Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: [gentoo-user] kernel bug?

2014-07-16 Thread Gmail

I start to use genkernel-next from the upgrade to gnome 3.12 with systemd.

I must repeat: with kernel 3.12.13 no problem, with 3.12.2x kernel 
system block during the ramdisk loading.


I see many discussion about this problem (many without solution again), 
but nothing to solve.


Gentoo Bugzilla ask to me a dmseg where to see the problem's details, 
but when the system freeze don't make any dmesg output.



Il 16/07/2014 05:20, taozhijiang ha scritto:
Yes, genkernel-next should be used. look at the install gentoo gnome 
with systemd from
scratch ( Sorry for currently I can not access Internet so can not 
provide your link)
I have test genkernel-next with systemd (needed by GNOME 3.12), all 
seems OK, with

kernel version 3.15。
But now I am using KDE 4.13 with openRC on ZFS。systemd sometimes 
makes things

strange, I switched to KDE, all seems well currently.
;-)
2014-07-16

Thanks  Best Regards.
陶治江 | TAO Zhijiang
研发处 | SOHO国际产品线
Tel: 3129
Mobile: 18938910923
Email: taozhijiang@tp-link.{net, com.cn}

*发件人:* Jc_García
*发送时间:* 2014-07-16  05:26:08
*收件人:* gentoo-user
*抄送:*
*主题:* Re: [gentoo-user] kernel bug?
2014-07-15 9:38 GMT-06:00 Gmail serverp...@gmail.com:
 My /usr partition in on the / partition.

 I just use initrd, i've compiled kernel with genkernel.

 I'm trying to look row for row if there's some diff.


Are you using genkernel also to generate a the initramfs? for booting
systemd this is not supported by genkernel(tthat's is pointed in the
systemd instalation guide in the wiki), you should be using either
sys-kernel/genkernel-next, or sys-kernel/dracut(this has been the most
widely recommended on this list).




Re: [gentoo-user] kernel bug?

2014-07-15 Thread Gmail
I've checked all many times...
The problem is present again

Anybody has the same problem with kernel 3.12.2x?



Il 15/07/2014 02:47, taozhijiang ha scritto:
 Maybe you should check your grub2 chkconfig whether
 it is OK, especially the real_init filed.
 Suggest if failed again, re-emerge dbus and systemd???
 ;-) I am a new comer...
 2014-07-15
 
 Thanks  Best Regards.
 陶治江 | TAO Zhijiang
 研发处 | SOHO国际产品线
 Tel: 3129
 Mobile: 18938910923
 Email: taozhijiang@tp-link.{net, com.cn}
 
 *发件人:* Gmail
 *发送时间:* 2014-07-14 22:17:57
 *收件人:* gentoo-user
 *抄送:*
 *主题:* [gentoo-user] kernel bug?
 Hi, i've upgraded kernel from 3.12.13 to 3.12.20.
 I've make a oldconfig as usual, but with new kernel the boot blocks at
 the begining to the ramdisk loading.
 I've tried with other 3.12.2x with the same negative results.
 I use grub2 with systemd.



Re: [gentoo-user] kernel bug?

2014-07-15 Thread Alexander Kapshuk
On 07/14/2014 05:18 PM, Gmail wrote:
 Hi, i've upgraded kernel from 3.12.13 to 3.12.20.
 I've make a oldconfig as usual, but with new kernel the boot blocks at
 the begining to the ramdisk loading.
 I've tried with other 3.12.2x with the same negative results.
 I use grub2 with systemd.

Is your '/usr' partition housed on a filesystem of its own, or does it
reside on the '/' partition?

http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Initramfs/HOWTO
For systems where all necessary files and tools reside on the same file
system, the |init| application can perfectly control the further boot
process. But when multiple file systems are defined (or more exotic
installations are done), this might become a bit more tricky:

  * When the /usr partition is on a separate file system, tools and
drivers that have files stored within /usr cannot be used unless
/usr is available. If those tools are needed to make /usr available,
then we cannot boot up the system.

  * If the root file system is encrypted, then the Linux kernel will not
be able to find the |init| application, resulting in an unbootable
system.

