[gentoo-user] Re: bash_history

2006-03-19 Thread Tim Kruse
* On 18.03.2006 Neil Bothwick wrote:

 On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 10:17:19 +0100, Tim Kruse wrote:

  Like you set all options in zsh ...

 setopt INC_APPEND_HISTORY  # incrementally append history to $HISTFILE

 Not that different from Bash then? :-)

 shopt -s histappend

 Do you mean the option itself or setting options? Setting
options is not so different in the most shells I think.

 If you mean the option itself then ...

,-
| % man bash | col -b | grep -A 3 histappend
| histappend
| If  set,  the history list is appended to the file named
| by the value of the HISTFILE  variable  when  the  shell
| exits, rather than overwriting the file.
| %
| % man zshoptions | col -b | grep -A 5 APPEND_HISTORY
| APPEND_HISTORY D
| If this is set, zsh sessions will append their history  list  to
| the  history file, rather than overwrite it. Thus, multiple par-
| allel zsh sessions will all have their history  lists  added  to
| the history file, in the order they are killed.
|
| ---
| INC_APPEND_HISTORY
| This options works like APPEND_HISTORY except that  new  history
| lines  are added to the $HISTFILE incrementally (as soon as they
| are entered), rather than waiting until  the  shell  is  killed.
| The  file  is periodically trimmed to the number of lines speci-
| fied by $SAVEHIST, but can exceed this value between  trimmings.
`-

 You see the difference? :-P

 So long,
tkr

-- 
What you don't know can hurt you, only you won't know it.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[gentoo-user] Sharing file systems

2006-03-19 Thread Sumeet Pal Singh
HI
This mail is not directly related to gentoo.
I have gentoo,ubuntu 5.10 on my system and using FC3 since it was released. 

I
tried to install FC4 on my system by sharing the swap and /home
partition between FC4 and ubuntu. The installation went well. I did not
install KDE in FC4. 
I was well aware of permission screw ups that this could lead to, hence
I did not create any user (The UID and GID of root is preserved across
Linux distros)

I booted in as root and created a new user with UID and GID same as on ubuntu.
Now I booted in GNOME and it was completely configured Moreover
gaim started and signed me in to all my accounts!!! This was first time
login...

My question is that can sharing /home okay for a long run or will it lead to problems. 
Also can other file systems like /usr be shared along with this and if it can be then under what restrictions??
If any one has done this please let me know.


Sumeet


Re: [gentoo-user] Sharing file systems

2006-03-19 Thread Hemmann, Volker Armin
On Sunday 19 March 2006 13:04, Sumeet Pal Singh wrote:
 HI
 This mail is not directly related to gentoo.
 I have gentoo,ubuntu 5.10 on my system and using FC3 since it was released.

 I tried to install FC4 on my system by sharing the swap and /home partition
 between FC4 and ubuntu. The installation went well. I did not install KDE
 in FC4.
 I was well aware of permission screw ups that this could lead to, hence I
 did not create any user (The UID and GID of root is preserved across Linux
 distros)

 I booted in as root and created a new user with UID and GID same as on
 ubuntu.
 Now I booted in GNOME and it was completely configured Moreover gaim
 started and signed me in to all my accounts!!! This was first time login...

 My question is that can sharing /home okay for a long run or will it lead
 to problems.
 Also can other file systems like /usr be shared along with this and if it
 can be  then under what restrictions??
 If any one has done this please let me know.


as long as you are using the same software versions on both systems (at least 
the major version number should be the same) it should be ok.

But why are you asking here and not at the ubuntu or fc mailing lists?
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Sharing file systems

2006-03-19 Thread Holly Bostick
Hemmann, Volker Armin schreef:
 On Sunday 19 March 2006 13:04, Sumeet Pal Singh wrote:
 HI This mail is not directly related to gentoo. I have 
 gentoo,ubuntu 5.10 on my system and using FC3 since it was 
 released.
 
 I tried to install FC4 on my system by sharing the swap and /home 
 partition between FC4 and ubuntu. The installation went well. I did
  not install KDE in FC4.
snip
 
 I booted in as root and created a new user with UID and GID same as
  on ubuntu. Now I booted in GNOME and it was completely 
 configured Moreover gaim started and signed me in to all my 
 accounts!!! This was first time login...
 
 My question is that can sharing /home okay for a long run or will 
 it lead to problems.
snip
 
 
 as long as you are using the same software versions on both systems 
 (at least the major version number should be the same) it should be 
 ok.

That's what I would have thought, too. But frankly, it seems too much
maintenance to me, since as soon as the versions go out of sync, then
you're likely to have problems that are difficult to track down.

I have no problem with two users from different distros having their
/home folder on the same partition (in fact, my Gentoo install and my
SuSE install share a /home partition), but I wouldn't myself have the
two users merged that way across two Linux distros. I admit I did do
something similar when I had a massive multiboot (5 Linux distros, 2
Windows installs), for relatively easy compatibility with the shared
Windows partitions, but even then, every user had their own /home
folder, they just had the same UID and a shared GID (which I made the
same on all related distros). But then again, I don't store things in
my /home folder; I store them on their own partitions that are linked
into my home folder, so it's not as if it's a space saver for me to
have two separate distros using the same /home/username, and since I see
it as a relatively dangerous pain-in-the-butt, I don't do it.

/usr and the like is right out, obviously-- your libs will get creamed
pretty quick doing something like that, unless they're /exactly/ the
same across both distros, and that seems unlikely to me (or unlikely to
last long, if you're lucky temporarily).
 
 But why are you asking here and not at the ubuntu or fc mailing 
 lists?

Good question.

Holly
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Wireless woes after upgrading kernel from kernel-genkernel-x86-2.6.15-gentoo-r1 to kernel-genkernel-x86-2.6.13-gent

2006-03-19 Thread Daniel da Veiga
On 3/19/06, Richard Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi - my original kernel-genkernel-x86-2.6.15-gentoo-r1 runs wireless
 fine with ipw2200 and ipw2200-firmware. After upgrading to
 kernel-genkernel-x86-2.6.13-gentoo-r5 I was experiencing conflicts as in

Well, it seems like a DOWNGRADE, isn't it? If that's the case and not
a typo, you may miss some features... If it is a typo, well, when I
upgraded from 2.6.15-r1 to 2.6.15-r5 I had a hard time making my eth
to work, had to get genkernel default config file and start again from
there, because a lot of conflicts, maybe you could try default
genkernel config...

 order to continue using these tools I had to disable the IEEE802.11
 subsystem and rebuild my kernel. I've tried very configuration I can
 think of (without success). Below is my latest effort can, anyone offer
 advice? Many thanks, Richard

 -- Relevent /usr/src/linux/.config section 
 #CONFIG_NET_PKTGEN is not set
 # CONFIG_HAMRADIO=y

 #
 # Packet Radio protocols
 #
 # CONFIG_AX25 is not set
 # CONFIG_IRDA is not set
 # CONFIG_BT is not set
 # CONFIG_IEEE80211 is not set

 --- Result displayed by modprobe ipw2200 after emerging ipw2200
 ipw2200-firmware ---
 # modprobe ipw2200
 WARNING: Error inserting ieee80211
 (/lib/modules/2.6.15-gentoo-r1/net/ieee80211/ieee80211.ko): Unknown
 symbol in module, or unknown parameter (see dmesg)
 FATAL: Error inserting ipw2200
 (/lib/modules/2.6.15-gentoo-r1/net/wireless/ipw2200.ko): Unknown symbol
 in module, or unknown parameter (see dmesg)

