[google-appengine] Locked out of my Domain, and Getting a run-around
So I've been using Appengine since it's inception. As soon as domains were made available I got one. My app is tiny and little used, but I keep it active for the few who use it. Today I got my yearly notice about domain renewal. No biggie, other than my Credit card recently expired and I need to enter the new information. But what should be a simple task has become anything but. I follow the link to renew my payment info: https://support.google.com/a/answer/1218673 I click on the Google Admin console link there, and takes me to another page to log into https://admin.google.com/. Guess what, it says you have to have a business account. I don't have a business account, and I don't have a business. I just want to update my payment info to pay 10 bucks to renew my domain. No problem, says some other pages after some research. Domain management has been moved to the Developer Console. So I go to the console, and it doesn't even recognize I have a custom domain. It says "Prove you own your domain with easy steps..." So what are the steps? Add CNAME or TXT record to your domain. ... Sure I could do that, but I access the domain through my Google Apps account. The one that doesn't exist anymore... I go to Enom to try to recover some kind of access there, but guess what, they offer no support, because the domain was sold through a reseller... Google. And they say to log into Google for Business... SO I'm right back where I started. With no way to update my credit card to pay a 10 dollar renewal on a rinky-dink domain. Google sure did shaft me good. Thanks. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-appengine/fcc28c28-8f4a-4ac9-9390-cc23359dd97d%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[google-appengine] Re: One senses GAE is just not a major priority for Google
Disagree whole-heartedly. GAE has always been highly reliable, despite some early growing pains. Every system has platform specific quirks; name one that doesn't. And as for Python 2.5 being 'old', i could care less. The point is to get jobs done, not brag about version numbers. 2.5 was more than fine to do anything imaginable. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[google-appengine] Re: GAE SDK Release announcements ???
Thanks for the head's up. Here i thought we were just getting a break from the constant updating. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [google-appengine] BANNED PLS !! https://absentis64.appspot.com/www.evdenevenakliyatfirmalari.pro/
It's not copying your site's content. it's a proxy. it just redirects requests to *any site* through their site. the content being viewed is still coming from your site. For example. you can change the URL on the end to any other site on the internet. Try this for instance: https://absentis64.appspot.com/www.google.com or https://absentis64.appspot.com/www.whitehouse.gov As you can see, it just proxies to the site you put on the end. But anyway, I see you have taken the advice and blocked your page from viewing through the proxy. On Monday, February 17, 2014 6:14:11 PM UTC-8, kişisel Pazar wrote: belong to me How can I copy my site's content without my permission? The purpose of this site is to jerk.. google has banned my website.. I do not understand why this site do not banned?.. not only me but everyone is leaving in the lurch!!.. This site is officially a spam site .. Pull me publishes all pages and google site is making my place.. :@@ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
[google-appengine] Re: App engine examples and documentation suck -Don't waste your time
works fine for me. I guess it's just you. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
[google-appengine] Re: Wait, what? App Engine doesn't work with latest version of WordPress?
On Saturday, November 30, 2013 7:47:58 AM UTC-8, OC2PS wrote: Looks like App Engine has trouble with WordPress 3.7.1 http://wordpress.org/support/topic/trouble-running-local-wordpress-in-google-app-engine This is terrible especially as WordPress have decided that they will start automatically updating WordPress without human intervention! Just find the code doing the auto-update and delete/disable it. They really shouldn't be doing that, as systems can be delicate and altering versions without permission is a recipe for disaster. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [google-appengine] Puzzled by promotion of Go for high performance web serving
Sounds like the typical Hipster mentality. They created Go so they could say they wrote in a language that's not mainstream. :) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: Master/Slave Datastore Deprecation Question
I base that on my interpretation of Google's Depreciation policy: https://developers.google.com/appengine/terms Section 7.3 The original terms at the time of the Master/Slave depreciation was for 3 years, so I believe Google still has to honor that timeframe. But after that time is up, They are under no obligation to continue to offer or support the Master/Slave datastore. I wouldn't make any bets on it continuing to operate. As for the read/write issues, I found the simplest way to handle it is to make good use of Memcache. Store any new data writes in Memcache, and check Memcache before doing any Datastore reads. This way you'll always get the latest data. On Thursday, May 2, 2013 1:36:54 PM UTC-7, John Wheeler wrote: Hi Darien, Can you point me to the documentation or information that explains that it will 'cease to exist'? Are you just assuming that or did you read that from a reliable source? Thanks, John On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Darien Caldwell darien@gmail.comjavascript: wrote: It's already depreciated. It will cease to exist when the deadline arrives. On Wednesday, May 1, 2013 9:16:07 PM UTC-7, John Wheeler wrote: When the master slave datastore becomes deprecated, does that mean Google will shut down applications that are using it or just stop supporting it? If it's the latter, what exactly does that mean? For example, will the Master/Slave maintenance periods stop where they flush the memcache or whatever? John -- You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/google-appengine/3SymDhYn7mA/unsubscribe?hl=en . To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to google-appengi...@googlegroups.com javascript:. To post to this group, send email to google-a...@googlegroups.comjavascript: . Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en . For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
[google-appengine] Re: Master/Slave Datastore Deprecation Question
It's already depreciated. It will cease to exist when the deadline arrives. On Wednesday, May 1, 2013 9:16:07 PM UTC-7, John Wheeler wrote: When the master slave datastore becomes deprecated, does that mean Google will shut down applications that are using it or just stop supporting it? If it's the latter, what exactly does that mean? For example, will the Master/Slave maintenance periods stop where they flush the memcache or whatever? John -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
[google-appengine] GAE Dev Environment issue (since 1.7.6)
