Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-20 Thread Linda
Hi Skip, 

I much prefer Tom's Vista3270 as well. But at work, there is only Attachmate.

Linda

Sent from my iPhone

> On Mar 10, 2016, at 10:04 AM, Jesse 1 Robinson  
> wrote:
> 
> Tom Brennan is too modest to peddle his product, so I'll do it. Get a copy of 
> Vista3270. Screen size flexibility is only one of its many virtues. 
> 
> .
> .
> .
> J.O.Skip Robinson
> Southern California Edison Company
> Electric Dragon Team Paddler 
> SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
> 323-715-0595 Mobile
> 626-302-7535 Office
> robin...@sce.com
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On 
> Behalf Of Jerry Whitteridge
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 9:55 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: (External):Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use
> 
> Barbara - I've been trying to find a way and so far (at least up to 
> Attachmate release 9.3) have not found a way.
> 
> Jerry Whitteridge
> Manager Mainframe Systems & Storage
> Albertsons - Safeway Inc.
> 925 738 9443
> Corporate Tieline - 89443
> 
> If you feel in control
> you just aren't going fast enough.
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On 
> Behalf Of nitz-ibm
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 9:48 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use
> 
>> On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 21:45:48 +0800, David Crayford wrote:
>> 
>> What screen size do you use?
> I would love to use the standard 62x162 screensize (and have for the past 7 
> years or so), but unfortunately my new employer uses an attachmate extra 
> emulation that can only do 27x132. Does anyone know if I can fool attachmate 
> into a larger screensize (like I could with PComm before it offered 62x160) 
> by editing the parameter file? Having only 27 lines severely limits my 
> productivity. :-(
> 
> Barbara
> 
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-19 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 17:47:38 +, Mick Graley wrote:
>
>I wish IBM would enhance ISPF so that it would set the screen mode to
>80x24 when I swap to my edit screen and back to 132x27 when I swap
>back to SDSF. I don't see that being too big a deal if you're not
>actually showing 2 logical screens with a split line on the one
>terminal emulator window.
> 
Can't that be selected as DATA mode?

-- gil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-19 Thread David Crayford

On 17/03/2016 5:08 AM, Patrick Loftus wrote:

Vista 3270 doesn't even have to be installed, either.
Once you've installed it on one machine, I've found you can dump the relevant 
folders onto a USB stick, copy onto the work machine, and just execute the 
vistaTN3270.exe file.  I've not tried running it from a USB stick.you never 
know, might work.



And you can't beat the price, at $30 it's a steal. Tom is literally 
giving it away, an amazing act of altruism. He could double that price 
and customers would still bite his hand off!



On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 19:08:16 +, Jesse 1 Robinson  
wrote:


I would not want to get anyone in trouble, but Vista3270 does not require local 
admin rights. My new laptop came without admin. I could not install a new 
release of (stupid) Java, but I was able to install Vista. Just saying.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-19 Thread David Crayford

On 19/03/2016 1:56 AM, nitz-ibm wrote:

Hi Barbara,

I use Attachmate Extra also. Depending on what I am doing, I use mod 2 (24x80), 
mod 3 (32x80), mod 4 (43x80), or mod 5 (24x132). It depends de on what I am 
doing. I also have 12 sessions defined, some with different background colors 
that I only use for one lpar. Open your session tab and you should be able to 
set the model number for that session. Depending on your VTAM setup you may 
also need to use the long longon format for example ~ LOG applid,S3270R4q

Since you are getting mod5, you should be able to at least get more lines on 
your screen. The Attachmate Extra I have been using is very old.

Linda,

I went to Tom Brannons site and discovered that Vista3270 can be used on a 
trial basis. Had to do some guessing as to the port to use (different on each 
system), but I managed to connect to all systems I have to work with. Setting 
the screen colours to a white background was easy (certainly easier than 
customizing Attachmate). I showed off Vista3270 to my colleague(s), one of 
which also downloaded and installed because he needs more lines than Attachmate 
offers and a wide display. I also made them envious by showing them that the 
mouse scroll wheel works on 3270! :-)


I have used the wheelkeys utility http://wheelkeys.soft112.com/ to map 
F7/F8 in Extra. Works great. It doesn't work in the newer Reflection.



Thanks to Tom Brannon!

Barbara

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-19 Thread Lindy Mayfield
I totally agree.  I've used it since, probably over 15 years now.  I just paid 
for it because our company didn't force us to use theirs. :-)

I couldn't be happier with it.  I totally recommend it over any I've ever used.

/Lindy

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Linda
Sent: perjantaina 18. maaliskuuta 2016 5.26
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

Hi Skip, 

I much prefer Tom's Vista3270 as well. But at work, there is only Attachmate.

Linda

Sent from my iPhone

> On Mar 10, 2016, at 10:04 AM, Jesse 1 Robinson  
> wrote:
> 
> Tom Brennan is too modest to peddle his product, so I'll do it. Get a copy of 
> Vista3270. Screen size flexibility is only one of its many virtues. 
> 
> .
> .
> .
> J.O.Skip Robinson
> Southern California Edison Company
> Electric Dragon Team Paddler
> SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
> 323-715-0595 Mobile
> 626-302-7535 Office
> robin...@sce.com
> 
> 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-19 Thread Linda
Hi Barbara,

I use Attachmate Extra also. Depending on what I am doing, I use mod 2 (24x80), 
mod 3 (32x80), mod 4 (43x80), or mod 5 (24x132). It depends de on what I am 
doing. I also have 12 sessions defined, some with different background colors 
that I only use for one lpar. Open your session tab and you should be able to 
set the model number for that session. Depending on your VTAM setup you may 
also need to use the long longon format for example ~ LOG applid,S3270R4q 

Since you are getting mod5, you should be able to at least get more lines on 
your screen. The Attachmate Extra I have been using is very old. 

HTH,

Linda

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 10, 2016, at 9:47 AM, nitz-ibm  wrote:

>> On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 21:45:48 +0800, David Crayford wrote:
>> 
>> What screen size do you use?
> I would love to use the standard 62x162 screensize (and have for the past 7 
> years or so), but unfortunately my new employer uses an attachmate extra 
> emulation that can only do 27x132. Does anyone know if I can fool attachmate 
> into a larger screensize (like I could with PComm before it offered 62x160) 
> by editing the parameter file? Having only 27 lines severely limits my 
> productivity. :-(
> 
> Barbara
> 
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-19 Thread R.S.

W dniu 2016-03-17 o 13:27, David Crayford pisze:

On 17/03/2016 5:08 AM, Patrick Loftus wrote:

Vista 3270 doesn't even have to be installed, either.
Once you've installed it on one machine, I've found you can dump the 
relevant folders onto a USB stick, copy onto the work machine, and 
just execute the vistaTN3270.exe file.  I've not tried running it 
from a USB stick.you never know, might work.




And you can't beat the price, at $30 it's a steal. Tom is literally 
giving it away, an amazing act of altruism. He could double that price 
and customers would still bite his hand off!
AFAIK Nexus 3270 is even cheaper (and definitely the ...fastest, and the 
smallest). The cheapest is wc3270 which is windows-compatible clone of 
x3270. It's free.
Of course Vista is realy good stuff! BTW: Once upon a time I've got a 
licence from Tom ...for free.


From the other hand, IBM PCOMM is huge, slow and damn expensive. It's 
quite good as well, but I wouldn't want to pay for it.


--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland






--
Treść tej wiadomości może zawierać informacje prawnie chronione Banku 
przeznaczone wyłącznie do użytku służbowego adresata. Odbiorcą może być jedynie 
jej adresat z wyłączeniem dostępu osób trzecich. Jeżeli nie jesteś adresatem 
niniejszej wiadomości lub pracownikiem upoważnionym do jej przekazania 
adresatowi, informujemy, że jej rozpowszechnianie, kopiowanie, rozprowadzanie 
lub inne działanie o podobnym charakterze jest prawnie zabronione i może być 
karalne. Jeżeli otrzymałeś tę wiadomość omyłkowo, prosimy niezwłocznie 
zawiadomić nadawcę wysyłając odpowiedź oraz trwale usunąć tę wiadomość 
włączając w to wszelkie jej kopie wydrukowane lub zapisane na dysku.

This e-mail may contain legally privileged information of the Bank and is 
intended solely for business use of the addressee. This e-mail may only be 
received by the addressee and may not be disclosed to any third parties. If you 
are not the intended addressee of this e-mail or the employee authorized to 
forward it to the addressee, be advised that any dissemination, copying, 
distribution or any other similar activity is legally prohibited and may be 
punishable. If you received this e-mail by mistake please advise the sender 
immediately by using the reply facility in your e-mail software and delete 
permanently this e-mail including any copies of it either printed or saved to 
hard drive.

mBank S.A. z siedzibą w Warszawie, ul. Senatorska 18, 00-950 Warszawa, 
www.mBank.pl, e-mail: kont...@mbank.pl
Sąd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy XII Wydział Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru 
Sądowego, nr rejestru przedsiębiorców KRS 025237, NIP: 526-021-50-88. 
Według stanu na dzień 01.01.2016 r. kapitał zakładowy mBanku S.A. (w całości 
wpłacony) wynosi 168.955.696 złotych.


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-19 Thread Mick Graley
Hi All,

At my old employers we used Eicon Aviva for terminal emulation and it
was quite good, I liked it, lots of customization possible and it was
fast. At my current employer we use Microfocus Rumba and I'm not very
impressed with it! At home I've used X3270 on Linux and WC3270 on
Windows to connect to Hercules and they're both OK for the price ;-)

Back to the original question though, I like to use a model 2 for
editing code (big beefy font and most code is card image anyway) and a
model 5 for SDSF. I used to use different MAI sessions with different
user IDs and logmodes to achieve this from one terminal session set up
as a model 5. It was a bit of a pain switching between the different
sessions rather than just using one ISPF session with split screen (I
always have logical screen 1 as workplace and logical screen 2 as
SDSF, then various other logical screens for DB2, BMC, extra edit
sessions etc).

I hate using a model 5 with edit on one screen and SDSF on the other
as ISPF "windows" the 80 byte edit screen into the 132 chars and it
looks horrible for editing code.

I never have the split line showing so I always get a full logical screen.

I wish IBM would enhance ISPF so that it would set the screen mode to
80x24 when I swap to my edit screen and back to 132x27 when I swap
back to SDSF. I don't see that being too big a deal if you're not
actually showing 2 logical screens with a split line on the one
terminal emulator window.

Any thoughts?

Cheers,

Mick.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-19 Thread Mick Graley
No. That's what I've got set.
Cheers,
Mick.


On 18 March 2016 at 18:09, Paul Gilmartin
<000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 17:47:38 +, Mick Graley wrote:
>>
>>I wish IBM would enhance ISPF so that it would set the screen mode to
>>80x24 when I swap to my edit screen and back to 132x27 when I swap
>>back to SDSF. I don't see that being too big a deal if you're not
>>actually showing 2 logical screens with a split line on the one
>>terminal emulator window.
>>
> Can't that be selected as DATA mode?
>
> -- gil
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-19 Thread Jesse 1 Robinson
I have nagged Tom for years over the fire-sale price of Vista. He's very 
sensitive to what he views as 'price points' for garage-ware--no matter how 
good it is. Tom does not deal with POs. (Nor, by the way, does Barry Merrill 
for MXG.) Tom is good about providing gratis copies to students as well as to 
those who have 'mechanical' problems paying in US dollars. 

Nevertheless it all adds up. 

.
.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler 
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
323-715-0595 Mobile
626-302-7535 Office
robin...@sce.com


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of R.S.
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2016 6:37 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

W dniu 2016-03-17 o 14:15, David Crayford pisze:
> On 17/03/2016 9:04 PM, R.S. wrote:
>>>>
>>>
>>> And you can't beat the price, at $30 it's a steal. Tom is literally 
>>> giving it away, an amazing act of altruism. He could double that 
>>> price and customers would still bite his hand off!
>> AFAIK Nexus 3270 is even cheaper (and definitely the ...fastest, and 
>> the smallest). The cheapest is wc3270 which is windows-compatible 
>> clone of x3270. It's free.
>> Of course Vista is realy good stuff! BTW: Once upon a time I've got a 
>> licence from Tom ...for free.
>>
>> From the other hand, IBM PCOMM is huge, slow and damn expensive. It's 
>> quite good as well, but I wouldn't want to pay for it.
>
> We have PComm here and I won't use it. It has keyboard lag and the 
> font's don't scale. POS!

It is rarely needed now, but PCOMM supports variety of connection ways, 
including SNA, coax, etc. Having PCOMM you can set up woriking SNA network 
between workstations. Keyboard can be *easily* redefined. Fonts are not 
scalable, but very good shape (for terminal purposes) IMHO. BTW: 
AFAIR Vista 3270 also do not use scalable fonts.
PCOMM also has good features for IND$file transmissions.
Last, but not least for me: it is one of very few 3270 emulator which
*correctly* support polish characters.

