[jQuery] Re: Making internet explorer behave with jquery
Luke wrote:
Basically what I'm trying to do is apply a .text and a .textFocus to
certain elements. for example: input and input:focus, respectively. So
what I've done is this:
I am not concerned with the focus portion at this point... only with
applying the correct class to the correct elements. For some reason ie
just won't comply.
Javascript:
$(function(){
$('[EMAIL PROTECTED]text]').addClass('textinput');
});
and the css
CSS:
form input[type=text],
form input[type=password],
form textarea,
form .textinput {
border: 1px solid #666;
padding: 2px;
}
For some reason this does not work. The class .textinput is not being
applied to the element in this case. I know that jquery is selecting
the correct elements (from testing it). I also tried this, and it
works, but I don't want to have to define my textinput classes twice,
that would be totally lame. Sad
CSS:
form input[type=text],
form input[type=password],
form textarea {
border: 1px solid #666;
padding: 2px;
}
form .textinput {
border: 1px solid #666;
padding: 2px;
}
Does anybody know why this might be happening?
IE 6 does not understand the attribute selectors and therefore skips the
whole rule. So you cannot group them together and need to define the
rules twice like in your second example.
--Klaus
[jQuery] making ajax calls in jqmodal window. Possible?
Hi All,
Anyone know if it's possible to make ajax calls from inside a jqModal
popup window that was loaded via ajax? I have code like this:
$(document).ready( function() {
$('#userSwitcher').hide();
$('#userSwitcher').jqm({
trigger:'a.jqmTrigger',
ajax:'/pos2/purchase/quick_change.cfm',
target:$('#users'),
modal:true,
onShow:function(h){
h.w.show();
}
});
});
a id=aUserSwitcher href=## class=jqmTriggerSwitch/a
div id=userSwitcher class=jqmWindow style=width:600px;height:500px
div id=users/div
/div
and have included jqModal.js and jqModal.css in the calling page, then
in the quick_change.cfm file I'm doing additional ajax calls:
var url = something.html
$.get( url, function(template){
etc
but that $.get() never fires AND the userSwitcher div loads up real
quick, then the whole page goes white and goes nowhere: it just spins.
Bug? Is this possible via jqModal? I'm pretty sure I had something like
this working with the thickbox plugin a few months ago, but the
jquery.com site was down earlier tonight when I went fishing for the
latest code to try to use, so I tried using jqModal.
TIA,
Jack
[jQuery] Re: Syntactic sugar for checking whether an element exists
jQuery is a language and as such requires you to read at least a bit of documentation or examples before starting. Maybe .is() and .length should be more prominently visible in the doc, but I see no point in adding the .exists() and .hasClass() cruft to the (beautiful) jQuery code. -- Fil
[jQuery] Re: Scroller ticker...
Not quite the same as it fades in rather than scrolls. Sliding could be done if you replace fadeOut with slideUp and fadeIn with slideDown Example: http://www.texotela.co.uk/code/jquery/newsticker/slide/ On Jul 9, 5:21 pm, Sean Catchpole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I like newsticker: http://www.texotela.co.uk/code/jquery/newsticker/ ~Sean
[jQuery] [Firefox Bug] Text flicker
I'm getting an animation bug where all text on the page flickers slightly during a fade() animation. I can't seem to find the specific reason this appears but I'll keep trying. Any ideas or am I beating a dead horse? Btw I'm using Firefox v2.0.0.4 on OS X.
[jQuery] Re: Getting the next span
Thanks Sean, I ended up using the second one as a basis. Here's what
I ended up with:
$(~ span:first, this);
This gives me the single next span, just like I wanted.
On Jul 9, 9:12 pm, Sean Catchpole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$('#span1').bind('click', function() { return $(this).next(span); });
or
$('#span1').bind('click', function() { return $(~ span,this); });
~Sean
[jQuery] Re: Syntactic sugar for checking whether an element exists
But I don't think we disagree at all. I wasn't talking about .get() with no
arguments, but rather .get(n) and .size(), which are just slower synonyms
for [n] and .length.
Yeah I agree with you on that. I just read: 'we should get rid of the
get() function' and freaked : p
-- Felix
--
My Blog: http://www.thinkingphp.org
My Business: http://www.fg-webdesign.de
Michael Geary wrote:
There's no reason at all to stick with .get(n) and .size()
now that the array-like jQuery object allows the
simpler and more efficient [n] and .length.
I disagree. Whenever you need to sort the elements in an
ul or something then you'll have to use the Array.sort()
function, so you need to do $('ul li').get().sort(...). Here
is an example of where I needed this functionality:
http://bin.cakephp.org/view/1632218532
It's not a big deal that I have to call get(), but it would
be a big problem if it wasn't there!
That's a good point about .get() with no arguments - it gives you a genuine
Array object which can be quite useful.
But I don't think we disagree at all. I wasn't talking about .get() with no
arguments, but rather .get(n) and .size(), which are just slower synonyms
for [n] and .length.
-Mike
[jQuery] Re: Syntactic sugar for checking whether an element exists
if ($('#someID')) {
// something matched the selector
}
See, and there you go making a wrong assumption that beginners are much
more likely to run into. !![] is evaluating to true and so is a jQuery
object that has not matched any items. I'm not blaming you for it, it's
counter-intuitive (if you don't know objects always evaluate to true)
but that's how JS works. So an exists() function could could probably
help people avoiding this mistake.
(Your other example where using [0] is a workable solution however)
-- Felix
--
My Blog: http://www.thinkingphp.org
My Business: http://www.fg-webdesign.de
RobG wrote:
On Jul 10, 4:50 am, Sean Catchpole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe that learning jquery returns an array like object is more
useful than creating a .exists() function.
It seems to me that the most common reason for testing if an element
exists is to use it later, so why not:
var element;
if ( (element=$('#someID')[0]) ) {
/* element exists */
} else {
/* damn... */
}
Another idea is that if the seletor doesn't select any elements,
return null (as does getElementById() in that case):
if ($('#someID')) {
// something matched the selector
}
but that may not be backward compatible. Of what use is an empty
jQuery object?
--
Rob
[jQuery] Return attribute content from XPath match //[EMAIL PROTECTED]'banner']/@alt
with something like.. img id=banner alt=This is a banner / //[EMAIL PROTECTED]'banner']/@alt would return This is a banner. Doing it this way does not work, but is valid in XPather https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1192 Is there another way to do this in JQuery (I am currently just looping the return and extracting the attribute if set)?
[jQuery] Re: Syntactic sugar for checking whether an element exists
In fact, if you find yourself doing a lot of if(something exists) {
... } else { ...}, you might want to consider trying to move some of
your code into a plugin.
The target audience for an exists() function would be new comers to
jQuery. Those are generally a little scared about writing their own
'plugin' even so there isn't much to be scared about I think and I'm
just making this assumption here ; ).
Anyway, there are situations where plugins are not enough. For example
if you have to modify other elements in case a certain screen element
exists then a plugin won't really help you a lot unless it's very
app-specifc.
-- Felix
--
My Blog: http://www.thinkingphp.org
My Business: http://www.fg-webdesign.de
Erik Beeson wrote:
In fact, if you find yourself doing a lot of if(something exists) {
... } else { ...}, you might want to consider trying to move some of
your code into a plugin. Most jQuery functions/plugins already deal
with the if(exists)... part by simply not executing if nothing is
selected. If you really want the 'else' part, you could imagine a
simple plugin, something like (untested):
$.fn.ifEmpty = function(f) {
if(this.length == 0) f.apply(this);
return this;
}
And use it like this:
$('#foo').show().ifEmpty(function() {
alert(foo doesn't exist);
});
Which would show the element with ID foo, or show an alert if the
element doesn't exist. Equivalent to:
var $foo = $('#foo');
if($foo.length 0) {
$foo.show();
} else {
alert(foo doesn't exist);
}
Just an idea.
--Erik
On 7/9/07, Erik Beeson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another idea is that if the seletor doesn't select any elements,
return null (as does getElementById() in that case):
...
but that may not be backward compatible. Of what use is an empty
jQuery object?
An empty jQuery object doesn't break chainability:
$('#foo').hide();
Will hide the element with ID foo if it exists. Otherwise, it does
nothing. If null were returned, that would generate a javascript
error, so you would have to always check for the existence of the
element if you wanted to be sure you didn't generate an error.
This is one of the sweetest features of jQuery.
--Erik
[jQuery] flash of unstyled content...Safari...hide() problems
I have been going through the tutorials and following many of the
examples here to try and get an introduction to jquery,
I have added the following code to my site but I am running into
problems with Safari.
script type=text/javascript
$(document).ready(function() {
$(dd:not(:first)).css ('display', 'none');
$(dt a).click(function(){
$(dd:visible).slideUp(fast);
$(this).parent().next().slideDown(slow);
return false;
});
});
/script
script type=text/Javascript
$(document).ready(function() {
$('.fulltext').css ('display', 'none');
$('h3').click(function() {
$(.fulltext).css('display','none');
$(this).parent().next().fadeIn(500);
return false;
});
});
/script
Essentially the first hide() or in this case css('display',none) is
causing the the 'fouc' in Safari and I can't figure out how to get
around it other than to look for another solution. Unfortunately
sometimes everything just works but it never lasts.
my site is http://italartnet.com and jquery (latest version) is active
on the index and artists section. Any suggestions on a workaround
would be most welcome.
Kind regards,
Alex Fleming
[jQuery] Re: Return attribute content from XPath match //[EMAIL PROTECTED]'banner']/@alt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
with something like..
img id=banner alt=This is a banner /
//[EMAIL PROTECTED]'banner']/@alt would return This is a banner. Doing it this
way does not work, but is valid in XPather
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1192
Is there another way to do this in JQuery (I am currently just looping
the return and extracting the attribute if set)?
jQuery supports (some) XPath for selecting things, but not the whole
Spec. Try:
var alt = $('#banner').attr('alt');
Looping is pointless because an id is supposed to be unique in a
document. Also I think the CSS selector syntax should be faster then
your generic approach.
--Klaus
[jQuery] Re: validation pluging work in FireFox but Not in Internet Explorer
any suggestion about this,please On Jul 9, 10:56 am, WebolizeR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi; I've used the jQuery's official validation plugin (http:// bassistance.de/jquery-plugins/jquery-plugin-validation/), your can see the page in here (http://nexus.di-tasarim.com/index.php? option=com_nexusact=coursestask=viewAppid=1) The main difference between the orginal code and mine is,I used a table based layout for form only, it is not cause any error in FireFox but in Internet Explorer is fails. And also I put the same tableless code from orginal examples, it also fails in Internet Explorer. What's problem, please help... tHanks...
