5.4 installed on a laptop running KDE - I've managed to get the audio working but the volume is very low and I'm not able to increase it at all .I'm using the driver below ( snd_ich ) : [EMAIL PROTECTED] cat /dev/sndstat FreeBSD Audio Driver (newpcm) Installed devices: pcm0: at io 0x1400, 0x1c80 irq 18 bufsz 16384 (1p/1r/4v channels duplex default) pcm0: port 0x1c80-0x1cff,0x1400-0x14ff irq 18 at device 2.7 on pci0 pcm0: Any ideas on what the problem could be and how I can fix it ? Jimmy. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Absence of any PGP utility in 5-x
Hi. Maybe this mailing list is wrong place for my question. Why there is no any PGP Utility in base system in 5 branch? Thanks... /Vitaly ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
portmanager, amavis update problem
There seems to be a dependency loop occuring on our server when trying to do an upgrade; is there a way to force the update and rebuild dependencies? Below is a snippet of output (please let me know if more of the update info is needed...) -Bart * -=>MISSING<=- p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.4[/mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin] may be a dependency of amavisd-new-2.3.1,1 verifying dependency status of p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.4 (may take awhile) by executing command: cd /usr/ports/security/amavisd-new; make all-depends-list * * * * p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.4 is indeed a missing dependency, adding to list of things to be updated * * * * checking for p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.4 dependencies that also may not be installed listing p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.4's known dependencies by executing command: cd /usr/ports/mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin; make all-depends-list * * * * dependency -=>/converters/p5-MIME-Base64 p5-MIME-Base64-3.05 is installed dependency -=>/devel/p5-Storable p5-Storable-2.15 is installed dependency -=>/devel/p5-Time-HiRes p5-Time-HiRes-1.68,1 is installed dependency -=>/dns/p5-Net-DNS p5-Net-DNS-0.51 is installed dependency -=>/mail/p5-Mail-Tools p5-Mail-Tools-1.66 is installed dependency -=>/mail/razor-agents razor-agents-2.72 is installed dependency -=>/net-mgmt/p5-Net-IP p5-Net-IP-1.23 is installed dependency -=>/net/p5-IO-INET6 p5-IO-INET6-2.01 is installed dependency -=>/net/p5-Net p5-Net-1.19,1 is installed dependency -=>/net/p5-Socket6 p5-Socket6-0.18 is installed dependency -=>/net/p5-URI p5-URI-1.35 is installed dependency -=>/security/p5-Authen-SASL p5-Authen-SASL-2.09 is installed dependency -=>/security/p5-Digest p5-Digest-HMAC-1.01 is installed dependency -=>/security/p5-Digest-HMAC p5-Digest-HMAC-1.01 is installed dependency -=>/security/p5-Digest-MD5 p5-Digest-MD5-2.33 is installed dependency -=>/security/p5-Digest-SHA1 p5-Digest-SHA1-2.10 is installed dependency -=>/sysutils/rc_subr rc_subr-1.31 is installed dependency -=>/www/p5-HTML-Parser p5-HTML-Parser-3.45 is installed dependency -=>/www/p5-HTML-Tagset p5-HTML-Tagset-3.04 is installed PMGRrStatus 0.2.9_4 info: looking for old installed ports have:png-1.2.8_2 status: CURRENT: /graphics/png have:libXft-2.1.6_1status: CURRENT: /x11-fonts/libXft have:fontconfig-2.2.3,1status: CURRENT: /x11-fonts/fontconfig have:p5-XML-Parser-2.34_1 status: CURRENT: /textproc/p5-XML-Parser have:XFree86-FontServer-4.5.0 status: CURRENT: /x11-servers/XFree86-4-FontServer have:xterm-202 status: CURRENT: /x11/xterm have:lsof-4.75 status: CURRENT: /sysutils/lsof have:XFree86-clients-4.5.0 status: CURRENT: /x11/XFree86-4-clients have:pico-4.62 status: CURRENT: /editors/pico have:XFree86-documents-4.5.0 status: CURRENT: /x11/XFree86-4-documents have:XFree86-fontEncodings-4.5.0 status: CURRENT: /x11-fonts/XFree86-4-fontEncodings have:XFree86-font100dpi-4.5.0 status: CURRENT: /x11-fonts/XFree86-4-font100dpi have:XFree86-font75dpi-4.5.0 status: CURRENT: /x11-fonts/XFree86-4-font75dpi have:XFree86-fontCyrillic-4.5.0 status: CURRENT: /x11-fonts/XFree86-4-fontCyrillic have:pine-4.63 status: CURRENT: /mail/pine4 have:XFree86-libraries-4.5.0 status: CURRENT: /x11/XFree86-4-libraries have:pkgconfig-0.17.2 status: CURRENT: /devel/pkgconfig have:XFree86-fontDefaultBitmaps-4.5.0 status: CURRENT: /x11-fonts/XFree86-4-fontDefaultBitmaps have:p5-IO-stringy-2.110 status: CURRENT: /devel/p5-IO-stringy have:libxml2-2.6.19status: CURRENT: /textproc/libxml2 have:XFree86-manuals-4.5.0 status: CURRENT: /x11/XFree86-4-manuals have:fvwm-1.24rstatus: CURRENT: /x11-wm/fvwm have:libtool-1.3.5_2 status: CURRENT: /devel/libtool13 have:p5-Test-Harness-2.42_1status: CURRENT: /devel/p5-Test-Harness have:gmake-3.80_2 status: CURRENT: /devel/gmake have:ezm3-1.2 status: CURRENT: /lang/ezm3 have:openssl-0.9.7gstatus: CURRENT: /security/openssl have:screen-4.0.2_1status: CURRENT: /misc/screen have:ruby-1.6.8.2004.07.28_1 status: CURRENT: /lang/ruby16 have:cgilib-0.5status: CURRENT: /devel/cgilib have:libart_lgpl2-2.3.17 status: CURRENT: /graphics/libart_lgpl2 have:p5-Digest-HMAC-1.01 status: CURRENT: /security/p5-Digest-HMAC have:aaccli-1.0status: CURRENT: /sysutils/aaccli have:p5-File-Temp-0.16_2 status: CURRENT: /devel/p5-File-Temp have:p5-Net-IP-1.23status: CURRENT: /net-mgmt/p5-Net-IP have:gettext-0
Re: sound driver - low volume problem
Jimmy Kimanzi skrev: Hi, I have FreeBSD 5.4 installed on a laptop running KDE - I've managed to get the audio working but the volume is very low and I'm not able to increase it at all .I'm using the driver below ( snd_ich ) : [EMAIL PROTECTED] cat /dev/sndstat FreeBSD Audio Driver (newpcm) Installed devices: pcm0: at io 0x1400, 0x1c80 irq 18 bufsz 16384 (1p/1r/4v channels duplex default) pcm0: port 0x1c80-0x1cff,0x1400-0x14ff irq 18 at device 2.7 on pci0 pcm0: Any ideas on what the problem could be and how I can fix it ? Jimmy. Have you tried to raise the volume with the mixer? # mixer Mixer synthis currently set to 75:75 Mixer pcm is currently set to 75:75 Mixer speaker is currently set to 75:75 Mixer line is currently set to 75:75 Mixer mic is currently set to 0:0 Mixer cd is currently set to 75:75 Mixer mix is currently set to 0:0 Mixer igainis currently set to 0:0 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
portmanager, amavis install problem
There seems to be a dependency loop occuring on our server when trying to do an upgrade; is there a way to force the update and rebuild dependencies? Below is a snippet of output (please let me know if more of the update info is needed...) -Bart * -=>MISSING<=- p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.4[/mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin] may be a dependency of amavisd-new-2.3.1,1 verifying dependency status of p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.4 (may take awhile) by executing command: cd /usr/ports/security/amavisd-new; make all-depends-list * * * * p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.4 is indeed a missing dependency, adding to list of things to be updated * * * * checking for p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.4 dependencies that also may not be installed listing p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.4's known dependencies by executing command: cd /usr/ports/mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin; make all-depends-list * * * * dependency -=>/converters/p5-MIME-Base64 p5-MIME-Base64-3.05 is installed dependency -=>/devel/p5-Storable p5-Storable-2.15 is installed dependency -=>/devel/p5-Time-HiRes p5-Time-HiRes-1.68,1 is installed dependency -=>/dns/p5-Net-DNS p5-Net-DNS-0.51 is installed dependency -=>/mail/p5-Mail-Tools p5-Mail-Tools-1.66 is installed dependency -=>/mail/razor-agents razor-agents-2.72 is installed dependency -=>/net-mgmt/p5-Net-IP p5-Net-IP-1.23 is installed dependency -=>/net/p5-IO-INET6 p5-IO-INET6-2.01 is installed dependency -=>/net/p5-Net p5-Net-1.19,1 is installed dependency -=>/net/p5-Socket6 p5-Socket6-0.18 is installed dependency -=>/net/p5-URI p5-URI-1.35 is installed dependency -=>/security/p5-Authen-SASL p5-Authen-SASL-2.09 is installed dependency -=>/security/p5-Digest p5-Digest-HMAC-1.01 is installed dependency -=>/security/p5-Digest-HMAC p5-Digest-HMAC-1.01 is installed dependency -=>/security/p5-Digest-MD5 p5-Digest-MD5-2.33 is installed dependency -=>/security/p5-Digest-SHA1 p5-Digest-SHA1-2.10 is installed dependency -=>/sysutils/rc_subr rc_subr-1.31 is installed dependency -=>/www/p5-HTML-Parser p5-HTML-Parser-3.45 is installed dependency -=>/www/p5-HTML-Tagset p5-HTML-Tagset-3.04 is installed PMGRrStatus 0.2.9_4 info: looking for old installed ports have:png-1.2.8_2 status: CURRENT: /graphics/png have:libXft-2.1.6_1status: CURRENT: /x11-fonts/libXft have:fontconfig-2.2.3,1status: CURRENT: /x11-fonts/fontconfig have:p5-XML-Parser-2.34_1 status: CURRENT: /textproc/p5-XML-Parser have:XFree86-FontServer-4.5.0 status: CURRENT: /x11-servers/XFree86-4-FontServer have:xterm-202 status: CURRENT: /x11/xterm have:lsof-4.75 status: CURRENT: /sysutils/lsof have:XFree86-clients-4.5.0 status: CURRENT: /x11/XFree86-4-clients have:pico-4.62 status: CURRENT: /editors/pico have:XFree86-documents-4.5.0 status: CURRENT: /x11/XFree86-4-documents have:XFree86-fontEncodings-4.5.0 status: CURRENT: /x11-fonts/XFree86-4-fontEncodings have:XFree86-font100dpi-4.5.0 status: CURRENT: /x11-fonts/XFree86-4-font100dpi have:XFree86-font75dpi-4.5.0 status: CURRENT: /x11-fonts/XFree86-4-font75dpi have:XFree86-fontCyrillic-4.5.0 status: CURRENT: /x11-fonts/XFree86-4-fontCyrillic have:pine-4.63 status: CURRENT: /mail/pine4 have:XFree86-libraries-4.5.0 status: CURRENT: /x11/XFree86-4-libraries have:pkgconfig-0.17.2 status: CURRENT: /devel/pkgconfig have:XFree86-fontDefaultBitmaps-4.5.0 status: CURRENT: /x11-fonts/XFree86-4-fontDefaultBitmaps have:p5-IO-stringy-2.110 status: CURRENT: /devel/p5-IO-stringy have:libxml2-2.6.19status: CURRENT: /textproc/libxml2 have:XFree86-manuals-4.5.0 status: CURRENT: /x11/XFree86-4-manuals have:fvwm-1.24rstatus: CURRENT: /x11-wm/fvwm have:libtool-1.3.5_2 status: CURRENT: /devel/libtool13 have:p5-Test-Harness-2.42_1status: CURRENT: /devel/p5-Test-Harness have:gmake-3.80_2 status: CURRENT: /devel/gmake have:ezm3-1.2 status: CURRENT: /lang/ezm3 have:openssl-0.9.7gstatus: CURRENT: /security/openssl have:screen-4.0.2_1status: CURRENT: /misc/screen have:ruby-1.6.8.2004.07.28_1 status: CURRENT: /lang/ruby16 have:cgilib-0.5status: CURRENT: /devel/cgilib have:libart_lgpl2-2.3.17 status: CURRENT: /graphics/libart_lgpl2 have:p5-Digest-HMAC-1.01 status: CURRENT: /security/p5-Digest-HMAC have:aaccli-1.0status: CURRENT: /sysutils/aaccli have:p5-File-Temp-0.16_2 status: CURRENT: /devel/p5-File-Temp have:p5-Net-IP-1.23status: CURRENT: /net-mgmt/p5-Net-IP have:gettext-0
Re: Absence of any PGP utility in 5-x
On Mon, 27 Jun 2005, Vitaly Bogdanov wrote: > Maybe this mailing list is wrong place for my question. > Why there is no any PGP Utility in base system in 5 branch? Because there are very good PGP utilities in the ports :-) http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/security/gnupg http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/security/pgp http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/security/pgp6 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: sound driver - low volume problem
On 6/27/05, Jimmy Kimanzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I have FreeBSD 5.4 installed on a laptop running KDE - I've managed to > get the audio working but the volume is very low and I'm not able to > increase it at all .I'm using the driver below ( snd_ich ) : > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] cat /dev/sndstat > FreeBSD Audio Driver (newpcm) > Installed devices: > pcm0: at io 0x1400, 0x1c80 irq 18 bufsz 16384 (1p/1r/4v > channels duplex default) > > pcm0: port 0x1c80-0x1cff,0x1400-0x14ff irq 18 at device 2.7 > on pci0 > pcm0: > > I've had this same problem when I had a SiS 754 chipset, and it went away when I switched to a nForce motherboard. The problem doesn't exist with an ATI 9100 chipset either. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: portmanager, amavis install problem
On Jun 27, 2005, at 10:32 AM, Bart Silverstrim wrote: There seems to be a dependency loop occuring on our server when trying to do an upgrade; is there a way to force the update and rebuild dependencies? Below is a snippet of output (please let me know if more of the update info is needed...) I tried updating just the p5-spamassassin module and it would halt on trying to rebuild a dependancy; it was suggesting a deinstall/reinstall of the perl module. I did, then it would stop on a different one. After about five manual deinstall/reinstalls of p5 modules, it rebuilt without error, but now in the amavis logs I notice: TROUBLE in check_mail: mime_decode-1 FAILED: Error reading: Resource temporarily unavailable at (eval 57) line 153, line 2. in checking some messages. Any ideas on what to rebuild from this? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Absence of any PGP utility in 5-x
In the last episode (Jun 27), Vitaly Bogdanov said:
> Maybe this mailing list is wrong place for my question. Why there is
> no any PGP Utility in base system in 5 branch?
You have your choice of PGP clients in the ports tree.
/usr/ports/security/{pgp,pgp6,gnupg,gnupg-devel}
--
Dan Nelson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: portmanager, amavis update problem
On 27/06/05, Bart Silverstrim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There seems to be a dependency loop occuring on our server when trying > to do an upgrade; is there a way to force the update and rebuild > dependencies? Below is a snippet of output (please let me know if more > of the update info is needed...) The output seems to suggest that p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.4 isn't installed and as such portmanager wants to install it. Why it is looping the build I don't know. Have you tried manualling installing the amavisd-new port? If there is a problem with the dependencies then manually installing the port should pull in SpamAssassin without any problems and portmanager should no longer need to rebuild it thus allowing it to continue on upgrading anything else. Al -- LJ: http://www.livejournal.com/users/everlone GPG/PGP: http://www.no-dns-yet.org.uk/~everlone/pubkey.gpg ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
IPFILTER Help
I have Posted Earlier that my network was, was having a lot of problems printing to the shared printers. The scenario is this. Dsl Modem/Router --> FREEBSD FIREWALL -- > Switch -- > LAN I have a dhcp server on the FreeBSD Firewall. And it seems that the windows clients are searching for the local share names[ie. printers] through our isp's dns servers. How can i fix this problem? _ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: portmanager, amavis install problem
On Monday 27 June 2005 07:32, Bart Silverstrim wrote: > There seems to be a dependency loop occuring on our server when trying > to do an upgrade; is there a way to force the update and rebuild > dependencies? Below is a snippet of output (please let me know if more > of the update info is needed...) > > -Bart Bart, not sure why SpamAssassin is loop ing in your case but here is what I would try: 1) Manually deinstall/reinstall SpamAssassin Likely it will fail to build for some reason that isn't on your output listed below and that needs to be corrected if it does, if it does build and install manually then likely the problem is now solved. -Mike > * > > -=>MISSING<=- p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.4[/mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin] > may be a dependency of amavisd-new-2.3.1,1 > verifying dependency status of p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.4 (may take > awhile) by executing command: > cd /usr/ports/security/amavisd-new; make all-depends-list >* * * * > p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.4 is indeed a missing dependency, adding to > list of things to be updated >* * * * > checking for p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.4 dependencies that also may not > be installed > listing p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.4's known dependencies by executing > command: > cd /usr/ports/mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin; make all-depends-list >* * * * > dependency -=>/converters/p5-MIME-Base64 > p5-MIME-Base64-3.05 is installed > dependency -=>/devel/p5-Storable > p5-Storable-2.15 is installed > dependency -=>/devel/p5-Time-HiRes > p5-Time-HiRes-1.68,1 is installed > dependency -=>/dns/p5-Net-DNS > p5-Net-DNS-0.51 is installed > dependency -=>/mail/p5-Mail-Tools > p5-Mail-Tools-1.66 is installed > dependency -=>/mail/razor-agents > razor-agents-2.72 is installed > dependency -=>/net-mgmt/p5-Net-IP > p5-Net-IP-1.23 is installed > dependency -=>/net/p5-IO-INET6 > p5-IO-INET6-2.01 is installed > dependency -=>/net/p5-Net > p5-Net-1.19,1 is installed > dependency -=>/net/p5-Socket6 > p5-Socket6-0.18 is installed > dependency -=>/net/p5-URI > p5-URI-1.35 is installed > dependency -=>/security/p5-Authen-SASL > p5-Authen-SASL-2.09 is installed > dependency -=>/security/p5-Digest > p5-Digest-HMAC-1.01 is installed > dependency -=>/security/p5-Digest-HMAC > p5-Digest-HMAC-1.01 is installed > dependency -=>/security/p5-Digest-MD5 > p5-Digest-MD5-2.33 is installed > dependency -=>/security/p5-Digest-SHA1 > p5-Digest-SHA1-2.10 is installed > dependency -=>/sysutils/rc_subr > rc_subr-1.31 is installed > dependency -=>/www/p5-HTML-Parser > p5-HTML-Parser-3.45 is installed > dependency -=>/www/p5-HTML-Tagset > p5-HTML-Tagset-3.04 is installed > > > PMGRrStatus 0.2.9_4 info: looking for old installed ports > > have:png-1.2.8_2 status: CURRENT: /graphics/png > have:libXft-2.1.6_1status: CURRENT: /x11-fonts/libXft > have:fontconfig-2.2.3,1status: CURRENT: /x11-fonts/fontconfig > have:p5-XML-Parser-2.34_1 status: CURRENT: /textproc/p5-XML-Parser > have:XFree86-FontServer-4.5.0 status: CURRENT: > /x11-servers/XFree86-4-FontServer > have:xterm-202 status: CURRENT: /x11/xterm > have:lsof-4.75 status: CURRENT: /sysutils/lsof > have:XFree86-clients-4.5.0 status: CURRENT: /x11/XFree86-4-clients > have:pico-4.62 status: CURRENT: /editors/pico > have:XFree86-documents-4.5.0 status: CURRENT: /x11/XFree86-4-documents > have:XFree86-fontEncodings-4.5.0 status: CURRENT: > /x11-fonts/XFree86-4-fontEncodings > have:XFree86-font100dpi-4.5.0 status: CURRENT: > /x11-fonts/XFree86-4-font100dpi > have:XFree86-font75dpi-4.5.0 status: CURRENT: > /x11-fonts/XFree86-4-font75dpi > have:XFree86-fontCyrillic-4.5.0 status: CURRENT: > /x11-fonts/XFree86-4-fontCyrillic > have:pine-4.63 status: CURRENT: /mail/pine4 > have:XFree86-libraries-4.5.0 status: CURRENT: /x11/XFree86-4-libraries > have:pkgconfig-0.17.2 status: CURRENT: /devel/pkgconfig > have:XFree86-fontDefaultBitmaps-4.5.0 status: CURRENT: > /x11-fonts/XFree86-4-fontDefaultBitmaps > have:p5-IO-stringy-2.110 status: CURRENT: /devel/p5-IO-stringy > have:libxml2-2.6.19status: CURRENT: /textproc/libxml2 > have:XFree86-manuals-4.5.0 status: CURRENT: /x11/XFree86-4-manuals > have:fvwm-1.24rstatus: CURRENT: /x11-wm/fvwm > have:libtool-1.3.5_2 status: CURRENT: /devel/libtool13 > have:p5-Test-Harness-2.42_1status: CURRENT: /devel/p5-Test-Harness > have:gmake-3.80_2 status: CURRENT: /devel/gmake > have:ezm3-1.2 status: CURRENT: /lang/ezm3 > have:open
Re: portmanager, amavis update problem
On Jun 27, 2005, at 11:02 AM, Alistair Sutton wrote: On 27/06/05, Bart Silverstrim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: There seems to be a dependency loop occuring on our server when trying to do an upgrade; is there a way to force the update and rebuild dependencies? Below is a snippet of output (please let me know if more of the update info is needed...) The output seems to suggest that p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.4 isn't installed and as such portmanager wants to install it. Why it is looping the build I don't know. Have you tried manualling installing the amavisd-new port? If there is a problem with the dependencies then manually installing the port should pull in SpamAssassin without any problems and portmanager should no longer need to rebuild it thus allowing it to continue on upgrading anything else. right now it looks like after manually deinstalling/reinstalling a couple of the perl modules Amavis depends on (well, spamassassin) it builds, but there's a problem with a MIME module or something depending thereof :-/ I get mime_decode-1 FAILED errors in the amavis logs. Is there a way to rebuild amavis and all the perl modules it uses easily? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: IPFILTER Help
On Mon, 27 Jun 2005, Stephan Weaver wrote: > I have Posted Earlier that my network was, was having a lot of problems > printing to the shared printers. > > The scenario is this. > > Dsl Modem/Router --> FREEBSD FIREWALL -- > Switch -- > LAN > > I have a dhcp server on the FreeBSD Firewall. > > And it seems that the windows clients are searching for the local share > names[ie. printers] > through our isp's dns servers. > > How can i fix this problem? One way to resolve this would be to block all SMB/CIFS related traffic from reaching *out* of your FreeBSD gateway. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: portmanager, amavis install problem
On Jun 27, 2005, at 11:01 AM, Michael C. Shultz wrote: On Monday 27 June 2005 07:32, Bart Silverstrim wrote: There seems to be a dependency loop occuring on our server when trying to do an upgrade; is there a way to force the update and rebuild dependencies? Below is a snippet of output (please let me know if more of the update info is needed...) -Bart Bart, not sure why SpamAssassin is loop ing in your case but here is what I would try: Would that rebuild the dependencies? I should also point out that I'm not sure it was a portmanger problem, it just appeared while portmanager was doing the upgrade. I also should note that I think Perl updated; I couldn't do the first manual make deinstall && make reinstall of a perl module needed to do the update until I re-ran use.perl port. I then had to manually make deinstall && make reinstall several p5 modules needed by the spamassassin system. I'm wondering if "recompiling" the p5 modules spamassassin uses would fix the problem, but don't know the command off the top of my head to do so, and trying a portupgrade -Rr amavisd-new does nothing. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: portmanager, amavis update problem
On 27/06/05, Bart Silverstrim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jun 27, 2005, at 11:02 AM, Alistair Sutton wrote: > > > Have you tried manualling installing the amavisd-new port? If there is > > a problem with the dependencies then manually installing the port > > should pull in SpamAssassin without any problems and portmanager > > should no longer need to rebuild it thus allowing it to continue on > > upgrading anything else. > > right now it looks like after manually deinstalling/reinstalling a > couple of the perl modules Amavis depends on (well, spamassassin) it > builds, but there's a problem with a MIME module or something depending > thereof :-/ > > I get mime_decode-1 FAILED errors in the amavis logs. I'm guessing that may have something to do with one of the perl mime modules but I've no idea which one (helpful aren't I? ;-) > Is there a way to rebuild amavis and all the perl modules it uses > easily? Apologies for asking this but have you read /usr/ports/UPDATING specifically wrt the recent perl upgrade? Could be worth running the perl upgrade script mentioned there. I know that portmanager should handle the upgrade without any issues but I've not managed to have enough time to let my system work through all the perl-dependent ports yet. You could use 'portupgrade -fR amavis' to rebuild all the ports that amavis depends upon as well as amavis itself. That should work things out in the right order and rebuild everything so that all dependecies are sorted. Al -- LJ: http://www.livejournal.com/users/everlone GPG/PGP: http://www.no-dns-yet.org.uk/~everlone/pubkey.gpg ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
IPF Logging packets Every 2-10 Seconds.