-- 
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-19 Thread Elardus Engelbrecht
David Crayford wrote:

>> From the other hand, IBM PCOMM is huge, slow and damn expensive. It's quite 
>> good as well, but I wouldn't want to pay for it.

>We have PComm here and I won't use it. 
>It has keyboard lag 

Perhaps it is your PC/Laptop operating system which has a very slow key 
response time or repeat-delay or do you have any assistive software enabled?

If it is about transmitting the screen buffer over to z/OS, have a talk with 
your network team, perhaps there is some bandwidth problem or just heavy 
traffic.

>and the font's don't scale. 

Ouch. When I used PCOMM years ago, I used a full screen setting and live with 
whatever font type/size/colours were available.

>POS!

and a PITA to use it!

I never liked the replay of macros, but then it is just me.

Groete / Greetings
Elardus Engelbrecht

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-19 Thread Linda
Session tab. 

Linda

Sent from my iPhone

> On Mar 10, 2016, at 10:03 AM, Charles Mills  wrote:
> 
> Can anyone tell me where this is? Don't see it under Options, 6. Set screen
> characteristics...
> 
> Charles
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Peter Hunkeler
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 9:23 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: AW: Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use
> 
> 
>> Maybe I'm being thick here but with X3270 I think I'm stuck at 32 x 80 
>> -
> and not because of the emulator but because I don't know how to get the z/OS
> TSO/ISPF environment I'm using to take advantage of more. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Not at a terminal now, but there is a setting in "ISPF Settings" wiht
> options STD, DATA, MAX which has great influence on how ISPF behaves (it is
> called "screen size" or something the like). Have you set this to either
> DATA, or my preferred setting MAX. (I don't like the constant resizing whch
> happens with DATA).
> 
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-19 Thread David Crayford

On 17/03/2016 9:04 PM, R.S. wrote:




And you can't beat the price, at $30 it's a steal. Tom is literally 
giving it away, an amazing act of altruism. He could double that 
price and customers would still bite his hand off!
AFAIK Nexus 3270 is even cheaper (and definitely the ...fastest, and 
the smallest). The cheapest is wc3270 which is windows-compatible 
clone of x3270. It's free.
Of course Vista is realy good stuff! BTW: Once upon a time I've got a 
licence from Tom ...for free.


From the other hand, IBM PCOMM is huge, slow and damn expensive. It's 
quite good as well, but I wouldn't want to pay for it. 


We have PComm here and I won't use it. It has keyboard lag and the 
font's don't scale. POS!


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-19 Thread Edward Finnell
Anyone tried the WEBified ISPF with z/OSMF? Good, bad, indifferent?
 
I was looking at some of Peter van Dyke's Hidden treasures in ISPF. It  
looks promising with default screen size of 264x160 and up to 4 sessions ala  
3290. Guess if first showed up in 1.3. The session I was
looking at was S12720 from Winter SHARE 2013-p33.
 
 
In a message dated 3/17/2016 7:27:52 A.M. Central Daylight Time,  
dcrayf...@gmail.com writes:

And you  can't beat the price, at $30 it's a steal. Tom is literally 
giving it  away, an amazing act of altruism. He could double that price 
and customers  would still bite his hand  off!


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-19 Thread R.S.

W dniu 2016-03-17 o 14:15, David Crayford pisze:

On 17/03/2016 9:04 PM, R.S. wrote:




And you can't beat the price, at $30 it's a steal. Tom is literally 
giving it away, an amazing act of altruism. He could double that 
price and customers would still bite his hand off!
AFAIK Nexus 3270 is even cheaper (and definitely the ...fastest, and 
the smallest). The cheapest is wc3270 which is windows-compatible 
clone of x3270. It's free.
Of course Vista is realy good stuff! BTW: Once upon a time I've got a 
licence from Tom ...for free.


From the other hand, IBM PCOMM is huge, slow and damn expensive. It's 
quite good as well, but I wouldn't want to pay for it. 


We have PComm here and I won't use it. It has keyboard lag and the 
font's don't scale. POS!


It is rarely needed now, but PCOMM supports variety of connection ways, 
including SNA, coax, etc. Having PCOMM you can set up woriking SNA 
network between workstations. Keyboard can be *easily* redefined. Fonts 
are not scalable, but very good shape (for terminal purposes) IMHO. BTW: 
AFAIR Vista 3270 also do not use scalable fonts.

PCOMM also has good features for IND$file transmissions.
Last, but not least for me: it is one of very few 3270 emulator which 
*correctly* support polish characters.


--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland






---
Treść tej wiadomości może zawierać informacje prawnie chronione Banku 
przeznaczone wyłącznie do użytku służbowego adresata. Odbiorcą może być jedynie 
jej adresat z wyłączeniem dostępu osób trzecich. Jeżeli nie jesteś adresatem 
niniejszej wiadomości lub pracownikiem upoważnionym do jej przekazania 
adresatowi, informujemy, że jej rozpowszechnianie, kopiowanie, rozprowadzanie 
lub inne działanie o podobnym charakterze jest prawnie zabronione i może być 
karalne. Jeżeli otrzymałeś tę wiadomość omyłkowo, prosimy niezwłocznie 
zawiadomić nadawcę wysyłając odpowiedź oraz trwale usunąć tę wiadomość 
włączając w to wszelkie jej kopie wydrukowane lub zapisane na dysku.

This e-mail may contain legally privileged information of the Bank and is 
intended solely for business use of the addressee. This e-mail may only be 
received by the addressee and may not be disclosed to any third parties. If you 
are not the intended addressee of this e-mail or the employee authorized to 
forward it to the addressee, be advised that any dissemination, copying, 
distribution or any other similar activity is legally prohibited and may be 
punishable. If you received this e-mail by mistake please advise the sender 
immediately by using the reply facility in your e-mail software and delete 
permanently this e-mail including any copies of it either printed or saved to 
hard drive.

mBank S.A. z siedzibą w Warszawie, ul. Senatorska 18, 00-950 Warszawa, 
www.mBank.pl, e-mail: kont...@mbank.pl
Sąd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy XII Wydział Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru 
Sądowego, nr rejestru przedsiębiorców KRS 025237, NIP: 526-021-50-88. 
Według stanu na dzień 01.01.2016 r. kapitał zakładowy mBanku S.A. (w całości 
wpłacony) wynosi 168.955.696 złotych.


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-19 Thread Patrick Loftus
Well, it works, and is better than I expected, but if you're working all day in 
ISPF, I'd choose a dedicated 3270 emulator.

TN3270 Plus I found was excellent - multiple tabbed sessions in 1 window.  
That's the only other thing I wish Vista had.



On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 17:13:34 -0400, Edward Finnell  wrote:

>Anyone tried the WEBified ISPF with z/OSMF? Good, bad, indifferent?

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-19 Thread David Crayford

On 17/03/2016 9:36 PM, R.S. wrote:
Last, but not least for me: it is one of very few 3270 emulator which 
*correctly* support polish characters. 


Now that's a game changer!

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-19 Thread nitz-ibm
> Hi Barbara,
> 
> I use Attachmate Extra also. Depending on what I am doing, I use mod 2 
> (24x80), mod 3 (32x80), mod 4 (43x80), or mod 5 (24x132). It depends de on 
> what I am doing. I also have 12 sessions defined, some with different 
> background colors that I only use for one lpar. Open your session tab and you 
> should be able to set the model number for that session. Depending on your 
> VTAM setup you may also need to use the long longon format for example ~ LOG 
> applid,S3270R4q 
> 
> Since you are getting mod5, you should be able to at least get more lines on 
> your screen. The Attachmate Extra I have been using is very old. 

Linda,

I went to Tom Brannons site and discovered that Vista3270 can be used on a 
trial basis. Had to do some guessing as to the port to use (different on each 
system), but I managed to connect to all systems I have to work with. Setting 
the screen colours to a white background was easy (certainly easier than 
customizing Attachmate). I showed off Vista3270 to my colleague(s), one of 
which also downloaded and installed because he needs more lines than Attachmate 
offers and a wide display. I also made them envious by showing them that the 
mouse scroll wheel works on 3270! :-)

Thanks to Tom Brannon!

Barbara

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-19 Thread Patrick Loftus
Vista 3270 doesn't even have to be installed, either.
Once you've installed it on one machine, I've found you can dump the relevant 
folders onto a USB stick, copy onto the work machine, and just execute the 
vistaTN3270.exe file.  I've not tried running it from a USB stick.you never 
know, might work.


On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 19:08:16 +, Jesse 1 Robinson  
wrote:

>I would not want to get anyone in trouble, but Vista3270 does not require 
>local admin rights. My new laptop came without admin. I could not install a 
>new release of (stupid) Java, but I was able to install Vista. Just saying. 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-12 Thread Malcolm Beattie
Edward Finnell writes:
> LOGMODE  D4C32XX3 is a standard VTAM logmode that has the "query terminal 
> size" bit  turned on.  Works for any 3270 screen size whether standard or  
> custom.

D4C32XX3 is fine for use with remote SNA LUs (which are how the
Comms Server TN3270E server presents its devices) but for use
with local non-SNA 3270 devices, it leads to errors such as:

  22.23.58   IKT117I TSO/VTAM INITIALIZATION FAILED FOR  
   APPLNAME=TSO0001 , LUNAME=MBSNANET.L702   
  22.23.58 STC00032  IST663I BIND FAIL REQUEST RECEIVED, SENSE=0821  
  IST664I REAL  OLU=MBSNANET.L702   REAL  DLU=MBSNANET.TSOA0001  
  IST889I SID = C83FAAA75CC26A10 
  IST314I END
  22.23.58   IKT111I APPLNAME=TSO0001  FAILED DUE TO: TCAS CLSDST
   PASS FAILURE  
  22.23.58   IKJ608I LOGON TERMINATED, IKTXINIT, TSO/VTAM
   INITIALIZATION ERROR  
  22.23.58 STC00035  IKT030I TCAS LOGON PROCESS FAILURE PLU=TSOA0001 
   SLU=MBSNANET.TSOA0001  SENSE= 0821
  22.23.58 STC00032  IST804I CLOSE IN PROGRESS FOR TSO0001 OPENED BY 
   ***NA***  
  22.23.58 STC00032  IST400I TERMINATION IN PROGRESS FOR APPLID TSO0001  
  22.23.58 STC00032  IST805I VTAM CLOSE COMPLETE FOR TSO0001 

Local non-SNA 3270 devices are what are presented by 3270 device
definitions that are
* in z/VM guests ("SPECIAL vdev 3270") for DIALling to z/OS guests
* in aws3274 stanzas (when running under zPDT or RDzUT)
* configured in OSA-ICC (I would think though I haven't tried)

So for anyone using any of those, the logmode to use for them is
D4B32XX3 (i.e. B instead of C as the third character).
An example VTAM definition for such devices is:

LA701 LOCAL CUADDR=701,TERM=3277,DLOGMOD=D4B32XX3,USSTAB=

--Malcolm

-- 
Malcolm Beattie
Linux and System z Technical Consultant, zChampion
IBM UK Systems and Technology Group

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-12 Thread Mark Regan
I use 90x160 with TSO/ISPF/SDSF and with NetView, of course I'm using 24"
monitors when doing so.

On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 8:45 AM David Crayford  wrote:

> We're building a new product which will have several UI's; ISPF, Web,
> Eclipse etc. For the ISPF we're wondering how we should optimize the
> screen real estate for todays customer.
>
> I use a custom 60x160 which seems to be the norm in our office. Lots of
> the tools we use, especially debuggers like z/XCD and DebugTool work
> much better with that model.
> I use RDz for development but for most stuff fall back on the green
> screens like SDSF and tools that don't have a good GUI, which is 90% of
> them.
>
> What screen size do you use?
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-11 Thread David Crayford

On 12/03/2016 4:08 AM, Kirk Wolf wrote:

Maybe switch out completely different UIs based on the detected screen
size?

If you detect 24x80, you could use a mode where each screen is like:

= Acme Product Interface (snarky mode) ===

What do you want to do?
a) 
b) 
c) 

Type a letter HERE> __  and press ENTER (if you can find it).


(sorry David, it's Friday :-)


LOL! It doesn't have to be a Friday for moment of mirth ;^)


Kirk Wolf
Dovetailed Technologies
http://dovetail.com

On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 2:39 PM, Robert Prins 
wrote:


On 2016-03-10 13:45, David Crayford wrote:


We're building a new product which will have several UI's; ISPF, Web,
Eclipse
etc. For the ISPF we're wondering how we should optimize the screen real
estate
for todays customer.

I use a custom 60x160 which seems to be the norm in our office. Lots of
the
tools we use, especially debuggers like z/XCD and DebugTool work much
better
with that model.
I use RDz for development but for most stuff fall back on the green
screens like
SDSF and tools that don't have a good GUI, which is 90% of them.

What screen size do you use?


Tom Brennans's Vista tn3270, 62x160, on a full HD screen. Would like to
set it even higher, but for some reason that fails.

