date:20061205

Hi,

What is the current development branch?  I saw a note saying that the
main head was out of date.  I've checked out branches/rel-2-2 but want
to make sure it's the right one before poking at it too much.

Thanks.

/Paul

Re: Test failed!


Looks like the logging jar(s) are missing or corrupted.

Try using a different sampler and see if you get a similar error.

On 05/12/06, vaishjan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Hi,

 I am using SOAP/XML-RPC Request.

 I have started the jmeter as jmeter -L jorphan=DEBUG


 The request has url as
http://localhost:8080/servlets-examples/servlet/EchoServlet

 When i Run, i do see the box gets iluminated to green  then to grey.

 I cudn't see any Result (View Result, Graph Result- where i have added)

 Log file gives the error message as:
Test failed! java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError

Submitting the log file for reference

Plz do let me know what needs to be done

Xpecting an early reply



Thnx  Rgds,
Vaish http://www.nabble.com/file/4469/jmeter.log jmeter.log
--
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Test-failed%21-tf2761793.html#a7699824
Sent from the JMeter - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Current JMeter development branch


On 05/12/06, Paul Kuykendall (PL/EUS) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hi,

What is the current development branch?  I saw a note saying that the
main head was out of date.  I've checked out branches/rel-2-2 but want
to make sure it's the right one before poking at it too much.


Yes, that's the correct one.

Perhaps we should a merge at some point, but it's a _lot_ of work.
[Or maybe we could do some judicious renames instead...]


Thanks.

/Paul




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Current JMeter development branch

Thanks.

I'm trying to extend the XML Schema assertion to make it able to use
multiple XSD files during the validation.  Of course, if it's possible
to do such now, please let me know so I don't waste my time. :-)
Thanks!

/Paul 

-Original Message-
From: sebb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 9:44 AM
To: JMeter Users List
Subject: Re: Current JMeter development branch

On 05/12/06, Paul Kuykendall (PL/EUS) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
 Hi,

 What is the current development branch?  I saw a note saying that the 
 main head was out of date.  I've checked out branches/rel-2-2 but want

 to make sure it's the right one before poking at it too much.

Yes, that's the correct one.

Perhaps we should a merge at some point, but it's a _lot_ of work.
[Or maybe we could do some judicious renames instead...]

 Thanks.

 /Paul



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Current JMeter development branch


I don't think it's possible to provide multiple files to the assertion.

However, you can have multiple assertions applied to the same sample result.

I don't know anything about the underlying XML API, but unless it's
possible to provide multiple files to a single validation invocation,
then using multiple assertions won't be much slower.

Also, I think assertions stop being processed as soon as one fails.

S.
On 05/12/06, Paul Kuykendall (PL/EUS) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Thanks.

I'm trying to extend the XML Schema assertion to make it able to use
multiple XSD files during the validation.  Of course, if it's possible
to do such now, please let me know so I don't waste my time. :-)
Thanks!

/Paul

-Original Message-
From: sebb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 9:44 AM
To: JMeter Users List
Subject: Re: Current JMeter development branch

On 05/12/06, Paul Kuykendall (PL/EUS) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
 Hi,

 What is the current development branch?  I saw a note saying that the
 main head was out of date.  I've checked out branches/rel-2-2 but want

 to make sure it's the right one before poking at it too much.

Yes, that's the correct one.

Perhaps we should a merge at some point, but it's a _lot_ of work.
[Or maybe we could do some judicious renames instead...]

 Thanks.

 /Paul



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Current JMeter development branch

It is possible to lump multiple XSDs into one validator.  I'll have to
modify my existing code to not use the Java 5 specific methods, but I
know it is possible.

Unfortunately the cleanest way of doing it does require the
javax.xml.validation API.  See
http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-javaxmlvalidapi.html
for a detailed example.  To use multiple XSDs you declare a different
Source for each XSD then create an array of all Source classes that is
passed into the factory.newSchema() method.

What is the roadmap for moving to Java 5 as the required JVM?  Or is it
on the roadmap at all?

/Paul

-Original Message-
From: sebb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 9:56 AM
To: JMeter Users List
Subject: Re: Current JMeter development branch

I don't think it's possible to provide multiple files to the assertion.

However, you can have multiple assertions applied to the same sample
result.

I don't know anything about the underlying XML API, but unless it's
possible to provide multiple files to a single validation invocation,
then using multiple assertions won't be much slower.

Also, I think assertions stop being processed as soon as one fails.

S.
On 05/12/06, Paul Kuykendall (PL/EUS) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
 Thanks.

 I'm trying to extend the XML Schema assertion to make it able to use 
 multiple XSD files during the validation.  Of course, if it's possible

 to do such now, please let me know so I don't waste my time. :-) 
 Thanks!

 /Paul

 -Original Message-
 From: sebb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 9:44 AM
 To: JMeter Users List
 Subject: Re: Current JMeter development branch

 On 05/12/06, Paul Kuykendall (PL/EUS) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
  Hi,
 
  What is the current development branch?  I saw a note saying that 
  the main head was out of date.  I've checked out branches/rel-2-2 
  but want

  to make sure it's the right one before poking at it too much.

 Yes, that's the correct one.

 Perhaps we should a merge at some point, but it's a _lot_ of work.
 [Or maybe we could do some judicious renames instead...]

  Thanks.
 
