Re: How do you do a standalone restore in a virtual tape enviroment

2008-06-20 Thread Jennifer Currell
yes - virtual tapes wil be duplexed.
Question is how to get the starter/driving system up.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: How do you do a standalone restore in a virtual tape enviroment

2008-06-20 Thread Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM


"Jennifer Currell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> yes - virtual tapes wil be duplexed.
> Question is how to get the starter/driving system up.
> 

I intended to say in my previous post: 
You should be able to do from your virtual tapes, similar as you do now
from your real tapes.

Kees.
**
For information, services and offers, please visit our web site:
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain
confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee
only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part
of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or
distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or
attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately
by return e-mail, and delete this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries
and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or
incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor
responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal
Dutch Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with
registered number 33014286 
**

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Antwort: Thoughts/Experience with migration from Serana Changeman to SCLM

2008-06-20 Thread Jan MOEYERSONS
On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 13:17:11 +0200, Albert Klimek 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>In the past we had a similar situation. The management had decided to 
remove CA Librarian. 

I can understand one would want to remove CA; after all, although I have no 
experience with Librarian, I do have experience with CA. No offence...


>I know nothing about SCLM, but we have selected CVS/MVS for our 
purposes. 

Again, I have no real experience using either SCLM or CVS, but both only 
support well the versioning and give you (very) little life cycle (workflow) 
management. And it is precisely the life cycle management that I feel is 
important.


>The special decision criteria for CVS on MVS: 
>- low cost solution by using Open Source 

Don't be fooled by the fact that you do not have to pay $$$ for acquiring the 
software. The real cost is in implementation, migration, training, etc.

>I developed an ISPF-Frontend for ease of use and to control the workflow 
(test, quality-control, integration, production)

You see: that is were your cost will go...

> Therefore we are very flexible for future expansions. 

Sorry, no, you will not. Because you will have to do it all yourself and on 
your 
own. In my book you are always better of buying something than building it.

My opinion.

Cheers,

Jantje.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Invite to join nitwits ???

2008-06-20 Thread Shane
Anyone else get one ??? (I got 3).

Shane ...

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Invite to join nitwits ???

2008-06-20 Thread Bonno, Tuco
yeah, I got one too  and have not bitten  yet   anyone up for belling 
the cat?



/s/ tuco bonno
Graduate, College of Conflict Management
University of SouthEast Asia
"I partied on the Ho Chi Minh Trail - tiến lên !! "







-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shane
Sent: Friday, 20 June, 2008 05:35 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Invite to join nitwits ???

Anyone else get one ??? (I got 3).

Shane ...

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Antwort: Re: Antwort: Thoughts/Experience with migration from Serana Changeman to SCLM

2008-06-20 Thread Albert Klimek
< You see: that is were your cost will go...
I agree, it's a low cost solution, not for free.

I made a simple calculation. If I buy a commercial software I had to pay 
the purchase price, I had to pay for implementation and then each year for 
maintenance. 

With the use of open source software, initially I have much effort, then 
this is rather low. Therefore my Company save money in the amount of my 
salary, month per month.

 
Gesendet von: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
20.06.2008 11:05
Bitte antworten an
IBM Mainframe Discussion List 


An
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Kopie

Thema
Re: Antwort: Thoughts/Experience with migration from Serana Changeman to 
SCLM 






On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 13:17:11 +0200, Albert Klimek 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>In the past we had a similar situation. The management had decided to 
remove CA Librarian. 

I can understand one would want to remove CA; after all, although I have 
no 
experience with Librarian, I do have experience with CA. No offence...


>I know nothing about SCLM, but we have selected CVS/MVS for our 
purposes. 

Again, I have no real experience using either SCLM or CVS, but both only 
support well the versioning and give you (very) little life cycle 
(workflow) 
management. And it is precisely the life cycle management that I feel is 
important.


>The special decision criteria for CVS on MVS: 
>- low cost solution by using Open Source 

Don't be fooled by the fact that you do not have to pay $$$ for acquiring 
the 
software. The real cost is in implementation, migration, training, etc.

>I developed an ISPF-Frontend for ease of use and to control the workflow 
(test, quality-control, integration, production)

You see: that is were your cost will go...

> Therefore we are very flexible for future expansions. 

Sorry, no, you will not. Because you will have to do it all yourself and 
on your 
own. In my book you are always better of buying something than building 
it.

My opinion.

Cheers,

Jantje.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



VERLAGSGRUPPE WELTBILD GMBH
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Augsburg
Handelsregister Augsburg HRB 6035 
Ust-ID-Nr: DE 127501299

Geschäftsführung:
Carel Halff (Vorsitzender), Dr. Klaus Driever, Werner Ortner, Herbert Zoch

Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates:
Dr. Klaus Donaubauer


Re: How do you do a standalone restore in a virtual tape enviroment

2008-06-20 Thread Jennifer Currell
Got the answer now. Thanks.

see page 324 of the TS7740 Redbook. 

http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg247312.html?Open 

Standalone Mount 

This allows defined users with the correct authority to instruct a VTS to 
manually mount a virtual volume on a virtual drive. 

This function enables you to mount a logical volume on a selected virtual 
drive. If you have an operating system image written to a logical volume, 
performing a standalone mount of a 
logical volume to a virtual drive can allow you to boot from that mounted 
logical volume. 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: replacing SAS for SMF reports?

2008-06-20 Thread Jim Marshall
One might  look at the product from NICUS at  www.nicus.com   

It accepts many types of inputs to produce the results on a PC. I have not 
given the product a close look for I only bumped into it at an IT Financial 
conference a few weeks ago. It even has a toolkit for migrating NeuMics to 
MXG.  

jim 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Looking for consult help getting to 31-bit CICS Cobol

2008-06-20 Thread Davis, Kriss P
You could also look at MHTRAN2 to do your COBOL conversion.   I used it to 
convert a whole portfolio of COBOL source and copybook code (around 1300 
programs and related copybooks).  I don't believe it has a "TRACKING" component 
to help you keep track of what has been converted and what has not.  But it did 
a good job for me getting the code changed and ready for re-compile and 
re-link.  Since I was the only one working on the project, I did not need a 
sophisticated source code portfolio manager to track what had been changed and 
converted.

I did this conversion over 10 years ago, so my experience with the product is a 
bit dated. 

I used SAS to unload the source code libraries, build JCL streams of mass 
translates and compiles, etc.


Prince Software.

http://www.princesoftware.com/pages/mhtran2.html



Kriss Davis

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(309) 438-3101
  

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Slow FTP transfer from z/OS to Unix

2008-06-20 Thread François Paré
Rob,

We tried TRACERTE but there is no problem there, one hop a couple of 
milliseconds. We will work on traces and thank you for all the tracks you gave.


François Paré

-Message d'origine-
De : IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Rob 
Schramm
Envoyé : 19 juin 2008 17:40
À : IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Objet : Re: Slow FTP transfer from z/OS to Unix

François,

Honestly, I am not sure what to make of the problem.  But for general 
problem solving, I would ensure that files being transferred are all the 
same.  That the direction is the same.

