Re: [gentoo-user] Has anyone successfully built OO 1.1 (recently unmasked)
On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 22:27:46 +0200 Redeeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i have compiled openoffice-ximian1.1 successful. and what more is, it > seemed that i am the only one that didnt have the copy'n'paste bug :-) > now you might ask: did you make a package?! and yes, i did ;> > i even removed the filtering stuff in the ebuild so that it uses all > my CFLAGS, if there is and interrest in my package, i will gladly give > it, on the forums you can see alot more about it :-) I got to emerge with out the ">" bug fix. The only thing I did was something I saw on the forums, which was to emerge ccache. Worked like a charm. -- bruce pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Has anyone successfully built OO 1.1 (recently unmasked)
On Oct 19, 2003, at 7:37 am, Chris I wrote: On 2003.10.19 00:34, Collins Richey wrote: True enough, but there's no way to modify a pdf. You can create pdf easily enough from other files, but you can't update a pdf. I've never done that on any OS. I'm admittedly not very familiar with the format, but i was under the impression that pdfs were more or less a write-once format. Apparently I've been missing out :) Verily so. Adobe Professional for Mac seems quite competent; although it does have some limitations, I've managed to change colours of text & presumably (this wasn't what I was interested in at the time) you can change the content of the text also. There is a pdflib available for Linux which allows you to work with the contents of pdfs, but: 1) I don't really know how useful it is - the documentation is quite heavy going, and so it's probably not for casual use. 2) Only the demo version is free. Stroller. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Has anyone successfully built OO 1.1 (recently unmasked)
Remove all sse2 related use flags - this includes specifying pentium3 instead of pentium4. Built ok then. BillK On Mon, 2003-10-20 at 12:37, Kevin Miller, Jr. wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Second failed install attempt. Here is what I got before OO failed: > > WARNING! Project(s): > gtk > > not found and couldn't be built. Correct build.lsts. > > > >>> Install openoffice-1.1.0 into /var/tmp/portage/openoffice-1.1.0/image/ > category app-office > * Installing OpenOffice.org into build root... > glibc version: 2.3.2 > ./setup: The temporary directory is full. > (/var/tmp/portage/openoffice-1.1.0/temp/sv001.tmp) > > !!! ERROR: app-office/openoffice-1.1.0 failed. > !!! Function src_install, Line 521, Exitcode 255 > !!! (no error message) > > Kevin > > On Sunday 19 October 2003 06:15 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > 031019 Collins Richey wrote: > > > On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 20:58:46 +0200 Timo Boettcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >>> no problem here using GCC 3.2.3 . it took 5 h 45 m , incl download. > > >>> ordinary ADSL ( c 45 min IIRC), Athlon XP 2500+ , Soyo mobo, > > >>> 512 MB DDR400. what worried me was that it threatened > > >>> to run out of HD space, using c 2,5 GB for its temporary files. > > >> > > >> Are you using reiserfs? > > > > of course (grin). > > > > >> 2.5GB weren't near enough for me, 2.7GB neither, > > >> it worked with 3.3GB (being a total of 30hours cpu-time) > > > > > > Second the motion. On my ext3 system, > > > in excess of 4gig were required last time I compiled! > > > > i built a fast machine w the intention of trying Gentoo > > & i'm pleased to find i seem to have got it right (touch wood etc). > > - -- > Kevin Miller, Jr. > Masters of Public Affairs, > Comparative and International Affairs, Information Systems, and Nonprofit > Management, > School of Public and Environmental Affairs > Indiana University - Bloomington > http://www.amerasianworld.com > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > mobile: 812-219-5047 > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQE/k2aFP2TQUAjSykARAo3RAJ4y6ZHTHpTnVBXNr77wNQSdl5K+EgCgnjLQ > t5Kfvr9/5O4loijHIDZvirU= > =WQZx > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Has anyone successfully built OO 1.1 (recently unmasked)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Second failed install attempt. Here is what I got before OO failed: WARNING! Project(s): gtk not found and couldn't be built. Correct build.lsts. >>> Install openoffice-1.1.0 into /var/tmp/portage/openoffice-1.1.0/image/ category app-office * Installing OpenOffice.org into build root... glibc version: 2.3.2 ./setup: The temporary directory is full. (/var/tmp/portage/openoffice-1.1.0/temp/sv001.tmp) !!! ERROR: app-office/openoffice-1.1.0 failed. !!! Function src_install, Line 521, Exitcode 255 !!! (no error message) Kevin On Sunday 19 October 2003 06:15 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > 031019 Collins Richey wrote: > > On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 20:58:46 +0200 Timo Boettcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>> no problem here using GCC 3.2.3 . it took 5 h 45 m , incl download. > >>> ordinary ADSL ( c 45 min IIRC), Athlon XP 2500+ , Soyo mobo, > >>> 512 MB DDR400. what worried me was that it threatened > >>> to run out of HD space, using c 2,5 GB for its temporary files. > >> > >> Are you using reiserfs? > > of course (grin). > > >> 2.5GB weren't near enough for me, 2.7GB neither, > >> it worked with 3.3GB (being a total of 30hours cpu-time) > > > > Second the motion. On my ext3 system, > > in excess of 4gig were required last time I compiled! > > i built a fast machine w the intention of trying Gentoo > & i'm pleased to find i seem to have got it right (touch wood etc). - -- Kevin Miller, Jr. Masters of Public Affairs, Comparative and International Affairs, Information Systems, and Nonprofit Management, School of Public and Environmental Affairs Indiana University - Bloomington http://www.amerasianworld.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] mobile: 812-219-5047 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/k2aFP2TQUAjSykARAo3RAJ4y6ZHTHpTnVBXNr77wNQSdl5K+EgCgnjLQ t5Kfvr9/5O4loijHIDZvirU= =WQZx -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Has anyone successfully built OO 1.1 (recently unmasked)
031019 Collins Richey wrote: > On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 20:58:46 +0200 Timo Boettcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> no problem here using GCC 3.2.3 . it took 5 h 45 m , incl download. >>> ordinary ADSL ( c 45 min IIRC), Athlon XP 2500+ , Soyo mobo, >>> 512 MB DDR400. what worried me was that it threatened >>> to run out of HD space, using c 2,5 GB for its temporary files. >> Are you using reiserfs? of course (grin). >> 2.5GB weren't near enough for me, 2.7GB neither, >> it worked with 3.3GB (being a total of 30hours cpu-time) > Second the motion. On my ext3 system, > in excess of 4gig were required last time I compiled! i built a fast machine w the intention of trying Gentoo & i'm pleased to find i seem to have got it right (touch wood etc). -- ,, SUPPORT ___//___, Philip Webb : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Centre for Urban & Community Studies TRANSIT`-O--O---' University of Toronto -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Has anyone successfully built OO 1.1 (recently unmasked)
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 20:58:46 +0200 Timo Boettcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi purslow, > > Nachricht vom Samstag, 18. Oktober 2003, 23:51:52: > > > 031018 Andrew Gaffney wrote: > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>> no problem here using GCC 3.2.3 . it took 5 h 45 m , incl > >>> download. You must have a very fast connection and a *very* fast > >>> computer. > > > ordinary ADSL ( c 45 min IIRC), Athlon XP 2500+ , Soyo mobo, 512 MB > > DDR400. what worried me was that it threatened to run out of HD > > space, using c 2,5 GB for its temporary files. > Are you using reiserfs? 2.5GB weren't near enough for me, 2.7GB > neither, it worked with 3.3GB (being a total of 30hours cpu-time) > Second the motion. On my ext3 system, in excess of 4gig were required last time I compiled! -- Collins Richey - Denver Area if you fill your heart with regrets of yesterday and the worries of tomorrow, you have no today to be thankful for. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re[2]: [gentoo-user] Has anyone successfully built OO 1.1 (recently unmasked)
Hi purslow, Nachricht vom Samstag, 18. Oktober 2003, 23:51:52: > 031018 Andrew Gaffney wrote: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> no problem here using GCC 3.2.3 . it took 5 h 45 m , incl >>> download. You must have a very fast connection and a *very* fast >>> computer. > ordinary ADSL ( c 45 min IIRC), Athlon XP 2500+ , Soyo mobo, 512 MB > DDR400. what worried me was that it threatened to run out of HD > space, using c 2,5 GB for its temporary files. Are you using reiserfs? 2.5GB weren't near enough for me, 2.7GB neither, it worked with 3.3GB (being a total of 30hours cpu-time) Timo -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Has anyone successfully built OO 1.1 (recently unmasked)
What I really despise is pdf attachments. OO will create pdf just fine, but there's no way to read and modify it on linux (that I am aware of). There are many pdf viewers for linux. I use gpdf, and have used ggv, xpdf, and a few others. They are fairly decent, but the font rendering, at least on pdf's i have viewed, is terrible. And they lack the ability to search pdfs (if the pdf itself has said ability). That said, acrobat reader is availiable for linux. True enough, but there's no way to modify a pdf. You can create pdf easily enough from other files, but you can't update a pdf. True enough - but I fail to see the problem here, as the entire purpose of the PDF format is to provide a *read-only* version of a document that anyone can read, no matter what platform or what fonts they have installed, as long as they have a reader. If you want to exchange files that are editable, then you need to do so in a common file format that both of you have. Charles -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Has anyone successfully built OO 1.1 (recently unmasked)
hehe, the protection from write to pdf's lays in the viewer, if you download xpdf source, there is only 2 places you shall change, and whoop, you are set ;-) but its illegal, and thats why pdf is read-only, so companies can distribute stuff without the ability of others to change and steal. On Sun, 2003-10-19 at 08:37, Chris I wrote: > On 2003.10.19 00:34, Collins Richey wrote: > > On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 22:06:35 -0400 Chris I <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > What I really despise is pdf attachments. OO will create pdf > > just > > > > fine, but > > > > there's no way to read and modify it on linux (that I am aware > > of). > > > > > > There are many pdf viewers for linux. I use gpdf, and have used > > ggv, > > > > > xpdf, and a few others. They are fairly decent, but the font > > rendering, > > > at least on pdf's i have viewed, is terrible. And they lack the > > ability > > > to search pdfs (if the pdf itself has said ability). > > > > > > That said, acrobat reader is availiable for linux. > > > > > > > True enough, but there's no way to modify a pdf. You can create pdf > > easily > > enough from other files, but you can't update a pdf. > > I've never done that on any OS. I'm admittedly not very familiar with > the format, but i was under the impression that pdfs were more or less > a write-once format. > > Apparently I've been missing out :) -- Regards, Redeeman () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\- against microsoft attachments -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Has anyone successfully built OO 1.1 (recently unmasked)
On 2003.10.19 00:34, Collins Richey wrote: On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 22:06:35 -0400 Chris I <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What I really despise is pdf attachments. OO will create pdf just > > fine, but > > there's no way to read and modify it on linux (that I am aware of). > > There are many pdf viewers for linux. I use gpdf, and have used ggv, > xpdf, and a few others. They are fairly decent, but the font rendering, > at least on pdf's i have viewed, is terrible. And they lack the ability > to search pdfs (if the pdf itself has said ability). > > That said, acrobat reader is availiable for linux. > True enough, but there's no way to modify a pdf. You can create pdf easily enough from other files, but you can't update a pdf. I've never done that on any OS. I'm admittedly not very familiar with the format, but i was under the impression that pdfs were more or less a write-once format. Apparently I've been missing out :) -- Chris I Wasting time is an important part of living. pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Has anyone successfully built OO 1.1 (recently unmasked)
On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 22:06:35 -0400 Chris I <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What I really despise is pdf attachments. OO will create pdf just > > fine, but > > there's no way to read and modify it on linux (that I am aware of). > > There are many pdf viewers for linux. I use gpdf, and have used ggv, > xpdf, and a few others. They are fairly decent, but the font rendering, > at least on pdf's i have viewed, is terrible. And they lack the ability > to search pdfs (if the pdf itself has said ability). > > That said, acrobat reader is availiable for linux. > True enough, but there's no way to modify a pdf. You can create pdf easily enough from other files, but you can't update a pdf. -- Collins Richey - Denver Area if you fill your heart with regrets of yesterday and the worries of tomorrow, you have no today to be thankful for. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Has anyone successfully built OO 1.1 (recently unmasked)
On 2003.10.18 17:50, Collins Richey wrote: On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 23:31:43 +0200 Redeeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i have a Athlon XP1800+ with 640mb ddr pc2100ram, it takes me 3 seconds > to start my own compiled openoffice-ximian1.1-r1, both first and second > time, the openoffice1.0-bin i got took 12 seconds first time, and 7 > seconds second time, so i am happy with my own compiled ;-) > Sound cool. Sometime when I can setup enough temp space, I'll try it again. OTOH, since I normally only use OO a few times a month, I can tolerate 8 seconds quite easily. I use OO for school on a regular basis (in windows and linux). Currently (in linux) I'm using the openoffice-ximian ebuild from BMG. The launch (currently oo-ximian-1.1_rc3 due to lack of compile space) isnt that great (15 seconds every time). It's a pain for classes where I will close and open it dozens of times. Will try 1.1 release with and without patches, and -bin. I always create binary tarballs of large packages like this "just in case", so its not too tough to alternate between them. > () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail > /\- against microsoft attachments I agree about html mail. But Microsoft attachments are a lot more tolerable with OO! What I really despise is pdf attachments. OO will create pdf just fine, but there's no way to read and modify it on linux (that I am aware of). There are many pdf viewers for linux. I use gpdf, and have used ggv, xpdf, and a few others. They are fairly decent, but the font rendering, at least on pdf's i have viewed, is terrible. And they lack the ability to search pdfs (if the pdf itself has said ability). That said, acrobat reader is availiable for linux. -- Chris I I don't mind arguing with myself. It's when I lose that it bothers me. -- Richard Powers pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Has anyone successfully built OO 1.1 (recently unmasked)
It worked here. I assume you have a java jre installed? On Saturday 18 October 2003 16:01, you wrote: > It runs for serveral hours and croaks with an undefined symbol error. > Here are that (last few lines upto and including the error) > > Making: ../unxlngi4.pro/lib/libfwe645li.so > > ERROR: Error 65280 occurred while making > /var/tmp/portage/openoffice-1.1.0/work/oo_1.1_src/framework/util > > !!! ERROR: app-office/openoffice-1.1.0 failed. > !!! Function src_compile, Line 450, Exitcode 1 > !!! Build failed! -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Has anyone successfully built OO 1.1 (recently unmasked)
031018 Mike Williams wrote: > On Saturday 18 October 2003 22:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> is there a way to tell Emerge to use a specific dir for temporary storage? >> i have a 12 GB part'n specifically intended for that kind of thing, >> which i have mounted simply as /z . > Change the PORTAGE_TMPDIR variable in /etc/make.conf thanx: done. -- ,, SUPPORT ___//___, Philip Webb : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Centre for Urban & Community Studies TRANSIT`-O--O---' University of Toronto -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Has anyone successfully built OO 1.1 (recently unmasked)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 18 October 2003 22:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > is there a way to tell Emerge to use a specific dir for temporary storage? > i have a 12 GB part'n specifically intended for that kind of thing, > which i have mounted simply as /z . Change the PORTAGE_TMPDIR variable in /etc/make.conf - -- Mike Williams -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/kbf7InuLMrk7bIwRAm2kAJ9Gs7Ao+3AdT3QGjlW7Iju7Lb0DhwCghAKV PMrAp7bUXu80clS5mYFNF7g= =XDvU -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Has anyone successfully built OO 1.1 (recently unmasked)
031018 Andrew Gaffney wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> no problem here using GCC 3.2.3 . it took 5 h 45 m , incl download. > You must have a very fast connection and a *very* fast computer. ordinary ADSL ( c 45 min IIRC), Athlon XP 2500+ , Soyo mobo, 512 MB DDR400. what worried me was that it threatened to run out of HD space, using c 2,5 GB for its temporary files. i'm looking fwd to KDE 3.2 (grin). is there a way to tell Emerge to use a specific dir for temporary storage? i have a 12 GB part'n specifically intended for that kind of thing, which i have mounted simply as /z . -- ,, SUPPORT ___//___, Philip Webb : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Centre for Urban & Community Studies TRANSIT`-O--O---' University of Toronto -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Has anyone successfully built OO 1.1 (recently unmasked)
On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 23:31:43 +0200 Redeeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i have a Athlon XP1800+ with 640mb ddr pc2100ram, it takes me 3 seconds > to start my own compiled openoffice-ximian1.1-r1, both first and second > time, the openoffice1.0-bin i got took 12 seconds first time, and 7 > seconds second time, so i am happy with my own compiled ;-) > Sound cool. Sometime when I can setup enough temp space, I'll try it again. OTOH, since I normally only use OO a few times a month, I can tolerate 8 seconds quite easily. > () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail > /\- against microsoft attachments I agree about html mail. But Microsoft attachments are a lot more tolerable with OO! What I really despise is pdf attachments. OO will create pdf just fine, but there's no way to read and modify it on linux (that I am aware of). -- Collins Richey - Denver Area if you fill your heart with regrets of yesterday and the worries of tomorrow, you have no today to be thankful for. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Has anyone successfully built OO 1.1 (recently unmasked)
i have a Athlon XP1800+ with 640mb ddr pc2100ram, it takes me 3 seconds to start my own compiled openoffice-ximian1.1-r1, both first and second time, the openoffice1.0-bin i got took 12 seconds first time, and 7 seconds second time, so i am happy with my own compiled ;-) On Sat, 2003-10-18 at 23:28, Collins Richey wrote: > On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 13:10:52 -0700 "Kevin Miller, Jr." > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Check the forums. There was a discussion about this. I did not succeed in > > compiling it myself. Seems that those who have the newest versions of gcc > > are having problems. They do have a solution in the forums. > > > > Good advice, if you like lots of pain. > > The better alternative (IMHO) is to get an openoffice-bin (from portage) or > directly from the OO site. There has been a lot of noise about compiled > versions of OO being faster, but I've not experienced much difference on newer > versions. The OO 1.1 binary release comes up in about 8 seconds (or 3 seconds > when reloaded) on my AthlonXP 1800 (512Meg), practically the same as when I used > the compiled version. > > Of course, if you really have many hours and 5gig work space worth of patience, > have at it. > > Whatever version you get, there is still a few bugs. For example, when I try > to insert a special symbol, OO craps out. -- Regards, Redeeman () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\- against microsoft attachments -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Has anyone successfully built OO 1.1 (recently unmasked)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 031018 Kevin Miller, Jr. wrote: Check the forums. There was a discussion about this. I did not succeed in compiling it myself. Seems that those who have the newest versions of gcc are having problems. They do have a solution in the forums. no problem here using GCC 3.2.3 . it took 5 h 45 m , incl download. You must have a very fast connection and a *very* fast computer. -- Andrew Gaffney -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Has anyone successfully built OO 1.1 (recently unmasked)
On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 13:10:52 -0700 "Kevin Miller, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Check the forums. There was a discussion about this. I did not succeed in > compiling it myself. Seems that those who have the newest versions of gcc > are having problems. They do have a solution in the forums. > Good advice, if you like lots of pain. The better alternative (IMHO) is to get an openoffice-bin (from portage) or directly from the OO site. There has been a lot of noise about compiled versions of OO being faster, but I've not experienced much difference on newer versions. The OO 1.1 binary release comes up in about 8 seconds (or 3 seconds when reloaded) on my AthlonXP 1800 (512Meg), practically the same as when I used the compiled version. Of course, if you really have many hours and 5gig work space worth of patience, have at it. Whatever version you get, there is still a few bugs. For example, when I try to insert a special symbol, OO craps out. -- Collins Richey - Denver Area if you fill your heart with regrets of yesterday and the worries of tomorrow, you have no today to be thankful for. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Has anyone successfully built OO 1.1 (recently unmasked)
031018 Kevin Miller, Jr. wrote: > Check the forums. There was a discussion about this. > I did not succeed in compiling it myself. > Seems that those who have the newest versions of gcc are having problems. > They do have a solution in the forums. no problem here using GCC 3.2.3 . it took 5 h 45 m , incl download. -- ,, SUPPORT ___//___, Philip Webb : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Centre for Urban & Community Studies TRANSIT`-O--O---' University of Toronto -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Has anyone successfully built OO 1.1 (recently unmasked)
i have compiled openoffice-ximian1.1 successful. and what more is, it seemed that i am the only one that didnt have the copy'n'paste bug :-) now you might ask: did you make a package?! and yes, i did ;> i even removed the filtering stuff in the ebuild so that it uses all my CFLAGS, if there is and interrest in my package, i will gladly give it, on the forums you can see alot more about it :-) my emerge --info: Portage 2.0.49-r13 (default-x86-1.4, gcc-3.3.1, glibc-2.3.2-r1, 2.4.22) = System uname: 2.4.22 i686 AMD Athlon(TM) XP 1800+ Gentoo Base System version 1.4.3.10p1 distcc 2.9 i686-pc-linux-gnu (protocols 1 and 2) (default port 3632) [disabled] ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86" AUTOCLEAN="yes" CFLAGS="-march=athlon-xp -O3 -pipe -mmmx -msse -m3dnow -mfpmath=sse,387 -fexpensive-optimizations -fstack-protector -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fforce-addr -falign-functions=4 -frerun-loop-opt -frerun-cse-after-loop -maccumulate-outgoing-args -fprefetch-loop-arrays" CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu" COMPILER="gcc3" CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /var/qmail/control /usr/kde/2/share/config /usr/kde/3/share/config /var/bind /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xkb /opt/tomcat/conf /usr/kde/3.1/share/config /usr/share/config" CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/gconf /etc/env.d" CXXFLAGS="-march=athlon-xp -O3 -pipe -mmmx -msse -m3dnow -mfpmath=sse,387 -fexpensive-optimizations -fstack-protector -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fforce-addr -falign-functions=4 -frerun-loop-opt -frerun-cse-after-loop -maccumulate-outgoing-args -fprefetch-loop-arrays" DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles" FEATURES="sandbox ccache autoaddcvs" GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://gentoo.oregonstate.edu http://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/distributions/gentoo"; MAKEOPTS="-j2" PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages" PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp" PORTDIR="/usr/portage" PORTDIR_OVERLAY="" SYNC="rsync://rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage" USE="x86 oss apm encode foomaticdb libg++ mad mikmod mpeg nls pdflib png quicktime spell xv zlib gdbm berkdb slang readline arts svga tcltk X sdl tcpd pam libwww perl python esd imlib gnome qt motif mozilla ldap cdr avi alsa gpm -cups gtk2 gtk -kde mmx 3dnow mysql jpeg ipv6 gif crypt java xml xml2 ncurses truetype oggvorbis opengl ssl sse usb xmms" On Sat, 2003-10-18 at 22:01, Lincoln A. Baxter wrote: > It runs for serveral hours and croaks with an undefined symbol error. > Here are that (last few lines upto and including the error) > > Making: ../unxlngi4.pro/lib/libfwe645li.so > /usr/bin/ccache gcc -c -fPIC -o ../unxlngi4.pro/slo/fwe_dflt_version.o > -DUNX -I../unxlngi4.pro/inc > /var/tmp/portage/openoffice-1.1.0/work/oo_1.1_src/solenv/src/version.c > /usr/bin/ccache gcc -z combreloc -z defs -Wl,-rpath,'$ORIGIN' -shared > -L../unxlngi4.pro/lib -L../lib > -L/var/tmp/portage/openoffice-1.1.0/work/oo_1.1_src/solenv/unxlngi4/lib > -L/var/tmp/portage/openoffice-1.1.0/work/oo_1.1_src/solver/645/unxlngi4.pro/lib > -L/var/tmp/portage/openoffice-1.1.0/work/oo_1.1_src/solenv/unxlngi4/lib > -L/opt/blackdown-jdk-1.4.1/lib -L/opt/blackdown-jdk-1.4.1/jre/lib/i386 > -L/opt/blackdown-jdk-1.4.1/jre/lib/i386/client > -L/opt/blackdown-jdk-1.4.1/jre/lib/i386/native_threads - > ion.o ../unxlngi4.pro/slo/menudocumenthandler.o > ../unxlngi4.pro/slo/saxnamespacefilter.o > ../unxlngi4.pro/slo/statusbarconfiguration.o > ../unxlngi4.pro/slo/statusbardocumenthandler.o > ../unxlngi4.pro/slo/toolboxconfiguration.o > ../unxlngi4.pro/slo/toolboxdocumenthandler.o > ../unxlngi4.pro/slo/toolboxlayoutdocumenthandler.o > ../unxlngi4.pro/slo/imagesconfiguration.o > ../unxlngi4.pro/slo/imagesdocumenthandler.o > ../unxlngi4.pro/slo/xmlnamespaces.o > ../unxlngi4.pro/slo/actiontriggerpropertyset.o ../unxlngi > o ../unxlngi4.pro/slo/acceleratorinfo.o -lvcl645li -lsvl645li -lutl645li > -ltl645li -lcomphelp3gcc3 -lcppuhelpergcc3 -lcppu -lvos3gcc3 -lsal -ldl > -lpthread -lm -Wl,-Bdynamic -lstlport_gcc -lstdc++ > rm -f ../unxlngi4.pro/lib/check_libfwe645li.so > mv ../unxlngi4.pro/lib/libfwe645li.so > ../unxlngi4.pro/lib/check_libfwe645li.so > /var/tmp/portage/openoffice-1.1.0/work/oo_1.1_src/solenv/bin/checkdll.sh > -L../unxlngi4.pro/lib -L../lib > -L/var/tmp/portage/openoffice-1.1.0/work/oo_1.1_src/solenv/unxlngi4/lib > -L/var/tmp/portage/openoffice-1.1.0/work/oo_1.1_src/solver/645/unxlngi4.pro/lib > -L/var/tmp/portage/openoffice-1.1.0/work/oo_1.1_src/solenv/unxlngi4/lib > -L/opt/blackdown-jdk-1.4.1/lib -L/opt/blackdown-jdk-1.4.1/jre/lib/i386 > -L/opt/blackdown-jdk-1.4.1/jre/lib/i386/client > -L/opt/blackdown-jdk-1.4.1/jre/lib/i386/native_thread > Checking DLL ../unxlngi4.pro/lib/check_libfwe645li.so ...: ERROR: > /var/tmp/portage/openoffice-1.1.0/work/oo_1.1_src/solver/645/unxlngi4.pro/lib/libvcl645li.so: > undefined symbol: _ZN10MenuButton8KeyInputMRK8KeyEvent > dmake: Error code 1, while making '../unxlngi4.pro/lib/libfwe645li.so' > ---* TG_SLO.MK *--- > > ERROR: Error 65280 occurred while making > /var/tmp/portage/openoffice-1.1.0/work/oo_1.1_src/f
Re: [gentoo-user] Has anyone successfully built OO 1.1 (recently unmasked)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Check the forums. There was a discussion about this. I did not succeed in compiling it myself. Seems that those who have the newest versions of gcc are having problems. They do have a solution in the forums. - -- Kevin Miller, Jr. Masters of Public Affairs, Comparative and International Affairs, Information Systems, and Nonprofit Management, School of Public and Environmental Affairs Indiana University - Bloomington http://www.amerasianworld.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] mobile: 812-219-5047 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/kZ5RP2TQUAjSykARAvLTAJ9T8WzxInn92bulg6cRxwtpYaPoSwCfb/GP Mc94cjYBTVkxnqan8K38ito= =L+w4 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
[gentoo-user] Has anyone successfully built OO 1.1 (recently unmasked)
It runs for serveral hours and croaks with an undefined symbol error. Here are that (last few lines upto and including the error) Making: ../unxlngi4.pro/lib/libfwe645li.so /usr/bin/ccache gcc -c -fPIC -o ../unxlngi4.pro/slo/fwe_dflt_version.o -DUNX -I../unxlngi4.pro/inc /var/tmp/portage/openoffice-1.1.0/work/oo_1.1_src/solenv/src/version.c /usr/bin/ccache gcc -z combreloc -z defs -Wl,-rpath,'$ORIGIN' -shared -L../unxlngi4.pro/lib -L../lib -L/var/tmp/portage/openoffice-1.1.0/work/oo_1.1_src/solenv/unxlngi4/lib -L/var/tmp/portage/openoffice-1.1.0/work/oo_1.1_src/solver/645/unxlngi4.pro/lib -L/var/tmp/portage/openoffice-1.1.0/work/oo_1.1_src/solenv/unxlngi4/lib -L/opt/blackdown-jdk-1.4.1/lib -L/opt/blackdown-jdk-1.4.1/jre/lib/i386 -L/opt/blackdown-jdk-1.4.1/jre/lib/i386/client -L/opt/blackdown-jdk-1.4.1/jre/lib/i386/native_threads - ion.o ../unxlngi4.pro/slo/menudocumenthandler.o ../unxlngi4.pro/slo/saxnamespacefilter.o ../unxlngi4.pro/slo/statusbarconfiguration.o ../unxlngi4.pro/slo/statusbardocumenthandler.o ../unxlngi4.pro/slo/toolboxconfiguration.o ../unxlngi4.pro/slo/toolboxdocumenthandler.o ../unxlngi4.pro/slo/toolboxlayoutdocumenthandler.o ../unxlngi4.pro/slo/imagesconfiguration.o ../unxlngi4.pro/slo/imagesdocumenthandler.o ../unxlngi4.pro/slo/xmlnamespaces.o ../unxlngi4.pro/slo/actiontriggerpropertyset.o ../unxlngi o ../unxlngi4.pro/slo/acceleratorinfo.o -lvcl645li -lsvl645li -lutl645li -ltl645li -lcomphelp3gcc3 -lcppuhelpergcc3 -lcppu -lvos3gcc3 -lsal -ldl -lpthread -lm -Wl,-Bdynamic -lstlport_gcc -lstdc++ rm -f ../unxlngi4.pro/lib/check_libfwe645li.so mv ../unxlngi4.pro/lib/libfwe645li.so ../unxlngi4.pro/lib/check_libfwe645li.so /var/tmp/portage/openoffice-1.1.0/work/oo_1.1_src/solenv/bin/checkdll.sh -L../unxlngi4.pro/lib -L../lib -L/var/tmp/portage/openoffice-1.1.0/work/oo_1.1_src/solenv/unxlngi4/lib -L/var/tmp/portage/openoffice-1.1.0/work/oo_1.1_src/solver/645/unxlngi4.pro/lib -L/var/tmp/portage/openoffice-1.1.0/work/oo_1.1_src/solenv/unxlngi4/lib -L/opt/blackdown-jdk-1.4.1/lib -L/opt/blackdown-jdk-1.4.1/jre/lib/i386 -L/opt/blackdown-jdk-1.4.1/jre/lib/i386/client -L/opt/blackdown-jdk-1.4.1/jre/lib/i386/native_thread Checking DLL ../unxlngi4.pro/lib/check_libfwe645li.so ...: ERROR: /var/tmp/portage/openoffice-1.1.0/work/oo_1.1_src/solver/645/unxlngi4.pro/lib/libvcl645li.so: undefined symbol: _ZN10MenuButton8KeyInputMRK8KeyEvent dmake: Error code 1, while making '../unxlngi4.pro/lib/libfwe645li.so' ---* TG_SLO.MK *--- ERROR: Error 65280 occurred while making /var/tmp/portage/openoffice-1.1.0/work/oo_1.1_src/framework/util !!! ERROR: app-office/openoffice-1.1.0 failed. !!! Function src_compile, Line 450, Exitcode 1 !!! Build failed! -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
