KR>gear legs

2021-08-15 Thread Flesner



As to our discussion on gear legs, does anyone have info on this nice 
looking KR in Poland?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M8wpv9H_sBw

Larry Flesner

-Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
-Change list delivery options at 
https://list.krnet.org/list/krnet.list.krnet.org/ Affinity List Info Board
-Search recent KRnet Archives at  
https://list.krnet.org/empathy/list/krnet.list.krnet.org/
-Search John Bouyea's decades of archive at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/ 


KR>gear legs, plans, KR Forum, etc....

2021-07-30 Thread Mark Langford
This effort to source gear legs fits right in with the main topic of 
this year's OSH KR Forum, which is the inability to source KR specific 
parts.  The question of where to get certain KR parts (not to mention 
plans) is a recurring theme, and it's becoming clear that most of these 
are  no longer available.  For that reason, I think the prudent course 
is for KRnet list members to step up to the plate and solve this, one 
person at a time.


One example is nose gear.  The nose-gear most folks have used for years 
is unobtainable, and honestly, has had failures resulting in dead props 
and cowlings (usually  due to hard landings).  Robert Pesak came up with 
his own design, which consists of a fiberglass spring and some rubber 
dampers.  Fabrication is a DIY job, not requiring CNC tubing benders, 
but a simple welder (if I recall correctly) and some attachment points 
to the engine mount.  Robert and I plan to get together and draw up the 
details in the next few weeks, and post the drawings on KRnet for others 
to replicate.  If somebody wants to make those and sell them to others 
(if Robert's not interested), problem solved!  There are many more 
examples, such as control sticks, flap handles, landing gear legs or 
brackets, and one that Jeff Lang mentioned at OSH, the phenolic drive 
pucks that go between the generator and crankshaft on a certain VW 
implementation (I forget which one).  There's a large number of such 
projects, and I think we should do our best to create detailed drawings 
to post on www.krnet.org, and interested DIY guys could make (or have 
made) several of each so that they are ready to sell and ship to other 
KR builders.  This is exactly the same system that the early KR 
Newsletter spawned, with ads in each issue for these kinds of components.


So please give some thought to what you might need or can make to sell 
to other builders, so we can all continue to find the special parts that 
we all need to finish up our planes.


Thanks
--
Mark Langford
m...@n56ml.com
http://www.n56ml.com
Huntsville, AL

-Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
-Change list delivery options at 
https://list.krnet.org/list/krnet.list.krnet.org/ Affinity List Info Board
-Search recent KRnet Archives at  
https://list.krnet.org/empathy/list/krnet.list.krnet.org/
-Search John Bouyea's decades of archive at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/ 


Re: KR> Gear legs - G loading

2018-06-26 Thread Rllanning via KRnet
Thanks I think he just wants something he run through the copy machine or fax 
maybe not sure
But the one in the plans will have to do.

Sent from my iPad

> On Jun 26, 2018, at 5:46 AM, Mark Langford via KRnet  
> wrote:
> 
> Rick Lanning wrote:
> 
> > My FSDO is coming July 3 to my airworthiness certificate he wants a 3 D 
> > drawing what did you use for that the one broke apart in the book? I hope 
> > that is good for Him.
> 
> If I understand what you mean, I would bet money the guy will pass you 
> without a 3D drawing, but the one that comes with the plans (and likely 
> appears in many places in the old Newsletters) would certainly qualify as a 
> 3D drawing.  He may only want that to collect all of his "squawks" on you 
> you'll know what needs fixing, if anything, or maybe he just wants to 
> understand the design better (which I doubt).
> 
> Mark Langford
> m...@n56ml.com
> http://www.n56ml.com
> 
> 
> ___
> Search the KRnet Archives at 
> https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
> Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
> see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
> options.
> To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org

___
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org


Re: KR> Gear legs - G loading

2018-06-26 Thread Mark Langford via KRnet

Rick Lanning wrote:

> My FSDO is coming July 3 to my airworthiness certificate he wants a 3 
D drawing what did you use for that the one broke apart in the book? I 
hope that is good for Him.


If I understand what you mean, I would bet money the guy will pass you 
without a 3D drawing, but the one that comes with the plans (and likely 
appears in many places in the old Newsletters) would certainly qualify 
as a 3D drawing.  He may only want that to collect all of his "squawks" 
on you you'll know what needs fixing, if anything, or maybe he just 
wants to understand the design better (which I doubt).


Mark Langford
m...@n56ml.com
http://www.n56ml.com


___
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org


Re: KR> Gear legs - G loading

2018-06-25 Thread Flesner via KRnet

On 6/25/2018 3:10 PM, Rllanning via KRnet wrote:

My FSDO is coming July 3 to my airworthiness certificate he wants a 3 D drawing 
what did you use for that the one broke apart in the book? I hope that is good 
for Him.


++


Try this one

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/a4/93/83/a4938339405504b8b75a9a62b765582b.jpg


Larry Flesner


___
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org


Re: KR> Gear legs - G loading

2018-06-25 Thread Daniel Heath via KRnet
YOU MAY Be able to use this:

http://krbuilder.org/WeightAndBalance/WB_Documents.html

Scroll down.  

My Panther Building Documentation at PantherBuilder Web Site

Daniel R. Heath - Lexington, SC

-Original Message-
From: KRnet [mailto:krnet-boun...@list.krnet.org] On Behalf Of Rllanning via
KRnet
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2018 4:10 PM
To: KRnet
Cc: Rllanning
Subject: Re: KR> Gear legs - G loading

Mark
My FSDO is coming July 3 to my airworthiness certificate he wants a 3 D
drawing what did you use for that the one broke apart in the book? I hope
that is good for Him.

Sent from my iPad

> On Jun 14, 2018, at 3:18 AM, Mark Langford via KRnet
 wrote:
> 
> 
> That's the first I've heard of issues with the nose dropping abruptly on
> the tri-gear versions, so it looks like a bit more investigation is in
> order.  I've seen drawings in the aircraft design books regarding
> recommended gear angles with respect to CG for both conventional and
> tri-gear installations, and will fish those out when I get I chance.
> Pazmany did some especially good work in this area, with fairly precise
> descriptions for the geometry of both gear types.   Any anecdotal
> information from KR pilots (with reasonable CGs and some hours of KR
> flying experience) who've noticed the nose dropping suddenly on their
> tri-gear KR would be appreciated.  I'll try to add some of this
> increased gear knowledge to my gear site in the next few weeks.  This is
> also a reminder to me that I need to update www.krnet.org also, so we
> can pass on this useful information to aid future builders.  I'll
> probably be asking for some dimensions from tri-gear guys who are
> satisfied with their landings in that process, as well as any who feel
> their nose drops abruptly, if there are any still flying.
> 
> Also, it's worth pointing out that the gear was either designed/tested,
> or both to 3 g's.  That's presumably for a 900 lb KR2.  My first landing
> was 5.5 g's as felt by the panel-mounted meter, at what was probably 950
> pounds, so it's pretty safe to say that my first landing proved that the
> standard Diehl conventional gear legs of the mid-nineties is good for
> 5.8 g's!  I dropped it in from what seemed like 8'at least 5'. That
> was my first lesson on sudden full throttle excursions from idlethe
> engine quit dead, just when I desperately needed a few hundred RPMs.  
> At the time I felt quite lucky I didn't tear the gear off entirely (it
> was quite a jolt), although I did finally manage to tear one off in a
> terraced hay field dead-stick landing 1130 hours later!
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Mark Langford, Harvest, AL
> ML "at" N56ML.com
> www.N56ML.com
> 
> 
> ___
> Search the KRnet Archives at
https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
> Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
> see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change
options.
> To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org

___
Search the KRnet Archives at
https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org


___
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org


Re: KR> Gear legs - G loading

2018-06-25 Thread Rllanning via KRnet
Mark
My FSDO is coming July 3 to my airworthiness certificate he wants a 3 D drawing 
what did you use for that the one broke apart in the book? I hope that is good 
for Him.

Sent from my iPad

> On Jun 14, 2018, at 3:18 AM, Mark Langford via KRnet  
> wrote:
> 
> 
> That's the first I've heard of issues with the nose dropping abruptly on
> the tri-gear versions, so it looks like a bit more investigation is in
> order.  I've seen drawings in the aircraft design books regarding
> recommended gear angles with respect to CG for both conventional and
> tri-gear installations, and will fish those out when I get I chance.
> Pazmany did some especially good work in this area, with fairly precise
> descriptions for the geometry of both gear types.   Any anecdotal
> information from KR pilots (with reasonable CGs and some hours of KR
> flying experience) who've noticed the nose dropping suddenly on their
> tri-gear KR would be appreciated.  I'll try to add some of this
> increased gear knowledge to my gear site in the next few weeks.  This is
> also a reminder to me that I need to update www.krnet.org also, so we
> can pass on this useful information to aid future builders.  I'll
> probably be asking for some dimensions from tri-gear guys who are
> satisfied with their landings in that process, as well as any who feel
> their nose drops abruptly, if there are any still flying.
> 
> Also, it's worth pointing out that the gear was either designed/tested,
> or both to 3 g's.  That's presumably for a 900 lb KR2.  My first landing
> was 5.5 g's as felt by the panel-mounted meter, at what was probably 950
> pounds, so it's pretty safe to say that my first landing proved that the
> standard Diehl conventional gear legs of the mid-nineties is good for
> 5.8 g's!  I dropped it in from what seemed like 8'at least 5'. That
> was my first lesson on sudden full throttle excursions from idlethe
> engine quit dead, just when I desperately needed a few hundred RPMs.  
> At the time I felt quite lucky I didn't tear the gear off entirely (it
> was quite a jolt), although I did finally manage to tear one off in a
> terraced hay field dead-stick landing 1130 hours later!
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Mark Langford, Harvest, AL
> ML "at" N56ML.com
> www.N56ML.com
> 
> 
> ___
> Search the KRnet Archives at 
> https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
> Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
> see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
> options.
> To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org

___
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org


Re: KR> Gear legs

2018-06-17 Thread brian.kraut--- via KRnet
To add a bit more to what Larry recommends on lengthening the legs, I
don't know if Steve will sell longer legs, but I would expect to pay a
hefty premium for them.  I spoke to Dan Diehl years ago and he told me
that he buys the scotchply sheets in 4' X 8' pieces so they are cut down
to get 24" blanks.  Making one set of longer legs means wasting some of
the sheet so the cost to him was double what a 24" leg would be since he
wound up with an unusable 20" of wasted material if he made one 30" set.
 Certainly doable, just don't think Steve is ripping you off if he
charges you double to legs only a few inches longer.  Of course, if you
can find a set of Grumman legs to cut down the price is good.

When I was working on my last 2S I had changed several things in the
gear geometry so I got an uncut 24" blank from Dan and welded my own
brackets with the lower steel bracket being a bit longer.  I also
changed the angle of the legs to a bit more vertical which gave me a
taller stance for the same length of leg.


Brian Kraut
904-536-1780
br...@eamanuacturing.com



At this point I'll toss in my opinion on the gear.  Anyone building a 
2S, with tail wheel and using Diehl type gear, and making them from the 
larger gear blanks should make them longer than 24 inches for a better 3

point stance.  Jeff Scott and I have 30 inch legs and I like it that 
way. https://www.dropbox.com/s/wb9mahqklj8540o/100_.JPG?dl=0

28 inches might also be a good length.  Just my opinion.

Larry Flesner

___
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org


Re: KR> Gear legs - G loading

2018-06-14 Thread Chris Gardiner via KRnet
Mark,
The old literature I have from Diehl Aero-Nautical on the KR 2 Landing Gear 
states “gear has been tested to 5Gs” .
I also have had a few bad “drop in “ landings that tested the gear to that 
extent and it has never cracked or failed.
Cheers
Chris Gardiner


Sent from my iPad

> On Jun 14, 2018, at 3:18 AM, Mark Langford via KRnet  
> wrote:
> 
> 
> That's the first I've heard of issues with the nose dropping abruptly on
> the tri-gear versions, so it looks like a bit more investigation is in
> order.  I've seen drawings in the aircraft design books regarding
> recommended gear angles with respect to CG for both conventional and
> tri-gear installations, and will fish those out when I get I chance.
> Pazmany did some especially good work in this area, with fairly precise
> descriptions for the geometry of both gear types.   Any anecdotal
> information from KR pilots (with reasonable CGs and some hours of KR
> flying experience) who've noticed the nose dropping suddenly on their
> tri-gear KR would be appreciated.  I'll try to add some of this
> increased gear knowledge to my gear site in the next few weeks.  This is
> also a reminder to me that I need to update www.krnet.org also, so we
> can pass on this useful information to aid future builders.  I'll
> probably be asking for some dimensions from tri-gear guys who are
> satisfied with their landings in that process, as well as any who feel
> their nose drops abruptly, if there are any still flying.
> 
> Also, it's worth pointing out that the gear was either designed/tested,
> or both to 3 g's.  That's presumably for a 900 lb KR2.  My first landing
> was 5.5 g's as felt by the panel-mounted meter, at what was probably 950
> pounds, so it's pretty safe to say that my first landing proved that the
> standard Diehl conventional gear legs of the mid-nineties is good for
> 5.8 g's!  I dropped it in from what seemed like 8'at least 5'. That
> was my first lesson on sudden full throttle excursions from idlethe
> engine quit dead, just when I desperately needed a few hundred RPMs.  
> At the time I felt quite lucky I didn't tear the gear off entirely (it
> was quite a jolt), although I did finally manage to tear one off in a
> terraced hay field dead-stick landing 1130 hours later!
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Mark Langford, Harvest, AL
> ML "at" N56ML.com
> www.N56ML.com
> 
> 
> ___
> Search the KRnet Archives at 
> https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
> Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
> see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
> options.
> To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org


___
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org


Re: KR> Gear legs

2018-06-14 Thread Joe Wallace via KRnet
Thanks Steve, for the clarifications…. jw

> On Jun 13, 2018, at 17:20, Steve G. via KRnet  wrote:
> 
> For the sake of accurate info in the archives, here is the deal. 
> 
> The conventional cut gear was the first and only type produced by Dan. 
> Initially they told people they were reversible (which is probably what Larry 
> was thinking). The trigear type cut didn’t come about until about 1991. There 
> have been no changes after that time. 
> 
> The conventional gear, when used as a trigear had a tendency to slam the nose 
> down on landing   The early nose struts were glass and kept breaking. This is 
> one reason they changed to 4130 strut. This issue also prompted t

___
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org


Re: KR> Gear legs

2018-06-14 Thread Christopher Pryce via KRnet
Straight edge is conventional
Double edge is tricycle

They are both the current style

On Thu, Jun 14, 2018, 18:36 mark jones via KRnet 
wrote:

> Someone clear this up. There are two types of Diehl legs out there. One
> has a straight edge the entire length on one side and the other style has
> an angle on both edges. Which is the current style and which should be used
> on which gear configuration.
>
> Mark Jones
> Oldsmar, Fl
> www.flykr2s.com
> flyk...@gmail.com
>
> Sent from my iPhone 7
>
>
>
___
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org


Re: KR> Gear legs - G loading

2018-06-14 Thread Steve G. via KRnet
Probably because you haven't seen anyone use the conventional gear for a tri
gear configuration. It makes it harder to rotate with higher speeds needed.
The use of the conventional gear caused the nose gear to shimmy and break.
That also is one of the factors why Dan changed the gear leg profile and
went to the 4130 strut. Mark's data would be interesting to have or see if
there are still people out there with this configuration. Dan recalled all
the fiberglass struts they sent out.

