[jQuery] Re: Access li by item in the array
Sorry again if I was offensive. Trying to be ironical in a foreing language frequently leads to this, I should've known better. I'm glad we sorted it out, except for the soccer thing ;) About having no idea on the scope of your project, that's what I was trying to ask you. It's easier to help or offer advice knowing the whole context, objectives and all, than looking at separate pieces. cheers -- ricardo On Jul 9, 6:51 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: It's too bad we didn't kick your ass in soccer the past couple weeks ago. Now I wish we really had! Brazil is overrated in soccer. On Jul 9, 4:40 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: This is exactly the kind of shit I'm talking about and I am cocky? unreal. On Jul 9, 4:37 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: Has nothing to do with me not being good enough and you have no idea on the scope of my project. I can't believe you actually replied like that and honestly coming here to tell me you're serious. But to state something like that and to butt in like this is unbelievable. Do you do this to people at work? They'd probably kick your ass for saying something like that. On Jul 9, 4:27 pm, Ricardo ricardob...@gmail.com wrote: It's not meant to be derogatory, no. I've said that many times, it's a fact isn't it? Sorry if it came out as rude. I could name dozens of better programmers than I am, and I'm not pissed off by that! On Jul 9, 6:06 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: Or just save your sleep time and hire someone with more experience to do this for you :] can I ask you if that was a derogatory statement? Seems like it to me. On Jul 9, 3:34 pm, Ricardo ricardob...@gmail.com wrote: expresso (we don't know your name), if you're still in need of help, why not post an overview of what you need? You've posted several pieces of your puzzle but no one can guess the overall structure you're trying to code. Like I need a carousel that expands when blablabla and loads blablabla from json. And I'm pretty sure you have an architectural problem there, the specific issues that pop up are just a consequence of a lack of planning. Or just save your sleep time and hire someone with more experience to do this for you :] And, please, try to keep discussions decently worded, and avoid posting in sequence, specially if it's just pointless fighting, this is a public forum. Thanks! On Jul 9, 4:45 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: I understand. I have nothing that much against you Morning and I'll try to sound less abrasive in the future. Keep in mind I have been up till about 12:30am for about 4 nights straight on this so I am definitely trying all I could on customizing it and could not afford to just step back and say forget this plug-in because I had gotten much to far into it for our solution. I am not one to just post and get freebies. Trust me, that's lame. On Jul 9, 2:42 pm, MorningZ morni...@gmail.com wrote: It's been perfectly clear that whatever you are trying to accomplish is anything *but* simple... and after two weeks of messing with it, maybe it is/was time to cut your losses on trying to manipulate code with which you have no idea what is going on under the hood. and code that someone wrote for free, supported for free, and has since moved on.. the tablesorter plugin is the same way... it's an older plugin that still works today, but people customizing it are on their own... whatever... i've done my best to help and point out issues to this point best of luck... looks like you'll need it . On Jul 9, 3:33 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: Funny thing is, I'll be blogging about this carousel. And you may find my implementation to be pretty complex but you would not know about the entire implementation and you assume that what we are doing is simple On Jul 9, 2:03 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: making it difficult to understand what you are asking tell me how it's difficult, I am very thorough in explaining the situation and things tried. On Jul 9, 1:57 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: You've got it backwards it makes more sense and keeps the clutter out if you stay in the same topic. I did not say not to stay on the same topic. I said if I start veering off into anther discussion that's talking about a different approach (in
[jQuery] Re: Access li by item in the array
If i'm reading your code right, you may want to try eq(i) instead of index (i). index is used to return the index of the match element, its not used to retrieve that element. cheers Michael Lawson Development Lead, Global Solutions, ibm.com Phone: 1-276-206-8393 E-mail: mjlaw...@us.ibm.com 'Examine my teachings critically, as a gold assayer would test gold. If you find they make sense, conform to your experience, and don't harm yourself or others, only then should you accept them.' From: expresso dschin...@gmail.com To: jQuery (English) jquery-en@googlegroups.com Date: 07/09/2009 09:55 AM Subject:[jQuery] Access li by item in the array Is it possible to target certain li in an unordered list by index with jQuery? I thought maybe I could use .index but was not able to get the syntax right. I thought maybe something like this would work but is has not: $(#mycarousel li).index(i).css(margin-right, 5px); inline: graycol.gifinline: ecblank.gif
[jQuery] Re: Access li by item in the array
thanks will try that out. On Jul 9, 9:15 am, Michael Lawson mjlaw...@us.ibm.com wrote: If i'm reading your code right, you may want to try eq(i) instead of index (i). index is used to return the index of the match element, its not used to retrieve that element. cheers Michael Lawson Development Lead, Global Solutions, ibm.com Phone: 1-276-206-8393 E-mail: mjlaw...@us.ibm.com 'Examine my teachings critically, as a gold assayer would test gold. If you find they make sense, conform to your experience, and don't harm yourself or others, only then should you accept them.' From: expresso dschin...@gmail.com To: jQuery (English) jquery-en@googlegroups.com Date: 07/09/2009 09:55 AM Subject: [jQuery] Access li by item in the array Is it possible to target certain li in an unordered list by index with jQuery? I thought maybe I could use .index but was not able to get the syntax right. I thought maybe something like this would work but is has not: $(#mycarousel li).index(i).css(margin-right, 5px); graycol.gif 1KViewDownload ecblank.gif 1KViewDownload
[jQuery] Re: Access li by item in the array
how about reading all the replies to your other thread about this? $(#mycarousel li:eq(10)).css(margin-right, 5px); expresso wrote: Is it possible to target certain li in an unordered list by index with jQuery? I thought maybe I could use .index but was not able to get the syntax right. I thought maybe something like this would work but is has not: $(#mycarousel li).index(i).css(margin-right, 5px);
[jQuery] Re: Access li by item in the array
thanks will try that out. On Jul 9, 9:15 am, Michael Lawson mjlaw...@us.ibm.com wrote: If i'm reading your code right, you may want to try eq(i) instead of index (i). index is used to return the index of the match element, its not used to retrieve that element. cheers Michael Lawson Development Lead, Global Solutions, ibm.com Phone: 1-276-206-8393 E-mail: mjlaw...@us.ibm.com 'Examine my teachings critically, as a gold assayer would test gold. If you find they make sense, conform to your experience, and don't harm yourself or others, only then should you accept them.' From: expresso dschin...@gmail.com To: jQuery (English) jquery-en@googlegroups.com Date: 07/09/2009 09:55 AM Subject: [jQuery] Access li by item in the array Is it possible to target certain li in an unordered list by index with jQuery? I thought maybe I could use .index but was not able to get the syntax right. I thought maybe something like this would work but is has not: $(#mycarousel li).index(i).css(margin-right, 5px); graycol.gif 1KViewDownload ecblank.gif 1KViewDownload
[jQuery] Re: Access li by item in the array
Because sometimes I get into other topics not related to my original posts in those other thread so it's only respectful on my part to start a new thread on a different topic that's veering off in the same thread. Not cool. On Jul 9, 9:30 am, Liam Potter radioactiv...@gmail.com wrote: how about reading all the replies to your other thread about this? $(#mycarousel li:eq(10)).css(margin-right, 5px); expresso wrote: Is it possible to target certain li in an unordered list by index with jQuery? I thought maybe I could use .index but was not able to get the syntax right. I thought maybe something like this would work but is has not: $(#mycarousel li).index(i).css(margin-right, 5px);
[jQuery] Re: Access li by item in the array
so it's only respectful on my part to start a new thread on a different topic that's veering off in the same thread. Not cool. You've got it backwards it makes more sense and keeps the clutter out if you stay in the same topic. As Liam points out you already asked the index question, AND it was answered by Charlie, in the topic you created just 13 hours ago http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-en/browse_thread/thread/88329168e57e952d/957b76fc83f1f967?hl=en and yet, here's an identical topic asking the identical question with 2 min apart two sentence ramblings on them all Realize what this list for what it is: a mailing list where lots of us provide free help out of our own time making it difficult to understand what you are asking, being rude to people trying to show you the way, rambling on and on with the same stuff all that doesn't lend itself very well to make your issues worth other peoples time and effort . On Jul 9, 11:12 am, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: Because sometimes I get into other topics not related to my original posts in those other thread so it's only respectful on my part to start a new thread on a different topic that's veering off in the same thread. Not cool. On Jul 9, 9:30 am, Liam Potter radioactiv...@gmail.com wrote: how about reading all the replies to your other thread about this? $(#mycarousel li:eq(10)).css(margin-right, 5px); expresso wrote: Is it possible to target certain li in an unordered list by index with jQuery? I thought maybe I could use .index but was not able to get the syntax right. I thought maybe something like this would work but is has not: $(#mycarousel li).index(i).css(margin-right, 5px);
[jQuery] Re: Access li by item in the array
how the hell am I being rude? And second, I am giving information to help you help me. Again I try all sorts of shit before I post stuff. I don't just post on every step of the way. I am showing you what I have tried. So you either get called out for not giving enough information or giving too little. Chill On Jul 9, 11:04 am, MorningZ morni...@gmail.com wrote: so it's only respectful on my part to start a new thread on a different topic that's veering off in the same thread. Not cool. You've got it backwards it makes more sense and keeps the clutter out if you stay in the same topic. As Liam points out you already asked the index question, AND it was answered by Charlie, in the topic you created just 13 hours ago http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-en/browse_thread/thread/8832916... and yet, here's an identical topic asking the identical question with 2 min apart two sentence ramblings on them all Realize what this list for what it is: a mailing list where lots of us provide free help out of our own time making it difficult to understand what you are asking, being rude to people trying to show you the way, rambling on and on with the same stuff all that doesn't lend itself very well to make your issues worth other peoples time and effort . On Jul 9, 11:12 am, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: Because sometimes I get into other topics not related to my original posts in those other thread so it's only respectful on my part to start a new thread on a different topic that's veering off in the same thread. Not cool. On Jul 9, 9:30 am, Liam Potter radioactiv...@gmail.com wrote: how about reading all the replies to your other thread about this? $(#mycarousel li:eq(10)).css(margin-right, 5px); expresso wrote: Is it possible to target certain li in an unordered list by index with jQuery? I thought maybe I could use .index but was not able to get the syntax right. I thought maybe something like this would work but is has not: $(#mycarousel li).index(i).css(margin-right, 5px);
[jQuery] Re: Access li by item in the array
You've got it backwards it makes more sense and keeps the clutter out if you stay in the same topic. I did not say not to stay on the same topic. I said if I start veering off into anther discussion that's talking about a different approach (in this case in that previous thread I started with a question about obtaining the LAST li). Then I wondering maybe instead I can just iterate through the list of li and grab some by index. At that point, that's a whole different issue or scope. Yea, that time I should have stuck with the thread because I already committed to the question on the index. Anyway I get it. But I should not be posting 2 different questions on the same thread which is what I try to avoid On Jul 9, 1:54 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: how the hell am I being rude? And second, I am giving information to help you help me. Again I try all sorts of shit before I post stuff. I don't just post on every step of the way. I am showing you what I have tried. So you either get called out for not giving enough information or giving too little. Chill On Jul 9, 11:04 am, MorningZ morni...@gmail.com wrote: so it's only respectful on my part to start a new thread on a different topic that's veering off in the same thread. Not cool. You've got it backwards it makes more sense and keeps the clutter out if you stay in the same topic. As Liam points out you already asked the index question, AND it was answered by Charlie, in the topic you created just 13 hours ago http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-en/browse_thread/thread/8832916... and yet, here's an identical topic asking the identical question with 2 min apart two sentence ramblings on them all Realize what this list for what it is: a mailing list where lots of us provide free help out of our own time making it difficult to understand what you are asking, being rude to people trying to show you the way, rambling on and on with the same stuff all that doesn't lend itself very well to make your issues worth other peoples time and effort . On Jul 9, 11:12 am, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: Because sometimes I get into other topics not related to my original posts in those other thread so it's only respectful on my part to start a new thread on a different topic that's veering off in the same thread. Not cool. On Jul 9, 9:30 am, Liam Potter radioactiv...@gmail.com wrote: how about reading all the replies to your other thread about this? $(#mycarousel li:eq(10)).css(margin-right, 5px); expresso wrote: Is it possible to target certain li in an unordered list by index with jQuery? I thought maybe I could use .index but was not able to get the syntax right. I thought maybe something like this would work but is has not: $(#mycarousel li).index(i).css(margin-right, 5px);
