Re: [gentoo-user] OT: Convert ext3 to reiserfs

2003-07-31 Thread Henti Smith
On 30 Jul 2003 17:00:21 -0400
Paul K. Dickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I run reiserfs on my laptop and have for over a year.  I suspend every
 day, and on monday, my laptop is dead because I never plugged it in/used
 it.  Thats every weekend this past year plus some.  Monday morning I
 power up, every thing is peachy.  Just for shits and giggles I ran
 reiserfsck on the fs from the gentoo cd.  no problems found anywhere. 
 Stick that in your pipe and smoke it mr. ext3 man;)

I have to admit .. I'm very much a reiserfs puppy. I used to run a cvs/file/mail 
server for a game development company in south africa on a 60gig drive with reiserfs 
and I messed it up running reiserfsck on it while it was mounted .. dropped everything 
badly .. 

went onto reiser list .. grabed the latest recovery tools .. took a few hours to 
rebuild everything and lost nothing at all. 

I'm not going to switch to any other FS anytime soon 

-- 
Henti Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Administrator
The Computer-Smith Networking
http://www.tcsn.co.za

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] OT: Convert ext3 to reiserfs

2003-07-30 Thread Paul K. Dickson
I run reiserfs on my laptop and have for over a year.  I suspend every
day, and on monday, my laptop is dead because I never plugged it in/used
it.  Thats every weekend this past year plus some.  Monday morning I
power up, every thing is peachy.  Just for shits and giggles I ran
reiserfsck on the fs from the gentoo cd.  no problems found anywhere. 
Stick that in your pipe and smoke it mr. ext3 man;)

Paul

On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 16:37, Harald Arnesen wrote:
 Norberto BENSA [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  Arnold Krille wrote:
  From my personal experience: ext3 is _much_ better than reiserfs!
 
  Two words: DON'T START (a flame war) :-)
 
  Everybody knows reiserfs IS way better than anything else! :-)
 
 Except when your machine crashes, and you lose a few directories. That
 has never happened to me with ext3. Now I try xfs on my laptop.


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] OT: Convert ext3 to reiserfs

2003-07-24 Thread Fredrik Jagenheim
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 09:23:41PM -0500, Alec Berryman wrote:
 On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 19:40, Vano D wrote:
 
  Note that I split the thing into 640 megs so I can store it into a CDROM
  and that I make the filename with the date extension.
 
 Dumb question: I'm new to split; can you untar each split file
 individually, or do you need to do them in sequence like a split RAR?

Even worse than that. Split is a totally separate program, it does
what it sounds like; takes file A and chomps it up into pieces
A.1, A.2, etc.

Tar have no idea about this. It will happily read your first file
A.1 and when it reaches the end of that file, it will stop there,
complaining about the broken archive.

If you /haven't/ compressed the archive, you /might/ be able to take
one of the split files and extract files from it, but you /WILL/ loose
the first file in the archive (actually, the one that got split
between this split file and the previous).

If you compressed the archive, you won't be able to read anything from
the split files, unless of course you have the first one.

Do make tar read the split files again, you just:

'cat A.1 A.2 A.3  A' and voila, you can unpack the A file.

This is one of the biggest reason why you shouldn't compress backup
data. Say that you burned the A.2 file on CD and either the burning
process, the media, or the reading of that file has gone bad. You've
had that happened to you, haven't you? ;)

Now, /atleast/ all files in the archive A.3 is gone... Probably
more. Tar can't recover from an error in the compressed archive.
However, if it's an uncompressed archive, you'd just loose the one
file that went wrong...

Remember, noone cares if you do backups. It's if you can restore that
matters. :)

//H

-- 
To segfault is human; to bluescreen moronic. 

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] OT: Convert ext3 to reiserfs

2003-07-23 Thread Finne Boonen
just wonderign, wouldn't tar.bz files not keep your attributes?

Finne

On Wed, 23
Jul 2003, Christian Aust wrote:

 Hi all,
 
 I'd like to convert my 10GB root partition from ext3 to reiserfs. I've learned that 
 I 
 can't do that on the fly, like ext2-ext3 conversion is done. So I'll have to backup 
 all 
 data, reformat the partition and copy everything back.
 
 Unfortunately, my external drive is formatted as FAT32 and will not preserve all 
 filesystem attributes as owner, timestamp and such. My idea was to create an image 
 on 
 that drive (which would be ext2 formatted) and copy everything to this image which 
 is 
 located on a FAT32 partition. Can I do this? How do I create such an image? How do I 
 mount it? IMHO it should be possible with the standard tools contained on the 
 Knoppix 
 3.2 CD so I can boot from another medium.
 
 Best regards, thanks for any help.
 
 -  Christian
 
 --
 
 Christian Aust
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 icq: 84500990 - Yahoo!: datenimperator - MSN: datenimperator
 PGP: A073 F9CD 2F23 25D2 EB95 E7A3 B9B4 2AF3 E103 DB5A
 
 --
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
 


mvg
Finne Boonen
***
Beware of the spring, it'll jump you when you least expect it


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] OT: Convert ext3 to reiserfs

2003-07-23 Thread Christian Aust
Finne Boonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 23 Jul 2003 11:09:25 +0200 (MET DST):

just wonderign, wouldn't tar.bz files not keep your attributes?
Hmm, haven't thought of that. How would I easily tar everything except /proc, /dev and 
/mnt, and send it through bzip2? Regards,

-  Christian

--

Christian Aust
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
icq: 84500990 - Yahoo!: datenimperator - MSN: datenimperator
PGP: A073 F9CD 2F23 25D2 EB95 E7A3 B9B4 2AF3 E103 DB5A
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] OT: Convert ext3 to reiserfs

2003-07-23 Thread Matthias F. Brandstetter
-- quoting Christian Aust --
 Hmm, haven't thought of that. How would I easily tar everything
 except /proc, /dev and /mnt, and send it through bzip2? Regards,

You can use tar with the --exclude option (see man page for more 
info). And tar has the feature to pipe all through gzip to pack the 
archive contents. Just use the -z flag for this (again, man tar 
is your friend).

HTH, Matthias

-- 
Matthias F. Brandstetter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
now playing Groove Salad: a nicely chilled plate of ambient beats and 
grooves. [SomaFM]


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] OT: Convert ext3 to reiserfs

2003-07-23 Thread Finne Boonen
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Christian Aust wrote:

 Finne Boonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 23 Jul 2003 11:09:25 +0200 (MET DST):
 
  just wonderign, wouldn't tar.bz files not keep your attributes?
 
 Hmm, haven't thought of that. How would I easily tar everything except /proc, /dev 
 and 
 /mnt, and send it through bzip2? Regards,
 

tar -cj /home  file.tar.bz2

untarren met:
tar -xvjpf file.tar.bz2

 -  Christian
 
 --
 
 Christian Aust
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 icq: 84500990 - Yahoo!: datenimperator - MSN: datenimperator
 PGP: A073 F9CD 2F23 25D2 EB95 E7A3 B9B4 2AF3 E103 DB5A
 
 --
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
 


mvg
Finne Boonen
***
Beware of the spring, it'll jump you when you least expect it


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] OT: Convert ext3 to reiserfs

2003-07-23 Thread Lars Geiger
Hi Matthias,
On Wednesday, July 23, 2003 at 11:21:39 [GMT +0200], you wrote:

 -- quoting Christian Aust --
 Hmm, haven't thought of that. How would I easily tar everything
 except /proc, /dev and /mnt, and send it through bzip2?

 [...] And tar has the feature to pipe all through gzip to pack the
 archive contents. Just use the -z flag for this (again, man tar is
 your friend).

Or -j to pipe through bzip2. Although I wouldn't compress the archive at
all in this case, at least not when there is enough free space on the
FAT32 partition. Compression only takes more time and as you usually
won't keep the archive for a longer time, I'd prefer the saved time over
the saved space.