The design of the conventional gear leg placed the axle point at the same
location where Ken designed the retract gear to be. When on the back side of
the spar it places the wheels too far aft. The gear leg profile for the
trigear (like Jones' KR) placed the wheels farther forward allowing easier
rotation on take-off. 

For those still not sure of which leg is which, the gear leg pictured on nV
Aero is the conventional leg. I may be pulling the plug on the website soon.

Steve Glover


-Original Message-
From: KRnet [mailto:krnet-boun...@list.krnet.org] On Behalf Of Mark Langford
via KRnet
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2018 12:19 AM
To: KRnet
Cc: m...@n56ml.com
Subject: Re: KR> Gear legs - G loading


That's the first I've heard of issues with the nose dropping abruptly on the
tri-gear versions, so it looks like a bit more investigation is in order.
I've seen drawings in the aircraft design books regarding recommended gear
angles with respect to CG for both conventional and tri-gear installations,
and will fish those out when I get I chance.
Pazmany did some especially good work in this area, with fairly precise
descriptions for the geometry of both gear types.   Any anecdotal
information from KR pilots (with reasonable CGs and some hours of KR flying
experience) who've noticed the nose dropping suddenly on their tri-gear KR
would be appreciated.  I'll try to add some of this increased gear knowledge
to my gear site in the next few weeks.  This is also a reminder to me that I
need to update www.krnet.org also, so we can pass on this useful information
to aid future builders.  I'll probably be asking for some dimensions from
tri-gear guys who are satisfied with their landings in that process, as well
as any who feel their nose drops abruptly, if there are any still flying.

Also, it's worth pointing out that the gear was either designed/tested, or
both to 3 g's.  That's presumably for a 900 lb KR2.  My first landing was
5.5 g's as felt by the panel-mounted meter, at what was probably 950 pounds,
so it's pretty safe to say that my first landing proved that the standard
Diehl conventional gear legs of the mid-nineties is good for
5.8 g's!  I dropped it in from what seemed like 8'at least 5'. That was
my first lesson on sudden full throttle excursions from idlethe engine
quit dead, just when I desperately needed a few hundred RPMs.  
At the time I felt quite lucky I didn't tear the gear off entirely (it was
quite a jolt), although I did finally manage to tear one off in a terraced
hay field dead-stick landing 1130 hours later!

Thanks,

Mark Langford, Harvest, AL
ML "at" N56ML.com
www.N56ML.com


___
Search the KRnet Archives at
https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org


___
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org


Re: KR> Gear legs

2018-06-14 Thread mark jones via KRnet
Someone clear this up. There are two types of Diehl legs out there. One has a 
straight edge the entire length on one side and the other style has an angle on 
both edges. Which is the current style and which should be used on which gear 
configuration. 

Mark Jones
Oldsmar, Fl
www.flykr2s.com
flyk...@gmail.com

Sent from my iPhone 7

> On Jun 13, 2018, at 6:29 PM, Tony King via KRnet  wrote:
> 
> Good info Steve.  Thanks for clearing that up.
> 
> On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 at 08:26, Steve G. via KRnet 
> wrote:
> 
>> For the sake of accurate info in the archives, here is the deal.
>> 
>> The conventional cut gear was the first and only type produced by Dan.
>> Initially they told people they were reversible (which is probably what
>> Larry was thinking). The trigear type cut didn’t come about until about
>> 1991. There have been no changes after that time.
>> 
>> The conventional gear, when used as a trigear had a tendency to slam the
>> nose down on landing   The early nose struts were glass and kept breaking.
>> This is one reason they changed to 4130 strut. This issue also prompted the
>> redesign of the main gear leg for the trigear.
>> 
>> Dan was tired of explaining or arguing with people as to why the  main
>> gear leg for the trigear should not be reversed for a conventional
>> taildragger so he just ultimately said it will work but it is not
>> recommended.
>> 
>> The set back on the trigear leg in the taildragger installation makes it
>> very touchy. The plane will go over on the nose much more easily when on
>> step and applying brakes without a good feel for how the plane will
>> respond. It is much more solid using the proper gear leg.
>> 
>> Nothing has ever been posted on my website to the contrary and I always
>> recommend using the proper leg for the installation.
>> 
>> FYI, the original material blanks to cut the gear legs now cost nearly as
>> much as what I sell the entire kit for.
>> 
>> Steve Glover
>> 
>> Sent from my electronic leash.
>> 
>>> On Jun 13, 2018, at 06:24, Flesner via KRnet 
>> wrote:
>>> 
 On 6/13/2018 8:19 AM, Rob Schmitt wrote:
 My empty weight at 1st flight was 600 pounds.
>>> 
>>> +++
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Rob,
>>> 
>>> Thanks for the reply.  Our KR's are like people, we tend to get heavier
>> with age. :-)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Larry Flesner
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ___
>>> Search the KRnet Archives at
>> https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
>>> Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
>>> see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to
>> change options.
>>> To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org
>> 
>> ___
>> Search the KRnet Archives at
>> https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
>> Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
>> see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change
>> options.
>> To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org
>> 
> ___
> Search the KRnet Archives at 
> https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
> Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
> see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
> options.
> To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org

___
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org


Re: KR> Gear legs - G loading

2018-06-14 Thread Mark Langford via KRnet


That's the first I've heard of issues with the nose dropping abruptly on
the tri-gear versions, so it looks like a bit more investigation is in
order.  I've seen drawings in the aircraft design books regarding
recommended gear angles with respect to CG for both conventional and
tri-gear installations, and will fish those out when I get I chance.
Pazmany did some especially good work in this area, with fairly precise
descriptions for the geometry of both gear types.   Any anecdotal
information from KR pilots (with reasonable CGs and some hours of KR
flying experience) who've noticed the nose dropping suddenly on their
tri-gear KR would be appreciated.  I'll try to add some of this
increased gear knowledge to my gear site in the next few weeks.  This is
also a reminder to me that I need to update www.krnet.org also, so we
can pass on this useful information to aid future builders.  I'll
probably be asking for some dimensions from tri-gear guys who are
satisfied with their landings in that process, as well as any who feel
their nose drops abruptly, if there are any still flying.

Also, it's worth pointing out that the gear was either designed/tested,
or both to 3 g's.  That's presumably for a 900 lb KR2.  My first landing
was 5.5 g's as felt by the panel-mounted meter, at what was probably 950
pounds, so it's pretty safe to say that my first landing proved that the
standard Diehl conventional gear legs of the mid-nineties is good for
5.8 g's!  I dropped it in from what seemed like 8'at least 5'. That
was my first lesson on sudden full throttle excursions from idlethe
engine quit dead, just when I desperately needed a few hundred RPMs.  
At the time I felt quite lucky I didn't tear the gear off entirely (it
was quite a jolt), although I did finally manage to tear one off in a
terraced hay field dead-stick landing 1130 hours later!

Thanks,

Mark Langford, Harvest, AL
ML "at" N56ML.com
www.N56ML.com


___
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org


Re: KR> Gear legs

2018-06-13 Thread John Bouyea via KRnet
Steve,
I'll also add "Thank you for the posting." It is precisely this type of 
accurate, factual and historical information that we run the archives for in 
the first place. 
Langford reminds members to "Search the archives before posting questions as 
your answer may already be out there."
This is one of those valuable postings. Thanks Steve.
John Bouyea
N5391M/ KR2
OR81/ Hillsboro, OR

-Original Message-----
Subject: Re: KR> Gear legs

For the sake of accurate info in the archives, here is the deal. 
...
Steve Glover


___
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org


Re: KR> Gear legs

2018-06-13 Thread Ppaulvsk via KRnet
Thank you Steve.  Good to hear from you. It's been awhile.☺


Paul ViskBelleville Il.618-406-4705
 Original message From: Tony King via KRnet 
 Date: 6/13/18  5:29 PM  (GMT-06:00) To: KRnet 
 Cc: Tony King  Subject: Re: KR> Gear 
legs 
Good info Steve.  Thanks for clearing that up.

On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 at 08:26, Steve G. via KRnet 
wrote:

> For the sake of accurate info in the archives, here is the deal.
>
> The conventional cut gear was the first and only type produced by Dan.
> Initially they told people they were reversible (which is probably what
> Larry was thinking). The trigear type cut didn’t come about until about
> 1991. There have been no changes after that time.
>
> The conventional gear, when used as a trigear had a tendency to slam the
> nose down on landing   The early nose struts were glass and kept breaking.
> This is one reason they changed to 4130 strut. This issue also prompted the
> redesign of the main gear leg for the trigear.
>
> Dan was tired of explaining or arguing with people as to why the  main
> gear leg for the trigear should not be reversed for a conventional
> taildragger so he just ultimately said it will work but it is not
> recommended.
>
> The set back on the trigear leg in the taildragger installation makes it
> very touchy. The plane will go over on the nose much more easily when on
> step and applying brakes without a good feel for how the plane will
> respond. It is much more solid using the proper gear leg.
>
> Nothing has ever been posted on my website to the contrary and I always
> recommend using the proper leg for the installation.
>
> FYI, the original material blanks to cut the gear legs now cost nearly as
> much as what I sell the entire kit for.
>
> Steve Glover
>
> Sent from my electronic leash.
>
> > On Jun 13, 2018, at 06:24, Flesner via KRnet 
> wrote:
> >
> >> On 6/13/2018 8:19 AM, Rob Schmitt wrote:
> >> My empty weight at 1st flight was 600 pounds.
> >
> > +++
> >
> >
> > Rob,
> >
> > Thanks for the reply.  Our KR's are like people, we tend to get heavier
> with age. :-)
> >
> >
> > Larry Flesner
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Search the KRnet Archives at
> https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
> > Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
> > see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to
> change options.
> > To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org
>
> ___
> Search the KRnet Archives at
> https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
> Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
> see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change
> options.
> To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org
>
___
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org
___
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org


Re: KR> Gear legs

2018-06-13 Thread Jeff Scott via KRnet


Steve,
 
Thanks for putting the history of this question into context.
 
-Jeff Scott
- 

Cc: "Steve G." 
Subject: Re: KR> Gear legs
For the sake of accurate info in the archives, here is the deal.

The conventional cut gear was the first and only type produced by Dan. 
Initially they told people they were reversible (which is probably what Larry 
was thinking). The trigear type cut didn’t come about until about 1991. There 
have been no changes after that time.

The conventional gear, when used as a trigear had a tendency to slam the nose 
down on landing The early nose struts were glass and kept breaking. This is one 
reason they changed to 4130 strut. This issue also prompted the redesign of the 
main gear leg for the trigear.

Dan was tired of explaining or arguing with people as to why the main gear leg 
for the trigear should not be reversed for a conventional taildragger so he 
just ultimately said it will work but it is not recommended.

The set back on the trigear leg in the taildragger installation makes it very 
touchy. The plane will go over on the nose much more easily when on step and 
applying brakes without a good feel for how the plane will respond. It is much 
more solid using the proper gear leg.

Nothing has ever been posted on my website to the contrary and I always 
recommend using the proper leg for the installation.

FYI, the original material blanks to cut the gear legs now cost nearly as much 
as what I sell the entire kit for.

Steve Glover

Sent from my electronic leash.
 

___
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org


Re: KR> Gear legs

2018-06-13 Thread Tony King via KRnet
Good info Steve.  Thanks for clearing that up.

On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 at 08:26, Steve G. via KRnet 
wrote:

> For the sake of accurate info in the archives, here is the deal.
>
> The conventional cut gear was the first and only type produced by Dan.
> Initially they told people they were reversible (which is probably what
> Larry was thinking). The trigear type cut didn’t come about until about
> 1991. There have been no changes after that time.
>
> The conventional gear, when used as a trigear had a tendency to slam the
> nose down on landing   The early nose struts were glass and kept breaking.
> This is one reason they changed to 4130 strut. This issue also prompted the
> redesign of the main gear leg for the trigear.
>
> Dan was tired of explaining or arguing with people as to why the  main
> gear leg for the trigear should not be reversed for a conventional
> taildragger so he just ultimately said it will work but it is not
> recommended.
>
> The set back on the trigear leg in the taildragger installation makes it
> very touchy. The plane will go over on the nose much more easily when on
> step and applying brakes without a good feel for how the plane will
> respond. It is much more solid using the proper gear leg.
>
> Nothing has ever been posted on my website to the contrary and I always
> recommend using the proper leg for the installation.
>
> FYI, the original material blanks to cut the gear legs now cost nearly as
> much as what I sell the entire kit for.
>
> Steve Glover
>
> Sent from my electronic leash.
>
> > On Jun 13, 2018, at 06:24, Flesner via KRnet 
> wrote:
> >
> >> On 6/13/2018 8:19 AM, Rob Schmitt wrote:
> >> My empty weight at 1st flight was 600 pounds.
> >
> > +++
> >
> >
> > Rob,
> >
> > Thanks for the reply.  Our KR's are like people, we tend to get heavier
> with age. :-)
> >
> >
> > Larry Flesner
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Search the KRnet Archives at
> https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
> > Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
> > see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to
> change options.
> > To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org
>
> ___
> Search the KRnet Archives at
> https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
> Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
> see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change
> options.
> To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org
>
___
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org


Re: KR> Gear legs

2018-06-13 Thread Steve G. via KRnet
For the sake of accurate info in the archives, here is the deal. 

The conventional cut gear was the first and only type produced by Dan. 
Initially they told people they were reversible (which is probably what Larry 
was thinking). The trigear type cut didn’t come about until about 1991. There 
have been no changes after that time. 

The conventional gear, when used as a trigear had a tendency to slam the nose 
down on landing   The early nose struts were glass and kept breaking. This is 
one reason they changed to 4130 strut. This issue also prompted the redesign of 
the main gear leg for the trigear. 

Dan was tired of explaining or arguing with people as to why the  main gear leg 
for the trigear should not be reversed for a conventional taildragger so he 
just ultimately said it will work but it is not recommended. 

The set back on the trigear leg in the taildragger installation makes it very 
touchy. The plane will go over on the nose much more easily when on step and 
applying brakes without a good feel for how the plane will respond. It is much 
more solid using the proper gear leg. 

Nothing has ever been posted on my website to the contrary and I always 
recommend using the proper leg for the installation. 

FYI, the original material blanks to cut the gear legs now cost nearly as much 
as what I sell the entire kit for. 

Steve Glover

Sent from my electronic leash. 

