Re: [hlds_linux] An ask to Valve

2003-08-18 Thread Stephen Micheals
Whare can i get this plugin i did not see it on amx's site
- Original Message -
From: Daniel Stroven [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 10:23 AM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] An ask to Valve


 VAC does the best it can.  CD works, but to many people won't use it.  UGS
 gives the choice of VAC or CD for its matchs.  You must have one or the
 other.  For a pub you need the VAC and good admins.  What I use lately has
 worked great for catching cheaters.  If one of my admins suspects someone
is
 cheating, they use the amx plugin, amx_invis.  If the suspected player
 see's you, then he probably is cheating.   It has been very effective for
me
 so far.  ..as an example.

 A player by the name Pulse joined the server.  It appeared he was
 cheating.  At the start of the round, I did amx_invis on myself and rushed
 to where that player kepts coming from.  I come around the corner and its
 just me and that player.  He follows my movement as if I were completely
 visable to him and he headshot me.  (i was walking to avoid noise when I
 reached his area)

 On the next round, I tell him he has been caught cheating, and that I was
 invisible to all non-cheating players on the server...which he replies,
you
 looked normal to me.  Now a couple other players were not convinced,
 because they didn't see what happened.  So I said as proof, I will knife
out
 the entire enemy team to prove that a non-cheating player might see
 something shimmer like the predator, but would not see me clearly and
that
 for all basic purpose..i was invisible completely.

 So I knifed the entire team, even goofing around standing among several of
 the opposite team.  Players realized there was no way for me to look
 normal to the player Pulse, and realized he in fact was cheating.

 Now, this works great UNLESS, someone out there knows how a non-cheating
 client would see someone invisible as if he was visible.   Otherwise it
 works great for me, since their is no echo of the admin running the
command,
 a cheater does not get any advanced notice that you have turned yourself
 invisible.

 If no one can show an invisible player looking normal to a non-cheater,
then
 as an admin tool, I would have to say this one has been one of the most
 helpful I have ever used.


 - Original Message -
 From: lastshooter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 12:23 PM
 Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] An ask to Valve


   Now, you might have other reasons to complain, but if your server is
   overrun by cheaters you only have your own lazy ass to blame, the
tools
   for cheatprevention has been there for you all the time.
 
  Excuse me? I ran CD long before VAC, it has one big problem, its a
 required
  dl and install. In fact, I know of no leagues that require it, NONE. VAC
  does seem to work imho, the CS cheats show up as soon as an update is
out.
  The TFC community has dropped badly, and I also suspect that the amount
of
  CS servers that run CD is low percentage wise. So, keep your head stuck
in
  the sand and pretend all is well. Until an effective wide spread
 anti-cheat
  is used, as in VAC, your community will continue to decline. TFC has had
 no
  updates, VAC or otherwise in a long,long time, all valve ever does is
 spout
  meaningless promise's. Frankly, I've had it, and so have a lot of other
  people.
 
  ___
  To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
 please visit:
  http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
 


 ___
 To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
 http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux


Re: [hlds_linux] An ask to Valve

2003-08-18 Thread Daniel Stroven
amx_invis
http://amxmod.net/forums/viewtopic.php?t=9100highlight=amxinvis

works great in my opinion but I try to keep it low key.

- Original Message -
From: hondaman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 1:45 PM
Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] An ask to Valve


 What plugin do you use to make yourself invisible?

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel
Stroven
 Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 12:24 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] An ask to Valve


 VAC does the best it can.  CD works, but to many people won't use it.  UGS
 gives the choice of VAC or CD for its matchs.  You must have one or the
 other.  For a pub you need the VAC and good admins.  What I use lately has
 worked great for catching cheaters.  If one of my admins suspects someone
is
 cheating, they use the amx plugin, amx_invis.  If the suspected player
 see's you, then he probably is cheating.   It has been very effective for
me
 so far.  ..as an example.