[jQuery] Re: Access li by item in the array
making it difficult to understand what you are asking tell me how it's difficult, I am very thorough in explaining the situation and things tried. On Jul 9, 1:57 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: You've got it backwards it makes more sense and keeps the clutter out if you stay in the same topic. I did not say not to stay on the same topic. I said if I start veering off into anther discussion that's talking about a different approach (in this case in that previous thread I started with a question about obtaining the LAST li). Then I wondering maybe instead I can just iterate through the list of li and grab some by index. At that point, that's a whole different issue or scope. Yea, that time I should have stuck with the thread because I already committed to the question on the index. Anyway I get it. But I should not be posting 2 different questions on the same thread which is what I try to avoid On Jul 9, 1:54 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: how the hell am I being rude? And second, I am giving information to help you help me. Again I try all sorts of shit before I post stuff. I don't just post on every step of the way. I am showing you what I have tried. So you either get called out for not giving enough information or giving too little. Chill On Jul 9, 11:04 am, MorningZ morni...@gmail.com wrote: so it's only respectful on my part to start a new thread on a different topic that's veering off in the same thread. Not cool. You've got it backwards it makes more sense and keeps the clutter out if you stay in the same topic. As Liam points out you already asked the index question, AND it was answered by Charlie, in the topic you created just 13 hours ago http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-en/browse_thread/thread/8832916... and yet, here's an identical topic asking the identical question with 2 min apart two sentence ramblings on them all Realize what this list for what it is: a mailing list where lots of us provide free help out of our own time making it difficult to understand what you are asking, being rude to people trying to show you the way, rambling on and on with the same stuff all that doesn't lend itself very well to make your issues worth other peoples time and effort . On Jul 9, 11:12 am, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: Because sometimes I get into other topics not related to my original posts in those other thread so it's only respectful on my part to start a new thread on a different topic that's veering off in the same thread. Not cool. On Jul 9, 9:30 am, Liam Potter radioactiv...@gmail.com wrote: how about reading all the replies to your other thread about this? $(#mycarousel li:eq(10)).css(margin-right, 5px); expresso wrote: Is it possible to target certain li in an unordered list by index with jQuery? I thought maybe I could use .index but was not able to get the syntax right. I thought maybe something like this would work but is has not: $(#mycarousel li).index(i).css(margin-right, 5px);
[jQuery] Re: Access li by item in the array
making it difficult to understand what you are asking tell me how it's difficult, I am very thorough in explaining the situation and things tried. On Jul 9, 1:57 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: You've got it backwards it makes more sense and keeps the clutter out if you stay in the same topic. I did not say not to stay on the same topic. I said if I start veering off into anther discussion that's talking about a different approach (in this case in that previous thread I started with a question about obtaining the LAST li). Then I wondering maybe instead I can just iterate through the list of li and grab some by index. At that point, that's a whole different issue or scope. Yea, that time I should have stuck with the thread because I already committed to the question on the index. Anyway I get it. But I should not be posting 2 different questions on the same thread which is what I try to avoid On Jul 9, 1:54 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: how the hell am I being rude? And second, I am giving information to help you help me. Again I try all sorts of shit before I post stuff. I don't just post on every step of the way. I am showing you what I have tried. So you either get called out for not giving enough information or giving too little. Chill On Jul 9, 11:04 am, MorningZ morni...@gmail.com wrote: so it's only respectful on my part to start a new thread on a different topic that's veering off in the same thread. Not cool. You've got it backwards it makes more sense and keeps the clutter out if you stay in the same topic. As Liam points out you already asked the index question, AND it was answered by Charlie, in the topic you created just 13 hours ago http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-en/browse_thread/thread/8832916... and yet, here's an identical topic asking the identical question with 2 min apart two sentence ramblings on them all Realize what this list for what it is: a mailing list where lots of us provide free help out of our own time making it difficult to understand what you are asking, being rude to people trying to show you the way, rambling on and on with the same stuff all that doesn't lend itself very well to make your issues worth other peoples time and effort . On Jul 9, 11:12 am, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: Because sometimes I get into other topics not related to my original posts in those other thread so it's only respectful on my part to start a new thread on a different topic that's veering off in the same thread. Not cool. On Jul 9, 9:30 am, Liam Potter radioactiv...@gmail.com wrote: how about reading all the replies to your other thread about this? $(#mycarousel li:eq(10)).css(margin-right, 5px); expresso wrote: Is it possible to target certain li in an unordered list by index with jQuery? I thought maybe I could use .index but was not able to get the syntax right. I thought maybe something like this would work but is has not: $(#mycarousel li).index(i).css(margin-right, 5px);
[jQuery] Re: Access li by item in the array
hahah, I double posted. OH boy, bend me over and slap me. I don't think you get the point of the double post thing... you said in another post that i hit refresh... in other words, your feeling is the mailing list is operators are standing by to take your call in that you should sit there and hit F5 and F5 and F5 and F5, when some patience shown might be in order... As for being rude, you posting (in disabled div topic) Morning, then tell my why the code is putting that in there straight from the JCarousel plug-in? is *you* being rude to *me*, acting like: 1) I wrote it and could (or want) to explain it to you 2) I owed you an explanation or something I pointed out that there is no disabled state for a div in the W3C specs, and you blow up at my wondering why the author of that plugin put it on there... how the @#$% am i supposed to know? and don't take my previous post as mean or rude or mad or anything, i was simply pointing out things you have been doing (all this double posting crap, rudeness, frustration, confusion, etc) for the past few days that, put simply, are super annoying... and that doesn't make it very appealing for others to help you out I've been patient on all your posts trying my best to help you figure out your issue, Charlie has been, Liam has been.. and all we get in return from you is pretty much a big fuck you... really classy . On Jul 9, 3:08 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: hahah, I double posted. OH boy, bend me over and slap me. On Jul 9, 2:03 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: making it difficult to understand what you are asking tell me how it's difficult, I am very thorough in explaining the situation and things tried. On Jul 9, 1:57 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: You've got it backwards it makes more sense and keeps the clutter out if you stay in the same topic. I did not say not to stay on the same topic. I said if I start veering off into anther discussion that's talking about a different approach (in this case in that previous thread I started with a question about obtaining the LAST li). Then I wondering maybe instead I can just iterate through the list of li and grab some by index. At that point, that's a whole different issue or scope. Yea, that time I should have stuck with the thread because I already committed to the question on the index. Anyway I get it. But I should not be posting 2 different questions on the same thread which is what I try to avoid On Jul 9, 1:54 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: how the hell am I being rude? And second, I am giving information to help you help me. Again I try all sorts of shit before I post stuff. I don't just post on every step of the way. I am showing you what I have tried. So you either get called out for not giving enough information or giving too little. Chill On Jul 9, 11:04 am, MorningZ morni...@gmail.com wrote: so it's only respectful on my part to start a new thread on a different topic that's veering off in the same thread. Not cool. You've got it backwards it makes more sense and keeps the clutter out if you stay in the same topic. As Liam points out you already asked the index question, AND it was answered by Charlie, in the topic you created just 13 hours ago http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-en/browse_thread/thread/8832916... and yet, here's an identical topic asking the identical question with 2 min apart two sentence ramblings on them all Realize what this list for what it is: a mailing list where lots of us provide free help out of our own time making it difficult to understand what you are asking, being rude to people trying to show you the way, rambling on and on with the same stuff all that doesn't lend itself very well to make your issues worth other peoples time and effort . On Jul 9, 11:12 am, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: Because sometimes I get into other topics not related to my original posts in those other thread so it's only respectful on my part to start a new thread on a different topic that's veering off in the same thread. Not cool. On Jul 9, 9:30 am, Liam Potter radioactiv...@gmail.com wrote: how about reading all the replies to your other thread about this? $(#mycarousel li:eq(10)).css(margin-right, 5px); expresso wrote: Is it possible to target certain li in an unordered list by index with jQuery? I thought maybe I could use .index but was not able to get the syntax right. I thought maybe something like this would work but is has not: $(#mycarousel li).index(i).css(margin-right, 5px);
[jQuery] Re: Access li by item in the array
Charlie, I have said thanks in a lot of my posts. Second, I am customizing this control way beyond what most people have. And yes, it's pretty frustrating to say the least when you create a plugin and then disappear after 2 years. While it's open source, still. When you email the creator nicely asking him if he's still contributing and you get no response, and then the forums the pages for that Carousel are abandoned, one's got to wonder wtf. My tone? Look at the kind of responses I get from people like you. Stuff like Of Course that won't work. Your tone is just as cocky as you think mine is. a number of the last posts directed back to you have been trying to give you a clue that everyone is getting really tired of all the frantic posts I don't see how they are frantic, just separated out. And I don't see all the people here who are getting fed up. I want you and Morning to know that some of the responses are definitely passive aggressive on your side to even start with. Do you need examples? I'm not here to argue. I'll do my best to consolidate my replies. And understand that people are human, sure I'm frustrated with the fact that the author is no longer to be found. Don't take someone's frustration to the point of saying I'm being negative when I was not THAT negative. What a way to blow this entire thing out of the water. On Jul 9, 2:08 pm, Charlie charlie...@gmail.com wrote: you sir are a complete ingrate! You have had endless help from numerous people for 2 weeks on a simple carousel. I don't think you understand the tone of a number of the last posts directed back to you have been trying to give you a clue that everyone is getting really tired of all the frantic posts, condemning someone's code ( on a plugin that 100's of people have used I might add), not reading replies with solutions..and to top it off this post makes it sound like others with busy lives are just sitting around waiting to help you! This post is rude! Wake up! Any reply to MorningZ's post I would have been expecting to see some thanks, rather than being a pompous A**. My bet is you just burned a big bridge to any further assistance with an attitude like the one displayed here I'm betting I speak for many others who are tired of the inbox clutter from your carousel problems expresso wrote:how the hell am I being rude? And second, I am giving information to help you help me. Again I try all sorts of shit before I post stuff. I don't just post on every step of the way. I am showing you what I have tried. So you either get called out for not giving enough information or giving too little. Chill On Jul 9, 11:04 am, MorningZmorni...@gmail.comwrote:so it's only respectful on my part to start a new thread on a different topic that's veering off in the same thread. Not cool. You've got it backwards it makes more sense and keeps the clutter out if you stay in the same topic. As Liam points out you already asked the index question, AND it was answered by Charlie, in the topic you created just 13 hours agohttp://groups.google.com/group/jquery-en/browse_thread/thread/8832916... and yet, here's an identical topic asking the identical question with 2 min apart two sentence ramblings on them all Realize what this list for what it is: a mailing list where lots of us provide free help out of our own time making it difficult to understand what you are asking, being rude to people trying to show you the way, rambling on and on with the same stuff all that doesn't lend itself very well to make your issues worth other peoples time and effort . On Jul 9, 11:12 am, expressodschin...@gmail.comwrote:Because sometimes I get into other topics not related to my original posts in those other thread so it's only respectful on my part to start a new thread on a different topic that's veering off in the same thread. Not cool.On Jul 9, 9:30 am, Liam Potterradioactiv...@gmail.comwrote:how about reading all the replies to your other thread about this?$(#mycarousel li:eq(10)).css(margin-right, 5px);expresso wrote:Is it possible to target certain li in an unordered list by index with jQuery? I thought maybe I could use .index but was not able to get the syntax right.I thought maybe something like this would work but is has not:$(#mycarousel li).index(i).css(margin-right, 5px);