> On Jun 13, 2018, at 06:24, Flesner via KRnet  wrote:
> 
>> On 6/13/2018 8:19 AM, Rob Schmitt wrote:
>> My empty weight at 1st flight was 600 pounds.
> 
> +++
> 
> 
> Rob,
> 
> Thanks for the reply.  Our KR's are like people, we tend to get heavier with 
> age. :-)
> 
> 
> Larry Flesner
> 
> 
> ___
> Search the KRnet Archives at 
> https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
> Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
> see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
> options.
> To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org

___
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org


Re: KR> Gear legs

2018-06-13 Thread Flesner via KRnet

On 6/13/2018 8:19 AM, Rob Schmitt wrote:

My empty weight at 1st flight was 600 pounds.


+++


Rob,

Thanks for the reply.  Our KR's are like people, we tend to get heavier 
with age. :-)



Larry Flesner


___
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org


Re: KR> Gear legs

2018-06-13 Thread Rob Schmitt via KRnet
Larry,

Roger, I have the Dan Diehl tri-gear design legs and nose gear. KR2S length, VW 
Revmaster engine and no major issues with CG. I keep my passenger weight 
allowed to 200 lbs to ensure it stays in the CG range.  My empty weight at 1st 
flight was 600 pounds. I am still flying regularly. 

Thanks,

Rob Schmitt
N1852Z




-Original Message-
From: KRnet  On Behalf Of Flesner via KRnet
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2018 7:43 AM
To: krnet@list.krnet.org
Cc: Flesner 
Subject: Re: KR> Gear legs

On 6/12/2018 7:50 PM, mark jones via KRnet wrote:
> The manual I have has no date on it but the gear kit it came with was bought 
> mid 90’s. It states “for tail dragged mount leg on front of spar angled 
> forward and for tri-gear mount leg on rear of spar angled rearward”.

++


So, here is what we know in spite of all claims and counter claims.  Dan Diehl 
designed, tested, and sold gear legs that he said were reversible for tail 
wheel and tri-gear setups.  Many KRs were built using them and worked quite 
well in either configuration.  Along came the KR2S, a bit longer in length so 
maybe a bit more tail weight but the Diehl gear worked well with a bit heavier 
Corvair engine.  (Rob Schmidt, do you have Diehl gear with VW engine?)

At some point Steve Glover purchased for sale the Diehl KR components. He still 
advertises the gear as the "Diehl" gear so one can only assume they would work 
as Dan designed them.  If Steve has made any changes to the Diehl gear leg 
design he should make that info available to anyone purchasing a "Diehl" set of 
landing gear.

Sid had to add considerable weight to the engine mount to correct some sort of 
CG problem so I don't think we can use his KR / experience as a base line for 
"Diehl" gear.  Jeff Scott did a real world "reverse" and they worked fine.

Bottom line: If you have "original" Diehl gear setup the legs and castings 
should work in either the tri-gear or conventional gear orientation.

At this point I'll toss in my opinion on the gear.  Anyone building a 2S, with 
tail wheel and using Diehl type gear, and making them from the larger gear 
blanks should make them longer than 24 inches for a better 3 point stance.  
Jeff Scott and I have 30 inch legs and I like it that way. 
https://www.dropbox.com/s/wb9mahqklj8540o/100_.JPG?dl=0

28 inches might also be a good length.  Just my opinion.

Larry Flesner


___
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org


___
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org


Re: KR> Gear legs

2018-06-13 Thread Flesner via KRnet

On 6/12/2018 7:50 PM, mark jones via KRnet wrote:

The manual I have has no date on it but the gear kit it came with was bought 
mid 90’s. It states “for tail dragged mount leg on front of spar angled forward 
and for tri-gear mount leg on rear of spar angled rearward”.


++


So, here is what we know in spite of all claims and counter claims.  Dan 
Diehl designed, tested, and sold gear legs that he said were reversible 
for tail wheel and tri-gear setups.  Many KRs were built using them and 
worked quite well in either configuration.  Along came the KR2S, a bit 
longer in length so maybe a bit more tail weight but the Diehl gear 
worked well with a bit heavier Corvair engine.  (Rob Schmidt, do you 
have Diehl gear with VW engine?)


At some point Steve Glover purchased for sale the Diehl KR components.   
He still advertises the gear as the "Diehl" gear so one can only assume 
they would work as Dan designed them.  If Steve has made any changes to 
the Diehl gear leg design he should make that info available to anyone 
purchasing a "Diehl" set of landing gear.


Sid had to add considerable weight to the engine mount to correct some 
sort of CG problem so I don't think we can use his KR / experience as a 
base line for "Diehl" gear.  Jeff Scott did a real world "reverse" and 
they worked fine.


Bottom line: If you have "original" Diehl gear setup the legs and 
castings should work in either the tri-gear or conventional gear 
orientation.


At this point I'll toss in my opinion on the gear.  Anyone building a 
2S, with tail wheel and using Diehl type gear, and making them from the 
larger gear blanks should make them longer than 24 inches for a better 3 
point stance.  Jeff Scott and I have 30 inch legs and I like it that 
way. https://www.dropbox.com/s/wb9mahqklj8540o/100_.JPG?dl=0


28 inches might also be a good length.  Just my opinion.

Larry Flesner


___
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org


Re: KR> Gear Legs

2018-06-12 Thread Steve G. via KRnet
--Original Message-
> From: "Ken Hurley via KRnet" 
> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2018 3:18pm
> To: "KRnet" 
> Cc: "Ken Hurley" 
> Subject: KR> KR2
> 
> 
> 
> I'm working on my KR2 to get it flying this month. I may need some
> guideance on getting the FAA blessing to fly it. I'll make a list of what I
> think I need and post later. While it's 90 degrees + on earth, it isn't
> that hot in the air! I've never flown a tail dragger. I've got a few
> friends that fly them all the time and are will to help teach me the ground
> procedures!
> 
> Up in the air this month,, is my goal!
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Ken Hurley
> kenhurle...@gmail.com
> ___
> Search the KRnet Archives at 
> https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
> Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
> see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
> options.
> To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> 
> Message: 14
> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2018 17:26:45 -0500
> From: Ppaulvsk 
> To: KRnet 
> Subject: Re: KR> KR2
> Message-ID: <5b1ef711.1c69fb81.ba996.b...@mx.google.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> 
> I'll see if I can make it out there this month on the way back from? Carthage?
> 
> 
> Paul ViskBelleville Il.618-406-4705
>  Original message From: Ken Hurley via KRnet 
>  Date: 6/11/18  5:18 PM  (GMT-06:00) To: KRnet 
>  Cc: Ken Hurley  Subject: KR> KR2
> I'm working on my KR2 to get it flying this month. I may need some
> guideance on getting the FAA blessing to fly it. I'll make a list of what I
> think I need and post later. While it's 90 degrees + on earth, it isn't
> that hot in the air! I've never flown a tail dragger. I've got a few
> friends that fly them all the time and are will to help teach me the ground
> procedures!
> 
> Up in the air this month,, is my goal!
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Ken Hurley
> kenhurle...@gmail.com
> ___
> Search the KRnet Archives at 
> https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
> Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
> see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
> options.
> To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org
> 
> --
> 
> Message: 15
> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2018 18:06:21 -0500
> From: Flesner 
> To: krnet@list.krnet.org
> Subject: Re: KR> Gear legs
> Message-ID: 
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
> 
>> On 6/11/2018 1:32 PM, Christopher Pryce via KRnet wrote:
>>  I have physically held both of them in my hand and there is a
>> difference.
> 
> +++
> 
> 
> Chris,
> 
> Do you recall the brand / supplier for each of the sets and what the
> difference was?? Maybe we can narrow this down.
> 
> Larry Flesner
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> 
> Message: 16
> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2018 18:10:29 -0500
> From: Flesner 
> To: inhisservice--- via KRnet 
> Subject: Re: KR> Canopy pull up from aero loads
> Message-ID: <0c59fc63-2c41-00ab-7d8c-6f90f2f6a...@frontier.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
> 
>> On 6/11/2018 5:23 PM, inhisservice--- via KRnet wrote:
>> In the coming month I will work out a latch to hold the canopy firmly in 
>> place and check it with h-stab camera again.
> 
> +
> 
> Consider release in an emergency situation in your design.
> 
> Larry Flesner
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> 
> Message: 17
> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 03:11:07 +0400
> From: Christopher Pryce 
> To: KRnet 
> Subject: Re: KR> Gear legs
> Message-ID:
> 
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
> 
> My first set came from a donor KR2 I purchased in Mississippi.  It was a
> tri gear and I was planning on using the gear legs for my conventional
> setup.  After I purchased it, I found out that the legs were cut with
> angles on both sides.  I was expecting them to have a straight edge on one
> side.  I called Steve Glover and he told me that there is a difference
> between the two (when that happened, I don't know).  I then purch

Re: KR> Gear Legs

2018-06-12 Thread Sid Wood via KRnet
.@gmail.com
___
Search the KRnet Archives at 
https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.

Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.

To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org

--

Message: 15
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2018 18:06:21 -0500
From: Flesner 
To: krnet@list.krnet.org
Subject: Re: KR> Gear legs
Message-ID: 
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed

On 6/11/2018 1:32 PM, Christopher Pryce via KRnet wrote:

  I have physically held both of them in my hand and there is a
difference.


+++


Chris,

Do you recall the brand / supplier for each of the sets and what the
difference was?? Maybe we can narrow this down.

Larry Flesner




--

Message: 16
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2018 18:10:29 -0500
From: Flesner 
To: inhisservice--- via KRnet 
Subject: Re: KR> Canopy pull up from aero loads
Message-ID: <0c59fc63-2c41-00ab-7d8c-6f90f2f6a...@frontier.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed

On 6/11/2018 5:23 PM, inhisservice--- via KRnet wrote:
In the coming month I will work out a latch to hold the canopy firmly in 
place and check it with h-stab camera again.


+

Consider release in an emergency situation in your design.

Larry Flesner




--

Message: 17
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 03:11:07 +0400
From: Christopher Pryce 
To: KRnet 
Subject: Re: KR> Gear legs
Message-ID:

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

My first set came from a donor KR2 I purchased in Mississippi.  It was a
tri gear and I was planning on using the gear legs for my conventional
setup.  After I purchased it, I found out that the legs were cut with
angles on both sides.  I was expecting them to have a straight edge on one
side.  I called Steve Glover and he told me that there is a difference
between the two (when that happened, I don't know).  I then purchased a
brand new set through Steve, in 2014 I believe, for conventional gear and
they are cut like the picture you provided.

On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 3:06 AM, Flesner via KRnet 
wrote:


On 6/11/2018 1:32 PM, Christopher Pryce via KRnet wrote:


  I have physically held both of them in my hand and there is a
difference.



+++


Chris,

Do you recall the brand / supplier for each of the sets and what the
difference was?  Maybe we can narrow this down.


Larry Flesner


___
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/k
r...@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org




--

Message: 18
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2018 18:31:10 -0500
From: Flesner 
To: krnet@list.krnet.org
Subject: Re: KR> Gear legs
Message-ID: <3b76fd89-6df3-4c80-9d9b-1d9e5e339...@frontier.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed

On 6/11/2018 6:11 PM, Christopher Pryce via KRnet wrote:

My first set came from a donor KR2 I purchased in Mississippi.  It was a
tri gear and I was planning on using the gear legs for my conventional
setup.  After I purchased it, I found out that the legs were cut with
angles on both sides.  I was expecting them to have a straight edge on one
side.  I called Steve Glover and he told me that there is a difference
between the two (when that happened, I don't know).  I then purchased a
brand new set through Steve, in 2014 I believe, for conventional gear and
they are cut like the picture you provided.


+


I purchased my gear legs from Diehl 20+ years ago and they had one
straight edge the entire length of the leg.? They look to be the same as
NVaero is selling now.? Unless Dan changed the design before I hooked up
with the KR community some 28 years ago I have no idea about the set
from the donor KR.? I'm wondering if the builder of that KR modified
them, not that any of us builders today would do such a thing.? I'm
thinking Steve is selling the gear legs in the same shape that he got
from Dan.? I seem to recall Dan did a drop test on the legs for early
testing and Marty Roberts was involved in the early design / testing of
the gear. Someone mentioned the cast brackets are quite strong.? The
brackets I questioned earlier and were changed by Dan were the lower
cast aluminum brackets that the axles bolted to.? They were rather
narrow and had bolt holes to

Re: KR> Gear legs

2018-06-12 Thread mark jones via KRnet
Also, interestingly the instructions mention this is rated for 3G. 

Mark Jones
Oldsmar, Fl
www.flykr2s.com
flyk...@gmail.com

Sent from my iPhone 7

> On Jun 12, 2018, at 8:50 PM, mark jones via KRnet  
> wrote:
> 
> The manual I have has no date on it but the gear kit it came with was bought 
> mid 90’s. It states “for tail dragged mount leg on front of spar angled 
> forward and for tri-gear mount leg on rear of spar angled rearward”.  The 
> drawing Larry made is representative of the one in the manual. Now here is 
> the kicker. The gear legs that actually came with that manual are angled on 
> both leading edge and trailing edge. One side of the leg is angled more than 
> the other and that edge goes against the mount. This will yield a distance of 
> axle centerline from spar of approximately ten inches from the face of the 
> spar for both options. 
> 
> Mark Jones
> Oldsmar, Fl
> www.flykr2s.com
> flyk...@gmail.com
> 
> Sent from my iPhone 7
> ___
> Search the KRnet Archives at 
> https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
> Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
> see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
> options.
> To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org

___
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org


KR> Gear legs

2018-06-12 Thread mark jones via KRnet
The manual I have has no date on it but the gear kit it came with was bought 
mid 90’s. It states “for tail dragged mount leg on front of spar angled forward 
and for tri-gear mount leg on rear of spar angled rearward”.  The drawing Larry 
made is representative of the one in the manual. Now here is the kicker. The 
gear legs that actually came with that manual are angled on both leading edge 
and trailing edge. One side of the leg is angled more than the other and that 
edge goes against the mount. This will yield a distance of axle centerline from 
spar of approximately ten inches from the face of the spar for both options. 

Mark Jones
Oldsmar, Fl
www.flykr2s.com
flyk...@gmail.com

Sent from my iPhone 7
___
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org


Re: KR> Gear legs

2018-06-11 Thread donald january via KRnet
I sold the Diehl gear off myKR2 (1985 built)and I remember it was the same
shape as the earlier drawing in resent post. I kick myself in the a$$
because I do believe they would work on my Taylor-monoplane. If I'm right
you get your CG on the airfoil first then set your gear angle to the wanted
tail weight in level flight.

On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 6:01 PM, Jeff Scott via KRnet 
wrote:

>
> I purchased my gear legs from Diehl 20+ years ago and they had one
> straight edge the entire length of the leg.  They look to be the same as
> NVaero is selling now.  Unless Dan changed the design before I hooked up
> with the KR community some 28 years ago I have no idea about the set
> from the donor KR.  I'm wondering if the builder of that KR modified
> them, not that any of us builders today would do such a thing.  I'm
> thinking Steve is selling the gear legs in the same shape that he got
> from Dan.  I seem to recall Dan did a drop test on the legs for early
> testing and Marty Roberts was involved in the early design / testing of
> the gear. Someone mentioned the cast brackets are quite strong.  The
> brackets I questioned earlier and were changed by Dan were the lower
> cast aluminum brackets that the axles bolted to.  They were rather
> narrow and had bolt holes to close to the edge in my opinion.  There
> were a couple of failures and Dan recalled them all and replaced them
> with 1/4" 4130 steel.  That has to be more that 15 years ago as I've
> been flying mine since early 2004.
>
> Larry Flesner
> ---
>
> Not that it's important by any stretch of the imagination, but the lower
> cast aluminum brackets had been recalled before I acquired my KR as a
> project 23 years ago.  They had already been swapped out when I picked up
> the project.  Time does get away from us old timers...  I would guess that
> if anyone wanted to pin point a date (I don't), it would be in the old
> newsletters from around 1993 - 1995.
>
> Dan was not a fan of the longer gear legs he sold to Larry and me.  When
> he first saw my plane, he tried to talk me into cutting a few inches off
> the gear.  I declined.  His comment was, "Then make good landings!"  I've
> been beating this plane on the ground for 1200 hours now, and so far, the
> gear is still hanging on.  I did find an issue using the 5:00x5 tires with
> some of the tacky tires that don't skid much on touchdown (Good Year Flight
> Custom III) as they were actually twisting the spars a bit on touch down
> and causing some cracks in the skin around the gear mounts.  At that time,
> my flights were all from a high altitude airport, which means a
> significantly higher landing speed.  Between the faster landings, more
> inertia to spin up a 5:00x5 tire, the tackiness of the flight Custom III
> tires, and 6 more inches of leverage with the longer gear legs, I could
> feel a noticeable jerk on the gear upon touch down.  I took those tires off
> and went back to the cheap Condor tires, which ended the problem.
>
> -Jeff Scott
>
>
> ___
> Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/
> krnet@list.krnet.org/.
> Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
> see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change
> options.
> To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org
>
___
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org


Re: KR> Gear legs

2018-06-11 Thread Jeff Scott via KRnet

I purchased my gear legs from Diehl 20+ years ago and they had one
straight edge the entire length of the leg.  They look to be the same as
NVaero is selling now.  Unless Dan changed the design before I hooked up
with the KR community some 28 years ago I have no idea about the set
from the donor KR.  I'm wondering if the builder of that KR modified
them, not that any of us builders today would do such a thing.  I'm
thinking Steve is selling the gear legs in the same shape that he got
from Dan.  I seem to recall Dan did a drop test on the legs for early
testing and Marty Roberts was involved in the early design / testing of
the gear. Someone mentioned the cast brackets are quite strong.  The
brackets I questioned earlier and were changed by Dan were the lower
cast aluminum brackets that the axles bolted to.  They were rather
narrow and had bolt holes to close to the edge in my opinion.  There
were a couple of failures and Dan recalled them all and replaced them
with 1/4" 4130 steel.  That has to be more that 15 years ago as I've
been flying mine since early 2004.

Larry Flesner
---

Not that it's important by any stretch of the imagination, but the lower cast 
aluminum brackets had been recalled before I acquired my KR as a project 23 
years ago.  They had already been swapped out when I picked up the project.  
Time does get away from us old timers...  I would guess that if anyone wanted 
to pin point a date (I don't), it would be in the old newsletters from around 
1993 - 1995.

Dan was not a fan of the longer gear legs he sold to Larry and me.  When he 
first saw my plane, he tried to talk me into cutting a few inches off the gear. 
 I declined.  His comment was, "Then make good landings!"  I've been beating 
this plane on the ground for 1200 hours now, and so far, the gear is still 
hanging on.  I did find an issue using the 5:00x5 tires with some of the tacky 
tires that don't skid much on touchdown (Good Year Flight Custom III) as they 
were actually twisting the spars a bit on touch down and causing some cracks in 
the skin around the gear mounts.  At that time, my flights were all from a high 
altitude airport, which means a significantly higher landing speed.  Between 
the faster landings, more inertia to spin up a 5:00x5 tire, the tackiness of 
the flight Custom III tires, and 6 more inches of leverage with the longer gear 
legs, I could feel a noticeable jerk on the gear upon touch down.  I took those 
tires off and went back to the cheap Condor tires, which ended the problem.

-Jeff Scott


___
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org


Re: KR> Gear legs

2018-06-11 Thread Flesner via KRnet

On 6/11/2018 6:11 PM, Christopher Pryce via KRnet wrote:

My first set came from a donor KR2 I purchased in Mississippi.  It was a
tri gear and I was planning on using the gear legs for my conventional
setup.  After I purchased it, I found out that the legs were cut with
angles on both sides.  I was expecting them to have a straight edge on one
side.  I called Steve Glover and he told me that there is a difference
between the two (when that happened, I don't know).  I then purchased a
brand new set through Steve, in 2014 I believe, for conventional gear and
they are cut like the picture you provided.


+


I purchased my gear legs from Diehl 20+ years ago and they had one 
straight edge the entire length of the leg.  They look to be the same as 
NVaero is selling now.  Unless Dan changed the design before I hooked up 
with the KR community some 28 years ago I have no idea about the set 
from the donor KR.  I'm wondering if the builder of that KR modified 
them, not that any of us builders today would do such a thing.  I'm 
thinking Steve is selling the gear legs in the same shape that he got 
from Dan.  I seem to recall Dan did a drop test on the legs for early 
testing and Marty Roberts was involved in the early design / testing of 
the gear. Someone mentioned the cast brackets are quite strong.  The 
brackets I questioned earlier and were changed by Dan were the lower 
cast aluminum brackets that the axles bolted to.  They were rather 
narrow and had bolt holes to close to the edge in my opinion.  There 
were a couple of failures and Dan recalled them all and replaced them 
with 1/4" 4130 steel.  That has to be more that 15 years ago as I've 
been flying mine since early 2004.


Larry Flesner


___
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org


Re: KR> Gear legs

2018-06-11 Thread Christopher Pryce via KRnet
My first set came from a donor KR2 I purchased in Mississippi.  It was a
tri gear and I was planning on using the gear legs for my conventional
setup.  After I purchased it, I found out that the legs were cut with
angles on both sides.  I was expecting them to have a straight edge on one
side.  I called Steve Glover and he told me that there is a difference
between the two (when that happened, I don't know).  I then purchased a
brand new set through Steve, in 2014 I believe, for conventional gear and
they are cut like the picture you provided.

On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 3:06 AM, Flesner via KRnet 
wrote:

> On 6/11/2018 1:32 PM, Christopher Pryce via KRnet wrote:
>
>>   I have physically held both of them in my hand and there is a
>> difference.
>>
>
> +++
>
>
> Chris,
>
> Do you recall the brand / supplier for each of the sets and what the
> difference was?  Maybe we can narrow this down.
>
>
> Larry Flesner
>
>
> ___
> Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/k
> r...@list.krnet.org/.
> Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
> see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change
> options.
> To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org
>
___
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org


Re: KR> Gear legs

2018-06-11 Thread Flesner via KRnet

On 6/11/2018 1:32 PM, Christopher Pryce via KRnet wrote:

  I have physically held both of them in my hand and there is a
difference.


+++


Chris,

Do you recall the brand / supplier for each of the sets and what the 
difference was?  Maybe we can narrow this down.


Larry Flesner


___
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org


Re: KR> Gear Legs

2018-06-11 Thread Flesner via KRnet

On 6/11/2018 11:43 AM, Sid Wood via KRnet wrote:
I originally put the tail wheel version gear legs on my tri-gear KR-2; 
I could not get into the plane without dumping on its butt.


+


Sid,

As I recall your project was quite heavy, 800+ pounds, and rather tail 
heavy so you added considerable weight to the engine mount or somewhere 
up front.  Could that have contributed to the problem and are your gear 
legs the original Deihl legs or a newer / different cut?  Sometimes I 
think we call an apple rotten when we are dealing with an orange.  KR's 
are sometimes so different, one to another, that we must use caution 
when comparing one to another.


Larry Flesner


___
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org


Re: KR> Gear legs

2018-06-11 Thread Jeff Scott via KRnet

Well, facts are facts.  And sometimes they are even right. ;o)

I suspect that somewhere along the line, either Dan or Steve made a change to 
the gear design.  While it is highly unlikely I still have the installation 
instructions from 24 years ago, it seems pretty clear to me that turning the 
gear around by swapping sides with the gear mounts was the standard at the 
time.  Many of us did so, and I did have a discussion with Dan about it before 
I did so.  Back when Dan was selling them, the gear was universal and could be 
mounted either way.  Perhaps in the later years, Dan either made a change to 
accommodate the longer and heavier -2S planes, or Steve made a change for 
similar reasons, or to work better with the pre-cut Grumman gear legs Steve is 
using vs the scotchply sheets Dan was cutting up to fabricate the gear legs.  
Since he hasn't chimed in on the subject, we don't really know.  But I also 
have little doubt that what Chris says is also true, that now days, there are 
two different sets of legs.  We just don't know when, how or why that came 
about.

-Jeff Scott
Cherokee Village, AR


 

Sent: Monday, June 11, 2018 at 1:32 PM
From: "Christopher Pryce via KRnet" 
To: KRnet 
Cc: "Christopher Pryce" 
Subject: Re: KR> Gear legs
I am not disputing that purpose built conventional gear can be used for
tricycle gear. I am just stating the fact that there are two types of
purpose built main gear for the two types. This is not an opinion, it is a
fact. I have physically held both of them in my hand and there is a
difference. Once again, if you look in the archives about this you can see
a message from Steve Glover, the only person who has the rights and makes
the landing gear, that there is a difference. Mark, you even chimed in and
agreed with the conversation. I am not ranting or trying to argue, I just
want people to know the facts.


On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 5:12 PM, mark jones via KRnet 
wrote:

> I reversed mine on my first KR. They were ordered as conventional and I
> installed as tri gear. Worked great for me. I have the original
> instructions and will look when I get home.
>
> Mark Jones
> Oldsmar, Fl
> www.flykr2s.com[http://www.flykr2s.com]
> flyk...@gmail.com
>
> Sent from my iPhone 7
>
> > On Jun 11, 2018, at 9:04 AM, Flesner via KRnet 
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > NVAero list a set of Diehl gear on their web page at
> http://www.nvaero.com/products/Diehl-Main-Landing-Gear-Assembly.html[http://www.nvaero.com/products/Diehl-Main-Landing-Gear-Assembly.html]
>  for
> tail wheel setup.
> >
> > The photo for trigear shows the same gear leg and bracket and the shape
> of the leg is similar to the little drawing I posted.
> >
> > http://www.nvaero.com/diehl-complete-tri-gear-kit-with-[http://www.nvaero.com/diehl-complete-tri-gear-kit-with-]
> wheel-pants-fairings/
> >
> > The first web address above says I reviewed them on November 4, 2010 and
> said they are rugged and easy to install. I don't recall making that
> review and can't find that post in the archives but they are rugged and
> easy to install. The original aluminum lower casting I thought was a poor
> design and I made my lower axle attach bracket using 4130 at about the same
> time that Dan Diehl recalled all the lower brackets and replaced them with
> a steel bracket very similar to the ones I made.
> >
> > If someone can come up with the original Diehl install instructions we
> can bring this issue to conclusion, even if it was confirmed years ago.
> I'm still on the side of "they are reversible"
> >
> > Larry Flesner
> >

___
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org


Re: KR> Gear legs

2018-06-11 Thread Christopher Pryce via KRnet
I am not disputing that purpose built conventional gear can be used for
tricycle gear.  I am just stating the fact that there are two types of
purpose built main gear for the two types.  This is not an opinion, it is a
fact.  I have physically held both of them in my hand and there is a
difference.  Once again, if you look in the archives about this you can see
a message from Steve Glover, the only person who has the rights and makes
the landing gear, that there is a difference.  Mark, you even chimed in and
agreed with the conversation.  I am not ranting or trying to argue, I just
want people to know the facts.


On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 5:12 PM, mark jones via KRnet 
wrote:

> I reversed mine on my first KR. They were ordered as conventional and I
> installed as tri gear. Worked great for me. I have the original
> instructions and will look when I get home.
>
> Mark Jones
> Oldsmar, Fl
> www.flykr2s.com
> flyk...@gmail.com
>
> Sent from my iPhone 7
>
> > On Jun 11, 2018, at 9:04 AM, Flesner via KRnet 
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > NVAero list a set of Diehl gear on their web page at
> http://www.nvaero.com/products/Diehl-Main-Landing-Gear-Assembly.html for
> tail wheel setup.
> >
> > The photo for trigear shows the same gear leg and bracket and the shape
> of the leg is similar to the little drawing I posted.
> >
> > http://www.nvaero.com/diehl-complete-tri-gear-kit-with-
> wheel-pants-fairings/
> >
> > The first web address above says I reviewed them on November 4, 2010 and
> said they are rugged and easy to install.  I don't recall making that
> review and can't find that post in the archives but they are rugged and
> easy to install.  The original aluminum lower casting I thought was a poor
> design and I made my lower axle attach bracket using 4130 at about the same
> time that Dan Diehl recalled all the lower brackets and replaced them with
> a steel bracket very similar to the ones I made.
> >
> > If someone can come up with the original Diehl install instructions we
> can bring this issue to conclusion, even if it was confirmed years ago.
> I'm still on the side of "they are reversible"
> >
> > Larry Flesner
> >
> > ___
> > Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/
> krnet@list.krnet.org/.
> > Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
> > see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to
> change options.
> > To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org
>
> ___
> Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/
> krnet@list.krnet.org/.
> Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
> see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change
> options.
> To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org
>
___
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org


Re: KR> Gear legs

2018-06-11 Thread Larry via KRnet
I reversed a set many years ago as per Diehl instructions to convert a 
taildragger into a nose dragger. I had to take mounting brackets off of the 
front side of the spars put the brackets on opposite sides of the fuselage and 
then mount them on the back/aft side of the front spars. The most severe angle 
that is cut into the top of the Diehl gear goes against the spar. For a nose 
gear/trigear airplane that angle causes the gear to angle backwards/aft which 
puts the main tires several inches behind the spar which is what prevents it 
from falling on its butt unlike what some builders have done.
As for the Diehl cast aluminum parts that bolt to the spar, the main gear bolt 
to, no worries on strength. My friend bellied his KR in just short of killing 
himself after vapor lock, broke both landing gear off, both wheels came up into 
the bottom of the wings. Those aluminum castings were not damaged at all and 
were used to accomplish the conversion I mention above.

Larry H


> On Jun 11, 2018, at 8:04 AM, Flesner via KRnet  wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> NVAero list a set of Diehl gear on their web page at 
> http://www.nvaero.com/products/Diehl-Main-Landing-Gear-Assembly.html for tail 
> wheel setup.
> 
> The photo for trigear shows the same gear leg and bracket and the shape of 
> the leg is similar to the little drawing I posted.
> 
> http://www.nvaero.com/diehl-complete-tri-gear-kit-with-wheel-pants-fairings/
> 
> The first web address above says I reviewed them on November 4, 2010 and said 
> they are rugged and easy to install.  I don't recall making that review and 
> can't find that post in the archives but they are rugged and easy to install. 
>  The original aluminum lower casting I thought was a poor design and I made 
> my lower axle attach bracket using 4130 at about the same time that Dan Diehl 
> recalled all the lower brackets and replaced them with a steel bracket very 
> similar to the ones I made.
> 
> If someone can come up with the original Diehl install instructions we can 
> bring this issue to conclusion, even if it was confirmed years ago.  I'm 
> still on the side of "they are reversible"
> 
> Larry Flesner
> 
> ___
> 


___
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org


Re: KR> Gear Legs

2018-06-11 Thread Sid Wood via KRnet
For a Tri-gear KR-2, the main wheel axles need to be 20 inches behind the 
the aft face of the main spar for the aircraft to balance with people 
onboard.  Otherwise it it will fall on its butt.  I originally put the tail 
wheel version gear legs on my tri-gear KR-2; I could not get into the plane 
without dumping on its butt.  Distance from the main spar was 17 inches aft. 
I made a set of Grumman-based gear legs that got 20 inches aft for the 
axles; no further problem with that.
I agree that you could put the tri-gear legs on a tail dragger, but then the 
CG may be too far aft of the main wheels.  That can aggravate ground 
handling and put excessive weight on the tail wheel.
I highly do not recommend putting the tail wheel version gear legs on a 
tri-gear KR-2.  Been there, done that.


Sid Wood
Tri-gear KR-2 N6242
California, MD, USA
--

Man, I keep reading over and over that you can't just turn the gear brackets 
around to change the mains from a trigear to a tail dragger or vice versa. 
Sure glad the KRNet and all this knowledge didn't exist when I bought mine 
as a project.  It was a trigear then.  I turned the gear around and have 
flown as a taildragger for 1200 hours now just blissfully ignorant about 
having apparently done the impossible.  Perhaps I got away with it because I 
have the 30" gear legs, so had sufficient aft and forward "sweep" without 
changing the gear angles.  But what I do know is that I just remounted the 
gear brackets to the other side of the spar without redrilling anything and 
moved on with building the rest of the plane.


-Jeff Scott
Cherokee Village, AR




___
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org


Re: KR> Gear legs

2018-06-11 Thread mark jones via KRnet
I reversed mine on my first KR. They were ordered as conventional and I 
installed as tri gear. Worked great for me. I have the original instructions 
and will look when I get home. 

Mark Jones
Oldsmar, Fl
www.flykr2s.com
flyk...@gmail.com

Sent from my iPhone 7

> On Jun 11, 2018, at 9:04 AM, Flesner via KRnet  wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> NVAero list a set of Diehl gear on their web page at 
> http://www.nvaero.com/products/Diehl-Main-Landing-Gear-Assembly.html for tail 
> wheel setup.
> 
> The photo for trigear shows the same gear leg and bracket and the shape of 
> the leg is similar to the little drawing I posted.
> 
> http://www.nvaero.com/diehl-complete-tri-gear-kit-with-wheel-pants-fairings/
> 
> The first web address above says I reviewed them on November 4, 2010 and said 
> they are rugged and easy to install.  I don't recall making that review and 
> can't find that post in the archives but they are rugged and easy to install. 
>  The original aluminum lower casting I thought was a poor design and I made 
> my lower axle attach bracket using 4130 at about the same time that Dan Diehl 
> recalled all the lower brackets and replaced them with a steel bracket very 
> similar to the ones I made.
> 
> If someone can come up with the original Diehl install instructions we can 
> bring this issue to conclusion, even if it was confirmed years ago.  I'm 
> still on the side of "they are reversible"
> 
> Larry Flesner
> 
> ___
> Search the KRnet Archives at 
> https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
> Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
> see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
> options.
> To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org

___
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org


Re: KR> Gear legs

2018-06-11 Thread Flesner via KRnet




NVAero list a set of Diehl gear on their web page at 
http://www.nvaero.com/products/Diehl-Main-Landing-Gear-Assembly.html for 
tail wheel setup.


The photo for trigear shows the same gear leg and bracket and the shape 
of the leg is similar to the little drawing I posted.


http://www.nvaero.com/diehl-complete-tri-gear-kit-with-wheel-pants-fairings/

The first web address above says I reviewed them on November 4, 2010 and 
said they are rugged and easy to install.  I don't recall making that 
review and can't find that post in the archives but they are rugged and 
easy to install.  The original aluminum lower casting I thought was a 
poor design and I made my lower axle attach bracket using 4130 at about 
the same time that Dan Diehl recalled all the lower brackets and 
replaced them with a steel bracket very similar to the ones I made.


If someone can come up with the original Diehl install instructions we 
can bring this issue to conclusion, even if it was confirmed years ago.  
I'm still on the side of "they are reversible"


Larry Flesner

___
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org


Re: KR> Gear legs

2018-06-10 Thread Christopher Pryce via KRnet
Last I checked Steve Glover at NvAero still sells them.

On Mon, Jun 11, 2018, 07:12 Jeff Scott via KRnet 
wrote:

>
> Was there info on who the supplier is/was on the gear leg that is
> different than the Diehl design?  Is there any supplier now selling gear
> legs?
>
> Larry Flesner
>
>
>
> FletchAir in Comfort, TX was selling fiberglass Grumman gear legs that
> many people bought to use for their KRs.
>
> -Jeff Scott
>
> ___
> Search the KRnet Archives at
> https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
> Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
> see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change
> options.
> To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org
>
___
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org


Re: KR> Gear legs

2018-06-10 Thread Jeff Scott via KRnet

Was there info on who the supplier is/was on the gear leg that is
different than the Diehl design?  Is there any supplier now selling gear
legs?

Larry Flesner


 
FletchAir in Comfort, TX was selling fiberglass Grumman gear legs that many 
people bought to use for their KRs. 

-Jeff Scott

___
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org


Re: KR> Gear legs

2018-06-10 Thread Flesner via KRnet

On 6/10/2018 8:16 PM, Christopher Pryce via KRnet wrote:

  I found the conversations we had about this in
2014 confirming that there are two different types of Main gear legs now.


+

Was there info on who the supplier is/was on the gear leg that is 
different than the Diehl design?  Is there any supplier now selling gear 
legs?


Larry Flesner



___
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org


Re: KR> Gear legs

2018-06-10 Thread Flesner via KRnet

On 6/10/2018 8:33 PM, Flesner via KRnet wrote:


The drawing below is not accurate but is as I remember the leg from 14 
years ago. 


+

The little drawing didn't come through.  With luck you can see it at 
https://www.dropbox.com/s/al23405tky2y22y/gear%20leg%20001.jpg?dl=0


Larry Flesner


___
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org


Re: KR> Gear legs

2018-06-10 Thread Flesner via KRnet

On 6/10/2018 8:03 PM, Christopher Pryce via KRnet wrote:

  I was told
there was a difference between conventional and tricycle gear



The drawing below is not accurate but is as I remember the leg from 14 
years ago.  The short angled edge goes on the bracket and the leg 
extends either forward or rearward from the spar.  One side of the leg 
is straight for the entire length.  I added a 1 inch foam block to the 
lead and trail edge for shaping and ran the brake line through the 
hollowed out foam on the lead edge.


In one of Tony Bingalis' books he says the main wheel on a tail dragger 
should extend forward of the C.G. and an angle of 15 to 25 degrees.  I 
can only assume that would hold true for the nose wheel gear if the leg 
is reversible.


Larry Flesner

___
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org


Re: KR> Gear legs

2018-06-10 Thread Christopher Pryce via KRnet
Follow up:
If you search the archives I found the conversations we had about this in
2014 confirming that there are two different types of Main gear legs now.
___
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org


Re: KR> Gear legs

2018-06-10 Thread Christopher Pryce via KRnet
I will say that I bought a donor project that had tricycle gear and the
legs had angles on  both sides. After confirming with nvaero, I was told
there was a difference between conventional and tricycle gear. The
conventional gear I ordered only has an angle cut onto one side of the gear
legs.  Maybe there was a change at some point.

On Mon, Jun 11, 2018, 05:00 mark jones via KRnet 
wrote:

> Larry I am pretty sure you are correct. I am out of town till Wednesday
> and when I get home I will check the instructions and see if our memories
> are good.
>
> Mark Jones
> Oldsmar, Fl
> www.flykr2s.com
> flyk...@gmail.com
>
> Sent from my iPhone 7
>
> > On Jun 10, 2018, at 8:20 PM, Flesner via KRnet 
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> I turned the gear around and have flown as a taildragger for 1200 hours
> now
> >
> 
> >
> > Every time this subject comes up I keep thinking the original Diehl
> instructions for the gear said they were reversible.  Put them on the front
> of the spar for tail dragger and on the rear of the spar for nose wheel.  I
> can't  find my Diehl instructions to dispute anyone's opinions but I think
> they are reversible.  Anyone have Dan Diehl's installation pack?  Jeff and
> I have the only two KR's with 30" Diehl legs but that is not an issue for
> reverse or no reverse.
> >
> > Larry Flesner
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Search the KRnet Archives at
> https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
> > Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
> > see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to
> change options.
> > To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org
>
> ___
> Search the KRnet Archives at
> https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
> Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
> see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change
> options.
> To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org
>
___
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org


Re: KR> Gear legs

2018-06-10 Thread mark jones via KRnet
Larry I am pretty sure you are correct. I am out of town till Wednesday and 
when I get home I will check the instructions and see if our memories are good. 

Mark Jones
Oldsmar, Fl
www.flykr2s.com
flyk...@gmail.com

Sent from my iPhone 7

> On Jun 10, 2018, at 8:20 PM, Flesner via KRnet  wrote:
> 
> 
>> I turned the gear around and have flown as a taildragger for 1200 hours now
> 
> 
> Every time this subject comes up I keep thinking the original Diehl 
> instructions for the gear said they were reversible.  Put them on the front 
> of the spar for tail dragger and on the rear of the spar for nose wheel.  I 
> can't  find my Diehl instructions to dispute anyone's opinions but I think 
> they are reversible.  Anyone have Dan Diehl's installation pack?  Jeff and I 
> have the only two KR's with 30" Diehl legs but that is not an issue for 
> reverse or no reverse.
> 
> Larry Flesner
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Search the KRnet Archives at 
> https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
> Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
> see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
> options.
> To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org

___
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org


Re: KR> Gear legs

2018-06-10 Thread Flesner via KRnet



I turned the gear around and have flown as a taildragger for 1200 hours now



Every time this subject comes up I keep thinking the original Diehl 
instructions for the gear said they were reversible.  Put them on the 
front of the spar for tail dragger and on the rear of the spar for nose 
wheel.  I can't  find my Diehl instructions to dispute anyone's opinions 
but I think they are reversible.  Anyone have Dan Diehl's installation 
pack?  Jeff and I have the only two KR's with 30" Diehl legs but that is 
not an issue for reverse or no reverse.


Larry Flesner



___
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org


Re: KR> Gear legs

2018-06-10 Thread Mark Wegmet via KRnet
I’m just an engineer, it’s about geometry… just do the math. JMHO
 
Mark W.
N952MW
 
From: KRnet [mailto:krnet-boun...@list.krnet.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Scott via 
KRnet
Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2018 3:39 PM
To: krnet@list.krnet.org
Cc: Jeff Scott
Subject: Re: KR> Gear legs
 
Man, I keep reading over and over that you can't just turn the gear brackets 
around to change the mains from a trigear to a tail dragger or vice versa.  
Sure glad the KRNet and all this knowledge didn't exist when I bought mine as a 
project.  It was a trigear then.  I turned the gear around and have flown as a 
taildragger for 1200 hours now just blissfully ignorant about having apparently 
done the impossible.  Perhaps I got away with it because I have the 30" gear 
legs, so had sufficient aft and forward "sweep" without changing the gear 
angles.  But what I do know is that I just remounted the gear brackets to the 
other side of the spar without redrilling anything and moved on with building 
the rest of the plane.
 
-Jeff Scott
Cherokee Village, AR
  
Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2018 at 1:11 PM
From: "Sid Wood via KRnet" 
To: krnet@list.krnet.org
Cc: "Sid Wood" 
Subject: Re: KR> Gear legs
I have the template I used for my KR-2 Tri-gear using the Grumman blanks.
The template is for the aft facing gear legs. Tri-gear and tail dragger
legs are not interchangeable. The Grumman blanks are 1-inch thick; you will
need to plane them down to 3/4-inch thick. A bench mounted power planer
will do the job; just make several passes to gradually get it done. The
glass fibers are tough.
The difference for the aft facing and forward facing gear legs is the
location of the bolt holes and the sweep angle of the leg after it leaves
the spar mounting bracket. The forward facing gear leg does not sweep as
much as the aft facing leg. The toe is established when you drill the holes
for the axle adapter bracket. Fine adjustments for toe and camber can be
made with shims at the axle mounting bolts. Do it correctly when you drill
the holes in the fiberglass and you will not need the shims.

Sid Wood
Tri-gear KR-2 N6242
California, MD, USA
--
 


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
___
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org


KR> Gear legs for sale.

2018-06-10 Thread mark jones via KRnet
If anyone is interested, I have a brand new set of Diehl main gear legs with 
spar brackets and axle brackets. Nothing has been done to them as far as 
mounting holes being drilled and the brake line has not been installed yet. I 
am using a set of Grove gear as my mains. If interested email me direct at 
flyk...@gmail.com 

Mark Jones
Oldsmar, Fl
www.flykr2s.com
flyk...@gmail.com

Sent from my iPhone 7
___
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org


Re: KR> Gear legs

2018-06-10 Thread Jeff Scott via KRnet

Man, I keep reading over and over that you can't just turn the gear brackets around to change the mains from a trigear to a tail dragger or vice versa.  Sure glad the KRNet and all this knowledge didn't exist when I bought mine as a project.  It was a trigear then.  I turned the gear around and have flown as a taildragger for 1200 hours now just blissfully ignorant about having apparently done the impossible.  Perhaps I got away with it because I have the 30" gear legs, so had sufficient aft and forward "sweep" without changing the gear angles.  But what I do know is that I just remounted the gear brackets to the other side of the spar without redrilling anything and moved on with building the rest of the plane.

 

-Jeff Scott

Cherokee Village, AR

 

Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2018 at 1:11 PM
From: "Sid Wood via KRnet" 
To: krnet@list.krnet.org
Cc: "Sid Wood" 
Subject: Re: KR> Gear legs

I have the template I used for my KR-2 Tri-gear using the Grumman blanks.
The template is for the aft facing gear legs. Tri-gear and tail dragger
legs are not interchangeable. The Grumman blanks are 1-inch thick; you will
need to plane them down to 3/4-inch thick. A bench mounted power planer
will do the job; just make several passes to gradually get it done. The
glass fibers are tough.
The difference for the aft facing and forward facing gear legs is the
location of the bolt holes and the sweep angle of the leg after it leaves
the spar mounting bracket. The forward facing gear leg does not sweep as
much as the aft facing leg. The toe is established when you drill the holes
for the axle adapter bracket. Fine adjustments for toe and camber can be
made with shims at the axle mounting bolts. Do it correctly when you drill
the holes in the fiberglass and you will not need the shims.

Sid Wood
Tri-gear KR-2 N6242
California, MD, USA
--
 




___
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org


Re: KR> Gear legs

2018-06-10 Thread Sid Wood via KRnet
I have the template I used for my KR-2 Tri-gear using the Grumman blanks. 
The template is for the aft facing gear legs.  Tri-gear and tail dragger 
legs are not interchangeable.  The Grumman blanks are 1-inch thick; you will 
need to plane them down to 3/4-inch thick.  A bench mounted power planer 
will do the job; just make several passes to gradually get it done.  The 
glass fibers are tough.
The difference for the aft facing and forward facing gear legs is the 
location of the bolt holes and the sweep angle of the leg after it leaves 
the spar mounting bracket.  The forward facing gear leg does not sweep as 
much as the aft facing leg.  The toe is established when you drill the holes 
for the axle adapter bracket.  Fine adjustments for toe and camber can be 
made with shims at the axle mounting bolts.  Do it correctly when you drill 
the holes in the fiberglass and you will not need the shims.


Sid Wood
Tri-gear KR-2 N6242
California, MD, USA
--

I am wondering if anyone has a template or dimensions that I should cut the 
Grumman gear legs down to for my Kr2.
The original weight of C-GSJS was just over 400 lbs. I don't want to make 
these new legs ( removed the original retracts) too stiff but sure don't 
want them to fail.

I will also be adding tubing for the brake lines as per the archives emails.
I will have to check the measurements but I think 1 inch thick and quite 
wide.

Thanks
Bob R
Winnipeg

--

What I did to get my measurements was to take the pictures off of NV Aero's 
website and Mark Langford website and interpolator them to my measurements.


Paul ViskBelleville Il.618-406-4705 




___
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org


Re: KR> Gear legs

2018-06-09 Thread Ppaulvsk via KRnet
What I did to get my measurements was to take the pictures off of NV Aero's 
website and Mark Langford website and interpolator them to my measurements.


Paul ViskBelleville Il.618-406-4705
 Original message From: Robert Russell via KRnet 
 Date: 6/9/18  7:11 PM  (GMT-06:00) To: '''KRnet''' 
 Cc: pi...@mymts.net Subject: KR> Gear legs 
I am wondering if anyone has a template or dimensions that I should cut the 
Grumman gear legs down to for my Kr2.
The original weight of C-GSJS was just over 400 lbs. I don't want to make these 
new legs ( removed the original retracts) too stiff but sure don't want them to 
fail.
I will also be adding tubing for the brake lines as per the archives emails.
I will have to check the measurements but I think 1 inch thick and quite wide.
Thanks
Bob R
Winnipeg 

___
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org
___
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org


KR> Gear legs

2018-06-09 Thread Robert Russell via KRnet
I am wondering if anyone has a template or dimensions that I should cut the 
Grumman gear legs down to for my Kr2.
The original weight of C-GSJS was just over 400 lbs. I don't want to make these 
new legs ( removed the original retracts) too stiff but sure don't want them to 
fail.
I will also be adding tubing for the brake lines as per the archives emails.
I will have to check the measurements but I think 1 inch thick and quite wide.
Thanks
Bob R
Winnipeg 

___
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org


KR> Gear Legs

2014-12-17 Thread Jeff Scott
Dan Diehl sold his KR molds and tooling to Steve at NVAero.  So until Steve 
decides whether he plans to sell parts again, sell the rights to sell many of 
the parts, or someone else decides to sell "like" parts, that's where we are.  
The parts aren't readily available.

-Jeff Scott
Los Alamos, NM

>
> So does this discussion about unavailability mean that Diehl won't sell
> their products directly to builders (or have they stopped making their
> products altogether?)



KR> Gear Legs

2014-12-16 Thread Mike T
So does this discussion about unavailability mean that Diehl won't sell
their products directly to builders (or have they stopped making their
products altogether?)
On Dec 16, 2014 12:49 PM, "Rodger via KRnet"  wrote:

> By chance, does anyone have a set of Diehl brackets for sale?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Rodger
> ___
> Search the KRnet Archives at http://tugantek.com/archmailv2-kr/search.
> To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to KRnet-leave at list.krnet.org
> please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
> see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change
> options
>


KR> Gear Legs

2014-12-16 Thread Rodger
By chance, does anyone have a set of Diehl brackets for sale?

Thanks,

Rodger


KR> Gear Legs

2014-12-16 Thread John Bouyea
Hi Pete. I don't have dimensions at hand so I'll try to get measurements
when I get out to HIO this afternoon/ evening. There is a straight edge and
an edge with a joggle dimension. Here's the process I went through to fit
them to my tri-gear.
http://www.bouyea.net/cur_proj/n5391m/newlgear/index.htm 

John Bouyea
N5391M/ KR2
OR81/ Hillsboro, OR

-Original Message-
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2014 9:08 PM
Subject: Re: KR> Gear Legs

This thread started as a request for the dimensions for the Diehl legs.  ...
BUT I have no idea because I don't know the dimensions of the  Diehl gear.
Does anyone have a set they can measure?  I will really appreciate knowing
shape and size of the Diehl leg.

Legless in Oregon.
AKA Pete Gauthier




KR> Gear Legs

2014-12-15 Thread Pete and Karen Gauthier

This thread started as a request for the dimensions for the Diehl legs.  The 
Rand Robinson Engineering legs being replaced are 7075 aluminum, very similar 
to the one Steve just described and the mount/bracket is cast aluminum (very 
stout cast aluminum).  The legs angle out at 22 deg. (not much angle) and the 
asssembly is very stiff.  The test pilot commented on the stiffnes during taxi 
testying and after the first flight.  I like the Diehl design and since they 
are not available and I have the Grummen legs, I thought I could mix and match 
to come up with something that will work.  I am a "that's close enough" 
Engineer but when I can, I like to do some analysis as a guessing gage.   I am 
comfortable with the assumption that the Diehl and grummen legs are very 
similar material.  What I don't know, and accept that I will probably cannot 
know, is the orientation and stack pattern of each.  If there is a 25% 
difference in the thickness , that is substancial and needs to be considered. 
BUT I have no idea because I don't know the dimensions of the  Diehl gear. Does 
anyone have a set they can measure?  I will really appreciate knowing shape and 
size of the Diehl leg.



Legless in Oregon.



AKA Pete Gauthier 


KR> gear legs

2014-12-15 Thread Tony King
It's pretty simple. From memory I paid about 35 bucks plus delivery for a pair 
of Grumman gear legs.  If I'd found Deihl legs for a similar price I'd have 
been happy to use them.  Also not sure where to get Deihl gear from these days.

TK

Sent from my iPhone

> On 14 Dec 2014, at 9:23 pm, Dan Heath via KRnet  
> wrote:
> 
> I am really curious about the reason for these posts.  Why are not the Diehl
> legs the best for the KR?  I am sure I must have missed something along the
> way.  Or, is it just the overwhelming desire of KR builders to do it
> differently?
> 
> 
> 
> See N64KR at   http://KRBuilder.org - Then click on
> the pics 
> 
> 
> 
> 2015 KR Gathering - McMinnville, OR.  September 3 - 6 -- See U There.
> 
> 
> 
> Peoples Choice at 2013 - KR Gathering in Mt. Vernon, Il - MVN 
> 
> Best KR at 2013 - KR Gathering in Mt. Vernon, Il - MVN 
> 
> Best Interior at 2013 - KR Gathering in Mt. Vernon, Il - MVN 
> 
> Best Paint at 2013 - KR Gathering in Mt. Vernon, Il - MVN 
> 
> Best Firwwall Forward at 2013 - KR Gathering in Mt. Vernon, Il - MVN 
> 
> 
> 
> Best Interior and Panel at 2008 - KR Gathering in Mt. Vernon, Il - MVN
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Daniel R. Heath - Lexington, SC
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Search the KRnet Archives at http://tugantek.com/archmailv2-kr/search.
> To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to KRnet-leave at list.krnet.org
> please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
> see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
> options



KR> Gear Legs

2014-12-14 Thread STEVE
Gear Legs:  We made a set of aluminum gear legs for Steve Glover (NVAERO) 
before he called it quits.  They are made from 2024t351 x .750" T.  They were 
cut the same tapered shape I assume that the Diehl Legs are.   I don't know if 
he ever got a chance to try them out.  
I think they are less than the Diehl gear legs are, retailing for about $375.00 
for a pair with the pre-welded axles (3/4" diameter).  The gear legs are bent 
close to the bottom to eliminate the need for the casting at the axle.

Steve Bennett

Great Plains Aircraft

iflyavw at msn.com



KR> gear legs

2014-12-14 Thread Kenneth Wiltrout
Dan I built 6399U (KR2S) with the Diehl landing gear and have had no issues 
after 13 years of flying. I was so impressed with how stiff they were that I 
did not wrap them in fiberglass, I installed them as I received them. No 
problems so far.I have had several hard landings over the years with no ill 
effects.?6399U is a tri-gear with a 2100 Revmaster.Good luck!Kenny 
WiltroutKutztown,Pa 

 On Sunday, December 14, 2014 6:23 AM, Dan Heath via KRnet  wrote:


 I am really curious about the reason for these posts.? Why are not the Diehl
legs the best for the KR?? I am sure I must have missed something along the
way.? Or, is it just the overwhelming desire of KR builders to do it
differently?



See N64KR at?  http://KRBuilder.org - Then click on
the pics 



2015 KR Gathering - McMinnville, OR.? September 3 - 6 -- See U There.



Peoples Choice at 2013 - KR Gathering in Mt. Vernon, Il - MVN 

Best KR at 2013 - KR Gathering in Mt. Vernon, Il - MVN 

Best Interior at 2013 - KR Gathering in Mt. Vernon, Il - MVN 

Best Paint at 2013 - KR Gathering in Mt. Vernon, Il - MVN 

Best Firwwall Forward at 2013 - KR Gathering in Mt. Vernon, Il - MVN 



Best Interior and Panel at 2008 - KR Gathering in Mt. Vernon, Il - MVN





Daniel R. Heath - Lexington, SC





___
Search the KRnet Archives at http://tugantek.com/archmailv2-kr/search.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to KRnet-leave at list.krnet.org
please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options





KR> Gear legs

2014-12-14 Thread r.macdonald at clear.net.nz
Hi guys, have a look at a product called Pultrusion it is continuous glass 
fibres pulled through a die with resin added, comes in all shapes & sizes used 
for anything from fishing rods to replace structural steel to trailer springs. 
All it needs is someone to do a bit of investigation. 
I can get this locally for a few dollars a metre for a bar 6?wide X 1?thick.

Just a suggestion 
Robin. 
NZ

---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection 
is active.
http://www.avast.com


KR> gear legs

2014-12-14 Thread Dan Heath
I am really curious about the reason for these posts.  Why are not the Diehl
legs the best for the KR?  I am sure I must have missed something along the
way.  Or, is it just the overwhelming desire of KR builders to do it
differently?



See N64KR at   http://KRBuilder.org - Then click on
the pics 



2015 KR Gathering - McMinnville, OR.  September 3 - 6 -- See U There.



Peoples Choice at 2013 - KR Gathering in Mt. Vernon, Il - MVN 

Best KR at 2013 - KR Gathering in Mt. Vernon, Il - MVN 

Best Interior at 2013 - KR Gathering in Mt. Vernon, Il - MVN 

Best Paint at 2013 - KR Gathering in Mt. Vernon, Il - MVN 

Best Firwwall Forward at 2013 - KR Gathering in Mt. Vernon, Il - MVN 



Best Interior and Panel at 2008 - KR Gathering in Mt. Vernon, Il - MVN





Daniel R. Heath - Lexington, SC







KR> Gear legs

2014-12-13 Thread laser147 at juno.com
Just for another data point on this subject, Ken Cottle put Sonari gear
on his (mine now) KR 1?.  He  bought the gear through Steve at Great
Plains Aircraft.  They've worked fine for about 1300 hours now.  I'm not
sure but I think Grove makes the Sonari gear.

Mike
KSEE



Apple's Crazy New Gizmo
Forget the iPhone 6. Next hit Apple product leaked. (see picture)
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/548cb51d68c09351d437cst02vuc



KR> gear legs

2014-10-11 Thread Flesner


Recent discussion on gear legs using Yankee gear.  I measured my 
Diehl legs (30 inches long) to which I added additional glass and 
they measure 1 inch thick.  I also added 1 inch of foam to the front 
and rear edge to run brake line and to shape to streamline.  My empty 
weight is 765 pounds and have on occasion flown to 1320 pounds.  This 
seems to be the ideal length and thickness.  My KR is a 24 inch 
stretch over the standard KR and this dimension gives a nice 3 point 
attitude on the ground.  My wheels are set for zero toe-in / toe-out 
and the tires show little if any edge wear and ground handling is 
superb.  On a KR2S you may want to go with a 28 inch leg to account 
for the slightly shorter fuselage.  Lower leg fittings are easy to 
make with a 2X6 inch X 1/4 inch piece of 4130.  Make a saw cut at the 
3 inch mark about 3/4 of the way through the metal.  Bend at the cut 
to a 45 degree angle, weld and dress the cut, and weld a gusset on 
the inside.  http://myplace.frontier.com/~flesner/21.jpg   A 
single washer on the top two axle bolts between the axle and fitting 
should give you the correct camber.  Set toe-in / toe-out by drilling 
one hole in the gear leg to attach the bracket, snug it down, set 
toe-in / toe-out, and drill remaining holes.  I think I'd suggest 
using the Diehl profile on cutting the Yankee legs as I believe they 
are made of the same material.  I'm using the Cleveland 500X5 wheels 
and brakes and the RV wheel pants cover the entire assemble and work great.

http://krgathering.com/picture_library/Gathering%202011/N211LF/RRL_2710.jpg

As alwaysYRMV..

Larry Flesner 




KR> Gear legs

2008-10-12 Thread Phil Matheson
I have now added Don Laverick's Gear leg Photo's to my web page. The last 5 
photo's on the Aussie KR page
These are the pultrusion type legs as discussed a few weeks ago.

Plus added a few Engine items to the Engine Page

http://www.philskr2.50megs.com/

Phil Matheson
VH-PKR
mathes...@dodo.com.au
0358833588
Australia
Web Page
http://www.philskr2.50megs.com/
See  VW Engines
http://www.vw-engines.com/
www.homebuilt-aviation.com/





KR> gear legs

2008-10-12 Thread Larry&Sallie Flesner


>Can anyone tell me if I need to wrap the entire leg
>with the glass,or just the lower portion around the drinking straw
>I'm using the Diehl legs
>Robert Pesak
++


If you are just wrapping the leg to conceal the brake line in
a straw or foam you could probably just wrap the bottom
end.  If you wrap more than a layer or two I'd do the entire
leg so as not to create and stress points at the edge of
the lay ups.

  I'm using a set of 30" Diehl legs and I added approx 1/8"
of glass for additional stiffening so I did the entire leg.
I use a combination of UNI cloth and some interlaced
KR cloth with the final wrap using KR cloth.  I used foam
to streamline the lead and trail edges and concealed the
brake line in the lead edge foam.   That combination seems
to work well for my KR weight.  The standard Diehl legs on
moderate weight KR's probably don't require any additional
strength as proven by their good track record.