  /Paul
 
 

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Exceptions during the DB Performance Test


Hi: 
I get the following Error while running the Database Performance test
scripts. And the error % is really high because of this issue. Please do
explain why this is happening and how it can be fixed. I don't get this
error when I run the test with 1 thread, but as I keep increasing the number
of threads my errors occur earlier in the test. Please explain as early as
possible why this is happening:

And in my Jmeter View Results Tree I get the message 
org.apache.avalon.excalibur.datasource.NoAvailableConnectionException:
Could not create enough Components to service your request (Timed out).
under the sample Result. 

In the Jmeter.log file I get the following exception: 

JDBC Users 1-409 started 
2006/11/27 13:14:44 INFO  - jmeter.threads.JMeterThread: Thread JDBC Users
1-410 started 
2006/11/27 13:14:44 WARN  - jmeter.protocol.jdbc.config.DataSourceElement:
Could not return Connection java.lang.Exception: Could not create enough
Components to service your request (Timed out). 
at
org.apache.avalon.excalibur.pool.ResourceLimitingPool.get(ResourceLimitingPool.java:350)
 
at
org.apache.avalon.excalibur.pool.ValidatedResourceLimitingPool.get(ValidatedResourceLimitingPool.java:130)
 
at
org.apache.avalon.excalibur.datasource.ResourceLimitingJdbcDataSource.getConnection(ResourceLimitingJdbcDataSource.java:222)
 
at
org.apache.jmeter.protocol.jdbc.sampler.JDBCSampler.sample(JDBCSampler.java:90) 
at org.apache.jmeter.threads.JMeterThread.run(JMeterThread.java:247) 
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595) 

2006/11/27 13:14:44 ERROR - jmeter.protocol.jdbc.sampler.JDBCSampler: Error
in JDBC sampling
org.apache.avalon.excalibur.datasource.NoAvailableConnectionException: Could
not create enough Components to service your request (Timed out). 


Thanks
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Exceptions-during-the-DB-Performance-Test-tf2762930.html#a7703468
Sent from the JMeter - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Remote Testing


Hi:
I am doing the Database Performance Test and I would like to do Remote
Testing. I was reading the Jmeter Manual for Remote testing and I was not
able to understand the following statement:

The recommended approach is to have one or more machines on the same
Ethernet segment as your application server that you configure to run the
JMeter Engine. This will minimize the impact of the network on the test
results without impacting the performance of the application serer itself. 

Please clarify.

Thanks



-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Remote-Testing-tf2763024.html#a7703778
Sent from the JMeter - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Exceptions during the DB Performance Test


The log message suggests that you have run out of connections.

How many did you confgure? And how many threads are you running?


On 05/12/06, socio_pal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Hi:
I get the following Error while running the Database Performance test
scripts. And the error % is really high because of this issue. Please do
explain why this is happening and how it can be fixed. I don't get this
error when I run the test with 1 thread, but as I keep increasing the number
of threads my errors occur earlier in the test. Please explain as early as
possible why this is happening:

And in my Jmeter View Results Tree I get the message
org.apache.avalon.excalibur.datasource.NoAvailableConnectionException:
Could not create enough Components to service your request (Timed out).
under the sample Result.

In the Jmeter.log file I get the following exception:

JDBC Users 1-409 started
2006/11/27 13:14:44 INFO  - jmeter.threads.JMeterThread: Thread JDBC Users
1-410 started
2006/11/27 13:14:44 WARN  - jmeter.protocol.jdbc.config.DataSourceElement:
Could not return Connection java.lang.Exception: Could not create enough
Components to service your request (Timed out).
   at
org.apache.avalon.excalibur.pool.ResourceLimitingPool.get(ResourceLimitingPool.java:350)
   at
org.apache.avalon.excalibur.pool.ValidatedResourceLimitingPool.get(ValidatedResourceLimitingPool.java:130)
   at
org.apache.avalon.excalibur.datasource.ResourceLimitingJdbcDataSource.getConnection(ResourceLimitingJdbcDataSource.java:222)
   at
org.apache.jmeter.protocol.jdbc.sampler.JDBCSampler.sample(JDBCSampler.java:90)
   at org.apache.jmeter.threads.JMeterThread.run(JMeterThread.java:247)
   at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)

2006/11/27 13:14:44 ERROR - jmeter.protocol.jdbc.sampler.JDBCSampler: Error
in JDBC sampling
org.apache.avalon.excalibur.datasource.NoAvailableConnectionException: Could
not create enough Components to service your request (Timed out).


Thanks
--
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Exceptions-during-the-DB-Performance-Test-tf2762930.html#a7703468
Sent from the JMeter - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Synchronizing Timers buggy?


I've not used the Sync Timer in earnest, so I don't know if it has
these problems.

I do know that sometimes the 2/80 display can go wrong (I've seen -1/n
!), but the fact that stop test is having a problem suggests that
there are indeed still some threads active. [BTW, Shutdown is a less
forceful version - it does not kill threads]

It might be worth replacing the sampler with a Java Request Sampler
(use a similar time delay) to see how the Sync Timer behaves with a
simpler test.

