AW: [leaf-user] Custom commands??
I knew this once before, but forgot :-( How do I implement my own command line commands?? Ie; use mflash to perform mount -t msdos /dev/nftla1 /flash export mflash = 'mount -t msdos /dev/nftla1 /flash' I believe this can also be saved in .profile as well. In my book, that defines an environment variable I suggest appending the following line to /etc/profile: alias mflash=mount -t msdos /dev/nftla1 /flash Then backup etc.lrp Cheers Alex --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: AW: [leaf-user] Custom commands??
Thanks folks. With this reminder I now remember that I previously used the 'alias' command inside one of the booting scripts to set up some permanent commands. Never heard of the 'export' one. I never create any other users, only use root so likely any script that executes during boot will work. But any helpful hints on the best (or rule-of-thumb) file would be appreciated. John === Work: http://www.olgclotteries.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] 888-345-7568 ext. 2205 Personal: http://www.mullan.ca [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === Alex Rhomberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: LEAF-user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: AW: [leaf-user] Custom commands?? ceforge.net 03-02-2003 04:32 AM I knew this once before, but forgot :-( How do I implement my own command line commands?? Ie; use mflash to perform mount -t msdos /dev/nftla1 /flash export mflash = 'mount -t msdos /dev/nftla1 /flash' I believe this can also be saved in .profile as well. In my book, that defines an environment variable I suggest appending the following line to /etc/profile: alias mflash=mount -t msdos /dev/nftla1 /flash Then backup etc.lrp Cheers Alex --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] need to connect to corp sidewinder firewall
On Monday 03 February 2003 01:00 am, Don Seiler wrote: That sounds pretty much like what I'm doing now with iptables. Only I'm assuming in this situation I'd be doing the VPN authentication on the router instead of from the desktop box? If not then, as I said, I'm already doing this, and not successfully. If you are not doing 'pass-through' and want to use a 'gw-to-gw' connection, you will _need_ to have your corp admin's change the configuration on their end to account for this or it absolutely will not work. Both sides _must_ have the same type of connection configuration for you. http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/guitarlynn/ipsec.txt -- ~Lynn Avants Linux Embedded Firewall Project developer http://leaf.sourceforge.net --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Connecting to ssh with WinXP
Hi, Is there a Win32 ssh client available? I just can't find even a hint of one. Preferably free? :P Thanks, Jim. --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Bering uClibc - ulogd: load_plugins: /usr/lib/ulogd/ulog_*.so - Filenot found
Hi all, I've downloaded ulogd-0.98 from CVS, applied the patch and compiled for uClibc, made ulogd.lrp and reboot with the new package. Ulogd complains about finding plugins specified in /etc/ulogd.conf [/usr/lib/ulogd/ulogd_*.so File not found] but all needed plugins are fine, owned by root in /usr/lib/ulogd/ ] The same ulogd package built for glibc works fine :( If anyone has any idea ... Thanks in advance, lwd. --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] need to connect to corp sidewinder firewall
Should the corp admin's change anything on the firewall to allow for my pass-through connection? I _am_ doing NAT on my end also. I read on that ipsec.txt that this breaks one of the protocols. What alternatives do I have? Don. On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, Lynn Avants wrote: On Monday 03 February 2003 01:00 am, Don Seiler wrote: That sounds pretty much like what I'm doing now with iptables. Only I'm assuming in this situation I'd be doing the VPN authentication on the router instead of from the desktop box? If not then, as I said, I'm already doing this, and not successfully. If you are not doing 'pass-through' and want to use a 'gw-to-gw' connection, you will _need_ to have your corp admin's change the configuration on their end to account for this or it absolutely will not work. Both sides _must_ have the same type of connection configuration for you. http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/guitarlynn/ipsec.txt --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] need to connect to corp sidewinder firewall