 --- Output from dmesg ---
 ieee80211: disagrees about version of symbol per_cpu__softnet_data
 ieee80211: Unknown symbol per_cpu__softnet_data
 ieee80211: disagrees about version of symbol free_netdev
 ieee80211: Unknown symbol free_netdev
 ieee80211: disagrees about version of symbol netif_rx
 ieee80211: Unknown symbol netif_rx
 ipw2200: Unknown symbol ieee80211_wx_get_encodeext
 ipw2200: Unknown symbol ieee80211_wx_set_encode
 ipw2200: Unknown symbol ieee80211_wx_get_encode
 ipw2200: Unknown symbol ieee80211_txb_free
 ipw2200: Unknown symbol ieee80211_wx_set_encodeext
 ipw2200: Unknown symbol ieee80211_wx_get_scan
 ipw2200: Unknown symbol escape_essid
 ipw2200: Unknown symbol ieee80211_rx
 ipw2200: Unknown symbol ieee80211_rx_mgt
 ipw2200: Unknown symbol free_ieee80211
 ipw2200: Unknown symbol alloc_ieee80211
 ieee80211: disagrees about version of symbol per_cpu__softnet_data
 ieee80211: Unknown symbol per_cpu__softnet_data
 ieee80211: disagrees about version of symbol free_netdev
 ieee80211: Unknown symbol free_netdev
 ieee80211: disagrees about version of symbol netif_rx
 ieee80211: Unknown symbol netif_rx
 ipw2200: Unknown symbol ieee80211_wx_get_encodeext
 ipw2200: Unknown symbol ieee80211_wx_get_scan
 ipw2200: Unknown symbol escape_essid
 ipw2200: Unknown symbol ieee80211_rx
 ipw2200: Unknown symbol ieee80211_rx_mgt
 ipw2200: Unknown symbol free_ieee80211
 ipw2200: Unknown symbol alloc_ieee80211
 mtrr: no more MTRRs available
 tg3: eth1: Link is up at 100 Mbps, full duplex.
 tg3: eth1: Flow control is off for TX and off for RX.
 ieee80211: disagrees about version of symbol per_cpu__softnet_data
 ieee80211: Unknown symbol per_cpu__softnet_data
 ieee80211: disagrees about version of symbol free_netdev
 ieee80211: Unknown symbol free_netdev
 ieee80211: disagrees about version of symbol netif_rx
 ieee80211: Unknown symbol netif_rx
 ipw2200: Unknown symbol ieee80211_wx_get_encodeext
 ipw2200: Unknown symbol ieee80211_wx_set_encode
 ipw2200: Unknown symbol ieee80211_wx_get_encode
 ipw2200: Unknown symbol ieee80211_txb_free
 ipw2200: Unknown symbol ieee80211_wx_set_encodeext
 ipw2200: Unknown symbol ieee80211_wx_get_scan
 ipw2200: Unknown symbol escape_essid
 ipw2200: Unknown symbol ieee80211_rx
 ipw2200: Unknown symbol ieee80211_rx_mgt
 ipw2200: Unknown symbol free_ieee80211
 ipw2200: Unknown symbol alloc_ieee80211



 --
 gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list




--
Daniel da Veiga
Computer Operator - RS - Brazil
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.1
GCM/IT/P/O d-? s:- a? C++$ UBLA++ P+ L++ E--- W+++$ N o+ K- w O M- V-
PS PE Y PGP- t+ 5 X+++ R+* tv b+ DI+++ D+ G+ e h+ r+ y++
--END GEEK CODE BLOCK--

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] sendmail with outlook

2006-03-19 Thread Hiren Dave
Hi,

I have a setup of mail server with sendmail 8.13 and pop3/imap. Now the problem is that I can send mail from outlook via sendmail but I am not able to receive message. The error is coming that Your server has unexpectedly terminated the connection. Possible causes for this include server problems, network problems, or a long period of inactivity. Account: '
192.168.0.2', Server: '192.168.0.2', Protocol: POP3, Port: 110, Secure(SSL): No, Error Number: 0x800CCC0F.

Any one has any idea about this problem. There is no log in /var/log/messages or /var/log/maillog.


Re: [gentoo-user] Sharing file systems

2006-03-19 Thread Hemmann, Volker Armin
On Sunday 19 March 2006 13:55, Holly Bostick wrote:

 That's what I would have thought, too. But frankly, it seems too much
 maintenance to me, since as soon as the versions go out of sync, then
 you're likely to have problems that are difficult to track down.

 I have no problem with two users from different distros having their
 /home folder on the same partition (in fact, my Gentoo install and my
 SuSE install share a /home partition), but I wouldn't myself have the
 two users merged that way across two Linux distros. I admit I did do
 something similar when I had a massive multiboot (5 Linux distros, 2
 Windows installs), for relatively easy compatibility with the shared
 Windows partitions, but even then, every user had their own /home
 folder, they just had the same UID and a shared GID (which I made the
 same on all related distros). But then again, I don't store things in
 my /home folder; I store them on their own partitions that are linked
 into my home folder, so it's not as if it's a space saver for me to
 have two separate distros using the same /home/username, and since I see
 it as a relatively dangerous pain-in-the-butt, I don't do it.

well I did it once (twoce?), back when I used suse and tried some other stuff. 
I even caried the suse /home with my one and only user to slackware and later 
gentoo. I was just carefull to give my user always the same gid/uid and it 
worked hassle free. But it was not a real 'sharing' more a 'take over to the 
next distribution'.
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] sendmail with outlook

2006-03-19 Thread Uwe Thiem
On 19 March 2006 15:34, Hiren Dave wrote:
 Hi,

 I have a setup of mail server with sendmail 8.13 and pop3/imap. Now the
 problem is that I can send mail from outlook via sendmail but I am not able
 to receive message. The error is coming that Your server has unexpectedly
 terminated the connection. Possible causes for this include server
 problems, network problems, or a long period of inactivity. Account:
 '192.168.0.2', Server: '192.168.0.2', Protocol: POP3, Port: 110,
 Secure(SSL): No, Error Number: 0x800CCC0F.

It seems your outlook tries to use SSL while your POP server isn't configured 
for it. Might be the other way round, though.

Uwe

-- 
Why do consumers keep buying products they will live to curse?
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Bind Problem

2006-03-19 Thread JimD

What is the output of this command:

netstat -tap


- Original Message - 
From: Hiren Dave

To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2006 12:37 AM
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Bind Problem


Hi,

Thanks for the solution. Now I can see MX entry in dig command. Now the 
command telnet server1.guru.com 25 or telnet 192.168.0.2 25 is not 
working. The error is coming that the is connection refused. But the command 
telnet 127.0.0.1 25 is working correctly. Why is this happening?


Thanks,
Hiren 



--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Problems with domainname

2006-03-19 Thread JimD

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


In order to get a proper FQDN, you need to set up three files:
/etc/hosts, /etc/conf.d/hostanme, /etc/conf.d/domainname.

I also have the same problems as you in past, and one day I found
that the most tricky thing was that you must give a seperate line
for your FQDN name in /etc/hosts!

This is a part of my /etc/hosts file:

127.0.0.1   localhost
127.0.0.1   lp.lcst.com lp


You can combine it all in one line like so:

127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost


--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Problems with cedilla

2006-03-19 Thread Diogo Tridapalli
The accentuated C occurs in X and terminal or just in firefox?

On 3/19/06, Felipe Ribeiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi,

 I've set my us_intl keyboard, and the accentuation is working ok, but
 i`ve got a problem with cedilla, when i type ' and c, it appears a ć
 (accentuated C) instead of cedilla, what should i do?

 Cheers,
 Felipe

 --
 gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list




--
Diogo B. Tridapalli

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Problems with cedilla

2006-03-19 Thread Mauro Faccenda
On Sunday 19 March 2006 02:14, Felipe Ribeiro wrote:
 Are you sure? At Windles i use ' + C,  and comma isnt a dead key.

windows and kde apps we use ' then c to get a ç. in gtk apps (firefox, for 
example) we use altgr + , then c.

[]'s
Mauro

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Sharing file systems

2006-03-19 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sun, 19 Mar 2006 17:34:55 +0530, Sumeet Pal Singh wrote:

 My question is that can sharing /home okay for a long run or will it
 lead to problems.

Sharing the /home partition is fine, sharing a home directory between
distros will cause trouble. Even if you fix the permissions problems, by
giving the user the same UID on all distros, you'll have trouble when you
have different versions of the same software and the configuration files
get screwed.

The solution I have used is to have a separate home directory for each
distro, but keeping the same user name and ID. I named them nelz-gentoo,
nelz-mandrake etc, to make it easy to keep track. For data you want to
share between the distros, I used symlinks like
ln -s ../nelz-gentoo/documents nlez-mandrake/documents.

Share things like you KDE/GNOME config files and it WILL bite you at some
time.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Where the system is concerned, you're not allowed to ask `Why?'


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Re: bash_history

2006-03-19 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sun, 19 Mar 2006 09:18:58 +0100, Tim Kruse wrote:

  You see the difference? :-P

Yes. One up to zsh it would appear, there;'s no such option in Bash.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Your lack of organisation does not represent an
emergency in my world.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Sharing file systems

2006-03-19 Thread Hemmann, Volker Armin
On Sunday 19 March 2006 16:57, Neil Bothwick wrote:

 Share things like you KDE/GNOME config files and it WILL bite you at some
 time.

no, it won't

kde uses for its major versionds (3.3, 3.4, 3.5) different directories 
(.kde3.3, .kde3.4, .kde3.5). Worst case - you have to set a symlink (.kde) 
before you log in.