[jQuery] Re: Access li by item in the array
Morning, then tell my why the code is putting that in there straight from the JCarousel plug-in Because previous to that, you were pretty cocky about the way you said that disabled is not part of a div Read the post. YOu have to take that response above in context. I was in no way trying to be cocky, just making a point that hey, it's in there so I don't get why then. On Jul 9, 2:22 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: Charlie, I have said thanks in a lot of my posts. Second, I am customizing this control way beyond what most people have. And yes, it's pretty frustrating to say the least when you create a plugin and then disappear after 2 years. While it's open source, still. When you email the creator nicely asking him if he's still contributing and you get no response, and then the forums the pages for that Carousel are abandoned, one's got to wonder wtf. My tone? Look at the kind of responses I get from people like you. Stuff like Of Course that won't work. Your tone is just as cocky as you think mine is. a number of the last posts directed back to you have been trying to give you a clue that everyone is getting really tired of all the frantic posts I don't see how they are frantic, just separated out. And I don't see all the people here who are getting fed up. I want you and Morning to know that some of the responses are definitely passive aggressive on your side to even start with. Do you need examples? I'm not here to argue. I'll do my best to consolidate my replies. And understand that people are human, sure I'm frustrated with the fact that the author is no longer to be found. Don't take someone's frustration to the point of saying I'm being negative when I was not THAT negative. What a way to blow this entire thing out of the water. On Jul 9, 2:08 pm, Charlie charlie...@gmail.com wrote: you sir are a complete ingrate! You have had endless help from numerous people for 2 weeks on a simple carousel. I don't think you understand the tone of a number of the last posts directed back to you have been trying to give you a clue that everyone is getting really tired of all the frantic posts, condemning someone's code ( on a plugin that 100's of people have used I might add), not reading replies with solutions..and to top it off this post makes it sound like others with busy lives are just sitting around waiting to help you! This post is rude! Wake up! Any reply to MorningZ's post I would have been expecting to see some thanks, rather than being a pompous A**. My bet is you just burned a big bridge to any further assistance with an attitude like the one displayed here I'm betting I speak for many others who are tired of the inbox clutter from your carousel problems expresso wrote:how the hell am I being rude? And second, I am giving information to help you help me. Again I try all sorts of shit before I post stuff. I don't just post on every step of the way. I am showing you what I have tried. So you either get called out for not giving enough information or giving too little. Chill On Jul 9, 11:04 am, MorningZmorni...@gmail.comwrote:so it's only respectful on my part to start a new thread on a different topic that's veering off in the same thread. Not cool. You've got it backwards it makes more sense and keeps the clutter out if you stay in the same topic. As Liam points out you already asked the index question, AND it was answered by Charlie, in the topic you created just 13 hours agohttp://groups.google.com/group/jquery-en/browse_thread/thread/8832916... and yet, here's an identical topic asking the identical question with 2 min apart two sentence ramblings on them all Realize what this list for what it is: a mailing list where lots of us provide free help out of our own time making it difficult to understand what you are asking, being rude to people trying to show you the way, rambling on and on with the same stuff all that doesn't lend itself very well to make your issues worth other peoples time and effort . On Jul 9, 11:12 am, expressodschin...@gmail.comwrote:Because sometimes I get into other topics not related to my original posts in those other thread so it's only respectful on my part to start a new thread on a different topic that's veering off in the same thread. Not cool.On Jul 9, 9:30 am, Liam Potterradioactiv...@gmail.comwrote:how about reading all the replies to your other thread about this?$(#mycarousel li:eq(10)).css(margin-right, 5px);expresso wrote:Is it possible to target certain li in an unordered list by index with jQuery? I thought maybe I could use .index but was not able to get the syntax right.I thought maybe something like this would work but is has not:$(#mycarousel li).index(i).css(margin-right, 5px);
[jQuery] Re: Access li by item in the array
and you blow up at my wondering why the author of that plugin put it on there... how the @#$% am i supposed to know? if that's blowing up then you need to relax when you read replies. That in no way was blowing up. On Jul 9, 2:24 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: Morning, then tell my why the code is putting that in there straight from the JCarousel plug-in Because previous to that, you were pretty cocky about the way you said that disabled is not part of a div Read the post. YOu have to take that response above in context. I was in no way trying to be cocky, just making a point that hey, it's in there so I don't get why then. On Jul 9, 2:22 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: Charlie, I have said thanks in a lot of my posts. Second, I am customizing this control way beyond what most people have. And yes, it's pretty frustrating to say the least when you create a plugin and then disappear after 2 years. While it's open source, still. When you email the creator nicely asking him if he's still contributing and you get no response, and then the forums the pages for that Carousel are abandoned, one's got to wonder wtf. My tone? Look at the kind of responses I get from people like you. Stuff like Of Course that won't work. Your tone is just as cocky as you think mine is. a number of the last posts directed back to you have been trying to give you a clue that everyone is getting really tired of all the frantic posts I don't see how they are frantic, just separated out. And I don't see all the people here who are getting fed up. I want you and Morning to know that some of the responses are definitely passive aggressive on your side to even start with. Do you need examples? I'm not here to argue. I'll do my best to consolidate my replies. And understand that people are human, sure I'm frustrated with the fact that the author is no longer to be found. Don't take someone's frustration to the point of saying I'm being negative when I was not THAT negative. What a way to blow this entire thing out of the water. On Jul 9, 2:08 pm, Charlie charlie...@gmail.com wrote: you sir are a complete ingrate! You have had endless help from numerous people for 2 weeks on a simple carousel. I don't think you understand the tone of a number of the last posts directed back to you have been trying to give you a clue that everyone is getting really tired of all the frantic posts, condemning someone's code ( on a plugin that 100's of people have used I might add), not reading replies with solutions..and to top it off this post makes it sound like others with busy lives are just sitting around waiting to help you! This post is rude! Wake up! Any reply to MorningZ's post I would have been expecting to see some thanks, rather than being a pompous A**. My bet is you just burned a big bridge to any further assistance with an attitude like the one displayed here I'm betting I speak for many others who are tired of the inbox clutter from your carousel problems expresso wrote:how the hell am I being rude? And second, I am giving information to help you help me. Again I try all sorts of shit before I post stuff. I don't just post on every step of the way. I am showing you what I have tried. So you either get called out for not giving enough information or giving too little. Chill On Jul 9, 11:04 am, MorningZmorni...@gmail.comwrote:so it's only respectful on my part to start a new thread on a different topic that's veering off in the same thread. Not cool. You've got it backwards it makes more sense and keeps the clutter out if you stay in the same topic. As Liam points out you already asked the index question, AND it was answered by Charlie, in the topic you created just 13 hours agohttp://groups.google.com/group/jquery-en/browse_thread/thread/8832916... and yet, here's an identical topic asking the identical question with 2 min apart two sentence ramblings on them all Realize what this list for what it is: a mailing list where lots of us provide free help out of our own time making it difficult to understand what you are asking, being rude to people trying to show you the way, rambling on and on with the same stuff all that doesn't lend itself very well to make your issues worth other peoples time and effort . On Jul 9, 11:12 am, expressodschin...@gmail.comwrote:Because sometimes I get into other topics not related to my original posts in those other thread so it's only respectful on my part to start a new thread on a different topic that's veering off in the same thread. Not cool.On Jul 9, 9:30 am, Liam Potterradioactiv...@gmail.comwrote:how about reading all the replies to your other thread about this?$(#mycarousel li:eq(10)).css(margin-right, 5px);expresso
[jQuery] Re: Access li by item in the array
Charlie and this is what pisses me off about you, statements like this: You have had endless help from numerous people for 2 weeks on a simple carousel so you're saying basically you're an idiot, this shit is simple. wtf man, and you find me cocky? I hate developers like you who think that they are God's gift to mankind and you come at people with things like what you can't figure that out, it's simple kind of cocky attitude like I'm some kind of dumbass. On Jul 9, 2:24 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: Morning, then tell my why the code is putting that in there straight from the JCarousel plug-in Because previous to that, you were pretty cocky about the way you said that disabled is not part of a div Read the post. YOu have to take that response above in context. I was in no way trying to be cocky, just making a point that hey, it's in there so I don't get why then. On Jul 9, 2:22 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: Charlie, I have said thanks in a lot of my posts. Second, I am customizing this control way beyond what most people have. And yes, it's pretty frustrating to say the least when you create a plugin and then disappear after 2 years. While it's open source, still. When you email the creator nicely asking him if he's still contributing and you get no response, and then the forums the pages for that Carousel are abandoned, one's got to wonder wtf. My tone? Look at the kind of responses I get from people like you. Stuff like Of Course that won't work. Your tone is just as cocky as you think mine is. a number of the last posts directed back to you have been trying to give you a clue that everyone is getting really tired of all the frantic posts I don't see how they are frantic, just separated out. And I don't see all the people here who are getting fed up. I want you and Morning to know that some of the responses are definitely passive aggressive on your side to even start with. Do you need examples? I'm not here to argue. I'll do my best to consolidate my replies. And understand that people are human, sure I'm frustrated with the fact that the author is no longer to be found. Don't take someone's frustration to the point of saying I'm being negative when I was not THAT negative. What a way to blow this entire thing out of the water. On Jul 9, 2:08 pm, Charlie charlie...@gmail.com wrote: you sir are a complete ingrate! You have had endless help from numerous people for 2 weeks on a simple carousel. I don't think you understand the tone of a number of the last posts directed back to you have been trying to give you a clue that everyone is getting really tired of all the frantic posts, condemning someone's code ( on a plugin that 100's of people have used I might add), not reading replies with solutions..and to top it off this post makes it sound like others with busy lives are just sitting around waiting to help you! This post is rude! Wake up! Any reply to MorningZ's post I would have been expecting to see some thanks, rather than being a pompous A**. My bet is you just burned a big bridge to any further assistance with an attitude like the one displayed here I'm betting I speak for many others who are tired of the inbox clutter from your carousel problems expresso wrote:how the hell am I being rude? And second, I am giving information to help you help me. Again I try all sorts of shit before I post stuff. I don't just post on every step of the way. I am showing you what I have tried. So you either get called out for not giving enough information or giving too little. Chill On Jul 9, 11:04 am, MorningZmorni...@gmail.comwrote:so it's only respectful on my part to start a new thread on a different topic that's veering off in the same thread. Not cool. You've got it backwards it makes more sense and keeps the clutter out if you stay in the same topic. As Liam points out you already asked the index question, AND it was answered by Charlie, in the topic you created just 13 hours agohttp://groups.google.com/group/jquery-en/browse_thread/thread/8832916... and yet, here's an identical topic asking the identical question with 2 min apart two sentence ramblings on them all Realize what this list for what it is: a mailing list where lots of us provide free help out of our own time making it difficult to understand what you are asking, being rude to people trying to show you the way, rambling on and on with the same stuff all that doesn't lend itself very well to make your issues worth other peoples time and effort . On Jul 9, 11:12 am, expressodschin...@gmail.comwrote:Because sometimes I get into other topics not related to my original posts in those other thread so it's only respectful on my part to start a new thread on a different topic