[jQuery] Re: Text flicker
url? On 10 Jul., 05:47, Rob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm getting an animation bug where all text on the page flickers slightly during a fade() animation. I can't seem to find the specific reason this appears but I'll keep trying. Any ideas or am I beating a dead horse? Btw I'm using Firefox v2.0.0.4 on OS X.
[jQuery] Thickbox Reloaded
Bonjour: I haven't seen any talk about Thickbox Reloaded since mid-May. And I noticed that Thickbox 3 is out now. Is Thickbox Reloaded still happening? The alpha files I got my hands on didn't work in Safari...but...yeah...it's an Alpha. Any word, hint, suggestion...when the beta might happen for it? ;)
[jQuery] .trigger(click) // don't work? [newbie]
HI,
i have these line on document.ready and using jquery-1.1.3.pack.js
(no, not 1.1.3.1):
$(function(){
$('#chiamacap').trigger('click');
$(a#chiamacap).bind(click,
function(){
alert(hi);
});
});
The book says that you can simulate a click by using the trigger()
method.
If i click the #chiamacap link it runs an alert. wow ;-)
But by applying trigger() to $('#chiamacap') on load does not work.
What am i doing wrong?
GC
[jQuery] Re: Syntactic sugar for checking whether an element exists
jQuery is a language It was a library last time I checked ; ). and as such requires you to read at least a bit of documentation or examples before starting. Why? For me the sweetest thing about using jQuery has been it's intuitiveness right out of the box. When I started I just looked at some initial code samples (fancy API pages weren't around back then or I didn't know about them) and then was virtually able to 'guess' the jQuery functions I needed. Need to add a class? Hmm let me try addClass() - works, yeah! Now I want to remove an element from the DOM - oh remove() it is! So now I just need to check whether this element exists. Hm - exists() produces a fatal error. Let me search the docs: * http://docs.jquery.com/Special:Search?search=element+existsfulltext=Search http://docs.jquery.com/Special:Search?search=element+existsfulltext=Search * http://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Adocs.jquery.com%20element%20existshl=en http://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Adocs.jquery.com%20element%20existshl=en At this point I would need to actually post to the group or read the complete API docs in detail to find that is() is the answer to the problem. Same goes for hasClass() I think. Maybe .is() and .length should be more prominently visible in the doc, but I see no point in adding the .exists() and .hasClass() cruft to the (beautiful) jQuery code. I think is() is beautiful as well and there is nothing wrong with .length. However both pose a certain barrier for something new-comers will possibly try to do quite often. -- Felix -- My Blog: http://www.thinkingphp.org My Business: http://www.fg-webdesign.de Fil wrote: jQuery is a language and as such requires you to read at least a bit of documentation or examples before starting. Maybe .is() and .length should be more prominently visible in the doc, but I see no point in adding the .exists() and .hasClass() cruft to the (beautiful) jQuery code. -- Fil
[jQuery] Re: flash of unstyled content...Safari...hide() problems
I seem to have fixed the problem. Perhaps it is too early to tell but things are much better. Alex Fleming
[jQuery] Re: Syntactic sugar for checking whether an element exists
What about
Array.prototype.sort.apply( $('li') );
Not sue if that'll work...
I think that could work, but it's breaking chainability so I think the
array plugin mentioned by Jörn earlier is a better alternative. However
since I all I need is sort(), I actually am fine with using get() that
one time.
-- Felix
--
My Blog: http://www.thinkingphp.org
My Business: http://www.fg-webdesign.de
Klaus Hartl wrote:
Felix Geisendörfer wrote:
Felix, not to worry, there's nothing wrong at all with using .length
- and it is obviously faster than a function call.
I figured that by now. I think Matt was much better at explaining why
I think an alternative exists() function is useful - it simply is the
most intuitive thing a new jQuery user looks for. I also agree with
his hasClass argument. I love the is() function, but I would have
taken me a long time to find it if I my question was phrased Who can
I determine if an element has a certain class.is() is more powerful
but not nearly as intuitive as hasClass would be for new users.
In the earliest versions of jQuery, the jQuery object was not an
array, but had a private array object that you accessed using
.get(n) and .size(). The only reason those functions still exist is
for compatibility with old code.
There's no reason at all to stick with .get(n) and .size() now that
the array-like jQuery object allows the simpler and more efficient
[n] and .length.
I disagree. Whenever you need to sort the elements in an ul or
something then you'll have to use the Array.sort() function, so you
need to do $('ul li').get().sort(...). Here is an example of where I
needed this functionality: http://bin.cakephp.org/view/1632218532
It's not a big deal that I have to call get(), but it would be a big
problem if it wasn't there!
What about
Array.prototype.sort.apply( $('li') );
Not sue if that'll work...
--Klaus
[jQuery] append reformting the content i send it
wtf? I have specific html i want added to a div so I use append to add it. fine it works but it is formatting the code and making it unusable. how do i prevent append from doing this?
[jQuery] Re: Syntactic sugar for checking whether an element exists
jQuery is a language It was a library last time I checked ; ). yeah, well, it can be many things to many people; we all agree it's code. I think it's art, too Why? For me the sweetest thing about using jQuery has been it's intuitiveness right out of the box. ok, so next time i want to code something in jquery i'll just write $(make coffee) ? No, there are things that are intuitive **once you've understood the basics**. IOW intuitiveness is based on your assumptions and your knowledge. Why would you assume that .hasClass() exists? And not, e.g., isMemberOf() or .classMatches() ? It must depend of what you're already familiar with before you switch to jQuery. For me (and I really mean not speaking for everyone) it's more intuitive if there is an internal logic that I can understand; adding stuff that is redundant is merely adding cruft, and hence counter-intuitive. That's why I wanted to add my I don't agree message -- though I understand and respect your position, I don't share it. -- Fil
[jQuery] Re: .trigger(click) // don't work? [newbie]
HI,
i have these line on document.ready and using jquery-1.1.3.pack.js
(no, not 1.1.3.1):
$(function(){
$('#chiamacap').trigger('click');
$(a#chiamacap).bind(click,
function(){
alert(hi);
});
});
The book says that you can simulate a click by using the trigger()
method.
If i click the #chiamacap link it runs an alert. wow ;-)
But by applying trigger() to $('#chiamacap') on load does not work.
What am i doing wrong?
You're triggering the click action before binding the click behavior. You
need to bind the behavior before you can trigger it.
-Dan
[jQuery] Re: Thickbox Reloaded
I've got a 2/3 rewrite of thickbox that is a lot more flexible. I've tested it on Safari, IE6 and Firefox. Anyone interested? On Jul 10, 11:56 am, Txt.Vaska [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bonjour: I haven't seen any talk about Thickbox Reloaded since mid-May. And I noticed that Thickbox 3 is out now. Is Thickbox Reloaded still happening? The alpha files I got my hands on didn't work in Safari...but...yeah...it's an Alpha. Any word, hint, suggestion...when the beta might happen for it? ;)
[jQuery] Re: JQuery - CrossBrowser? - Script not working in Firefox
Ok, so you da man when it comes to this AutoCompleter? I did try
the page from FF and it definitely worked. Would you mind looking at
the code?
function findValue(li) {
if( li == null ) return alert(No match!);
// if coming from an AJAX call, let's use the CityId as the value
if( !!li.extra ) var sValue = li.extra[0];
// otherwise, let's just display the value in the text box
else var sValue = li.selectValue;
oItmDesc = document.getElementById(ItmDesc);
oItmDesc.innerHTML = li.extra[0];
oOnHandQty = document.getElementById(OnHandQty);
oOnHandQty.innerHTML = li.extra[1]
oPrice = document.getElementById(Price);
oPrice.innerHTML = li.extra[2]
// alert(The value you selected was: + sValue);
}
There's nothing that jumps out as something that wouldn't work in FF.
However, you obviously have an error somewhere in your code. I'd recommend
installing the Firebug plug-in for FF--it'll really allow you to dig deep
into what's going on (you'll be able to run traces, see the results from
AJAX calls, etc.)
One thing I would recommend do in the above code is making use of jQuery.
You're going back to DOM methods and missing out on the benefits of jQuery.
The following could be re-written:
oItmDesc = document.getElementById(ItmDesc);
oItmDesc.innerHTML = li.extra[0];
oOnHandQty = document.getElementById(OnHandQty);
oOnHandQty.innerHTML = li.extra[1]
oPrice = document.getElementById(Price);
oPrice.innerHTML = li.extra[2]
To:
$(#ItmDesc).html(li.extra[0]);
$(#OnHandQty).html(li.extra[1]);
$(#Price).html(li.extra[2]);
Not only is this a lot less code, it'll also make sure your code is cross
browser compatible.
-Dan
[jQuery] Re: Thickbox Reloaded
Txt.Vaska wrote: Bonjour: I haven't seen any talk about Thickbox Reloaded since mid-May. And I noticed that Thickbox 3 is out now. Is Thickbox Reloaded still happening? The alpha files I got my hands on didn't work in Safari...but...yeah...it's an Alpha. Any word, hint, suggestion...when the beta might happen for it? ;) I consider it nearly beta, I only need to cleanup and fix a few styles before announcing. It actually is in heavy use for my project and it works cross browser. I just need to move over some styles... --Klaus
[jQuery] Re: Using AutoCompleter, how do you pass parameters
Now if I could only make sense of that page. g So you wrote that mod to the original AutoCompleter by Dylan V and now you and this other guy Joern are working on it? Sorry, just trying to understand who's who. What should I download from that page? Not that the who's who really matters that much, but the story is as follows. Dylan Verheul released the original Autocomplete plug-in. It did most of what I needed, but was missing several crucial parts that I needed so I fixed a few bugs and added the handful of features I needed. Jörn Zaefferer liked what I did, but wanted to implement a few more features (such as multiple selections,) so he started re-writing my mod (it's almost a completely re-write now) to add new features and streamline the code. When I can, I help Jörn out with the project. As for what you should download, I'd recommend grabbing all the code and playing around with it. It's a completely re-write and we know some of the new features are not finished (multiple select items don't work completely the way we'd like to see them work.) -Dan On Jul 9, 8:49 am, Dan G. Switzer, II [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: One other thing: If the user does not actually select an item from the list and, instead, just tabs out of the field - perhaps because the item that was put into the textbox via the quick-fill was the one he wanted - then the code to populate other fields does not fire. How can I get that code to fire? (The code below does not fire) Yeah, that looks like a bug. Development of this code branch has actually stopped and been replaced with: http://dev.jquery.com/browser/trunk/plugins/autocomplete It looks like this issue is resolved in the latest code base. -Dan
[jQuery] Re: Release: Tooltip plugin 1.1
On Jul 9, 2:33 am, Jörn Zaefferer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: R.RajeshJebaAnbiahwrote: Another thing, you're bundling your site's style in zip file. Are you referring to the demo files? If so, that is intentional. If not, could you clarify that? http://jquery.bassistance.de/tooltip/jquery.tooltip.zip / jquery.tooltip.css This file has the style for the demo/site too. I'd rather prefer it contain only the tooltip related styles and can possibly add another style say demo.css for demo related styles. FWIW, I hate Arial font like anything; when I added jquery.tooltip.css, I have noticed that all the fonts have changed to Arial. With FireBug, I have noticed that the jquery.tooltip.css's style takes precedence for body tag. Another thing, the id=tooltip is quite common thing, so it could have been jqtooltip or so. -- ?php echo 'Just another PHP saint'; ? Email: rrjanbiah-at-Y!comBlog: http://rajeshanbiah.blogspot.com/
[jQuery] display: block forcing blocks to jump in FF
Say like (note the display: inline):
div id=barspan id=foo style=display: inlinefoo/span./
div
Do animation on $('#foo'), can notice a jump in FF. This is because,
jQuery is toggling with display none to block and vice-versa; but
doesn't apply display: inline. Is there any workarounds? or advices?