I do not know, what gnome does, maybe the worst possible, but KDE is fine.
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Problems with domainname

2006-03-19 Thread Felipe Ribeiro
SOLVED!

Thanks!

On 3/19/06, JimD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  In order to get a proper FQDN, you need to set up three files:
  /etc/hosts, /etc/conf.d/hostanme, /etc/conf.d/domainname.
 
  I also have the same problems as you in past, and one day I found
  that the most tricky thing was that you must give a seperate line
  for your FQDN name in /etc/hosts!
 
  This is a part of my /etc/hosts file:
 
  127.0.0.1   localhost
  127.0.0.1   lp.lcst.com lp

 You can combine it all in one line like so:

 127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost


 --
 gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] Gnome Floppy Formatter bug ?

2006-03-19 Thread sHadoW MaN
I have gnome-utils-2..12.2 installed...so I  launched the gnome floppy 
formatter application and then when I wanted to close the application by 
clicking the Close buttons, nothing happened so I had to click to the x on 
the right top of the window to force quit application. I lauched gfloppy 
from console and here's the output:


*** glibc detected *** free(): invalid pointer: 0x40f9f532 ***

I re-emerged all gnome-utils package dependencies including glibc and the 
problem is still present. I am not sure if it's a bug or not.

How can I fix this issue please?

cApTaiN_FaNtAsTiK

_
Gardez le contrôle grâce à la protection contre les fenêtres pop-up 
articulée sur la technologie brevetée Microsoft SmartScreen 
http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=fr-capage=features/popup Commencez dès 
maintenant à profiter de tous les avantages de MSN Premium et obtenez les 
deux premiers mois GRATUITS*.


--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Sharing file systems

2006-03-19 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sun, 19 Mar 2006 17:13:37 +0100, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:

  Share things like you KDE/GNOME config files and it WILL bite you at
  some time.
 
 no, it won't
 
 kde uses for its major versionds (3.3, 3.4, 3.5) different directories 
 (.kde3.3, .kde3.4, .kde3.5). Worst case - you have to set a symlink
 (.kde) before you log in.

Major versions, yes, but not minor versions. The problems occur when you
upgrade one distro to a later minor version, run it, then go back to the
older version. config files are intended to be backward-compatible, not
forward-compatible. This isn't urban myth, I have experienced it.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Nice computers don't go down.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Re: bash_history

2006-03-19 Thread Octavio Ruiz (Ta^3)
Tim Kruse, who happens to be smarter than you, thinks:
 * On 18.03.2006 Neil Bothwick wrote:
  On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 10:17:19 +0100, Tim Kruse wrote:
 
   Like you set all options in zsh ...
  setopt INC_APPEND_HISTORY  # incrementally append history to $HISTFILE
 
  Not that different from Bash then? :-)
  shopt -s histappend
 
  Do you mean the option itself or setting options? Setting
 options is not so different in the most shells I think.
 
  If you mean the option itself then ...

You also want to set,

export PROMPT_COMMAND=${PROMPT_COMMAND:+${PROMPT_COMMAND} ;} history -a

in cojuction with histappend.

-- 
It's not pretty being easy.


pgpF0svi73nlX.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[gentoo-user] Mozilla - pop-ups not blocked !!

2006-03-19 Thread Rohit Sharma




Hi,

I am using Mozilla 1.7.12 

Mozilla/5.0
(X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20060222
at my home desktop. However, even when configured to block unrequested
popups, my mozilla [on both windows and linux] is not able to block
pop-ups from websites. I assure you this is not a spam/dangerous link
and you shall know exactly what I mean if you clicked on 

http://www.samachar.com/showurl.htm?rurl=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1455375.cms?headline=Couples~framing~parents~with~dowry

This is my news-consolidated site that I access every morning.
What may I be doing wrong?
-- 

Rohit's signatures
Best regards,

Rohit
Sharma



-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Mozilla - pop-ups not blocked !!

2006-03-19 Thread fire-eyes
On Sunday 19 March 2006 12:48, Rohit Sharma wrote:
 !DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DT
[snip]

Please post to this list in plain text and I will consider responding, I was 
going to until my client was flooded with stuff appropriate for a web 
browser...
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Mozilla - pop-ups not blocked !!

2006-03-19 Thread Jane
On Sun, 2006-03-19 at 17:48 +, Rohit Sharma wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I am using Mozilla 1.7.12  
 Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20060222
 at my home desktop. However, even when configured to block unrequested
 popups, my mozilla [on both windows and linux] is not able to block
 pop-ups from websites. I assure you this is not a spam/dangerous link
 and you shall know exactly what I mean if you clicked on 
 
 http://www.samachar.com/showurl.htm?rurl=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1455375.cms?headline=Couples~framing~parents~with~dowry
 
 This is my news-consolidated site that I access every morning.
 What may I be doing wrong?
 -- 
 Best regards,
 
 Rohit Sharma
 
 -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Firefox seems to be ok with this site.

Jane

-- 
Jane [EMAIL PROTECTED]





___ 
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! 
Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] livecd install problems

2006-03-19 Thread Rumen Yotov
On Sunday 19 March 2006 20:04, David Relson wrote:
 G'day,

 I'm trying to install the livecd (livecd-i686-installer-2006.0.iso) on
 a PII-450 machine with 256MB ram and an 18GB Fujitsu hard drive.  The
 machine is on a 192.168.1.x LAN with 192.168.1.2 providing DNS and DSL
 firewall services.  The installation fails :=  Copies of
 installprofile.xml, clientconfiguration.xml, and installer.log.failed
 are below.

 All my attempts at installing have failed so far.  Suggestions as to
 what's wrong (and help in getting around the problems) would be appreciated
 !

 Thanks.

 David

  /var/log/installer.log.failed

...SKIP...
Hi,
Try a second time following the latest docs (haven't read them myself ;) and 
don't hurry.
If the problem persist, try installing the old way - open a terminal (as root) 
and follow the appropriate docs (2006.0 or 2005.1).
PS: also could try a minimal-arch-2006.0 CD with a stage3 tarball.
HTH.Rumen


pgpvEsw8TNbuU.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] livecd install problems

2006-03-19 Thread Daniel da Veiga
On 3/19/06, David Relson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 G'day,

 I'm trying to install the livecd (livecd-i686-installer-2006.0.iso) on
 a PII-450 machine with 256MB ram and an 18GB Fujitsu hard drive.  The
 machine is on a 192.168.1.x LAN with 192.168.1.2 providing DNS and DSL
 firewall services.  The installation fails :=  Copies of
 installprofile.xml, clientconfiguration.xml, and installer.log.failed
 are below.

 All my attempts at installing have failed so far.  Suggestions as to
 what's wrong (and help in getting around the problems) would be appreciated !

 Thanks.

 David

  /var/log/installer.log.failed

 GLI: March 19 2006 17:54:40 - Setting root password.
 GLI: March 19 2006 17:54:42 - Livecd root password set.
 GLI: March 19 2006 17:54:46 - Portmap started.
 GLI: March 19 2006 17:54:46 - Completed pre_install steps
 GLI: March 19 2006 17:58:21 - Partition table for /dev/sda is 
 unchanged...skipping
 GLI: March 19 2006 17:58:26 - Exception received during 'Mount local 
 partitions': MountError :FATAL: mount_local_partitions: Could not mount a 
 partition
 GLI: March 19 2006 17:58:26 - Traceback (most recent call last):
 GLI: March 19 2006 17:58:26 - File /opt/installer/GLIClientController.py, 
 line 165, in run
 self._install_steps[self._install_step]['function']()
 GLI: March 19 2006 17:58:26 - File 
 /opt/installer/GLIArchitectureTemplate.py, line 441, in 
 mount_local_partitions
 raise GLIException(MountError, 'fatal','mount_local_partitions','Could 
 not mount a partition')
 GLI: March 19 2006 17:58:26 - GLIException: MountError :FATAL: 
 mount_local_partitions: Could not mount a partition


Well, it seems the installer was unable to mount /mnt/gentoo, that
will be your root mountpoint (the / in the device), you have told
the installer not to format the partitions, that could be one of the
reasons why it can't mount it, because simply there's no filesystem on
the device. Another option is that you have mounted the device
already.

Do you have anything else on the disk? Another partition or
filesystem? Something that you don't wanna loose? If not, I suggest
you tell the installer to format the partitions...


  clientconfiguratin.xml

 ?xml version=1.0 ?
 client-configuration
 network-gateway
 192.168.1.2
 /network-gateway
 http-proxy/
 network-ip
 192.168.1.30
 /network-ip
 rsync-proxy/
 ftp-proxy/
 verbose
 False
 /verbose
 enable-ssh
 False
 /enable-ssh
 install-mode
 normal
 /install-mode
 root-mount-point
 /mnt/gentoo
 /root-mount-point
 profile-uri/
 network-type
 static
 /network-type
 network-netmask
 255.255.255.0
 /network-netmask
 log-file
 /var/log/installer.log
 /log-file
 network-interface
 eth0
 /network-interface
 root-passwd
 **
 /root-passwd
 network-dhcp-options/
 architecture-template
 x86
 /architecture-template
 network-broadcast
 192.168.1.255
 /network-broadcast
 interactive
 True
 /interactive
 dns-servers
 192.168.1.2
 /dns-servers
 kernel-modules/
 /client-configuration



  installprofile.xml
 ?xml version=1.0 ?
 gli-profile
 kernel-build-method
 genkernel
 /kernel-build-method
 cron-daemon
 vixie-cron
 /cron-daemon
 domainname
 localdomain
 /domainname
 portage-snapshot
 file:///mnt/cdrom/snapshots/portage-20060123.tar.bz2
 /portage-snapshot
 kernel-source
 livecd-kernel
 /kernel-source
 install-pcmcia-cs
 False
 /install-pcmcia-cs
 time-zone
 America/New_York
 /time-zone
 install-distcc
 False
 /install-distcc
 boot-device
 /dev/sda
 /boot-device
 dynamic-stage3
 True
 /dynamic-stage3
 kernel-bootsplash
 False
 /kernel-bootsplash
 bootloader-mbr
 True
 /bootloader-mbr
 hostname
 localhost
 /hostname
 bootloader-kernel-args/
 post-install-script-uri/
 nisdomainname/
 install-stage
 3
 /install-stage
 ftp-proxy/
 rsync-proxy/
 stage-tarball/
 bootloader
 grub
 /bootloader
 root-pass-hash
 $1$a.PHSveD$04QXafey77sXdPqi2QBvW/
 /root-pass-hash
 

Re: [gentoo-user] Mozilla - pop-ups not blocked !!

2006-03-19 Thread Daniel da Veiga
The site is OK, and even with the ridiculous URL redirection by
samachar it does not open any popups (at least for me).

On 3/19/06, Rohit Sharma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Hi,

  I am using Mozilla 1.7.12
  Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20060222
  at my home desktop. However, even when configured to block unrequested
 popups, my mozilla [on both windows and linux] is not able to block pop-ups
 from websites. I assure you this is not a spam/dangerous link and you shall
 know exactly what I mean if you clicked on

 http://www.samachar.com/showurl.htm?rurl=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1455375.cms?headline=Couples~framing~parents~with~dowry

  This is my news-consolidated site that I access every morning.
  What may I be doing wrong?

 --

 Best regards,
  Rohit Sharma
  -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list


--
Daniel da Veiga
Computer Operator - RS - Brazil
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.1
GCM/IT/P/O d-? s:- a? C++$ UBLA++ P+ L++ E--- W+++$ N o+ K- w O M- V-
PS PE Y PGP- t+ 5 X+++ R+* tv b+ DI+++ D+ G+ e h+ r+ y++
--END GEEK CODE BLOCK--

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] core packages for a dual-boot system

2006-03-19 Thread hawat . thufir
I've thought about gentoo for some time, and getting closer to switching 
over from fedora.


as can be seen, there's a vfat partition, /mnt/windows.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ df
Filesystem   1K-blocks  Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00
  17394484  14690156   1806488  90% /
/dev/hda2   101105 18104 77780  19% /boot
/dev/shm111860 0111860   0% /dev/shm
/dev/hda1 11451144   9922200   1528944  87% /mnt/windows
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ date
Sun Mar 19 12:28:40 EST 2006
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$


Occasionally I boot into windows and would, for the time being, like to 
keep that capability.  However, I might entirely drop windows down the 
road.


I want to be able to return to:

' After step 5, core packages, which are the same on all Gentoo 
installations, are installed'

http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?part=1chap=1

as a baseline.  Would there be a command to do so?


To install:

acroread
Description: Adobe's PDF reader

For an x86 system, would I download the file from adobe, then something 
like emerge acroread, and would that also give me the plugin for 
firefox?  Or, is the firefox plugin for that through 
http://mozplugger.mozdev.org/ which connects to acroread?  I know 
there are other GPL readers, of course.


For perhaps a different thread, I'm feeling my way with with xmms, 
realplayer, windows media player, mplayer, shoutcast, streamripper and 
streamtuner, etc.  Right now I have firefox configured such that an MP3 
shoutcast playlist opens with Audio Player (xmms), which is ok, but I 
notice that streamtuner uses bmp.  One of the reasons I'm looking at 
gentoo is in the hope that gentoo handles mplayer and the multitudes of 
codecs well.


I have a gnoppix CD kicking around, so I'll probably use that, if I can 
find it.



thanks,

Thufir
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] Re: core packages for a dual-boot system

2006-03-19 Thread hawat . thufir

On Sun, 19 Mar 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: core packages for a dual-boot system

I've thought about gentoo for some time, and getting closer to switching over 
from fedora.


as can be seen, there's a vfat partition, /mnt/windows.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ df
Filesystem   1K-blocks  Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00
 17394484  14690156   1806488  90% /
/dev/hda2   101105 18104 77780  19% /boot
/dev/shm111860 0111860   0% /dev/shm
/dev/hda1 11451144   9922200   1528944  87% /mnt/windows
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ date
Sun Mar 19 12:28:40 EST 2006
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$



4.b. Designing a Partitioning Scheme

Default Partitioning Scheme

If you are not interested in drawing up a partitioning scheme for your 
system, you can use the partitioning scheme we use throughout this book:

Partition   Filesystem  SizeDescription
/dev/hda1   ext232M Boot partition
/dev/hda2   (swap)  512MSwap partition
/dev/hda3   ext3Rest of the diskRoot partition


http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?part=1chap=4#fdisk


So, I want something like:
Partition   Filesystem  SizeDescription
/dev/hda1   ext232M Boot partition
/dev/hda2   (swap)  512MSwap partition
/dev/hda3   ext3??? Root partition
/dev/hda4   fat32


I'm concerned about overwriting the windows partition, or mucking up the 
dual-boot bootloader.


There are directions at 
http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Dual_boot#Single_Drive_Install_.28Windows_Pre-Installed.29, 
but I'd like to have it all worked out ahead of time for my own sake.


Perhaps I don't even need to format anything?


-Thufir
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Sharing file systems

2006-03-19 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sun, 19 Mar 2006 19:24:10 +0100, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:

  Major versions, yes, but not minor versions. The problems occur when
  you upgrade one distro to a later minor version, run it, then go back
  to the older version. config files are intended to be
  backward-compatible, not forward-compatible. This isn't urban myth, I
  have experienced it.
 
 and which desktop environment breaks compatibility in minor versions?
 I had some config breakage between KDE3.4 and 3.5 related to some 3rd
 party decoration/theme, but in the minor versions, it shouldn't matter.

KDE, especially if one of the distros uses a customised version.

Running Gentoo and Mandrake with a shared home directory broke things in
very short order. Using separate home directories on a single shared
partition gave no such problems.

Every distro is different (otherwise, what would be the point?) so
sharing config files is always going to be risky.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

OS/2: Obsolete Soon, Too


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] livecd install problems

2006-03-19 Thread David Relson
On Sun, 19 Mar 2006 15:21:50 -0300
Daniel da Veiga wrote:

...[snip]...

 
 Well, it seems the installer was unable to mount /mnt/gentoo, that
 will be your root mountpoint (the / in the device), you have told
 the installer not to format the partitions, that could be one of the
 reasons why it can't mount it, because simply there's no filesystem on
 the device. Another option is that you have mounted the device
 already.
 
 Do you have anything else on the disk? Another partition or
 filesystem? Something that you don't wanna loose? If not, I suggest
 you tell the installer to format the partitions...

Daniel:

Right on!  I restarted the install, taking care to scp the old
configuration to tmpfs (without mounting any partitions).  The install
is now unpacking the stage tarball.  This is considerably further along
than previous efforts.

Regards,

David
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] emerge kicker(KDE taskbar) fails

2006-03-19 Thread Adrian Vraciu

i can't emerge kicker from kde. here is the ouput of my error:
exe_dlg.cpp: In constructor `PanelExeDialog::PanelExeDialog(const QString, 
const QString, const QString, const QString, bool, QWidget*, const 
char*)':
exe_dlg.cpp:59: error: invalid use of undefined type `struct 
NonKDEButtonSettings'

exe_dlg.h:28: error: forward declaration of `struct NonKDEButtonSettings'
exe_dlg.cpp:62: error: invalid use of undefined type `struct 
NonKDEButtonSettings'

exe_dlg.h:28: error: forward declaration of `struct NonKDEButtonSettings'
exe_dlg.cpp:63: error: invalid use of undefined type `struct 
NonKDEButtonSettings'

exe_dlg.h:28: error: forward declaration of `struct NonKDEButtonSettings'
exe_dlg.cpp:64: error: invalid use of undefined type `struct 
NonKDEButtonSettings'

exe_dlg.h:28: error: forward declaration of `struct NonKDEButtonSettings'
exe_dlg.cpp:65: error: invalid use of undefined type `struct 
NonKDEButtonSettings'

exe_dlg.h:28: error: forward declaration of `struct NonKDEButtonSettings'
exe_dlg.cpp:66: error: invalid use of undefined type `struct 
NonKDEButtonSettings'

exe_dlg.h:28: error: forward declaration of `struct NonKDEButtonSettings'
exe_dlg.cpp:70: error: invalid use of undefined type `struct 
NonKDEButtonSettings'

exe_dlg.h:28: error: forward declaration of `struct NonKDEButtonSettings'
exe_dlg.cpp:72: error: invalid use of undefined type `struct 
NonKDEButtonSettings'

exe_dlg.h:28: error: forward declaration of `struct NonKDEButtonSettings'
exe_dlg.cpp:74: error: invalid use of undefined type `struct 
NonKDEButtonSettings'

exe_dlg.h:28: error: forward declaration of `struct NonKDEButtonSettings'
exe_dlg.cpp:76: error: invalid use of undefined type `struct 
NonKDEButtonSettings'

exe_dlg.h:28: error: forward declaration of `struct NonKDEButtonSettings'
exe_dlg.cpp: In member function `bool PanelExeDialog::useTerminal() const':
exe_dlg.cpp:93: error: invalid use of undefined type `struct 
NonKDEButtonSettings'

exe_dlg.h:28: error: forward declaration of `struct NonKDEButtonSettings'
exe_dlg.cpp: In member function `QString PanelExeDialog::title() const':
exe_dlg.cpp:98: error: invalid use of undefined type `struct 
NonKDEButtonSettings'

exe_dlg.h:28: error: forward declaration of `struct NonKDEButtonSettings'
exe_dlg.cpp: In member function `QString PanelExeDialog::commandLine() 
const':
exe_dlg.cpp:103: error: invalid use of undefined type `struct 
NonKDEButtonSettings'

exe_dlg.h:28: error: forward declaration of `struct NonKDEButtonSettings'
exe_dlg.cpp: In member function `QString PanelExeDialog::iconPath() const':
exe_dlg.cpp:108: error: invalid use of undefined type `struct 
NonKDEButtonSettings'

exe_dlg.h:28: error: forward declaration of `struct NonKDEButtonSettings'
exe_dlg.cpp: In member function `QString PanelExeDialog::command() const':
exe_dlg.cpp:113: error: invalid use of undefined type `struct 
NonKDEButtonSettings'

exe_dlg.h:28: error: forward declaration of `struct NonKDEButtonSettings'
exe_dlg.cpp: In member function `void PanelExeDialog::updateIcon()':
exe_dlg.cpp:119: error: invalid use of undefined type `struct 
NonKDEButtonSettings'

exe_dlg.h:28: error: forward declaration of `struct NonKDEButtonSettings'
exe_dlg.cpp: In member function `void PanelExeDialog::fillCompletion()':
exe_dlg.cpp:124: error: invalid use of undefined type `struct 
NonKDEButtonSettings'

exe_dlg.h:28: error: forward declaration of `struct NonKDEButtonSettings'
exe_dlg.cpp: In member function `void PanelExeDialog::slotReturnPressed()':
exe_dlg.cpp:171: error: invalid use of undefined type `struct 
NonKDEButtonSettings'

exe_dlg.h:28: error: forward declaration of `struct NonKDEButtonSettings'
exe_dlg.cpp:172: error: invalid use of undefined type `struct 
NonKDEButtonSettings'

exe_dlg.h:28: error: forward declaration of `struct NonKDEButtonSettings'
exe_dlg.cpp:172: error: invalid use of undefined type `struct 
NonKDEButtonSettings'

exe_dlg.h:28: error: forward declaration of `struct NonKDEButtonSettings'
exe_dlg.cpp: In member function `void PanelExeDialog::slotSelect(const 
QString)':
exe_dlg.cpp:187: error: invalid use of undefined type `struct 
NonKDEButtonSettings'

exe_dlg.h:28: error: forward declaration of `struct NonKDEButtonSettings'
make[3]: *** [exe_dlg.lo] Error 1
make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs
make[3]: Leaving directory 
`/var/tmp/portage/kicker-3.4.3/work/kicker-3.4.3/kicker/ui'

make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory 
`/var/tmp/portage/kicker-3.4.3/work/kicker-3.4.3/kicker'

make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/kicker-3.4.3/work/kicker-3.4.3'
make: *** [all] Error 2

!!! ERROR: kde-base/kicker-3.4.3 failed.
!!! Function kde_src_compile, Line 224, Exitcode 2
!!! died running emake, kde_src_compile:make
!!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, NOT this status 
message.


and here is my emerge --info:

varky ~ # emerge --info
Portage 2.0.54 (default-linux/x86/2006.0, 

Re: [gentoo-user] Mozilla - pop-ups not blocked !!

2006-03-19 Thread JimD



No popups for me. I am using Firefox 1.5 and 
I also have the adblock extension installed. Looking at adblock it appears 
that anything from the url ads.indiatimes.com is blocked.

Try putting this linein your /etc/hosts 
file:

127.0.0.1 ads.indiatimes.com

Or install these two extensions:

For Firefox:
http://adblock.mozdev.org/
https://addons.mozilla.org/extensions/moreinfo.php?id=1136

For Mozilla Sute:
https://addons.mozilla.org/extensions/moreinfo.php?id=10application=mozilla
https://addons.mozilla.org/extensions/moreinfo.php?id=1136application=mozilla

Just restart Firefox/Mozilla after you install the 
two extensions.

Jim

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Rohit 
  Sharma 
  To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org 
  
  Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2006 12:48 
  PM
  Subject: [gentoo-user] Mozilla - pop-ups 
  not blocked !!
  Hi,I am using Mozilla 1.7.12 
  
  
  Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20060222at my 
  home desktop. However, even when configured to block unrequested popups, my 
  mozilla [on both windows and linux] is not able to block pop-ups from 
  websites. I assure you this is not a spam/dangerous link and you shall know 
  exactly what I mean if you clicked on http://www.samachar.com/showurl.htm?rurl=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1455375.cms?headline=Couples~framing~parents~with~dowryThis 
  is my news-consolidated site that I access every morning.What may I be 
  doing wrong?


Re: [gentoo-user] Problems with cedilla

2006-03-19 Thread Diogo Tridapalli
if you set

GTK_IM_MODULE=cedilla

' + c will work in gtk apps too.

On 3/19/06, Mauro Faccenda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Sunday 19 March 2006 02:14, Felipe Ribeiro wrote:
  Are you sure? At Windles i use ' + C,  and comma isnt a dead key.

 windows and kde apps we use ' then c to get a ç. in gtk apps (firefox, for
 example) we use altgr + , then c.

 []'s
 Mauro

 --
 gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list




--
Diogo B. Tridapalli

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Problems with cedilla

2006-03-19 Thread Mauro Faccenda
On Sunday 19 March 2006 18:00, Diogo Tridapalli wrote:
 if you set

 GTK_IM_MODULE=cedilla

 ' + c will work in gtk apps too.

it worked for me. thanks.