The solution for this problem has since long been to use an /initrd/
(initial root device).

Did you run a diff on your 3.12.13/.config and 3.12.13/.config, to make
sure you didn't overlook anything to do with the systemd-related config
options?




Re: [gentoo-user] kernel bug?

2014-07-15 Thread Gmail

My /usr partition in on the / partition.

I just use initrd, i've compiled kernel with genkernel.

I'm trying to look row for row if there's some diff.


Il 15/07/2014 17:34, Alexander Kapshuk ha scritto:

On 07/14/2014 05:18 PM, Gmail wrote:

Hi, i've upgraded kernel from 3.12.13 to 3.12.20.
I've make a oldconfig as usual, but with new kernel the boot blocks 
at the begining to the ramdisk loading.

I've tried with other 3.12.2x with the same negative results.
I use grub2 with systemd.

Is your '/usr' partition housed on a filesystem of its own, or does it 
reside on the '/' partition?


http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Initramfs/HOWTO
For systems where all necessary files and tools reside on the same 
file system, the |init| application can perfectly control the further 
boot process. But when multiple file systems are defined (or more 
exotic installations are done), this might become a bit more tricky:


  * When the /usr partition is on a separate file system, tools and
drivers that have files stored within /usr cannot be used unless
/usr is available. If those tools are needed to make /usr
available, then we cannot boot up the system.

  * If the root file system is encrypted, then the Linux kernel will
not be able to find the |init| application, resulting in an
unbootable system.

The solution for this problem has since long been to use an /initrd/ 
(initial root device).


Did you run a diff on your 3.12.13/.config and 3.12.13/.config, to 
make sure you didn't overlook anything to do with the systemd-related 
config options?







Re: [gentoo-user] kernel bug?

2014-07-15 Thread Alexander Kapshuk
On 07/15/2014 06:38 PM, Gmail wrote:
 My /usr partition in on the / partition.

 I just use initrd, i've compiled kernel with genkernel.

 I'm trying to look row for row if there's some diff.


 Il 15/07/2014 17:34, Alexander Kapshuk ha scritto:
 On 07/14/2014 05:18 PM, Gmail wrote:
 Hi, i've upgraded kernel from 3.12.13 to 3.12.20.
 I've make a oldconfig as usual, but with new kernel the boot blocks
 at the begining to the ramdisk loading.
 I've tried with other 3.12.2x with the same negative results.
 I use grub2 with systemd.

 Is your '/usr' partition housed on a filesystem of its own, or does
 it reside on the '/' partition?

 http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Initramfs/HOWTO
 For systems where all necessary files and tools reside on the same
 file system, the |init| application can perfectly control the further
 boot process. But when multiple file systems are defined (or more
 exotic installations are done), this might become a bit more tricky:

   * When the /usr partition is on a separate file system, tools and
 drivers that have files stored within /usr cannot be used unless
 /usr is available. If those tools are needed to make /usr
 available, then we cannot boot up the system.

   * If the root file system is encrypted, then the Linux kernel will
 not be able to find the |init| application, resulting in an
 unbootable system.

 The solution for this problem has since long been to use an /initrd/
 (initial root device).

 Did you run a diff on your 3.12.13/.config and 3.12.13/.config, to
 make sure you didn't overlook anything to do with the systemd-related
 config options?



Googling for 'gentoo linux kernel gets stuck at ramdisk loading',
returned the following gentoo specific results. See if that helps pin
down the problem:
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-912622-start-0.html
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-7552928.html
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-989210.html
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-7179048.html



Re: [gentoo-user] kernel bug?

2014-07-15 Thread Alexander Kapshuk
On 07/15/2014 06:38 PM, Gmail wrote:
 My /usr partition in on the / partition.

 I just use initrd, i've compiled kernel with genkernel.

 I'm trying to look row for row if there's some diff.


 Il 15/07/2014 17:34, Alexander Kapshuk ha scritto:
 On 07/14/2014 05:18 PM, Gmail wrote:
 Hi, i've upgraded kernel from 3.12.13 to 3.12.20.
 I've make a oldconfig as usual, but with new kernel the boot blocks
 at the begining to the ramdisk loading.
 I've tried with other 3.12.2x with the same negative results.
 I use grub2 with systemd.