TIA
--
?php echo 'Just another PHP saint'; ?
Email: rrjanbiah-at-Y!comBlog: http://rajeshanbiah.blogspot.com/
[jQuery] Re: Using AutoCompleter, how do you pass parameters
Just my $0.02: I'd recommend going with Jörn's rewrite, UNLESS you need the mustMatch option which doesn't yet work in his version. Jörn's version is much more likely to be updated than mine and (I assume) Dan's, and Jörn did a more than excellent job. I'm switching jobs on August 1, and my new job actually needs me to do jQuery stuff (everything I did up to now was in my spare time), so I hope to be more active as of then. Dylan On 7/10/07, Dan G. Switzer, II [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now if I could only make sense of that page. g So you wrote that mod to the original AutoCompleter by Dylan V and now you and this other guy Joern are working on it? Sorry, just trying to understand who's who. What should I download from that page? Not that the who's who really matters that much, but the story is as follows. Dylan Verheul released the original Autocomplete plug-in. It did most of what I needed, but was missing several crucial parts that I needed so I fixed a few bugs and added the handful of features I needed. Jörn Zaefferer liked what I did, but wanted to implement a few more features (such as multiple selections,) so he started re-writing my mod (it's almost a completely re-write now) to add new features and streamline the code. When I can, I help Jörn out with the project. As for what you should download, I'd recommend grabbing all the code and playing around with it. It's a completely re-write and we know some of the new features are not finished (multiple select items don't work completely the way we'd like to see them work.) -Dan On Jul 9, 8:49 am, Dan G. Switzer, II [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: One other thing: If the user does not actually select an item from the list and, instead, just tabs out of the field - perhaps because the item that was put into the textbox via the quick-fill was the one he wanted - then the code to populate other fields does not fire. How can I get that code to fire? (The code below does not fire) Yeah, that looks like a bug. Development of this code branch has actually stopped and been replaced with: http://dev.jquery.com/browser/trunk/plugins/autocomplete It looks like this issue is resolved in the latest code base. -Dan
[jQuery] Re: Using AutoCompleter, how do you pass parameters
Just my $0.02: I'd recommend going with Jörn's rewrite, UNLESS you need the mustMatch option which doesn't yet work in his version. Jörn's version is much more likely to be updated than mine and (I assume) Dan's, and Jörn did a more than excellent job. As I alluded to in my message, I've stopped development of my plug-in to help out Jörn.
[jQuery] Re: .trigger(click) // don't work? [newbie]
;-)... ehm thanks... now it works. It was sufficent to cut and paste it after the click behaviuor experimenting... experimenting... ciao grazie GC
[jQuery] Re: Thickbox Reloaded
I am always! -Original Message- From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jökull Sent: mardi 10 juillet 2007 13:40 To: jQuery (English) Subject: [jQuery] Re: Thickbox Reloaded I've got a 2/3 rewrite of thickbox that is a lot more flexible. I've tested it on Safari, IE6 and Firefox. Anyone interested? On Jul 10, 11:56 am, Txt.Vaska [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bonjour: I haven't seen any talk about Thickbox Reloaded since mid-May. And I noticed that Thickbox 3 is out now. Is Thickbox Reloaded still happening? The alpha files I got my hands on didn't work in Safari...but...yeah...it's an Alpha. Any word, hint, suggestion...when the beta might happen for it? ;) Ce message Envoi est certifié sans virus connu. Analyse effectuée par AVG. Version: 7.5.476 / Base de données virus: 269.10.2/893 - Date: 9/07/2007 17:22
[jQuery] Re: Thickbox Reloaded
I consider it nearly beta, I only need to cleanup and fix a few styles before announcing. It actually is in heavy use for my project and it works cross browser. I just need to move over some styles... --Klaus Cool, that's good news. I think I saw the current build over at Plazes? I'm ready to put this thing through some testing on a few different things whenever you get it out the door. Cheers
[jQuery] Re: Thickbox Reloaded
Hi Klaus, I personally am looking very much forward to your implementation. I like its design much more than TB3, with all due respect to the script that converted me to jquery. Just an encouragement ;) Alexandre -Original Message- From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Klaus Hartl Sent: mardi 10 juillet 2007 13:46 To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com Subject: [jQuery] Re: Thickbox Reloaded Txt.Vaska wrote: Bonjour: I haven't seen any talk about Thickbox Reloaded since mid-May. And I noticed that Thickbox 3 is out now. Is Thickbox Reloaded still happening? The alpha files I got my hands on didn't work in Safari...but...yeah...it's an Alpha. Any word, hint, suggestion...when the beta might happen for it? ;) I consider it nearly beta, I only need to cleanup and fix a few styles before announcing. It actually is in heavy use for my project and it works cross browser. I just need to move over some styles... --Klaus Ce message Envoi est certifié sans virus connu. Analyse effectuée par AVG. Version: 7.5.476 / Base de données virus: 269.10.2/893 - Date: 9/07/2007 17:22
[jQuery] Re: announcement: jQuery-based generic board game interface
Can you explain (ever so briefly) how this would be used? Is it merely a way to quickly place pieces on an existing board? -Original Message- From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Resig Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 9:41 PM To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com Subject: [jQuery] Re: announcement: jQuery-based generic board game interface Stephan - Great work! I could definitely see how this would be useful. --John On 7/9/07, Stephan Beal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hiya! The jQ site says that this list is the place to make announcements, so here it goes... The past couple of days i've been working on an application for playtesting new boardgames (a long-time hobby of mine), and it's now at a point where it mostly does what i want. With only about 175 lines of JS code (plus about 3 times that amount of HTML, PHP, and CSS), i'm still slapping my forehead over simple it is to do complex DOM-related tasks using jQuery. i didn't have to use the standard DOM API a single time, and had no problem finding a jQuery function to do everything i needed/wanted to do. Here it is, in any case: http://wanderinghorse.net/gaming/bpi/ (BPI is a working title meaning Boardgame Prototyping Interface) There are, of course, many more potential features to add, but it is currently suitable for its purpose: setting up and playtesting new boardgame designs without having to print out the boards and pieces. Caveat: it's only been tested in Firefox 2.0.0.4 and Konqueror 3.5.7, but it does not work 100% correctly in Konqueror because in jQ 1.1.3.1 the dblclick() callbacks are never triggered in that browser (a bug report has been filed). :D
[jQuery] Re: Thickbox Reloaded
On 11/07/2007, at 12:25 AM, Alexandre Plennevaux wrote: Hi Klaus, I personally am looking very much forward to your implementation. I like its design much more than TB3, with all due respect to the script that converted me to jquery. Just an encouragement ;) Alexandre Ditto! Still very much looking forward to TB Reloaded. Joel Birch.
[jQuery] Re: Thickbox Reloaded
Perhaps it needs a new name as well (rather than just 'Thickbox Reloaded'), because it does function slightly differently to Thickbox? On Jul 10, 2:32 pm, Joel Birch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 11/07/2007, at 12:25 AM, Alexandre Plennevaux wrote: Hi Klaus, I personally am looking very much forward to your implementation. I like its design much more than TB3, with all due respect to the script that converted me to jquery. Just an encouragement ;) Alexandre Ditto! Still very much looking forward to TB Reloaded. Joel Birch.
[jQuery] Re: announcement: jQuery-based generic board game interface
Another Jquery based board game that I'm putting into beta : http://64squar.es It's an online realtime chess game with drag and drop pieces. On Jul 10, 2:31 pm, Andy Matthews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can you explain (ever so briefly) how this would be used? Is it merely a way to quickly place pieces on an existing board? -Original Message- From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Resig Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 9:41 PM To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com Subject: [jQuery] Re: announcement: jQuery-based generic board game interface Stephan - Great work! I could definitely see how this would be useful. --John On 7/9/07, Stephan Beal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hiya! The jQ site says that this list is the place to make announcements, so here it goes... The past couple of days i've been working on an application for playtesting new boardgames (a long-time hobby of mine), and it's now at a point where it mostly does what i want. With only about 175 lines of JS code (plus about 3 times that amount of HTML, PHP, and CSS), i'm still slapping my forehead over simple it is to do complex DOM-related tasks using jQuery. i didn't have to use the standard DOM API a single time, and had no problem finding a jQuery function to do everything i needed/wanted to do. Here it is, in any case: http://wanderinghorse.net/gaming/bpi/ (BPI is a working title meaning Boardgame Prototyping Interface) There are, of course, many more potential features to add, but it is currently suitable for its purpose: setting up and playtesting new boardgame designs without having to print out the boards and pieces. Caveat: it's only been tested in Firefox 2.0.0.4 and Konqueror 3.5.7, but it does not work 100% correctly in Konqueror because in jQ 1.1.3.1 the dblclick() callbacks are never triggered in that browser (a bug report has been filed). :D
[jQuery] 2 beginner question
Hello
First very simple question: why ist this not allowed?
[code]
$(document).ready(
var isplaying = false;
//something else
);
[/code]
and this is?
var isplaying = false;
$(document).ready(
//do something else
);
[/code]
==
Second Question. When I load this page in FF, Firebug gives my 1
Error: missing ) after argument list });\n (Line28)
[code]
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd;
html xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml; xml:lang=en
head
titleSiggi Bucher: Photographin/title
meta name=description content=Siggi Bucher - Photographin
aus
Leidenschaft /
meta http-equiv=Content-type
content=text/html;charset=UTF-8 /
link rel=stylesheet href=screen.css type=text/css
media=screen /
script type=text/javascript
src=inc/jquery-1.1.3.1.pack.js/
script
script type=text/javascript
var isplaying = false;
$(document).ready(
$(#gomusic).click(function() {
if(!isplaying) {
popUp(sound.html);
$(#gomusic).text(sound off);
$(#gomusic).attr(href,#);
var isplaying = true;
} else {
sound.close();
$(#gomusic).text(sound on);
var isplaying = false;
}
return false;
});
function popUp(url) {
sound=window.open(url,'soundbumbam','height=50,width=150');
window.focus();
return false;
}
);
/script
/head
body
div id=left
div id=sound
a href=javascript:popUp('sound.html');
id=gomusicsound on/
a
/div
/div
/body
/html
[/code]
[jQuery] Re: Google Maps like interface with JQuery
Here is the code for what I am working on right now. It's nowhere
complete, but I'm looking to build a fully functional application for
jQuery and Google Maps.
/*
* Google Map Application (GMApp)
* Author: Tane Piper ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
* Website: http://digitalspaghetti.tooum.net
* Licensed under the MIT License:
http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php
*
* === Changelog ===
* Version 0.1
* + Initial Version
*/
jQuery.gmapp = {
build : function(settings) {
/* Default Settings*/
settings = jQuery.extend({
maptype: G_HYBRID_TYPE,
center: [55.958858,-3.162302],
zoom: 12,
control: small,
showtype: true,
showoverview: true,
infoarea: #gmapp-info
},settings);
if (GBrowserIsCompatible())
{
return this.each(function(){
var map = new GMap2 (this);
var geocoder = new GClientGeocoder();
var infoarea = settings.infoarea;
map.setCenter(new
GLatLng(settings.center[0],settings.center[1]),settings.zoom,settings.maptype);
switch(settings.control)
{
case small:
map.addControl(new
GSmallMapControl());
break;
case large:
map.addControl(new
GLargeMapControl());
break;
default:
map.addControl(new
GSmallMapControl());
}
if (settings.showtype == true){
map.addControl(new GMapTypeControl());
}
if (settings.showoverview == true){
map.addControl(new
GOverviewMapControl());
}
/* Seach for the lat lng of our address*/
jQuery('#findaddress').bind('click', function(){
jQuery.gmapp.searchAddress(jQuery('#Address').attr('value'), map,
geocoder);
});
});
}
},
searchAddress : function(address,map,geocoder) {
geocoder.getLatLng(
address,
function(point){
if (!point) {
alert(address + not found);
} else {
map.setCenter(point,12);
var marker = new GMarker(point, {draggable:
true});
map.addOverlay(marker);
marker.openInfoWindowHtml(Lat: + point.lat() +
Lng: + point.lng());
GEvent.addListener(marker, dragend,
function(){
mylocation = marker.getPoint();
marker.openInfoWindowHtml(Latitude: +
mylocation.lat() + br
/Longitude: + mylocation.lng());
});
}
});
},
}
jQuery.fn.gmapp = jQuery.gmapp.build;
To use it, create your div area and specify the width and height. Then do
$('#yourdiv').gmapp(); to activate.
At the moment, you can create a form with a field id=Address and a
submit button id=findaddress. This will then geocode any address
you type in and center the map on it, adding a marker. You can then
drag the marker around and it will give you the lat lng position.
At the moment, thats pretty much all it does. I'm working on version
0.2 just now with more functionality for my application, but I'm happy
to share it.
On 7/9/07, Pete [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
Does anyone know of a Google Maps like interface implemented using
JQuery?
The only real requirement is that a user can zoom in/out. On zoom, a
new image is properly loaded in terms of zoom and user expected
location.
If not, could you point me to a couple functions within JQuery that
would be a good starting point for this type of project?
Cheers,
Pete
--
Tane Piper
http://digitalspaghetti.tooum.net
This email is: [ ] blogable [ x ] ask
[jQuery] Re: announcement: jQuery-based generic board game interface
On Jul 10, 3:31 pm, Andy Matthews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can you explain (ever so briefly) how this would be used? Is it merely a way to quickly place pieces on an existing board? That's basically it - a generic game board and generic game pieces. Just as when you and i play a board game together, a HUMAN has to interpret the game rules (which, in the case of games being playtested/ prototyped, are always changing). This is basically an ultra-lite version of a C++ app i wrote some years ago called QUB (the Q Universal Boardgame): http://qub.sourceforge.net/screenshots/ That project is now defunct, as it grew too large to maintain (it was taking 30 minutes to compile after each significant code change). My goal with this app is to provide the most basic of functionality which QUB provided, and to do so via an AJAX/AHAH framework. When designing new boardgames it is often convenient to throw a few pieces onto a board and just play around with some ideas. That is what QUB was for, and that's what this JS app is for.
[jQuery] Re: 2 beginner question
cheers! I'm such a beginner.
http://i.somethingawful.com/cliff/ihateyou/page-262/3.jpg
On 10 Jul., 15:55, John Resig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You have to add an extra wrapper function in .ready(), like so:
$(document).ready(function(){
// your code
});
On 7/10/07, tlob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
First very simple question: why ist this not allowed?
[code]
$(document).ready(
var isplaying = false;
//something else
);
[/code]
and this is?
var isplaying = false;
$(document).ready(
//do something else
);
[/code]
==
Second Question. When I load this page in FF, Firebug gives my 1
Error: missing ) after argument list });\n (Line28)
[code]
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd;
html xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml; xml:lang=en
head
titleSiggi Bucher: Photographin/title
meta name=description content=Siggi Bucher -
Photographin aus
Leidenschaft /
meta http-equiv=Content-type
content=text/html;charset=UTF-8 /
link rel=stylesheet href=screen.css type=text/css
media=screen /
script type=text/javascript
src=inc/jquery-1.1.3.1.pack.js/
script
script type=text/javascript
var isplaying = false;
$(document).ready(
$(#gomusic).click(function() {
if(!isplaying) {
popUp(sound.html);
$(#gomusic).text(sound
off);
$(#gomusic).attr(href,#);
var isplaying = true;
} else {
sound.close();
$(#gomusic).text(sound on);
var isplaying =
false;
}
return false;
});
function popUp(url) {
sound=window.open(url,'soundbumbam','height=50,width=150');
window.focus();
return false;
}
);
/script
/head
body
div id=left
div id=sound
a href=javascript:popUp('sound.html');
id=gomusicsound on/
a
/div
/div
/body
/html
[/code]
[jQuery] Re: announcement: jQuery-based generic board game interface
Fun. I assume by boardgames you're talking about Catan, WH10k and that sort of thing and not Risk or Monopoly? -Original Message- From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephan Beal Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 8:45 AM To: jQuery (English) Subject: [jQuery] Re: announcement: jQuery-based generic board game interface On Jul 10, 3:31 pm, Andy Matthews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can you explain (ever so briefly) how this would be used? Is it merely a way to quickly place pieces on an existing board? That's basically it - a generic game board and generic game pieces. Just as when you and i play a board game together, a HUMAN has to interpret the game rules (which, in the case of games being playtested/ prototyped, are always changing). This is basically an ultra-lite version of a C++ app i wrote some years ago called QUB (the Q Universal Boardgame): http://qub.sourceforge.net/screenshots/ That project is now defunct, as it grew too large to maintain (it was taking 30 minutes to compile after each significant code change). My goal with this app is to provide the most basic of functionality which QUB provided, and to do so via an AJAX/AHAH framework. When designing new boardgames it is often convenient to throw a few pieces onto a board and just play around with some ideas. That is what QUB was for, and that's what this JS app is for.
[jQuery] SITE SUBMISSION: 64squar.es
Added: http://64squar.es - an online realtime chess game with drag and drop pieces.
[jQuery] Re: Thickbox Reloaded
Sam Collett wrote: Perhaps it needs a new name as well (rather than just 'Thickbox Reloaded'), because it does function slightly differently to Thickbox? Thickbox Reloaded was just a working title for me (it was supposed to become TB 3 at that time), but now that there is an official TB 3, I'm fine with that and quite a few people already adopted that name. But I'm all open. Functionality doesn't differ too much from Thickbox though - the main difference being the chainability and type auto detection. --Klaus
[jQuery] Re: Syntactic sugar for checking whether an element exists
ok, so next time i want to code something in jquery i'll just write
$(make coffee) ?
Haha, now I'm questioning your ambition. This is the holy grail of all
programming, it's almost blasphemy to make fun of it ; ).
For me (and I really mean not speaking for everyone) it's more
intuitive if there is an internal logic that I can understand;
Ok, I guess in this case the only language we share is jQuery ; ).
Intuition irrational by definition, see:
http://www.google.com/search?q=define:intuition.
No, there are things that are intuitive **once you've understood the
basics**. IOW intuitiveness is based on your assumptions and your
knowledge. Why would you assume that .hasClass() exists? And not,
e.g., isMemberOf() or .classMatches() ? It must depend of what you're
already familiar with before you switch to jQuery.
I agree with you that people will try to use stuff they know from other
libraries first before falling back to intuition. So what would be two
of the most popular ones to expect?
Mootools:
* includes a hasClass() function:
http://docs.mootools.net/Native/Element.js#Element.hasClass
* includes a remove() function:
http://docs.mootools.net/Native/Element.js#Element.remove
Prototype:
* includes a hasClassName() function:
http://www.prototypejs.org/api/element#method-hasclassname
* includes a remove() function:
http://www.prototypejs.org/api/element/remove
To be fair. Neither Mootools nor Prototype seem to include an exists()
function. This however could also be traced back by the fact that they
do not share the jQuery philosophy in terms of advocating their CSS
selector engine as a) their main element retrieval method and b) don't
use it as a wrapper for chainability.
Anyway I can see your argument about how an exists() function would be
redundant. jQuery has a lot of convenience wrappers for things, but
$.fn.exists = function(){return !!this.length}; would be the smallest
and least functional one. Same is almost true for hasClass (return
this.is('.'+class));. This is where you can convince me with a
rational/scientific argument that those functions aren't needed.
However, as you said this library is more then just code, it's art. And
this is why I'm emphasizing those new functions: They empower the artist
(who does not read the complete docs before getting started) and don't
hurt the scientists
What a rant ... haha
Anyway, interesting discussion and good arguments,
-- Felix
--
My Blog: http://www.thinkingphp.org
My Business: http://www.fg-webdesign.de
Fil wrote:
jQuery is a language
It was a library last time I checked ; ).
yeah, well, it can be many things to many people; we all agree it's
code. I think it's art, too
Why? For me the sweetest thing about using jQuery has been it's
intuitiveness right out of the box.
ok, so next time i want to code something in jquery i'll just write
$(make coffee) ?
No, there are things that are intuitive **once you've understood the
basics**. IOW intuitiveness is based on your assumptions and your
knowledge. Why would you assume that .hasClass() exists? And not,
e.g., isMemberOf() or .classMatches() ? It must depend of what you're
already familiar with before you switch to jQuery.
For me (and I really mean not speaking for everyone) it's more
intuitive if there is an internal logic that I can understand; adding
stuff that is redundant is merely adding cruft, and hence
counter-intuitive.
That's why I wanted to add my I don't agree message -- though I
understand and respect your position, I don't share it.
-- Fil
[jQuery] Re: 2 beginner question
You have to add an extra wrapper function in .ready(), like so:
$(document).ready(function(){
// your code
});
On 7/10/07, tlob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
First very simple question: why ist this not allowed?
[code]
$(document).ready(
var isplaying = false;
//something else
);
[/code]
and this is?
var isplaying = false;
$(document).ready(
//do something else
);
[/code]
==
Second Question. When I load this page in FF, Firebug gives my 1
Error: missing ) after argument list });\n (Line28)
[code]
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd;
html xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml; xml:lang=en
head
titleSiggi Bucher: Photographin/title
meta name=description content=Siggi Bucher - Photographin
aus
Leidenschaft /
meta http-equiv=Content-type content=text/html;charset=UTF-8
/
link rel=stylesheet href=screen.css type=text/css
media=screen /
script type=text/javascript
src=inc/jquery-1.1.3.1.pack.js/
script
script type=text/javascript
var isplaying = false;
$(document).ready(
$(#gomusic).click(function() {
if(!isplaying) {
popUp(sound.html);
$(#gomusic).text(sound off);
$(#gomusic).attr(href,#);
var isplaying = true;
} else {
sound.close();
$(#gomusic).text(sound
on);
var isplaying = false;
}
return false;
});
function popUp(url) {
sound=window.open(url,'soundbumbam','height=50,width=150');
window.focus();
return false;
}
);
/script
/head
body
div id=left
div id=sound
a href=javascript:popUp('sound.html');
id=gomusicsound on/
a
/div
/div
/body
/html
[/code]
[jQuery] Re: Syntactic sugar for checking whether an element exists
Anyway I can see your argument about how an exists() function would
be redundant. jQuery has a lot of convenience wrappers for things,
but $.fn.exists = function(){return !!this.length}; would be the
smallest and least functional one. Same is almost true for hasClass
(return this.is('.'+class));. This is where you can convince me
with a rational/scientific argument that those functions aren't
needed. However, as you said this library is more then just code,
it's art. And this is why I'm emphasizing those new functions: They
empower the artist (who does not read the complete docs before
getting started) and don't hurt the scientists
There could be a jConvenient plugin then that would add convenient
wrapper such as exists or hasClass.
I'm not sure it should contain makeCoffee through... ;-)
-Nicolas
--
Nicolas Brush HOIZEY
Clever Age : http://www.clever-age.com/
Gastero Prod : http://www.gasteroprod.com/
Photos : http://www.flickr.com/gp/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/M1c002
[jQuery] Link with hover and a div
Hi,
I wan't to show a div on an mouseover at a link, like a tooltip.
Parts of my Code:
function jpmTip_init() {
$(a).hover(
function(event) {
$('div.jpmTipDIV').remove();
jpmTip_show(this, event.pageX, event.pageY);
},
function() {
window.setTimeout($('div#jpmTipDIV').remove(), 200);
}
);
}
function jpmTip_show(obj, mouseX, mouseY) {
$(body).append(div id='jpmTipDIV' ... /div);
$(div#jpmTipDIV).show();
return false;
}
This works fine. But I wan't the div not to be removed, when the user
set's the mouse
on the div. I think, I should use other methods than hover. But I have
no Idea.
Cann anyone help please? And sorry for my bad english.
kind regards
JPM
[jQuery] Re: append reformting the content i send it
What is the content you are trying to add...? On 7/10/07, Terry B [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: wtf? I have specific html i want added to a div so I use append to add it. fine it works but it is formatting the code and making it unusable. how do i prevent append from doing this? -- Rob Desbois Eml: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: 01452 760631 Mob: 07946 705987 There's a whale there's a whale there's a whale fish he cried, and the whale was in full view. ...Then ooh welcome. Ahhh. Ooh mug welcome.
[jQuery] Re: announcement: jQuery-based generic board game interface
On Jul 10, 4:04 pm, Andy Matthews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Fun. I assume by boardgames you're talking about Catan, WH10k and that sort of thing and not Risk or Monopoly? There's no reason Risk or Monopoly couldn't be played, provided a way can be worked out to handle things like game-specific cards. By handle i mean bring into play. In principal cards are the same as pieces - a graphic, or even a text-based widget. However, doing things like keeping cards secret (in Risk) would be next to impossible in this interface. Monopoly, on the other hand, could be adequately simulated provided that: a) several players don't mind sitting around the same computer screen. b) you have a big enough screen/resolution that you can fit the board, all playing cards, etc., on the screen. While fitting on the screen is not a technical requirement, it eases usability greatly. c) you write a bit of code to shuffle the Chance of Community Chest cards and dole them out as needed (could be a simple button click). In principal, any game which can be represented by simple pieces and/ or cards, and does not have any secret data associated with each player, can be represented by a generic boardgaming interface such as this one. Some changes may need to be made to accommodate the change of media, compared to a a physical game board and cards, but that normally isn't a problem. With fancy JS/CSS code you could even simulate the look/feel of real Monopoly cards (for example) by using embedded window-like widgets. :)
[jQuery] Re: Convert XMLDocument to text
Hi, I'm new to jQuery. I have this problem: I am using php to produce html. Them a would like to manipulate that html with jQuery. jQuery is not handling de html written with php. Any help? Thank you On Jul 7, 3:35 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Heh, hours of searching, and the minute after you post your question you find the answer... :) var x = (new XMLSerializer()).serializeToString(xmlobject); On Jul 7, 11:26 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have received an XMLDocument object through an Ajax call and has subsequently changed some of the nodes in the object. I now want to convert it to a plain text string so I can pass it on as a parameter. Is there any way in jQuery to do this?
[jQuery] Re: announcement: jQuery-based generic board game interface
On Jul 10, 3:39 pm, weepy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Another Jquery based board game that I'm putting into beta : http://64squar.es It's an online realtime chess game with drag and drop pieces. Wow! Great! Those features are still a long way away (if ever) as far as my mini-project goes, but it's great to see that someone actually has accomplished it. If i do decide to go that extra mile, i will certainly poke around your code to see how you've done it. :D
[jQuery] too much recursion (sound PopUp)
Hello I finaly managed to finish my job. Only with your help. http://siggibucher.com/preview/soundtest.html But when I click the sound on link, Firebug is complaining about too much recursion window.focus(); I have no idea, was this is, or should I change something? THX in advance! tom
[jQuery] Re: 2 beginner question
Answer both of your questions:
Use:
$(document).ready(function() { /* ... */ });
Not:
$(document).ready( /* ... */ );
- jake
On 7/10/07, tlob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
First very simple question: why ist this not allowed?
[code]
$(document).ready(
var isplaying = false;
//something else
);
[/code]
and this is?
var isplaying = false;
$(document).ready(
//do something else
);
[/code]
==
Second Question. When I load this page in FF, Firebug gives my 1
Error: missing ) after argument list });\n (Line28)
[code]
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd;
html xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml; xml:lang=en
head
titleSiggi Bucher: Photographin/title
meta name=description content=Siggi Bucher - Photographin
aus
Leidenschaft /
meta http-equiv=Content-type content=text/html;charset=UTF-8
/
link rel=stylesheet href=screen.css type=text/css
media=screen /
script type=text/javascript
src=inc/jquery-1.1.3.1.pack.js/
script
script type=text/javascript
var isplaying = false;
$(document).ready(
$(#gomusic).click(function() {
if(!isplaying) {
popUp(sound.html);
$(#gomusic).text(sound off);
$(#gomusic).attr(href,#);
var isplaying = true;
} else {
sound.close();
$(#gomusic).text(sound
on);
var isplaying = false;
}
return false;
});
function popUp(url) {
sound=window.open(url,'soundbumbam','height=50,width=150');
window.focus();
return false;
}
);
/script
/head
body
div id=left
div id=sound
a href=javascript:popUp('sound.html');
id=gomusicsound on/
a
/div
/div
/body
/html
[/code]
[jQuery] Re: Convert XMLDocument to text
On 7/10/07, João Araújo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm new to jQuery. I have this problem: I am using php to produce html. Them a would like to manipulate that html with jQuery. jQuery is not handling de html written with php. Any help? Thank you It looks like you sent this messaging by clicking reply on a previous thread. This makes it grouped under a different message subject (Convert XMLDocument to text), which may prevent a lot of people from seeing it and being able to help you. Recommend you compose a new message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Richard
[jQuery] Re: Syntactic sugar for checking whether an element exists
On Jul 9, 2007, at 3:05 PM, Matt Kruse wrote: On Jul 9, 1:50 pm, Sean Catchpole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I believe that learning jquery returns an array like object is more useful than creating a .exists() function. IMO, many people look for common sense methods that should exist in jQuery, or at least as part of a standard and commonly-used plugin. An exists() method seems like a reasonable candidate. As another example, I think .hasClass() should exist, even though you can do .is(.className) - simply because most people will look for a method called hasClass rather than reading the docs and eventually finding that .is() is the correct way to do it. It makes jQuery a little more approachable and user-friendly if it has exactly what you're looking for and expect, even though it may just be a wrapper for the real underlying functionality. I was pleased when jQuery got rid of all the pointless helper functions for CSS and simply went to name and value pairs for a css function. (IIRC). -- Alan Gutierrez | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://blogometer.com/ | 504 717 1428 Think New Orleans | http://thinknola.com/
[jQuery] Draggable from Interface plugin - Bug with IE6 [Solved]
Hello,
I have been struggling for the last hour because of a little problem
with the Draggable component of the Interface plug-in.
