Re: z/OS BDAM question

2018-11-07 Thread Joel C. Ewing
On 11/07/2018 12:06 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
> On 2018-11-06, at 22:20:07, Joel C. Ewing wrote:
>
>> If you search on-line for Unicode characters, their code point values
>> are usually given using the "U+" notation, where  is in hex, so
>> IBM is just following standard usage. 
>>  
> My curiosity was more about whether and where it's conventional
> to separate digit groups with that U+2420  SYMBOL FOR SPACE glyph.
> It seems needlessly recherché.
>
 On 2018-11-02, at 05:39:38, R.S. wrote:
>...
> ... 16␠777␠215 tracks ...
> -- gil
>

 I now understand the current recommended practice in international
contexts is to avoid use of comma or period as numeric thousands
separators because of conflicting conventions in different countries,
with a "thin blank" U+2009 being the preferred alternative.  My guess is
the author of the IBM manual intended to follow that practice, but was
using an editor that allowed or encouraged an erroneous choice for the
blank code point, resulting in one with a visible-blank glyph.   With my
normal email viewing font and reading glasses, I could barely see
anything for the less dense "SP" glyph -- I interpreted it as merely
dirt specks on my display screen until I later resorted to extreme
zoom-in.  I suspect whoever composed and proofread the original manual
was similarly challenged and never realized a visible glyph had been
used for the blank.
    Joel C. Ewing

-- 
Joel C. Ewing

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: z/OS BDAM question

2018-11-06 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On 2018-11-06, at 22:20:07, Joel C. Ewing wrote:

> If you search on-line for Unicode characters, their code point values
> are usually given using the "U+" notation, where  is in hex, so
> IBM is just following standard usage. 
>  
My curiosity was more about whether and where it's conventional
to separate digit groups with that U+2420  SYMBOL FOR SPACE glyph.
It seems needlessly recherché.

>>> On 2018-11-02, at 05:39:38, R.S. wrote:
...
 ... 16␠777␠215 tracks ...

-- gil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: z/OS BDAM question

2018-11-06 Thread Joel C. Ewing
If you search on-line for Unicode characters, their code point values
are usually given using the "U+" notation, where  is in hex, so
IBM is just following standard usage. 

Also this notation is only weird if one is not familiar with current
Linux desktop systems -- this not that far from how an arbitrary Unicode
character is directly entered into an application on Fedora Linux:
    CTRL+SHIFT+u followed by the Unicode hex code-point value  followed
by a space.
and the above sequence could be logically abbreviated like
    CTRL+U2422␣    which enters the single Unicode character ␢(with no
trailing space)
I assume the Unicode notation convention came first, and Linux just
chose to support Unicode input using a convention that closely
approximates that Unicode notation.

  One would hope any IBM manual(s) using the "U+..." notation might
explain it somewhere for the benefit of those not that familiar with
Unicode notations.

    Joel C. Ewing 



On 11/02/2018 10:49 AM, Mick Graley wrote:
> Nah - it's actually how they are on the IBM manual page - weird.
>
>
> On Fri, 2 Nov 2018 at 15:38, Paul Gilmartin <
> 000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
>> On 2018-11-02, at 05:39:38, R.S. wrote:
>>> ...
>>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed
>>>
>>> ... 16␠777␠215 tracks ...
>>>
>> I had to look it up:
>> The following table lists some symbols, in decreasing order by
>> practical usefulness.
>> Their shapes vary by font; especially the last one varies a lot.
>> ␣   U+2423  OPEN BOX
>> ␢   U+2422  BLANK SYMBOL
>> ␠   U+2420  SYMBOL FOR SPACE
>>
>> Eek!  Do they always write numbers that way in Poland?
>>
>> -- gil
>>
-- 

Joel C. Ewing

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: z/OS BDAM question

2018-11-02 Thread Mick Graley
Nah - it's actually how they are on the IBM manual page - weird.


On Fri, 2 Nov 2018 at 15:38, Paul Gilmartin <
000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

> On 2018-11-02, at 05:39:38, R.S. wrote:
> > ...
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed
> >
> > ... 16␠777␠215 tracks ...
> >
> I had to look it up:
> The following table lists some symbols, in decreasing order by
> practical usefulness.
> Their shapes vary by font; especially the last one varies a lot.
> ␣   U+2423  OPEN BOX
> ␢   U+2422  BLANK SYMBOL
> ␠   U+2420  SYMBOL FOR SPACE
>
> Eek!  Do they always write numbers that way in Poland?
>
> -- gil
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: z/OS BDAM question

2018-11-02 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On 2018-11-02, at 05:39:38, R.S. wrote:
> ...
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed
>  
> ... 16␠777␠215 tracks ...
>  
I had to look it up:
The following table lists some symbols, in decreasing order by practical 
usefulness.
Their shapes vary by font; especially the last one varies a lot.
␣   U+2423  OPEN BOX
␢   U+2422  BLANK SYMBOL
␠   U+2420  SYMBOL FOR SPACE

Eek!  Do they always write numbers that way in Poland?

-- gil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: z/OS BDAM question

2018-11-02 Thread Mick Graley
Another poster (sorry I deleted the post so can't credit him) already
stated that the addressable range depends on the method you use to access
the data set.
Yes relative track addressing is 2 bytes and limited to 64K tracks.
But relative block addressing is 3 bytes and so limited to 16M blocks.
So depending on your block size you can address more than the physical
limit of the data set.
However, as Curtis has just pointed out, Adabas itself doesn't use BDAM, it
uses EXCP/EXCPVR.
And yes Curtis you are correct - most of our Adabas data sets are DSORG=DA
but some of them are indeed DSORG=PS.
Because I inherited these systems I'm not quite sure why.
Must be something to do with the way they were first allocated and
formatted (maybe different releases of Adabas), but it doesn't make a
difference, they both work fine.
Cheers,
Mick.