 A player by the name Pulse joined the server.  It appeared he was
 cheating.  At the start of the round, I did amx_invis on myself and rushed
 to where that player kepts coming from.  I come around the corner and its
 just me and that player.  He follows my movement as if I were completely
 visable to him and he headshot me.  (i was walking to avoid noise when I
 reached his area)

 On the next round, I tell him he has been caught cheating, and that I was
 invisible to all non-cheating players on the server...which he replies,
you
 looked normal to me.  Now a couple other players were not convinced,
 because they didn't see what happened.  So I said as proof, I will knife
out
 the entire enemy team to prove that a non-cheating player might see
 something shimmer like the predator, but would not see me clearly and
that
 for all basic purpose..i was invisible completely.

 So I knifed the entire team, even goofing around standing among several of
 the opposite team.  Players realized there was no way for me to look
 normal to the player Pulse, and realized he in fact was cheating.

 Now, this works great UNLESS, someone out there knows how a non-cheating
 client would see someone invisible as if he was visible.   Otherwise it
 works great for me, since their is no echo of the admin running the
command,
 a cheater does not get any advanced notice that you have turned yourself
 invisible.

 If no one can show an invisible player looking normal to a non-cheater,
then
 as an admin tool, I would have to say this one has been one of the most
 helpful I have ever used.


 - Original Message -
 From: lastshooter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 12:23 PM
 Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] An ask to Valve


   Now, you might have other reasons to complain, but if your server is
   overrun by cheaters you only have your own lazy ass to blame, the
   tools for cheatprevention has been there for you all the time.
 
  Excuse me? I ran CD long before VAC, it has one big problem, its a
 required
  dl and install. In fact, I know of no leagues that require it, NONE.
  VAC does seem to work imho, the CS cheats show up as soon as an update
  is out. The TFC community has dropped badly, and I also suspect that
  the amount of CS servers that run CD is low percentage wise. So, keep
  your head stuck in the sand and pretend all is well. Until an
  effective wide spread
 anti-cheat
  is used, as in VAC, your community will continue to decline. TFC has
  had
 no
  updates, VAC or otherwise in a long,long time, all valve ever does is
 spout
  meaningless promise's. Frankly, I've had it, and so have a lot of
  other people.
 
  ___
  To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
 please visit:
  http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
 


 ___
 To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
 please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux



 ___
 To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
 http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux



___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux


Re: [hlds_linux] An ask to Valve

2003-08-18 Thread kama
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, lastshooter wrote:

  Now, you might have other reasons to complain, but if your server is
  overrun by cheaters you only have your own lazy ass to blame, the tools
  for cheatprevention has been there for you all the time.

 Excuse me? I ran CD long before VAC, it has one big problem, its a required
 dl and install.

Well, i blame all the 3rd party server/client anticheat programs that came
after punkbuster. punkbuster was accepted due to it was the only one
(almost). after PB decided to give up on HL, there came a huge amount of
others that tried todo the same. thats when users stopped believe in
downloading AC-clients.

 In fact, I know of no leagues that require it, NONE. VAC
 does seem to work imho, the CS cheats show up as soon as an update is out.

No big league should depend on any AC. not even VAC.

 Frankly, I've had it, and so have a lot of other people.

Well, at least the the glass is getting really filled up. There are 2
things that i want valve to do..

1. Get a lower CPU usage on HLDS
2. Get as low latency as possible

I would rather see them stop working on cs1.6 and getting these things
fixed first..

/Bjorn

--

Your mouse has moved. Please restart Windows for the change to take
effect.

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux


RE: [hlds_linux] An ask to Valve

2003-08-18 Thread Tony Di Schino

--- hondaman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 What plugin do you use to make yourself invisible?