I am always suspicious of files, ftp options, network paths (thru routers, 
cables and firewalls) and MTU.  I have seen or been part of a number of 
bizarre TCP/IP problems over the years and anything you can do to 
normalize your testing/verification will help yield tests that will 
uncover the real culprit.

problems... firewall rules gone bad, firewall loose cables, tar pits, 
packet fragments not being accepted, bad routing, excessive 
retransmitting, ftp bugs, osa bugs, windows bugs (exhausted windows 
resource causing the IP stack to report errors) .. I am sure that there 
are some choice ones I am forgetting... like s0c4 on a vba file ftp, port 
scanners for security killing boxes.

Rob

p.s. You might also consider running TRACE on the LINUX box as well.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Moving from CA-MIM to GRS.

2008-06-20 Thread Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM


-Original Message-
From: Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM 
Sent: vrijdag 20 juni 2008 8:30
To: 'IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU'
Subject: Re: Moving from CA-MIM to GRS.



"Peter X. DeFabritus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> I found a Techdoc as a possibility:
> 
> http://www-03.ibm.com/support/techdocs/atsmastr.nsf/WebIndex/TD103317
> 
> --

Thanks,

I will study it, it looks useful at first glance.

Kees.


At a second glance, it is mostly a list of reasons why the conversion is
not easy to accomplish and why it is advisable to hire IBM to do it.

Kees.

**
For information, services and offers, please visit our web site:
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain
confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee
only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part
of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or
distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or
attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately
by return e-mail, and delete this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries
and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or
incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor
responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal
Dutch Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with
registered number 33014286 
**

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Remote Tape Backup

2008-06-20 Thread Dean Montevago
Hi,

Senior management has this vision of moving our Data Center to a new
location and having the tape processing in another. Don't ask me why or
how come because I have no idea.  Does anyone else do this ? What kind
of technology would you need ? Dark fiber keeps coming up in
conversation. Any info, white papers, opinions would be greatly
appreciated. 

TIA
Dean

Dean Montevago
Sr. Systems Specialist
Visiting Nurse Service of New York
(212) 609 - 9608
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: LISTDSI alternative?

2008-06-20 Thread Mark Zelden
On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 20:34:08 -0500, Paul Gilmartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


>>
>How was the temp panel data set allocated?  Perhaps by a profile
>or by JCL, or by a DYNALLOC in a Rexx exec?  If the last, the
>RTDDN operand of BPXWDYN returns the DDNAME to you.
>

Finding the DDNAME wasn't the problem.  I generate a random DDNAME [1]

I use TSO ALLOCATE.   The problem was I needed to know the exact data
set name allocated so I could do a 2nd ALLOCATE of the temp PDS with
member name included to write the panel PDS member with EXECIO.  
When the data set was allocated to VIO I could not find the DSN using 
LISTDSI in order to do the 2nd allocate.  Using all the proper LM* ISPF
services is a little slower, but it is the correct way to handle it and it
always works. 

Current code:
http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsfiles/iplinfo.txt
look for "BROWSE_ISPF:"

 [1] IPLINFO history: The ddname was was also part of the DSN going 
back to when I allocated a non-temp dsn for the panel lib and output 
of IPLINFO. That way there would not be a duplicate dsn if you executed 
IPLINFO multiple times recursively (or in other logical sessions), were
blown off TSO or something failed in the exec or if you   But that would leave
an orphan data set under your userid HLQ - similar to what could happen
with ISPF list/log dsns.  Which why I wanted to change it all to temp dsns.

Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
z/OS Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: How do you do a standalone restore in a virtual tape enviroment

2008-06-20 Thread Mark Zelden
On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 02:43:08 -0500, Jennifer Currell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>yes - virtual tapes wil be duplexed.
>Question is how to get the starter/driving system up.
>

Need more details.  Do you use a recovery vendor? If so, don't they
have a floor / starter system?  If not (or is) and you have your own
DASD, you can keep a one or 2 pack rescue system around (examples
to build one on my web site).  

Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
z/OS Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Moving from CA-MIM to GRS.

2008-06-20 Thread Rob Scott
Kees,

I believe that IBM has specialized teams to perform this - people who know both 
GRS and MIM in-depth.

Getting the RNL's wrong could be disastrous - and may not even surface for a 
while.

Afterall, this is your production data at risk here - and if I was in your 
shoes, I would give these guys a call...


Rob Scott
Rocket Software, Inc
275 Grove Street
Newton, MA 02466
617-614-2305
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM
Sent: 20 June 2008 14:13
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Moving from CA-MIM to GRS.



-Original Message-
From: Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM
Sent: vrijdag 20 juni 2008 8:30
To: 'IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU'
Subject: Re: Moving from CA-MIM to GRS.



"Peter X. DeFabritus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>...
> I found a Techdoc as a possibility:
>
> http://www-03.ibm.com/support/techdocs/atsmastr.nsf/WebIndex/TD103317
>
> --

Thanks,

I will study it, it looks useful at first glance.

Kees.


At a second glance, it is mostly a list of reasons why the conversion is not 
easy to accomplish and why it is advisable to hire IBM to do it.

Kees.

**
For information, services and offers, please visit our web site:
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message.

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286
**

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at 
http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: replacing SAS for SMF reports?

2008-06-20 Thread Martin Packer
Perl got mentioned. I suspect the problem - if there IS a problem - is 
going to be VBS records. But then I don't know Perl.

I have a side interest in "seeing modern stuff demonstrated on z/OS" and a 
German colleague whose whole "day job" appears to be the same. Maybe I 
should work with HIM to demo Perl going against SMF. Note: Perl would have 
to cope well with things like triplets.

Any other languages need to be demo'ed against SMF? Or similar truculent 
data? :-)

Martin

Martin Packer
Performance Consultant
IBM United Kingdom Ltd
+44-20-8832-5167
+44-7802-245-584
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Twitter: MartinPacker








Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU






--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Network Time Protocol (NTP) client support question

2008-06-20 Thread Thompson, Steve
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Timothy Sipples
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 7:49 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Network Time Protocol (NTP) client support question

Edward Jaffe asks (rhetorically?):
>A Linux_for_z LPAR has the ability to "steer" the hardware TOD clock?

Not to my knowledge, no.


Assume that all functions of Linux are implemented (outside of I/O
specific) on a z box.

With time functions being part of that, wouldn't Linux for z/Series
systems be able to update the TOD? 

Assuming that this is true, what effect would this have on other LPARs
in that CEC?

So, if the effect is not deleterious, then is this not an "OPEN" source
and cheap way of doing this without having to pay IBM for STP code?

Since I do not have a CEC to play with, I don't have the ability to test
this. But it seems to me that if one could get standalone time, it could
be quickly tested. 

Regards,
Steve Thompson

-- All opinions expressed by me are my own and may not necessarily
reflect those of my employer. --

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: replacing SAS for SMF reports?

2008-06-20 Thread McKown, John
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Packer
> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 8:30 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: replacing SAS for SMF reports?
> 
> Perl got mentioned. I suspect the problem - if there IS a 
> problem - is 
> going to be VBS records. But then I don't know Perl.