S.
On 05/12/06, Richard Gaywood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hi group!

I'm experimenting with adding a synchronzing timer to my existing XML-RPC
load test (hitting on a simple web service[1]) to emulate some peak load
we're seeing on our live servers. However, the test has gone a bit wonky...
it doesn't seem to end cleanly. For example, in the test I've got running
right now, I had 80 threads with a sync timer to group them into five at a
time, with a timer on the thread group of 30 seconds. The test ended over
ten minutes ago but the JMeter UI claims 2/80 threads are still active;
I've hit stop test and that's wedged on shutting down all test threads,
please be patient. netstat -n shows no active connections to my
webservice so it's not a socket timeout thing (been there, done that, got
the scars to prove it too :oD)

I vaguely recall reading somewhere that the synchronizing timer can have
these problems, but googling the list hasn't turned anything up. Is there
any work around?

(I'm using Sun's JDK 1.5.0 reg 09-b03 and JMeter 2.2.)

[1] simple test:
thread group
| - XML-RPC sampler
 | - size assertion
 | - save (failed) responses to file
 | - sync timer




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Current JMeter development branch


Java 5 is not on the roadmap at present.

We have abandoned support for Java 1.3, but there are too many people
still using Java 1.4. There was a long discussion about this earlier
this year.

You can of course create your own samplers that rely on Java 5.

S.
On 05/12/06, Paul Kuykendall (PL/EUS) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

It is possible to lump multiple XSDs into one validator.  I'll have to
modify my existing code to not use the Java 5 specific methods, but I
know it is possible.

Unfortunately the cleanest way of doing it does require the
javax.xml.validation API.  See
http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-javaxmlvalidapi.html
for a detailed example.  To use multiple XSDs you declare a different
Source for each XSD then create an array of all Source classes that is
passed into the factory.newSchema() method.

What is the roadmap for moving to Java 5 as the required JVM?  Or is it
on the roadmap at all?

/Paul

-Original Message-
From: sebb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 9:56 AM
To: JMeter Users List
Subject: Re: Current JMeter development branch

I don't think it's possible to provide multiple files to the assertion.

However, you can have multiple assertions applied to the same sample
result.

I don't know anything about the underlying XML API, but unless it's
possible to provide multiple files to a single validation invocation,
then using multiple assertions won't be much slower.

Also, I think assertions stop being processed as soon as one fails.

S.
On 05/12/06, Paul Kuykendall (PL/EUS) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
 Thanks.

 I'm trying to extend the XML Schema assertion to make it able to use
 multiple XSD files during the validation.  Of course, if it's possible

 to do such now, please let me know so I don't waste my time. :-)
 Thanks!

 /Paul

 -Original Message-
 From: sebb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 9:44 AM
 To: JMeter Users List
 Subject: Re: Current JMeter development branch

 On 05/12/06, Paul Kuykendall (PL/EUS) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
  Hi,
 
  What is the current development branch?  I saw a note saying that
  the main head was out of date.  I've checked out branches/rel-2-2
  but want

  to make sure it's the right one before poking at it too much.

 Yes, that's the correct one.

 Perhaps we should a merge at some point, but it's a _lot_ of work.
 [Or maybe we could do some judicious renames instead...]

  Thanks.
 
  /Paul
 
 

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Exceptions during the DB Performance Test

In the JDBC Connection Configuration, the Max. number of Connections as 10
and am using 50 threads to run my performance test. But my Database allows
upto 500 sessions. Is there any max. limit for Jmeter? I thought 10 is the
allowed number of connections, can I configure it to have more connections?
But why is that I get the error only after an hour or so? I use 50 threads
and ramp up period of 5 secs. So, once all the 50 threads are started
shoudln't i get the error? My test runs successfully for an hour or so and
then I get this error. Please explain as early as possible.

Thanks

sebb-2 wrote:

The log message suggests that you have run out of connections.

How many did you confgure? And how many threads are you running?

On 05/12/06, socio_pal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hi:
I get the following Error while running the Database Performance test
scripts. And the error % is really high because of this issue. Please do
explain why this is happening and how it can be fixed. I don't get this
error when I run the test with 1 thread, but as I keep increasing the
number
of threads my errors occur earlier in the test. Please explain as early
as
possible why this is happening:

And in my Jmeter View Results Tree I get the message
org.apache.avalon.excalibur.datasource.NoAvailableConnectionException:
Could not create enough Components to service your request (Timed out).
under the sample Result.

In the Jmeter.log file I get the following exception:

JDBC Users 1-409 started
2006/11/27 13:14:44 INFO - jmeter.threads.JMeterThread: Thread JDBC
Users
1-410 started
2006/11/27 13:14:44 WARN -
jmeter.protocol.jdbc.config.DataSourceElement:
Could not return Connection java.lang.Exception: Could not create enough
Components to service your request (Timed out).
at
org.apache.avalon.excalibur.pool.ResourceLimitingPool.get(ResourceLimitingPool.java:350)
at
org.apache.avalon.excalibur.pool.ValidatedResourceLimitingPool.get(ValidatedResourceLimitingPool.java:130)
at
org.apache.avalon.excalibur.datasource.ResourceLimitingJdbcDataSource.getConnection(ResourceLimitingJdbcDataSource.java:222)
at
org.apache.jmeter.protocol.jdbc.sampler.JDBCSampler.sample(JDBCSampler.java:90)
at
org.apache.jmeter.threads.JMeterThread.run(JMeterThread.java:247)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)

2006/11/27 13:14:44 ERROR - jmeter.protocol.jdbc.sampler.JDBCSampler:
Error
in JDBC sampling
org.apache.avalon.excalibur.datasource.NoAvailableConnectionException:
Could
not create enough Components to service your request (Timed out).

Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Exceptions-during-the-DB-Performance-Test-tf2762930.html#a7703468
Sent from the JMeter - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Exceptions-during-the-DB-Performance-Test-tf2762930.html#a7705621
Sent from the JMeter - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Losing Cookie while following redirect

2006-12-05 Thread JerryWho


Hi Stefan,

Stefan Adamovsky wrote:
 
 The Http Sampler2 is the Http Request HTTP Client!
 Try to use the standard sampler HTTP Request, be sure you selected Follow
 Redirects. Add the HTTP Cookie Manager, select Clear Cookies for each
 interaction, set cookie Policy to compatibility. Don't try to add Session
 IDs or something like that here, the Cookie Manager will store these
 things for you and the will automatical sended with your HTTP Requests
 Add a HTTP Header Manager!
 

I tried this, but without success. Looking at the first request I see that
the cookie was sent:
GET / HTTP/1.1
Connection: keep-alive
User-Agent: Java/1.5.0_06
Host: test.jerrywho.de
Accept: text/html, image/gif, image/jpeg, *; q=.2, */*; q=.2
Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded

HTTP/1.1 302 Found
Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2006 19:00:52 GMT
Server: Apache/1.3.37 (Unix) PHP/4.4.3 mod_perl/1.29
X-Powered-By: PHP/4.4.3
Set-Cookie: MeinCookie=1165345252
Location: /ziel.php
Connection: close
Transfer-Encoding: chunked
Content-Type: text/html

But the redirected request doesn't use the cookie:
GET /ziel.php HTTP/1.1
Connection: keep-alive
User-Agent: Java/1.5.0_06
Host: test.jerrywho.de
Accept: text/html, image/gif, image/jpeg, *; q=.2, */*; q=.2
Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2006 19:00:52 GMT
Server: Apache/1.3.37 (Unix) PHP/4.4.3 mod_perl/1.29
X-Powered-By: PHP/4.4.3
Connection: close
Transfer-Encoding: chunked
Content-Type: text/html

I put my Jmeter-config on that webserver: http://test.jerrywho.de/Demo.jmx
Maybe you can have a look at it?

TIA
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Losing-Cookie-while-following-redirect-tf2761354.html#a7705832
Sent from the JMeter - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Current JMeter development branch

I've been able to get it working with 1.4.  Right now I'm fighting the
GUI config portion of the assertion. Where would the best place for any
patches to be sent, here or the -dev list?

/Paul

-Original Message-
From: sebb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 12:17 PM
To: JMeter Users List
Subject: Re: Current JMeter development branch

Java 5 is not on the roadmap at present.

We have abandoned support for Java 1.3, but there are too many people
still using Java 1.4. There was a long discussion about this earlier
this year.

You can of course create your own samplers that rely on Java 5.

S.
On 05/12/06, Paul Kuykendall (PL/EUS) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
 It is possible to lump multiple XSDs into one validator.  I'll have to

 modify my existing code to not use the Java 5 specific methods, but I 
 know it is possible.

 Unfortunately the cleanest way of doing it does require the 
 javax.xml.validation API.  See 
 http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-javaxmlvalidapi.ht
 ml for a detailed example.  To use multiple XSDs you declare a 
 different Source for each XSD then create an array of all Source 
 classes that is passed into the factory.newSchema() method.

 What is the roadmap for moving to Java 5 as the required JVM?  Or is 
 it on the roadmap at all?

 /Paul

 -Original Message-
 From: sebb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 9:56 AM
 To: JMeter Users List
 Subject: Re: Current JMeter development branch

 I don't think it's possible to provide multiple files to the
assertion.

 However, you can have multiple assertions applied to the same sample 
 result.

 I don't know anything about the underlying XML API, but unless it's 
 possible to provide multiple files to a single validation invocation, 
 then using multiple assertions won't be much slower.

 Also, I think assertions stop being processed as soon as one fails.

 S.
 On 05/12/06, Paul Kuykendall (PL/EUS) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
  Thanks.

  I'm trying to extend the XML Schema assertion to make it able to use

  multiple XSD files during the validation.  Of course, if it's 
  possible

  to do such now, please let me know so I don't waste my time. :-) 
  Thanks!

  /Paul

  -Original Message-
  From: sebb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 9:44 AM
  To: JMeter Users List
  Subject: Re: Current JMeter development branch

  On 05/12/06, Paul Kuykendall (PL/EUS) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  wrote:
   Hi,

   What is the current development branch?  I saw a note saying that 
   the main head was out of date.  I've checked out branches/rel-2-2 
   but want

   to make sure it's the right one before poking at it too much.

  Yes, that's the correct one.

  Perhaps we should a merge at some point, but it's a _lot_ of work.
  [Or maybe we could do some judicious renames instead...]

   Thanks.

   /Paul

  - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Current JMeter development branch


Please create a Bugzilla enhancement request.

Once created, patches (unified diff format please, as used by Eclipse)
can be attached to the issue.

Patches sent to mailing lists tend to get mangled and/or forgotten.

If you get stuck with the GUI part, just add a note and I can probably
finish it.

