[jQuery] Re: Half star rating plugin won't work with jQuery 1.2.3
On Feb 29, 2008, at 1:16 PM, AsymF wrote: I got this one to work: Star Rating Plugin v1.1 -> http://www.fyneworks.com/jquery/star- rating/ But the half star plugin won't work with 1.2.3: http://www.learningjquery.com/2007/05/half-star-rating-plugin Does anyone know a fix? The stars all appear grayed out and hover also doesn't work. Hi there, check it out here: http://examples.learningjquery.com/rating/ It appears to be working with jQuery 1.2.3 just fine. Just to give credit where it's due, Ritesh Agrawal wrote the plugin. I just made it work with 1/2 increments because someone asked for that. --Karl _ Karl Swedberg www.englishrules.com www.learningjquery.com
[jQuery] Re: Can I use jQuery to superimpose one image over part of another?
Hi Dave,
You could easily make this happen with CSS alone, or am I missing
something?
#imageDisplay {
position: relative;
width: 200px;
overflow: hidden;
}
#image3 { /* give it whatever id you want */
position: absolute;
left: 100px;
}
--Karl
_
Karl Swedberg
www.englishrules.com
www.learningjquery.com
On Mar 3, 2008, at 4:44 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Let's say I have this HTML
and then I have another image, "image3.gif". I would like to layer
image3.gif 100 pixels from the left most coordinate of "image1.gif" so
that it appears on top of the other two images. The parent DIV,
"imageDisplay", is relatively positioned. Is there a way, using
jQuery, to do what I'm asking that works in both IE and Firefox, don't
care about the other browsers for now.
Thanks, - Dave
[jQuery] Re: Function overriding
On 3月4日, 上午12時37分, David Stamm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm sorry, I thought you were trying to architect your own plugin to
> make it easier to override for others.
>
> A useful technique when you're overriding someone else's function, is
> to save a reference to the original implementation right before you
> override it:
>
> // save a reference to the original function
> fn = jQuery.example;
>
> // override function
> jQuery.example = function(str) {
> // use the original implementation
> fn(str.toUpperCase());
> };
>
> This doesn't really help in your example, since you're trying to
> override a call to alert(). But I thought I'd mention it, in case it
> does applies to your real-world situation.
>
> thanks,
> David
>
>
Thanks for your tips.
Howard
[jQuery] Re: jQuery on Mozilla rhino
On 3月4日, 上午7時27分, "John Resig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sounds like you're using an old version of Rhino. > > --John Hi John, I am using the latest one: rhino1_6R7 I can run successfully according to your post, I just can't read the JavaScript file (env.js) by using Java! I will dig into the code to see what are the difference between load() in the js.jar and engine.eval(...) in Java. Thanks! Howard
[jQuery] Re: techniques for displaying line numbers
In looking for ideas, I discovered the http://plugins.jquery.com/project/designMode designMode plugin , which facilitates cross browser use of the designMode feature. Using this approach, I loaded a page with simple ordered list into an iframe. With designMode turned on, I can add lines and line items. It's not exactly what I was looking for, but it's a step in that direction. I would love to hear other ideas! r. rolfsf wrote: > > I'm trying to sketch out a concept for an application that is essentially > a simple text editor or equation editor. A user will type or paste some > text ( a calculation of sorts) into a text area. > > Is there a way, perhaps using jquery, to display the line numbers along > side the text or text-area? Is there a way to render the text area as an > ordered list on the fly, while still allowing editing? > > Just looking for ideas from anyone who may have encountered this > > thanks > Rolf > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/techniques-for-displaying-line-numbers-tp15812042s27240p15818436.html Sent from the jQuery General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[jQuery] Re: adding a loading image to a mouse pointer
Hi there,
Do you want the loading image to follow the mouse as the mouse moves?
if so, you can set its top and left css properties on mousemove.
Something like this:
$('body').mousemove(function(event) {
$('#loading-image').css({
top: (event.pageY + 10) + 'px',
left: (event.pageX + 10) + 'px'
});
});
You might need to look into ways to avoid CPU spikes because the
mousemove event can be processor-intensive. But this is a good start.
Oh, one more thing: make sure that loading image is set to position:
absolute; in the stylesheet, so that it can freely move around.
--Karl
_
Karl Swedberg
www.englishrules.com
www.learningjquery.com
On Mar 3, 2008, at 9:32 AM, ryszard99 wrote:
hi there,
i've just started doing jquery stuff and am interested in how i can
add a loading image that will follow the mouse pointer, pretty much
exactly how cluetip does it. actually i'm using cluetip in my site
and would like to replicate the loading image functionality..
if someone could point a n00b in the right direction i'd appreciate
it.
regs
.r99
[jQuery] Re: jQuery & Firefox bug.