Larry Flesner







KR> gear legs

2008-10-12 Thread Dan Heath
I do believe that the Dan Diehl instructions state that the legs must be
wrapped.  I do know that mine are wrapped. 

See N64KR at http://KRBuilder.org - Then click on the pics 
See you in Mt. Vernon - 2006 - KR Gathering
There is a time for building and a time for FLYING and the time for building
is OVER.
Daniel R. Heath - Lexington, SC


KR> gear legs

2008-10-12 Thread Larry&Sallie Flesner
At 06:24 PM 6/7/2006, you wrote:
>I do believe that the Dan Diehl instructions state that the legs must be
>wrapped.  I do know that mine are wrapped.

++=

I pulled my many years old instructions out of the file cabinet
and Dan Diehl suggest you glue the straw in place for a brake
line and then wrap the leg with two layers of glass to hold the
straw and fair the gear leg.

Larry Flesner






KR> gear legs

2008-10-12 Thread Charles Buddy & Cheryl Midkiff
Here's a cut and paste from Dan's instructions, which are located on his 
website.   http://www.diehlaero.com/ . He has underlined MUST in the 
instructions.




KR-2 LANDING GEAR INSTRUCTIONS


The composite landing gear is made from a 3-M product called Scotchply. The 
castings are made of aluminum alloy. The prototype was load tested to 2.5 
G's, 1,250 lbs. On each main gear. This resulted in a 3 1/2" flexure which 
is 75% of ultimate bending. With this information and subsequent flight 
testing, the gear was lengthened 4". The increased leg length provides more 
ground clearance. To 3/4". This has resulted in a nice springy 3 G gear. 
Also, at this same time the gear legs were beefed up, the casting thickness 
was increased by 3/32".

The Gear legs are shipped precut and the edges are chamfered. The 
taildragger conversion mounts the main gear on the forward side of the main 
spar with castings bolted on just outside the fuselage sides. The gear legs 
angle forward. The tri-gear mounts the gear legs on the aft side of the main 
spar with the legs angling back. The tail dragger version of the gear leg 
has a straight leading edge from top to bottom. The tri-gear version has a 
crook on both sides of the leg. The arrow points forward.

Four pieces of biaxial cloth are provided with each kit. This cloth must be 
put on the legs before drilling holes. The cloth runs from top to bottom of 
each leg. Follow drawings. This cloth is installed to prevent leg twist 
during touchdown and braking. After the biaxial wraps have been installed, 
the brakeline housing needs to be built. Either Epoxy or vinylester resin 
will work fine.

To enclose the brakeline, a large diameter soda straw can be "hot glued" to 
the edge of the gear leg below where it bolts to the casting. Once attached, 
two layers of fiberglass should be wrapped around the straw. This holds the 
straw in place and helps "fair the leg". (Note: On tri-gear versions, mount 
the straw on the forward side of the gear. On the tail dragger version, 
mount the straw on the aft side of the leg.

Six AN-4-32A bolts mount the main casting to the spar. Two AN-4-16A and two 
AN-4-17A bolts join the leg to main casting. The axle casting is bolted to 
the leg with four AN-4-15A bolts.

The axle is bolted to the axle casting with four AN4 bolts. (Not provided in 
kit.) The length will vary depending on the axle and type of brake 
available. Cleveland and Matco are the most common.

Bud Midkiff
Lynnwood, WA

- Original Message - 
From: "Dan Heath" 
To: 
Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 4:24 PM
Subject: Re: KR> gear legs


>I do believe that the Dan Diehl instructions state that the legs must be
> wrapped.  I do know that mine are wrapped.
>
> See N64KR at http://KRBuilder.org - Then click on the pics
> See you in Mt. Vernon - 2006 - KR Gathering
> There is a time for building and a time for FLYING and the time for 
> building
> is OVER.
> Daniel R. Heath - Lexington, SC
> ___
> Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp
> to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net
> please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
> 





KR> gear legs

2008-10-12 Thread Robert K Pesak
 Hay Everyone
   Can anyone tell me if I need to wrap the entire leg with the 
glass,or just the lower portion around the drinking straw? I'm using the Diehl 
legs.


   Robert Pesak

Hermitage, Tn.





KR> gear legs

2008-10-12 Thread Kenneth Wiltrout
I used the Diehl legs as wellI only wrapped the bottom and have 
had no issues for 6 yrs now. That being said I believe the instructions that 
came with the legs wanted the entire leg wrapped. ( I think )

ken wiltrout
kutztown,pa




- Original Message - 
From: "Robert K Pesak" 
To: 
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 10:02 PM
Subject: KR> gear legs


> Hay Everyone
>   Can anyone tell me if I need to wrap the entire leg with the 
> glass,or just the lower portion around the drinking straw? I'm using the 
> Diehl legs.
>
> 
> Robert Pesak
> 
> Hermitage, Tn.
>
>
>
> ___
> Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp
> to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net
> please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.8.2/357 - Release Date: 6/6/2006
>
> 




KR> gear legs

2008-10-12 Thread Brian Kraut
I spoke to Dan about it when I did mine because he shorted me on the amount
of cloth.  He said to wrap the whole leg.  The reason for wrapping is that
the fibers in the Scotchply are unidirectional and they can split with the
grain of the material if they are not wrapped.  They would be most likely to
start the split through one of the bolt holes that attach them to the top
bracket.

Brian Kraut
Engineering Alternatives, Inc.
www.engalt.com

-Original Message-
From: krnet-boun...@mylist.net [mailto:krnet-boun...@mylist.net]On
Behalf Of Kenneth Wiltrout
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 10:34 PM
To: 1...@lizard.esosoft.net; hermit...@lizard.esosoft.net;
t...@lizard.esosoft.net; KRnet
Subject: Re: KR> gear legs


I used the Diehl legs as wellI only wrapped the bottom and have
had no issues for 6 yrs now. That being said I believe the instructions that
came with the legs wanted the entire leg wrapped. ( I think )

ken wiltrout
kutztown,pa




- Original Message -
From: "Robert K Pesak" 
To: 
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 10:02 PM
Subject: KR> gear legs


> Hay Everyone
>   Can anyone tell me if I need to wrap the entire leg with the
> glass,or just the lower portion around the drinking straw? I'm using the
> Diehl legs.
>
>
> Robert Pesak
>
> Hermitage, Tn.
>
>
>
> ___
> Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp
> to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net
> please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.8.2/357 - Release Date: 6/6/2006
>
>


___
Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp
to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net
please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html





KR> gear legs

2008-10-12 Thread Barry Kruyssen
My legs from Jabiru sound like they are simular in the lay up.  And when I
crashed in the paddock they delaminated and my undercariage collapsed.  I
will wrap them this time, even though Jabiru don't do it.

Regards
Barry Kruyssen
Cairns, Australia
k...@bigpond.com
http://www.users.bigpond.com/kr2/kr2.htm


-Original Message-
From: krnet-boun...@mylist.net [mailto:krnet-boun...@mylist.net] On Behalf
Of Brian Kraut
Sent: Wednesday, 7 June 2006 1:47 PM
To: KRnet
Subject: RE: KR> gear legs

I spoke to Dan about it when I did mine because he shorted me on the amount
of cloth.  He said to wrap the whole leg.  The reason for wrapping is that
the fibers in the Scotchply are unidirectional and they can split with the
grain of the material if they are not wrapped.  They would be most likely to
start the split through one of the bolt holes that attach them to the top
bracket.





KR> Gear legs and belly-boards

2008-10-12 Thread Dan Heath
If you want simple, use the Grove single piece gear. Expensive, but reliable
 simple, and easy on maintenance. Much easier to install and does not
require as much surgery to the KR. I have installed both, and there is no
comparison for simple.

I think the belly board is the only way to go. Simple and the last thing you
need when landing is more lift generated by flaps. But, I have neither,
however, did stay at an Holiday Inn Express last night. 

See N64KR at http://KRBuilder.org - Then click on the pics 

See you in Mt. Vernon - 2006 - KR Gathering

There is a time for building and a time for FLYING and the time for building
is over.

Daniel R. Heath - Lexington, SC

---Original Message---

Gear legs and belly-boards






KR> Gear legs and belly-boards

2008-10-12 Thread VIRGIL N SALISBURY
If you float, you are carring too much speed on final, Virg

On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 17:37:05 -0500 "Rich Meyer"  writes:
> Joe,
> Can you (or others) give me the pros and cons of aluminum 
> gear legs
> vs. the Diehl scotchply composite?  I'm about a week away from 
> ordering the
> Diehl kit for converting from original retracts to fixed trigear.  
> Simple,
> tested . . .  Are there other options I should consider?
> 
> As we open our wing stubs, change our brakes and seat, and 
> otherwise
> cut and machine and fiberglas, seems we might also want to add 
> either a
> belly-board or flaps.  We've been warned that otherwise we'll be 
> half-way
> down the runway before we stop floating.  On first glance, 
> belly-board looks
> simpler.  (Right now, I like simple, I want to fly soon and I can 
> save some
> upgrades for another winter.)
> 
> We're eager for advice,
> Rich, for the Benton Aero Club and N26LT
> --
> -Original Message-
> From: krnet-bounces+cptcsd=npcc@mylist.net
> [mailto:krnet-bounces+cptcsd=npcc@mylist.net] On Behalf Of Joe 
> Beyer
> Sent: Monday, October 17, 2005 3:02 AM
> To: kr...@mylist.net
> Subject: KR> (no subject)
> 
> 
> Message: 8
> Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 18:58:58 -0500
> From: "M & C" 
> Subject: Re: KR> Aluminum barstock
> To: "KRnet" 
> 
> I did this back in '88 and it works fine. Send me your email address 
> and I
> can send some pictures.
> 
> -Joe
> 
> >I've still got the old spring bar for the oringal retracks so I 
> plan to
> just
> >cut it into and use it. The oringal bar was designed to handle the 
> 
> >landing loads so it it should handle any loads imposed on it in a 
> fixed 
> >gear position. I've never heard of one breaking?? Commits or 
> >suggestions welcome.
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Search the KRnet Archives at 
> http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp
> to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net
> ease see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
> 
> 


Virgil N. Salisbury - AMSOIL
www.lubedealer.com/salisbury
Miami ,Fl



KR> Gear legs and belly-boards

2008-10-12 Thread Mark Langford
> I think the belly board is the only way to go. Simple and the last thing
you
> need when landing is more lift generated by flaps.

I'm not sure if I believe that, because no airplanes would have flaps if
that were the case.  The big thing that flaps give you (besides free drag)
is they lower the landing speed by 5 mph (in my case).  That's got to be
good for something.  I look at the extra lift as basically meaning that I'm
flying a lighter bird, so my landing speed can be slower.  I will agree that
belly boards are easy to install and are quite effective, but they won't
give you the 5 mph lower landing speed.   That's not to say that some day I
may show up with a belly board TOO though.

Yesterday I did a little glide testing with and without flaps.  Glide ratio
is about 11:1 without them at best glide speed (80 mph or so) clean, and
9.5:1 with flaps.  My flaps only drop 30 degrees due to lack of geometrical
room under my seats for the jack screw to operate, and lack of foresight as
to where my torque tube is located (which limits bellcrank length to exactly
what it is now).  If I had 60 degrees of split flaps, I'd have a real speed
brake.  I'll fix that one of these days though.

Something else I determined yesterday is that propwash must be the problem
with my static system, not proximity of the wing or tire.  I put a 10"
extension on the static tube and it made no difference.  Readings were way
off, so I pulled the hose off after I leveled off, which opened the static
line to the cockpit interior,  and everything started reading more
accurately.  I did a little sanding on my wing, and when I fired up the
engine it blew the dust off 2' out from the stub wing junction.  My
static/pitot tube is at the stub/outer wing junction, just like the plans
call for, but it ain't working for me!

Mark Langford, Huntsville, Alabama
see KR2S project N56ML at http://home.hiwaay.net/~langford
email to N56ML "at" hiwaay.net
--




Fw: KR> Gear legs and belly-boards

2008-10-12 Thread P.Byington

- Original Message - 
From: "Mark Langford" 
To: "KRnet" 
Sent: Friday, October 21, 2005 7:11 PM
Subject: Re: KR> Gear legs and belly-boards

Mark;

I had the same problem with my airspeed indicater when I first flew N54PB
back in 1991.  I too had installed the static and pitot tube as per
instructions in the manual.  The resulting readings were way off.  The
readings changed drastically when changing gear configuration, ie up or
down.

I experimented with several different locations and finally installed the
pitot tube on the top of the veritcal stabilizer and left the static port
open inside the cabin.  I calculate that I have a error of 5mph due to prop
wash, I can live with that and I don't have to worry about someone
(including myself) accidently snagging the pitot tube during a walk around
or crawl underneath around.

FYI
Thanks
Parley Byington
N54PB
Henderson Nv
par...@anv.net


>> Something else I determined yesterday is that propwash must be the
problem
> with my static system, not proximity of the wing or tire.  I put a 10"
> extension on the static tube and it made no difference.  Readings were way
> off, so I pulled the hose off after I leveled off, which opened the static
> line to the cockpit interior,  and everything started reading more
> accurately.  I did a little sanding on my wing, and when I fired up the
> engine it blew the dust off 2' out from the stub wing junction.  My
> static/pitot tube is at the stub/outer wing junction, just like the plans
> call for, but it ain't working for me!
>
> Mark Langford, Huntsville, Alabama
> see KR2S project N56ML at http://home.hiwaay.net/~langford
> email to N56ML "at" hiwaay.net
> --
>
>
> ___
> Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp
> to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net
> please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html




KR> Gear legs and belly-boards

2008-10-12 Thread Dan Heath
Virgil,

Can you give us some examples of your landings in a KR, to help us
understand that statement.  Like how to avoid too much speed, in a KR. 