On Monday 03 February 2003 08:00 am, Don Seiler wrote: Should the corp admin's change anything on the firewall to allow for my pass-through connection? I _am_ doing NAT on my end also. I read on that ipsec.txt that this breaks one of the protocols. What alternatives do I have? Not if the service is port-forwarded through the firewall to your desktop. Your admin will see it as your box is connected directly to the internet for the ipsec service/protocol. They only need to change if you are using a 'gw'to-gw' connection. -- ~Lynn Avants Linux Embedded Firewall Project developer http://leaf.sourceforge.net --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] need to connect to corp sidewinder firewall
I read somewhere that there is a timeout issue with with rp-pppoe or NAT, where it tries ti re-generate something ever 10 minutes or so. Sorry I don't have specifics and this all might sound a little crazy. The fact of the matter is I _can_ connect to their VPN, I just get disconnected frequently and like clockwork. If it weren't for the screen program I would have gone crazy. The corp admins tell me that the users who don't have home networks and connect right to their DSL/Cable modem from their desktops don't have this problem. Don. On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, Lynn Avants wrote: On Monday 03 February 2003 08:00 am, Don Seiler wrote: Should the corp admin's change anything on the firewall to allow for my pass-through connection? I _am_ doing NAT on my end also. I read on that ipsec.txt that this breaks one of the protocols. What alternatives do I have? Not if the service is port-forwarded through the firewall to your desktop. Your admin will see it as your box is connected directly to the internet for the ipsec service/protocol. They only need to change if you are using a 'gw'to-gw' connection. --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Connecting to ssh with WinXP
Definetly! I use TeraTerm Pro with TTSH add-in. Works like a charm. === Work: http://www.olgclotteries.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] 888-345-7568 ext. 2205 Personal: http://www.mullan.ca [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === James Neave [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [leaf-user] Connecting to ssh with WinXP ceforge.net 03-02-2003 08:56 AM Hi, Is there a Win32 ssh client available? I just can't find even a hint of one. Preferably free? :P Thanks, Jim. --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Connecting to ssh with WinXP
Is there a Win32 ssh client available? I just can't find even a hint of one. Preferably free? :P TeraTermPro+SSH and Putty could do what you want. Bye Elmar -- Elmar Gerwalin , University of Kaiserslautern,Germany Dept. of Theoretical Chemistry and IT Service Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]0631-205-2749 --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Connecting to ssh with WinXP
On Monday 03 February 2003 07:56 am, James Neave wrote: Hi, Is there a Win32 ssh client available? I just can't find even a hint of one. Preferably free? :P Putty. -- ~Lynn Avants Linux Embedded Firewall Project developer http://leaf.sourceforge.net --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Connecting to ssh with WinXP
At 15:16 03/02/03 +0100, Elmar Gerwalin wrote: Is there a Win32 ssh client available? I just can't find even a hint of one. Preferably free? :P TeraTermPro+SSH and Putty could do what you want. In addition to the recommendations you've already got, a search at google for free ssh client windows turns up a load of other options cheers Julian -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ljchurch.co.uk --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Connecting to ssh with WinXP
On Monday 03 February 2003 09:11 am, James Neave wrote: Putty or TTP+SSH, got it! Now I can pull my logs over from the Bering box, post them here, and ask yet more questions. ;) But I'll pre-empt myself and ask now how I can transfer files from the Bering Box over to my WinXP box. Check: SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html Use 'scp' through ssh. -- ~Lynn Avants Linux Embedded Firewall Project developer http://leaf.sourceforge.net --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Connecting to ssh with WinXP
On Monday 03 February 2003 16:11, James Neave wrote: Putty or TTP+SSH, got it! But I'll pre-empt myself and ask now how I can transfer files from the Bering Box over to my WinXP box. WinSCP(2) is not bad. Elmar -- Elmar Gerwalin , University of Kaiserslautern,Germany Dept. of Theoretical Chemistry and IT Service Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]0631-205-2749 --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Connecting to ssh with WinXP
James Neave wrote: Putty or TTP+SSH, got it! Now I can pull my logs over from the Bering box, post them here, and ask yet more questions. ;) But I'll pre-empt myself and ask now how I can transfer files from the Bering Box over to my WinXP box. Ta, Jim. Ixplorer is a windows client for pscp. iXplorer is a freeware Windows GUI client for pcp (personal secure copy) All you need on the leaf box is sshd Download http://www.tucows.com/preview/195163.html -- Victor McAllister --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Bering partial backup not working (was: Bering 2.4.18 CD)
