[leaf-user] tcng
Has anyone created or seen a lrp made of tcng? It figures in the lartc mailing list and is a tc script generator and simulator. http://tcng.sourceforge.net In case it has not been, could someone help creating one please? I know very little of UML and development set up to do this on my own. Someday I will. Anyone willing to lend a hand please? Mohan --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel http://hpc.devchannel.org/ leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] WISP and Atmel AT76C503A
Hi all, A quick and easy question, does WISP support an Atmel AT76C503A based USB wireless devices? We are preparing an offer based on that board. If its not directly supported but could be integrated (the tools and code are there), if the offer is approved we could donate or pay for such a feature. Thanks in advance. Regards. -- Jaime Nebrera Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel http://hpc.devchannel.org/ leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] VPN - Freeswan
Hello, one and all I've been trying to established a FreeSwan connection between 2 locations, follow the directions on Jnilo's website, and those by the french guy, can't remember his name.. But anyway, I get FreeSwan up and running, Shorewall was configured, according to Tom's directions...on his website, But yet, I still don't get any connection between the 2 different networks.. Can some one send me a copy of their ipsec.lrp config file, so I can compare it to see whats wrong with mines, For some reason, everything is starting good, no error messages, but yet, I ain't getting in touch with the network on the other side of the interenet thnks --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel http://hpc.devchannel.org/ leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] VPN - Freeswan
Hi it might help if you tell the list what you try to achieve, e.g. - connect subnets, hosts or what - use certificates, RSA or PSK - what firewall freeSwan release - setup information for both - an ipsec barf output from both ends - . Your information is just a leeetle bit too general Cheers Erich At 12:37 13.12.2002 +0100, you wrote: Hello, one and all I've been trying to established a FreeSwan connection between 2 locations, follow the directions on Jnilo's website, and those by the french guy, can't remember his name.. But anyway, I get FreeSwan up and running, Shorewall was configured, according to Tom's directions...on his website, But yet, I still don't get any connection between the 2 different networks.. THINK Püntenstrasse 39 8143 Stallikon mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Fingerprint: BC9A 25BC 3954 3BC8 C024 8D8A B7D4 FF9D 05B8 0A16 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel http://hpc.devchannel.org/ leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Re: [leaf-devel] WISP and Atmel AT76C503A
There shouldn't be a problem to integrate it. I know that linux-wlan-ng supports it (in client infrastructure mode) and support form hostap_cs is coming. Jaime Nebrera Herrera wrote: Hi all, A quick and easy question, does WISP support an Atmel AT76C503A based USB wireless devices? We are preparing an offer based on that board. If its not directly supported but could be integrated (the tools and code are there), if the offer is approved we could donate or pay for such a feature. Thanks in advance. Regards. -- Best Regards, Vladimir Systems Engineer (RHCE) --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel http://hpc.devchannel.org/ leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Help compiling small program in Bering 1.0 environment?
Added the list back in, in case somebody has something to add...
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 08:20:27AM -0800, Zane Wright wrote:
Hey nobody replied to my posting. IF you could do it that'd be great! I
It *would* wouldn't it? ;)
I'm having a spot of trouble, though :( Well two actually, or maybe...
see below
guess its probably time for me to start looking into the whole UML thing
now... joys. But thanks again!
You really should though. It's pretty easy to set it up... (*I* managed
;)
Basically you get a filesystem (which is a big file), a
'kernel-executable' and a {rpm|deb|tar.gz} utility package.
You put the file-system file somewhere, and the kernel in the same
dir (in your ~/ somewhere).
Install the (in my case rpm) package on your system, and you're set...
(The package takes care of whatever needs to be on your system, for the
UML system to be able to access the hosts filesystem, network etc.)
It's pretty easy, follow the docs and you'll have it up in a couple
hours :)
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/uml01.html
Now, about the trouble:
Problem 1:
uml_link:~/mnt/ethloop# ll
total 16
-rw-r--r-- 1 500 users 54 Oct 18 2001 Makefile
-rw-r--r-- 1 500 users9771 May 3 2002 ethloop.c
uml_link:~/mnt/ethloop# make
gcc -g -O2ethloop.c -o ethloop
ethloop.c:6: netpacket/packet.h: No such file or directory
O.K. but I have packet.h on the host system. So I copy that to the UML
system:
uml_link:~/mnt/ethloop# cp ../packet.h /usr/include/netpacket/
- which *seems* to be fine. Because on the next compile, what fails is:
Problem 2:
uml_link:~/mnt/ethloop# gcc -g -O2 ethloop.c -o ethloop
ethloop.c: In function `send_raw':
ethloop.c:121: `MSG_DONTWAIT' undeclared (first use this function)
ethloop.c:121: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
ethloop.c:121: for each function it appears in.)