When I was dragging an element for the first time, everything was OK.
But as I tried to drag another element, the first element was moved
instead of the selected one (in fact, just clicking anywhere on the
page would move the first element).
I've found a workaround, so I put it here in case it would be useful
for someone:
$('.thumb').Draggable({
/*
your draggable config here
*/
onStop : function() {jquery.iDrag.dragged = null}
});
Has anybody else met this behaviour?
[jQuery] Re: thickbox onload
Hi,
Any one knows how to center the thickbox inside the element it is
contained and not in the whole view port?
Thanks
On Jul 4, 3:43 am, Eric Crull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In another thread Felix Geisendorfer published a little plugin that he
uses to rebind thickbox after the document has finished loading. The
line below starting tb_show calls the thickbox. I'm sure you could
easily use this as a starting point.
Here's the original
thread:http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-en/browse_thread/thread/f0d3920...
please note that in that thread, the command was TB_show, which will
not work with the newer thickbox plug-in.
$.fn.useThickbox = function()
{
return this.click(function()
{
var t = this.title || this.name || null;
var g = this.rel || false;
tb_show(t,this.href,g);
this.blur();
return false;
});
}
On Jul 3, 10:55 am, Anthony Leboeuf(Worcester Wide Web)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Is it possible to make thickbox onload instead of clicking a link? I
need to load up a thickbox for login information. Thanks
-Tony
[jQuery] Re: JQuery - CrossBrowser? - Script not working in Firefox
Ok, thanks for those suggestions. I'm only starting off with JQuery.
I hope to keep learning about it. At present, the syntax is very
strange.
On Jul 10, 8:42 am, Dan G. Switzer, II [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Ok, so you da man when it comes to this AutoCompleter? I did try
the page from FF and it definitely worked. Would you mind looking at
the code?
function findValue(li) {
if( li == null ) return alert(No match!);
// if coming from an AJAX call, let's use the CityId as the value
if( !!li.extra ) var sValue = li.extra[0];
// otherwise, let's just display the value in the text box
else var sValue = li.selectValue;
oItmDesc = document.getElementById(ItmDesc);
oItmDesc.innerHTML = li.extra[0];
oOnHandQty = document.getElementById(OnHandQty);
oOnHandQty.innerHTML = li.extra[1]
oPrice = document.getElementById(Price);
oPrice.innerHTML = li.extra[2]
// alert(The value you selected was: + sValue);
}
There's nothing that jumps out as something that wouldn't work in FF.
However, you obviously have an error somewhere in your code. I'd recommend
installing the Firebug plug-in for FF--it'll really allow you to dig deep
into what's going on (you'll be able to run traces, see the results from
AJAX calls, etc.)
One thing I would recommend do in the above code is making use of jQuery.
You're going back to DOM methods and missing out on the benefits of jQuery.
The following could be re-written:
oItmDesc = document.getElementById(ItmDesc);
oItmDesc.innerHTML = li.extra[0];
oOnHandQty = document.getElementById(OnHandQty);
oOnHandQty.innerHTML = li.extra[1]
oPrice = document.getElementById(Price);
oPrice.innerHTML = li.extra[2]
To:
$(#ItmDesc).html(li.extra[0]);
$(#OnHandQty).html(li.extra[1]);
$(#Price).html(li.extra[2]);
Not only is this a lot less code, it'll also make sure your code is cross
browser compatible.
-Dan- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
[jQuery] Re: Return attribute content from XPath match //[EMAIL PROTECTED]'banner']/@alt
Well bad example, I will not be using it will the id attribute, and I
will be getting more the one results, so $().attr() will not work.
On Jul 10, 3:41 am, Klaus Hartl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
with something like..
img id=banner alt=This is a banner /
//[EMAIL PROTECTED]'banner']/@alt would return This is a banner. Doing it
this
way does not work, but is valid in
XPatherhttps://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1192
Is there another way to do this in JQuery (I am currently just looping
the return and extracting the attribute if set)?
jQuery supports (some) XPath for selecting things, but not the whole
Spec. Try:
var alt = $('#banner').attr('alt');
Looping is pointless because an id is supposed to be unique in a
document. Also I think the CSS selector syntax should be faster then
your generic approach.
--Klaus
[jQuery] Re: Return attribute content from XPath match //[EMAIL PROTECTED]'banner']/@alt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well bad example, I will not be using it will the id attribute, and I
will be getting more the one results, so $().attr() will not work.
On Jul 10, 3:41 am, Klaus Hartl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
with something like..
img id=banner alt=This is a banner /
//[EMAIL PROTECTED]'banner']/@alt would return This is a banner. Doing it this
way does not work, but is valid in
XPatherhttps://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1192
Is there another way to do this in JQuery (I am currently just looping
the return and extracting the attribute if set)?
jQuery supports (some) XPath for selecting things, but not the whole
Spec. Try:
var alt = $('#banner').attr('alt');
Looping is pointless because an id is supposed to be unique in a
document. Also I think the CSS selector syntax should be faster then
your generic approach.
--Klaus
Ok, say you want an array that gathers all the alt attributes of the
matched elements, you can use the $.map method:
var altAttrs = $.map( $('img'), function() { return this.alt; } );
--Klaus
[jQuery] Feature request: XPath attribute content selector
I need to be able to grab attribute content staight from XPath in the form of //[EMAIL PROTECTED]'imageClass']/@id would return the ids of anything with the class name imageClass. I have not got the reg exp knowledge to do this myself.
[jQuery] Re: Feature request: XPath attribute content selector
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to be able to grab attribute content staight from XPath in the
form of //[EMAIL PROTECTED]'imageClass']/@id would return the ids of anything
with the class name imageClass. I have not got the reg exp knowledge
to do this myself.
I doubt this is likely to be added, as it doesn't return a set of DOM
nodes, which is pretty central to JQuery. But it's not hard to get them
in code:
var ids = $.map($(.imageClass), function(item) {return item.id;});
Cheers,
-- Scott
[jQuery] ProtoLoad
I noticed this new ajax loading script. http://aka-fotos.de/protoload/ It's based on Prototype, but if you look just at the relevant script: http://aka-fotos.de/protoload/js/protoload.js It's extremely small, but has a pretty nice feature set. (covering individual items) We have a few plugins that are similar to this, but maybe this is inspirational to add a little something. Glen
[jQuery] Re: Is there a way to READ the $.ajax settings?
Stephan Beal wrote: On Jul 9, 9:26 pm, Sean Catchpole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: $.ajaxSettings.async That's exactly what i was looking for. Thanks :). Do you happen to know if that's documented anywhere? i can find no mention of it on the jquery site, and using the on-site search engine returns (as usual) No page title matches. http://docs.jquery.com/Ajax#Options The first option :-) -- Jörn Zaefferer http://bassistance.de
[jQuery] Re: Random number of events required on page
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What I'm trying to figure out how to do is to have jQuery handle multiple events on one page, that are pulled out a of a database (can be any amount of numbers). A good example of what I'm trying to do would be a large FAQ listing, where each question is clickable, which after it is clicked, expands the answer under it. After doing all of the reading I've only found ways that unless I manually specifiy each div differently, clicking on one question will expand all of the answers. With a some what random amount of questions on each page, how could I make it so that it could check each question and expand each individual answer? That basically sounds like a good use case for the accordion plugin: http://bassistance.de/jquery-plugins/jquery-plugin-accordion/ -- Jörn Zaefferer http://bassistance.de
[jQuery] Re: validation pluging work in FireFox but Not in Internet Explorer
WebolizeR wrote: any suggestion about this,please I get this warning when enabling strict warnings (via web developer toolbar) in Firefox: trailing comma is not legal in ECMA-262 object initializers }\n index.php (line 39) -- Jörn Zaefferer http://bassistance.de
[jQuery] Re: Release: Tooltip plugin 1.1
R. Rajesh Jeba Anbiah wrote: On Jul 9, 2:33 am, Jörn Zaefferer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: R.RajeshJebaAnbiahwrote: Another thing, you're bundling your site's style in zip file. Are you referring to the demo files? If so, that is intentional. If not, could you clarify that? http://jquery.bassistance.de/tooltip/jquery.tooltip.zip / jquery.tooltip.css This file has the style for the demo/site too. I'd rather prefer it contain only the tooltip related styles and can possibly add another style say demo.css for demo related styles. FWIW, I hate Arial font like anything; when I added jquery.tooltip.css, I have noticed that all the fonts have changed to Arial. With FireBug, I have noticed that the jquery.tooltip.css's style takes precedence for body tag. Another thing, the id=tooltip is quite common thing, so it could have been jqtooltip or so. Good points, thanks a lot! I'll seperate the demo and the plugin related styles into their own files. Changing the default id would break existing code. Its used only in a single place, to making it an option would be easy. I find it convinient to just define styles for #tooltip. What do you think? -- Jörn Zaefferer http://bassistance.de
[jQuery] Re: Using AutoCompleter, how do you pass parameters
AtlantaGeek wrote: Now if I could only make sense of that page. g So you wrote that mod to the original AutoCompleter by Dylan V and now you and this other guy Joern are working on it? Sorry, just trying to understand who's who. What should I download from that page? A somewhat stable version is here, complete with docs, demos and a convinient download package: http://bassistance.de/jquery-plugins/jquery-plugin-autocomplete/ On my own schedule validation 1.2 comes before any further work on autocomplete. Though once I'm there I'd like to finish all the stuff we added and make it an official plugin, ie. release 1.0 at last. -- Jörn Zaefferer http://bassistance.de
[jQuery] Re: Return attribute content from XPath match //[EMAIL PROTECTED]'banner']/@alt
On Jul 10, 2007, at 1:06 PM, Klaus Hartl wrote:
Ok, say you want an array that gathers all the alt attributes of
the matched elements, you can use the $.map method:
var altAttrs = $.map( $('img'), function() { return this.alt; } );
--Klaus
That's a good idea. Or, if you want to do stuff with the attribute,
you could use an .each() method:
$('img').each(function() {
var imgAlt = $(this).attr('alt');
// do stuff
});
--Karl
_
Karl Swedberg
www.englishrules.com
www.learningjquery.com
[jQuery] Re: ProtoLoad
This is exactly what's done by blockUI: http://www.malsup.com/jquery/block/#element In fact, it's almost identical - I wonder if they got some inspiration from blockUI? --John On 7/10/07, Glen Lipka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I noticed this new ajax loading script. http://aka-fotos.de/protoload/ It's based on Prototype, but if you look just at the relevant script: http://aka-fotos.de/protoload/js/protoload.js It's extremely small, but has a pretty nice feature set. (covering individual items) We have a few plugins that are similar to this, but maybe this is inspirational to add a little something. Glen
[jQuery] Re: announcement: jQuery-based generic board game interface
Stephan Beal wrote: b) you have a big enough screen/resolution that you can fit the board, all playing cards, etc., on the screen. While fitting on the screen is not a technical requirement, it eases usability greatly. Sounds like the right application for surface computers: http://youtube.com/watch?v=CZrr7AZ9nCY -- Jörn Zaefferer http://bassistance.de
[jQuery] Re: ProtoLoad
I was sort of thinking like BlockUI Lite. Block UI is 15K. It does alot more than this little thing does. But sometimes you just need the little thing. Glen On 7/10/07, Rey Bango [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: LOL! That was the same thing I thought of when I saw it this morning. Rey John Resig wrote: This is exactly what's done by blockUI: http://www.malsup.com/jquery/block/#element In fact, it's almost identical - I wonder if they got some inspiration from blockUI? --John On 7/10/07, Glen Lipka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I noticed this new ajax loading script. http://aka-fotos.de/protoload/ It's based on Prototype, but if you look just at the relevant script: http://aka-fotos.de/protoload/js/protoload.js It's extremely small, but has a pretty nice feature set. (covering individual items) We have a few plugins that are similar to this, but maybe this is inspirational to add a little something. Glen -- BrightLight Development, LLC. 954-775- (o) 954-600-2726 (c) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.iambright.com
[jQuery] Re: ProtoLoad
LOL! That was the same thing I thought of when I saw it this morning. Rey John Resig wrote: This is exactly what's done by blockUI: http://www.malsup.com/jquery/block/#element In fact, it's almost identical - I wonder if they got some inspiration from blockUI? --John On 7/10/07, Glen Lipka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I noticed this new ajax loading script. http://aka-fotos.de/protoload/ It's based on Prototype, but if you look just at the relevant script: http://aka-fotos.de/protoload/js/protoload.js It's extremely small, but has a pretty nice feature set. (covering individual items) We have a few plugins that are similar to this, but maybe this is inspirational to add a little something. Glen -- BrightLight Development, LLC. 954-775- (o) 954-600-2726 (c) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.iambright.com
[jQuery] Re: ProtoLoad
Glen, It's not fair to judge a plugin's file size from the raw source. It's like saying jQuery is 60K. Many plugins, like blockUI and the form plugin, have extensive commenting - complete with examples. I think blockUI packs down to 5K which is still larger than Protoload, but nowhere near 15K. jQuery's build system lets you min or pack the plugins quite easily! :-) Mike On 7/10/07, Glen Lipka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was sort of thinking like BlockUI Lite. Block UI is 15K. It does alot more than this little thing does. But sometimes you just need the little thing. Glen On 7/10/07, Rey Bango [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: LOL! That was the same thing I thought of when I saw it this morning. Rey John Resig wrote: This is exactly what's done by blockUI: http://www.malsup.com/jquery/block/#element In fact, it's almost identical - I wonder if they got some inspiration from blockUI? --John On 7/10/07, Glen Lipka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I noticed this new ajax loading script. http://aka-fotos.de/protoload/ It's based on Prototype, but if you look just at the relevant script: http://aka-fotos.de/protoload/js/protoload.js It's extremely small, but has a pretty nice feature set. (covering individual items) We have a few plugins that are similar to this, but maybe this is inspirational to add a little something. Glen -- BrightLight Development, LLC. 954-775- (o) 954-600-2726 (c) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.iambright.com
[jQuery] Re: ProtoLoad
Sorry, you are right. I just did a quick size check, I didnt think about the comments. My bad. mea culpa! :) Glen On 7/10/07, Mike Alsup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Glen, It's not fair to judge a plugin's file size from the raw source. It's like saying jQuery is 60K. Many plugins, like blockUI and the form plugin, have extensive commenting - complete with examples. I think blockUI packs down to 5K which is still larger than Protoload, but nowhere near 15K. jQuery's build system lets you min or pack the plugins quite easily! :-) Mike On 7/10/07, Glen Lipka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was sort of thinking like BlockUI Lite. Block UI is 15K. It does alot more than this little thing does. But sometimes you just need the little thing. Glen On 7/10/07, Rey Bango [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: LOL! That was the same thing I thought of when I saw it this morning. Rey John Resig wrote: This is exactly what's done by blockUI: http://www.malsup.com/jquery/block/#element In fact, it's almost identical - I wonder if they got some inspiration from blockUI? --John On 7/10/07, Glen Lipka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I noticed this new ajax loading script. http://aka-fotos.de/protoload/ It's based on Prototype, but if you look just at the relevant script: http://aka-fotos.de/protoload/js/protoload.js It's extremely small, but has a pretty nice feature set. (covering individual items) We have a few plugins that are similar to this, but maybe this is inspirational to add a little something. Glen -- BrightLight Development, LLC. 954-775- (o) 954-600-2726 (c) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.iambright.com
[jQuery] Re: Syntactic sugar for checking whether an element exists
On Jul 9, 2007, at 23:57 , Erik Beeson wrote:
In fact, if you find yourself doing a lot of if(something exists) {
... } else { ...}, you might want to consider trying to move some of
your code into a plugin. Most jQuery functions/plugins already deal
with the if(exists)... part by simply not executing if nothing is
selected.
Along those lines, I especially like using .each() for this kind of
logic:
$('#myId').each(function() {
// do things with this here
});
The .each() functions as an if, automatically scales to multiple
matches (often without planning for it), and as a bonus creates a
little namespace in the function where you can declare local variables.
--
Jonathan Chaffer
Technology Officer, Structure Interactive
[jQuery] Re: WYSIWYG Editor in Jquery
Hi Gurpreet, It's a pity that you plan to abandon using WYMeditor because of sparse documentation. Please feel free to ask any questions/send feedback on the mailing- list [1] or on the forum [2], we'll be glad to help. Cheers, jf [1]: http://lists.wymeditor.org/ [2]: http://forum.wymeditor.org/ On Jul 3, 10:41 am, G[N]Urpreet Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks guys, But I used WYMEDITOR (http://www.wymeditor.org/en/) for this project. Making it work was a pain primarily because of sparse documentation.
[jQuery] Re: ProtoLoad
You have incurred the wrath of Alsup. Poor you! ;) Glen Lipka wrote: Sorry, you are right. I just did a quick size check, I didnt think about the comments. My bad. mea culpa! :) Glen On 7/10/07, *Mike Alsup* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Glen, It's not fair to judge a plugin's file size from the raw source. It's like saying jQuery is 60K. Many plugins, like blockUI and the form plugin, have extensive commenting - complete with examples. I think blockUI packs down to 5K which is still larger than Protoload, but nowhere near 15K. jQuery's build system lets you min or pack the plugins quite easily! :-) Mike On 7/10/07, Glen Lipka [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was sort of thinking like BlockUI Lite. Block UI is 15K. It does alot more than this little thing does. But sometimes you just need the little thing. Glen On 7/10/07, Rey Bango [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: LOL! That was the same thing I thought of when I saw it this morning. Rey John Resig wrote: This is exactly what's done by blockUI: http://www.malsup.com/jquery/block/#element In fact, it's almost identical - I wonder if they got some inspiration from blockUI? --John On 7/10/07, Glen Lipka [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I noticed this new ajax loading script. http://aka-fotos.de/protoload/ It's based on Prototype, but if you look just at the relevant script: http://aka-fotos.de/protoload/js/protoload.js It's extremely small, but has a pretty nice feature set. (covering individual items) We have a few plugins that are similar to this, but maybe this is inspirational to add a little something. Glen -- BrightLight Development, LLC. 954-775- (o) 954-600-2726 (c) [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.iambright.com -- BrightLight Development, LLC. 954-775- (o) 954-600-2726 (c) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.iambright.com
[jQuery] FishEye Math
I am playing around the with great Interface plugins, the http://interface.eyecon.ro/demos/fisheye.html in particular and was wondering if anyone had played around with the code to allow for different sized images to be used, rather than a single size? Any math wiz that could point me in the right direction would be greatly appreciated. In the meantime, I'll keep on with my own trial and error. Thanks! *
[jQuery] Re: FishEye Math
I didn't like the implementation. It steals real estate before you are actually using the menu. I believe it should only respond AFTER your have triggered the space. Then if you move off it the trigger area should go back to just the menu and be dormant again. John Jeff (Gmail) wrote: I am playing around the with great Interface plugins, the http://interface.eyecon.ro/demos/fisheye.html in particular and was wondering if anyone had played around with the code to allow for different sized images to be used, rather than a single size? Any math wiz that could point me in the right direction would be greatly appreciated. In the meantime, I'll keep on with my own trial and error. Thanks! *
[jQuery] Re: allow no more than 3 checkboxes checked
That works very well. Could you also grey out the unchecked
checkboxes after 3 are checked?
You can try this:
$.fn.limit = function(n) {
var self = this;
this.click(function(){ return (self.filter(:checked).length=n); });}
$(input:checkbox).limit(3);
[jQuery] Re: WYSIWYG Editor in Jquery
Yea, that is pretty weak - if you have an issue with it, bring it up an help develop it - thats the only way these things grow. It's a pity that you plan to abandon using WYMeditor because of sparse documentation. -- Tane Piper http://digitalspaghetti.tooum.net This email is: [ ] blogable [ x ] ask first [ ] private
[jQuery] IE7 and jQuery Corners.....
Howdy, On a site I'm test designing I'm using jQuery and Corners, and it's working great so far. The problem I'm having with my site is IE7. In Firefox, it works great, all corners are the way I want them. In IE7, only the bottom is rounded. I need help.. http://www.jswindle.com/testing/trisha/ Thanks!
[jQuery] Element defined or not
Wich is the best way to know if a element for example a div is defined? like in php if ( empty($test) ) or if ( isset($test) ) thx
[jQuery] Re: ProtoLoad
Wrath? But I used a smiley! Mike On 7/10/07, Rey Bango [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You have incurred the wrath of Alsup. Poor you! ;) Glen Lipka wrote: Sorry, you are right. I just did a quick size check, I didnt think about the comments. My bad. mea culpa! :) Glen On 7/10/07, *Mike Alsup* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Glen, It's not fair to judge a plugin's file size from the raw source. It's like saying jQuery is 60K. Many plugins, like blockUI and the form plugin, have extensive commenting - complete with examples. I think blockUI packs down to 5K which is still larger than Protoload, but nowhere near 15K. jQuery's build system lets you min or pack the plugins quite easily! :-)
[jQuery] Fwd: [jQuery] Re: allow no more than 3 checkboxes checked
On 7/10/07, cfdvlpr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That works very well. Could you also grey out the unchecked
checkboxes after 3 are checked?