[jQuery] Re: Access li by item in the array
While I certainly have gotten all pissed off in this thread now...I think both sides need to re-evaluate. On your side, you need to both stop with your little hints of you're an idiot in your responses. Key words like these from developers who think they are above others is what I'm talking about: Of Course Why would you do that Obviously key words like this are unneccessary when you are trying to help out a fellow. So please, this is not a one way highway here for bashing today. On Jul 9, 2:24 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: Morning, then tell my why the code is putting that in there straight from the JCarousel plug-in Because previous to that, you were pretty cocky about the way you said that disabled is not part of a div Read the post. YOu have to take that response above in context. I was in no way trying to be cocky, just making a point that hey, it's in there so I don't get why then. On Jul 9, 2:22 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: Charlie, I have said thanks in a lot of my posts. Second, I am customizing this control way beyond what most people have. And yes, it's pretty frustrating to say the least when you create a plugin and then disappear after 2 years. While it's open source, still. When you email the creator nicely asking him if he's still contributing and you get no response, and then the forums the pages for that Carousel are abandoned, one's got to wonder wtf. My tone? Look at the kind of responses I get from people like you. Stuff like Of Course that won't work. Your tone is just as cocky as you think mine is. a number of the last posts directed back to you have been trying to give you a clue that everyone is getting really tired of all the frantic posts I don't see how they are frantic, just separated out. And I don't see all the people here who are getting fed up. I want you and Morning to know that some of the responses are definitely passive aggressive on your side to even start with. Do you need examples? I'm not here to argue. I'll do my best to consolidate my replies. And understand that people are human, sure I'm frustrated with the fact that the author is no longer to be found. Don't take someone's frustration to the point of saying I'm being negative when I was not THAT negative. What a way to blow this entire thing out of the water. On Jul 9, 2:08 pm, Charlie charlie...@gmail.com wrote: you sir are a complete ingrate! You have had endless help from numerous people for 2 weeks on a simple carousel. I don't think you understand the tone of a number of the last posts directed back to you have been trying to give you a clue that everyone is getting really tired of all the frantic posts, condemning someone's code ( on a plugin that 100's of people have used I might add), not reading replies with solutions..and to top it off this post makes it sound like others with busy lives are just sitting around waiting to help you! This post is rude! Wake up! Any reply to MorningZ's post I would have been expecting to see some thanks, rather than being a pompous A**. My bet is you just burned a big bridge to any further assistance with an attitude like the one displayed here I'm betting I speak for many others who are tired of the inbox clutter from your carousel problems expresso wrote:how the hell am I being rude? And second, I am giving information to help you help me. Again I try all sorts of shit before I post stuff. I don't just post on every step of the way. I am showing you what I have tried. So you either get called out for not giving enough information or giving too little. Chill On Jul 9, 11:04 am, MorningZmorni...@gmail.comwrote:so it's only respectful on my part to start a new thread on a different topic that's veering off in the same thread. Not cool. You've got it backwards it makes more sense and keeps the clutter out if you stay in the same topic. As Liam points out you already asked the index question, AND it was answered by Charlie, in the topic you created just 13 hours agohttp://groups.google.com/group/jquery-en/browse_thread/thread/8832916... and yet, here's an identical topic asking the identical question with 2 min apart two sentence ramblings on them all Realize what this list for what it is: a mailing list where lots of us provide free help out of our own time making it difficult to understand what you are asking, being rude to people trying to show you the way, rambling on and on with the same stuff all that doesn't lend itself very well to make your issues worth other peoples time and effort . On Jul 9, 11:12 am, expressodschin...@gmail.comwrote:Because sometimes I get into other topics not related to my original posts in those other thread so it's only respectful on my part to start a new thread
[jQuery] Re: Access li by item in the array
Funny thing is, I'll be blogging about this carousel. And you may find my implementation to be pretty complex but you would not know about the entire implementation and you assume that what we are doing is simple On Jul 9, 2:03 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: making it difficult to understand what you are asking tell me how it's difficult, I am very thorough in explaining the situation and things tried. On Jul 9, 1:57 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: You've got it backwards it makes more sense and keeps the clutter out if you stay in the same topic. I did not say not to stay on the same topic. I said if I start veering off into anther discussion that's talking about a different approach (in this case in that previous thread I started with a question about obtaining the LAST li). Then I wondering maybe instead I can just iterate through the list of li and grab some by index. At that point, that's a whole different issue or scope. Yea, that time I should have stuck with the thread because I already committed to the question on the index. Anyway I get it. But I should not be posting 2 different questions on the same thread which is what I try to avoid On Jul 9, 1:54 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: how the hell am I being rude? And second, I am giving information to help you help me. Again I try all sorts of shit before I post stuff. I don't just post on every step of the way. I am showing you what I have tried. So you either get called out for not giving enough information or giving too little. Chill On Jul 9, 11:04 am, MorningZ morni...@gmail.com wrote: so it's only respectful on my part to start a new thread on a different topic that's veering off in the same thread. Not cool. You've got it backwards it makes more sense and keeps the clutter out if you stay in the same topic. As Liam points out you already asked the index question, AND it was answered by Charlie, in the topic you created just 13 hours ago http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-en/browse_thread/thread/8832916... and yet, here's an identical topic asking the identical question with 2 min apart two sentence ramblings on them all Realize what this list for what it is: a mailing list where lots of us provide free help out of our own time making it difficult to understand what you are asking, being rude to people trying to show you the way, rambling on and on with the same stuff all that doesn't lend itself very well to make your issues worth other peoples time and effort . On Jul 9, 11:12 am, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: Because sometimes I get into other topics not related to my original posts in those other thread so it's only respectful on my part to start a new thread on a different topic that's veering off in the same thread. Not cool. On Jul 9, 9:30 am, Liam Potter radioactiv...@gmail.com wrote: how about reading all the replies to your other thread about this? $(#mycarousel li:eq(10)).css(margin-right, 5px); expresso wrote: Is it possible to target certain li in an unordered list by index with jQuery? I thought maybe I could use .index but was not able to get the syntax right. I thought maybe something like this would work but is has not: $(#mycarousel li).index(i).css(margin-right, 5px);
[jQuery] Re: Access li by item in the array
Oh men.. C'mon!! threads are supposed to be to help people out.. If you want to fight, do it in private... cuz there is a lot of people that may be interested in this topic too and will find no help in your discussion... Don't be so selfish - Original Message - From: expresso dschin...@gmail.com To: jQuery (English) jquery-en@googlegroups.com Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 1:25 PM Subject: [jQuery] Re: Access li by item in the array and you blow up at my wondering why the author of that plugin put it on there... how the @#$% am i supposed to know? if that's blowing up then you need to relax when you read replies. That in no way was blowing up. On Jul 9, 2:24 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: Morning, then tell my why the code is putting that in there straight from the JCarousel plug-in Because previous to that, you were pretty cocky about the way you said that disabled is not part of a div Read the post. YOu have to take that response above in context. I was in no way trying to be cocky, just making a point that hey, it's in there so I don't get why then. On Jul 9, 2:22 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: Charlie, I have said thanks in a lot of my posts. Second, I am customizing this control way beyond what most people have. And yes, it's pretty frustrating to say the least when you create a plugin and then disappear after 2 years. While it's open source, still. When you email the creator nicely asking him if he's still contributing and you get no response, and then the forums the pages for that Carousel are abandoned, one's got to wonder wtf. My tone? Look at the kind of responses I get from people like you. Stuff like Of Course that won't work. Your tone is just as cocky as you think mine is. a number of the last posts directed back to you have been trying to give you a clue that everyone is getting really tired of all the frantic posts I don't see how they are frantic, just separated out. And I don't see all the people here who are getting fed up. I want you and Morning to know that some of the responses are definitely passive aggressive on your side to even start with. Do you need examples? I'm not here to argue. I'll do my best to consolidate my replies. And understand that people are human, sure I'm frustrated with the fact that the author is no longer to be found. Don't take someone's frustration to the point of saying I'm being negative when I was not THAT negative. What a way to blow this entire thing out of the water. On Jul 9, 2:08 pm, Charlie charlie...@gmail.com wrote: you sir are a complete ingrate! You have had endless help from numerous people for 2 weeks on a simple carousel. I don't think you understand the tone of a number of the last posts directed back to you have been trying to give you a clue that everyone is getting really tired of all the frantic posts, condemning someone's code ( on a plugin that 100's of people have used I might add), not reading replies with solutions..and to top it off this post makes it sound like others with busy lives are just sitting around waiting to help you! This post is rude! Wake up! Any reply to MorningZ's post I would have been expecting to see some thanks, rather than being a pompous A**. My bet is you just burned a big bridge to any further assistance with an attitude like the one displayed here I'm betting I speak for many others who are tired of the inbox clutter from your carousel problems expresso wrote:how the hell am I being rude? And second, I am giving information to help you help me. Again I try all sorts of shit before I post stuff. I don't just post on every step of the way. I am showing you what I have tried. So you either get called out for not giving enough information or giving too little. Chill On Jul 9, 11:04 am, MorningZmorni...@gmail.comwrote:so it's only respectful on my part to start a new thread on a different topic that's veering off in the same thread. Not cool. You've got it backwards it makes more sense and keeps the clutter out if you stay in the same topic. As Liam points out you already asked the index question, AND it was answered by Charlie, in the topic you created just 13 hours agohttp://groups.google.com/group/jquery-en/browse_thread/thread/8832916... and yet, here's an identical topic asking the identical question with 2 min apart two sentence ramblings on them all Realize what this list for what it is: a mailing list where lots of us provide free help out of our own time making it difficult to understand what you are asking, being rude to people trying to show you the way, rambling on and on with the same stuff all that doesn't lend itself very well to make your issues worth other peoples time and effort . On Jul 9, 11:12 am, expressodschin...@gmail.comwrote:Because sometimes I get into other topics
[jQuery] Re: Access li by item in the array
