Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5)
Francis De Brabandere schrieb am 13.09.2009 20:38:26: > ... > the keys on the website points to > http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/empire-db/KEYS > I suggest it points to a location in the repo where it is kept so we > don't have to update two copies each time. I am not sure this is feasible. Locating it in the dist site seems standard to me, though I do not know whether it is an absolute must. If there is no compelling reason to move it, please keep the file there, but make sure your public key is contained in it. > We should at least update > the dist/incubator/empire-db/KEYS file when the release is accepted > (if we keep it) Francis, you can simply add your key, no matter whether the release is accepted or not, and preferably before the release is voted on. It is no problem if there is no release for a key in the KEYS file. > I added myself a while ago to the keys in our > repo/trunk/tools/KEYS.txt. Should we move that file to trunk and > publish it in the dist? I'm not sure whether I understand you correctly, but the file repo/trunk/tools/KEYS.txt is fine as KEYS file. Just make sure the file in the dist directory has the same content. > ... > further my public key is available here: > http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=francisdb Yes, I checked that. But everybody can upload keys to a keyserver and call themselves Francis De Brabandere, so this is no real protection, just convenience. Thomas > > On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Thomas Fischer wrote: > > I have checked the release and I have found the following issues: > > ... > > - francis' signature is not in the KEYS.txt on the website. (see below)) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5)
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Francis De Brabandere wrote: > I added myself a while ago to the keys in our > repo/trunk/tools/KEYS.txt. Should we move that file to trunk and > publish it in the dist? I would say so. The advantage of having the KEYS file also in the /dist/ is that it'll be close to where its used. The advantage of SVN, well that should be obvious :) > also from here: > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#distribution-checksums-sigs > "that the KEYS file contains the public key. (Storing public keys in a > KEYS file is recommended but is not policy.)" > further my public key is available here: > http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=francisdb Yeah, publishing a KEYS file by itself does not really provide the end user with much additional guarantee beyond a SHA1 hash of the file (which is why imagine KEYS files are not policy). The thing that matters much more is linking up to the apache web of trust: http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html#web-of-trust For similar reasons it is also good if multiple people sign releases - more trust :) cheers, - Leo (who in java land already considers it a "win" these days when people opt out of auto-downloading from ibiblio.org, so personally no longer bothers with GPG) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5)
The jar diff is discussed in an other thread. Added myself to the site: http://incubator.apache.org/empire-db/community/contributors.htm meanwhile I created this document on the wiki: http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/empiredb/Becoming+part+of+the+team (just as a start) the keys on the website points to http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/empire-db/KEYS I suggest it points to a location in the repo where it is kept so we don't have to update two copies each time. We should at least update the dist/incubator/empire-db/KEYS file when the release is accepted (if we keep it) I added myself a while ago to the keys in our repo/trunk/tools/KEYS.txt. Should we move that file to trunk and publish it in the dist? also from here: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#distribution-checksums-sigs "that the KEYS file contains the public key. (Storing public keys in a KEYS file is recommended but is not policy.)" further my public key is available here: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=francisdb Cheers, Francis On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Thomas Fischer wrote: > I have checked the release and I have found the following issues: > - jar files in the maven2 repo and the distribution differ. No idea how > this can happen. (see below)) > - francis' signature is not in the KEYS.txt on the website. (see below)) > > Everything else looks good, except the issues sebb found. > > If these issues are fixed, an rc will get a +1 from me > > Thomas > > I have checked the following: > > staging repo: > - empire-db > - jar contains NOTICE and LICENSE > > -empire-db-struts2 > - jar contains NOTICE and LICENSE > > -empire-db-example-advanced > - jar contains NOTICE and LICENSE > > -empire-db-example-basic > - jar contains NOTICE and LICENSE > > -empire-db-example-cxf > - jar contains NOTICE and LICENSE > > rat report looks good > > distribution: > - NOTICE, LICENSE and DISCLAIMER look good > - javadoc looks good > - sources look good > - sources build > - unit tests pass > - all required dependencies are available from central repository, > - docs (README.txt, tutorial.pdf) look good > - md5 and sha1 sums are correct > - signatures are correct, however, francis' key is not in the KEYS.txt. > This needs to be fixed. > > compare maven repo and distribution: > - empire-db-2.0.5-incubating.jar in staging repo and in zip/tgz differ > binaryly. The file size in the staging repository is 269.663 bytes, whereas > in the sistribution, it is 269.664 bytes. > empire-db-struts2-2.0.5-incubating.jar also seems to be different, but has > same file size. > > Regards, > > Thomas > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > -- http://www.somatik.be Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5)
I have checked the release and I have found the following issues: - jar files in the maven2 repo and the distribution differ. No idea how this can happen. (see below)) - francis' signature is not in the KEYS.txt on the website. (see below)) Everything else looks good, except the issues sebb found. If these issues are fixed, an rc will get a +1 from me Thomas I have checked the following: staging repo: - empire-db - jar contains NOTICE and LICENSE -empire-db-struts2 - jar contains NOTICE and LICENSE -empire-db-example-advanced - jar contains NOTICE and LICENSE -empire-db-example-basic - jar contains NOTICE and LICENSE -empire-db-example-cxf - jar contains NOTICE and LICENSE rat report looks good distribution: - NOTICE, LICENSE and DISCLAIMER look good - javadoc looks good - sources look good - sources build - unit tests pass - all required dependencies are available from central repository, - docs (README.txt, tutorial.pdf) look good - md5 and sha1 sums are correct - signatures are correct, however, francis' key is not in the KEYS.txt. This needs to be fixed. compare maven repo and distribution: - empire-db-2.0.5-incubating.jar in staging repo and in zip/tgz differ binaryly. The file size in the staging repository is 269.663 bytes, whereas in the sistribution, it is 269.664 bytes. empire-db-struts2-2.0.5-incubating.jar also seems to be different, but has same file size. Regards, Thomas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5)
On 12/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote: > I got this fixed by adding deployment skipping for our examples module: > > > > > >maven-deploy-plugin > > true > > > > > > > As you can see in the latest snapshot builds the examples are not > being deployed any more: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/empire-db/ > > Now for the staging repo I fear we'll have to create an other RC as I > can not remove folders there. > Anything else we should fix? Just noticed that the tutorial has the following footer: Copyright © 2008-2009, The Apache Software Foundation www.empire-db.org The URL needs to be fixed or removed. > Cheers, > > Francis > > > On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 1:06 PM, sebb wrote: > > On 12/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote: > >> Let's say we do not publish the war's (remove them from the staging > >> repo) as they have no real value. > >> > >> Would you agree with that? > > > > OK by me. > > > > It also seems wrong to publish some content only via Maven. > > > > I would expect to see all the Maven content available in the release > artifacts. > > > > It may be packaged differently - e.g. separate javadoc and source jars > > - and the release artifact may include files that are not in the Maven > > repo (e.g. documentation), but I don't think there should be anything > > in Maven that is not in the release [excluding the Maven-specific repo > > config files] > > > >> Thanks, > >> > >> Francis > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 11:41 PM, sebb wrote: > >> > On 11/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote: > >> >> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:15 PM, Francis De Brabandere > >> >> > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:04 PM, Francis De Brabandere > >> >> > wrote: > >> >> > [X] -1 > >> >> > >> >> Distribution archives are broken. > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> Maven artifacts don't have correct N&L files. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> That war contains jar's that each contain their own license and > notice > >> >> >> files. Should we take those over in an extra N&L? How do you want > us > >> >> >> to keep track of all transitive dependencies in the future. If > one of > >> >> >> the projects we depend on takes an extra dependency we also have > to > >> >> >> add it, there is no easy way to handle this? > >> >> > > >> >> > If we really have to do this I'd rather release the examples as > source > >> >> > code only. Is that a valid option? > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> further I had a look at an other apache project war archive and it > >> >> does not contain any N&L files either: > >> >> > http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/org/apache/wicket/wicket-examples/1.4-rc4/wicket-examples-1.4-rc4.war > >> >> > >> > > >> > I think that's wrong too. > >> > > >> >> Thanks, > >> >> Francis > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> http://www.somatik.be > >> >> Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house. > >> >> > >> >> - > >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > - > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > >> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> > >> http://www.somatik.be > >> Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house. > >> > >> - > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >> > >> > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > > -- > http://www.somatik.be > Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5)
I got this fixed by adding deployment skipping for our examples module: maven-deploy-plugin true As you can see in the latest snapshot builds the examples are not being deployed any more: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/empire-db/ Now for the staging repo I fear we'll have to create an other RC as I can not remove folders there. Anything else we should fix? Cheers, Francis On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 1:06 PM, sebb wrote: > On 12/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote: >> Let's say we do not publish the war's (remove them from the staging >> repo) as they have no real value. >> >> Would you agree with that? > > OK by me. > > It also seems wrong to publish some content only via Maven. > > I would expect to see all the Maven content available in the release > artifacts. > > It may be packaged differently - e.g. separate javadoc and source jars > - and the release artifact may include files that are not in the Maven > repo (e.g. documentation), but I don't think there should be anything > in Maven that is not in the release [excluding the Maven-specific repo > config files] > >> Thanks, >> >> Francis >> >> >> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 11:41 PM, sebb wrote: >> > On 11/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote: >> >> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:15 PM, Francis De Brabandere >> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> > On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:04 PM, Francis De Brabandere >> >> > wrote: >> >> > [X] -1 >> >> >> >> Distribution archives are broken. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Maven artifacts don't have correct N&L files. >> >> >> >> >> >> That war contains jar's that each contain their own license and >> notice >> >> >> files. Should we take those over in an extra N&L? How do you want us >> >> >> to keep track of all transitive dependencies in the future. If one of >> >> >> the projects we depend on takes an extra dependency we also have to >> >> >> add it, there is no easy way to handle this? >> >> > >> >> > If we really have to do this I'd rather release the examples as source >> >> > code only. Is that a valid option? >> >> >> >> >> >> further I had a look at an other apache project war archive and it >> >> does not contain any N&L files either: >> >> >> http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/org/apache/wicket/wicket-examples/1.4-rc4/wicket-examples-1.4-rc4.war >> >> >> > >> > I think that's wrong too. >> > >> >> Thanks, >> >> Francis >> >> >> >> -- >> >> http://www.somatik.be >> >> Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house. >> >> >> >> - >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> >> >> >> >> > >> > - >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> > >> > >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> http://www.somatik.be >> Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house. >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > -- http://www.somatik.be Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5)
On 12/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote: > Let's say we do not publish the war's (remove them from the staging > repo) as they have no real value. > > Would you agree with that? OK by me. It also seems wrong to publish some content only via Maven. I would expect to see all the Maven content available in the release artifacts. It may be packaged differently - e.g. separate javadoc and source jars - and the release artifact may include files that are not in the Maven repo (e.g. documentation), but I don't think there should be anything in Maven that is not in the release [excluding the Maven-specific repo config files] > Thanks, > > Francis > > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 11:41 PM, sebb wrote: > > On 11/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote: > >> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:15 PM, Francis De Brabandere > >> > >> wrote: > >> > On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:04 PM, Francis De Brabandere > >> > wrote: > >> > [X] -1 > >> > >> Distribution archives are broken. > >> >>> > >> >>> Maven artifacts don't have correct N&L files. > >> >> > >> >> That war contains jar's that each contain their own license and notice > >> >> files. Should we take those over in an extra N&L? How do you want us > >> >> to keep track of all transitive dependencies in the future. If one of > >> >> the projects we depend on takes an extra dependency we also have to > >> >> add it, there is no easy way to handle this? > >> > > >> > If we really have to do this I'd rather release the examples as source > >> > code only. Is that a valid option? > >> > >> > >> further I had a look at an other apache project war archive and it > >> does not contain any N&L files either: > >> > http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/org/apache/wicket/wicket-examples/1.4-rc4/wicket-examples-1.4-rc4.war > >> > > > > I think that's wrong too. > > > >> Thanks, > >> Francis > >> > >> -- > >> http://www.somatik.be > >> Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house. > >> > >> - > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >> > >> > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > > > -- > > http://www.somatik.be > Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5)
Let's say we do not publish the war's (remove them from the staging repo) as they have no real value. Would you agree with that? Thanks, Francis On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 11:41 PM, sebb wrote: > On 11/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:15 PM, Francis De Brabandere >> >> wrote: >> > On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:04 PM, Francis De Brabandere >> > wrote: >> > [X] -1 >> >> Distribution archives are broken. >> >>> >> >>> Maven artifacts don't have correct N&L files. >> >> >> >> That war contains jar's that each contain their own license and notice >> >> files. Should we take those over in an extra N&L? How do you want us >> >> to keep track of all transitive dependencies in the future. If one of >> >> the projects we depend on takes an extra dependency we also have to >> >> add it, there is no easy way to handle this? >> > >> > If we really have to do this I'd rather release the examples as source >> > code only. Is that a valid option? >> >> >> further I had a look at an other apache project war archive and it >> does not contain any N&L files either: >> http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/org/apache/wicket/wicket-examples/1.4-rc4/wicket-examples-1.4-rc4.war >> > > I think that's wrong too. > >> Thanks, >> Francis >> >> -- >> http://www.somatik.be >> Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house. >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > -- http://www.somatik.be Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5)
On 11/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote: > On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:15 PM, Francis De Brabandere > > wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:04 PM, Francis De Brabandere > > wrote: > > [X] -1 > > Distribution archives are broken. > >>> > >>> Maven artifacts don't have correct N&L files. > >> > >> That war contains jar's that each contain their own license and notice > >> files. Should we take those over in an extra N&L? How do you want us > >> to keep track of all transitive dependencies in the future. If one of > >> the projects we depend on takes an extra dependency we also have to > >> add it, there is no easy way to handle this? > > > > If we really have to do this I'd rather release the examples as source > > code only. Is that a valid option? > > > further I had a look at an other apache project war archive and it > does not contain any N&L files either: > > http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/org/apache/wicket/wicket-examples/1.4-rc4/wicket-examples-1.4-rc4.war > I think that's wrong too. > Thanks, > Francis > > -- > http://www.somatik.be > Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5)
On 11/09/2009, Rainer Döbele wrote: > Hi Sebb, > > thanks for checking our release once again but I was shocked to read about > your verdict. > > However I have problems to reproduce your findings. > I have downloaded both the zip and the tar from > http://people.apache.org/~francisdb/empire-db/ > > The only difference I could find, was that the zip additionally contains 5 > empty directories that are not present in the tar. But the number and content > of the files do match. > > Also I could not find any raw class files or eclipse project directories. > And there does not seem to be a war file either unless you build it with > Maven. And of course Maven will produce those files. > > I have re-checked a couple of times and I might as well be too stupid to > understand what is wrong with the release. > > Could you please re-check and give me some details about where those > differences and those files are? Sorry, my bad - was looking at an old copy of the expanded archives; current ones look OK. > Thanks > Rainer > > > Sebb wrote: > > Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5) > > > > > On 11/09/2009, sebb wrote: > > > On 08/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > The Empire-db community has completed working on Release 2.0.5 and > > is > > > > now looking for approval of the IPMC to publish the release. Since > > our > > > > previous attempt failed on general@ we prepared a fifth release > > > > candidate. > > > > > > > > These are the major change from our previous 2.0.4 release: > > > > - Maven project management > > > > - New database handlers for Apache Derby, H2, PostgreSQL > > > > - New Examples showing WebService integration using Apache CXF > > > > - Unified distribution file for core and struts2 extensions. > > > > > > > > Change log: > > > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/empire-db/tags/apache-empire- > > db-2.0.5-incubating-rc5/CHANGELOG.txt?view=markup > > > > > > > > Subversion tag: > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/empire-db/tags/apache- > > empire-db-2.0.5-incubating-rc5 > > > > > > > > Maven staging repository: > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/empire-db- > > staging-045 > > > > > > > > > Took a brief look, seems OK. > > > > On further inspection - not OK. > > > > For example, the file > > empire-db-example-struts2-cxf-2.0.5-incubating.war file contains lots > > of 3rd party libraries which are not mentioned in the NOTICE or > > LICENSE files. > > > > > > > > > Distribution files are located here > > > > http://people.apache.org/~francisdb/empire-db/ > > > > > > > > > The tar.gz and .zip files have different contents. > > > > > > They both look completely wrong to me, as they contain raw class files > > > and Eclipse .settings directories. > > > > > > > > > > Rat report for the tag is available here: > > > > http://people.apache.org/~francisdb/empire-db/rat.txt > > > > > > > > Vote open for 72 hours. > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 > > > > [ ] +0 > > > > > > > [X] -1 > > > > > > Distribution archives are broken. > > > > Maven artifacts don't have correct N&L files. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > http://www.somatik.be > > > > Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house. > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5)
On 11/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote: > >> Distribution files are located here > >> http://people.apache.org/~francisdb/empire-db/ > > > > The tar.gz and .zip files have different contents. > > > I did a diff on both archives after extraction and they seem to be equal. > > > > > > They both look completely wrong to me, as they contain raw class files > > and Eclipse .settings directories. > > > could you show me where those .class files and .settings folders are? Sorry, my bad - I was looking at unpacked archives from the previous RC which had been used for test builds; the current archives look fine. > Thanks, > Francis > > > -- > > http://www.somatik.be > Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5)
Francis De Brabandere wrote: > Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5) > > Hi Rainer, > > > The only difference I could find, was that the zip additionally contains > 5 empty directories that are not present in the tar. But the number and > content of the files do match. > > could you tell me which ones those are? > I have a handy java tool called "Remove Empty Directories" that tells you which are empty (and allows you to remove them). I guess the tar format just won't allow empty directories as the zip format does. Empty directories are: \src\empire-db\src\main\resources \src\empire-db-examples\empire-db-example-struts2-cxf\src\test \src\empire-db-struts2\src\test \src\empire-db-struts2\src\test\java \src\empire-db-struts2\src\test\resources I cannot imagine however that this could be a problem. > > > > Also I could not find any raw class files or eclipse project directories. > And there does not seem to be a war file either unless you build it with > Maven. And of course Maven will produce those files. > > The war file is not in the distribution but will be pushed to the > maven repository. See > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/empire-db-staging-045 > > Cheers, > Francis > > -- > http://www.somatik.be > Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5)
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:15 PM, Francis De Brabandere wrote: > On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:04 PM, Francis De Brabandere > wrote: > [X] -1 Distribution archives are broken. >>> >>> Maven artifacts don't have correct N&L files. >> >> That war contains jar's that each contain their own license and notice >> files. Should we take those over in an extra N&L? How do you want us >> to keep track of all transitive dependencies in the future. If one of >> the projects we depend on takes an extra dependency we also have to >> add it, there is no easy way to handle this? > > If we really have to do this I'd rather release the examples as source > code only. Is that a valid option? further I had a look at an other apache project war archive and it does not contain any N&L files either: http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/org/apache/wicket/wicket-examples/1.4-rc4/wicket-examples-1.4-rc4.war Thanks, Francis -- http://www.somatik.be Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5)
Hi Rainer, > The only difference I could find, was that the zip additionally contains 5 > empty directories that are not present in the tar. But the number and content > of the files do match. could you tell me which ones those are? > > Also I could not find any raw class files or eclipse project directories. And > there does not seem to be a war file either unless you build it with Maven. > And of course Maven will produce those files. The war file is not in the distribution but will be pushed to the maven repository. See https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/empire-db-staging-045 Cheers, Francis -- http://www.somatik.be Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5)
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:04 PM, Francis De Brabandere wrote: >>> > [X] -1 >>> >>> Distribution archives are broken. >> >> Maven artifacts don't have correct N&L files. > > That war contains jar's that each contain their own license and notice > files. Should we take those over in an extra N&L? How do you want us > to keep track of all transitive dependencies in the future. If one of > the projects we depend on takes an extra dependency we also have to > add it, there is no easy way to handle this? If we really have to do this I'd rather release the examples as source code only. Is that a valid option? Thanks, Francis -- http://www.somatik.be Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5)
>> > [X] -1 >> >> Distribution archives are broken. > > Maven artifacts don't have correct N&L files. That war contains jar's that each contain their own license and notice files. Should we take those over in an extra N&L? How do you want us to keep track of all transitive dependencies in the future. If one of the projects we depend on takes an extra dependency we also have to add it, there is no easy way to handle this? -- http://www.somatik.be Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5)
Hi Sebb, thanks for checking our release once again but I was shocked to read about your verdict. However I have problems to reproduce your findings. I have downloaded both the zip and the tar from http://people.apache.org/~francisdb/empire-db/ The only difference I could find, was that the zip additionally contains 5 empty directories that are not present in the tar. But the number and content of the files do match. Also I could not find any raw class files or eclipse project directories. And there does not seem to be a war file either unless you build it with Maven. And of course Maven will produce those files. I have re-checked a couple of times and I might as well be too stupid to understand what is wrong with the release. Could you please re-check and give me some details about where those differences and those files are? Thanks Rainer Sebb wrote: > Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5) > > On 11/09/2009, sebb wrote: > > On 08/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > The Empire-db community has completed working on Release 2.0.5 and > is > > > now looking for approval of the IPMC to publish the release. Since > our > > > previous attempt failed on general@ we prepared a fifth release > > > candidate. > > > > > > These are the major change from our previous 2.0.4 release: > > > - Maven project management > > > - New database handlers for Apache Derby, H2, PostgreSQL > > > - New Examples showing WebService integration using Apache CXF > > > - Unified distribution file for core and struts2 extensions. > > > > > > Change log: > > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/empire-db/tags/apache-empire- > db-2.0.5-incubating-rc5/CHANGELOG.txt?view=markup > > > > > > Subversion tag: > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/empire-db/tags/apache- > empire-db-2.0.5-incubating-rc5 > > > > > > Maven staging repository: > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/empire-db- > staging-045 > > > > > > Took a brief look, seems OK. > > On further inspection - not OK. > > For example, the file > empire-db-example-struts2-cxf-2.0.5-incubating.war file contains lots > of 3rd party libraries which are not mentioned in the NOTICE or > LICENSE files. > > > > > > Distribution files are located here > > > http://people.apache.org/~francisdb/empire-db/ > > > > > > The tar.gz and .zip files have different contents. > > > > They both look completely wrong to me, as they contain raw class files > > and Eclipse .settings directories. > > > > > > > Rat report for the tag is available here: > > > http://people.apache.org/~francisdb/empire-db/rat.txt > > > > > > Vote open for 72 hours. > > > > > > [ ] +1 > > > [ ] +0 > > > > > [X] -1 > > > > Distribution archives are broken. > > Maven artifacts don't have correct N&L files. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > http://www.somatik.be > > > Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house. > > > > > > > - > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5)
>> Distribution files are located here >> http://people.apache.org/~francisdb/empire-db/ > > The tar.gz and .zip files have different contents. I did a diff on both archives after extraction and they seem to be equal. > > They both look completely wrong to me, as they contain raw class files > and Eclipse .settings directories. could you show me where those .class files and .settings folders are? Thanks, Francis -- http://www.somatik.be Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5)
On 11/09/2009, sebb wrote: > On 08/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote: > > Hi, > > > > The Empire-db community has completed working on Release 2.0.5 and is > > now looking for approval of the IPMC to publish the release. Since our > > previous attempt failed on general@ we prepared a fifth release > > candidate. > > > > These are the major change from our previous 2.0.4 release: > > - Maven project management > > - New database handlers for Apache Derby, H2, PostgreSQL > > - New Examples showing WebService integration using Apache CXF > > - Unified distribution file for core and struts2 extensions. > > > > Change log: > > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/empire-db/tags/apache-empire-db-2.0.5-incubating-rc5/CHANGELOG.txt?view=markup > > > > Subversion tag: > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/empire-db/tags/apache-empire-db-2.0.5-incubating-rc5 > > > > Maven staging repository: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/empire-db-staging-045 > > > Took a brief look, seems OK. On further inspection - not OK. For example, the file empire-db-example-struts2-cxf-2.0.5-incubating.war file contains lots of 3rd party libraries which are not mentioned in the NOTICE or LICENSE files. > > > Distribution files are located here > > http://people.apache.org/~francisdb/empire-db/ > > > The tar.gz and .zip files have different contents. > > They both look completely wrong to me, as they contain raw class files > and Eclipse .settings directories. > > > > Rat report for the tag is available here: > > http://people.apache.org/~francisdb/empire-db/rat.txt > > > > Vote open for 72 hours. > > > > [ ] +1 > > [ ] +0 > > > [X] -1 > > Distribution archives are broken. Maven artifacts don't have correct N&L files. > > > > > > -- > > > http://www.somatik.be > > Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house. > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5)
On 08/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote: > Hi, > > The Empire-db community has completed working on Release 2.0.5 and is > now looking for approval of the IPMC to publish the release. Since our > previous attempt failed on general@ we prepared a fifth release > candidate. > > These are the major change from our previous 2.0.4 release: > - Maven project management > - New database handlers for Apache Derby, H2, PostgreSQL > - New Examples showing WebService integration using Apache CXF > - Unified distribution file for core and struts2 extensions. > > Change log: > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/empire-db/tags/apache-empire-db-2.0.5-incubating-rc5/CHANGELOG.txt?view=markup > > Subversion tag: > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/empire-db/tags/apache-empire-db-2.0.5-incubating-rc5 > > Maven staging repository: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/empire-db-staging-045 Took a brief look, seems OK. > Distribution files are located here > http://people.apache.org/~francisdb/empire-db/ The tar.gz and .zip files have different contents. They both look completely wrong to me, as they contain raw class files and Eclipse .settings directories. > Rat report for the tag is available here: > http://people.apache.org/~francisdb/empire-db/rat.txt > > Vote open for 72 hours. > > [ ] +1 > [ ] +0 > [X] -1 Distribution archives are broken. > > > -- > http://www.somatik.be > Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5)
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 8:01 PM, Rainer Döbele wrote: > +1 (non-binding unfortunately). > > Any IPMC members willing to have a look at this release? Did the Empire-db mentors vote on this release already? I don't see any mentor's +1s here, was there a vote on the project's list? -Bertrand > Francis De Brabandere wrote: >> re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5) >> >> Hi, >> >> The Empire-db community has completed working on Release 2.0.5 and is >> now looking for approval of the IPMC to publish the release. Since our >> previous attempt failed on general@ we prepared a fifth release >> candidate. >> >> These are the major change from our previous 2.0.4 release: >> - Maven project management >> - New database handlers for Apache Derby, H2, PostgreSQL >> - New Examples showing WebService integration using Apache CXF >> - Unified distribution file for core and struts2 extensions. >> >> Change log: >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/empire-db/tags/apache-empire-db- >> 2.0.5-incubating-rc5/CHANGELOG.txt?view=markup >> >> Subversion tag: >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/empire-db/tags/apache- >> empire-db-2.0.5-incubating-rc5 >> >> Maven staging repository: >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/empire-db-staging- >> 045 >> >> Distribution files are located here >> http://people.apache.org/~francisdb/empire-db/ >> >> Rat report for the tag is available here: >> http://people.apache.org/~francisdb/empire-db/rat.txt >> >> Vote open for 72 hours. >> >> [ ] +1 >> [ ] +0 >> [ ] -1 >> >> >> -- >> http://www.somatik.be >> Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house. >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5)
+1 (non-binding unfortunately). Any IPMC members willing to have a look at this release? Thanks, Rainer Francis De Brabandere wrote: > re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5) > > Hi, > > The Empire-db community has completed working on Release 2.0.5 and is > now looking for approval of the IPMC to publish the release. Since our > previous attempt failed on general@ we prepared a fifth release > candidate. > > These are the major change from our previous 2.0.4 release: > - Maven project management > - New database handlers for Apache Derby, H2, PostgreSQL > - New Examples showing WebService integration using Apache CXF > - Unified distribution file for core and struts2 extensions. > > Change log: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/empire-db/tags/apache-empire-db- > 2.0.5-incubating-rc5/CHANGELOG.txt?view=markup > > Subversion tag: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/empire-db/tags/apache- > empire-db-2.0.5-incubating-rc5 > > Maven staging repository: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/empire-db-staging- > 045 > > Distribution files are located here > http://people.apache.org/~francisdb/empire-db/ > > Rat report for the tag is available here: > http://people.apache.org/~francisdb/empire-db/rat.txt > > Vote open for 72 hours. > > [ ] +1 > [ ] +0 > [ ] -1 > > > -- > http://www.somatik.be > Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
