[Leaf-user] Problems with PPP, first packet lost

2001-06-25 Thread Luis.F.Correia


Hi!

I have been working fine with my EigerStein2Beta for some time now
but I still have one annoying bug that I want to solve now.

My router uses pppd which I got from a ppp package somewhere.
when one machine tries to access the net, the dial-on-demand pppd
dials happily to the net, but my stupid windoze browser times out.

I recall that with the 2.0.36 kernels, you would do a 
echo 1  /proc/somewhere  and the router would save the first 
packet so it will not be lost.

Now is this available for the 2.2.16 series of kernels, or is
my request not solved by this thing?

Thanks for all your help

Luis Correia

___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



Re: [Leaf-user] Proxy ARP DMZ to Internal Forwarding

2001-06-25 Thread Charles Steinkuehler

 Now that my system is FINALLY up and working at 95%, there is one thing
not
 behaving as expected.  I have been looking thru my doc links, trying to
find
 a reference to this, and came up blank.  I thought I had read somewhere
that
 the default behavior was to allow all traffic from Internal to DMZ ---
 useful for managing the servers that live there; but disallowing
 DMZ-initiated traffic back into the Internal network.

This is how things are supposed to work.  The internal net to DMZ connection
is made by masquerading the internal net to the IP of the firewall, so
outbound stuff from the internal net to the DMZ is allowed, but the DMZ
systems cannot directly see the internal network.

 Here's what I am getting:

 Jun 25 06:42:16 cuinn kernel: Packet log: forward DENY eth1 PROTO=6
 64.81.226.171:80 192.168.1.201:2539 L=48 S=0x00 I=1095 F=0x4000 T=63 (#41)

 For everything, including pings and UDP...

 Filters (I'm still no ace at reading this):

For whatever reason, there is no masquerade rule in the forward chain
hooking the internal net to the DMZ...there's just the 'global' masquerade
rule for the internet (on eth0).  Post or e-mail your /etc/ipfilter.conf and
I'll take a look at it...

Charles Steinkuehler
http://lrp.steinkuehler.net
http://c0wz.steinkuehler.net (lrp.c0wz.com mirror)


___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



RE: [Leaf-user] Proxy ARP DMZ to Internal Forwarding

2001-06-25 Thread Dan

Charles,

Here's the output --- thanks again:


#
#
# ipfilter.conf This file contains the functions that contain the firewall
#   and ipfilter configuration. This is an example setup for
#   IP masquearding
#
IPFILTER_CONF_VERSION=20010330

# set -x # Uncomment for script debug

IPCH=/sbin/ipchains --no-warnings
IPMASQADM=/usr/sbin/ipmasqadm

# DONT change this!
LOCAL_NET=127.0.0.0/8
LOCAL_IP=127.0.0.1

# Some functions to handle Protocol IP Port tuples
echoProto () {
local IFS='_'
set -- $1
echo $1
}

echoIp () {
local IFS='_'
set -- $1
echo $2
}

echoPort () {
local IFS='_'
set -- $1
echo $3
}

echoIpPort () {
local IFS='_'
set -- $1
echo $2 $3
}

echoSrvIpPort () {
local IFS='_'
set -- $1
echo $4 $5
}

echoMrkMark () {
local IFS='_'
set -- $1
echo $1
}

echoMrkProto () {
local IFS='_'
set -- $1
echo $2
}

echoMrkIpPort () {
local IFS='_'
set -- $1
echo $3 $4
}

echoBpSrc () {
local IFS='_'
set -- $1
echo $2
}

echoBpDstPort () {
local IFS='_'
set -- $1
echo $3 $4
}

echoFwDstPort () {
local IFS='_'
set -- $1
echo $2
}

echoFwSrcIp () {
local IFS='_'
set -- $1
echo $1
}

# A function to filter out Martian source addresses
stopMartians () {
local LIST=$1
shift

# The source addresses listed here are conservatively
# invalid as they are either used as broadcast/multicast
# destation addresses, a special value in IP stacks, loopback
# networks and illegal/ambiguous Classed IP addressing networks.
#
# You can add your 'martian/invalid' source address blocks to the
# MARTIAN_NETS list in /etc/network.conf

# All ones, all zeroes
$IPCH -A $LIST -j DENY -p all  -s 0.0.0.0 -d 0/0 -l $*
$IPCH -A $LIST -j DENY -p all  -s 255.255.255.255 -d 0/0 -l $*