Hi! What do you mean? I didn't understand! OutSystems corporate site Cheers, Mário On Feb 22, 10:14 pm, ruizbennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you remove the href (which has the postback), it will work in > firefox.
[jQuery] Re: ANNOUNCE: No Spam plugin
Hi Mike
On Jan 23, 9:39 am, Mike Branski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This jQuery plugin turns an obfuscated e-mail address into a human-
> readable one. It's lightweight and accepts multiple filtering levels
> for additional security.
Thanks for the plugin. Works great for me!
I did run into a problem with email addresses that have more than one
dot (period) in them. For example, my/name/my/domain/com gets
rendered as [EMAIL PROTECTED] when it should be
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I made a small change in the encoding convention by using a double
slash (//) to represent the @. Single slashes (/) represent the
dots. So my example is now encoded as my/name//my/domain/com.
Another thing that I noticed is if there are several single slashes in
the obfuscated email address, only the first one gets substituted with
a dot because the replace() function is not executing globally.
So to put this together, I changed the common code sequence:
.replace('/', '@').replace('/', '.')
to:
.replace('//', '@').replace(/\//g, '.')
This replaces the singly occurring double slash with an @, then
replaces all single slashes with a dot.
Cheers,
Bill
I
[jQuery] Re: Using jQuery without ready()
In that limited case, I supposed you don't 100% have to, but it's still a **really** good idea. First of all, you want your page to load before executing scripts. There is nothing worse that JS failing half way through a page load, it's faster to execute jQuery after the DOM has loaded, you can put all your JS in one place and it's better coding style. I guess the question is: what are you trying to gain by NOT wrapping it in document.ready? On Mar 4, 11:02 am, fetis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mar 3, 6:20 am, Hamish Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >http://docs.jquery.com/How_jQuery_Works#Launching_Code_on_Document_Ready > > But I'm not needed in code that running after page loaded. I just want > to add some class (for example) to already loaded element. Have I wrap > it into ready() event?
[jQuery] Re: jQuery on Mozilla rhino
Sounds like you're using an old version of Rhino.
--John
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 6:16 AM, howa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Anyone tried to run jQuery on rhino?
>
> I followed John's post, it was okay.
>
> However, if I code in Java (since I don't use command line), the
> env.js cannot be interpreted:
>
> E.g.
>
> engine.eval(new FileReader("C:/env.js"));
>
> It gives:
>
> javax.script.ScriptException:
> sun.org.mozilla.javascript.internal.EvaluatorException: missing :
> after property id (#15) in at line
> number 15
> at com.sun.script.javascript.RhinoScriptEngine.eval(Unknown Source)
> at javax.script.AbstractScriptEngine.eval(Unknown Source)
> at Test.main(Test.java:33)
>
> Where line15 is:
>
> get userAgent(){
>
>
> a little bit strange...
>
> Any idea?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
[jQuery] Re: IE7 Flicker On DIV slideUp()
I wonder if this could be logged as a bug. I glanced at the jQuery source
for animate, but it's difficult to figure out exactly where the problem is
through all the abstraction.
Several people have noticed this behavior in IE, but so far nobody has been
able to come up with a definitive solution AFAIK.
-- Josh
- Original Message -
From: "alphadog" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "jQuery (English)"
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2008 12:56 PM
Subject: [jQuery] IE7 Flicker On DIV slideUp()
So, I have an issue that I have seen mentioned in other posts but no
solutions work for me for some reason where in FF, slideUp() works
fine, but in IE7, it flickers at the end of the slide. I am using
jquery-1.2.3.pack.js and the DOCTYPE is set to strict ("-//W3C//DTD
XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-
strict.dtd"). I'm not sure how to fix this? (using hide() causes no
flicker, but I'd like to keep the slide.)
Here's the code:
var doUp = true;
$(document).ready(function(){
$("#TogglePaneHeader").click(function(){
if (doUp) {
$("#PaneHeaderButton").attr("src", "/wvo_dev/images/plus.gif");
$("#TogglePaneContent").slideUp("fast");
doUp = false;
}
else {
$("#PaneHeaderButton").attr("src", "/wvo_dev/images/minus.gif");
$("#TogglePaneContent").slideDown("fast");
doUp = true;
}
});
});
.paneHeader {
background-color:#1b7433;
font: bold 13px Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
color: white;
display: block;
position: relative; /*To help in the anchoring of the ".statusicon"
icon image*/
width: auto;
padding: 4px 0;
padding-left: 10px;
text-decoration: none;
}
FILTER:
Your content goes here.
RESULTS:
Some additional layout CSS:
#frameBody {
position: fixed;
top: 51px;
left: 151px;
right: 0;
bottom: 31px;
overflow: auto;
background: #fff;
}
#frameBodyContent {
margin: 5px;
margin-left: 10px;
border:dotted 1px white;
}
* html body { /*IE hack*/
padding: 55px 0 30px 150px;
}
* html #frameBody { /*IE hack*/
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
}
[jQuery] Re: Using jQuery without ready()
If you put the jquery reference in the and your script after the close of the tag, you don't need to use a $(document).ready. The funny thing is, that's exactly the behavior that $(document).ready is designed to simulate. JK -Original Message- From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of fetis Sent: Monday, March 03, 2008 1:55 PM To: jQuery (English) Subject: [jQuery] Re: Using jQuery without ready() On Mar 3, 5:24 am, the_woodsman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > To my knowledge, the main motivation for using ready and similar is > that otherwise, you have to pay close attention to where your scripts > are included in your page to ensure everything that the script relies > on has already been added to that page. > For example, if your script affects all .someClass elements, but not > all of them have been added to the document before your script file > was included, then the ones that came after the script block/include > will be missed out. > Yes, I know about possible problems if some part of page is not loaded. I'm speaking about case when all HTML elements are loaded before script running. Have this scheme some hidden problems?
[jQuery] Re: why jQuery?
Zok, Quite a bit of work has been done in having jQuery and Rails work together. If you search the list archives, you can find out morw. Rey... zok wrote: Hey, thanks for your answers. Doesn't jQuery work with Rails? Cause I think jQuery is more flexible and has the simler code. Right? Thanks zok On 3 Mrz., 05:02, Shawn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: First, I think that only YOU can make that choice for yourself. Each developer has their own techniques/styles. We can't make judgements to match your environment or habits :) Next, I think both have a future because they serve slightly different needs and audiences. (IMO). jQuery seems to me to more useful for a web developer or those building the not so simple interfaces. Prototype/scriptaculous seems to be better for those who either a) use Rails (this is changing though), b) look for the cut/paste solutions, or c) don't need to go beyond the "simple" tasks. (i.e. web and graphic designers with little JS experience) Now, that above is kind of a loaded statement and I expect lots of rebuttals... :) But that's the way I see it. To be fair though Prototype on it's own *could* be used for more, but for me at least it gets in the way more often than not, though I haven't used it for bout a year now... My random (and suspect) thoughts Shawn zok wrote: Hey, what is going to have the best future: jQuery or Prototype (scriptaculous)? Maybe you can tell me a few differences and/or reasons for your joice... Regards, zok
[jQuery] Re: why jQuery?
Exactly, javascript runs on the client's browser. Ruby, PHP, ASP.NET etc. etc. all run on the server. There should be no conflict. JK _ From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Ray Sent: Monday, March 03, 2008 1:05 PM To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com Subject: [jQuery] Re: why jQuery? jQuery should work with ANY back end language, since it is a font end language. On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 12:52 PM, zok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hey, thanks for your answers. Doesn't jQuery work with Rails? Cause I think jQuery is more flexible and has the simler code. Right? Thanks zok On 3 Mrz., 05:02, Shawn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > First, I think that only YOU can make that choice for yourself. Each > developer has their own techniques/styles. We can't make judgements to > match your environment or habits :) > > Next, I think both have a future because they serve slightly different > needs and audiences. (IMO). jQuery seems to me to more useful for a web > developer or those building the not so simple interfaces. > Prototype/scriptaculous seems to be better for those who either a) use > Rails (this is changing though), b) look for the cut/paste solutions, or > c) don't need to go beyond the "simple" tasks. (i.e. web and graphic > designers with little JS experience) > > Now, that above is kind of a loaded statement and I expect lots of > rebuttals... :) But that's the way I see it. To be fair though > Prototype on it's own *could* be used for more, but for me at least it > gets in the way more often than not, though I haven't used it for bout a > year now... > > My random (and suspect) thoughts > > Shawn > > zok wrote: > > Hey, > > > what is going to have the best future: jQuery or Prototype > > (scriptaculous)? > > Maybe you can tell me a few differences and/or reasons for your > > joice... > > > Regards, > > zok
[jQuery] Re: Event Bubbling - Not!
skube, try *mouseleave* instead, that one take bubbling into account.
On 3/3/08, skube <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I am a little confused about event bubbling. Say for example I have
> the following bit of HTML:
>
>
>
>
> one
>
>
> two
>
>
>
>
> when I try:
>
> $("#main").mouseout(function() {
> alert('test');
> });
>
>
> The alert gets fired even when mousing in/out of divs one/two, but
> while still staying within the main div.
>
> How do I fire the alert only if I mouseout of everything (including
> main), not just out of one and into two?
>
--
Benjamin Sterling
http://www.KenzoMedia.com
http://www.KenzoHosting.com
http://www.benjaminsterling.com
[jQuery] Event Bubbling - Not!
I am a little confused about event bubbling. Say for example I have
the following bit of HTML:
one
two
when I try:
$("#main").mouseout(function() {
alert('test');
});
The alert gets fired even when mousing in/out of divs one/two, but
while still staying within the main div.
How do I fire the alert only if I mouseout of everything (including
main), not just out of one and into two?
[jQuery] Re: Using jQuery without ready()
On Mar 3, 6:20 am, Hamish Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://docs.jquery.com/How_jQuery_Works#Launching_Code_on_Document_Ready But I'm not needed in code that running after page loaded. I just want to add some class (for example) to already loaded element. Have I wrap it into ready() event?
[jQuery] Re: Using jQuery without ready()
On Mar 3, 5:24 am, the_woodsman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > To my knowledge, the main motivation for using ready and similar is > that otherwise, you have to pay close attention to where your scripts > are included in your page to ensure everything that the script relies > on has already been added to that page. > For example, if your script affects all .someClass elements, but not > all of them have been added to the document before your script file > was included, then the ones that came after the script block/include > will be missed out. > Yes, I know about possible problems if some part of page is not loaded. I'm speaking about case when all HTML elements are loaded before script running. Have this scheme some hidden problems?
[jQuery] Re: assign to outerhtml
I had to do something similar, and this is how I solved it.
$.ajax({url:'blabla',success:process});
function process(results)
{
var id = 'therowid';
var origRow = $('#'+id);
var newRow = $(results).insertAfter(origRow);
origRow.remove();
newRow.attr('id',id);
}
So long as "results" was a string of properly formed TR html, this would
insert a new row after the current one, then remove the current one.
Of course, this would only work if you don't have a bunch events wired up
the row or its children.
JK
-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of pihentagy
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2008 1:41 PM
To: jQuery (English)
Subject: [jQuery] assign to outerhtml
Hi all!
I'd like to update a tr tag of a table with an ajax call.
The problem is that outerhtml is an IE specific attribute, and I have
the row style defined in the tr tag.
Is there a cross-browser solution to update a single row of a table
either with some cross-browser outerhtml script or without using
outerhtml?
So here just getting the outerhtml is not enough, I'd like to use it
as an lvalue.
Since I'm a beginner in jquery, can I have a minimal but complete
example? (I have some difficulties with the ajax functions)
thanks
Gergo
[jQuery] Can I use jQuery to superimpose one image over part of another?
Hi, Let's say I have this HTML and then I have another image, "image3.gif". I would like to layer image3.gif 100 pixels from the left most coordinate of "image1.gif" so that it appears on top of the other two images. The parent DIV, "imageDisplay", is relatively positioned. Is there a way, using jQuery, to do what I'm asking that works in both IE and Firefox, don't care about the other browsers for now. Thanks, - Dave
[jQuery] assign to outerhtml
Hi all! I'd like to update a tr tag of a table with an ajax call. The problem is that outerhtml is an IE specific attribute, and I have the row style defined in the tr tag. Is there a cross-browser solution to update a single row of a table either with some cross-browser outerhtml script or without using outerhtml? So here just getting the outerhtml is not enough, I'd like to use it as an lvalue. Since I'm a beginner in jquery, can I have a minimal but complete example? (I have some difficulties with the ajax functions) thanks Gergo
[jQuery] Re: How do I make an inline anchor link slowly scroll down?
Olaf ? What the... ???
Now you are not including jQuery.ScrollTo... how do you expect it to
work ?
Add the plugin and it works...
Cheers
Ariel Flesler
On 3 mar, 15:52, "Michael Ray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thank Olaf for finding that spelling error!
>
> Ok, so I fixed that spelling error (what a shameful mistake i know), but it
> still does not want to work! I have simplified the code even further to just
> affect all inline links on the page:
>
> Here is the code
>
>
> $(document).ready(function(){
> $.localScroll();
> });
>
>
> and here is the html
>
> THIS IS A TEST
> ...
> ...
> ...
> This is where it should go
>
> here is the page.
>
> http://66.199.224.168/calendar
>
> This seriously boggles my mind.
>
> -Mike R
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 6:41 AM, Ariel Flesler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Ohhh man... I got crazy, mumbling to myself "what the heck!".
> > After 10 minutes of going thru pretty much everything, I realized you
> > wrote:
> >
[jQuery] Re: Can't get started on Getting Started :)
For what it's worth, I copied and pasted your HTML code and tested it on my computer and it worked. There were two changes I had to make. 1. There are some odd line-breaks in your html below. Maybe they were added by your e-mail client, but I had to make into one line, and