expresso, Please stop going on and on and on (ad infinitum). (I am trying to be polite) Thank you. On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 12:33 -0700, expresso wrote: Funny thing is, I'll be blogging about this carousel. And you may find my implementation to be pretty complex but you would not know about the entire implementation and you assume that what we are doing is simple On Jul 9, 2:03 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: making it difficult to understand what you are asking tell me how it's difficult, I am very thorough in explaining the situation and things tried. On Jul 9, 1:57 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: You've got it backwards it makes more sense and keeps the clutter out if you stay in the same topic. I did not say not to stay on the same topic. I said if I start veering off into anther discussion that's talking about a different approach (in this case in that previous thread I started with a question about obtaining the LAST li). Then I wondering maybe instead I can just iterate through the list of li and grab some by index. At that point, that's a whole different issue or scope. Yea, that time I should have stuck with the thread because I already committed to the question on the index. Anyway I get it. But I should not be posting 2 different questions on the same thread which is what I try to avoid On Jul 9, 1:54 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: how the hell am I being rude? And second, I am giving information to help you help me. Again I try all sorts of shit before I post stuff. I don't just post on every step of the way. I am showing you what I have tried. So you either get called out for not giving enough information or giving too little. Chill On Jul 9, 11:04 am, MorningZ morni...@gmail.com wrote: so it's only respectful on my part to start a new thread on a different topic that's veering off in the same thread. Not cool. You've got it backwards it makes more sense and keeps the clutter out if you stay in the same topic. As Liam points out you already asked the index question, AND it was answered by Charlie, in the topic you created just 13 hours ago http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-en/browse_thread/thread/8832916... and yet, here's an identical topic asking the identical question with 2 min apart two sentence ramblings on them all Realize what this list for what it is: a mailing list where lots of us provide free help out of our own time making it difficult to understand what you are asking, being rude to people trying to show you the way, rambling on and on with the same stuff all that doesn't lend itself very well to make your issues worth other peoples time and effort . On Jul 9, 11:12 am, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: Because sometimes I get into other topics not related to my original posts in those other thread so it's only respectful on my part to start a new thread on a different topic that's veering off in the same thread. Not cool. On Jul 9, 9:30 am, Liam Potter radioactiv...@gmail.com wrote: how about reading all the replies to your other thread about this? $(#mycarousel li:eq(10)).css(margin-right, 5px); expresso wrote: Is it possible to target certain li in an unordered list by index with jQuery? I thought maybe I could use .index but was not able to get the syntax right. I thought maybe something like this would work but is has not: $(#mycarousel li).index(i).css(margin-right, 5px); -- Matt Zagrabelny - mzagr...@d.umn.edu - (218) 726 8844 University of Minnesota Duluth Information Technology Systems Services PGP key 1024D/84E22DA2 2005-11-07 Fingerprint: 78F9 18B3 EF58 56F5 FC85 C5CA 53E7 887F 84E2 2DA2 He is not a fool who gives up what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose. -Jim Elliot signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
[jQuery] Re: Access li by item in the array
hahah, I double posted. OH boy, bend me over and slap me. On Jul 9, 2:03 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: making it difficult to understand what you are asking tell me how it's difficult, I am very thorough in explaining the situation and things tried. On Jul 9, 1:57 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: You've got it backwards it makes more sense and keeps the clutter out if you stay in the same topic. I did not say not to stay on the same topic. I said if I start veering off into anther discussion that's talking about a different approach (in this case in that previous thread I started with a question about obtaining the LAST li). Then I wondering maybe instead I can just iterate through the list of li and grab some by index. At that point, that's a whole different issue or scope. Yea, that time I should have stuck with the thread because I already committed to the question on the index. Anyway I get it. But I should not be posting 2 different questions on the same thread which is what I try to avoid On Jul 9, 1:54 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: how the hell am I being rude? And second, I am giving information to help you help me. Again I try all sorts of shit before I post stuff. I don't just post on every step of the way. I am showing you what I have tried. So you either get called out for not giving enough information or giving too little. Chill On Jul 9, 11:04 am, MorningZ morni...@gmail.com wrote: so it's only respectful on my part to start a new thread on a different topic that's veering off in the same thread. Not cool. You've got it backwards it makes more sense and keeps the clutter out if you stay in the same topic. As Liam points out you already asked the index question, AND it was answered by Charlie, in the topic you created just 13 hours ago http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-en/browse_thread/thread/8832916... and yet, here's an identical topic asking the identical question with 2 min apart two sentence ramblings on them all Realize what this list for what it is: a mailing list where lots of us provide free help out of our own time making it difficult to understand what you are asking, being rude to people trying to show you the way, rambling on and on with the same stuff all that doesn't lend itself very well to make your issues worth other peoples time and effort . On Jul 9, 11:12 am, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: Because sometimes I get into other topics not related to my original posts in those other thread so it's only respectful on my part to start a new thread on a different topic that's veering off in the same thread. Not cool. On Jul 9, 9:30 am, Liam Potter radioactiv...@gmail.com wrote: how about reading all the replies to your other thread about this? $(#mycarousel li:eq(10)).css(margin-right, 5px); expresso wrote: Is it possible to target certain li in an unordered list by index with jQuery? I thought maybe I could use .index but was not able to get the syntax right. I thought maybe something like this would work but is has not: $(#mycarousel li).index(i).css(margin-right, 5px);
[jQuery] Re: Access li by item in the array
making it difficult to understand what you are asking tell me how it's difficult, I am very thorough in explaining the situation and things tried. On Jul 9, 1:57 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: You've got it backwards it makes more sense and keeps the clutter out if you stay in the same topic. I did not say not to stay on the same topic. I said if I start veering off into anther discussion that's talking about a different approach (in this case in that previous thread I started with a question about obtaining the LAST li). Then I wondering maybe instead I can just iterate through the list of li and grab some by index. At that point, that's a whole different issue or scope. Yea, that time I should have stuck with the thread because I already committed to the question on the index. Anyway I get it. But I should not be posting 2 different questions on the same thread which is what I try to avoid On Jul 9, 1:54 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: how the hell am I being rude? And second, I am giving information to help you help me. Again I try all sorts of shit before I post stuff. I don't just post on every step of the way. I am showing you what I have tried. So you either get called out for not giving enough information or giving too little. Chill On Jul 9, 11:04 am, MorningZ morni...@gmail.com wrote: so it's only respectful on my part to start a new thread on a different topic that's veering off in the same thread. Not cool. You've got it backwards it makes more sense and keeps the clutter out if you stay in the same topic. As Liam points out you already asked the index question, AND it was answered by Charlie, in the topic you created just 13 hours ago http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-en/browse_thread/thread/8832916... and yet, here's an identical topic asking the identical question with 2 min apart two sentence ramblings on them all Realize what this list for what it is: a mailing list where lots of us provide free help out of our own time making it difficult to understand what you are asking, being rude to people trying to show you the way, rambling on and on with the same stuff all that doesn't lend itself very well to make your issues worth other peoples time and effort . On Jul 9, 11:12 am, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: Because sometimes I get into other topics not related to my original posts in those other thread so it's only respectful on my part to start a new thread on a different topic that's veering off in the same thread. Not cool. On Jul 9, 9:30 am, Liam Potter radioactiv...@gmail.com wrote: how about reading all the replies to your other thread about this? $(#mycarousel li:eq(10)).css(margin-right, 5px); expresso wrote: Is it possible to target certain li in an unordered list by index with jQuery? I thought maybe I could use .index but was not able to get the syntax right. I thought maybe something like this would work but is has not: $(#mycarousel li).index(i).css(margin-right, 5px);
[jQuery] Re: Access li by item in the array
As requested I'm done. I hope that Charlie re-evaluates his assumptions (that people have not tried things out, that what they are doing overall is simple, yada yada) before he posts things. As for the future yea, I'll try to consolidate. I try to give as much information as possible as to what I tried but I'll try to consolidate those replies into less posts. thanks for your help Morning and Charlie. On Jul 9, 2:39 pm, Matt Zagrabelny mzagr...@d.umn.edu wrote: expresso, Please stop going on and on and on (ad infinitum). (I am trying to be polite) Thank you. On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 12:33 -0700, expresso wrote: Funny thing is, I'll be blogging about this carousel. And you may find my implementation to be pretty complex but you would not know about the entire implementation and you assume that what we are doing is simple On Jul 9, 2:03 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: making it difficult to understand what you are asking tell me how it's difficult, I am very thorough in explaining the situation and things tried. On Jul 9, 1:57 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: You've got it backwards it makes more sense and keeps the clutter out if you stay in the same topic. I did not say not to stay on the same topic. I said if I start veering off into anther discussion that's talking about a different approach (in this case in that previous thread I started with a question about obtaining the LAST li). Then I wondering maybe instead I can just iterate through the list of li and grab some by index. At that point, that's a whole different issue or scope. Yea, that time I should have stuck with the thread because I already committed to the question on the index. Anyway I get it. But I should not be posting 2 different questions on the same thread which is what I try to avoid On Jul 9, 1:54 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: how the hell am I being rude? And second, I am giving information to help you help me. Again I try all sorts of shit before I post stuff. I don't just post on every step of the way. I am showing you what I have tried. So you either get called out for not giving enough information or giving too little. Chill On Jul 9, 11:04 am, MorningZ morni...@gmail.com wrote: so it's only respectful on my part to start a new thread on a different topic that's veering off in the same thread. Not cool. You've got it backwards it makes more sense and keeps the clutter out if you stay in the same topic. As Liam points out you already asked the index question, AND it was answered by Charlie, in the topic you created just 13 hours ago http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-en/browse_thread/thread/8832916... and yet, here's an identical topic asking the identical question with 2 min apart two sentence ramblings on them all Realize what this list for what it is: a mailing list where lots of us provide free help out of our own time making it difficult to understand what you are asking, being rude to people trying to show you the way, rambling on and on with the same stuff all that doesn't lend itself very well to make your issues worth other peoples time and effort . On Jul 9, 11:12 am, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: Because sometimes I get into other topics not related to my original posts in those other thread so it's only respectful on my part to start a new thread on a different topic that's veering off in the same thread. Not cool. On Jul 9, 9:30 am, Liam Potter radioactiv...@gmail.com wrote: how about reading all the replies to your other thread about this? $(#mycarousel li:eq(10)).css(margin-right, 5px); expresso wrote: Is it possible to target certain li in an unordered list by index with jQuery? I thought maybe I could use .index but was not able to get the syntax right. I thought maybe something like this would work but is has not: $(#mycarousel li).index(i).css(margin-right, 5px); -- Matt Zagrabelny - mzagr...@d.umn.edu - (218) 726 8844 University of Minnesota Duluth Information Technology Systems Services PGP key 1024D/84E22DA2 2005-11-07 Fingerprint: 78F9 18B3 EF58 56F5 FC85 C5CA 53E7 887F 84E2 2DA2 He is not a fool who gives up what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose. -Jim Elliot signature.asc 1KViewDownload
[jQuery] Re: Access li by item in the array
you sir are a complete ingrate!
You have had endless help from numerous people for 2 weeks on a simple
carousel. I don't think you understand the tone of a number of the last
posts directed back to you have been trying to give you a clue that
everyone is getting really tired of all the frantic posts, condemning
someone's code ( on a plugin that 100's of people have used I might
add), not reading replies with solutions..and to top it off this
post makes it sound like others with busy lives are just sitting around
waiting to help you!
This post is rude! Wake up! Any reply to MorningZ's post I would have
been expecting to see some thanks, rather than being a pompous A**. My
bet is you just burned a big bridge to any further assistance with an
attitude like the one displayed here
I'm betting I speak for many others who are tired of the inbox clutter
from your carousel problems
expresso wrote:
how the hell am I being rude?
And second, I am giving information to help you help me. Again I try
all sorts of shit before I post stuff. I don't just post on every
step of the way. I am showing you what I have tried. So you either
get called out for not giving enough information or giving too
little.
Chill
On Jul 9, 11:04am, MorningZ morni...@gmail.com wrote:
"so it's only respectful on my part to
start a new thread on a different topic that's veering off in the same
thread. Not cool. "
You've got it backwards it makes more sense and keeps the clutter
out if you stay in the same topic.