On 31 Jan 2003 08:48:41 EST Sean E. Covel wrote: On Thu, 2003-01-30 at 22:34, Brad Fritz wrote: sc I created new .lrp files with the correct path (no ./etc) and I'm still sc having the tar problem. Anyone have any thoughts? [..] bf Can you provide a link to or post the etc.local file? [..] sc Good point. I couldn't find them either so I emailed Todd. I'll host sc them. I'm not sure if you want to help, or if you just want the files sc ;-), but here they are. I also posted my ISO in case someone wants to sc do some debugging. sc sc The files are here: sc sc http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/scovel Looks like there are carriage returns in the .local files that are causing problems with the grep at ~101 of lrcfg.back.script . Try the versions I sterilized with dos2unix and sent you offlist and let us know if that fixes the problem. --Brad --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Bering uClibc - ulogd: load_plugins: /usr/lib/ulogd/ulog_*.so - File not found
Hi all, I've downloaded ulogd-0.98 from CVS, applied the patch and compiled for uClibc, made ulogd.lrp and reboot with the new package. Ulogd complains about finding plugins specified in /etc/ulogd.conf [/usr/lib/ulogd/ulogd_*.so File not found] but all needed plugins are fine, owned by root in /usr/lib/ulogd/ ] The same ulogd package built for glibc works fine :( If anyone has any idea ... Thanks in advance, lwd. Laurentiu, Did you follow the instructions in ulogd.txt and used ulogd.mk? (ulogd.mk changed a week ago, so maybe you must download it again) I know it works, just tried it myself. There is also a complete ulogd.lrp package compiled for uClibc in CVS. Eric --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-679331 ] NICs/network not comming up?
Support Requests item #679331, was opened at 2003-02-03 00:35 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=679331group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Dachstein Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: rob merritt (merrittr) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: NICs/network not comming up? Initial Comment: I read throuht the faqs and my logs looking for error msgs but there don't seem to be any. Here is my problem: pent 266 + 96mb ran 2 identical 8139too cards (thats what mandrake 8.2 thinks anyway and it works) in modules I have pci-scan and tulip enabled in modules but I get a no route to host message find attached the dump.log of all pertinent info and thanks for the help rob merritt [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Comment By: Lynn Avants (guitarlynn) Date: 2003-02-03 09:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=176069 You'll want to download and add the '8139too' module from Charles' site at: http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/cstein The 'small' kernel tree is for the floppy. The tulip driver will _not_ work on 8139too cards. -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=679331group_id=13751 --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Connecting to ssh with WinXP
At 01:56 PM 2/3/03 +, James Neave wrote: Is there a Win32 ssh client available? I just can't find even a hint of one. Preferably free? :P I'm not sure why you ask this question on a Linux list, but ... the two widely used Wndows ssh clients are Putty and TerraTerm. I've used them both on Win98 and 2K (I prefer Putty for everyday use), but I imagine they will work on XP as well. And I find that if I go to www.google.com and search on windows ssh client, links to them are the first two things that come back ... so you may want to refine your search strategies for the future. -- ---Never tell me the odds! Ray Olszewski -- Han Solo Palo Alto, California, USA [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Bering partial backup not working (was: Bering2.4.18 CD)
sc Good point. I couldn't find them either so I emailed Todd. I'll host sc them. I'm not sure if you want to help, or if you just want the files sc ;-), but here they are. I also posted my ISO in case someone wants to sc do some debugging. sc sc The files are here: sc sc http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/scovel Looks like there are carriage returns in the .local files that are causing problems with the grep at ~101 of lrcfg.back.script . Try the versions I sterilized with dos2unix and sent you offlist and let us know if that fixes the problem. --Brad Shame on me! I'll bet that's it. I was planning on spending some time tonight debugging the script, but I'll give the dos2unix command a shot first and save myself the time. I'll let you all know if it works. If it does, I'll post a new (Unix) version of the files, and my ISO as well in case someone wants it. Sean --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] My Dachstein not quite up and running