S.
On 05/12/06, Paul Kuykendall (PL/EUS) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I've been able to get it working with 1.4.  Right now I'm fighting the
GUI config portion of the assertion. Where would the best place for any
patches to be sent, here or the -dev list?

/Paul

-Original Message-
From: sebb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 12:17 PM
To: JMeter Users List
Subject: Re: Current JMeter development branch

Java 5 is not on the roadmap at present.

We have abandoned support for Java 1.3, but there are too many people
still using Java 1.4. There was a long discussion about this earlier
this year.

You can of course create your own samplers that rely on Java 5.

S.
On 05/12/06, Paul Kuykendall (PL/EUS) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
 It is possible to lump multiple XSDs into one validator.  I'll have to

 modify my existing code to not use the Java 5 specific methods, but I
 know it is possible.

 Unfortunately the cleanest way of doing it does require the
 javax.xml.validation API.  See
 http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-javaxmlvalidapi.ht
 ml for a detailed example.  To use multiple XSDs you declare a
 different Source for each XSD then create an array of all Source
 classes that is passed into the factory.newSchema() method.

 What is the roadmap for moving to Java 5 as the required JVM?  Or is
 it on the roadmap at all?

 /Paul

 -Original Message-
 From: sebb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 9:56 AM
 To: JMeter Users List
 Subject: Re: Current JMeter development branch

 I don't think it's possible to provide multiple files to the
assertion.

 However, you can have multiple assertions applied to the same sample
 result.

 I don't know anything about the underlying XML API, but unless it's
 possible to provide multiple files to a single validation invocation,
 then using multiple assertions won't be much slower.

 Also, I think assertions stop being processed as soon as one fails.

 S.
 On 05/12/06, Paul Kuykendall (PL/EUS) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
  Thanks.
 
  I'm trying to extend the XML Schema assertion to make it able to use

  multiple XSD files during the validation.  Of course, if it's
  possible

  to do such now, please let me know so I don't waste my time. :-)
  Thanks!
 
  /Paul
 
  -Original Message-
  From: sebb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 9:44 AM
  To: JMeter Users List
  Subject: Re: Current JMeter development branch
 
  On 05/12/06, Paul Kuykendall (PL/EUS) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  wrote:
   Hi,
  
   What is the current development branch?  I saw a note saying that
   the main head was out of date.  I've checked out branches/rel-2-2
   but want
 
   to make sure it's the right one before poking at it too much.
 
  Yes, that's the correct one.
 
  Perhaps we should a merge at some point, but it's a _lot_ of work.
  [Or maybe we could do some judicious renames instead...]
 
   Thanks.
  
   /Paul
  
  
 
  
  - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
  
  - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Exceptions during the DB Performance Test

There is a pool timeout; default 10 seconds.

I think that means that the connection pool will only give up if it
has to wait longer to get a free connection.

So long as enough connections are returned to the pool in time, you
won't necessarily need as many as 1 per thread. But of course some
threads may wait to get a connection.

Try increasing the connection count.

S.
On 05/12/06, socio_pal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Thanks

sebb-2 wrote:

The log message suggests that you have run out of connections.

How many did you confgure? And how many threads are you running?

On 05/12/06, socio_pal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

In the Jmeter.log file I get the following exception:

org.apache.avalon.excalibur.pool.ResourceLimitingPool.get(ResourceLimitingPool.java:350)
at

org.apache.avalon.excalibur.pool.ValidatedResourceLimitingPool.get(ValidatedResourceLimitingPool.java:130)
at

org.apache.avalon.excalibur.datasource.ResourceLimitingJdbcDataSource.getConnection(ResourceLimitingJdbcDataSource.java:222)
at

org.apache.jmeter.protocol.jdbc.sampler.JDBCSampler.sample(JDBCSampler.java:90)
at
org.apache.jmeter.threads.JMeterThread.run(JMeterThread.java:247)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)

Thanks
--
View this message in context:

http://www.nabble.com/Exceptions-during-the-DB-Performance-Test-tf2762930.html#a7703468
Sent from the JMeter - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Exceptions-during-the-DB-Performance-Test-tf2762930.html#a7705621
Sent from the JMeter - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Losing Cookie while following redirect


On 05/12/06, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

The test plan has only one sampler, and loop count is zero, and the


 ^one^

Cookie Manager is set to clear cookies each iteration. So there is no
chance that the cookie will be sent anywhere.

The sampler is also set to Redirect Automatically, which means you
should not be seeing 302s.


On 05/12/06, JerryWho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi Stefan,

 Stefan Adamovsky wrote:
 
  The Http Sampler2 is the Http Request HTTP Client!
  Try to use the standard sampler HTTP Request, be sure you selected Follow
  Redirects. Add the HTTP Cookie Manager, select Clear Cookies for each
  interaction, set cookie Policy to compatibility. Don't try to add Session
  IDs or something like that here, the Cookie Manager will store these
  things for you and the will automatical sended with your HTTP Requests
  Add a HTTP Header Manager!
 

 I tried this, but without success. Looking at the first request I see that
 the cookie was sent:
 GET / HTTP/1.1
 Connection: keep-alive
 User-Agent: Java/1.5.0_06
 Host: test.jerrywho.de
 Accept: text/html, image/gif, image/jpeg, *; q=.2, */*; q=.2
 Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded

 HTTP/1.1 302 Found
 Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2006 19:00:52 GMT
 Server: Apache/1.3.37 (Unix) PHP/4.4.3 mod_perl/1.29
 X-Powered-By: PHP/4.4.3
 Set-Cookie: MeinCookie=1165345252
 Location: /ziel.php
 Connection: close
 Transfer-Encoding: chunked
 Content-Type: text/html

 But the redirected request doesn't use the cookie:
 GET /ziel.php HTTP/1.1
 Connection: keep-alive
 User-Agent: Java/1.5.0_06
 Host: test.jerrywho.de
 Accept: text/html, image/gif, image/jpeg, *; q=.2, */*; q=.2
 Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded

 HTTP/1.1 200 OK
 Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2006 19:00:52 GMT
 Server: Apache/1.3.37 (Unix) PHP/4.4.3 mod_perl/1.29
 X-Powered-By: PHP/4.4.3
 Connection: close
 Transfer-Encoding: chunked
 Content-Type: text/html

 I put my Jmeter-config on that webserver: http://test.jerrywho.de/Demo.jmx
 Maybe you can have a look at it?

 TIA
 --
 View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Losing-Cookie-while-following-redirect-tf2761354.html#a7705832
 Sent from the JMeter - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: response assertion: 2 questions

2006-12-05 Thread Ed Young


\d{10} not quite...

\d{10} is true for any string of numeric *at least* 10 in length.

The response I'm looging for is:

1. I'm looking for a single numeric string of *exactly* 10. No more, no less.
2. Nothing else in the response.

It's simple, but I'm missing it...


On 12/4/06, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On 04/12/06, Ed Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Question 1.
 I'm trying to figure out how to test for a numeric value of a
 particular character length. An example is:
 234335675
 or
 001454668

 The easy part is the numeric check:
 [0-9]
 or
 \d

 I'm not sure how to check the length part and combine it with the
 numeric part into the regexp.

 I see that
 {n}

 says match exactly n times. I'm using the demo applet at:
 http://jakarta.apache.org/oro/demo.html
  to test my regexps but so far no luck.

\d{n}

e.g.

\d{9}

You can even use

\d{1,10}

to mean 1-10 digits.

 Question 2:
 If I add a pattern to test is it logically AND'd to the other
 patterns I set up?

Sort of - if any match fails, then it sets the response failed flag.

 Thanks,

 --
 Ed

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





--
Ed

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Losing Cookie while following redirect


The test plan has only one sampler, and loop count is zero, and the
Cookie Manager is set to clear cookies each iteration. So there is no
chance that the cookie will be sent anywhere.

The sampler is also set to Redirect Automatically, which means you
should not be seeing 302s.


On 05/12/06, JerryWho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Hi Stefan,

Stefan Adamovsky wrote:

 The Http Sampler2 is the Http Request HTTP Client!
 Try to use the standard sampler HTTP Request, be sure you selected Follow
 Redirects. Add the HTTP Cookie Manager, select Clear Cookies for each
 interaction, set cookie Policy to compatibility. Don't try to add Session
 IDs or something like that here, the Cookie Manager will store these
 things for you and the will automatical sended with your HTTP Requests
 Add a HTTP Header Manager!


I tried this, but without success. Looking at the first request I see that
the cookie was sent:
GET / HTTP/1.1
Connection: keep-alive
User-Agent: Java/1.5.0_06
Host: test.jerrywho.de
Accept: text/html, image/gif, image/jpeg, *; q=.2, */*; q=.2
Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded

HTTP/1.1 302 Found
Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2006 19:00:52 GMT
Server: Apache/1.3.37 (Unix) PHP/4.4.3 mod_perl/1.29
X-Powered-By: PHP/4.4.3
Set-Cookie: MeinCookie=1165345252
Location: /ziel.php
Connection: close
Transfer-Encoding: chunked
Content-Type: text/html

But the redirected request doesn't use the cookie:
GET /ziel.php HTTP/1.1
Connection: keep-alive
User-Agent: Java/1.5.0_06
Host: test.jerrywho.de
Accept: text/html, image/gif, image/jpeg, *; q=.2, */*; q=.2
Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2006 19:00:52 GMT
Server: Apache/1.3.37 (Unix) PHP/4.4.3 mod_perl/1.29
X-Powered-By: PHP/4.4.3
Connection: close
Transfer-Encoding: chunked
Content-Type: text/html

I put my Jmeter-config on that webserver: http://test.jerrywho.de/Demo.jmx
Maybe you can have a look at it?

TIA
--
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Losing-Cookie-while-following-redirect-tf2761354.html#a7705832
Sent from the JMeter - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: response assertion: 2 questions


\d{10} *does* mean to match exactly 10 digits.

But you are right that it can match something *containing* more than
10 - it will match the 10 and stop looking further.

Sorry, I should have spotted that ...

To look for exactly 10 digits with nothing else, use the matches checkbox.
This only succeeds if the RE matches everything.

If you are looking for a 10 digit string which can be surrounded by
non-digits, you can try:

\D\d{10}\D

S.
On 05/12/06, Ed Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

\d{10} not quite...

\d{10} is true for any string of numeric *at least* 10 in length.

The response I'm looging for is:

1. I'm looking for a single numeric string of *exactly* 10. No more, no less.
2. Nothing else in the response.

It's simple, but I'm missing it...


On 12/4/06, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 04/12/06, Ed Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Question 1.
  I'm trying to figure out how to test for a numeric value of a
  particular character length. An example is:
  234335675
  or
  001454668
 
  The easy part is the numeric check:
  [0-9]
  or
  \d
 
  I'm not sure how to check the length part and combine it with the
  numeric part into the regexp.
 
  I see that
  {n}
 
  says match exactly n times. I'm using the demo applet at:
  http://jakarta.apache.org/oro/demo.html
   to test my regexps but so far no luck.

 \d{n}

 e.g.

 \d{9}

 You can even use

 \d{1,10}

 to mean 1-10 digits.

  Question 2:
  If I add a pattern to test is it logically AND'd to the other
  patterns I set up?

 Sort of - if any match fails, then it sets the response failed flag.

  Thanks,
 
  --
  Ed
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




--
Ed

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Exceptions during the DB Performance Test

I have increased the Max. Number of Connections from 10 to 200 now. I did
this gradually test after test. But as I increase the No. of connections the
throughput/sec in my Summary Report seems to be coming down. Shouldn't I see
a increase in throughput as I increase the Number of Connections? And can
you please let me what Idle Cleanup Interval field stands for. I ahve the
default as 6ms, do I have reduce this as well?
My Database is configured to have 500 sessions and I want to try and use all
of those 500 sessions, but seeing a decrease in Throughput as I keep
increasing the number of connections doesn't make me happy. Please clarify.

Thanks.

sebb-2 wrote:

There is a pool timeout; default 10 seconds.

I think that means that the connection pool will only give up if it
has to wait longer to get a free connection.

So long as enough connections are returned to the pool in time, you
won't necessarily need as many as 1 per thread. But of course some
threads may wait to get a connection.

Try increasing the connection count.

S.
On 05/12/06, socio_pal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

In the JDBC Connection Configuration, the Max. number of Connections as
10
and am using 50 threads to run my performance test. But my Database
allows
upto 500 sessions. Is there any max. limit for Jmeter? I thought 10 is
the
allowed number of connections, can I configure it to have more
connections?
But why is that I get the error only after an hour or so? I use 50
threads
and ramp up period of 5 secs. So, once all the 50 threads are started
shoudln't i get the error? My test runs successfully for an hour or so
and
then I get this error. Please explain as early as possible.

Thanks

sebb-2 wrote:

The log message suggests that you have run out of connections.

How many did you confgure? And how many threads are you running?

On 05/12/06, socio_pal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hi:
I get the following Error while running the Database Performance test
scripts. And the error % is really high because of this issue. Please
do
explain why this is happening and how it can be fixed. I don't get
this
error when I run the test with 1 thread, but as I keep increasing the
number
of threads my errors occur earlier in the test. Please explain as
early
as
possible why this is happening:

And in my Jmeter View Results Tree I get the message

org.apache.avalon.excalibur.datasource.NoAvailableConnectionException:
Could not create enough Components to service your request (Timed
out).
under the sample Result.

In the Jmeter.log file I get the following exception:

org.apache.avalon.excalibur.pool.ResourceLimitingPool.get(ResourceLimitingPool.java:350)
at

org.apache.avalon.excalibur.pool.ValidatedResourceLimitingPool.get(ValidatedResourceLimitingPool.java:130)
at

org.apache.avalon.excalibur.datasource.ResourceLimitingJdbcDataSource.getConnection(ResourceLimitingJdbcDataSource.java:222)
at

org.apache.jmeter.protocol.jdbc.sampler.JDBCSampler.sample(JDBCSampler.java:90)
at
org.apache.jmeter.threads.JMeterThread.run(JMeterThread.java:247)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)

Thanks
--
View this message in context:

http://www.nabble.com/Exceptions-during-the-DB-Performance-Test-tf2762930.html#a7703468
Sent from the JMeter - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Exceptions-during-the-DB-Performance-Test-tf2762930.html#a7705621
Sent from the JMeter - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
View this message in context:

Re: Losing Cookie while following redirect

2006-12-05 Thread JerryWho



sebb-2 wrote:
 
 The test plan has only one sampler, and loop count is zero, and the
 Cookie Manager is set to clear cookies each iteration. So there is no
 chance that the cookie will be sent anywhere.
 
 The sampler is also set to Redirect Automatically, which means you
 should not be seeing 302s.
 

Maybe I don't understand how JMeter really works. But the sampler requests
the url /. This page redirects to /ziel.php and sets the cookie. So
/ziel.php has to be downloaded (what really happens) but without the
cookie been sent. This seems a little bit strange to me because a normal
browser sends the cookie to /ziel.php.

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Losing-Cookie-while-following-redirect-tf2761354.html#a7708536
Sent from the JMeter - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Current JMeter development branch

Hi,

I looked through the outstanding bugzilla entries and 39328 looked to be
for a similar feature.  The GUI part is functional, but is probably
somewhat brittle.  I did my best, but it's definitely not production
quality.  (I'm a server-side SW engineer, not a GUI person.)  Any help
on getting it production quality would be appreciated.  I attached a
patch file to the 39328 bug with my changes.  Only 3 files were
modified, so it's pretty self-contained.

/Paul

-Original Message-
From: sebb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 1:45 PM
To: JMeter Users List
Subject: Re: Current JMeter development branch

Please create a Bugzilla enhancement request.

Once created, patches (unified diff format please, as used by Eclipse)
can be attached to the issue.

Patches sent to mailing lists tend to get mangled and/or forgotten.

If you get stuck with the GUI part, just add a note and I can probably
finish it.

S.
On 05/12/06, Paul Kuykendall (PL/EUS) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
 I've been able to get it working with 1.4.  Right now I'm fighting the

 GUI config portion of the assertion. Where would the best place for 
 any patches to be sent, here or the -dev list?

 /Paul

 -Original Message-
 From: sebb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 12:17 PM
 To: JMeter Users List
 Subject: Re: Current JMeter development branch

 Java 5 is not on the roadmap at present.

 We have abandoned support for Java 1.3, but there are too many people 
 still using Java 1.4. There was a long discussion about this earlier 
 this year.

 You can of course create your own samplers that rely on Java 5.

 S.
 On 05/12/06, Paul Kuykendall (PL/EUS) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
  It is possible to lump multiple XSDs into one validator.  I'll have 
  to

  modify my existing code to not use the Java 5 specific methods, but 
  I know it is possible.
 
  Unfortunately the cleanest way of doing it does require the 
  javax.xml.validation API.  See 
  http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-javaxmlvalidapi.
  ht ml for a detailed example.  To use multiple XSDs you declare a 
  different Source for each XSD then create an array of all Source 
  classes that is passed into the factory.newSchema() method.
 
  What is the roadmap for moving to Java 5 as the required JVM?  Or is

  it on the roadmap at all?
 
  /Paul
 
  -Original Message-
  From: sebb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 9:56 AM
  To: JMeter Users List
  Subject: Re: Current JMeter development branch
 
  I don't think it's possible to provide multiple files to the
 assertion.
 
  However, you can have multiple assertions applied to the same sample

  result.
 
  I don't know anything about the underlying XML API, but unless it's 
  possible to provide multiple files to a single validation 
  invocation, then using multiple assertions won't be much slower.
 
  Also, I think assertions stop being processed as soon as one fails.
 
  S.
  On 05/12/06, Paul Kuykendall (PL/EUS) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  wrote:
   Thanks.
  
   I'm trying to extend the XML Schema assertion to make it able to 
   use

   multiple XSD files during the validation.  Of course, if it's 
   possible
 
   to do such now, please let me know so I don't waste my time. :-) 
   Thanks!
  
   /Paul
  
   -Original Message-
   From: sebb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 9:44 AM
   To: JMeter Users List
   Subject: Re: Current JMeter development branch
  
   On 05/12/06, Paul Kuykendall (PL/EUS) 
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   wrote:
Hi,
   
What is the current development branch?  I saw a note saying 
that the main head was out of date.  I've checked out 
branches/rel-2-2 but want
  
to make sure it's the right one before poking at it too much.
  
   Yes, that's the correct one.
  
   Perhaps we should a merge at some point, but it's a _lot_ of work.
   [Or maybe we could do some judicious renames instead...]
  
Thanks.
   
/Paul
   
   
  
   --
   --
   - To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   For additional commands, e-mail: 
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
   --
   --
   - To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   For additional commands, e-mail: 
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
 
  
  - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
  
  - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Remote Testing

2006-12-05 Thread Peter Lin


if you didn't read the tutorial on distributed testing, I would recommend
doing that.

There's 2 reasons why you want jmeter on the same ethernet segment. More
specifically on the same subnet. java RMI doesn't work over multiple subnets
out of the box, so jmeter has the same requirements.

peter

On 12/5/06, socio_pal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



Hi:
I am doing the Database Performance Test and I would like to do Remote
Testing. I was reading the Jmeter Manual for Remote testing and I was not
able to understand the following statement:

The recommended approach is to have one or more machines on the same
Ethernet segment as your application server that you configure to run the
JMeter Engine. This will minimize the impact of the network on the test
results without impacting the performance of the application serer itself.


Please clarify.

Thanks



--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Remote-Testing-tf2763024.html#a7703778
Sent from the JMeter - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

another extractor question

2006-12-05 Thread Kyle Schmitt


This should be obvious, but since when is should reality?

OK, so I'm trying to extract the viewstate out of a dotnet app.
Jmeter recorded it just fine, but of course, that recording won't
quite work due to the viewstate stuff.

So I figured, I'd just put a regex extractor in the sampler that
returns with a viewstate variable.

Reference Name: viewstate
O Body O Headers X URL
Regular Expression: __VIEWSTATE=(.*?)
Match No.: 1
Default Value: Can't find viewstate!

But all I ever see in my logs is the Can't find viewstate default
value.  At first I thought I put it in the wrong sampler, but no
matter which sampler I put it in, it doesn't find the variable.

So...
what am I doing wrong?

Thanks,
   Kyle

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: another extractor question

2006-12-05 Thread Kyle Schmitt


Hum.  I don't know if it would be in the body, but it makes sense, on
second thought, that it wouldn't be in the url (it's post not get).


 Reference Name: viewstate
  O Body O Headers X URL
does this mean you are checking against the URL?

And yes, that meant it was checking against the URL, though the body
didn't fare any better...
Could it actually be in the body and my regex is completely malformed?
Any clues as to how to go about viewing the post variables inside of a
body?

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: another extractor question