As Liam points out you already asked the index question, AND it
was answered by Charlie, in the topic you created just 13 hours ago
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-en/browse_thread/thread/8832916...
and yet, here's an identical topic asking the identical question with
2 min apart two sentence ramblings on them all
Realize what this list for what it is: a mailing list where lots of
us provide free help out of our own time
making it difficult to understand what you are asking, being rude to
people trying to show you the way, rambling on and on with the same
stuff all that doesn't lend itself very well to make your issues
worth other peoples time and effort
.
On Jul 9, 11:12am, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote:
Because sometimes I get into other topics not related to my original
posts in those other thread so it's only respectful on my part to
start a new thread on a different topic that's veering off in the same
thread. Not cool.
On Jul 9, 9:30am, Liam Potter radioactiv...@gmail.com wrote:
how about reading all the replies to your other thread about this?
$("#mycarousel li:eq(10)").css("margin-right", "5px");
expresso wrote:
Is it possible to target certain li in an unordered list by index
with jQuery? I thought maybe I could use .index but was not able to
get the syntax right.
I thought maybe something like this would work but is has not:
$("#mycarousel li").index(i).css("margin-right", "5px");
[jQuery] Re: Access li by item in the array
It's been perfectly clear that whatever you are trying to accomplish is anything *but* simple... and after two weeks of messing with it, maybe it is/was time to cut your losses on trying to manipulate code with which you have no idea what is going on under the hood. and code that someone wrote for free, supported for free, and has since moved on.. the tablesorter plugin is the same way... it's an older plugin that still works today, but people customizing it are on their own... whatever... i've done my best to help and point out issues to this pointbest of luck... looks like you'll need it . On Jul 9, 3:33 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: Funny thing is, I'll be blogging about this carousel. And you may find my implementation to be pretty complex but you would not know about the entire implementation and you assume that what we are doing is simple On Jul 9, 2:03 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: making it difficult to understand what you are asking tell me how it's difficult, I am very thorough in explaining the situation and things tried. On Jul 9, 1:57 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: You've got it backwards it makes more sense and keeps the clutter out if you stay in the same topic. I did not say not to stay on the same topic. I said if I start veering off into anther discussion that's talking about a different approach (in this case in that previous thread I started with a question about obtaining the LAST li). Then I wondering maybe instead I can just iterate through the list of li and grab some by index. At that point, that's a whole different issue or scope. Yea, that time I should have stuck with the thread because I already committed to the question on the index. Anyway I get it. But I should not be posting 2 different questions on the same thread which is what I try to avoid On Jul 9, 1:54 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: how the hell am I being rude? And second, I am giving information to help you help me. Again I try all sorts of shit before I post stuff. I don't just post on every step of the way. I am showing you what I have tried. So you either get called out for not giving enough information or giving too little. Chill On Jul 9, 11:04 am, MorningZ morni...@gmail.com wrote: so it's only respectful on my part to start a new thread on a different topic that's veering off in the same thread. Not cool. You've got it backwards it makes more sense and keeps the clutter out if you stay in the same topic. As Liam points out you already asked the index question, AND it was answered by Charlie, in the topic you created just 13 hours ago http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-en/browse_thread/thread/8832916... and yet, here's an identical topic asking the identical question with 2 min apart two sentence ramblings on them all Realize what this list for what it is: a mailing list where lots of us provide free help out of our own time making it difficult to understand what you are asking, being rude to people trying to show you the way, rambling on and on with the same stuff all that doesn't lend itself very well to make your issues worth other peoples time and effort . On Jul 9, 11:12 am, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: Because sometimes I get into other topics not related to my original posts in those other thread so it's only respectful on my part to start a new thread on a different topic that's veering off in the same thread. Not cool. On Jul 9, 9:30 am, Liam Potter radioactiv...@gmail.com wrote: how about reading all the replies to your other thread about this? $(#mycarousel li:eq(10)).css(margin-right, 5px); expresso wrote: Is it possible to target certain li in an unordered list by index with jQuery? I thought maybe I could use .index but was not able to get the syntax right. I thought maybe something like this would work but is has not: $(#mycarousel li).index(i).css(margin-right, 5px);
[jQuery] Re: Access li by item in the array
I understand. I have nothing that much against you Morning and I'll try to sound less abrasive in the future. Keep in mind I have been up till about 12:30am for about 4 nights straight on this so I am definitely trying all I could on customizing it and could not afford to just step back and say forget this plug-in because I had gotten much to far into it for our solution. I am not one to just post and get freebies. Trust me, that's lame. On Jul 9, 2:42 pm, MorningZ morni...@gmail.com wrote: It's been perfectly clear that whatever you are trying to accomplish is anything *but* simple... and after two weeks of messing with it, maybe it is/was time to cut your losses on trying to manipulate code with which you have no idea what is going on under the hood. and code that someone wrote for free, supported for free, and has since moved on.. the tablesorter plugin is the same way... it's an older plugin that still works today, but people customizing it are on their own... whatever... i've done my best to help and point out issues to this point best of luck... looks like you'll need it . On Jul 9, 3:33 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: Funny thing is, I'll be blogging about this carousel. And you may find my implementation to be pretty complex but you would not know about the entire implementation and you assume that what we are doing is simple On Jul 9, 2:03 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: making it difficult to understand what you are asking tell me how it's difficult, I am very thorough in explaining the situation and things tried. On Jul 9, 1:57 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: You've got it backwards it makes more sense and keeps the clutter out if you stay in the same topic. I did not say not to stay on the same topic. I said if I start veering off into anther discussion that's talking about a different approach (in this case in that previous thread I started with a question about obtaining the LAST li). Then I wondering maybe instead I can just iterate through the list of li and grab some by index. At that point, that's a whole different issue or scope. Yea, that time I should have stuck with the thread because I already committed to the question on the index. Anyway I get it. But I should not be posting 2 different questions on the same thread which is what I try to avoid On Jul 9, 1:54 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: how the hell am I being rude? And second, I am giving information to help you help me. Again I try all sorts of shit before I post stuff. I don't just post on every step of the way. I am showing you what I have tried. So you either get called out for not giving enough information or giving too little. Chill On Jul 9, 11:04 am, MorningZ morni...@gmail.com wrote: so it's only respectful on my part to start a new thread on a different topic that's veering off in the same thread. Not cool. You've got it backwards it makes more sense and keeps the clutter out if you stay in the same topic. As Liam points out you already asked the index question, AND it was answered by Charlie, in the topic you created just 13 hours ago http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-en/browse_thread/thread/8832916... and yet, here's an identical topic asking the identical question with 2 min apart two sentence ramblings on them all Realize what this list for what it is: a mailing list where lots of us provide free help out of our own time making it difficult to understand what you are asking, being rude to people trying to show you the way, rambling on and on with the same stuff all that doesn't lend itself very well to make your issues worth other peoples time and effort . On Jul 9, 11:12 am, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: Because sometimes I get into other topics not related to my original posts in those other thread so it's only respectful on my part to start a new thread on a different topic that's veering off in the same thread. Not cool. On Jul 9, 9:30 am, Liam Potter radioactiv...@gmail.com wrote: how about reading all the replies to your other thread about this? $(#mycarousel li:eq(10)).css(margin-right, 5px); expresso wrote: Is it possible to target certain li in an unordered list by index with jQuery? I thought maybe I could use .index but was not able to get the syntax right. I thought maybe something like this would work but is has not: $(#mycarousel li).index(i).css(margin-right, 5px);
[jQuery] Re: Access li by item in the array
expresso (we don't know your name), if you're still in need of help, why not post an overview of what you need? You've posted several pieces of your puzzle but no one can guess the overall structure you're trying to code. Like I need a carousel that expands when blablabla and loads blablabla from json. And I'm pretty sure you have an architectural problem there, the specific issues that pop up are just a consequence of a lack of planning. Or just save your sleep time and hire someone with more experience to do this for you :] And, please, try to keep discussions decently worded, and avoid posting in sequence, specially if it's just pointless fighting, this is a public forum. Thanks! On Jul 9, 4:45 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: I understand. I have nothing that much against you Morning and I'll try to sound less abrasive in the future. Keep in mind I have been up till about 12:30am for about 4 nights straight on this so I am definitely trying all I could on customizing it and could not afford to just step back and say forget this plug-in because I had gotten much to far into it for our solution. I am not one to just post and get freebies. Trust me, that's lame. On Jul 9, 2:42 pm, MorningZ morni...@gmail.com wrote: It's been perfectly clear that whatever you are trying to accomplish is anything *but* simple... and after two weeks of messing with it, maybe it is/was time to cut your losses on trying to manipulate code with which you have no idea what is going on under the hood. and code that someone wrote for free, supported for free, and has since moved on.. the tablesorter plugin is the same way... it's an older plugin that still works today, but people customizing it are on their own... whatever... i've done my best to help and point out issues to this point best of luck... looks like you'll need it . On Jul 9, 3:33 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: Funny thing is, I'll be blogging about this carousel. And you may find my implementation to be pretty complex but you would not know about the entire implementation and you assume that what we are doing is simple On Jul 9, 2:03 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: making it difficult to understand what you are asking tell me how it's difficult, I am very thorough in explaining the situation and things tried. On Jul 9, 1:57 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: You've got it backwards it makes more sense and keeps the clutter out if you stay in the same topic. I did not say not to stay on the same topic. I said if I start veering off into anther discussion that's talking about a different approach (in this case in that previous thread I started with a question about obtaining the LAST li). Then I wondering maybe instead I can just iterate through the list of li and grab some by index. At that point, that's a whole different issue or scope. Yea, that time I should have stuck with the thread because I already committed to the question on the index. Anyway I get it. But I should not be posting 2 different questions on the same thread which is what I try to avoid On Jul 9, 1:54 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: how the hell am I being rude? And second, I am giving information to help you help me. Again I try all sorts of shit before I post stuff. I don't just post on every step of the way. I am showing you what I have tried. So you either get called out for not giving enough information or giving too little. Chill On Jul 9, 11:04 am, MorningZ morni...@gmail.com wrote: so it's only respectful on my part to start a new thread on a different topic that's veering off in the same thread. Not cool. You've got it backwards it makes more sense and keeps the clutter out if you stay in the same topic. As Liam points out you already asked the index question, AND it was answered by Charlie, in the topic you created just 13 hours ago http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-en/browse_thread/thread/8832916... and yet, here's an identical topic asking the identical question with 2 min apart two sentence ramblings on them all Realize what this list for what it is: a mailing list where lots of us provide free help out of our own time making it difficult to understand what you are asking, being rude to people trying to show you the way, rambling on and on with the same stuff all that doesn't lend itself very well to make your issues worth other peoples time and effort . On Jul 9, 11:12 am, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: Because sometimes I get into other topics not related to
[jQuery] Re: Access li by item in the array