I keep having a strange issue, and I'm really unclear as to the cause. When Dev Environment 1.7.6 came out, I made the switch from Pyton 2.5 to Python 2.7. In the course of using 1.7.6 I kept encountering this issue: C:\Program Files (x86)\Google\google_appengine\slconductor_27manage.py appcfg update Running on Kay-3.0.0 Traceback (most recent call last): File C:\Program Files (x86)\Google\google_appengine\slconductor_27\manage.py , line 19, in module from kay.management import * File C:\Program Files (x86)\Google\google_appengine\slconductor_27\kay\management\__init__.py, line 30, in module from kay.management.test import do_runtest File C:\Program Files (x86)\Google\google_appengine\slconductor_27\kay\management\test.py, line 38, in module from google.appengine.api import urlfetch_stub File C:\Program Files (x86)\Google\google_appengine\google\appengine\api\urlfetch_stub.py, line 33, in module _fancy_urllib_InvalidCertException = fancy_urllib.InvalidCertificateException AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'InvalidCertificateException' I finally figured out the issue was caused by an empty __init__.py file in C:\Program Files (x86)\Google\google_appengine\lib\fancy_urllib The actual library is in C:\Program Files (x86)\Google\google_appengine\lib\fancy_urllib\fancy_urllib for some reason. Deleting the empty file gets the library to load. I figured it was just an install error, but upon installing 1.7.7 Dev environment, the empty file was put back in place, causing the error to return. So I'm unclear why the installer keeps putting this empty file so that the library can't be loaded. I should probably add I'm running the environment on Windows 7. Any ideas? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
[google-appengine] Re: Important for Python developers - Updates to the Development Server in 1.7.6
On Tuesday, March 19, 2013 5:57:02 PM UTC-7, Andrew Jessup wrote: Python 2.5 applications are no longer officially supported on the new Development Server in line with our deprecation announcement (although they may still be run) I must have missed that notification. I know 2.7 was brought online, but I've seen nothing to indicate 2.5 was being depreciated or removed. Where/when was this announcement? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
[google-appengine] Re: How to move data reliably from front to backends ?
Memcache? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/UapcKANoMK8J. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: 1.7.0 Prerelease Now Available
On Monday, June 18, 2012 5:00:23 PM UTC-7, Marce (Google) wrote: - The total size of all application versions is now limited to 1 GB. In the future, you'll be able to purchase additional storage for your application code. I assume this means a visible quota will be added; right now I have no earthly idea how much room my applications use. Also does this count the compiled *.pyc files in addition to the application files uploaded? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/3HTIKAKhaukJ. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: We NEED a GAE CoffeeMaker API when our local supplies are depleted
If google was charging people for fresh coffee, I would agree this is needed. As it is they are only charging for hosting, so they should probably stick to APIs related to that. Like, hmm, I don't know, an API to notify when you're running out of quota. ^.^ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/unovGfa2LgEJ. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: BadRequestError: app s~helixchewer cannot access app helixchewer's data during create_bulkloader_config
I just ran into this issue. Seems it's still unresolved a year later. :\ On Thursday, March 3, 2011 11:21:56 AM UTC-8, Ikai L (Google) wrote: I talked to Jamie about this and there's a bug filed in the issues tracker: http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=4671 Ikai Lan Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine Blog: http://googleappengine.blogspot.com Twitter: http://twitter.com/app_engine Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Jamie H ja...@mhztech.com wrote: the s~ is affecting what email address I can send email from. I am now forced to use no-reply@s~APP-ID.appspotmail.com which as far as I know is not an RFC valid email address On Jan 24, 3:21 pm, Ikai Lan (Google) ikai.l+gro...@google.com wrote: Yes, that is the goal. The s~ should not appear anywhere with the exception of maybe the admin-console. If it's required anywhere else, that is a bug we should address. -- Ikai Lan Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine Blogger:http://googleappengine.blogspot.com Reddit:http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine Twitter:http://twitter.com/app_engine On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 2:12 AM, Waldemar Kornewald wkornew...@gmail.comwrote: Will this be fixed, so it's transparent? From an end-user point of view there is no reason to have such a distinction. It only complicates everything and people are sending me bug reports about the remote API not working with Django-nonrel when they use the high-replication datastore. In case the s~ prefix will stay, how can I detect this in Django-nonrel if I only know the normal appid and the user doesn't manually specify that his app uses the HR datastore? Bye, Waldemar -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com google-appengine%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/SYqsODK_A_wJ. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: First Tutorial On GAE Python Is Up
On Jan 22, 4:12 am, Brandon Wirtz drak...@digerat.com wrote: a video like this will make about $8 over its life time. How does it make anything? There's no ads on it. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: HRD migration tool now available!
I'm still not clear about the domain through Google Apps that points to the application. Does this tool switch the domain over too? Or does that have to be done manually? And if manually, how do you do it? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Google Bot Is Your Enemy
Nice, so basically Google is using their own service to tack on additional charges to your bill. Doesn't sound ethical. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Should Google deprecate Master/Slave data store option?
On Aug 17, 5:24 am, Joshua Smith joshuaesm...@charter.net wrote: I certainly hope they don't deprecate M/S, unless/until the following issues are addressed: I agree. It would also be nice if there was some documentation detailing some of the things people tend to gloss over. Like - used my app to initialize the data (this will be problematic for some), - had google point the old app id to the new app id. A bit too much like ??? Profit for my taste. Maybe the tool Ikai mentioned will resolve most of that. Until then, M/S is where I'll stay. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Receiving mail at appspotmail.com. Message size limits, address filtering, spam protection?
On Jun 2, 7:54 am, J C ciho...@gmail.com wrote: Security through obscurity is really the only way? You make it sound like a bad thing. All security is through obscurity. Even RSA encryption is only as good as not knowing the key to decode it. Whoever started that Security through Obscurity is no security at all meme did a whole generation a bad service. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: So Tell Me About GO
On May 12, 8:17 pm, stevep prosse...@gmail.com wrote: Point of emphasis: Google's execs have a fiduciary responsibility to make decisions they believe will best benefit shareholders, not small developers. How does running off all the developers benefit the shareholders? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Is App Engine suddenly becoming more expensive???
