Re: [leaf-user] Suitable hardware for own appliance (Tom Lobato)

2008-07-25 Thread Marko Nurmenniemi
Paul Rogers wrote:
 Please, can you give me pointers to hardware vendors or projects
 with such especifications.
 
 How about any old PC you've got?  LEAF doesn't put a heavy load
 on a system.  Any old PC from 486 on up that you can fit whatever
 NIC's you have lying around and can get ~32MB of RAM into, should
 work beautifully.

16MB works also in my 486, although I haven't updated lately.

Linux firewall 2.4.32 #1 Sat Mar 4 21:00:13 CET 2006 i486 unknown
13:55:54 up 153 days, 22:02, load average: 0.32, 0.06, 0.02

-M

Btw. renewed my UPS battery about 153 days ago...


-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK  win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100url=/

leaf-user mailing list: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
Support Request -- http://leaf-project.org/


Re: [leaf-user] The old floppy question

2007-07-19 Thread Marko Nurmenniemi
Tony wrote:
 This may be prudent, but it may not be reality.  If you were worried 
 about resiliency, would you be using old or repurposed hardware to begin 
 with?
 
 I agree that CF's or USB sticks are a better choice, but the user base 
 seems to be indicating that the floppy isn't dead yet.
 
 Tony
 
 Harry Lachanas wrote:
 Imagine this scenario,
 you have LEAF boxes spread all over your country,
 would you trust floppy disks on your installations even with backups around?

 Floppy disk devices have movable parts, CFs don't, usb-sticks don't,
 I personally haven't used any floppies for 4 years now, period.

 Regards,
 Harry.


Imagine this scenario, I'm a person who hates to throw working stuff
away. So I have two identical back-up machines ready in the shelf if my
main Hw decides to buy the farm. I have recently also salvaged a 5½
floppy drive just in case I want to go really medieval on this...and yes
I have the floppies for a lifetime. I could always go to the
Pc-superstore and buy a ready system. What's the fun in that?

All releases are tried and if accepted by my let's see if this works
method are made to a disk image complete with settings and all needed
drivers but nothing extra for quick recovery. There is always two
identical disks ready for service.

Disk will only be read once a month in average. I usually also pull the
media out after booting since firewall is protected by a UPS so it will
stay up even if there is power outage, same goes for ADSL. Actually
there was a blackout recently and only electronic devices still on in
our neighborhood were my firewall and ADSL and the UPS beeping...creepy.

OK but to the point. Is there a tried and easy method to make a IDE-CF
image based on the disk version I'm now using?

-Marko


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/

leaf-user mailing list: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
Support Request -- http://leaf-project.org/


Re: [leaf-user] The old floppy question

2007-07-18 Thread Marko Nurmenniemi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Lets make a poll to find out how many of us are booting bering from a
 floppy and decide from there.
 
 I still favor  use Bering 1.2 floppies.  I like the security of the 
 write-protect slider.  And part of the idea about Linux, and Bering firewalls 
 in particular, is repurposing old hardware for a new  useful task.  It's not 
 so hard to find boxes of an appropriate horsepower for the task that came 
 with floppies.
 
 
 Paul Rogers  ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
 http://www.xprt.net/~pgrogers/
 Rogers' Second Law: Everything you do communicates.
 (I do not personally endorse any additions after this line. TANSTAAFL :-)
 

This is a spinoff from some other list?

Anyhuu, my poor old 486/50 @ 16MB has been running for years (5+) with 
just a floppy drive.

I have not found a suitable as easy way to run this firewall. Somewhere 
in boxes there is IDE-CompactFlash adapter but never get around to 
making it work...


What's the back story here?

-Marko

-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/

leaf-user mailing list: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
Support Request -- http://leaf-project.org/


Re: [leaf-user] DNAT rule

2005-12-10 Thread Marko Nurmenniemi

Andrew Gray (Gil) wrote:


Why not just use the MAC Address and have dhcp always assign that machine the
same address.   That way all other settings from dhcp will be applied to the
machine every time and changes to the settings applied by dhcp will also be
picked up by that machine.   This method has been working for me for several
years now on one of my servers.