...now, I know enough C to agree with gcc that MSG_DONTWAIT is indeed
not declared before line 121 (or later for that matter)... what I don't
know is what to do about it...
I'm thinking that either it should get declared in packet.h but isn't
(because the packet.h from the host system [SuSE 8.0] doesn't match) or
there's some other mismatch somewhere... (?)
What do you think?
Jon
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:
With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility
Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel
http://hpc.devchannel.org/
leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] HOST NOT FOUND!
MY vpn works until yesterday just fine, and today, after a reinit of the client, i get the error: fatal[get_ip_address:pptp.c:232]: gethostbyname: HOST NOT FOUND and the VPN don't work anymore, i search and don't find any mention to a error like that, anyone knows what can be??? Thanks! here is how i start pptp: pptp debug logfd2 200.xxx.xxx.xx DOMAIN\\username lock noauth \ nobsdcomp nodeflate mppe-40 mppe-128 mppe-stateless require \ -mppe mtu 1000 mru 1000 lcp-echo-failure 10 lcp-echo-interval 10 _ MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel http://hpc.devchannel.org/ leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
RE: [leaf-user] VoIP SIP /H323 Proxy packages for Bering
Hi ! I am late with something like this. I hope to pass VoIP through Bering and can't do that until now... I am very busy and not time to check more this last month. If you have some idea ? I think that we must to connect VoIP gateway (from Micronet Taiwan) in the DMZ and DNAT all UDP ports starting from 1024 to 65535 to it, because VoIP uses dynamic UDP ports allocation after connected through TPC 1718/1719. I must check this this W.E. and inform the list if all is ok ! Best Regards, Francois BERGERET, France. -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de TC Envoyé : jeudi 12 décembre 2002 23:30 À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : Re: [leaf-user] VoIP SIP /H323 Proxy packages for Bering All By the lack of response to this does this mean that NO ONE is running has a working SIP/H323 proxy's on a Bering Router/FW ?? -Original Message- From: TC [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: December 11, 2002 8:16 AM Subject: [leaf-user] VoIP SIP /H323 Proxy packages for Bering All I have been a Dachstein user for must be a few years now, but I am now running the asterisk open source PBX, and they have done a lot of neat work on the SIP/H323 channel drivers. So it looks like I want to get some SIP / HG323 proxy's running on my firewall looks like Bering has the active devleopment these days. So what proxy's for SIP/H323 has anybody on the list, actually got running these days what SIP/H323 clients behind have you been able to test against ?? --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel http://hpc.devchannel.org/ leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel http://hpc.devchannel.org/ leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel http://hpc.devchannel.org/ leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
Hello everyone, I have not to bad expirience with Bering firewall and everything goes great until I've decided to make things even better - introduce traffic shaping. And here the problems begins. It simply do not working - on command like: tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: cbq avpkt 1000 bandwidth 10mbit I'm getting: RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument I do understand that this answer means general failure, but I even couldn't imagine where to start fixing the things. BTW I'm using Bering 1.0-stable (I hope so:-) since I've upgraded to it from RC3) Thank you in advance, Alex. --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel http://hpc.devchannel.org/ leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
--On Friday, December 13, 2002 02:24:33 PM -0500 Alex Ryabtsev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello everyone, I have not to bad expirience with Bering firewall and everything goes great until I've decided to make things even better - introduce traffic shaping. And here the problems begins. It simply do not working - on command like: tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: cbq avpkt 1000 bandwidth 10mbit I'm getting: RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument I do understand that this answer means general failure, but I even couldn't imagine where to start fixing the things. BTW I'm using Bering 1.0-stable (I hope so:-) since I've upgraded to it from RC3) Thank you in advance, You need to load the sch_cbq module. If your later tc commands use Stocastic Fair Queuing, you will also need sch_sfq. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptables made easy Shoreline,\ http://shorewall.sf.net Washington USA \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel http://hpc.devchannel.org/ leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Help compiling small program in Bering 1.0 environment?
Dang... if only I knew C... I guess I'll just try the UML stuff next week
when I get the chance and see if I can make something work. I definatly
think this would be a handy tool for those testing throttle control so i'll
make sure and post it somewhere where people can get it.
While I'm at it... when I have that UML stuff installed properly and all.
Would it be too difficult compiling a new version of perl with a bunch of
modules like the current perl5 lrp? I wouldn't think it'd be too tough...
anybody had any chance at looking into that because if not I might as well
do it since i'll have to use it anywho. If anybody has any comments on any
of this feel free ;)
Zane
- Original Message -
From: Jon Clausen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 9:53 AM
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Help compiling small program in Bering 1.0
environment?
Added the list back in, in case somebody has something to add...
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 08:20:27AM -0800, Zane Wright wrote:
Hey nobody replied to my posting. IF you could do it that'd be great! I
It *would* wouldn't it? ;)
I'm having a spot of trouble, though :( Well two actually, or maybe...
see below
guess its probably time for me to start looking into the whole UML thing
now... joys. But thanks again!
You really should though. It's pretty easy to set it up... (*I* managed
;)
Basically you get a filesystem (which is a big file), a
'kernel-executable' and a {rpm|deb|tar.gz} utility package.
You put the file-system file somewhere, and the kernel in the same
dir (in your ~/ somewhere).
Install the (in my case rpm) package on your system, and you're set...
(The package takes care of whatever needs to be on your system, for the
UML system to be able to access the hosts filesystem, network etc.)
It's pretty easy, follow the docs and you'll have it up in a couple
hours :)
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/uml01.html
Now, about the trouble:
Problem 1:
uml_link:~/mnt/ethloop# ll
total 16
-rw-r--r-- 1 500 users 54 Oct 18 2001 Makefile
-rw-r--r-- 1 500 users9771 May 3 2002 ethloop.c
uml_link:~/mnt/ethloop# make
gcc -g -O2ethloop.c -o ethloop
ethloop.c:6: netpacket/packet.h: No such file or directory
O.K. but I have packet.h on the host system. So I copy that to the UML
system:
uml_link:~/mnt/ethloop# cp ../packet.h /usr/include/netpacket/
- which *seems* to be fine. Because on the next compile, what fails is:
Problem 2:
uml_link:~/mnt/ethloop# gcc -g -O2 ethloop.c -o ethloop
ethloop.c: In function `send_raw':
ethloop.c:121: `MSG_DONTWAIT' undeclared (first use this function)
ethloop.c:121: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
ethloop.c:121: for each function it appears in.)
...now, I know enough C to agree with gcc that MSG_DONTWAIT is indeed
not declared before line 121 (or later for that matter)... what I don't
know is what to do about it...
I'm thinking that either it should get declared in packet.h but isn't
(because the packet.h from the host system [SuSE 8.0] doesn't match) or
there's some other mismatch somewhere... (?)
What do you think?
Jon
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:
With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility
Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel
http://hpc.devchannel.org/
leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:
With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility
Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel
http://hpc.devchannel.org/
leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Shorewall required modules
I recently found that /etc/shorewall/modules referenced a number of modules needed by the firewall. Of them, a number were not listed in /lib/modules. These were: ip_tables iptable_filter ip_conntrack iptable_nat ip_conntrack and ip_tables were referenced in dmesg after booting, but I couldn't find them listed in /lib/modules. Is this just a red herring - are these already compiled into the kernel - or is this a potential contibution to existing networking problems? If I need to import iptable_filter and iptable_nat, where do I find them? They were not to be found anywhere in http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bering/latest/modules/ Thanks! Josh --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel http://hpc.devchannel.org/ leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Shorewall required modules
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Joshua Klein wrote: I recently found that /etc/shorewall/modules referenced a number of modules needed by the firewall. Of them, a number were not listed in /lib/modules. These were: ip_tables iptable_filter ip_conntrack iptable_nat ip_conntrack and ip_tables were referenced in dmesg after booting, but I couldn't find them listed in /lib/modules. Is this just a red herring - are these already compiled into the kernel Assuming you are referring to Bering, yes. - or is this a potential contibution to existing networking problems? No. [...] If you _are_ dealing with problems that you think are related to masquerading, you might want to confirm that support for ftp and irc is loaded (I think this is included in the default image): # lsmod [...] ip_nat_irc 2384 0 (unused) ip_nat_ftp 2960 0 (unused) ip_conntrack_irc3056 1 ip_conntrack_ftp3824 1 [..] --- Jeff NewmillerThe . . Go Live... DCN:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Basics: ##.#. ##.#. Live Go... Live: OO#.. Dead: OO#.. Playing Research Engineer (Solar/BatteriesO.O#. #.O#. with /Software/Embedded Controllers) .OO#. .OO#. rocks...2k --- --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel http://hpc.devchannel.org/ leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Pause between syslogd and klogd
