[hlds_linux] Ryan McCullough is out of the office.

[Ryan McCullough]

I will be out of the office starting  08/16/2003 and will not return until
08/25/2003.

I will respond to your message when I return.

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

Re: [hlds_linux] PrivatePlayers 0.40

[Ryan McCullough]

what does this do??
"dJeyL" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:mailman.1036028472.9536.hlds_linux@;list.valvesoftware.com...
Hello,

I've just released a new version of PrivatePlayers (P2), my MetaMod plugin
that controls who can play on any Half-Life mod server !

Changes and additions in version 0.40 :
° fixed sometimes bad counting players (sv_timeout workaround for
   connections refused by other Metamod plugins)
° fixed multiple MySQL connections when changing maps
° added p2_type 4 : refuse unknown players if there are at least
   (CVar)p2_min known players
° added CVar p2_forcenames, to ensure known players use their known name,
   and protect them (anti-fake)
° added WebMod 0.43 interfacing functions

More information & download page :
http://djeyl.net/p2.php?language=english

Cheers,
-- dJeyL


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

Re: [hlds_linux] What's next? CS 1.6, or CS:CZ?

[Ryan McCullough]

I think there is 3 new weapons. Some new rifle I have seen in the movie
demos, RPG, Molotov Cocktail.

"DaiTengu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:mailman.1035982932.31399.hlds_linux@;list.valvesoftware.com...
> CS 1.6 will be out in Beta, with  STEAM 2.0 (mid November) 1.6 will
> introduce 2 new weapons, and the riot shield... www.steampowered.com has
> a little blurb on it.
>
> 
> Mike Miller  ICQ:30705948
> War Ensemble Online  (war-ensemble.com)
> War Ensemble BBS(telnet://bbs.war-ensemble.com)
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:hlds_linux-admin@;list.valvesoftware.com] On Behalf Of Steve Cody
> Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 4:52 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [hlds_linux] What's next? CS 1.6, or CS:CZ?
>
> Does anybody know what we'll see next?  Will these be different?  Will
> they
> run on the same server engine that we have now?  Are any of them coming
> out
> within the next month?
>
> Thanks,
> Steve
>
> ___
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
>
> ---
> Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.408 / Virus Database: 230 - Release Date: 10/24/2002
>
>


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

Re: [hlds_linux] Re: OT: weapon restriction (Ryan McCullough)

[Ryan McCullough]

would you like some cheese with that?

"Christian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Please! Stop whining about awp!
>
>


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

Re: [hlds_linux] Command Name

[Ryan McCullough]

there are plugins to disable these types of names. Check out clanmod, it
allows wildcards in the illegal names. Wont let a person with a bad name
join, and when you try to change your name to a bad name it doesnt let you.

"m0gely" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Mad Scientist wrote:
>
> >
> > Of course, then they just disconnect and reconnect with a different
name...
> >
> > -Mad
> >
>
> admin_llama changes their name to llama and won't let thm change it back
> unless they disconnect to do it.  so adminmod must have functionality to
> not allow changing names while connected.  while they could disconnect
> and change their name anyways, i think it would still be effective.
> usually people that change their name do it when they are about to die,
> or like arene said when they start to suck.  it would make it a pain to
> have to disconnect to change the name, and who's to say they wouldn't
> start playing well again then hose their attempt.  i would put in a
> request in the adminmod sript forum.
>
> --
> - m0gely
> http://quake2.telestream.com/
> Q2 | Q3A | Counter-strike
>


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

Re: [hlds_linux] Re[3]: [hlds_linux] OT: CS economics (was RE: weapon restriction)

[Ryan McCullough]

"Jan Brunner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I forgot some things:
> JB> Remember doing USP head shots while jumping?
> JB> Remember the AK being dead accurate at very long distances?
> JB> Remember being able to jump without stupid FPS depending slowdown?
> JB> Remember no one using low ex_interp?
> JB> Remember those MP5 kings who hit everything in the head while jumping?
> JB> Remember the Scout being as accurate as the AWP while standing?
> JB> Remember being able to dodge bullets while planting the bomb?
> JB> Remember the AK with the old, compensable recoil?
> JB> Remember less slowdown when being hit?
> JB> Remember training paying off more?
> Remember being able to change weapons faster than my grandpa?
> Remember killing enemies while walking down a stair with a hand gun?
> Remember being able to walk from a small border without making sounds?
> Remember walking being faster than crawling?
Remember being able to fire before the weapon was fully up
Remember custom weapon skins
Remember when seeing blood on the wall meant you hit the guy(damn netcode)
Remember when the glock was actually a good gun
.

>
> Add whatever you like... :)
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Jan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

Re: [hlds_linux] CD-KEY in use

[Ryan McCullough]

hes telling you to STFU for a while in nice words. hehe

"Eric (Deacon)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> What?
>
> --
> Eric (the Deacon remix)
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:hlds_linux-
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sebastian
> > Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2002 12:14 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] CD-KEY in use
> >
> > Can we cut down the spam deacon, sheesh, go get some fresh air.
> >
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> > -Sebastian
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Eric
> > (Deacon)
> > Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2002 12:27 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] CD-KEY in use
> >
> > > Eric (The Deacon) would most likely say:
> > >
> > > your spelling is atrocious | we never had these problems in b6 | i'm
> > leaving
> > > this list now forever (returning 2 days later)
> >
> >  RESOUNDIIING
> >__
> >   *--- |__| \  /\  / /_\  |   |/ |*
> > |  |  |  \/  \/ /   \ |__ |\ |
> >  o
> >
> > --
> > Eric (the Deacon remix)
> >
> > ___
> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> > please visit:
> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> >
> > ___
> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please
> > visit:
> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
>


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

Re: [hlds_linux] OT: weapon restriction

[Ryan McCullough]

ive seen that. I hate it :P

seriously what happened to this topic. It has gotten way out of control.

"Eric (Deacon)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > BTW, was I ever answered? is there a way to 100% remove the awp?
>
> Zippo, who runs the "Beer for Breakfast" CS servers
> (http://bfb.bogleg.org) has a script (that he probably wrote himself)
> that forces the client to immediately execute the "drop" command if an
> AWP is picked up while AWP restriction is enabled.  This means even if
> someone manages to get around the buy menu restrictions, it's like their
> holding a REALLY slippery hot potato :)
>
> --
> Eric (the Deacon remix)
>


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

Re: [hlds_linux] [OT] Speakeasy DSL, Linux, Servers and Free XBOX or PS2

[Ryan McCullough]

how come bandwidht is soo cheap over there?
"Frank Stollar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Robert Paulson wrote:
> > where do you get that 10M/10M, I would give my left nut for that speed.
>
> >> Meanwhile I think I'll keep my 10M/10M for $36/mo :D
>
> Hehe, same here with 15 EUR/mo for 10Mbit/10Mbit here in Munich/Germany.
>
> *g*
> Frank
>


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

Re: [hlds_linux] weapon restriction

[Ryan McCullough]

"James Gurney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...

> Ok, running I might have been exagerating, but frequently you'll watch
> people hiding behind a wall.. They sidestep out with their awp zoomed,
> and are able to fire and get an accurate shot without pausing to steady
> the weapon, crouching, etc. My entire point was that the awp is lacking
> any sort of random movement such as you would expect in a realistic
> sniper rifle.
>
This is a talent learned. You sidestep and press the other way. If you fire
at the right time you get a true 100% accurate shot but this is hard to do
and takes lots of practice and skill. I am learning, slowly.



>
> This was remedied before, and apparently someone has figured a way
> around it again because it's something I see fairly often.
>
I have seen this in the last couple weeks too and while it sucks, its no
reason to attack the weapon itself. A hack is just as deadly and maddening
on any other weapon.


>
> Yes, this was my point. It's not realistic, and while I agree that
> nothing in CS is, I personally think the awp is disproportionately
> unrealistic compared to other weapons.
>
so was the rail gun in Q3 an unfair weapon as well? There will always be the
TOP, most powerful weapon. Taking that away, takes away the reward of the
good player. My reward for killing 5 peopel in the pistol round is that I
get to buy an awp the next round and actually have some fun.


>
> You have a habit of making posts which contain comments that make
> judgements on other people (see quoted email pieces above). If you're
> not going to make points on the question at hand, I consider that to be
> trolling.

come one james, you know eric and how he gets. Eric can be an ass but its
all in good fun and he usually has a good point.

>
> James
>


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

Re: [hlds_linux] weapon restriction

[Ryan McCullough]

i love you eric(in a purely non gay kind of way), but you forgot one
important thing to this response


THWACK!!


"Eric (Deacon)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > Because it sucks ass, can fuck up an entire FFA, and is generally
> the most
> > > unrealistic weapon in cs... did I mention it sucked ass?
> >
> > I see the problem being the fact that it's 100% accurate, regardless
> of
> > whether you're running, side stepping.. even at full zoom..
>
> Have you ever actually played CS?
>
> > With the awp, people use it like a pistol and get
> > perfect shots every time.
>
> Obviously, no, you've never played CS, or you play with 1200 ping
> against uber-skilled bots with h4x.
>
> > I've thought about disabling it myself a few
> > times due to the abuse it gets (People using scripts that fire an awp
> > shot, reload, switch to another weapon and then back again, which
> allows
> > them to get a rate of awp fire equivalent to a pistol)..
>
> If you claim to have played CS before, when was the last time you claim
> to have done so?
>
> --
> Eric (the Deacon remix)
>


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

Re: [hlds_linux] weapon restriction

[Ryan McCullough]

I coudnt have said it better. I too used to be an AWP-Hater calling people
who used it "awp whores" as the term goes. Then I started playing with it,
and learned to play with the weapon and grew to love it. I know at least 10
other people who were in the same boat as me. Hated the weapon until they
learned to use it. You know what I hated most about the awp? Getting killed
by it and not being able to kill the other guy even when I bought one. I
think this is why most people dislike the awp. I will tell you, some maps
just are not the same without the awp. What is to stop a sewer storm on
aztec without the awp?

I also agree that the awp takes some level of skill to use as opposed to
some peoples claims that its a n00b weapon. There is a reason almost all CAL
players use it as their primary weapon. Watch some cal demos, 90% of the
time the guy has a deagle and an awp.

I also agree that the problem is not the awp being too powerful of a weapon
for the game, it is the players not evening the skill. Like Unix here said,
a skilled player can own in any weapon. They just prefer the awp.

I would also like to point out that the awp gets harder and harder to use
with each version of CS. The accuracy gets less and less wiht each new
version. Remember when shooting the guy in the foot(I loved doing this on
the bridge on dust) would kill him, now you have to hit them in the chest or
head. The weapon has made some changes and I think right now it is a fairly
balanced between power and difficulty of use.

I would urge you to take Unix's challenge and play with the awp for a week.
Really play with it. I am sure you would come to love it.


"Flavored UNIX" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> From: "Jules (aka Buddha-Pest)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > in agreement...  look at most top clan matches, it's all awp
> vs. awp.
>
> Not really.  Granted, the AWP is a huge factor in match-play, and
> could possibly be considered the most important weapon in the
> game.  But you very rarely see a top clan buy 4 or 5 AWPs in a
> round in a match.  For one thing, the economics of the game
> usually preclude everyone from being able to afford one (there's
> a reason the AWP is so expensive), but even if the entire team
> were rich it doesn't make tactical sense to have 5 snipers --
> it's much more effective to have several assault rifles
> supporting your sniper(s).
>
> The notable exception is on defense in de_aztec, which can be
> controlled totally by a team of five good snipers.  I seem to
> remember old X3 using all AWPs as CTs on de_dust2 in a match
> once, but again, it's much more usual to see one or two snipers
> per side.
>
>
> > i think the awp in it's current rendition is an important part
> of the game.
> > it means you don't just run around crazy in open spaces, you
> have to respect
> > open terrain, long hallways, etc just like real teams/soldiers
> do.  but i
> > think that in the hands of an awp expert the weapon becomes
> unbalancing.  i
> > have a couple of regulars on my server who can work absolute
> magic with that
> > thing.  it makes it no fun for the others.
>
> Totally agree it's an important part of the game, but I disagree
> with the logic of how it unbalances the game.  Yes, an AWP in the
> hands of an expert will wreak havoc, but then again so will any
> weapon in the hands of an expert.  The real issue is balance of
> skill, not balance of weapons: a CAL-i level player armed with a
> glock will own a server of casual players.  On the other hand, if
> everyone on the server is on the same talent curve, then AWPs
> should make for much more interesting games (as long as there's
> room to improve, more on this later).
>
> You say the AWP "makes it no fun for the others", but that's
> placing a premium on the fun of the unskilled.  This is your
> choice, of course.  But remember that for skilled players, the
> fun comes in the perfection and execution of their skill.  I
> guess some feel they have to sacrifice the fun of the skilled for
> the fun of the unskilled, and it seems to me that the servers
> which restrict the AWP are making that claim.
>
> But consider this: while some players may not care about
> improving at CS in any way, I think many (if not most) of your
> regs actually try to become better.  With a little wise prodding,
> you may be surprised to find that your regs come to love the AWP.
>
> I speak from experience here.  I had a strong community on my
> 16-player pub for two years, with about 200 regulars.  Back then
> I wasn't aware of the beauty of competitive CS, so we ran a "free
> money", AWP-restricted server.  In our minds the scout was more
> manly since it wasn't a one-kill weapon, and whenever newcomers
> would protest we'd call them "AWP pussies" and such.
>
> Then I started playing in and following the competitive CS scene,
> and realized how important the AWP is (and, equally as
> enlightening, how *difficult* the AWP is to use).  Suddenly our
> b

Re: [hlds_linux] weapon restriction

[Ryan McCullough]

Hmm, realistic. And so getting shot 6 times with an mp5 and not dying is
realistic? Come on, its not like this game is s life like.

I usually find players that dislike the awp are usually just not that good
or are too lazy to dodge it.


"Rene Luckow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Because it sucks ass, can fuck up an entire FFA, and is generally the most
> unrealistic weapon in cs... did I mention it sucked ass?
>
> On Tuesday 24 September 2002 23:50, Ryan McCullough wrote:
> > I really dont understand what everyone doesnt like about the awp.
> >
> >
> > "DaiTengu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >
> > > Although I usually take the attitude ... "Kill me with the awp once,
> > > shame on you ... kill me twice ... shame on me"
> > >
> > > It's not that hard to dodge a sniper ...
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rene
> > > Luckow
> > > Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2002 7:12 PM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] weapon restriction
> > >
> > > Well, consider this being me asking then :)
> > >
> > > I use HalfD, but I don't want to punish the idiots, merely render it
> > > impossible for them to use the awp...
> > >
> > > On Saturday 21 September 2002 22:26, dJeyL wrote:
> > > > well, it *is* possible
> > > >
> > > > http://djeyl.net/s3.php?language=english
> > > >
> > > > now if you want a little metamod plugin that can do that, just ask ;
> > >
> > > will
> > >
> > > > find some time to do it next week :-)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > cheers,
> > > > -- djeyl
> > > >
> > > > - Original Message -
> > > > From: "Rene Luckow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2002 10:17 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] weapon restriction
> > > >
> > > > > In botman's forum:
> > > > > 
> > > > > You can't strip out weapons in Counter-Strike, since they aren't
> > >
> > > spawned
> > >
> > > > in
> > > >
> > > > > the map by the engine.  Weapons in Counter-Strike are GIVEN to the
> > >
> > > player
> > >
> > > > > (not spawned).  You can only strip out things that spawn when the
> > >
> > > map is
> > >
> > > > > first loaded.
> > > > >
> > > > > If you don't see something laying on the ground (or floating in
the
> > >
> > > air)
> > >
> > > > when
> > > >
> > > > > you first load a map, you can't use Stripper2 to remove it.
> > > > >
> > > > > botman
> > > > > ---
> > > > >
> > > > > So that won't work... currently I'm using the restriction adminmod
> > >
> > > gives,
> > >
> > > > it's
> > > >
> > > > > just that ppl can workaround that something about binding a
key
> > >
> > > to
> > >
> > > > > and then bruteforcing it a couple of times...
> > > > >
> > > > > On Saturday 21 September 2002 21:47, dJeyL wrote:
> > > > > > it can.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > you could for example restrict them with adminmod, and if
players
> > >
> > > try
> > >
> > > > > > to workaround it, they just waste dollars but never get their
> > >
> > > weapon :
> > > > > > just use botman's stripper2 metamod plugin :
> > > > > > http://www.planethalflife.com/botman/stripper2.shtml
> > > > > >
> > > > > > cheers,
> > > > > > -- djeyl
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - Original Message -
> > > > > > From: "Rene Luckow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > > Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2002 9:42 PM
> > > > > > Subject: [hlds_linux] weapon r

Re: [hlds_linux] Memory Usage?

[Ryan McCullough]

nothing is going to account for half a second of lag. Sorry.


"Chris Deome" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Ryan.. I have included an MTR from my ISP's Linux box.
>
> Here is the shot
> 12. 208.187.127.193
> 0%   77   7729   25   27 46
> 13. cust-208-187-122-52.bbsc.net
> 0%   77   7732   30   67744
> 14. 216-147-134-5.lymanbros.net
> 0%   77   7742   30   63663
>
> The Last column is the worst ping.
>
> Number 12 is the router that is providing the wireless that is mounted on
a
> Large Movie house called Jordan Commons.
>
> Num 13 is the AP accepting the wireless shot.. and 14 is my server.  I was
> just wondering if there are any configs out there that deal with this much
> variable latency.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ryan
> McCullough
> Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 3:43 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Memory Usage?
>
>
> what is the latency to the accesspoint?
>
> "foad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Hey Everyone,
> >
> > Well.. Any help would be appreciated.  I am also on a 3MB wireless shot
> > across the valley of SLC to a T3.  Any help with lag also would be
great..
> > (Does anyone have a config for wireless??)
> >
> > I am not running HL Guard :-(...  Current MOD's installed are::
> >
> >  Metamod version 1.12.00, Copyright (c) 2001 Will Day
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Metamod comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type `meta
gpl'.
> >This is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it
> >under certain conditions; type `meta gpl' for details.
> >
> > L 09/20/2002 - 16:08:43: [META] Metamod v1.12.00, 2002/04/23
> > L 09/20/2002 - 16:08:43: [META] by Will Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > L 09/20/2002 - 16:08:43: [META]http://www.metamod.org/
> > L 09/20/2002 - 16:08:43: [META] compiled: Apr 23 2002, 23:48:05 Eastern
> > (optimized)
> > L 09/20/2002 - 16:08:43: [META] Recognized game 'cstrike'; using dllfile
> > 'cs_i386.so'
> > L 09/20/2002 - 16:08:43: [META] Game DLL for 'Counter-Strike' loaded
> > successfully
> > L 09/20/2002 - 16:08:43: [META] ini: Begin reading plugins list:
> metamod.ini
> > L 09/20/2002 - 16:08:43: [META] ini: Read plugin config for:
> > 
> > L 09/20/2002 - 16:08:43: [META] ini: Read plugin config for:
> > 
> > L 09/20/2002 - 16:08:43: [META] ini: Finished reading plugins list:
> > metamod.ini; Found 2 plugins to load
> > L 09/20/2002 - 16:08:43: [META] dll: Loading plugins...
> > L 09/20/2002 - 16:08:43: [ADMIN] By Alfred Reynolds
> > (http://www.adminmod.org)
> > L 09/20/2002 - 16:08:43: [ADMIN] Version: 25026a (MM)
> > L 09/20/2002 - 16:08:43: [META] dll: Loaded plugin 'Adminmod': Adminmod
> > v25026a (MM) 24-10-2001, Alfred R
> >
> > Also Running the Non beta of  "statsme_version" is "2.6.4"
> >
> > Here is a SC of my config::
> >
> > log on
> > pausable 0
> > hostname "[c|Sc0] -=1=- .:Swishem.Net:."
> > decalfrequency 1
> > allow_spectators 1
> > sv_accelerate 5.00
> > sv_cheats 0
> > sv_contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > sv_aim 0
> > sv_airmove 1
> > sv_allowdownload 1
> > sv_allowupload 1
> > sv_bounce 1
> > sv_gravity 800
> > sv_maxspeed 320
> > sv_maxrate 
> > sv_minrate 3000
> > server_fps 75.00
> > sv_maxupdaterate 160.00
> > //rcon_password
> > sv_stepsize 18
> > sv_stopspeed 75.00
> > mp_autoteambalance 1
> > mp_buytime 4
> > mp_c4timer 35
> > mp_chattime 3
> > mp_consistency 1
> > mp_forcechasecam 1
> > mp_flashlight 1
> > mp_friendlyfire 1
> > mp_freezetime 1
> > mp_footsteps 1
> > mp_fragsleft 0
> > mp_logfile 1
> > mp_logmessages 1
> > mp_roundtime 3
> > mp_teamplay 0
> > mp_timelimit 30
> > mp_timeleft 1
> > mp_tkpunish 1
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Foad (Chris)
> >
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Eric
> > (Deacon)
> > Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 12:26 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] Memory Usage?
> >
> >
> > > > Are you running HLGuard?  I know some people have this problem wh

Re: [hlds_linux] bod and admin_mod ....

[Ryan McCullough]

hpbbot is a good stable bot but I ahve found the bots to be kind of dumb.
They cant buy weapons and I dont see them defuse bombs. Stable bot though.


"Maximilian Marx" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> botmans hpbbot will also work under linux
> - Original Message -
> From: "Mike Hodgkinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 4:34 PM
> Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] bod and admin_mod 
>
>
> > Most bots work with admin_mod, and should have instructions on thier
> pages.
> > Theres only 2 bots I know of that work with linux tho.
> > PLBot (olo.counter-strike.pl)
> > RealBot (bot.counter-strike.net/realbot)
> >
> > Realbots currently better, but the author has stopped coding to work on
> CS:
> > CZ.
> > Olo is working on a rewrite of PLBot which he will call CBBot. Hopefully
> it
> > should be a really great bot for dedicated servers.
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Prodigy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 9:27 PM
> > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] bod and admin_mod 
> >
> >
> > > try olo's plbot
> > >
> > > search google.
> > >
> > > - Original Message -
> > > From: "TigerFox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 11:51 PM
> > > Subject: [hlds_linux] bod and admin_mod 
> > >
> > >
> > > > is there any bot that works with admin_mod?
> > > >
> > > > ___
> > > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
archives,
> > > please visit:
> > > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ___
> > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> > please visit:
> > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> > >
> >
> > ___
> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
>


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

Re: [hlds_linux] bod and admin_mod ....

[Ryan McCullough]

I really like plbot but it seemed to crash my server alot.

"Mike Hodgkinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Most bots work with admin_mod, and should have instructions on thier
pages.
> Theres only 2 bots I know of that work with linux tho.
> PLBot (olo.counter-strike.pl)
> RealBot (bot.counter-strike.net/realbot)
>
> Realbots currently better, but the author has stopped coding to work on
CS:
> CZ.
> Olo is working on a rewrite of PLBot which he will call CBBot. Hopefully
it
> should be a really great bot for dedicated servers.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Prodigy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 9:27 PM
> Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] bod and admin_mod 
>
>
> > try olo's plbot
> >
> > search google.
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "TigerFox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 11:51 PM
> > Subject: [hlds_linux] bod and admin_mod 
> >
> >
> > > is there any bot that works with admin_mod?
> > >
> > > ___
> > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> > please visit:
> > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> >
>


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

Re: [hlds_linux] [OT] Players who ruin the game because of thier stats...

[Ryan McCullough]

I like your solution
"David Harrison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I just delete the stats of people that are playing like pussies until they
> get the message
>
> -- trog
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Rob Sanders" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 10:37 AM
> Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] [OT] Players who ruin the game because of thier
> stats...
>
>
> > Kill the stats.  I've had nothing but problems like you mention.
> >
> > On Wed, 18 Sep 2002 18:32:51 -0400, Oscar N wrote:
> >
> > > We've had some complains about this, players who camp all the map
> > > because they don't want to get killed and loose a few points etc...
But
> > > we still want to have the stats, not every cs server here in sweden
have
> > > stats. It takes some time to set it up good and when it's realtime
based
> > > it also requires a nice computer. We think it can draw at least some
> > > players to our server and therefor we want it... Does anyone else has
> > > this problem when they are running stats from the cs servers?
> > >
> > > Anyway, we started thinking about how to get rid of the players who
> > > spoil the game, so right now I'm rewriting some code. Our thoughts was
> > > to first remove the rank based on skill points. Instead the players
> > > should be ranked on how long they have been connected. Who hope to
keep
> > > at least some of the players who think it's important to check out how
> > > good they have been with a certain weapon and things like that. And
what
> > > we hope most for is to get rid of the players who ruin the game.
> > >
> > > If anyone has some code/idea or want the code, let me know... Check it
> > > out at http://stats.bhood.nu It's not finished yet, but it's not much
> > > let.
> > >
> > > /Oscar, www.bhood.nu
> > ___
> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> >
>


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

Re: [hlds_linux] [OT] Players who ruin the game because of thier stats...

[Ryan McCullough]

use a camp slap script for metamod. Make the penalty big though, like 25-50
healthpoint for camping more than x number of seconds.


"Rob Sanders" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Kill the stats.  I've had nothing but problems like you mention.
>
> On Wed, 18 Sep 2002 18:32:51 -0400, Oscar N wrote:
>
> > We've had some complains about this, players who camp all the map
> > because they don't want to get killed and loose a few points etc... But
> > we still want to have the stats, not every cs server here in sweden have
> > stats. It takes some time to set it up good and when it's realtime based
> > it also requires a nice computer. We think it can draw at least some
> > players to our server and therefor we want it... Does anyone else has
> > this problem when they are running stats from the cs servers?
> >
> > Anyway, we started thinking about how to get rid of the players who
> > spoil the game, so right now I'm rewriting some code. Our thoughts was
> > to first remove the rank based on skill points. Instead the players
> > should be ranked on how long they have been connected. Who hope to keep
> > at least some of the players who think it's important to check out how
> > good they have been with a certain weapon and things like that. And what
> > we hope most for is to get rid of the players who ruin the game.
> >
> > If anyone has some code/idea or want the code, let me know... Check it
> > out at http://stats.bhood.nu It's not finished yet, but it's not much
> > let.
> >
> > /Oscar, www.bhood.nu


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

Re: [hlds_linux] sys_ticrate : explained ?

[Ryan McCullough]

there was a good doc about this somewhere. might have been an email. Check
out hte udpsoft pingbooster site.


"Spectre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> finally I found the very detailed page about ticrate.
> The explanation is meant for Unreal Tournament but
> I'd think it shows nicely how pings and resources
> depend from a right value for ticrate.
> I'm not sure though if it behaves similar with HL?!
>
>
http://www.unrealadmin.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=FAQ&file=index&myfaq=
yes&
> id_cat=4&categories=UT+-+Netspeed+Tutorial+by+TNSe#24
>
> enjoy
> - Spectre
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jan Arild Risan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 8:14 AM
> Subject: [hlds_linux] sys_ticrate : explained ?
>
>
> > is there any good 'guide' to what this cvar should be set to ?
> >
> >
> > Jan Arild Risan
> > TC2K2
> >
> > ___
> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please
> visit:
> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
>


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

Re: [hlds_linux] if this doesnt convince you gentoo owns all...

[Ryan McCullough]

i thot you were gone eric. good to read you again.

"Eric (Deacon)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Sweetness
>
> <3 gentoo
>
> --
> Eric (the Deacon remix)
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:hlds_linux-
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kevin J. Anderson
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 9:26 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [hlds_linux] if this doesnt convince you gentoo owns all...
> >
> >
> ftp://ftp.gtlib.cc.gatech.edu/pub/gentoo/releases/1.4_rc1/x86/livecd-ut2
> 003-
> > x86-1.4_rc1-r1.iso
> >
> > boot that cd, and plug and play the ut2003 demo on linux   more
> info @
> > www.gentoo.org, and this ./ article
> > http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/09/17/1634214&mode=flat&tid=127
> >
> > ps.  this subject line is not meant to start up a distro flame war,
> but
> > rather just pointing out something incredibly cool, and kind of gives
> one an
> > idea what gentoo's philosophy is all about (to do really cool shite
> imho)
> >
> > kev
> >
> > ___
> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please
> > visit:
> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
>


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

Re: [hlds_linux] Unbans (Global)

[Ryan McCullough]

yeah, maybe I was wrong in posting that info but as Dave said I was
suggesting that if you put the problem in front of the big dogs then maybe
they will be encouraged to kick some ass on the problem. I know how
development works and if a manager gets pissed because he suddenly starts
getting complaints from users(and alot of them no less) in his personal
email address it makes magical things happen overnight.

"Jeremy Brooking" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> On Wed, 2002-09-18 at 13:52, David Harrison wrote:
> > I think Ryan's point was, at the moment there is no official place to
> > request support from and he was making a somewhat whimsical comment that
> > perhaps if the users started deluging the upper echelons of Valve
management
> > with requests for more information about why they were banned - instead
of
> > server admins who simply don't know - then things might start to
progress a
> > little more smoothly. I don't think he was seriously advocating we go
out
> > and publish their details to our respective communities.
>
> Oh no, I understand that, my point was more of a "Id rather not suggest
> to them anywhere to mail, than suggest somewhere it may not even be
> answered"
>


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

Re: [hlds_linux] Unbans (Global)

[Ryan McCullough]

uh yeah, what he said.


"David Harrison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > There needs to be some 'official' place to request support from. I am
> > sure they could indeed deal with the issue, but mailing direct to a
> > particular staff member (who may be on holiday, sick or just too busy to
> > check his mail daily) is really not appropriate to get support.
>
> I think Ryan's point was, at the moment there is no official place to
> request support from and he was making a somewhat whimsical comment that
> perhaps if the users started deluging the upper echelons of Valve
management
> with requests for more information about why they were banned - instead of
> server admins who simply don't know - then things might start to progress
a
> little more smoothly. I don't think he was seriously advocating we go out
> and publish their details to our respective communities.
>
> -- trog
>
>


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

Re: [hlds_linux] F1/F2 bind workaround..

[Ryan McCullough]

yes but those DLLS will be important eventually and when they are I will
still like to use my function keys.


"Stefan Huszics" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Change the name of *DemoEditor.dll* and *GameUi.dll* to eg
> *DemoEditor._* and *GameUI._*
> The files can be located in *Half-Life/valve/cl_dlls*
>
> Then f1 & f2 will be bindable again.
>
> Ryan McCullough wrote:
>
> >it doesnt work because those DLLs grab the key and make it so your binds
> >have no bearing. My buyscript is run after engine initialization and I
still
> >cannot use my function keys.
> >
> >
>
> --
> /Stefan
>
> Software never has bugs. It just develops random features. =)
>
>
>


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

Re: [hlds_linux] cheater warning

[Ryan McCullough]

There could be an option for hte admin to kick the offender after they have
been listed as cheating by X different servers. Like I wouldnt take the word
of one server admin but 3 I would accept and add the cheater to my ban list.
Would only work for Cheaters too, not too good for TKer as some people dont
ban for TK, TW, language, sprays.


"Stephen Ogletree" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> That would actually be really cool... so wonid's could have a "history"
> tracked instead of just a banned list of numbers... Perhaps it could log
> each time a person is kicked/banned and when they join a server it reports
> that the person has XX events and the latest one is  for  on 
at
> , and perhaps with a dll or something you could have a menu that lets
> people look at a person's history.
>
> Well, now it sounds like a lot more work, but it would be awesome.
>
> Stephen
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Matt
> Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 7:55 AM
> To: hlds
> Subject: [hlds_linux] cheater warning
>
>
>
> I was wondering if anyone would be interested in this.  I know that the
> global blacklist app has been discussed and actually I have a
> master/slave global blacklist app already written.  I have modded it a
> little to not kick but to warn other players like so:
>
> Player (wonid) was caught cheating on 10/12/2001 on server
> "198.69.131.1" using "OGC 5.1".
>
> That comes up as soon as they connect.  Right now its in perl so I'm
> moving it to metamod since I need some C sockets practice.  Would anyone
> be interested in something like this?  Is it even worth using since
> there are so many stolen wonids?
>
> --
>
> Cheers,
>
> Matt
>
> ___
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
>


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

Re: [hlds_linux] logfile management

[Ryan McCullough]

they should compress much better than that. I compress about 80mb of logs
into <10mb.


"Chuck Larson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> A months logs uncompressed are about 120 MB and compressed about 45 MB
>
>
> Chuck Larson
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.tombstone-gaming.com
>
>
> Quoting "Brian A. Stumm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >
> > Couple questions for you...
> >
> > How big (file size) is one months worth of log files?
> >
> > How big is one maps regular *.log file for you and how long maps do
> > you
> > run or how much disk space does one days worth of log files take up
> > for
> > you (uncompressed). Trying to get an idea of how big one months logs
> > would
> > be compressed for *my* situation...
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Chuck Larson wrote:
> >
> > > I wrote one that I use with cron that tars and gzips last months
> > logs
> > > into a seperate directory then deletes last months logs.
> > >
> > > I do this on the 15 of every month since I rarely have to go back
> > more
> > > than 2 weeks.
> > >
> > > You could modify this to suit your needs I'm sure
> > >
> > >
> > > # - Start of script
> > >
> > > #!/bin/bash
> > > #
> > > # Archives last months hlds_linux logs
> > > #
> > >
> > > MONTH=`date '+%m' --date='1 month ago'`
> > > YEAR=`date '+%Y' --date='1 month ago'`
> > >
> > > # Location of HLDS log directory
> > > LOGSDIR='/usr/games/hlife/hlds_l/cstrike/logs'
> > >
> > > # Location to place tarball
> > > ARCHIVE='/usr/games/hlife/logArchives'
> > >
> > > if [ $YEAR ]
> > > then
> > > if [ $MONTH ]
> > > then
> > > cd $LOGSDIR
> > > echo Archiving last months logs
> > > if [ -e `tar -zcf
> > $ARCHIVE/logs_$YEAR-$MONTH.tar.gz
> > > L$MONTH*` ]
> > > then
> > > echo Removing last months logs
> > > rm -rf L$MONTH*
> > > else
> > > echo Error Archiving logs
> > > fi
> > > else
> > > echo Error determing last month value
> > > fi
> > > else
> > >echo Error determining last month and year values
> > > fi
> > >
> > > # --- END SCRIPT
> > > Chuck Larson
> > > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > http://www.tombstone-gaming.com
> > >
> > >
> > > Quoting "Brian A. Stumm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >
> > > > Has anyone written or found a shell script or the like used to
> > > > automatically delete log files that are a certain number of days
> > old?
> > > > I'd
> > > > like to keep a solid months worth of log files (31 maybe 35 days
> > or
> > > > so).
> > > > I'm imagining a shell script that is croned to run once a day
> > > > deleting
> > > > files older than a certain age. I'm sure I could figure something
> > out
> > > > but
> > > > thought I'd ask if anyone else is doing something similar.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > >
> > >
> > > -
> > > This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
> > > ___
> > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
> > archives, please visit:
> > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> > >
> >
> > --
> >ab.
> > Brian A. Stummd88b.
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]   8P"YP"Y88
> > http://www.bs-linux.com   8|o||o|88
> > The Choice of a Gnu Generation8'.88
> >   8`._.' Y8.
> >   #  d/  `8b.
> >  ###   .dP   . Y8b.
> >  ##   #   d8:'   "
> > `::88b.
> >  ##   ###   ### ###   ###   ###  ###   ###   d8"
> > `Y88b
> >  ##  #  ##   ###   ##  ####   ##   ##   :8P '
> > :888
> >  ## #   ##   ####  #### ###  8a.:
> > _a88P
> >  #####   ####  #### ###._/"Yaa_ :.|
> > 88P|
> >  ## # #######  ###### ##   \YP"  `| 8P
> > `.
> >  #### ### #  ####  ###  ###   ##   ##  / \._.d|
> > .'
> > #  ###       ### ### ###   ### `--..__)88P`._.'
> >
> >
> > ___
> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
> > archives, please visit:
> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> >
>
>
> -
> This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

Re: [hlds_linux] server.cfg, autoexec.cfg, *.cfg - ettiquette

[Ryan McCullough]

some commands with your banned.cfg need to be in autoexec rather than
server.cfg. Otherwise you run the risk of overwriting your banned.cfg fairly
often.


"m0gely" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> --
> [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
> Sorry this may be a double post, I email the 1st time from the wrong
> account.  So I am seeing all these posts about what var's should be in
> what configs.  I am a little confused as I have never see any sort of
> guide or Bosworth's book of Etiquette on the matter.  It appears that
> "log on" in multiple config's causes issues.  If it does, it does,
> although I can't see why turning on something that is already on would
> hose it.  But that's not my question here.  When I saw the "log on" in
> statsme.cfg, I did disable it simply because I know it doesn't need to
> be run twice.  So I guess I stayed out of trouble without knowing it.  I
> have also seen posts on this list and in other forums regarding where
> stuff should be.  Why is this?  This is my cstrike startup:
>
> ./hlds -game cstrike +maxplayers 12 -noipx +map de_dust2
>
> Everything else is in my server.cfg file.  I have never had an
> autoexec.cfg file although I have always been aware of it and how it
> works.  I guess I just felt it was redundant and not needed, and I
> preferred to keep all my settings in one file.  I also try to make sure
> I don't have duplicate settings in other cfg's that come along w/ mods I
> use.  Am I missing out on something by doing this?  What are the reasons
> if any for having an autoexec.cfg or putting certain var's in certain
> cfg's?
>
> - m0gely
>   http://quake2.telestream.com
> Q2 | Q3A | Counter-Strike
>
> --
>


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

Re: [hlds_linux] Custom Models? Are they Now Cheating?

[Ryan McCullough]

what do you mean "consistency checks"?? I had a ton of custom weapon skins
and when I connect to a server it tried to download all the skins off the
server. Why? How do player models respond?


"Eric Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> As long as the models pass the normal consistency checks done by
> Counter-Strike, they should be fine.  This hasn't changed.
>
> -Eric
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Duncan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 11:18 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED] ';
> '[EMAIL PROTECTED] '
> Subject: [hlds_linux] Custom Models? Are they Now Cheating?
>
>
>   Can someone (ERic) Please Confirm or at least clear up for me the issue
of
> Custom Models. I know  a lot of our regs just downloaded and installed the
> new FUSION 7.0 pack for CS. I would like to know if this is a problem so I
> can spread the word in our community.
> Thanks
> _dave
> ___
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

Re: [hlds_linux] Countermap pack2

[Ryan McCullough]

> I dont have the email of the man who poseted here about mittoting the pack

lol, at least he was consistent




___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

Re: [hlds_linux] PHP script listing cheaters caught by Valve's anti-cheat.

[Ryan McCullough]

if you find it please post it.

"Steve Fulton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi all,
>
> Early someone mentioned they made a PHP script that parsed the logs and
> generated a page of all people caught with Valve's anti-cheat.  I was
> wondering if that person would mind sharing the source ;)
>
> -- Steve
>
>
>
> --
> "Nullum magnum ingenium sine mixtura dementiae fuit."
> -- Seneca
>
>


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

Re: [hlds_linux] Logging of Security update?

[Ryan McCullough]

what would you need it for though? If your server is working and connected
to the internet you are running the latest version.


"Chuck Larson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Currently, is there a log event for the security updates?
>
> If so, just flame me for missing that.
>
>
> Chuck Larson
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.tombstone-gaming.com
>
>
>
>
>
> -
> This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

Re: [hlds_linux] CPU exesive usage

[Ryan McCullough]

I dont think a single 1.7ghz is capable of running 3 full hlds processes.


"Antoine Beyney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi, I am games-fed.com senior admin and I have many problems with CS 1.4
> about the cpu usage, on P4 1.7GHZ 512mb DDR the first server take 50% CPU
> the second 25 and third 9%, when the tree are full the ping raise to
130ms.
> I can't understand why it'does it ... For the ram usage I havn' t problem
all
> tree are about 75 - 90MB ...
>
> Plz help me.
>
> Regards,
>
> Antoine


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

Re: [hlds_linux] FW: [hlds_linux] High Server Usage?

[Ryan McCullough]

are you running the 3109c patch? I believe it fixed the linux memory
problem. If you are running windows server( in which case why are you
posting here) there isnt a fix yet and doesnt look like one is on the
horizon.


"Barry L. Jeung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Never got any response on this issue, and it seems to be worsening. Just
wondering if anyone else is noticing higher than normal memory usage. I run
2 very popular 32 player CS servers, and I get a LOT of "feedback" when the
server isn't running tip-top. The same server listed below, with the
exception that I removed the democracy plugin and updated StatsMe to 2.5.6
was just showing the following:

nobody   15504 14.6 61.1 340720 314716 ? RJun01 366:00 ./hlds -game
cstrike -port 27015 -pingboost 2

I just restarted the server + halfd since I was getting reports of pings
skyrocketing. My other 32 player server is currently showing the following,
and will probably need to be restarted soon as well.

nobody   32516 22.3 42.5 359100 218612 ? SMay31 930:33 ./hlds -game
cstrike -port 27015 -pingboost 2

This box is identically configured, the only difference being a faster
processor (Athlon XP 1800+) and a lower version of RH (7.2 as opposed to
7.3). Both boxes have everything stripped of what they don't need, all RPMS
patched up to date, and "low-fat" kernels compiled from the latest source
(2.4.18). Just wondering if anyone else is noticing skyrocketing memory
usage, and if so, what steps they've taken to troubleshoot/fix. Thanks
again.

-Original Message-
From: Barry L. Jeung
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 11:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [hlds_linux] High Server Usage?


nobody   10921 14.8 42.2 223128 217356 ? RMay27 169:29 ./hlds -game
cstrike -port 27015 -pingboost 2

That that seem to be a little on the high side for memory usage? Any thing I
can check?

Machine specs:
Athlon XP 1600+
512mb RAM

HLDS Specs:
version :  45/3.1.0.9 2024 secure
map :  de_prodigy at: 0 x, 0 y, 0 z
players :  31 active (32 max)

Running beta C with HalfD 2.18, MM 1.12.00, AM 2.50.26a, HLG 1.00 Beta 4,
Statsme 2.1.16, and the standard AM plugins + democracy and maptracker. I
don't really care that it's using that much memory (dedicated CS machine),
but it just seems a little high. Thanks
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

RE: caught one??? Re: [hlds_linux] Linux pbctojpg..

[a Ryan McCullough]

Dude!! that looks like part of the OGC hack! I have the ogc hack movie on my
comp and that looks like it could be the lasers that it can display.

-Original Message-
From: Kevin J. Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 9:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: caught one??? Re: [hlds_linux] Linux pbctojpg.. 


hahahah,   check out bong_man and the red laser thing going through the
screen in dust!!!

where can admins get screenbuster?
- Original Message -
From: "Simon Garner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 8:07 AM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Linux pbctojpg..


| And here is ScreenBuster running under Linux:
|
| http://pb.gameplanet.co.nz/
|
| I'm rather pleased with it :)
|
|
| From: "Niklas Göransson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|
| > http://www.multiplayer.it/files/scheda.php3?id=5668
| > for win32 but the scripts are in perl and can be used on a linux
machine,
| they'll probably distribute a linux version of these scripts in a
fourtnight
| or so.
| >
| > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/26/01 04:09am >>>
| > Ok, I know theres 3-4 pb screen shot scripts in perl...   Someone point
| > me to them!
| >
| > -Original Message-
| > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
| > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| > Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 7:08 PM
| > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| > Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] Linux pbctojpg..
| >
| >
| > So Simon, have you looked at the viability of using the win32 perl
| > scripts on a linux host? Has anyone else?
| >
| > ---
| > Red Phive
| > www.redphive.org
| >
| > -Original Message-
| > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Simon
| > Garner
| > Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 3:40 PM
| > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Linux pbctojpg..
| >
| >
| > Woohoo!
| >
| > Getting Screenbuster working should give PB a few more weeks of life...
| >
| >
| > From: "James Gurney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| >
| > > Is out.. download now from punkbuster.com..
| > >
| > >
| > > ___
| > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
| > please visit:
| > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
| >
| > ___
| > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
| > please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
| >
| > ___
| > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
| > please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
| >
| >
| > ___
| > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
| please visit:
| > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
| >
| > ___
| > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
| please visit:
| > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
|
| ___
| To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
| http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

RE: [hlds_linux] Calculation for Max Players

[Ryan McCullough]

hmmm, looks like it rejected my attachment. Try this link.
http://www.geocities.com/uncle_rache/transfer1.xls

-Original Message-
From: Ryan McCullough [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 1:59 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] Calculation for Max Players


keep in mind that the spreadsheet was written before 1.3 came out. 1.3
includes voice which I believe adds about 1k/sec more bandwidth per user.

-Original Message-
From: Coroner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 1:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [hlds_linux] Calculation for Max Players


Hello hlds_l gods,

I've seen it before and though that I saved it.  I was mistaken on the
saved it part.  Does anyone know the calculation you can use to
determine the approximate amount of players a given amount of bandwidth
can sustain.  For instance, if you wanted to figure out how many
players a 1.5/384 ADSL line could handle; or a 768/768.  Also, is it
dependent
upon the MOD ?  For instance, would Counter Strike require more
bandwidth than plain vanilla Death Match ?

Thanks all,


Coroner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

RE: [hlds_linux] Need some help here ! ( Part 2 )

[Ryan McCullough]

True. The client port is unimportant in this case. Notice how "lool" is
using 21483. Try banning his IP. If he comes back, then ban his whole subnet
with your linux OS isntead of HL. Someone on here with moreproficiency in
linux than I can tell you how to ban a subnet through your linux os.



-Original Message-
From: Niklas Göransson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 3:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Need some help here ! ( Part 2 )


as far as the clientport is concerned there is nothing in the "RFC" that
states that the client MUST use 27005, it's just the default port and can
easily be changed, either coming from a NATed environment or changing
+clientport to whatever you want, true?

>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/23/01 12:01pm >>>

Forgot one thing to my former post,

This is what I saw in the logs :

L 10/21/2001 - 18:31:07: "Cyrus The Virus<241><214988><>" connected, address
"212.187.82.155:43622"
   
In the logs I do see his WONID, but the portnumber behind his IP is
different from the rest.

This is how normal connects to the server look like :

L 10/21/2001 - 18:14:57: "ZeroLogic<213><807579><>" connected, address
"xxx.xx.148.202:27005"
L 10/21/2001 - 18:14:58: "Bollox<214><267297><>" connected, address
"xxx.xxx.119.15:27005"
L 10/21/2001 - 18:14:58: "T@rget<215><211199><>" connected, address
"xxx.xx.222.244:27005"
L 10/21/2001 - 18:14:58: "c]_[BIER]R0y@L<216><1708916><>" connected, address
"xxx.xxx.64.142:27005"
L 10/21/2001 - 18:14:58: "mutta<217><284860><>" connected, address
"xxx.xxx.153.209:27005"
L 10/21/2001 - 18:14:59: "lool<218><268701><>" connected, address
"xxx.xx.96.129:21483"
L 10/21/2001 - 18:15:00: "[=XP=]TyRoNE<219><602922><>" connected, address
"xxx.xxx.89.111:27005"
L 10/21/2001 - 18:15:04: World triggered "Round_Start"
L 10/21/2001 - 18:15:06: "Bollox<214><267297><>" entered the game
L 10/21/2001 - 18:15:09: "[3NZyM]<220><1320862><>" connected, address
"xx.xxx.234.227:27005"

As you can seem all players have 27005 behind their IP, except for that
rotten cheater, he's got 43622

If someone knows how this is possible, please post it here.

Grtz,

Marcel

-- 
Get your free warez from ftp://127.0.0.1 

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

RE: [hlds_linux] strange errors

[Ryan McCullough]

Just my opinion, but this looks like it may be from the new code to protect
against the zero length name.

-Original Message-
From: Ketchup [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, October 14, 2001 3:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [hlds_linux] strange errors


Hi,

I just received a strange logfile from one of my servers, any idea
what may cause this? Maybe Admin MOD?

System: HLDS 3108 Linux (now updatet to 3108a), Admin MOD 2.50.07 with
lots of plugins ...

--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--

V_ReadClientMessage: unknown command char (141)
L 10/14/2001 - 20:46:19: Server cvar "public_slots_free" = "3.00"
L 10/14/2001 - 20:46:19: "PornX<436><998904>" disconnected
Dropped PornX from server
Reason: Bad command character in client command 

SV_ReadClientMessage: badread
L 10/14/2001 - 21:17:03: Server cvar "public_slots_free" = "1.00"
L 10/14/2001 - 21:17:03: "[UBC]Frustzwerg<443><103026>"
disconnected
Dropped [UBC]Frustzwerg from server
Reason: Bad parse in client command 

SV_ReadClientMessage: badread
L 10/14/2001 - 21:17:16: Server cvar "public_slots_free" = "1.00"
L 10/14/2001 - 21:17:16: "[UBC]Col-Trautman<447><925520>"
disconnected
Dropped [UBC]Col-Trautman from server
Reason: Bad parse in client command 

SV_ReadClientMessage: unknown command char (14)
L 10/14/2001 - 21:18:22: Server cvar "public_slots_free" = "1.00"
L 10/14/2001 - 21:18:22: "[UBC]RedBaron<449><94582>" disconnected
Dropped [UBC]RedBaron from server
Reason: Bad command character in client command 

--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--

-- 

 Peter aka Ketchup

 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.pommesbude.org
 http://www.counter-strike.de
 http://gameguard.clanhosting.de

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

RE: [hlds_linux] Upgrade Advice

[Ryan McCullough]

It seems like the machine you currently have shouldn't be acting in the way
you describe. Does linux have any serious performance issues with a celeron
proc? 1.3 made some changes that seriously impact cpu from 1.1, so maybe
there is your problem.

-Original Message-
From: Chuck Hays [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, October 14, 2001 10:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Upgrade Advice


Thats my exact setup (Duron 800 - 256 meg PC133 ram), and I run 25
players with no problems. Running CS/halfd/hlstats/adminmod.  Plus a
small website etc...  runs with no problems, so that hardware would be
sufficient for your goals.

-Chuck Hays
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

On Sun, 2001-10-14 at 22:39, Khyron wrote:
> I'm (trying) to run a 16 player CS serv, with halfd and adminmod.
> 
> I currently have a celeron 433 (o'clocked to 487) and 256 megs Ram, on
> 1500/580 DSL.
> 
> When 10 people are on, cpu usage hits 48%, with Ram usage at about 120.
> Pings fluctuate, but when alone, I ping 25, when 10 are on, I'm over 70
> (which makes me think its not a network issue).
> 
> So has my old server gotten long in the tooth and I have to bite the
bullet
> and upgrade, or is under 50% cpu still acceptable for a server? (and I
have
> something else killing me)...
> 
> If an upgrade is required, would an 800mhz duron with 256 ddr be
sufficient?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Khyron
> 


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

RE: to muchHeadshots

[Ryan McCullough]

aztec too

-Original Message-
From: Yacketta, Ronald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2001 6:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: to muchHeadshots



Yeah, there is alost a bug in de_dust for 1.3
players walk in the sky! I have screens

- Original Message -
From: "Killah" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2001 7:35 AM
Subject: to muchHeadshots


>
> Hi all
> I was reading today on some forums and saw this demo.
> http://vos-clan.gamepoint.net/cs-jump-bug.zip
>
> take a look at it and take conclusions about the many headshots in CS 1.3.
>

RE: new cheat for cs?

[Ryan McCullough]

I think it is scripting.
You setup and alias that fires, switches to your pistol/knife, switches back
to awp. The you are able to fire again.

-Original Message-
From: James Gurney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 11:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: new cheat for cs?



I dunno.. There was someone on my server last night who was firing the awp
at the same rate as a pistol..

- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 10:23 AM
Subject: RE: new cheat for cs?


>
>
> I've seen it happen on really laggy connections, but it wasn't a
> cheat. Also you can interrupt the shotgun(s) loading process to fire a
shot.
>
>
> Daniel K.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Casey Zacek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 8:22 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: new cheat for cs?
>
>
>
>
> I'm hearing complaints about some new cheat in CS where you can fire while
> reloading.  Anyone else seen or heard of it?
>
> --
> -- Casey Zacek (Zippo)
>Beer for Breakfast servers 
>209.41.98.2:27016 (multi-map), 27017 (militia), 27019 (DoD) (Dallas,
TX)
>207.106.65.68:27015 (de_ maps), 27016 (dust/dust2) (Washington, DC)
>
>
>

RE: Round start ???

[Ryan McCullough]

well to start I would make sure you have stuff in your mapcycle.txt. If this
is not the problem then set the mapcycle perms to 777 and see if it works.
If this works, play with the perms to get a level you like and that works.
If it doesn't work tell us your results.

-Original Message-
From: Marcel Beringer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 11:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Round start ???




It seems that I know what the problem is, but I don't know the solution.

After the map is about to change, it freezes up. Normally after a few
seconds you see the "Loading" in the screen, and then it changes map.

When I manually change the map, it loads the map as usual and players can
connect again. When you open the console and type "listmaps" nothing
happens ! So I think that that might be the problem. It doesn't know which
map to load next.

On the server the chmod for the mapcycle.txt is 644, and for some weird
reason the server doesn't see it. I run two CS servers on the same
machine, with different start-up lines, motd's and server.cfg's.

Do I need to put the mapcycle.txt in the server.cfg somewhere or in the
startupline ? Or do I need to make the mapcycle.txt executable ?

If someone knows, please reply ;)

Kind regards,

Marcel Beringer

> -Original Message-
> From: Marcel Beringer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 4:01 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Round start ???
>
> Hi all,
>
> I installed a Hl & CS server for a friend of mine the same way I already
> installed a couple of other servers.
>
> The problem with the new server is, that when people connect they can only
> spectate. So they enter the server, and cannot pick a team.
>
> I have used exactly the same server.cfg as I have used for the other
> servers ( the ones that DO work :) ) but still it doesn't seem to work
> correctly.
>
> The server IP is 195.64.68.54:27015 and 195.64.68.54:27025
>
> Doesn anyone know what could be the problem here ?
>
> Grtz,
>
> Marcel
>
> --
> God may be my Co-pilot ... but the Devil's my Bombardier.
>
>

Grtz,

Marcel

--
God may be my Co-pilot ... but the Devil's my Bombardier.

RE: Eeeeep timeout errors ?

[Ryan McCullough]

I
think that is the won auth part. You might want to see if you can
ping
half-life.east.won.net
IP:63.251.143.218
half-life.west.won.net IP:
216.52.220.16
half-life.central.won.net IP:
63.251.143.213
 
Sounds
like you can't so check your network connection and DNS entries. You might need
to use the IP's in your woncomm.lst

  -Original Message-From: Luca Grossi
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001
  7:13 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
  Ep timeout errors ?
  Seem
  to be getting these errors ? any ideas ?
  linux:/home/games/halflife/hlds_l #
  ./hlds_run -game cstrike +maxplayers 10 +map cs_assaultHost_InitAdded
  packfile /home/games/halflife/hlds_l/valve/pak0.pak (985 files)Protocol
  version 45Exe version 4.1.0.8Exe build: 15:09:28 Sep 17 2001
  (1789)Timed out.Timed out.

RE: Problems

[Ryan McCullough]

The ATI fix also applied to some geforce cards as well. I believe it was the
geforce 3 line though.

-Original Message-
From: Elminst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 9:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Problems



If he has a GeForce there is no reason for him to have installed the ATI
patch.
The ATI patch was exactly that, for ATI cards ONLY.
He may need to reinstall CS and his video drivers.

- Original Message -
From: "Tim Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 11:29 AM
Subject: Problems


>
> I have a client that is having problems with CS and was wondering if
anyone
> can help him out?
> This is what he says is wrong even after he applied the ATI fix patch
>
> Hey Guys,
> I think I might not be able to play CS for a bit untill I fix this problem
> with my new GeForce 2 MX 400. It seems that since I put it on I get
> overflowed and/or my game freezes and all I hear is the sound that was
> playing when I froze over and over. So I don't know if I can get it fixed
or
> not. But if Anyone can help me, HELP ME!!
> *dying from CS Withdrawl*
> *convoltions*
> ACK!
>
>
> Here are his Specs:
> Amd Athlon 1 Ghz, GeForce 2 400 MX, SoundBlaster Live Value, 256 Megs of
> Ram, 56 gigz HDs,
>
> Timothy H. Cooper
> WorldCom
> AM&O East
> Traffic Engineer
> (703)886-1110
> V806-1110
>
>
>

RE: Round start ???

[Ryan McCullough]

Do you have a +maxplayers 10 in your startup?

-Original Message-
From: Marcel Beringer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 4:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Round start ???




Hi all,

I installed a Hl & CS server for a friend of mine the same way I already
installed a couple of other servers.

The problem with the new server is, that when people connect they can only
spectate. So they enter the server, and cannot pick a team.

I have used exactly the same server.cfg as I have used for the other
servers ( the ones that DO work :) ) but still it doesn't seem to work
correctly.

The server IP is 195.64.68.54:27015 and 195.64.68.54:27025

Doesn anyone know what could be the problem here ?

Grtz,

Marcel

--
God may be my Co-pilot ... but the Devil's my Bombardier.

RE: Server crashes - fixed yet?

[Ryan McCullough]

Didn't I get this yesterday? Is listserv sending yesterdays email again?
maybe that why so many in my inbox this morning.

-Original Message-
From: Eric Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Server crashes - fixed yet?



> I'd dispute the cause as being radio commands.  We thought this was the
> problem and disabled voice on 50 odd servers, but this didn't help,
several
> times we had crashes over the next couple of days.  We've put voice back
on
> and still are seeing the same number of seemingly random crashes.  We're
> only seeing a few crashes each evening, but it's a few more than what we
> have been seeing for the past year, and they aren't clean crashes so the
> server won't restart via script.
>
> I should note these are win32 servers with a crash problem; our one linux
> test CS server hasn't crashed once (running on FreeBSD).

FWIW, running 24 servers on one Win2k AS machine, I haven't had a crash like
you
describe for as long as I can remember.  It's always been restarted easily,
either by ServerDoc or by Firedaemon...

Eric (the Deacon remix)
http://www.firekite.com

RE: Punkbuster is dead?

[Ryan McCullough]

See thats the thing that they cover. If you were banned for no good reason
you can appeal through the website or an email address. It would need to be
part of the MOTD or sent to the users screen with a kicked by console
message so that the user knew. That way they could apeal and say they
weren't cheating, explain themselves and go from there. By having the server
who banned the person you can talk to the person who banned them and find
out what happened. The user would be unbanned with sufficient reason, but
with a remark that if they screwed around again to be re-banned. Yeah, one
bad admin could screw it up, but if you got alot of complaints from users
about getting banned for now reason on one guys server, you would know that
he was abusing the system. Nothing will ever be perfect, but this is probly
as good as it gets.

If you have a better suggestion I would like to hear it.

-Original Message-
From: Buddha-Pest [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 3:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Punkbuster is dead?



this system is something that works in theory but is open to incredible
abuse.  the  bottom line is, how do you categorically KNOW that someone is
cheating?  sure, wallhackers who shoot through walls are easy to spot.  but
what about wallhackers that just use the information to be more aware?  and
all it takes is one bad admin and someone might get banned from every server
without cause.

the only way something like this would work is if all the admins were in a
trusted domain.  i wouldn't want to join this network knowing some of the
peeps on this list, for example...

there's a small number of admins i really trust and those are the ones i'd
like to share my bans with.

- Original Message -
From: "Mirco Bauer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:43 PM
Subject: Re: Punkbuster is dead?


>
> yeah
> I did a project like that 1 year ago already.
> its called HLACS
> Half-Life AntiCheat System
> it works by itself... Admins enter bans and all servers are getting after
> the 15 min the new version
> I made a lil linux script and a Win32 client :)
> but its at the moment down... btw it has already many bans...
>
> Mirco Bauer
> - Original Message -
> From: "James Gurney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:13 PM
> Subject: Re: Punkbuster is dead?
>
>
> >
> > Yep, this is the sort of thing I was thinking of.. It would be trivial
to
> > output from a php file in the format of the banned.cfg file, and then
all
> > you'd need to do would be to set up a cron job that does:
> >
> > wget http://whaterver/banned.php > banned.txt
> >
> > every 10 minutes or so..
> >
> > I really think this is the only way to go. Imagine if *every* server did
> > this? Would people risk cheating if they knew it meant they'd get banned
> > >from every server out there? This also lessens the load on individual
> admins
> > to police their servers. If hundreds of people are out there submitting
> ids
> > of cheaters, you distribute the load much better.
> >
> > For this to work though, it would need to be very very widespread. Would
> be
> > nice if Valve could include a readme about it in the server archives on
> the
> > next release if we can get something set up?
> >
> >
> >
> > > http://guest:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ban/
> > > Simon garner posted this a while ago. Maybe with his guidance/help we
> > could
> > > get something like this going in the states and other countries. It
uses
> > > mysql and php.
> >
> >
>
>

RE: Punkbuster is dead?

[Ryan McCullough]

Someone has something like this already. I don't recall the URL, I will dig
for it. /me rumages
http://pbusted.cscentral.com/caughts.php
http://poo.foolclan.com/cgi-bin/ikonboard/ikonboard.cgi
http://quakest.xmission.com/banned.txt /some guys banned list, not proven
HERE IS THE ONE
http://guest:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ban/
Simon garner posted this a while ago. Maybe with his guidance/help we could
get something like this going in the states and other countries. It uses
mysql and php. He offered at the time to provide the source. If I can get
one of my extra computers back, I would not mind running this. I only have
cable, but this is not really that bandwidth intensive.

The way they solved the trust issue was that when you submitted an ID you
had to give a reason with it for why they were banned. They could also apeal
to it looks like and get unbanned, but they were on probation meaning if
they screwed around again they were banned. What happens is when ID's are
submitted you give a reason such as "PB detected OpenGL", "Intentional Team
Killing/Team Hurting", "abusive towards players and myself", "this person is
[ :) ]Creed, was caught wusing wallHax by PB(gameplanet servers)". This site
also stored who submitted the cheater. Since it is in mysql, I am sure there
is a way to also filter by cheat they were using. For instance if you want
to ban haxors, but not TKers if you do not run a FF server you could just
search for that. It is a pretty sweet way of doing this.

Comments simon? What do you guys think of simon's site? Interested in using
that system?

-Original Message-
From: James Gurney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Punkbuster is dead?



> > The latest Linux release was the best so far too.
>
> Ya except that you CANNOT run the linux version in required mode cuase it
> kicks everyone for "No PB Client" violations even though everyone is
running
> an up-to-date and valid PB client.

Works fine for me in required mode.

Anyway, it's a real shame, now we get to welcome back all the cheaters.
Woohoo.

This leads me onto a new idea, however.

Would anyone be interested in taking part in a universal blacklist system?
Whereby trusted people on servers can submit wonid's to a list on a web page
somewhere. You then run a small daemon on your server that contacts this
page and grabs the wonid's and sticks them in the banlist. The only problem
with this system is that you have to trust the people submitting ids for
banning. Actually proving a cheat is difficult but maybe possible by
watching the first person perspective in the new spectator mode. Perhaps a
screenshot or demo from this would be required before accepting an id..

If anyone is interested in taking part in a coordinated blacklist like this,
I'd be happy to organise it. I know there are blacklists out there already,
but I'd like to think this would be better coordinated and automated..

Comments anyone?

[ADMIN] ** HLDS_Linux Listserv FAQ & Rules **

[Ryan McCullough]

HLDS_Linux LISTSERV FAQ & RULES v1.2

[EMAIL PROTECTED] - This listserv is for the discusson of
Linux specific HLDS issues.

Please abide by the following rules:
- Read the documentation and do a little research first (or risk being
flamed and thwacked as a llama n00b). See FAQ #5 below.
- Post Related Topics Only. See FAQ #6 below.
- No HL Client General Questions (please go to one of the many gaming sites
like http://www.planethalflife.com)
- No HTML Emails (please keep to plain text - no colors or font changes)
- Don't subscribe using a postmaster box.  Your posts may be automatically
deleted. It is recommended that you create a new box just for this list.
- No Racist Remarks
- Don't Reply to "unsubscribe" Posts.
- If you feel the need to attack another member of this list, please do so
OFF the list.  The rest of us don't need to know how you feel.

---
The following FAQ was created by experienced admins on this list:

1. Unsubscribing from this List
2. Other Lists
3. HLDS_Linux Admin Addons and Utilities
4. Other HLDS_Linux Admin Resources
5. Initial Research
6. Related Topics for this List
7. List Archive


1) UNSUBSCRIBING FROM THIS LIST - Many people sign up to this list and find
that it's either too much for them or they have been helped and no longer
wish to be subscribed and continue receiving the high-volume traffic to
their email box.  To unsbuscribe, please send an email with the following:

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 
Body: unsubscribe hlds_linux

Make sure you send the email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and not
to this list (you'll risk being flamed and thwacked if you do).  Also, make
sure the body only has "unsubscribe hlds_linux" on the first line. The
subject line is ignored and can be left blank.

To make it even easier, just click on the following:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=unsubscribe%20hlds_linux


2) OTHER LISTS - There are a few other lists that Valve provides and you can
find those listed with instructions on their site at
http://www.valvesoftware.com/serveradmin.htm.


3) HLDS ADMIN ADDONS AND UTILITIES - The following is a list of a few of the
most popular HLDS admin addons and utilities that you may find useful
(please read their documentation and see their forums and email lists for
specific questions before asking on this list):

- AdminMOD (http://www.adminmod.org) -- The only MOD that enables HLDS_Linux
admins to extend their server with many different features.
**NOTE** Backup forum located at http://forums.unitedadmins.com/

- halfd (http://www.halfd.org) -- Advanced Server Management for Half Life
Servers.

- PunkBuster (http://www.punkbuster.com/) -- Anti-cheat system used on HLDS
servers.

For a more in-depth list, UnitedAdmins members can go:
http://www.unitedadmins.com/Links.asp?i=23


4) OTHER HLDS ADMIN RESOURCES - The following are other HLDS admin related
resources that are available:

- HLDS Setup How To Guide (http://server.counter-strike.net/howto.html) --
How To Guide to Setting up an HLDS Server

- #hlds IRC Channel on GamesNet (irc://irc.gamesnet.net/hlds)

- Counter-Server (http://server.counter-strike.net/) -- The CS Server Admin
Resource

- UnitedAdmins.com (http://www.unitedadmins.com/) -- Uniting Gaming Server
Admins (member maintained)

- HLTV FAQ (http://www.slipgate.de/projects/hltv_faq.html)

- HLTV How-To Guide (http://satan1.dynodns.net/HLTV/index.htm)


5) INITIAL RESEARCH - Before posting to this list, please do the necessary
research on your own by using the following steps as a guideline (this will
save you and other admins on the list time and energy):

- Visit Manufacturer/Developer Website/Forums
- Email Manufacturer/Developer Support
- Search the web with a Search Engines(ie. Google)
- Search the List Archive (see FAQ #7 below)
- Post to this HLDS List

PLEASE NOTE: If you do have a question and find the solution on your own,
please share with others by prefixing the subject with a "[INFO]" tag.
Thank you!


6) RELATED TOPICS FOR THIS LIST - To help define what topics are acceptable
on this listserv, please consider the following guidelines:

- Questions about HLDS (Half-Life Dedicated Server) for Linux/FreeBSD
- OS/Hardware questions, only if directly related to HL (if gray area mark
with [OT] in subject)
- Questions about HL MODs
- Questions about HL Add-ons or Helpfull Tools.  See FAQ #3.


7) LIST ARCHIVE - Congiman has been nice enough to maintain an archive of
this list up until 8/22/2001. A new archive is now available as well.

09/15/2001-Present
http://www.mail-archive.com/hlds_linux%40list.valvesoftware.com/
or
12/30/1999-08/22/2001
http://maillist.congiman.com/pipermail/listtfclinux/

===
This email will be periodically posted to the HLDS_Linux listserv.
Please send your comments, changes, or additions to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Servers CRASH!

[Ryan McCullough]

Try turning adminmod off and see if it makes a difference.

-Original Message-
From: Mark Moran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 6:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Servers CRASH!



Correct RE: Dll's, that's why I just remove it from my liblist.gam.  My
servers were upgrade w/ a full 1.1.0.8, and CS 1.3.  Got the latest 2.50.07
adminmod and metamod.  Still not ok.  All servers have been idle here for
about 6 hours and they're all up.  As soon as I get some peeps, I'll be
watching them go down. :*(

-Original Message-
From: sqlboy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 9:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Servers CRASH!




Hey there, I don't think the Linux server uses mp.dll.  I don't think the
file even exists in the Linux install.  Not only that, if it was a problem
loading a DLL or SO, the server would not run at all.

This is how I upgrade mine.  I untar the full install package in a temporary
area.  Then I delete all the files I don't want to overwrite, like:
liblist.gam, server.cfg, etc.  After that I cp -R * /path/to/dir

If you are running admin mod, you need the latest version and you should
also check metamod.org for an update and replace metamod_i386.so.

Start over with the full install packages and you should be ok.

SQL


-- Original Message --
From: Brad Ball <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 00:43:44 -0400

>
>Hey man. .. I was having the same problem with my servers. They'd run for
>some period of time (ALWAYS less than 1 map) and then crash with no
>explanation. After talking with some other epople I fund out that if you
>edit the file:
>liblist.gam
>you'll see the following line:
>gamedll "dlls\mp.dll"
>Obviously that is not correct. Since it is a LINUX server it should be:
>gamedll "dlls/mp.dll"
>So I changed that and started the server up .. Everything seemed to be
>running smoothly ... I got through 3 maps and then the server crashed. But
>it was a different type of crash this time  We were playing ... all the
>sudden things go weird .. The you saw "Warning: Connection Problem" .. then
>you got "Server connection timed out". I went to the logs and found this:
>L 09/21/2001 - 00:11:16: Server cvar "sv_wateraccelerate" = "6"
>L 09/21/2001 - 00:11:16: Server say "Server now running STANDARD config
>file."
>L 09/21/2001 - 00:11:16: Server say "get your stats and other srever info
>at:"
>L 09/21/2001 - 00:11:16: Server say "http://eka.bluegrass.net";
>L 09/21/2001 - 00:11:16: Server shutdown
>L 09/21/2001 - 00:11:16: Log file closed
>
>Notice the "L 09/21/2001 - 00:11:16: Server shutdown" line. I don't know
>what caused that. Anyway, I started the server back up a minute ago and am
>waiting to see if it happens again.  That is all the info I have gathered
on
>this problem. Please if you find out ANYTHING at all about this, please
>please please let me. It is driving me nuts cause it doesn't seem to be
>happeneing to alot of people.
>
>Brad
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Mark Moran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 12:06 AM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Servers CRASH!
>>
>>
>>
>> I've got 3 linux servers running, upgraded to 1.1.0.8 and CS
>> 1.3.  2 (#1 and
>> #2)run on the same machine w/ symlinks for everything but the
>> config files
>> and are on the same pipe.  The third (#3) is on another
>> machine different
>> pipe.  #1 can't get past a 30 minute map of dust.  Sometimes
>> crashing in 4
>> minutes, sometimes 29 minutes into the map.  No errors are
>> given.  And peeps
>> have to be on.  It can sit idle for hours w/o a problem.  #2
>> seems to get
>> through several maps w/o crashing.  #3 too.  All are running
>> the latest
>> metamod, adminmod 2.50.07.  (Tried it w/o those too).
>>
>> This is driving me and the players NUTS!  I'll provide
>> whatever info more is
>> needed.  Valve if you need telnet access to the server just
>> ask.  Anything
>> to get this bug fixed.
>>
>>
>
>
>

RE: THANKS FOR A GREAT UPGRADE

[Ryan McCullough]

what happened in 1016?

-Original Message-
From: Damian Harouff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 8:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: THANKS FOR A GREAT UPGRADE



Ever since the 1016 to 1100 fiasco, it hasn't gotten better or redeemed
itself. What are you basing this on that it's the "best one yet"?

On Thursday 20 September 2001 23:52, you wrote:
> I may have some issues but I think this latest update will prob be the
best
> one yet..
> can you believe owning a game for almost 3 years and still getting free
> updates and
> add-ons!
> I love the valve team and the CS team... and would definitely pay for CS 1
> time per year
> for great add-ons/updates.

RE: MD5 Sum for CS MOD Update (unofficial)

[Ryan McCullough]

The one for the full is the only one I am missing. The filename is
csv13full.exe i believe. Does anyone have an md5 for this file? I installed
it last night and played with it. Seemed to be ok, but there was talk about
versions slipping around that had the nimda virus in it. I would like to get
a valve originating md5, or rather couter-strike.net md5. I guess it works.

Here is the MD5 I have. THIS IS NOT OFFICIAL. THIS IS THE MD5 THAT I CREATED
WITH THE FILE I DOWNLOADED AND HAVE NOT VERIFIED IT.

045a9690571bbf24bdf4a12f063af8ca *csv13full.exe


If someone knows, can you verify for me please if this is correct. Thanks.

-Original Message-
From: Ken Kirchner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 4:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: MD5 Sum for CS MOD Update (unofficial)



On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, Ryan McCullough wrote:

>
> This is fine and dandy, but I still have yet to see md5's for the MOD
> version of CS.

Here's mine for the MOD update... I havent been able to get the full yet.

d351b2cf522d6df9669e0e0c55248742  csv1113.exe

--
Ken Kirchner:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Assistant System Administrator  :  Tel (318)222-2638
ShreveNet, Inc. :  Fax (318)213-2650

ShreveNet - Your Premium Internet Service Provider!

RE: Ang: Re: are these md5 for the clients correct ??

[Ryan McCullough]

This is fine and dandy, but I still have yet to see md5's for the MOD
version of CS.

-Original Message-
From: Ken Kirchner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 3:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Ang: Re: are these md5 for the clients correct ??




For those that were asking...

> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Eric Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cc: "Erik Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 9:26 AM
> > Subject: Primary Server Update ...cont.
> >
> > > More mirrors for everyone to utilize...
> > >
> > > ** BE SURE TO CHECK THE MD5SUMS FOR THE FILES YOU DOWNLOAD.  IF THEY
DO
> >
> > >NOT MATCH, DELETE THEM AND DOWNLOAD THE FILES FROM SOMEWHERE ELSE.

SERVER FILES

> > > HL Win32 Full  hlserver4108.exe
> > > md5sum: 4d132ca14919370fd795da832004d53e

> > > HL Win32 Upgrade  hlds41074108.exe
> > > md5sum: a5bc8778ebcf399bc0425dd4133d99a5

> > > HL Linux Full  hlds_l_3108_full.tar.gz
> > > md5sum: e034c77e5835bca3bb26c6d058efa30c

> > > HL Linux Upgrade hlds_l_3108_upgrade.tar.gz
> > > md5sum: c1f4e12c169793022f2bb5910fd69006

> > > CS Linux Full  cs_13_full.tar.gz
> > > md5sum: c17b30da26ee20db65c89eb5ac24bb63

> > > CS Linux Upgrade  cs_13_upgrade.tar.gz
> > > md5sum: 49439643a8a3ffcc8b32b1a6e3a7a5c9

CLIENT FILES

I downloaded these from Valve, but I do not have the official Valve letter
stating these are the true MD5 sums:

e5354347ecceede2795effe60bb5757c  11071108.exe
b9aebfb192fe95d884db8f319504a8e9  cs10021003.exe
791c8e0cb120a9668a4c1c8b23c01594  cs1003.exe
ef4ed2a010bfd5012e3ceb0ccb9d42ce  hl1108.exe

--
Ken Kirchner:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Assistant System Administrator  :  Tel (318)222-2638
ShreveNet, Inc. :  Fax (318)213-2650

ShreveNet - Your Premium Internet Service Provider!

RE: adminmod 2.50e broken with new hl/cs?

[Ryan McCullough]

well, when I go here: http://www.metamod.org/

I get this:


403 Forbidden

Forbidden
You don't have permission to access /
on this server.



Am I using the right url?

-Original Message-
From: Will Day [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 2:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: adminmod 2.50e broken with new hl/cs?



A short time ago, at a computer terminal far, far away, Ryan McCullough
wrote:
>This went across the hlds list already.
>
>Apparently metamod is broken in the new release. Look for a new metamod.
For
>some reason the site is jacked right now: http://www.metamod.org/ with some
>permissions thing. Maybe in response to nimba???

I'm not aware of a permissions problem on the server; everything should be
working.  There does seem to be a lot of traffic now, though, so that may
be affecting response time.  I haven't seen any particular traffic
attributable to nimba, though.

--
Will Day  Those who would give up essential Liberty, to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve
UNIX System Programmerneither Liberty nor Safety.  - Benjamin Franklin,
Atlanta, GA  Pennsylvania Assembly, Nov. 11, 1755

RE: adminmod 2.50e broken with new hl/cs?

[Ryan McCullough]

This went across the hlds list already.

Apparently metamod is broken in the new release. Look for a new metamod. For
some reason the site is jacked right now: http://www.metamod.org/ with some
permissions thing. Maybe in response to nimba???

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 1:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: adminmod 2.50e broken with new hl/cs?



Uh, subject says most of it is admin mod broken or am I a moron
(both are possible).

I just switched servers so I'm not totally sure if I fudged this up or
if adminmod needs to be updated too.

HL just coredumps upon someone joining a team.  I didn't have any
special plugins or anything going because like I said, I _just_ switched
the servers (, dual 1.2 now in service)

help?

-paul
meatbarn.com

RE: Argh! server.cfg in cs upgrade

[Ryan McCullough]

better stop by store on way home to get microphone. I need to get one at
least. Never had a need for it before.

-Original Message-
From: [TANJ]Zibby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 12:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Argh! server.cfg in cs upgrade



I should have checked this before I extracted the update, but make sure
you backup your current server.cfg before you extract the update because
it will be overwritten.

Luckily, all my .cfg's are in /etc/hlds_l/cstrike and sym-linked in
/opt/games/half-life/hlds_l/cstrike, so I just had to relink it, not go to
my backups. :)

But still, is it necissary to have a server.cfg in the upgrade archive?
>From my point of view, it's definitly not desirable. I think it should be
in the full install, but not in the update.

Anyway, up and running on the new patches. Now I just have to sneak out of
work early and go play...hehehe. :)

Andy "Zibby" Zbikowski - TANJ Admin
Play CS @ tanj.ringworld.org:27015
http://gamestats.ringworld.org

RE: list list repeat repeat again again?

[Ryan McCullough]

now i am. I all of a sudden got a repeat of all of this mornings email.

-Original Message-
From: Eric Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 11:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: list list repeat repeat again again?



I am...

Eric (the Deacon remix)
http://www.firekite.com


> -Original Message-
> From: Bryan Socha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 1:06 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: list list repeat repeat again again?
>
>
>
> I am not getting doubles
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Big_B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 1:42 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: list list repeat repeat again again?
>
>
>
> Yep Yep
> wonder what is happening.
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Damian Harouff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 12:20 PM
> Subject: list list repeat repeat again again?
>
>
> >
> > Is is anyone anyone getting getting double double messages messages?
> >
> > ;)
> >
> >
> >
>
>