[google-appengine] Re: What happened to the promised reliability improvement for email delivery?

2012-01-31 Thread pdknsk
I've noticed this in the 1.6.2 release notes. While not DKIM, it might
help.

- Mail Quota for App Engine apps that have signed up for billing will
only be
  increased after the first payment for the app is processed.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



[google-appengine] Re: What happened to the promised reliability improvement for email delivery?

2011-12-13 Thread pdknsk
I had still hoped Google is quiet on this because they wanted to
surprise us and sneak this into 1.6.1 but no such luck.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



Re: [google-appengine] Re: What happened to the promised reliability improvement for email delivery?

2011-12-02 Thread Andrin von Rechenberg
We are sending out about 1.8 million emails per month.
SES or sendgrid would be way to expensive. (~$1000).
We do it from a single server (2ghz, 4gb) hosted somewhere
outside of google. It costs us about $60 per month and we
have a great delivery rate (spif, dkim, dedicated ip and
also very important: we handle all email bounces in
appengine and dont send any further email to an address
if it bounces)

Our delivery rate is quite high, way beyond GAE, except
for hotmail.

I can highly recommend building setting up your own email
server and just add a simple php script to expose a http
api. Took me about a day to setup and its 20x cheaper
then sendgrid. It's been running for almost a year and
i never even had to login into the mailserver. it just
runs super smooth. I'm monitoring it with prodeagle.com

Cheers,
-Andrin

On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 2:53 AM, Vivek Puri v...@vivekpuri.com wrote:

 'Cause we like startups!

 On Dec 1, 8:19 pm, voscausa robert@gmail.com wrote:
  Why Sendgrid and not AWS SES. I moved to AWS SES and it is looking veyy
  good.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Google App Engine group.
 To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



RE: [google-appengine] Re: What happened to the promised reliability improvement for email delivery?

2011-12-02 Thread Brandon Wirtz
Server Beach. Pick a Canada CoLo

Pricing about what Andrin said.  Being in Canada you screw up and violate
some Cann Spam law. Or if you do so intentionally. Being in Canada will
prevent your system from just disappearing, and having your domain stolen.
At least for a little while.

 

They have a 100% SLA  (.5% better than Google's) Because they are hard core
like that.

 

I have coupons if you need them.   

 

I run quite a few servers there.

 

 

From: google-appengine@googlegroups.com
[mailto:google-appengine@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Andrin von
Rechenberg
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 12:35 AM
To: google-appengine@googlegroups.com
Cc: Uwe Maurer
Subject: Re: [google-appengine] Re: What happened to the promised
reliability improvement for email delivery?

 

We are sending out about 1.8 million emails per month.

SES or sendgrid would be way to expensive. (~$1000).

We do it from a single server (2ghz, 4gb) hosted somewhere

outside of google. It costs us about $60 per month and we

have a great delivery rate (spif, dkim, dedicated ip and

also very important: we handle all email bounces in

appengine and dont send any further email to an address

if it bounces)

Our delivery rate is quite high, way beyond GAE, except

for hotmail.

 

I can highly recommend building setting up your own email

server and just add a simple php script to expose a http

api. Took me about a day to setup and its 20x cheaper

then sendgrid. It's been running for almost a year and

i never even had to login into the mailserver. it just

runs super smooth. I'm monitoring it with prodeagle.com

 

Cheers,

-Andrin

On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 2:53 AM, Vivek Puri v...@vivekpuri.com wrote:

'Cause we like startups!


On Dec 1, 8:19 pm, voscausa robert@gmail.com wrote:
 Why Sendgrid and not AWS SES. I moved to AWS SES and it is looking veyy
 good.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.

To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
mailto:google-appengine%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com .
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.

 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



[google-appengine] Re: What happened to the promised reliability improvement for email delivery?

2011-12-01 Thread Vivek Puri
'Cause we like startups!

On Dec 1, 8:19 pm, voscausa robert@gmail.com wrote:
 Why Sendgrid and not AWS SES. I moved to AWS SES and it is looking veyy
 good.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



[google-appengine] Re: What happened to the promised reliability improvement for email delivery?