See N64KR at http://KRBuilder.org - Then click on the pics 
See you in Mt. Vernon - 2006 - KR Gathering
There is a time for building and a time for FLYING and the time for building
is over.
Daniel R. Heath - Lexington, SC
---Original Message---
If you float, you are carring too much speed on final, Virg


KR> Gear legs and belly-boards

2008-10-12 Thread VIRGIL N SALISBURY
In any aircraft, the idea is to touch down at minimum speed. This
you learned
 in flight school or from your instructor. Regardless of the aircraft, if
you float on
landing, your touchdown speed was too fast. Stick and Rudder is an
excellent place
to get this information. Perfect practice makes perfect landings. NOW,
what you all
want to hear, NO I have never flown and landed any KR aircraft. As the
rules for lift do not 
change, excess speed on landing will ALWAYS cause the aircraft to FLOAT,
Virg
Go ahead, I have broad shoulders and a DELETE KEY
HUFF PUFF

On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 05:19:00 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time) "Dan Heath"
 writes:
> Virgil,
> 
> Can you give us some examples of your landings in a KR, to help us
> understand that statement.  Like how to avoid too much speed, in a 
> KR. 
>  
> See N64KR at http://KRBuilder.org - Then click on the pics 
> See you in Mt. Vernon - 2006 - KR Gathering
> There is a time for building and a time for FLYING and the time for 
> building
> is over.
> Daniel R. Heath - Lexington, SC
> ---Original Message---
> If you float, you are carring too much speed on final, Virg
> ___
> Search the KRnet Archives at 
> http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp
> to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net
> please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
> 
> 


Virgil N. Salisbury - AMSOIL
www.lubedealer.com/salisbury
Miami ,Fl



KR> Gear legs and belly-boards

2008-10-12 Thread ifly...@aol.com
Landing a tri gear at minimun speed is not an issue.  Landing a low  
taildragger is a problem at minimum speed because the tail wheel will impact 
the  
runway before the mains and set up a miserable bounce.  Therefore a little  
more 
speed is required on some taildraggers - such as mine- for a smooth  landing.  
Float is not a big issue - good brakes might be.   Bill


KR> Gear legs and belly-boards

2008-10-12 Thread VIRGIL N SALISBURY

On Sun, 23 Oct 2005 11:23:59 EDT ifly...@aol.com writes:
> Landing a tri gear at minimun speed is not an issue.  Landing a low  
> 
> taildragger is a problem at minimum speed because the tail wheel 
> will impact the  
> runway before the mains and set up a miserable bounce.

When the tail is on the ground first, it will not bounce. you are
locked into landing.
Proven many times in Cubs Champs & Tcraft. As you slow, the angle
of attack
 becomes less and you will not become airborne, Virg

  Therefore a 
> little  more 
> speed is required on some taildraggers - such as mine- for a smooth  
> landing.  
> Float is not a big issue - good brakes might be.   Bill
> ___
> Search the KRnet Archives at 
> http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp
> to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net
> please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
> 
> 


Virgil N. Salisbury - AMSOIL
www.lubedealer.com/salisbury
Miami ,Fl



KR> Gear legs and belly-boards

2008-10-12 Thread fles...@midwest.net


When the tail is on the ground first, it will not bounce. you are
locked into landing.
proved many times in Cubs Champs & Tcraft. As you slow, the angle
of attack
 becomes less and you will not become airborne, VJ

+++

Most of the old aircraft (Cubs, Champs, Tcraft) had bunge landing
gear systems that absorbed the energy of the mains hitting the
ground.  Try that in an airplane with a gear system that will spring
you back into the air ( early Cessna's, KR's ).

The fact that my KR (any airplane for that matter) is still flying if
the tailwheel touches first indicates that the three point attitude
on the ground is less than the stall speed.  Any gear system that
does not fully absorb the impact forces will have you airborne
again and flying.  Even if the touchdown is smooth and no bounce
results, any increase in headwind could have you flying again.
A quartering head wind is the worst as it may raise only one wing
and at the same time cause you to drift sideways.  Not a good
situation, in a taildragger especially.  Tri-gear aircraft tend to
align themselves with the direction of travel once the mains
are on the ground.  The physics of taildragger gear cause them to
prefer going tail first on the ground.  

The taildragger pilot must use the aerodynamic qualities of the airplane
, and possibly some braking action, to control the airplane from the 
moment the wheels contact the ground until the wing has completely
stopped flying and he/she can control the ground handling with the
gear ( steerable tailwheel or brakes and rudder with a full-swivel
tailwheel).

You can tell how comfortable a KR pilot is in landing his KR by the
number of pucker wrinkles in his seat cushion !  :-)

Larry Flesner



KR> Gear legs and belly-boards

2008-10-12 Thread Orma
While my KR was a retract, and before I installed flaps, the only was to 
slow the KR to a reasonable landing speed was to fly with the nose high and 
the tail low.   If not, the approach speed would always get too high.   It 
was quite common for me to come in and land with the tail touching first. 
The tail would touch and you could hear that little caster wheel start to 
spool up and the tail cone would act as a megaphone and the noise was like a 
roar.   I could balance the aircraft on the tail and very slowly lower the 
nose until the mains would touch.  My forward roll out would me all but non 
existent.   This could usually only be accomplished with the wind down the 
runway.
Obviously I changed gear and added flaps for a reason.   On all the days 
except the perfect ones, My approach had to be flat and in the nose high 
landing attitude I had no forward visibility.   The flaps corrected that 
problem and the fixed spring bar gave me the ability to bounce on the days 
when I was less then perfect.
Now most of the time I wheel land and hold the tail off like Larry described 
till it won't fly any more and use lots of brakes to keep the roll out 
short.   On the occasions when I have had lots of pattern practice and fly 
the final approach at less then 70 MPH my roll outs are fairly short.   As 
my approach speeds near 80 MPH, I can float for what seems forever. 
Managing the final approach speed and visibility over the nose was my 
motivators for installing flaps.
Orma
Southfield, MI
KR-2  N110LR  1984
See Tweety at http://www.kr-2.aviation-mechanics.com
See other KR spces at www.kr-2.aviation-mechanics.com/krinfo.htm





KR> Gear legs and belly-boards

2008-10-12 Thread Steve Glover
Well Virg, I would say since you have not flown a KR, you really are not
qualified to comment here.  I have also flown Champs, Cubs, etc. in
addition to the 300 hours in my KR.  They land VERY different from a KR
in speed and weight.  I can assure you, the KR will bounce back into the
air after the tail wheel contacts the ground first.  Please don't take
this as a flame but the misinformation could get someone hurt who is new
to flying the KR.

Regards,

Steve Glover
KR-2 N902G
AJO, Ca



Virg said>
When the tail is on the ground first, it will not bounce. you
are locked into landing.
Proven many times in Cubs Champs & Tcraft. As you slow, the
angle of attack
 becomes less and you will not become airborne, Virg





KR> Gear legs and belly-boards

2008-10-12 Thread VIRGIL N SALISBURY

On Sun, 23 Oct 2005 11:58:27 -0500 (GMT-05:00) fles...@midwest.net
writes:
> 
> 
> When the tail is on the ground first, it will not bounce. 
> you are
> locked into landing.
> proved many times in Cubs Champs & Tcraft. As you slow, the 
> angle
> of attack
>  becomes less and you will not become airborne, VJ
> 
> +++
> 
> Most of the old aircraft (Cubs, Champs, Tcraft) had bunge landing
> gear systems that absorbed the energy of the mains hitting the
> ground.  Try that in an airplane with a gear system that will 
> spring
> you back into the air ( early Cessna's, KR's ).Negative, if you
get airborne again 
it is because you did not have and keep the stick FULL aft, Virg
> 

Virgil N. Salisbury - AMSOIL
www.lubedealer.com/salisbury
Miami ,Fl



KR> Gear legs and belly-boards

2008-10-12 Thread VIRGIL N SALISBURY
Accepted as not a flame BUT if the tailwheel stays on the ground
you will NOT get airborne., Virg
Aerodynamics do not change regardless of aircraft.

On Sun, 23 Oct 2005 10:42:15 -0700 "Steve Glover"  writes:
> Well Virg, I would say since you have not flown a KR, you really are 
> not
> qualified to comment here.  I have also flown Champs, Cubs, etc. in
> addition to the 300 hours in my KR.  They land VERY different from a 
> KR
> in speed and weight.  I can assure you, the KR will bounce back into 
> the
> air after the tail wheel contacts the ground first.  Please don't 
> take
> this as a flame but the misinformation could get someone hurt who is 
> new
> to flying the KR.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Steve Glover
> KR-2 N902G
> AJO, Ca
> 
> 
>  
> Virg said>
> When the tail is on the ground first, it will not bounce. 
> you
> are locked into landing.
> Proven many times in Cubs Champs & Tcraft. As you slow, the
> angle of attack
>  becomes less and you will not become airborne, Virg
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Search the KRnet Archives at 
> http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp
> to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net
> please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
> 
> 


Virgil N. Salisbury - AMSOIL
www.lubedealer.com/salisbury
Miami ,Fl



KR> Gear legs and belly-boards

2008-10-12 Thread Rich Meyer
Joe,
Can you (or others) give me the pros and cons of aluminum gear legs
vs. the Diehl scotchply composite?  I'm about a week away from ordering the
Diehl kit for converting from original retracts to fixed trigear.  Simple,
tested . . .  Are there other options I should consider?

As we open our wing stubs, change our brakes and seat, and otherwise
cut and machine and fiberglas, seems we might also want to add either a
belly-board or flaps.  We've been warned that otherwise we'll be half-way
down the runway before we stop floating.  On first glance, belly-board looks
simpler.  (Right now, I like simple, I want to fly soon and I can save some
upgrades for another winter.)

We're eager for advice,
Rich, for the Benton Aero Club and N26LT
--
-Original Message-
From: krnet-bounces+cptcsd=npcc@mylist.net
[mailto:krnet-bounces+cptcsd=npcc@mylist.net] On Behalf Of Joe Beyer
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2005 3:02 AM
To: kr...@mylist.net
Subject: KR> (no subject)


Message: 8
List-Post: krnet@list.krnet.org
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 18:58:58 -0500
From: "M & C" 
Subject: Re: KR> Aluminum barstock
To: "KRnet" 

I did this back in '88 and it works fine. Send me your email address and I
can send some pictures.

-Joe

>I've still got the old spring bar for the oringal retracks so I plan to
just
>cut it into and use it. The oringal bar was designed to handle the 
>landing loads so it it should handle any loads imposed on it in a fixed 
>gear position. I've never heard of one breaking?? Commits or 
>suggestions welcome.





KR> Gear Legs

2008-10-12 Thread Colin Rainey
There was a commentary a short while back about cutting a grove gear leg set 
and how it would weaken the setup. Might want to check on the effect of cutting 
in the strength department prior to making that cut.  Alot of that strength may 
have come from being one piece. Check the archives for the discussion.

Installing the new motor mount

Colin Rainey
brokerpilot9...@earthlink.net
EarthLink Revolves Around You.


KR> Gear Legs

2008-10-12 Thread M & C
I did check the archrives but couldn't find anything on cutting the gear but 
there commits on drilling and not heating it up. I don't plan to do any 
heating of the spring bar just cut it with a power hacksaw. I will have to 
drill some holes in them for attachment of upper and lower brackets.

Mike Turner
Jackson, Missouri
Swing the prop and light the fire, dance amoung the stars.N642MC
- Original Message - 
From: "Colin Rainey" 
To: 
Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2005 7:15 PM
Subject: KR> Gear Legs


> There was a commentary a short while back about cutting a grove gear leg 
> set and how it would weaken the setup. Might want to check on the effect 
> of cutting in the strength department prior to making that cut.  Alot of 
> that strength may have come from being one piece. Check the archives for 
> the discussion.
>
> Installing the new motor mount
>
> Colin Rainey
> brokerpilot9...@earthlink.net
> EarthLink Revolves Around You.
> ___
> Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp
> to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net
> please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
> 



KR> Gear legs.

2008-10-12 Thread Martindale Family
Hey Jeff

Are they set at a steeper angle or are they thicker to take out some of the
springiness?

Must look like a KR on stilts or do you extend the tailwheel as well.

John

- Original Message - 
From: 
To: 
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 11:14 AM
Subject: Re: KR> glide rato..


> 30" Diehl gear legs.




KR> Gear legs.

2008-10-12 Thread Jeff Scott

No, No, and yes.  There are lots of photos on the web from the gatherings.  
You'll have to judge for yourself.

-Jeff

-- "Martindale Family"  wrote:
Hey Jeff

Are they set at a steeper angle or are they thicker to take out some of the
springiness?

Must look like a KR on stilts or do you extend the tailwheel as well.

John

- Original Message - 
From: 
To: 
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 11:14 AM
Subject: Re: KR> glide rato..


> 30" Diehl gear legs.


___
Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp
to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net
please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html




KR> Gear legs.

2008-10-12 Thread Mark Langford
Jeff Scott wrote:

>There are lots of photos on the web from the gatherings.

 My wallpaper on my home computer is
http://home.hiwaay.net/~langford/jeff_wallpaper.jpg .

Mark Langford, Huntsville, Alabama
see homebuilt airplane at http://home.hiwaay.net/~langford
email to N56ML "at" hiwaay.net




KR> Gear legs

2008-10-12 Thread thepitt...@juno.com

What is the length of the deihl gear legs? Mine are 26 1/2" just curious.


Eric Pitts
Terre Haute, In
KR2S

___
Speed up your surfing with Juno SpeedBand.
Now includes pop-up blocker!
Only $14.95/month -visit http://www.juno.com/surf to sign up today!




KR> Gear legs

2008-10-12 Thread Mark Langford
Eric Pitts wrote:

> What is the length of the deihl gear legs? Mine are 26 1/2" just curious.

The composite legs themselves are 24".

Mark Langford, Huntsville, Alabama
see KR2S project N56ML at http://home.hiwaay.net/~langford
email to N56ML "at" hiwaay.net
--



KR> Gear legs

2008-10-12 Thread thepitt...@juno.com

Thanks for the info Mark, 2.5 inches should help on the prop clearance.

Eric

-- "Mark Langford"  wrote:
Eric Pitts wrote:

> What is the length of the deihl gear legs? Mine are 26 1/2" just curious.

The composite legs themselves are 24".

Mark Langford, Huntsville, Alabama
see KR2S project N56ML at http://home.hiwaay.net/~langford
email to N56ML "at" hiwaay.net
--

___
Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp
to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net
please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html


___
Speed up your surfing with Juno SpeedBand.
Now includes pop-up blocker!
Only $14.95/month -visit http://www.juno.com/surf to sign up today!




KR> Gear legs

2008-10-12 Thread Glasseyegav
Hi all,

Quick question!! on the Dan Deihl type gear legs, Do the bolts holding the legs 
to the wing spar bracket require aluminium back up plates against the 
fibreglass leg or are flat washers enough surface area??

Gavin
-- next part --
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.8 - Release Date: 03/01/2005


KR> Gear legs

2008-10-12 Thread Brian Kraut
Just washers.  All of the hardware comes with the Diehl set when you buy it.
IIRC they are the larger diameter wood type washers.

Brian Kraut
Engineering Alternatives, Inc.
www.engalt.com

-Original Message-
From: krnet-bounces+brian.kraut=engalt@mylist.net
[mailto:krnet-bounces+brian.kraut=engalt@mylist.net]On Behalf Of
Glasseyegav
Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 9:35 PM
To: KR builders and pilots
Subject: KR> Gear legs


Hi all,

Quick question!! on the Dan Deihl type gear legs, Do the bolts holding the
legs to the wing spar bracket require aluminium back up plates against the
fibreglass leg or are flat washers enough surface area??

Gavin




KR> Gear legs

2008-10-12 Thread Dean Cooper
Gavin wrote:
>Do the bolts holding the legs to the wing spar bracket require aluminium
back up plates

Gavin,

I bought my Diehl kit 12 months ago and it came with AN960 flat washers and
locknuts.


Dean Cooper
Jacksonville, FL
Email me at dean_coo...@bellsouth.net
See my KR project at www.geocities.com/djramccoop1/KR2_Home.html