Re: [JBoss-user] JBoss-user Digest, Vol 2, Issue 184
this is an issue in jboss classloader go to the deploy folder. inside \jbossweb-tomcat55.sar\META-INF\jboss-service.xml file you'll find. attribute name=Java2ClassLoadingCompliancefalse/attribute attribute name=UseJBossWebLoaderfalse/attribute edit this tags to true. another possibility, is your deployed ejb(class files) and class inside the classes folder of war is a different output from different compilation. this happens because you may be implementing seializble and while compiling it generates some id that is diffrent evertime you compile. so compile the ejb's and remove the old ones abd copy the class files to required place and run your struts program - Original Message From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: jboss-user@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 12:42:24 AM Subject: JBoss-user Digest, Vol 2, Issue 184 Send JBoss-user mailing list submissions to jboss-user@lists.sourceforge.net To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can reach the person managing the list at [EMAIL PROTECTED] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: Contents of JBoss-user digest... Today's Topics: 1. JBoss 4.x error: GenericEJBInterceptor (Anand Kulkarni) 2. jBPM (jPDL) pageflow - use without jboss, ejb3 (Torsten Krah) -- Message: 1 Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 00:19:38 -0700 (PDT) From: Anand Kulkarni [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [JBoss-user] JBoss 4.x error: GenericEJBInterceptor To: jboss-user@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Hi, I am working on JBoss server with struts and EJB. I am presently using JBoss4.x.. I deploy my struts and EJB application in the same JBoss server. If I try to invoke stateless EJB from struts action class then it gives me the following error: // 22:50:23,718 INFO [STDOUT] ctx = [EMAIL PROTECTED] 22:50:23,906 INFO [STDOUT] ERROR [http-0.0.0.0-8080-1] (Log4JLogger.java:119) - Servlet.service() for servlet action threw exception java.io.InvalidClassException: org.jboss.proxy.ejb.GenericEJBInterceptor; local class incompatible: stream classdesc serialVersionUID = 3844706474734439975, loc al class serialVersionUID = 4582256576523491346 at java.io.ObjectStreamClass.initNonProxy(ObjectStreamClass.java:519) // The code works perfectly in JBoss 3.0.8 but for JBoss 4.x it gives the above errors. Can somebody tell me how to invoke EJB from web application using JBoss 4.x app server ? Waiting for the early reply. Thanks. regards, Anand __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- Message: 2 Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 16:31:06 +0200 From: Torsten Krah [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [JBoss-user] jBPM (jPDL) pageflow - use without jboss, ejb3 To: jboss-user@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain Can i use the pageflow from jBPM ( instead the one of JSF navigation ) without jboss application server and without ejb3? Are hibernate and tomcat 5 enough? If yes, how to configure it to make it work? Looking at the Guide for jBPM 3.1, the pageflow section 4.5.3 is empty, any hints or suggestions? thx for help. kind regards -- - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV -- ___ JBoss-user mailing list JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user End of JBoss-user Digest, Vol 2, Issue 184 ** - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ JBoss-user mailing list JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] [JBoss-user][Installation, Configuration Deployement] Installin g JBoss on IBM AIX 5.2
Hi, We are trying to install Jboss on a IBM AIX 5.2 machine. The command java fullversion gives : java full version J2RE 1.4.2 IBM AIX build ca142-20050929a (SR3) We put Jboss-4.0.2 on the machine. We also have an oracle Database on the same machine (Oracle 9.2.0.1.0). We downloaded the oracle JDBC driver ojdbc14.zip. The file run.sh has been slightly modified to remove the Java options (-server Xms128m Xmx512m) which do not exist with the jdk1.4.2 IBM AIX. When running the script run.sh, we have the following traces and the process loops (a control C does not stop the process): = JBoss Bootstrap Environment JBOSS_HOME: /home/gerling/jboss-4.0.2 JAVA: /usr/java14/bin/java JAVA_OPTS: -DProgram.name=run.sh CLASSPATH: /home/gerling/jboss-4.0.2/bin/run.jar:/usr/java14/lib/tools.jar = 15:17:56,365 INFO [Server] Starting JBoss (MX MicroKernel)... 15:17:56,367 INFO [Server] Release ID: JBoss [Zion] 4.0.2 (build: CVSTag=JBoss_4_0_2 date=200505022023) 15:17:56,368 INFO [Server] Home Dir: /home/gerling/jboss-4.0.2 15:17:56,368 INFO [Server] Home URL: file:/home/gerling/jboss-4.0.2/ 15:17:56,368 INFO [Server] Library URL: file:/home/gerling/jboss-4.0.2/lib/ 15:17:56,370 INFO [Server] Patch URL: null 15:17:56,370 INFO [Server] Server Name: default 15:17:56,415 INFO [Server] Server Home Dir: /home/gerling/jboss-4.0.2/server/default 15:17:56,415 INFO [Server] Server Home URL: file:/home/gerling/jboss-4.0.2/server/default/ 15:17:56,416 INFO [Server] Server Data Dir: /home/gerling/jboss-4.0.2/server/default/data 15:17:56,416 INFO [Server] Server Temp Dir: /home/gerling/jboss-4.0.2/server/default/tmp 15:17:56,416 INFO [Server] Server Config URL: file:/home/gerling/jboss-4.0.2/server/default/conf/ 15:17:56,417 INFO [Server] Server Library URL: file:/home/gerling/jboss-4.0.2/server/default/lib/ 15:17:56,418 INFO [Server] Root Deployment Filename: jboss-service.xml 15:17:56,420 INFO [Server] Starting General Purpose Architecture (GPA)... 15:17:58,595 INFO [ServerInfo] Java version: 1.4.2,IBM Corporation 15:17:58,596 INFO [ServerInfo] Java VM: Classic VM 1.4.2,IBM Corporation 15:17:58,596 INFO [ServerInfo] OS-System: AIX 5.2,ppc 15:18:01,761 INFO [Server] Core system initialized 15:18:09,897 INFO [Log4jService$URLWatchTimerTask] Configuring from URL: resource:log4j.xml 15:18:10,482 INFO [WebService] Using RMI server codebase: http://uafrpar0001:8083/ 15:18:11,193 INFO [NamingService] Started jndi bootstrap jnpPort=1099, rmiPort=1098, backlog=50, bindAddress=/0.0.0.0, Client SocketFactory=null, Server [EMAIL PROTECTED] 15:18:26,150 INFO [Embedded] Catalina naming disabled 15:18:27,287 INFO [Http11Protocol] Initializing Coyote HTTP/1.1 on http-0.0.0.0-8080 15:18:27,290 INFO [Catalina] Initialization processed in 1009 ms 15:18:27,293 INFO [StandardService] Starting service jboss.web 15:18:27,308 INFO [StandardEngine] Starting Servlet Engine: Apache Tomcat/5.5.9 15:18:27,435 INFO [StandardHost] XML validation disabled 15:18:27,663 INFO [Catalina] Server startup in 373 ms 15:18:28,594 INFO [TomcatDeployer] deploy, ctxPath=/invoker, warUrl=file:/home/gerling/jboss-4.0.2/server/default/deploy/http-invoker.sar/invoker.war/ 15:18:29,522 INFO [WebappLoader] Dual registration of jndi stream handler: factory already defined Does anyone have an idea? Thank you very much.
[JBoss-user] [JBoss-user][Installation, Configuration Deployement] Installin g JBoss on IBM AIX 5.2
Title: [JBoss-user][Installation, Configuration Deployement] Installing JBoss on IBM AIX 5.2 Hi, We are trying to install Jboss on a IBM AIX 5.2 machine. The command "java -fullversion" gives : java full version J2RE 1.4.2 IBM AIX build ca142-20050929a (SR3) We put Jboss-4.0.2 on the machine. We also have an oracle Database on the same machine (Oracle 9.2.0.1.0). We downloaded the oracle JDBC driver "ojdbc14.zip". The file "run.sh" has been slightly modified to remove the Java options (-server -Xms128m -Xmx512m) which do not exist with the jdk1.4.2 IBM AIX. When running the script "run.sh", we have the following traces and the process loops (a control C does not stop the process): "= JBoss Bootstrap Environment JBOSS_HOME: /home/gerling/jboss-4.0.2 JAVA: /usr/java14/bin/java JAVA_OPTS: -DProgram.name=run.sh CLASSPATH: /home/gerling/jboss-4.0.2/bin/run.jar:/usr/java14/lib/tools.jar = 15:17:56,365 INFO [Server] Starting JBoss (MX MicroKernel)... 15:17:56,367 INFO [Server] Release ID: JBoss [Zion] 4.0.2 (build: CVSTag=JBoss_4_0_2 date=200505022023) 15:17:56,368 INFO [Server] Home Dir: /home/gerling/jboss-4.0.2 15:17:56,368 INFO [Server] Home URL: file:/home/gerling/jboss-4.0.2/ 15:17:56,368 INFO [Server] Library URL: file:/home/gerling/jboss-4.0.2/lib/ 15:17:56,370 INFO [Server] Patch URL: null 15:17:56,370 INFO [Server] Server Name: default 15:17:56,415 INFO [Server] Server Home Dir: /home/gerling/jboss-4.0.2/server/default 15:17:56,415 INFO [Server] Server Home URL: file:/home/gerling/jboss-4.0.2/server/default/ 15:17:56,416 INFO [Server] Server Data Dir: /home/gerling/jboss-4.0.2/server/default/data 15:17:56,416 INFO [Server] Server Temp Dir: /home/gerling/jboss-4.0.2/server/default/tmp 15:17:56,416 INFO [Server] Server Config URL: file:/home/gerling/jboss-4.0.2/server/default/conf/ 15:17:56,417 INFO [Server] Server Library URL: file:/home/gerling/jboss-4.0.2/server/default/lib/ 15:17:56,418 INFO [Server] Root Deployment Filename: jboss-service.xml 15:17:56,420 INFO [Server] Starting General Purpose Architecture (GPA)... 15:17:58,595 INFO [ServerInfo] Java version: 1.4.2,IBM Corporation 15:17:58,596 INFO [ServerInfo] Java VM: Classic VM 1.4.2,IBM Corporation 15:17:58,596 INFO [ServerInfo] OS-System: AIX 5.2,ppc 15:18:01,761 INFO [Server] Core system initialized 15:18:09,897 INFO [Log4jService$URLWatchTimerTask] Configuring from URL: resource:log4j.xml 15:18:10,482 INFO [WebService] Using RMI server codebase: http://uafrpar0001:8083/ 15:18:11,193 INFO [NamingService] Started jndi bootstrap jnpPort=1099, rmiPort=1098, backlog=50, bindAddress=/0.0.0.0, Client SocketFactory=null, Server [EMAIL PROTECTED] 15:18:26,150 INFO [Embedded] Catalina naming disabled 15:18:27,287 INFO [Http11Protocol] Initializing Coyote HTTP/1.1 on http-0.0.0.0-8080 15:18:27,290 INFO [Catalina] Initialization processed in 1009 ms 15:18:27,293 INFO [StandardService] Starting service jboss.web 15:18:27,308 INFO [StandardEngine] Starting Servlet Engine: Apache Tomcat/5.5.9 15:18:27,435 INFO [StandardHost] XML validation disabled 15:18:27,663 INFO [Catalina] Server startup in 373 ms 15:18:28,594 INFO [TomcatDeployer] deploy, ctxPath=/invoker, warUrl=file:/home/gerling/jboss-4.0.2/server/default/deploy/http-invoker.sar/invoker.war/ 15:18:29,522 INFO [WebappLoader] Dual registration of jndi stream handler: factory already defined " Does anyone have an idea? Thank you very much.
[JBoss-user] [JBoss-user]Integrate .NET and J2EE
I need to implement an application ( inside LAN Network) with the following features : --CLIENT- Client : VB .NET applicaction Web Client: IExplorer ---SERVER Application Server : JBoss 3.2.3 JSP/Servlet Container : Tomcat Web Server Apache --- The first solution that I found was Web Service ( Client[VB .NET] - Server ) but I read that this is bud solution because there are a lot of traffic in the network with Web Services. Anybody knows any better solution to integrate an Client ( VB .NET ) and server (J2EE) into LAN Network Thank Jaime Gomez --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470alloc_id=3638op=click ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] [JBoss-user]how an VB application to call EJB ?
Anybody know how does an VB application call to EJB ?, there any kind of plugin?, I'm interested in to implement a basic example of Visual Basic to call EJB of type session thank for their time Jaime Gomez --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470alloc_id=3638op=click ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
RE: [JBoss-user] [JBoss-user]how an VB application to call EJB ?
You can call a DLL that in turn calls static Java methods to call your EJB: http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/native1.1/index.html -Original Message- From: JAIME GOMEZ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 8:02 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [JBoss-user] [JBoss-user]how an VB application to call EJB ? Anybody know how does an VB application call to EJB ?, there any kind of plugin?, I'm interested in to implement a basic example of Visual Basic to call EJB of type session thank for their time Jaime Gomez --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470alloc_id=3638op=click ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id70alloc_id638op=click ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] jboss-user,
,remove [EMAIL PROTECTED] [] COOLhttp://www.coolcn.com 13:14:45 --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa0013ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] [JBoss-user]problem in User defined primary key CMP
Hi, i have ceated one entity bean for which i am using my own primary key ,
details are here under:
Entity Bean ejbCreate method:::
public PriceListScheduleLinkPK ejbCreate(PriceListScheduleLink
thePriceListScheduleLink) throws CreateException{
setPricelistHeaderId(thePriceListScheduleLink.getPricelistHeaderId());
setPublisherScheduleId(thePriceListScheduleLink.getPublisherScheduleId());
return null;
}
primary key class::
public class PriceListScheduleLinkPK implements java.io.Serializable
{
public int priceListHeaderId;
public int publisherScheduleId;
// Default Constructor
public PriceListScheduleLinkPK(){}
public int getPriceListHeaderId()
{
return priceListHeaderId;
}
public int getPublisherScheduleId()
{
return publisherScheduleId;
}
// provide implementation for hascode and equals
public int hashCode()
{
return (priceListHeaderId+
price:publisher+publisherScheduleId).hashCode();
}
public boolean equals(Object other) {
if (other instanceof PriceListScheduleLinkPK) {
return (priceListHeaderId
==((PriceListScheduleLinkPK)other).priceListHeaderId
publisherScheduleId==((PriceListScheduleLinkPK)other).publisherScheduleId);
}
return false;
}
extarct of ejb-jar.xml :::
ejb-namePriceList_Schedule_Link/ejb-name
local-homecom.gist.usapl.product.PriceListScheduleLinkEntityHome/local-ho
me
localcom.gist.usapl.product.PriceListScheduleLinkEntityObject/local
ejb-classcom.gist.usapl.product.PriceListScheduleLinkEntityBean/ejb-class
persistence-typeContainer/persistence-type
prim-key-classcom.gist.usapl.product.PriceListScheduleLinkPK/prim-key-cla
ss
reentrantFalse/reentrant
cmp-version2.x/cmp-version
abstract-schema-namePriceListScheduleLink/abstract-schema-name
now the problem is ::
during deployment in JBoss the query generated by server( for
findByPrimaryKey method) shows query as:
select publisher_schedule_id from PriceList_Schedule_Link where
publisher_schedule_id=? where as i believe it should show for both the
fields.
also, after calling other finder method ie findByPriceListHeader(
priceListHeaderId) , it returns collection quicky but when i am using
priceListScheduleLinkEntityObject.remove and
priceListScheduleLinkEntityHome.create(..)
it is throwing transaction-time-out exception for no of records as low as
700-800. ( actualy does remove and create for 4-5 beans only and then this
exception comes)
Looking forward for some response.
thanx in advance,
Regards,
Sanjeev
}
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines at the
same time. Free trial click here: http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/345/0
___
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
RE: [JBoss-user] [JBoss-user]Container Transacted MDB ?
The only valid transaction settings for an MDB are requires and
not supported. Change requires new to requires and see what happens.
I'm surprised this is not picked up by the bean validator.
Rgds,
Dan.
--
Danny Yates
-Original Message-
From: Magesh Prabhu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 July 2003 11:12
To: jboss-user
Subject: [JBoss-user] [JBoss-user]Container Transacted MDB ?
Guys,
I want my Message Driven Bean under Transaction boundaries. Transaction
should start when onMessage() call is received. Here's my deployment
descriptor which says my MDB is ContainerTransacted and It requires a New
Transaction.
message-driven
description![CDATA[This is reponsible for prioritising requests and
dispatching them accordingly.]]/description
ejb-nameQueueDispatcherMDBBean/ejb-name
ejb-classcom.pindartech.imageprocessing.manager.queuemanager.QueueDispatch
erBean/ejb-class
message-selector/message-selector
transaction-typeContainer/transaction-type
acknowledge-modeAuto-acknowledge/acknowledge-mode
message-driven-destination
destination-typejavax.jms.Queue/destination-type
/message-driven-destination
/message-driven
container-transaction
method
ejb-nameQueueDispatcherMDBBean/ejb-name
method-name*/method-name
/method
trans-attributeRequiresNew/trans-attribute
/container-transaction
This MDB calls an helper class which inturn calls a bunch of Entity Beans
and updates the database. In Exceptional scenario when I want to rollback
the whole Transaction, I use this.context.setRollbackOnly();
public void onMessage(javax.jms.Message message) {
try {
... do the business
} catch(Exception e) {
this.context.setRollbackOnly();
}
}
When Exception occours, I get a message saying setRollbackOnly() must be
called only from a Transacted Bean. Why does the container think that my MDB
is not Container Transacted.
Please advice me If I'm missing out on anything.
[ERROR] - [LogInterceptor].handleException() RuntimeException:
java.lang.IllegalStateException: setRollbackOnly must only be called in the
context of a transaction (EJB 2.0 - 15.5.1)
at
org.jboss.ejb.MessageDrivenEnterpriseContext$MessageDrivenContextImpl.setRol
lbackOnly(MessageDrivenEnterpriseContext.java:214)
at
com.pindartech.imageprocessing.manager.queuemanager.QueueDispatcherBean.onMe
ssage(QueueDispatcherBean.java:139)
...
Thanks in advance,
Magesh
**
This email and its attachments are intended for the above
named only and may be confidential. If they have come to
you in error, you must take no action based on them, nor
must you copy or show them to anyone; please reply to this
email and highlight the error.
Security Warning: Please note that this email has been
created in the knowledge that the internet email is not a
100% secure communications medium. We advise that you
understand and observe this lack of security when emailing us.
Viruses: Although we have taken steps to ensure that this
email and attachments are free from any virus, we advise
that in keeping with good computing practice the recipient
should ensure they are actually virus free.
If you have received this email in error please notify:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa0016ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/01
___
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
_
Notice to recipient:
The information in this internet e-mail and any attachments is confidential
and may be privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are
not the intended addressee please notify the sender immediately by
telephone. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
is prohibited and may be unlawful.
When addressed to external clients any opinions or advice contained in this
internet e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in any
applicable governing terms of business or client engagement letter issued by
the pertinent Bank of America group entity.
If this email originates from the U.K. please note that Bank of America,
N.A., London Branch, Banc of America Securities Limited and Banc of America
Futures Incorporated are regulated by the Financial Services Authority
RE: [JBoss-user] [JBoss-user]Container Transacted MDB ?
MDBs can only be Required or NotSupported
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
JBoss Group, LLC
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Magesh Prabhu
Sent: 04 July 2003 11:12
To: jboss-user
Subject: [JBoss-user] [JBoss-user]Container Transacted MDB ?
Guys,
I want my Message Driven Bean under Transaction boundaries.
Transaction should start when onMessage() call is received.
Here's my deployment descriptor which says my MDB is
ContainerTransacted and It requires a New Transaction.
message-driven
description![CDATA[This is reponsible for
prioritising requests and dispatching them
accordingly.]]/description
ejb-nameQueueDispatcherMDBBean/ejb-name
ejb-classcom.pindartech.imageprocessing.manager.queuemanager
.QueueDispatcherBean/ejb-class
message-selector/message-selector
transaction-typeContainer/transaction-type
acknowledge-modeAuto-acknowledge/acknowledge-mode
message-driven-destination
destination-typejavax.jms.Queue/destination-type
/message-driven-destination
/message-driven
container-transaction
method
ejb-nameQueueDispatcherMDBBean/ejb-name
method-name*/method-name
/method
trans-attributeRequiresNew/trans-attribute
/container-transaction
This MDB calls an helper class which inturn calls a bunch of
Entity Beans and updates the database. In Exceptional
scenario when I want to rollback the whole Transaction, I use
this.context.setRollbackOnly();
public void onMessage(javax.jms.Message message) {
try {
... do the business
} catch(Exception e) {
this.context.setRollbackOnly();
}
}
When Exception occours, I get a message saying
setRollbackOnly() must be called only from a Transacted Bean.
Why does the container think that my MDB is not Container Transacted.
Please advice me If I'm missing out on anything.
[ERROR] - [LogInterceptor].handleException() RuntimeException:
java.lang.IllegalStateException: setRollbackOnly must only be
called in the context of a transaction (EJB 2.0 - 15.5.1)
at
org.jboss.ejb.MessageDrivenEnterpriseContext$MessageDrivenCont
extImpl.setRollbackOnly(MessageDrivenEnterpriseContext.java:214)
at
com.pindartech.imageprocessing.manager.queuemanager.QueueDispa
tcherBean.onMessage(QueueDispatcherBean.java:139)
...
Thanks in advance,
Magesh
**
This email and its attachments are intended for the above
named only and may be confidential. If they have come to
you in error, you must take no action based on them, nor
must you copy or show them to anyone; please reply to this
email and highlight the error.
Security Warning: Please note that this email has been
created in the knowledge that the internet email is not a
100% secure communications medium. We advise that you
understand and observe this lack of security when emailing us.
Viruses: Although we have taken steps to ensure that this
email and attachments are free from any virus, we advise
that in keeping with good computing practice the recipient
should ensure they are actually virus free.
If you have received this email in error please notify:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa0016ave/direct;at.asp_06
1203_01/01
___
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa0016ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/01
___
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
Re: [JBoss-user] [JBoss-user]Container Transacted MDB ?
Thanks again folks,
This solved my problem and was a good learning too.
Cheers,
Magesh
On 7/4/03 11:44 AM, Adrian Brock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MDBs can only be Required or NotSupported
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
JBoss Group, LLC
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Magesh Prabhu
Sent: 04 July 2003 11:12
To: jboss-user
Subject: [JBoss-user] [JBoss-user]Container Transacted MDB ?
Guys,
I want my Message Driven Bean under Transaction boundaries.
Transaction should start when onMessage() call is received.
Here's my deployment descriptor which says my MDB is
ContainerTransacted and It requires a New Transaction.
message-driven
description![CDATA[This is reponsible for
prioritising requests and dispatching them
accordingly.]]/description
ejb-nameQueueDispatcherMDBBean/ejb-name
ejb-classcom.pindartech.imageprocessing.manager.queuemanager
.QueueDispatcherBean/ejb-class
message-selector/message-selector
transaction-typeContainer/transaction-type
acknowledge-modeAuto-acknowledge/acknowledge-mode
message-driven-destination
destination-typejavax.jms.Queue/destination-type
/message-driven-destination
/message-driven
container-transaction
method
ejb-nameQueueDispatcherMDBBean/ejb-name
method-name*/method-name
/method
trans-attributeRequiresNew/trans-attribute
/container-transaction
This MDB calls an helper class which inturn calls a bunch of
Entity Beans and updates the database. In Exceptional
scenario when I want to rollback the whole Transaction, I use
this.context.setRollbackOnly();
public void onMessage(javax.jms.Message message) {
try {
... do the business
} catch(Exception e) {
this.context.setRollbackOnly();
}
}
When Exception occours, I get a message saying
setRollbackOnly() must be called only from a Transacted Bean.
Why does the container think that my MDB is not Container Transacted.
Please advice me If I'm missing out on anything.
[ERROR] - [LogInterceptor].handleException() RuntimeException:
java.lang.IllegalStateException: setRollbackOnly must only be
called in the context of a transaction (EJB 2.0 - 15.5.1)
at
org.jboss.ejb.MessageDrivenEnterpriseContext$MessageDrivenCont
extImpl.setRollbackOnly(MessageDrivenEnterpriseContext.java:214)
at
com.pindartech.imageprocessing.manager.queuemanager.QueueDispa
tcherBean.onMessage(QueueDispatcherBean.java:139)
...
Thanks in advance,
Magesh
**
This email and its attachments are intended for the above
named only and may be confidential. If they have come to
you in error, you must take no action based on them, nor
must you copy or show them to anyone; please reply to this
email and highlight the error.
Security Warning: Please note that this email has been
created in the knowledge that the internet email is not a
100% secure communications medium. We advise that you
understand and observe this lack of security when emailing us.
Viruses: Although we have taken steps to ensure that this
email and attachments are free from any virus, we advise
that in keeping with good computing practice the recipient
should ensure they are actually virus free.
If you have received this email in error please notify:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa0016ave/direct;at.asp_06
1203_01/01
___
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa0016ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/01
___
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa0016ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/01
[JBoss-user] [JBoss-user]
Hi, Can anyone tell me how to increase the transaction timeout on Jboss 3.0.6 and on Jboss 3.2.1? Thanks Davide signature.asc Description: PGP signature
RE: [JBoss-user] [JBoss-user]
In 3.2.1, in jboss_dist/server/target/deploy/transaction-service.xml you will find the following stanza: !-- | The fast in-memory transaction manager. -- mbean code=org.jboss.tm.TransactionManagerService name=jboss:service=TransactionManager attribute name=TransactionTimeout300/attribute depends optional-attribute-name=XidFactoryjboss:service=XidFactory/depends /mbean Change the 300 (in seconds) to whatever you want. I suspect this is the same for 3.0.6 as well. Dustin -Original Message- From: Davide Pozza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 12:24 PM To: Jboss Subject: [JBoss-user] [JBoss-user] Hi, Can anyone tell me how to increase the transaction timeout on Jboss 3.0.6 and on Jboss 3.2.1? Thanks Davide --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ObjectStore. If flattening out C++ or Java code to make your application fit in a relational database is painful, don't do it! Check out ObjectStore. Now part of Progress Software. http://www.objectstore.net/sourceforge ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
Re: [JBoss-user] [JBoss-user]
On Thu, 29 May 2003 03:17, Barlow, Dustin wrote: In 3.2.1, in jboss_dist/server/target/deploy/transaction-service.xml you will find the following stanza: I suspect this is the same for 3.0.6 as well. Almost, but I think it is in jboss_dist/server/target/conf/jboss-service.xml Also (but I haven't really tested this) you should be able to change this from the jmx-console in the TransactionManager service. Just change the attribute value, Apply Changes and then stop and start the service. Thanks for the answer Dustin, I've been meaning to find this out for a while but never got around to it. It is a real pain when a transaction times out during a debug session. Now I can set it to 30 minutes (getting a bit slow in my old age :-) brian wallis... --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay Get office equipment for less on eBay! http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] JBoss-user -- confirmation of subscription -- request 630806
Original Message Subject: JBoss-user -- confirmation of subscription -- request 630806 Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 03:31:14 -0800 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] JBoss-user -- confirmation of subscription -- request 630806 We have received a request from 212.113.17.3 for subscription of your email address, [EMAIL PROTECTED], to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list. To confirm the request, please send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and either: - maintain the subject line as is (the reply's additional Re: is ok), - or include the following line - and only the following line - in the message body: confirm 630806 (Simply sending a 'reply' to this message should work from most email interfaces, since that usually leaves the subject line in the right form.) If you do not wish to subscribe to this list, please simply disregard this message. Send questions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] JBoss User Archives NOT available
Hi, Someone has mentioned that the JBoss-user archives on sourceforge do not work. This is very bad for newbies like me, because it means that I might get ignored when asking what I think is a valid question. All in all it just kills karma... Could someone please have a look at the problem as it seems to still be an issue? Regards, -- Alwyn Schoeman SMART Money Inc. The clock on the wall keeps moving, time stands still... No matter how the dice may fall, someone else always gets to call the number... msg21534/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [JBoss-user] JBoss User Archives NOT available
Yes it is much irritating, but try this instead: http://www.mail-archive.com/jboss-user%40lists.sourceforge.net/ /Lennart torsdagen den 26 september 2002 kl 13.23 skrev Alwyn Schoeman: Hi, Someone has mentioned that the JBoss-user archives on sourceforge do not work. This is very bad for newbies like me, because it means that I might get ignored when asking what I think is a valid question. All in all it just kills karma... Could someone please have a look at the problem as it seems to still be an issue? Regards, -- Alwyn Schoeman SMART Money Inc. The clock on the wall keeps moving, time stands still... No matter how the dice may fall, someone else always gets to call the number... mime-attachment --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
Re: [JBoss-user] jboss-user shutdown
I think the biggest problem is in sourceforge.net Because it is owned by Sourceforge, why jboss.org have their own mailing list.. so if i reply to them not to a user of the sender but the list.. I prefer forum, but the list must be active still, until we see the popularity of forum is increase. but, in my country, where the internet connection is suck, to much corruption on telecommunication, btw it is still a suck country. I prefer mailing list still activated. even i used cable modem (own by a conglomerat), fuck them.. imagine.. the cable modem can be disconnect.. without support and explaination.. Please, activate both of it.. I like phpbuilder.com concepet, but i never visit them, i prefer email.. Frans - Original Message - From: Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: marc fleury [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: danch [EMAIL PROTECTED]; David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 11:17 PM Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] jboss-user shutdown This was imported from the news group. If this is meant to be user read-only then we should change its group from jboss.user.faq to jboss.faq, since we currently only allow users to post to stuff under jboss.user.* --jason On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, marc fleury wrote: |Hopefully the new policy that only a few people can post on the FAQ |forum will help that. I did set it up that way but saw a random post in there from a user, can I ask one of you guys to try and post directly and see if it does post to faq or not? I don't know that the security configuration was picked up correctly BTW, let me know if you want to be added to the moderator faq group, I will add you guys marcf | | |-danch | | |___ |JBoss-user mailing list |[EMAIL PROTECTED] |https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
Re: [JBoss-user] jboss-user shutdown
My only addition to the debate of the jboss-user mailing list shutdown is can the folks at JBoss.org please test their website with Opera and fix it. I have found that I have had to fall back to a windoze pc running IE in order to get stuff from the site because Opera is unhappy with the layout. If it is truly an Opera issue then I guess I can survive. Thanks, -Kent ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
Re: FW: PRIVATE: Re: [JBoss-user] jboss-user shutdown
Dear Marc ! I am not able to polemize with you, but please do not remove mail-list. I simply hate web-based forums. I like simple text-based discussions. And its faster. sincerely Olek - Original Message - From: marc fleury [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Christian Riege [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 7:10 PM Subject: RE: FW: PRIVATE: Re: [JBoss-user] jboss-user shutdown |p.s.: marc, i wholeheartedly agree with your statement that jboss-user |was a waste of time when there were 300+ posts a day -- i don't want |those times back either. but please please please with sugar on top keep |jboss-dev a mailing list :) jboss-user at 300 posts was a waste of time forums will scale in users and developers. jboss-dev is going to be mirrored on the forums so you will be able to either participate from mail or participate from the forum, personally I plan on working from the web. See, here I am trying to finish the proxy rewrite/invocation chain rewrite and I keep popping to read my mail and here I am breaking away and answering, the forum is better in that way, you go when you want, you use when you want and since we nntp mirror you still have it. You want to be notified as a user when your answer is up? you will have that feature. So even for jboss-dev which is the list that has 300 mails per day these days and is becoming a pain and a jungle, it might be interesting to try to forum formula. Look the forum is already a success with more traffic than this list ever saw, and it still has a LOT of room to grow, you don't feel overwhelmed in the forums, everyone is happier, you bitch a bit and then you realize it just is a bit better really, lost stuff gained stuff... Finally the forums are RIGHT THERE, in YOUR FACE, you just click once you downloaded and BAM you in the middle of the maelstrom, the energy, the people, right now there is a gap website/list and I want to do away with this, this is trully powerful, do you realize that folks will be able to see the developers be right next to them, that stuff will SO ALIVE it will blow everybody's mind away, they will WANT to be there and help and what not, trust I know these things, I know marketing of our project and software... it is going to blow everyone away to see dev working LIVE! no-one else can do this, I hope it will work marcf ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
Re: FW: PRIVATE: Re: [JBoss-user] jboss-user shutdown
Ever since this issue was around here, I wondered why marc essentially doesnt like mailing lists. Now everything is clear: == X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) just kidding marc ;-) so long Peter ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
RE: FW: PRIVATE: Re: [JBoss-user] jboss-user shutdown
true man, my mailer (outlook) is dead dead dead, it runs *by itself* on a win2000 pro laptop 500mhz and 128 meg ram and teh machine is just so unstable (after 18 month of abuse) that I need to reinstall everything in the coming days. Outlook is good but doesn't scale in time. The forums do scale, we have already 3 times more users of the forums than we ever had of the mailing lists when we were going crazy with it and the forums *really* have room to grow, that is the scalability I was looking for marcf |-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Peter Sojan |Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 11:16 AM |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Subject: Re: FW: PRIVATE: Re: [JBoss-user] jboss-user shutdown | | | |Ever since this issue was around here, I wondered why marc essentially |doesnt like mailing lists. Now everything is clear: | |== X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) | |just kidding marc ;-) | |so long |Peter | | |___ |JBoss-user mailing list |[EMAIL PROTECTED] |https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
RE: FW: PRIVATE: Re: [JBoss-user] jboss-user shutdown
hi, sorry for the off-topic but a) i couldn't resist further on commenting and b) this list is going to be gone in a few [ days | weeks | months ] anyways. On Wed, 2001-12-05 at 17:41, marc fleury wrote: true man, my mailer (outlook) is dead dead dead, it runs *by itself* on a win2000 pro laptop 500mhz and 128 meg ram and teh machine is just so unstable (after 18 month of abuse) that I need to reinstall everything in the coming days. flamebait so the reason we're disbanding the mailing lists is that one person cannot cope with his e-mail? /flamebait Outlook is good but doesn't scale in time. It's by far the best for spreading worms, agreed :). The forums do scale, we have already 3 times more users of the forums than we ever had of the mailing lists when we were going crazy with it and the forums *really* have room to grow, that is the scalability I was looking for they are scalable, true. but i think that this scalability has absolutely nothing to do with the number of users but with the behaviour of the users. using a mailing-list its ever-so-easy to just hit the reply button and hack away. this holds especially true for the me too types of messages. a forum avoids this as the effort to just reply is a lot harder. the delay between hitting reply and actually typing away is not .2 microseconds but more in the vicinity of 2-5 seconds. the same holds true for actually sending the reply (again, with the forum there is a built-in delay which a lot of people find very uncomfortable). i've made this experience with various forums which are cross-gated to mailing lists. the traffic that is being generated by people posting via the web to the forum in relation to the traffic generated by people on the list is roughly 1:10. so this is a Good Thing(tm). Now on to the bad thing: personally i hate forums. they are a burden to use. reading a forum takes me about 5-10 times longer (reaching up to 20-30 times when on a dial-up connection) than reading the same messages via my e-mail client. a forum also doesn't support proper threading, marking of messages, etc. pp. its not a case i have with Jive in particular. i have this case with *every* web-based forum. i appreciate the effort that goes into Jive to make it easier/quicker to use but i think its a dead-end at least if you're talking about the browser-based frontend. i therefore really like the effort you're putting into making the forums available via NNTP. this way both sides of the ocean that is user-land will be happy. thanks for listening + keep up the good work, christian p.s.: marc, i wholeheartedly agree with your statement that jboss-user was a waste of time when there were 300+ posts a day -- i don't want those times back either. but please please please with sugar on top keep jboss-dev a mailing list :) msg12999/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
RE: FW: PRIVATE: Re: [JBoss-user] jboss-user shutdown
|p.s.: marc, i wholeheartedly agree with your statement that jboss-user |was a waste of time when there were 300+ posts a day -- i don't want |those times back either. but please please please with sugar on top keep |jboss-dev a mailing list :) jboss-user at 300 posts was a waste of time forums will scale in users and developers. jboss-dev is going to be mirrored on the forums so you will be able to either participate from mail or participate from the forum, personally I plan on working from the web. See, here I am trying to finish the proxy rewrite/invocation chain rewrite and I keep popping to read my mail and here I am breaking away and answering, the forum is better in that way, you go when you want, you use when you want and since we nntp mirror you still have it. You want to be notified as a user when your answer is up? you will have that feature. So even for jboss-dev which is the list that has 300 mails per day these days and is becoming a pain and a jungle, it might be interesting to try to forum formula. Look the forum is already a success with more traffic than this list ever saw, and it still has a LOT of room to grow, you don't feel overwhelmed in the forums, everyone is happier, you bitch a bit and then you realize it just is a bit better really, lost stuff gained stuff... Finally the forums are RIGHT THERE, in YOUR FACE, you just click once you downloaded and BAM you in the middle of the maelstrom, the energy, the people, right now there is a gap website/list and I want to do away with this, this is trully powerful, do you realize that folks will be able to see the developers be right next to them, that stuff will SO ALIVE it will blow everybody's mind away, they will WANT to be there and help and what not, trust I know these things, I know marketing of our project and software... it is going to blow everyone away to see dev working LIVE! no-one else can do this, I hope it will work marcf ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
RE: NNTP gateway? Re: [JBoss-user] jboss-user shutdown
We are still trying to work out some kinks with the NNTP mirror, once that has been handled we will. --jason On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, Reynir Hübner wrote: great!!! promote this and most people will be happy.. ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
Re: [JBoss-user] jboss-user shutdown
Please don't do that. Mailing lists are a proven stable and useful way for user-user or either user-developer talk. They're used everywhere as the best solution for these tasks. Forums _will_not_ever_ provide the same functionality and usefulness what mailing-lists do. Beside, noone can see a reason why shouldn't jboss-user stay alive; if you shut down the list, I even suggest starting a new one either on a free mailing-list server, or any big server of ours around. We - the users of JBoss - do need that kind of communication. Christopher On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 07:24:27PM -0500, marc fleury wrote: jboss-user is shutting down, go to the forums for your free help it is more structured and less invasive, go! even jboss-dev is going to end up there in the short run marcf |-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc fleury |Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 6:41 PM |To: Jboss-User@Lists. Sourceforge. Net |Subject: [JBoss-user] jboss-user shutdown | | |it's been in the works for 3 month, jboss-user is going away, | |goodbye and remember i love you | |marcf | | |Marc Fleury |President |JBoss Group, LLC | | | |___ |JBoss-user mailing list |[EMAIL PROTECTED] |https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user -- .Digital.Yearning.for.Networked.Assassination.and.Xenocide ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
NNTP gateway? Re: [JBoss-user] jboss-user shutdown
Is there a way to use NNTP to read the forums? Web-based forum browsing is very troublesome. Maurice. - Original Message - From: Bill Burke [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jboss-User@Lists. Sourceforge. Net [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 04 December, 2001 5:18 AM Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] jboss-user shutdown Oh well, guess I'm never answering another user question againWhy shut off the user lists? Do you pay for it? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc fleury Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 7:24 PM To: marc fleury; Jboss-User@Lists. Sourceforge. Net Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] jboss-user shutdown jboss-user is shutting down, go to the forums for your free help it is more structured and less invasive, ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
Re: [JBoss-user] jboss-user shutdown
On Tue, 2001-12-04 at 14:10, Jozsa Kristof wrote: We - the users of JBoss - do need that kind of communication. I completely agree. Mailing lists are a much less intrusive form of communicatoin and you will find that many people prefer mailing lists to forums; if you close the official mailing lists some people will not bother to visit the forums at all and you will lose potential contributions in the form of code, user support and general knowledge. Please re-consider this decision. Pavel. ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
Re: [JBoss-user] jboss-user shutdown
I really love jboss-user list... That solved several problems in my config/installations. I can talk with more people that are going trhought same problems that I have. If the mailing list stops, the information will not be delivered in my hands. I will have that to search they, what I will not be able to make due to time. Please, don't shutdown jboss-user maling list!!! Thanks, Edson Carlos Ericksson Richter - Original Message - From: Jozsa Kristof [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 9:10 AM Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] jboss-user shutdown Please don't do that. Mailing lists are a proven stable and useful way for user-user or either user-developer talk. They're used everywhere as the best solution for these tasks. Forums _will_not_ever_ provide the same functionality and usefulness what mailing-lists do. Beside, noone can see a reason why shouldn't jboss-user stay alive; if you shut down the list, I even suggest starting a new one either on a free mailing-list server, or any big server of ours around. We - the users of JBoss - do need that kind of communication. Christopher On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 07:24:27PM -0500, marc fleury wrote: jboss-user is shutting down, go to the forums for your free help it is more structured and less invasive, go! even jboss-dev is going to end up there in the short run marcf |-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc fleury |Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 6:41 PM |To: Jboss-User@Lists. Sourceforge. Net |Subject: [JBoss-user] jboss-user shutdown | | |it's been in the works for 3 month, jboss-user is going away, | |goodbye and remember i love you | |marcf | | |Marc Fleury |President |JBoss Group, LLC | | | |___ |JBoss-user mailing list |[EMAIL PROTECTED] |https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user -- .Digital.Yearning.for.Networked.Assassination.and.Xenocide ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
Re: [JBoss-user] jboss-user shutdown
On 4 Dec 2001, Pavel P. Tcholakov wrote: We - the users of JBoss - do need that kind of communication. I completely agree. Mailing lists are a much less intrusive form of Please re-consider this decision. I am right behind Pavel here. Mailing lists use the push tenhnique, while forums use the pull technique, i.e., as a user of these ways of communication you don't have to do anything to receive answers and questions in a mailing list, whereas you have to actively log on www.jboss.org and repeatedly refresh the web page and search for new questions and answer. Forums are great when you need to search through their archives, but if you just want an answer to a simple question you can just check your mail every now and then and see if something has turned up in the mailinglist. Both of these ways of communications are needed. Don't close this list. Kristoffer Larsson ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
Re: NNTP gateway? Re: [JBoss-user] jboss-user shutdown
I think that NNTP access to the forums would make everyone happy. Those who like the web interface can surf to the forums; those who prefer the mailing list can use their mail tool of choice to read NNTP. Everyone wins! David -- Maurice le Rutte wrote: Is there a way to use NNTP to read the forums? Web-based forum browsing is very troublesome. Maurice. - Original Message - From: Bill Burke [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jboss-User@Lists. Sourceforge. Net [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 04 December, 2001 5:18 AM Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] jboss-user shutdown Oh well, guess I'm never answering another user question againWhy shut off the user lists? Do you pay for it? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc fleury Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 7:24 PM To: marc fleury; Jboss-User@Lists. Sourceforge. Net Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] jboss-user shutdown jboss-user is shutting down, go to the forums for your free help it is more structured and less invasive, ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
AW: [JBoss-user] jboss-user shutdown
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 hi all, i'm also a big fan of this mailing list although i'm mostly lurking in the background. the pro and contra has been discussed a while ago but Marc obviously does not want to leave the list intact. i think it should not be a big problem for us to move the list to a different location under some bogus project-name, that way the list will obviously lose the 'official' status and perhaps will also lose some members and will not gain too many new members as i think we would not get linked on the jboss homepage and so on... but we would have our mailing list. i hope this is not too offensive to some of the guys but it would definitely end this discussion. (or now starts an even bigger one). just a thought, jan - -- Jan Heise / Tel: +49-163-4803237 / E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - -Ursprungliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Im Auftrag von Kristoffer Larsson Gesendet: Dienstag, 4. Dezember 2001 14:22 An: Pavel P. Tcholakov Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: [JBoss-user] jboss-user shutdown On 4 Dec 2001, Pavel P. Tcholakov wrote: We - the users of JBoss - do need that kind of communication. I completely agree. Mailing lists are a much less intrusive form of Please re-consider this decision. I am right behind Pavel here. Mailing lists use the push tenhnique, while forums use the pull technique, i.e., as a user of these ways of communication you don't have to do anything to receive answers and questions in a mailing list, whereas you have to actively log on www.jboss.org and repeatedly refresh the web page and search for new questions and answer. Forums are great when you need to search through their archives, but if you just want an answer to a simple question you can just check your mail every now and then and see if something has turned up in the mailinglist. Both of these ways of communications are needed. Don't close this list. Kristoffer Larsson ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 7.0.4 iQA/AwUBPAzWO5/YNqVvLvLkEQKDfwCg3+0HSgW97dWIvwNEpzlA51lm5ncAnjIn ZrMGcIeK/P66ww0wMe2LAnYS =MqNB -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
RE: [JBoss-user] jboss-user shutdown
I agree too... this looks like the eternal war between news/mailinglist outlook calendar/quickplace agenda/HR planning/Project ... moreover my opinion is that push/pull is not a problem around what we talk about, but why we are here... push is the ONLY way to make happy peoples help poor guys, anticipate problems, and be informed. pull is the BEST way for poor guys to tell their misery, find previous solution, and track answers... as you see, if one channel must be killed, this is the forum (priority of ONLY against BETTER). why not gateway these two system (not easy I agree) one way would be : -put a threadID in the subject (+content?+headers?), associating a message with the original forum. -invite/force people to send NEW problems/thread only on the forum (no new thread authorized from mail... valid threadID mandatory...) - any answer made from mail or forum send to the right forum thread and to the whole mailing list... - give URL to a message thread in the forum, in the mail message. a nice/hard project... -Message d'origine- De: Edson Carlos Ericksson Richter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Date: mardi 4 décembre 2001 15:11 À: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet: Re: [JBoss-user] jboss-user shutdown I really love jboss-user list... That solved several problems in my config/installations. I can talk with more people that are going trhought same problems that I have. If the mailing list stops, the information will not be delivered in my hands. I will have that to search they, what I will not be able to make due to time. ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
RE: [JBoss-user] jboss-user shutdown
sorry forgot replyall |-Original Message- |From: marc fleury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] |Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 8:41 AM |To: Jozsa Kristof |Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] jboss-user shutdown | | ||Mailing lists are a proven stable and useful way for user-user or either ||user-developer talk. They're used everywhere as the best solution |for these ||tasks. Forums _will_not_ever_ provide the same functionality and |usefulness ||what mailing-lists do. Beside, noone can see a reason why shouldn't ||jboss-user stay alive; if you shut down the list, I even suggest |starting a ||new one either on a free mailing-list server, or any big server of ||ours around. || ||We - the users of JBoss - do need that kind of communication. | |it is a duplicate with the forums, and the forums provide a good |breakdown of the topics (going to make them better soon). mail |didn't work for many developers (just too much stuff) while the |online stuff has 'security' and scott reads that a lot etc etc. |right now i want to promote one place for answer online. | |see the point is to scale, this list was under heavy criticism 9 |month ago for the sheer volume, the developers were fed up and |many users complaining of 'posted this no-one answered', what you |see now is the goody of being 5-6 to post everyday (as opposed to |300 like we did one day) and you get an answer. | |here is what we can do, the list remains but is closed, |essentially subscriptions are gone, it means those of you that are |here can use this list if you wish but the rest are moving online, | |take care, we can't please everybody | |marcf | || ||Christopher || || ||On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 07:24:27PM -0500, marc fleury wrote: || jboss-user is shutting down, go to the forums for your free help ||it is more || structured and less invasive, || || go! even jboss-dev is going to end up there in the short run || || marcf || || |-Original Message- || |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] || |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc fleury || |Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 6:41 PM || |To: Jboss-User@Lists. Sourceforge. Net || |Subject: [JBoss-user] jboss-user shutdown || | || | || |it's been in the works for 3 month, jboss-user is going away, || | || |goodbye and remember i love you || | || |marcf || | || | || |Marc Fleury || |President || |JBoss Group, LLC || | || | || | || |___ || |JBoss-user mailing list || |[EMAIL PROTECTED] || |https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user || || || ___ || JBoss-user mailing list || [EMAIL PROTECTED] || https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user || ||-- ||.Digital.Yearning.for.Networked.Assassination.and.Xenocide ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
Re: [JBoss-user] jboss-user shutdown
Of course, the principal point of this list is that it is looked from time-to-time (if not every time) by official people (like Marc), and then they can get some felling about users have difficulty or will put in a wish list... Putting this list in a non-oficial or non monitored list will put it in the same way that has put the Interbase mailing list at Mers (when the official developers don't intervine more, the people lose the interest in the list, since some problems are really complicated to be answered by other users, and then they came generally repeating same questions, because no one has answered for the first time). And having the list a bogus project-name in anywhere will make the list to not gain new readers... Just loose existing... I really ask for Marc to not shutdown this list, nor move them to a forum approach. It's a really useful work tool for me, and I think that is useful to many, many other people too. Thanks, Edson Carlos Ericksson Richter - Original Message - From: Jan Heise [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Kristoffer Larsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 10:57 AM Subject: AW: [JBoss-user] jboss-user shutdown -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 hi all, i'm also a big fan of this mailing list although i'm mostly lurking in the background. the pro and contra has been discussed a while ago but Marc obviously does not want to leave the list intact. i think it should not be a big problem for us to move the list to a different location under some bogus project-name, that way the list will obviously lose the 'official' status and perhaps will also lose some members and will not gain too many new members as i think we would not get linked on the jboss homepage and so on... but we would have our mailing list. i hope this is not too offensive to some of the guys but it would definitely end this discussion. (or now starts an even bigger one). just a thought, jan - -- Jan Heise / Tel: +49-163-4803237 / E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - -Ursprungliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Im Auftrag von Kristoffer Larsson Gesendet: Dienstag, 4. Dezember 2001 14:22 An: Pavel P. Tcholakov Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: [JBoss-user] jboss-user shutdown On 4 Dec 2001, Pavel P. Tcholakov wrote: We - the users of JBoss - do need that kind of communication. I completely agree. Mailing lists are a much less intrusive form of Please re-consider this decision. I am right behind Pavel here. Mailing lists use the push tenhnique, while forums use the pull technique, i.e., as a user of these ways of communication you don't have to do anything to receive answers and questions in a mailing list, whereas you have to actively log on www.jboss.org and repeatedly refresh the web page and search for new questions and answer. Forums are great when you need to search through their archives, but if you just want an answer to a simple question you can just check your mail every now and then and see if something has turned up in the mailinglist. Both of these ways of communications are needed. Don't close this list. Kristoffer Larsson ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 7.0.4 iQA/AwUBPAzWO5/YNqVvLvLkEQKDfwCg3+0HSgW97dWIvwNEpzlA51lm5ncAnjIn ZrMGcIeK/P66ww0wMe2LAnYS =MqNB -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
FW: PRIVATE: Re: [JBoss-user] jboss-user shutdown
it seems i forgot to put the list marcf |-Original Message- |From: Jozsa Kristof [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] |Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 9:17 AM |To: marc fleury |Subject: PRIVATE: Re: [JBoss-user] jboss-user shutdown | | |On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 08:40:54AM -0500, marc fleury wrote: | |Mailing lists are a proven stable and useful way for user-user or either | |user-developer talk. They're used everywhere as the best |solution for these | |tasks. Forums _will_not_ever_ provide the same functionality |and usefulness | |what mailing-lists do. Beside, noone can see a reason why shouldn't | |jboss-user stay alive; if you shut down the list, I even |suggest starting a | |new one either on a free mailing-list server, or any big server of | |ours around. | | | |We - the users of JBoss - do need that kind of communication. | | it is a duplicate with the forums, | |true | | and the forums provide a good breakdown of the topics | |..but miss the push-functionality of the mailing-lists | | (going to make them better soon). mail didn't work for many developers | (just too much stuff) while the online stuff has 'security' and scott | reads that a lot etc etc. right now i want to promote one place for | answer online. | |considered the NNTP-based web interface? might be a one size fits all |solution. | | for the sheer volume, the developers were fed up and many users |complaining | of 'posted this no-one answered', what you see now is the goody |of being 5-6 | to post everyday (as opposed to 300 like we did one day) and you get an | answer. | |yeah right.. just like an irc channel with over 150 people, etc. | | | here is what we can do, the list remains but is closed, essentially | subscriptions are gone, it means those of you that are here can use this | list if you wish but the rest are moving online, | | take care, we can't please everybody | |okay, thanks for your wise decision. Please post your mail to the |jboss-user |list as well (i think i just got it myself), this will both make them happy |and quiet about that topic, which just starts to get real hot and flamey. | |Christopher |-- |.Digital.Yearning.for.Networked.Assassination.and.Xenocide ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
Re: NNTP gateway? Re: [JBoss-user] jboss-user shutdown
But doesn't such a thing exist? I have access to it through nntp.jboss.org I havent posted, but reading works fine. cheers Jesper David Ward wrote: I think that NNTP access to the forums would make everyone happy. Those who like the web interface can surf to the forums; those who prefer the mailing list can use their mail tool of choice to read NNTP. Everyone wins! David -- Maurice le Rutte wrote: Is there a way to use NNTP to read the forums? Web-based forum browsing is very troublesome. Maurice. - Original Message - From: Bill Burke [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jboss-User@Lists. Sourceforge. Net [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 04 December, 2001 5:18 AM Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] jboss-user shutdown Oh well, guess I'm never answering another user question againWhy shut off the user lists? Do you pay for it? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc fleury Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 7:24 PM To: marc fleury; Jboss-User@Lists. Sourceforge. Net Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] jboss-user shutdown jboss-user is shutting down, go to the forums for your free help it is more structured and less invasive, ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
RE: NNTP gateway? Re: [JBoss-user] jboss-user shutdown
great!!! promote this and most people will be happy.. -r -Original Message- From: Jesper Rasmussen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 4. desember 2001 14:38 To: David Ward Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: NNTP gateway? Re: [JBoss-user] jboss-user shutdown But doesn't such a thing exist? I have access to it through nntp.jboss.org I havent posted, but reading works fine. cheers Jesper David Ward wrote: I think that NNTP access to the forums would make everyone happy. Those who like the web interface can surf to the forums; those who prefer the mailing list can use their mail tool of choice to read NNTP. Everyone wins! David -- Maurice le Rutte wrote: Is there a way to use NNTP to read the forums? Web-based forum browsing is very troublesome. Maurice. - Original Message - From: Bill Burke [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jboss-User@Lists. Sourceforge. Net [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 04 December, 2001 5:18 AM Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] jboss-user shutdown Oh well, guess I'm never answering another user question againWhy shut off the user lists? Do you pay for it? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc fleury Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 7:24 PM To: marc fleury; Jboss-User@Lists. Sourceforge. Net Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] jboss-user shutdown jboss-user is shutting down, go to the forums for your free help it is more structured and less invasive, ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
AW: [JBoss-user] jboss-user shutdown
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 hi Edson, you are right in your conclusion, but i said before: this discussion on leaving the mailing list untouched is quite old. A lot of email has been sent in favour to leave the mailing list as it is. Marc always responded that he can not make all of us happy and that he stands like a rock on shutting the list down and moving us over to forums; for those of us who don't want to move, a strong unoffical list would perhaps be a better solution than moving to the forums. This list is unlikely to be ignored by the jboss group guys, so instead of bugging Marc with something he has not been likely to do for the last 4-5 months it is perhaps better to put up a different solution. this is only a suggestion and could be better than nothing. jan - -- Jan Heise / Tel: +49-163-4803237 / E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Im Auftrag von Edson Carlos Ericksson Richter Gesendet: Dienstag, 4. Dezember 2001 16:32 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: [JBoss-user] jboss-user shutdown Of course, the principal point of this list is that it is looked from time-to-time (if not every time) by official people (like Marc), and then they can get some felling about users have difficulty or will put in a wish list... Putting this list in a non-oficial or non monitored list will put it in the same way that has put the Interbase mailing list at Mers (when the official developers don't intervine more, the people lose the interest in the list, since some problems are really complicated to be answered by other users, and then they came generally repeating same questions, because no one has answered for the first time). And having the list a bogus project-name in anywhere will make the list to not gain new readers... Just loose existing... I really ask for Marc to not shutdown this list, nor move them to a forum approach. It's a really useful work tool for me, and I think that is useful to many, many other people too. Thanks, Edson Carlos Ericksson Richter - - Original Message - From: Jan Heise [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Kristoffer Larsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 10:57 AM Subject: AW: [JBoss-user] jboss-user shutdown -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 hi all, i'm also a big fan of this mailing list although i'm mostly lurking in the background. the pro and contra has been discussed a while ago but Marc obviously does not want to leave the list intact. i think it should not be a big problem for us to move the list to a different location under some bogus project-name, that way the list will obviously lose the 'official' status and perhaps will also lose some members and will not gain too many new members as i think we would not get linked on the jboss homepage and so on... but we would have our mailing list. i hope this is not too offensive to some of the guys but it would definitely end this discussion. (or now starts an even bigger one). just a thought, jan - -- Jan Heise / Tel: +49-163-4803237 / E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - -Ursprungliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Im Auftrag von Kristoffer Larsson Gesendet: Dienstag, 4. Dezember 2001 14:22 An: Pavel P. Tcholakov Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: [JBoss-user] jboss-user shutdown On 4 Dec 2001, Pavel P. Tcholakov wrote: We - the users of JBoss - do need that kind of communication. I completely agree. Mailing lists are a much less intrusive form of Please re-consider this decision. I am right behind Pavel here. Mailing lists use the push tenhnique, while forums use the pull technique, i.e., as a user of these ways of communication you don't have to do anything to receive answers and questions in a mailing list, whereas you have to actively log on www.jboss.org and repeatedly refresh the web page and search for new questions and answer. Forums are great when you need to search through their archives, but if you just want an answer to a simple question you can just check your mail every now and then and see if something has turned up in the mailinglist. Both of these ways of communications are needed. Don't close this list. Kristoffer Larsson ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 7.0.4 iQA/AwUBPAzWO5/YNqVvLvLkEQKDfwCg3+0HSgW97dWIvwNEpzlA51lm5ncAnjIn ZrMGcIeK/P66ww0wMe2LAnYS =MqNB -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user -BEGIN PGP
Re: [JBoss-user] jboss-user shutdown
On 2001.12.04 08:21:47 -0500 Kristoffer Larsson wrote: On 4 Dec 2001, Pavel P. Tcholakov wrote: We - the users of JBoss - do need that kind of communication. I completely agree. Mailing lists are a much less intrusive form of Please re-consider this decision. I am right behind Pavel here. Mailing lists use the push tenhnique, while forums use the pull technique, i.e., as a user of these ways of communication you don't have to do anything to receive answers and questions in a mailing list, whereas you have to actively log on www.jboss.org and repeatedly refresh the web page and search for new questions and answer. Forums are great when you need to search through their archives, but if you just want an answer to a simple question you can just check your mail every now and then and see if something has turned up in the mailinglist. Both of these ways of communications are needed. Don't close this list. Kristoffer Larsson Unfortunately, I think both email and the forums are kind of awful. Possibly a wiki would be better, I don't know. I did get tired of the hundreds of emails every day on jboss-user. If the forum could-- notify you when something new in a forum (not a thread) showed up had a better next unread function had a better way of editing answers so a body of correct answers with appropriate detail could develop. I'd be happier with it. Wikis are supposed to be good at the last, but I don't know if they can do any kind of notification or selection for new content. I found a very simple jsp based wiki that just uses files, it works fine with jetty/jboss. It has ___NO___ decoration a la jboss website. Anyone think we should try it? Hmmm. heres another idea for a useful jboss demo... a jsp/ejb/db wiki with notifications and new content navigation. david jencks ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
Re: [JBoss-user] jboss-user shutdown
David Jencks wrote: Unfortunately, I think both email and the forums are kind of awful. Possibly a wiki would be better, I don't know. I did get tired of the hundreds of emails every day on jboss-user. If the forum could-- notify you when something new in a forum (not a thread) showed up had a better next unread function had a better way of editing answers so a body of correct answers with appropriate detail could develop. Hopefully the new policy that only a few people can post on the FAQ forum will help that. -danch ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
Re: [JBoss-user] jboss-user shutdown
on 1-12-04 19.23, David Jencks at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmmm. heres another idea for a useful jboss demo... a jsp/ejb/db wiki with notifications and new content navigation. Yes *** and lets try have a plugable sift index for quick/smart search ! ... ? intergrated together with Jive ! ... ? ... /peter_f ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
RE: [JBoss-user] jboss-user shutdown
|Hopefully the new policy that only a few people can post on the FAQ |forum will help that. I did set it up that way but saw a random post in there from a user, can I ask one of you guys to try and post directly and see if it does post to faq or not? I don't know that the security configuration was picked up correctly BTW, let me know if you want to be added to the moderator faq group, I will add you guys marcf | | |-danch | | |___ |JBoss-user mailing list |[EMAIL PROTECTED] |https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
RE: [JBoss-user] jboss-user shutdown
On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, marc fleury wrote: |Hopefully the new policy that only a few people can post on the FAQ |forum will help that. I did set it up that way but saw a random post in there from a user, can I ask one of you guys to try and post directly and see if it does post to faq or not? I don't know that the security configuration was picked up correctly I just tried and got a You are not authorized to perform the action you attempted message. thats what you want right? cheers dim ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
RE: [JBoss-user] jboss-user shutdown
This was imported from the news group. If this is meant to be user read-only then we should change its group from jboss.user.faq to jboss.faq, since we currently only allow users to post to stuff under jboss.user.* --jason On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, marc fleury wrote: |Hopefully the new policy that only a few people can post on the FAQ |forum will help that. I did set it up that way but saw a random post in there from a user, can I ask one of you guys to try and post directly and see if it does post to faq or not? I don't know that the security configuration was picked up correctly BTW, let me know if you want to be added to the moderator faq group, I will add you guys marcf | | |-danch | | |___ |JBoss-user mailing list |[EMAIL PROTECTED] |https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] jboss-user shutdown
it's been in the works for 3 month, jboss-user is going away, goodbye and remember i love you marcf Marc Fleury President JBoss Group, LLC ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
RE: [JBoss-user] jboss-user shutdown
jboss-user is shutting down, go to the forums for your free help it is more structured and less invasive, go! even jboss-dev is going to end up there in the short run marcf |-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc fleury |Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 6:41 PM |To: Jboss-User@Lists. Sourceforge. Net |Subject: [JBoss-user] jboss-user shutdown | | |it's been in the works for 3 month, jboss-user is going away, | |goodbye and remember i love you | |marcf | | |Marc Fleury |President |JBoss Group, LLC | | | |___ |JBoss-user mailing list |[EMAIL PROTECTED] |https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
RE: [JBoss-user] jboss-user shutdown
Oh well, guess I'm never answering another user question againWhy shut off the user lists? Do you pay for it? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc fleury Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 7:24 PM To: marc fleury; Jboss-User@Lists. Sourceforge. Net Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] jboss-user shutdown jboss-user is shutting down, go to the forums for your free help it is more structured and less invasive, go! even jboss-dev is going to end up there in the short run marcf |-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc fleury |Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 6:41 PM |To: Jboss-User@Lists. Sourceforge. Net |Subject: [JBoss-user] jboss-user shutdown | | |it's been in the works for 3 month, jboss-user is going away, | |goodbye and remember i love you | |marcf | | |Marc Fleury |President |JBoss Group, LLC | | | |___ |JBoss-user mailing list |[EMAIL PROTECTED] |https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] jboss-user@lists.sourceforge.net
___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] [JBoss-user]What is the better solution for j2ee server
From docs for jboss, it seems I should run tomcat inside the same VM as jBoss for better performance. From docs for tomcan, it is better to connect Tomcat to the popular open source web server, Apache. So, does anyone integrate all the three (apache+tomcat+jboss) in one process as a more complete J2EE server? And how to do? THANKS! ,ºÇ«¨¥x%ËI,ºÇ«+-²Ê.Ç¢¸ ëa¶ÚþX¬¶Ë(º· ~àzwþX¬¶ÏåËbú?º,²ë
Re: [JBoss-user] [JBoss-user]What is the better solution for j2ee server
You don't. Apache is natively compiled and therefore runs directly under a shell command prompt. Tomcat and JBoss are Java programs and therefore run under a JVM. - Original Message - From: Fei Wang [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2001 3:59 AM Subject: [JBoss-user] [JBoss-user]What is the better solution for j2ee server From docs for jboss, it seems I should run tomcat inside the same VM as jBoss for better performance. From docs for tomcan, it is better to connect Tomcat to the popular open source web server, Apache. So, does anyone integrate all the three (apache+tomcat+jboss) in one process as a more complete J2EE server? And how to do? ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] : [JBoss-user] hello everybody!
It doesn't work, I have put the cocoon.jar at JBOSS_HOME/lib/ext , the same error like this: java.lang.RuntimeException: Error loading logicsheet at resource://org/apache/cocoon/processor/xsp/library/java/util.xsl due to java.lang.Exception: Resource not found or retrieving error. at org.apache.cocoon.processor.xsp.XSPProcessor.init(XSPProcessor.java:299) at org.apache.cocoon.framework.Manager.create(Manager.java:109) at org.apache.cocoon.framework.Router.init(Router.java:80) at org.apache.cocoon.framework.Manager.create(Manager.java:109) at org.apache.cocoon.Engine.init(Engine.java:179) at org.apache.cocoon.Engine.getInstance(Engine.java:232) at org.apache.cocoon.Cocoon.init(Cocoon.java:157) at org.apache.tomcat.core.ServletWrapper.doInit(ServletWrapper.java:317) at org.apache.tomcat.core.Handler.init(Handler.java:215) at org.apache.tomcat.core.ServletWrapper.init(ServletWrapper.java:296) at org.apache.tomcat.core.Handler.service(Handler.java:254) at org.apache.tomcat.core.ServletWrapper.service(ServletWrapper.java:372) at org.apache.tomcat.core.ContextManager.internalService(ContextManager.java:797) at org.apache.tomcat.core.ContextManager.service(ContextManager.java:743) at org.apache.tomcat.service.http.HttpConnectionHandler.processConnection(HttpConnectionHandler.java:213) at org.apache.tomcat.service.TcpWorkerThread.runIt(PoolTcpEndpoint.java:416) at org.apache.tomcat.util.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(ThreadPool.java:501) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:484) I use jboss 2.2.2 tomcat 3.2.1 cocoon 1.8.1 - if its just not finding the jar put it in the JBOSS_HOME/lib/ext directory and JBoss should pick it up from there. Vinay - Original Message - From: Tony Shao - ThatWeb [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 8:58 AM Subject: [JBoss-user] hello everybody! A question: I have configured cocoon + tomcat ok and jboss + tomcat is ok but jboss + cocoon is wrong , the error is : not found the util.xsl , I think don't find the cocoon.jar what can I do ? $ ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user ,ºÇ«¨¥x%ËI,ºÇ«+-²Ê.Ç¢¸ ëa¶ÚþX¬¶Ë(º· ~àzwþX¬¶ÏåËbú?º,²ë
[JBoss-user] JBoss-user] unsubscribe.
JBoss-user] unsubscribe. __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices http://auctions.yahoo.com/ ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] [JBoss-user]expected one name tag ; Someone familar with this error?
Hi, I am trying to deploy a jar file which contains a few EJBs, however I am getting th efollowing error message: [Container factory] Deploying TariffSession [Container factory] org.jboss.ejb.DeploymentException: Error in jaws.xml for Ent ity Discount: expected one name tag Well this is my jaws.xml for the discount bean: datasourcejava:/DefaultDS/datasource type-mappingOracle8/type-mapping enterprise-beans entity ejb-nameDiscount/ejb-name table-nameDiscount/table-name cmp-field field-namediscountID/field-name column-namediscount_id/column-name /cmp-field finder method-signaturefindAll()/method-signature where-clause/where-clause load-stateTrue/load-state /finder /entity Well I don't have a clue how to resolve this, maybe someone can help me, please. Roman ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
RE: [JBoss-user] [JBoss-user]expected one name tag ; Someone familar with this er ror?
Hi, you do not need to define findAll method in jaws.xml, it is magic. Anyway, your definition of finder method is not correct at all. Review the doc Vincent. -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Roman Brückner Envoyé : jeudi 3 mai 2001 17:29 À : '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Objet : [JBoss-user] [JBoss-user]expected one name tag ; Someone familar with this er ror? Hi, I am trying to deploy a jar file which contains a few EJBs, however I am getting th efollowing error message: [Container factory] Deploying TariffSession [Container factory] org.jboss.ejb.DeploymentException: Error in jaws.xml for Ent ity Discount: expected one name tag Well this is my jaws.xml for the discount bean: datasourcejava:/DefaultDS/datasource type-mappingOracle8/type-mapping enterprise-beans entity ejb-nameDiscount/ejb-name table-nameDiscount/table-name cmp-field field-namediscountID/field-name column-namediscount_id/column-name /cmp-field finder method-signaturefindAll()/method-signature where-clause/where-clause load-stateTrue/load-state /finder /entity Well I don't have a clue how to resolve this, maybe someone can help me, please. Roman ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
Re: [JBoss-user] [JBoss-user]expected one name tag ; Someone familar with this er ror?
Is it possible that this has something do to with the finder, that there is a name tag required? -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Roman Brückner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 3. Mai 2001 17:29 An: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Betreff: [JBoss-user] [JBoss-user]expected one name tag ; Someone familar with this er ror? Hi, I am trying to deploy a jar file which contains a few EJBs, however I am getting th efollowing error message: [Container factory] Deploying TariffSession [Container factory] org.jboss.ejb.DeploymentException: Error in jaws.xml for Ent ity Discount: expected one name tag Well this is my jaws.xml for the discount bean: datasourcejava:/DefaultDS/datasource type-mappingOracle8/type-mapping enterprise-beans entity ejb-nameDiscount/ejb-name table-nameDiscount/table-name cmp-field field-namediscountID/field-name column-namediscount_id/column-name /cmp-field finder method-signaturefindAll()/method-signature where-clause/where-clause load-stateTrue/load-state /finder /entity Well I don't have a clue how to resolve this, maybe someone can help me, please. Roman ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
RE: [JBoss-user] [JBoss-user]expected one name tag ; Someone familar with this er ror?
That is what I mean yes. Take a look at http://www.jboss.org/documentation/HTML/ch05s07.html Regards. Vincent. -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Roman Brückner Envoyé : jeudi 3 mai 2001 18:37 À : '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Objet : Re: [JBoss-user] [JBoss-user]expected one name tag ; Someone familar with this er ror? Is it possible that this has something do to with the finder, that there is a name tag required? -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Roman Brückner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 3. Mai 2001 17:29 An: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Betreff: [JBoss-user] [JBoss-user]expected one name tag ; Someone familar with this er ror? Hi, I am trying to deploy a jar file which contains a few EJBs, however I am getting th efollowing error message: [Container factory] Deploying TariffSession [Container factory] org.jboss.ejb.DeploymentException: Error in jaws.xml for Ent ity Discount: expected one name tag Well this is my jaws.xml for the discount bean: datasourcejava:/DefaultDS/datasource type-mappingOracle8/type-mapping enterprise-beans entity ejb-nameDiscount/ejb-name table-nameDiscount/table-name cmp-field field-namediscountID/field-name column-namediscount_id/column-name /cmp-field finder method-signaturefindAll()/method-signature where-clause/where-clause load-stateTrue/load-state /finder /entity Well I don't have a clue how to resolve this, maybe someone can help me, please. Roman ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] JBoss-user -- confirmation of subscription -- request 879263
__ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices http://auctions.yahoo.com/ ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
RE: [JBoss-user] [JBoss-user]
yes. regards, /reynir -Original Message- From: wei shung chung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23. mars 2001 07:57 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [JBoss-user] [JBoss-user] Hi, Can we use entity beans with SQL server or mySQL ? Thanks. Wei(new to EJB/JBoss) __ Do You Yahoo!? Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
Re: [JBoss-user] [JBoss-user]
SQL server will work. Instructions on configuration have been posted to the list recently. On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, wei shung chung wrote: Hi, Can we use entity beans with SQL server or mySQL ? Thanks. Wei(new to EJB/JBoss) __ Do You Yahoo!? Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user -- Dan Christopherson (danch) nVisia Technical Architect (www.nvisia.com) Opinions expressed are mine and do not neccessarily reflect any position or opinion of nVISIA. --- If you're a capitalist and you have the best goods and they're free, you don't have to proselytize, you just have to wait. -Eben Moglen ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] JBoss user archive search doesn't work
Hi, Can anyone provide a link to search the jboss-user archive? I got an error msg everytime I tried to search via http://www.geocrawler.com/lists/3/SourceForge I got Out of Environment Space error when I run Jboss. I know some one ask the same question before. However, I can't search the archive so I'm sorry to ask again here. Thanks Pifen Ellwood ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
Re: [JBoss-user] JBoss user archive search doesn't work
Pifen Ellwood wrote: Hi, Can anyone provide a link to search the jboss-user archive? I got an error msg everytime I tried to search via http://www.geocrawler.com/lists/3/SourceForge I got Out of Environment Space error when I run Jboss. I know some one ask the same question before. However, I can't search the archive so I'm sorry to ask again here. Thanks Pifen Ellwood Pifen, The new sourceforge archive doesn seem to have anything yet, but the old archives can be reached at and searched from http://www.mail-archive.com/jboss-user@list.working-dogs.com/ Chris ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
RE: [JBoss-user] JBoss user archive search doesn't work
are you running Win95 or Win98? you have to set the environment space for your dos prompt /e:4096 or something like that? Filip ~ Namaste - I bow to the divine in you ~ Filip Hanik Software Architect [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.filip.net -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pifen Ellwood Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 8:37 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [JBoss-user] JBoss user archive search doesn't work Hi, Can anyone provide a link to search the jboss-user archive? I got an error msg everytime I tried to search via http://www.geocrawler.com/lists/3/SourceForge I got Out of Environment Space error when I run Jboss. I know some one ask the same question before. However, I can't search the archive so I'm sorry to ask again here. Thanks Pifen Ellwood ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] [JBoss-user]
Hi, Can we use entity beans with SQL server or mySQL ? Thanks. Wei(new to EJB/JBoss) __ Do You Yahoo!? Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