On Fri, 2 Nov 2018 at 12:30, Giliad Wilf <
00d50942efa9-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

> Interesting.
> I recall two statements, probably from two different sources:
>
> One states that BDAM does not support large format datasets.
>
> The other states that DA datasets accessed by relative track address are
> limited to 65536 tracks.
>
> ...so, I must assume ADABAS has a way for accessing records of a dataset
> that large...
>
> On Fri, 2 Nov 2018 11:32:23 +, Mick Graley 
> wrote:
>
> >Hi All,
> >
> >I can confirm that there is no 64K tracks limit on DSORG=DA data sets.
> >I inherited a number of Adabas databases and they use DSORG=DA.
> >One of my larger databases has a data storage component that is 240,525
> >tracks (16,035 cylinders) in 9 extents across 8 volumes.
> >
> >Organization  . . . : DA
> >Record format . . . : F
> >Record length . . . : 5064
> >Block size  . . . . : 5064
> >1st extent cylinders: 363
> >Secondary cylinders : 1668
> >Allocated cylinders : 16,035
> >Allocated extents . : 9
> >
> >The rules are documented here:
> >
> https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.3.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r3.idad400/mdss.htm
> >
> >Cheers,
> >
> >Mick.
> >
> >
> >On Sat, 27 Oct 2018 at 01:10, Steve Smith  wrote:
> >
> >> BDAM implies DSORG DA, but can use any RECFM.  However, DSORG DA files
> are
> >> usually physically equivalent to DSORG PS, and often are so designated.
> >> However, most DA files I've seen are indeed RECFM=F.
> >>
> >> sas
> >>
> >> On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 11:40 AM Tom Sims  wrote:
> >>
> >> > Datacom may use some method of "direct access," but the datasets
> >> > themselves are RECFM=F.
> >>
> >> --
> >> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> >> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >>
> >
> >--
> >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> >send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: z/OS BDAM question

2018-11-02 Thread Pew, Curtis G
On Nov 2, 2018, at 7:29 AM, Giliad Wilf 
<00d50942efa9-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> 
> ...so, I must assume ADABAS has a way for accessing records of a dataset that 
> large...

Actually, current ADABAS versions don’t use an access method; they write their 
own channel programs and issue EXCP. I think there’s an option to use VSAM on 
EAVs. All our ADABAS container datasets are defined as PS in the VTOC, but that 
doesn’t really matter.


-- 
Pew, Curtis G
curtis@austin.utexas.edu
ITS Systems/Core/Administrative Services


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: z/OS BDAM question

2018-11-02 Thread Giliad Wilf
Interesting.
I recall two statements, probably from two different sources:

One states that BDAM does not support large format datasets.

The other states that DA datasets accessed by relative track address are 
limited to 65536 tracks.

...so, I must assume ADABAS has a way for accessing records of a dataset that 
large...

On Fri, 2 Nov 2018 11:32:23 +, Mick Graley  wrote:

>Hi All,
>
>I can confirm that there is no 64K tracks limit on DSORG=DA data sets.
>I inherited a number of Adabas databases and they use DSORG=DA.
>One of my larger databases has a data storage component that is 240,525
>tracks (16,035 cylinders) in 9 extents across 8 volumes.
>
>Organization  . . . : DA
>Record format . . . : F
>Record length . . . : 5064
>Block size  . . . . : 5064
>1st extent cylinders: 363
>Secondary cylinders : 1668
>Allocated cylinders : 16,035
>Allocated extents . : 9
>
>The rules are documented here:
>https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.3.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r3.idad400/mdss.htm
>
>Cheers,
>
>Mick.
>
>
>On Sat, 27 Oct 2018 at 01:10, Steve Smith  wrote:
>
>> BDAM implies DSORG DA, but can use any RECFM.  However, DSORG DA files are
>> usually physically equivalent to DSORG PS, and often are so designated.
>> However, most DA files I've seen are indeed RECFM=F.
>>
>> sas
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 11:40 AM Tom Sims  wrote:
>>
>> > Datacom may use some method of "direct access," but the datasets
>> > themselves are RECFM=F.
>>
>> --
>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>>
>
>--
>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: z/OS BDAM question

2018-11-02 Thread R.S.
It is a little bit more complex. There is third flavour or DSORG=PO, it 
is DSNTYPE=HFS. ;-)
HFS is also constrained to single volume when non-SMS-managed.  In the 
past it was simply single volume.
Last, but not least: a database structure (table, tablespace, index) may 
or may not be constrained by limito of single dataset. For example, it 
was possible to create more-than-4GB objects, while VSAM limit was 4GB. 
Now it is usually EA VSAM, but it is still possible to use multiple 
datasets per object.


Backing to the dataset limitations - PDS is the only dataset 
type/subtype which is really constrained to 64kTRK, because it is both 
single-volume, and 64k limit susceptible.


--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland






W dniu 2018-11-02 o 13:18, Mick Graley pisze:

Hi Radoslaw,
That's true, but I believe the OP was asking whether the entire data set
was limited to 64K tracks and I believe only PDS and PDS/E are limited to
one volume.
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.3.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r3.idad400/d4002.htm
None of my database data sets (DB2, IMS, Adabas) are limited to one volume.
Cheers,
Mick.


==

Jeśli nie jesteś adresatem tej wiadomości:

- powiadom nas o tym w mailu zwrotnym (dziękujemy!),
- usuń trwale tę wiadomość (i wszystkie kopie, które wydrukowałeś lub zapisałeś 
na dysku).
Wiadomość ta może zawierać chronione prawem informacje, które może wykorzystać 
tylko adresat.Przypominamy, że każdy, kto rozpowszechnia (kopiuje, rozprowadza) 
tę wiadomość lub podejmuje podobne działania, narusza prawo i może podlegać 
karze.

mBank S.A. z siedzibą w Warszawie, ul. Senatorska 18, 00-950 
Warszawa,www.mBank.pl, e-mail: kont...@mbank.pl. Sąd Rejonowy dla m. st. 
Warszawy XII Wydział Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sądowego, KRS 025237, 
NIP: 526-021-50-88. Kapitał zakładowy (opłacony w całości) według stanu na 
01.01.2018 r. wynosi 169.248.488 złotych.

If you are not the addressee of this message:

- let us know by replying to this e-mail (thank you!),
- delete this message permanently (including all the copies which you have 
printed out or saved).
This message may contain legally protected information, which may be used 
exclusively by the addressee.Please be reminded that anyone who disseminates 
(copies, distributes) this message or takes any similar action, violates the 
law and may be penalised.

mBank S.A. with its registered office in Warsaw, ul. Senatorska 18, 00-950 
Warszawa,www.mBank.pl, e-mail: kont...@mbank.pl. District Court for the Capital 
City of Warsaw, 12th Commercial Division of the National Court Register, KRS 
025237, NIP: 526-021-50-88. Fully paid-up share capital amounting to PLN 
169,248,488 as at 1 January 2018.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: z/OS BDAM question

2018-11-02 Thread Mick Graley
Hi Radoslaw,
That's true, but I believe the OP was asking whether the entire data set
was limited to 64K tracks and I believe only PDS and PDS/E are limited to
one volume.
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.3.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r3.idad400/d4002.htm
None of my database data sets (DB2, IMS, Adabas) are limited to one volume.
Cheers,
Mick.


On Fri, 2 Nov 2018 at 11:58, R.S.  wrote:

> Mick,
> You are still missing the point: 64k TRK limit is PER VOLUME. It regards
> PDS, (basic) PS, and DA.
> In other words, BDAM datasets are 64k TRK constrained as some other
> datasets are.
> Of course some (PDS) datasets cannot be multivolume, while DA (and PS)
> can be, but that's different story.
>
> --
> Radoslaw Skorupka
> Lodz, Poland
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> W dniu 2018-11-02 o 12:51, Mick Graley pisze:
> > Hi  Radoslaw,
> > If you combine all the rules for direct data sets across 2 or 3 pages of
> > the manual you get:
> > 65,535 tracks per volume, 59 volumes, 16 extents per volume, 255 extents
> > across all volumes.
> > Which suggests to me a limit of 3,866,565 tracks.
> > Cheers,
> > Mick.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 2 Nov 2018 at 11:40, R.S. 
> wrote:
> >
> >> Documentations says the following:
> >>
> >> /Many types of data sets *are limited* to 65␠535 total tracks allocated
> >> on any one volume, and if a greater number of tracks is required, this
> >> attempt to create a data set will fail./
> >>
> >> //
> >> /Data sets that *are not limited* to 65␠535 total tracks allocated on
> >> any one volume are: /
> >>
> >>* /A large format sequential; but cannot occupy more than 16␠777␠215
> >>  tracks on a single volume. /
> >>* /Extended-format sequential/
> >>* /UNIX files/
> >>* /PDSE/
> >>* /VSAM/
> >>
> >> ...lack od BDAM files here
> >>
> >> I think, you missed very important point: 64k tracks *PER VOLUME*. The
> >> limit is not per dataset.
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Radoslaw Skorupka
> >> Lodz, Poland
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> W dniu 2018-11-02 o 12:32, Mick Graley pisze:
> >>> Hi All,
> >>>
> >>> I can confirm that there is no 64K tracks limit on DSORG=DA data sets.
> >>> I inherited a number of Adabas databases and they use DSORG=DA.
> >>> One of my larger databases has a data storage component that is 240,525
> >>> tracks (16,035 cylinders) in 9 extents across 8 volumes.
> >>>
> >>> Organization  . . . : DA
> >>> Record format . . . : F
> >>> Record length . . . : 5064
> >>> Block size  . . . . : 5064
> >>> 1st extent cylinders: 363
> >>> Secondary cylinders : 1668
> >>> Allocated cylinders : 16,035
> >>> Allocated extents . : 9
> >>>
> >>> The rules are documented here:
> >>>
> >>
> https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.3.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r3.idad400/mdss.htm
> >>> Cheers,
> >>>
> >>> Mick.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, 27 Oct 2018 at 01:10, Steve Smith  wrote:
> >>>
>  BDAM implies DSORG DA, but can use any RECFM.  However, DSORG DA files
> >> are
>  usually physically equivalent to DSORG PS, and often are so
> designated.
>  However, most DA files I've seen are indeed RECFM=F.
> 
>  sas
> 
> >>
>
>
> ==
>
> Jeśli nie jesteś adresatem tej wiadomości:
>
> - powiadom nas o tym w mailu zwrotnym (dziękujemy!),
> - usuń trwale tę wiadomość (i wszystkie kopie, które wydrukowałeś lub
> zapisałeś na dysku).
> Wiadomość ta może zawierać chronione prawem informacje, które może
> wykorzystać tylko adresat.Przypominamy, że każdy, kto rozpowszechnia
> (kopiuje, rozprowadza) tę wiadomość lub podejmuje podobne działania,
> narusza prawo i może podlegać karze.
>
> mBank S.A. z siedzibą w Warszawie, ul. Senatorska 18, 00-950 Warszawa,
> www.mBank.pl, e-mail: kont...@mbank.pl. Sąd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy
> XII Wydział Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sądowego, KRS 025237, NIP:
> 526-021-50-88. Kapitał zakładowy (opłacony w całości) według stanu na
> 01.01.2018 r. wynosi 169.248.488 złotych.
>
> If you are not the addressee of this message:
>
> - let us know by replying to this e-mail (thank you!),
> - delete this message permanently (including all the copies which you have
> printed out or saved).
> This message may contain legally protected information, which may be used
> exclusively by the addressee.Please be reminded that anyone who
> disseminates (copies, distributes) this message or takes any similar
> action, violates the law and may be penalised.
>
> mBank S.A. with its registered office in Warsaw, ul. Senatorska 18, 00-950
> Warszawa,www.mBank.pl, e-mail: kont...@mbank.pl. District Court for the
> Capital City of Warsaw, 12th Commercial Division of the National Court
> Register, KRS 025237, NIP: 526-021-50-88. Fully paid-up share capital
> amounting to PLN 169,248,488 as at 1 January 2018.
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with 

Re: z/OS BDAM question

2018-11-02 Thread R.S.

Mick,
You are still missing the point: 64k TRK limit is PER VOLUME. It regards 
PDS, (basic) PS, and DA.
In other words, BDAM datasets are 64k TRK constrained as some other 
datasets are.
Of course some (PDS) datasets cannot be multivolume, while DA (and PS) 
can be, but that's different story.


--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland







W dniu 2018-11-02 o 12:51, Mick Graley pisze:

Hi  Radoslaw,
If you combine all the rules for direct data sets across 2 or 3 pages of
the manual you get:
65,535 tracks per volume, 59 volumes, 16 extents per volume, 255 extents
across all volumes.
Which suggests to me a limit of 3,866,565 tracks.
Cheers,
Mick.


On Fri, 2 Nov 2018 at 11:40, R.S.  wrote:


Documentations says the following:

/Many types of data sets *are limited* to 65␠535 total tracks allocated
on any one volume, and if a greater number of tracks is required, this
attempt to create a data set will fail./

//
/Data sets that *are not limited* to 65␠535 total tracks allocated on
any one volume are: /

   * /A large format sequential; but cannot occupy more than 16␠777␠215
 tracks on a single volume. /
   * /Extended-format sequential/
   * /UNIX files/
   * /PDSE/
   * /VSAM/

...lack od BDAM files here

I think, you missed very important point: 64k tracks *PER VOLUME*. The
limit is not per dataset.


--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland






W dniu 2018-11-02 o 12:32, Mick Graley pisze:

Hi All,

I can confirm that there is no 64K tracks limit on DSORG=DA data sets.
I inherited a number of Adabas databases and they use DSORG=DA.
One of my larger databases has a data storage component that is 240,525
tracks (16,035 cylinders) in 9 extents across 8 volumes.

Organization  . . . : DA
Record format . . . : F
Record length . . . : 5064
Block size  . . . . : 5064
1st extent cylinders: 363
Secondary cylinders : 1668
Allocated cylinders : 16,035
Allocated extents . : 9

The rules are documented here:


https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.3.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r3.idad400/mdss.htm

Cheers,

Mick.


On Sat, 27 Oct 2018 at 01:10, Steve Smith  wrote:


BDAM implies DSORG DA, but can use any RECFM.  However, DSORG DA files

are

usually physically equivalent to DSORG PS, and often are so designated.
However, most DA files I've seen are indeed RECFM=F.

sas






==

Jeśli nie jesteś adresatem tej wiadomości:

- powiadom nas o tym w mailu zwrotnym (dziękujemy!),
- usuń trwale tę wiadomość (i wszystkie kopie, które wydrukowałeś lub zapisałeś 
na dysku).
Wiadomość ta może zawierać chronione prawem informacje, które może wykorzystać 
tylko adresat.Przypominamy, że każdy, kto rozpowszechnia (kopiuje, rozprowadza) 
tę wiadomość lub podejmuje podobne działania, narusza prawo i może podlegać 
karze.

mBank S.A. z siedzibą w Warszawie, ul. Senatorska 18, 00-950 
Warszawa,www.mBank.pl, e-mail: kont...@mbank.pl. Sąd Rejonowy dla m. st. 
Warszawy XII Wydział Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sądowego, KRS 025237, 
NIP: 526-021-50-88. Kapitał zakładowy (opłacony w całości) według stanu na 
01.01.2018 r. wynosi 169.248.488 złotych.

If you are not the addressee of this message:

- let us know by replying to this e-mail (thank you!),
- delete this message permanently (including all the copies which you have 
printed out or saved).
This message may contain legally protected information, which may be used 
exclusively by the addressee.Please be reminded that anyone who disseminates 
(copies, distributes) this message or takes any similar action, violates the 
law and may be penalised.

mBank S.A. with its registered office in Warsaw, ul. Senatorska 18, 00-950 
Warszawa,www.mBank.pl, e-mail: kont...@mbank.pl. District Court for the Capital 
City of Warsaw, 12th Commercial Division of the National Court Register, KRS 
025237, NIP: 526-021-50-88. Fully paid-up share capital amounting to PLN 
169,248,488 as at 1 January 2018.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: z/OS BDAM question

2018-11-02 Thread Mick Graley
Hi  Radoslaw,
If you combine all the rules for direct data sets across 2 or 3 pages of
the manual you get:
65,535 tracks per volume, 59 volumes, 16 extents per volume, 255 extents
across all volumes.
Which suggests to me a limit of 3,866,565 tracks.
Cheers,
Mick.


On Fri, 2 Nov 2018 at 11:40, R.S.  wrote:

> Documentations says the following:
>
> /Many types of data sets *are limited* to 65␠535 total tracks allocated
> on any one volume, and if a greater number of tracks is required, this
> attempt to create a data set will fail./
>
> //
> /Data sets that *are not limited* to 65␠535 total tracks allocated on
> any one volume are: /
>
>   * /A large format sequential; but cannot occupy more than 16␠777␠215
> tracks on a single volume. /
>   * /Extended-format sequential/
>   * /UNIX files/
>   * /PDSE/
>   * /VSAM/
>
> ...lack od BDAM files here
>
> I think, you missed very important point: 64k tracks *PER VOLUME*. The
> limit is not per dataset.
>
>
> --
> Radoslaw Skorupka
> Lodz, Poland
>
>
>
>
>
>
> W dniu 2018-11-02 o 12:32, Mick Graley pisze:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I can confirm that there is no 64K tracks limit on DSORG=DA data sets.
> > I inherited a number of Adabas databases and they use DSORG=DA.
> > One of my larger databases has a data storage component that is 240,525
> > tracks (16,035 cylinders) in 9 extents across 8 volumes.
> >
> > Organization  . . . : DA
> > Record format . . . : F
> > Record length . . . : 5064
> > Block size  . . . . : 5064
> > 1st extent cylinders: 363
> > Secondary cylinders : 1668
> > Allocated cylinders : 16,035
> > Allocated extents . : 9
> >
> > The rules are documented here:
> >
> https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.3.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r3.idad400/mdss.htm
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Mick.
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 27 Oct 2018 at 01:10, Steve Smith  wrote:
> >
> >> BDAM implies DSORG DA, but can use any RECFM.  However, DSORG DA files
> are
> >> usually physically equivalent to DSORG PS, and often are so designated.
> >> However, most DA files I've seen are indeed RECFM=F.
> >>
> >> sas
> >>
>
>
> ==
>
> Jeśli nie jesteś adresatem tej wiadomości:
>
> - powiadom nas o tym w mailu zwrotnym (dziękujemy!),
> - usuń trwale tę wiadomość (i wszystkie kopie, które wydrukowałeś lub
> zapisałeś na dysku).
> Wiadomość ta może zawierać chronione prawem informacje, które może
> wykorzystać tylko adresat.Przypominamy, że każdy, kto rozpowszechnia
> (kopiuje, rozprowadza) tę wiadomość lub podejmuje podobne działania,
> narusza prawo i może podlegać karze.
>
> mBank S.A. z siedzibą w Warszawie, ul. Senatorska 18, 00-950 Warszawa,
> www.mBank.pl, e-mail: kont...@mbank.pl. Sąd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy
> XII Wydział Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sądowego, KRS 025237, NIP:
> 526-021-50-88. Kapitał zakładowy (opłacony w całości) według stanu na
> 01.01.2018 r. wynosi 169.248.488 złotych.
>
> If you are not the addressee of this message:
>
> - let us know by replying to this e-mail (thank you!),
> - delete this message permanently (including all the copies which you have
> printed out or saved).
> This message may contain legally protected information, which may be used
> exclusively by the addressee.Please be reminded that anyone who
> disseminates (copies, distributes) this message or takes any similar
> action, violates the law and may be penalised.
>
> mBank S.A. with its registered office in Warsaw, ul. Senatorska 18, 00-950
> Warszawa,www.mBank.pl, e-mail: kont...@mbank.pl. District Court for the
> Capital City of Warsaw, 12th Commercial Division of the National Court
> Register, KRS 025237, NIP: 526-021-50-88. Fully paid-up share capital
> amounting to PLN 169,248,488 as at 1 January 2018.
>
>
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: z/OS BDAM question

2018-11-02 Thread R.S.

Documentations says the following:

/Many types of data sets *are limited* to 65␠535 total tracks allocated 
on any one volume, and if a greater number of tracks is required, this 
attempt to create a data set will fail./


//
/Data sets that *are not limited* to 65␠535 total tracks allocated on 
any one volume are: /


 * /A large format sequential; but cannot occupy more than 16␠777␠215
   tracks on a single volume. /
 * /Extended-format sequential/
 * /UNIX files/
 * /PDSE/
 * /VSAM/

...lack od BDAM files here

I think, you missed very important point: 64k tracks *PER VOLUME*. The 
limit is not per dataset.



--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland






W dniu 2018-11-02 o 12:32, Mick Graley pisze:

Hi All,

I can confirm that there is no 64K tracks limit on DSORG=DA data sets.
I inherited a number of Adabas databases and they use DSORG=DA.
One of my larger databases has a data storage component that is 240,525
tracks (16,035 cylinders) in 9 extents across 8 volumes.

Organization  . . . : DA
Record format . . . : F
Record length . . . : 5064
Block size  . . . . : 5064
1st extent cylinders: 363
Secondary cylinders : 1668
Allocated cylinders : 16,035
Allocated extents . : 9

The rules are documented here:
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.3.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r3.idad400/mdss.htm

Cheers,

Mick.


On Sat, 27 Oct 2018 at 01:10, Steve Smith  wrote:


BDAM implies DSORG DA, but can use any RECFM.  However, DSORG DA files are
usually physically equivalent to DSORG PS, and often are so designated.
However, most DA files I've seen are indeed RECFM=F.

sas




==

Jeśli nie jesteś adresatem tej wiadomości:

- powiadom nas o tym w mailu zwrotnym (dziękujemy!),
- usuń trwale tę wiadomość (i wszystkie kopie, które wydrukowałeś lub zapisałeś 
na dysku).
Wiadomość ta może zawierać chronione prawem informacje, które może wykorzystać 
tylko adresat.Przypominamy, że każdy, kto rozpowszechnia (kopiuje, rozprowadza) 
tę wiadomość lub podejmuje podobne działania, narusza prawo i może podlegać 
karze.

mBank S.A. z siedzibą w Warszawie, ul. Senatorska 18, 00-950 
Warszawa,www.mBank.pl, e-mail: kont...@mbank.pl. Sąd Rejonowy dla m. st. 
Warszawy XII Wydział Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sądowego, KRS 025237, 
NIP: 526-021-50-88. Kapitał zakładowy (opłacony w całości) według stanu na 
01.01.2018 r. wynosi 169.248.488 złotych.

If you are not the addressee of this message:

- let us know by replying to this e-mail (thank you!),
- delete this message permanently (including all the copies which you have 
printed out or saved).
This message may contain legally protected information, which may be used 
exclusively by the addressee.Please be reminded that anyone who disseminates 
(copies, distributes) this message or takes any similar action, violates the 
law and may be penalised.

mBank S.A. with its registered office in Warsaw, ul. Senatorska 18, 00-950 
Warszawa,www.mBank.pl, e-mail: kont...@mbank.pl. District Court for the Capital 
City of Warsaw, 12th Commercial Division of the National Court Register, KRS 
025237, NIP: 526-021-50-88. Fully paid-up share capital amounting to PLN 
169,248,488 as at 1 January 2018.



--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: z/OS BDAM question

2018-11-02 Thread Mick Graley
Hi All,

I can confirm that there is no 64K tracks limit on DSORG=DA data sets.
I inherited a number of Adabas databases and they use DSORG=DA.
One of my larger databases has a data storage component that is 240,525
tracks (16,035 cylinders) in 9 extents across 8 volumes.

Organization  . . . : DA
Record format . . . : F
Record length . . . : 5064
Block size  . . . . : 5064
1st extent cylinders: 363
Secondary cylinders : 1668
Allocated cylinders : 16,035
Allocated extents . : 9

The rules are documented here:
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.3.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r3.idad400/mdss.htm

Cheers,

Mick.


On Sat, 27 Oct 2018 at 01:10, Steve Smith  wrote:

> BDAM implies DSORG DA, but can use any RECFM.  However, DSORG DA files are
> usually physically equivalent to DSORG PS, and often are so designated.
> However, most DA files I've seen are indeed RECFM=F.
>
> sas
>
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 11:40 AM Tom Sims  wrote:
>
> > Datacom may use some method of "direct access," but the datasets
> > themselves are RECFM=F.
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: z/OS BDAM question

2018-10-26 Thread Steve Smith
BDAM implies DSORG DA, but can use any RECFM.  However, DSORG DA files are
usually physically equivalent to DSORG PS, and often are so designated.
However, most DA files I've seen are indeed RECFM=F.

sas

On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 11:40 AM Tom Sims  wrote:

> Datacom may use some method of "direct access," but the datasets
> themselves are RECFM=F.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: z/OS BDAM question

2018-10-26 Thread Tom Sims
Datacom may use some method of "direct access," but the datasets 
themselves are RECFM=F.


Disclaimer, not a Datacom expert, more of a Datacom victim, by way of 
other CA program products.


Tom Sims

On 10/26/2018 8:11 AM, Rob Schramm wrote:

I think I have seen it work for DSNTYPE=LARGE instead of extended format.

Aren't CA Datacom files bdam?  I say that because.. last time i interacted
with Datacom it was only able to use DSNTYPE=LARGE.

Rob Schramm



--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: z/OS BDAM question

2018-10-26 Thread Chris Hoelscher
Well I'll BDAM

Chris Hoelscher
Technology Architect, Database Infrastructure Services
Technology Solution Services
Humana Inc.
123 East Main Street
Louisville, KY 40202
Humana.com
(502) 476-2538 or 407-7266


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of Tom 
Marchant
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2018 11:32 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] z/OS BDAM question

On Wed, 24 Oct 2018 18:22:04 +, Frank M. Ramaekers wrote:

>want to know if BDAM can be larger than 65535 tracks.   Is this limitation per 
>extent or entire file size.

It seems to depend on how you want to access it.

https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.3.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r3.idad400/d4087.htm

--
Tom Marchant

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which 
it is addressed
and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material.  If you receive this 
material/information in error,
please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information.

Humana Inc. and its subsidiaries comply with applicable Federal civil rights 
laws and
do not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, 
disability, sex,
sexual orientation, gender identity, or religion. Humana Inc. and its 
subsidiaries do not
exclude people or treat them differently because of race, color, national 
origin, age,
disability, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or religion.

English: ATTENTION: If you do not speak English, language assistance services, 
free
of charge, are available to you. Call 1‐877‐320‐1235 (TTY: 711).

Español (Spanish): ATENCIÓN: Si habla español, tiene a su disposición servicios
gratuitos de asistencia lingüística. Llame al 1‐877‐320‐1235 (TTY: 711).

繁體中文(Chinese):注意:如果您使用繁體中文,您可以免費獲得語言援助
服務。請致電 1‐877‐320‐1235 (TTY: 711)。

Kreyòl Ayisyen (Haitian Creole): ATANSION: Si w pale Kreyòl Ayisyen, gen sèvis 
èd
pou lang ki disponib gratis pou ou. Rele 1‐877‐320‐1235 (TTY: 711).

Polski (Polish): UWAGA: Jeżeli mówisz po polsku, możesz skorzystać z bezpłatnej
pomocy językowej. Zadzwoń pod numer 1‐877‐320‐1235 (TTY: 711).

한국어 (Korean): 주의: 한국어를 사용하시는 경우, 언어 지원 서비스를 무료로
이용하실 수 있습니다. 1‐877‐320‐1235 (TTY: 711)번으로 전화해 주십시오.


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: z/OS BDAM question

2018-10-26 Thread Tom Marchant
On Wed, 24 Oct 2018 18:22:04 +, Frank M. Ramaekers wrote:

>want to know if BDAM can be larger than 65535 tracks.   Is this limitation per 
>extent or entire file size.

It seems to depend on how you want to access it.

https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.3.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r3.idad400/d4087.htm

-- 
Tom Marchant

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: z/OS BDAM question

2018-10-26 Thread Rob Schramm
I think I have seen it work for DSNTYPE=LARGE instead of extended format.

Aren't CA Datacom files bdam?  I say that because.. last time i interacted
with Datacom it was only able to use DSNTYPE=LARGE.

Rob Schramm

On Thu, Oct 25, 2018, 11:18 PM Farley, Peter x23353 <
peter.far...@broadridge.com> wrote:

> My personal experience converting two old BDAM-based systems in the past
> (one for an ISV product, one for a user application), is that converting to
> use RRDS is relatively easy (SMOP), gives you much better control of error
> conditions, and performs as well or better even in extreme conditions if
> you make intelligent use of BLSR or SMB to use local caching of buffers.
> Memory is (relatively) cheap, so make the most use of it that you can.
>
> And RRDS can be both extended (> 4Gb file size) and compressed saving much
> disk space, but YMMV depending on the volume of I/O you need to sustain.
> Compression isn't free, though it seems to be quite inexpensive (in CPU
> time) these days, at least on relatively current hardware.
>
> And RRDS is supported in z/VSE as well, making the code more portable if
> you need that option.
>
> HTH
>
> Peter
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Frank M. Ramaekers
> Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2018 2:22 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: z/OS BDAM question
>
> EXTERNAL EMAIL
>
> I'm a z/VM and z/VSE shop, but we do have a z/OS system and someone in IT
> want to know if BDAM can be larger than 65535 tracks.   Is this limitation
> per extent or entire file size.
>
> From the z/VSE LISTSERV:
> I believe it is 65K tracks per extent with a maximum of 255 extents for
> BDAM, but I can't find any doc to verify that right now.
>
> --
>
>
> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
> addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential.
> If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized
> representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
> dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
> e-mail and delete the message and any attachments from your system.
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: z/OS BDAM question

2018-10-25 Thread Farley, Peter x23353
My personal experience converting two old BDAM-based systems in the past (one 
for an ISV product, one for a user application), is that converting to use RRDS 
is relatively easy (SMOP), gives you much better control of error conditions, 
and performs as well or better even in extreme conditions if you make 
intelligent use of BLSR or SMB to use local caching of buffers.  Memory is 
(relatively) cheap, so make the most use of it that you can.

And RRDS can be both extended (> 4Gb file size) and compressed saving much disk 
space, but YMMV depending on the volume of I/O you need to sustain.  
Compression isn't free, though it seems to be quite inexpensive (in CPU time) 
these days, at least on relatively current hardware.

And RRDS is supported in z/VSE as well, making the code more portable if you 
need that option.

HTH

Peter

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Frank M. Ramaekers
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2018 2:22 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: z/OS BDAM question

EXTERNAL EMAIL

I'm a z/VM and z/VSE shop, but we do have a z/OS system and someone in IT want 
to know if BDAM can be larger than 65535 tracks.   Is this limitation per 
extent or entire file size.

>From the z/VSE LISTSERV:
I believe it is 65K tracks per extent with a maximum of 255 extents for BDAM, 
but I can't find any doc to verify that right now.

--


This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee 
and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader 
of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this 
communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication 
in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any 
attachments from your system.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: z/OS BDAM question

2018-10-25 Thread R.S.

W dniu 2018-10-24 o 20:22, Frank M. Ramaekers pisze:

I'm a z/VM and z/VSE shop, but we do have a z/OS system and someone in IT want 
to know if BDAM can be larger than 65535 tracks.   Is this limitation per 
extent or entire file size.

>From the z/VSE LISTSERV:
I believe it is 65K tracks per extent with a maximum of 255 extents for BDAM, 
but I can't find any doc to verify that right now.

BDAM (DSORG=DA) dataset is limited to 64k TRKs. Whole dataset, not extent.
There are other limitations regarding extents.

--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland




==

Jeśli nie jesteś adresatem tej wiadomości:

- powiadom nas o tym w mailu zwrotnym (dziękujemy!),
- usuń trwale tę wiadomość (i wszystkie kopie, które wydrukowałeś lub zapisałeś 
na dysku).
Wiadomość ta może zawierać chronione prawem informacje, które może wykorzystać 
tylko adresat.Przypominamy, że każdy, kto rozpowszechnia (kopiuje, rozprowadza) 
tę wiadomość lub podejmuje podobne działania, narusza prawo i może podlegać 
karze.

mBank S.A. z siedzibą w Warszawie, ul. Senatorska 18, 00-950 
Warszawa,www.mBank.pl, e-mail: kont...@mbank.pl. Sąd Rejonowy dla m. st. 
Warszawy XII Wydział Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sądowego, KRS 025237, 
NIP: 526-021-50-88. Kapitał zakładowy (opłacony w całości) według stanu na 
01.01.2018 r. wynosi 169.248.488 złotych.

If you are not the addressee of this message:

- let us know by replying to this e-mail (thank you!),
- delete this message permanently (including all the copies which you have 
printed out or saved).
This message may contain legally protected information, which may be used 
exclusively by the addressee.Please be reminded that anyone who disseminates 
(copies, distributes) this message or takes any similar action, violates the 
law and may be penalised.

mBank S.A. with its registered office in Warsaw, ul. Senatorska 18, 00-950 
Warszawa,www.mBank.pl, e-mail: kont...@mbank.pl. District Court for the Capital 
City of Warsaw, 12th Commercial Division of the National Court Register, KRS 
025237, NIP: 526-021-50-88. Fully paid-up share capital amounting to PLN 
169,248,488 as at 1 January 2018.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: z/OS BDAM question

2018-10-25 Thread Giliad Wilf
You can't.
BDAM does not support DSNTYPE=LARGE.

Giliad


On Wed, 24 Oct 2018 18:22:04 +, Frank M. Ramaekers  
wrote:

>I'm a z/VM and z/VSE shop, but we do have a z/OS system and someone in IT want 
>to know if BDAM can be larger than 65535 tracks.   Is this limitation per 
>extent or entire file size.
>
>From the z/VSE LISTSERV:
>I believe it is 65K tracks per extent with a maximum of 255 extents for BDAM, 
>but I can't find any doc to verify that right now.
>
>Frank M. Ramaekers Jr. | Systems Programmer | Information Technology | 
>American Income Life Insurance Company | 254-761-6649 (732-6649)
>
>--
>This message contains information which is privileged and confidential and is 
>solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended 
>recipient, be aware that any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, or use 
>of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received 
>this in error, please destroy it immediately and notify us at 
>privacy...@torchmarkcorp.com.
>
>--
>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: z/OS BDAM question

2018-10-25 Thread Mikael Nystrom
If you use the Relative Block Address the dataset can be much larger.

Mikael Nyström 
Core Ledger
SEB
Phone: +46 70 739 48 55
Switchboard: +46 771 62 10 00
Postal Address: A-B9, SE-106 40 Stockholm, Sweden 
Office Address: Stjarntorget 4 
E-mail: mikael.nyst...@seb.se 
www.seb.se 
? Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This e-mail is confidential and may contain legally privileged information. If 
you have received it by mistake, please inform us by reply e-mail and then 
delete it (including any attachments) from your system; you should not copy it 
or in any other way disclose its content to anyone. E-mail is susceptible to 
data corruption, interception, unauthorised amendment, tampering and virus. We 
do not accept liability for any such actions or the consequences thereof. 


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Frank M. Ramaekers
Sent: den 24 oktober 2018 20:22
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: z/OS BDAM question

I'm a z/VM and z/VSE shop, but we do have a z/OS system and someone in IT want 
to know if BDAM can be larger than 65535 tracks.   Is this limitation per 
extent or entire file size.

>From the z/VSE LISTSERV:
I believe it is 65K tracks per extent with a maximum of 255 extents for BDAM, 
but I can't find any doc to verify that right now.

Frank M. Ramaekers Jr. | Systems Programmer | Information Technology | American 
Income Life Insurance Company | 254-761-6649 (732-6649)

--
This message contains information which is privileged and confidential and is 
solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended 
recipient, be aware that any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, or use 
of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received 
this in error, please destroy it immediately and notify us at 
privacy...@torchmarkcorp.com.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: z/OS BDAM question

2018-10-24 Thread Mike Hochee
Hi Frank,


The limitation is for the entire data set...


Rule: Direct data sets whose records are to be identified by relative track 
address must be limited in size to no more than 65 536 tracks for the entire 
data set.


The above and more details can be found here... 
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/epubs/pdf/dgt3d410.pdf  I don't believe this 
limitation has changed in the past few years, but you might want to check the 
doc for whatever version of z/OS you're running.


HTH,

Mike


From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  on behalf of 
Frank M. Ramaekers 
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2018 2:22 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: z/OS BDAM question

I'm a z/VM and z/VSE shop, but we do have a z/OS system and someone in IT want 
to know if BDAM can be larger than 65535 tracks.   Is this limitation per 
extent or entire file size.

>From the z/VSE LISTSERV:
I believe it is 65K tracks per extent with a maximum of 255 extents for BDAM, 
but I can't find any doc to verify that right now.

Frank M. Ramaekers Jr. | Systems Programmer | Information Technology | American 
Income Life Insurance Company | 254-761-6649 (732-6649)

--
This message contains information which is privileged and confidential and is 
solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended 
recipient, be aware that any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, or use 
of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received 
this in error, please destroy it immediately and notify us at 
privacy...@torchmarkcorp.com.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN