Re: compare zfs xfs and jfs o
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote: Needing fsck because the drive is failing and not able to store and retrieve data reliably any more is a whole different thing. or bad data stored because of non-disk errors. in this case any filesystem will store the wrong data. This has little to do with ZFS. Beside in production one should run with ECC memory to eliminate the possibility of incorrect data from memory ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: compare zfs xfs and jfs o
On 09/08/2012 16:09, Matthias Gamsjager wrote: Beside in production one should run with ECC memory to eliminate the possibility of incorrect data from memory ECC doesn't detect all memory errors. -- Bruce Cran ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: compare zfs xfs and jfs o
Of course ZFS doesn't need fsck. Until it fails. Did you personally try ZFS ? of course. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: compare zfs xfs and jfs o
On 07/08/2012 22:09, Wojciech Puchar wrote: Of course ZFS doesn't need fsck. Until it fails. It doesn't need fsck for the normal case of filesystem corruption due to system crashes: in that case, you stand to lose maybe the last one or two IO transactions that hadn't made it onto the disk yet, but the data that was already on the disk will still be consistent. Needing fsck because the drive is failing and not able to store and retrieve data reliably any more is a whole different thing. ZFS at least will discover that this is happening due to the built-in checksumming and avoid many instances of silent corruption. What it can't do is take a filesystem containing random errors and reconstruct a pristine version from it. But then what filesystem can? Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matt...@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: compare zfs xfs and jfs o
Needing fsck because the drive is failing and not able to store and retrieve data reliably any more is a whole different thing. or bad data stored because of non-disk errors. least will discover that this is happening due to the built-in checksumming and avoid many instances of silent corruption. What it can't do is take a filesystem containing random errors and reconstruct a pristine version from it. But then what filesystem can? the question is how much can. Anyway ok i will not try anymore to stop you from your ZFS religion. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: compare zfs xfs and jfs o
El 05/08/12 18:10, Wojciech Puchar escribió: really - stick with FreeBSD UFS. it is really best. Yes UFS is very good, but very hight IO ZFS is fastest if you use L2ARC/ZIL on SSD. if... better just move heavy used things on SSD and rest on HDD. really it's fastest. Yes, you can do that ... until the SSD is full ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: compare zfs xfs and jfs o
El 05/08/12 20:05, Anonymous Remailer (austria) escribió: I think that XFS JFS are more mature filesystems than ZFS This is not up for discussion. but the feature set of ZFS i ahead in the future. Too many iPads, iPhones, etc? For a NFS server first I'll go with ZFS because the consistence in disk If not spelling, or grammar... and speed will gonna be the differentiator. A high-school education may well have been the differentiator, but that's not important right now. Journaling filesystems are not known for speed. EXT2 will probably outperform ZFS as far as NFS servers go. English is not my native language, so i can make mistakes. ZFS is the way to go if you need consistency + speed on a NFS server/service. -- Speed Will Gonna Be The Differentiator ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: compare zfs xfs and jfs o
El 05/08/12 18:13, Wojciech Puchar escribió: with ZFS because the consistence in disk and speed will gonna be the differentiator. true. it is consistently slow. REALLY from what tale do you people get such a statements. There is no tale, only a feature set: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zfs#Features And everything everyone writes is always true. Did you read the foot notes ? the subsequent links ? Regards, ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: compare zfs xfs and jfs o
English is not my native language, so i can make mistakes. ZFS is the way to go if you need consistency + speed on a NFS server/service. Of course ZFS doesn't need fsck. Until it fails. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: compare zfs xfs and jfs o
El 07/08/12 16:09, Wojciech Puchar escribió: English is not my native language, so i can make mistakes. ZFS is the way to go if you need consistency + speed on a NFS server/service. Of course ZFS doesn't need fsck. Until it fails. Did you personally try ZFS ? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: compare zfs xfs and jfs o
Hi Ashkan, I think that XFS JFS are more mature filesystems than ZFS, but the feature set of ZFS i ahead in the future. For a NFS server first I'll go with ZFS because the consistence in disk and speed will gonna be the differentiator. true. it is consistently slow. REALLY from what tale do you people get such a statements. Look at L2ARC and ZIL to improve ZFS speed. it's far better to just put manually heavily used things to SSD. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: compare zfs xfs and jfs o