Can Perl read z/OS datasets? Or only UNIX files? If the latter, then
you'd need to either copy the SMF data to a UNIX file, or maybe use
Dovetail's "fromdsn" to pipe the dataset contents to the Perl script. In
either case, Perl is only going to see a stream of bytes. Which could be
a problem unless that stream includes the RDW (which fromdsn can do) so
that Perl will know how long each record is. I don't know if it is
possible to "reconstruct" SMF records into individual records if the RDW
is missing. I would also be a bit concerned with easy use of SMF/RMF
timestamps. That is the main reason that I love SAS for SMF/RMF
processing.

> 
> I have a side interest in "seeing modern stuff demonstrated 
> on z/OS" and a 
> German colleague whose whole "day job" appears to be the 
> same. Maybe I 
> should work with HIM to demo Perl going against SMF. Note: 
> Perl would have 
> to cope well with things like triplets.

I think Perl could do this using the "substr" function, along with the
"unpack" function. That's what I do in REXX.

> 
> Any other languages need to be demo'ed against SMF? Or 
> similar truculent 
> data? :-)

I did some work using Java, but a combination of lack of time and a
decrease in interest (it is difficult!) put the kabosh on that project.

> 
> Martin
> 
> Martin Packer


--
John McKown
Senior Systems Programmer
HealthMarkets
Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage
Administrative Services Group
Information Technology

The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged
and/or confidential.  It is for intended addressee(s) only.  If you are
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure,
reproduction, distribution or other use of this communication is
strictly prohibited and could, in certain circumstances, be a criminal
offense.  If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the
sender by reply and delete this message without copying or disclosing
it.  

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Problems that occur in production

2008-06-20 Thread J. Chiampi
Hello,

I'm looking for information about problems that could occur in production
with Cobol programs and that could generate abend. I would like to find a
description and how to prevent them before they occur. 

For instance, I think that it could be interesting to avoid moving
alphanumeric variables into numeric variable without checking them by using
a IF NUMERIC or moving data into another that is shorter or avoid closing
file or never check array boundaries... 

Do you see other important cases related to performance or robustness?

Thanks in advance.

Regards

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Executing multiple console commands in different job steps

2008-06-20 Thread Timmerman, Kurt
Hello,

 

I have the need to execute multiple console commands in a batch job. I
have used the "// COMMAND 'command operand'" JCL statement as well as an
IEFBR14 with the command in the IEFBR14 job but everything I have tried
gets executed immediately. I have not been able to come up with a way to
execute console commands in separate steps of a batch job when the step
runs, they all execute immediately. I'd like a very simple solution to
this if anyone has one?

 

Thanks,

Kurt

 

__
The information transmitted (including attachments) is covered by the 
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is intended only 
for the person(s) or entity/entities to which it is addressed and may contain 
confidential and/or privileged material.  Any review, retransmission, 
dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this 
information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient(s) is 
prohibited.  If you received this in error, please contact the sender and 
delete the material from any computer.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Network Time Protocol (NTP) client support question

2008-06-20 Thread Scott Rowe
An OS running in an LPAR cannot change the hardware clock, it can only modify 
it's own view of time, which is maintained (IIRC) as an offset to the true 
hardware clock.

>>> "Thompson, Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 6/20/2008 9:49 AM >>>
Assume that all functions of Linux are implemented (outside of I/O
specific) on a z box.

With time functions being part of that, wouldn't Linux for z/Series
systems be able to update the TOD? 

Assuming that this is true, what effect would this have on other LPARs
in that CEC?

So, if the effect is not deleterious, then is this not an "OPEN" source
and cheap way of doing this without having to pay IBM for STP code?

Since I do not have a CEC to play with, I don't have the ability to test
this. But it seems to me that if one could get standalone time, it could
be quickly tested. 

Regards,
Steve Thompson

-- All opinions expressed by me are my own and may not necessarily
reflect those of my employer. --


Note that my email domain has changed from jo-annstores.com to joann.com.  
Please update your address book and other records to reflect this change.

CONFIDENTIALITY/EMAIL NOTICE: The material in this transmission contains 
confidential and privileged information intended only for the addressee.  If 
you are not the intended recipient, please be advised that you have received 
this material in error and that any forwarding, copying, printing, 
distribution, use or disclosure of the material is strictly prohibited.  If you 
have received this material in error, please (i) do not read it, (ii) reply to 
the sender that you received the message in error, and (iii) erase or destroy 
the material. Emails are not secure and can be intercepted, amended, lost or 
destroyed, or contain viruses. You are deemed to have accepted these risks if 
you communicate with us by email. Thank you.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Executing multiple console commands in different job steps

2008-06-20 Thread Jerry Durbin
If your site is controlling the console command and you have authority to do 
so, try adding the batch TSO JCL & doing something like:
//DISPLAY  EXEC PGM=IKJEFT01
//SYSOUT   DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSTSPRT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSTSIN  DD *
CONSOLE NAME(JDDISLAY)
D A,L
END
/*

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
Timmerman, Kurt
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 8:03 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Executing multiple console commands in different job steps

Hello,



I have the need to execute multiple console commands in a batch job. I have 
used the "// COMMAND 'command operand'" JCL statement as well as an
IEFBR14 with the command in the IEFBR14 job but everything I have tried gets 
executed immediately. I have not been able to come up with a way to execute 
console commands in separate steps of a batch job when the step runs, they all 
execute immediately. I'd like a very simple solution to this if anyone has one?



Thanks,

Kurt



__
The information transmitted (including attachments) is covered by the 
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is intended only 
for the person(s) or entity/entities to which it is addressed and may contain 
confidential and/or privileged material.  Any review, retransmission, 
dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this 
information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient(s) is 
prohibited.  If you received this in error, please contact the sender and 
delete the material from any computer.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at 
http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Executing multiple console commands in different job steps

2008-06-20 Thread Mark Jacobs
Timmerman, Kurt wrote:
> Hello,
>
>  
>
> I have the need to execute multiple console commands in a batch job. I
> have used the "// COMMAND 'command operand'" JCL statement as well as an
> IEFBR14 with the command in the IEFBR14 job but everything I have tried
> gets executed immediately. I have not been able to come up with a way to
> execute console commands in separate steps of a batch job when the step
> runs, they all execute immediately. I'd like a very simple solution to
> this if anyone has one?
>
>  
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kurt
>
>  
>
>
>   

Take a look at File 246: Issue Console Commands from Batch on the CBT
Tape  (WWW.CBTTAPE.ORG)

-- 
Mark Jacobs
Time Customer Service
Tampa, FL


When the Nazis came for the communists,
I remained silent;
I was not a communist.

When they locked up the social democrats,
I remained silent;
I was not a social democrat.

When they came for the trade unionists,
I did not speak out;
I was not a trade unionist.

When they came for the Jews,
I remained silent;
I wasn't a Jew.

When they came for me,
there was no one left to speak out.

Pastor Martin Niemöller (1892–1984)

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Executing multiple console commands in different job steps

2008-06-20 Thread Barkow, Eileen
i have a program that uses the svc 34 interface to issue commands - i can send 
it to you if you want.

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark 
Jacobs
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 10:24 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Executing multiple console commands in different job steps

Timmerman, Kurt wrote:
> Hello,
>
>  
>
> I have the need to execute multiple console commands in a batch job. I
> have used the "// COMMAND 'command operand'" JCL statement as well as an
> IEFBR14 with the command in the IEFBR14 job but everything I have tried
> gets executed immediately. I have not been able to come up with a way to
> execute console commands in separate steps of a batch job when the step
> runs, they all execute immediately. I'd like a very simple solution to
> this if anyone has one?
>
>  
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kurt
>
>  
>
>
>   

Take a look at File 246: Issue Console Commands from Batch on the CBT
Tape  (WWW.CBTTAPE.ORG)

-- 
Mark Jacobs
Time Customer Service
Tampa, FL


When the Nazis came for the communists,
I remained silent;
I was not a communist.

When they locked up the social democrats,
I remained silent;
I was not a social democrat.

When they came for the trade unionists,
I did not speak out;
I was not a trade unionist.

When they came for the Jews,
I remained silent;
I wasn't a Jew.

When they came for me,
there was no one left to speak out.

Pastor Martin Niemöller (1892-1984)

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Invite to join nitwits ???

2008-06-20 Thread Ed Finnell
 
In a message dated 6/20/2008 5:20:20 A.M. Central Daylight Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

for belling the cat?


>>
Report SPAM ought to suffice...








**Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for 
fuel-efficient used cars.  
(http://autos.aol.com/used?ncid=aolaut000507)

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Reallocating temp dsn (was: LISTDSI alternative?)

2008-06-20 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 08:20:07 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote:
>
>I use TSO ALLOCATE.   The problem was I needed to know the exact data
>set name allocated so I could do a 2nd ALLOCATE of the temp PDS with
>member name included to write the panel PDS member with EXECIO.
>When the data set was allocated to VIO I could not find the DSN using
>LISTDSI in order to do the 2nd allocate.  Using all the proper LM* ISPF
>services is a little slower, but it is the correct way to handle it and it
>always works.
>
>Current code:
> http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsfiles/iplinfo.txt
>look for "BROWSE_ISPF:"
>
Thanks.

Uh, yah.  Been there; couldn't do that (but I didn't try LM*).

If I use BPXWDYN( 'alloc RTDDN(DD) RTVOL(V) RTDSN(DS) ...' ) to allocate
it to DASD,  I can process it with EXECIO using the returned DDNAME,
and later reallocate it to a different DDNAME using the returned
volume and dsn.  But if I allocate it to VIO, the returned volume
and dsn are insufficient to reallocate it.

Circumventions:

o I don't use VIO.

o I pass the returned ddname to the utility in an alternate ddname parameter.

o I allocate to the DDNAME I intend to use later.  This can look bizarre:

call BPXWDYN( 'alloc dd(SYSIN) unit(VIO) ...' )
'EXECIO' stem.0 'DISKW SYSIN (stem stem.'

As someone suggested earlier, who needs VIO nowadays?  But the academic
question remains:  Is it possible to dynamically reallocate a VIO data
set to a different DDNAME?  Rexx?  Otherwise (other than JCL referback)?
How does JCL do it?

-- gil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Reallocating temp dsn (was: LISTDSI alternative?)

2008-06-20 Thread Mark Zelden
On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 09:52:09 -0500, Paul Gilmartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>Circumventions:
>
>o I don't use VIO.

Can't control what other shops use or do in SMS code.

>
>o I pass the returned ddname to the utility in an alternate ddname parameter.
>
>o I allocate to the DDNAME I intend to use later.  This can look bizarre:
>
>call BPXWDYN( 'alloc dd(SYSIN) unit(VIO) ...' )
>'EXECIO' stem.0 'DISKW SYSIN (stem stem.'

Again, I needed to do the EXECIO to a PDS member.

>
>As someone suggested earlier, who needs VIO nowadays? 

Can't control what other shops use or do in SMS code.


>But the academic
>question remains:  Is it possible to dynamically reallocate a VIO data
>set to a different DDNAME?  Rexx?  Otherwise (other than JCL referback)?
>How does JCL do it?
>

--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
z/OS Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Moving from CA-MIM to GRS.

2008-06-20 Thread Brian Peterson
I've done a MIM to GRS Star conversion at two different shops, and I thought 
it was pretty easy.

Its easy IF:

SYS-plex = GRS-plex = SMS-plex = TAPE-DEVICE-SHARING-plex

It is NOT easy if you HAVE to share dasd beyond the boundary of a sysplex.  
In my case, I fixed that first, and then once the Sysplex boundary was the 
same as the shared-dasd boundary, then the project was easy.

My opinion.

Brian

On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:12:37 +0200, Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM wrote:

>"Peter X. DeFabritus" wrote in message
>> I found a Techdoc as a possibility:
>>
>> http://www-
03.ibm.com/support/techdocs/atsmastr.nsf/WebIndex/TD103317
>>
>> --
>
>Thanks,
>
>I will study it, it looks useful at first glance.
>
>Kees.
>
>
>At a second glance, it is mostly a list of reasons why the conversion is
>not easy to accomplish and why it is advisable to hire IBM to do it.
>
>Kees.
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Problems that occur in production

2008-06-20 Thread Ed Finnell
 
In a message dated 6/20/2008 8:58:40 A.M. Central Daylight Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

a IF NUMERIC or moving data into another that is shorter or avoid  closing
file or never check array boundaries... 

Do you see other  important cases related to performance or robustness?

Thanks in  advance.


>>
Regression testing is a long time science.  There are tools
and methodologies for just about every facet  of IT.
 
Google for Regression testing  software.
 
One that looked promising and get a triple  buzzword bingo pretty rapidly:
 
_http://www.rttsweb.com/services/?_kk=regression%20testing&_kt=80adb2a4-6141-4
804-8056-9a508e440316&gclid=CNDYh5-qg5QCFRGHQAodEyedVw_ 
(http://www.rttsweb.com/services/?_kk=regression%20testing&_kt=80adb2a4-6141-4804-8056-9a508e440316&;
gclid=CNDYh5-qg5QCFRGHQAodEyedVw) 







**Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for 
fuel-efficient used cars.  
(http://autos.aol.com/used?ncid=aolaut000507)

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Stupid Question of the day.

2008-06-20 Thread Sabo, Frank
I am going to do a migration from OS/390 2.10 to zOS 1.9. The mainframe was 
supposed to go away six years ago, however some of the applications have been 
migrated off, but other still remain. Change in management decision to keep the 
mainframe as a viable platform and upgrade it with new hardware and software. 
However that is not my question, we run a shared JES2 spool between multiple 
LPARS a programmer wants to logon to TSO several times using the same user id. 
Today we can not do it , you get a jcl error. Has this changed with the newer 
releases of the operating systems? I thought I would ask before I started 
digging into it.

Thanks for any help.


Frank W Sabo Jr.
SR. Systems Administrator
Giant Eagle Inc.
Phone:  412 967-3764
Fax:412 967-6120
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]




--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Moving from CA-MIM to GRS.

2008-06-20 Thread Mark Zelden
On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 10:29:10 -0500, Brian Peterson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>I've done a MIM to GRS Star conversion at two different shops, and I thought
>it was pretty easy.
>
>Its easy IF:
>
>SYS-plex = GRS-plex = SMS-plex = TAPE-DEVICE-SHARING-plex
>
>It is NOT easy if you HAVE to share dasd beyond the boundary of a sysplex.
>In my case, I fixed that first, and then once the Sysplex boundary was the
>same as the shared-dasd boundary, then the project was easy.
>
>My opinion.
>

Ditto.  MIM displays help a lot.   ATS star can also handle foreign tapes if
you can't make sysplex =  TAPE-DEVICE-SHARING-plex (but MIA is still
an option on its own as is IBM ATAM (Automated Tape Allocation Manager).

Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
z/OS Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Stupid Question of the day.

2008-06-20 Thread Mark Zelden
On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 11:29:33 -0400, Sabo, Frank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

>I am going to do a migration from OS/390 2.10 to zOS 1.9. The mainframe was
supposed to go away six years ago, however some of the applications have
been migrated off, but other still remain. Change in management decision to
keep the mainframe as a viable platform and upgrade it with new hardware and
software. However that is not my question, we run a shared JES2 spool
between multiple LPARS a programmer wants to logon to TSO several times
using the same user id. Today we can not do it , you get a jcl error. Has
this changed with the newer releases of the operating systems? I thought I
would ask before I started digging into it.
>

Look for $SNGLTSO on CBT file 434 or the JOBs/Doc section of my web
site (URL below).

Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
z/OS Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Stupid Question of the day.

2008-06-20 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 10:38:09 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote:

>On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 11:29:33 -0400, Sabo, Frank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
>
>>I am going to do a migration from OS/390 2.10 to zOS 1.9. The mainframe was
>supposed to go away six years ago, however some of the applications have
>been migrated off, but other still remain. Change in management decision to
>keep the mainframe as a viable platform and upgrade it with new hardware and
>software. However that is not my question, we run a shared JES2 spool
>between multiple LPARS a programmer wants to logon to TSO several times
>using the same user id. Today we can not do it , you get a jcl error. Has

JCL error?  Which?  I'd more expect the additional LOGON attempts to
hang on ENQ.

>this changed with the newer releases of the operating systems? I thought I
>would ask before I started digging into it.
>
We've long accomplished this by configuring MIM not to propagate a
certain ENQ.  No one complains.  The last session to LOGOFF owns
the updates to the ISPF profile.  I've heard of no complaints;
I've heard of no data set corruptions (the window is tiny);
backups are available; and it's not Shmuel's dog.

>Look for $SNGLTSO on CBT file 434 or the JOBs/Doc section of my web
>site (URL below).
>
>z/OS Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/
>Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html

-- gil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Executing multiple console commands in different job steps

2008-06-20 Thread Myers, Edouard (OCTO)
Checkout ALEXCMDS on the share tape. You can do that by setting timers.


Edouard A. Myers

Senior Information Technology Specialist
Office of the Chief Technology Officer  
DC Government  
222 Massachusetts Ave, NW, Suite 200 
Washington, DC 20001  

Phone : 202-727-4017 
Fax: 202-727-3880  
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Website: http://www.octo.dc.gov

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Timmerman, Kurt
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 10:03 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Executing multiple console commands in different job steps

Hello,

 

I have the need to execute multiple console commands in a batch job. I
have used the "// COMMAND 'command operand'" JCL statement as well as an
IEFBR14 with the command in the IEFBR14 job but everything I have tried
gets executed immediately. I have not been able to come up with a way to
execute console commands in separate steps of a batch job when the step
runs, they all execute immediately. I'd like a very simple solution to
this if anyone has one?

 

Thanks,

Kurt

 

__
The information transmitted (including attachments) is covered by the
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is intended
only for the person(s) or entity/entities to which it is addressed and
may contain confidential and/or privileged material.  Any review,
retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action
in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient(s) is prohibited.  If you received this in error,
please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Problems that occur in production

2008-06-20 Thread Steve Comstock

J. Chiampi wrote:

Hello,

I'm looking for information about problems that could occur in production
with Cobol programs and that could generate abend. I would like to find a
description and how to prevent them before they occur. 


For instance, I think that it could be interesting to avoid moving
alphanumeric variables into numeric variable without checking them by using
a IF NUMERIC or moving data into another that is shorter or avoid closing
file or never check array boundaries... 


Do you see other important cases related to performance or robustness?

Thanks in advance.

Regards


You could use LE condition handling to trap errors and
handle them in some installation-specified standard
way. In our course "Enterprise COBOL Update I: Essentials"
we have a lab that builds and uses a condition handler
to intercept most errors; the classroom version just
lets the program continue; in real life, of course, you
would take more severe actions. But at least we demo how
to intercept and analyze conditions that arise. Check out

  http://www.trainersfriend.com/COBOL_Courses/d704descr.htm



Kind regards,

-Steve Comstock
The Trainer's Friend, Inc.

303-393-8716
http://www.trainersfriend.com

  z/OS Application development made easier
* Our classes include
   + How things work
   + Programming examples with realistic applications
   + Starter / skeleton code
   + Complete working programs
   + Useful utilities and subroutines
   + Tips and techniques

==> Check out the Trainer's Friend Store to purchase z/OS  <==
==> application developer toolkits. Sample code in four<==
==> programming languages, JCL to Assemble or compile, <==
==> bind and test. <==
==>   http://www.trainersfriend.com/TTFStore/index.html<==

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Remote Tape Backup

2008-06-20 Thread R.S.

Dean Montevago wrote:

Hi,

Senior management has this vision of moving our Data Center to a new
location and having the tape processing in another. Don't ask me why or
how come because I have no idea.  Does anyone else do this ? What kind
of technology would you need ? Dark fiber keeps coming up in
conversation. Any info, white papers, opinions would be greatly
appreciated. 


Yes, there people who do it (i.e. me).
So, it is feasible.
Technology, links, cost - all those depends on your needs.

Simple scenario:
IBM library (3494) connected using FICON links, moderate distance.
You need dark fiber *or* free lamba's on your DWDM.
It works like local library.
For STK solution you will need TCP/IP connectivity as well (can be 
transmitted over the same fiber).
If you can't afford dark fiber, you can consider some TCP/IP based 
solutions.


HTH
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland


--
BRE Bank SA
ul. Senatorska 18
00-950 Warszawa
www.brebank.pl

Sd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy 
XII Wydzia Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sdowego, 
nr rejestru przedsibiorców KRS 025237

NIP: 526-021-50-88
Wedug stanu na dzie 01.01.2008 r. kapita zakadowy BRE Banku SA  wynosi 
118.642.672 zote i zosta w caoci wpacony.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Invite to join nitwits ???

2008-06-20 Thread Bonno, Tuco
an old story  one day all the mice get together and start to complain about 
the cat who is preying upon them.  one of them finally comes up w/ an idea:  
"let's get a little bell and put it around his neck; that way, he won't be able 
to creep up on us any more without making any noise".  Everyone thinks this is 
a great idea and there's a whole lot of hooping and hollering about it.  except 
for old Grandpa mouse, who just sits there, apparently more asleep than awake . 
finally someone notices and asks Grandpa mouse, "what's the matter grandpa? 
don't you think that that's a great idea?"  And old Grandpa just opens one eye 
and says,  "And just which one of you young Turks is going to be the one to put 
that bell around the cat's neck?"
hence the expression "to bell the cat" --- who is going to undertake the risky 
behaviour? 