I'm back at work for the week now so I'll try the suggestions you guys gave since Thursday. In the meantime, I moved the firewall to a more accessible location and reconnected it with new cables. Now I get the following msg popping up every few seconds: eth0: rtl8139 Interrupt line blocked, status and when I try to ping an external address I get: eth0: Trasmit timeout, status ff media ff and 100% packet loss. I can ping the internal NT fine. --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Aliasing multiple subnets through a single NIC
Can someone please point me to an example of how to do this with Bering. I would like to alias a route to the .145 subnet on Router B from a new router I am adding to our network. Please help. I currently have static routes added as per the description below: .router A auto eth0 iface eth0 inet static address 192.168.141.1 masklen 24 broadcast 192.168.141.255 # gateway 1.2.3.1 auto eth1 iface eth1 inet static address 192.168.142.1 masklen 24 broadcast 192.168.142.255 # gateway 1.2.3.1 auto eth2 iface eth2 inet static address 192.168.143.1 masklen 24 broadcast 192.168.143.255 # gateway 1.2.3.1 auto eth3 iface eth3 inet static address 192.168.147.1 masklen 24 broadcast 192.168.147.255 gateway 192.168.147.4 up ip route add 192.168.140.0/24 via 192.168.147.3 || true up ip route add 192.168.144.0/24 via 192.168.147.2 || true up ip route add 192.168.145.0/24 via 192.168.147.2 || true up ip route add 192.168.146.0/24 via 192.168.147.2 || true ^ ^ Router B # /etc/network/interfaces -- configuration file for LEAF network # J. Nilo, April 2002 # # Loopback interface. auto lo iface lo inet loopback # Step 1: configure external interface # uncomment/adjust one of the following 4 options # Option 1.1 (default): eth0 / dynamic IP from pump/dhclient #auto eth0 #iface eth0 inet dhcp # # Option 1.2: eth0 / Fixed IP (assumed to be 1.2.3.4). # (broadcast/gateway optional) auto eth0 iface eth0 inet static address 192.168.147.2 masklen 24 broadcast 192.168.147.255 gateway 192.168.147.1 auto eth1 iface eth1 inet static address 192.168.144.1 masklen 24 broadcast 192.168.144.255 # gateway 1.2.3.1 auto eth2 iface eth2 inet static address 192.168.145.1 masklen 24 broadcast 192.168.145.255 # gateway 1.2.3.1 auto eth3 iface eth3 inet static address 192.168.146.1 masklen 24 broadcast 192.168.146.255 # gateway 192.168.147.4 Thanks in advance. Troy --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Bering C.D.
On Mon, 03 Feb 2003 11:19:41 PST Michael Campion wrote: What is this C.D. I keep hearing about and can it be purchased? Nope, but you can build one yourself: http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bucdrom.html http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bubooting.html#AEN1155 or try lcapriotti's RC4 ISO: http://cvs.sf.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/leaf/devel/lcapriotti/ --Brad --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Can't boot from hard drive partition
Possibly a daft question, but is the partition active? I've had this sort of thing happen before when I create partitions and forget to make them active. If you're not sure, use fdisk on a DOS floppy to check and set it if you need to. IIRC the partition has a A next to it. You can use a linux fdisk if you prefer. I'm trying to boot LRP from a small DOS partition on a IDE hard drive following the instructions in the LRPHardDiskHOWTO, but I'm not having any luck. The message I get on boot is: Searching for Boot Record from IDE-0..OK Missing operating system --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] My Dachstein not quite up and running
Okay, my dhcpd file now reads as follows:
subnet 10.10.10.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
option routers 10.10.10.254;
option domain-name esimail.org;
option domain-name-servers 127.0.0.1;
range 10.10.10.1 10.10.10.199;
}
I made the newbie mistake of thinking option meant optional so I hadn't
changed them previously. (per Charles)
Switched eth1_IPADDR=10.10.10.1 to eth1_IPADDR=10.10.10.254 (per Lynn)
and checked the things Ray asked about:
the masq rule reads:
0 0 MASQ all -- 0xFF 0x00 eth0 10.10.10.0/24 0.0.0.0/0 n/a
and cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward does return a 1
Now everything seems to work correctly! (Ping, web access, and SSH at
least--I haven't put our Exchange server behind the firewall yet since
there are other users in the office.) I am so thankful for your help
through this.
Three more question before I go though:
1) Since the ISP's router is set to route incoming mail to our exchange
server at it's current address (192.168.1.2) all I should have to do is
assign that server a new static IP (something along the lines of
10.10.10.200) and let the ISP know about this change, right?
2) It looks like our ISP's router is set to renew nonstatic ip addresses
every 27000 seconds (7.5 hours). I know this affects the ip address for
eth0, will that affect anything else behind the firewall? Basically I'm
wondering if this is okay to leave as-is or should I try to assign eth0 a
static ip.
3) How do I enable the weblet application? I changed the settings in the
weblet package: SERVER_NAME and SERVER_ADDR to both be 10.10.10.254 to
match the eth1 address. I also changed the CLIENT_ADDR to 10.10.10. but so
far I've been unable to access is from the internal NT box.
Thanks again,
Chris
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Can't boot from hard drive partition
Thanks for responding. Yes, the DOS partition is marked as active. I assume whether the fdisk /MBR is done before or after the LRP files are copied onto the DOS partition makes no difference. Correct? When you used partitions, did you just used the format c: and syslinux -s c: commands from a DOS boot disk as mentioned in the HOWTO? Thanks again. On Monday 03 February 2003 16:59, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Possibly a daft question, but is the partition active? I've had this sort of thing happen before when I create partitions and forget to make them active. If you're not sure, use fdisk on a DOS floppy to check and set it if you need to. IIRC the partition has a A next to it. You can use a linux fdisk if you prefer. I'm trying to boot LRP from a small DOS partition on a IDE hard drive following the instructions in the LRPHardDiskHOWTO, but I'm not having any luck. The message I get on boot is: Searching for Boot Record from IDE-0..OK Missing operating system --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Can't boot from hard drive partition
Sorry, I may have misread your earlier post. I think my normal approach is fdisk - set up partitions - reboot fdisk /mbr format c: lock c: syslinux -s c: copy LRP packages to disk (don't overwrite the ldlinux.sys file) although the order does vary slightly depending on my mood. Did you run syslinux -s c: after you ran fdisk /mbr? If not, you need to. Another thing, which version of syslinux are you using? I run Bering on 486's with CompactFlash and I can't get anything past syslinux-1.48 to actually work with this kit. Thanks for responding. Yes, the DOS partition is marked as active. I assume whether the fdisk /MBR is done before or after the LRP files are copied onto the DOS partition makes no difference. Correct? When you used partitions, did you just used the format c: and syslinux -s c: commands from a DOS boot disk as mentioned in the HOWTO? Thanks again. On Monday 03 February 2003 16:59, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Possibly a daft question, but is the partition active? I've had this sort of thing happen before when I create partitions and forget to make them active. If you're not sure, use fdisk on a DOS floppy to check and set it if you need to. IIRC the partition has a A next to it. You can use a linux fdisk if you prefer. I'm trying to boot LRP from a small DOS partition on a IDE hard drive following the instructions in the LRPHardDiskHOWTO, but I'm not having any luck. The message I get on boot is: Searching for Boot Record from IDE-0..OK Missing operating system --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Can't boot from hard drive partition
Not forgetting to change your syslinux.cfg file to use the correct device (/dev/hda1 ??), of course. I think my normal approach is fdisk - set up partitions - reboot fdisk /mbr format c: lock c: syslinux -s c: copy LRP packages to disk (don't overwrite the ldlinux.sys file) although the order does vary slightly depending on my mood. --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] My Dachstein not quite up and running
At 03:17 PM 2/3/03 -0800, Chris Low wrote: [...] and checked the things Ray asked about: the masq rule reads: 0 0 MASQ all -- 0xFF 0x00 eth0 10.10.10.0/24 0.0.0.0/0 n/a [...] Three more question before I go though: 1) Since the ISP's router is set to route incoming mail to our exchange server at it's current address (192.168.1.2) all I should have to do is assign that server a new static IP (something along the lines of 10.10.10.200) and let the ISP know about this change, right? Wrong. Since the LEAF router MASQs (NATs) the 10.10.10.0/24 network (that's the import of the MASQ line I asked about), it appears to the ISP's router that all the traffic is coming from 192.168.1.whatever_DHCP_assigns_to_the_external_interface . if you want to MASQ the LAN this way, you will need to (a) port forward traffic to port 25 on the LEAF router to the 10.10.10.x mail server (b) have the ISP router port forward port 25 to the LEAF router's external address. (I'm assuming here that the ISP router NATs 192.168.1.0/24, something you haven't actually said. It is possible that the ISP actually routes to 192.168.1.0/24 rather than NATs it, and that some address translation takes place upstream of you. In that case, everything is different, and you haven't told us enough details to get good advice.) While this approach should work, it is clumsy. A much better approach might be, if you can arrange this, to put the 192.168.1.0/24 network behind your LEAF firewall, use some other address pair to set up a static route between the ISP's router and the LEAF router, and tell the ISP's router that the LEAF router is its route to 192.168.1.0/24. Then let the ISP's router do the NAT'ing, and use the LEAF rotuer just for firewall rules. Although I say much better, a real assessment of the best approach (there are other ways to do it too, such as proxy arp'ing on the LEAF router) requires an evaluation of your actual setup, including what options your ISP will provide, what you need firewalled and why, and probably more. We can talk about possibilities, not really tell you what is beest for your particular circumstances. 2) It looks like our ISP's router is set to renew nonstatic ip addresses every 27000 seconds (7.5 hours). I know this affects the ip address for eth0, will that affect anything else behind the firewall? No. Anything behind the firewall gets its address either via static assignment or from the *LEAF* router's DHCP server. Unless you make special arrangements to forward them, DHCP requests/assignments do not cross routers. Basically I'm wondering if this is okay to leave as-is or should I try to assign eth0 a static ip. It depends on how you decide to solve the routing and mail-server problems. But a static address would simplify about every solution to them I can think of. 3) How do I enable the weblet application? I changed the settings in the weblet package: SERVER_NAME and SERVER_ADDR to both be 10.10.10.254 to match the eth1 address. I also changed the CLIENT_ADDR to 10.10.10. but so far I've been unable to access is from the internal NT box. Someone else will have to help with this one, since I don't use the weblet. If nothing is forthcoming, though, consider reporting with a more complete description of the changes, of what the unable to access failure looks like (what error does the browser report, or does it just try forever?), and of the NT host's network settings. -- ---Never tell me the odds! Ray Olszewski -- Han Solo Palo Alto, California, USA [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
RE: [leaf-user] Connecting to ssh with WinXP
Winscp is a lot better and robust though. Mohan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Victor McAllister Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 9:22 PM Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Connecting to ssh with WinXP James Neave wrote: Putty or TTP+SSH, got it! Now I can pull my logs over from the Bering box, post them here, and ask yet more questions. ;) But I'll pre-empt myself and ask now how I can transfer files from the Bering Box over to my WinXP box. Ta, Jim. Ixplorer is a windows client for pscp. iXplorer is a freeware Windows GUI client for pcp (personal secure copy) All you need on the leaf box is sshd Download http://www.tucows.com/preview/195163.html -- Victor McAllister --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Can't boot from hard drive partition
On Monday 03 February 2003 04:29 pm, Spiro Philopoulos wrote: I'm using syslinux and all the necessary files are on the partition. I know the kernel image and all other files are OK because I've been using them to boot from a non-partitioned drive for a long time (just by dd'ing the LRP image and running syslinux). I also ran fdisk /MBR from a DOS floppy to make sure a clean MBR is installed. Partitions and everything look fine. Any guesses/help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. Well, the versions of syslinux can be quite particular with certain pieces of hardware. I've never had a problem with syslinux-v1.66. Is your DOS partition less than the 25Meg limit? Did you reboot after partitioning? If formatting with M$ tools later than DOS-6.0, did you lock the drive? Is the drive hda? Some machines won't boot unless it is. Your error would seem to indicate that the machine is not seeing syslinux at all. -- ~Lynn Avants Linux Embedded Firewall Project developer http://leaf.sourceforge.net --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] My Dachstein not quite up and running
Chris,
Ray covered everything but Weblet.
For Weblet you seem to have everything except the /etc/hosts.allow file
changed. Check and make sure that it has 10.10.10. in there too.
Best,
Steve
On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 16:17, Chris Low wrote:
Okay, my dhcpd file now reads as follows:
subnet 10.10.10.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
option routers 10.10.10.254;
option domain-name esimail.org;
option domain-name-servers 127.0.0.1;
range 10.10.10.1 10.10.10.199;
}
I made the newbie mistake of thinking option meant optional so I hadn't
changed them previously. (per Charles)
Switched eth1_IPADDR=10.10.10.1 to eth1_IPADDR=10.10.10.254 (per Lynn)
and checked the things Ray asked about:
the masq rule reads:
0 0 MASQ all -- 0xFF 0x00 eth0 10.10.10.0/24 0.0.0.0/0 n/a
and cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward does return a 1
Now everything seems to work correctly! (Ping, web access, and SSH at
least--I haven't put our Exchange server behind the firewall yet since
there are other users in the office.) I am so thankful for your help
through this.
Three more question before I go though:
1) Since the ISP's router is set to route incoming mail to our exchange
server at it's current address (192.168.1.2) all I should have to do is
assign that server a new static IP (something along the lines of
10.10.10.200) and let the ISP know about this change, right?
2) It looks like our ISP's router is set to renew nonstatic ip addresses
every 27000 seconds (7.5 hours). I know this affects the ip address for
eth0, will that affect anything else behind the firewall? Basically I'm
wondering if this is okay to leave as-is or should I try to assign eth0 a
static ip.
3) How do I enable the weblet application? I changed the settings in the
weblet package: SERVER_NAME and SERVER_ADDR to both be 10.10.10.254 to
match the eth1 address. I also changed the CLIENT_ADDR to 10.10.10. but so
far I've been unable to access is from the internal NT box.
Thanks again,
Chris
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Can't boot from hard drive partition
I'm trying to boot LRP from a small DOS partition on a IDE hard drive following the instructions in the LRPHardDiskHOWTO, but I'm not having any luck. The message I get on boot is: Searching for Boot Record from IDE-0..OK Missing operating system I'm using syslinux and all the necessary files are on the partition. I know the kernel image and all other files are OK because I've been using them to boot from a non-partitioned drive for a long time (just by dd'ing the LRP image and running syslinux). I also ran fdisk /MBR from a DOS floppy to make sure a clean MBR is installed. Partitions and everything look fine. Any guesses/help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Bering uClibc - ulogd: load_plugins: /usr/lib/ulogd/ulog_*.so- File not found
Eric Spakman wrote:
Laurentiu,
Did you follow the instructions in ulogd.txt and used ulogd.mk?
(ulogd.mk changed a week ago, so maybe you must download it again)
I know it works, just tried it myself. There is also a complete
ulogd.lrp package compiled for uClibc in CVS.
Hi Eric,
Yes, I followed the instructions and used the new version of ulogd.mk;
the trouble is at line 448 in ulogd.c:
if (!dlopen(file, RTLD_NOW)) {
ulogd_log(ULOGD_ERROR, load_plugins: %s - %s\n,
file, dlerror());
..
I changed it to print file content and it's OK /usr/lib/ulogd/
...and so on. So, IMHO the problem may be dlopen() of uClibc ?...
Any suggestions?
I did all this because I need ulogd_PGSQL plugin and I like to do
things by myself. That's why I believe Bering is GREAT!
Thanks,
lwd
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