Or just save your sleep time and hire someone with more experience to do this for you :] can I ask you if that was a derogatory statement? Seems like it to me. On Jul 9, 3:34 pm, Ricardo ricardob...@gmail.com wrote: expresso (we don't know your name), if you're still in need of help, why not post an overview of what you need? You've posted several pieces of your puzzle but no one can guess the overall structure you're trying to code. Like I need a carousel that expands when blablabla and loads blablabla from json. And I'm pretty sure you have an architectural problem there, the specific issues that pop up are just a consequence of a lack of planning. Or just save your sleep time and hire someone with more experience to do this for you :] And, please, try to keep discussions decently worded, and avoid posting in sequence, specially if it's just pointless fighting, this is a public forum. Thanks! On Jul 9, 4:45 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: I understand. I have nothing that much against you Morning and I'll try to sound less abrasive in the future. Keep in mind I have been up till about 12:30am for about 4 nights straight on this so I am definitely trying all I could on customizing it and could not afford to just step back and say forget this plug-in because I had gotten much to far into it for our solution. I am not one to just post and get freebies. Trust me, that's lame. On Jul 9, 2:42 pm, MorningZ morni...@gmail.com wrote: It's been perfectly clear that whatever you are trying to accomplish is anything *but* simple... and after two weeks of messing with it, maybe it is/was time to cut your losses on trying to manipulate code with which you have no idea what is going on under the hood. and code that someone wrote for free, supported for free, and has since moved on.. the tablesorter plugin is the same way... it's an older plugin that still works today, but people customizing it are on their own... whatever... i've done my best to help and point out issues to this point best of luck... looks like you'll need it . On Jul 9, 3:33 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: Funny thing is, I'll be blogging about this carousel. And you may find my implementation to be pretty complex but you would not know about the entire implementation and you assume that what we are doing is simple On Jul 9, 2:03 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: making it difficult to understand what you are asking tell me how it's difficult, I am very thorough in explaining the situation and things tried. On Jul 9, 1:57 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: You've got it backwards it makes more sense and keeps the clutter out if you stay in the same topic. I did not say not to stay on the same topic. I said if I start veering off into anther discussion that's talking about a different approach (in this case in that previous thread I started with a question about obtaining the LAST li). Then I wondering maybe instead I can just iterate through the list of li and grab some by index. At that point, that's a whole different issue or scope. Yea, that time I should have stuck with the thread because I already committed to the question on the index. Anyway I get it. But I should not be posting 2 different questions on the same thread which is what I try to avoid On Jul 9, 1:54 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: how the hell am I being rude? And second, I am giving information to help you help me. Again I try all sorts of shit before I post stuff. I don't just post on every step of the way. I am showing you what I have tried. So you either get called out for not giving enough information or giving too little. Chill On Jul 9, 11:04 am, MorningZ morni...@gmail.com wrote: so it's only respectful on my part to start a new thread on a different topic that's veering off in the same thread. Not cool. You've got it backwards it makes more sense and keeps the clutter out if you stay in the same topic. As Liam points out you already asked the index question, AND it was answered by Charlie, in the topic you created just 13 hours ago http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-en/browse_thread/thread/8832916... and yet, here's an identical topic asking the identical question with 2 min apart two sentence ramblings on them all Realize what this list for what it is: a mailing list where lots of us provide free help out of our own time making it difficult to understand what you are asking, being rude to people
[jQuery] Re: Access li by item in the array
Ricardo, I have a feeling some put you up to this to piss me off again :) Nice work. On Jul 9, 4:06 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: Or just save your sleep time and hire someone with more experience to do this for you :] can I ask you if that was a derogatory statement? Seems like it to me. On Jul 9, 3:34 pm, Ricardo ricardob...@gmail.com wrote: expresso (we don't know your name), if you're still in need of help, why not post an overview of what you need? You've posted several pieces of your puzzle but no one can guess the overall structure you're trying to code. Like I need a carousel that expands when blablabla and loads blablabla from json. And I'm pretty sure you have an architectural problem there, the specific issues that pop up are just a consequence of a lack of planning. Or just save your sleep time and hire someone with more experience to do this for you :] And, please, try to keep discussions decently worded, and avoid posting in sequence, specially if it's just pointless fighting, this is a public forum. Thanks! On Jul 9, 4:45 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: I understand. I have nothing that much against you Morning and I'll try to sound less abrasive in the future. Keep in mind I have been up till about 12:30am for about 4 nights straight on this so I am definitely trying all I could on customizing it and could not afford to just step back and say forget this plug-in because I had gotten much to far into it for our solution. I am not one to just post and get freebies. Trust me, that's lame. On Jul 9, 2:42 pm, MorningZ morni...@gmail.com wrote: It's been perfectly clear that whatever you are trying to accomplish is anything *but* simple... and after two weeks of messing with it, maybe it is/was time to cut your losses on trying to manipulate code with which you have no idea what is going on under the hood. and code that someone wrote for free, supported for free, and has since moved on.. the tablesorter plugin is the same way... it's an older plugin that still works today, but people customizing it are on their own... whatever... i've done my best to help and point out issues to this point best of luck... looks like you'll need it . On Jul 9, 3:33 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: Funny thing is, I'll be blogging about this carousel. And you may find my implementation to be pretty complex but you would not know about the entire implementation and you assume that what we are doing is simple On Jul 9, 2:03 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: making it difficult to understand what you are asking tell me how it's difficult, I am very thorough in explaining the situation and things tried. On Jul 9, 1:57 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: You've got it backwards it makes more sense and keeps the clutter out if you stay in the same topic. I did not say not to stay on the same topic. I said if I start veering off into anther discussion that's talking about a different approach (in this case in that previous thread I started with a question about obtaining the LAST li). Then I wondering maybe instead I can just iterate through the list of li and grab some by index. At that point, that's a whole different issue or scope. Yea, that time I should have stuck with the thread because I already committed to the question on the index. Anyway I get it. But I should not be posting 2 different questions on the same thread which is what I try to avoid On Jul 9, 1:54 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: how the hell am I being rude? And second, I am giving information to help you help me. Again I try all sorts of shit before I post stuff. I don't just post on every step of the way. I am showing you what I have tried. So you either get called out for not giving enough information or giving too little. Chill On Jul 9, 11:04 am, MorningZ morni...@gmail.com wrote: so it's only respectful on my part to start a new thread on a different topic that's veering off in the same thread. Not cool. You've got it backwards it makes more sense and keeps the clutter out if you stay in the same topic. As Liam points out you already asked the index question, AND it was answered by Charlie, in the topic you created just 13 hours ago http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-en/browse_thread/thread/8832916... and yet, here's an identical topic asking the identical question with 2 min apart two sentence ramblings on
[jQuery] Re: Access li by item in the array
Ricardo, I have a feeling some put you up to this to piss me off again :) Nice work. On Jul 9, 4:06 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: Or just save your sleep time and hire someone with more experience to do this for you :] can I ask you if that was a derogatory statement? Seems like it to me. On Jul 9, 3:34 pm, Ricardo ricardob...@gmail.com wrote: expresso (we don't know your name), if you're still in need of help, why not post an overview of what you need? You've posted several pieces of your puzzle but no one can guess the overall structure you're trying to code. Like I need a carousel that expands when blablabla and loads blablabla from json. And I'm pretty sure you have an architectural problem there, the specific issues that pop up are just a consequence of a lack of planning. Or just save your sleep time and hire someone with more experience to do this for you :] And, please, try to keep discussions decently worded, and avoid posting in sequence, specially if it's just pointless fighting, this is a public forum. Thanks! On Jul 9, 4:45 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: I understand. I have nothing that much against you Morning and I'll try to sound less abrasive in the future. Keep in mind I have been up till about 12:30am for about 4 nights straight on this so I am definitely trying all I could on customizing it and could not afford to just step back and say forget this plug-in because I had gotten much to far into it for our solution. I am not one to just post and get freebies. Trust me, that's lame. On Jul 9, 2:42 pm, MorningZ morni...@gmail.com wrote: It's been perfectly clear that whatever you are trying to accomplish is anything *but* simple... and after two weeks of messing with it, maybe it is/was time to cut your losses on trying to manipulate code with which you have no idea what is going on under the hood. and code that someone wrote for free, supported for free, and has since moved on.. the tablesorter plugin is the same way... it's an older plugin that still works today, but people customizing it are on their own... whatever... i've done my best to help and point out issues to this point best of luck... looks like you'll need it . On Jul 9, 3:33 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: Funny thing is, I'll be blogging about this carousel. And you may find my implementation to be pretty complex but you would not know about the entire implementation and you assume that what we are doing is simple On Jul 9, 2:03 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: making it difficult to understand what you are asking tell me how it's difficult, I am very thorough in explaining the situation and things tried. On Jul 9, 1:57 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: You've got it backwards it makes more sense and keeps the clutter out if you stay in the same topic. I did not say not to stay on the same topic. I said if I start veering off into anther discussion that's talking about a different approach (in this case in that previous thread I started with a question about obtaining the LAST li). Then I wondering maybe instead I can just iterate through the list of li and grab some by index. At that point, that's a whole different issue or scope. Yea, that time I should have stuck with the thread because I already committed to the question on the index. Anyway I get it. But I should not be posting 2 different questions on the same thread which is what I try to avoid On Jul 9, 1:54 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: how the hell am I being rude? And second, I am giving information to help you help me. Again I try all sorts of shit before I post stuff. I don't just post on every step of the way. I am showing you what I have tried. So you either get called out for not giving enough information or giving too little. Chill On Jul 9, 11:04 am, MorningZ morni...@gmail.com wrote: so it's only respectful on my part to start a new thread on a different topic that's veering off in the same thread. Not cool. You've got it backwards it makes more sense and keeps the clutter out if you stay in the same topic. As Liam points out you already asked the index question, AND it was answered by Charlie, in the topic you created just 13 hours ago http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-en/browse_thread/thread/8832916... and yet, here's an identical topic asking the identical question with 2 min apart two sentence ramblings on
[jQuery] Re: Access li by item in the array
It's not meant to be derogatory, no. I've said that many times, it's a fact isn't it? Sorry if it came out as rude. I could name dozens of better programmers than I am, and I'm not pissed off by that! On Jul 9, 6:06 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: Or just save your sleep time and hire someone with more experience to do this for you :] can I ask you if that was a derogatory statement? Seems like it to me. On Jul 9, 3:34 pm, Ricardo ricardob...@gmail.com wrote: expresso (we don't know your name), if you're still in need of help, why not post an overview of what you need? You've posted several pieces of your puzzle but no one can guess the overall structure you're trying to code. Like I need a carousel that expands when blablabla and loads blablabla from json. And I'm pretty sure you have an architectural problem there, the specific issues that pop up are just a consequence of a lack of planning. Or just save your sleep time and hire someone with more experience to do this for you :] And, please, try to keep discussions decently worded, and avoid posting in sequence, specially if it's just pointless fighting, this is a public forum. Thanks! On Jul 9, 4:45 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: I understand. I have nothing that much against you Morning and I'll try to sound less abrasive in the future. Keep in mind I have been up till about 12:30am for about 4 nights straight on this so I am definitely trying all I could on customizing it and could not afford to just step back and say forget this plug-in because I had gotten much to far into it for our solution. I am not one to just post and get freebies. Trust me, that's lame. On Jul 9, 2:42 pm, MorningZ morni...@gmail.com wrote: It's been perfectly clear that whatever you are trying to accomplish is anything *but* simple... and after two weeks of messing with it, maybe it is/was time to cut your losses on trying to manipulate code with which you have no idea what is going on under the hood. and code that someone wrote for free, supported for free, and has since moved on.. the tablesorter plugin is the same way... it's an older plugin that still works today, but people customizing it are on their own... whatever... i've done my best to help and point out issues to this point best of luck... looks like you'll need it . On Jul 9, 3:33 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: Funny thing is, I'll be blogging about this carousel. And you may find my implementation to be pretty complex but you would not know about the entire implementation and you assume that what we are doing is simple On Jul 9, 2:03 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: making it difficult to understand what you are asking tell me how it's difficult, I am very thorough in explaining the situation and things tried. On Jul 9, 1:57 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: You've got it backwards it makes more sense and keeps the clutter out if you stay in the same topic. I did not say not to stay on the same topic. I said if I start veering off into anther discussion that's talking about a different approach (in this case in that previous thread I started with a question about obtaining the LAST li). Then I wondering maybe instead I can just iterate through the list of li and grab some by index. At that point, that's a whole different issue or scope. Yea, that time I should have stuck with the thread because I already committed to the question on the index. Anyway I get it. But I should not be posting 2 different questions on the same thread which is what I try to avoid On Jul 9, 1:54 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: how the hell am I being rude? And second, I am giving information to help you help me. Again I try all sorts of shit before I post stuff. I don't just post on every step of the way. I am showing you what I have tried. So you either get called out for not giving enough information or giving too little. Chill On Jul 9, 11:04 am, MorningZ morni...@gmail.com wrote: so it's only respectful on my part to start a new thread on a different topic that's veering off in the same thread. Not cool. You've got it backwards it makes more sense and keeps the clutter out if you stay in the same topic. As Liam points out you already asked the index question, AND it was answered by Charlie, in the topic you created just 13 hours ago http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-en/browse_thread/thread/8832916... and yet,