Robert
--
Robert AH Prins
robert.ah.prins(a)gmail.com


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-11 Thread Tom Marchant
On Fri, 11 Mar 2016 20:39:19 +, Robert Prins wrote:

>Tom Brennans's Vista tn3270, 62x160, on a full HD screen. Would like to set it
>even higher, but for some reason that fails.

I assume that you mean that the larger size is rejected by the host, not that 
Vista fails. 
I've configured Vista much larger than that, and found that ISPF doesn't allow 
more 
than 160 columns. The maximum number of rows that ISPF will support is about 
100. 
I'm not sure of the exact number, but 101 is the number that seems stuck in my 
head.

I'd sure like to see what I can put on a 4K monitor. 3840 x 2160 should allow 
for a very 
nice 99 x 160 display, even considerably less than full screen. That is, if my 
video card 
can handle it.

-- 
Tom Marchant

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-11 Thread Silvio Camplani
Ditto concerning Vista3270.
99x134 for me.
 
Regards,
 
Silvio Camplani
zSeries Sr. Analyst, Systems Support
Bombardier
 
 
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016, at 01:04 PM, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote:
> Tom Brennan is too modest to peddle his product, so I'll do it. Get a
> copy of Vista3270. Screen size flexibility is only one of its many
> virtues.
>
> .
> .
> .
> J.O.Skip Robinson
>
>
 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-11 Thread Kirk Wolf
Maybe switch out completely different UIs based on the detected screen
size?

If you detect 24x80, you could use a mode where each screen is like:

= Acme Product Interface (snarky mode) ===

What do you want to do?
a) 
b) 
c) 

Type a letter HERE> __  and press ENTER (if you can find it).


(sorry David, it's Friday :-)

Kirk Wolf
Dovetailed Technologies
http://dovetail.com

On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 2:39 PM, Robert Prins 
wrote:

> On 2016-03-10 13:45, David Crayford wrote:
>
>> We're building a new product which will have several UI's; ISPF, Web,
>> Eclipse
>> etc. For the ISPF we're wondering how we should optimize the screen real
>> estate
>> for todays customer.
>>
>> I use a custom 60x160 which seems to be the norm in our office. Lots of
>> the
>> tools we use, especially debuggers like z/XCD and DebugTool work much
>> better
>> with that model.
>> I use RDz for development but for most stuff fall back on the green
>> screens like
>> SDSF and tools that don't have a good GUI, which is 90% of them.
>>
>> What screen size do you use?
>>
>
> Tom Brennans's Vista tn3270, 62x160, on a full HD screen. Would like to
> set it even higher, but for some reason that fails.
>
> Robert
> --
> Robert AH Prins
> robert.ah.prins(a)gmail.com
>
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-11 Thread Robert Prins

On 2016-03-10 13:45, David Crayford wrote:

We're building a new product which will have several UI's; ISPF, Web, Eclipse
etc. For the ISPF we're wondering how we should optimize the screen real estate
for todays customer.

I use a custom 60x160 which seems to be the norm in our office. Lots of the
tools we use, especially debuggers like z/XCD and DebugTool work much better
with that model.
I use RDz for development but for most stuff fall back on the green screens like
SDSF and tools that don't have a good GUI, which is 90% of them.

What screen size do you use?


Tom Brennans's Vista tn3270, 62x160, on a full HD screen. Would like to set it 
even higher, but for some reason that fails.


Robert
--
Robert AH Prins
robert.ah.prins(a)gmail.com

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-11 Thread Jesse 1 Robinson
It's Friday AM here, and I've already learned a new word. ;-)

.
.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler 
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
323-715-0595 Mobile
626-302-7535 Office
robin...@sce.com


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 9:11 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

On Fri, 11 Mar 2016 08:50:00 -0800, John Mattson wrote:

>I use Mod-5 and have been an advocate for it because most emulators 
>support it,  Most zOS sites just give everyone Mod-2 because that is 
>the usual emulator default.  Everyone I have shown that they can use 
>Mod-5 is usually delighted with it and never go back. Just being to see 
>the fully sysout or syslog width convinces most everyone.
> 
Imagine their further delight if they discover OVERSIZE with the ability to see 
an entire "page".  And 133 might allow viewing Carriage Control.

Oh!  Compromises; my laptop screen size, presbyopia, ...

-- gil


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-11 Thread Ed Jaffe

On 3/11/2016 1:50 AM, Styles, Andy (SD EP zPlatform) wrote:

My one bugbear is products that don't support screen sizes greater than 24x80 - 
someone mentioned Control-M, and that was certainly one of them that causes me 
issues. Xpediter/TSO is another, I had to raise an issue with Compuware because 
it corrupted my display with a large screen, so they wrote a fix...which 
prevents you starting Xpediter if your screens size is bigger than 62x160 - No, 
that's not what I wanted Compuware!


You: Hey Doc, it hurts when I do this.
Doc: Don't do that.

--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
831 Parkview Drive North
El Segundo, CA 90245
http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-11 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Fri, 11 Mar 2016 08:50:00 -0800, John Mattson wrote:

>I use Mod-5 and have been an advocate for it because most emulators support
>it,  Most zOS sites just give everyone Mod-2 because that is the usual
>emulator default.  Everyone I have shown that they can use Mod-5 is usually
>delighted with it and never go back. Just being to see the fully sysout or
>syslog width convinces most everyone.
> 
Imagine their further delight if they discover OVERSIZE with the ability to
see an entire "page".  And 133 might allow viewing Carriage Control.

Oh!  Compromises; my laptop screen size, presbyopia, ...

-- gil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-11 Thread John Mattson
I use Mod-5 and have been an advocate for it because most emulators support
it,  Most zOS sites just give everyone Mod-2 because that is the usual
emulator default.  Everyone I have shown that they can use Mod-5 is usually
delighted with it and never go back. Just being to see the fully sysout or
syslog width convinces most everyone.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-11 Thread Styles, Andy (SD EP zPlatform)
I have used 84x160 (under PComm) and now we've been migrated to Attachmate's 
Reflection 2014, I use 82x160, because Attachmate's font handling isn't quite 
as good as PComm - although it offers a wider choice.  Both in PComm and in 
Reflection, I remove all the window decorations (using the TouchUX and Windows 
Full Screen in Reflection) and have the Windows task bar auto-hide to give me a 
very retro 100% full screen mainframe view. Makes the font sizes larger too - 
I've said to a number of people who comment on the font size that it's no 
smaller than most Word docs or email messages..

My one bugbear is products that don't support screen sizes greater than 24x80 - 
someone mentioned Control-M, and that was certainly one of them that causes me 
issues. Xpediter/TSO is another, I had to raise an issue with Compuware because 
it corrupted my display with a large screen, so they wrote a fix...which 
prevents you starting Xpediter if your screens size is bigger than 62x160 - No, 
that's not what I wanted Compuware!

Andy Styles 
z/Series Systems Programmer 
 
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of David Crayford
Sent: 10 March 2016 13:46
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

-- This email has reached the Bank via an external source --
 

We're building a new product which will have several UI's; ISPF, Web, Eclipse 
etc. For the ISPF we're wondering how we should optimize the screen real estate 
for todays customer.

I use a custom 60x160 which seems to be the norm in our office. Lots of the 
tools we use, especially debuggers like z/XCD and DebugTool work much better 
with that model.
I use RDz for development but for most stuff fall back on the green screens 
like SDSF and tools that don't have a good GUI, which is 90% of them.

What screen size do you use?

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Lloyds Banking Group plc. Registered Office: The Mound, Edinburgh EH1 1YZ. 
Registered in Scotland no. SC95000. Telephone: 0131 225 4555. Lloyds Bank plc. 
Registered Office: 25 Gresham Street, London EC2V 7HN. Registered in England 
and Wales no. 2065. Telephone 0207626 1500. Bank of Scotland plc. Registered 
Office: The Mound, Edinburgh EH1 1YZ. Registered in Scotland no. SC327000. 
Telephone: 03457 801 801. Cheltenham & Gloucester plc. Registered Office: 
Barnett Way, Gloucester GL4 3RL. Registered in England and Wales 2299428. 
Telephone: 0345 603 1637

Lloyds Bank plc, Bank of Scotland plc are authorised by the Prudential 
Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and 
Prudential Regulation Authority.

Cheltenham & Gloucester plc is authorised and regulated by the Financial 
Conduct Authority.

Halifax is a division of Bank of Scotland plc. Cheltenham & Gloucester Savings 
is a division of Lloyds Bank plc.

HBOS plc. Registered Office: The Mound, Edinburgh EH1 1YZ. Registered in 
Scotland no. SC218813.

This e-mail (including any attachments) is private and confidential and may 
contain privileged material. If you have received this e-mail in error, please 
notify the sender and delete it (including any attachments) immediately. You 
must not copy, distribute, disclose or use any of the information in it or any 
attachments. Telephone calls may be monitored or recorded.


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-11 Thread David Crayford

On 11/03/2016 1:39 AM, Ed Jaffe wrote:

On 3/10/2016 5:45 AM, David Crayford wrote:
I use a custom 60x160 which seems to be the norm in our office. Lots 
of the tools we use, especially debuggers like z/XCD and DebugTool 
work much better with that model.


My 3270 displays are all 68x80 default size and 68x142 alternate size. 
Why?


I just tried that and it's pretty good. I'm gonna use that from now on.



I reduced the number of rows on my displays from 90 down to 68 after I 
started needing glasses to work. Since then, I've been getting larger 
and larger PC monitors to compensate...




I'm having the same problem, I started wearing reading glasses a couple 
of years ago. IMO, you can't have enough screen real estate. I would 
love a 39" 4K TV on my desk, and they
can cost less than $500 these days 
http://blog.slickedit.com/2015/01/from-0-to-4k-a-belated-christmas-story/.


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-11 Thread Bruce Hewson
Gil,

But I get:

 IKJ56710I INVALID USERID, applid(tso)
 IKJ56703A REENTER THIS OPERAND -



Means your USSTAB has special code for LOGON keyword.

It may have support for

L APPLID(TSO) LOGON(D4C32XX3) 
or "=" instead of "()"

Regards
Bruce

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-11 Thread Bruce Hewson
Using Tom Brennan's Vista TN3270.

makes it real easy to select "strange" screen sizes.

Mostly I use 60x160 at home, and 52x140 on the smaller monitor at work.

I use 70 x 80  for Omegamon MVS Classic screens.

As Tom knows, I sometimes have many TN3270 sessions open and hit his screen 
count limit, which he kindly expanded his limit to 39 screens.

Regards
Bruce Hewson

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-10 Thread David Crayford

On 11/03/2016 2:04 AM, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote:

Tom Brennan is too modest to peddle his product, so I'll do it. Get a copy of 
Vista3270. Screen size flexibility is only one of its many virtues.


We've got a choice of Attachmate Extra/Reflection and PComm where I 
work. I use Vista3270 which I purchased myself many years ago. It hardly 
broke the bank at $30. It has many virtues. The very sensible
wheel mouse mapping to F7/F8 just makes perfect sense and is a huge 
productivity boost when scrolling through heaps of syslog.  I can't 
understand why other emulators don't do it too.



.
.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
323-715-0595 Mobile
626-302-7535 Office
robin...@sce.com


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Jerry Whitteridge
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 9:55 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

Barbara - I've been trying to find a way and so far (at least up to Attachmate 
release 9.3) have not found a way.

Jerry Whitteridge
Manager Mainframe Systems & Storage
Albertsons - Safeway Inc.
925 738 9443
Corporate Tieline - 89443

If you feel in control
you just aren't going fast enough.



-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of nitz-ibm
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 9:48 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use


On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 21:45:48 +0800, David Crayford wrote:

What screen size do you use?


I would love to use the standard 62x162 screensize (and have for the past 7 
years or so), but unfortunately my new employer uses an attachmate extra 
emulation that can only do 27x132. Does anyone know if I can fool attachmate 
into a larger screensize (like I could with PComm before it offered 62x160) by 
editing the parameter file? Having only 27 lines severely limits my 
productivity. :-(

Barbara

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-10 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Fri, 11 Mar 2016 10:52:55 +1100, Paul Gillis  wrote:

>I use the -oversize option as -oversize 134x60.

>-Original Message-
>From: Martin Packer
>Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 10:49 AM
>
>Maybe I'm being thick here but with X3270 I think I'm stuck at 32 x 80 - and
>not because of the emulator but because I don't know how to get the z/OS
>TSO/ISPF environment I'm using to take advantage of more.
>
You've pretty well convinced me that the problem lies at the host, not at
the terminal, but so many replies are terminal-oriented.  I found:
http://planetmvs.com/tn3270/faq.html

D4C32XX3 - This is an IBM supplied LOGMODE and should be in your VTAMLIB
Here are some sample commands to use at the TCPIP USS screen after changing 
your TN3270 emulator to use non-standard screen sizes:
logon applid(tso) logmode(d4c32xx3)
logon applid=tso logmode=d4c32xx3 

But I get:

 IKJ56710I INVALID USERID, applid(tso)
 IKJ56703A REENTER THIS OPERAND -

It seems to be a VTAM configuration option, but I can't find where these are set
nor which one is in effect for me.  But I shouldn't care because things are 
working
well for me.

-- gil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-10 Thread Paul Gillis
I use the -oversize option as -oversize 134x60.

Cheers,
Paul Gillis

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Dyck, Lionel B. (TRA)
Sent: Friday, 11 March 2016 3:54 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

Isn't there a -model option something like:

-model n

Where n is 2 for mod 2, 3 for mod 3, etc.

I don't have access to x3270 right now but that is what I seem to recall.

--
Lionel B. Dyck (Contractor)
Mainframe Systems Programmer
Enterprise Infrastructure Support (Station 200) (005OP6.3.10) VA OI&T
Service Delivery & Engineering
Office: 512-326-6173
Cell: 925-348-0237


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Martin Packer
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 10:49 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

Maybe I'm being thick here but with X3270 I think I'm stuck at 32 x 80 - and
not because of the emulator but because I don't know how to get the z/OS
TSO/ISPF environment I'm using to take advantage of more.

Cheers, Martin

Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator, Worldwide Cloud & Systems
Performance, IBM

+44-7802-245-584

email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com

Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog: 
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker



From:   "R.S." 
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date:   10/03/2016 16:23
Subject:    Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List 



24x80

Yes, I have colour monitor, flat one, actually two of them, 27" each.
And still the most popular (3270) screen resolution I use is 24x80.
Atavism ;-)
I also use 43x80 and rarely 24x132 or 42x132.

BTW: I wish I would have any resolution *I want* and my application simply
supported it. That wasn't case at least for ControlM panels ("illegal"
resolutions caused abend).

--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland






---
Treść tej wiadomości może zawierać informacje prawnie chronione Banku 
przeznaczone wyłącznie do użytku służbowego adresata. Odbiorcą może być 
jedynie jej adresat z wyłączeniem dostępu osób trzecich. Jeżeli nie jesteś 
adresatem niniejszej wiadomości lub pracownikiem upoważnionym do jej 
przekazania adresatowi, informujemy, że jej rozpowszechnianie, kopiowanie, 
rozprowadzanie lub inne działanie o podobnym charakterze jest prawnie 
zabronione i może być karalne. Jeżeli otrzymałeś tę wiadomość omyłkowo, 
prosimy niezwłocznie zawiadomić nadawcę wysyłając odpowiedź oraz trwale 
usunąć tę wiadomość włączając w to wszelkie jej kopie wydrukowane lub 
zapisane na dysku.

This e-mail may contain legally privileged information of the Bank and is 
intended solely for business use of the addressee. This e-mail may only be 
received by the addressee and may not be disclosed to any third parties. 
If you are not the intended addressee of this e-mail or the employee 
authorized to forward it to the addressee, be advised that any 
dissemination, copying, distribution or any other similar activity is 
legally prohibited and may be punishable. If you received this e-mail by 
mistake please advise the sender immediately by using the reply facility 
in your e-mail software and delete permanently this e-mail including any 
copies of it either printed or saved to hard drive.

mBank S.A. z siedzibą w Warszawie, ul. Senatorska 18, 00-950 Warszawa, 
www.mBank.pl, e-mail: kont...@mbank.pl
Sąd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy XII Wydział Gospodarczy Krajowego 
Rejestru Sądowego, nr rejestru przedsiębiorców KRS 025237, NIP: 
526-021-50-88. Według stanu na dzień 01.01.2016 r. kapitał zakładowy 
mBanku S.A. (w całości wpłacony) wynosi 168.955.696 złotych.


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


AW: Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-10 Thread Peter Hunkeler
> Pity. I can hope that the new emulation they want to use can handle it. 
> (Saying in German: Hope dies last - die Hoffnung stirbt zuletzt).


We're using Reflection from Attachmate (if I'm not totally wrong). This handles 
any screen dimensions I wanted to use so far.



--
Peter Hunkeler

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-10 Thread Alan Young
The reason I asked about the X3270 version is that there are some 
IBM-DYNAMIC bugs have been fixed over time. What error message is TSO 
issuing? Does logging on with a LOGMODE of D4C32XX3 make any difference?


Alan

Martin Packer wrote:
(My) RHEL has an ancient X3270 but X3270 is happy with it. It's my TSO 
logon that isn't.


Cheers, Martin

Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Cloud & Systems Performance, IBM

+44-7802-245-584

email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com

Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog: 
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker




From:   Alan Young 
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date:   10/03/2016 21:04
Subject:Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do 
you use

Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List 



Ah, yeah, sorry about that parameter flip. Which version of X3270 is in 
use? It works for me with 3.4ga10.


Alan

Martin Packer wrote:
  

Thanks. But -oversize 132x43 (not order) got rejection from TSO.

Cheers, Martin

Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Cloud & Systems Performance, IBM

+44-7802-245-584

email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com

Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog: 
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker




From:   Alan Young 
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date:   10/03/2016 20:07
Subject:    Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do 
you use

Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List 



Try adding the -oversize option as -oversize 43x132.

Alan

Martin Packer wrote:


Yes. And it gives invidious choices:   43 x 80 and 32 x 132.  You can 
guess I'd want 43 x 132. :-)


Cheers, Martin

Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Cloud & Systems Performance, IBM

+44-7802-245-584

email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com

Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog: 
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker




From:   "Dyck, Lionel B. (TRA)" 
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date:   10/03/2016 17:04
Subject:    Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do 
  


  

you use
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
  


  


Isn't there a -model option something like:

-model n

Where n is 2 for mod 2, 3 for mod 3, etc.

I don't have access to x3270 right now but that is what I seem to 

  

recall.



--
  

Lionel B. Dyck (Contractor)
Mainframe Systems Programmer 
Enterprise Infrastructure Support (Station 200) (005OP6.3.10)

VA OI&T Service Delivery & Engineering
Office: 512-326-6173
Cell: 925-348-0237


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] 
  
On 
  


Behalf Of Martin Packer
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 10:49 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

Maybe I'm being thick here but with X3270 I think I'm stuck at 32 x 80 
  
- 
  

and not because of the emulator but because I don't know how to get the 
  


  

z/OS TSO/ISPF environment I'm using to take advantage of more.

Cheers, Martin

Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator, Worldwide Cloud & Systems 
Performance, IBM


+44-7802-245-584

email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com

Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog: 
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker




From:   "R.S." 
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date:   10/03/2016 16:23
Subject:Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
  


  


24x80

Yes, I have colour monitor, flat one, actually two of them, 27" each.
And still the most popular (3270) screen resolution I use is 24x80.
Atavism ;-)
I also use 43x80 and rarely 24x132 or 42x132.

BTW: I wish I would have any resolution *I want* and my application 

  
simply 


supported it. That wasn't case at least for ControlM panels ("illegal" 
resolutions caused abend).


--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland






---
Treść tej wiadomości może zawierać informacje prawnie chronione Banku 
przeznaczone wyłącznie do użytku służbowego adresata. Odbiorcą może być 
  


  
jedynie jej adresat z wyłączeniem dostępu osób trzecich. Jeżeli nie 

  
jesteś 


adresatem niniejszej wiadomości lub pracownikiem upoważnionym do jej 
przekazania adresatowi, informujemy, że jej rozpowszechnianie, 

  
kopiowanie, 


rozprowadzanie lub inne działanie o podobnym charakterze jest prawnie 
zabronione i może być karalne. Jeżeli otrzymałeś tę wiadomość omyłkowo, 
  


  
prosimy niezwłocznie zawiadomić nadawcę wysyłając odpowiedź oraz trwale 
  


  
usunąć tę wiadomość włączając w to wszelkie jej kopie

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-10 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 20:17:11 +, Martin Packer wrote:

>Thanks. But -oversize 132x43 (not order) got rejection from TSO.
>
And yet I'm working with:

 ZTERMCP5 is: 01047
 ZTERMCID is: 01047
 ZTERMCS5 is: 00697
 ZENVIR   is: ISPF 7.2MVS TSO
 ZOS390RL is: z/OS   02.02.00
 ZGUI is:
 ZISPFOS  is: ISPF FOR z/OS 02.02.00
 ZLANGis:
 ZSEQ is: 05411
 ZTSICMD  is: ISPF
 ZWSOPSYS is:
 ZSCREEND is: 0044
 ZSCREENW is: 0132

BTW, are there variables that tell:
The size of the split, rather than the overall size of the screen?
LOGMODE?
Others?  (Well, yes, RTFM.  But which section?)

-- gil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-10 Thread Martin Packer
(My) RHEL has an ancient X3270 but X3270 is happy with it. It's my TSO 
logon that isn't.

Cheers, Martin

Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Cloud & Systems Performance, IBM

+44-7802-245-584

email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com

Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog: 
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker



From:   Alan Young 
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date:   10/03/2016 21:04
Subject:Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do 
you use
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List 



Ah, yeah, sorry about that parameter flip. Which version of X3270 is in 
use? It works for me with 3.4ga10.

Alan

Martin Packer wrote:
> Thanks. But -oversize 132x43 (not order) got rejection from TSO.
>
> Cheers, Martin
>
> Martin Packer,
> zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
> Worldwide Cloud & Systems Performance, IBM
>
> +44-7802-245-584
>
> email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
>
> Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
> Blog: 
> https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker
>
>
>
> From:   Alan Young 
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Date:   10/03/2016 20:07
> Subject:Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do 
> you use
> Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
>
>
>
> Try adding the -oversize option as -oversize 43x132.
>
> Alan
>
> Martin Packer wrote:
> 
>> Yes. And it gives invidious choices:   43 x 80 and 32 x 132.  You can 
>> guess I'd want 43 x 132. :-)
>>
>> Cheers, Martin
>>
>> Martin Packer,
>> zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
>> Worldwide Cloud & Systems Performance, IBM
>>
>> +44-7802-245-584
>>
>> email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
>>
>> Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
>> Blog: 
>> https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker
>>
>>
>>
>> From:   "Dyck, Lionel B. (TRA)" 
>> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>> Date:   10/03/2016 17:04
>> Subject:Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do 

>> you use
>> Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List 

>>
>>
>>
>> Isn't there a -model option something like:
>>
>> -model n
>>
>> Where n is 2 for mod 2, 3 for mod 3, etc.
>>
>> I don't have access to x3270 right now but that is what I seem to 
>> 
> recall.
> 
>> 
> 
--
> 
>> Lionel B. Dyck (Contractor)
>> Mainframe Systems Programmer 
>> Enterprise Infrastructure Support (Station 200) (005OP6.3.10)
>> VA OI&T Service Delivery & Engineering
>> Office: 512-326-6173
>> Cell: 925-348-0237
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] 
On 
>> 
>
> 
>> Behalf Of Martin Packer
>> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 10:49 AM
>> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use
>>
>> Maybe I'm being thick here but with X3270 I think I'm stuck at 32 x 80 
- 
>> 
>
> 
>> and not because of the emulator but because I don't know how to get the 

>> z/OS TSO/ISPF environment I'm using to take advantage of more.
>>
>> Cheers, Martin
>>
>> Martin Packer,
>> zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator, Worldwide Cloud & Systems 
>> Performance, IBM
>>
>> +44-7802-245-584
>>
>> email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
>>
>> Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
>> Blog: 
>> https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker
>>
>>
>>
>> From:   "R.S." 
>> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>> Date:   10/03/2016 16:23
>> Subject:Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use
>> Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List 

>>
>>
>>
>> 24x80
>>
>> Yes, I have colour monitor, flat one, actually two of them, 27" each.
>> And still the most popular (3270) screen resolution I use is 24x80.
>> Atavism ;-)
>> I also use 43x80 and rarely 24x132 or 42x132.
>>
>> BTW: I wish I would have any resolution *I want* and my application 
>> 
> simply 
> 
>> supported it. That wasn't case at least for ControlM panels ("illegal" 
>> resolutions caused abend).
>>
>> --
>> Radoslaw Skorupka
>> Lodz, Poland
>>
>>
>>
>&g

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-10 Thread Alan Young
Ah, yeah, sorry about that parameter flip. Which version of X3270 is in 
use? It works for me with 3.4ga10.


Alan

Martin Packer wrote:

Thanks. But -oversize 132x43 (not order) got rejection from TSO.

Cheers, Martin

Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Cloud & Systems Performance, IBM

+44-7802-245-584

email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com

Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog: 
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker




From:   Alan Young 
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date:   10/03/2016 20:07
Subject:Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do 
you use

Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List 



Try adding the -oversize option as -oversize 43x132.

Alan

Martin Packer wrote:
  
Yes. And it gives invidious choices:   43 x 80 and 32 x 132.  You can 
guess I'd want 43 x 132. :-)


Cheers, Martin

Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Cloud & Systems Performance, IBM

+44-7802-245-584

email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com

Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog: 
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker




From:   "Dyck, Lionel B. (TRA)" 
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date:   10/03/2016 17:04
Subject:        Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do 
you use

Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List 



Isn't there a -model option something like:

-model n

Where n is 2 for mod 2, 3 for mod 3, etc.