/s/ tuco bonno
Graduate, College of Conflict Management
University of SouthEast Asia
"I partied on the Ho Chi Minh Trail - tiến lên !! "





-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed 
Finnell
Sent: Friday, 20 June, 2008 10:29 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Invite to join nitwits ???

 
In a message dated 6/20/2008 5:20:20 A.M. Central Daylight Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

for belling the cat?


>>
Report SPAM ought to suffice...








**Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for 
fuel-efficient used cars.  
(http://autos.aol.com/used?ncid=aolaut000507)

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Executing multiple console commands in different job steps

2008-06-20 Thread Richard Bond
IEBEDIT followed by a "wait" program  (just because the command has been 
submitted doesn't mean it will execute before you issue the next one).   If you 
want a sample, let me know.   I used this procedure to roll staging sysres 
volume to an alternate resvol.
 
Dick
HFHS
Mainframe Administration

>>> "Timmerman, Kurt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 6/20/2008 10:03:29 AM >>>

Hello,



I have the need to execute multiple console commands in a batch job. I
have used the "// COMMAND 'command operand'" JCL statement as well as an
IEFBR14 with the command in the IEFBR14 job but everything I have tried
gets executed immediately. I have not been able to come up with a way to
execute console commands in separate steps of a batch job when the step
runs, they all execute immediately. I'd like a very simple solution to
this if anyone has one?



Thanks,

Kurt



__
The information transmitted (including attachments) is covered by the 
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is intended only 
for the person(s) or entity/entities to which it is addressed and may contain 
confidential and/or privileged material.  Any review, retransmission, 
dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this 
information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient(s) is 
prohibited.  If you received this in error, please contact the sender and 
delete the material from any computer.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html





==
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email contains information from the sender that 
may be CONFIDENTIAL, LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, PROPRIETARY or otherwise protected 
from disclosure. This email is intended for use only by the person or entity to 
whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, 
disclosure, copying, distribution, printing, or any action taken in reliance on 
the contents of this email, is strictly prohibited. If you received this email 
in error, please contact the sending party by reply email, delete the email 
from your computer system and shred any paper copies.
 
Note to Patients: There are a number of risks you should consider before using 
e-mail to communicate with us. See our Privacy Policy and Henry Ford My Health 
at www.henryford.com for more detailed information. If you do not believe that 
our policy gives you the privacy and security protection you need, do not send 
e-mail or Internet communications to us.

==

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Moving from CA-MIM to GRS.

2008-06-20 Thread Richard Bond
Main reason to have MII/MIA in the first place is so you don't have those 
restrictions (with due regard to PDSE's):
 
Sysplex NE MIM-plex NE SMS-plex NE MIA-plex   Kudos to those who can avoid that 
in a large, fast-growing shop.
 
(There are other pluses as well.)
 
Dick
HFHS
Mainframe Administration

>>> "Brian Peterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 6/20/2008 11:29:10 AM >>>

I've done a MIM to GRS Star conversion at two different shops, and I thought 
it was pretty easy.

Its easy IF:

SYS-plex = GRS-plex = SMS-plex = TAPE-DEVICE-SHARING-plex

It is NOT easy if you HAVE to share dasd beyond the boundary of a sysplex.  
In my case, I fixed that first, and then once the Sysplex boundary was the 
same as the shared-dasd boundary, then the project was easy.

My opinion.

Brian

On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:12:37 +0200, Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM wrote:

>"Peter X. DeFabritus" wrote in message
>> I found a Techdoc as a possibility:
>>
>> http://www-
03.ibm.com/support/techdocs/atsmastr.nsf/WebIndex/TD103317
>>
>> --
>
>Thanks,
>
>I will study it, it looks useful at first glance.
>
>Kees.
>
>
>At a second glance, it is mostly a list of reasons why the conversion is
>not easy to accomplish and why it is advisable to hire IBM to do it.
>
>Kees.
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html





==
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email contains information from the sender that 
may be CONFIDENTIAL, LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, PROPRIETARY or otherwise protected 
from disclosure. This email is intended for use only by the person or entity to 
whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, 
disclosure, copying, distribution, printing, or any action taken in reliance on 
the contents of this email, is strictly prohibited. If you received this email 
in error, please contact the sending party by reply email, delete the email 
from your computer system and shred any paper copies.
 
Note to Patients: There are a number of risks you should consider before using 
e-mail to communicate with us. See our Privacy Policy and Henry Ford My Health 
at www.henryford.com for more detailed information. If you do not believe that 
our policy gives you the privacy and security protection you need, do not send 
e-mail or Internet communications to us.

==

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Executing multiple console commands in different job steps

2008-06-20 Thread Steven Conway
I just downloaded and installed W$$MGCR from the CBT Tape.  Assemble and 
link, life is good.

Steve Conway
Lead Systems Programmer
Information Systems & Services Division
Computer & Network Operations
Phone:   (703) 450-3156
Fax:(703) 450-3197



   "Timmerman, Kurt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
   Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
   06/20/2008 10:03 AM
   Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List 


To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc

Subject
Executing multiple console commands in different job steps






Hello,

 

I have the need to execute multiple console commands in a batch job. I
have used the "// COMMAND 'command operand'" JCL statement as well as an
IEFBR14 with the command in the IEFBR14 job but everything I have tried
gets executed immediately. I have not been able to come up with a way to
execute console commands in separate steps of a batch job when the step
runs, they all execute immediately. I'd like a very simple solution to
this if anyone has one?

 

Thanks,

Kurt

 

__
The information transmitted (including attachments) is covered by the 
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is intended 
only for the person(s) or entity/entities to which it is addressed and may 
contain confidential and/or privileged material.  Any review, 
retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in 
reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the 
intended recipient(s) is prohibited.  If you received this in error, 
please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Moving from CA-MIM to GRS.

2008-06-20 Thread Brian Peterson
I absolutely agree with you regarding the advantages of the MII/MIA products 
in environments where "beyond the -plex boundary sharing" is required.

Further, the MII/MIA products were always of very high quality, in my 
experience.

Brian

On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 14:07:08 -0400, Richard Bond wrote:

>Main reason to have MII/MIA in the first place is so you don't have those 
restrictions (with due regard to PDSE's):
> 
>Sysplex NE MIM-plex NE SMS-plex NE MIA-plex   Kudos to those who can 
avoid that in a large, fast-growing shop.
> 
>(There are other pluses as well.)
> 
>Dick
>HFHS
>Mainframe Administration
>
 "Brian Peterson" 6/20/2008 11:29:10 AM >>>
>
>I've done a MIM to GRS Star conversion at two different shops, and I 
thought 
>it was pretty easy.
>
>Its easy IF:
>
>SYS-plex = GRS-plex = SMS-plex = TAPE-DEVICE-SHARING-plex
>
>It is NOT easy if you HAVE to share dasd beyond the boundary of a sysplex.  
>In my case, I fixed that first, and then once the Sysplex boundary was the 
>same as the shared-dasd boundary, then the project was easy.
>
>My opinion.
>
>Brian
>
>On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:12:37 +0200, Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM wrote:
>
>>"Peter X. DeFabritus" wrote in message
>>> I found a Techdoc as a possibility:
>>>
>>> http://www-
>03.ibm.com/support/techdocs/atsmastr.nsf/WebIndex/TD103317
>>>
>>> --
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>I will study it, it looks useful at first glance.
>>
>>Kees.
>>
>>
>>At a second glance, it is mostly a list of reasons why the conversion is
>>not easy to accomplish and why it is advisable to hire IBM to do it.
>>
>>Kees.
>>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Invite to join nitwits ???

2008-06-20 Thread Eric Bielefeld

All right - I'll bite.  What is the invite to join the nitwits about?

I don't think I ever heard the expression "to bell the cat".  Thats a good 
story, although like this posting, totally off topic.  Ah, but its Friday. 
I almost forgot.  Being unemployed does have some benefits!


Eric Bielefeld
Sr. z/OS Systems Programmer
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
414-475-7434

- Original Message - 
From: "Bonno, Tuco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: 
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 12:47 PM
Subject: Re: Invite to join nitwits ???


an old story  one day all the mice get together and start to complain 
about the cat who is preying upon them.  one of them finally comes up w/ 
an idea:  "let's get a little bell and put it around his neck; that way, 
he won't be able to creep up on us any more without making any noise". 
Everyone thinks this is a great idea and there's a whole lot of hooping 
and hollering about it.  except for old Grandpa mouse, who just sits 
there, apparently more asleep than awake . finally someone notices and 
asks Grandpa mouse, "what's the matter grandpa? don't you think that 
that's a great idea?"  And old Grandpa just opens one eye and says,  "And 
just which one of you young Turks is going to be the one to put that bell 
around the cat's neck?"
hence the expression "to bell the cat" --- who is going to undertake the 
risky behaviour?



/s/ tuco bonno
Graduate, College of Conflict Management
University of SouthEast Asia
"I partied on the Ho Chi Minh Trail - tiến lên !! "





-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
Behalf Of Ed Finnell

Sent: Friday, 20 June, 2008 10:29 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Invite to join nitwits ???


In a message dated 6/20/2008 5:20:20 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

for belling the cat?





Report SPAM ought to suffice...








**Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for
fuel-efficient used cars. 
(http://autos.aol.com/used?ncid=aolaut000507)


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html 


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Release 6.1 of IBMLink - AST

2008-06-20 Thread Mark Zelden
On Thu, 5 Jun 2008 15:34:23 -0500, Mark Zelden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>On Wed, 4 Jun 2008 11:57:33 -0500, Mark Zelden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>> I will open a PMR.
>
>I just received an update from my feedback:
>
>
>Mark, we are aware of this problem and it is being looked into by
>development. At this time, I don't have any estimate as to when it will
>get fixed.
>ServiceLink Support
>
>

Latest update from IBM:

"this week a fix was scheduled for the July fixpack, to deploy
on the evening of July 11."


--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
z/OS Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Stupid Question of the day.

2008-06-20 Thread Eric Bielefeld
I think the reason for the JCL error is that your exec or clist that 
allocates your ISPF profile dataset is probably allocating the same dataset 
name on both systems.  If you have a sysplex, the enque is propagated to the 
other system, hence the JCL error.


I know when I was working at Land's End, we had a sysplex.  I wondered why 
my ISPF profile dataset was different, and the other sysprog there explained 
to me about the enque, which for the profile DS is DISP=OLD.  You have to 
write the logon exec or clist to take into account the system it is on, and 
allocate a name that's different on each system.


Eric Bielefeld
Sr. z/OS Systems Programmer
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
414-475-7434

- Original Message - 
From: "Sabo, Frank" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: 
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 10:29 AM
Subject: Stupid Question of the day.


I am going to do a migration from OS/390 2.10 to zOS 1.9. The mainframe was 
supposed to go away six years ago, however some of the applications have 
been migrated off, but other still remain. Change in management decision to 
keep the mainframe as a viable platform and upgrade it with new hardware and 
software. However that is not my question, we run a shared JES2 spool 
between multiple LPARS a programmer wants to logon to TSO several times 
using the same user id. Today we can not do it , you get a jcl error. Has 
this changed with the newer releases of the operating systems? I thought I 
would ask before I started digging into it.


Thanks for any help.


Frank W Sabo Jr.
SR. Systems Administrator
Giant Eagle Inc.
Phone:  412 967-3764
Fax:412 967-6120
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]




--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html 


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Invite to join nitwits ???

2008-06-20 Thread Wayne Driscoll
Eric,
There was an invite to some "alleged" tech list.  It (all 3 copies) was dumped 
in my spam folder automatically, so it may be in yours.

Wayne Driscoll
Product Developer
NOTE:  All opinions are strictly my own.

 

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric 
Bielefeld
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 2:57 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Invite to join nitwits ???

All right - I'll bite.  What is the invite to join the nitwits about?

I don't think I ever heard the expression "to bell the cat".  Thats a good 
story, although like this posting, totally off topic.  Ah, but its Friday. 
I almost forgot.  Being unemployed does have some benefits!

Eric Bielefeld
Sr. z/OS Systems Programmer
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
414-475-7434

- Original Message - 
From: "Bonno, Tuco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: 
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 12:47 PM
Subject: Re: Invite to join nitwits ???


> an old story  one day all the mice get together and start to complain 
> about the cat who is preying upon them.  one of them finally comes up w/ 
> an idea:  "let's get a little bell and put it around his neck; that way, 
> he won't be able to creep up on us any more without making any noise". 
> Everyone thinks this is a great idea and there's a whole lot of hooping 
> and hollering about it.  except for old Grandpa mouse, who just sits 
> there, apparently more asleep than awake . finally someone notices and 
> asks Grandpa mouse, "what's the matter grandpa? don't you think that 
> that's a great idea?"  And old Grandpa just opens one eye and says,  "And 
> just which one of you young Turks is going to be the one to put that bell 
> around the cat's neck?"
> hence the expression "to bell the cat" --- who is going to undertake the 
> risky behaviour?
>
>
> /s/ tuco bonno
> Graduate, College of Conflict Management
> University of SouthEast Asia
> "I partied on the Ho Chi Minh Trail - tiến lên !! "
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
> Behalf Of Ed Finnell
> Sent: Friday, 20 June, 2008 10:29 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Invite to join nitwits ???
>
>
> In a message dated 6/20/2008 5:20:20 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> for belling the cat?
>
>
>>>
> Report SPAM ought to suffice...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> **Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for
> fuel-efficient used cars. 
> (http://autos.aol.com/used?ncid=aolaut000507)
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
> Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
> Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Invite to join nitwits ???

2008-06-20 Thread Howard Brazee
On 20 Jun 2008 12:57:02 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Bielefeld)
wrote:

>All right - I'll bite.  What is the invite to join the nitwits about?

I didn't recognize this so I marked it as spam.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Stupid Question of the day.

2008-06-20 Thread Doug Henry
On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:20:09 -0500, Eric Bielefeld  wrote:

>we had a sysplex.  I wondered why
>my ISPF profile dataset was different, and the other sysprog there explained
>to me about the enque, which for the profile DS is DISP=OLD.  You have to
>write the logon exec or clist to take into account the system it is on, and
>allocate a name that's different on each system.

One of the enhancements with z/OS 1.9 is " Users are able to share ISPF 
profiles across different systems in the same sysplex".


Doug   
 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Invite to join nitwits ???

2008-06-20 Thread Eric Bielefeld
OK - Thanks.  I logged on to my Roadrunner account through webmail, and 
there wasn't anything in my spam folder.  I did have an email by Mr. Bond 
through IBM-Main.  I don't quite understand why it put it there.  My regular 
email account gets 20 to 30 emails in spam every day, but this account gets 
one or two a week.


I noticed one thing bad about this list though.  Since Darren took his 
exits, or whatever you call them on this platform out, people don't delete 
the last 3 lines.  I think I deleted about 4 sets of them.  I think before 
if there was already 1 or 2 of them there, it sent your post back until you 
deleted them.


Eric Bielefeld
Sr. z/OS Systems Programmer
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
414-475-7434

- Original Message - 
From: "Wayne Driscoll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: 
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 3:46 PM
Subject: Re: Invite to join nitwits ???



Eric,
There was an invite to some "alleged" tech list.  It (all 3 copies) was 
dumped in my spam folder automatically, so it may be in yours.


Wayne Driscoll
Product Developer
NOTE:  All opinions are strictly my own.


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



UA Listserv outage on Monday 6-23-2008

2008-06-20 Thread Darren Evans-Young
FYI...

---
Subject: Listserv outage on Monday 6-23-2008

Listserv will be down briefly on Monday morning June 23, 2008.  This
outage is needed to update licensing keys for the Listserv and antivirus
software.

While Listserv is down, any emails sent to UA hosted Listserv lists, for
distribution to subscribers, will be queued until Listserv comes back up.
This also means the Listserv Web Interface will be disabled during this
time.
---


Darren

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Stupid Question of the day.

2008-06-20 Thread Skip Robinson
One impediment to multiple logon is the enqueue on QNAME(SYSIKJUA). You can
enable multi-system logon by blocking propagation of that enqueue to other
members of a sysplex. I don't see how you could block recognition of that
enqueue on a single system. This enqueue represents the individual TSO user
instance and has nothing to do with data set allocation.

.
.
JO.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
626-302-7535 Office
323-715-0595 Mobile
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


   
 Doug Henry
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 K.COM> To 
 Sent by: IBM  IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
 Mainframe  cc 
 Discussion List   
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject 
 .EDU> Re: Stupid Question of the day. 
   
   
 06/20/2008 01:53  
 PM
   
   
 Please respond to 
   IBM Mainframe   
  Discussion List  
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   .EDU>   
   
   




On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:20:09 -0500, Eric Bielefeld  wrote:

>we had a sysplex.  I wondered why
>my ISPF profile dataset was different, and the other sysprog there
explained
>to me about the enque, which for the profile DS is DISP=OLD.  You have to
>write the logon exec or clist to take into account the system it is on,
and
>allocate a name that's different on each system.

One of the enhancements with z/OS 1.9 is " Users are able to share ISPF
profiles across different systems in the same sysplex".


Doug

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Stupid Question of the day.

2008-06-20 Thread Ted MacNEIL
>One impediment to multiple logon is the enqueue on QNAME(SYSIKJUA). You can 
>enable multi-system logon by blocking propagation of that enqueue to other
members of a sysplex.

It's a simple parm under JES2.
You don't have to worry about ENQ's for the SYSIkJUA, rather just with the 
allocated DSNs.

-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Remote Tape Backup

2008-06-20 Thread Russell Witt
Dean,

You have a couple of options. Virtual-tape offerings are probably the best
bet (no need for channel-extenders). Both the IBM offering and CA-Vtape
allow you to use TCP/IP to connect. EMC has also has a Virtual-tape offering
that I believe (not 100% sure) uses TCP/IP as well; the difference is the
both IBM and CA's offering backup their virtual-tape cache to physical tape
(on-site and/or off-site) while EMC is cache only. The STK/VSM option is
also available, but is not yet TCP/IP available (it requires a
channel-extender).

Russell Witt
CA

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Dean Montevago
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 8:14 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Remote Tape Backup


Hi,

Senior management has this vision of moving our Data Center to a new
location and having the tape processing in another. Don't ask me why or
how come because I have no idea.  Does anyone else do this ? What kind
of technology would you need ? Dark fiber keeps coming up in
conversation. Any info, white papers, opinions would be greatly
appreciated.

TIA
Dean

Dean Montevago
Sr. Systems Specialist
Visiting Nurse Service of New York
(212) 609 - 9608
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Stupid Question of the day.

2008-06-20 Thread Skip Robinson
Well, it's Friday night and I'm trying to watch Burn Notice. On one member
of my 1.9 sandbox sysplex, I see this:

ISG343I 18.52.17 GRS STATUS  FRAME LAST   F  E   SYS=B0
S=SYSTEM  SYSIKJUA ROBINSS
SYSNAMEJOBNAME ASID TCBADDR   EXC/SHRSTATUS
B0   0090   00AFFB00 EXCLUSIVEOWN

Because we exclude--or rather don't include--SYSIKJUA in the conversion to
SYSTEMS scope, I can logon to other members of this sysplex with the same
userid. We also tell JES2 to allow multiple TSO logon, but the whole
solution requires both GRS and JES2 changes. Plus accommodations for
conflicting data sets.

If I'm wrong, I owe Ted a drink at SCIDS--from the CASH bar!!!




   
 Ted MacNEIL   
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 CA>To 
 Sent by: IBM  IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
 Mainframe  cc 
 Discussion List   
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject 
 .EDU> Re: Stupid Question of the day. 
   
   
 06/20/2008 04:52  
 PM
   
   
 Please respond to 
   IBM Mainframe   
  Discussion List  
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   .EDU>   
   
   




>One impediment to multiple logon is the enqueue on QNAME(SYSIKJUA). You
can enable multi-system logon by blocking propagation of that enqueue to
other
members of a sysplex.

It's a simple parm under JES2.
You don't have to worry about ENQ's for the SYSIkJUA, rather just with the
allocated DSNs.

-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Stupid Question of the day.

2008-06-20 Thread Ted MacNEIL
>Because we exclude--or rather don't include--SYSIKJUA in the conversion to 
>SYSTEMS scope, I can logon to other members of this sysplex with the same
userid. We also tell JES2 to allow multiple TSO logon, but the whole solution 
requires both GRS and JES2 changes. Plus accommodations for conflicting data 
sets.

We changed nothing when we upgraded from 2.10 to 1.4.
It jest grew.
I was the first to find it out, with an ISPPROF ENQ issue.

>If I'm wrong, I owe Ted a drink at SCIDS--from the CASH bar!!!

Find me a job, and I'll be happier.

-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Stupid Question of the day.

2008-06-20 Thread Tom Moulder
In Canada or the States?

Tom Moulder


Find me a job, and I'll be happier.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html