i have 16tb storage. 8x2tb sata raided. i want to share it on network via nfs. which file system is better for it? thank you badly imprecise question. you may share any filesystem. Not sure what you want to achieve. No explanation of raided - this means nothing without precise description. If you ask what i do commonly then i would do 8 gmirror-based RAID1 volumes, and standard UFS filesystem on each with softupdates (or softupdates+journal). And move as much as possible software directly to machine. Never create another level of indirection (like NFS) when not needed. if you really HAVE to use NFS heavily i strongly recommend using unfsd from ports and patch if to AVOID constant fsync, and make sure UPS is installed. NFS protocol is terrible by design (not by implementation) resulting in all writes being done synchronously. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: compare zfs xfs and jfs o
On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 03:46:53PM -0500, Marco Muskus wrote: Hi Ashkan, I think that XFS JFS are more mature filesystems than ZFS, but the feature set of ZFS i ahead in the future. For a NFS server first I'll go with ZFS because the consistence in disk and speed will gonna be the differentiator. The idea that ZFS is faster than XFS is certainly a new one for me. Do you have some benchmarks for that? -- Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: compare zfs xfs and jfs o
I think that XFS JFS are more mature filesystems than ZFS, but the feature set of ZFS i ahead in the future. For a NFS server first I'll go with ZFS because the consistence in disk and speed will gonna be the differentiator. The idea that ZFS is faster than XFS is certainly a new one for me. Do is ZFS supposed to be faster at all? really - stick with FreeBSD UFS. it is really best. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: compare zfs xfs and jfs o
El 05/08/12 06:22, Wojciech Puchar escribió: Hi Ashkan, I think that XFS JFS are more mature filesystems than ZFS, but the feature set of ZFS i ahead in the future. For a NFS server first I'll go with ZFS because the consistence in disk and speed will gonna be the differentiator. true. it is consistently slow. REALLY from what tale do you people get such a statements. There is no tale, only a feature set: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zfs#Features Look at L2ARC and ZIL to improve ZFS speed. it's far better to just put manually heavily used things to SSD. Yes ! That's what actually ZFS do with SSD put the most used elements on it. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: compare zfs xfs and jfs o
El 05/08/12 13:03, Wojciech Puchar escribió: I think that XFS JFS are more mature filesystems than ZFS, but the feature set of ZFS i ahead in the future. For a NFS server first I'll go with ZFS because the consistence in disk and speed will gonna be the differentiator. The idea that ZFS is faster than XFS is certainly a new one for me. Do is ZFS supposed to be faster at all? really - stick with FreeBSD UFS. it is really best. Yes UFS is very good, but very hight IO ZFS is fastest if you use L2ARC/ZIL on SSD. There is no doubt in the benefits of SSD on the fileservers (SMB, NFS,etc.) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: compare zfs xfs and jfs o
really - stick with FreeBSD UFS. it is really best. Yes UFS is very good, but very hight IO ZFS is fastest if you use L2ARC/ZIL on SSD. if... better just move heavy used things on SSD and rest on HDD. really it's fastest. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: compare zfs xfs and jfs o
with ZFS because the consistence in disk and speed will gonna be the differentiator. true. it is consistently slow. REALLY from what tale do you people get such a statements. There is no tale, only a feature set: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zfs#Features And everything everyone writes is always true. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: compare zfs xfs and jfs o
I think that XFS JFS are more mature filesystems than ZFS This is not up for discussion. but the feature set of ZFS i ahead in the future. Too many iPads, iPhones, etc? For a NFS server first I'll go with ZFS because the consistence in disk If not spelling, or grammar... and speed will gonna be the differentiator. A high-school education may well have been the differentiator, but that's not important right now. Journaling filesystems are not known for speed. EXT2 will probably outperform ZFS as far as NFS servers go. -- Speed Will Gonna Be The Differentiator ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: compare zfs xfs and jfs o
--As of August 5, 2012 10:29:16 AM -0600, Chad Perrin is alleged to have said: I think that XFS JFS are more mature filesystems than ZFS, but the feature set of ZFS i ahead in the future. For a NFS server first I'll go with ZFS because the consistence in disk and speed will gonna be the differentiator. The idea that ZFS is faster than XFS is certainly a new one for me. Do you have some benchmarks for that? --As for the rest, it is mine. Particularly in this use-case: From my reading ZFS has a performance hit when used as a base filesystem for NFS. (Largely because it insists on *actually following* the NFS spec, and not taking some shortcuts that are common elsewhere...) Not that I have tested that, even on my NFS server. (Which runs ZFS - there are other excellent reasons to use it, and speed isn't a major concern for that particular box.) Daniel T. Staal --- This email copyright the author. Unless otherwise noted, you are expressly allowed to retransmit, quote, or otherwise use the contents for non-commercial purposes. This copyright will expire 5 years after the author's death, or in 30 years, whichever is longer, unless such a period is in excess of local copyright law. --- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
compare zfs xfs and jfs o
hello i have 16tb storage. 8x2tb sata raided. i want to share it on network via nfs. which file system is better for it? thank you ——— Ashkan R ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: compare zfs xfs and jfs o
Hi Ashkan, I think that XFS JFS are more mature filesystems than ZFS, but the feature set of ZFS i ahead in the future. For a NFS server first I'll go with ZFS because the consistence in disk and speed will gonna be the differentiator. Look at L2ARC and ZIL to improve ZFS speed. Regards, El 04/08/12 09:01, ashkab rahmani escribió: hello i have 16tb storage. 8x2tb sata raided. i want to share it on network via nfs. which file system is better for it? thank you ——— Ashkan R ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail tofreebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
xfs portupgrade problem
Hi, After the X.org upgrade to 7.5, xfs fails to upgrade: === Building for xfs-1.1.0,1 make all-am /usr/local/bin/xmlto -m ./doc/xfs-design.xsl -o doc pdf ./doc/xfs-design.xml Making portrait pages on letter paper (215.9mmx279.4mm) This is pdfeTeX, Version 3.141592-1.21a-2.2 (Web2C 7.5.4) entering extended mode (./tmp.fo ! Missing $ inserted. inserted text $ to be read again _ l.71 ...e./fo:block/fo:blockfo:block id=per_ client_processingfo:blo... ? ! Emergency stop. inserted text $ to be read again _ l.71 ...e./fo:block/fo:blockfo:block id=per_ client_processingfo:blo... No pages of output. Transcript written on tmp.log. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-fonts/xfs/work/xfs-1.1.0. *** Error code 1 I've never seen one of these before. Has anyone an idea? Regards, Marco -- QOTD: Sacred cows make great hamburgers. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: kernel panic - umount xfs partition
... # mount -t xfs -o ro /dev/ad0s2 /mnt # ls /mnt # cp /mnt/my_file /home/zbigniew I forgot add here that I do then # umount /mnt and after that was kernel panic. I'm sorry for the mistake. Zbigniew ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
kernel panic - umount xfs partition
Hello, I have a Dabian 5.0 and FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE-p2 on i386 athlon-xp. I have two partitions under Debian. They are xfs file system. So I mount it from FreeBSD # mount -t xfs -o ro /dev/ad0s1 /mnt # ls /mnt # umount /mnt Everything is OK, but now I do the following # mount -t xfs -o ro /dev/ad0s2 /mnt # ls /mnt # cp /mnt/my_file /home/zbigniew when cp finish the system was frozen and after a while do reboot. After reboot I saw coredump on the swap file. This is only for me or also maybe you have such problem. My system is for desktop usage. I work at school. Zbigniew ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Is there anyway to mount linux xfs filesystems in 5.4
This is something really important if I am going to use FreeBSD more. I need to mount my Gentoo linux which I have on XFS REISERFS partitions. -- SoCalRocks ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is there anyway to mount linux xfs filesystems in 5.4
On 9/20/05, jdonahue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is something really important if I am going to use FreeBSD more. I need to mount my Gentoo linux which I have on XFS REISERFS partitions. -- You can use mount -t ext2fs /drive /mnt Drive is like /dev/ad1 etc and /mnt is mount point Not sure bout Reiserfs, might not be able to ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: XFS on FreeBSD
Craig Rodrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 06:50:38PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote: I'm interested in the project to port XFS to FreeBSD. However, every link I've traced down leads to a dead end. An announcement of FreeBSD for XFS was made on March 22 on the freebsd-current mailing list: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2005-March/047744.html Does anyone have links to where this project is currently housed, or any information about its status? All the current information about this project is located on a new project web page: http://people.freebsd.org/~rodrigc/xfs/ Thanks to everyone who answered. I'm not sure why I had so much trouble finding this before. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
XFS on FreeBSD
I'm interested in the project to port XFS to FreeBSD. However, every link I've traced down leads to a dead end. Does anyone have links to where this project is currently housed, or any information about its status? -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: XFS on FreeBSD
On Tuesday 31 May 2005 15:50, the author Bill Moran contributed to the dialogue on- XFS on FreeBSD: I'm interested in the project to port XFS to FreeBSD. However, every link I've traced down leads to a dead end. Does anyone have links to where this project is currently housed, or any information about its status? This is all I have on my system (its from www.freebsd.org): _ SGI XFS port for FreeBSD Contact: Alexander Kabaev [EMAIL PROTECTED] Contact: Russell Cattelan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Not much has changed since last report was submitted. The read-only access XFS volumes is quite stable now. The work is underway to rewrite xfs_buf layer to minimize local changes intrusiveness. Initial attempt to make XFS code to compile and run on amd64 is in progress too. We really need a care-taker for our userland tools. _ david -- 40 yrs navigating and computing in blue waters. English Owner Captain of British Registered 60' bluewater Ketch S/V Taurus. Currently in San Diego, CA. Sailing May/June bound for Europe via Panama Canal. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: XFS on FreeBSD
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 06:50:38PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote: I'm interested in the project to port XFS to FreeBSD. However, every link I've traced down leads to a dead end. An announcement of FreeBSD for XFS was made on March 22 on the freebsd-current mailing list: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2005-March/047744.html Does anyone have links to where this project is currently housed, or any information about its status? All the current information about this project is located on a new project web page: http://people.freebsd.org/~rodrigc/xfs/ -- Craig Rodrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
XFS for FreeBSD
I've been able to locate some postings that suggested there was an effort to get SGI's XFS ported to FreeBSD -- along with some concerns about licensing (GPL) issues. I'd like to get more information - is there an official project, who's heading it up, etc. etc. Thanks. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
xfs support [was: Re: jfs4bsd]
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 06:22:58 +0930 Greg 'groggy' Lehey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday, 19 April 2004 at 22:42:17 +0200, Marc UBM Bocklet wrote: Hiho! :-) Is there any chance that I can get patches for JFS support under FreeBSD? No. The project never took off. Ah, thanks. What about support for xfs? Bye Marc ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: xfs support [was: Re: jfs4bsd]
On Thursday, 22 April 2004 at 0:14:22 +0200, Marc UBM Bocklet wrote: On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 06:22:58 +0930 Greg 'groggy' Lehey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday, 19 April 2004 at 22:42:17 +0200, Marc UBM Bocklet wrote: Hiho! :-) Is there any chance that I can get patches for JFS support under FreeBSD? No. The project never took off. Ah, thanks. What about support for xfs? As far as I know, nothing has happened there either. This would be a more worthwhile project. Greg -- When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients. If you don't, I may ignore the reply or reply to the original recipients. For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html Note: I discard all HTML mail unseen. Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for PGP public key. See complete headers for address and phone numbers. pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: xfs support [was: Re: jfs4bsd]
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 08:05:32AM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: On Thursday, 22 April 2004 at 0:14:22 +0200, Marc UBM Bocklet wrote: On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 06:22:58 +0930 Greg 'groggy' Lehey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday, 19 April 2004 at 22:42:17 +0200, Marc UBM Bocklet wrote: Hiho! :-) Is there any chance that I can get patches for JFS support under FreeBSD? No. The project never took off. Ah, thanks. What about support for xfs? As far as I know, nothing has happened there either. This would be a more worthwhile project. One of the developers was working on it and had made substantial progress, but is currently busy with work. Keep an eye on the fs@ list for announcements when it's ready. Kris pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
XFS
After a bit of Googling and a search of the list archives, have I correctly come to the conclusion that there isn't any, as of yet, support for XFS in FreeBSD? -- Black Dragon /\ ASCII ribbon campaign \ / against HTML mail and Hell, rocket science isn't even rocket science. X postings. A NASA Rocket Scientist; Undernet; circa 1996/ \ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: XFS
On Tuesday, 17 December 2002 at 20:05:05 -0500, Black Dragon wrote: After a bit of Googling and a search of the list archives, have I correctly come to the conclusion that there isn't any, as of yet, support for XFS in FreeBSD? Yes. Greg -- When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients. If you don't, I may ignore the reply or reply to the original recipients. For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html See complete headers for address and phone numbers To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: XFS
On Tuesday, 17 December 2002 at 20:45:33 -0500, Black Dragon wrote: On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 11:41:27AM +1030, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: On Tuesday, 17 December 2002 at 20:05:05 -0500, Black Dragon wrote: After a bit of Googling and a search of the list archives, have I correctly come to the conclusion that there isn't any, as of yet, support for XFS in FreeBSD? Yes. Thank you for the prompt reply. I need to set up a tftp server to do an IRIX installation, and because I can't mount the installation cds on FreeBSD, I'm going to have to install Linux on a spare machine. Bummer. :-( No, you don't need XFS to net boot. I spent a lot of time netbooting Linux from a FreeBSD system, and I didn't use ext2fs for that. Greg -- When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients. If you don't, I may ignore the reply or reply to the original recipients. For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html See complete headers for address and phone numbers To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