[jQuery] Re: Access li by item in the array
Has nothing to do with me not being good enough and you have no idea on the scope of my project. I can't believe you actually replied like that and honestly coming here to tell me you're serious. But to state something like that and to butt in like this is unbelievable. Do you do this to people at work? They'd probably kick your ass for saying something like that. On Jul 9, 4:27 pm, Ricardo ricardob...@gmail.com wrote: It's not meant to be derogatory, no. I've said that many times, it's a fact isn't it? Sorry if it came out as rude. I could name dozens of better programmers than I am, and I'm not pissed off by that! On Jul 9, 6:06 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: Or just save your sleep time and hire someone with more experience to do this for you :] can I ask you if that was a derogatory statement? Seems like it to me. On Jul 9, 3:34 pm, Ricardo ricardob...@gmail.com wrote: expresso (we don't know your name), if you're still in need of help, why not post an overview of what you need? You've posted several pieces of your puzzle but no one can guess the overall structure you're trying to code. Like I need a carousel that expands when blablabla and loads blablabla from json. And I'm pretty sure you have an architectural problem there, the specific issues that pop up are just a consequence of a lack of planning. Or just save your sleep time and hire someone with more experience to do this for you :] And, please, try to keep discussions decently worded, and avoid posting in sequence, specially if it's just pointless fighting, this is a public forum. Thanks! On Jul 9, 4:45 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: I understand. I have nothing that much against you Morning and I'll try to sound less abrasive in the future. Keep in mind I have been up till about 12:30am for about 4 nights straight on this so I am definitely trying all I could on customizing it and could not afford to just step back and say forget this plug-in because I had gotten much to far into it for our solution. I am not one to just post and get freebies. Trust me, that's lame. On Jul 9, 2:42 pm, MorningZ morni...@gmail.com wrote: It's been perfectly clear that whatever you are trying to accomplish is anything *but* simple... and after two weeks of messing with it, maybe it is/was time to cut your losses on trying to manipulate code with which you have no idea what is going on under the hood. and code that someone wrote for free, supported for free, and has since moved on.. the tablesorter plugin is the same way... it's an older plugin that still works today, but people customizing it are on their own... whatever... i've done my best to help and point out issues to this point best of luck... looks like you'll need it . On Jul 9, 3:33 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: Funny thing is, I'll be blogging about this carousel. And you may find my implementation to be pretty complex but you would not know about the entire implementation and you assume that what we are doing is simple On Jul 9, 2:03 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: making it difficult to understand what you are asking tell me how it's difficult, I am very thorough in explaining the situation and things tried. On Jul 9, 1:57 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: You've got it backwards it makes more sense and keeps the clutter out if you stay in the same topic. I did not say not to stay on the same topic. I said if I start veering off into anther discussion that's talking about a different approach (in this case in that previous thread I started with a question about obtaining the LAST li). Then I wondering maybe instead I can just iterate through the list of li and grab some by index. At that point, that's a whole different issue or scope. Yea, that time I should have stuck with the thread because I already committed to the question on the index. Anyway I get it. But I should not be posting 2 different questions on the same thread which is what I try to avoid On Jul 9, 1:54 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: how the hell am I being rude? And second, I am giving information to help you help me. Again I try all sorts of shit before I post stuff. I don't just post on every step of the way. I am showing you what I have tried. So you either get called out for not giving enough information or giving too little. Chill On Jul 9, 11:04 am, MorningZ morni...@gmail.com wrote: so it's only respectful on my part to start a new
[jQuery] Re: Access li by item in the array
This is exactly the kind of shit I'm talking about and I am cocky? unreal. On Jul 9, 4:37 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: Has nothing to do with me not being good enough and you have no idea on the scope of my project. I can't believe you actually replied like that and honestly coming here to tell me you're serious. But to state something like that and to butt in like this is unbelievable. Do you do this to people at work? They'd probably kick your ass for saying something like that. On Jul 9, 4:27 pm, Ricardo ricardob...@gmail.com wrote: It's not meant to be derogatory, no. I've said that many times, it's a fact isn't it? Sorry if it came out as rude. I could name dozens of better programmers than I am, and I'm not pissed off by that! On Jul 9, 6:06 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: Or just save your sleep time and hire someone with more experience to do this for you :] can I ask you if that was a derogatory statement? Seems like it to me. On Jul 9, 3:34 pm, Ricardo ricardob...@gmail.com wrote: expresso (we don't know your name), if you're still in need of help, why not post an overview of what you need? You've posted several pieces of your puzzle but no one can guess the overall structure you're trying to code. Like I need a carousel that expands when blablabla and loads blablabla from json. And I'm pretty sure you have an architectural problem there, the specific issues that pop up are just a consequence of a lack of planning. Or just save your sleep time and hire someone with more experience to do this for you :] And, please, try to keep discussions decently worded, and avoid posting in sequence, specially if it's just pointless fighting, this is a public forum. Thanks! On Jul 9, 4:45 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: I understand. I have nothing that much against you Morning and I'll try to sound less abrasive in the future. Keep in mind I have been up till about 12:30am for about 4 nights straight on this so I am definitely trying all I could on customizing it and could not afford to just step back and say forget this plug-in because I had gotten much to far into it for our solution. I am not one to just post and get freebies. Trust me, that's lame. On Jul 9, 2:42 pm, MorningZ morni...@gmail.com wrote: It's been perfectly clear that whatever you are trying to accomplish is anything *but* simple... and after two weeks of messing with it, maybe it is/was time to cut your losses on trying to manipulate code with which you have no idea what is going on under the hood. and code that someone wrote for free, supported for free, and has since moved on.. the tablesorter plugin is the same way... it's an older plugin that still works today, but people customizing it are on their own... whatever... i've done my best to help and point out issues to this point best of luck... looks like you'll need it . On Jul 9, 3:33 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: Funny thing is, I'll be blogging about this carousel. And you may find my implementation to be pretty complex but you would not know about the entire implementation and you assume that what we are doing is simple On Jul 9, 2:03 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: making it difficult to understand what you are asking tell me how it's difficult, I am very thorough in explaining the situation and things tried. On Jul 9, 1:57 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: You've got it backwards it makes more sense and keeps the clutter out if you stay in the same topic. I did not say not to stay on the same topic. I said if I start veering off into anther discussion that's talking about a different approach (in this case in that previous thread I started with a question about obtaining the LAST li). Then I wondering maybe instead I can just iterate through the list of li and grab some by index. At that point, that's a whole different issue or scope. Yea, that time I should have stuck with the thread because I already committed to the question on the index. Anyway I get it. But I should not be posting 2 different questions on the same thread which is what I try to avoid On Jul 9, 1:54 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: how the hell am I being rude? And second, I am giving information to help you help me. Again I try all sorts of shit before I post stuff. I don't just post on every step of the way. I am showing you what I have tried. So
[jQuery] Re: Access li by item in the array
It's too bad we didn't kick your ass in soccer the past couple weeks ago. Now I wish we really had! Brazil is overrated in soccer. On Jul 9, 4:40 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: This is exactly the kind of shit I'm talking about and I am cocky? unreal. On Jul 9, 4:37 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: Has nothing to do with me not being good enough and you have no idea on the scope of my project. I can't believe you actually replied like that and honestly coming here to tell me you're serious. But to state something like that and to butt in like this is unbelievable. Do you do this to people at work? They'd probably kick your ass for saying something like that. On Jul 9, 4:27 pm, Ricardo ricardob...@gmail.com wrote: It's not meant to be derogatory, no. I've said that many times, it's a fact isn't it? Sorry if it came out as rude. I could name dozens of better programmers than I am, and I'm not pissed off by that! On Jul 9, 6:06 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: Or just save your sleep time and hire someone with more experience to do this for you :] can I ask you if that was a derogatory statement? Seems like it to me. On Jul 9, 3:34 pm, Ricardo ricardob...@gmail.com wrote: expresso (we don't know your name), if you're still in need of help, why not post an overview of what you need? You've posted several pieces of your puzzle but no one can guess the overall structure you're trying to code. Like I need a carousel that expands when blablabla and loads blablabla from json. And I'm pretty sure you have an architectural problem there, the specific issues that pop up are just a consequence of a lack of planning. Or just save your sleep time and hire someone with more experience to do this for you :] And, please, try to keep discussions decently worded, and avoid posting in sequence, specially if it's just pointless fighting, this is a public forum. Thanks! On Jul 9, 4:45 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: I understand. I have nothing that much against you Morning and I'll try to sound less abrasive in the future. Keep in mind I have been up till about 12:30am for about 4 nights straight on this so I am definitely trying all I could on customizing it and could not afford to just step back and say forget this plug-in because I had gotten much to far into it for our solution. I am not one to just post and get freebies. Trust me, that's lame. On Jul 9, 2:42 pm, MorningZ morni...@gmail.com wrote: It's been perfectly clear that whatever you are trying to accomplish is anything *but* simple... and after two weeks of messing with it, maybe it is/was time to cut your losses on trying to manipulate code with which you have no idea what is going on under the hood. and code that someone wrote for free, supported for free, and has since moved on.. the tablesorter plugin is the same way... it's an older plugin that still works today, but people customizing it are on their own... whatever... i've done my best to help and point out issues to this point best of luck... looks like you'll need it . On Jul 9, 3:33 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: Funny thing is, I'll be blogging about this carousel. And you may find my implementation to be pretty complex but you would not know about the entire implementation and you assume that what we are doing is simple On Jul 9, 2:03 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: making it difficult to understand what you are asking tell me how it's difficult, I am very thorough in explaining the situation and things tried. On Jul 9, 1:57 pm, expresso dschin...@gmail.com wrote: You've got it backwards it makes more sense and keeps the clutter out if you stay in the same topic. I did not say not to stay on the same topic. I said if I start veering off into anther discussion that's talking about a different approach (in this case in that previous thread I started with a question about obtaining the LAST li). Then I wondering maybe instead I can just iterate through the list of li and grab some by index. At that point, that's a whole different issue or scope. Yea, that time I should have stuck with the thread because I already committed to the question on the index. Anyway I get it. But I should not be posting 2 different questions on the same thread which is what I try to avoid
