[julia-users] Re: Julia v0.3.10

[elextr]

On Thursday, June 25, 2015 at 1:47:51 PM UTC+10, Tony Kelman wrote:
>
> Hello all! The latest bugfix release of the 0.3.x Julia line has been 
> released. Binaries are available from the usual place 
> ,
>

Is the ubuntu packages ppa linked from here going to be updated, it is 
still at 0.3.8?

Cheers
Lex

 

> and as is typical with such things, please report all issues to either the 
> issue 
> tracker , or email the 
> julia-users list.
>
> This is a bugfix release, primarily concerned with rebuilding the Windows 
> binaries against an updated libstdc++ ABI in order for packages using 
> WinRPM to work again. If you are on Windows and have hit "Provider 
> PackageManager failed to satisfy dependency ..." errors, please try this 
> version and hopefully it will be fixed. To see all other bugs fixed since 
> 0.3.9, see this commit log 
> .
>
> This is a recommended upgrade for anyone using any of the previous 0.3.x 
> releases, and should act as a drop-in replacement for any of the 0.3.x 
> line. We would like to get feedback if someone has a working program that 
> breaks after this upgrade. 
>

> -Tony
>
>

[julia-users] Re: Julia v0.3.10

[Tony Kelman]

Yes, I suspect it will, but it may take a week or two for Elliot Saba 
(@staticfloat) to get to it. I can't imagine any of the backports we've 
made would present any problems to updating the Ubuntu package in the 
releases PPA, but Elliot's been a bit busy recently and there are enough 
things breaking on master to keep up with to make sure all the nightlies 
work too.


On Thursday, June 25, 2015 at 3:05:21 AM UTC-4, ele...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thursday, June 25, 2015 at 1:47:51 PM UTC+10, Tony Kelman wrote:
>>
>> Hello all! The latest bugfix release of the 0.3.x Julia line has been 
>> released. Binaries are available from the usual place 
>> ,
>>
>
> Is the ubuntu packages ppa linked from here going to be updated, it is 
> still at 0.3.8?
>
> Cheers
> Lex
>
>  
>
>> and as is typical with such things, please report all issues to either 
>> the issue tracker , or email 
>> the julia-users list.
>>
>> This is a bugfix release, primarily concerned with rebuilding the Windows 
>> binaries against an updated libstdc++ ABI in order for packages using 
>> WinRPM to work again. If you are on Windows and have hit "Provider 
>> PackageManager failed to satisfy dependency ..." errors, please try this 
>> version and hopefully it will be fixed. To see all other bugs fixed since 
>> 0.3.9, see this commit log 
>> .
>>
>> This is a recommended upgrade for anyone using any of the previous 0.3.x 
>> releases, and should act as a drop-in replacement for any of the 0.3.x 
>> line. We would like to get feedback if someone has a working program that 
>> breaks after this upgrade. 
>>
>
>> -Tony
>>
>>

[julia-users] Re: Julia v0.3.10

[elextr]

On Thursday, June 25, 2015 at 9:11:04 PM UTC+10, Tony Kelman wrote:
>
> Yes, I suspect it will, but it may take a week or two for Elliot Saba 
> (@staticfloat) to get to it. I can't imagine any of the backports we've 
> made would present any problems to updating the Ubuntu package in the 
> releases PPA, but Elliot's been a bit busy recently and there are enough 
> things breaking on master to keep up with to make sure all the nightlies 
> work too.
>

Ok, just noting that the PPA has completely missed 0.3.9.
 

>
>
> On Thursday, June 25, 2015 at 3:05:21 AM UTC-4, ele...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, June 25, 2015 at 1:47:51 PM UTC+10, Tony Kelman wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello all! The latest bugfix release of the 0.3.x Julia line has been 
>>> released. Binaries are available from the usual place 
>>> ,
>>>
>>
>> Is the ubuntu packages ppa linked from here going to be updated, it is 
>> still at 0.3.8?
>>
>> Cheers
>> Lex
>>
>>  
>>
>>> and as is typical with such things, please report all issues to either 
>>> the issue tracker , or email 
>>> the julia-users list.
>>>
>>> This is a bugfix release, primarily concerned with rebuilding the 
>>> Windows binaries against an updated libstdc++ ABI in order for packages 
>>> using WinRPM to work again. If you are on Windows and have hit "Provider 
>>> PackageManager failed to satisfy dependency ..." errors, please try this 
>>> version and hopefully it will be fixed. To see all other bugs fixed since 
>>> 0.3.9, see this commit log 
>>> .
>>>
>>> This is a recommended upgrade for anyone using any of the previous 0.3.x 
>>> releases, and should act as a drop-in replacement for any of the 0.3.x 
>>> line. We would like to get feedback if someone has a working program that 
>>> breaks after this upgrade. 
>>>
>>
>>> -Tony
>>>
>>>

[julia-users] Re: Julia v0.3.10

[Sisyphuss]

We are all waiting for v0.4 !