 Is your '/usr' partition housed on a filesystem of its own, or does
 it reside on the '/' partition?

 http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Initramfs/HOWTO
 For systems where all necessary files and tools reside on the same
 file system, the |init| application can perfectly control the further
 boot process. But when multiple file systems are defined (or more
 exotic installations are done), this might become a bit more tricky:

   * When the /usr partition is on a separate file system, tools and
 drivers that have files stored within /usr cannot be used unless
 /usr is available. If those tools are needed to make /usr
 available, then we cannot boot up the system.

   * If the root file system is encrypted, then the Linux kernel will
 not be able to find the |init| application, resulting in an
 unbootable system.

 The solution for this problem has since long been to use an /initrd/
 (initial root device).

 Did you run a diff on your 3.12.13/.config and 3.12.13/.config, to
 make sure you didn't overlook anything to do with the systemd-related
 config options?



Did the output you got when generating 'grub.cfg' look similar to this?
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?style=printablefull=1#genkernel

Code Listing 2.3: Generating GRUB2 configuration

# grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub/grub.cfg
Generating grub.cfg ...
Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-3.12.20-gentoo
Found initrd image: /boot/initramfs-genkernel-x86-3.12.20-gentoo
done

The output of the command must mention that at least one Linux image is
found, as those are needed to boot the system. If you use initramfs or
used genkernel to build the kernel, the correct initrd image should be
detected as well. If this is not the case, go to /boot and check the
contents using the ls command. If the files are indeed missing, go back
to the kernel configuration and installation instructions.




Re: [gentoo-user] kernel bug?

2014-07-15 Thread Ivan Viso Altamirano
Maybe you doesn't have enabled systemd support .


2014-07-15 17:05 GMT+00:00 Alexander Kapshuk alexander.kaps...@gmail.com:

  On 07/15/2014 06:38 PM, Gmail wrote:

 My /usr partition in on the / partition.

 I just use initrd, i've compiled kernel with genkernel.

 I'm trying to look row for row if there's some diff.


 Il 15/07/2014 17:34, Alexander Kapshuk ha scritto:

 On 07/14/2014 05:18 PM, Gmail wrote:

 Hi, i've upgraded kernel from 3.12.13 to 3.12.20.
 I've make a oldconfig as usual, but with new kernel the boot blocks at the
 begining to the ramdisk loading.
 I've tried with other 3.12.2x with the same negative results.
 I use grub2 with systemd.

  Is your '/usr' partition housed on a filesystem of its own, or does it
 reside on the '/' partition?

 http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Initramfs/HOWTO
 For systems where all necessary files and tools reside on the same file
 system, the init application can perfectly control the further boot
 process. But when multiple file systems are defined (or more exotic
 installations are done), this might become a bit more tricky:

- When the /usr partition is on a separate file system, tools and
drivers that have files stored within /usr cannot be used unless /usr
is available. If those tools are needed to make /usr available, then
we cannot boot up the system.


- If the root file system is encrypted, then the Linux kernel will not
be able to find the init application, resulting in an unbootable
system.

 The solution for this problem has since long been to use an *initrd*
 (initial root device).

 Did you run a diff on your 3.12.13/.config and 3.12.13/.config, to make
 sure you didn't overlook anything to do with the systemd-related config
 options?



  Did the output you got when generating 'grub.cfg' look similar to this?

 http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?style=printablefull=1#genkernel

   Code Listing 2.3: Generating GRUB2 configuration

 # grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub/grub.cfg
 Generating grub.cfg ...
 Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-3.12.20-gentoo
 Found initrd image: /boot/initramfs-genkernel-x86-3.12.20-gentoo
 done

The output of the command must mention that at least one Linux image
 is found, as those are needed to boot the system. If you use initramfs or
 used genkernel to build the kernel, the correct initrd image should be
 detected as well. If this is not the case, go to /boot and check the
 contents using the ls command. If the files are indeed missing, go back
 to the kernel configuration and installation instructions.




Re: [gentoo-user] kernel bug?

2014-07-15 Thread Jc García
2014-07-15 9:38 GMT-06:00 Gmail serverp...@gmail.com:
 My /usr partition in on the / partition.

 I just use initrd, i've compiled kernel with genkernel.

 I'm trying to look row for row if there's some diff.


Are you using genkernel also to generate a the initramfs? for booting
systemd this is not supported by genkernel(tthat's is pointed in the
systemd instalation guide in the wiki), you should be using either
sys-kernel/genkernel-next, or sys-kernel/dracut(this has been the most
widely recommended on this list).



[gentoo-user] Re: Re: [gentoo-user] kernel bug?

2014-07-15 Thread taozhijiang
Yes, genkernel-next should be used. look at the install gentoo gnome with 
systemd from 
scratch ( Sorry for currently I can not access Internet so can not provide your 
link)
I have test genkernel-next with systemd (needed by GNOME 3.12), all seems OK, 
with
kernel version 3.15。
But now I am using KDE 4.13 with openRC on ZFS。systemd sometimes makes things 
strange, I switched to KDE, all seems well currently.  
 
;-)

2014-07-16 



Thanks  Best Regards.

陶治江 | TAO Zhijiang
研发处 | SOHO国际产品线
Tel: 3129
Mobile: 18938910923
Email:   taozhijiang@tp-link.{net, com.cn}





发件人: Jc_García 
发送时间: 2014-07-16  05:26:08 
收件人: gentoo-user 
抄送: 
主题: Re: [gentoo-user] kernel bug? 
 
2014-07-15 9:38 GMT-06:00 Gmail serverp...@gmail.com:
 My /usr partition in on the / partition.

 I just use initrd, i've compiled kernel with genkernel.

 I'm trying to look row for row if there's some diff.


Are you using genkernel also to generate a the initramfs? for booting
systemd this is not supported by genkernel(tthat's is pointed in the
systemd instalation guide in the wiki), you should be using either
sys-kernel/genkernel-next, or sys-kernel/dracut(this has been the most
widely recommended on this list).


[gentoo-user] kernel bug?

2014-07-14 Thread Gmail

Hi, i've upgraded kernel from 3.12.13 to 3.12.20.
I've make a oldconfig as usual, but with new kernel the boot blocks at 
the begining to the ramdisk loading.

I've tried with other 3.12.2x with the same negative results.
I use grub2 with systemd.



Re: [gentoo-user] kernel bug?

2014-07-14 Thread taozhijiang
Maybe you should check your grub2 chkconfig whether 
it is OK, especially the real_init  filed.
Suggest if failed again, re-emerge dbus and systemd???

;-) I am a new comer...

2014-07-15 



Thanks  Best Regards.

陶治江 | TAO Zhijiang
研发处 | SOHO国际产品线
Tel: 3129
Mobile: 18938910923
Email:   taozhijiang@tp-link.{net, com.cn}





发件人: Gmail 
发送时间: 2014-07-14  22:17:57 
收件人: gentoo-user 
抄送: 
主题: [gentoo-user] kernel bug? 
 
Hi, i've upgraded kernel from 3.12.13 to 3.12.20.
I've make a oldconfig as usual, but with new kernel the boot blocks at 
the begining to the ramdisk loading.
I've tried with other 3.12.2x with the same negative results.
I use grub2 with systemd.


[gentoo-user] Kernel Bug acpi-cpufreq?

2011-06-21 Thread 4k3nd0

Hi guys,

since some time, my Laptop switch the CPU-Freq very strange. It turns 
down under high load. I detected this error under 3 different Linux 
Distribution.


I'm not sure about it, so i asking: Has someone else with a Intel Core2 
CPU T5600 that kind of problem?


Greeting's Akendo



Re: [gentoo-user] Kernel BUG

2008-11-04 Thread David Relson
On Tue, 4 Nov 2008 11:33:09 -0200
Jorge Peixoto de Morais Neto wrote:

 
  For about a week, my workstation has been crashing every day or so.
  Typically it happens late at night while BackupPC is backing up a
  hard drive. With tail -F /var/log/messages running I saw EXT3
  mentioned a few days ago and started suspecting a hard drive
  problem.