2011-11-27 Thread voscausa
I have SES up and running making use of this python 2.6 SES API.  
https://github.com/pankratiev/python-amazon-ses-api
As you said, this is working fine. And I'am now able to handle bounced 
e-mail messages with Return-Path.

To use this API for GAE Python 2.5 I had to make some changes by overriding 
two methods. Here is the code for sending e-mails.
To make the code even more reliable, reviews are welcome. This is my first 
experience with Amazon services.

#!/usr/bin/python
# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-

from my_settings import AMAZON_ACCESS_KEY_ID, AMAZON_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY
from amazon_ses import AmazonSES, EmailMessage
from google.appengine.api import urlfetch
from google.appengine.runtime import DeadlineExceededError
import urllib, logging

class gaeAmazonSES(AmazonSES): 
  # make the API work for GAE python 2.5   
  

def _performAction(self, actionName, params=None):
if not params:
params = {}
params['Action'] = actionName
#https://email.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/

reason = '' 
# exception
retry = 0   
# download error retry
while retry = 1 : 
 # a one time retry
try :  
url = 'https://email.us-east-1.amazonaws.com'
response = urlfetch.fetch(url=url, 
payload=urllib.urlencode(params), method=urlfetch.POST, 
headers=self._getHeaders())
break
except (urlfetch.DownloadError, DeadlineExceededError),e :
logging.debug('Amazon SES download or deadline error : %d' 
%(retry + 1)) 
if retry == 0 :
retry = retry + 1
continue   
 # retry
else :
reason = e 

break

if reason == '' :   
# check for fetch errors  
responseResult = response.content
status_code =  response.status_code
logging.debug(response.headers)
else :
responseResult = None
status_code = -1
result = self._responseParser.parse(actionName, status_code, 
reason, responseResult)
logging.debug(result)
return result

def sendEmail(self, source, toAddresses, message, 
replyToAddresses=None, returnPath=None, ccAddresses=None, 
bccAddresses=None):
params = { 'Source': source }
if not replyToAddresses : replyToAddresses = [source,] 
 # always reply_to
for objName, addresses in zip([ToAddresses, CcAddresses, 
BccAddresses, ReplyToAddresses ], 
  [toAddresses, ccAddresses, 
bccAddresses, replyToAddresses]):
if addresses:
if not isinstance(addresses, basestring) and 
getattr(addresses, '__iter__', False):
for i, address in enumerate(addresses):
if objName == 'ReplyToAddresses' : 
 # reply_to  
params['ReplyToAddresses.member.%d' %(i + 1)] = 
address
else : 
 # destination
params['Destination.%s.member.%d' % (objName, i 
+ 1)] = address
else:
if objName == 'ReplyToAddresses' :
params['ReplyToAddresses.member.1'] = addresses
else :
params['Destination.%s.member.1' % objName] = 
addresses
  
if not returnPath:
returnPath = source
params['ReturnPath'] = returnPath
params['Message.Subject.Charset'] = message.charset
params['Message.Subject.Data'] = message.subject.encode('utf-8')
if message.bodyText:
params['Message.Body.Text.Charset'] = message.charset
params['Message.Body.Text.Data'] = 
message.bodyText.encode('utf-8')
if message.bodyHtml:
params['Message.Body.Html.Charset'] = message.charset
params['Message.Body.Html.Data'] = 
message.bodyHtml.encode('utf-8')
logging.debug(params)
return self._performAction('SendEmail', params)  

def sesMail(sender, mail_to, subject, body_text, reply_to=None, bcc=None):

amazonSes = gaeAmazonSES(AMAZON_ACCESS_KEY_ID, AMAZON_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY)
message = EmailMessage()

message.subject = subject
message.bodyText = body_text  
result = 

[google-appengine] Re: What happened to the promised reliability improvement for email delivery?

2011-11-14 Thread pdknsk
As we've discussed on the bug report, DKIM could literally be a one
line bug fix.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



[google-appengine] Re: What happened to the promised reliability improvement for email delivery?

