Re: [gentoo-user] Re: make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails [SOLVED]

2012-07-03 Thread Michael Scherer

Hi all,

I promised to tell you when I cracked this nasty little
problem of mine, though it's somewhat embarrassing
for me:

in short, don't put shell scripts called ld or cc in your
/usr/local/bin.
I had an ld script to give me lists of directories
in a certain format and then forgot about its
existence, until I had the happy idea to type 'ld'
on the command line to see what would happen.

at least now I know that I've really grown old.

again, thank you for all your efforts to help me.

kind regards, michael




Re: [gentoo-user] got error while emerging virtualbox-modules-4.1.12

2012-06-22 Thread Michael Scherer

On 22.06.2012 12:48, Александр wrote:


got error while emerging virtualbox-modules-4.1.12
http://pastebin.com/NBN9Xvk4

new system
profile hardened/linux/amd64
kernel build with genkernel all

any thoughts pls

ps. sorry, mb write this second time (have problem with shared mail 
server)


1) post the bug according to the directions given in If you need 
support ...

or

2) have a look at the offending line in SUPDrvIDC.h:163:22:, maybe
you can fix it. then rebuild the digest (build 
virtualbox-modules-4.1.12.build digest)

and emerge again. you need to protect this ebuild, too, because otherwise
it will be overridden at the next emerge --sync
or

3) wait a couple of days and try again, the error might then be fixed

1) is preferable, developers need to know if something is wrong.

regards, michael




Re: [gentoo-user] Problems lua/luarocks

2012-06-20 Thread Michael Scherer
On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 20:02:20 +0200
meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:

 Hi,
 
 I got some problems with lua and its package manager called
 luarocks. From the lua mailing list I got the information,
 that luarocks normall installs lua module/packages/rocks 
 below /usr/local ... a place lua will look for, when adviced
 to use a certain module.
 
 With Gentoo, luarocks was fixed to install below
 /usr/lib64/lua/luarocks/lib/luarocks/rocks
 but lua wasn't instructed to do the same.
 
 Regardless what rocks I am installing, lua won't find
 it. So what can I do to fix that?
 
 Thank you very much for any help in advance!
 Best regards,
 mcc
 
 
 
 
 

I built a simple module, called by a likewise simple program.
after some searching around I found that by setting LUA_PATH with

export LUA_PATH=/usr/lib64/lua/luarocks/share/lua/5.1/?.lua;

I succeeded in running program + module.

I don't know, though, wether this works in more complicated
projects, but you might give it a try. If it works, you should
set LUA_CPATH too (if you want to include C-modules).

regards, michael



Re: [gentoo-user] Issues with =x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati-6.14.4: driver issue or hardware issue?

2012-06-12 Thread Michael Scherer
On Thu, 7 Jun 2012 16:18:02 +0200
Michael Scherer a6702...@unet.univie.ac.at wrote:

 On Thu, 7 Jun 2012 04:52:35 -0400
 Andrey Moshbear andrey@gmail.com wrote:
 
  On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Michael Scherer
  a6702...@unet.univie.ac.at wrote:
   On Fri, 1 Jun 2012 04:11:35 -0400
   Andrey Moshbear andrey@gmail.com wrote:
  
   On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Michael Scherer
   a6702...@unet.univie.ac.at wrote:
- Original Message - From: Andrey Moshbear
andrey@gmail.com To: gentoo-user
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Sent: Tuesday, 22 May, 2012
08:02 Subject: [gentoo-user] Issues with
=x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati-6.14.4: driver issue or hardware
issue?
   
   
   
Lately, I've been having some issues with segfaults when
running startx and it's been pretty persistent.
   
Xorg.0.log and emerge --info are available at
https://gist.github.com/2766926 .
Kernel config is available at https://gist.github.com/276943 .
   
I've tried downgrading, but
=x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati-6.14.2 fails to compile due to
incomplete structs.
   
Is this more a driver or a hardware issue?
   
   
first thing thing is your usage of ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=amd64
~amd64. with ~amd64 you globally
allow all packages masked for amd64. unless you are a
developer/tester for gentoo you should remove
this keyword, because gentoo usually has good reasons to mask
some packages. if for some reason you
really need a masked package, you can do this easily only for
that package. global unmasking alone might be the reason for
half of your troubles.
   
second, it is advisable to use kernel modesetting, which is
obviously not enabled. gentoo has a detailed
howto for this under
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/xorg-config.xml. this gives you
all necessary details.
   
just a quick shot for the moment. your kernel config doesn't
under the link you give, I'd like to see that
too, and maybe /etc/X11/xorg.conf or the contents
of /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d, if you have any of these,
   
regards, nichael
   
   
  
   Well, I added radeon drm  modesetting and the kernel is crashing
   right after the microcode is loaded, but without any signs of
   panic, be it flashing keyboard lights or kernel backtrace with
   register values.
  
   Also, the segfault was caused by the DRI code interpreting a DRI
   opcode as a pointer, hence 0xa4 or similar in the back trace.
  
   --
   m0shbear
  
  
   in any case, I'd need some more information:
   the link to your .config is broken, I only get an empty page.
   if the kernel is involved, output of dmesg and rc.log would
   be needed to.
  
   by the way, did you anything with your ACCEPT_KEYWORDS?
   if not, the best thing would be set it simply = (and
   afterwards --update world, --depclean and revdep-rebuild),
   but that's up to you.
  
   please send me the requested information, otherwise it's
   difficult to find out what's wrong.
  
  
  Also, I've noticed that that radeon.ko autodetection configures it
  as a RS780, whereas, according to motherboard documentation, it
  should be RS880 (780G vs 785G).
  This may be a reason for crashing, since the video card dies due to
  being supplied bad microcode.
  
 
 according to the gentoo manual, under device drivers-graphics-
 support for framebufferdevices you should uncheck
 -everything- except enable video mode handling helpers.
 instead of uvesafb in the kernel parameters you may use
 radeondrmfb, if anything at all.
 
 from the Xorg radeon page:
 First of all check that you don't load radeonfb, uvesafb or vesafb
 module. This includes no vga parameters for kernel when using KMS.
 Console is provided by fbcon and radeondrmfb frame buffer console. So
 it is best to make sure that fbcon module is loaded
 
 disabling vesa also should rid you of uvesa messages in Xorg.0.log.
 
 the rs880 and configuring as rs780 is indeed probably at the root
 of your troubles. seems that you got the wrong firmware. I have
 found other postings with the exact same problem, but as yet
 no clear solution. I'll see what I can find and let you know.
 
 regards, michael
 
 

if you haven't solved your problem already, there are two
possibilities you coud try:
one is using the Radeon R600-family RLC microcode: radeon/R600_rlc.bin
(without something else). this should include the rs880.
another option might be to download firmware-linux-nonfree from
http://packages.debian.org/de/squeeze/firmware-linux-nonfree
some people seem to have used it successfully, but I don't
know if it works on gentoo.

sorry that I can only guess on this, not having an rs880 myself.
isn't someone on gentoo users with a similar configuration who
could give you better advice?

regards, michael




Re: [gentoo-user] Issues with =x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati-6.14.4: driver issue or hardware issue?

2012-06-07 Thread Michael Scherer
On Thu, 7 Jun 2012 04:52:35 -0400
Andrey Moshbear andrey@gmail.com wrote:

 On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Michael Scherer
 a6702...@unet.univie.ac.at wrote:
  On Fri, 1 Jun 2012 04:11:35 -0400
  Andrey Moshbear andrey@gmail.com wrote:
 
  On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Michael Scherer
  a6702...@unet.univie.ac.at wrote:
   - Original Message - From: Andrey Moshbear
   andrey@gmail.com To: gentoo-user
   gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Sent: Tuesday, 22 May, 2012 08:02
   Subject: [gentoo-user] Issues with
   =x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati-6.14.4: driver issue or hardware
   issue?
  
  
  
   Lately, I've been having some issues with segfaults when running
   startx and it's been pretty persistent.
  
   Xorg.0.log and emerge --info are available at
   https://gist.github.com/2766926 .
   Kernel config is available at https://gist.github.com/276943 .
  
   I've tried downgrading, but =x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati-6.14.2
   fails to compile due to incomplete structs.
  
   Is this more a driver or a hardware issue?
  
  
   first thing thing is your usage of ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=amd64
   ~amd64. with ~amd64 you globally
   allow all packages masked for amd64. unless you are a
   developer/tester for gentoo you should remove
   this keyword, because gentoo usually has good reasons to mask
   some packages. if for some reason you
   really need a masked package, you can do this easily only for
   that package. global unmasking alone might be the reason for
   half of your troubles.
  
   second, it is advisable to use kernel modesetting, which is
   obviously not enabled. gentoo has a detailed
   howto for this under
   http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/xorg-config.xml. this gives you all
   necessary details.
  
   just a quick shot for the moment. your kernel config doesn't
   under the link you give, I'd like to see that
   too, and maybe /etc/X11/xorg.conf or the contents
   of /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d, if you have any of these,
  
   regards, nichael
  
  
 
  Well, I added radeon drm  modesetting and the kernel is crashing
  right after the microcode is loaded, but without any signs of
  panic, be it flashing keyboard lights or kernel backtrace with
  register values.
 
  Also, the segfault was caused by the DRI code interpreting a DRI
  opcode as a pointer, hence 0xa4 or similar in the back trace.
 
  --
  m0shbear
 
 
  in any case, I'd need some more information:
  the link to your .config is broken, I only get an empty page.
  if the kernel is involved, output of dmesg and rc.log would
  be needed to.
 
  by the way, did you anything with your ACCEPT_KEYWORDS?
  if not, the best thing would be set it simply = (and
  afterwards --update world, --depclean and revdep-rebuild),
  but that's up to you.
 
  please send me the requested information, otherwise it's
  difficult to find out what's wrong.
 
 
 Also, I've noticed that that radeon.ko autodetection configures it as
 a RS780, whereas, according to motherboard documentation, it should be
 RS880 (780G vs 785G).
 This may be a reason for crashing, since the video card dies due to
 being supplied bad microcode.
 

according to the gentoo manual, under device drivers-graphics-
support for framebufferdevices you should uncheck
-everything- except enable video mode handling helpers.
instead of uvesafb in the kernel parameters you may use
radeondrmfb, if anything at all.

from the Xorg radeon page:
First of all check that you don't load radeonfb, uvesafb or vesafb
module. This includes no vga parameters for kernel when using KMS.
Console is provided by fbcon and radeondrmfb frame buffer console. So
it is best to make sure that fbcon module is loaded

disabling vesa also should rid you of uvesa messages in Xorg.0.log.

the rs880 and configuring as rs780 is indeed probably at the root
of your troubles. seems that you got the wrong firmware. I have
found other postings with the exact same problem, but as yet
no clear solution. I'll see what I can find and let you know.

regards, michael




Re: [gentoo-user] Issues with =x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati-6.14.4: driver issue or hardware issue?

2012-06-05 Thread Michael Scherer
On Fri, 1 Jun 2012 04:11:35 -0400
Andrey Moshbear andrey@gmail.com wrote:

 On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Michael Scherer
 a6702...@unet.univie.ac.at wrote:
  - Original Message - From: Andrey Moshbear
  andrey@gmail.com To: gentoo-user
  gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Sent: Tuesday, 22 May, 2012 08:02
  Subject: [gentoo-user] Issues with
  =x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati-6.14.4: driver issue or hardware issue?
 
 
 
  Lately, I've been having some issues with segfaults when running
  startx and it's been pretty persistent.
 
  Xorg.0.log and emerge --info are available at
  https://gist.github.com/2766926 .
  Kernel config is available at https://gist.github.com/276943 .
 
  I've tried downgrading, but =x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati-6.14.2
  fails to compile due to incomplete structs.
 
  Is this more a driver or a hardware issue?
 
 
  first thing thing is your usage of ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=amd64 ~amd64.
  with ~amd64 you globally
  allow all packages masked for amd64. unless you are a
  developer/tester for gentoo you should remove
  this keyword, because gentoo usually has good reasons to mask some
  packages. if for some reason you
  really need a masked package, you can do this easily only for that
  package. global unmasking alone might be the reason for half of
  your troubles.
 
  second, it is advisable to use kernel modesetting, which is
  obviously not enabled. gentoo has a detailed
  howto for this under http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/xorg-config.xml.
  this gives you all necessary details.
 
  just a quick shot for the moment. your kernel config doesn't under
  the link you give, I'd like to see that
  too, and maybe /etc/X11/xorg.conf or the contents
  of /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d, if you have any of these,
 
  regards, nichael
 
 
 
 Well, I added radeon drm  modesetting and the kernel is crashing
 right after the microcode is loaded, but without any signs of panic,
 be it flashing keyboard lights or kernel backtrace with register
 values.
 
 Also, the segfault was caused by the DRI code interpreting a DRI
 opcode as a pointer, hence 0xa4 or similar in the back trace.
 
 --
 m0shbear
 

in any case, I'd need some more information:
the link to your .config is broken, I only get an empty page.
if the kernel is involved, output of dmesg and rc.log would
be needed to.

by the way, did you anything with your ACCEPT_KEYWORDS?
if not, the best thing would be set it simply = (and
afterwards --update world, --depclean and revdep-rebuild),
but that's up to you.

please send me the requested information, otherwise it's
difficult to find out what's wrong.

regards, michael



Re: [gentoo-user] Issues with =x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati-6.14.4: driver issue or hardware issue?

2012-05-23 Thread Michael Scherer
- Original Message - 
From: Andrey Moshbear andrey@gmail.com

To: gentoo-user gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Sent: Tuesday, 22 May, 2012 08:02
Subject: [gentoo-user] Issues with =x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati-6.14.4: driver 
issue or hardware issue?



Lately, I've been having some issues with segfaults when running
startx and it's been pretty persistent.

Xorg.0.log and emerge --info are available at https://gist.github.com/2766926 .
Kernel config is available at https://gist.github.com/276943 .

I've tried downgrading, but =x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati-6.14.2 fails
to compile due to incomplete structs.

Is this more a driver or a hardware issue?

--
001100 m0shbear
010010
00 andrey at moshbear dot net
11 andrey dot vul at gmail
101101
110011




first thing thing is your usage of ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=amd64 ~amd64. with ~amd64 
you globally
allow all packages masked for amd64. unless you are a developer/tester for 
gentoo you should remove
this keyword, because gentoo usually has good reasons to mask some packages. if 
for some reason you
really need a masked package, you can do this easily only for that package.
global unmasking alone might be the reason for half of your troubles.

second, it is advisable to use kernel modesetting, which is obviously not 
enabled. gentoo has a detailed
howto for this under http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/xorg-config.xml. this gives 
you all necessary details.

just a quick shot for the moment. your kernel config doesn't under the link you 
give, I'd like to see that
too, and maybe /etc/X11/xorg.conf or the contents of /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d, if 
you have any of these,

regards, nichael




Re: [gentoo-user] Re: make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails

2012-05-22 Thread Michael Scherer
On Thu, 17 May 2012 22:59:41 +0200
Alex Schuster wo...@wonkology.org wrote:

 Michael Scherer writes:
 
  1) make output:
  
CHK include/linux/version.h
CHK include/generated/utsrelease.h
CALLscripts/checksyscalls.sh
CHK include/generated/compile.h
LD  init/mounts.o
  ls -Al -m elf_x86_64 -r -o init/mounts.o init/do_mounts.o
  init/do_mounts_initrd.o init/mounts.o: No such file or directory
  make[1]: *** [init/mounts.o] Error 1
  make: *** [init] Error 2
  
  There is an LD, the ls line is part of the error message.
 
 But the options look really more like ld options to me. How this could
 possibly happen, I don't know. Some overriding of $(LD) perhaps? Does
 env | egrep -i 'ls|ld' show something weird? Does it also fail as a
 non-root user, after you copied the stuff over to somewhere where this
 user can write? Just grasping at straws here.
 
 
  But without doubt you are right that mounts.o is not built, for
  whatever reason.
 
 Because ld should build it from init/do_mounts.o, but ls is being
 called instead?
 
  The build command
  
  init/.do_mounts.o.cmd:cmd_init/do_mounts.o := gcc
  -Wp,-MD,init/.do_mounts.o.d -nostdinc
  -isystem /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.3/include
  -I/usr/src/linux-3.2.12-gentoo/arch/x86/include
  -Iarch/x86/include/generated -Iinclude
  -include /usr/src/linux-3.2.12-gentoo/include/linux/kconfig.h
  -D__KERNEL__ -Wall -Wundef -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs
  -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common
  -Werror-implicit-function-declaration -Wno-format-security
  -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks -O2 -m64 -march=k8 -mno-red-zone
  -mcmodel=kernel -funit-at-a-time -maccumulate-outgoing-args
  -fstack-protector -DCONFIG_AS_CFI=1 -DCONFIG_AS_CFI_SIGNAL_FRAME=1
  -DCONFIG_AS_CFI_SECTIONS=1 -DCONFIG_AS_FXSAVEQ=1 -pipe
  -Wno-sign-compare -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -mno-sse -mno-mmx
  -mno-sse2 -mno-3dnow -Wframe-larger-than=2048
  -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-optimize-sibling-calls
  -fno-inline-functions-called-once -Wdeclaration-after-statement
  -Wno-pointer-sign -fno-strict-overflow -fconserve-stack
  -DCC_HAVE_ASM_GOTO -DKBUILD_STR(s)=\#s
  -DKBUILD_BASENAME=KBUILD_STR(do_mounts)
  -DKBUILD_MODNAME=KBUILD_STR(mounts) -c -o init/do_mounts.o
  init/do_mounts.c
  
  contains a directive to build mounts.o, see second last line, but
  it for some reason this is ignored.
  Maybe there is a flaw in that command, only I can't find it.
 
 Neither can I. Is this command executed at all? If you maybe replace
 the 'gcc' by 'gccXXX', does this give an error? Or put an 'echo' in
 front of the gcc'.
 You can try 'make -d', this will give you LOTS of debug output, but I
 don't think you will see the actual commands then.
 
   Wonko
 

Now at last there is some kind of progress. Last thing I tried was
replacing my current .config with that of my previous kernel (3.2.1-r2)
and at least the make ran all the way up to the point where it should
link everything to build vmlinux, only now it tells me it couldn't
find vmlinux.o.

The last couple of lines from the make output:

  CC  arch/x86/lib/cache-smp.o
  CC  arch/x86/lib/msr.o
  AS  arch/x86/lib/msr-reg.o
  CC  arch/x86/lib/msr-reg-export.o
  AS  arch/x86/lib/iomap_copy_64.o
  LD  arch/x86/lib/built-in.o
ls -Al -m elf_x86_64 -r -o arch/x86/lib/built-in.o
arch/x86/lib/msr-smp.o arch/x86/lib/cache-smp.o arch/x86/lib/msr.o
arch/x86/lib/msr-reg.o arch/x86/lib/msr-reg-export.o
arch/x86/lib/iomap_copy_64.o
  AS  arch/x86/lib/clear_page_64.o
  AS  arch/x86/lib/cmpxchg16b_emu.o
  AS  arch/x86/lib/copy_page_64.o
  AS  arch/x86/lib/copy_user_64.o
  AS  arch/x86/lib/copy_user_nocache_64.o
  AS  arch/x86/lib/csum-copy_64.o
  CC  arch/x86/lib/csum-partial_64.o
  CC  arch/x86/lib/csum-wrappers_64.o
  CC  arch/x86/lib/delay.o
  AS  arch/x86/lib/getuser.o
  GEN arch/x86/lib/inat-tables.c
  CC  arch/x86/lib/inat.o
  CC  arch/x86/lib/insn.o
  AS  arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.o
  AS  arch/x86/lib/memmove_64.o
  AS  arch/x86/lib/memset_64.o
  AS  arch/x86/lib/putuser.o
  AS  arch/x86/lib/rwlock.o
  AS  arch/x86/lib/rwsem.o
  AS  arch/x86/lib/thunk_64.o
  CC  arch/x86/lib/usercopy.o
  CC  arch/x86/lib/usercopy_64.o
  AR  arch/x86/lib/lib.a
  LD  vmlinux.o
ls -Al -m elf_x86_64 -r -o vmlinux.o arch/x86/kernel/head_64.o
arch/x86/kernel/head64.o arch/x86/kernel/head.o
arch/x86/kernel/init_task.o init/built-in.o --start-group
usr/built-in.o arch/x86/built-in.o kernel/built-in.o mm/built-in.o
fs/built-in.o ipc/built-in.o security/built-in.o crypto/built-in.o
block/built-in.o lib/lib.a arch/x86/lib/lib.a lib/built-in.o
arch/x86/lib/built-in.o drivers/built-in.o sound/built-in.o
firmware/built-in.o arch/x86/pci/built-in.o arch/x86/power/built-in.o
arch/x86/video/built-in.o net/built-in.o --end-group
 MODPOST vmlinux.o
  vmlinux.o: No such file or directory make[1]: ***
  [vmlinux.o] Error 1 make

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails

2012-05-17 Thread Michael Scherer
On Wed, 16 May 2012 07:41:32 +0700
Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:

 On May 15, 2012 7:50 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  Maybe like me, you blabber more than you think:
 
  http://archives.gentoo.org/stats/gentoo-user-per-year.xml
 
  I didn't put them in any certain order but you have fallen a bit
  tho. Someone put alum in your water or something?
 
 
 I blabbed that much??
 
 Gee... I purposefully stay away from piping up in threads related to
 CUPS, KDE, Gnome, and other desktop-only stuff, and still end up in
 the top 5?? o_O
 
 Rgds,

OK, OK. May I remind you what started this thread?
If bottom-most is really that important to you, I will
of course comply, though with outlook express which I'm
forced to use most of the time this is a bit tedious.
I had no idea what a flood of angry comments my post
on preferring top-most would start off.

My original problem (see title) is as yet unsolved. Any one
out there with an idea what might be causing this?
I'm grateful to those 3 or 4 who tried to help, but
by now I'm rather desperate and in the whole of internet
pages there is nothing even coming near.

bugzilla told me this wasn't a bug and go to the forums.
So you are really my last resort.

regards, michael



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails

2012-05-17 Thread Michael Scherer
On Thu, 17 May 2012 18:13:14 +0100
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:

 On Thu, 17 May 2012 18:14:20 +0200, Michael Scherer wrote:
 
  I had no idea what a flood of angry comments my post
  on preferring top-most would start off.
 
 It wasn't your preference, it was your attitude, with this comment
 
 from now on I'm going follow my habits and damn the flames.
 
 Did you really have no idea that such an arrogant and inflammatory
 statement would produce a reaction?
 
 

That line was indeed ill conceived, and is usually not my style.
Probably I was very tired and the frustration about not being
able to solve my problem expressed itself in the wrong context.

regards, michael
 



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails

2012-05-17 Thread Michael Scherer
On Thu, 17 May 2012 12:05:07 -0500
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:

 Michael Scherer wrote:
  On Wed, 16 May 2012 07:41:32 +0700
  Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
  
  On May 15, 2012 7:50 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  Maybe like me, you blabber more than you think:
 
  http://archives.gentoo.org/stats/gentoo-user-per-year.xml
 
  I didn't put them in any certain order but you have fallen a bit
  tho. Someone put alum in your water or something?
 
 
  I blabbed that much??
 
  Gee... I purposefully stay away from piping up in threads related
  to CUPS, KDE, Gnome, and other desktop-only stuff, and still end
  up in the top 5?? o_O
 
  Rgds,
  
  OK, OK. May I remind you what started this thread?
  If bottom-most is really that important to you, I will
  of course comply, though with outlook express which I'm
  forced to use most of the time this is a bit tedious.
  I had no idea what a flood of angry comments my post
  on preferring top-most would start off.
  
  My original problem (see title) is as yet unsolved. Any one
  out there with an idea what might be causing this?
  I'm grateful to those 3 or 4 who tried to help, but
  by now I'm rather desperate and in the whole of internet
  pages there is nothing even coming near.
  
  bugzilla told me this wasn't a bug and go to the forums.
  So you are really my last resort.
  
  regards, michael
  
  
 
 
 I would start with running make -j1  make modules_install.  Someone
 else posted it could be a race condition.
 
 Are you editing the config by hand or are you using menuconfig or some
 such tool?  If editing by hand maybe one thing is enabled but
 something else it needs is not.
 
 Still thinking.
 
 Dale
 
 :-)  :-)
 
 

Same result as ever. I use make nconfig, which is somewhat easier
to navigate around. Only once I tried to manually change .config,
because revdep-rebuild wanted to rebuild sys-fs/udisks, which
complained about CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND not being set, but a silent
make oldconfig removed the line automatically. I did the change
manually because CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND doesn't seem to exist in 3.2.12.

Anyway, thank you for thinking about it.

regards, michael



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails

2012-05-17 Thread Michael Scherer
On Thu, 17 May 2012 13:47:56 -0400
Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:

 On 2012-05-17 12:14 PM, Michael Scherer a6702...@unet.univie.ac.at
 wrote:
  If bottom-most is really that important to you, I will of course
  comply, though with outlook express which I'm forced to use most of
  the time this is a bit tedious.
 
 Interesting... so, you have someone standing next to you most of the 
 time, pointing a gun at your head, forcing you to use one of the
 worst mail clients that ever existed?
 

thunderbird under windows has problems with imap accounts and outlook
is still much worse, not to speak of gmail and the like. With forced
I actually meant forced to work with windows, where I use outlook
express which may be bad but I am used to it.

regards, michael



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails

2012-05-17 Thread Michael Scherer
On Fri, 18 May 2012 01:06:02 +0700
Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:

 On May 17, 2012 11:19 PM, Michael Scherer
 a6702...@unet.univie.ac.at wrote:
 
  On Wed, 16 May 2012 07:41:32 +0700
  Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
 
   On May 15, 2012 7:50 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
   
Maybe like me, you blabber more than you think:
   
http://archives.gentoo.org/stats/gentoo-user-per-year.xml
   
I didn't put them in any certain order but you have fallen a bit
tho. Someone put alum in your water or something?
   
  
   I blabbed that much??
  
   Gee... I purposefully stay away from piping up in threads related
   to CUPS, KDE, Gnome, and other desktop-only stuff, and still end
   up in the top 5?? o_O
  
   Rgds,
 
  OK, OK. May I remind you what started this thread?
  If bottom-most is really that important to you, I will
  of course comply, though with outlook express which I'm
  forced to use most of the time this is a bit tedious.
  I had no idea what a flood of angry comments my post
  on preferring top-most would start off.
 
  My original problem (see title) is as yet unsolved. Any one
  out there with an idea what might be causing this?
  I'm grateful to those 3 or 4 who tried to help, but
  by now I'm rather desperate and in the whole of internet
  pages there is nothing even coming near.
 
  bugzilla told me this wasn't a bug and go to the forums.
  So you are really my last resort.
 
  regards, michael
 
 
 Based on the information you've given, there can be only 2 possible
 cause:
 
 1. The Makefile is somehow b0rken.
 
 Evidence : 'ls' instead of 'ld'
 
 2. Some file creation failed, causing the next step to fail.
 
 Please post the output of 'df -i'. I once ran out of inodes during
 kernel compile, even when the filesystem (ext4) was created with IIRC
 100'000-something inodes (and still having several gigabytes of free
 space).
 
 Nowadays, I put /usr/src and portage's tempdir on a reiserfs to
 prevent running out of inodes.
 
 3. Something is wrong with your filesystem.
 
 Especially if /usr/src is *already* on reiserfs. In this case, boot
 using SystemRescueCD and do an offline fsck on the partition
 containing /usr/src
 
 4. Swapfile / Swap partition problems.
 
 Even with enough RAM, sometimes gcc just wants a swap. Post the
 output of 'swapon -s' please.
 
 And there's also the possibility that somehow the swap gets b0rked.
 Try turning off swap, rebuild the swap, and turning it back on.
 
 Rgds,

1) make output:

  CHK include/linux/version.h
  CHK include/generated/utsrelease.h
  CALLscripts/checksyscalls.sh
  CHK include/generated/compile.h
  LD  init/mounts.o
ls -Al -m elf_x86_64 -r -o init/mounts.o init/do_mounts.o
init/do_mounts_initrd.o init/mounts.o: No such file or directory
make[1]: *** [init/mounts.o] Error 1
make: *** [init] Error 2

There is an LD, the ls line is part of the error message.

2) df -i

Filesystem  Inodes  IUsed   IFree IUse% Mounted on
rootfs 1313280   5652 13076281% /
/dev/root  1313280   5652 13076281% /
devtmpfs385505785  3847201% /dev
rc-svcdir   385724 63  3856611% /lib64/rc/init.d
/tmpfs  385724  1  3857231% /dev/shm
/dev/sda12  130560 23  1305371% /boot
/dev/sda15 3932656 363434 3569222   10% /usr
/dev/sda16 6119424 275818 58436065% /var

3) /usr/src is ext4, and all ebuilds run without problems.
If something is wrong with the file system, maybe an fsck would
show it, so I'll try that.

4) swapon -s

FilenameTypeSize
UsedPriority /dev/sda13
partition   104823760   -1

immediately after running make.

Remaking the swap area resulted in the same line as above.

But without doubt you are right that mounts.o is not built, for
whatever reason. The build command

init/.do_mounts.o.cmd:cmd_init/do_mounts.o := gcc
-Wp,-MD,init/.do_mounts.o.d -nostdinc
-isystem /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.3/include
-I/usr/src/linux-3.2.12-gentoo/arch/x86/include
-Iarch/x86/include/generated -Iinclude
-include /usr/src/linux-3.2.12-gentoo/include/linux/kconfig.h
-D__KERNEL__ -Wall -Wundef -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs
-fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -Werror-implicit-function-declaration
-Wno-format-security -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks -O2 -m64 -march=k8
-mno-red-zone -mcmodel=kernel -funit-at-a-time
-maccumulate-outgoing-args -fstack-protector -DCONFIG_AS_CFI=1
-DCONFIG_AS_CFI_SIGNAL_FRAME=1 -DCONFIG_AS_CFI_SECTIONS=1
-DCONFIG_AS_FXSAVEQ=1 -pipe -Wno-sign-compare
-fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -mno-sse -mno-mmx -mno-sse2 -mno-3dnow
-Wframe-larger-than=2048 -fno-omit-frame-pointer
-fno-optimize-sibling-calls -fno-inline-functions-called-once
-Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wno-pointer-sign -fno-strict-overflow
-fconserve-stack -DCC_HAVE_ASM_GOTO -DKBUILD_STR(s)=\#s
-DKBUILD_BASENAME=KBUILD_STR(do_mounts)
-DKBUILD_MODNAME=KBUILD_STR(mounts) -c -o init

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails

2012-05-17 Thread Michael Scherer
On Thu, 17 May 2012 22:13:02 +0200
Michael Scherer a6702...@unet.univie.ac.at wrote:

 On Fri, 18 May 2012 01:06:02 +0700
 Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
 
  On May 17, 2012 11:19 PM, Michael Scherer
  a6702...@unet.univie.ac.at wrote:
  
   On Wed, 16 May 2012 07:41:32 +0700
   Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
  
On May 15, 2012 7:50 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:

 Maybe like me, you blabber more than you think:

 http://archives.gentoo.org/stats/gentoo-user-per-year.xml

 I didn't put them in any certain order but you have fallen a
 bit tho. Someone put alum in your water or something?

   
I blabbed that much??
   
Gee... I purposefully stay away from piping up in threads
related to CUPS, KDE, Gnome, and other desktop-only stuff, and
still end up in the top 5?? o_O
   
Rgds,
  
   OK, OK. May I remind you what started this thread?
   If bottom-most is really that important to you, I will
   of course comply, though with outlook express which I'm
   forced to use most of the time this is a bit tedious.
   I had no idea what a flood of angry comments my post
   on preferring top-most would start off.
  
   My original problem (see title) is as yet unsolved. Any one
   out there with an idea what might be causing this?
   I'm grateful to those 3 or 4 who tried to help, but
   by now I'm rather desperate and in the whole of internet
   pages there is nothing even coming near.
  
   bugzilla told me this wasn't a bug and go to the forums.
   So you are really my last resort.
  
   regards, michael
  
  
  Based on the information you've given, there can be only 2 possible
  cause:
  
  1. The Makefile is somehow b0rken.
  
  Evidence : 'ls' instead of 'ld'
  
  2. Some file creation failed, causing the next step to fail.
  
  Please post the output of 'df -i'. I once ran out of inodes during
  kernel compile, even when the filesystem (ext4) was created with
  IIRC 100'000-something inodes (and still having several gigabytes
  of free space).
  
  Nowadays, I put /usr/src and portage's tempdir on a reiserfs to
  prevent running out of inodes.
  
  3. Something is wrong with your filesystem.
  
  Especially if /usr/src is *already* on reiserfs. In this case, boot
  using SystemRescueCD and do an offline fsck on the partition
  containing /usr/src
  
  4. Swapfile / Swap partition problems.
  
  Even with enough RAM, sometimes gcc just wants a swap. Post the
  output of 'swapon -s' please.
  
  And there's also the possibility that somehow the swap gets b0rked.
  Try turning off swap, rebuild the swap, and turning it back on.
  
  Rgds,
 
 1) make output:
 
   CHK include/linux/version.h
   CHK include/generated/utsrelease.h
   CALLscripts/checksyscalls.sh
   CHK include/generated/compile.h
   LD  init/mounts.o
 ls -Al -m elf_x86_64 -r -o init/mounts.o init/do_mounts.o
 init/do_mounts_initrd.o init/mounts.o: No such file or directory
 make[1]: *** [init/mounts.o] Error 1
 make: *** [init] Error 2
 
 There is an LD, the ls line is part of the error message.
 
 2) df -i
 
 Filesystem  Inodes  IUsed   IFree IUse% Mounted on
 rootfs 1313280   5652 13076281% /
 /dev/root  1313280   5652 13076281% /
 devtmpfs385505785  3847201% /dev
 rc-svcdir   385724 63  3856611% /lib64/rc/init.d
 /tmpfs  385724  1  3857231% /dev/shm
 /dev/sda12  130560 23  1305371% /boot
 /dev/sda15 3932656 363434 3569222   10% /usr
 /dev/sda16 6119424 275818 58436065% /var
 
 3) /usr/src is ext4, and all ebuilds run without problems.
 If something is wrong with the file system, maybe an fsck would
 show it, so I'll try that.
 
 4) swapon -s
 
 Filename  TypeSize
 Used  Priority /dev/sda13
 partition 104823760   -1
 
 immediately after running make.
 
 Remaking the swap area resulted in the same line as above.
 
 But without doubt you are right that mounts.o is not built, for
 whatever reason. The build command
 
 init/.do_mounts.o.cmd:cmd_init/do_mounts.o := gcc
 -Wp,-MD,init/.do_mounts.o.d -nostdinc
 -isystem /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.3/include
 -I/usr/src/linux-3.2.12-gentoo/arch/x86/include
 -Iarch/x86/include/generated -Iinclude
 -include /usr/src/linux-3.2.12-gentoo/include/linux/kconfig.h
 -D__KERNEL__ -Wall -Wundef -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs
 -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -Werror-implicit-function-declaration
 -Wno-format-security -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks -O2 -m64
 -march=k8 -mno-red-zone -mcmodel=kernel -funit-at-a-time
 -maccumulate-outgoing-args -fstack-protector -DCONFIG_AS_CFI=1
 -DCONFIG_AS_CFI_SIGNAL_FRAME=1 -DCONFIG_AS_CFI_SECTIONS=1
 -DCONFIG_AS_FXSAVEQ=1 -pipe -Wno-sign-compare
 -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -mno-sse -mno-mmx -mno-sse2 -mno-3dnow
 -Wframe-larger-than=2048 -fno-omit-frame-pointer
 -fno-optimize-sibling-calls -fno-inline-functions-called-once

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails

2012-05-14 Thread Michael Scherer

in my opinion it isn't. with top posting I see the newest message
immidiately, while otherwise I need page through sometimes
huge amounts of mostly obsolete comments.
where it's possible, I put my messages on top, and I've found
more than once forum-rules that require or at least recommend
top posting.
but I garantee that I will get flames, why I do this and urge me
to change my habits.
obviously this is an ingrained habit on gentoo-users, but from
now on I'm going follow my habits and damn the flames.

regards

michael

--
Michael Scherer
Univ.klinik f. Psychiatrie
email: michael.sche...@meduniwien.ac.at
phone: +43 6991 941 22 54

- Original Message - 
From: ny6...@gmail.com

To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Sent: Monday, 14 May, 2012 04:13
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails



A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.

On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 03:44:31AM +0200, Michael Scherer wrote:


regrettably no. at this point make (correctly) assumes that mounts.o
should have been built, but it didn't.
sorry for my delayed replay, I've tried I lot of possibilities, needless
to say without success.

thanks

michael

--
Michael Scherer
Univ.klinik f. Psychiatrie
email: michael.sche...@meduniwien.ac.at
phone: +43 6991 941 22 54

- Original Message - 
From: walt w41...@gmail.com

To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Sent: Saturday, 12 May, 2012 20:17
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails


 On 05/10/2012 07:20 AM, Michael Scherer wrote:
   LD  init/mounts.o
 ls -Al -m elf_x86_64 -r -o init/mounts.o init/do_mounts.o
   init/do_mounts_initrd.o init/mounts.o: No such file or directory
 
 Maybe that step is correct but it sure looks strange to me.  Looks

 like 'ls' is being substituted for 'ld', maybe?  Is that a cut-and-
 paste error?


Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?

Terry






Re: [gentoo-user] Re: make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails

2012-05-13 Thread Michael Scherer

regrettably no. at this point make (correctly) assumes that mounts.o
should have been built, but it didn't.
sorry for my delayed replay, I've tried I lot of possibilities, needless
to say without success.

thanks

michael

--
Michael Scherer
Univ.klinik f. Psychiatrie
email: michael.sche...@meduniwien.ac.at
phone: +43 6991 941 22 54

- Original Message - 
From: walt w41...@gmail.com

To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Sent: Saturday, 12 May, 2012 20:17
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails



On 05/10/2012 07:20 AM, Michael Scherer wrote:

  LD  init/mounts.o
ls -Al -m elf_x86_64 -r -o init/mounts.o init/do_mounts.o
  init/do_mounts_initrd.o init/mounts.o: No such file or directory


Maybe that step is correct but it sure looks strange to me.  Looks
like 'ls' is being substituted for 'ld', maybe?  Is that a cut-and-
paste error?












Re: [gentoo-user] make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails

2012-05-11 Thread Michael Scherer
On Fri, 11 May 2012 01:18:18 -0400
Joshua Murphy poiso...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 9:01 PM, Michael Scherer
 a6702...@unet.univie.ac.at wrote:
  I'm always replying to gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org and I'm not
  aware I ever used
  one of the addresses you mentioned below. I'm rather new to this
  forum, so it's
  entirely possible I did something wrong somewhere, so please tell
  me where else
  I should post my replies.
  And if you feel the urge to correct me on my postings you might as
  well post some
  advice on my problem too.
 
 
  michael
 
  --
  Michael Scherer
  Univ.klinik f. Psychiatrie
  email: michael.sche...@meduniwien.ac.at
  phone: +43 6991 941 22 54
 
  - Original Message - From: Stroller
  strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk
  To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
  Sent: Thursday, 10 May, 2012 23:08
 
  Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails
 
 
 
  On 10 May 2012, at 15:20, Michael Scherer wrote:
 
 
  References: 4faa2f0d.8080...@gmail.com
         4faa595a.4040...@libertytrek.org
 
   cak2h+ec30vq09u22vac72hsqbjb2zn5b25snh6-d3cdxrre...@mail.gmail.com
 
   caa2qdgw8uuf3h-cbiqn48f+pboj3ahct2whdd1swze-g7z_...@mail.gmail.com
 
  after downloading the 3.2.12-sources everything went fine
  for a couple of weeks, I compiled them a couple of times,
  but suddenly, maybe because of some world-updates, errors
  started to accumulate, …
 
 
 
  Please don't hijack threads like this:
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thread_hijacking
  http://groups.google.com/group/linux.gentoo.user/msg/8a540add45e7e9b8?
 
  It is irritating for people using thread-aware e-mail clients...
  In case you didn't know, it happens when you use reply for
  sending a new question instead of composing a new message.
 
  Stroller.
 
 
 
 He pulled those addresses from the message headers that went out with
 your initial question, which it appears you sent, aiming to start a
 new thread of discussion on, by hitting reply in the midst of
 [gentoo-user] Are those green drives any good? and changing the
 subject. It's a quick way to get a message headed towards the list,
 but it *does* throw clients that are better at thread tracking for a
 bit of a loop (and makes it easy for your question to get lost in an
 already 40+ message long thread). As for your initial question,
 building from your config on a clean (distclean, no ccache, etc)
 3.1.12 gentoo patched tree built rather quick and problem free on my
 box here (using -j5 at that. My first guess was a race issue in a
 parallel build)... You might find something notably different in your
 versions of things, so here's what I'm running on there.
 
 lanos linux-3.2.12-gentoo # emerge --info
 Portage 2.1.10.49 (default/linux/amd64/10.0, gcc-4.5.3,
 glibc-2.14.1-r3, 3.2.1-gentoo-r2-lanos x86_64)
 =
 System uname:
 Linux-3.2.1-gentoo-r2-lanos-x86_64-Intel-R-_Core-TM-2_Quad_CPU_Q6600_@_2.40GHz-with-gentoo-2.0.3
 Timestamp of tree: Mon, 07 May 2012 17:30:01 +
 app-shells/bash:  4.2_p20 dev-lang/python:  2.7.2-r3,
 3.1.4-r3, 3.2.2 dev-util/pkgconfig:   0.26
 sys-apps/baselayout:  2.0.3
 sys-apps/openrc:  0.9.8.4
 sys-apps/sandbox: 2.5
 sys-devel/autoconf:   2.13, 2.68
 sys-devel/automake:   1.11.1
 sys-devel/binutils:   2.21.1-r1
 sys-devel/gcc:4.5.3-r2
 sys-devel/gcc-config: 1.5-r2
 sys-devel/libtool:2.4-r1
 sys-devel/make:   3.82-r1
 sys-kernel/linux-headers: 3.1 (virtual/os-headers)
 sys-libs/glibc:   2.14.1-r3
 
 If you're running something newer somewhere, or vanilla-sources, or
 somesuch I can poke around a bit and see if I can replicate your
 troubles here, but I can't guarantee short timeframes... I've around
 1k miles of travelling this weekend, half of which will be learning
 quickly whether the car I just grabbed on ebay was a good idea or not.
 

Hi all,

thanks for advice, I wont make the same error again.

I use plain old gentoo-sources, but for once I'll have a shot at
some other kernel, maybe this could give me at least a hint.
I'll check your versions, I already thought some update broke
the kernel compile. Hope I'll find something.

thanks again

michael



Re: [gentoo-user] make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails

2012-05-11 Thread Michael Scherer
On Fri, 11 May 2012 01:18:18 -0400
Joshua Murphy poiso...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 9:01 PM, Michael Scherer
 a6702...@unet.univie.ac.at wrote:
  I'm always replying to gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org and I'm not
  aware I ever used
  one of the addresses you mentioned below. I'm rather new to this
  forum, so it's
  entirely possible I did something wrong somewhere, so please tell
  me where else
  I should post my replies.
  And if you feel the urge to correct me on my postings you might as
  well post some
  advice on my problem too.
 
 
  michael
 
  --
  Michael Scherer
  Univ.klinik f. Psychiatrie
  email: michael.sche...@meduniwien.ac.at
  phone: +43 6991 941 22 54
 
  - Original Message - From: Stroller
  strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk
  To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
  Sent: Thursday, 10 May, 2012 23:08
 
  Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails
 
 
 
  On 10 May 2012, at 15:20, Michael Scherer wrote:
 
 
  References: 4faa2f0d.8080...@gmail.com
         4faa595a.4040...@libertytrek.org
 
   cak2h+ec30vq09u22vac72hsqbjb2zn5b25snh6-d3cdxrre...@mail.gmail.com
 
   caa2qdgw8uuf3h-cbiqn48f+pboj3ahct2whdd1swze-g7z_...@mail.gmail.com
 
  after downloading the 3.2.12-sources everything went fine
  for a couple of weeks, I compiled them a couple of times,
  but suddenly, maybe because of some world-updates, errors
  started to accumulate, …
 
 
 
  Please don't hijack threads like this:
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thread_hijacking
  http://groups.google.com/group/linux.gentoo.user/msg/8a540add45e7e9b8?
 
  It is irritating for people using thread-aware e-mail clients...
  In case you didn't know, it happens when you use reply for
  sending a new question instead of composing a new message.
 
  Stroller.
 
 
 
 He pulled those addresses from the message headers that went out with
 your initial question, which it appears you sent, aiming to start a
 new thread of discussion on, by hitting reply in the midst of
 [gentoo-user] Are those green drives any good? and changing the
 subject. It's a quick way to get a message headed towards the list,
 but it *does* throw clients that are better at thread tracking for a
 bit of a loop (and makes it easy for your question to get lost in an
 already 40+ message long thread). As for your initial question,
 building from your config on a clean (distclean, no ccache, etc)
 3.1.12 gentoo patched tree built rather quick and problem free on my
 box here (using -j5 at that. My first guess was a race issue in a
 parallel build)... You might find something notably different in your
 versions of things, so here's what I'm running on there.
 
 lanos linux-3.2.12-gentoo # emerge --info
 Portage 2.1.10.49 (default/linux/amd64/10.0, gcc-4.5.3,
 glibc-2.14.1-r3, 3.2.1-gentoo-r2-lanos x86_64)
 =
 System uname:
 Linux-3.2.1-gentoo-r2-lanos-x86_64-Intel-R-_Core-TM-2_Quad_CPU_Q6600_@_2.40GHz-with-gentoo-2.0.3
 Timestamp of tree: Mon, 07 May 2012 17:30:01 +
 app-shells/bash:  4.2_p20 dev-lang/python:  2.7.2-r3,
 3.1.4-r3, 3.2.2 dev-util/pkgconfig:   0.26
 sys-apps/baselayout:  2.0.3
 sys-apps/openrc:  0.9.8.4
 sys-apps/sandbox: 2.5
 sys-devel/autoconf:   2.13, 2.68
 sys-devel/automake:   1.11.1
 sys-devel/binutils:   2.21.1-r1
 sys-devel/gcc:4.5.3-r2
 sys-devel/gcc-config: 1.5-r2
 sys-devel/libtool:2.4-r1
 sys-devel/make:   3.82-r1
 sys-kernel/linux-headers: 3.1 (virtual/os-headers)
 sys-libs/glibc:   2.14.1-r3
 
 If you're running something newer somewhere, or vanilla-sources, or
 somesuch I can poke around a bit and see if I can replicate your
 troubles here, but I can't guarantee short timeframes... I've around
 1k miles of travelling this weekend, half of which will be learning
 quickly whether the car I just grabbed on ebay was a good idea or not.
 

I have the exact same hard- and software as described in your list,
but the result doesn't change. Below is the command that should create
mounts.o but for some reason can't make it:

init/.do_mounts.o.cmd:cmd_init/do_mounts.o := gcc -Wp,-MD,init/.do_mounts.o.d  
-nostdinc -isystem /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.3/include 
-I/usr/src/linux-3.2.12-gentoo/arch/x86/include -Iarch/x86/include/generated 
-Iinclude  -include /usr/src/linux-3.2.12-gentoo/include/linux/kconfig.h 
-D__KERNEL__ -Wall -Wundef -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs 
-fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -Werror-implicit-function-declaration 
-Wno-format-security -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks -O2 -m64 -march=k8 
-mno-red-zone -mcmodel=kernel -funit-at-a-time -maccumulate-outgoing-args 
-fstack-protector -DCONFIG_AS_CFI=1 -DCONFIG_AS_CFI_SIGNAL_FRAME=1 
-DCONFIG_AS_CFI_SECTIONS=1 -DCONFIG_AS_FXSAVEQ=1 -pipe -Wno-sign-compare 
-fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -mno-sse -mno-mmx -mno-sse2 -mno-3dnow 
-Wframe-larger-than=2048 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-optimize

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails

2012-05-11 Thread Michael Scherer

Yes, all of those. Other ebuilds run without troubles. That's what makes this 
failed
kernel build all the more mysterious. I've run out of options. Maybe a new 
kernel
release will help, but I need my box and the tweaks to .config, and I don't want
to wait, especially as I fear things might not go better even then.

regards

michael

--
Michael Scherer
Univ.klinik f. Psychiatrie
email: michael.sche...@meduniwien.ac.at
phone: +43 6991 941 22 54

- Original Message - 
From: walt w41...@gmail.com

To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Sent: Saturday, 12 May, 2012 00:48
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails



On 05/10/2012 07:20 AM, Michael Scherer wrote:

Hi all,

after downloading the 3.2.12-sources everything went fine
for a couple of weeks, I compiled them a couple of times,
but suddenly, maybe because of some world-updates, errors
started to accumulate,


Yes, sounds like something is wrong with your build environment.

Have you run revdep-rebuild lately?  What about etc-update or
something equivalent to it?

Very unlikely suspects but very easy to rule out:
Correct /usr/src/linux symlink?  Recent fsck?

Hm, what else?







Re: [gentoo-user] make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails

2012-05-10 Thread Michael Scherer
my /usr-partition is at 17% and all other ebuilds, like a new install of 
netbeans 7.1, run just fine,
so I doubt this could be the reason, but I'll check anyway.

thanks

michael

-- 
Michael Scherer
Univ.klinik f. Psychiatrie
email: michael.sche...@meduniwien.ac.at
phone: +43 6991 941 22 54

  - Original Message - 
  From: Pandu Poluan 
  To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org 
  Sent: Thursday, 10 May, 2012 16:50
  Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails



  On May 10, 2012 9:27 PM, Michael Scherer a6702...@unet.univie.ac.at wrote:
  
   Hi all,
  
   after downloading the 3.2.12-sources everything went fine
   for a couple of weeks, I compiled them a couple of times,
   but suddenly, maybe because of some world-updates, errors
   started to accumulate, first it could do make but no modules,
   then kernel make made it almost and now I'm stuck with this
   rather short make output:
  
HOSTCC  scripts/basic/fixdep
HOSTCC  scripts/kconfig/conf.o
HOSTCC  scripts/kconfig/zconf.tab.o
   scripts/kconfig/zconf.tab.c: In function ‘header_print_comment’:
   scripts/kconfig/confdata.c:540:10: warning: ignoring return value of
‘fwrite’, declared with attribute warn_unused_result
scripts/kconfig/zconf.tab.c: In function ‘kconfig_print_comment’:
scripts/kconfig/confdata.c:467:10: warning: ignoring return value of
‘fwrite’, declared with attribute warn_unused_result HOSTLD
scripts/kconfig/conf scripts/kconfig/conf --silentoldconfig Kconfig
CHK include/linux/version.h CHK include/generated/utsrelease.h
CC  kernel/bounds.s
GEN include/generated/bounds.h
CC  arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.s
GEN include/generated/asm-offsets.h
CALLscripts/checksyscalls.sh
CC  scripts/mod/empty.o
HOSTCC  scripts/mod/mk_elfconfig
MKELF   scripts/mod/elfconfig.h
HOSTCC  scripts/mod/file2alias.o
HOSTCC  scripts/mod/modpost.o
HOSTCC  scripts/mod/sumversion.o
HOSTLD  scripts/mod/modpost
HOSTCC  scripts/kallsyms
HOSTCC  scripts/pnmtologo
HOSTCC  scripts/conmakehash
HOSTCC  scripts/bin2c
CC  init/main.o
CHK include/generated/compile.h
CC  init/version.o
CC  init/do_mounts.o
CC  init/do_mounts_initrd.o
LD  init/mounts.o
   ls -Al -m elf_x86_64 -r -o init/mounts.o init/do_mounts.o
init/do_mounts_initrd.o init/mounts.o: No such file or directory
   make[1]: *** [init/mounts.o] Error 1
   make: *** [init] Error 2
  
   glibc is 2.14.1-r3, which otherwise works perfectly, so I don't
   think it's the reason.
   I cleared ccache and rebuilt the kernel sources, to no avail.
  
   .config is in attachments.
  
   Maybe someone could give me a hint, I need that kernel really
   badly and hopefully soon.
  
   kind regards
  
   michael
  

  Make sure you're not running out of space or inodes on the mounted filesystem.

  (I once ran out of inodes even when freespace is still large. Now I do 
compiles -- kernel or otherwise -- on reiserfs)

  Rgds,



Re: [gentoo-user] make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails

2012-05-10 Thread Michael Scherer

I'm always replying to gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org and I'm not aware I ever 
used
one of the addresses you mentioned below. I'm rather new to this forum, so it's
entirely possible I did something wrong somewhere, so please tell me where else
I should post my replies.
And if you feel the urge to correct me on my postings you might as well post 
some
advice on my problem too.

michael

--
Michael Scherer
Univ.klinik f. Psychiatrie
email: michael.sche...@meduniwien.ac.at
phone: +43 6991 941 22 54

- Original Message - 
From: Stroller strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk

To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Sent: Thursday, 10 May, 2012 23:08
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails



On 10 May 2012, at 15:20, Michael Scherer wrote:


References: 4faa2f0d.8080...@gmail.com
4faa595a.4040...@libertytrek.org
cak2h+ec30vq09u22vac72hsqbjb2zn5b25snh6-d3cdxrre...@mail.gmail.com
caa2qdgw8uuf3h-cbiqn48f+pboj3ahct2whdd1swze-g7z_...@mail.gmail.com

after downloading the 3.2.12-sources everything went fine
for a couple of weeks, I compiled them a couple of times,
but suddenly, maybe because of some world-updates, errors
started to accumulate, …



Please don't hijack threads like this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thread_hijacking
http://groups.google.com/group/linux.gentoo.user/msg/8a540add45e7e9b8?

It is irritating for people using thread-aware e-mail clients...
In case you didn't know, it happens when you use reply for sending
a new question instead of composing a new message.

Stroller.





Re: [gentoo-user] genkernel assistance building initramfs

2012-04-24 Thread Michael Scherer

So you solved it.
It would be nice then to adorn your subject lines with a [solved] tag,
to avoid further getting mails with comments that are obsolete.

michael

--
Michael Scherer
Univ.klinik f. Psychiatrie
email: michael.sche...@meduniwien.ac.at
phone: +43 6991 941 22 54

- Original Message - 
From: Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com

To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Sent: Tuesday, 24 April, 2012 01:43
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] genkernel assistance building initramfs



Michael Scherer wrote:

On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 18:01:09 -0500
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:


Michael Scherer wrote:

On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 13:26:57 -0500
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:


Michael Mol wrote:

So, my habit is to have /usr sit on top of LVM on top of mdraid. I
really don't want to get into the business of manually managing my
own initramfs, and udev = 181 will eventually hit stable. I want
my systems ready before that.

Now, having looked at the pertinent documentation, it looks like
the command I need to run is:

genkernel --lvm --mdadm --disklabel initramfs

and then add the initramfs to my grub setup.

The trouble is, genkernel dies on me. I tried for some feedback in
#gentoo-chat, and DrEeevil gave me two clues:

13:34 +DrEeevil that shouldn't even be possible
13:36 +DrEeevil mikemol: looks like static linking didn't on
your system

I don't know where to take things from here. I'm hesitant to file
a bug on b.g.o, because the tail end of genkernel.log specifically
says not to file build errors as bug reports.

So...any ideas? This is an amd64 mostly-stable system, and dracut
is still masked on amd64, which is why I'm trying to get genkernel
working.

I've attached genkernel.log




If I read the -dev mailing list correctly, they plan to still
support /usr without a init thingy.  After all the mess I went
through, we may not need the init thingy after all.

Go figure.

Dale

:-)  :-)



I wouldn't bet on that.

But there is a detailed gentoo howto to create an iniramfs
that does just that: load /usr.
http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Early_Userspace_Mounting
It works. You only need tell your bootloader that now you
have an initramfs.
There's also a more general introduction
http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Initramfs
for a lot of other options

michael





I'm not betting on it but that is what the Gentoo council voted on and
it said that /usr on a separate partition was going to be supported.

You must have missed the HUGE thread where I was trying to get a init
thingy to work huh?

Dale

:-)  :-)



Indeed, I missed all but one email, but there was no hint
at all that anything had been said before I came in.
Sorry for my unsolicited comments, and I hope you have
solved that problem in one or another way.

michael






I meant to put a LOL after the comment about the huge thread.  I'm not
sure how I missed that.  :/   I did get it to work finally.  It took
several peoples help and a hammer on my part.  ;-)

I'm just curious as to how they are going to support this in the future.
I have read where some say it can be done but others say it can't, or
not easily.  Old saying, this is where the rubber meets the road.  ^_^


To the OP.  I would use dracut.  I ran into trouble but I found out
later that a earlier attempt at a init thingy was causing the dracut
init thingy to mess up.  I strongly suspect that if I had known to get
rid of the previous attempt, it would have worked the first time.  My
previous attempt was the one that was built into the kernel itself.
Lets just say there was a huge fight and I missed it.  Grub was telling
one thing to load and the kernel was trying to load something else.  I'm
sure it was a nice fight.

Dale

:-)  :-)

--
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or
how you interpreted my words!

Miss the compile output?  Hint:
EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS=--quiet-build=n






Re: [gentoo-user] laptop screen goes dark in boot

2012-04-23 Thread Michael Scherer
unless you have solved the problem already, could you please
post the rc.log, too?

michael

-- 
Michael Scherer
Univ.klinik f. Psychiatrie
email: michael.sche...@meduniwien.ac.at
phone: +43 6991 941 22 54

  - Original Message - 
  From: Zhang Jun 
  To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org 
  Sent: Monday, 23 April, 2012 03:50
  Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] laptop screen goes dark in boot


  I get the dmesg log and kernel config, forgot to get the rc.log ( using 
windows now ).
  please help to have a look on these files,
  also tryed boot with different kernel parameters for acpi, only acpi=off 
works, but I don't think it is a good idea.
  I'm using grub4dos with kernel (hd0,7)/kernel-3.0.17-r1 root=/dev/sda9 ro 
quiet vga=792 gentoo=nodevfs acpi_enforce_resources=lax resume=swap:/dev/sda7, 
remove the acpi_enforce_resources=lax also not works.

  thanks!


  On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 2:53 AM, Michael Scherer a6702...@unet.univie.ac.at 
wrote:

did you look at the logs? if you haven't already looked at them dmesg and 
/var/log/rc.log
have information that could help you pinpoint the problem.
one of the earlier live-cds had that problem and I got around it by 
starting the the cd with
gentoo noacpi nox options though I doubt this can help in your case.
could you provide some more information like the logs, the loader conf 
files and may be
.config of your kernel make?

michael

-- 
Michael Scherer
Univ.klinik f. Psychiatrie
email: michael.sche...@meduniwien.ac.at
phone: +43 6991 941 22 54

  - Original Message - 
  From: Zhang Jun 
  To: gentoo-user 
  Sent: Sunday, 22 April, 2012 08:25
  Subject: [gentoo-user] laptop screen goes dark in boot


  laptop: asus F3TC, amd Turion, NV-go7300
  kernel-3.0.17-r1 tuxonice

  screen goes dark just after I see the linux boot logo,
  when using kernel 2.6.x, I even do not use hotkey to control lcd 
backlight, default light is ok,
  but now, it goes dark, re-compiled kernel many times, but no luck,

  in kernel acpi config page, I did't see the video module, and seems no 
/proc/acpi/video/ .

  is there anyone have met this problem and have solution ?

  thanks!





Re: [gentoo-user] genkernel assistance building initramfs

2012-04-23 Thread Michael Scherer
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 13:26:57 -0500
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:

 Michael Mol wrote:
  So, my habit is to have /usr sit on top of LVM on top of mdraid. I
  really don't want to get into the business of manually managing my
  own initramfs, and udev = 181 will eventually hit stable. I want my
  systems ready before that.
  
  Now, having looked at the pertinent documentation, it looks like the
  command I need to run is:
  
  genkernel --lvm --mdadm --disklabel initramfs
  
  and then add the initramfs to my grub setup.
  
  The trouble is, genkernel dies on me. I tried for some feedback in
  #gentoo-chat, and DrEeevil gave me two clues:
  
  13:34 +DrEeevil that shouldn't even be possible
  13:36 +DrEeevil mikemol: looks like static linking didn't on your
  system
  
  I don't know where to take things from here. I'm hesitant to file a
  bug on b.g.o, because the tail end of genkernel.log specifically
  says not to file build errors as bug reports.
  
  So...any ideas? This is an amd64 mostly-stable system, and dracut is
  still masked on amd64, which is why I'm trying to get genkernel
  working.
  
  I've attached genkernel.log
  
 
 
 If I read the -dev mailing list correctly, they plan to still support
 /usr without a init thingy.  After all the mess I went through, we may
 not need the init thingy after all.
 
 Go figure.
 
 Dale
 
 :-)  :-)
 

I wouldn't bet on that.

But there is a detailed gentoo howto to create an iniramfs
that does just that: load /usr.
http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Early_Userspace_Mounting
It works. You only need tell your bootloader that now you
have an initramfs.
There's also a more general introduction
http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Initramfs
for a lot of other options

michael



Re: [gentoo-user] genkernel assistance building initramfs

2012-04-23 Thread Michael Scherer
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 18:01:09 -0500
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:

 Michael Scherer wrote:
  On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 13:26:57 -0500
  Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
  
  Michael Mol wrote:
  So, my habit is to have /usr sit on top of LVM on top of mdraid. I
  really don't want to get into the business of manually managing my
  own initramfs, and udev = 181 will eventually hit stable. I want
  my systems ready before that.
 
  Now, having looked at the pertinent documentation, it looks like
  the command I need to run is:
 
  genkernel --lvm --mdadm --disklabel initramfs
 
  and then add the initramfs to my grub setup.
 
  The trouble is, genkernel dies on me. I tried for some feedback in
  #gentoo-chat, and DrEeevil gave me two clues:
 
  13:34 +DrEeevil that shouldn't even be possible
  13:36 +DrEeevil mikemol: looks like static linking didn't on
  your system
 
  I don't know where to take things from here. I'm hesitant to file
  a bug on b.g.o, because the tail end of genkernel.log specifically
  says not to file build errors as bug reports.
 
  So...any ideas? This is an amd64 mostly-stable system, and dracut
  is still masked on amd64, which is why I'm trying to get genkernel
  working.
 
  I've attached genkernel.log
 
 
 
  If I read the -dev mailing list correctly, they plan to still
  support /usr without a init thingy.  After all the mess I went
  through, we may not need the init thingy after all.
 
  Go figure.
 
  Dale
 
  :-)  :-)
 
  
  I wouldn't bet on that.
  
  But there is a detailed gentoo howto to create an iniramfs
  that does just that: load /usr.
  http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Early_Userspace_Mounting
  It works. You only need tell your bootloader that now you
  have an initramfs.
  There's also a more general introduction
  http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Initramfs
  for a lot of other options
  
  michael
  
  
 
 
 I'm not betting on it but that is what the Gentoo council voted on and
 it said that /usr on a separate partition was going to be supported.
 
 You must have missed the HUGE thread where I was trying to get a init
 thingy to work huh?
 
 Dale
 
 :-)  :-)
 

Indeed, I missed all but one email, but there was no hint
at all that anything had been said before I came in.
Sorry for my unsolicited comments, and I hope you have
solved that problem in one or another way.

michael




Re: [gentoo-user]How can i remove the xfce clearly?

2012-04-22 Thread Michael Scherer
not dangerous. only you need to look carefully at what depclean wants to delete.
as gentoo says, in some cases it could break dependencies needed by other 
software and
to avoid damage you should run revdep-rebuild, which scans all dependecies and 
reinstalls
them if it finds something is missing.
I use both regularly, especially after an emerge --update world and never had 
any real
trouble with it.

hope this eases your concerns a bit

michael

-- 
Michael Scherer
Univ.klinik f. Psychiatrie
email: michael.sche...@meduniwien.ac.at
phone: +43 6991 941 22 54

  - Original Message - 
  From: 赵佳晖 
  To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org 
  Sent: Sunday, 22 April, 2012 03:31
  Subject: Re: [gentoo-user]How can i remove the xfce clearly?


  But it seems that the --depclean is a dangerous operate ??


  在 2012年4月22日 上午7:15,Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net写道:

Am 21.04.2012 20:39, schrieb ny6...@gmail.com:

 On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 09:45:49AM +0200, Florian Philipp wrote:
 Am 21.04.2012 05:27, schrieb ??:
 I just install the xfce a few days ago, But i find i didn't like it . So
 i want to remove it and install the Gnome . How can i remove the xfce
 clearly ?

 --
 

 Gnome and Xfce share many libraries. Therefore it is best to install
 Gnome first, before removing Xfce. Otherwise you will remove libraries
 which you will later re-emerge for Gnome.

 Then you need to configure your display manager (kdm, gdm, xdm) to use
 Gnome instead of Xfce. Kdm and Gdm should allow you to do that directly
 on the login screen.

 When you are satisfied with Gnome, edit /var/lib/portage/world and
 remove every line containing an Xfce package. Then run `emerge -av
 --depclean` and you are done.

 You could continue to remove config files but that is usually not worth
 the trouble.

 Hope this helps,
 Florian Philipp



 Do I understand you correctly that it is not necessary to run emerge
 -unmerge first before removing the atoms from @world and running emerge
 --depclean?

 Terry



Yes. I think it is also mentioned in the gentoo handbook. In fact, you
should not use --unmerge because it doesn't check dependencies before
removing the package.

If you want to delete a package only if no other package depends on it,
either remove it from world or use
`emerge -av --depclean package_name`.
The latter has the advantage of also telling you what depends on it.

Regards,
Florian Philipp







  -- 
  好好学习,天天向上!!!


Re: [gentoo-user] laptop screen goes dark in boot

2012-04-22 Thread Michael Scherer
did you look at the logs? if you haven't already looked at them dmesg and 
/var/log/rc.log
have information that could help you pinpoint the problem.
one of the earlier live-cds had that problem and I got around it by starting 
the the cd with
gentoo noacpi nox options though I doubt this can help in your case.
could you provide some more information like the logs, the loader conf files 
and may be
.config of your kernel make?

michael

-- 
Michael Scherer
Univ.klinik f. Psychiatrie
email: michael.sche...@meduniwien.ac.at
phone: +43 6991 941 22 54

  - Original Message - 
  From: Zhang Jun 
  To: gentoo-user 
  Sent: Sunday, 22 April, 2012 08:25
  Subject: [gentoo-user] laptop screen goes dark in boot


  laptop: asus F3TC, amd Turion, NV-go7300
  kernel-3.0.17-r1 tuxonice

  screen goes dark just after I see the linux boot logo,
  when using kernel 2.6.x, I even do not use hotkey to control lcd backlight, 
default light is ok,
  but now, it goes dark, re-compiled kernel many times, but no luck,

  in kernel acpi config page, I did't see the video module, and seems no 
/proc/acpi/video/ .

  is there anyone have met this problem and have solution ?

  thanks!



Re: [gentoo-user] changed motherboard, no AHCI

2012-04-20 Thread Michael Scherer

which motherboard did you buy? it might be interesting to search
for other users' experiences.

michael

--
Michael Scherer
Univ.klinik f. Psychiatrie
email: michael.sche...@meduniwien.ac.at
phone: +43 6991 941 22 54

- Original Message - 
From: Philip Webb purs...@ca.inter.net

To: Gentoo User gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Sent: Friday, 20 April, 2012 11:25
Subject: [gentoo-user] changed motherboard, no AHCI



My motherboard went on the blink earlier this week.
I've now successfully installed a new one,
but now can't get the kernel to find the SATA hard disk (803 etc).

The problem seems to be that the kernel has AHCI enabled,
which was necessary for the old mobo,
but the new one's BIOS doesn't have an option to select AHCI.
The Ubuntu + Mandriva partitions start properly, as does System Rescue,
so the problem has to be in the Gentoo kernel configuration.

(1) Can I simply drop AHCI from the kernel or do I need to do something else ?
(2) Can I recompile the kernel without going thro' a partial re-install
or do I need to do a change-root etc to get it to work ?

Can anyone advise ?

--
,,
SUPPORT ___//___,   Philip Webb
ELECTRIC   /] [] [] [] [] []|   Cities Centre, University of Toronto
TRANSIT`-O--O---'   purslowatchassdotutorontodotca







Re: [gentoo-user]It comes problem when emerge fcitx

2012-04-18 Thread Michael Scherer

the message says
=app-i18n/fcitx-4.2.1 ~x86
which means that the package is masked for x86
if you really need to install it, unmasking the
package should work

michael

--
Michael Scherer
Univ.klinik f. Psychiatrie
email: michael.sche...@meduniwien.ac.at
phone: +43 6991 941 22 54

- Original Message - 
From: Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com

To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Sent: Wednesday, 18 April, 2012 16:23
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user]It comes problem when emerge fcitx



赵佳晖 wrote:

Hello everyone, i just want to install the fcitx in gentoo , but when i
emerge fcitx , it comes the problem, the message are bleow:

* IMPORTANT: 6 news items need reading for repository 'gentoo'.
 * Use eselect news to read news items.


These are the packages that would be merged, in order:

Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild  N~] app-i18n/fcitx-4.2.1  USE=cairo dbus gtk pango -debug
-gtk3 -opencc -qt -table 557 kB

Total: 1 package (1 new), Size of downloads: 557 kB

The following keyword changes are necessary to proceed:
#required by fcitx (argument)
=app-i18n/fcitx-4.2.1 ~x86

Use --autounmask-write to write changes to config files (honoring
CONFIG_PROTECT).

 * IMPORTANT: 6 news items need reading for repository 'gentoo'.
 * Use eselect news to read news items.

How did this happen? i have tried to use --autounmask-write , but it
didn't work, Can anyone help me ?
--
好好学习,天天向上!!!



When you ran it with autounmask-write, did you update the config files?
It looks to me like fcitx is keyworded.

Dale

:-)  :-)

--
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or
how you interpreted my words!

Miss the compile output?  Hint:
EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS=--quiet-build=n







Re: [gentoo-user] USB sticks now mounting on /run/media instead of /media ?

2012-04-18 Thread Michael Scherer

a possibility could be to get the label or UUID of the device.
blkid will give you a list to find out.
you could then enter the device in fstab with either LABEL=label or
UUID=uuid, bypassing the need to use /dev/something, which for USB-disks
might change from one system start to the next

hope I understood your problem correctly

michael

--
Michael Scherer
Univ.klinik f. Psychiatrie
email: michael.sche...@meduniwien.ac.at
phone: +43 6991 941 22 54

- Original Message - 
From: Claudio Roberto França Pereira spide...@gmail.com

To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Sent: Wednesday, 18 April, 2012 19:04
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] USB sticks now mounting on /run/media instead of 
/media ?



How do you mount them automatically? Isn't there a middle-man software
that mounts removable drives? I'm pretty sure I never had a drive
automount without kde or gnome managing them.