Re: Error using command QUERY ACCESSORS VMSYS:

2009-04-01 Thread Kris Buelens
I observed some details when I started to test with a Rexx server
using WAKEUP (EXT.
It appears that the SFS server sends the CMS client one interrupt telling
  "something has changed in something you know about"
It is then up to the CMS client to decide when it will ask the SFS
server what was changed.  As long as the CMS client does not not send
that question, no other interrupts are sent to him.  As long as no SFS
objects are touched, the CMS client doesn't have to bother the SFS
server with his question "please send me the changes"

2009/4/2 Alan Altmark 
>
> On Wednesday, 04/01/2009 at 09:46 EDT, Alan Ackerman
>  wrote:
>
> > I was under the impression (from something I read here) that the cached
> C
> > MS list of files was
> > updated when someone changed files on the directory. For SFS to inform
> CM
> > S of this would
> > required that it know that CMS had it accessed. If this isn't what
> happen
> > s, I'll have to try to find
> > that previous discussion and attempt to understand it again.
>
> This was addressed in another post.  Yes, there is a cache of meta data.
>
> > If I access a file-control directory and issue LISTFILE * * fm, then
> some
> > one adds or deletes a file
> > on the directory and I issue LISTFILE * * fm again, does it show the
> diff
> > erence? (I think it does.)
>
> Yes.
>
> > If
> > so, how? Does it reload the entire file list each time from the SFS
> serve
> > r? If so, what is the value of
> > caching the list?
>
> If memory serves, the cache allowed CMS to detect that someone else had
> changed the file under you so that XEDIT, for example, could warn you that
> the file had changed and "Are you sure?"  (I have oh-so-vague
> recollections that the cache was a late add.) \
>
> > Same question for a dircontrol directory. (I suspect it doesn't show the
> > difference.)
>
> The whole point of dircontrol directories is the access-to-release
> consistency of the content.  As long as you have the directory accessed,
> no changes to the files in it will be visible to you, so it doesn't really
> matter if the cache is present or not.
>
> Alan Altmark
> z/VM Development
> IBM Endicott



--
Kris Buelens,
IBM Belgium, VM customer support


Re: File System - If you had everything, where would you put it?

2009-04-01 Thread Gary M. Dennis
David,

Thanks. 


1. How does OpenSolaris zfs utilize the storage tier on System z? Are the
disks  allocated to  zfs pool(s)  simply reserved CMS formatted disks?
2. How does the Async I/O in ZFS work? Would the guest that requested the
I/O  be signaled with an ext interrupt by the I/O appliance?
3. What API/system transport layer would be used in VM for guests to conduct
I/O through an appliance managing ZFS?
  

Regards,

--.  .-  .-.  -.--

Gary Dennis

0 ... living between the zeroes ... 0


On 4/1/09 8:47 PM, "David Boyes"  wrote:

> Some of the STK/Sun disks have hardware features to do this. OpenAFS or Lustre
> could do this if you allow Linux guests to provide the services, or ZFS if you
> allow OpenSolaris guests. It¹d be very easy to package up an appliance server
> image to do what you need done with either one (Linux or OpenSolaris).
> 
> Other than that, you have to use SFS or BFS, and both need some work to do
> continuous availability. Minidisks won¹t work for this.
> 
> On 4/1/09 5:32 PM, "Gary M. Dennis"  wrote:
> 
>> Is there a VM I/O management system available which will:
>> 
>> 1. Support space allocation requests for guests on a sparse basis? The file
>> server needs to make the guest believe it actually has the entire allocation
>> while only tying up space in the pool the guest actually used.
>> 
>> 2. Support Async I/O requests from multiple guests?
>> 
>> 3. Dynamically scale and from sub- TB to n EB.
> 








Re: Error using command QUERY ACCESSORS VMSYS:

2009-04-01 Thread Alan Altmark
On Wednesday, 04/01/2009 at 09:46 EDT, Alan Ackerman 
 wrote:

> I was under the impression (from something I read here) that the cached 
C
> MS list of files was
> updated when someone changed files on the directory. For SFS to inform 
CM
> S of this would
> required that it know that CMS had it accessed. If this isn't what 
happen
> s, I'll have to try to find
> that previous discussion and attempt to understand it again.

This was addressed in another post.  Yes, there is a cache of meta data.

> If I access a file-control directory and issue LISTFILE * * fm, then 
some
> one adds or deletes a file
> on the directory and I issue LISTFILE * * fm again, does it show the 
diff
> erence? (I think it does.) 

Yes.

> If
> so, how? Does it reload the entire file list each time from the SFS 
serve
> r? If so, what is the value of
> caching the list?

If memory serves, the cache allowed CMS to detect that someone else had 
changed the file under you so that XEDIT, for example, could warn you that 
the file had changed and "Are you sure?"  (I have oh-so-vague 
recollections that the cache was a late add.) \

> Same question for a dircontrol directory. (I suspect it doesn't show the
> difference.)

The whole point of dircontrol directories is the access-to-release 
consistency of the content.  As long as you have the directory accessed, 
no changes to the files in it will be visible to you, so it doesn't really 
matter if the cache is present or not.

Alan Altmark
z/VM Development
IBM Endicott


Re: File System - If you had everything, where would you put it?

2009-04-01 Thread Alan Altmark
On Wednesday, 04/01/2009 at 05:33 EDT, "Gary M. Dennis" 
 wrote:
> Is there a VM I/O management system available which will:
> 
> 1. Support space allocation requests for guests on a sparse basis? The 
file
> server needs to make the guest believe it actually has the entire 
allocation
> while only tying up space in the pool the guest actually used.

This is a function of the disk storage controller.  IBM Flashcopy SE 
(Space Efficient) enables overcommittment (and, hence, UNDERprovisioning!) 
of storage. 

> 2. Support Async I/O requests from multiple guests?

That is SSCH or DIAGNOSE 0x250.

> 3. Dynamically scale and from sub- TB to n EB.

Storage controllers can be provisioned with a wide range of backing store. 
 If a guest needs more disk space, give it another minidisk.

It is up to the guest to aggregate multiple minidisks into a single data 
repository.  (A la LVM in Linux.)  z/VM does not have multiple-extent 
minidisks.

Alan Altmark
z/VM Development
IBM Endicott


Re: File System - If you had everything, where would you put it?

2009-04-01 Thread David Boyes
Some of the STK/Sun disks have hardware features to do this. OpenAFS or Lustre 
could do this if you allow Linux guests to provide the services, or ZFS if you 
allow OpenSolaris guests. It'd be very easy to package up an appliance server 
image to do what you need done with either one (Linux or OpenSolaris).

Other than that, you have to use SFS or BFS, and both need some work to do 
continuous availability. Minidisks won't work for this.

On 4/1/09 5:32 PM, "Gary M. Dennis"  wrote:

Is there a VM I/O management system available which will:

1. Support space allocation requests for guests on a sparse basis? The file
server needs to make the guest believe it actually has the entire allocation
while only tying up space in the pool the guest actually used.

2. Support Async I/O requests from multiple guests?

3. Dynamically scale and from sub- TB to n EB.


Re: Error using command QUERY ACCESSORS VMSYS:

2009-04-01 Thread Alan Ackerman
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 11:38:41 -0400, Alan Altmark  wrote:

>On Wednesday, 03/25/2009 at 12:05 EDT, Alan Ackerman
> wrote:
>
>> Can someone explain this restriction to me. If I have accessed a
>> file mode directory, doesn't the SFS server know that?
>
>ACCESS of a filecontrol directory doesn't really "access" anything.  CMS

>reads the directory and caches the information, then closes the director
y.
> That same sequence could just an app making CSL calls.  So, no, the
>server doesn't know you've accessed a filecontrol directory.
>
>ACCESS of a dircontrol directory is different since you have a consisten
t
>(fixed) ACCESS-to-RELEASE view of the file content.  The SFS server has 
to
>maintain a "bookmark" for you, and so must keep track of ACCESS and
>RELEASE.
>
>Alan Altmark
>z/VM Development
>IBM Endicott
>
=
==
==

I was under the impression (from something I read here) that the cached C
MS list of files was 
updated when someone changed files on the directory. For SFS to inform CM
S of this would 
required that it know that CMS had it accessed. If this isn't what happen
s, I'll have to try to find 
that previous discussion and attempt to understand it again.

If I access a file-control directory and issue LISTFILE * * fm, then some
one adds or deletes a file 
on the directory and I issue LISTFILE * * fm again, does it show the diff
erence? (I think it does.) If 
so, how? Does it reload the entire file list each time from the SFS serve
r? If so, what is the value of 
caching the list?

Same question for a dircontrol directory. (I suspect it doesn't show the 
difference.)

I have many years of heavy use of file control directories, but hardly an
y with dircontrol 
directories. To my mind, file control directories behave right, and make 
it much easier to write 
applications.

Alan Ackerman
Alan (dot) Ackerman (at) Bank of America (dot) com 


Re: 5.4 Install curiosity

2009-04-01 Thread Marcy Cortes
0901 was released last week (aka 5403)

http://www.vm.ibm.com/service/rsu/stk540.html

 


Marcy

 
"This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If
you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the
addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on
this message or any information herein. If you have received this
message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail
and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation."


-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Stephen Frazier
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 1:47 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] 5.4 Install curiosity

Steve Mitchell wrote:
> To the best of my knowledge 'YES'.  I do know I put the DVD in the 
> drive, and when the lights quit flashing entered go.  I though I 
> verified all the messages, but as I said originally, I am human, ie
'to err is human'!
>   
In that case then you have installed the RSU that was shipped with the
order. Is it the latest RSU available? I don't know and neither do you. 
Order from IBM the latest RSU. Apply it. If anything applies then you
didn't have the latest RSU. If nothing applies then you have it already.

When IBM releases a new RSU order it and apply it.

--
Stephen Frazier
Information Technology Unit
Oklahoma Department of Corrections
3400 Martin Luther King
Oklahoma City, Ok, 73111-4298
Tel.: (405) 425-2549
Fax: (405) 425-2554
Pager: (405) 690-1828
email:  stevef%doc.state.ok.us


File System - If you had everything, where would you put it?

2009-04-01 Thread Gary M. Dennis
Is there a VM I/O management system available which will:

1. Support space allocation requests for guests on a sparse basis? The file
server needs to make the guest believe it actually has the entire allocation
while only tying up space in the pool the guest actually used.

2. Support Async I/O requests from multiple guests?

3. Dynamically scale and from sub- TB to n EB.

--.  .-  .-.  -.--

Gary Dennis


0 ... living between the zeroes ... 0


Re: 5.4 Install curiosity

2009-04-01 Thread Stephen Frazier

Steve Mitchell wrote:

To the best of my knowledge 'YES'.  I do know I put the DVD in the drive,
and when the lights quit flashing entered go.  I though I verified all the
messages, but as I said originally, I am human, ie 'to err is human'!
  
In that case then you have installed the RSU that was shipped with the 
order. Is it the latest RSU available? I don't know and neither do you. 
Order from IBM the latest RSU. Apply it. If anything applies then you 
didn't have the latest RSU. If nothing applies then you have it already. 
When IBM releases a new RSU order it and apply it.


--
Stephen Frazier
Information Technology Unit
Oklahoma Department of Corrections
3400 Martin Luther King
Oklahoma City, Ok, 73111-4298
Tel.: (405) 425-2549
Fax: (405) 425-2554
Pager: (405) 690-1828
email:  stevef%doc.state.ok.us


Re: 5.4 Install curiosity

2009-04-01 Thread Steve Mitchell
To the best of my knowledge 'YES'.  I do know I put the DVD in the drive,
and when the lights quit flashing entered go.  I though I verified all the
messages, but as I said originally, I am human, ie 'to err is human'!

Steve Mitchell
Sr Systems Software Specialist
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Kansas
(785) 291-8885

'There are no degrees of Honesty-you're either Honest or you're not!




   
  From:   Michael MacIsaac  
   

   
  To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU   
   

   
  Date:   04/01/2009 02:03 PM   
   

   
  Subject:Re: 5.4 Install curiosity 
   

   






Steve,

>From the notes I have taken installing 5.4:

Start INSTDVD, it runs for up to two hours, then
...
4. You are asked to place the system RSU in the drive. Insert the z/VM
Stacked
Recommended Service Upgrade 5401 DVD into the HMC DVD-ROM drive.
5. At the Integrated 3270 Console, type GO. You should see a messages of
the form DVDLOAD:
LOADING FILE CKD5000x IMAGE *. This step should take two to four minutes..
6. Finally, you should see the message HCPIDV8329I INSTDVD EXEC ENDED
SUCCESSFULLY.


So do you remember plugging in the 2nd DVD (RSU), typing "GO" and seeing
those messages?

"Mike MacIsaac"(845) 433-7061




CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole 
use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, 
trade secret or privileged information.  Any unauthorized review use, 
disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law.  If you 
are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this 
message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and 
destroy all copies of the original message.


Re: 5.4 Install curiosity

2009-04-01 Thread Michael MacIsaac
Steve,

>From the notes I have taken installing 5.4:

Start INSTDVD, it runs for up to two hours, then 
...
4. You are asked to place the system RSU in the drive. Insert the z/VM 
Stacked
Recommended Service Upgrade 5401 DVD into the HMC DVD-ROM drive.
5. At the Integrated 3270 Console, type GO. You should see a messages of 
the form DVDLOAD:
LOADING FILE CKD5000x IMAGE *. This step should take two to four minutes.
6. Finally, you should see the message HCPIDV8329I INSTDVD EXEC ENDED 
SUCCESSFULLY.


So do you remember plugging in the 2nd DVD (RSU), typing "GO" and seeing 
those messages?

"Mike MacIsaac"(845) 433-7061

Re: 5.4 Install curiosity

2009-04-01 Thread David Boyes
 
> (Embedded image moved to file: pic06422.jpg)
> Am I confused about what this process is doing?

Your screen shot didn't make it, but I'm guessing it's applying something
that looks like an RSU.

As I said, things may have been changed recently. The DVD I got for 5.4 did
not have the RSU on it, and did not include the RSU in the order, so I hit a
couple of bugs that were fixed in the RSU the hard way. IBM may also have
remastered the disk with at least the initial 5.4 RSU applied. Would make
sense if they did. 

In any case, ordering the latest RSU and applying it will fix the original
problem. VMSES is smart enough to do nothing if the service is already
applied. 

-- db


Re: 5.4 Install curiosity

2009-04-01 Thread Steve Mitchell
Perhaps I'm mistaken, but I have a DVD labeled z/VM Stacked Recommended
Service Upgrade 5402.  The installation materials, specifically Guide for
Automated Installation and Service, include the following process in the
INSTDVD instructions:
(Embedded image moved to file: pic06422.jpg)

Am I confused about what this process is doing?

Steve Mitchell
Sr Systems Software Specialist
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Kansas
(785) 291-8885

'There are no degrees of Honesty-you're either Honest or you're not!




   
  From:   David Boyes
   

   
  To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU   
   

   
  Date:   04/01/2009 11:52 AM   
   

   
  Subject:Re: 5.4 Install curiosity 
   

   





Order the latest RSU for electronic delivery from IBM. Unless something has
changed recently, the RSU is not on the DVD.




CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole 
use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, 
trade secret or privileged information.  Any unauthorized review use, 
disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law.  If you 
are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this 
message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and 
destroy all copies of the original message.


Re: 5.4 Install curiosity

2009-04-01 Thread Mike Walter
To clarify...  when that RSU arrives, load it onto the MAINT 500 disk.

If you transfer it to the 500 disk from an internet delivery (rather than 
tape), be sure to specify the download arguments as documented at that 
site, and then use the DETERSE command to reformat it so that the VMSES/E 
commands will work against it.

Mike Walter 
Hewitt Associates 
Any opinions expressed herein are mine alone and do not necessarily 
represent the opinions or policies of Hewitt Associates.




"David Boyes"  

Sent by: "The IBM z/VM Operating System" 
04/01/2009 11:51 AM
Please respond to
"The IBM z/VM Operating System" 



To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc

Subject
Re: 5.4 Install curiosity






Order the latest RSU for electronic delivery from IBM. Unless something 
has changed recently, the RSU is not on the DVD. 





The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents may 
contain information that is confidential or otherwise protected from 
disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, or if this 
message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender 
by reply e-mail and then delete this message, including any attachments. Any 
dissemination, distribution or other use of the contents of this message by 
anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. All messages 
sent to and from this e-mail address may be monitored as permitted by 
applicable law and regulations to ensure compliance with our internal policies 
and to protect our business. E-mails are not secure and cannot be guaranteed to 
be error free as they can be intercepted, amended, lost or destroyed, or 
contain viruses. You are deemed to have accepted these risks if you communicate 
with us by e-mail. 




Re: 5.4 Install curiosity

2009-04-01 Thread David Boyes
Order the latest RSU for electronic delivery from IBM. Unless something has 
changed recently, the RSU is not on the DVD.




5.4 Install curiosity

2009-04-01 Thread Steve Mitchell
I'm installing 5.4 w/DVD on 2nd Level.  I've made it to Step 6:Run SERVIC
E 
of Chapter 7 Load the System Image.

I've 'acc 500 c' then 'listfile * servlink c',  NOTHING.
I've followed the steps and messages quite succinctly, but I am human and
 
may have missed something when doing the RSU phase of INSTDVD.  I have 

IPL'd the 5.4 system several times and have logged in as maint,operator a
nd 
tcpmaint, all work fine.  Now I'm puzzled, dare say stymied as to what to
 
do next.  Go On?  Re DO INSTDVD?  Order RSU from IBM?  Any guidance is 

appreciatted.  THANKS.


Re: z/VM and DS6000 Disks

2009-04-01 Thread Schuh, Richard
Under the circumstances, it would appear that this forum is a good
avenue of first, not last, resort for you. The folks who linger here
like to answer questions and help with problems. That includes the ones
from IBM as well as the ones who aren't.


Regards, 
Richard Schuh 

 



Blog with more info on Mantissa and z/VOS

2009-04-01 Thread Lionel B. Dyck
Came across this blog this morning with more (still not a lot) of 
information on z/VOS

http://www.mantissa.com/blog

cheers

Lionel B. Dyck, Consultant/Specialist 
Enterprise Platform Services, Mainframe Engineering 
KP-IT Enterprise Engineering 
925-926-5332 (8-473-5332) | E-Mail: lionel.b.d...@kp.org 
AIM: lbdyck | Yahoo IM: lbdyck 
Kaiser Service Credo: "Our cause is health. Our passion is service. We?re 
here to make lives better.? 

?Never attribute to malice what can be caused by miscommunication.? 

NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, 
you are prohibited from sharing, copying, or otherwise using or disclosing 
its contents. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the 
sender immediately by reply e-mail and permanently delete this e-mail and 
any attachments without reading, forwarding or saving them. Thank you. 

Re: z/VM and DS6000 Disks

2009-04-01 Thread Heckler, Bruce
Thanks Alan, 

My boss built the IODF on one of our z/OS LPARs.  That's probably why we're 
having a "documentation disconnect".  "E-debris"?!  I got'a remember to use 
that one. 

Yeah, we shook our heads too on no support. But this is normal University 
researcher mentality.  We'll keep plugging along until we get the thing up.   

Thanks again, 

Bruce




Bruce Heckler
ACT Datacenter
10280 North Torrey Pines Rd. #375 
La Jolla CA.  92093
(858) 534-2152

-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf 
Of Alan Altmark
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 10:15 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: z/VM and DS6000 Disks

On Tuesday, 03/31/2009 at 11:27 EDT, "Heckler, Bruce"  
wrote:

> Apparently when you define a string in IODF it builds a string as type 
FCP. 
> Then it builds another string type FBASCSI which has the LUN, ..., and 
> references back to the same offset FCP address.  The burning question is 
when 
> you plug in addresses to initialize the sysres and such, which set do 
you use? 
> If I were doing this myself, I'd keep plugging until I found something 
that 
> works. But this machine is locked in a different computer room, I don't 
have 
> access, access time, and some other compounding limitations.  You're 
right, the 
> Install Guide is standard IBM dull but accurate.  However, the naming 
> conventions are a bit confusing between what IODF, INSTDVD, and the 
Install 
> manual are using (at least how I read it).  The rest of the install is 
very 
> simple.

Just so you know, z/VM doesn't know or care about the "e-debris"(usually 
UNIT=) that z/OS puts in an IODF.  That "FBASCSI" thing isn't in the IOCP 
manual and z/VM doesn't require it.  We simply require that you define an 
FCP CHPID and some number of IODEVICEs on that chpid. 

EDEVICE  TYPE FBA   FCP_DEVICE  ...

All installation references to a real FBA device are a reference to an 
.

> Last, I'd LOVE to open a PMR.  But the Fine Arts folk who own this box 
bought 
> it on a shoestring (read: "No Support Contract").

Note that it also means you cannot upgrade your z/VM for free.  Any future 
upgrade will require payment of the OTC fees again.

Alan Altmark
z/VM Development
IBM Endicott


Re: Using FTP Banner Causes DTCFTS2512I Every 5 Minutes

2009-04-01 Thread Michael Coffin
Hi Tom,

My Linux SA confirmed he was using Nagios for this task.  He has it
turned off for the time being until he can find a less disruptive way of
doing this.  :)

-Mike

-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Thomas Kern
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2009 3:44 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Using FTP Banner Causes DTCFTS2512I Every 5 Minutes


Was it a homegrown cron task or a monitoring system like Hobbit/Xymon or
Nagios?

We have both Hobbit and Nagios but have not yet put in the FTP BANNER.

/Tom Kern

Michael Coffin wrote:
> That was exactly what it was!  My Linux sysprog had a cron job kicking

> off every 5 minutes to make sure the z/VM FTP servers were available, 
> and the job would close the connection before we completed writing the

> banner.
> 
> Thanks for the suggestion on where to look Mark, much appreciated.  :)
> 
> -Mike


Re: A Question about the VM Page and RES volumes

2009-04-01 Thread Kris Buelens
Sorry I let room for misunderstanding: PAV gives more addresses to a volume,
hence it can lower the observed IO rate on a per address base.  When looking
at a volume the IO rate can go up indeed.
Queuing is indeed what one needs to look at, VM performance tools however
cannot show queues internal in a server, to help them, the server itself
should be made PAV aware (Linux can, SFS/DB2 can't).

2009/4/1 Rob van der Heij 

> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 8:35 AM, Kris Buelens 
> wrote:
>
> > In any case, so not only paging: the model you'd use depends on the IO
> > rate.  If you need lots of space with low IO rates: bigger models don't
> > penalize you.  PAV will lower the observed IO rate.
>
> PAV lowers the observed I/O rate? Where do you observe that?
> If you create 2 exposures to the same volume, you'd expect to do
> *more* I/O per second in peak periods. Thus effectively lower your net
> I/O response time. You may not fully double the throughput, so when
> PAV spreads the load well, you'd see each of the subchannels take less
> than the single one before. But since that's only part of the story,
> the I/O rate per subchannel is not a helpful metric. And if you're not
> getting pretty close, you might question whether PAV was a good
> investment there.
>
> Really, only when your performance monitor shows you I/O queue time
> for the device, PAV could make sense (if that I/O is relevant for your
> service levels). As you say, many applications represent a single
> requester and don't queue where PAV would be able to help. But even if
> the application could, the workload may not be such that it actually
> happens. That's why it makes sense to start from the other end: look
> at what impacts the service levels of your critical workload.
>
> Rob
> --
> Rob van der Heij
> Velocity Software
> http://www.velocitysoftware.com/
>



-- 
Kris Buelens,
IBM Belgium, VM customer support


Re: A Question about the VM Page and RES volumes

2009-04-01 Thread Rob van der Heij
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 8:35 AM, Kris Buelens  wrote:

> In any case, so not only paging: the model you'd use depends on the IO
> rate.  If you need lots of space with low IO rates: bigger models don't
> penalize you.  PAV will lower the observed IO rate.

PAV lowers the observed I/O rate? Where do you observe that?
If you create 2 exposures to the same volume, you'd expect to do
*more* I/O per second in peak periods. Thus effectively lower your net
I/O response time. You may not fully double the throughput, so when
PAV spreads the load well, you'd see each of the subchannels take less
than the single one before. But since that's only part of the story,
the I/O rate per subchannel is not a helpful metric. And if you're not
getting pretty close, you might question whether PAV was a good
investment there.

Really, only when your performance monitor shows you I/O queue time
for the device, PAV could make sense (if that I/O is relevant for your
service levels). As you say, many applications represent a single
requester and don't queue where PAV would be able to help. But even if
the application could, the workload may not be such that it actually
happens. That's why it makes sense to start from the other end: look
at what impacts the service levels of your critical workload.

Rob
-- 
Rob van der Heij
Velocity Software
http://www.velocitysoftware.com/