... [snip]

 
   Is there a better way to capture the full BUG output???
   Once I have the full BUG output, what's the next useful thing to
  do?
 
 
  join the lkml (linux kernel mailing list) and let them know about
  it?
 
 
 For a patched kernel like gentoo-sources, wouldn't it be appropriate
 better to file a bug report at Gentoo's bugzilla?

At the moment I'm trying to capture the full BUG output.  Once I have
that, I'll report it and (likely) switch to a different kernel
version with hopes of having a reliable system once again.


David



Re: [gentoo-user] Kernel BUG

2008-11-04 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Dienstag 04 November 2008, David Relson wrote:
 On Tue, 4 Nov 2008 11:33:09 -0200

 Jorge Peixoto de Morais Neto wrote:
   For about a week, my workstation has been crashing every day or so.
   Typically it happens late at night while BackupPC is backing up a
   hard drive. With tail -F /var/log/messages running I saw EXT3
   mentioned a few days ago and started suspecting a hard drive
   problem.

 ... [snip]

Is there a better way to capture the full BUG output???
Once I have the full BUG output, what's the next useful thing to
   do?
  
   join the lkml (linux kernel mailing list) and let them know about
   it?
 
  For a patched kernel like gentoo-sources, wouldn't it be appropriate
  better to file a bug report at Gentoo's bugzilla?

 At the moment I'm trying to capture the full BUG output.  Once I have
 that, I'll report it and (likely) switch to a different kernel
 version with hopes of having a reliable system once again.


 David

install vanilla-sources.
if crash happens again, report to lkml. Joining is not necessary nor 
recommended.




Re: [gentoo-user] Kernel BUG

2008-11-04 Thread Hazen Valliant-Saunders
join the lkml (linux kernel mailing list) and let them know about it?

On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 7:43 AM, David Relson [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:

 For about a week, my workstation has been crashing every day or so.
 Typically it happens late at night while BackupPC is backing up a hard
 drive. With tail -F /var/log/messages running I saw EXT3 mentioned a
 few days ago and started suspecting a hard drive problem.

 Last night it happened again.  This time my tail ... window was
 opened full screen so I saw all the messages and know more.  Here's
 part of what I wrote down (until I got tired of writing):

  BUG unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 008
  IP   ff8027ce14 free_block+0xb4/0x160
  PGD 11b638067 PUD 11b631067 PMD 0
  Oops 0002[1]SMP
  ...
  Call Trace
 8027cac0 cache_flusharray+0x60/0xe0
 8027cc46 kmem_cache_free

 I'm running a 2.6.25-gentoo-r7

 To learn more about what's happening (and to more easily record
 all the kernel messages), I'm now running tail -F /var/log/messages
 from a second machine (via an SSH session).

 Questions:

  Is there a better way to capture the full BUG output???
  Once I have the full BUG output, what's the next useful thing to do?

 Thanks!

 David





-- 
Hazen Valliant-Saunders
IT/IS Consultant
(613) 355-5977


Re: [gentoo-user] Kernel BUG

2008-11-04 Thread Jorge Peixoto de Morais Neto

 For about a week, my workstation has been crashing every day or so.
 Typically it happens late at night while BackupPC is backing up a hard
 drive. With tail -F /var/log/messages running I saw EXT3 mentioned a
 few days ago and started suspecting a hard drive problem.

 Last night it happened again.  This time my tail ... window was
 opened full screen so I saw all the messages and know more.  Here's
 part of what I wrote down (until I got tired of writing):

  BUG unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 008
  IP   ff8027ce14 free_block+0xb4/0x160
  PGD 11b638067 PUD 11b631067 PMD 0
  Oops 0002[1]SMP
  ...
  Call Trace
 8027cac0 cache_flusharray+0x60/0xe0
 8027cc46 kmem_cache_free

 I'm running a 2.6.25-gentoo-r7

 To learn more about what's happening (and to more easily record
 all the kernel messages), I'm now running tail -F /var/log/messages
 from a second machine (via an SSH session).

 Questions:

  Is there a better way to capture the full BUG output???
  Once I have the full BUG output, what's the next useful thing to do?


 join the lkml (linux kernel mailing list) and let them know about it?


For a patched kernel like gentoo-sources, wouldn't it be appropriate
better to file a bug report at Gentoo's bugzilla?



Re: [gentoo-user] Kernel BUG

2008-11-04 Thread Zhang Le
On 07:43 Tue 04 Nov , David Relson wrote:
...
 
 Questions:  
 
   Is there a better way to capture the full BUG output???
   Once I have the full BUG output, what's the next useful thing to do?

Chances are the bug has already been fixed in later version.
Before you send the bug report, I suggest you to try a more recent version and
see if the bug disappears.

If you are interested in find the cause yourself, you can take a look at this:
/usr/src/linux/Documentation/oops-tracing.txt

Zhang, Le



[gentoo-user] Kernel BUG

2008-11-04 Thread David Relson
For about a week, my workstation has been crashing every day or so.
Typically it happens late at night while BackupPC is backing up a hard
drive. With tail -F /var/log/messages running I saw EXT3 mentioned a
few days ago and started suspecting a hard drive problem.

Last night it happened again.  This time my tail ... window was
opened full screen so I saw all the messages and know more.  Here's
part of what I wrote down (until I got tired of writing): 

  BUG unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 008
  IP   ff8027ce14 free_block+0xb4/0x160
  PGD 11b638067 PUD 11b631067 PMD 0
  Oops 0002[1]SMP
  ...
  Call Trace
 8027cac0 cache_flusharray+0x60/0xe0
 8027cc46 kmem_cache_free

I'm running a 2.6.25-gentoo-r7

To learn more about what's happening (and to more easily record
all the kernel messages), I'm now running tail -F /var/log/messages
from a second machine (via an SSH session).  

Questions:  

  Is there a better way to capture the full BUG output???
  Once I have the full BUG output, what's the next useful thing to do?

Thanks!

David




Re: [gentoo-user] kernel BUG when unplugging usb?

2008-02-14 Thread Sascha Hlusiak
Am Donnerstag 14 Februar 2008 07:12:48 schrieb Iain Buchanan:
 Hi all,

 When I unplug my usb mouse and keyboard for longer than a few seconds
 (not sure of the exact time, but must be more than, say, 5 seconds) I
 get a BUG message in dmesg.  When I plug them back in, they don't work!

 I just tried to unload  reload usb-hid, but modprobe locked up on the
 reload.  It appears the only way to fix it is to reboot.

 This happens with tuxonice sources 2.6.23-r9 but never happened with
 2.6.22.* or earlier.
That bug is known (search with google), it's a race condition because of 
proper locking in the kernel in the evdev code.

It's fixed in 2.6.24.


Sascha


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


[gentoo-user] kernel BUG when unplugging usb?

2008-02-13 Thread Iain Buchanan
Hi all,

When I unplug my usb mouse and keyboard for longer than a few seconds
(not sure of the exact time, but must be more than, say, 5 seconds) I
get a BUG message in dmesg.  When I plug them back in, they don't work!

I just tried to unload  reload usb-hid, but modprobe locked up on the
reload.  It appears the only way to fix it is to reboot.

This happens with tuxonice sources 2.6.23-r9 but never happened with
2.6.22.* or earlier.

Here's the dmesg output:

usb 3-2: USB disconnect, address 5
usb 2-1: USB disconnect, address 4
BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 00100100
 printing eip:
c029e85c
*pde = 4b79c067
Oops:  [#1]
PREEMPT SMP 
Modules linked in: ndiswrapper rndis_host cdc_ether usbnet rfcomm l2cap
ntfs smbfs vfat fat autofs4 snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer_oss snd_seq_oss
snd_seq_midi_event snd_seq snd_seq_device i8k usbhid ohci1394 ieee1394
hci_usb b44 snd_intel8x0 yenta_socket rsrc_nonstatic snd_ac97_codec
ac97_bus snd_pcm ehci_hcd irda fglrx(P) pcmcia_core uhci_hcd usbcore
snd_timer crc_ccitt snd_page_alloc
CPU:0
EIP:0060:[c029e85c]Tainted: PVLI
EFLAGS: 00010206   (2.6.23-tuxonice-r9 #6)
EIP is at evdev_disconnect+0x5b/0x96
eax:    ebx: 000ffcf0   ecx:    edx: f7cb8aa0
esi: f7062c00   edi: f7062c5c   ebp: f7062600   esp: f7645e8c
ds: 007b   es: 007b   fs: 00d8  gs:   ss: 0068
Process khubd (pid: 1350, ti=f7644000 task=c1b2f000 task.ti=f7644000)
Stack:  dd278800 dd278f98 ecc9f000 c029cc42  c7a4b000
ecc9f000 
   0202 ee8edca0 ecc9fc58 c02aeabd c7a4b01c c7a4b000 ecc9f000
f92d32a9 
   f7062600 f706261c f92d8140 ee087458 f92a91ff f706261c f92d8178
 
Call Trace:
 [c029cc42] input_unregister_device+0x67/0xfc
 [c02aeabd] hidinput_disconnect+0x2e/0x47
 [f92d32a9] hid_disconnect+0x76/0xce [usbhid]
 [f92a91ff] usb_unbind_interface+0x2d/0x6e [usbcore]
 [c026b148] __device_release_driver+0x71/0x8e
 [c026b4d0] device_release_driver+0x1e/0x34
 [c026ab46] bus_remove_device+0x5e/0x6c
 [c0269673] device_del+0x19e/0x212
 [f92a6f61] usb_disable_device+0x5c/0xbb [usbcore]
 [f92a3ab0] usb_disconnect+0x83/0xe6 [usbcore]
 [f92a411a] hub_thread+0x319/0x9ff [usbcore]
 [c0325dd9] __sched_text_start+0x589/0x5b7
 [c013060c] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x35
 [f92a3e01] hub_thread+0x0/0x9ff [usbcore]
 [c013053d] kthread+0x38/0x5f
 [c0130505] kthread+0x0/0x5f
 [c0104adf] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
 ===
Code: e8 6d d2 ff ff 8b 5e 54 eb 1b 8d 83 08 04 00 00 b9 06 00 02 00 ba
1d 00 00 00 e8 0b 3d ed ff 8b 9b 10 04 00 00 81 eb 10 04 00 00 8b 83
10 04 00 00 0f 18 00 90 8d 93 10 04 00 00 8d 46 54 39 c2 
EIP: [c029e85c] evdev_disconnect+0x5b/0x96 SS:ESP 0068:f7645e8c
atkbd.c: Unknown key pressed (translated set 2, code 0x86 on
isa0060/serio0).
atkbd.c: Use 'setkeycodes e006 keycode' to make it known.
atkbd.c: Unknown key pressed (translated set 2, code 0x86 on
isa0060/serio0).
atkbd.c: Use 'setkeycodes e006 keycode' to make it known.
atkbd.c: Unknown key pressed (translated set 2, code 0x86 on
isa0060/serio0).
atkbd.c: Use 'setkeycodes e006 keycode' to make it known.
atkbd.c: Unknown key pressed (translated set 2, code 0x86 on
isa0060/serio0).
atkbd.c: Use 'setkeycodes e006 keycode' to make it known.
atkbd.c: Unknown key pressed (translated set 2, code 0x86 on
isa0060/serio0).
atkbd.c: Use 'setkeycodes e006 keycode' to make it known.
atkbd.c: Unknown key pressed (translated set 2, code 0x86 on
isa0060/serio0).
atkbd.c: Use 'setkeycodes e006 keycode' to make it known.
atkbd.c: Unknown key pressed (translated set 2, code 0x86 on
isa0060/serio0).
atkbd.c: Use 'setkeycodes e006 keycode' to make it known.


Strange as it sounds, I haven't had much experience with these- where do
I start looking?

thanks,
-- 
Iain Buchanan iaindb at netspace dot net dot au

The gates in my computer are AND, OR and NOT; they are not Bill.

-- 
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list