-- 
Regards,
Lars


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] OT: Convert ext3 to reiserfs

2003-07-23 Thread Peter Ruskin
On Wednesday 23 Jul 2003 10:14, Christian Aust wrote:
 Finne Boonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 23 Jul 2003 11:09:25 
+0200 (MET DST):
  just wonderign, wouldn't tar.bz files not keep your attributes?

 Hmm, haven't thought of that. How would I easily tar everything
 except /proc, /dev and /mnt, and send it through bzip2? Regards,

 -  Christian

tar -cpvvzf backup_file.tar.gz / --exclude /proc --exclude /dev
  or
rsync -av --exclude /proc --exclude /dev / dir_containing_backup/

I wouldn't exclude /dev though.

Peter
-- 
==
Gentoo Linux:   Gentoo Base System version 1.4.3.7
kernel-2.4.22_pre2-gss i686 AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1600+
==


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] OT: Convert ext3 to reiserfs

2003-07-23 Thread Arnold Krille
On Wednesday 23 July 2003 11:05, Christian Aust wrote:
 I'd like to convert my 10GB root partition from ext3 to reiserfs. I've
 learned that I can't do that on the fly, like ext2-ext3 conversion is
 done. So I'll have to backup all data, reformat the partition and copy
 everything back.

Just one little question: WHY do you want to do this???

From my personal experience: ext3 is _much_ better than reiserfs!
Its backward compatible, so you can easily fix it with ext2-tools, which isn't 
the case with reiserfs and which is the reason why I switched from reiserfs 
to ext3 as my reiserfs had faults no one could repair...

Try to mount reiserfs with an 2.2 kernel of an rescue disc.

Maybe this is the start of the next flamewar...(Vi is better than emacs;-)

Arnold

-- 
Get my public-key from pgp.mit.edu or pgp.uni-mainz.de
---
Hi, I am a .signature virus. Please copy me into your ~/.signature and send me 
to all your contacts.
After a month or so log in as root and do a rm / -rf. Or ask your 
administrator to do so...


pgp0.pgp
Description: signature


Re: [gentoo-user] OT: Convert ext3 to reiserfs

2003-07-23 Thread Arnold Krille
On Wednesday 23 July 2003 12:27, Christian Aust wrote:
 Arnold Krille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 23 Jul 2003 11:44:24 
+0200:
  Just one little question: WHY do you want to do this???
   From my personal experience: ext3 is _much_ better than reiserfs!
  Its backward compatible, so you can easily fix it with ext2-tools, which
  isn't the case with reiserfs and which is the reason why I switched from
  reiserfs to ext3 as my reiserfs had faults no one could repair...
 full ACK with what you've mentioned about rescue system and such, but in my
 case I'm using 2.4 rescue disks only which happen to have reiserfs support

from my experience the only rescuedisc you find in case of an emergency is the 
oldest ;-)

 (i.e. Knoppix). Also I found that reiserfs performs much better than ext3
 on the computers where I've tried it. And performance is one of my top
 concerns for everyday use on my laptop.

Don't know about performance but my ext3 don't feel slower than reiserfs, 
espacially as on most modern laptops more and more ide work is done from the 
processor and so every filesystem is slower afaik.

 So I'd like to give reiserfs a try on the laptop, too. Best regards,

Do it if you want, but my bad experiences with reiserfs where on my 
every_days_work laptop where its not possible to add another disc for 
temporary backup...

Arnold

-- 
Get my public-key from pgp.mit.edu or pgp.uni-mainz.de
---
Hi, I am a .signature virus. Please copy me into your ~/.signature and send me 
to all your contacts.
After a month or so log in as root and do a rm / -rf. Or ask your 
administrator to do so...


pgp0.pgp
Description: signature


Re: [gentoo-user] OT: Convert ext3 to reiserfs

2003-07-23 Thread Fredrik Jagenheim
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 11:28:29AM +0200, Lars Geiger wrote:
 Although I wouldn't compress the archive at all in this case, at
 least not when there is enough free space on the FAT32 partition.
 Compression only takes more time and as you usually won't keep the
 archive for a longer time, I'd prefer the saved time over the saved
 space.

Not to mention that it's nice to be able to read the entire archive
even after a bit got faulty somewhere in the compressed file.

//H

-- 
To segfault is human; to bluescreen moronic. 

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] OT: Convert ext3 to reiserfs

2003-07-23 Thread Rob Snow
Just to throw some weight the other way, since this seems to be a 
preferences thread.  I've had wonderful experience with ReiserFS on 
both laptop and desktop machines.  If you have the time and a free 
disk, I heartily suggest you give it a try.  I think you'll probably not go 
back. 
 
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 13:13:24 +0200, Arnold Krille wrote 
 On Wednesday 23 July 2003 12:27, Christian Aust wrote: 
  Arnold Krille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 23 Jul 2003 
11:44:24  
 +0200: 
   Just one little question: WHY do you want to do this??? 
From my personal experience: ext3 is _much_ better than 
reiserfs! 
   Its backward compatible, so you can easily fix it with ext2-tools, 
which 
   isn't the case with reiserfs and which is the reason why I 
switched from 
   reiserfs to ext3 as my reiserfs had faults no one could repair... 
  full ACK with what you've mentioned about rescue system and 
such, but in my 
  case I'm using 2.4 rescue disks only which happen to have 
reiserfs support 
  
 from my experience the only rescuedisc you find in case of an  
 emergency is the oldest ;-) 
  
  (i.e. Knoppix). Also I found that reiserfs performs much better than 
ext3 
  on the computers where I've tried it. And performance is one of my 
top 
  concerns for everyday use on my laptop. 
  
 Don't know about performance but my ext3 don't feel slower than  
 reiserfs, espacially as on most modern laptops more and more ide  
 work is done from the processor and so every filesystem is slower 
afaik. 
  
  So I'd like to give reiserfs a try on the laptop, too. Best regards, 
  
 Do it if you want, but my bad experiences with reiserfs where on my  
 every_days_work laptop where its not possible to add another disc  
 for temporary backup... 
  
 Arnold 
  
 --  
 Get my public-key from pgp.mit.edu or pgp.uni-mainz.de 
 --- 
 Hi, I am a .signature virus. Please copy me into your ~/.signature  
 and send me to all your contacts. After a month or so log in as root  
 and do a rm / -rf. Or ask your administrator to do so... 

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] OT: Convert ext3 to reiserfs

2003-07-23 Thread Norberto BENSA
Arnold Krille wrote:
 From my personal experience: ext3 is _much_ better than reiserfs!

Two words: DON'T START (a flame war) :-)

Everybody knows reiserfs IS way better than anything else! :-)

Norberto


pgp0.pgp
Description: signature


Re: [gentoo-user] OT: Convert ext3 to reiserfs

2003-07-23 Thread Andrew Gaffney
Norberto BENSA wrote:
Arnold Krille wrote:

From my personal experience: ext3 is _much_ better than reiserfs!


Two words: DON'T START (a flame war) :-)

Everybody knows reiserfs IS way better than anything else! :-)
That's what I hear a lot, but I've also heard the horror stories of 
losing entire filesystems to ReiserFS. I've never heard of anything like 
that happening with ext2/3.

--
Andrew Gaffney
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] OT: Convert ext3 to reiserfs

2003-07-23 Thread Gent00
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

El Mié 23 Jul 2003 16:21, Norberto BENSA escribió:

| Arnold Krille wrote:
|  From my personal experience: ext3 is _much_ better than reiserfs!
|
| Two words: DON'T START (a flame war) :-)
|
| Everybody knows reiserfs IS way better than anything else! :-)
  That's your opinion.. my fellow patriot. ;)
  ReiserFS destroyed my entire disk when I was running OpenLinux. Don't remind 
me those times please!

  I preffer XFS or EXT3 as well. But I'll never use Raiser again. It really 
sucks! But neither of then, nor Reiser nor XFS supports bad cluster.. so 
well.. I've got yo choose EXT3.

- -- 
..:: Gent00:.:.
...: [EMAIL PROTECTED] .:..
::.. Fingerprint: F86A AF36 4B75 6CD0 FFBB A800 8C86 CCA9 ..:.
.::. Powered By Gentoo Linux   .:..

Probarás... probarás... pero con éste te quedarás.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/Hu4KjIbMqXs4fYIRAmfWAJ4jpeLFUbbWKQ7K9Fb1D8XBcDxMpQCeJg93
XIb9R96swOBqOKUs/pw25/0=
=+X/U
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] OT: Convert ext3 to reiserfs

2003-07-23 Thread Arnold Krille
On Wednesday 23 July 2003 21:01, Rob Snow wrote:
 Just to throw some weight the other way, since this seems to be a
 preferences thread.  I've had wonderful experience with ReiserFS on
 both laptop and desktop machines.  If you have the time and a free
 disk, I heartily suggest you give it a try.  I think you'll probably not go
 back.

Nothing against giving it a try but I went back to ext...

Arnold

-- 
Get my public-key from pgp.mit.edu or pgp.uni-mainz.de
---
Hi, I am a .signature virus. Please copy me into your ~/.signature and send me 
to all your contacts.
After a month or so log in as root and do a rm / -rf. Or ask your 
administrator to do so...


pgp0.pgp
Description: signature


Re: [gentoo-user] OT: Convert ext3 to reiserfs

2003-07-23 Thread Harald Arnesen
Norberto BENSA [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Arnold Krille wrote:
 From my personal experience: ext3 is _much_ better than reiserfs!

 Two words: DON'T START (a flame war) :-)

 Everybody knows reiserfs IS way better than anything else! :-)

Except when your machine crashes, and you lose a few directories. That
has never happened to me with ext3. Now I try xfs on my laptop.
-- 
Hilsen Harald.

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] OT: Convert ext3 to reiserfs

2003-07-23 Thread Norberto BENSA
Andrew Gaffney wrote:
 Norberto BENSA wrote:
  Everybody knows reiserfs IS way better than anything else! :-)

 That's what I hear a lot, but I've also heard the horror stories of
 losing entire filesystems to ReiserFS. I've never heard of anything like
 that happening with ext2/3.

Ohhh... I can tell you many histories me losing ext[23] partitions when I ran 
Debian. 

Please, stop this thread here. Choice of FS is very personal, much like 
Windows vs. Linux vs. *BSD vs. OS/2 vs MacOS whateverversion vs. AmigaOS vs. 
[put your favorite OS here.]

With best regards,
Norberto

-- 
$ man women
No manual entry for women


pgp0.pgp
Description: signature


Re: [gentoo-user] OT: Convert ext3 to reiserfs

2003-07-23 Thread Alec Berryman
On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 15:10, Andrew Gaffney wrote:
 That's what I hear a lot, but I've also heard the horror stories of 
 losing entire filesystems to ReiserFS. I've never heard of anything like 
 that happening with ext2/3.

For what it's worth, I've never lost a filesystem to Reiser, but have
lost a few to ext2/3.  I hear that most of the huge Reiser bugs are
gone.  Either way, corruptions shouldn't worry you if you treat it
nicely.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [gentoo-user] OT: Convert ext3 to reiserfs

2003-07-23 Thread Steven Elling
On Wednesday 23 July 2003 15:10, Andrew Gaffney wrote:
 That's what I hear a lot, but I've also heard the horror stories of
 losing entire filesystems to ReiserFS. I've never heard of anything like
 that happening with ext2/3.

I'll share the one and only problem I've had with reiserfs.

One day my system's kernel started to dump the registers and halt.  I would 
reboot and everything would be fine.  I would login to the machine using 
KDM/KDE and work away for a while then again the system would halt.  I 
couldn't figure out what was going on.

I can't remember why I did it, but I booted the system without X and went to 
clean out /tmp.  When I did a 'rm -rf *' in temp the kernel dumped 
registers and halted.  I said and thought to myself WTF.  After rebooting, 
I selectively removed files from /tmp and found that when I tried to remove 
one particular directory the system would halt.  I decided to boot into 
single user mode and run reiserfsck.  When I did, reiserfsck reported it 
found errors it could not fix and I would have to use the '--rebuild-tree' 
option.  I ran reiserfsck with the option and it fixed my problem without 
loosing any data.  I was able to remove everything from /tmp and not have 
the kernel halt.


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] OT: Convert ext3 to reiserfs

2003-07-23 Thread Vano D
On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 11:09, Finne Boonen wrote:
 just wonderign, wouldn't tar.bz files not keep your attributes?

This is the tar line in a script I use to make backups of the whole
system once in a while (I know, I need a better backup system). I have
tried restoring and the whole system comes back ok. So it deffinitely
works :)

tar cjpf - / --exclude=usr/portage/distfiles/* --exclude=tmp/*
--exclude=/proc/* --exclude=/.journal | split -b 640m -
/tmp/gentoo-system-`date +%Y%m%d`-

Note that I split the thing into 640 megs so I can store it into a CDROM
and that I make the filename with the date extension.

You can obviously switch the 'j' option with the 'z' option or simply
none for no compression. Whatever you do keep the 'p' which preserves
file attributes and what not. You also need the 'p' while untarring, as
stated in the Gentoo install docs.

BTW, /.journal is the ext3 journal file which should not be copied (as
stated somewhere in the man pages of something... dont remember now).


Cheers,

-- 
Vano D [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] OT: Convert ext3 to reiserfs

2003-07-23 Thread Alec Berryman
On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 17:46, Steven Elling wrote:
 I can't remember why I did it, but I booted the system without X and went to 
 clean out /tmp.  When I did a 'rm -rf *' in temp the kernel dumped 
 registers and halted.  I said and thought to myself WTF.  After rebooting, 
 I selectively removed files from /tmp and found that when I tried to remove 
 one particular directory the system would halt.  I decided to boot into 
 single user mode and run reiserfsck.  When I did, reiserfsck reported it 
 found errors it could not fix and I would have to use the '--rebuild-tree' 
 option.  I ran reiserfsck with the option and it fixed my problem without 
 loosing any data.  I was able to remove everything from /tmp and not have 
 the kernel halt.

I should add - reiserfsck is _much_ faster than e2fsck.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [gentoo-user] OT: Convert ext3 to reiserfs

2003-07-23 Thread Alec Berryman
On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 19:40, Vano D wrote:

 Note that I split the thing into 640 megs so I can store it into a CDROM
 and that I make the filename with the date extension.

Dumb question: I'm new to split; can you untar each split file
individually, or do you need to do them in sequence like a split RAR?


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [gentoo-user] OT: Convert ext3 to reiserfs

2003-07-23 Thread nmeyers
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 09:19:11PM -0500, Alec Berryman wrote:
 On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 17:46, Steven Elling wrote:
  I can't remember why I did it, but I booted the system without X and went to 
  clean out /tmp.  When I did a 'rm -rf *' in temp the kernel dumped 
  registers and halted.  I said and thought to myself WTF.  After rebooting, 
  I selectively removed files from /tmp and found that when I tried to remove 
  one particular directory the system would halt.  I decided to boot into 
  single user mode and run reiserfsck.  When I did, reiserfsck reported it 
  found errors it could not fix and I would have to use the '--rebuild-tree' 
  option.  I ran reiserfsck with the option and it fixed my problem without 
  loosing any data.  I was able to remove everything from /tmp and not have 
  the kernel halt.
 
 I should add - reiserfsck is _much_ faster than e2fsck.

I've had reiserfsck --rebuild-tree turn damaged filesystems into totally
unusable filesystems. Maybe it's gotten more robust since I encountered
my problems.

Nathan Meyers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list