Hello list, My IPF Firewall System is logging packets almost every 2 - 10 seconds. I would like to narrow this problem down. firewall# cat /etc/ipf.rules block in all block out all pass in quick on lo0 all pass out quick on lo0 all pass out quick on vr0 from any to any keep state pass in quick on vr1 all pass out quick on vr1 all # Block all inbound traffic from non-routable or reserved address spaces block in log quick on vr0 from 192.168.0.0/16 to any #RFC 1918 private IP block in log quick on vr0 from 172.16.0.0/12 to any#RFC 1918 private IP block in log quick on vr0 from 10.0.0.0/8 to any #RFC 1918 private IP block in log quick on vr0 from 127.0.0.0/8 to any #loopback block in log quick on vr0 from 0.0.0.0/8 to any#loopback block in log quick on vr0 from 169.254.0.0/16 to any #DHCP auto-config block in log quick on vr0 from 192.0.2.0/24 to any #reserved for doc's block in log quick on vr0 from 204.152.64.0/23 to any #Sun cluster interconnect block in log quick on vr0 from 224.0.0.0/3 to any #Class D & E multicast # Block frags block in quick on vr0 all with frags # Block short tcp packets block in quick on vr0 proto tcp all with short # Block source routed packets block in quick on vr0 all with opt lsrr block in quick on vr0 all with opt ssrr # Block nmap OS fingerprint attempts # Log first occurrence of these so I can get their IP address block in log first quick on vr0 proto tcp all flags FUP block in log first quick on vr0 proto tcp all flags SF/SFRA block in log first quick on vr0 proto tcp all flags /SFRA block in log first quick on vr0 proto tcp all flags F/SFRA block in log first quick on vr0 proto tcp all flags U/SFRAU block in log first quick on vr0 proto tcp all flags P # Block anything with special options block in quick on vr0 all with ipopts # Block public pings block in log quick on vr0 proto icmp all icmp-type 8 # TSTT NameServers pass in quick on vr0 proto tcp/udp from 196.3.132.1 to any keep state pass in quick on vr0 proto tcp/udp from 196.3.132.4 to any keep state # Block and log only first occurrence of all remaining traffic # coming into the firewall. The logging of only the first # occurrence stops a .denial of service. attack targeted # at filling up your log file space. # This rule enforces the block all by default logic. block in log first quick on vr0 all firewall# tail -f /var/log/ipfilter.log 27/06/2005 11:13:48.699874 vr0 @0:27 b 138.217.177.128,2840 -> 192.168.1.1,16478 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN 27/06/2005 11:13:54.736606 vr0 @0:27 b 138.217.177.128,2840 -> 192.168.1.1,16478 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN 27/06/2005 11:14:03.585530 vr0 @0:27 b 67.33.99.114,50895 -> 192.168.1.1,16478 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN 27/06/2005 11:14:06.598363 vr0 @0:27 b 67.33.99.114,50895 -> 192.168.1.1,16478 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN 27/06/2005 11:14:09.699265 vr0 @0:27 b 200.108.28.115,3053 -> 192.168.1.1,445 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN 27/06/2005 11:14:12.515511 vr0 @0:27 b 67.33.99.114,50895 -> 192.168.1.1,16478 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN 27/06/2005 11:14:12.670997 vr0 @0:27 b 200.108.28.115,3053 -> 192.168.1.1,445 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN 27/06/2005 11:14:14.470027 vr0 @0:27 b 218.212.63.91,1425 -> 192.168.1.1,16478 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN 27/06/2005 11:14:17.432263 vr0 @0:27 b 218.212.63.91,1425 -> 192.168.1.1,16478 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN 27/06/2005 11:14:23.439618 vr0 @0:27 b 218.212.63.91,1425 -> 192.168.1.1,16478 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN 27/06/2005 11:14:29.633637 vr0 @0:27 b 70.186.121.59,4675 -> 192.168.1.1,16478 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN 27/06/2005 11:14:30.068091 vr0 @0:27 b 138.217.177.128,2905 -> 192.168.1.1,16478 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN 27/06/2005 11:14:32.592810 vr0 @0:27 b 70.186.121.59,4675 -> 192.168.1.1,16478 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN 27/06/2005 11:14:32.954266 vr0 @0:27 b 138.217.177.128,2905 -> 192.168.1.1,16478 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN 27/06/2005 11:14:38.859627 vr0 @0:27 b 70.186.121.59,4675 -> 192.168.1.1,16478 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN 27/06/2005 11:14:38.993186 vr0 @0:27 b 138.217.177.128,2905 -> 192.168.1.1,16478 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN 27/06/2005 11:15:03.372975 vr0 @0:27 b 138.217.177.128,2957 -> 192.168.1.1,16478 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN 27/06/2005 11:15:06.350342 vr0 @0:27 b 138.217.177.128,2957 -> 192.168.1.1,16478 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN 27/06/2005 11:15:12.289440 vr0 @0:27 b 138.217.177.128,2957 -> 192.168.1.1,16478 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN 27/06/2005 11:15:14.453865 vr0 @0:27 b 138.217.177.128,2971 -> 192.168.1.1,16478 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN 27/06/2005 11:15:17.418664 vr0 @0:27 b 138.217.177.128,2971 -> 192.168.1.1,16478 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN 27/06/2005 11:15:23.462695 vr0 @0:27 b 138.217.177.128,2971 -> 192.168.1.1,16478 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN 27/06/2005 11:15:53.929698 vr0 @0:27 b 81.18.10.245,3183 -> 192.168.1.1,16478 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN 27/06/2005 11:15:54.745636 vr0 @0:27 b 70.176.85.4,2263 -> 192.168.1.1,16478 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN 27/06/2005 11:15:55.988928 vr0 @0:27 b 81.18.10.245,3183 -> 192.168.1.1,16478 PR tcp l
Re: portmanager, amavis update problem
On Jun 27, 2005, at 11:14 AM, Alistair Sutton wrote: On 27/06/05, Bart Silverstrim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Jun 27, 2005, at 11:02 AM, Alistair Sutton wrote: Have you tried manualling installing the amavisd-new port? If there is a problem with the dependencies then manually installing the port should pull in SpamAssassin without any problems and portmanager should no longer need to rebuild it thus allowing it to continue on upgrading anything else. right now it looks like after manually deinstalling/reinstalling a couple of the perl modules Amavis depends on (well, spamassassin) it builds, but there's a problem with a MIME module or something depending thereof :-/ I get mime_decode-1 FAILED errors in the amavis logs. I'm guessing that may have something to do with one of the perl mime modules but I've no idea which one (helpful aren't I? ;-) Well, it helps to know that someone is guessing what I'm guessing :-) Is there a way to rebuild amavis and all the perl modules it uses easily? Apologies for asking this but have you read /usr/ports/UPDATING specifically wrt the recent perl upgrade? Could be worth running the perl upgrade script mentioned there. I saw it (too late, but I did see it and run the script). Output: /usr/local/bin/perl-after-upgrade amavisd-new-2.3.1,1: 0 moved, 0 modified, 0 adjusted p5-Archive-Tar-1.23_1: 0 moved, 0 modified, 0 adjusted p5-Archive-Zip-1.14_1: 0 moved, 0 modified, 0 adjusted p5-BerkeleyDB-0.26: 0 moved, 0 modified, 0 adjusted p5-Compress-Zlib-1.34: 0 moved, 0 modified, 0 adjusted p5-Convert-BinHex-1.119: 0 moved, 0 modified, 0 adjusted p5-Convert-TNEF-0.17: 0 moved, 0 modified, 0 adjusted p5-Convert-UUlib-1.05.1,1: 0 moved, 0 modified, 0 adjusted p5-Digest-HMAC-1.01: 0 moved, 0 modified, 0 adjusted p5-Digest-SHA1-2.10: 0 moved, 0 modified, 0 adjusted p5-File-Temp-0.16_2: 0 moved, 0 modified, 0 adjusted p5-HTML-Parser-3.45: 0 moved, 0 modified, 0 adjusted p5-HTML-Tagset-3.04: 0 moved, 0 modified, 0 adjusted p5-IO-String-1.06: 0 moved, 0 modified, 0 adjusted p5-IO-stringy-2.110: 0 moved, 0 modified, 0 adjusted p5-IO-Zlib-1.04_1: 0 moved, 0 modified, 0 adjusted p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.4: 0 moved, 0 modified, 0 adjusted p5-Mail-Tools-1.66: 0 moved, 0 modified, 0 adjusted p5-MIME-Base64-3.05: 0 moved, 0 modified, 0 adjusted p5-MIME-Tools-5.417,2: 0 moved, 0 modified, 0 adjusted p5-Net-DNS-0.51: 0 moved, 0 modified, 0 adjusted p5-Net-Server-0.87_1: 0 moved, 0 modified, 0 adjusted p5-PathTools-3.09: 0 moved, 0 modified, 0 adjusted p5-Scalar-List-Utils-1.14,1: 0 moved, 0 modified, 0 adjusted p5-Test-Harness-2.42_1: 0 moved, 0 modified, 0 adjusted p5-Test-Simple-0.60: 0 moved, 0 modified, 0 adjusted p5-Unix-Syslog-0.100: 0 moved, 0 modified, 0 adjusted \ --- Fixed 0 packages (0 files moved, 0 files modified) Skipped 134 packages I know that portmanager should handle the upgrade without any issues but I've not managed to have enough time to let my system work through all the perl-dependent ports yet. You could use 'portupgrade -fR amavis' to rebuild all the ports that amavis depends upon as well as amavis itself. That should work things out in the right order and rebuild everything so that all dependecies are sorted. I'll try that one...but I should probably run portupgrade -fR amavisd-new, no? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
buildworld problem
hi. i have a problem, that I think is probably just a mistake in the way I do things... am trying to buildworld on a 5.2.1-release (have done build world several times with success on 4.x) the system is a fresh install. i go to single user, and I get rm: ipf: is a directory as an error. ...this is happening in the "make cleandir" part already... but it doesn't happen when in multiuser mode... actually in multiuser mode "make clean" and "make cleandir" work well... if I bypass this by "DNOCLEAN" i get to the next error (in single and multiuser mode): ... "===> rescue/rescue make: don't know how to make build-tools. Stop *** Error code 2 " what am I doing wrong? I did cvsup on the src, docs, ports for the i386 last 4days, always the same... it's a celeron 400MHz, 768MB RAM etc... nothing unusual, and it's obviusly not a hardware problem :) please CC me on answers, as I am not subscribed to this list... tks, ANdrei --- The problem with our world is stupidity. I'm not saying there should be a capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
wireless config in dhclient.conf (CURRENT)
Hi,
I have a problem configuring dhclient for my wireless interface, ath, on
-CURRENT. I updated my system recently and are now using the port of
dhclient from OpenBSD.
I have a Comtrend DSL/AP on channel 11 with ssid ISPY, my wired server
(FBSD 5.4) is running isc-dhcpd v. 3. My neighbour has a 3Com DSL/AP on
channel 6 with default configuration, running a dhcp server. On my
laptop I have a 3Com PCMCIA card, ath0.
According to the documentation I can find on the web, I should include
an entry in /etc/dhclient.conf like:
interface "ath0" {
media "ssid ISPY mode 11g";
}
but doing so dhclient fails to get a lease on boot. Instead it enters
into an "infinite" loop (long, I eventually pressed CRTL-C), changing
link state to up, sending one dhcp request, and changing linkstate to
down. This does not change if I include a "channel 11" in the media line.
Since configuration failed the interface is not configured and dhclient
is not running. If I log in and run dhclient it fails as above - no
surprise.
If I manually set ssid and mode, then I can run dhclient at it
associates and gets a lease as it should.
If I leave no configuration, it sometimes picks up my neighbours AP and
get a lease from that - his signal is at times stronger than my own
(probably Comtrend crap against 3Com).
How do I correctly configure dhclient for my wireless nic so it
associates with my network?
Thanks, Erik
--
Ph: +34.666334818 web: http://www.locolomo.org
S/MIME Certificate: http://www.locolomo.org/crt/2004071206.crt
Subject ID: A9:76:7A:ED:06:95:2B:8D:48:97:CE:F2:3F:42:C8:F2:22:DE:4C:B9
Fingerprint: 4A:E8:63:38:46:F6:9A:5D:B4:DC:29:41:3F:62:D3:0A:73:25:67:C2
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: portmanager, amavis update problem
On 27/06/05, Bart Silverstrim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jun 27, 2005, at 11:14 AM, Alistair Sutton wrote: > > >> I get mime_decode-1 FAILED errors in the amavis logs. > > > > I'm guessing that may have something to do with one of the perl mime > > modules but I've no idea which one (helpful aren't I? ;-) > > Well, it helps to know that someone is guessing what I'm guessing :-) At least you don't have go mad on your own ;-) > > I know that portmanager should handle the upgrade without any issues > > but I've not managed to have enough time to let my system work through > > all the perl-dependent ports yet. > > > > You could use 'portupgrade -fR amavis' to rebuild all the ports that > > amavis depends upon as well as amavis itself. That should work things > > out in the right order and rebuild everything so that all dependecies > > are sorted. > > I'll try that one...but I should probably run portupgrade -fR > amavisd-new, no? Good point ;-) Al -- LJ: http://www.livejournal.com/users/everlone GPG/PGP: http://www.no-dns-yet.org.uk/~everlone/pubkey.gpg ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: buildworld problem
On Mon, 27 Jun 2005, ANdrei wrote: > i have a problem, that I think is probably just a mistake in the way I do > things... am trying to buildworld on a 5.2.1-release (have done build > world several times with success on 4.x) the system is a fresh > install. i go to single user, and I get > > rm: ipf: is a directory > > as an error. > ...this is happening in the "make cleandir" part already... but it doesn't > happen when in multiuser mode... actually in multiuser mode "make clean" and > "make cleandir" work well... Remove the contents of your /usr/obj tree and build again. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Re[2]: Still trying to get my site up!
--On June 27, 2005 6:59:00 AM -0400 Gerard Seibert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ** Reply Separator ** Monday, June 27, 2005 6:48:35 AM The netstat -na | grep LISTEN command produces this output: tcp40 0 *.139 *.* LISTEN tcp40 0 *.445 *.* LISTEN tcp40 0 *.901 *.* LISTEN tcp46 0 0 *.9545 *.* LISTEN tcp40 0 127.0.0.1.25 *.* LISTEN Both http://192,168.0.4:9545 goes to my site. The http://192.168.0.4:80 produces this error: Looking up 192.168.0.4 Making HTTP connection to 192.168.0.4 Alert!: Unable to connect to remote host. lynx: Can't access startfile http://192.168.0.4/ You *do* understand that 192.168.x.x is an RFC 1918 address and is not routeable on the Internet, don't you? Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Adjunct Information Security Officer University of Texas at Dallas AVIEN Founding Member http://www.utdallas.edu/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: upgrading all ports
Is there a way to do all of this with packages, I've used ports system exclusively? The reason I ask is... well I don't like waiting 2 to 3 days for everything to rebuild and I take the defaults for most programs anyways. if I could do that and then just rebuild the apps I want with custom flags that would be cool... pkg_version -v says I have 176 out of date ports. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Share Printers, Printing Long.
In Response To Your Last Email.
What Do you suggest i do?
On 6/22/05, Rick Preston wrote:
On 6/22/05, Stephan Weaver wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have suscessfully installed my DSL MODEM Behind my FREEBSD Firewall.
> Ever Since i have done this, i noticed that my windows users, when
trying to
> print to shared printers, it takes very long for them to access the
> printers.
> I have an empty ipf.rules
> and my ip nat rules looks like
> map vr0 192.168.0.0/24 -> 0.0.0.0/32 proxy port ftp ftp/tcp
> map vr0 192.168.0.0/24 -> 0.0.0.0/32 portmap tcp/udp 4:6
> map vr0 192.168.0.0/24 -> 0.0.0.0/32
>
>
> my dhcp.conf looks like
> >cat /usr/local/etc/dhcpd.conf
> option domain-name "pizzaboys.org";
> option domain-name-servers 192.3.132.1, 196.3.132.4;
>
> default-lease-time 86400;
> max-lease-time 86400;
>
> authoritative;
>
> ddns-update-style none;
>
> log-facility local1;
>
> subnet 192.168.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
> range 192.168.0.100 192.168.0.200;
> option routers 192.168.0.2;
> }
>
>
> Any Assistance Please
Are the shared printers in the 192.168.0/24 subnet? Are they
connected to workstation that get their IP through DHCP? What are you
using for workstation name resolution? What are you using for a port
type on the windows machines, \\workstation\printer?
is it DSL<-->firewall<--> workstations&printers?
Looks to me like it is a name resolution thing. Your DNS servers are
outside your subnet and probably doesn't know what is in your network.
Yes, I would agree, if you are printing to shares, \\workstation\printer.
You may need to run a WINS server. or create an lmhosts file on each box.
Answer these questions and I can probably give you some ideas.