# Loop back addresses
$IPCH -A $LIST -j DENY -p all  -s 127.0.0.0/8 -d 0/0 -l $*

# Multicast source addresses
$IPCH -A $LIST -j DENY -p all  -s 224.0.0.0/4 -d 0/0 -l $*

# RFC 1918/1627/1597 blocks
$IPCH -A $LIST -j DENY -p all  -s 10.0.0.0/8 -d 0/0 -l $*
$IPCH -A $LIST -j DENY -p all  -s 172.16.0.0/12 -d 0/0 -l $*
$IPCH -A $LIST -j DENY -p all  -s 192.168.0.0/16 -d 0/0 -l $*

# IANA reserved blocks (Martians from the gated restricted list
# - actually impossible/ambiguous classed networks)
$IPCH -A $LIST -j DENY -p all  -s 0.0.0.0/8 -d 0/0 -l $*
$IPCH -A $LIST -j DENY -p all  -s 128.0.0.0/16 -d 0/0 -l $*
$IPCH -A $LIST -j DENY -p all  -s 191.255.0.0/16 -d 0/0 -l $*
$IPCH -A $LIST -j DENY -p all  -s 192.0.0.0/24 -d 0/0 -l $*
$IPCH -A $LIST -j DENY -p all  -s 223.255.255.0/24 -d 0/0 -l $*
# Class E address (experimental use)
$IPCH -A $LIST -j DENY -p all  -s 240.0.0.0/4 -d 0/0 -l $*

# Addtions/other IANA reserved blocks
for NET in $MARTIAN_NETS; do
$IPCH -A $LIST -j DENY -p all -s $NET -d 0/0 -l $*
done; unset NET
}

# A  function to block services that give trouble on an IFACE
standardBlock () {
local LIST=$1
shift

# Block SMB/Windows networking to protect Windows boxes and to stop
# Windows NT doing braindead things with mail, www, etc
# This also prevents Internet Explorer spraying user logins
# and passwords everywhere
$IPCH -A $LIST -j REJECT -p tcp -s 0/0 -d 0/0 netbios-ns $*
$IPCH -A $LIST -j REJECT -p tcp -s 0/0 -d 0/0 135 $*
$IPCH -A $LIST -j REJECT -p udp -s 0/0 -d 0/0 netbios-ns $*
$IPCH -A $LIST -j REJECT -p udp -s 0/0 -d 0/0 135 $*
$IPCH -A $LIST -j REJECT -p tcp -s 0/0 -d 0/0
netbios-dgm:netbios-ssn $*
$IPCH -A $LIST -j REJECT -p udp -s 0/0 -d 0/0 netbios-dgm $*
$IPCH -A $LIST -j REJECT -p udp -s 0/0 netbios-ns:netbios-dgm -d 0/0 $*
$IPCH -A $LIST -j REJECT -p udp -s 0/0 135 -d 0/0 $*
$IPCH -A $LIST -j REJECT -p tcp -s 0/0 netbios-ns:netbios-ssn -d 0/0 $*
$IPCH -A $LIST -j REJECT -p tcp -s 0/0 135 -d 0/0 $*

}

# A function to control SNMP access on a network
snmpBlock () {
local LIST=$1
local DEST_IP=$2
local SNMP_IP
shift 2

if [ $SNMP_BLOCK != YES -a $SNMP_BLOCK != Yes \
-a $SNMP_BLOCK != yes ] ; then
return 0
fi

for SNMP_IP in $SNMP_MANAGER_IPS; do
$IPCH -A $LIST -j ACCEPT -p udp -s $SNMP_IP -d $DEST_IP 161:162 $*
done; unset SNMP_IP
$IPCH -A $LIST -j REJECT -p udp -s 0/0 -d $DEST_IP 161:162 -l $*
}

# A function to build rule chains for checking the overlapping IP space
# when running a proxy-arp'd DMZ network
ipfilter_dmzChain 

Re: [Leaf-user] Problems with PPP, first packet lost

2001-06-25 Thread Mike Noyes

Luis.F.Correia, 2001-06-22 16:26 +0100
I have been working fine with my EigerStein2Beta for some time now
but I still have one annoying bug that I want to solve now.

My router uses pppd which I got from a ppp package somewhere.
when one machine tries to access the net, the dial-on-demand pppd
dials happily to the net, but my stupid windoze browser times out.

I recall that with the 2.0.36 kernels, you would do a
echo 1  /proc/somewhere  and the router would save the first
packet so it will not be lost.

