Re: [hlds_linux] Re: OT: IPTables logging
There's a great little package I used before I learned all I ever wanted to know about IPTables. It's called NARC (Netfilter Automatic Rule Configurator). It's easy to use, it has one main config file where you input all your settings. http://www.knowplace.org/netfilter/narc.html Think of it as "IPTables for the people without time on their hands." --agenthh Tyler "Overkill" Schwend wrote: Ha, ignore all that. I figured it out. (Sigh) > -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tyler "Overkill" Schwend Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 5:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] Re: OT: IPTables logging Interesting... I shall try that... Have a look here, since I'm having a seperate problem now that I've tried to organize stuff again... -- Chain INPUT (policy DROP) target prot opt source destination INPUT_ACCEPT all -- anywhere anywhere Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination Chain INPUT_ACCEPT (1 references) target prot opt source destination ACCEPT udp -- anywhere anywhere udp ACCEPT icmp -- anywhere anywhere ACCEPT all -- anywhere anywhere state ESTABLISHED ACCEPT tcp -- anywhere anywhere tcp spt:4662 ACCEPT tcp -- anywhere anywhere tcp spt:3784 ACCEPT udp -- anywhere anywhere udp spt:3784 ACCEPT udp -- anywhere anywhere udp spt:4662 INPUT_HOSTS all -- anywhere anywhere RETURN all -- anywhere anywhere Chain INPUT_HOSTS (1 references) target prot opt source destination ACCEPT all -- [various hosts] anywhere RETURN all -- anywhere anywhere -- Now all of the sudden Ventrilo, on port 3784, isn't working for people who aren't in the INPUT_HOSTS chain ? As for the log, you say put it as the last in the INPUT chain? ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] re: Server Perf
VAC has been the real killer, it drove CPU usage up around 10 - 15% atleast. Voice comms are ok, But i still use team speak personally. - Original Message - From: "James Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 3:17 AM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] re: Server Perf > On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 10:11:40PM -0500, Justin Mitchell wrote: > > Yah, if i recall correctly 1.3 used gobs more cpu than previous versions. I > > had to shut down my server b/c of it. > > - Multicast spectator added. > - Voice communication added. <-- hate it (so much) > > I'd say these did it. Not entirely sure what Multicast spectator means - > is this to do with hltv etc? > > -- > James. > > > > > From: "Matthew Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > So is Valve in league with Intel and AMD? or does counterstrike just do > > > alot more than it used to? > > > > > > > > > --On Thursday, 20 February 2003 9:59 PM -0500 Justin Mitchell > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > My celeron 400 used to be full 24/7 with 20 players... and everyone > > > > pinged > > > > under 20. Now it'll barely handle 10 > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] re: Server Perf
I run a teamspeak server, which doesn't seem to use up much cpu, the server shouldn't really have to do any processing on the voice so it shouldn't use up much cpu I wouldn't imagine. (Bandwidth perhaps) Matt. --On Thursday, 20 February 2003 7:27 PM -0800 Mad Scientist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: James Clark said: - Voice communication added. <-- hate it (so much) I disabled v-comm - didn't seem to have any effect on CPU usage. -Mad ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
RE: [hlds_linux] re: Server Perf
->-Original Message- ->From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ->[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of James Clark ->Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 10:18 PM ->To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ->Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] re: Server Perf -> -> ->On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 10:11:40PM -0500, Justin Mitchell wrote: ->> Yah, if i recall correctly 1.3 used gobs more cpu than previous ->versions. I ->> had to shut down my server b/c of it. -> ->- Multicast spectator added. ->- Voice communication added. <-- hate it (so much) -> ->I'd say these did it. Not entirely sure what Multicast spectator means - ->is this to do with hltv etc? -> Dont forget VAC, the new netcode, new playermodels and also of course the infamous hitbox computations. kev ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] re: Server Perf
James Clark said: > - Voice communication added. <-- hate it (so much) I disabled v-comm - didn't seem to have any effect on CPU usage. -Mad ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] re: Server Perf
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 10:11:40PM -0500, Justin Mitchell wrote: > Yah, if i recall correctly 1.3 used gobs more cpu than previous versions. I > had to shut down my server b/c of it. - Multicast spectator added. - Voice communication added. <-- hate it (so much) I'd say these did it. Not entirely sure what Multicast spectator means - is this to do with hltv etc? -- James. > From: "Matthew Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > So is Valve in league with Intel and AMD? or does counterstrike just do > > alot more than it used to? > > > > > > --On Thursday, 20 February 2003 9:59 PM -0500 Justin Mitchell > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > My celeron 400 used to be full 24/7 with 20 players... and everyone > > > pinged > > > under 20. Now it'll barely handle 10 ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] re: Server Perf
Yah, if i recall correctly 1.3 used gobs more cpu than previous versions. I had to shut down my server b/c of it. - Original Message - From: "Matthew Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 10:02 PM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] re: Server Perf > So is Valve in league with Intel and AMD? or does counterstrike just do > alot more than it used to? > > > --On Thursday, 20 February 2003 9:59 PM -0500 Justin Mitchell > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > My celeron 400 used to be full 24/7 with 20 players... and everyone pinged > > under 20. Now it'll barely handle 10 > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Kevin Gerry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 9:48 PM > > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] re: Server Perf > > > > > >> Hey, I remember when HL came out and a P3-500 was a 'dream server' for > >> the damn thing heh > >> > >> *sigh* where are those 'good'ol' days?!? > >> > >> ~Poof > >> - Original Message - > >> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 18:29 > >> Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] re: Server Perf > >> > >> > >> > Well ym dual AMD 1400+ does More Work than my Dual 2.4ghz Xeon machine > >> with > >> > my current red hat insatll, and it lags worse when it does, Because > >> > each > >> of > >> > the servers spike up to 70 % cpus usage randomly > >> > > >> > I love AMD chips and will probably be buying ONly amd servers from now > > on > >> > > >> > > >> > - Original Message - > >> > From: "Daniel Albuschat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 6:33 PM > >> > Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] re: Server Perf > >> > > >> > > >> > > On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Eric (Deacon) wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > > > I have Intel Nic , redhat 7.2, kernel 2.4.19 and the same > > problems > >> > > > > > of perf : lags and high cpu usage. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > /me too :-) > >> > > > > > >> > > > > SuSE 7.3, 2.4.10-4GB, latest hlds. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Very high CPU load when more than 3-4 players are connected... > >> > > > > Running on a Pentium IV 1.8 Ghz machine with 1.024 MB RAM > >> > > > > >> > > > I think I heard AMD calling your name :P > >> > > > >> > > I really think that a 1.8 Ghz CPU (no matter, if AMD or Intel) > >> > > shouldn't get that high load when running the halflife server > >> > > with 4 players. > >> > > > >> > > And, to begin a flamewar, as it was your wish, I think that > >> > > Intel CPU's and Intel chipsets are much more reliable than > >> > > AMD one's. > >> > > And in my opinion reliability is more important than performance, > >> > > especially when talking of server machines. > >> > > > >> > > What is a broken CPU good for? :P > >> > > > >> > > As I said, 1.8Ghz should be enough for this task. > >> > > Just imagine, Half-Life is now a plenty years old. > >> > > Back then, there were no 1.8Ghz machines but gameserver > >> > > ran anyway. :-) > >> > > > >> > > cu, Daniel > >> > > > >> > > -- > >> > > eat(this); // delicious suicide > >> > > ___ > >> > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list > >> > > archives, > >> > please visit: > >> > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > >> > > > >> > > >> > ___ > >> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > >> please visit: > >> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > >> > > >> > >> ___ > >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > > please visit: > >> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > >> > > > > ___ > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > > please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] re: Server Perf
So is Valve in league with Intel and AMD? or does counterstrike just do alot more than it used to? --On Thursday, 20 February 2003 9:59 PM -0500 Justin Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: My celeron 400 used to be full 24/7 with 20 players... and everyone pinged under 20. Now it'll barely handle 10 - Original Message - From: "Kevin Gerry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 9:48 PM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] re: Server Perf Hey, I remember when HL came out and a P3-500 was a 'dream server' for the damn thing heh *sigh* where are those 'good'ol' days?!? ~Poof - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 18:29 Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] re: Server Perf > Well ym dual AMD 1400+ does More Work than my Dual 2.4ghz Xeon machine with > my current red hat insatll, and it lags worse when it does, Because > each of > the servers spike up to 70 % cpus usage randomly > > I love AMD chips and will probably be buying ONly amd servers from now on > > > - Original Message - > From: "Daniel Albuschat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 6:33 PM > Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] re: Server Perf > > > > On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Eric (Deacon) wrote: > > > > > > > I have Intel Nic , redhat 7.2, kernel 2.4.19 and the same problems > > > > > of perf : lags and high cpu usage. > > > > > > > > /me too :-) > > > > > > > > SuSE 7.3, 2.4.10-4GB, latest hlds. > > > > > > > > Very high CPU load when more than 3-4 players are connected... > > > > Running on a Pentium IV 1.8 Ghz machine with 1.024 MB RAM > > > > > > I think I heard AMD calling your name :P > > > > I really think that a 1.8 Ghz CPU (no matter, if AMD or Intel) > > shouldn't get that high load when running the halflife server > > with 4 players. > > > > And, to begin a flamewar, as it was your wish, I think that > > Intel CPU's and Intel chipsets are much more reliable than > > AMD one's. > > And in my opinion reliability is more important than performance, > > especially when talking of server machines. > > > > What is a broken CPU good for? :P > > > > As I said, 1.8Ghz should be enough for this task. > > Just imagine, Half-Life is now a plenty years old. > > Back then, there were no 1.8Ghz machines but gameserver > > ran anyway. :-) > > > > cu, Daniel > > > > -- > > eat(this); // delicious suicide > > ___ > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list > > archives, > please visit: > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] re: Server Perf
My celeron 400 used to be full 24/7 with 20 players... and everyone pinged under 20. Now it'll barely handle 10 - Original Message - From: "Kevin Gerry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 9:48 PM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] re: Server Perf > Hey, I remember when HL came out and a P3-500 was a 'dream server' for the > damn thing heh > > *sigh* where are those 'good'ol' days?!? > > ~Poof > - Original Message - > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 18:29 > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] re: Server Perf > > > > Well ym dual AMD 1400+ does More Work than my Dual 2.4ghz Xeon machine > with > > my current red hat insatll, and it lags worse when it does, Because each > of > > the servers spike up to 70 % cpus usage randomly > > > > I love AMD chips and will probably be buying ONly amd servers from now on > > > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Daniel Albuschat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 6:33 PM > > Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] re: Server Perf > > > > > > > On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Eric (Deacon) wrote: > > > > > > > > > I have Intel Nic , redhat 7.2, kernel 2.4.19 and the same problems > > > > > > of perf : lags and high cpu usage. > > > > > > > > > > /me too :-) > > > > > > > > > > SuSE 7.3, 2.4.10-4GB, latest hlds. > > > > > > > > > > Very high CPU load when more than 3-4 players are connected... > > > > > Running on a Pentium IV 1.8 Ghz machine with 1.024 MB RAM > > > > > > > > I think I heard AMD calling your name :P > > > > > > I really think that a 1.8 Ghz CPU (no matter, if AMD or Intel) > > > shouldn't get that high load when running the halflife server > > > with 4 players. > > > > > > And, to begin a flamewar, as it was your wish, I think that > > > Intel CPU's and Intel chipsets are much more reliable than > > > AMD one's. > > > And in my opinion reliability is more important than performance, > > > especially when talking of server machines. > > > > > > What is a broken CPU good for? :P > > > > > > As I said, 1.8Ghz should be enough for this task. > > > Just imagine, Half-Life is now a plenty years old. > > > Back then, there were no 1.8Ghz machines but gameserver > > > ran anyway. :-) > > > > > > cu, Daniel > > > > > > -- > > > eat(this); // delicious suicide > > > ___ > > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > > please visit: > > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > > > > > ___ > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf
:-/. Guess I'll have to go ahead and try 2.4.19 and see if it makes a difference. Justin - Original Message - From: "Matthew Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Justin Mitchell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 9:49 PM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > no real noticable difference. > > > --On Thursday, 20 February 2003 9:50 PM -0500 Justin Mitchell > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Any status on your situation? I'm curious if that kernel made a > > difference. > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Matthew Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 9:34 PM > > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > > > > > >> haven't noticed much difference, but don't have many people playing at > >> the moment. > >> > >> > >> > >> --On Tuesday, 18 February 2003 9:31 PM -0500 Justin Mitchell > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > Did it make a difference? I think that kernel only had security > >> > enhancements. > >> > > >> > - Original Message - > >> > From: "Matthew Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 8:59 PM > >> > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > >> > > >> > > >> >> it upgraded to > >> >> 2.4.18-24.7.x > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> --On Tuesday, 18 February 2003 8:32 PM -0500 Justin Mitchell > >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > What version of redhat? The latest 7.2 kernel is still a 2.4.18. > >> >> > > >> >> > - Original Message - > >> >> > From: "Matthew Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> >> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> >> > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 8:00 PM > >> >> > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> >> > >> >> >> I'm just updating one of my systems from > >> >> >> 2.4.18-3 to, whatever is the latest (via up2date) > >> >> >> > >> >> >> So i'll let you know when its done :) > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Matt. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> --On Tuesday, 18 February 2003 7:56 PM -0500 Justin Mitchell > >> >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Ohh, so the bug is just in 2.4.18? Every post keeps getting > >> >> >> > better > >> > :). > >> >> >> > I think I'll wait a few more and see what else turns up. > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > Justin > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > - Original Message - > >> >> >> > From: "DLinkOZ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> >> >> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> >> >> > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 7:52 PM > >> >> >> > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> I went the fast and easy way and used the 2.4.19 rpm and it > > worked > >> >> > great. > >> >> >> >> As with anything, mileage may vary. > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> - Original Message - > >> >> >> >> From: "vOrTeX" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> >> >> >> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> >> >> >> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 6:36 PM > >> >> >> >> Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > Howdy, > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > > Eek, kernel troubles are not what I need. My boxes are > >> >> >> >> > > hosted remotely, so if I kernel compile goes bad then I'm > >> >> >> >> > > screwed. What kinds of issues were you having? Were you > >> >> >> >> > > using an rpm > > or > >> > source? > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > I built from source, and all sorts of strange problems cropped > >> > up... > >> >> >> >> > bash didnt work correctly (would not show files on a ls), some > >> >> > daemons > >> >> >> >> > did not start (syslog), and initially the network card module > > did > >> >> >> >> > not load. i guess all things that could have been prevented, > > but > >> >> >> >> > like i said i wanted to kill off redhat anyway so didnt try > >> >> >> >> > too hard to correct the problems. Perhaps an RPM install of > >> >> >> >> > the kernel would be better? > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > > > > Try the 2.4.9 series kernel with redhat and you should > > have > >> > a > >> >> > lot > >> >> >> >> > > > > better luck. > >> >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > I tried 2.4.9 on the box before I replaced it with Debian, > > I > >> > had > >> >> >> >> > > > more troubles than it was worth, and I prefer Debian > >> >> >> >> > > > anyway :D (heh, i am looking for any excuse to get rid of > >> >> >> >> > > > redhat from my network... i cant stand it :D ) > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > Cheers, > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > James Mclean > >> >> >> >> > vOrTeX > >> >> >> >> > GamingSA.com Lead Admin > >> >> >> >> > ___ > >> >> >> >> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list > >> >> > archives, > >> >> >> >> please visit: > >> >> >> >> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> ___ > >> >> >> >> To unsub
Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf
no real noticable difference. --On Thursday, 20 February 2003 9:50 PM -0500 Justin Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Any status on your situation? I'm curious if that kernel made a difference. - Original Message - From: "Matthew Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 9:34 PM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf haven't noticed much difference, but don't have many people playing at the moment. --On Tuesday, 18 February 2003 9:31 PM -0500 Justin Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Did it make a difference? I think that kernel only had security > enhancements. > > - Original Message - > From: "Matthew Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 8:59 PM > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > > >> it upgraded to >> 2.4.18-24.7.x >> >> >> >> --On Tuesday, 18 February 2003 8:32 PM -0500 Justin Mitchell >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > What version of redhat? The latest 7.2 kernel is still a 2.4.18. >> > >> > - Original Message - >> > From: "Matthew Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 8:00 PM >> > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf >> > >> > >> >> >> >> I'm just updating one of my systems from >> >> 2.4.18-3 to, whatever is the latest (via up2date) >> >> >> >> So i'll let you know when its done :) >> >> >> >> Matt. >> >> >> >> --On Tuesday, 18 February 2003 7:56 PM -0500 Justin Mitchell >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> >> > Ohh, so the bug is just in 2.4.18? Every post keeps getting >> >> > better > :). >> >> > I think I'll wait a few more and see what else turns up. >> >> > >> >> > Justin >> >> > >> >> > - Original Message - >> >> > From: "DLinkOZ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 7:52 PM >> >> > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> I went the fast and easy way and used the 2.4.19 rpm and it worked >> > great. >> >> >> As with anything, mileage may vary. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> - Original Message - >> >> >> From: "vOrTeX" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> >> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> >> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 6:36 PM >> >> >> Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Howdy, >> >> >> > >> >> >> > > Eek, kernel troubles are not what I need. My boxes are >> >> >> > > hosted remotely, so if I kernel compile goes bad then I'm >> >> >> > > screwed. What kinds of issues were you having? Were you >> >> >> > > using an rpm or > source? >> >> >> > >> >> >> > I built from source, and all sorts of strange problems cropped > up... >> >> >> > bash didnt work correctly (would not show files on a ls), some >> > daemons >> >> >> > did not start (syslog), and initially the network card module did >> >> >> > not load. i guess all things that could have been prevented, but >> >> >> > like i said i wanted to kill off redhat anyway so didnt try >> >> >> > too hard to correct the problems. Perhaps an RPM install of >> >> >> > the kernel would be better? >> >> >> > >> >> >> > > > > Try the 2.4.9 series kernel with redhat and you should have > a >> > lot >> >> >> > > > > better luck. >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > I tried 2.4.9 on the box before I replaced it with Debian, I > had >> >> >> > > > more troubles than it was worth, and I prefer Debian >> >> >> > > > anyway :D (heh, i am looking for any excuse to get rid of >> >> >> > > > redhat from my network... i cant stand it :D ) >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Cheers, >> >> >> > >> >> >> > James Mclean >> >> >> > vOrTeX >> >> >> > GamingSA.com Lead Admin >> >> >> > ___ >> >> >> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list >> > archives, >> >> >> please visit: >> >> >> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ___ >> >> >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list > archives, >> >> > please visit: >> >> >> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > ___ >> >> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list > archives, >> >> > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux >> >> >> >> >> >> ___ >> >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, >> > please visit: >> >> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux >> >> >> > >> > ___ >> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, >> > please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux >> >> >> ___ >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view
Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf
Any status on your situation? I'm curious if that kernel made a difference. - Original Message - From: "Matthew Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 9:34 PM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > haven't noticed much difference, but don't have many people playing at the > moment. > > > > --On Tuesday, 18 February 2003 9:31 PM -0500 Justin Mitchell > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Did it make a difference? I think that kernel only had security > > enhancements. > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Matthew Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 8:59 PM > > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > > > > > >> it upgraded to > >> 2.4.18-24.7.x > >> > >> > >> > >> --On Tuesday, 18 February 2003 8:32 PM -0500 Justin Mitchell > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > What version of redhat? The latest 7.2 kernel is still a 2.4.18. > >> > > >> > - Original Message - > >> > From: "Matthew Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 8:00 PM > >> > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > >> > > >> > > >> >> > >> >> I'm just updating one of my systems from > >> >> 2.4.18-3 to, whatever is the latest (via up2date) > >> >> > >> >> So i'll let you know when its done :) > >> >> > >> >> Matt. > >> >> > >> >> --On Tuesday, 18 February 2003 7:56 PM -0500 Justin Mitchell > >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > Ohh, so the bug is just in 2.4.18? Every post keeps getting better > > :). > >> >> > I think I'll wait a few more and see what else turns up. > >> >> > > >> >> > Justin > >> >> > > >> >> > - Original Message - > >> >> > From: "DLinkOZ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> >> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> >> > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 7:52 PM > >> >> > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> >> I went the fast and easy way and used the 2.4.19 rpm and it worked > >> > great. > >> >> >> As with anything, mileage may vary. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> - Original Message - > >> >> >> From: "vOrTeX" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> >> >> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> >> >> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 6:36 PM > >> >> >> Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Howdy, > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > Eek, kernel troubles are not what I need. My boxes are hosted > >> >> >> > > remotely, so if I kernel compile goes bad then I'm screwed. > >> >> >> > > What kinds of issues were you having? Were you using an rpm or > > source? > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > I built from source, and all sorts of strange problems cropped > > up... > >> >> >> > bash didnt work correctly (would not show files on a ls), some > >> > daemons > >> >> >> > did not start (syslog), and initially the network card module did > >> >> >> > not load. i guess all things that could have been prevented, but > >> >> >> > like i said i wanted to kill off redhat anyway so didnt try too > >> >> >> > hard to correct the problems. Perhaps an RPM install of the > >> >> >> > kernel would be better? > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > > > Try the 2.4.9 series kernel with redhat and you should have > > a > >> > lot > >> >> >> > > > > better luck. > >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> > > > I tried 2.4.9 on the box before I replaced it with Debian, I > > had > >> >> >> > > > more troubles than it was worth, and I prefer Debian anyway > >> >> >> > > > :D (heh, i am looking for any excuse to get rid of redhat > >> >> >> > > > from my network... i cant stand it :D ) > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > Cheers, > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > James Mclean > >> >> >> > vOrTeX > >> >> >> > GamingSA.com Lead Admin > >> >> >> > ___ > >> >> >> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list > >> > archives, > >> >> >> please visit: > >> >> >> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> ___ > >> >> >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list > > archives, > >> >> > please visit: > >> >> >> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > >> >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > ___ > >> >> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list > > archives, > >> >> > please visit: > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> ___ > >> >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > >> > please visit: > >> >> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > >> >> > >> > > >> > ___ > >> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > >> > please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > >>
Re: [hlds_linux] re: Server Perf
Hey, I remember when HL came out and a P3-500 was a 'dream server' for the damn thing heh *sigh* where are those 'good'ol' days?!? ~Poof - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 18:29 Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] re: Server Perf > Well ym dual AMD 1400+ does More Work than my Dual 2.4ghz Xeon machine with > my current red hat insatll, and it lags worse when it does, Because each of > the servers spike up to 70 % cpus usage randomly > > I love AMD chips and will probably be buying ONly amd servers from now on > > > - Original Message - > From: "Daniel Albuschat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 6:33 PM > Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] re: Server Perf > > > > On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Eric (Deacon) wrote: > > > > > > > I have Intel Nic , redhat 7.2, kernel 2.4.19 and the same problems > > > > > of perf : lags and high cpu usage. > > > > > > > > /me too :-) > > > > > > > > SuSE 7.3, 2.4.10-4GB, latest hlds. > > > > > > > > Very high CPU load when more than 3-4 players are connected... > > > > Running on a Pentium IV 1.8 Ghz machine with 1.024 MB RAM > > > > > > I think I heard AMD calling your name :P > > > > I really think that a 1.8 Ghz CPU (no matter, if AMD or Intel) > > shouldn't get that high load when running the halflife server > > with 4 players. > > > > And, to begin a flamewar, as it was your wish, I think that > > Intel CPU's and Intel chipsets are much more reliable than > > AMD one's. > > And in my opinion reliability is more important than performance, > > especially when talking of server machines. > > > > What is a broken CPU good for? :P > > > > As I said, 1.8Ghz should be enough for this task. > > Just imagine, Half-Life is now a plenty years old. > > Back then, there were no 1.8Ghz machines but gameserver > > ran anyway. :-) > > > > cu, Daniel > > > > -- > > eat(this); // delicious suicide > > ___ > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] re: Server Perf
Well ym dual AMD 1400+ does More Work than my Dual 2.4ghz Xeon machine with my current red hat insatll, and it lags worse when it does, Because each of the servers spike up to 70 % cpus usage randomly I love AMD chips and will probably be buying ONly amd servers from now on - Original Message - From: "Daniel Albuschat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 6:33 PM Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] re: Server Perf > On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Eric (Deacon) wrote: > > > > > I have Intel Nic , redhat 7.2, kernel 2.4.19 and the same problems > > > > of perf : lags and high cpu usage. > > > > > > /me too :-) > > > > > > SuSE 7.3, 2.4.10-4GB, latest hlds. > > > > > > Very high CPU load when more than 3-4 players are connected... > > > Running on a Pentium IV 1.8 Ghz machine with 1.024 MB RAM > > > > I think I heard AMD calling your name :P > > I really think that a 1.8 Ghz CPU (no matter, if AMD or Intel) > shouldn't get that high load when running the halflife server > with 4 players. > > And, to begin a flamewar, as it was your wish, I think that > Intel CPU's and Intel chipsets are much more reliable than > AMD one's. > And in my opinion reliability is more important than performance, > especially when talking of server machines. > > What is a broken CPU good for? :P > > As I said, 1.8Ghz should be enough for this task. > Just imagine, Half-Life is now a plenty years old. > Back then, there were no 1.8Ghz machines but gameserver > ran anyway. :-) > > cu, Daniel > > -- > eat(this); // delicious suicide > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
[hlds_linux] request: configurable VAC
Hello Valve, Would it be possible to add a few configuration options to VAC? As it is, VAC gobbles an enormous amount of CPU power and makes it completely unusable on some servers. But, I'd still like to use the global banlist and the simple cheat detection. Would it be possible to add configuration options so we can switch on and off the various aspect of VAC? This would make it much more useful to a lot of people I'm sure. Justin ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] OT: IPTables logging
Create a new chain where you log before blocking packet. And then change in your firewall config every rules to jump to this new chain in place of Blocking... Timothy - Original Message - From: "Tyler "Overkill" Schwend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 6:41 PM Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] OT: IPTables logging > Alright, good and well... but what about logging ONLY blocked > packets? My default policy is to block all packets, with a few > holes poked through for the others... I can't figure out how best > to do this... if it's even possible. > > - > Tyler "[TASF]Overkill" Schwend > "Semper facere bonum, an a amare odium, vita mors." > "Waiting for our enemies to strike us first is as dangerous and > irresponsible as it is an act of ignorance." > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
RE: [hlds_linux] OT: IPTables logging
Alright, good and well... but what about logging ONLY blocked packets? My default policy is to block all packets, with a few holes poked through for the others... I can't figure out how best to do this... if it's even possible. - Tyler "[TASF]Overkill" Schwend "Semper facere bonum, an a amare odium, vita mors." "Waiting for our enemies to strike us first is as dangerous and irresponsible as it is an act of ignorance." ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] OT: IPTables logging
Tyler \Overkill\ Schwend said: > Does anyone know the proper way to make IPTables log all dropped > packets? http://www.netfilter.org/documentation/ -Mad ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] OT: IPTables logging
You have to launch klogd with option -c 1 Go in /etc/sysconfig/syslog to fix this and restart syslogd . Logs will stop flooding your console. - Original Message - From: "Tyler "Overkill" Schwend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 5:40 PM Subject: [hlds_linux] OT: IPTables logging > Does anyone know the proper way to make IPTables log all dropped > packets? I added a rule to LOG all TCP packets just to test out > the logging, and not only to the network and local access lock > up, but the console got flooded with what I assume should have > gone in the logs... IDeas? > > - > Tyler "[TASF]Overkill" Schwend > "Semper facere bonum, an a amare odium, vita mors." > "Waiting for our enemies to strike us first is as dangerous and > irresponsible as it is an act of ignorance." > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
[hlds_linux] OT: IPTables logging
Does anyone know the proper way to make IPTables log all dropped packets? I added a rule to LOG all TCP packets just to test out the logging, and not only to the network and local access lock up, but the console got flooded with what I assume should have gone in the logs... IDeas? - Tyler "[TASF]Overkill" Schwend "Semper facere bonum, an a amare odium, vita mors." "Waiting for our enemies to strike us first is as dangerous and irresponsible as it is an act of ignorance." ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] re: Server Perf
I have Intel Nic , redhat 7.2, kernel 2.4.19 and the same problems of perf : lags and high cpu usage. Timothy - Original Message - From: "Rob Poe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 4:47 PM Subject: [hlds_linux] re: Server Perf > I have a RedHat 7.3 (2.4.18-24.7.x) box (P4 1.9, 512mb ram, SCSI disks) > that experiences WEIRD lag issues (lag spikes) with Day of Defeat 3.1 > > When I have > 13 people in it, and up to 21 people, the spikes are > often and continuous. The processor on the box rarely hits more than > 70% > even with 20 people (the server's max players). > > I thought it might have been our T1 (which rarely hits over 65k/sec > sustained -- and the 65k/sec is the DOD clients). We moved into > a new building and a new T1 line. Still does it. > > No weird messages in /var/log/messages and the Cisco router shows no > packet errors in sho int s0 > > I tried stopping all other services (named, sendmail, apache) with > no benefit. > > I also have an RH8 box for a little clan server and it even lags > (P3 1ghz, 2.4.18-24.8.0) but not as badly as the pub (fewer players > in also). > > Could this ALSO be related to the kernel? Or do you think it might be > related to the Realtek network cards in both? To be fair to the > Realtek cards, I believe I had Intel nic's in them before and also > had problems, but I'm not positive on that one. > > Thanks! > > r > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
[hlds_linux] re: Server Perf
I have a RedHat 7.3 (2.4.18-24.7.x) box (P4 1.9, 512mb ram, SCSI disks) that experiences WEIRD lag issues (lag spikes) with Day of Defeat 3.1 When I have > 13 people in it, and up to 21 people, the spikes are often and continuous. The processor on the box rarely hits more than 70% even with 20 people (the server's max players). I thought it might have been our T1 (which rarely hits over 65k/sec sustained -- and the 65k/sec is the DOD clients). We moved into a new building and a new T1 line. Still does it. No weird messages in /var/log/messages and the Cisco router shows no packet errors in sho int s0 I tried stopping all other services (named, sendmail, apache) with no benefit. I also have an RH8 box for a little clan server and it even lags (P3 1ghz, 2.4.18-24.8.0) but not as badly as the pub (fewer players in also). Could this ALSO be related to the kernel? Or do you think it might be related to the Realtek network cards in both? To be fair to the Realtek cards, I believe I had Intel nic's in them before and also had problems, but I'm not positive on that one. Thanks! r ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf
Yesterday I setup a new 7.3 box with the latest kernel. Same problem. I reverted to my trusty 2.4.9-34 and things are great again. I know... broken record, but it works for me (across several machines running P4's, a celeron, an xp 2100 and a dual PIII). All react the same way. I just have to do a --force to get the older kernel rpm in there. - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 9:40 AM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > the most uptodate version. But i have tried with all versions and Get this > problem with all > > > - Original Message - > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 2:53 PM > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > > > > we use 8.0 on our dual xeon machine and experience similar problems. We're > > looking at debian as the next alternative > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Haspers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 2:32 PM > > Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > > > > > > > Does everyone experiencing this lag/performance issue using RH 7.2 or > 7.3? > > > Does this problem only occurs with 7.2? Someone tried RH8? > > > > > > What would be the best OS for hosting the HLDS? We currently use 7.3 but > > > with some Xeon machines we are experiencing strange lag (freezes for a > > > second sometimes). > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Justin > > > Mitchell > > > Sent: woensdag 19 februari 2003 2:32 > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > > > > > > > > > What version of redhat? The latest 7.2 kernel is still a 2.4.18. > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "Matthew Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 8:00 PM > > > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm just updating one of my systems from > > > > 2.4.18-3 to, whatever is the latest (via up2date) > > > > > > > > So i'll let you know when its done :) > > > > > > > > Matt. > > > > > > > > --On Tuesday, 18 February 2003 7:56 PM -0500 Justin Mitchell > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Ohh, so the bug is just in 2.4.18? Every post keeps getting better > :). > > I > > > > > think I'll wait a few more and see what else turns up. > > > > > > > > > > Justin > > > > > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > > > From: "DLinkOZ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 7:52 PM > > > > > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> I went the fast and easy way and used the 2.4.19 rpm and it worked > > > great. > > > > >> As with anything, mileage may vary. > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> - Original Message - > > > > >> From: "vOrTeX" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > >> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > >> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 6:36 PM > > > > >> Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > Howdy, > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Eek, kernel troubles are not what I need. My boxes are hosted > > > > >> > > remotely, so if I kernel compile goes bad then I'm screwed. > What > > > > >> > > kinds of issues were you having? Were you using an rpm or > source? > > > > >> > > > > > >> > I built from source, and all sorts of strange problems cropped > > up... > > > > >> > bash didnt work correctly (would not show files on a ls), some > > > daemons > > > > >> > did not start (syslog), and initially the network card module did > > not > > > > >> > load. i guess all things that could have been prevented, but like > i > > > > >> > said i wanted to kill off redhat anyway so didnt try too hard to > > > > >> > correct the problems. Perhaps an RPM install of the kernel would > be > > > > >> > better? > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Try the 2.4.9 series kernel with redhat and you should have > a > > > lot > > > > >> > > > > better luck. > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > I tried 2.4.9 on the box before I replaced it with Debian, I > > had > > > > >> > > > more troubles than it was worth, and I prefer Debian anyway > :D > > > > >> > > > (heh, i am looking for any excuse to get rid of redhat from > my > > > > >> > > > network... i cant stand it :D ) > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Cheers, > > > > >> > > > > > >> > James Mclean > > > > >> > vOrTeX > > > > >> > GamingSA.com Lead Admin > > > > >> > ___ > > > > >> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list > > > archives, > > > > >> please visit: > > > > >> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> ___ > > > > >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list > > ar
Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf
the most uptodate version. But i have tried with all versions and Get this problem with all - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 2:53 PM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > we use 8.0 on our dual xeon machine and experience similar problems. We're > looking at debian as the next alternative > > - Original Message - > From: "Haspers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 2:32 PM > Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > > > > Does everyone experiencing this lag/performance issue using RH 7.2 or 7.3? > > Does this problem only occurs with 7.2? Someone tried RH8? > > > > What would be the best OS for hosting the HLDS? We currently use 7.3 but > > with some Xeon machines we are experiencing strange lag (freezes for a > > second sometimes). > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Justin > > Mitchell > > Sent: woensdag 19 februari 2003 2:32 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > > > > > > What version of redhat? The latest 7.2 kernel is still a 2.4.18. > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Matthew Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 8:00 PM > > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > > > > > > > > > > I'm just updating one of my systems from > > > 2.4.18-3 to, whatever is the latest (via up2date) > > > > > > So i'll let you know when its done :) > > > > > > Matt. > > > > > > --On Tuesday, 18 February 2003 7:56 PM -0500 Justin Mitchell > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Ohh, so the bug is just in 2.4.18? Every post keeps getting better :). > I > > > > think I'll wait a few more and see what else turns up. > > > > > > > > Justin > > > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > > From: "DLinkOZ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 7:52 PM > > > > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > > > > > > > > > > > >> I went the fast and easy way and used the 2.4.19 rpm and it worked > > great. > > > >> As with anything, mileage may vary. > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> - Original Message - > > > >> From: "vOrTeX" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 6:36 PM > > > >> Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > Howdy, > > > >> > > > > >> > > Eek, kernel troubles are not what I need. My boxes are hosted > > > >> > > remotely, so if I kernel compile goes bad then I'm screwed. What > > > >> > > kinds of issues were you having? Were you using an rpm or source? > > > >> > > > > >> > I built from source, and all sorts of strange problems cropped > up... > > > >> > bash didnt work correctly (would not show files on a ls), some > > daemons > > > >> > did not start (syslog), and initially the network card module did > not > > > >> > load. i guess all things that could have been prevented, but like i > > > >> > said i wanted to kill off redhat anyway so didnt try too hard to > > > >> > correct the problems. Perhaps an RPM install of the kernel would be > > > >> > better? > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > Try the 2.4.9 series kernel with redhat and you should have a > > lot > > > >> > > > > better luck. > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > I tried 2.4.9 on the box before I replaced it with Debian, I > had > > > >> > > > more troubles than it was worth, and I prefer Debian anyway :D > > > >> > > > (heh, i am looking for any excuse to get rid of redhat from my > > > >> > > > network... i cant stand it :D ) > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > Cheers, > > > >> > > > > >> > James Mclean > > > >> > vOrTeX > > > >> > GamingSA.com Lead Admin > > > >> > ___ > > > >> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list > > archives, > > > >> please visit: > > > >> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> ___ > > > >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list > archives, > > > > please visit: > > > >> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > >> > > > > > > > > ___ > > > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > > > > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > > > > > > > ___ > > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > > please visit: > > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > > > > > ___ > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > > please visit: > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > > __
RE: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf
Which kernel do you use? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: donderdag 20 februari 2003 15:53 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf we use 8.0 on our dual xeon machine and experience similar problems. We're looking at debian as the next alternative - Original Message - From: "Haspers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 2:32 PM Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > Does everyone experiencing this lag/performance issue using RH 7.2 or 7.3? > Does this problem only occurs with 7.2? Someone tried RH8? > > What would be the best OS for hosting the HLDS? We currently use 7.3 but > with some Xeon machines we are experiencing strange lag (freezes for a > second sometimes). > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Justin > Mitchell > Sent: woensdag 19 februari 2003 2:32 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > > > What version of redhat? The latest 7.2 kernel is still a 2.4.18. > > - Original Message - > From: "Matthew Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 8:00 PM > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > > > > > > I'm just updating one of my systems from > > 2.4.18-3 to, whatever is the latest (via up2date) > > > > So i'll let you know when its done :) > > > > Matt. > > > > --On Tuesday, 18 February 2003 7:56 PM -0500 Justin Mitchell > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Ohh, so the bug is just in 2.4.18? Every post keeps getting better :). I > > > think I'll wait a few more and see what else turns up. > > > > > > Justin > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "DLinkOZ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 7:52 PM > > > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > > > > > > > > >> I went the fast and easy way and used the 2.4.19 rpm and it worked > great. > > >> As with anything, mileage may vary. > > >> > > >> > > >> - Original Message - > > >> From: "vOrTeX" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 6:36 PM > > >> Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > > >> > > >> > > >> > Howdy, > > >> > > > >> > > Eek, kernel troubles are not what I need. My boxes are hosted > > >> > > remotely, so if I kernel compile goes bad then I'm screwed. What > > >> > > kinds of issues were you having? Were you using an rpm or source? > > >> > > > >> > I built from source, and all sorts of strange problems cropped up... > > >> > bash didnt work correctly (would not show files on a ls), some > daemons > > >> > did not start (syslog), and initially the network card module did not > > >> > load. i guess all things that could have been prevented, but like i > > >> > said i wanted to kill off redhat anyway so didnt try too hard to > > >> > correct the problems. Perhaps an RPM install of the kernel would be > > >> > better? > > >> > > > >> > > > > Try the 2.4.9 series kernel with redhat and you should have a > lot > > >> > > > > better luck. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > I tried 2.4.9 on the box before I replaced it with Debian, I had > > >> > > > more troubles than it was worth, and I prefer Debian anyway :D > > >> > > > (heh, i am looking for any excuse to get rid of redhat from my > > >> > > > network... i cant stand it :D ) > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > Cheers, > > >> > > > >> > James Mclean > > >> > vOrTeX > > >> > GamingSA.com Lead Admin > > >> > ___ > > >> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list > archives, > > >> please visit: > > >> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> ___ > > >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > > > please visit: > > >> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > >> > > > > > > ___ > > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > > > please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > > > > ___ > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or vi
Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf
we use 8.0 on our dual xeon machine and experience similar problems. We're looking at debian as the next alternative - Original Message - From: "Haspers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 2:32 PM Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > Does everyone experiencing this lag/performance issue using RH 7.2 or 7.3? > Does this problem only occurs with 7.2? Someone tried RH8? > > What would be the best OS for hosting the HLDS? We currently use 7.3 but > with some Xeon machines we are experiencing strange lag (freezes for a > second sometimes). > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Justin > Mitchell > Sent: woensdag 19 februari 2003 2:32 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > > > What version of redhat? The latest 7.2 kernel is still a 2.4.18. > > - Original Message - > From: "Matthew Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 8:00 PM > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > > > > > > I'm just updating one of my systems from > > 2.4.18-3 to, whatever is the latest (via up2date) > > > > So i'll let you know when its done :) > > > > Matt. > > > > --On Tuesday, 18 February 2003 7:56 PM -0500 Justin Mitchell > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Ohh, so the bug is just in 2.4.18? Every post keeps getting better :). I > > > think I'll wait a few more and see what else turns up. > > > > > > Justin > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "DLinkOZ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 7:52 PM > > > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > > > > > > > > >> I went the fast and easy way and used the 2.4.19 rpm and it worked > great. > > >> As with anything, mileage may vary. > > >> > > >> > > >> - Original Message - > > >> From: "vOrTeX" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 6:36 PM > > >> Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > > >> > > >> > > >> > Howdy, > > >> > > > >> > > Eek, kernel troubles are not what I need. My boxes are hosted > > >> > > remotely, so if I kernel compile goes bad then I'm screwed. What > > >> > > kinds of issues were you having? Were you using an rpm or source? > > >> > > > >> > I built from source, and all sorts of strange problems cropped up... > > >> > bash didnt work correctly (would not show files on a ls), some > daemons > > >> > did not start (syslog), and initially the network card module did not > > >> > load. i guess all things that could have been prevented, but like i > > >> > said i wanted to kill off redhat anyway so didnt try too hard to > > >> > correct the problems. Perhaps an RPM install of the kernel would be > > >> > better? > > >> > > > >> > > > > Try the 2.4.9 series kernel with redhat and you should have a > lot > > >> > > > > better luck. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > I tried 2.4.9 on the box before I replaced it with Debian, I had > > >> > > > more troubles than it was worth, and I prefer Debian anyway :D > > >> > > > (heh, i am looking for any excuse to get rid of redhat from my > > >> > > > network... i cant stand it :D ) > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > Cheers, > > >> > > > >> > James Mclean > > >> > vOrTeX > > >> > GamingSA.com Lead Admin > > >> > ___ > > >> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list > archives, > > >> please visit: > > >> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> ___ > > >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > > > please visit: > > >> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > >> > > > > > > ___ > > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > > > please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > > > > ___ > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
RE: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf
Does everyone experiencing this lag/performance issue using RH 7.2 or 7.3? Does this problem only occurs with 7.2? Someone tried RH8? What would be the best OS for hosting the HLDS? We currently use 7.3 but with some Xeon machines we are experiencing strange lag (freezes for a second sometimes). -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Justin Mitchell Sent: woensdag 19 februari 2003 2:32 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf What version of redhat? The latest 7.2 kernel is still a 2.4.18. - Original Message - From: "Matthew Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 8:00 PM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > > I'm just updating one of my systems from > 2.4.18-3 to, whatever is the latest (via up2date) > > So i'll let you know when its done :) > > Matt. > > --On Tuesday, 18 February 2003 7:56 PM -0500 Justin Mitchell > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Ohh, so the bug is just in 2.4.18? Every post keeps getting better :). I > > think I'll wait a few more and see what else turns up. > > > > Justin > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "DLinkOZ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 7:52 PM > > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > > > > > >> I went the fast and easy way and used the 2.4.19 rpm and it worked great. > >> As with anything, mileage may vary. > >> > >> > >> - Original Message - > >> From: "vOrTeX" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 6:36 PM > >> Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > >> > >> > >> > Howdy, > >> > > >> > > Eek, kernel troubles are not what I need. My boxes are hosted > >> > > remotely, so if I kernel compile goes bad then I'm screwed. What > >> > > kinds of issues were you having? Were you using an rpm or source? > >> > > >> > I built from source, and all sorts of strange problems cropped up... > >> > bash didnt work correctly (would not show files on a ls), some daemons > >> > did not start (syslog), and initially the network card module did not > >> > load. i guess all things that could have been prevented, but like i > >> > said i wanted to kill off redhat anyway so didnt try too hard to > >> > correct the problems. Perhaps an RPM install of the kernel would be > >> > better? > >> > > >> > > > > Try the 2.4.9 series kernel with redhat and you should have a lot > >> > > > > better luck. > >> > > > > >> > > > I tried 2.4.9 on the box before I replaced it with Debian, I had > >> > > > more troubles than it was worth, and I prefer Debian anyway :D > >> > > > (heh, i am looking for any excuse to get rid of redhat from my > >> > > > network... i cant stand it :D ) > >> > > >> > > >> > Cheers, > >> > > >> > James Mclean > >> > vOrTeX > >> > GamingSA.com Lead Admin > >> > ___ > >> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > >> please visit: > >> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> ___ > >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > > please visit: > >> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > >> > > > > ___ > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > > please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] HLTV ON LINUX !! PROBLEM
>> Man I love when people aren't specific... >> What happens when you try? > ehhh i cant RUN !! Try this command just before you try to run the HLTV again: export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=.:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH PS. Some people are really weird ;) -- Martel Valgoerad (a.k.a. Michal Minicki) | "Lubie kobiety, bo sa [AIE]Martel--> [EMAIL PROTECTED] | takie cieple w srodku" Web Page: http://www.aie.pl | (c) unknown ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
RE: [hlds_linux] HLTV ON LINUX !! PROBLEM
Do you have no legs? Is your computer not turned on? Be more specific! - Tyler "[TASF]Overkill" Schwend "Semper facere bonum, an a amare odium, vita mors." "Waiting for our enemies to strike us first is as dangerous and irresponsible as it is an act of ignorance." ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] TOS packet priority?
Normally the TOS field will be used within private networks to allow classification of packets. By classifying you can then define policing and shaping. This is used mostly over slow links <1mb. My question is if the internet routers at various isp's are using this field, and everyone starts tweaking their traffic to high priority, will it really have any effect in the long run, and is it in the best interest of the gaming community to actually think that game traffic is high priority? If we lose a packet or two in Cstrike, does it really make that much of a differnce? Florian Zschocke wrote: > Kevin J. Anderson wrote: > > > what do you guys think? anyone know if this is actually coded into the > > linux server? would that be good? bad? > > It most probably wouldn't be bad. The question is, would it be any > good. A few years a go most TCP/IP implementations ignored the TOS > field and the same was true for the majority of routers. I'm not > sure if that changed much by now. I know that quite a few routers > in the Net still ignore the TSO field. Does anybody have > additional current data on this? > > Florian. > > -- > Want to produce professional emails and Usenet postings? > http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
RE: [hlds_linux] HLTV ON LINUX !! PROBLEM
> Man I love when people aren't specific... > > What happens when you try? > ehhh i cant RUN !! ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
RE: [hlds_linux] HLTV ON LINUX !! PROBLEM
Man I love when people aren't specific... What happens when you try? - Tyler "[TASF]Overkill" Schwend "Semper facere bonum, an a amare odium, vita mors." "Waiting for our enemies to strike us first is as dangerous and irresponsible as it is an act of ignorance." ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
[hlds_linux] HLTV ON LINUX !! PROBLEM
hello I have problem ! I cant run HLTV on linux !! , HLDS 3110 , CS 1.5 and addons ! Soft : Linux RedHat 7.3 who can help me plzzz HELP ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] RE: New WON auth servers
> When is that stupid "CD-Key in use" (when the CD-Key is definitely *not* > in use) error going to stop being a problem? It's gotten pretty old > after all these months :( > > -- > Eric (the Deacon remix) > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux elo your problem will be sometimes this probably WON DON'T CHCECK YOUR CD-key completley Reboot your computer :))) and all will by fine !! :D ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] TOS packet priority?