Cheers,
Rick
_
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: portmanager, amavis install problem
On Monday 27 June 2005 08:12, you wrote: > On Jun 27, 2005, at 11:01 AM, Michael C. Shultz wrote: > > On Monday 27 June 2005 07:32, Bart Silverstrim wrote: > >> There seems to be a dependency loop occuring on our server when trying > >> to do an upgrade; is there a way to force the update and rebuild > >> dependencies? Below is a snippet of output (please let me know if > >> more > >> of the update info is needed...) > >> > >> -Bart > > > > Bart, not sure why SpamAssassin is loop ing in your case but here is > > what I > > would try: > > > > Would that rebuild the dependencies? No > > I should also point out that I'm not sure it was a portmanger problem, > it just appeared while portmanager was doing the upgrade. > > I also should note that I think Perl updated; I couldn't do the first > manual make deinstall && make reinstall of a perl module needed to do > the update until I re-ran use.perl port. I then had to manually make > deinstall && make reinstall several p5 modules needed by the > spamassassin system. > > I'm wondering if "recompiling" the p5 modules spamassassin uses would > fix the problem, but don't know the command off the top of my head to > do so, and trying a portupgrade -Rr amavisd-new does nothing. You could try pkg_deleting p5* then rerunning portmanager. That would go after just the p5* ports that are dependencies. If that doesn't work then you'll have to track down the actual problem. The error you posted in one of your messages "I get mime_decode-1 FAILED errors in the amavis logs" is the place to start, that error means nothing to me but maybe you could forward it to the spamassasin author/maintainer? -Mike ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: portmanager, amavis update problem
On Jun 27, 2005, at 11:26 AM, Alistair Sutton wrote: On 27/06/05, Bart Silverstrim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Jun 27, 2005, at 11:14 AM, Alistair Sutton wrote: I get mime_decode-1 FAILED errors in the amavis logs. I'm guessing that may have something to do with one of the perl mime modules but I've no idea which one (helpful aren't I? ;-) Well, it helps to know that someone is guessing what I'm guessing :-) At least you don't have go mad on your own ;-) I know that portmanager should handle the upgrade without any issues but I've not managed to have enough time to let my system work through all the perl-dependent ports yet. You could use 'portupgrade -fR amavis' to rebuild all the ports that amavis depends upon as well as amavis itself. That should work things out in the right order and rebuild everything so that all dependecies are sorted. I'll try that one...but I should probably run portupgrade -fR amavisd-new, no? Good point ;-) Tried, it failed part-way through. It acted like Perl was switched back to "system" and was the wrong version. Re-ran the use.perl port, and then had to manually re-run make deinstall && make reinstall on half a dozen perl modules, then it acted like it was going to work but then as soon as I brought the mail system up, it started spewing: TROUBLE in check_mail: mime_decode-1 FAILED: Error reading: Resource temporarily unavailable at (eval 57) line 153, line 2. and TROUBLE in check_mail: virus_scan FAILED: virus_scan: ALL VIRUS SCANNERS FAILED: Clam Antivirus-clamd av-scanner FAILED: Too many retries to talk to /var/run/clamav/clamd (Error reading from /var/run/clamav/clamd: Resource temporarily unavailable at (eval 53) line 253, line 1.) at (eval 53) line 264, line 1.; Clam Antivirus - clamscan av-scanner FAILED: Error reading: Resource temporarily unavailable at (eval 53) line 389, line 1. I checked /var/run, and clamav had permissions of 777, and the clamd file is there with full access available. maybe there's something with the error checks that was altered in Amavis that I'm missing?? And this time around, the antivirus check error is new...amavis, when starting, says: Jun 27 11:49:06 myserver /usr/local/sbin/amavisd[39698]: starting. /usr/local/sbin/amavisd at myserver amavisd-new-2.3.1 (20050509), Unicode aware Jun 27 11:49:06 myserver /usr/local/sbin/amavisd[39698]: Perl version 5.008007 Jun 27 11:49:06 myserver /usr/local/sbin/amavisd[39699]: Module Amavis::Conf2.038 Jun 27 11:49:06 myserver /usr/local/sbin/amavisd[39699]: Module Archive::Tar1.23 Jun 27 11:49:06 myserver /usr/local/sbin/amavisd[39699]: Module Archive::Zip1.14 Jun 27 11:49:06 myserver /usr/local/sbin/amavisd[39699]: Module Compress::Zlib 1.34 Jun 27 11:49:06 myserver /usr/local/sbin/amavisd[39699]: Module Convert::TNEF 0.17 Jun 27 11:49:06 myserver /usr/local/sbin/amavisd[39699]: Module Convert::UUlib 1.051 Jun 27 11:49:06 myserver /usr/local/sbin/amavisd[39699]: Module DB_File 1.811 Jun 27 11:49:06 myserver /usr/local/sbin/amavisd[39699]: Module MIME::Entity5.417 Jun 27 11:49:06 myserver /usr/local/sbin/amavisd[39699]: Module MIME::Parser5.417 Jun 27 11:49:06 myserver /usr/local/sbin/amavisd[39699]: Module MIME::Tools 5.417 Jun 27 11:49:06 myserver /usr/local/sbin/amavisd[39699]: Module Mail::Header1.66 Jun 27 11:49:06 myserver /usr/local/sbin/amavisd[39699]: Module Mail::Internet 1.66 Jun 27 11:49:06 myserver /usr/local/sbin/amavisd[39699]: Module Mail::SpamAssassin 3.04 Jun 27 11:49:06 myserver /usr/local/sbin/amavisd[39699]: Module Net::Cmd2.26 Jun 27 11:49:06 myserver /usr/local/sbin/amavisd[39699]: Module Net::DNS0.51 Jun 27 11:49:06 myserver /usr/local/sbin/amavisd[39699]: Module Net::SMTP 2.29 Jun 27 11:49:06 myserver /usr/local/sbin/amavisd[39699]: Module Net::Server 0.87 Jun 27 11:49:06 myserver /usr/local/sbin/amavisd[39699]: Module Time::HiRes 1.66 Jun 27 11:49:06 myserver /usr/local/sbin/amavisd[39699]: Module Unix::Syslog0.100 Jun 27 11:49:06 myserver /usr/local/sbin/amavisd[39699]: Amavis::DB codeNOT loaded Jun 27 11:49:06 myserver /usr/local/sbin/amavisd[39699]: Amavis::Cache code NOT loaded Jun 27 11:49:06 myserver /usr/local/sbin/amavisd[39699]: SQL base code NOT loaded Jun 27 11:49:06 myserver /usr/local/sbin/amavisd[39699]: SQL::Log code NOT loaded Jun 27 11:49:06 myserver /usr/local/sbin/amavisd[39699]: SQL::QuarantineNOT loaded Jun 27 11:49:06 myserver /usr/local/sbin/amavisd[39699]: Lookup::SQL code NOT loaded Jun 27 11:49:06 myserver /usr/local/sbin/amavisd[39699]: Lookup::LDAP code NOT loaded Jun 27 11:49:06 myserver /usr/local/sbin/amavisd[39699]: AM.PDP prot code loaded Jun 27 11:49:06 myserver /usr/local/sbin/amavisd[39699]: SMTP-in prot code loaded Jun 27 11:49:06 myserver /usr/local/sbin/amavisd[39
Re: IPFILTER Help
One way to resolve this would be to block all SMB/CIFS related traffic from reaching *out* of your FreeBSD gateway. Hi, One thing to remember which may not be obvious at first - if you simply drop the packet, the client will wait till it times out, giving you that impression of just hanging/waiting. If instead, you reject the packet with the proper icmp code, the client will fail right away. For traffic from your LAN, you may want to reject rather than drop. For traffic from WAN, you probably want to drop (why give yourself away). check the excellent ipf howto for details. http://www.obfuscation.org/ipf/ipf-howto.pdf http://www.nwo.net/ipf/ipf-howto.html (html format of the pdf) Cheers, Beto ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: upgrading all ports
On Monday 27 June 2005 16:39, Nikolas Britton wrote: > Is there a way to do all of this with packages, I've used ports system > exclusively? The reason I ask is... well I don't like waiting 2 to 3 > days for everything to rebuild and I take the defaults for most > programs anyways. if I could do that and then just rebuild the apps I > want with custom flags that would be cool... pkg_version -v says I > have 176 out of date ports. You can do it to a limited extent using portupgrade with the -P and -PP options, or the settings in pkgtools.conf. The trouble is finding a suitable source of packages, I've upgraded KDE this way using the fruitsalad servers at freebsd.kde.org, but the ordinary FreeBSD servers don't keep packages up-to-date for releases. It might work for 5-stable. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: portmanager, amavis update problem
On Jun 27, 2005, at 11:26 AM, Alistair Sutton wrote: On Jun 27, 2005, at 11:26 AM, Alistair Sutton wrote: On 27/06/05, Bart Silverstrim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Jun 27, 2005, at 11:14 AM, Alistair Sutton wrote: I get mime_decode-1 FAILED errors in the amavis logs. I'm guessing that may have something to do with one of the perl mime modules but I've no idea which one (helpful aren't I? ;-) Well, it helps to know that someone is guessing what I'm guessing :-) At least you don't have go mad on your own ;-) I know that portmanager should handle the upgrade without any issues but I've not managed to have enough time to let my system work through all the perl-dependent ports yet. You could use 'portupgrade -fR amavis' to rebuild all the ports that amavis depends upon as well as amavis itself. That should work things out in the right order and rebuild everything so that all dependecies are sorted. I'll try that one...but I should probably run portupgrade -fR amavisd-new, no? Good point ;-) Tried, it failed part-way through. It acted like Perl was switched back to "system" and was the wrong version. Re-ran the use.perl port, and then had to manually re-run make deinstall && make reinstall on half a dozen perl modules, then it acted like it was going to work but then as soon as I brought the mail system up, it started spewing: TROUBLE in check_mail: mime_decode-1 FAILED: Error reading: Resource temporarily unavailable at (eval 57) line 153, line 2. and TROUBLE in check_mail: virus_scan FAILED: virus_scan: ALL VIRUS SCANNERS FAILED: Clam Antivirus-clamd av-scanner FAILED: Too many retries to talk to /var/run/clamav/clamd (Error reading from /var/run/clamav/clamd: Resource temporarily unavailable at (eval 53) line 253, line 1.) at (eval 53) line 264, line 1.; Clam Antivirus - clamscan av-scanner FAILED: Error reading: Resource temporarily unavailable at (eval 53) line 389, line 1. I checked /var/run, and clamav had permissions of 777, and the clamd file is there with full access available. maybe there's something with the error checks that was altered in Amavis that I'm missing?? And this time around, the antivirus check error is new...amavis, when starting, says: I found a line in the amavisd.conf file that I set to true $bypass_decode_parts = 1; Looks like a workaround to try getting mail to work, but shouldn't be set this way... :-/ Got rid of the one error though. Still, I'm getting: TROUBLE in check_mail: virus_scan FAILED: virus_scan: ALL VIRUS SCANNERS FAILED: Clam Antivirus-clamd av-scanner FAILED: Too many retries to talk to /var/run/clamav/clamd (Error reading from /var/run/clamav/clamd: Resource temporarily unavailable at (eval 53) line 253, line 1.) at (eval 53) line 264, line 1.; Clam Antivirus - clamscan av-scanner FAILED: Error reading: Resource temporarily unavailable at (eval 53) line 389, line 2. which leads to a: PRESERVING EVIDENCE in /var/amavis/amavis-20050627T120942-48739 Check the path of the error: # pwd /var/run/clamav # ls -al total 6 drwxrwxrwx 2 clamav clamav 512 Jun 27 12:15 . drwxr-xr-x 5 rootwheel 512 Jun 27 11:46 .. srwxrwxrwx 1 vscan clamav0 Jun 27 12:15 clamd -rw-rw 1 vscan clamav5 Jun 27 12:15 clamd.pid # Amavis sees this at startup: Jun 27 12:16:30 myserver /usr/local/sbin/amavisd[48847]: starting. /usr/local/sbin/amavisd at myserver amavisd-new-2.3.1 (20050509), Unicode aware Jun 27 12:16:30 myserver /usr/local/sbin/amavisd[48847]: Perl version 5.008007 Jun 27 12:16:30 myserver /usr/local/sbin/amavisd[48848]: Module Amavis::Conf2.038 Jun 27 12:16:30 myserver /usr/local/sbin/amavisd[48848]: Module Compress::Zlib 1.34 Jun 27 12:16:30 myserver /usr/local/sbin/amavisd[48848]: Module DB_File 1.811 Jun 27 12:16:30 myserver /usr/local/sbin/amavisd[48848]: Module MIME::Entity5.417 Jun 27 12:16:30 myserver /usr/local/sbin/amavisd[48848]: Module MIME::Parser5.417 Jun 27 12:16:30 myserver /usr/local/sbin/amavisd[48848]: Module MIME::Tools 5.417 Jun 27 12:16:30 myserver /usr/local/sbin/amavisd[48848]: Module Mail::Header1.66 Jun 27 12:16:30 myserver /usr/local/sbin/amavisd[48848]: Module Mail::Internet 1.66 Jun 27 12:16:30 myserver /usr/local/sbin/amavisd[48848]: Module Mail::SpamAssassin 3.04 Jun 27 12:16:30 myserver /usr/local/sbin/amavisd[48848]: Module Net::Cmd2.26 Jun 27 12:16:30 myserver /usr/local/sbin/amavisd[48848]: Module Net::DNS0.51 Jun 27 12:16:30 myserver /usr/local/sbin/amavisd[48848]: Module Net::SMTP 2.29 Jun 27 12:16:30 myserver /usr/local/sbin/amavisd[48848]: Module Net::Server 0.87 Jun 27 12:16:30 myserver /usr/local/sbin/amavisd[48848]: Module Time::HiRes 1.66 Jun 27 12:16:30 myserver /usr/local/sbin/amavisd[48848]: Module Unix::Syslog0.100 Jun 27 12:16:30 myserver /usr/local/sbin/amavisd[48848]: Amavis
RE: POWERVAULT 705n
OK The NAS runs Freebsd ( cant tell what version) The only way (so far ) I can see to access it is through the web browser By typing 192.168.x.x/config/debug I tried to connect by telnet-ting to port 80 but I get this HTTP/1.0 400 Bad Reques Server: Quantum Corpora Content-type: text/html Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 Bad Req Connection to host lost It doesn't *seem* to be a full version of BSD ,when I tried various commands they all did not work , as far as I can tell it doesn't even contain an /etc or /usr directory This is what I got from an ls Inode ATTR Protection Size Created Modified Accessed UID GID Name 2dr-xr-xr-x0 05/31/2005 9:36:53 06/27/2005 12:16:39 06/27/2005 12:16:3932 . 2dr-xr-xr-x0 05/31/2005 9:36:53 06/27/2005 12:16:39 06/27/2005 12:16:3932 .. 3dr-xr-xr-x0 05/31/2005 9:36:53 06/27/2005 12:16:39 06/27/2005 12:16:3932 config 5dr-xr-xr-x0 05/31/2005 9:36:53 06/27/2005 12:16:39 06/27/2005 12:16:3932 status 8dr-xr-xr-x0 05/31/2005 9:36:53 06/27/2005 12:16:39 06/27/2005 12:16:3932 www 9dr-xr-xr-x0 05/31/2005 9:36:53 06/27/2005 12:16:39 06/27/2005 12:16:3932 dev 10dr-xr-xr-x0 05/31/2005 9:36:53 06/27/2005 12:16:39 06/27/2005 12:16:3932 sys 11dr-xr-xr-x0 05/31/2005 9:36:53 06/27/2005 12:16:39 06/27/2005 12:16:3932 empty 12-r--r--r--0 05/31/2005 9:36:53 06/27/2005 12:16:39 06/27/2005 12:16:3932 rpc 216 ?? sys_freaddir inode: 216, sys_lstat inode: 2 drwxrwxrwx 512 11/11/2002 14:30:21 02/07/2003 10:35:51 05/31/2005 9:36:1332 priv 217 ?? sys_freaddir inode: 217, sys_lstat inode: 2 drwxrwxrwx 512 10/19/2002 3:13:51 02/07/2003 10:35:52 04/02/2004 11:39:5232 pri2 218 H drwxrwxrwx0 05/31/2005 9:36:53 06/27/2005 12:16:39 06/27/2005 12:16:3932 0 219 ?? sys_freaddir inode: 219, sys_lstat inode: 2 drwxrwxrwx 2560 10/19/2002 4:01:35 06/27/2005 2:46:12 06/27/2005 12:16:0632 1 220 H drwxrwxrwx0 05/31/2005 9:36:53 06/27/2005 12:16:39 06/27/2005 12:16:3932 2 221 H drwxrwxrwx0 05/31/2005 9:36:53 06/27/2005 12:16:39 06/27/2005 12:16:3932 3 222 H drwxrwxrwx0 05/31/2005 9:36:53 06/27/2005 12:16:39 06/27/2005 12:16:3932 4 223 H drwxrwxrwx0 05/31/2005 9:36:53 06/27/2005 12:16:39 06/27/2005 12:16:3932 5 224 H drwxrwxrwx0 05/31/2005 9:36:53 06/27/2005 12:16:39 06/27/2005 12:16:3932 6 225 H drwxrwxrwx0 05/31/2005 9:36:53 06/27/2005 12:16:39 06/27/2005 12:16:3932 7 226 H drwxrwxrwx0 05/31/2005 9:36:53 06/27/2005 12:16:39 06/27/2005 12:16:3932 8 227 H drwxrwxrwx0 05/31/2005 9:36:53 06/27/2005 12:16:39 06/27/2005 12:16:3932 9 228 H drwxrwxrwx0 05/31/2005 9:36:53 06/27/2005 12:16:39 06/27/2005 12:16:3932 10 229 H drwxrwxrwx0 05/31/2005 9:36:53 06/27/2005 12:16:39 06/27/2005 12:16:3932 11 Any thoughts on perhaps UPGRADING the OS? Is it even feasible? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jean-Paul Natola Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 10:13 AM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: POWERVAULT 705n Hi Everyone, In need of desperate help here, I have a Powervault on our network , Dell informs me that since its NOT windows powered I have basically no specific control , auditing etcc,, A network folder was deleted from the NAS yesterday, and I have no way of determining who did it. I know it's a *nix kernel. Also there are files there that , when we want to delete (MAC files often) it says access denied. Ideally , set permissions (i.e. can read , write, change, NOT delete), also audit to see who did what when , and delete those "access denied" files- I'm sure if I can get into it through a shell? Or root? This would be possible??? Maybe??? Any help would be great Jean-Paul Natola Network Administrator Information Technology Family Care International 588 Broadway Suite 503 New York, NY 10012 Phone:212-941-5300 xt 36 Fax: 212-941-5563 Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Pthread Problem building clamav-0.86.1
Nope,
The simple answer is to compile clamav with the "disable-pthreads"
option. Modify the configure args of the Makefile using these
attributes :
CONFIGURE_ARGS= --with-dbdir=${DBDIR} \
--with-zlib=/usr \
--disable-zlib-vcheck \
--disable-clamuko \
--disable-clamav \
--enable-bigstack \
--disable-gethostbyname_r \
--enable-readdir_r \
--disable-dependency-tracking \
--disable-pthreads
It'll compile smoothly.