2011-11-13 Thread Ernesto Oltra
Sendgrid.com ; built in top of Amazon SES, but it gives you a nice API 
through simple web requests, and it helps with statistics, bounces, etc.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/hpaK52aBAWsJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



Re: [google-appengine] Re: What happened to the promised reliability improvement for email delivery?

2011-11-12 Thread Jeff Schnitzer
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 7:07 PM, jon jonni.g...@gmail.com wrote:
 Assume #3.  Use a different email provider.  There are countless to choose 
 from.

 Jeff can you recommend one?

We're about to integrate with messagebus.com but I don't know enough
about their service yet to give the big thumbs up.  They're run by
very cool people, so all lights are green so far.

I'm pretty close to adopting a startup-only policy for service
providers.  The support we've been getting from MessageBus and WePay
(especially WePay!) has been nothing short of astounding.  You'll
never get the time of day out of Amazon or PayPal.  Despite Google's
silence on this particular issue (which I suspect is due to a
questionable commitment), the support here in this forum has been
really good - I'm not sure if you realize it, but the people answering
questions in this forum are often the actual engineers developing
features.

As far as email goes - personally, I'd rather Appengine shut down the
email API and put those developers to work on something else.  Email
is something that many other providers do well, and there's no
particular benefit to having it built in (getting two bills is truly a
first world problem).  I'd rather Google focus on the hard problems
which can't easily be implemented by third parties - spatial indexes,
pull queue grouping, transactional task deleting, etc.  These enable
whole new solution domains.  Think about the major new features that
the GAE team has rolled out in the last year... the HRD, XG
transactions, Backends, Exploding Index Repellant, Pull Queues,
Memcache CAS, Deferred Tasks, Cursors, Async Datastore Operations...
every time one of these features comes out I think How did I ever
write code without this?  That's what I want more of.

Jeff

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



Re: [google-appengine] Re: What happened to the promised reliability improvement for email delivery?

2011-11-12 Thread Adrian Scott
 As far as email goes - personally, I'd rather Appengine shut down the
 email API and put those developers to work on something else.  Email


I agree, completely...

well almost completely... Keep the current basic email to help newbies play
and test, but minimize devoting any further significant resources and
possibly relabel that api as beta/experimental or at least as not destined
to receive lots of attention right away, to be up front about it. It's a
non-trivial, high-nuisance service to provide/maintain.

-A

-- 
Adrian Scott, Ph.D.
CEO, Founder
CoderBuddy
http://www.coderbuddy.com/ -- Create a Facebook or Google App Engine app
in a minute without installing anything




 is something that many other providers do well, and there's no
 particular benefit to having it built in (getting two bills is truly a
 first world problem).  I'd rather Google focus on the hard problems
 which can't easily be implemented by third parties - spatial indexes,
 pull queue grouping, transactional task deleting, etc.  These enable
 whole new solution domains.  Think about the major new features that
 the GAE team has rolled out in the last year... the HRD, XG
 transactions, Backends, Exploding Index Repellant, Pull Queues,
 Memcache CAS, Deferred Tasks, Cursors, Async Datastore Operations...
 every time one of these features comes out I think How did I ever
 write code without this?  That's what I want more of.

 Jeff

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Google App Engine group.
 To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



[google-appengine] Re: What happened to the promised reliability improvement for email delivery?

2011-11-12 Thread pdknsk
If Google announced to drop further support for the mail API, that
would be fine, because developers can make an informed decision then.

I'm mostly interested in DKIM, which has the potential to really
improve reliability and seems (from my basic understanding) almost
trivial to implement. Why? It's already set up when you register a
domain through Google Apps. Google adds DKIM headers automatically to
all emails send from the Google Mail interface. So all that's missing
is an additional dkim parameter which automatically adds those headers
when sending through App Engine.

It might even be possible for developers to calculate and add those
headers themselves, if Google adds DKIM-Signature to allowed headers.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



Re: [google-appengine] Re: What happened to the promised reliability improvement for email delivery?

2011-11-12 Thread Martin Waller
The email needs to be sorted. No email sent to a hotmail account from the app 
engine seem to arrive!

Sent from my iPhone

On 12 Nov 2011, at 19:36, pdknsk pdk...@googlemail.com wrote:

 If Google announced to drop further support for the mail API, that
 would be fine, because developers can make an informed decision then.
 
 I'm mostly interested in DKIM, which has the potential to really
 improve reliability and seems (from my basic understanding) almost
 trivial to implement. Why? It's already set up when you register a
 domain through Google Apps. Google adds DKIM headers automatically to
 all emails send from the Google Mail interface. So all that's missing
 is an additional dkim parameter which automatically adds those headers
 when sending through App Engine.
 
 It might even be possible for developers to calculate and add those
 headers themselves, if Google adds DKIM-Signature to allowed headers.
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Google App Engine group.
 To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at 
 http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



[google-appengine] Re: What happened to the promised reliability improvement for email delivery?

2011-11-12 Thread Thomas Wiradikusuma
+1 with me.
This sort of thing gives GAE a bad name. Better implement it good or
not at all.

But of course people would wonder, aint email one of Google's
strength? (Gmail)


On Nov 13, 1:50 am, Adrian Scott adr...@coderbuddy.com wrote:
  As far as email goes - personally, I'd rather Appengine shut down the
  email API and put those developers to work on something else.  Email

 I agree, completely...

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



[google-appengine] Re: What happened to the promised reliability improvement for email delivery?

2011-11-12 Thread jon
messagebus.com is in private beta now. Does anyone have any other
suggestions?

I hear you Jeff about GAE ditching the email service but startups have
enough 3rd party services to deal with as it is (analytics, mobile
push, web channel). Having fewer providers to work with is always
better.

On Nov 13, 1:09 pm, Thomas Wiradikusuma wiradikus...@gmail.com
wrote:
 +1 with me.
 This sort of thing gives GAE a bad name. Better implement it good or
 not at all.

 But of course people would wonder, aint email one of Google's
 strength? (Gmail)

 On Nov 13, 1:50 am, Adrian Scott adr...@coderbuddy.com wrote:







   As far as email goes - personally, I'd rather Appengine shut down the
   email API and put those developers to work on something else.  Email

  I agree, completely...

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



[google-appengine] Re: What happened to the promised reliability improvement for email delivery?

2011-11-11 Thread pdknsk
I'm disappointed no Googler responded. I'll have to interpret this as
suggested by Jeff then.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



[google-appengine] Re: What happened to the promised reliability improvement for email delivery?

2011-11-11 Thread jon
 Assume #3.  Use a different email provider.  There are countless to choose 
 from.

Jeff can you recommend one?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



[google-appengine] Re: What happened to the promised reliability improvement for email delivery?

2011-11-10 Thread pdknsk
I'd really appreciate a response from a Googler, as to what the plan
is. I know Google doesn't give ETAs for new features, but just a
general response will do, like so.

We will improve email delivery reliability soon.
We will improve email delivery reliability at some point, but not
soon.
We have no plans to improve email delivery reliability.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



Re: [google-appengine] Re: What happened to the promised reliability improvement for email delivery?

2011-11-10 Thread Jeff Schnitzer
Assume #3.  Use a different email provider.  There are countless to choose from.

Jeff

On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 1:02 PM, pdknsk pdk...@googlemail.com wrote:
 I'd really appreciate a response from a Googler, as to what the plan
 is. I know Google doesn't give ETAs for new features, but just a
 general response will do, like so.

 We will improve email delivery reliability soon.
 We will improve email delivery reliability at some point, but not
 soon.
 We have no plans to improve email delivery reliability.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Google App Engine group.
 To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at 
 http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



Re: [google-appengine] Re: What happened to the promised reliability improvement for email delivery?

2011-11-10 Thread voscausa
Can you recommend one? What about :  http://mailchimp.com/

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/q9X9UQyODXgJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



[google-appengine] Re: What happened to the promised reliability improvement for email delivery?

2011-11-10 Thread JH
I've had a lot of success with Amazon SES.  I switched when I noticed
a lot of GAE email being flagged as spam and google employees on this
very group said they really do intend to become a mass email platform.

I have an extremely high deliverability rate with SES.

On Nov 10, 1:45 pm, voscausa robert@gmail.com wrote:
 Can you recommend one? What about :  http://mailchimp.com/

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



Re: [google-appengine] Re: What happened to the promised reliability improvement for email delivery?

2011-11-10 Thread James Broberg
SES, Dynect email, many others to choose from.

On 11 November 2011 07:36, JH ja...@mhztech.com wrote:
 I've had a lot of success with Amazon SES.  I switched when I noticed
 a lot of GAE email being flagged as spam and google employees on this
 very group said they really do intend to become a mass email platform.

 I have an extremely high deliverability rate with SES.

 On Nov 10, 1:45 pm, voscausa robert@gmail.com wrote:
 Can you recommend one? What about :  http://mailchimp.com/

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Google App Engine group.
 To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at 
 http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



Re: [google-appengine] Re: What happened to the promised reliability improvement for email delivery?

2011-11-09 Thread Mos
+1;  would be great to see something in the upcoming 1.6.1

On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 1:51 AM, Daniel danielkra...@gmail.com wrote:

  +1

 On Nov 8, 11:37 am, pdknsk pdk...@googlemail.com wrote:
  Google announced this in May.
 
  We have added a few restrictions to the Mail API to improve the
  reliability and reputation of the service for all applications. First,
  emails must be sent from email accounts managed by Google (either
  Gmail, or a domain signed up for Google Apps). Second, we致e reduced
  the number of free recipients per day from 2000 to 100 for newly
  created applications. Both of these will help ensure mail from your
  application arrives at the destination reliably.
 
  http://googleappengine.blogspot.com/2011/05/app-engine-150-release.html
 
  Well, it doesn't seem to have made a difference because many mails to
  specific providers are still not delivered reliably, as has been
  documented multiple times in this group and elsewhere. Another
  complaint about it was posted today. I had really hoped Google would
  have DKIM in place for new billing to improve reliability.
 
  http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=3161

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Google App Engine group.
 To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



Re: [google-appengine] Re: What happened to the promised reliability improvement for email delivery?

2011-11-09 Thread Daniel Florey
Yes, please!
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=3161
and
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=1800


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/JIMJ5GNXUd8J.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



[google-appengine] Re: What happened to the promised reliability improvement for email delivery?

2011-11-09 Thread pdknsk
Google should have a two tiered approach. If you're on a free app,
this is as good as it gets. You won't get far with 100 mails per day
anyway. For paying customers though (especially with domains
registered through Google Apps), Google should really improve the
service. I'm willing to pay extra too. Google already increased the
price by $0.19 per day, but alright.

I really want to avoid to use Amazon SES, Postmarkapp, Sendgrid, ...,
because I prefer to have billing and service in one place.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



[google-appengine] Re: What happened to the promised reliability improvement for email delivery?

2011-11-08 Thread Daniel
 +1

On Nov 8, 11:37 am, pdknsk pdk...@googlemail.com wrote:
 Google announced this in May.

 We have added a few restrictions to the Mail API to improve the
 reliability and reputation of the service for all applications. First,
 emails must be sent from email accounts managed by Google (either
 Gmail, or a domain signed up for Google Apps). Second, we’ve reduced
 the number of free recipients per day from 2000 to 100 for newly
 created applications. Both of these will help ensure mail from your
 application arrives at the destination reliably.

 http://googleappengine.blogspot.com/2011/05/app-engine-150-release.html

 Well, it doesn't seem to have made a difference because many mails to
 specific providers are still not delivered reliably, as has been
 documented multiple times in this group and elsewhere. Another
 complaint about it was posted today. I had really hoped Google would
 have DKIM in place for new billing to improve reliability.

 http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=3161

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.