The funny thing is, I think Google, and a lot of other people, have forgotten what Cloud Computing was started for. It was because large companies (like Google) had a lot of hardware which is necessary to handle the loads their services require, but which don't always work at full capacity. They spend varying amounts of time idle. The idea was to A) allow people to utilize this idle time for something productive, and B) allow said Big Company to recoup some costs associated with powering and maintaining all of this hardware which isn't being utilized 100%. key word is 'recoup'. It seems to me a lot of companies are looking to 'cash in' rather than 'recoup'. The hardware and infrastructure is sitting there, effectively 'for free' because Google requires it to run it's business. Charging anything more that what it costs to develop and maintain the API and associated administration is going beyond this for the profit motive, plain and simple. All of the hardware/electricity/ Network Administration is already being paid for (in spades) by all of the profits Google reaps from all of it's various enterprises, that all run off the same machinery. The question is, is this what Google is doing? Is the pricing beyond what it costs to make GAE available to the public? I don't think anyone knows, except Google. But I wouldn't be surprised if they have lost sight of the original motivation for all of this was, Conservation, not Profit. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Google should want to provide messaging in App Engine
Well, Brandon happens to be right. You can add any kind of messaging to GAE you want. Or anything else, for that matter. And GAE already does support XMPP, which is a messaging system, and a very widely adopted and robust, and open one at that. Basically the OP doesn't want to get with the times and doesn't want to do any work. Make a JMS system for GAE. Someone with your credentials should be able to do that, right? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Any past scenarios of data getting lost?
I'd really be surprised if there is any service in the history of mankind that promises 0% loss of data. Maybe there is, but I bet it's incredibly expensive. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Any past scenarios of data getting lost?
Hm, for 10k a monuth i'll etch the data on gold disks, and send it on a 'voyage' into deep space. In the unlikely event of cosmic catastrophe or alien intervention, a backup of the backup will be retrieved from Brandon's service (which we will utilize as a private sub-contractor). How's that for data safety? On May 2, 2:07 pm, Brandon Wirtz drak...@digerat.com wrote: I will promise 0% loss of your data. Prices are affordable, but availability is low :-) Similar towww.cdninabox.comI'm proud to announcewww.backupinabox.com unlike CDN in a box which is powered by Google's High Replication Appengine Backup in a Box literally is a box and we stick your backups as printed paper in a box. Place that box in a water tight safe, and drop it in a lake. We don't tell you or anyone which lake, or where in the lake, and the lake is actually a sewage treatment plant, so it is really very safe. Be secure in knowing your data is backed up and will never be destroyed. Pricing starts at $500 a month for storage. Restoring your backed up data is priced on demand based on the need, the speed at which you need restoration to occur, and if the lake is frozen over at the time you need restoration. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: Ang.: RE: RE: [google-appengine] Advantages of GAE
On Apr 25, 12:37 pm, nickmilon nickmi...@gmail.com wrote: One major advantage of GAE it is that is more green than alternatives. Charging by resource usage (cpu cycles, bandwidth etc) forces us to energy efficient programming style. Also I am sure G datacenters are much more efficient than someone's LAMP stack. The Mercury News just recently had an article about this: http://www.mercurynews.com/green-energy/ci_17900411 Some of Google's datacenters are very 'green'. Some are not. In some locales there's just no alternatives to be had. But it's good to see an Industry Wide attempt to make datacenters greener, at any rate. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Startup Weekend and Google App Engine
On Apr 14, 3:44 pm, Jeff Schnitzer j...@infohazard.org wrote: The idea of getting technology mandates from a VC strikes me as not so different from a chef getting preparation instructions from the guy who drives the SYSCO truck. Well said. :) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Startup Weekend and Google App Engine
Frankly this whole argument is silly. Apple started with something they cobbled together themselves from spare parts. Google started with their own proprietary software, BackRub, which was written in Java and Python and ran on Linux. They didn't have anyone to help them, and they succeeded. Anyone using GAE, AWS, or anything period, has just as much a chance to succeed, or fail, based on the merit of their *idea*. It's the destination that is important, quibbling over how you get there is non-productive. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Startup Weekend and Google App Engine
haha. from this article google dredged up from that query (http:// alllooksame.com/?p=600) I’m not exactly sure why this shift in sentiment is happening but I believe it started after the Dotcom bust. Many “great” ideas never saw the light of day, and everyone realized the limitations of “great ideas”. Not just that, the Internet made it very easy to search and find the same or similar ideas that other people came up with. If you have a “great idea”, you just have to Google it, and chances are, someone else has already beat you to it. That doesn't invalidate great ideas in the least. It just shows many startups aren't original. The author aptly put great and great ideas in quotes, because they aren't in that form. A great idea will succeed. A 'me too' probably will not, even if executed well. If a VC doesn't have the capacity to tell a truely great idea from a great idea (that's already been done), well, they are in the wrong line of business. Of course there are many other factors involved, but this isn't a venue for discussing VC funding strategies etc. And yes, I'm 100% Engineer, and proud of it. :) On Apr 13, 1:39 pm, Jeff Schnitzer j...@infohazard.org wrote: At risk of dragging this on... Ask any VC what they think about the relative merits of Idea and Execution. Or ask Google: http://www.google.com/search?q=idea+vs+execution Jeff On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Darien Caldwell darien.caldw...@gmail.com wrote: Frankly this whole argument is silly. Apple started with something they cobbled together themselves from spare parts. Google started with their own proprietary software, BackRub, which was written in Java and Python and ran on Linux. They didn't have anyone to help them, and they succeeded. Anyone using GAE, AWS, or anything period, has just as much a chance to succeed, or fail, based on the merit of their *idea*. It's the destination that is important, quibbling over how you get there is non-productive. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Delete entry from list via production Data Viewer
I use lists for user data and I have to say I've yet to find a way to modify lists via the datastore viewer. I think Google rightly prevents this, as a list can potentially be a thousand or more items long. But I still wish there was a way to do this for shorter lists. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: How to block Google App Engine?
If you care so little about search engine rank, that you're willing to block all search engines, why block them at all? Let them rank you badly, or well, or basically what would it matter, if you don't care about it? Maybe if you more clearly defined this sentence, it would make sense: polluted entries (e.g. certain queries) are used as a vector tampering with other, external properties Give concrete examples. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: is it possible that repeated task executions happen in parallel ?
Well the fact that I said I have seen it happen should be sufficient. Believe me, I wouldn't have bothered with all the rewrites if it didn't. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: is it possible that repeated task executions happen in parallel ?
It's rare, but possible. I've seen it happen on my site a couple times. I originally didn't plan for it, but made some adjustments to accommodate the situation. Idempotence is of course the key. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: The Image Service API needs help badly!
On Mar 20, 4:12 pm, Brandon Wirtz drak...@digerat.com wrote: Your issue is mostly a rant. You will get better results posting I can't figure out how to do X, I have Tried Y, but it return Z. Please help I guess one man's rant is another man's constructive feedback. All I see is someone listing the things they wish the service would do. That's hardly a rant. IF you want to see a rant, just get me started on how people seem to think they need to control how others express themselves on message boards, that they don't even own or operate. :) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: About the usage of GAE
There are many frameworks, such as Kay (http://code.google.com/p/kay- framework/) that support private authentication. Being accessed by Iphone/Ipad etc, is all up to you and how you design your site. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: HR Vs. Master-Slave Comparison. Is it worth extra cost?
On Mar 4, 12:48 pm, Jeff Schwartz jefftschwa...@gmail.com wrote: HR is obviously the chosen path and to ignore that is, well, foolish. I think this is part of the problem too. Until today, I was never aware there was a path to choose. Master/Slave always there, and worked fine (at least from my perspective). HR was introduced as an alternative, for people with Mission Critical needs. That is how it was introduced, as an alternative, not as a replacement. Then suddenly it's Master slave = bad out of left field. It's understandable people may be shocked/confused. Until today I never understood HR to be the new, better way. But now that I've been awakened to the writing on the wall for Master/ Slave, I guess I'll have to start looking at HR more seriously. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: HR Vs. Master-Slave Comparison. Is it worth extra cost?
I'm kind of disappointed with Google's recent attitude change. When master/slave was all there was, it was deemed 'production worthy'. Now suddenly it's If you are running a production service, you should not use Master/Slave datastore. Ever. Given that the HR datastore has some pretty big problems from a user perspective (costs 3 times more, only supports Eventual consistency), it's not really feasable to use for production code in *every* instance. So I'm very disappointed to hear these kinds of comments coming from Google. You shouldn't make something, then complain when people use it. If you don't want people using Master/Slave, maybe you should remove it. To berate customers for preferring an option you *provide* is just mind blowing. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: AOL federated ID
Well, i think the word 'opaque' in the URL is a clue. It seems they are providing an OpenID identifier, but at the same time hiding the actual ID. probably to prevent spammers from using the email portion to send spam. I would say intentional. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Problem about indexes and floats
This part explains the problem: NeedIndexError: The built-in indices are not efficient enough for this query and your data. Please add a composite index for this query. This query needs this index: - kind: Country properties: - name: country_code - name: government_tax Without an Index defined, GAE can do relatively simple queries. But apparently '0.5' must return a lot of results. So GAE is telling you that you need to define a specific index for that type of query. Put that information into your index.yaml file, update the app, and wait a few hours for the index to build. More info here: http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/config/indexconfig.html -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Upcoming changes to Task Queues
It's kind of humorous you guys ended up here with that question. The error message is related to the service that 'app' was written on, and not an error with the App itself. It should clear up on it's own. The person who wrote the 'app' shouldn't be passing that message on to end users, as it's obviously confusing. You should be directing your questions to the creator of the App, not Google. They didn't make the app. Obviously the error says to come here though. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Where can I find commercial successfully websites created using GAE?
On Jan 27, 11:40 am, Brandon Wirtz drak...@digerat.com wrote: Ah, so you are one of those people who read websites, but don't want the people who make the content to make any money. I bet you listen to NPR and play CD's when they go to pledge breaks.. I don't have any ad blocking software installed, but I have never, ever, ever, clicked on a website ad. Do you still make money then? If he's removing from his sight something he has no intent of ever clicking on anyway, I don't see you have right to complain. I wasn't going to comment on the fact your site looks like a click mill, but after that response, I don't feel bad about saying it now. Exactly the kind of site I would never use. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Possible Typo in 1.4.1. release notes
By Offline they mean in an offline Task (Task Queue service). Online would mean it's in a user facing request handler, where it's still a max of 10 seconds. Probably could be worded a little clearer. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: AWS Elastic Beanstalk : Like GAE, but without the restrictions.
At least it has a somewhat dirty sounding name. :) On Jan 23, 12:01 pm, Peter Recore peterrec...@gmail.com wrote: LOL! Your title leaves a bit to be desired. You say like GAE but without the restrictions. Wouldn't it be more accurate to say Like GAE, but without some of the restrictions, and also without some of the features? On Jan 19, 5:29 am, Rajkumar Radhakrishnan r.rajku...@gmail.com wrote: -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Deal Breaker: App not visible in China
It will be fixed when China becomes a Democracy. So you can estimate for yourself how many decades/centuries that may take. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: What does offline URL Fetch mean?
Strange. I saw no notice that 1.4.1 SDK had been released. And the Launcher still says 1.4.0 is the latest. Where did you find the release notes for this SDK? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: must i install Visual Studio for python ssl module?