Thanks to Matt Fretwell from clamav Mailing List //
Le 26 juin 05 à 21:43, Craig Kleski a écrit :
On Sunday 26 June 2005 09:45 pm, bsd wrote:
Hello,
I have built on my test machine the latest version of clamav and I am
facing a pthread build problem.
My system is FreeBSD 5.2.1 //
I ain't no C programmer (unfortunately) so any help will be welcome.
Another question is how can I get back to the previous version that
was installed (and working) on the system ?
Sincerly yours;
===> Building for clamav-0.86.1
make all-recursive
Making all in libclamav
Making all in clamscan
/bin/sh /usr/local/bin/libtool15 --mode=link cc -O -pipe -
mcpu=pentiumpro -L/usr/local/lib -lc_r -lldap -o clamscan
output.o getopt.o memory.o cfgparser.o misc.o clamscan.o options.o
others.o manager.o treewalk.o ../libclamav/libclamav.la
cc -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -o .libs/clamscan output.o getopt.o
memory.o cfgparser.o misc.o clamscan.o options.o others.o manager.o
treewalk.o -L/usr/local/lib ../libclamav/.libs/libclamav.so -lldap -
lbz2 -lgmp -lcurl -lssl -lcrypto -lz -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/usr/local/lib
../libclamav/.libs/libclamav.so: undefined reference to
`pthread_cleanup_pop'
../libclamav/.libs/libclamav.so: undefined reference to
`pthread_create' ../libclamav/.libs/libclamav.so: undefined reference
to
`pthread_cleanup_push'
../libclamav/.libs/libclamav.so: undefined reference to
`pthread_join' *** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/security/clamav/work/clamav-0.86.1/clamscan.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/security/clamav/work/clamav-0.86.1.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/security/clamav/work/clamav-0.86.1.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/security/clamav.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/security/clamav.
«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§
Gregober ---> PGP ID --> 0x1BA3C2FD
bsd @at@ todoo.biz
«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Possible solution: alter the Makefile LDFLAGS by adding "-lpthread"
Then try the build again.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: upgrading all ports
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 27 Jun 2005, RW wrote: On Saturday 25 June 2005 12:22, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: I want to do a portupgrade on all installed ports. What's the right way? "portupgrade -arR ?" or "portupgrade -a" ? AFAIK there is no difference between the two; "-a" means upgrade all ports in the package database, "-Rr" means add in the dependencies and dependent ports based on what's in the database, but these are already covered by -a. New dependencies are built as a side-effect of building out-of-date ports - not through the -R option. There *is* a difference between -FRa and -Fa because -FR is translated into a "make checksum-recursive". Anyone who believes that portupgrade is slower than removing all port and reinstalling has probably been misled by watching portupgrade -FRa which runs "make checksum-recursive" for each installed port and so visits some ports many time. Portmanager is a good way to bring your ports up-to-date, but it also rebuilds all ports that depend on out-of date ports. It's a very slow process if you have a slow machine and most of your ports were up-to-date already, but try it for yourself. Portupgrade does a pretty good job if you follow UPDATING, and use the gnome script for major Gnome upgrades. If you want to force the rebuilding of all your ports then see pkg_glob(1) and portupgrade (1) for instructions on how to rebuild ports built after a given timestamp, as this gives you a restartable method. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" This couldn't have come at a better time for me. I really boned things up about 40 hours ago. I was getting ready to leave and because I'd been doing some learning/experimenting with portupgrade on some held ports, I hit the wrong switch. I think it was portupgrade -arRF & now, about 40 hours later, shortly after returning home, we're still going, going, going... Things are really in a mess & I've read the recent posts on this thread & can attest, sitting here for several hours, that "visits some ports many times" is an understatement. It's becoming rediculous & I'm wondering if, at some point, when clean is going after something else was just upgraded, if I can break out & go back with a simple portupgrade -arR & not screw things up to badly. Any help/feedback on this will be GREATLY appreciated. :) Denny White -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCwCs6y0Ty5RZE55oRAj6LAJ4wuENN2VAn5IlWUeRsPVps5nBgcQCgtsRr +YpDWuFkojneBoJkl3qk4Jk= =DrUN -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: portmanager, amavis update problem
On 27/06/05, Bart Silverstrim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So why wouldn't it read it properly?? I'm really at a loss here.
I'm afraid I am too as I've never used amavis{-new} before.
Sorry
Al
--
LJ: http://www.livejournal.com/users/everlone
GPG/PGP: http://www.no-dns-yet.org.uk/~everlone/pubkey.gpg
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
OpenWebMail won't make
I've been trying to install openwebmail. I've tried portupgrade and make and both seem to have the same issue. I get an error message that perl 5.6.1 or higher is needed and suggesting that I install 5.8. I've done that (several times) but I still get the error message. Has anyone come across this and have a solution? I'm running FBSD 4.9. Thanks, Bill ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Freebsd 5.4 cannot fetch xfree86?
perikillo wrote:
> Hi to all.
>I install freebsd 5.4 Release, with xorg i have problems with my
>kbd, and i decide to install the old friend XFree86-4, i read the
>handbook about, the example say:
>test# pkg_add -r XFree86
>
> But my system dosent found nothing, the answer is something about
>"Cannot fetch xfree86 packages from ftp.freebsd.org.
>
>
>
You can use the PACKAGESITE variable to get pkg_add to go where you
want. This next line can be done a whole bunch of different ways, but
it's the most general, but I have crafted this for my own system, which
is a amd64, so it points there. If you don't see this, and change this
to point to your own system's architecture, yu're on your own if you
mess things up:
env
PACKAGESITE=ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-current/All/
/usr/sbin/pkg_add -f -r ${PKG_TARGET}
> There is something else i need to do? or where i can change the
>default URL? OR wich URL have those pakages ? Any help i will
>apreciate.
>
>Thanks to all.
>___
>freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>
>
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: freebsd as the basis for something better?
On 6/27/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello Nikolas! > > >Hey don't bash plan9, they have some cool ideas and unix would not > >exist if it wasn't for bell labs (AT&T back then) but mainly I > >just like glenda (the one in the space suit), can we change the > beastie > >to glenda? http://www.cs.bell-labs.com/plan9dist/glenda.html > > Plan9 deserves my apologies because of Glenda. Damn cute :) > > >UNIX is user friendly. It's just selective about who its friends > >are. New gui tools are needed. lets bring the CLI tools to the > GUI, > >like pipes, redirects, etc. some of apples ideas are nice aka > NeXTSTEP. > >Why are we trying to emulate windows when mircosoft just steals > it's > >idea's from apple? lets cut the middle man out. BeOS was cool too. > > Well said. > > Don't tell anybody about this: www.senseos.org/sos.pdf > But that's what I intend to do so far (+ www.quelsolaar.com). > > >I'm not a programmer so I'm not sure how I could help you. > > A solid supply of ideas would be nice! > To bring UNIX to the masses one of the first things we need to do is make installing and running apps easy. Right now we are in what once was called "DLL Hell" in windows 3.x, is this the best we can do? Hard drive space is a non issue today so what is wrong with making fat binaries that that have all the dependencies compiled into one file. Another apple idea is making the binaries platform independent so it will run on an i386, ppc, sparc, etc. This is the biggest problem I have with UNIX. Step 1: Download the app from developer foo's website. Step 2: Double click on the app. Step 3: The app launches and the dam thing just works. What is so hard about this guys? Anyways... here's a cool video from back in the day, 1991 (DOS 5.0 and windows 3.0 in microsoft's timeline), with steve jobs demoing NeXTSTEP. Microsoft's windows still can't do some of the stuff they where doing back in 91. It a quicktime video btw: http://www.openstep.se/jobs/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: freebsd as the basis for something better?
On Jun 27, 2005, at 11:01 AM, Nikolas Britton wrote: To bring UNIX to the masses one of the first things we need to do is make installing and running apps easy. Right now we are in what once was called "DLL Hell" in windows 3.x, is this the best we can do? Hard drive space is a non issue today so what is wrong with making fat binaries that that have all the dependencies compiled into one file. Another apple idea is making the binaries platform independent so it will run on an i386, ppc, sparc, etc. This is the biggest problem I have with UNIX. Step 1: Download the app from developer foo's website. Step 2: Double click on the app. Step 3: The app launches and the dam thing just works. What is so hard about this guys? Anyways... here's a cool video from back in the day, 1991 (DOS 5.0 and windows 3.0 in microsoft's timeline), with steve jobs demoing NeXTSTEP. Microsoft's windows still can't do some of the stuff they where doing back in 91. It a quicktime video btw: http://www.openstep.se/jobs/ Is there any wonder that the people who have already brought "Unix" to the masses is Steve Jobs and the historical descendent to OpenStep (NEXTStep) -- Mac OS X? Most of what is described above exists in OS X already. Chad --- Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC Your Web App and Email hosting provider [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
RE: IPF Logging packets Every 2-10 Seconds.
The log shows that it's all packets try to penetrate your firewall. This is normal public internet traffic sent by people trying to break into your system. Your firewall is doing its job of blocking this unwanted junk just like you want it to do. If you don't want to see this stuff in your log then remove the log keyword from your rules and it will stop logging that junk. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Stephan Weaver Sent: Monday, June 27, 2005 11:19 AM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: IPF Logging packets Every 2-10 Seconds. Hello list, My IPF Firewall System is logging packets almost every 2 - 10 seconds. I would like to narrow this problem down. firewall# cat /etc/ipf.rules block in all block out all pass in quick on lo0 all pass out quick on lo0 all pass out quick on vr0 from any to any keep state pass in quick on vr1 all pass out quick on vr1 all # Block all inbound traffic from non-routable or reserved address spaces block in log quick on vr0 from 192.168.0.0/16 to any #RFC 1918 private IP block in log quick on vr0 from 172.16.0.0/12 to any#RFC 1918 private IP block in log quick on vr0 from 10.0.0.0/8 to any #RFC 1918 private IP block in log quick on vr0 from 127.0.0.0/8 to any #loopback block in log quick on vr0 from 0.0.0.0/8 to any#loopback block in log quick on vr0 from 169.254.0.0/16 to any #DHCP auto-config block in log quick on vr0 from 192.0.2.0/24 to any #reserved for doc's block in log quick on vr0 from 204.152.64.0/23 to any #Sun cluster interconnect block in log quick on vr0 from 224.0.0.0/3 to any #Class D & E multicast # Block frags block in quick on vr0 all with frags # Block short tcp packets block in quick on vr0 proto tcp all with short # Block source routed packets block in quick on vr0 all with opt lsrr block in quick on vr0 all with opt ssrr # Block nmap OS fingerprint attempts # Log first occurrence of these so I can get their IP address block in log first quick on vr0 proto tcp all flags FUP block in log first quick on vr0 proto tcp all flags SF/SFRA block in log first quick on vr0 proto tcp all flags /SFRA block in log first quick on vr0 proto tcp all flags F/SFRA block in log first quick on vr0 proto tcp all flags U/SFRAU block in log first quick on vr0 proto tcp all flags P # Block anything with special options block in quick on vr0 all with ipopts # Block public pings block in log quick on vr0 proto icmp all icmp-type 8 # TSTT NameServers pass in quick on vr0 proto tcp/udp from 196.3.132.1 to any keep state pass in quick on vr0 proto tcp/udp from 196.3.132.4 to any keep state # Block and log only first occurrence of all remaining traffic # coming into the firewall. The logging of only the first # occurrence stops a .denial of service. attack targeted # at filling up your log file space. # This rule enforces the block all by default logic. block in log first quick on vr0 all firewall# tail -f /var/log/ipfilter.log 27/06/2005 11:13:48.699874 vr0 @0:27 b 138.217.177.128,2840 -> 192.168.1.1,16478 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN 27/06/2005 11:13:54.736606 vr0 @0:27 b 138.217.177.128,2840 -> 192.168.1.1,16478 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN 27/06/2005 11:14:03.585530 vr0 @0:27 b 67.33.99.114,50895 -> 192.168.1.1,16478 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN 27/06/2005 11:14:06.598363 vr0 @0:27 b 67.33.99.114,50895 -> 192.168.1.1,16478 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN 27/06/2005 11:14:09.699265 vr0 @0:27 b 200.108.28.115,3053 -> 192.168.1.1,445 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN 27/06/2005 11:14:12.515511 vr0 @0:27 b 67.33.99.114,50895 -> 192.168.1.1,16478 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN 27/06/2005 11:14:12.670997 vr0 @0:27 b 200.108.28.115,3053 -> 192.168.1.1,445 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN 27/06/2005 11:14:14.470027 vr0 @0:27 b 218.212.63.91,1425 -> 192.168.1.1,16478 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN 27/06/2005 11:14:17.432263 vr0 @0:27 b 218.212.63.91,1425 -> 192.168.1.1,16478 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN 27/06/2005 11:14:23.439618 vr0 @0:27 b 218.212.63.91,1425 -> 192.168.1.1,16478 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN 27/06/2005 11:14:29.633637 vr0 @0:27 b 70.186.121.59,4675 -> 192.168.1.1,16478 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN 27/06/2005 11:14:30.068091 vr0 @0:27 b 138.217.177.128,2905 -> 192.168.1.1,16478 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN 27/06/2005 11:14:32.592810 vr0 @0:27 b 70.186.121.59,4675 -> 192.168.1.1,16478 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN 27/06/2005 11:14:32.954266 vr0 @0:27 b 138.217.177.128,2905 -> 192.168.1.1,16478 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN 27/06/2005 11:14:38.859627 vr0 @0:27 b 70.186.121.59,4675 -> 192.168.1.1,16478 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN 27/06/2005 11:14:38.993186 vr0 @0:27 b 138.217.177.128,2905 -> 192.168.1.1,16478 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN 27/06/2005 11:15:03.372975 vr0 @0:27 b 138.217.177.128,2957 -> 192.168.1.1,16478 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN 27/06/2005 11:15:06.350342 vr0 @0:27 b 138.217.177.128,2957 -> 192.168.1.1,16478 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN 27/06/2005 11:15:12.289440 vr0 @0:27 b 138.217.177.128,2957 -> 192.168.1.1,16478 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN 27/06/2005 11:15:14.453865 v
Linux emulation on amd64, possible yet? ... plausible?