I don't have access to x3270 right now but that is what I seem to 


recall.
  


--
  

Lionel B. Dyck (Contractor)
Mainframe Systems Programmer 
Enterprise Infrastructure Support (Station 200) (005OP6.3.10)

VA OI&T Service Delivery & Engineering
Office: 512-326-6173
Cell: 925-348-0237


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On 



  

Behalf Of Martin Packer
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 10:49 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

Maybe I'm being thick here but with X3270 I think I'm stuck at 32 x 80 - 



  
and not because of the emulator but because I don't know how to get the 
z/OS TSO/ISPF environment I'm using to take advantage of more.


Cheers, Martin

Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator, Worldwide Cloud & Systems 
Performance, IBM


+44-7802-245-584

email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com

Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog: 
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker




From:   "R.S." 
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date:   10/03/2016 16:23
Subject:Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List 



24x80

Yes, I have colour monitor, flat one, actually two of them, 27" each.
And still the most popular (3270) screen resolution I use is 24x80.
Atavism ;-)
I also use 43x80 and rarely 24x132 or 42x132.

BTW: I wish I would have any resolution *I want* and my application 

simply 
  
supported it. That wasn't case at least for ControlM panels ("illegal" 
resolutions caused abend).


--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland






---
Treść tej wiadomości może zawierać informacje prawnie chronione Banku 
przeznaczone wyłącznie do użytku służbowego adresata. Odbiorcą może być 
jedynie jej adresat z wyłączeniem dostępu osób trzecich. Jeżeli nie 

jesteś 
  
adresatem niniejszej wiadomości lub pracownikiem upoważnionym do jej 
przekazania adresatowi, informujemy, że jej rozpowszechnianie, 

kopiowanie, 
  
rozprowadzanie lub inne działanie o podobnym charakterze jest prawnie 
zabronione i może być karalne. Jeżeli otrzymałeś tę wiadomość omyłkowo, 
prosimy niezwłocznie zawiadomić nadawcę wysyłając odpowiedź oraz trwale 
usunąć tę wiadomość włączając w to wszelkie jej kopie wydrukowane lub 
zapisane na dysku.


This e-mail may contain legally privileged information of the Bank and 

is 
  
intended solely for business use of the addressee. This e-mail may only 

be 
  
received by the addressee and may not be disclosed to any third parties. 



  
If you are not the intended addressee of this e-mail or the employee 
authorized to forward it to the addressee, be advised that any 
dissemination, copying, distribution or any other similar activity is 
legally prohibited and may be punishable. If you received this e-mail by 



  
mistake please advise the sender immediately by using the reply facility 



  
in your e-mail software and delete permanently this e-mail including any 



  

copies of it either printed or saved to hard drive.

mBank S.A. z siedzibą w Warszawie, ul. Senatorska 18, 00-950 Warszawa, 
www.mBank.pl, e-mail: kont...@mbank.pl
Sąd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy XII Wydział Gospodarcz

Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-10 Thread Chris Hoelscher
Didn’t IBM VTAM commercials back in the 70's user Terminal Models?

Chris Hoelscher
Technology Architect, Database Infrastructure Services
Technology Solution Services
: humana.com
123 East Main Street
Louisville, KY 40202
Humana.com
(502) 714-8615, (502) 476-2538


ge: INFO IBM-MAIN

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which 
it is addressed
and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material.  If you receive this 
material/information in error,
please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information.


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-10 Thread Don Leahy
62x160 using Tom Brennan's Vista 3270.

On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Martin Packer 
wrote:

> Thanks. But -oversize 132x43 (not order) got rejection from TSO.
>
> Cheers, Martin
>
> Martin Packer,
> zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
> Worldwide Cloud & Systems Performance, IBM
>
> +44-7802-245-584
>
> email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
>
> Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
> Blog:
> https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker
>
>
>
> From:   Alan Young 
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Date:   10/03/2016 20:07
> Subject:Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do
> you use
> Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
>
>
>
> Try adding the -oversize option as -oversize 43x132.
>
> Alan
>
> Martin Packer wrote:
> > Yes. And it gives invidious choices:   43 x 80 and 32 x 132.  You can
> > guess I'd want 43 x 132. :-)
> >
> > Cheers, Martin
> >
> > Martin Packer,
> > zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
> > Worldwide Cloud & Systems Performance, IBM
> >
> > +44-7802-245-584
> >
> > email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
> >
> > Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
> > Blog:
> > https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker
> >
> >
> >
> > From:   "Dyck, Lionel B. (TRA)" 
> > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> > Date:   10/03/2016 17:04
> > Subject:Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do
> > you use
> > Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
> >
> >
> >
> > Isn't there a -model option something like:
> >
> > -model n
> >
> > Where n is 2 for mod 2, 3 for mod 3, etc.
> >
> > I don't have access to x3270 right now but that is what I seem to
> recall.
> >
> >
> --
> > Lionel B. Dyck (Contractor)
> > Mainframe Systems Programmer
> > Enterprise Infrastructure Support (Station 200) (005OP6.3.10)
> > VA OI&T Service Delivery & Engineering
> > Office: 512-326-6173
> > Cell: 925-348-0237
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
>
> > Behalf Of Martin Packer
> > Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 10:49 AM
> > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use
> >
> > Maybe I'm being thick here but with X3270 I think I'm stuck at 32 x 80 -
>
> > and not because of the emulator but because I don't know how to get the
> > z/OS TSO/ISPF environment I'm using to take advantage of more.
> >
> > Cheers, Martin
> >
> > Martin Packer,
> > zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator, Worldwide Cloud & Systems
> > Performance, IBM
> >
> > +44-7802-245-584
> >
> > email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
> >
> > Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
> > Blog:
> > https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker
> >
> >
> >
> > From:   "R.S." 
> > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> > Date:   10/03/2016 16:23
> > Subject:Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use
> > Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
> >
> >
> >
> > 24x80
> >
> > Yes, I have colour monitor, flat one, actually two of them, 27" each.
> > And still the most popular (3270) screen resolution I use is 24x80.
> > Atavism ;-)
> > I also use 43x80 and rarely 24x132 or 42x132.
> >
> > BTW: I wish I would have any resolution *I want* and my application
> simply
> > supported it. That wasn't case at least for ControlM panels ("illegal"
> > resolutions caused abend).
> >
> > --
> > Radoslaw Skorupka
> > Lodz, Poland
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---
> > Treść tej wiadomości może zawierać informacje prawnie chronione Banku
> > przeznaczone wyłącznie do użytku służbowego adresata. Odbiorcą może być
> > jedynie jej adresat z wyłączeniem dostępu osób trzecich. Jeżeli nie
> jesteś
> >
> > adresatem niniejszej wiadomości lub pracownikiem upoważnionym do jej
> > przekazania adresatowi, informujemy, że jej rozpowszechnianie,
> kopiowanie,
> >
> > rozprowadzanie lub inne działanie o podobnym charakterze jest prawnie
> > zabronione i może być karalne. Jeżeli otrzymałeś tę wiadomoś

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-10 Thread Martin Packer
Thanks. But -oversize 132x43 (not order) got rejection from TSO.

Cheers, Martin

Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Cloud & Systems Performance, IBM

+44-7802-245-584

email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com

Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog: 
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker



From:   Alan Young 
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date:   10/03/2016 20:07
Subject:Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do 
you use
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List 



Try adding the -oversize option as -oversize 43x132.

Alan

Martin Packer wrote:
> Yes. And it gives invidious choices:   43 x 80 and 32 x 132.  You can 
> guess I'd want 43 x 132. :-)
>
> Cheers, Martin
>
> Martin Packer,
> zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
> Worldwide Cloud & Systems Performance, IBM
>
> +44-7802-245-584
>
> email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
>
> Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
> Blog: 
> https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker
>
>
>
> From:   "Dyck, Lionel B. (TRA)" 
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Date:   10/03/2016 17:04
> Subject:Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do 
> you use
> Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
>
>
>
> Isn't there a -model option something like:
>
> -model n
>
> Where n is 2 for mod 2, 3 for mod 3, etc.
>
> I don't have access to x3270 right now but that is what I seem to 
recall.
>
> 
--
> Lionel B. Dyck (Contractor)
> Mainframe Systems Programmer 
> Enterprise Infrastructure Support (Station 200) (005OP6.3.10)
> VA OI&T Service Delivery & Engineering
> Office: 512-326-6173
> Cell: 925-348-0237
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On 

> Behalf Of Martin Packer
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 10:49 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use
>
> Maybe I'm being thick here but with X3270 I think I'm stuck at 32 x 80 - 

> and not because of the emulator but because I don't know how to get the 
> z/OS TSO/ISPF environment I'm using to take advantage of more.
>
> Cheers, Martin
>
> Martin Packer,
> zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator, Worldwide Cloud & Systems 
> Performance, IBM
>
> +44-7802-245-584
>
> email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
>
> Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
> Blog: 
> https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker
>
>
>
> From:   "R.S." 
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Date:   10/03/2016 16:23
> Subject:Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use
> Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
>
>
>
> 24x80
>
> Yes, I have colour monitor, flat one, actually two of them, 27" each.
> And still the most popular (3270) screen resolution I use is 24x80.
> Atavism ;-)
> I also use 43x80 and rarely 24x132 or 42x132.
>
> BTW: I wish I would have any resolution *I want* and my application 
simply 
> supported it. That wasn't case at least for ControlM panels ("illegal" 
> resolutions caused abend).
>
> --
> Radoslaw Skorupka
> Lodz, Poland
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---
> Treść tej wiadomości może zawierać informacje prawnie chronione Banku 
> przeznaczone wyłącznie do użytku służbowego adresata. Odbiorcą może być 
> jedynie jej adresat z wyłączeniem dostępu osób trzecich. Jeżeli nie 
jesteś 
>
> adresatem niniejszej wiadomości lub pracownikiem upoważnionym do jej 
> przekazania adresatowi, informujemy, że jej rozpowszechnianie, 
kopiowanie, 
>
> rozprowadzanie lub inne działanie o podobnym charakterze jest prawnie 
> zabronione i może być karalne. Jeżeli otrzymałeś tę wiadomość omyłkowo, 
> prosimy niezwłocznie zawiadomić nadawcę wysyłając odpowiedź oraz trwale 
> usunąć tę wiadomość włączając w to wszelkie jej kopie wydrukowane lub 
> zapisane na dysku.
>
> This e-mail may contain legally privileged information of the Bank and 
is 
> intended solely for business use of the addressee. This e-mail may only 
be 
>
> received by the addressee and may not be disclosed to any third parties. 

> If you are not the intended addressee of this e-mail or the employee 
> authorized to forward it to the addressee, be advised that any 
> dissemination, copying, distribution or any other similar activity is 
> legally prohibited and may be punishable. If you received this e-mail by 

> mistake please advise the sender immediately by using the re

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-10 Thread Alan Young

Try adding the -oversize option as -oversize 43x132.

Alan

Martin Packer wrote:
Yes. And it gives invidious choices:   43 x 80 and 32 x 132.  You can 
guess I'd want 43 x 132. :-)


Cheers, Martin

Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Cloud & Systems Performance, IBM

+44-7802-245-584

email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com

Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog: 
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker




From:   "Dyck, Lionel B. (TRA)" 
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date:   10/03/2016 17:04
Subject:    Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do 
you use

Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List 



Isn't there a -model option something like:

-model n

Where n is 2 for mod 2, 3 for mod 3, etc.

I don't have access to x3270 right now but that is what I seem to recall.

--
Lionel B. Dyck (Contractor)
Mainframe Systems Programmer 
Enterprise Infrastructure Support (Station 200) (005OP6.3.10)

VA OI&T Service Delivery & Engineering
Office: 512-326-6173
Cell: 925-348-0237


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On 
Behalf Of Martin Packer

Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 10:49 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

Maybe I'm being thick here but with X3270 I think I'm stuck at 32 x 80 - 
and not because of the emulator but because I don't know how to get the 
z/OS TSO/ISPF environment I'm using to take advantage of more.


Cheers, Martin

Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator, Worldwide Cloud & Systems 
Performance, IBM


+44-7802-245-584

email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com

Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog: 
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker




From:   "R.S." 
To:     IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date:   10/03/2016 16:23
Subject:Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List 



24x80

Yes, I have colour monitor, flat one, actually two of them, 27" each.
And still the most popular (3270) screen resolution I use is 24x80.
Atavism ;-)
I also use 43x80 and rarely 24x132 or 42x132.

BTW: I wish I would have any resolution *I want* and my application simply 
supported it. That wasn't case at least for ControlM panels ("illegal" 
resolutions caused abend).


--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland






---
Treść tej wiadomości może zawierać informacje prawnie chronione Banku 
przeznaczone wyłącznie do użytku służbowego adresata. Odbiorcą może być 
jedynie jej adresat z wyłączeniem dostępu osób trzecich. Jeżeli nie jesteś 

adresatem niniejszej wiadomości lub pracownikiem upoważnionym do jej 
przekazania adresatowi, informujemy, że jej rozpowszechnianie, kopiowanie, 

rozprowadzanie lub inne działanie o podobnym charakterze jest prawnie 
zabronione i może być karalne. Jeżeli otrzymałeś tę wiadomość omyłkowo, 
prosimy niezwłocznie zawiadomić nadawcę wysyłając odpowiedź oraz trwale 
usunąć tę wiadomość włączając w to wszelkie jej kopie wydrukowane lub 
zapisane na dysku.


This e-mail may contain legally privileged information of the Bank and is 
intended solely for business use of the addressee. This e-mail may only be 

received by the addressee and may not be disclosed to any third parties. 
If you are not the intended addressee of this e-mail or the employee 
authorized to forward it to the addressee, be advised that any 
dissemination, copying, distribution or any other similar activity is 
legally prohibited and may be punishable. If you received this e-mail by 
mistake please advise the sender immediately by using the reply facility 
in your e-mail software and delete permanently this e-mail including any 
copies of it either printed or saved to hard drive.


mBank S.A. z siedzibą w Warszawie, ul. Senatorska 18, 00-950 Warszawa, 
www.mBank.pl, e-mail: kont...@mbank.pl
Sąd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy XII Wydział Gospodarczy Krajowego 
Rejestru Sądowego, nr rejestru przedsiębiorców KRS 025237, NIP: 
526-021-50-88. Według stanu na dzień 01.01.2016 r. kapitał zakładowy 
mBanku S.A. (w całości wpłacony) wynosi 168.955.696 złotych.



--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--

Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-10 Thread Edward Finnell
Anybody use a web3270 app? bluezone now Rocket used to have a fairly  
decent one.
 
 
In a message dated 3/10/2016 1:39:03 P.M. Central Standard Time,  
peter.far...@broadridge.com writes:

LOGMODE  D4C32XX3 is a standard VTAM logmode that has the "query terminal 
size" bit  turned on.  Works for any 3270 screen size whether standard or  
custom.

In ISPF settings screen (menu item 0) I use MAX, YMMV as to  whether you 
prefer MAX or  DATA.



--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-10 Thread Farley, Peter x23353
>From a VTAM logon screen:

LOGON APPLID=TSO,LOGMODE=D4C32XX3

APPLID is whatever you normally use to get to TSO/ISPF.

LOGMODE D4C32XX3 is a standard VTAM logmode that has the "query terminal size" 
bit turned on.  Works for any 3270 screen size whether standard or custom.

In ISPF settings screen (menu item 0) I use MAX, YMMV as to whether you prefer 
MAX or DATA.

HTH

Peter

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Martin Packer
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 11:49 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

Maybe I'm being thick here but with X3270 I think I'm stuck at 32 x 80 - and 
not because of the emulator but because I don't know how to get the z/OS 
TSO/ISPF environment I'm using to take advantage of more.

Cheers, Martin

--

This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee 
and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader 
of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this 
communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication 
in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any 
attachments from your system.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-10 Thread Steve Thompson
I am forced into 62x160 because of fixed 3270 definitions used 
where I work. My other options are MOD2-5, which do not give me 
the viewing space I am used to having (at least 43 lines and 133 
wide).


However, with 62x160, VM and TSO/ISPF work OK.

But keep a watch on ISPF. Some releases ago, it supported a 
larger screen size (same as the max size of VM if I remember 
correctly).


When I use a TN3270 emulator that I can control, I configure it 
for the best size for the monitor I am using. So I change the 
size depending on which monitors I'm connected to (which nearly 
always handles 43x133). Then I don't have to wear glasses to see 
the small fonts. And I size things similar to what I do with a 
browser. When I can get away with it, I keep browsers down to 
half-width of the display and just short of the task bar.


Regards,
Steve Thompson

On 03/10/2016 08:45 AM, David Crayford wrote:

We're building a new product which will have several UI's; ISPF,
Web, Eclipse etc. For the ISPF we're wondering how we should
optimize the screen real estate for todays customer.

I use a custom 60x160 which seems to be the norm in our office.
Lots of the tools we use, especially debuggers like z/XCD and
DebugTool work much better with that model.
I use RDz for development but for most stuff fall back on the
green screens like SDSF and tools that don't have a good GUI,
which is 90% of them.

What screen size do you use?

--

For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO
IBM-MAIN



--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-10 Thread Jesse 1 Robinson
I would not want to get anyone in trouble, but Vista3270 does not require local 
admin rights. My new laptop came without admin. I could not install a new 
release of (stupid) Java, but I was able to install Vista. Just saying. 

.
.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler 
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
323-715-0595 Mobile
626-302-7535 Office
robin...@sce.com


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of nitz-ibm
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 10:31 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

> Can anyone tell me where this is? Don't see it under Options, 6. Set 
> screen characteristics...
ISPF options 0, when you only have 24 lines it is on the second screen. 

Additionally, your 'logmode' has to match and you have to have your emulation 
set to accept the largest screen size it can handle. If the 'logmode' is one of 
the ones that allow the emulation and IP to query each other and agree on one 
size during connection establishment, then it comes down to 'only' specifying 
the screen size you want in the emulation, the rest is set automagically.

>Tom Brennan is too modest to peddle his product, so I'll do it. Get a copy of 
>Vista3270. Screen size flexibility is only one of its many virtues. 
I would if I could install anything on the office equipment. Unfortunately just 
about no one has local admin rights. :-(

Barbara

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-10 Thread Jerry Whitteridge
I'll second that ! He also worked to provide some SSL services and IPV6 that I 
needed in a timely fashion I couldn't have got from another vendor.

Jerry Whitteridge
Manager Mainframe Systems & Storage
Albertsons - Safeway Inc.
925 738 9443
Corporate Tieline - 89443

If you feel in control
you just aren't going fast enough.




-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Jesse 1 Robinson
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 10:05 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

Tom Brennan is too modest to peddle his product, so I'll do it. Get a copy of 
Vista3270. Screen size flexibility is only one of its many virtues.

.
.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
323-715-0595 Mobile
626-302-7535 Office
robin...@sce.com


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Jerry Whitteridge
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 9:55 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

Barbara - I've been trying to find a way and so far (at least up to Attachmate 
release 9.3) have not found a way.

Jerry Whitteridge
Manager Mainframe Systems & Storage
Albertsons - Safeway Inc.
925 738 9443
Corporate Tieline - 89443

If you feel in control
you just aren't going fast enough.



-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of nitz-ibm
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 9:48 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

> On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 21:45:48 +0800, David Crayford wrote:
>
>What screen size do you use?
>
I would love to use the standard 62x162 screensize (and have for the past 7 
years or so), but unfortunately my new employer uses an attachmate extra 
emulation that can only do 27x132. Does anyone know if I can fool attachmate 
into a larger screensize (like I could with PComm before it offered 62x160) by 
editing the parameter file? Having only 27 lines severely limits my 
productivity. :-(

Barbara

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

 Warning: All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the corporate 
e-mail system, and is subject to archival and review by someone other than the 
recipient. This e-mail may contain proprietary information and is intended only 
for the use of the intended recipient(s). If the reader of this message is not 
the intended recipient(s), you are notified that you have received this message 
in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this 
message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, 
please notify the sender immediately.


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-10 Thread nitz-ibm
> Can anyone tell me where this is? Don't see it under Options, 6. Set screen
> characteristics...
ISPF options 0, when you only have 24 lines it is on the second screen. 

Additionally, your 'logmode' has to match and you have to have your emulation 
set to accept the largest screen size it can handle. If the 'logmode' is one of 
the ones that allow the emulation and IP to query each other and agree on one 
size during connection establishment, then it comes down to 'only' specifying 
the screen size you want in the emulation, the rest is set automagically.

>Tom Brennan is too modest to peddle his product, so I'll do it. Get a copy of 
>Vista3270. Screen size flexibility is only one of its many virtues. 
I would if I could install anything on the office equipment. Unfortunately just 
about no one has local admin rights. :-(

Barbara

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-10 Thread nitz-ibm
> Barbara - I've been trying to find a way and so far (at least up to 
> Attachmate release 9.3) have not found a way.

Pity. I can hope that the new emulation they want to use can handle it. (Saying 
in German: Hope dies last - die Hoffnung stirbt zuletzt).

Barbara

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


AW: Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-10 Thread Peter Hunkeler

> Can anyone tell me where this is? Don't see it under Options, 6. Set screen
characteristics...


When writing ISPF Settings I meant ISPF option 0


--
Peter Hunkeler





--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-10 Thread Chuck Kreiter
At my last employer, I opened up a support ticket with Attachmate and they
do not support modern sizes.  

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Jerry Whitteridge
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 10:55 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

Barbara - I've been trying to find a way and so far (at least up to
Attachmate release 9.3) have not found a way.

Jerry Whitteridge
Manager Mainframe Systems & Storage
Albertsons - Safeway Inc.
925 738 9443
Corporate Tieline - 89443

If you feel in control
you just aren't going fast enough.



-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of nitz-ibm
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 9:48 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

> On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 21:45:48 +0800, David Crayford wrote:
>
>What screen size do you use?
>
I would love to use the standard 62x162 screensize (and have for the past 7
years or so), but unfortunately my new employer uses an attachmate extra
emulation that can only do 27x132. Does anyone know if I can fool attachmate
into a larger screensize (like I could with PComm before it offered 62x160)
by editing the parameter file? Having only 27 lines severely limits my
productivity. :-(

Barbara

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email
to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

 Warning: All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the corporate
e-mail system, and is subject to archival and review by someone other than
the recipient. This e-mail may contain proprietary information and is
intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s). If the reader of
this message is not the intended recipient(s), you are notified that you
have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination,
distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately.


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email
to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-10 Thread Charles Mills
Duh. Never mind.

Charles

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Charles Mills
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 10:03 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

Can anyone tell me where this is? Don't see it under Options, 6. Set screen
characteristics...

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-10 Thread Jesse 1 Robinson
Tom Brennan is too modest to peddle his product, so I'll do it. Get a copy of 
Vista3270. Screen size flexibility is only one of its many virtues. 

.
.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler 
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
323-715-0595 Mobile
626-302-7535 Office
robin...@sce.com


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Jerry Whitteridge
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 9:55 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

Barbara - I've been trying to find a way and so far (at least up to Attachmate 
release 9.3) have not found a way.

Jerry Whitteridge
Manager Mainframe Systems & Storage
Albertsons - Safeway Inc.
925 738 9443
Corporate Tieline - 89443

If you feel in control
you just aren't going fast enough.



-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of nitz-ibm
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 9:48 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

> On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 21:45:48 +0800, David Crayford wrote:
>
>What screen size do you use?
>
I would love to use the standard 62x162 screensize (and have for the past 7 
years or so), but unfortunately my new employer uses an attachmate extra 
emulation that can only do 27x132. Does anyone know if I can fool attachmate 
into a larger screensize (like I could with PComm before it offered 62x160) by 
editing the parameter file? Having only 27 lines severely limits my 
productivity. :-(

Barbara

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-10 Thread Charles Mills
Can anyone tell me where this is? Don't see it under Options, 6. Set screen
characteristics...

Charles

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Peter Hunkeler
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 9:23 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: AW: Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

 
> Maybe I'm being thick here but with X3270 I think I'm stuck at 32 x 80 
> -
and not because of the emulator but because I don't know how to get the z/OS
TSO/ISPF environment I'm using to take advantage of more. 




Not at a terminal now, but there is a setting in "ISPF Settings" wiht
options STD, DATA, MAX which has great influence on how ISPF behaves (it is
called "screen size" or something the like). Have you set this to either
DATA, or my preferred setting MAX. (I don't like the constant resizing whch
happens with DATA).

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-10 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 18:47:46 +0100, nitz-ibm wrote:

>... Does anyone know if I can fool attachmate into a larger screensize (like I 
>could with PComm before it offered 62x160) by editing the parameter file? 
>Having only 27 lines severely limits my productivity. :-(
> 
Probably not.  The older 327x Data Stream protocol depends on the ability to 
identify
a character cell with two 6-bit nybbles.  That imposes a limit of 4096.

-- gil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-10 Thread Jerry Whitteridge
Barbara - I've been trying to find a way and so far (at least up to Attachmate 
release 9.3) have not found a way.

Jerry Whitteridge
Manager Mainframe Systems & Storage
Albertsons - Safeway Inc.
925 738 9443
Corporate Tieline - 89443

If you feel in control
you just aren't going fast enough.



-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of nitz-ibm
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 9:48 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

> On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 21:45:48 +0800, David Crayford wrote:
>
>What screen size do you use?
>
I would love to use the standard 62x162 screensize (and have for the past 7 
years or so), but unfortunately my new employer uses an attachmate extra 
emulation that can only do 27x132. Does anyone know if I can fool attachmate 
into a larger screensize (like I could with PComm before it offered 62x160) by 
editing the parameter file? Having only 27 lines severely limits my 
productivity. :-(

Barbara

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

 Warning: All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the corporate 
e-mail system, and is subject to archival and review by someone other than the 
recipient. This e-mail may contain proprietary information and is intended only 
for the use of the intended recipient(s). If the reader of this message is not 
the intended recipient(s), you are notified that you have received this message 
in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this 
message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, 
please notify the sender immediately.


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-10 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 16:48:40 +, Martin Packer wrote:

>Maybe I'm being thick here but with X3270 I think I'm stuck at 32 x 80 - 
>and not because of the emulator but because I don't know how to get the 
>z/OS TSO/ISPF environment I'm using to take advantage of more.
>
Something about LOGMODE.  Educate your administrator.  We finally did.


On 2016-03-10, at 09:52, Pommier, Rex wrote:

>62x160, 27x132, 24x80.  Like others, I prefer to use a "non-standard" screen 
>size (the 62x160 is what I use mostly) but I have a couple applications that 
>only support the mod2-5 scenario so I normally have 2 sessions running all the 
>time, one with my big screen and another sitting at a mod5.
>

In a CMS XEDIT session I can pull the plug on my terminal then reconnect with
a terminal with different geometry.  XEDIT (presumably) fields the terminal I/O
error and obligingly repaints the screen to the new geometry.  ISPF?  In Shavian
mode, "... I ask, 'why not?'"

Where's SIGWINCH when you need it?


-- gil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-10 Thread nitz-ibm
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 21:45:48 +0800, David Crayford wrote:
> 
>What screen size do you use?
> 
I would love to use the standard 62x162 screensize (and have for the past 7 
years or so), but unfortunately my new employer uses an attachmate extra 
emulation that can only do 27x132. Does anyone know if I can fool attachmate 
into a larger screensize (like I could with PComm before it offered 62x160) by 
editing the parameter file? Having only 27 lines severely limits my 
productivity. :-(

Barbara

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-10 Thread Nims,Alva John (Al)
In your TCP/IP TN3270 member look in the "TELNETGLOBALS" section and in the 
documentation about the 
TELNETDEVICE 327n-n-E  D4C32XX3,D4C32XX3
Or something like that.  I believe the "D4C32XX3,D4C32XX3" lets you set a size 
up to 60x160.

In ISPF option 0 for settings and play around with the "Screen Format" (1, 2, 
3, & 4) with "Terminal Type" of 3 (3278) or 4 (3278A) 

Al Nims
Systems Admin/Programmer 3
UFIT
University of Florida
(352) 273-1298

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Peter Hunkeler
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 12:23 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: AW: Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

 
> Maybe I'm being thick here but with X3270 I think I'm stuck at 32 x 80 
> -
and not because of the emulator but because I don't know how to get the z/OS 
TSO/ISPF environment I'm using to take advantage of more. 




Not at a terminal now, but there is a setting in "ISPF Settings" wiht options 
STD, DATA, MAX which has great influence on how ISPF behaves (it is called 
"screen size" or something the like). Have you set this to either DATA, or my 
preferred setting MAX. (I don't like the constant resizing whch happens with 
DATA).




--
Peter Hunkeler





--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-10 Thread Tony Harminc
On 10 March 2016 at 08:45, David Crayford  wrote:
> What screen size do you use?

43x132

Tony H.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-10 Thread Ed Jaffe

On 3/10/2016 5:45 AM, David Crayford wrote:
I use a custom 60x160 which seems to be the norm in our office. Lots 
of the tools we use, especially debuggers like z/XCD and DebugTool 
work much better with that model.


My 3270 displays are all 68x80 default size and 68x142 alternate size. Why?

I don't like "Screen format: 3. Max" in ISPF because long input fields 
on 80-byte-wide screens don't wrap. I use "1. Data" instead.


I don't like 24x80 default screen size because it's way, way too small 
for writing code (and just about anything else). Keeping the number of 
rows constant between default and alternate screen sizes avoids the 
ridiculousness of having the screens, fonts, etc. jump around and change 
depending on what I happen to be looking at.


141 is the optimal width for IPCS BROWSE, but Greg Price's REVIEW chokes 
on odd widths, so I uplifted to 142.


I reduced the number of rows on my displays from 90 down to 68 after I 
started needing glasses to work. Since then, I've been getting larger 
and larger PC monitors to compensate...


--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
831 Parkview Drive North
El Segundo, CA 90245
http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


AW: Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-10 Thread Peter Hunkeler

>It wasn't private.



Yep, and when I finished reading I wondered what secrects he wanted to 
keep. Nothing dramatic was unveiled. IMHO.




--
Peter Hunkeler



--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-10 Thread Nims,Alva John (Al)
I use a 60x162 session for when I am attempting to much about in a USS file.

Al Nims
Systems Admin/Programmer 3
UFIT
University of Florida
(352) 273-1298

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Peter Hunkeler
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 12:19 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: AW: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

 
I'm using the maximum in either direction that gives me a reasonable font size, 
depending on the resolution of the monitor currently working with. I'm mostly 
using 60x160,  80x160 or 90x160, but also 60x132 for those dumb products that 
only support x80 or x132 (G...).

I'd expect any product, at least new ones, to support any combination between 
80x24 up to 90x160 (or whatever maximum ISPF supports). Some terminal 
emulators, such as IBM's Personal Communication is not good variable font 
sizes, so I tend to set the terminal dimension for best results.

I don't expect that to really matter but just tp be sure: Don't expect the 
colors to be old fashioned "something on black". I'v been using white as 
backgound color for at least 10 to 15 years. Much more relaxing than constantly 
switch between black background emulation window and white or light grey 
background on office and other workstation programs.


--Peter Hunkeler
 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


AW: Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-10 Thread Peter Hunkeler



>I have used Mod 4 (43x80) for years. There are times when a wider screen would 
>be useful, but Mod 5 e.g. shrinks characters to Lilliputian scale. Maybe if I 
>had a giant 4K monitor I would jack up the density...



You don't need a 4K monitor. A cheap standard 24" or 27" monitor allows for a 
reasonable font size, provided it's a business montor and not a movie viewer 
monitor. I mean to say it should have a vertical resolution of 1080 or more 
(which is hard to find, unfortunately).


--
Peter Hunkeler





--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-10 Thread Martin Packer
Yes. And it gives invidious choices:   43 x 80 and 32 x 132.  You can 
guess I'd want 43 x 132. :-)

Cheers, Martin

Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Cloud & Systems Performance, IBM

+44-7802-245-584

email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com

Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog: 
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker



From:   "Dyck, Lionel B. (TRA)" 
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date:   10/03/2016 17:04
Subject:    Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do 
you use
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List 



Isn't there a -model option something like:

-model n

Where n is 2 for mod 2, 3 for mod 3, etc.

I don't have access to x3270 right now but that is what I seem to recall.

--
Lionel B. Dyck (Contractor)
Mainframe Systems Programmer 
Enterprise Infrastructure Support (Station 200) (005OP6.3.10)
VA OI&T Service Delivery & Engineering
Office: 512-326-6173
Cell: 925-348-0237


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On 
Behalf Of Martin Packer
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 10:49 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

Maybe I'm being thick here but with X3270 I think I'm stuck at 32 x 80 - 
and not because of the emulator but because I don't know how to get the 
z/OS TSO/ISPF environment I'm using to take advantage of more.

Cheers, Martin

Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator, Worldwide Cloud & Systems 
Performance, IBM

+44-7802-245-584

email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com

Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog: 
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker



From:   "R.S." 
To:     IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date:   10/03/2016 16:23
Subject:Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List 



24x80

Yes, I have colour monitor, flat one, actually two of them, 27" each.
And still the most popular (3270) screen resolution I use is 24x80.
Atavism ;-)
I also use 43x80 and rarely 24x132 or 42x132.

BTW: I wish I would have any resolution *I want* and my application simply 
supported it. That wasn't case at least for ControlM panels ("illegal" 
resolutions caused abend).

--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland






---
Treść tej wiadomości może zawierać informacje prawnie chronione Banku 
przeznaczone wyłącznie do użytku służbowego adresata. Odbiorcą może być 
jedynie jej adresat z wyłączeniem dostępu osób trzecich. Jeżeli nie jesteś 

adresatem niniejszej wiadomości lub pracownikiem upoważnionym do jej 
przekazania adresatowi, informujemy, że jej rozpowszechnianie, kopiowanie, 

rozprowadzanie lub inne działanie o podobnym charakterze jest prawnie 
zabronione i może być karalne. Jeżeli otrzymałeś tę wiadomość omyłkowo, 
prosimy niezwłocznie zawiadomić nadawcę wysyłając odpowiedź oraz trwale 
usunąć tę wiadomość włączając w to wszelkie jej kopie wydrukowane lub 
zapisane na dysku.

This e-mail may contain legally privileged information of the Bank and is 
intended solely for business use of the addressee. This e-mail may only be 

received by the addressee and may not be disclosed to any third parties. 
If you are not the intended addressee of this e-mail or the employee 
authorized to forward it to the addressee, be advised that any 
dissemination, copying, distribution or any other similar activity is 
legally prohibited and may be punishable. If you received this e-mail by 
mistake please advise the sender immediately by using the reply facility 
in your e-mail software and delete permanently this e-mail including any 
copies of it either printed or saved to hard drive.

mBank S.A. z siedzibą w Warszawie, ul. Senatorska 18, 00-950 Warszawa, 
www.mBank.pl, e-mail: kont...@mbank.pl
Sąd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy XII Wydział Gospodarczy Krajowego 
Rejestru Sądowego, nr rejestru przedsiębiorców KRS 025237, NIP: 
526-021-50-88. Według stanu na dzień 01.01.2016 r. kapitał zakładowy 
mBanku S.A. (w całości wpłacony) wynosi 168.955.696 złotych.


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / sig

AW: Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-10 Thread Peter Hunkeler
>BTW: I wish I would have any resolution *I want* and my application
simply supported it. That wasn't case at least for ControlM panels
("illegal" resolutions caused abend).




Control-D is no better. I remember well when I had to start working with 
Control-M roughly 10 years ago. I found exactly what you're saying: Control-M 
abended with my larger terminal dimensions. I was lucky to get support from the 
sysprog resposible for the Control-x products and he opened a problem with the 
vendor. And more luckily, they indeed fix (well half way fixed) this. Since 
then you can use any number of rows but only 80 or 132 columns. The products 
still don't user more than 24 (or is it 27) rows but at least they don't abend 
anymore. Yeahhh... :-)


--
Peter Hunkeler



--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-10 Thread Ted MacNEIL
It wasn't private.

-teD
  Original Message  
From: Farley, Peter x23353
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 10:36
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

David,

I'm replying privately rather than to the list so as to avoid publishing this 
data to the world.

Personally I use two different terminal models on a regular basis:

50x160 for editing and batch development (SDSF, ISPF, etc.). I don't use 60x160 
because the font is a tad small for my aging eyes.

Model-4 (43x80) for all CICS sessions because the CA CICS Intertest version 
installed here doesn't use any lines beyond 43, which can get a little weird 
when single-stepping through a program.

The rest of the shop seems to use mostly model 2 and model 4 as far as I know.

HTH

Peter

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of David Crayford
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 8:46 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

We're building a new product which will have several UI's; ISPF, Web, 
Eclipse etc. For the ISPF we're wondering how we should optimize the 
screen real estate for todays customer.

I use a custom 60x160 which seems to be the norm in our office. Lots of 
the tools we use, especially debuggers like z/XCD and DebugTool work 
much better with that model.
I use RDz for development but for most stuff fall back on the green 
screens like SDSF and tools that don't have a good GUI, which is 90% of 
them.

What screen size do you use?

--


This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee 
and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader 
of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this 
communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication 
in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any 
attachments from your system.


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


AW: Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-10 Thread Peter Hunkeler

> Maybe I'm being thick here but with X3270 I think I'm stuck at 32 x 80 -
and not because of the emulator but because I don't know how to get the
z/OS TSO/ISPF environment I'm using to take advantage of more.




Not at a terminal now, but there is a setting in "ISPF Settings" wiht options 
STD, DATA, MAX which has great influence on how ISPF behaves (it is called 
"screen size" or something the like). Have you set this to either DATA, or my 
preferred setting MAX. (I don't like the constant resizing whch happens with 
DATA).




--
Peter Hunkeler





--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-10 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 21:45:48 +0800, David Crayford wrote:

>We're building a new product which will have several UI's; ISPF, Web,
>Eclipse etc. For the ISPF we're wondering how we should optimize the
>screen real estate for todays customer.
>
>What screen size do you use?
> 
Various.  Once recently I dropped back to *x80 merely to get an image I
could more readily copy-and-paste into a mesage.

My earnest request:  Please eschew pillarboxes.  Don't restrict input
fields for users of large screens in order to be compatible with standard
geometry.  And absolutely *never* interrupt a notional single input
field with attribute bytes as ISRTSO does.

But do not quietly truncate input from oversize terminals.  Either fail
with an error message or enter a confirmation dialogue.

-- gil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-10 Thread Jesse 1 Robinson
I have used Mod 4 (43x80) for years. There are times when a wider screen would 
be useful, but Mod 5 e.g. shrinks characters to Lilliputian scale. Maybe if I 
had a giant 4K monitor I would jack up the density...

.
.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler 
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
323-715-0595 Mobile
626-302-7535 Office
robin...@sce.com

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Martin Packer
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 8:49 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

Maybe I'm being thick here but with X3270 I think I'm stuck at 32 x 80 - and 
not because of the emulator but because I don't know how to get the z/OS 
TSO/ISPF environment I'm using to take advantage of more.

Cheers, Martin

Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator, Worldwide Cloud & Systems 
Performance, IBM

+44-7802-245-584

email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com

Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog: 
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker



From:   "R.S." 
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date:   10/03/2016 16:23
Subject:    Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List 



24x80

Yes, I have colour monitor, flat one, actually two of them, 27" each.
And still the most popular (3270) screen resolution I use is 24x80.
Atavism ;-)
I also use 43x80 and rarely 24x132 or 42x132.

BTW: I wish I would have any resolution *I want* and my application simply 
supported it. That wasn't case at least for ControlM panels ("illegal" 
resolutions caused abend).

--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-10 Thread Dyck, Lionel B. (TRA)
Isn't there a -model option something like:

-model n

Where n is 2 for mod 2, 3 for mod 3, etc.

I don't have access to x3270 right now but that is what I seem to recall.

--
Lionel B. Dyck (Contractor)
Mainframe Systems Programmer 
Enterprise Infrastructure Support (Station 200) (005OP6.3.10)
VA OI&T Service Delivery & Engineering
Office: 512-326-6173
Cell: 925-348-0237


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Martin Packer
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 10:49 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

Maybe I'm being thick here but with X3270 I think I'm stuck at 32 x 80 - and 
not because of the emulator but because I don't know how to get the z/OS 
TSO/ISPF environment I'm using to take advantage of more.

Cheers, Martin

Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator, Worldwide Cloud & Systems 
Performance, IBM

+44-7802-245-584

email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com

Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog: 
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker



From:   "R.S." 
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date:   10/03/2016 16:23
Subject:    Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List 



24x80

Yes, I have colour monitor, flat one, actually two of them, 27" each.
And still the most popular (3270) screen resolution I use is 24x80.
Atavism ;-)
I also use 43x80 and rarely 24x132 or 42x132.

BTW: I wish I would have any resolution *I want* and my application simply 
supported it. That wasn't case at least for ControlM panels ("illegal" 
resolutions caused abend).

--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland






---
Treść tej wiadomości może zawierać informacje prawnie chronione Banku 
przeznaczone wyłącznie do użytku służbowego adresata. Odbiorcą może być 
jedynie jej adresat z wyłączeniem dostępu osób trzecich. Jeżeli nie jesteś 
adresatem niniejszej wiadomości lub pracownikiem upoważnionym do jej 
przekazania adresatowi, informujemy, że jej rozpowszechnianie, kopiowanie, 
rozprowadzanie lub inne działanie o podobnym charakterze jest prawnie 
zabronione i może być karalne. Jeżeli otrzymałeś tę wiadomość omyłkowo, 
prosimy niezwłocznie zawiadomić nadawcę wysyłając odpowiedź oraz trwale 
usunąć tę wiadomość włączając w to wszelkie jej kopie wydrukowane lub 
zapisane na dysku.

This e-mail may contain legally privileged information of the Bank and is 
intended solely for business use of the addressee. This e-mail may only be 
received by the addressee and may not be disclosed to any third parties. 
If you are not the intended addressee of this e-mail or the employee 
authorized to forward it to the addressee, be advised that any 
dissemination, copying, distribution or any other similar activity is 
legally prohibited and may be punishable. If you received this e-mail by 
mistake please advise the sender immediately by using the reply facility 
in your e-mail software and delete permanently this e-mail including any 
copies of it either printed or saved to hard drive.

mBank S.A. z siedzibą w Warszawie, ul. Senatorska 18, 00-950 Warszawa, 
www.mBank.pl, e-mail: kont...@mbank.pl
Sąd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy XII Wydział Gospodarczy Krajowego 
Rejestru Sądowego, nr rejestru przedsiębiorców KRS 025237, NIP: 
526-021-50-88. Według stanu na dzień 01.01.2016 r. kapitał zakładowy 
mBanku S.A. (w całości wpłacony) wynosi 168.955.696 złotych.


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-10 Thread Pommier, Rex
62x160, 27x132, 24x80.  Like others, I prefer to use a "non-standard" screen 
size (the 62x160 is what I use mostly) but I have a couple applications that 
only support the mod2-5 scenario so I normally have 2 sessions running all the 
time, one with my big screen and another sitting at a mod5.

Rex 



-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of David Crayford
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 7:46 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

We're building a new product which will have several UI's; ISPF, Web, Eclipse 
etc. For the ISPF we're wondering how we should optimize the screen real estate 
for todays customer.

I use a custom 60x160 which seems to be the norm in our office. Lots of the 
tools we use, especially debuggers like z/XCD and DebugTool work much better 
with that model.
I use RDz for development but for most stuff fall back on the green screens 
like SDSF and tools that don't have a good GUI, which is 90% of them.

What screen size do you use?

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


The information contained in this message is confidential, protected from 
disclosure and may be legally privileged.  If the reader of this message is not 
the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this 
message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, 
distribution, copying, or any action taken or action omitted in reliance on it, 
is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this 
message and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard 
copy format.  Thank you.


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-10 Thread Martin Packer
Maybe I'm being thick here but with X3270 I think I'm stuck at 32 x 80 - 
and not because of the emulator but because I don't know how to get the 
z/OS TSO/ISPF environment I'm using to take advantage of more.

Cheers, Martin

Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Cloud & Systems Performance, IBM

+44-7802-245-584

email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com

Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog: 
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker



From:   "R.S." 
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date:   10/03/2016 16:23
Subject:    Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List 



24x80

Yes, I have colour monitor, flat one, actually two of them, 27" each.
And still the most popular (3270) screen resolution I use is 24x80.
Atavism ;-)
I also use 43x80 and rarely 24x132 or 42x132.

BTW: I wish I would have any resolution *I want* and my application 
simply supported it. That wasn't case at least for ControlM panels 
("illegal" resolutions caused abend).

-- 
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland






---
Treść tej wiadomości może zawierać informacje prawnie chronione Banku 
przeznaczone wyłącznie do użytku służbowego adresata. Odbiorcą może być 
jedynie jej adresat z wyłączeniem dostępu osób trzecich. Jeżeli nie jesteś 
adresatem niniejszej wiadomości lub pracownikiem upoważnionym do jej 
przekazania adresatowi, informujemy, że jej rozpowszechnianie, kopiowanie, 
rozprowadzanie lub inne działanie o podobnym charakterze jest prawnie 
zabronione i może być karalne. Jeżeli otrzymałeś tę wiadomość omyłkowo, 
prosimy niezwłocznie zawiadomić nadawcę wysyłając odpowiedź oraz trwale 
usunąć tę wiadomość włączając w to wszelkie jej kopie wydrukowane lub 
zapisane na dysku.

This e-mail may contain legally privileged information of the Bank and is 
intended solely for business use of the addressee. This e-mail may only be 
received by the addressee and may not be disclosed to any third parties. 
If you are not the intended addressee of this e-mail or the employee 
authorized to forward it to the addressee, be advised that any 
dissemination, copying, distribution or any other similar activity is 
legally prohibited and may be punishable. If you received this e-mail by 
mistake please advise the sender immediately by using the reply facility 
in your e-mail software and delete permanently this e-mail including any 
copies of it either printed or saved to hard drive.

mBank S.A. z siedzibą w Warszawie, ul. Senatorska 18, 00-950 Warszawa, 
www.mBank.pl, e-mail: kont...@mbank.pl
Sąd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy XII Wydział Gospodarczy Krajowego 
Rejestru Sądowego, nr rejestru przedsiębiorców KRS 025237, NIP: 
526-021-50-88. Według stanu na dzień 01.01.2016 r. kapitał zakładowy 
mBanku S.A. (w całości wpłacony) wynosi 168.955.696 złotych.


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-10 Thread R.S.

24x80

Yes, I have colour monitor, flat one, actually two of them, 27" each.
And still the most popular (3270) screen resolution I use is 24x80.
Atavism ;-)
I also use 43x80 and rarely 24x132 or 42x132.

BTW: I wish I would have any resolution *I want* and my application 
simply supported it. That wasn't case at least for ControlM panels 
("illegal" resolutions caused abend).


--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland






---
Treść tej wiadomości może zawierać informacje prawnie chronione Banku 
przeznaczone wyłącznie do użytku służbowego adresata. Odbiorcą może być jedynie 
jej adresat z wyłączeniem dostępu osób trzecich. Jeżeli nie jesteś adresatem 
niniejszej wiadomości lub pracownikiem upoważnionym do jej przekazania 
adresatowi, informujemy, że jej rozpowszechnianie, kopiowanie, rozprowadzanie 
lub inne działanie o podobnym charakterze jest prawnie zabronione i może być 
karalne. Jeżeli otrzymałeś tę wiadomość omyłkowo, prosimy niezwłocznie 
zawiadomić nadawcę wysyłając odpowiedź oraz trwale usunąć tę wiadomość 
włączając w to wszelkie jej kopie wydrukowane lub zapisane na dysku.

This e-mail may contain legally privileged information of the Bank and is 
intended solely for business use of the addressee. This e-mail may only be 
received by the addressee and may not be disclosed to any third parties. If you 
are not the intended addressee of this e-mail or the employee authorized to 
forward it to the addressee, be advised that any dissemination, copying, 
distribution or any other similar activity is legally prohibited and may be 
punishable. If you received this e-mail by mistake please advise the sender 
immediately by using the reply facility in your e-mail software and delete 
permanently this e-mail including any copies of it either printed or saved to 
hard drive.

mBank S.A. z siedzibą w Warszawie, ul. Senatorska 18, 00-950 Warszawa, 
www.mBank.pl, e-mail: kont...@mbank.pl
Sąd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy XII Wydział Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru 
Sądowego, nr rejestru przedsiębiorców KRS 025237, NIP: 526-021-50-88. 
Według stanu na dzień 01.01.2016 r. kapitał zakładowy mBanku S.A. (w całości 
wpłacony) wynosi 168.955.696 złotych.


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-10 Thread Tom Marchant
On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 21:45:48 +0800, David Crayford wrote:

>What screen size do you use?

90 x 142

-- 
Tom Marchant

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-10 Thread Farley, Peter x23353
And of course I forgot to change the address to David's and put it out here 
anyway.  Mea culpa.

Peter

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Farley, Peter x23353
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 10:37 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

David,

I'm replying privately rather than to the list so as to avoid publishing this 
data to the world.



--


This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee 
and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader 
of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this 
communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication 
in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any 
attachments from your system.


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-10 Thread Farley, Peter x23353
David,

I'm replying privately rather than to the list so as to avoid publishing this 
data to the world.

Personally I use two different terminal models on a regular basis:

50x160 for editing and batch development (SDSF, ISPF, etc.).  I don't use 
60x160 because the font is a tad small for my aging eyes.

Model-4 (43x80) for all CICS sessions because the CA CICS Intertest version 
installed here doesn't use any lines beyond 43, which can get a little weird 
when single-stepping through a program.

The rest of the shop seems to use mostly model 2 and model 4 as far as I know.

HTH

Peter

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of David Crayford
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 8:46 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

We're building a new product which will have several UI's; ISPF, Web, 
Eclipse etc. For the ISPF we're wondering how we should optimize the 
screen real estate for todays customer.

I use a custom 60x160 which seems to be the norm in our office. Lots of 
the tools we use, especially debuggers like z/XCD and DebugTool work 
much better with that model.
I use RDz for development but for most stuff fall back on the green 
screens like SDSF and tools that don't have a good GUI, which is 90% of 
them.

What screen size do you use?

--


This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee 
and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader 
of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this 
communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication 
in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any 
attachments from your system.


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-10 Thread Staller, Allan
Use 327x-2 as default, but allow for "all" 327x types, as well as "custom 
types" that do not match the 327x model descriptions.


We're building a new product which will have several UI's; ISPF, Web, Eclipse 
etc. For the ISPF we're wondering how we should optimize the screen real estate 
for todays customer.

I use a custom 60x160 which seems to be the norm in our office. Lots of the 
tools we use, especially debuggers like z/XCD and DebugTool work much better 
with that model.
I use RDz for development but for most stuff fall back on the green screens 
like SDSF and tools that don't have a good GUI, which is 90% of them.


This email � including attachments � may contain confidential information. If 
you are not the intended recipient, do not copy, distribute or act on it. 
Instead, notify the sender immediately and delete the message.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN