RE: [gentoo-user] how to szie an image so it fits on One sheet of paper (command line)

2003-08-01 Thread Henk Abma


Well, obviously it does support jpegs out of the box, it just isn't
 doing quite what you were expecting it to do.


Clear. Converting the image to a size of 72*8.5 results in an image that
prints correctly. pnmtops does the scaling automatically as someone else
pointed out. However I assume this down-scaling destroys a lot of detail
from the original. So, I'd still like to know how I can reproduce a 300-dpi
color scan on a 300- or 600 dpi printer. For if I understand you both
correctly, with cups' lp or pnmtops I'm only printing 72dpi images

Kind regards, Henk,


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



[gentoo-user] how to szie an image so it fits on One sheet of paper (command line)

2003-07-31 Thread Henk Abma
Hello,

What I wanted to do was to scan a sheet of paper, and reproduce it on my 
printer, sort of a command-line copier.

Since my printer is at 300 dpi, I thought it would be simple: scan the 
paper at 300 dpi, and enter: lpr scanned-paper.

Hovever this gives the result of enlarging the image, so it now occupies 4 
or 5 pages.

So the question is, how do I estimate the resolution so that it will 
occupy only one page. or is there another commandline based solution?

Thanks,

Henk,

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] how to szie an image so it fits on One sheet of paper (command line)

2003-07-31 Thread Henk Abma
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 07:55:55PM -0400, Bryan Feir wrote:
 
 Well, by default, pnmtops in the netpbm package will convert a Portable
 aNyMap to Postscript, and always reduce it to fit on one page.  (You can do
 'pnmtops -scale 0.25 input |lpr' to explicitly scale it down; by default
 it will enlarge the image four times to change a 72dpi image to a 300dpi
 image, then reduce the result if it's too big for the page.)  Nice thing
 about the netpbm programs is they all take standard input and output, so
 they can be used as chained filters and easily used for batch jobs.
 
 Might be useful if you gave us a better idea of what you were doing now,
 what programs you were using (including which print filters) and what
 intermediate formats.

Thanks  for the detailed answer.

I have cups 1.19 installed, a hp deskjet 990c, and use the driver for 
hpijs obtained from linuxprinting.org. In the configuration menu i have 
set the printer to use 300-dpi color draft mode.

For scanning I use scanimage from the sane package. The output was 
converted through ppmtojpeg like this:

scanimage --mode=color -r 300 |ppmtojpeg -q 85 output.jpg

identify from imagemagick tp;d ,e O jad 2532X35XX pixels, so to be safe I 
entered;

convert -scale 2390 output.jpg output2.jpg

finally:

lpr output2.jpg

with the result described earlier.

In the cups documentation it is stated that cups supports jpegs 'out of 
the box', so I thought the procedure described was the logical thing to 
do.

I'll give pnmtops a try tomorrow.

Thanks again,

Henk.

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: alsasound under kernel 2.6

2003-07-21 Thread Henk Abma
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 12:13:51AM +0200, Martin Gramatke wrote:
 Andy Arbon wrote:
 
 
 
 Did you remove the alsa-drivers? They seem to be deeply interweaved in my
 system, how did you do this?
 Do you use KDE/arts?
 Does your sound work more ore less with the kernel drivers?

for me sound doesn't work with 2.6. I used to use the snd-cs46xx driver 
with gentoo 2.4.20-gentoo-r5, but when I compile the same module as 
shipped with 2.6, it complains about a 'waiting for fifo' error and dies.

the alsasound script from gentoo also fails with this release, because it 
thinks alsa is already running, even if it isn't.

As soon as I stress the kernel a little, it simply dies, which reminds me 
of some OS I use at work The last time it happeed I was able to 
capture the following message:

Message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] at Sun Jul 20 17:08:32 2003 ...
localhost kernel: CPU 0: Machine Check Exception: 0004

Message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] at Sun Jul 20 17:08:32 2003 ...
localhost kernel: Bank 0: b6120135 at 02371f20

Message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] at Sun Jul 20 17:08:32 2003 ...
localhost kernel: Kernel panic: CPU context corrupt

I know it isn't supposed to be stable, so I won't complain about this... 
I'll take a second look when test2 arrives.

Henk,

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



[gentoo-user] phoenix crashes possibly solved

2003-02-26 Thread Henk Abma
Recently gdk-pixbuf 0.22.0 appeared in the list of masked packages. 
Because my Phoenix kept crashing at least five times a day with a gdk 
error, I decided to try this new gdk-pixbuf and Phoenix hasn't crashed 
for two days. So if I were gentoo, I'd mark this version stable

Henk,

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] PHP installation problem

2003-02-20 Thread Henk Abma
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 12:57:21PM +0100, Arturo di Gioia wrote:
 On Thu, 2003-02-20 at 01:43, Meir Kriheli wrote:
  On Wednesday 19 February 2003 16:58, rafailow wrote:
   On 19 Feb 2003 17:38:28 +0100
  
   Brave Cobra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2003-02-19 at 17:24, Arturo di Gioia wrote:
 On Wed, 2003-02-19 at 17:24, Brave Cobra wrote:
  emerge sun-jdk
  java-config --list-available-vms (to list the available ones)
  java-config --set-system-vm=sun-jdk-1.4.1.01 (or your corresponding
  version)

 1)

  emerge php
  
  Do all you guys really need java support with php ? Whole idea of use flags is 
  to customize the software to your needs. If not, why not set -java in USE 
  flags (along with X and qt while at it) ?

I was setting up a very basic server, with only mail, apache and php, but 
to my surprise php insisted on getting X even though * had -x as a use 
flag.

That 4.3.1 fails to config because of blackdown helped me fined the -java 
use flag, although the reported is a little strange, about my platform not 
supporting fork();


Henk,

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list




Re: [gentoo-user] baselayout and xfree up/downgradegrade

2003-02-11 Thread Henk Abma
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 10:28:06AM -0800, Ajay Sharma wrote:
 On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, el lodger wrote:
 
  After syncing emerge -up world gives a slew of upgrades
  (mostly gnome related). I am using baselayout-1.8.6.2 and
  emerge wants to downgrade to 1.8.5.8. I read that 6.2 wasn't
  supposed to be released but no reason was given to downgrade.

I thought/hoped that this baselayout would be the reason that my 
rcc-update added scripts don't run anymore.

After updating to gnome 2.2 I discovered that on the next reboot, I had no 
lan, no cups, etc. I hope that this donwgrade fixes  this

Henk,

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list




[gentoo-user] Mozilla/phoenix random crashes

2003-02-10 Thread Henk Abma
Hello,

I am having problems with both Mozilla and Phoenix (both through normal 
emerges). They crash at random moments. E.g. the last crash happend 
immediately after starting mozilla and pressing F11 to get to full-screen 
mode. It also sometimes happens after pressing 'enter' in the url entry 
box. I can't reproduce the problems.

I'm using an athlon-1800XP+ and gcc with the athlon options.

My graphics card is a hercules based on the ATI Radeon 9000-pro with the 
svga driver.

Anyone having simular problems and/or suggetsiont?

Opera and kde havn't crashed for weeks, so I don't think my system is 
unstable.

Henk,

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list




[gentoo-user] gnome 2.2 font size

2003-02-10 Thread Henk Abma
I emerged gnome 2.2 lately, and although it looks very clear, fonts are 
very large, even at 1024X768. When I change -dpi to something like 50, the 
logon screen from kdm contains very small letters, but as soon as gnome 
2.2 appears they get big again.

Anyone the same problem? how did you solve it?

Henk, 

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list




[gentoo-user] postfix 2.0.3 over 1.11

2003-02-03 Thread Henk Abma
Hello,

recently a sytem I had intended to run unattended forever has emerged 
postfix 2.0.3 over a perfectly working 1.11 installation and since than. 
The log says that the connection to postfix/private/proxymap is refused. 
What's the easiest way to return to a working version?

Thanks,

Henk.


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list