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel
 Stroven
 Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 12:24 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] An ask to Valve


 VAC does the best it can.  CD works, but to many people won't use it.
  UGS
 gives the choice of VAC or CD for its matchs.  You must have one or
 the
 other.  For a pub you need the VAC and good admins.  What I use
 lately has
 worked great for catching cheaters.  If one of my admins suspects
 someone is
 cheating, they use the amx plugin, amx_invis.  If the suspected
 player
 see's you, then he probably is cheating.   It has been very effective
 for me
 so far.  ..as an example.

 A player by the name Pulse joined the server.  It appeared he was
 cheating.  At the start of the round, I did amx_invis on myself and
 rushed
 to where that player kepts coming from.  I come around the corner and
 its
 just me and that player.  He follows my movement as if I were
 completely
 visable to him and he headshot me.  (i was walking to avoid noise
 when I
 reached his area)

 On the next round, I tell him he has been caught cheating, and that I
 was
 invisible to all non-cheating players on the server...which he
 replies, you
 looked normal to me.  Now a couple other players were not convinced,
 because they didn't see what happened.  So I said as proof, I will
 knife out
 the entire enemy team to prove that a non-cheating player might see
 something shimmer like the predator, but would not see me clearly
 and that
 for all basic purpose..i was invisible completely.

 So I knifed the entire team, even goofing around standing among
 several of
 the opposite team.  Players realized there was no way for me to look
 normal to the player Pulse, and realized he in fact was cheating.

 Now, this works great UNLESS, someone out there knows how a
 non-cheating
 client would see someone invisible as if he was visible.   Otherwise
 it
 works great for me, since their is no echo of the admin running the
 command,
 a cheater does not get any advanced notice that you have turned
 yourself
 invisible.

 If no one can show an invisible player looking normal to a
 non-cheater, then
 as an admin tool, I would have to say this one has been one of the
 most
 helpful I have ever used.

A quick search of amx forums for amx_invis returns the info you need.
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux


Re: [hlds_linux] An ask to Valve

2003-08-18 Thread James Clark
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 02:28:12PM -0400, Daniel Stroven wrote:
 amx_invis
 http://amxmod.net/forums/viewtopic.php?t=9100highlight=amxinvis

 works great in my opinion but I try to keep it low key.

Does it work on 1.6?  A few of the amx plugins I had working mint in
1.5 don't work as they did in 1.6.

--
James.

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux


RE: [hlds_linux] An ask to Valve

2003-08-18 Thread siberia
rant
I've been saying this (mostly to myself) for the past four years or so.
Valve is trying to prepare a 500 course meal all at once and everything
is starting to taste like shit. Rather than focus on one thing at a
time, they're working on eleven bajillion things at once. It's getting
annoying but unfortunately most people, including me, find their selves
hooked on a mod (tfc, cs, etc...) and can't do anything besides sit
through all this garbage. I know Valve would be hard pressed to give a
fuck, but they need to go back to the drawing board with their
development process. I can't think of one good thing that has come to
TFC in the past four years. I can however come up with several that have
made the game a pile of feces (net code, removing exec and killing file
scans [hlguard], the fact that it takes a quad xeon with 4GB of ram to
run a 4 player server in Linux, VAC, etc...). With all the incredibly
talented people they employ, Valve ceases to amaze me when it comes to
fucking things up. I dread updates to hlds or tfc because they always
seem to redefine horrible. I'm not looking forward to HL2 primarily
because if it's been created by the same people who have literally
destroyed a game I USED to love, I can only expect to be disappointed.

Now, don't get me wrong, I don't hate Valve. Considering this game is
what, 5 years old now and they STILL support it and update it, that's
quite remarkable and I believe everyone appreciates their dedication.
However, I wish they would get a LOT more feedback from the community
that puts dollars in their pockets before they decide to update
anything.

Whatever, I'm just angry.

/rant

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
lastshooter
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 12:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] An ask to Valve


 Now, you might have other reasons to complain, but if your server is
 overrun by cheaters you only have your own lazy ass to blame, the
 tools for cheatprevention has been there for you all the time.