On Thursday, June 25, 2015 at 5:47:51 AM UTC+2, Tony Kelman wrote:
>
> Hello all! The latest bugfix release of the 0.3.x Julia line has been 
> released. Binaries are available from the usual place 
> , and as is typical with such things, 
> please report all issues to either the issue tracker 
> , or email the julia-users 
> list.
>
> This is a bugfix release, primarily concerned with rebuilding the Windows 
> binaries against an updated libstdc++ ABI in order for packages using 
> WinRPM to work again. If you are on Windows and have hit "Provider 
> PackageManager failed to satisfy dependency ..." errors, please try this 
> version and hopefully it will be fixed. To see all other bugs fixed since 
> 0.3.9, see this commit log 
> .
>
> This is a recommended upgrade for anyone using any of the previous 0.3.x 
> releases, and should act as a drop-in replacement for any of the 0.3.x 
> line. We would like to get feedback if someone has a working program that 
> breaks after this upgrade.
>
> -Tony
>
>

Re: [julia-users] Re: Julia v0.3.10

[Elliot Saba]

Yes, that's my fault.  0.3.10 is making its way through the buildd servers
as we speak.
-E

On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 4:52 AM,  wrote:

>
>
> On Thursday, June 25, 2015 at 9:11:04 PM UTC+10, Tony Kelman wrote:
>>
>> Yes, I suspect it will, but it may take a week or two for Elliot Saba
>> (@staticfloat) to get to it. I can't imagine any of the backports we've
>> made would present any problems to updating the Ubuntu package in the
>> releases PPA, but Elliot's been a bit busy recently and there are enough
>> things breaking on master to keep up with to make sure all the nightlies
>> work too.
>>
>
> Ok, just noting that the PPA has completely missed 0.3.9.
>
>
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, June 25, 2015 at 3:05:21 AM UTC-4, ele...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thursday, June 25, 2015 at 1:47:51 PM UTC+10, Tony Kelman wrote:

 Hello all! The latest bugfix release of the 0.3.x Julia line has been
 released. Binaries are available from the usual place
 ,

>>>
>>> Is the ubuntu packages ppa linked from here going to be updated, it is
>>> still at 0.3.8?
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Lex
>>>
>>>
>>>
 and as is typical with such things, please report all issues to either
 the issue tracker , or
 email the julia-users list.

 This is a bugfix release, primarily concerned with rebuilding the
 Windows binaries against an updated libstdc++ ABI in order for packages
 using WinRPM to work again. If you are on Windows and have hit "Provider
 PackageManager failed to satisfy dependency ..." errors, please try this
 version and hopefully it will be fixed. To see all other bugs fixed since
 0.3.9, see this commit log
 .

 This is a recommended upgrade for anyone using any of the previous
 0.3.x releases, and should act as a drop-in replacement for any of the
 0.3.x line. We would like to get feedback if someone has a working program
 that breaks after this upgrade.

>>>
 -Tony

Re: [julia-users] Re: Julia v0.3.10

[elextr]

On Friday, June 26, 2015 at 7:04:48 AM UTC+10, Elliot Saba wrote:
>
> Yes, that's my fault.  0.3.10 is making its way through the buildd servers 
> as we speak.
> -E
>
>
Thanks for making the PPA, maybe you need some more elves :)

Cheers
Lex

 

> On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 4:52 AM, > wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, June 25, 2015 at 9:11:04 PM UTC+10, Tony Kelman wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes, I suspect it will, but it may take a week or two for Elliot Saba 
>>> (@staticfloat) to get to it. I can't imagine any of the backports we've 
>>> made would present any problems to updating the Ubuntu package in the 
>>> releases PPA, but Elliot's been a bit busy recently and there are enough 
>>> things breaking on master to keep up with to make sure all the nightlies 
>>> work too.
>>>
>>
>> Ok, just noting that the PPA has completely missed 0.3.9.
>>  
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thursday, June 25, 2015 at 3:05:21 AM UTC-4, ele...@gmail.com wrote:



 On Thursday, June 25, 2015 at 1:47:51 PM UTC+10, Tony Kelman wrote:
>
> Hello all! The latest bugfix release of the 0.3.x Julia line has been 
> released. Binaries are available from the usual place 
> ,
>

 Is the ubuntu packages ppa linked from here going to be updated, it is 
 still at 0.3.8?

 Cheers
 Lex

  

> and as is typical with such things, please report all issues to either 
> the issue tracker , or 
> email the julia-users list.
>
> This is a bugfix release, primarily concerned with rebuilding the 
> Windows binaries against an updated libstdc++ ABI in order for packages 
> using WinRPM to work again. If you are on Windows and have hit "Provider 
> PackageManager failed to satisfy dependency ..." errors, please try this 
> version and hopefully it will be fixed. To see all other bugs fixed since 
> 0.3.9, see this commit log 
> .
>
> This is a recommended upgrade for anyone using any of the previous 
> 0.3.x releases, and should act as a drop-in replacement for any of the 
> 0.3.x line. We would like to get feedback if someone has a working 
> program 
> that breaks after this upgrade. 
>

> -Tony
>
>
>

Re: [julia-users] Re: Julia v0.3.10

[Elliot Saba]

We at the north pole of technical computing *love* elves of all kinds.
Applications are open.  :)
-E

On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 5:53 PM,  wrote:

>
>
> On Friday, June 26, 2015 at 7:04:48 AM UTC+10, Elliot Saba wrote:
>>
>> Yes, that's my fault.  0.3.10 is making its way through the buildd
>> servers as we speak.
>> -E
>>
>>
> Thanks for making the PPA, maybe you need some more elves :)
>
> Cheers
> Lex
>
>
>
>> On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 4:52 AM,  wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thursday, June 25, 2015 at 9:11:04 PM UTC+10, Tony Kelman wrote:

 Yes, I suspect it will, but it may take a week or two for Elliot Saba
 (@staticfloat) to get to it. I can't imagine any of the backports we've
 made would present any problems to updating the Ubuntu package in the
 releases PPA, but Elliot's been a bit busy recently and there are enough
 things breaking on master to keep up with to make sure all the nightlies
 work too.

>>>
>>> Ok, just noting that the PPA has completely missed 0.3.9.
>>>
>>>


 On Thursday, June 25, 2015 at 3:05:21 AM UTC-4, ele...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thursday, June 25, 2015 at 1:47:51 PM UTC+10, Tony Kelman wrote:
>>
>> Hello all! The latest bugfix release of the 0.3.x Julia line has been
>> released. Binaries are available from the usual place
>> ,
>>
>
> Is the ubuntu packages ppa linked from here going to be updated, it is
> still at 0.3.8?
>
> Cheers
> Lex
>
>
>
>> and as is typical with such things, please report all issues to
>> either the issue tracker ,
>> or email the julia-users list.
>>
>> This is a bugfix release, primarily concerned with rebuilding the
>> Windows binaries against an updated libstdc++ ABI in order for packages
>> using WinRPM to work again. If you are on Windows and have hit "Provider
>> PackageManager failed to satisfy dependency ..." errors, please try this
>> version and hopefully it will be fixed. To see all other bugs fixed since
>> 0.3.9, see this commit log
>> .
>>
>> This is a recommended upgrade for anyone using any of the previous
>> 0.3.x releases, and should act as a drop-in replacement for any of the
>> 0.3.x line. We would like to get feedback if someone has a working 
>> program
>> that breaks after this upgrade.
>>
>
>> -Tony
>>
>>
>>

Re: [julia-users] Re: Julia v0.3.10

[Elliot Saba]

Who are we kidding, we don't have an application process.  We're
opensource, the closest we get is contributor guidelines
. :P
-E

Re: [julia-users] Re: Julia v0.3.10

[Michele Zaffalon]

But nevertheless thank you for releasing a stable version for all of us to
use.

On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Sisyphuss  wrote:

> We are all waiting for v0.4 !
>
>
> On Thursday, June 25, 2015 at 5:47:51 AM UTC+2, Tony Kelman wrote:
>>
>> Hello all! The latest bugfix release of the 0.3.x Julia line has been
>> released. Binaries are available from the usual place
>> , and as is typical with such things,
>> please report all issues to either the issue tracker
>> , or email the julia-users
>> list.
>>
>> This is a bugfix release, primarily concerned with rebuilding the Windows
>> binaries against an updated libstdc++ ABI in order for packages using
>> WinRPM to work again. If you are on Windows and have hit "Provider
>> PackageManager failed to satisfy dependency ..." errors, please try this
>> version and hopefully it will be fixed. To see all other bugs fixed since
>> 0.3.9, see this commit log
>> .
>>
>> This is a recommended upgrade for anyone using any of the previous 0.3.x
>> releases, and should act as a drop-in replacement for any of the 0.3.x
>> line. We would like to get feedback if someone has a working program that
>> breaks after this upgrade.
>>
>> -Tony
>>
>>