MSG In-short: what is, or where do I find info on, the current status of linux binary compatability on FreeBSD/amd64 platform MSG In-Long(er) Detailed format: ... Hey all - been searching the FAQ, and the release notes trying to find some diffinitive answer as to where linux binary compatability stands at in regards to the FreeBSD/amd64 platform... can't seem to find one, the only thing the release notes state (and 5.3R we're talking here), is that there is limited linux_32 compatability available. I'm (still) running FreeBSD/amd64 5.3R on a couple of dual-opteron boxen. What I'm eventually hoping to accomplish, is to get Sun JDK, Oracle Database (preferably 10g... but who knows), and possibly Sun One Studio to work. I can download all the above mentioned installs, and can even get partway through running some of them... The binaries always seem to fail with error 'ELF binary type "0" not known.' - which is to be expected seeing as how I've not enabled any sort of binary emulation. If going to 5.4R is the only option - I'm open to trying it, but prefer to do so on my laptop - and last known there were still issues with the keyboard probe/chipset of the Compaq 300-series amd64 platform, if anyone knows the status of that fix it'd be great to know too (of course assuming I've got the option of better linux emulation with 5.4R). Ideally, I'd like to be able to run the linux/amd64 binaries... But I really don't know where FreeBSD stands at current for doing this, or if it will even be possible, or if linux/32 is still in development stages... Can anyone provide me with a more authoratative response, either in form of status or in form of url/mailing list towards who is working on this stuff? Much appreciated all, and sorry if posting this to the general list was not the proper place - was unsure of where to ask. Thanks to all who reply. -- Nathan Vidican [EMAIL PROTECTED] Windsor Match Plate & Tool Ltd. http://www.wmptl.com/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: freebsd as the basis for something better?
On 6/27/05, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jun 27, 2005, at 11:01 AM, Nikolas Britton wrote: > > To bring UNIX to the masses one of the first things we need to do is > > make installing and running apps easy. Right now we are in what once > > was called "DLL Hell" in windows 3.x, is this the best we can do? Hard > > drive space is a non issue today so what is wrong with making fat > > binaries that that have all the dependencies compiled into one file. > > Another apple idea is making the binaries platform independent so it > > will run on an i386, ppc, sparc, etc. This is the biggest problem I > > have with UNIX. > > > > Step 1: Download the app from developer foo's website. > > Step 2: Double click on the app. > > Step 3: The app launches and the dam thing just works. > > > > What is so hard about this guys? > > > > Anyways... here's a cool video from back in the day, 1991 (DOS 5.0 and > > windows 3.0 in microsoft's timeline), with steve jobs demoing > > NeXTSTEP. Microsoft's windows still can't do some of the stuff they > > where doing back in 91. It a quicktime video btw: > > http://www.openstep.se/jobs/ > > Is there any wonder that the people who have already brought "Unix" > to the masses is Steve Jobs and the historical descendent to OpenStep > (NEXTStep) -- Mac OS X? > > Most of what is described above exists in OS X already. Anyone want some Cocoa? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Questions about packages and ports
I like to use the pkg_add -r feature of FreeBSD, however I have run into a problem where the ports have a more current version of the app then the package of the same app. It seems the ports collection is updated more then the package collection is this true? Is the maintainer of a package and a port the same person? Are they responsible for updating the package and the port? Packages will download dependencys required by the app does the ports do this as well? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Vinum and Volumes Larger Than 2TB
Howdy, I'm attempting to use Vinum to concat multiple plexes together to make a single 4.5TB volume. I've noticed that once I hit the 2TB mark it seems to fail, it looks like once it hits 2TB the size gets reset to 0. Example below, [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# vinum create /etc/vinum0.conf 2 drives: D partition0State: up /dev/da0A: 0/0 MB D partition1State: up /dev/da1A: 0/0 MB 1 volumes: V vinum0State: up Plexes: 1 Size: 1858 GB 1 plexes: P vinum0.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 2 Size: 3906 GB 2 subdisks: S vinum0.p0.s0 State: up D: partition0 Size: 1953 GB S vinum0.p0.s1 State: up D: partition1 Size: 1953 GB Now I've seen mentions of people using Vinum on larger partitions and it seems to work ok. Also when I use gvinum it succeeds, however given the state of the gvinum implementation I'd like to stick with vinum. Suggestions/comments anyone? Thanks in advance, -Bri ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: IPF Logging packets Every 2-10 Seconds.
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, wrote Stephan Weaver thusly... > > firewall# tail -f /var/log/ipfilter.log > 27/06/2005 11:13:48.699874 vr0 @0:27 b 138.217.177.128,2840 -> > 192.168.1.1,16478 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN > 27/06/2005 11:13:54.736606 vr0 @0:27 b 138.217.177.128,2840 -> > 192.168.1.1,16478 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN I was going to parse the logs, but the forced line breaks prevent me. When you (in general) are posting system messages, errors & such, please keep the line breaks/tabs as they appear in the original message. - Parv -- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Questions about packages and ports
Sean Murphy wrote: I like to use the pkg_add -r feature of FreeBSD, however I have run into a problem where the ports have a more current version of the app then the package of the same app. It seems the ports collection is updated more then the package collection is this true? Yes. Packages are built from ports, so you can expect the ports collection version to be as current or more current than the available packages. Is the maintainer of a package and a port the same person? Are they responsible for updating the package and the port? I don't believe so, or at least it's not a requirement that I know of. All maintainers are volunteers, and the load of maintaining the port and building and distributing packages is typically distributed over many volunteers. Packages will download dependencys required by the app does the ports do this as well? I think this depends on the options that you specify (for either packages or ports). Typically, though -- yes, building a port will automatically build the dependencies. More about packages & ports can be found in Chap. 4 of the Handbook: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ports.html -- Greg Barniskis, Computer Systems Integrator South Central Library System (SCLS) Library Interchange Network (LINK) , (608) 266-6348 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Questions about packages and ports
On 6/27/05, Sean Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I like to use the pkg_add -r feature of FreeBSD, however I have run into > a problem where the ports have a more current version of the app then > the package of the same app. > > It seems the ports collection is updated more then the package > collection is this true? Yes > > Is the maintainer of a package and a port the same person? Are they > responsible for updating the package and the port? Yes and No > > Packages will download dependencys required by the app does the ports do > this as well? Yes --- On a similar note can someone remind me how to set the remote package site for pkg_add and portupgrade -P? I remember it had something to do with setenv but don't remember the variable it uses and I've never used the portupgrade -P option before. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
waiting 15 seconds for scsi devices to settle
Hi there I have been trying to install FreeBSD 5.4 on a compaq proliant server model 1850R, The server is correctly configured and will run all the operating systems I have tried with the exception of FreeBSD. I have used the floppies to install the system in the hope of using FTP. The installer asks for all the disks as usual and gets to load the kernal but gets to the "waiting 15 for SCSI devices to settle" and stays there forever. I have tried launching the installer with option 6 and used set vm.old_contigmalloc=1 but this did nothing. I tried the installation with FreeBSD 5.3 and the same thing happened. Hope you can help me sort this out as I have a simmilar compaq server which has it installed and works fine. Many thanks for your time. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: upgrading all ports
On 6/27/05, Denny White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On Mon, 27 Jun 2005, Nikolas Britton wrote: > > >> > >> This couldn't have come at a better time for me. > >> I really boned things up about 40 hours ago. I was > >> getting ready to leave and because I'd been doing > >> some learning/experimenting with portupgrade on > >> some held ports, I hit the wrong switch. I think > >> it was portupgrade -arRF & now, about 40 hours > >> later, shortly after returning home, we're still > >> going, going, going... Things are really in > >> a mess & I've read the recent posts on this thread > >> & can attest, sitting here for several hours, that > >> "visits some ports many times" is an understatement. > >> It's becoming rediculous & I'm wondering if, at > >> some point, when clean is going after something > >> else was just upgraded, if I can break out & go > >> back with a simple portupgrade -arR & not screw > >> things up to badly. Any help/feedback on this will > >> be GREATLY appreciated. :) > >> Denny White > > > > You shouldn't have any problems if you do that but kill it at the > > beginning of the next build, not when it's cleaning. > > > > > > Thanks so much for the personal speedy reply. I've worked > for a month getting this system to about where I want it, > & I hate to see it all go down the tubes. Sure glad you > straightened me out on when to break out, too. I see you > didn't put in a cc to freebsd-questions, so I guess I > won't either. After breaking out of the loop, what's the > best thing to do at that point? The only way I could come > up with to try to start is: > cvsup ports-supfile > portsdb -Uu > portversion -l "<" > portupgrade -arR (no F this time) Just restart portupgrade without the F flag, it will pick-up where it left off. > If I can get things back right, I'll just learn to live > with the "held" ports. I never remember telling it to > hold anything, & it's probably pretty apparent I don't > understand as much as I should about portupgrade. I > learned what I know from Dru Lavigne's blogs at Oreilly, > & until I fat-fingered the F without thinking, it was > working okay, except for the held ports. Thanks again > for your help. > Denny White I'm not sure what you mean by held ports? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Vinum & GVinum Recommendations
I am using 4.11 and have been a FBSD user since the beginning of version 4. I successfully used vinum to create concatenated volumes that have grown over time. Vinum has proved very stable as long as the drives were IDE or SCSI. However I outgrew the confines of my case and added a firewire enclosure that contains two IDE drives. This was somewhere around 4.6. Initially, the firewire drives worked well once I learned I needed to set the SCSI delay kernel config option back up to 15 secs from 5 (unfortunately I lost my volumes getting that education). But when I upgraded from 4.9 to 4.10, vinum and the firewire devices didn't play well. I posted about it here: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2004-December/069290.html Later, I discovered there was an spb timeout issue that might be part of the problem and I posted about it here: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-firewire/2005-February/000331.html Anyway, I've been using the delete/create vinum volume workaround after every reboot as I never found a solution. But this last time, I lost both vinum volumes performing that workaround. I don't know what happened exactly other than fsck started getting disk errors. At the first problem, I answered 'n' and aborted the fsck. I tried the delete/create workaround again but was unable to stop or rm the subdisks, plexes, drives, etc. Then I rebooted. did the delete/create thing, but no longer could fsck read the disks. Without going on and on, the bottom line is that now I've lost both vinum volumes again. Since the bulk of my system is gone (I sure hope the tapes I have are good), I've decided to consider moving up to version 5. I've googled for info on gvinum but see a lot of posts about it being "flaky". What's it's status at this time? I really like having one large concatenated drive for storing my digital pictures, video, etc. but at this point, stability is more important. Also, how does ccd work with 5? I'd appreciate hearing of your experiences with vinum, gvinum, and ccd, especially as they relate to firewire devices. Thanks, Drew -- Visit The Alchemist's Warehouse Magic Tricks, DVDs, Videos, Books, & More! http://www.alchemistswarehouse.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Vinum & GVinum Recommendations
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 11:57:15AM -0700, Drew Tomlinson wrote: > I'd appreciate hearing of your experiences with vinum, gvinum, and ccd, > especially as they relate to firewire devices. In my experience, vinum doesn't play well with GEOM, and gvinum isn't anywhere near feature-complete. (I haven't looked at gvinum in a while; it has probably improved greatly) On the other hand, using GEOM itself has worked quite well; I use gmirror to mirror /usr, and gconcat to string a collection of drives together. Both have worked flawlessly since I set them up. --Mac pgpp15JFv1K1O.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: sata raid controllers compatibility
On 6/27/05, Zile <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi guys! > That you can speak about the support of Tekram TR-822 > and Adaptec AAR-1210SA SATA adapters into Free5.x? > ?, They are both basic 2 port SATA RAID 0/1 cards, I don't see why FreeBSD would not support them but it's allways a good idea to stick with whats in the hardware notes: http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.4R/hardware-i386.html ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: waiting 15 seconds for scsi devices to settle
I'm running 5.3 and 5.4 on roughly 6 of these 1850Rs with anywhere from 450-600mHz dual-procs. I loaded all from CD and never had any issues. What is the controller card you're using? Also, in the SmartStart config tool, what OS did you specify the machine would be used for? On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 19:42 +0100, Scott Neville wrote: > Hi there > I have been trying to install FreeBSD 5.4 on a compaq proliant server model > 1850R, The server is correctly configured and will run all the operating > systems I have tried with the exception of FreeBSD. I have used the floppies > to install the system in the hope of using FTP. The installer asks for all > the disks as usual and gets to load the kernal but gets to the "waiting 15 > for SCSI devices to settle" and stays there forever. I have tried launching > the installer with option 6 and used set vm.old_contigmalloc=1 but this did > nothing. I tried the installation with FreeBSD 5.3 and the same thing > happened. Hope you can help me sort this out as I have a simmilar compaq > server which has it installed and works fine. Many thanks for your time. > ___ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" -- Christopher Black Chief Security Engineer Secure Crossing 22750 Woodward Suite 304 - Ferndale, MI 48220 Tel (800) 761-4299 | Direct (248) 658-6120 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.securecrossing.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: waiting 15 seconds for scsi devices to settle
On 6/27/05, Scott Neville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi there > I have been trying to install FreeBSD 5.4 on a compaq proliant server model > 1850R, The server is correctly configured and will run all the operating > systems I have tried with the exception of FreeBSD. I have used the floppies > to install the system in the hope of using FTP. The installer asks for all > the disks as usual and gets to load the kernal but gets to the "waiting 15 > for SCSI devices to settle" and stays there forever. I have tried launching > the installer with option 6 and used set vm.old_contigmalloc=1 but this did > nothing. I tried the installation with FreeBSD 5.3 and the same thing > happened. Hope you can help me sort this out as I have a simmilar compaq > server which has it installed and works fine. Many thanks for your time. Try to load the installer with ACPI disabled. -- Dmitry "We live less by imagination than despite it" - Rockwell Kent, "N by E" ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Vinum & GVinum Recommendations
On 6/27/2005 12:04 PM Mac Mason wrote: On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 11:57:15AM -0700, Drew Tomlinson wrote: I'd appreciate hearing of your experiences with vinum, gvinum, and ccd, especially as they relate to firewire devices. In my experience, vinum doesn't play well with GEOM, and gvinum isn't anywhere near feature-complete. (I haven't looked at gvinum in a while; it has probably improved greatly) On the other hand, using GEOM itself has worked quite well; I use gmirror to mirror /usr, and gconcat to string a collection of drives together. Both have worked flawlessly since I set them up. --Mac I GEOM something that is built in to 5 or is it a port? I don't see it in ports so I assume it's built in. If gconcat works well with firewire, that would suit my needs just fine. Thanks for your reply, Drew -- Visit The Alchemist's Warehouse Magic Tricks, DVDs, Videos, Books, & More! http://www.alchemistswarehouse.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: sata raid controllers compatibility
On 6/27/05, Zile <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi guys! > That you can speak about the support of Tekram TR-822 > and Adaptec AAR-1210SA SATA adapters into Free5.x? > ?, They are both basic 2 port SATA RAID 0/1 cards, I don't see why FreeBSD would not support them but it's allways a good idea to stick with whats in the hardware notes: http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.4R/hardware-i386.html ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
waiting 15 seconds for scsi devices to settle
I am using the smart array controler 3200 for the drive cage that I am using. When i set up the server using smart start, I selected the operting system "other". Many thanks ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: waiting 15 seconds for scsi devices to settle
On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 20:20 +0100, Scott Neville wrote: > I am using the smart array controler 3200 for the drive cage that I am using. > When i set up the server using smart start, I selected the operting system > "other". Many thanks > Odd, I'm using the same controller with the same type of drives. I chose "SCO Unix" for my operating system. If turning off ACPI doesn't help, is it an option to start swapping parts to see if it's a bad drive or raid card? Perhaps also plug the drive caddy into the onboard scsi controller (no raid, sadly) and see if the problem persists? -- Christopher Black Chief Security Engineer Secure Crossing 22750 Woodward Suite 304 - Ferndale, MI 48220 Tel (800) 761-4299 | Direct (248) 658-6120 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.securecrossing.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
RE: IPF Logging packets Every 2-10 Seconds.
No you are wrong. if you look at the 1st log line. eg. >27/06/2005 11:13:48.699874 vr0 @0:27 b 138.217.177.128,2840 -> 192.168.1.1,16478 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN that log refers to RULE NUMBER 27, which in my RULSET, line 27 dosen't have the word log. so it must be something else. From: "fbsd_user" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Stephan Weaver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Subject: RE: IPF Logging packets Every 2-10 Seconds. Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 13:28:29 -0400 The log shows that it's all packets try to penetrate your firewall. This is normal public internet traffic sent by people trying to break into your system. Your firewall is doing its job of blocking this unwanted junk just like you want it to do. If you don't want to see this stuff in your log then remove the log keyword from your rules and it will stop logging that junk. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Stephan Weaver Sent: Monday, June 27, 2005 11:19 AM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: IPF Logging packets Every 2-10 Seconds. Hello list, My IPF Firewall System is logging packets almost every 2 - 10 seconds. I would like to narrow this problem down. firewall# cat /etc/ipf.rules block in all block out all pass in quick on lo0 all pass out quick on lo0 all pass out quick on vr0 from any to any keep state pass in quick on vr1 all pass out quick on vr1 all # Block all inbound traffic from non-routable or reserved address spaces block in log quick on vr0 from 192.168.0.0/16 to any #RFC 1918 private IP block in log quick on vr0 from 172.16.0.0/12 to any#RFC 1918 private IP block in log quick on vr0 from 10.0.0.0/8 to any #RFC 1918 private IP block in log quick on vr0 from 127.0.0.0/8 to any #loopback block in log quick on vr0 from 0.0.0.0/8 to any#loopback block in log quick on vr0 from 169.254.0.0/16 to any #DHCP auto-config block in log quick on vr0 from 192.0.2.0/24 to any #reserved for doc's block in log quick on vr0 from 204.152.64.0/23 to any #Sun cluster interconnect block in log quick on vr0 from 224.0.0.0/3 to any #Class D & E multicast # Block frags block in quick on vr0 all with frags # Block short tcp packets block in quick on vr0 proto tcp all with short # Block source routed packets block in quick on vr0 all with opt lsrr block in quick on vr0 all with opt ssrr # Block nmap OS fingerprint attempts # Log first occurrence of these so I can get their IP address block in log first quick on vr0 proto tcp all flags FUP block in log first quick on vr0 proto tcp all flags SF/SFRA block in log first quick on vr0 proto tcp all flags /SFRA block in log first quick on vr0 proto tcp all flags F/SFRA block in log first quick on vr0 proto tcp all flags U/SFRAU block in log first quick on vr0 proto tcp all flags P # Block anything with special options block in quick on vr0 all with ipopts # Block public pings block in log quick on vr0 proto icmp all icmp-type 8 # TSTT NameServers pass in quick on vr0 proto tcp/udp from 196.3.132.1 to any keep state pass in quick on vr0 proto tcp/udp from 196.3.132.4 to any keep state # Block and log only first occurrence of all remaining traffic # coming into the firewall. The logging of only the first # occurrence stops a .denial of service. attack targeted # at filling up your log file space. # This rule enforces the block all by default logic. block in log first quick on vr0 all firewall# tail -f /var/log/ipfilter.log 27/06/2005 11:13:48.699874 vr0 @0:27 b 138.217.177.128,2840 -> 192.168.1.1,16478 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN 27/06/2005 11:13:54.736606 vr0 @0:27 b 138.217.177.128,2840 -> 192.168.1.1,16478 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN 27/06/2005 11:14:03.585530 vr0 @0:27 b 67.33.99.114,50895 -> 192.168.1.1,16478 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN 27/06/2005 11:14:06.598363 vr0 @0:27 b 67.33.99.114,50895 -> 192.168.1.1,16478 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN 27/06/2005 11:14:09.699265 vr0 @0:27 b 200.108.28.115,3053 -> 192.168.1.1,445 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN 27/06/2005 11:14:12.515511 vr0 @0:27 b 67.33.99.114,50895 -> 192.168.1.1,16478 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN 27/06/2005 11:14:12.670997 vr0 @0:27 b 200.108.28.115,3053 -> 192.168.1.1,445 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN 27/06/2005 11:14:14.470027 vr0 @0:27 b 218.212.63.91,1425 -> 192.168.1.1,16478 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN 27/06/2005 11:14:17.432263 vr0 @0:27 b 218.212.63.91,1425 -> 192.168.1.1,16478 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN 27/06/2005 11:14:23.439618 vr0 @0:27 b 218.212.63.91,1425 -> 192.168.1.1,16478 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN 27/06/2005 11:14:29.633637 vr0 @0:27 b 70.186.121.59,4675 -> 192.168.1.1,16478 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN 27/06/2005 11:14:30.068091 vr0 @0:27 b 138.217.177.128,2905 -> 192.168.1.1,16478 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN 27/06/2005 11:14:32.592810 vr0 @0:27 b 70.186.121.59,4675 -> 192.168.1.1,16478 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN 27/06/2005 11:14:32.954266 vr0 @0:27 b 138.217.177.128,2905 -> 192.168.1.1,16478 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN 27/06/2005 11:14:38.859627 vr0 @0:27 b 70.186.121.59,
RE: IPF Logging packets Every 2-10 Seconds.
No you are wrong wrong. Rule number 27 in the incore table, not in your text source rule file. Use ipfstat -oihn to list the incore rules table. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Stephan Weaver Sent: Monday, June 27, 2005 3:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: IPF Logging packets Every 2-10 Seconds. No you are wrong. if you look at the 1st log line. eg. >27/06/2005 11:13:48.699874 vr0 @0:27 b 138.217.177.128,2840 -> 192.168.1.1,16478 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN that log refers to RULE NUMBER 27, which in my RULSET, line 27 dosen't have the word log. so it must be something else. >From: "fbsd_user" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "Stephan Weaver" ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >Subject: RE: IPF Logging packets Every 2-10 Seconds. >Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 13:28:29 -0400 > >The log shows that it's all packets try to penetrate your firewall. >This is normal public internet traffic sent by people trying to >break into your system. Your firewall is doing its job of blocking >this unwanted junk just like you want it to do. If you don't want to >see this stuff in your log then remove the log keyword from your >rules and it will stop logging that junk. > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Stephan >Weaver >Sent: Monday, June 27, 2005 11:19 AM >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: IPF Logging packets Every 2-10 Seconds. > > >Hello list, > >My IPF Firewall System is logging packets almost every 2 - 10 >seconds. >I would like to narrow this problem down. > >firewall# cat /etc/ipf.rules >block in all >block out all > >pass in quick on lo0 all >pass out quick on lo0 all > >pass out quick on vr0 from any to any keep state > >pass in quick on vr1 all >pass out quick on vr1 all > ># Block all inbound traffic from non-routable or reserved address >spaces >block in log quick on vr0 from 192.168.0.0/16 to any #RFC 1918 >private IP >block in log quick on vr0 from 172.16.0.0/12 to any#RFC 1918 >private IP >block in log quick on vr0 from 10.0.0.0/8 to any #RFC 1918 >private IP >block in log quick on vr0 from 127.0.0.0/8 to any #loopback >block in log quick on vr0 from 0.0.0.0/8 to any#loopback >block in log quick on vr0 from 169.254.0.0/16 to any #DHCP >auto-config >block in log quick on vr0 from 192.0.2.0/24 to any #reserved for >doc's >block in log quick on vr0 from 204.152.64.0/23 to any #Sun cluster >interconnect >block in log quick on vr0 from 224.0.0.0/3 to any #Class D & E >multicast > ># Block frags >block in quick on vr0 all with frags ># Block short tcp packets >block in quick on vr0 proto tcp all with short ># Block source routed packets >block in quick on vr0 all with opt lsrr >block in quick on vr0 all with opt ssrr ># Block nmap OS fingerprint attempts ># Log first occurrence of these so I can get their IP address >block in log first quick on vr0 proto tcp all flags FUP >block in log first quick on vr0 proto tcp all flags SF/SFRA >block in log first quick on vr0 proto tcp all flags /SFRA >block in log first quick on vr0 proto tcp all flags F/SFRA >block in log first quick on vr0 proto tcp all flags U/SFRAU >block in log first quick on vr0 proto tcp all flags P ># Block anything with special options >block in quick on vr0 all with ipopts > ># Block public pings >block in log quick on vr0 proto icmp all icmp-type 8 > > ># TSTT NameServers >pass in quick on vr0 proto tcp/udp from 196.3.132.1 to any keep >state >pass in quick on vr0 proto tcp/udp from 196.3.132.4 to any keep >state > ># Block and log only first occurrence of all remaining traffic ># coming into the firewall. The logging of only the first ># occurrence stops a .denial of service. attack targeted ># at filling up your log file space. ># This rule enforces the block all by default logic. >block in log first quick on vr0 all > > > > >firewall# tail -f /var/log/ipfilter.log >27/06/2005 11:13:48.699874 vr0 @0:27 b 138.217.177.128,2840 -> >192.168.1.1,16478 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN >27/06/2005 11:13:54.736606 vr0 @0:27 b 138.217.177.128,2840 -> >192.168.1.1,16478 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN >27/06/2005 11:14:03.585530 vr0 @0:27 b 67.33.99.114,50895 -> >192.168.1.1,16478 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN >27/06/2005 11:14:06.598363 vr0 @0:27 b 67.33.99.114,50895 -> >192.168.1.1,16478 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN >27/06/2005 11:14:09.699265 vr0 @0:27 b 200.108.28.115,3053 -> >192.168.1.1,445 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN >27/06/2005 11:14:12.515511 vr0 @0:27 b 67.33.99.114,50895 -> >192.168.1.1,16478 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN >27/06/2005 11:14:12.670997 vr0 @0:27 b 200.108.28.115,3053 -> >192.168.1.1,445 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN >27/06/2005 11:14:14.470027 vr0 @0:27 b 218.212.63.91,1425 -> >192.168.1.1,16478 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN >27/06/2005 11:14:17.432263 vr0 @0:27 b 218.212.63.91,1425 -> >192.168.1.1,16478 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN >27/06/2005 11:14:23.439618 vr0 @0:27 b 218.212.63.91,1425 -> >
Re: upgrading all ports
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 27 Jun 2005, Nikolas Britton wrote: On 6/27/05, Denny White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 27 Jun 2005, Nikolas Britton wrote: This couldn't have come at a better time for me. I really boned things up about 40 hours ago. I was getting ready to leave and because I'd been doing some learning/experimenting with portupgrade on some held ports, I hit the wrong switch. I think it was portupgrade -arRF & now, about 40 hours later, shortly after returning home, we're still going, going, going... Things are really in a mess & I've read the recent posts on this thread & can attest, sitting here for several hours, that "visits some ports many times" is an understatement. It's becoming rediculous & I'm wondering if, at some point, when clean is going after something else was just upgraded, if I can break out & go back with a simple portupgrade -arR & not screw things up to badly. Any help/feedback on this will be GREATLY appreciated. :) Denny White You shouldn't have any problems if you do that but kill it at the beginning of the next build, not when it's cleaning. Thanks so much for the personal speedy reply. I've worked for a month getting this system to about where I want it, & I hate to see it all go down the tubes. Sure glad you straightened me out on when to break out, too. I see you didn't put in a cc to freebsd-questions, so I guess I won't either. After breaking out of the loop, what's the best thing to do at that point? The only way I could come up with to try to start is: cvsup ports-supfile portsdb -Uu portversion -l "<" portupgrade -arR (no F this time) Just restart portupgrade without the F flag, it will pick-up where it left off. If I can get things back right, I'll just learn to live with the "held" ports. I never remember telling it to hold anything, & it's probably pretty apparent I don't understand as much as I should about portupgrade. I learned what I know from Dru Lavigne's blogs at Oreilly, & until I fat-fingered the F without thinking, it was working okay, except for the held ports. Thanks again for your help. Denny White I'm not sure what you mean by held ports? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" Held ports are listed in an array in /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf. Why I have any there beats me. I don't know enough about it yet to be able to give an answer. There are times when portupgrade will ask me questions about extra features in some port, but that's the only interaction I remember having with the program while it was running, as far as supplying answers to it. I never remember telling it to "hold" anything. Wish someone could help me get this through my thick noggin. :) I've been doing a lot of reading on it, & I see where a lot of folks think you're better off deinstalling ports & starting from scratch. Others prefer portsmanager, I think it's called. The reason I started using ports in the 1st place was to learn how to add extra features to progs that aren't installed by default, as in packages. Since I definitely ain't that sharp, I may start using pkgs more & ports less. I'd rather have a smooth working install than the power to wipe out my system & have to reinstall, at least until I ever get up to speed on things. Thank you very much for the help. Denny White -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCwFloy0Ty5RZE55oRAqiDAJ44tORnQYQY7QA1o5fMDxFSouurRQCg0aNc aZRTHj3B/y0nmcbP8bhb3FE= =bDDM -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: make builworld fails owing to libstdc++ problems