Excuse me? I ran CD long before VAC, it has one big problem, its a
required dl and install. In fact, I know of no leagues that require it,
NONE. VAC does seem to work imho, the CS cheats show up as soon as an
update is out. The TFC community has dropped badly, and I also suspect
that the amount of CS servers that run CD is low percentage wise. So,
keep your head stuck in the sand and pretend all is well. Until an
effective wide spread anti-cheat is used, as in VAC, your community will
continue to decline. TFC has had no updates, VAC or otherwise in a
long,long time, all valve ever does is spout meaningless promise's.
Frankly, I've had it, and so have a lot of other people.

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux


Re: [hlds_linux] An ask to Valve

2003-08-18 Thread m0gely
James Clark wrote:
Does it work on 1.6?  A few of the amx plugins I had working mint in
1.5 don't work as they did in 1.6.
The only AMX plugs that I have that don't work 100% are anything that has to do
w/ WONID's, like kicking or banning.  You can still do some of this, but a few
of the plugins that do it automatically can't.
--
- m0gely
http://quake2.telestream.com/
Q2 | Q3A | Counter-strike
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux


RE: [hlds_linux] An ask to Valve

2003-08-18 Thread craig kaiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and others well said and I see tha you get what I aam
trying to say!

And I do not hate Valve either! I started with TFC and then went to CS. It
has been a fun venture over all.

It is just that the frustration level builds and builds, until a server op
has to vent or go crazy :)

And yes I have ran all the third party anti's, geez Stefan Huszic's do you
think I have just buried my head in the sand and come to the conclusions the
cheaters have won without trying everything out there?  Come on!

Go to any of the CHEATER Sites and they proudly display what is VAC or CD
Proof.

Nothing is 100% and each and every anti out there has its own plus and minus
features. I for one would love to see PB return or VAC and CD work together.
HLG appears to me to have lost its edge.

And I agree Valve appears to have its hand in way to many projects, thus
stumbling! Focus focus focus Valve...lol...

I am not a software writer so I have to put my faith in Valve, and I would
rush out and purchase CS again and again if Valve would solve the CHEATER
Problem because my friends and I are long time CS Players who really love
this game!

We want to see CS and TFC survive, we really do!

Scum



___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux


Re: [hlds_linux] An ask to Valve

2003-08-18 Thread lastshooter
Well, after three years, playing TFC, I've ran across two servers that ran
CD, and 1/3 rd is a low percentage in my book. If all is well in CS, then
why are peeps like you always crying about the hacks.
  One thing I can say is, I've never played CS, and never will, so much for
checking facts, I could care less, my concerns are with TFC. CD is not the
solution for TFC or CS, unless integrated with hlds_l. As for running a
server with out a anti-cheat, I say again, I sold it. No mas.

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux


Re: [hlds_linux] An ask to Valve

2003-08-18 Thread Stefan Huszics
lastshooter wrote:

I also suspect that the amount of
CS servers that run CD is low percentage wise. So, keep your head stuck in
the sand and pretend all is well. Until an effective wide spread anti-cheat
is used, as in VAC, your community will continue to decline.
Now, if instead of making an ass of yourself by assuming you would have
actually checked, you would know that about 1/3 (8000+) of CS servers
wordwide are running with CD *inspite* having access to VAC. If you add
that up with how much less convenient it is both for admins as well as
players I'm sure you can figure out just how much better it is at
actually stopping cheats.
So if you are running a mod with no VAC and are *still* not using CD,
then it's probably not me that has my head in the sand now is it...
--
/Stefan
Software never has bugs. It just develops random features. =)

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux


Re: [hlds_linux] An ask to Valve

2003-08-18 Thread Stefan Huszics
Daniel Stroven wrote:

If one of my admins suspects someone is cheating, they use the amx plugin, amx_invis.

That is truely an interesting way to catch a cheater with aimbot at
least. HS on an invis player sure is being caught with your hand in the
cookie jar :D
--
/Stefan
Software never has bugs. It just develops random features. =)

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux