[leaf-user] Error on Booting CD

2002-06-24 Thread Abjin M H

Hi,

I just created a Dachstein-CD using the iso image from
http://lrp.steinkuehler.net (dachstein-cd-v1.0.2.iso) and when I boot my
system I got to the login prompt and it worked fine. Then I created two
files in a floppy as mentioned in the documentation “lrpkg.cfg” and
“pkgpath.cfg”. In lrpkg.cfg I have
LRP=etc,ramlog,local,modules,dhcpd,dnscache,weblet
and in pkgpath.cfg I have
PKGPATH=/dev/cdrom
But now when I boot from the cdrom with the floppy inserted the boot
process stops with this message
.
.
.
LINUXRC: Installing…
  LRP=etc: (nf!)
  ramlog: (nf!)
  local: (nf!)
  modules: (nf!)
  dhcpd: (nf!)
  dnscache: (nf!)
  weblet: (nf!)
LINUXRC: Finished
autodetecting RAID arrays
autorun …
… autorun DONE.
Freeing unused kernel memory: 52k freed
INIT: version 2.78 booting
INIT: No inittab file found

Enter runlevel:

Could someone please help me out here, I would really appreciate it. How
do I get to the login prompt? I want to run a firewall/vpn gateway.

Thank you

Abjin



---
Sponsored by:
ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



Re: [leaf-user] problem portforwarding with DCD 1.02

2002-06-24 Thread Greg Morgan

Robin wrote:
 
 hey greg.
 wel this is a big help, but still im to dumb to get it working.

I wouldn't say that.  It is just a familiarity thing.  You knew how to
do this in Coyote Linux and now are struggling with how to do it in
DCD.  Many people who help out on the list started out just like you.

 
 when i used my coyote linux router i got it working, so im familiar with the
 direct connect in active mode.
 heres a dump of that part of my network.conf file. What am i doing wrong
 here

The most important thing here is you helped yourself out.  You posted
the part of /etc/network.conf that you are struggling with.  That helps
people help you.  Moreover, if you post directly to the list, you may
have already had an answer by now.  In addition, it gives people a
chance to chime in if advice is not correct, etc.
0/0 is a convention to refer to your dynamic or static ip address.  You
need to allow the domain and bootpc through.  bootpc is actually a name
for a port found in /etc/services.  bootpc refers to port 68.  The
neo-modus.com stuff does not have a named port so you just use the
number that the neo-modus.com Direct Connect requires, 412. 
EXTERN_UDP_PORTS should look like this.  Just at to the list inside the
quotes. Like so.

NOTE: that the following set of changes are made in /etc/network.conf.

## UDP Services open to outside world
# Space seperated list: srcip/mask_dstport
# NOTE: bootpc port is used for dhcp client
EXTERN_UDP_PORTS=0/0_domain 0/0_bootpc 0/0_412

If you need to add additional ports in the future, just add a space and
another port number.

Delete the two commented lines below the EXTERN_UDP_PORTS i.e.
 #EXTERN UDP PORTS=0/0_411
 #EXTERN UDP PORTS=0/0_412

Note that there are two ways to perform this task.  I am telling you to
use the first one.  So now we have to clean up the second method.
Delete the two lines that look like this below.
EXTERN_UDP_PORT2=0/0 411 192.168.0.2
EXTERN_UDP_PORT#=0/0 412 192.168.0.2

 # -or-
 # Indexed list: SrcAddr/Mask port [ DestAddr[/DestMask] ]
 #EXTERN_UDP_PORT0=0/0 domain
 #EXTERN_UDP_PORT1=5.6.7.8 500 1.1.1.12
 EXTERN_UDP_PORT2=0/0 411 192.168.0.2
 EXTERN_UDP_PORT#=0/0 412 192.168.0.2

The problem here is that you have two definitions.  The first one was
for the incorrect port 411, but it was replaced with the correct 412. 
Please delete this line from the group below in /etc/network.conf.

EXTERN_TCP_PORTS=0/0_411

 # TCP services open to outside world
 # Space seperated list: srcip/mask_dstport
 EXTERN_TCP_PORTS=0/0_411
 EXTERN TCP PORTS=0/0_412

Ok now you have openned up the ports in the firewall with the above
steps as per Direct Connect's FAQ. Now you have to forward them to you
host on your internal network.  Please look for the # Port Forwarding
section of the /etc/network.conf file.  You are looking specifically for
this line.

#INTERN_SERVERS=tcp_${EXTERN_IP}_ftp_192.168.1.1_ftp
tcp_${EXTERN_IP}_smtp_192.168.1.1_smtp

I do not know what your current line looks like.  My instructions will
presume that you have no other services forwarded.  If you do you will
have to add them to the list.  This is a space seperated list just like
the others we have modified.  I believe this is how INTERN_SERVERS
should look like.  Please note the my email client may have broken this
line up at the space.  This should all be one line in your editor!  Also
note that I have changed the default port of 192.168.1.1 to the ip
address you tried below of 192.168.0.2.  That doesn't look correct but
go for it.

INTERN_SERVERS=tcp_${EXTERN_IP}_412_192.168.0.2_412
udp_${EXTERN_IP}_412_192.168.0.2_412

Finally, backup etc.lrp.

Ok I am just wondering.  You may have to experiment some.  It says in
their FAQ that you have to plug in your external IP address.  If you are
port forwarding to this machine with the Direct Conenct software, I
wonder if you realy have to configure the external IP.  You will have to
try the software with and without the IP configuration.  See part of
their FAQ I copied below in my original response to you.  Port
forwarding presents the connection right to your internal machine and
estentially defeats the NAT in a way.  Perhaps their software has to
make use of the external IP for some reason?


 other question. I ssh into my router from within my internal network, when i
 do ./etc/network.conf
 it sais permission denied..  how come.. i'm root right?

By the way, if you have ssh working, you're not so dumb as you think.  

You are missing at least one space.  ., dot, in front of a file means
that it is supposed to be a hidden file.  Regardless of being root or a
normal user, you were instructing Linux to treat this as an executable
file.  Linux tried to execute the hidden file, but the file
permissions were not correct for an executable file. Hence, the
permission denied message.  If you ls -l /etc/network.conf you may see
-rw-r--r--  in the leftmost part of the ls output. If you ls -l /bin/sed
you may see -rwxr-xr-x.  The 'x' makes it an 

Re: [leaf-user] Error on Booting CD

2002-06-24 Thread kimoppalfens

Aanhalen Abjin M H [EMAIL PROTECTED]:


First lets check to see if /dev/cdrom exists.

Try booting with the old cdrom and without the floppy disk.
login and do a

ls -la /dev/cdrom

If that link doesn't exist you found your problem.
And probably should manually create the link yourself.

edit /var/lib/lrpkg/root.dev.mk and and the
ln -sf /dev/hdX /dev/cdrom

Where X equals

A if the cdrom is attached to the primary ide-controller and is a master
B if the cdrom is attached to the primary ide-controller and is a slave
C if the cdrom is attached to the secondary ide-controller and is a master
D if the cdrom is attached to the secondary ide-controller and is a slave

Backup initrd

Kim Oppalfens
Azlan Training

 Hi,
 
 I just created a Dachstein-CD using the iso image from
 http://lrp.steinkuehler.net (dachstein-cd-v1.0.2.iso) and when I boot
 my
 system I got to the login prompt and it worked fine. Then I created two
 files in a floppy as mentioned in the documentation “lrpkg.cfg” and
 “pkgpath.cfg”. In lrpkg.cfg I have
 LRP=etc,ramlog,local,modules,dhcpd,dnscache,weblet
 and in pkgpath.cfg I have
 PKGPATH=/dev/cdrom
 But now when I boot from the cdrom with the floppy inserted the boot
 process stops with this message
 .
 .
 .
 LINUXRC: Installing…
   LRP=etc: (nf!)
   ramlog: (nf!)
   local: (nf!)
   modules: (nf!)
   dhcpd: (nf!)
   dnscache: (nf!)
   weblet: (nf!)
 LINUXRC: Finished
 autodetecting RAID arrays
 autorun …
 … autorun DONE.
 Freeing unused kernel memory: 52k freed
 INIT: version 2.78 booting
 INIT: No inittab file found
 
 Enter runlevel:
 
 Could someone please help me out here, I would really appreciate it.
 How
 do I get to the login prompt? I want to run a firewall/vpn gateway.
 
 Thank you
 
 Abjin
 
 
 
 ---
 Sponsored by:
 ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/
 
 leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
 SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
 
 


-
This mail sent through Tiscali Webmail (http://webmail.tiscali.be)


---
Sponsored by:
ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



[leaf-user] Active ftp problems with Bering_1.0-rc3

2002-06-24 Thread Alan Silvester

Hi,

I've got my Bering firewall box up and running (P133, 32 MB RAM) and it
is masquerading my www and passive ftp connections fine.  However, when
I try to use active ftp, I think somehow I'm not letting the data
connection back in.  This is what's happening (let me know if I've
forgot to include something):

Network setup:

  Other computers
 |
   Me| Firewall
 ---   -   --- I
| 192.168.1.100 |-| HUB |-| 192.168.1.254 | | 24.81.30.29 |-- S
 ---   -   --- P
  eth0   |  eth1  eth0
 |(dynamic IP)
Some more computers

lsmod:

ModulePagesUsed by
ip_nat_irc2384 0 (unused)
ip_nat_ftp2960 0 (unused)
ip_conntrack_irc  3056 1
ip_conntrack_ftp  3824 2
smc-ultra 4268 1
ne5988 1
8390  5780 0 [smc-ultra ne]

FTP session:

[mascdman@omega mascdman]$ lftp oksun2.okanagan.bc.ca
lftp oksun2.okanagan.bc.ca:~ debug 9
lftp oksun2.okanagan.bc.ca:~ user aksilves
Password: xxx
lftp oksun2.okanagan.bc.ca:~ ls
 Connecting to oksun2.okanagan.bc.ca (192.31.180.2) port 21
--- 220 oksun2 FTP server (OUC/CIS on Sun Jun 23 23:09:58 PDT 2002)
ready.
--- AUTH TLS
--- 500 'AUTH TLS': command not understood
--- USER aksilves
--- 331 Password required for aksilves.
--- PASS 
--- 230 User aksilves logged in.
--- PWD
--- 257 /home/oksun2/student/aksilves is current directory
--- PASV
--- 227 Entering Passive Mode (192,31,180,2,224,166)
 Connecting data socket to (192.31.180.2) port 57510
--- LIST
--- 150 ASCII data connection for /bin/ls (24.81.30.29,1437) (0 bytes).
--- 226 ASCII Transfer complete.
total 3280

skipping directory listing

 Closing data socket
lftp oksun2.okanagan.bc.ca:~ set ftp:passive-mode off
lftp oksun2.okanagan.bc.ca:~ ls
--- PORT 192,168,1,100,5,122
--- 200 PORT command successful.
--- LIST
`ls' at 0 [Waiting for data connection...]

And it will sit there... On some ftp sites, I'll eventually get: 

--- 426 Connection closed; transfer aborted.

On the firewall, this line is added to /proc/net/ip_conntrack, so I
assume it's tracking the ftp connection?

tcp  6 109 SYN_SENT src=192.31.180.2 dst=24.81.30.29 sport=20
dport=1402 [UNREPLIED] src=192.168.1.100 dst=192.31.180.2 sport=1402
dport=20 use=1

Iptables rule set:

# Default policies
iptables -P INPUT DROP
iptables -P OUTPUT DROP
iptables -P FORWARD DROP

# Send inbound ident/auth to my oidentd server
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp --syn --dport auth -j DNAT --to
192.168.1.100
# Masq stuff
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE

# Allow loopback
iptables -A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT
iptables -A OUTPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT

# Allow ssh to the firewall from the LAN
iptables -A INPUT -i eth1 -p tcp --dport ssh -j ACCEPT
# Allow DHCP traffic from the LAN
iptables -A INPUT -i eth1 -p tcp --dport bootps -j ACCEPT
iptables -A INPUT -i eth1 -p tcp --dport bootpc -j ACCEPT
# Allow related  established traffic
iptables -A INPUT -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT

# Allow related  established traffic
iptables -A OUTPUT -m state -state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT

# Allow related  established traffic
iptables -A FORWARD -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
# Allow new outbound connections
iptables -A FORWARD -m state --state NEW -i eth1 -j ACCEPT
# Allow inbound ident/auth traffic
iptables -A FORWARD -i eth0 -p tcp --syn --dport auth -j ACCEPT

What am I missing?  Any inbound tcp connections for active ftp should be
handled by the -A FORWARD -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j
ACCEPT rule, so I don't need to explicitly allow them, right? 

On a somewhat related note, a few of the servers I need to connect to
are running on unusual ports (port 777, iirc).  Somewhere, someone
mentioned that ip_conntrack_ftp won't track these connections unless
/etc/modules is changed from:

ip_conntrack_ftp
ip_nat_ftp

to:

ip_conntrack_ftp ports=21,777
ip_nat_ftp ports=21,777

Is this true and are these changes right?
(Yes this change *has* been made to my /etc/modules and no, active ftp
did not work *before* this change was made)

Thanks in advance,
Alan Silvester (mascdman _at_ shaw _dot_ ca)



---
Sponsored by:
ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



[leaf-user] Problem with bridge

2002-06-24 Thread abriggs

Hi,

I've got a network of two MS Win computers sitting behind a Leaf Bering
firewall running on a p133.

The Bering box shares my internet connection (previously Cable, currently
serial modem, hopefully soon ADSL) to the other two computers. This it does
flawlessly.

My problem is that I'm too cheap to buy a hub to connect the eth1 of the
Bering box to the other two computers, so I've installed an extra ethernet
card in said firewall, and hooked up two crossover cables.

I've uncommented both the PPP and Bridge sections of Network
conf-Interfaces.

I've configured Shorewall-IFaces to be
#ZONEINTERFACE  BROADCAST   OPTIONS
net ppp0-
loc br0 detect  routestopped
#LAST LINE -- ADD YOUR ENTRIES BEFORE THIS ONE -- DO NOT REMOVE

and lastly I've configured Shorewall-masq to be
#INTERFACE  SUBNET  ADDRESS
ppp0br0
#LAST LINE -- ADD YOUR ENTRIES ABOVE THIS LINE -- DO NOT REMOVE

oh and I fixed the bug in etc/network/if-pre-up.d/bridge

So basically both machines can see the firewall, the firewall can see both
machines. both machines can see the internet, but neither machine can see
the other. When I ping from one machine to the other I get

Reply from 192.168.1.254: Destination port unreachable.

So what gives?

p.s.

The bridge seems to have learned the macs ok

# brctl showmacs br0
port no mac addris local?   ageing timer
  2 00:02:e3:0a:c0:8a   no 1.70
  1 00:50:da:38:1e:b3   no 2.70
  2 00:c0:df:e3:df:e7   yes0.00
  1 00:c0:df:e3:ec:9b   yes0.00


Antony Briggs



---
Sponsored by:
ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



Re: [leaf-user] Problem with bridge

2002-06-24 Thread Przemyslaw Rudy

And don't forget about the ACCEPT rule/policy to tie 'loc' to itself.



---
Sponsored by:
ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



Re: [leaf-user] MASQ/NAT problem in Shorewall

2002-06-24 Thread Tom Eastep

On Sun, 23 Jun 2002, Nachman Yaakov Ziskind wrote:

 
 This sounds like more work than I'd like to do (right now); maybe later.


Fair enough.
 
 
 In another post you mentioned, 
 
 Groan -- you mentioned at the outset that you are running Shorewall 1.2.12
 yet I referred you to the 1.3.x FAQ. My bad... The syntax for 1.2.x is
 different.
 
 but didn't supply the syntax. Having read both the (1.2) documentation and the
 (1.3) FAQ, and being somewhat bleary-eyed, I was wondering if you could post
 the correct syntax.
 

The correct syntax is shown at http://www.shorewall.net/1.2/FAQ.htm/#faq2

-Tom
-- 
Tom Eastep\ Shorewall - iptables made easy
AIM: tmeastep  \ http://www.shorewall.net
ICQ: #60745924  \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---
Sponsored by:
ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



Re: [leaf-user] Error on Booting CD

2002-06-24 Thread Charles Steinkuehler

 I just created a Dachstein-CD using the iso image from
 http://lrp.steinkuehler.net (dachstein-cd-v1.0.2.iso) and when I boot
my
 system I got to the login prompt and it worked fine. Then I created
two
 files in a floppy as mentioned in the documentation lrpkg.cfg and
 pkgpath.cfg. In lrpkg.cfg I have
 LRP=etc,ramlog,local,modules,dhcpd,dnscache,weblet
 and in pkgpath.cfg I have
 PKGPATH=/dev/cdrom
 But now when I boot from the cdrom with the floppy inserted the boot
 process stops with this message

 LINUXRC: Installing.
   LRP=etc: (nf!)
   ramlog: (nf!)
   local: (nf!)
   modules: (nf!)
   dhcpd: (nf!)
   dnscache: (nf!)
   weblet: (nf!)

The init scripts are not finding any packages.  Try the following two
modifications:

1) Remove, delete, or rename the pkgpath.cfg file on the floppy, so it
is *NOT* found by the init scripts.  The default package path should
work fine as-is.

2) Change the lrpkg.cfg file to the following (note the LRP= is removed
from the front of the line):

etc,ramlog,local,modules,dhcpd,dnscache,weblet

This should get you up and running.  If you really want to use the
pkgpath.cfg file, you'll need to use the correct format.  Remove the
PKGPATH= from the file contents, and it helps to specify the file (but
this is not required).  So, for a typical CD install of Dachstein
pkgpath.cfg should contain the following (and does by default if you
don't change anything):

/dev/cdrom:iso9660

Charles Steinkuehler
http://lrp.steinkuehler.net
http://c0wz.steinkuehler.net (lrp.c0wz.com mirror)



---
Sponsored by:
ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



[leaf-user] Bearing 1.0-RC3 -- PPPOE

2002-06-24 Thread Reginald R. Richardson

Hi guys,

Just installed Bearing 1.0-RC3

Running a Static ADSL via eth1 and Cable Modem pppoe via eth0

For some reason, when I was testing, without the ADSL, my cable
connection seemed to work pretty fine, once the both of them was
configured, then the PPPOE seems like he didn't want to start up, I
received the following messages:


Jun 24 17:10:45 gw-homenet pppd[25591]: Connecting PPPoE socket:
00:00:00:00:00:00   0x807c260
Jun 24 17:10:45 gw-homenet pppd[25591]: Couldn't get channel number:
Transport endpoint is not connected
Jun 24 17:10:45 gw-homenet pppd[25591]: Doing disconnect
Jun 24 17:11:15 gw-homenet pppd[25591]: Sending PADI

Thnks for any experienced help that will follow,


Please see config below:

--- Interfaces setup ---

auto lo ppp0 eth1 eth2 eth3

 

iface lo inet loopback

 

# Cable interface (ppp0)

iface ppp0 inet ppp

pre-up ip link set eth0 up

provider dsl-provider eth0

 

# ADSL Interface (eth1)

iface eth1 inet static

address 10.0.0.100

masklen 24

broadcast 10.255.255.255

gateway 10.0.0.138

 

# LAN Interface-Backbone (eth2)

iface eth2 inet static

address 192.168.10.254

masklen 24

broadcast 192.168.10.255

# LAN Interface-Clients (eth3)

iface eth3 inet static

address 192.168.1.1

masklen 30

broadcast 192.168.1.3 


PPPOE/PPP Configurations:
These are the standard configs that came with Bearing, besides the
change of the PAP login name in pap, and PPPOE config

And this:


Shorewall Config

Zones:
#ZONE   DISPLAY COMMENTS
net Net Internet
loc Local   Local networks
loc1Subnet 1.0  Local Subnet
loc2Subnet 11.0 Local Subnet



Interfaces:

## 
#ZONEINTERFACE  BROADCAST   OPTIONS
net eth1detect  routefilter
net ppp0-   routefilter,norfc1918
loc eth2detect  routestopped
-   eth3detect  routestopped


Hosts
#ZONE   HOST(S) OPTIONS
loc1eth3:192.168.1.0/30 routestopped
loc2eth3:192.168.11.0/28routestopped


Policy:

### 
#SOURCE DESTPOLICY  LOG LEVEL
LIMIT:BURST
loc net ACCEPT
loc1net ACCEPT
loc2net ACCEPT
$FW loc ACCEPT
 

#fw net ACCEPT
net all DROPinfo
10/sec:40
all all REJECT  info


Masq:

##
#INTERFACE  SUBNET  ADDRESS
ppp0eth2
ppp0192.168.11.0/28
ppp0192.168.1.0/30
eth1eth2
eth1192.168.11.0/28
eth1192.168.1.0/30




---
Sponsored by:
ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



[leaf-user] ip_conntrack: max number of expected connections problem

2002-06-24 Thread abriggs

Hi again,

I'm using a Bering RC3 system and if I try to create more than one outgoing
ftp connection I get the following message:

Jun 24 16:50:46 firewall kernel: ip_conntrack: max number of expected
connections 1 of ftp reached for 192.168.1.11-193.41.x.x, reusing

Is there a way of increasing the expected connections?

Thanks in advance,

Antony Briggs



---
Sponsored by:
ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



[leaf-user] Bering on Gigabyte GA-586ATS motherboard

2002-06-24 Thread Brock Nanson

This is something I'm writing just so it will be added to the archives.
I have a few old boxes around here with Gigabyte GA-586ATS motherboards.
I tried to get them to boot a version of Bering I'd adjusted to work on
Compact Flash which worked on other boards.  During the kernel boot, it
would fail around the time it was looking at the PCI bus.  I played with
the BIOS for a while to no avail.  Eventually I found a BIOS upgrade for
this board which solved the problem.

So, if anyone has troubles with this board, I would suggest going to the
Gigabyte site and looking for the BIOS upgrade.  I suspect the problem
is 2.4 kernel-related as I didn't have the problem with the old Eiger
image.  Probably good advice to keep the BIOS current anyway, but
sometimes one hears hoofbeats and doesn't expect to see zebras ;-)  I
always initially think that problems like this are of my own making, but
luckily, sometimes this isn't the case...

Brock



---
Sponsored by:
ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



[leaf-user] dhcp server

2002-06-24 Thread Henning, Brian

Hello,

I have a couple of questions about the udhcp.lrp package. The server that
runs on my leaf box can give ip address to machines in my local network. How
can i specify the ip address a particular machine gets from the server? How
can I authenticate machines on the network based on mac address?

thanks,
brian


---
Sponsored by:
ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



Re: [leaf-user] dhcp server

2002-06-24 Thread guitarlynn

On Monday 24 June 2002 16:40, Henning, Brian wrote:
 Hello,

 I have a couple of questions about the udhcp.lrp package. The server
 that runs on my leaf box can give ip address to machines in my local
 network. How can i specify the ip address a particular machine gets
 from the server? 

Give it a static ip address in the *.200-*.253 ip range. The DHCP range
of *.1-*.199 is given in the order requested (booted). The range is
configurable in /etc/udhcpd.conf.

How can I authenticate machines on the network based
 on mac address?

I dunno. Most authentication is done via Samba (SMB), NFS, NIS 
and use host/domain/user to authenticate (which then maps the MAC
to the *name used).
-- 

~Lynn Avants
aka Guitarlynn

guitarlynn at users.sourceforge.net
http://leaf.sourceforge.net

If linux isn't the answer, you've probably got the wrong question!


---
Sponsored by:
ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



Re: [leaf-user] MASQ/NAT problem in Shorewall

2002-06-24 Thread Tom Eastep

On Sun, 23 Jun 2002, Tom Eastep wrote:

 
 The NAT rules that you post above don't include the fourth column. That 
 column determines if NAT occurs only from the interface specified in 
 column 2 or if it applies to connections from all interfaces. If you leave 
 it out, then NAT only applies to packets arriving through the interface in 
 column 2. Since you were pinging from another interface, NAT didn't apply 
 and the ICMP echo requests were directed to the firewall itself.
 

Ok -- I'm now wiping the egg off of my face. The fourth column 
(ALL INTERFACES) defaults to Yes.

-Tom
-- 
Tom Eastep\ Shorewall - iptables made easy
AIM: tmeastep  \ http://www.shorewall.net
ICQ: #60745924  \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---
Sponsored by:
ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



[leaf-user] ICQ configuration

2002-06-24 Thread MLU

Hello, my son would like to do file xfer with a friend using ICQ. How would I go about 
configuring that? 

I am using DCD.

Thank you.


---
Sponsored by:
ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



RE: [leaf-user] dhcp server

2002-06-24 Thread Joey Officer

This is done through a group setting, look below for an example...

group {
use-host-decl-names   on;

host workstation1 {
hardware ethernet   00:03:6D:13:09:F5;
fixed-address   192.168.1.200;
}
  }

the fixed-address can be anything you want it to be, as long as it is in the
same subnet, also make sure that you don't specify an IP within the range of
the dhcp leases.

Joey Officer
Advocate in Action

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Henning, Brian
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 4:40 PM
To: leaf (E-mail)
Subject: [leaf-user] dhcp server

Hello,

I have a couple of questions about the udhcp.lrp package. The server that
runs on my leaf box can give ip address to machines in my local network. How
can i specify the ip address a particular machine gets from the server? How
can I authenticate machines on the network based on mac address?

thanks,
brian


---
Sponsored by:
ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html




---
Sponsored by:
ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



[leaf-user] snmp problem on bering-1.0.rc-2

2002-06-24 Thread hari-nuryadi

Hi everyone,

I have problem with snmp on Bering-1.0.rc-2. The problem is
i can't grep snmp which i installed on bering-1.0.rc-2 from
the other machine (on local and remote network) but i can
grep it on local machine. I thought that it is a firewall
problem, but i already have these lines to my firewall
shorewall:

ACCEPT  loc   fwtcp 161
ACCEPT  net   fwtcp 161

and it still doesn't work.

FYI, i used default instalation of snmp.lrp and i used
snmpwalk and snmpstatus with public community to grep snmp.

FYI too, these are part of my default line configuration on
snmpd.conf

#
community publicxmini   -
## uncomment for private entry:
# community private minimini

##
## now follows the specific section of the linux-port.
##

##
## port to use (default is 161):
##
port:   161

And these are part of the output of my ps -ax:
 753 root S/usr/sbin/inetd
  756 root S/usr/sbin/snmpd -f
 1740 root S/usr/sbin/cron

I really confuse now, i hope someone in here can answer my
question. Thx for the answer.

Hari Nuryadi
- Kemudahan Hosting PlasaCom ---
Hosting menjadi lebih mudah dan murah dengan keringanan 50% biaya registrasi 
mail hosting dan webhosting selama bulan Juni 2002. 
Klik http://idc.plasa.com untuk pendaftaran





---
Sponsored by:
ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



RE: [leaf-user] snmp problem on bering-1.0.rc-2

2002-06-24 Thread Reginald R. Richardson

Try using UDP instead of TCP

-Original Message-
From: hari-nuryadi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 00:30
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [leaf-user] snmp problem on bering-1.0.rc-2


Hi everyone,

I have problem with snmp on Bering-1.0.rc-2. The problem is
i can't grep snmp which i installed on bering-1.0.rc-2 from
the other machine (on local and remote network) but i can
grep it on local machine. I thought that it is a firewall problem, but i
already have these lines to my firewall
shorewall:

ACCEPT  loc   fwtcp 161
ACCEPT  net   fwtcp 161

and it still doesn't work.

FYI, i used default instalation of snmp.lrp and i used
snmpwalk and snmpstatus with public community to grep snmp.

FYI too, these are part of my default line configuration on snmpd.conf

#
community publicxmini   -
## uncomment for private entry:
# community private minimini

##
## now follows the specific section of the linux-port.
##

##
## port to use (default is 161):
##
port:   161

And these are part of the output of my ps -ax:
 753 root S/usr/sbin/inetd
  756 root S/usr/sbin/snmpd -f
 1740 root S/usr/sbin/cron

I really confuse now, i hope someone in here can answer my question. Thx
for the answer.

Hari Nuryadi
- Kemudahan Hosting PlasaCom
--- Hosting menjadi lebih mudah dan murah
dengan keringanan 50% biaya registrasi 
mail hosting dan webhosting selama bulan Juni 2002. 
Klik http://idc.plasa.com untuk pendaftaran






---
Sponsored by:
ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


---
Sponsored by:
ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



Re: [leaf-user] snmp problem on bering-1.0.rc-2

2002-06-24 Thread hari-nuryadi

On Tue, 25 Jun 2002 01:10:46 +0200
 Reginald R. Richardson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
 Try using UDP instead of TCP
 
 -Original Message-
 From: hari-nuryadi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 00:30
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [leaf-user] snmp problem on bering-1.0.rc-2
 
 
 Hi everyone,
 
 I have problem with snmp on Bering-1.0.rc-2. The problem
 is
 i can't grep snmp which i installed on bering-1.0.rc-2
 from
 the other machine (on local and remote network) but i can
 grep it on local machine. I thought that it is a firewall
 problem, but i
 already have these lines to my firewall
 shorewall:
 
 ACCEPT  loc   fwtcp 161
 ACCEPT  net   fwtcp 161
 
 and it still doesn't work.
 
 FYI, i used default instalation of snmp.lrp and i used
 snmpwalk and snmpstatus with public community to grep
 snmp.
 
 FYI too, these are part of my default line configuration
 on snmpd.conf
 
 #
 community publicxmini   -
 ## uncomment for private entry:
 # community private minimini
 
 ##
 ## now follows the specific section of the linux-port.
 ##
 
 ##
 ## port to use (default is 161):
 ##
 port:   161
 
 And these are part of the output of my ps -ax:
  753 root S/usr/sbin/inetd
   756 root S/usr/sbin/snmpd -f
  1740 root S/usr/sbin/cron
 
 I really confuse now, i hope someone in here can answer
 my question. Thx
 for the answer.
 
 Hari Nuryadi
 - Kemudahan Hosting PlasaCom
 --- Hosting menjadi lebih
 mudah dan murah
 dengan keringanan 50% biaya registrasi 
 mail hosting dan webhosting selama bulan Juni 2002. 
 Klik http://idc.plasa.com untuk pendaftaran


Wow, what a nice, cool, and sort answer :)
It's work now :)
Thx man.

 
 
 
 
 
 ---
 Sponsored by:
 ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/


 leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
 SR FAQ:

http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html

- Kemudahan Hosting PlasaCom ---
Hosting menjadi lebih mudah dan murah dengan keringanan 50% biaya registrasi 
mail hosting dan webhosting selama bulan Juni 2002. 
Klik http://idc.plasa.com untuk pendaftaran





---
Sponsored by:
ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



[leaf-user] GuitarLynn's FreeS/WAN image problem

2002-06-24 Thread Ping Kwong


I tried getting the image working but for the life of me can't get
passed loading the network modules.  I've done several of Charles' LRP
on floppies and even on CD-ROM without a problem and even Bering.  But
when I try to load this image from floppy after replacing it with the
proper network modules it errors out.  I've tried both versions
rtl8139.o and 8139too.o and even the via-rhine.o module is having
problems loading.  When it tries the RTL8139 it does see a card
initially and tells me it's MAC address and what the current setting of
the card is then says the line is locked or something to that effect.
Could my ipsec.conf settings have an effect on whether the modules not
load?




---
Sponsored by:
ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



[leaf-user] How to fix a duplex mismatch?

2002-06-24 Thread Nachman Yaakov Ziskind

Bering firewall, 1.0rc2:
Linux yoreach 2.4.18 #1 Sun Apr 21 12:50:34 CEST 2002 i686 unknown

My logs are filling up with entries like:

Jun 24 17:14:00 yoreach kernel: eth0: Transmit error, Tx status register 82.
Jun 24 17:14:00 yoreach kernel: Probably a duplex mismatch.  See
Documentation/networking/vortex.txt
Jun 24 17:14:00 yoreach kernel:   Flags; bus-master 1, dirty 579(3) current
579(3)
Jun 24 17:14:00 yoreach kernel:   Transmit list  vs. c3da62c0.
Jun 24 17:14:00 yoreach kernel:   0: @c3da6200  length 820f status 0001020f

etc., etc. ad nauseam.

I did a web search and found:

http://www.scyld.com/network/vortex.html

which told me that a host on the network was incorrectly transmitting full-
duplex (and, by implication, that my network interface is set to half-duplex).
But, I am confused.

Eth0 is connected, I'm told (by my ISP, who may be the least reliable source on
this subject!), to one other machine, a router in the basement. Since internet
access appears to work reasonably well, should I change anything? Persuade my
ISP to change something (ha ha)?

I assume that the place to change things would be in the module line in
/etc/modules?

Now, I can live with the error messages, but, my logs are filling up.
Apparently, Bering creates a temporary filesystem in Ramdisk to hold the logs
(good), allots it 2 meg (ok, I guess) and shuts logging down when /var/log
exceeds capacity (bad). So, how do I:

1) Stop these messages from being logged; or

2) tell syslogd/klogd to wrap around or do something useful when the logs fill
up; or

3) increase the size of the logging filesystem?

I'd like to increase the amount of ram in play (anyway) as I have a lot on this
machine (it was a hand me down :-)

-- 
_
Nachman Yaakov Ziskind, EA, LLM [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Attorney and Counselor-at-Law   http://yankel.com
Economic Group Pension Services http://egps.com
Actuaries and Employee Benefit Consultants


---
Sponsored by:
ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



[leaf-user] VPN Through Dachstein and SSH problems

2002-06-24 Thread Eric Kubischta

Hello all - any assistance you could provide would be great.  I have been 
searching the FAQ's and archives for info to no avail.

I have two big problems:

1.  The Dachetein router is up and running great!  Thank you for previous 
help.  However, I cannot use Microsoft Dial-Up networking from a Windows box 
on my internal network to dial a VPN connection to a Windows NT server on 
the internet.  (This works fine if I remove the router)

Problem 2 - I cannot get SSH to Work!!  I followed instructions that I found 
here:  
http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=1441group_id=13751

I followed each step to the T.  However, when I try to connect (Using PuTTY 
from a Windows 2000 box on the internal network) the terminal screen comes 
up for about 1 second and then disappears completely)

A couple of things I have different:

I use MSN for my Broadband connection.  The Arescom DSL modem I have gives a 
192.168.1.2 IP to the Linux Router.  I reconfigured eth1 to hand out and use 
192.168.5.xxx to my internal network.

All other networking functionality seems to work (browsing the Internet, 
etc.)

Thanks for your help and let me know if you need any more info!

Thanks,

Eric


_
Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. 
http://www.hotmail.com



---
Sponsored by:
ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



Re: [leaf-user] Error on Booting CD

2002-06-24 Thread Abjin M H

Thanks, the problem was because in my lrpkg.cfg i started the line with
LRP=package1,package2. I just removed LRP= and it worked fine.

Abjin

Jeff Newmiller wrote:

 On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, Abjin M H wrote:

  Hi Kim,
 
  Thanks, it seems /dev/cdrom exists.
  ls -la /dev/cdrom gave me
  lrwxrwxrwx  1 root  root8 Jun 24 07:72 /dev/cdrom - .dev/hdb

 .dev/hdb would be an invalid destination to link to.  /dev/hdb would be
 okay.

 Check /var/lib/lrpkg/root.dev.mk as Kim suggests?

 
  Abjin
 
 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
   Aanhalen Abjin M H [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
  
   First lets check to see if /dev/cdrom exists.
  
   Try booting with the old cdrom and without the floppy disk.
   login and do a
  
   ls -la /dev/cdrom
  
   If that link doesn't exist you found your problem.
   And probably should manually create the link yourself.
  
   edit /var/lib/lrpkg/root.dev.mk and and the
   ln -sf /dev/hdX /dev/cdrom
  
   Where X equals
  
   A if the cdrom is attached to the primary ide-controller and is a master
   B if the cdrom is attached to the primary ide-controller and is a slave
   C if the cdrom is attached to the secondary ide-controller and is a master
   D if the cdrom is attached to the secondary ide-controller and is a slave
  
   Backup initrd
  
   Kim Oppalfens
   Azlan Training
  
Hi,
   
I just created a Dachstein-CD using the iso image from
http://lrp.steinkuehler.net (dachstein-cd-v1.0.2.iso) and when I boot
my
system I got to the login prompt and it worked fine. Then I created two
files in a floppy as mentioned in the documentation “lrpkg.cfg” and
“pkgpath.cfg”. In lrpkg.cfg I have
LRP=etc,ramlog,local,modules,dhcpd,dnscache,weblet
and in pkgpath.cfg I have
PKGPATH=/dev/cdrom
But now when I boot from the cdrom with the floppy inserted the boot
process stops with this message
.
.
.
LINUXRC: Installing…
  LRP=etc: (nf!)
  ramlog: (nf!)
  local: (nf!)
  modules: (nf!)
  dhcpd: (nf!)
  dnscache: (nf!)
  weblet: (nf!)
LINUXRC: Finished
autodetecting RAID arrays
autorun …
… autorun DONE.
Freeing unused kernel memory: 52k freed
INIT: version 2.78 booting
INIT: No inittab file found
   
Enter runlevel:
   
Could someone please help me out here, I would really appreciate it.
How
do I get to the login prompt? I want to run a firewall/vpn gateway.
   
Thank you
   
Abjin
   
   
   
---
Sponsored by:
ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
   
   
  
   -
   This mail sent through Tiscali Webmail (http://webmail.tiscali.be)
  
   ---
   Sponsored by:
   ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/
   
   leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
   SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
 
 
 
  ---
  Sponsored by:
  ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/
  
  leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
  SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
 

 ---
 Jeff NewmillerThe .   .  Go Live...
 DCN:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Basics: ##.#.   ##.#.  Live Go...
   Live:   OO#.. Dead: OO#..  Playing
 Research Engineer (Solar/BatteriesO.O#.   #.O#.  with
 /Software/Embedded Controllers)   .OO#.   .OO#.  rocks...2k
 ---

 ---
 Sponsored by:
 ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/
 
 leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
 SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



---
Sponsored by:
ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



Re: [leaf-user] VPN Through Dachstein and SSH problems

2002-06-24 Thread Jeff Newmiller

On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, Eric Kubischta wrote:

 Hello all - any assistance you could provide would be great.  I have been 
 searching the FAQ's and archives for info to no avail.
 
 I have two big problems:
 
 1.  The Dachetein router is up and running great!  Thank you for previous 
 help.  However, I cannot use Microsoft Dial-Up networking from a Windows box 
 on my internal network to dial a VPN connection to a Windows NT server on 
 the internet.  (This works fine if I remove the router)

I think you need to look for information on masquerading pptp.  I haven't
done it and don't know the details, but if it is possible I think you need
to at least load a special kernel module to make it work, because
the masquerading is an abuse that VPN's don't ordinarily get along with.

 Problem 2 - I cannot get SSH to Work!!  I followed instructions that I found 
 here:  
 http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=1441group_id=13751
 
 I followed each step to the T.  However, when I try to connect (Using PuTTY 
 from a Windows 2000 box on the internal network) the terminal screen comes 
 up for about 1 second and then disappears completely)
 
 A couple of things I have different:
 
 I use MSN for my Broadband connection.  The Arescom DSL modem I have gives a 
 192.168.1.2 IP to the Linux Router.  I reconfigured eth1 to hand out and use 
 192.168.5.xxx to my internal network.

You should fix your /etc/hosts.allow file.  It should be allowing
192.168.5. in rather than 192.168.1.

---
Jeff NewmillerThe .   .  Go Live...
DCN:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Basics: ##.#.   ##.#.  Live Go...
  Live:   OO#.. Dead: OO#..  Playing
Research Engineer (Solar/BatteriesO.O#.   #.O#.  with
/Software/Embedded Controllers)   .OO#.   .OO#.  rocks...2k
---



---
Sponsored by:
ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



Re: [leaf-user] GuitarLynn's FreeS/WAN image problem

2002-06-24 Thread guitarlynn

On Monday 24 June 2002 19:24, Ping Kwong wrote:
 I tried getting the image working but for the life of me can't get
 passed loading the network modules.  I've done several of Charles'
 LRP on floppies and even on CD-ROM without a problem and even Bering.
  But when I try to load this image from floppy after replacing it
 with the proper network modules it errors out.  

The modules are exactly the same as the Dachstein floppy image, 
except for the fact that I stripped most of the NIC modules out.
You should use the modules from the 2.2.19-small tree from 
Charles site for the ipsec-floppy image. I haven't heard of anyone
including myself having this particular error, but the rtl8139 chipset
can be picky about the correct module. Which revision is the chipset?


 I've tried both
 versions rtl8139.o and 8139too.o and even the via-rhine.o module is
 having problems loading.  When it tries the RTL8139 it does see a
 card initially and tells me it's MAC address and what the current
 setting of the card is then says the line is locked or something to
 that effect. Could my ipsec.conf settings have an effect on whether
 the modules not load?

ipsec has no effect on the card and module loading. It shouldn't effect
any other browsing or networking other than the subnet(s)/host(s) that
are defined in ipsec.conf. It would appear to be a hardware/module
problem to me. Any information regarding this (/var/log/syslog, etc...)
should help you get your system up.

I hope this helps,
-- 

~Lynn Avants
aka Guitarlynn

guitarlynn at users.sourceforge.net
http://leaf.sourceforge.net

If linux isn't the answer, you've probably got the wrong question!


---
Sponsored by:
ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html