I tried but the same error stil pops up. What else should I do? Vittorio Alle 07:26, lunedì 27 giugno 2005, Vasil Dimov ha scritto: > On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 09:33:19PM +0200, Vittorio De Martino wrote: > > uname -a > > FreeBSD fbsd.grtn 5.4-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p2 #0: Sat Jun 25 > > 17:40:47 CEST 2005 > > > > > > I have the following in > > in make.conf > > CPUTYPE=p4 > > CFLAGS= -O2 -pipe -funroll-loops > > COPTFLAGS= -O2 -pipe -funroll-loops > > > > in stable-supfile: > > *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5_4 > > in ports-supfile: > > default release=cvs tag=. > > > > I've just run (I've been using 5.4 since the very beginning and updated > > it every month roughly) > > > > # 1. �`cd /usr/src' � � � (or to the directory containing your source > > tree). # 2. �`make update' > > # 3. �`make buildworld' > > > > BUT.. > > > > x_handler.cc > > /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc++/../../../contrib/libstdc++/libsupc++/guard.cc > > /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc++/../../../contrib/libstdc++/libsupc++/new_handl > >er.cc > > /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc++/../../../contrib/libstdc++/libsupc++/new_op.cc > > /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc++/../../../contrib/libstdc++/libsupc++/new_opnt. > >cc > > /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc++/../../../contrib/libstdc++/libsupc++/new_opv.c > >c > > /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc++/../../../contrib/libstdc++/libsupc++/new_opvnt > >.cc > > /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc++/../../../contrib/libstdc++/libsupc++/pure.cc > > /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc++/../../../contrib/libstdc++/libsupc++/tinfo.cc > > /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc++/../../../contrib/libstdc++/libsupc++/tinfo2.cc > > /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc++/../../../contrib/libstdc++/libsupc++/vec.cc > > /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc++/../../../contrib/libstdc++/libsupc++/vterminat > >e.cc In file included > > from > > /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc++/../../../contrib/libstdc++/libsupc++/eh_alloc. > >cc:37: > > /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc++/../../../contrib/libstdc++/libsupc++/unwind-cx > >x.h:41:20: unwind.h: No such file or directory > > In file included > > from > > /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc++/../../../contrib/libstdc++/libsupc++/eh_aux_ru > >ntime.cc:34: > > /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc++/../../../contrib/libstdc++/libsupc++/unwind-cx > >x.h:41:20: unwind.h: No such file or directory > > In file included > > from > > /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc++/../../../contrib/libstdc++/libsupc++/eh_catch. > >cc:32: > > /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc++/../../../contrib/libstdc++/libsupc++/unwind-cx > >x.h:41:20: unwind.h: No such file or directory > > In file included > > from > > /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc++/../../../contrib/libstdc++/libsupc++/eh_except > >ion.cc:34: > > /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc++/../../../contrib/libstdc++/libsupc++/unwind-cx > >x.h:41:20: unwind.h: No such file or directory > > In file included > > from > > /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc++/../../../contrib/libstdc++/libsupc++/eh_global > >s.cc:33: > > /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc++/../../../contrib/libstdc++/libsupc++/unwind-cx > >x.h:41:20: unwind.h: No such file or directory > > In file included > > from > > /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc++/../../../contrib/libstdc++/libsupc++/eh_person > >ality.cc:34: > > /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc++/../../../contrib/libstdc++/libsupc++/unwind-cx > >x.h:41:20: unwind.h: No such file or directory > > /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc++/../../../contrib/libstdc++/libsupc++/eh_person > >ality.cc:38:23: unwind-pe.h: No such file or directory > > In file included > > from > > /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc++/../../../contrib/libstdc++/libsupc++/eh_term_h > >andler.cc:30: > > /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc++/../../../contrib/libstdc++/libsupc++/unwind-cx > >x.h:41:20: unwind.h: No such file or directory > > In file included > > from > > /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc++/../../../contrib/libstdc++/libsupc++/eh_termin > >ate.cc:34: > > /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc++/../../../contrib/libstdc++/libsupc++/unwind-cx > >x.h:41:20: unwind.h: No such file or directory > > In file included > > from > > /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc++/../../../contrib/libstdc++/libsupc++/eh_throw. > >cc:32: > > /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc++/../../../contrib/libstdc++/libsupc++/unwind-cx > >x.h:41:20: unwind.h: No such file or directory > > In file included > > from > > /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc++/../../../contrib/libstdc++/libsupc++/eh_type.c > >c:32: > > /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc++/../../../contrib/libstdc++/libsupc++/unwind-cx > >x.h:41:20: unwind.h: No such file or directory > > In file included > > from > > /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc++/../../../contrib/libstdc++/libsupc++/eh_unex_h > >andler.cc:30: > > /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc++/../../../contrib/libstdc++/libsupc++/unwind-cx > >x.h:41:20: unwind.h: No such file or directory > > In file included > > from > > /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc++/../../../contrib/libstdc++/libsupc++/pure.cc:3 > >1: > > /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc++/../../../contrib/libstdc++/libsupc++/unwind-cx > >x.h:41:20: unwind.h: No such file or directory > > In file included > > from > > /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc++/../../../contrib/libstdc++/libsupc++/vec.cc:37 > >: > > /usr/src/gnu/
Re: OpenWebMail won't make
Hi Bill,
On Mon, 27 Jun 2005, Bill Schmitt (SW) wrote:
|I've been trying to install openwebmail. I've tried portupgrade and make
|and both seem to have the same issue. I get an error message that perl
|5.6.1 or higher is needed and suggesting that I install 5.8. I've done
|that (several times) but I still get the error message. Has anyone come
|across this and have a solution? I'm running FBSD 4.9.
What the command bellow shows to you:
# perl -v
Following is a script to upgrade perl:
i) Install the perl5.8 port:
# portinstall lang/perl5.8
- or -
# cd /usr/ports/lang/perl5.8
# make install
ii) Set the new version of perl to be the default. (This also turns
off building perl as part of the base system):
# use.perl port
iii) Re-install any 3rd party modules, etc that you've installed so
the new perl can access them. There should be a neater way of
doing this...
# find /usr/local/lib/perl5/{site_perl/5.005,5.00503} -type f \
-print0 | \ xargs -0 -n 1 pkg_which | sort -u /tmp/perl-ports
# vi perl-ports
[ Sanity check the results: take out any non-ports (like
'?'), ports that are now bundled with perl or that you no
longer wish to have installed ]
# portupgrade -f `cat /tmp/perl-ports`
iv) All of the versions of automake use perl and have the version to use
as the 1st line. You need to:
portupgrade -f automake
to get things ready for your new version of perl.
- Marcelo Souza
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: make builworld fails owing to libstdc++ problems
On 2005-06-27 22:10, Vittorio De Martino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alle 07:26, luned?? 27 giugno 2005, Vasil Dimov ha scritto: > > On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 09:33:19PM +0200, Vittorio De Martino wrote: > > > uname -a > > > FreeBSD fbsd.grtn 5.4-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p2 #0: Sat Jun 25 > > > 17:40:47 CEST 2005 > > > > > > > > > I have the following in > > > in make.conf > > > CPUTYPE=p4 > > > CFLAGS= -O2 -pipe -funroll-loops > > > COPTFLAGS= -O2 -pipe -funroll-loops > > I tried but the same error stil pops up. What else should I do? > Vittorio Start by removing all the fancy options from make.conf and starting *WITHOUT* any make.conf file in /etc. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
RE: sata raid controllers compatibility
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Nikolas Britton > Sent: Monday, June 27, 2005 12:04 PM > ?, They are both basic 2 port SATA RAID 0/1 cards, I don't see why > FreeBSD would not support them but it's allways a good idea to stick > with whats in the hardware notes: > http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.4R/hardware-i386.html For disk controllers, the hardware notes begin with the ata driver but does not list any hardware that this driver supports. Where is the list of hardware that the ata driver supports? -gayn ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
bsdextended mac module question
Hello, I try to make a bsdextended mac policy and when I add the following rule, I can't login with a simple user: ugidfw add subject not uid root object uid root mode rx This rule is for protecting root's files from others in any case. And I've got the following message: /libexec/ld-els.so.1: Cannot fstat "/lib/libedit.so.4" Jun 27 10:36:25 localhost login: _secure_path: cannot stat /etc/login.conf: Permission denied What's wrong? Btw, could somebody tell what the a mode means in bsdextended rules? Thanks, Gábor Kövesdán ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: bsdextended mac module question
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 10:45:35AM +0200, K?vesd?n G?bor wrote: > Hello, > > I try to make a bsdextended mac policy and when I add the following > rule, I can't login with a simple user: > > ugidfw add subject not uid root object uid root mode rx I think you'll need to allow stat permission too - say "rxs" not just "rx". You may also want to think about what this rule does to /tmp. David. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: make builworld fails owing to libstdc++ problems
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 27 Jun 2005, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: On 2005-06-27 22:10, Vittorio De Martino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Alle 07:26, luned?? 27 giugno 2005, Vasil Dimov ha scritto: On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 09:33:19PM +0200, Vittorio De Martino wrote: uname -a FreeBSD fbsd.grtn 5.4-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p2 #0: Sat Jun 25 17:40:47 CEST 2005 I have the following in in make.conf CPUTYPE=p4 CFLAGS= -O2 -pipe -funroll-loops COPTFLAGS= -O2 -pipe -funroll-loops I tried but the same error stil pops up. What else should I do? Vittorio Start by removing all the fancy options from make.conf and starting *WITHOUT* any make.conf file in /etc. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" I'm not a programmer, but I have read where the funroll-loops can produce unstable code. And, I can attest to the fact that my system complained about the other flags you've got there & which I also tried to use, except for the cpu type. I had to stop, do some house cleaning, delete the stuff out of make.conf, & start over. Then everything went smoothly. And, as I said, I'm not a programmer, but I sat & watched the build going on after fixing make.conf, & I saw it using the same values, except for funroll-loops, that I had had in make.conf. Go figure! I know someone on this list can probably clear that up, as to why. Meantime, I'd do what the other answer to your post said to do & remove that stuff from make.conf & start over. If you still run into some problems, maybe it'd be because of the stuff left behind from when you tried to build before. Then you might want to clean up your /usr/src & /usr/obj's too. That is, cd /usr/src make clean cd ../obj chflags -R noschg * rm -rf * which will clean up from what you've previously done. Then again, you might want to wait until some more folks read this post and see if you get any more input. I'm just telling you what's worked for me in the past. Denny White -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCwHIsy0Ty5RZE55oRAuj9AKCVCayLIoDpog160A0xsfrx0r184gCffn6K 1jC514OPIBLdhoDbiTbM3XY= =QaSn -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Growfs and GConcat
Hello, I've added another disk to a gconcat system by remaking the device with another drive on the list. After doing this I can remount the filesystem and it comes up without any problems, however when I try to grow the UFS filesystem it fails. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# growfs /dev/concat/data growfs: we are not growing (204799->195180543) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# growfs -s 1 /dev/concat/data growfs: we are not growing (204799->0) Is there another more correct method to do this, or has anyone done this successfully? Thanks in advance, -Bri ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: sata raid controllers compatibility
Gayn Winters wrote: For disk controllers, the hardware notes begin with the ata driver but does not list any hardware that this driver supports. Where is the list of hardware that the ata driver supports? The hardware notes (i386 at least) begin with a *link* to man 4 ata. --Alex ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: sata raid controllers compatibility
On 6/27/05, Gayn Winters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > Nikolas Britton > > Sent: Monday, June 27, 2005 12:04 PM > > > ?, They are both basic 2 port SATA RAID 0/1 cards, I don't see why > > FreeBSD would not support them but it's allways a good idea to stick > > with whats in the hardware notes: > > http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.4R/hardware-i386.html > > For disk controllers, the hardware notes begin with the ata driver but > does not list any hardware that this driver supports. Where is the list > of hardware that the ata driver supports? > Click on the ata link... I will show you the ata manpage... otherwise type in man ata at the console of a FreeBSD system http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=ata&sektion=4&manpath=FreeBSD+5.4-RELEASE ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Questions about packages and ports
* Sean Murphy [2005-06-27 10:59 -0700] > I like to use the pkg_add -r feature of FreeBSD, however I have run > into a problem where the ports have a more current version of the app > then the package of the same app. > > It seems the ports collection is updated more then the package > collection is this true? The packages are automatically built from the port-collection. So a package is a binary pre-build version of the corresponding port. The ports collection are updated several times a day, while the rebuild-process takes a long time. This compilation takes place on the package building clusters (pointyhat.freebsd.org and some other cluster of which I cannot remember the name). Once the peckages have been built, they're uploaded to the master ftp-site, and will then be propagated to the mirror-sites. The packages are rebuilt about once a week, I think. > Is the maintainer of a package and a port the same person? Are they > responsible for updating the package and the port? Since the packages are automatically built, they don't have a maintainer in the same way as the ports do. I guess it is the Release Engineer team that's in charge of the packages that come with a release, but the one's that's on the ftp-sites are just automatically built from the ports. This process is prone to errors, and if a port becomes broken, I guess the corresponding package might get out-of-date. You could take a look at the errorlog on pointyhat.freebsd.org, but I'm not too sure about this process. Someone else could probably fill in the blanks. Or you could do a search on the web. I'm sure this process is described in detail somwhere. Bottom line is that the port maintainer makes sure that the port is buildable. The pointyhat-cluster then builds it to make a package. The package as such, has no maintainer of its own. > Packages will download dependencys required by the app does the ports do > this as well? Yes! ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