Now is this available for the 2.2.16 series of kernels, or is
my request not solved by this thing?

Luis,
I hope this helps.

string: ip_dynaddr site:linuxdoc.org
http://www.google.com/search?q=ip_dynaddr+site%3Alinuxdoc.org

--
Mike Noyes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FAQs sec00: LEAF SourceForge Site Answers
How do I request help?
http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=1891group_id=13751


___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



[Leaf-user] DAC960.o module needed

2001-06-25 Thread Zachariah Mully

Howdy all-
I need the module for a DAC960 SCSI RAID card (Mylex Acceleraid 250)
for kernel 2.2.16 (I'm running lrp2.9.8). Does anyone have this module
that they can send me? Or know of anyplace that I can download it? I
don't have a 2.2.16 box around to compile on and I need this for my LRP
disaster recovery disk.

Thanks again,
Zack


___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



Re: [Leaf-user] my head is spinning (long)

2001-06-25 Thread David Douthitt

Jack Coates wrote:

 How would all you smart people suggest improving this? My router is a
 486/33 with 24mb RAM and an unused 341mb drive, booting from (2) 1680kb
 floppies (92% and 68% full). I would like:
 
 * updated version, like Dachenstein or Oxygen -- these haven't been
 focussing on PPP though.

Only reason I haven't is that every time I attempt PPP, it seems to
take a LONG time to get it right, and causes a lot of headaches in the
meantime.

Last time I tackled it, I couldn't understand why no one could
connect.  Then I discovered if you stretched the time out to over
three minutes, you could connect (using Win95).

After compiling a special version of pppd with better logging, I
finally found that it was the inability to communicate with the DNS
server that was causing this!  And this after a month of haggling

I also discovered that ppp.lrp and pppd.lrp conflict with one another,
and they aren't up to date either.

 I have to admit that the option which has looked best to date is
 FTP installing a full Linux distro or FreeBSD on that little hard drive
 :-( A regular Unix toolkit instead of busybox and a packaging system
 would be pretty handy.

busybox now supports unpacking RPMs and *.deb files; that comes pretty
close.

I've been looking at full (small) distributions.  For 341M, you should
be able to install something like Red Hat if you tweak it and remove a
lot of the excess.  I'd like to create a Red Hat or Mandrake based
distro that would work in just a system as yours...

You might want to consider Peanut - it is also designed for small
environments like your 486.

___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



[Leaf-user] OT: KVM switches

2001-06-25 Thread Peter Nosko

pn] Does anyone here use a KVM switch for GUI workstations?  I use the old
manual switch boxes for my LRP machines because quality video needs are low.
But I've been using a Belkin Omni-Cube 4-port for X/Linux and Windows boxes
and am unsatisfied with the video degradation.  I'd appreciate any feedback
on reasonably-priced KVM switches with decent video performance.  Thanks.

---
Peter Nosko


_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



[Leaf-user] VPN ?

2001-06-25 Thread Ricardo Kleemann

Hi,

I've setup an Eigerstein2BETA system, just starting to play around with it.

Is it possible to have it run a vpn server so that I can have outside ssh 
clients connect to servers in the internal network?

Do I have to start using a hard disk instead of floppy?



___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



RE: [Leaf-user] OT: KVM switches

2001-06-25 Thread Tony

I just went through that same problem of crappy video.  What resolution
are you using and how long is your cables?  Are you getting ghosting?
If so, shitcan those cheap ass cables and get one that is shielded.  I
just picked up a ps/2 set from cyberguys.com for $23 bucks and it solved
all the problems.

BTW, I am using an OmniView SE 4 port.  I use the other crappy cables
for text based machines that don't need high resolution.

Later

Tony



 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Peter Nosko
 Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 17:48
 To: Leaf-User
 Subject: [Leaf-user] OT: KVM switches


 pn] Does anyone here use a KVM switch for GUI workstations?
 I use the old
 manual switch boxes for my LRP machines because quality video
 needs are low.
 But I've been using a Belkin Omni-Cube 4-port for X/Linux and
 Windows boxes
 and am unsatisfied with the video degradation.  I'd
 appreciate any feedback
 on reasonably-priced KVM switches with decent video
 performance.  Thanks.

 ---
 Peter Nosko


 _
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


 ___
 Leaf-user mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



Re: [Leaf-user] Newbie question perhaps.

2001-06-25 Thread Charles Steinkuehler

 I noticed you were responding to a question.  Did you see the following
 posting?  I received no response.

 Thanks a buncj if you can help.

 Glenn

 Glenn A. Thompson wrote:

  Hi all:
 
  I downloaded and configured Charles Steinkuehler's Static Eiger disk
  image.  I managed to get it working with my intel ethernet cards and
  also added vim and set it up to port forward a fews services to multiple
  hosts.  All works great.  I have been using it for a month now with no
  poblems.
 
  So, now the facility that was using the LRP box (via the lan it sits on)
  will be connected to another facility through a local private T1. What I
  want to do is get LRP to firewall (masq and portforward) for both
  facilities.  The current plan is to make one facility 192.168.1.0 and
  the other 192.168.2.0.  I figured I would just use rip on the routers
  that route between the two facilities.
 
  Asumming this can be done, do I just add a second network to the
  INTERN_NET variable in the network.conf?

I don't see any need for RIP, just create some static routes on the LRP box
so it knows about all the networks.  To connect everything to the internet,
just add multiple CIDR network specifications to the INTERN_NET variable
(NOTE: This only works with Eiger  later firewall scripts).

WARNING:  Your internal networks won't be able to talk to each other unless
you specifically create forwarding rules to allow the traffic.  With the
default Eiger scripts, this means editing /etc/ipfilter.conf.

 Clarification:  I assume I need to add a
 static route from the LRP box to the the local loop router.  I'm wanting
the
 LRP box to be a choke firewall for two internal lans separated by a T1.

This sounds appropriate given your text description of the network.
Remember, a picture's worth a thousand words, even if it's an ascii-art
network diagram ;-)

Charles Steinkuehler
http://lrp.steinkuehler.net
http://c0wz.steinkuehler.net (lrp.c0wz.com mirror)


___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



RE: [Leaf-user] OT: KVM switches

2001-06-25 Thread Peter Nosko

pn] Nope, went there, done that.  I have the deluxe 6' cables with ferrite
cores on each end from the PCs to the switch (just like the cables that come
with monitors, except longer) and I think a 10' cable from the monitor to
the switch.  I can't get much shorted than that with my setup.

pn] My windows boxes are running 1152x864@100MHz.  The 2 Linux boxes are the
same resolution, but I don't know how to tell what the vertical refresh is
on them.

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tony
 Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 18:30
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: [Leaf-user] OT: KVM switches


 I just went through that same problem of crappy video.  What resolution
 are you using and how long is your cables?  Are you getting ghosting?
 If so, shitcan those cheap ass cables and get one that is shielded.  I
 just picked up a ps/2 set from cyberguys.com for $23 bucks and it solved
 all the problems.

 BTW, I am using an OmniView SE 4 port.  I use the other crappy cables
 for text based machines that don't need high resolution.

 Later

 Tony



  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Peter Nosko
  Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 17:48
  To: Leaf-User
  Subject: [Leaf-user] OT: KVM switches
 
 
  pn] Does anyone here use a KVM switch for GUI workstations?
  I use the old
  manual switch boxes for my LRP machines because quality video
  needs are low.
  But I've been using a Belkin Omni-Cube 4-port for X/Linux and
  Windows boxes
  and am unsatisfied with the video degradation.  I'd
  appreciate any feedback
  on reasonably-priced KVM switches with decent video
  performance.  Thanks.
 
  ---
  Peter Nosko
 
 
  _
  Do You Yahoo!?
  Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
 
 
  ___
  Leaf-user mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
 


 ___
 Leaf-user mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



Re: [Leaf-user] OT: KVM switches

2001-06-25 Thread Sam Slade

I also use the Belkin Omni-View, PS2, with 6 foot cables.  As long as I
stay with no higher than 1024x760 the video is okay.  So I've been
looking also, but the real good ones that work cost many times the price
of the Omni-View, and I haven't seen a decently priced switch  either.

   Sam Slade

Peter Nosko wrote:
 
 pn] Does anyone here use a KVM switch for GUI workstations?  I use the old
 manual switch boxes for my LRP machines because quality video needs are low.
 But I've been using a Belkin Omni-Cube 4-port for X/Linux and Windows boxes
 and am unsatisfied with the video degradation.  I'd appreciate any feedback
 on reasonably-priced KVM switches with decent video performance.  Thanks.
 
 ---
 Peter Nosko
 
 _
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
 
 ___
 Leaf-user mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user

___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



[Leaf-user] FW: Leaf-user digest, Vol 1 #69 - 4 msgs

2001-06-25 Thread Kevin


added both ttyp1 and ttyp2 to the /etc/securetty file, saved and rebooted

putty still will not connect - get Remote Session Closed by Host

any other suggestions to get this sshd going??

Message: 1
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 09:14:05 -0700 (PDT)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Leaf-User@Lists. Sourceforge. Net [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Leaf-user] Serial Console HOWTO problems - now sshd issues
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Kevin wrote:

 Sorry so late, tried everything I could to get this working.
 
 I have now dropped and tried the ssh option.
 
 I have successfully installed from two floppy set-up, can backup and have
 keys made ans saved.
 
 When I try to log-in via the putty program, the remote host closes the
 connection.

Check that ttyp1 and ttyp2 are listed in /etc/securetty. You might also
want to consider using firewall rules or /etc/hosts.deny to prevent logins
from outside your lan.

---
Jeff NewmillerThe .   .  Go Live...
DCN:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Basics: ##.#.   ##.#.  Live Go...
  Live:   OO#.. Dead: OO#..  Playing
Research Engineer (Solar/BatteriesO.O#.   #.O#.  with
/Software/Embedded Controllers)   .OO#.   .OO#.  rocks...2k
---



___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



[Leaf-user] anyone using SBC ?

2001-06-25 Thread Ricardo Kleemann

Hi,

is anyone using SBC (single board computer) setups for LRP ?

Where can I find small sbc's with enclosures that would allow me to build 
a compact appliance that runs LRP ?

Thanks
Ricardo



___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



[Leaf-user] Ram Disk size and ipmasqadm help

2001-06-25 Thread Kevin

I have 32 meg ram in a p2 75 mhz box with two floppy's. I have the ram disk
set up for 16 meg at the present time.

Does LRP need the other 16 meg of memory to run the programs or do they run
in the 16 meg?


I need to add an ipmasqadm rule for IRC to see if that is the problem. I
have looked at every config file in the lrcfg program and can not find a
place to edit or add the rule. Can anyone shed some light on how to add?

thanks



___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



Re: [Leaf-user] anyone using SBC ?

2001-06-25 Thread Mike Noyes

Ricardo Kleemann, 2001-06-25 15:21 -0800
is anyone using SBC (single board computer) setups for LRP ?

Where can I find small sbc's with enclosures that would allow me to
build a compact appliance that runs LRP ?

Ricardo,
Take a look at our hardware links.
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/links.php?menu=2

--
Mike Noyes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FAQs sec00: LEAF SourceForge Site Answers
How do I request help?
http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=1891group_id=13751


___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



Re: [Leaf-user] FW: Leaf-user digest, Vol 1 #69 - 4 msgs

2001-06-25 Thread Victor McAllister

I disagree.  ttyp0 ttyp1 - is not needed for ssh login.  I recommend not having
ttyp0 enabled in /etc/securetty.
Perhaps you did not add sshd to /etc/hosts.allow
sshd:  192.168.1.1  if you are only allowing logins from internal network
single machine

sshd: 192.168.1.0/255.255.255.0 for internal network

not recommended sshd: ALL

sshd:

Kevin wrote:

 added both ttyp1 and ttyp2 to the /etc/securetty file, saved and rebooted

 putty still will not connect - get Remote Session Closed by Host

 any other suggestions to get this sshd going??


___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



Re: [Leaf-user] OT: KVM switches

2001-06-25 Thread Mike Sensney

At 05:48 PM 06/25/2001 -0400, Peter Nosko wrote:

pn] Does anyone here use a KVM switch for GUI workstations?  I use the old
manual switch boxes for my LRP machines because quality video needs are low.
But I've been using a Belkin Omni-Cube 4-port for X/Linux and Windows boxes
and am unsatisfied with the video degradation.  I'd appreciate any feedback
on reasonably-priced KVM switches with decent video performance.  Thanks.

---
Peter Nosko

I'm using a Generic Brand manual KVM 4 station switch (SW192323M-4) $22.00 
and 6' Video cables (UC1818-06) $6.00 from http://www.nwcable.com. I'm using 
it to connect a 17 CTX Ultra Screen and MS Natural KBD to 2 Windows and 2 
Linux boxes. I can drive the monitor to 1600x1200 and it looks crisp. Much 
better than my eyes can handle. 

The two problems I have with this KVM.

1) The KVM must be switched to a Windows box during boot or it or it won't 
see the KBD. (It is a pain trying to use Windows without a KBD.)

2) The mouse drivers get confused when you switch between boxes which can 
require a reboot to fix. (I use a separate mouse for each computer.)



RE: [Leaf-user] OT: KVM switches

2001-06-25 Thread Peter Nosko

pn] What I've noticed is more important than the specific resolution/refresh
rate is that all devices attached should use as similar as possible a
resolution/refresh rate.  But I still notice (most on the Win2K Server)
several areas on the screen that waver, similar to the way you see heat
rising off a road surface.  I consider spending more, but I want to make
sure that throwing money at the problem will actually solve it.


 Sam Slade Said:

 I also use the Belkin Omni-View, PS2, with 6 foot cables.  As long as I
 stay with no higher than 1024x760 the video is okay.  So I've been
 looking also, but the real good ones that work cost many times the price
 of the Omni-View, and I haven't seen a decently priced switch  either.

Sam Slade

 Peter Nosko wrote:
 
  pn] Does anyone here use a KVM switch for GUI workstations?  I
 use the old
  manual switch boxes for my LRP machines because quality video
 needs are low.
  But I've been using a Belkin Omni-Cube 4-port for X/Linux and
 Windows boxes
  and am unsatisfied with the video degradation.  I'd appreciate
 any feedback
  on reasonably-priced KVM switches with decent video
 performance.  Thanks.
 
  ---
  Peter Nosko
 
  _
  Do You Yahoo!?
  Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
 
  ___
  Leaf-user mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user

 ___
 Leaf-user mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



[Leaf-user] RE: IPSEC problems

2001-06-25 Thread John Abrams



Charles, Thanks for the information so far! I added 
the following lines to the ipfilter.conf file at the end: 

$IPCH -A input -j ACCEPT -p 50 -s 64.241.69.122 -d 
24.9.126.49

$IPCH -A input -j ACCEPT -p 51 -s 64.241.69.122 -d 
24.9.126.49

$IPCH -A input -pupd -s 64.241.69.122 
-d 24.9.126.49 500: -j ACCEPT

$IPCH -A input -j ACCEPT -p 50 -s 24.9.126.49 -d 
64.241.69.122
$IPCH -A input -j ACCEPT -p 51 -s 24.9.126.49 -d 
64.241.69.122


$IPCH -A input -pupd -s 24.9.126.49 -d 
64.241.69.122 500: -j ACCEPT

I've also set all of the relevant interfaces in 
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/interfacename/rp_filter to 0
The disks I'm using are Eigerstein 1 with the ipsec 
floppy kernel in a dual floppy configuration.

The network is like this:

private 192.168.10.0/24-Router 
cx1140290-c 24.0.0.0---Internet---Router 
64.241.69.122-private 192.168.110.0/24

with the obvious goal of accessing the remote 
networks for misc. services such as printing SMB etc.

In the barf log after the latest changes I can see 
that the packets are leaving but not showing up on the remote end.
The rp_filter setting bothers me.. I figure you 
have it turned on in the kernel for a reason but Klips says it may not work with 
the settings as they are default. 

I also tried echowall 1.22 with this configuration 
with no apparent change.

I have found several referances to using tcpdump to 
check traffic is there a lrp package for tcpdump? or maybe another utility for 
troubleshooting the network?

Thank you everyone for your advice so 
far!

John Abrams
Network Navigators 
USA


Re: [Leaf-user] Ram Disk size and ipmasqadm help

2001-06-25 Thread Victor McAllister

Kevin wrote:

 I have 32 meg ram in a p2 75 mhz box with two floppy's. I have the ram disk
 set up for 16 meg at the present time.

 Does LRP need the other 16 meg of memory to run the programs or do they run
 in the 16 meg?



You don't tell us which flavor of LRP you use.
6 megs for the ram drive is likely to be enough  for most users
The rest of the memory is used for the file system, buffers etc

 I need to add an ipmasqadm rule for IRC to see if that is the problem. I
 have looked at every config file in the lrcfg program and can not find a
 place to edit or add the rule. Can anyone shed some light on how to add?

 thanks

perhaps if you tell us the version of your firewall - someone can help with
your rule.


___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



Re: [Leaf-user] Serial Console HOWTO problems - now sshd issues

2001-06-25 Thread Patrick Benson

Kevin wrote:
 
 added both ttyp1 and ttyp2 to the /etc/securetty file, saved and rebooted
 
 putty still will not connect - get Remote Session Closed by Host
 
 any other suggestions to get this sshd going??

I agree with Victor, you don't have to add ttyp1 or ttyp2 and you must
have the file /etc/hosts.allow configured correctly. Do you have the
private key, identity, generated when sshd was installed, stored away
somewhere for executing sessions with putty on your Winbox? You may also
need to take a look in the /etc/ssh/sshd_config file:

#This is ssh server systemwide configuration file.

Port 22
#ListenAddress 0.0.0.0
ListenAddress My.internal.nic.ip
HostKey /etc/ssh/ssh_host_key
RandomSeed /etc/ssh/ssh_random_seed
ServerKeyBits 768
LoginGraceTime 600
KeyRegenerationInterval 3600

#For root access via authorized keys only!
#PermitRootLogin nopwd
PermitRootLogin yes

IgnoreRhosts no
StrictModes yes
QuietMode no
X11Forwarding no
X11DisplayOffset 10
FascistLogging no
PrintMotd yes
KeepAlive yes
SyslogFacility DAEMON
RhostsAuthentication no
RhostsRSAAuthentication no
RSAAuthentication yes
PasswordAuthentication no
PermitEmptyPasswords no
UseLogin no
# PidFile /u/zappa/.ssh/pid
AllowHosts My.internal.lan.ips
# DenyHosts lowsecurity.theirs.com *.evil.org evil.org
# Umask 022
# SilentDeny on

RSAAuthentication option set to yes and PasswordAuthentication set to no
allows only the machines on the LAN with a valid identity key without
the password login option enabled to have access to the LRP machine. 


-- 
Patrick Benson
Stockholm, Sweden

___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



Re: [Leaf-user] OT: KVM switches

2001-06-25 Thread Matt Schalit

Peter Nosko wrote:
 
 pn] What I've noticed is more important than the specific resolution/refresh
 rate is that all devices attached should use as similar as possible a
 resolution/refresh rate.  But I still notice (most on the Win2K Server)
 several areas on the screen that waver, similar to the way you see heat
 rising off a road surface.  I consider spending more, but I want to make
 sure that throwing money at the problem will actually solve it.


Check out Raritan and ask them why they are so expensive.

Check out www.warehouse.com for lots of good KVM's.
Find a place that offers satisfaction guaranteed and
pay with a credit card.

If you want these to work with Lrp, don't connect the
mouse cable to the Lrp box.

Best,
Matt

___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



[Leaf-user] sshd FIXED for my eiger with PPPoP!

2001-06-25 Thread Kevin

Thank You!  Victor!
Thank You!  Victor!
Thank You!  Victor!

sshd: 192.168.1.0/255.255.255.0
in the /etc/hosts.allow did the trick

I did not see that in the docs, so maybe it should be added somewhere for
the others like me :)

PS - I did delete the other entry of ttyp1 and ttyp2 in the security file

Message: 7
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 16:48:59 -0700
From: Victor McAllister [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Leaf-user] FW: Leaf-user digest, Vol 1 #69 - 4 msgs
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I disagree.  ttyp0 ttyp1 - is not needed for ssh login.  I recommend not
having
ttyp0 enabled in /etc/securetty.
Perhaps you did not add sshd to /etc/hosts.allow
sshd:  192.168.1.1  if you are only allowing logins from internal network
single machine

sshd: 192.168.1.0/255.255.255.0 for internal network

not recommended sshd: ALL

sshd:

Kevin wrote:

 added both ttyp1 and ttyp2 to the /etc/securetty file, saved and rebooted

 putty still will not connect - get Remote Session Closed by Host

 any other suggestions to get this sshd going??


 winmail.dat


RE: [Leaf-user] OT: KVM switches

2001-06-25 Thread Morgan Reed

Currently using the 2 port Linksys KVM, and I can not sing its praises
enough. runs my 21 monitor with no degradation (that I can see)  at
1024x728 75 Hz.  Monitor rates are one of the things that fall with cheap
cables, and the Linksys cables seem to be pretty good.

I picked mine up for $56.99 at MicroCenter in VA,  this was in the opened
bin, the regular price was $65.


Morgan Reed


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael D.
 Schleif
 Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 11:09 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [Leaf-user] OT: KVM switches



 Peter Nosko wrote:
 
  pn] Does anyone here use a KVM switch for GUI workstations?  I
 use the old
  manual switch boxes for my LRP machines because quality video
 needs are low.
  But I've been using a Belkin Omni-Cube 4-port for X/Linux and
 Windows boxes
  and am unsatisfied with the video degradation.  I'd appreciate
 any feedback
  on reasonably-priced KVM switches with decent video
 performance.  Thanks.

 I highly recommend Linksys KVM's -- for the money, there are none
 better, IMHO };-Þ

 http://www.linksys.com/products/group.asp?grid=15

 And, this is from somebody who's not likely to own anything else by
 Linksys ;

 We've used both the 2-port (PS2KVM2,
 http://www.linksys.com/products/product.asp?prid=129grid=15) and
 4-port (PS2KVM4,
 http://www.linksys.com/products/product.asp?prid=137grid=15) for
 several months.  Each can be had for well under $100, if you search
 aggressively.

 Very rarely have we seen any type of lockup -- usually, due to a
 connection kicked loose ;

 The only real gripe we have is, once in awhile, the cursor lags behind
 the mouse by a couple of milliseconds and you click; but, there's
 nothing quite there on which to click ;  This is not as bad as it may
 sound -- difficult situation to describe -- but, for some of us who fly
 around blindly, not always watching what we're doing on automatic pilot,
 it can be mildly frustrating.

 What do you think?

 --

 Best Regards,

 mds
 mds resource
 888.250.3987

 Dare to fix things before they break . . . 

 Our capacity for understanding is inversely proportional to how much we
 think we know.  The more I know, the more I know I don't know . . . 

 ___
 Leaf-user mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



Re: [Leaf-user] OT: KVM switches

2001-06-25 Thread Tom Eastep

On Monday 25 June 2001 08:52 pm, Morgan Reed wrote:
 Currently using the 2 port Linksys KVM, and I can not sing its praises
 enough. runs my 21 monitor with no degradation (that I can see)  at
 1024x728 75 Hz.  Monitor rates are one of the things that fall with cheap
 cables, and the Linksys cables seem to be pretty good.

 I picked mine up for $56.99 at MicroCenter in VA,  this was in the opened
 bin, the regular price was $65.



I'm using the Belkin Omni-View 4 with Belkin 6-foot cable sets here. I found 
that:

a) A system with an ATI Mach 4 on-board graphics adapter sucked when used 
through the KVM.
b) A second system (which I now use as my main Linux desktop) with a Matrox 
Millenium II AGP produces excellent results with the same cables!

-Tom
-- 
Tom Eastep  \  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ #60745924\ http://seattlefirewall.dyndns.org
Shoreline, Washington \__

___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



[Leaf-user] EchoWall and MSN Messenger

2001-06-25 Thread Vance Beth Price




Any plans to add rules for MSN messenger file 
transfers and voice?
This is one issue I have not been able to find an 
answer to.

Thanks,
Vance Price


[Leaf-user] dual modems in parrell

2001-06-25 Thread Karl Ponsonby



Hi all,
I currently am using a eigerstein hdd image with 
ipsec kernal. I have been asked the question as to whether you can use two 
modems in parrell to share the link. Can this be done. Thanks in 
advance.
Karl Ponsonby


Re: [Leaf-user] Traffic blocking script

2001-06-25 Thread Richard Lohman

Thanks, Tom! That was it. I rewrote the script in ae,
and it worked immediately.

--- Tom Eastep [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
 On Monday 25 June 2001 07:35 am, Richard Lohman
 wrote:
  The space preceeding the !/bin/sh has been
 corrected,
  but I'm still getting the not found errors. When
 the
  system boots, the last thing that happens prior to
 the
  block.sh script is that Seawall is run. Here is a
  brief clip of the screen:
 
 

--
  ...
  Defining Seawall Chain
  done.
 
  : not found
  : not found
  : not found
  : not found
  : not found
  : not found
  : not found
  : not found
  : not found
  : not found
 
  Starting /usr/bin/dnscache...
  ...
 
 These are the symptoms of a shell script whose lines
 are terminated with CRLF.
 
 -Tom
 -- 
 Tom Eastep  \ 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ICQ #60745924\
 http://seattlefirewall.dyndns.org
 Shoreline, Washington
\__


=
-
| Richard J. Lohman| If you always do what you've |
| Net. Engr./Asst Director | always done, you'll always   |
| Data Processing Dept.| get what you've always   |
| Porter County, IN| got. |
 -

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/

___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user