I once asked and received a compiled copy. But I have to confess I haven't tried it. There is always a risk that someone could have added in some vulnerability to a pre-compiled copy. Google used to distribute a compiled copy at this link: http://web-feature-labs.googlecode.com/files/ssl-py2.5-win32-1.15.exe however, they stopped for some reason. I wish they would put a known- clean copy back up. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: my app has been disabled
I don't think you understood what he was saying. Google support sent him an email about their impending takedown with spam links in the body of the email, resulting in the official Google email being caught in spam filters and not being delivered. That definitely *is* something the support team should avoid doing in the future. On Dec 21, 3:01 am, Jeff Schwartz jefftschwa...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Respectfully, I don't really think it is nor should it be the responsibility of the support team. It should be, I believe, the responsibility of every AppEngine developer to ensure that their application adheres to the TOS because that is what we agreed to out of choice when we signed up. Perhaps you can add some logic into your application that would allow those who spot potential spam to report it and that then would allow you to take some action. Jeff On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 2:12 AM, vrypan vry...@gmail.com wrote: OK, mystery solved. Ikai's emails contained the links that were used by spammers, and GMail treated them as... spam :-) This is something that the support team might have in mind for the future... P. On Dec 21, 7:53 am, vrypan vry...@gmail.com wrote: Ikai, thanks for stepping in, but I still can't find any emails from you in my inbox. Could you please resend whatever you have send me? (BTW, I just received an order receipt from AppEngine, so I'm sure I'm checking the right email) Thank you, Panayotis. On Dec 20, 11:08 pm, Ikai Lan (Google) ikai.l+gro...@google.comikai.l%2bgro...@google.com wrote: I'm working with him off-list to resolve the issue. In general, it's important to remember that as application developers, you are responsible for the content that is posted to your application. If objectionable content is reported that violates the terms of service, someone from our team will usually email the developers. We expect a response within 48 business hours. In most (99.99%) of cases, we will not disable applications before notifying developers. We ask people requesting takedowns for proof or, in cases of copyright violations, to follow the DMCA takedown procedures as documented for all Google properties. The type of situations where we'd take down a site while notifying a developer at the same time would be, for instance, a site that hosts a worm or exploits end user computer vulnerabilities. -- Ikai Lan Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine Blogger:http://googleappengine.blogspot.com Reddit:http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine Twitter:http://twitter.com/app_engine On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Maxim Veksler ma...@vekslers.org wrote: +1 On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 10:10 PM, Joshua Smith joshuaesm...@charter.netwrote: Thanks for posting this to the list. His story was disconcerting, and it's good to hear that he didn't respond to your emails. -Joshua On Dec 20, 2010, at 2:18 PM, Ikai Lan (Google) wrote: Hi, I sent you an email a week requesting a response. Please check your inbox for emails from me addressed to the billing administrator of your application (vrypan@). Because you didn't respond, I was forced to disable your application. Your application is in violation of our terms of service because it is being targeted by spammers to shorten spam URLs. If we are reported instances of these, we will contact the developers to: 1. Remove the content 2. Take aggressive measures to prevent spamming of their service Our terms of service dictate that you are responsible for policing the content of your application. If you are in violation, we will first notify you and work with you before disabling your application. However, if we do not receive a response, we will go ahead and disable the application. Please work with me off mailing list to resolve the issue. -- Ikai Lan Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine Blogger:http://googleappengine.blogspot.com Reddit:http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine Twitter:http://twitter.com/app_engine On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Jorge Guberte jorgegube...@gmail.comwrote: If that's the case, then the app i'm developing will be shut for sure, because it extends the Google Contacts platform, making use of the API Google provides. Makes no sense, right? 2010/12/19 Philip philip.mates...@driggle.com There is no way that the app was disabled because Google fears competition. I'm currently developing a google news like service on app engine and I got access to the matcher api and prediction api without any problems even though I have told explicitly that I am doing this. I also got always help from Googlers like Ikai in the IRC channel. Besides, I'm pretty sure
[google-appengine] Re: This request used a high amount of CPU and may soon exceed its quota - 2010/2011
I had a thread saved where Nick or someone else on the team confirmed the 1000 ms boundary, however it seems my saved thread collection has grown ridiculously big and I can't find it. I did find this thread discussing it however: http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/a5d1aeb359ff03ab -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: This request used a high amount of CPU and may soon exceed its quota - 2010/2011
The only penalty is that requests that take more than 1000 mS will not benefit from automatic scaling. And you'll use more quota, obviously. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Downloading and processing an archive
Unfortunately the standard ZipFile module in Python only supports extracting to a file; GAE doens't allow writing files however. You'd either need to find a package that supports extracting files to a variable, or write your own. The data could then be put into the Datastore or Blobstore. Of course that approach would have issues if the files are big, but sounds like they wouldn't be if the archive is only 30 megs. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: AlwaysOn and WarmUpRequests working poorly?
It sounds wrong. But it brings me back to a question i've been wondering to myself for awhile now: what constitutes an Instance, exactly? Is it the bulk of all the code uploaded, or just whatever modules were las used? For instance, I have several separate sections to my app, and depending on which URL a request is received on, different code paths are executed, each loading different modules. If I have a warm instance, exactly what is being kept warm? All of the modules for all of the URLs, or what exactly? How does the system decided what to keep warm? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Channel API: Callback when channel.js has been loaded
Can't you just add your own callback? The Javascript isn't encrypted. Roll your own custom version. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: I would like see datacenter
Google posted this video some time ago: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zRwPSFpLX8I While the main focus is on best practice, it does give a lot of views and details about Google's shipping container based datacenters. the last half is the most interesting. (unless you're into cooling plants). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: GoogleAppEngine-1.3.8.msi No Work on my Windows XP
I have had this happen when I tried running the install package from an encrypted drive, or a networked drive. It seems to be because it's self check bypasses the usual Windows file reading and the contents it checks is not decrypted or somehow corrupted. Moving the install file to a local unencrypted hard drive seemed to solve it. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Datastore viewer GQL tick box missing, can't enter GQL
I use IE 8, the checkbox shows fine. So it sounds like FF has a bug in it. ;) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: SDK 1.3.8 released!
It wasn't silently removed. Ikai stated they would re-evaluate the idea based on feedback, and re-introduce it later. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: app engine dashboard two step verification
I hope this is something we can disable. I don't want to have to mess with some phone app every time I need to log in. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: openid provider oauth
I'm doing a provider. People establish their identity on my site, and use that identity to log into other OpenID services with the credentials from my site. The links I provided will get you going in the right direction. :) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Customizing login using Google Accounts
I use the Kay framework, it has a pretty good Datastore Authentication system. http://kay-docs.shehas.net/auth.html http://code.google.com/p/kay-framework/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: openid provider
Hmm, Maybe we aren't talking of the same thing then. The Janrain library I found is Open source, Apache License: http://github.com/openid/python-openid The link came from this page on the Jainrain website: http://www.janrain.com/openid-enabled Nowhere do they say anything about charging. And I don't see how they could anyway. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: openid provider oauth
yes i have it working. I'm using it to provide OpenIDs to users for our related sites. Your best bet is to get this example provider app here: http://code.google.com/p/appengine-openid-provider/ It's based on Janrain's OpenID code ver. 2.1.1 But I found the latest version 2.2.5 dropped right in. It will give you an idea how to implement the library on GAE. Also the Janrain code has a Django version of a server included in the examples directory. Its a little more feature rich. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: openid provider oauth
Oh, I see you added OAuth into the mix. I'm not using OAuth. But App Engine has built in support for that I hear. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: openid provider
I'm working on one now, but I juse Janrain. Any particular reason you don't like it? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Why doesn't App Engine Status reflect the actual uptime of GAE?
I think a big part of the reason is some failures are mis-categorized: W 09-23 03:25PM 18.756 Request was aborted after waiting too long to attempt to service your request. This may happen sporadically when the App Engine serving cluster is under unexpectedly high or uneven load. If you see this message frequently, please contact the App Engine team. W 09-23 02:16PM 58.615 A serious problem was encountered with the process that handled this request, causing it to exit. This is likely to cause a new process to be used for the next request to your application. If you see this message frequently, you should contact the App Engine team. (Error code 203) Both of those are serious errors, but are flagged as warnings. They really should be Errors, so they would get counted in the error count, and more accurately show how many errors are occuring in the system. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Datastore stats (and other cloud stats)
I think the first graphs speak a lot to what many users are experiencing. It may be before 'fails' were rather mild, and just meant an extra 400 ms, but now, 'fails' are very hard and deadly. I don't agree that only customer facing applications are affected, any application that requires integrity of operation is. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Super High Latency!! many 500 response! What happen to GAE?
Lots of steady errors here. No, I don't use DJango. It does seem to be more likely on a cold instance, but probably because there is more actions that can potentially fail in such a case. The logs simply show everything is just taking way too long. It's like it's running in slow motion. Here's the timeline of the exact same handler, when it runs normally, and when it goes into super slow-mo and hits DeadlineExceeded: Normal: 09-23 08:20AM 17.669 /prvlog/?type=generate 200 1992ms 595cpu_ms 90api_cpu_ms 0kb Second Life LSL/10.9.10(210079) (http:// secondlife.com),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) 216.82.22.213 - - [23/Sep/2010:08:20:19 -0700] GET /prvlog/? type=generate HTTP/1.1 200 212 - Second Life LSL/10.9.10(210079) (http://secondlife.com),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) sl.logos-cards.com ms=1993 cpu_ms=595 api_cpu_ms=90 cpm_usd=0.016646 loading_request=1 D 09-23 08:20AM 18.814 Initializing code_cache. I 09-23 08:20AM 19.559 Request type GET I 09-23 08:20AM 19.660 This request caused a new process to be started for your application, and thus caused your application code to be loaded for the first time. This request may thus take longer and use more CPU than a typical request for your application. ( Note i chose a cold instance to compare apples to apples) From time the request was received, until the code cache started Init = approx 1.2 seconds From time the the code cache started Init until GET type determined = approx 0.8 seconds Super Slow-Mo: 09-23 08:19AM 54.029 /prvlog/?type=generate 500 36556ms 420cpu_ms 0kb Second Life LSL/10.9.10(210079) (http:// secondlife.com),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) 216.82.22.213 - - [23/Sep/2010:08:20:30 -0700] GET /prvlog/? type=generate HTTP/1.1 500 0 - Second Life LSL/10.9.10(210079) (http://secondlife.com),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) sl.logos-cards.com ms=36557 cpu_ms=420 api_cpu_ms=0 cpm_usd=0.011760 D 09-23 08:20AM 02.891 Initializing code_cache. E 09-23 08:20AM 30.572 Traceback (most recent call last): E 09-23 08:20AM 30.572 File /base/python_runtime/python_dist/lib/python2.5/wsgiref/ handlers.py, line 92, in run E 09-23 08:20AM 30.572 self.result = application(self.environ, self.start_response) E 09-23 08:20AM 30.573 File /base/data/home/apps/slconductor/1-6.344995808500721827/kay/ lib/werkzeug/wsgi.py, line 466, in __call__ E 09-23 08:20AM 30.573 class 'google.appengine.runtime.DeadlineExceededError': Traceback (most recent call last): File /base/data/home/apps/slconductor/1-6.344995808500721827/kay/ main.py, line 102, in module main() File /base/data/home/apps/slconductor/1-6.344995808500721827/kay/ main.py, line 71, in real_main KayHandler().run(application) File /base/python_runtime/python_dist/lib/python2.5/wsgiref/ handlers.py, line 96, in run self.handle_error() File /base/python_runtime/python_dist/lib/python2.5/wsgiref/ handlers.py, line 306, in handle_error self.log_exception(sys.exc_info()) File /base/python_runtime/python_dist/lib/python2.5/wsgiref/ handlers.py, line 298, in log_exception self.traceback_limit, stderr File /base/python_runtime/python_dist/lib/python2.5/traceback.py, line 125, in print_exception print_tb(tb, limit, file) File /base/python_runtime/python_dist/lib/python2.5/traceback.py, line 69, in print_tb line = linecache.getline(filename, lineno, f.f_globals) File /base/python_runtime/python_dist/lib/python2.5/linecache.py, line 14, in getline lines = getlines(filename, module_globals) File /base/python_runtime/python_dist/lib/python2.5/linecache.py, line 40, in getlines return updatecache(filename, module_globals) File /base/python_runtime/python_dist/lib/python2.5/linecache.py, line 129, in updatecache From time the request was received, until the code cache started Init = approx 8.9 seconds From time the the code cache started Init until GET type determined = Never reached, even after 28 seconds. It frankly has nothing at all to do with the code, it's a problem with App Engine. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Latency spikes and aborted requests in the last 24 hours
all serving for my app is now 100% dead. even the simplest request is coming up 500 errors. App ID is slconductor. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Scaleability and the magic 1000ms request time
On Sep 20, 2:19 pm, Jason C jason.a.coll...@gmail.com wrote: I did another count across all of our urls. 1 hour, 1.04p - 2.04p log time, 2010-09-20 DeadlineExceededErrors: 157 10-second timeouts: 179 Given the high rate of 10-second timeouts, can I assume that I am over the 1000ms threshhold? These errors represent almost all of the errors from our system. j no, the 10 second timeouts are when GAE can't even begin to service your request. It's not related to the speed of your request handler. On an aside, GAE does seem more prone to DeadlineExceededErrors now, than it did before last week's maintenance. I would usually see maybe 1 a week. Now I see at least 3-5 a day. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Tasks in Task Queue are not being executed
I just checked, task queue and chron are working here. But I'm on Python? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Increased CPU Time/Request after yesterdays maintenance?
I had a large cluster of failures around 8PM to 8:30 PM yesterday (PST). Then there was the issues at 5AM as you mentioned. I've since had clusters of issues at 8AM, 11 AM, 2PM I'm running on Python. My App ID is slconductor Many failures are 500 Server error The server encountered an error and could not complete your request. when they do get through, it's usually a Deadline Exceeded error, with the failure always in the same place: class 'google.appengine.runtime.DeadlineExceededError': Traceback (most recent call last): File /base/data/home/apps/slconductor/1-6.344784435568344209/ cards.py, line 896, in main run_wsgi_app(application) File /base/python_runtime/python_lib/versions/1/google/appengine/ ext/webapp/util.py, line 97, in run_wsgi_app run_bare_wsgi_app(add_wsgi_middleware(application)) File /base/python_runtime/python_lib/versions/1/google/appengine/ ext/webapp/util.py, line 115, in run_bare_wsgi_app result = application(env, _start_response) File /base/python_runtime/python_lib/versions/1/google/appengine/ ext/webapp/__init__.py, line 511, in __call__ handler.get(*groups) File /base/data/home/apps/slconductor/1-6.344784435568344209/ cards.py, line 566, in get db.put([item_record, user_record]) File /base/python_runtime/python_lib/versions/1/google/appengine/ ext/db/__init__.py, line 1338, in put keys = datastore.Put(entities, rpc=rpc) File /base/python_runtime/python_lib/versions/1/google/appengine/ api/datastore.py, line 291, in Put 'datastore_v3', 'Put', req, datastore_pb.PutResponse(), rpc) File /base/python_runtime/python_lib/versions/1/google/appengine/ api/datastore.py, line 194, in _MakeSyncCall rpc.wait() File /base/python_runtime/python_lib/versions/1/google/appengine/ api/apiproxy_stub_map.py, line 460, in wait self.__rpc.Wait() File /base/python_runtime/python_lib/versions/1/google/appengine/ api/apiproxy_rpc.py, line 112, in Wait rpc_completed = self._WaitImpl() File /base/python_runtime/python_lib/versions/1/google/appengine/ runtime/apiproxy.py, line 108, in _WaitImpl rpc_completed = _apphosting_runtime___python__apiproxy.Wait(self) I may see 1 error a week. it's been error after error all day. On Sep 14, 1:45 pm, Ikai Lan (Google) ikai.l+gro...@google.com wrote: Can you guys list how often you guys see these? Here's some information that'd be helpful for us: - What % of your requests return Request was aborted? Is it happening at specific times? Java or Python? - App ID There was a latency spike around 4am (http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-downtime-notify/brows...) and a minor spike about 6 hours after that. On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Arny arny...@googlemail.com wrote: We're having the same issue. Worked fine until the maintenance, as far I remember. Now our logs are filled with: # # Request was aborted after waiting too long to attempt to service your request. This may happen sporadically when the App Engine serving cluster is under unexpectedly high or uneven load. If you see this message frequently, please contact the App Engine team. # Even we do only get about 8-10 requests/sec and all our responses are memcached. Any word from the AppEngine Team? On Sep 14, 11:14 am, mscwd01 mscw...@gmail.com wrote: Hey, This may just be a coincidence but my average CPU time per request has risen noticably since yesterdays maintenance. Whereas my average was 250-300ms, it now takes on average 500-600ms. This is the exact same resource without any changes made, so I cannot seem to work out why this would be. Has anyone else noticed this? Thanks -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine%2Bunsubscrib e...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Error: Server Error
Yes, I'm getting this constantly with my app starting since around 8PM Pacific time. Not good :( -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Internal Server Error after Google Account Login (with Account recovery prompt)
Interesting. I had the exact same thing happen to me this morning, except that I clicked Remind me later. I just started over from my original URL when the errors occurred, and it proceeded fine after that. I'm betting it's an issue on Google's end. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: How to write a C# client to access google app engine?
On Aug 18, 6:04 pm, Vassili vassi...@gmail.com wrote: My post is regarding Google App Engine Plug-in for Eclipse. I am working with the default project there (which is using a POST, not a GET, as in you case). Did you create your application using that plug-in? If not, then we are talking about different things. Not really. All App Engine applications are just web services, whether made with a plugin or not. They are accessed via HTTP requests, and return HTTP responses. There's nothing hidden, magical, or secret about how that's done. The whole World Wide Web is built on the very public HTTP standard. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Buying domain from App Engine
Strange, when I bought my domain through App Engine, it went to E-Nom, not Godaddy. Maybe they rotate through providers. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Using % wildcard in a partial String search?
I'm guessing they imported the 'match' object from the re (Regular Expression) library as the name 'matches'. http://docs.python.org/library/re.html#regular-expression-objects It's a standard part of Python. Using regular expressions you can search for many complex patterns within a string. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Unable to SHOW image...
You need to specify a handler in your app.yaml for instance, this is how I map my favicon.ico handlers: - url: /favicon.ico static_files: favicon.ico upload: favicon.ico mime_type: image/x-icon This ensures the file gets uploaded, is set as a static file type and maps it to a URL. The better way to do this is put all of your static files (read JPG files) into a subdirectory, and make a generic handler for that directory: url: /static static_dir: static That way any file in that directory will be considered static and viewable from a HTML page. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Google AppEngine Indexing
It's not a 'problem' per se, it's simply how the system works. There's a queue for indexes to be built, and depending on if the queue is long or short when your index is added, the time you wait will be long or short. Unless Google radically changes their approach to index building, there will always be a substantial wait. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Analytics via log file?
This is the first time I've heard anyone suggest downloading App Engine logs is possible (something I have wished for). How do you do it? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: App Engine announcement emails being marked as Phishing in Gmail
I'm afraid this time it went to spam for me. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Is there an AnyValue filter in gae datastore?
Maybe I don't understand what you're asking, but since isToday and isThisWeek can be true or false, wouldn't it be simpler to just query for isThisMonth==true? In a basic sense, if a parameter can match any value, it doesn't need to be put into the condition. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: TransientError adding to queue..
I had my first TransientError last night, and now I'm wondering this too. I would think this is probably a reasonable thing to do. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: App Engine + Google Maps: templates to generate JS, AJAX to POST back? Really?
The method you describe is basically the route I took. And I have to say it works well. You can take a peek at an early proof-of-concept I did, and maybe the code will give you somewhere to start from. this version doesn't have JQuery integrated for AJAX yet, but that's precisely what I ended up using. http://home.comcast.net/~volfin/drag/demo.html -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Upcoming maintenance notification
Oddly enough, yes. I got the message in my Inbox, with no issues. On Jun 30, 12:55 pm, Ikai L (Google) ika...@google.com wrote: Was this message correctly directed into anyone's inbox? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Is the datastore not good for lots of small sized objects?
The reason for the ballooning is, by default two indexes are created for every property in your Entity model. All of these indexes add quite a bit to the necessary storage space. If you have any properties in your model that don't require an index, it's a good idea to specify indexed=False for that property in the model. More info here: http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/datastore/queriesandindexes.html Bulk uploading does take time, especially for so many entities, but hopefully it's something you only have to do once. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Version not ready : Updating is VERY SLOW
Yes, for me too. It's been taking about 4 to 5 minutes, versus the usual 60 seconds. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Problems in using the Mail API
I wouldn't be surprised to find out you're running into some kind of spam limiter. I'm sure you realize spam email is an ever growing problem and many companies, Google included, take steps to prevent the kind of thing you're trying to do here. There's no realistic reason anyone should be receiving 30 emails from the same source in a matter of minutes, well, other than sending spam. Try fewer emails and I bet it will work fine. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Handling Read Only During Maintenance - Never Works
I have seen from several sources that you can do this import:
from google.appengine.api.capabilities import CapabilitySet
and then tell when the datastore is read-only like so:
if not CapabilitySet('datastore_v3',
capabilities=['write']).is_enabled():
... handle read-only ...
However this is the second time that maintenance has occured, and this
method didn't work.
Is this now depreciated? Or did it ever work to begin with?
I know this page shows a slightly different method,
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/howto/maintenance.html
But it requires that you try to write before discovering you'r'e in
read-only mode. I don't want to have to put in an un-needed write just
to find out if the Datastore is in Read-Only mode.
Can anyone help with this?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Admin UI issue
This page has information and a video showing how to purchase resources and change them. http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/billing.html I have seen quite a few people posting that billing is having some issues right now, so perhaps that may explain why you can't find the method to change the settings. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Interesting evaluation of AppEngine for transaction processing and a comparison to other cloud providers
Yes, its like testing 3 cars, two diesel powered, and one gasoline powered, and putting diesel in all 3 for 'maximum consistency'. :) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: TPC-W benchmark - App Engine slow?
yes, this has been discussed in this thread: http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/b9864ce7a9de4296 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: perhaps a simple app.yaml issue?
The problem is likely in your code. the app.yaml sends the request to
your code 'contact.py'. However contact.py must then direct that
request to the proper handler. This is because a script can
potentially handle many different types of requests.
If your code is written similarly to many Google Example Apps (using
webapp), it should have a line like this at the bottom:
def main():
application = webapp.WSGIApplication([('/', YourHandler)],
debug=True)
util.run_wsgi_app(application)
This is the section that routes requests. You would need to change
this to pattern match the URL you specify, something like this:
def main():
application = webapp.WSGIApplication([('/index.html', YourHandler)],
debug=True)
util.run_wsgi_app(application)
More on this can be found here:
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/tools/webapp/running.html
If you're using some other platform, they should have their own system
for URL routing.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: How to download the source code of my app?
Actually, you can, if you happen to have remote API enabled: http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/31025ae9b5332a2d/b81d150dcc39cf5c In other instances, no. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: [Billing rates] Billing is not feasible enough
It would probably be more cost effective to have a page people can visit to get the daily summary, rather than using email. I would also wonder why your pricing structure can't afford 3 cents a month per user to cover the email expense. But without knowing what the application is, I can't really speculate beyond that. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