Kevin J. Anderson wrote: what do you guys think? anyone know if this is actually coded into the linux server? would that be good? bad? It most probably wouldn't be bad. The question is, would it be any good. A few years a go most TCP/IP implementations ignored the TOS field and the same was true for the majority of routers. I'm not sure if that changed much by now. I know that quite a few routers in the Net still ignore the TSO field. Does anybody have additional current data on this? Florian. -- Want to produce professional emails and Usenet postings? http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
RE: [hlds_linux] TOS packet priority?
> An interesting conversation just popped up on the bf1942 linux server port > list, as Im sure some of you that Ive seen on it already know, but I > thought > it would be relevant to hlds, and was curios whether this is implemented, > or > has even been considered for the linux hlds server? > [snipp] > > what do you guys think? anyone know if this is actually coded into the > linux server? would that be good? bad? > I have tried this "trick" with manipulating the tos packet priority with iptables and it really doesn't seem to do much, unless of course your hoses are really tight. One engineer at Intel working with the e1000 driver for linux thought it was probably a waste of CPU cycles. He is probably right, the 4.4.19 driver contained improvements for UDP packet handling and it had a very good effect on the daily player count on our servers (not only hl-cs). Having it coded in the server would be much better that using iptables (i.e. the same way as SSH and other programs do). --- marius ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf
Is it this much trouble with linux? Gah, I just love FreeBSD then... rock solid... /Bjorn On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, Matthew Watson wrote: > haven't noticed much difference, but don't have many people playing at the > moment. > > > > --On Tuesday, 18 February 2003 9:31 PM -0500 Justin Mitchell > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Did it make a difference? I think that kernel only had security > > enhancements. > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Matthew Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 8:59 PM > > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > > > > > >> it upgraded to > >> 2.4.18-24.7.x > >> > >> > >> > >> --On Tuesday, 18 February 2003 8:32 PM -0500 Justin Mitchell > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > What version of redhat? The latest 7.2 kernel is still a 2.4.18. > >> > > >> > - Original Message - > >> > From: "Matthew Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 8:00 PM > >> > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > >> > > >> > > >> >> > >> >> I'm just updating one of my systems from > >> >> 2.4.18-3 to, whatever is the latest (via up2date) > >> >> > >> >> So i'll let you know when its done :) > >> >> > >> >> Matt. > >> >> > >> >> --On Tuesday, 18 February 2003 7:56 PM -0500 Justin Mitchell > >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > Ohh, so the bug is just in 2.4.18? Every post keeps getting better > > :). > >> >> > I think I'll wait a few more and see what else turns up. > >> >> > > >> >> > Justin > >> >> > > >> >> > - Original Message - > >> >> > From: "DLinkOZ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> >> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> >> > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 7:52 PM > >> >> > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> >> I went the fast and easy way and used the 2.4.19 rpm and it worked > >> > great. > >> >> >> As with anything, mileage may vary. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> - Original Message - > >> >> >> From: "vOrTeX" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> >> >> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> >> >> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 6:36 PM > >> >> >> Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Howdy, > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > Eek, kernel troubles are not what I need. My boxes are hosted > >> >> >> > > remotely, so if I kernel compile goes bad then I'm screwed. > >> >> >> > > What kinds of issues were you having? Were you using an rpm or > > source? > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > I built from source, and all sorts of strange problems cropped > > up... > >> >> >> > bash didnt work correctly (would not show files on a ls), some > >> > daemons > >> >> >> > did not start (syslog), and initially the network card module did > >> >> >> > not load. i guess all things that could have been prevented, but > >> >> >> > like i said i wanted to kill off redhat anyway so didnt try too > >> >> >> > hard to correct the problems. Perhaps an RPM install of the > >> >> >> > kernel would be better? > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > > > Try the 2.4.9 series kernel with redhat and you should have > > a > >> > lot > >> >> >> > > > > better luck. > >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> > > > I tried 2.4.9 on the box before I replaced it with Debian, I > > had > >> >> >> > > > more troubles than it was worth, and I prefer Debian anyway > >> >> >> > > > :D (heh, i am looking for any excuse to get rid of redhat > >> >> >> > > > from my network... i cant stand it :D ) > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > Cheers, > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > James Mclean > >> >> >> > vOrTeX > >> >> >> > GamingSA.com Lead Admin > >> >> >> > ___ > >> >> >> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list > >> > archives, > >> >> >> please visit: > >> >> >> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> ___ > >> >> >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list > > archives, > >> >> > please visit: > >> >> >> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > >> >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > ___ > >> >> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list > > archives, > >> >> > please visit: > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> ___ > >> >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > >> > please visit: > >> >> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > >> >> > >> > > >> > ___ > >> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > >> > please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > >> > >> > >> ___ > >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view th
[hlds_linux] TOS packet priority?
An interesting conversation just popped up on the bf1942 linux server port
list, as Im sure some of you that Ive seen on it already know, but I thought
it would be relevant to hlds, and was curios whether this is implemented, or
has even been considered for the linux hlds server?
BTW, to make this easy for Ryan, I looked up the syntax by looking for the
relevant piece of code in the telnet SRPM. Here's the needed piece, from
command.c:
/* net is the socket handle */
int tos = IPTOS_LOWDELAY; /* Low Delay bit */
if ((setsockopt(net, IPPROTO_IP, IP_TOS,
(void *)&tos, sizeof(int)) < 0)
&& (errno != ENOPROTOOPT))
perror("telnet: setsockopt (IP_TOS) (ignored)");
and this is also interesting...
> Hi, can you explain how to do that using IPTABLES?
Here's the command I'm using for my Tribes 2 servers. A similar command
specifying your BF1942 port should work as well.
iptables -A OUTPUT -t mangle -p udp --source-port 28000:28099
-j TOS --set-tos Minimize-Delay
(That should all be on one line.)
This affects all UDP packets leaving from ports 28000-28099.
and someone also threw out this url
http://lartc.org/wondershaper/
what do you guys think? anyone know if this is actually coded into the
linux server? would that be good? bad?
: P
kev
->-Original Message-
->From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
->[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jon Dingman
->Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 1:23 AM
->To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
->Subject: [hlds_linux] CD cpu Performance
->
->
->I play on a server that just recently started running cheating death,
->and ive noticed my ping rise 10-15, I was wondering what is your opinion
->on this and if cheating death really takes that much more cpu power to
->run then it would not to. Obviously it takes more then to run nothing,
->but how much more on average.
->
->--jFi-DiGi[v]--
->
->
->___
->To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
->archives, please visit:
->http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