Using Bering 1.0 stable, there is a long pause during startup while the system log daemon starts. I see: Starting system log daemon: syslogd then a pause for a minute or more, after which klogd is appended to the line above, and startup proceeds normally. I'm using the stock 1680 image with root, etc, local, modules, iptables, pump, dhcpd, shorwall, dnscache and weblet packages. There is nothing surprising in the /etc/init.d/sysklogd startup script. Anyone seen this behavior? -Richard --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel http://hpc.devchannel.org/ leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Pause between syslogd and klogd
On 13 Dec 2002, Richard Doyle wrote: Using Bering 1.0 stable, there is a long pause during startup while the system log daemon starts. I see: Starting system log daemon: syslogd then a pause for a minute or more, after which klogd is appended to the line above, and startup proceeds normally. I'm using the stock 1680 image with root, etc, local, modules, iptables, pump, dhcpd, shorwall, dnscache and weblet packages. There is nothing surprising in the /etc/init.d/sysklogd startup script. Anyone seen this behavior? http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=1431group_id=13751 In the case of Bering, the problem is most likely that your router's hostname is not listed in /etc/hosts or that tinydns-private is not working. Note that either method can be used to resolve the host name based on IP number. --- Jeff NewmillerThe . . Go Live... DCN:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Basics: ##.#. ##.#. Live Go... Live: OO#.. Dead: OO#.. Playing Research Engineer (Solar/BatteriesO.O#. #.O#. with /Software/Embedded Controllers) .OO#. .OO#. rocks...2k --- --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel http://hpc.devchannel.org/ leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Boot LEAF/Bering from HD with GRUB?
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, Jeff Newmiller wrote: On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, David A. Bright wrote: other O/S installed on it and I'm using GRUB. Can someone tell me (or point me to info about) how to boot LEAF with GRUB? My first attempts weren't I will mention that this is a weak request for information... you need to Sorry you think it is weak. Perhaps this will help: I followed the instructions in the Bering User's Guide for booting from a hard disk with a few exceptions. One is that the partition used was /dev/hda3, not /dev/hda1. Also make a habit of putting specific information like actual configuration files (at least the relevant portions, though judging that can get you in trouble too) and actual error messages. The requirements for loading LEAF are the ability to load the kernel and initrd image, and an MSDOS or ISO9660 filesystem (depending on version) to load packages from. I haven't used GRUB, but if it is like LILO it doesn't know how to dig the kernel and initrd images out of those funky partitions, which is the expertise of syslinux or isolinux. If you have a more appropriate filesystem for GRUB to pull these images off of, you might try separating them from the packages on their MSDOS partition and putting them in that location. Alternatively, you might add support for ext2 to the initrd image (/boot/lib/modules) and pull everything from an ext2 partition. I haven't done either of these things though, so if you _did_, your too-brief report has wasted time for both of us because your problem is more specific than this answer is. --- Jeff NewmillerThe . . Go Live... DCN:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Basics: ##.#. ##.#. Live Go... Live: OO#.. Dead: OO#.. Playing Research Engineer (Solar/BatteriesO.O#. #.O#. with /Software/Embedded Controllers) .OO#. .OO#. rocks...2k --- -- David A. Bright [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel http://hpc.devchannel.org/ leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Boot LEAF/Bering from HD with GRUB?...Ignore
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, David A. Bright wrote: Sorry, ignore this message. I meant to throw an old message away and accidentally sent it instead. On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, Jeff Newmiller wrote: On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, David A. Bright wrote: other O/S installed on it and I'm using GRUB. Can someone tell me (or point me to info about) how to boot LEAF with GRUB? My first attempts weren't -- David A. Bright [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel http://hpc.devchannel.org/ leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