[]'s
Mauro
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] Re: core packages for a dual-boot system

2006-03-19 Thread hawat . thufir

On Sun, 19 Mar 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

..

as can be seen, there's a vfat partition, /mnt/windows.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ df
Filesystem   1K-blocks  Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00
 17394484  14690156   1806488  90% /
/dev/hda2   101105 18104 77780  19% /boot
/dev/shm111860 0111860   0% /dev/shm
/dev/hda1 11451144   9922200   1528944  87% /mnt/windows
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ date
Sun Mar 19 12:28:40 EST 2006
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$



4.b. Designing a Partitioning Scheme

Default Partitioning Scheme

If you are not interested in drawing up a partitioning scheme for your 
system, you can use the partitioning scheme we use throughout this book:

Partition   Filesystem  SizeDescription
/dev/hda1   ext232M Boot partition
/dev/hda2   (swap)  512MSwap partition
/dev/hda3   ext3Rest of the diskRoot partition


http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?part=1chap=4#fdisk


So, I want something like:
Partition   Filesystem  SizeDescription
/dev/hda1   ext232M Boot partition
/dev/hda2   (swap)  512MSwap partition
/dev/hda3   ext3??? Root partition
/dev/hda4   fat32


I'm concerned about overwriting the windows partition, or mucking up the 
dual-boot bootloader.


There are directions at 
http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Dual_boot#Single_Drive_Install_.28Windows_Pre-Installed.29, 
but I'd like to have it all worked out ahead of time for my own sake.


Perhaps I don't even need to format anything?


-Thufir




[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]#
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]#
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# cat /boot/grub/grub.conf
# grub.conf generated by anaconda
#
# Note that you do not have to rerun grub after making changes to this 
file

# NOTICE:  You have a /boot partition.  This means that
#  all kernel and initrd paths are relative to /boot/, eg.
#  root (hd0,1)
#  kernel /vmlinuz-version ro root=/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00
#  initrd /initrd-version.img
#boot=/dev/hda
default=0
timeout=5
splashimage=(hd0,1)/grub/splash.xpm.gz
hiddenmenu
title Fedora Core (2.6.15-1.1833_FC4)
root (hd0,1)
kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.15-1.1833_FC4 ro root=/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 
rhgb quiet

initrd /initrd-2.6.15-1.1833_FC4.img
title Fedora Core (2.6.14-1.1656_FC4)
root (hd0,1)
kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.14-1.1656_FC4 ro root=/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 
rhgb quiet

initrd /initrd-2.6.14-1.1656_FC4.img
title Fedora Core (2.6.11-1.1369_FC4)
root (hd0,1)
kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.11-1.1369_FC4 ro root=/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 
rhgb quiet

initrd /initrd-2.6.11-1.1369_FC4.img
title Other
rootnoverify (hd0,0)
chainloader +1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# date
Sun Mar 19 16:18:10 EST 2006
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]#



I also want to leave grub alone, yes?  Well, I want to switch it from 
fedora to gentoo, somehow.  But, I want to leave the windows part alone. 
Hmm.




thanks,

Thufir
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] amd64 Installer LiveCD?

2006-03-19 Thread JimD

Is there a liveCD for amd64?

The amd64 handbook part 1, chapter3 under the Do I need Networking? 
section states:


The stage3 file built by the amd64 Installer LiveCD is optimized for 
generic amd64 usage and uses NPTL.


However looking on the download page I only see the LiveCD for x86.

I really liked the LiveCD for x86 because I was able to browse the web/email 
while the installer did its thing : )  I am getting an amd64 system tomorrow 
and will be putting Gentoo on it and it would nice to have a GUI desktop 
during the install.


Jim 



--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Sharing file systems

2006-03-19 Thread Hemmann, Volker Armin
On Sunday 19 March 2006 20:25, Neil Bothwick wrote:
 On Sun, 19 Mar 2006 19:24:10 +0100, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
   Major versions, yes, but not minor versions. The problems occur when
   you upgrade one distro to a later minor version, run it, then go back
   to the older version. config files are intended to be
   backward-compatible, not forward-compatible. This isn't urban myth, I
   have experienced it.
 
  and which desktop environment breaks compatibility in minor versions?
  I had some config breakage between KDE3.4 and 3.5 related to some 3rd
  party decoration/theme, but in the minor versions, it shouldn't matter.

 KDE, especially if one of the distros uses a customised version.

 Running Gentoo and Mandrake with a shared home directory broke things in
 very short order. Using separate home directories on a single shared
 partition gave no such problems.

 Every distro is different (otherwise, what would be the point?) so
 sharing config files is always going to be risky.

well, you just proved, why distros should not customize the software
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Sharing file systems

2006-03-19 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sun, 19 Mar 2006 23:50:56 +0100, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:

  KDE, especially if one of the distros uses a customised version.
 
  Running Gentoo and Mandrake with a shared home directory broke things
  in very short order. Using separate home directories on a single
  shared partition gave no such problems.
 
  Every distro is different (otherwise, what would be the point?) so
  sharing config files is always going to be risky.
 
 well, you just proved, why distros should not customize the software

especially != only :)


-- 
Neil Bothwick

A consultant is a person who borrows your watch, tells you what time it
is, pockets the watch, and sends you a bill for it.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Re: core packages for a dual-boot system

2006-03-19 Thread Robert Welz

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On Sun, 19 Mar 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

..


as can be seen, there's a vfat partition, /mnt/windows.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ df
Filesystem   1K-blocks  Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00
 17394484  14690156   1806488  90% /
/dev/hda2   101105 18104 77780  19% /boot
/dev/shm111860 0111860   0% /dev/shm
/dev/hda1 11451144   9922200   1528944  87% /mnt/windows
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ date
Sun Mar 19 12:28:40 EST 2006
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$



4.b. Designing a Partitioning Scheme

Default Partitioning Scheme

If you are not interested in drawing up a partitioning scheme for your 
system, you can use the partitioning scheme we use throughout this book:

Partition Filesystem Size Description
/dev/hda1 ext2 32M Boot partition
/dev/hda2 (swap) 512M Swap partition
/dev/hda3 ext3 Rest of the disk Root partition


http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?part=1chap=4#fdisk 




So, I want something like:
Partition Filesystem Size Description
/dev/hda1 ext2 32M Boot partition
/dev/hda2 (swap) 512M Swap partition
/dev/hda3 ext3 ??? Root partition
/dev/hda4fat32


I'm concerned about overwriting the windows partition, or mucking up 
the dual-boot bootloader.


There are directions at 
http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Dual_boot#Single_Drive_Install_.28Windows_Pre-Installed.29, 
but I'd like to have it all worked out ahead of time for my own sake.


Perhaps I don't even need to format anything?


-Thufir




[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]#
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]#
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# cat /boot/grub/grub.conf
# grub.conf generated by anaconda
#
# Note that you do not have to rerun grub after making changes to this file
# NOTICE:  You have a /boot partition.  This means that
#  all kernel and initrd paths are relative to /boot/, eg.
#  root (hd0,1)
#  kernel /vmlinuz-version ro root=/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00
#  initrd /initrd-version.img
#boot=/dev/hda
default=0
timeout=5
splashimage=(hd0,1)/grub/splash.xpm.gz
hiddenmenu
title Fedora Core (2.6.15-1.1833_FC4)
root (hd0,1)
kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.15-1.1833_FC4 ro 
root=/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 rhgb quiet

initrd /initrd-2.6.15-1.1833_FC4.img
title Fedora Core (2.6.14-1.1656_FC4)
root (hd0,1)
kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.14-1.1656_FC4 ro 
root=/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 rhgb quiet

initrd /initrd-2.6.14-1.1656_FC4.img
title Fedora Core (2.6.11-1.1369_FC4)
root (hd0,1)
kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.11-1.1369_FC4 ro 
root=/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 rhgb quiet

initrd /initrd-2.6.11-1.1369_FC4.img
title Other
rootnoverify (hd0,0)
chainloader +1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# date
Sun Mar 19 16:18:10 EST 2006
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]#



I also want to leave grub alone, yes?  Well, I want to switch it from 
fedora to gentoo, somehow.  But, I want to leave the windows part alone. 
Hmm.




thanks,

Thufir

Hi.
You don't have to format your windows partition, you don't even toch it.
Just format /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00
and /dev/hda2 and install gentoo on /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00 as 
described in the handbook.


When gentoo is installed completely you just edit grub.conf and you are 
fine:

Add
title Windows
 rootnoverify (hd0,0)
 chainloader +1

and you can boot into Windows.

Robert






--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] amd64 Installer LiveCD?

2006-03-19 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
On Sunday 19 March 2006 15:27, JimD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 
about '[gentoo-user] amd64 Installer LiveCD?':
 Is there a liveCD for amd64?

I don't know where it is on the mirrors, but the bittorrent tracker has 
livecd-amd64-installer-2006.0; I'm seeding right now.

-- 
If there's one thing we've established over the years,
it's that the vast majority of our users don't have the slightest
clue what's best for them in terms of package stability.
-- Gentoo Developer Ciaran McCreesh
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] amd64 Installer LiveCD?

2006-03-19 Thread Bo Andresen
On Sunday 19 March 2006 22:27, JimD wrote:
 Is there a liveCD for amd64?

 The amd64 handbook part 1, chapter3 under the Do I need Networking?
 section states:

 The stage3 file built by the amd64 Installer LiveCD is optimized for
 generic amd64 usage and uses NPTL.

 However looking on the download page I only see the LiveCD for x86.

 I really liked the LiveCD for x86 because I was able to browse the
 web/email while the installer did its thing : )  I am getting an amd64
 system tomorrow and will be putting Gentoo on it and it would nice to have
 a GUI desktop during the install.

http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/2006.0/handbook-amd64.xml?part=1chap=2#doc_chap3

You can download the Universal Installation CD (and, if you want to, the 
Packages CD as well) from one of our mirrors. The Installation CD is located 
in the releases/amd64/2006.0/installcd directory; the Package CD is located 
in the releases/amd64/2006.0/packagecd directory.

-- 
Bo Andresen
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] amd64 Installer LiveCD?

2006-03-19 Thread JimD

Bo Andresen wrote:


http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/2006.0/handbook-amd64.xml?part=1chap=2#doc_chap3


snip

Is that the same as the *live* CD?  The x86 live CD for 2006.0 had a GUI 
that I could use why the installer did its thing.  I thought the regular 
universal installer was console only?


I wanted to use the GUI live cd to install with because tomorrow I will be 
building gentoo on a new amd64 that I am getting and it will be my only 
computer for the day.  I need to be able to use a graphical browser while I 
am building gentoo in case I need to connect in to my works over the 
SSL-VPN.


Jim 



--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] amd64 Installer LiveCD?

2006-03-19 Thread Bo Andresen
On Monday 20 March 2006 01:32, JimD wrote:
 Bo Andresen wrote:
  http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/2006.0/handbook-amd64.xml?part=1ch
 ap=2#doc_chap3

 Is that the same as the *live* CD?  The x86 live CD for 2006.0 had a GUI
 that I could use why the installer did its thing.  I thought the regular
 universal installer was console only?

Yes. The versioned 2006.0 Universal Installation CD aka the Installer LiveCD 
is the one with a GUI. Admittedly they haven't made that very clear but you 
will see it if you continue to chapter 3...

-- 
Bo Andresen
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Mozilla - pop-ups not blocked !!

2006-03-19 Thread JimD

Peter Ruskin wrote:


...or emerge net-proxy/privoxy


How is privoxy?  Is it fast?  I have never tried it.  I do think a system 
wide setup would be nice.  Can privoxy be used across my home network?


Jim 



--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] amd64 Installer LiveCD?

2006-03-19 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
On Sunday 19 March 2006 18:49, Bo Andresen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 
about 'Re: [gentoo-user] amd64 Installer LiveCD?':
 On Monday 20 March 2006 01:32, JimD wrote:
  Bo Andresen wrote:
   http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/2006.0/handbook-amd64.xml?part
  =1ch ap=2#doc_chap3
 
  Is that the same as the *live* CD?  The x86 live CD for 2006.0 had a
  GUI that I could use why the installer did its thing.  I thought the
  regular universal installer was console only?

 Yes. The versioned 2006.0 Universal Installation CD aka the Installer
 LiveCD is the one with a GUI. Admittedly they haven't made that very
 clear but you will see it if you continue to chapter 3...

No.  They are not the same.  However, there are 3 different gentoo LiveCDs, 
each appropriate for a different type of install.

On the tracker we have (and I'm seeding), among other things:
livecd-amd64-installer-2006.0  (LiveCD with Gentoo Installer)
install-amd64-universal-2006.0 (Universal LiveCD [no installer])
packages-amd64-2006.0  (Packages CD)
and
install-amd64-minimal-2006.0   (Minimal LiveCD [no installer])

The livecd-installer is new for this release.  The install-universal and 
install-minimal are the traditional live CDs, with and without stages and 
snapshots (and maybe some packages?).  The package CD is really only 
useful if you are installing the GRP (so, you can't tweak USE flags) but 
will get you a system with Gnome or KDE and a number of useful 
applications as fast as a standard binary distribution.

-- 
If there's one thing we've established over the years,
it's that the vast majority of our users don't have the slightest
clue what's best for them in terms of package stability.
-- Gentoo Developer Ciaran McCreesh
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] amd64 Installer LiveCD?

2006-03-19 Thread Bo Andresen
On Monday 20 March 2006 02:19, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
 On Sunday 19 March 2006 18:49, Bo Andresen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
  Yes. The versioned 2006.0 Universal Installation CD aka the Installer
  LiveCD is the one with a GUI. Admittedly they haven't made that very
  clear but you will see it if you continue to chapter 3...

 No.  They are not the same.  However, there are 3 different gentoo LiveCDs,
 each appropriate for a different type of install.

 On the tracker we have (and I'm seeding), among other things:
 livecd-amd64-installer-2006.0  (LiveCD with Gentoo Installer)
 install-amd64-universal-2006.0 (Universal LiveCD [no installer])
 packages-amd64-2006.0  (Packages CD)
 and
 install-amd64-minimal-2006.0   (Minimal LiveCD [no installer])

 The livecd-installer is new for this release.  The install-universal and
 install-minimal are the traditional live CDs, with and without stages and
 snapshots (and maybe some packages?).  The package CD is really only
 useful if you are installing the GRP (so, you can't tweak USE flags) but
 will get you a system with Gnome or KDE and a number of useful
 applications as fast as a standard binary distribution.

Yes you are right. Thanks for clearing that out. I misread the first section 
of Chapter 3. The in livecd-amd64-installer-2006.0 is located in 
releases/amd64/2006.0/livecd on the mirrors in opposition to my statement in 
my earlier replies.

Actually I just downloaded the x86 version yesterday because I wanted to see 
it. It is neat that you can actually do some real work on the computer while 
installing with the old methods using the new installer cd. :) Seems to me 
that the have picked the greatest possible approach to this.

-- 
Bo Andresen
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] kghostview pdf aspect distorted!

2006-03-19 Thread Iain Buchanan
Hi all,

When I open any pdf from any source (home-made or downloaded) in
kghostview, they seem to be stretched wider than normal.  Also the
font is some ugly fixed-width font.

However, in acrobat, or evince, the pdf's show nicely (correct aspect
and fonts).

You can see what I mean about the aspect here, but this is not my rig.
I just found this when searching for the problem online.  (Incidentally,
I couldn't find an answer either):
http://onfinite.com/libraries/145774/735.jpg

I've tried manually setting the page size to A4 but no difference.
Printing works great though!

Any ideas?  Thanks!
-- 
Iain Buchanan iain at netspace dot net dot au

Extreme fear can neither fight nor fly.
-- William Shakespeare, The Rape of Lucrece

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] Re: kghostview pdf aspect distorted!

2006-03-19 Thread Iain Buchanan
oops, should have said:

$ kghostview --version
Qt: 3.3.6
KDE: 3.5.1
KGhostView: 0.20

-- 
Iain Buchanan iain at netspace dot net dot au

There's no such thing as a free lunch.
-- Milton Friendman

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: kghostview pdf aspect distorted!

2006-03-19 Thread Joseph
What ghostscrip are you using?
If you have ghostscript-esp replace it with ghostscript-gnu and the
problems will go away.

-- 
#Joseph

On Mon, 2006-03-20 at 11:15 +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote:
 oops, should have said:
 
 $ kghostview --version
 Qt: 3.3.6
 KDE: 3.5.1
 KGhostView: 0.20
 
 -- 
 Iain Buchanan iain at netspace dot net dot au
 
 There's no such thing as a free lunch.
   -- Milton Friendman
 

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: kghostview pdf aspect distorted!

2006-03-19 Thread Iain Buchanan
On Sun, 2006-03-19 at 18:53 -0700, Joseph wrote:
 What ghostscrip are you using?
 If you have ghostscript-esp replace it with ghostscript-gnu and the
 problems will go away.

I tried that (unmerged esp, emerged gnu), and it doesn't seem to make
any difference.  I even rebuilt one of my own pdfs - no difference.  The
font is still weird and the aspect is stretched.

any more ideas?

thanks,
-- 
Iain Buchanan iain at netspace dot net dot au

Finagle's Creed:
Science is true.  Don't be misled by facts.

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: kghostview pdf aspect distorted!

2006-03-19 Thread JimD


Iain Buchanan wrote:


any more ideas?

thanks,


Try strace on evince and then strace on kghostview and see if kghostview 
is opening up a weird font or if it is doing anything really different 
than evince.


Also, you could look at the README from kghostview and see who the 
maintainer is can shoot him an email to see if this problem has come up 
before.


Jim

--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Is my postfix being used as a relay?

2006-03-19 Thread Nick Rout
If you want to see what each of the emails in your queue is take a look
in /var/spool/postifx. In that dir there are a number of subdirectories,
including one called defer and one called deferred. As I don't have
anything stuck in there I can't recall exactly which of those subdors
houses the deferred messages.

They are indexed in a further level of subdirs numbered
0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D.E,F depending on the first character of the
email's ID number (which you can see in the output of mailq). It is a
hex number. 

Does that make sense?


On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 09:41:06 -0800
Kevin O'Gorman wrote:

 On 3/17/06, John Jolet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  
   Yes, I expose this machine's port 25 on purpose.  So I would like
   to make
   it a good netizen.
  
   I had done this with sendmail in previous distros, but am a
   neophyte with
   Postfix.  Right now I want to verify if I have (or am) a problem.
  with postfix, it will, by default ONLY accept mail for which it
  considers itself the final destination for, or destinations that are
  in relay_domains.  typically, out of the box, it will not relay mail
  for anyone, though it will accept mail for it, as resolved from the
  box's fqdn, or mydestination.
 
  I have mine set up to also allow you to relay if you authenticate
  (using sasl, via pam...or pam via sasl, if you want to look at it
  that way).  basically that means I can send mail using this server
  from any network, as long as I set my client up to authenticate on
  send.  but you can't randomly use it as a relay.
  --
  gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
 
  Although it seems this host is not a relay, that does not explain the
 score or so of things languishing in my mail queue attempting to
 contact sites I have no knowledge of, and which do not accept
 the connection.  Any hints how to explore this?
 
 ++ kevin
 
 
 --
 Kevin O'Gorman, PhD

-- 
Nick Rout [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] # users gives strange results

2006-03-19 Thread Matthias Langer
Recently i've got a power failure while one of my gentoo boxes was up
and running. Since then, the users command seems not to work correctly
anymore, as it claims for users to be logged in that almost certainly
aren't and don't have a single process running. Besides of this issue,
everthing seems to work as expected. Can anybody here tell me where to
look for the source of this problem ?

Thanks, Matthias

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] # users gives strange results

2006-03-19 Thread Matthias Langer
On Mon, 2006-03-20 at 04:51 +0100, Matthias Langer wrote:
 Recently i've got a power failure while one of my gentoo boxes was up
 and running. Since then, the users command seems not to work correctly
 anymore, as it claims for users to be logged in that almost certainly
 aren't and don't have a single process running. Besides of this issue,
 everthing seems to work as expected. Can anybody here tell me where to
 look for the source of this problem ?
 
Just for the case that this helps describing my problem:

# users
mlangc mlangc

[should be: rattan]

# top
not a single process for mlangc

# tail -n 400 /var/log/messages

Mar 19 22:21:37 lgate886 login(pam_unix)[8674]: session opened for user
mlangc by (uid=0)
...
...
Mar 19 22:21:47 lgate886 (mlangc-8784): starting (version 2.12.1), pid
8784 user 'mlangc'
...
...
Mar 20 00:02:45 lgate886 (mlangc-8784): Exiting
Mar 20 00:02:50 lgate886 login(pam_unix)[8674]: session closed for user
mlangc
Mar 20 04:29:35 lgate886 sshd[9620]: Accepted keyboard-interactive/pam
for rattan from 192.168.0.102 port 41237 ssh2
Mar 20 04:29:35 lgate886 syslog-ng[5304]: STATS: dropped 0
Mar 20 04:29:35 lgate886 sshd(pam_unix)[9626]: session opened for user
rattan by (uid=0)
Mar 20 04:30:29 lgate886 su[9634]: Successful su for root by rattan
Mar 20 04:30:29 lgate886 su[9634]: + pts/0 rattan:root
Mar 20 04:30:29 lgate886 su(pam_unix)[9634]: session opened for user
root by (uid=1002)


-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] Re: no shell permission denied?

2006-03-19 Thread Trenton Adams
Oh, by the way, I'm leaving for about 2-3 days, so I'll be replying back then.

On 3/20/06, Trenton Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi everyone,

 I just re-installed my system because all of a sudden I started
 getting the following...

 [15:44 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /] # su - trenta
 Cannot execute /bin/bash: Permission denied

 In addition, I am also unable to login from the console, or X.  I get
 no shell: Permission Denied

 I'm starting to wonder if I'm getting a trojan somehow, because I'm
 getting this on two gentoo boxes.

 The last time this happened, it was shortly after loading pl2303,
 usbserial, or minicom.  I know this *NOW* because I just finished
 re-installing my system, and decided that I would try the /dev/ttyUSB0
 again with minicom, as I got some electronic stuff to play with
 recently, which requires RS232 com ports.  But, this is only the case
 on one system, not both.

 Now I'm a little ticked off because it took me awhile to get my system
 up and running, given all the packages I needed to install.

 Keep in mind that I restored my home directory and such, so I know
 it's not anything in my profile that could cause this.  Also, all
 services that try and startup with anything other than root get this
 as well.

 Any ideas on what the heck is going on with my gentoo systems?  I
 don't want to reinstall yet again, only to find I'm having the same
 problem.

 I'm thinking there may be a bug in the gentoo portage somewhere that
 is causing this, because I'm positive that I haven't changed any
 permissions on any files.


-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] no shell permission denied?

2006-03-19 Thread Trenton Adams
Hi everyone,

I just re-installed my system because all of a sudden I started
getting the following...

[15:44 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /] # su - trenta
Cannot execute /bin/bash: Permission denied

In addition, I am also unable to login from the console, or X.  I get
no shell: Permission Denied

I'm starting to wonder if I'm getting a trojan somehow, because I'm
getting this on two gentoo boxes.

The last time this happened, it was shortly after loading pl2303,
usbserial, or minicom.  I know this *NOW* because I just finished
re-installing my system, and decided that I would try the /dev/ttyUSB0
again with minicom, as I got some electronic stuff to play with
recently, which requires RS232 com ports.  But, this is only the case
on one system, not both.

Now I'm a little ticked off because it took me awhile to get my system
up and running, given all the packages I needed to install.

Keep in mind that I restored my home directory and such, so I know
it's not anything in my profile that could cause this.  Also, all
services that try and startup with anything other than root get this
as well.

Any ideas on what the heck is going on with my gentoo systems?  I
don't want to reinstall yet again, only to find I'm having the same
problem.

I'm thinking there may be a bug in the gentoo portage somewhere that
is causing this, because I'm positive that I haven't changed any
permissions on any files.

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] Problem burning Gentoo 700 MB LiveCD

2006-03-19 Thread Benjamin Sher

Dear friends:

I have been trying to burn the Gentoo 2006 ISO image to a Memorex 700 MB 
CD using Nero 5.5. I first tried to use other CD burning programs. They 
all gave the same error message: No media in the drive or Drive is 
empty. Please insert CD. Of course, the CD is in the drive. So, when 
Nero says:  No media in the drive. Please insert CD the drive opens up 
and I close the drive (or replace the CD with a new CD). But it 
repeatedly refuses to proceed. I also tried to uninstall and install my 
Nero 5.0 and then Nero 5.5 to no avail.


And yet, believe it or not, I did successfully burn an ISO image of the 
Gentoo Minimal InstallCD (49 MB). It took some effort (same error 
message) but finally succeeded.


I could install the minimal 50 meg bootable CD. I know it works. But I 
would prefer to install the 697 MB LiveCD. Here are two images with data 
on what's going on:


http://www.websher.net/temp/nero1.jpg
http://www.websher.net/temp/nero2.jpg

I would very much appreciate your help. Is this a hardware or software 
problem and is it fixable? At least, can I fix it enough to burn the 
Gentoo CD?


Thank you again.

Benjamin


--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] MOV to AVI

2006-03-19 Thread Justin Hart
Hey, I need to convert an MOV to an AVI... anybody have a way to do this?
--
Justin W. Hart

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list