$.fn.limit = function(n) {
var self = this;
this.click(function(){
(self.filter(:checked).length==n)?
self.not(:checked).attr(disabled,true).addClass(disabled):
self.not(:checked).attr(disabled,false).removeClass(disabled);
});
}
$(input:checkbox).limit(3);
~Sean
[jQuery] Re: Element defined or not
Try
if ($(selector).length0){
//...
}
On 7/10/07, Sebastián V. Würtz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wich is the best way to know if a element for example a div is defined?
like in php
if ( empty($test) )
or
if ( isset($test) )
thx
[jQuery] Re: Element defined or not
On 7/10/07, Sebastián V. Würtz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wich is the best way to know if a element for example a div is defined? We get this question a lot. jQuery returns the DOM in an array like fashion. This is standard: if($(div).length) ... or sometimes: var div = $(div)[0]; if(div) ... ~Sean
[jQuery] Re: BlockUI, order of ops issue
traunic,
You'll need to put your sorting code in a setTimeout fn so that the
browser has time to render the block before you pin the cpu. Try
something like this:
$(#entries).each(function(prntI,prnt){
$.blockUI();
setTimeout(function() {
$(div.entry,prnt).sort(function(a,b){
var x = $(span.foo,a).html();
var y = $(span.foo,b).html();
return ((x y) ? -1 : ((x y) ? 1 : 0));
}).appendTo(prnt);
$.unblockUI();
}, 10);
});
Mike
On 7/10/07, traunic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Earlier today I was looking at sorting code like this:
div id=entries
div class=entryspan class=foofoo1/spanspan
class=barbar1/span/div
div class=entryspan class=foofoo2/spanspan
class=barbar2/span/div
/div
And in implementing this realized that there can be a considerable
delay in the processing if the number of #entries div.entry is high.
So I wanted to use blockUI to let the user know the application is
working. I tried this:
$(#entries).each(function(prntI,prnt){
$.blockUI();
$(div.entry,prnt).sort(function(a,b){
var x = $(span.foo,a).html();
var y = $(span.foo,b).html();
return ((x y) ? -1 : ((x y) ? 1 : 0));
}).appendTo(prnt);
$.unblockUI();
});
But do not see any messages. If I add an alert after the $.blockUI();
before the sort, then everything works as expected (with the exception
of the unwanted alert). Is there a way to block - sort - unblock?
I am using blockUI v1.26 jQuery v1.1.3.1
p.s. the sort thread that started this is:
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-en/browse_frm/thread/e0d6c199552dd1f7
[jQuery] Re: Fwd: [jQuery] Re: allow no more than 3 checkboxes checked
Why add the class disabled Sean?
_
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Sean Catchpole
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 4:19 PM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Fwd: [jQuery] Re: allow no more than 3 checkboxes checked
On 7/10/07, cfdvlpr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That works very well. Could you also grey out the unchecked
checkboxes after 3 are checked?
$.fn.limit = function(n) {
var self = this;
this.click(function(){
(self.filter(:checked).length==n)?
self.not(:checked).attr(disabled,true).addClass(disabled):
self.not(:checked).attr(disabled,false).removeClass(disabled);
});
}
$(input:checkbox).limit(3);
~Sean
[jQuery] Re: Fwd: [jQuery] Re: allow no more than 3 checkboxes checked
You're missing your return statement in this revised version (for the
noob's: which is needed to cancel the event)
-js
On 7/10/07, Sean Catchpole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/10/07, cfdvlpr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That works very well. Could you also grey out the unchecked
checkboxes after 3 are checked?
$.fn.limit = function(n) {
var self = this;
this.click(function(){
(self.filter(:checked).length==n)?
self.not(:checked).attr(disabled,true).addClass(disabled):
self.not(:checked).attr(disabled,false).removeClass(disabled);
});
}
$(input:checkbox).limit(3);
~Sean
[jQuery] Re: ProtoLoad
He hasn't. I've incurred it and your wrath leaves lasting effects. ;) Mike Alsup wrote: Oh my! How could I have been so wrong? I hope you've recovered! Mike On 7/10/07, Glen Lipka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You used :-) rather than :) The nose adds wrath. Plain as the nose on my face. Glen On 7/10/07, Mike Alsup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wrath? But I used a smiley! Mike On 7/10/07, Rey Bango [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You have incurred the wrath of Alsup. Poor you! ;) -- BrightLight Development, LLC. 954-775- (o) 954-600-2726 (c) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.iambright.com
[jQuery] Re: BlockUI, order of ops issue
As you may have suspected this example is greatly simplified from what
I am working with. My real div.entrys look more like:
div div class=entry
a href=# id=123
img src=/img/filename.jpg border=0 height=230
width=176
/a
div class=createDateDIV
span class=labelSPANcreate date:/span
span class=valueSPAN11-29-2007/span
/div
div class=createDateIntDIV
span class=valueSPAN1196312400813/span
/div
div class=updateDateDIV
span class=labelSPANupdate date:/span
span class=valueSPAN01-01-2008/span
/div
div class=updateDateIntDIV
span class=valueSPAN1199163600828/span
/div
div class=createdByDIV
span class=labelSPANcreated by:/span
span class=valueSPANJohn Doe/span
/div
div class=imageNameDIV
span class=labelSPANimage name:/span
span class=valueSPANmy filename picture/span
/div
div class=sizeDIV
span class=labelSPANsize:/span
span class=valueSPANlarge/span
/div
/div
and my sorting looks more like:
$(#entries).each(function(prntI,prnt){
switch($(#myform div.displayOrderDIV input:checked).val()){
case createDate:
$(div.entry,prnt).sort(function(a,b){
var x = $(div.createDateIntDIV
span.valueSPAN,a).html();
var y = $(div.createDateIntDIV
span.valueSPAN,b).html();
return ((x y) ? -1 : ((x y) ? 1 : 0));
}).appendTo(prnt);
break;
case updateDate:
$(div.entry,prnt).sort(function(a,b){
var x = $(div.updateDateIntDIV
span.valueSPAN,a).html();
var y = $(div.updateDateIntDIV
span.valueSPAN,b).html();
return ((x y) ? -1 : ((x y) ? 1 : 0));
}).appendTo(prnt);
break;
case imageName:
$(div.entry,prnt).sort(function(a,b){
var x = $(div.imageNameDIV
span.valueSPAN,a).html();
var y = $(div.imageNameDIV
span.valueSPAN,b).html();
return ((x y) ? -1 : ((x y) ? 1 : 0));
}).appendTo(prnt);
break;
}
});
Clicking radio buttons resorts the thumbnails, and yes, it is horribly
slow. Node tree navigation gets a little messy with this structure,
but I can tweak the nodes a bit to help that. It makes sense that
would be quicker (I think I was letting jQuery make me lazy ;). Any
other ideas would be greatly appreciated.
-wade
On Jul 10, 5:37 pm, Michael Geary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The browser doesn't render anything while you are running a script, only
when the script stops. That's way alert() makes it work - it stops your
script and gives the browser a chance to render. You could follow the
blockUI() call with a 1 millisecond setTimeout call with the rest of your
code inside the callback function.
But wouldn't you rather have a faster sort? That sort function is going to
be extremely slow. You may not need blockUI at all if the sort is fast
enough.
A question related to that: Is the .foo span always the first child element
of each .entry div? There's one obvious speedup you can make if it is -
a.firstChild.innerHTML instead of $('span.foo',a).html() - but also a much
greater speedup by changing the sort algorithm. Let me know on that and I'll
get back to you with a faster way to sort the entries - or maybe just the
change above will be good enough.
-Mike
From: traunic
Earlier today I was looking at sorting code like this:
div id=entries
div class=entryspan class=foofoo1/spanspan
class=barbar1/span/div div class=entryspan
class=foofoo2/spanspan class=barbar2/span/div
/div
And in implementing this realized that there can be a
considerable delay in the processing if the number of
#entries div.entry is high.
So I wanted to use blockUI to let the user know the
application is working. I tried this:
$(#entries).each(function(prntI,prnt){
$.blockUI();
$(div.entry,prnt).sort(function(a,b){
var x = $(span.foo,a).html();
var y = $(span.foo,b).html();
return ((x y) ? -1 : ((x y) ? 1 : 0));
}).appendTo(prnt);
$.unblockUI();
});
But do not see any messages. If I add an alert after the
$.blockUI(); before the sort, then everything works as
expected (with the exception of the unwanted alert). Is
there a way to block - sort - unblock?
I am using blockUI v1.26 jQuery v1.1.3.1
p.s. the sort thread that started this
[jQuery] Re: Fwd: [jQuery] Re: allow no more than 3 checkboxes checked
On 7/10/07, Andy Matthews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why add the class disabled Sean? In case someone wanted to change the CSS when it is disabled. On 7/10/07, Jonathan Sharp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You're missing your return statement in this revised version (for the noob's: which is needed to cancel the event) Which isn't needed because the checkbox is now disabled. ~Sean
[jQuery] NEWS: Digg uses jQuery to Build the Digg iPhone App
Joe Stump and his crew over at Digg have really been pounding on jQuery lately and loving every minute of it. The latest to come out of Digg-ville is the new Digg iPhone web app. Main Digg-dude Kevin Rose talks about the new app on the Digg blog and sends out props to the jQuery team for their help. Be sure to Digg it up! http://digg.com/tech_news/Digg_iPhone_Beta_Live Rey
[jQuery] Re: NEWS: Digg uses jQuery to Build the Digg iPhone App
Cool news, thanks for the info Rey. ~Sean
[jQuery] Re: NEWS: Digg uses jQuery to Build the Digg iPhone App
Anytime my man. Sean Catchpole wrote: Cool news, thanks for the info Rey. ~Sean -- BrightLight Development, LLC. 954-775- (o) 954-600-2726 (c) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.iambright.com
[jQuery] Issues with retrieving an object
$('#downloadable_' + songId + '
a').clone(true).appendTo('#downloadable_ ' + songId);
I checked, and downloadable_' + songId is definitely an element.
Yet, this isn't working, it should, right?
That element will always only have one link in it and I want to clone
it and append it to it's parent (the element).