Just add the following to the end of the /etc/dhcpd.conf and you are away:

host computername{
   hardware ethernet 00:00:00:00:00:00;
   fixed-address 192.168.x.x;
}

Don't forget to change the relevant variables to suit your network first.
 


What is the difference between that and putting the line
dhcp-host=00:50:BF:xx:xx:xx,hannibal,192.168.xxx.xxx
in to /etc/dnsmasq.conf?

-M


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637alloc_id=16865op=click

leaf-user mailing list: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
Support Request -- http://leaf-project.org/


Re: [leaf-user] DNAT rule

2005-12-01 Thread Marko Nurmenniemi

Tom Eastep wrote:


On Thursday 01 December 2005 10:59, Jim Ford wrote:
 


I inserted the following line in my shorewall rules file:

DNATnetloc:192.168.1.1-192.168.1.64tcp6881:6888 -   
all


Hoping to solve a NAT problem with my Arureus bittorrent client. I gave the
IP address as a range because I may not always be sure that 192.168.1.1
would get assigned to the particular machine running Azureus. It didn't
work - but if I just give one address ie 192.168.1.1, it does. Can I not
use a range of IP addresses in this instance?
   



That is not an appropriate use of a range in the DEST of a DNAT rule.

From the documentation of the DEST column:

  Like in the SOURCE column, a range of IP addresses may be specified in the 
  DEST column as first address-last address. When the ACTION is DNAT or 
  DNAT-, connections will be assigned to the addresses in the range in a 
  round-robin fashion (load-balancing).


You need to configure your DHCP server to always give the same IP address to 
the machine running Arureus.


-Tom
 


And forward the port range to that IP only.

-M


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637alloc_id=16865op=click

leaf-user mailing list: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
Support Request -- http://leaf-project.org/


Re: [leaf-user] Firewall testing?

2005-11-30 Thread Marko Nurmenniemi

Tom Eastep wrote:


On Wednesday 30 November 2005 10:09, Jim Ford wrote:
 


Now I'm all snug and cosy behind my Leaf Bering firewall (thanks to the
helpful folk on this forum), I'd like to see just how secure it appears
from the outside. There are various sites, some of them commercial, that
give a free firewall security test. I've tried some of them and they give
varying results. I'm also aware that it's in the interest of the commercial
sites to say that my firewall is insecure - so they can sell me their
solution!

Any recommendations (or is it good enough for me to nmap from outside)?
   



You need to carefully evaluate all results -- see Shorewall FAQ 4 and it's 
related sub-FAQs. 

If you don't understand a particular report, I recommend running tcpdump on 
your firewall while doing the scan to verify that the probes are actually 
reaching your firewall and that they are not being responded to by an 
intermediate router.


-Tom
 


grc.com makes analyse but doesn't sell services.

-M


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637alloc_id=16865op=click

leaf-user mailing list: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
Support Request -- http://leaf-project.org/


Re: [leaf-user] Bering UClibc 2.3.1 problems

2005-11-29 Thread Marko Nurmenniemi

Charles Steinkuehler wrote:


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Eric Spakman wrote:

| Hello Jim,
|
On your windows box, try the following at a prompt:

Or, if you really want your windows box to get a consistent IP, just 
add a

stanza for it in the dhcpd config file:

~host mywinbox {
~   hardware ethernet 00:ab:cd:ef:12:34;
~   fixed-address 1.2.3.4;
~}


I have been using this kind of config in my Leaf box (in etc/dnsmasq.conf )
dhcp-range=192.168.1.1,192.168.1.199,12h
dhcp-host=00:50:BF:D9:EC:90,hannibal,192.168.1.30
dhcp-host=00:50:8B:74:B4:7D,192.168.1.50
dhcp-host=00:0D:60:7B:A5:99,192.168.1.80
dhcp-host=00:40:63:DD:80:27,media,192.168.1.70
dhcp-host=00:0f:ea:38:90:33,amd64,192.168.1.60

I want to be in controll of my IP's.
Setting the IP based on MAC kind of forces the address.
-M


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637alloc_id=16865op=click

leaf-user mailing list: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
Support Request -- http://leaf-project.org/


Re: [leaf-user] LEAF Project QBox Launched

2005-10-26 Thread Marko Nurmenniemi

Ron Senykoff wrote:


We are now launching a new product (open source - free - GPL) called
QBox. Qbox is a plug and play network appliance for traffic shaping
and uses LEAF as its build and (for now) the PC Engines WRAP board as
the hardware.

If anyone would like to check out the website and tell me what you
think I would really appreciate it. My goal here is to try and give
something back to the open source community.

-Ron

 


So where is this website?

-M


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc.
Get Certified Today * Register for a JBoss Training Course
Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005
Visit http://www.jboss.com/services/certification for more information

leaf-user mailing list: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
Support Request -- http://leaf-project.org/


Re: [leaf-user] multiple static ip address router/firewall

2005-07-14 Thread Marko Nurmenniemi

Charles Steinkuehler wrote:


Andrew Nance wrote:

| It is hard to estimate but somewhere around 750 Kbps to 1.5 Mbps total
| bandwidth.

Almost anything fairly modern (ie: Pentium-class PCI based system) 
should be

able to handle this kind of bandwidth.  Even 486 based systems with EISA
cards (should you actually be able to find one) could probably move this
much data around.
- --
Charles Steinkuehler


Testing my brand new set-up couple of years ago I got 700Kbps FTP 
transmissions with two SMC (ISA 10Mbps cards) in our company intranet. 
PC was a 486/50MHz with Bering 1.x from a floppy. It should be 
reasonable close to a ISA maximum?

Processor load was somewhere 20-30% if I remember correctly.

I have had the same machine running next to my ADSL for four years 
now...hey it's only 15 years old, it is supposed to work for another 10 
years atleast!


-M


---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477alloc_id=16492op=click

leaf-user mailing list: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
Support Request -- http://leaf-project.org/


Re: [leaf-user] ANN: Bering-uClibc 2.2.3

2005-02-04 Thread Marko Nurmenniemi
K.-P. Kirchdörfer wrote:
The Bering-uClibc team releases Bering-uClibc 2.2.3 today...
When is the webconf package going to be officially released?
It has been on Beta stage since last year.
-M
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag--drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl

leaf-user mailing list: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


[leaf-user] MSN Messenger + Bering-uClibc

2005-01-24 Thread Marko Nurmenniemi
   Hi,
I have a Bering-uClibc (V2.2.2) installed between me and the internet 
and everything is fine.

but
I have been requested to provide MSN Messenger connection to couple of 
machines with the same firewall protection but not my subnet. The 
problem that we are now facing is this.
It seems that application sharing and whiteboard functions (in Windows 
XP) are non functional. Ausio and video is functional. Skype works also.
Is there previous experience and what was the solution?

The PC that is running the FW is a 486/66 without HDD and I would like 
to keep that noiselevel.

-Marko
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag--drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl

leaf-user mailing list: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


Observation: [leaf-user] Webconf.lrp Beta 3 available

2004-12-05 Thread Marko Nurmenniemi
Nathan Angelacos wrote:
Beta 3 of webconf.lrp for Bering-uClibc is now available.  This version splits 
out the weblet functions from extra plugins.

http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/leaf/devel/nangel/webconf/lrp/webconf.lrp
contains only weblet-like monitoring functions, plus tools to back up the 
modules.  The pretty shorewall logs feature is now included in the 
logfiles.cgi. If its not good enough, or if there are other things that are 
missing, please let me know.

Is the method to switch from/to Basic/Expert taken out in purpose from this?
Link to Home needs to be also in the General section on the left not 
only in the bottom of the right page.

Documentation in 
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/leaf/devel/nangel/webconf/doc/webconf-configuration.html  
needs to mention the location to place the *.lwp packages and the fact 
that not all packages need to be specificly loaded. Some packages are 
automatically found from the /.

-M
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest  candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. 
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


[leaf-user] Weblet + WebConf

2004-11-27 Thread Marko Nurmenniemi
There is a minor problem in using these two tools at the same firewall.
Logging in weblet is unable to draw summaries Pretty Shorewal Logs if 
I delete logs from webconf side.
This seems to be due to...deleting the log-file.Some other functions are 
also miss behaving because of this.

Is there a way to nullify the file content like it is done automatically 
and not to delete it so that logging functions would not suffer?

-M
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest  candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. 
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


Re: [leaf-user] Weblet + WebConf

2004-11-27 Thread Marko Nurmenniemi
Victor McAllister wrote:
Marko Nurmenniemi wrote:
-M
not sure why you delete the logs but what about just
cd /var/log
logfile
That should make logfile an empty file
I'm making trials (running port scans etc.) and logs are filling all of 
my 20MB memory (only ~2MB to logs).
So I deleted the compressed logs to save memory. The way to nullify the 
logs would be needed for the NEW WebConf tool not for console.

-Marko
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest  candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. 
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


Re: [leaf-user] configuring 2 isa cards

2004-08-23 Thread Marko Nurmenniemi
Héctor Hoshi wrote:
Esteemed friends:
I am trying to configure 2 ne isa cards with 0x300,5
and 0x320,11 like io,irq.
No matter I do I did not get up those interfaces.
I am configuring bering uclibc 2.2 with an adsl modem
conection through eth0.
Any idea about how to isolate the trouble then
identify the specific problem ?, How I had to
configure modules to load these cards ?.
Thanks in advance
Héctor
 

the config should go like this
ne io=0x300,0x320 irq=5,11
Have you checked that you have the correct io  irq for those cards?
Is the correct driver in /lib/modules with depencies met?
What messages do you have  in logs/booting?
-M
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33
Save 50% off Retail on Ink  Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift.
http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


[leaf-user] RE: ANN: Bering-uClibc 2.2

2004-08-21 Thread Marko Nurmenniemi
Maybe related to one post earlier but since I'm not sure.
Something broke weblet after the first access. I'm using Mozilla  
Firefox browsers and weblet (main page at 192.168.1.254) was fine when 
used for the first time. Second time all I get is html (but mozilla will 
not display a page from it).
Ie will render the same page from a windows environment.
After boot (Bering that is) it will show the page again but only once.

It's definately not on the client side because I have tested this from 
Win98SE, Win2K  Fedora Core 2 environments with same results.

The subpages seems to work, http://192.168.1.254/cgi-bin/viewsys seems 
fine and works from Mozilla.

-M
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33
Save 50% off Retail on Ink  Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift.
http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


Re: [leaf-user] RE: ANN: Bering-uClibc 2.2

2004-08-21 Thread Marko Nurmenniemi
Martin Hejl wrote:
Hi Marko,
Marko Nurmenniemi wrote:
Something broke weblet after the first access
You're right - what happened was that /etc/sh-httpd.mime was missing 
in sh-httpd.conf, which would explain the issues you're seeing.

There's an updated version of sh-httpd.lrp in CVS, available at:
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/leaf/bin/packages/uclibc-0.9/20/sh-httpd.lrp?rev=HEADcontent-type=application/octet-stream 

but unfortunately, it hasn't yet made it into our packages area at 
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/packages/uclibc-0.9/20/ so we can't update 
the packages web-page yet.

I hope that helps.
Martin
I can confirm that it works.
Just downloaded the sh-www.lrp from the link Martin provided directly 
to floppy (replacing the original) and now after a reboot weblet is fine.

I also added the .../images/blank.gif to the floppy without 
mentionable results. Logs show that 404 error is now gone. I have no 
idea what the 1x2pixel .gif is doing and where...but it is fixable it seems.

-M
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33
Save 50% off Retail on Ink  Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift.
http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


Re: [leaf-user] RFC1483 Bridged llc Connection

2004-05-13 Thread Marko Nurmenniemi
Andrew Gray wrote:

Hello all,

Just a quick query to ask if anyone has connected to ADSL using an
RFC1483 Bridged llc connection.   I have been investigating possible
suppliers of ADSL and one which seems to show promise tells me their
connection is of this type as opposed to a PPPOE connection.   My
searches have not found anything as yet so I just wondered if anyone on
the list could shed some light on the subject for me.
I am currently using Bering uCiblic 2.01 with updates to the latest
version about to happen.
Andrew Gray

I have a adsl with RFC1483 routing, there is nothing to configure in leaf.
No problems so far.
Have been using the same connection with Dachstein, Bering and now with 
Bering uClibc 2.1.

-M

---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: SourceForge.net Broadband
Sign-up now for SourceForge Broadband and get the fastest
6.0/768 connection for only $19.95/mo for the first 3 months!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=2562alloc_id=6184op=click

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


Re: [leaf-user] Re: [leaf-devel] ANN: Bering-uClibc 2.2 beta2

2004-05-11 Thread Marko Nurmenniemi
K.-P. Kirchdörfer wrote:

Due to new linuxrc backupdisk is broken and has been removed. 
With scp and dd support it shouldn't be a problem though - will anyone miss 
this feature? 

 

I will miss it.

Keep it simple for the common people.
Menu option needs no learning and floppies do break from time to time...
-M

---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software
Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola, Ericsson  Lucent use to 
deliver higher performing products faster, at low TCO.
http://www.sleepycat.com/telcomwpreg.php?From=osdnemail3

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


Re: [leaf-user] Is my NIC the bottleneck?

2004-04-15 Thread Marko Nurmenniemi
I have Bering-uClibc 2.1 setup in a 486/66 with 16MB.

With two ISA (SMC 8216C) 10M cards I have a TESTED ~7M/s download speed 
from a company internal FTP server. With 100M connection I was able to 
download (without the FW in the middle) 20M/s. Both tests were done in a 
ethernet network without ADSL.

So this will prove that almost all ADSL speeds can be handled with a 
slow 486 level PC.
PC was actually ICL C4/33V with 25Mhz SX processor and a 66Mhz math 
co-processor.
Std. floppy version used without tweaking.

Home ADSL connection is 1M/512K and I get download speeds of 110K/s 
normally from university servers near me

-Marko

Peter Nosko wrote:

pn] Thanks, all.  I'm ashamed that I was unable to do
that math myself.
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 

Do you run your DSL modem as a modem only, or does
it do DHCP, DNS and firewall as well?
   

pn] Not sure what you mean (do DSL modems do all
that?).  My LEAF boxes do the DHCP, DNS and firewall
(and good 'ole routing).
pn] Hey Charles, E2B is still solid.  ;)



---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470alloc_id=3638op=click

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


Re: [leaf-user] Playing games through Dachstein

2004-03-18 Thread Marko Nurmenniemi
Arnold Wiegert wrote:

Hi,

two of my sons, one at home with his machine behind a Dachstein 
firewall, the other on the other side of the firewall, somewhere on 
the net, want to play a role playing game over the internet.

I've run the firewall for some time, but am still a newbie in many 
respects.

I'm looking for a way to let them play, while keeping up the firewall, 
but am not at all sure how to do it.

Any suggestions would be most welcome and if I need to provide more 
specifics, please let me know. At this point I'm not sure what might 
or might not be relevant :-(

Arnold

At the very minimum the game they are using needs to be indentified
.
Also please provide portion of the log (from weblet in your firewall) 
which shows the game being tried. This will show the ports it tries to use.

---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470alloc_id=3638op=click

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


Re: [leaf-user] Does ne.o work with Bering Uclib?

2004-03-17 Thread Marko Nurmenniemi
Tim Wegner wrote:

Ah so, the solution is to load the crc32 module before the 8390 
module. This is probably a FAQ that I missed, but if not, this would 
be a good thing to add to the installation docs since it's a 
difference from Bering,

 

It's not in the FAQ. but it is in the dependencies list.

In my case it changed somewhere around uClibc 2.
When previously I had 8390.o and smc-ultra.o
Now it is
crc32.o, 8390.o  smc-ultra.o
-M

---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470alloc_id=3638op=click

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


[leaf-user] Resetting logs from weblet

2004-03-04 Thread Marko Nurmenniemi
What does it require to be able to reset the logs to zero from weblet?
What kind of scripting is needed?
The purpose would be to enable the user to erase the logs after they are 
seen.

I'm using std. Bering-uClibc 2.1 rc2 (but will soon move to 
Bering-uClibc 2.1)

-Marko

---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470alloc_id=3638op=click

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


[leaf-user] Bering-uClibc 2.1 rc1 (Typo in logs)

2004-01-21 Thread Marko Nurmenniemi
   Hi,

In Firewall Status windows at
http://192.168.1.254/cgi-bin/checkfw?verbose
There is a typo on the last text line which says
Or check the hits sorted by port or by IP adress I believe the correct 
spelling is address?

-M



---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


[leaf-user] Bering-uClibc 2.1 rc1 (messages log)

2004-01-19 Thread Marko Nurmenniemi
   Hi,

I had a freeze on the system ten minutes ago and found this on the 
logs...firewall and the connection was OK after a minute or so. No 
booting or any other measures needed.

My connection is blasted with some traffic, there are 1623 denied or 
rejected packets in logs and FW has been up for three days now. At the 
time of this log I was accessing the shorewall.log from weblet.

Is there something that interests the developers?
Do you need additional info?
(http://192.168.1.254/cgi-bin/viewlogs?messages.3.gz+messages.2.gz+messages.1.gz+messages.0+messages)
 LOG **
Jan 19 12:40:54 firewall -- MARK --
Jan 19 16:40:54 firewall -- MARK --
Jan 19 20:40:54 firewall -- MARK --
Jan 20 00:01:10 firewall kernel: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation 
failed (gfp=0x1d2/0)
Jan 20 00:01:17 firewall last message repeated 17 times
Jan 20 00:01:17 firewall kernel: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation 
failed (gfp=0x1f0/0)
Jan 20 00:01:17 firewall kernel: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation 
failed (gfp=0x1d2/0)
Jan 20 00:01:18 firewall last message repeated 2 times
Jan 20 00:01:19 firewall kernel: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation 
failed (gfp=0x1f0/0)
Jan 20 00:01:20 firewall kernel: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation 
failed (gfp=0x1f0/0)
Jan 20 00:01:21 firewall kernel: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation 
failed (gfp=0x1d2/0)
Jan 20 00:01:22 firewall kernel: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation 
failed (gfp=0x1d2/0)
Jan 20 00:01:25 firewall kernel: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation 
failed (gfp=0x1f0/0)
Jan 20 00:01:25 firewall kernel: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation 
failed (gfp=0x1d2/0)
Jan 20 00:01:25 firewall kernel: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation 
failed (gfp=0x1d2/0)
Jan 20 00:01:25 firewall kernel: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation 
failed (gfp=0x1f0/0)
Jan 20 00:01:25 firewall kernel: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation 
failed (gfp=0x1d2/0)
Jan 20 00:01:27 firewall kernel: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation 
failed (gfp=0x1f0/0)
Jan 20 00:01:27 firewall kernel: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation 
failed (gfp=0x1d2/0)
Jan 20 00:01:27 firewall kernel: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation 
failed (gfp=0x1f0/0)
Jan 20 00:01:27 firewall kernel: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation 
failed (gfp=0x1f0/0)
Jan 20 00:01:27 firewall kernel: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation 
failed (gfp=0x1d2/0)
Jan 20 00:01:27 firewall kernel: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation 
failed (gfp=0x1d2/0)
Jan 20 00:01:27 firewall kernel: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation 
failed (gfp=0x1f0/0)
Jan 20 00:01:27 firewall kernel: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation 
failed (gfp=0x1f0/0)
Jan 20 00:01:27 firewall kernel: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation 
failed (gfp=0x1d2/0)
Jan 20 00:01:27 firewall kernel: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation 
failed (gfp=0x1f0/0)
Jan 20 00:01:27 firewall kernel: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation 
failed (gfp=0x1f0/0)
Jan 20 00:01:27 firewall kernel: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation 
failed (gfp=0x1d2/0)
Jan 20 00:01:27 firewall kernel: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation 
failed (gfp=0x1d2/0)
Jan 20 00:01:27 firewall kernel: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation 
failed (gfp=0x1f0/0)
Jan 20 00:01:27 firewall kernel: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation 
failed (gfp=0x1d2/0)
Jan 20 00:01:29 firewall last message repeated 4 times
Jan 20 00:01:29 firewall kernel: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation 
failed (gfp=0x1f0/0)
Jan 20 00:01:29 firewall kernel: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation 
failed (gfp=0x1d2/0)
Jan 20 00:01:33 firewall last message repeated 8 times
Jan 20 00:01:36 firewall kernel: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation 
failed (gfp=0x1f0/0)
Jan 20 00:01:36 firewall kernel: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation 
failed (gfp=0x1d2/0)
Jan 20 00:01:36 firewall kernel: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation 
failed (gfp=0x1f0/0)
Jan 20 00:01:36 firewall kernel: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation 
failed (gfp=0x1d2/0)
Jan 20 00:01:36 firewall kernel: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation 
failed (gfp=0x1f0/0)
Jan 20 00:01:36 firewall kernel: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation 
failed (gfp=0x1d2/0)
Jan 20 00:01:36 firewall kernel: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation 
failed (gfp=0x1d2/0)
Jan 20 00:01:36 firewall kernel: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation 
failed (gfp=0x1f0/0)
Jan 20 00:01:36 firewall kernel: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation 
failed (gfp=0x1f0/0)
Jan 20 00:01:36 firewall kernel: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation 
failed (gfp=0x1d2/0)
Jan 20 00:01:40 firewall last message repeated 4 times
Jan 20 00:01:40 firewall kernel: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation 
failed (gfp=0x1f0/0)
Jan 20 00:01:40 firewall kernel: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation 
failed (gfp=0x1d2/0)
Jan 20 00:01:40 firewall kernel: __alloc_pages: 0-order



---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn

Re: [leaf-user] ANN: Bering-uClibc 2.1-rc1

2004-01-15 Thread Marko Nurmenniemi
K.-P. Kirchdörfer wrote:

Today, January 15th 2004, the Bering-uClibc team releases
Bering-uClibc 2.1-rc1
As usual it can be downloaded from the FRS area:
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=13751package_id=67534
 

I downloaded the image and modules with Netscape 7.1 and noticed odd 
behaviour.
I have the mirror location set to heanet (IE) and so the modules 
download is automatically started.
The problem comes when downloading starts and Netscape asks where to 
place the file. It automatically assings a file type of
x.tar.gz.TAR.
tar.gz is ok but what is the last TAR for? Is this the problem of 
Netscape or sourceforge?

Download is normal if manual download is selected (no Preferred Mirror 
is set).

-M



---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


[leaf-user] Bering-uClibc 2.0 RC 3 Weblet trouble

2003-11-16 Thread Marko Nurmenniemi
Is anyone else seeing the Weblet problem I'm having with the cgi not
finding the scripts?
I'm getting 404 Not Found, File not found: /cgi-bin/add_any_query_here
on scripts that are trying to access firewall statistic on the RC 3 Bering.
The statuslights are also not shown in the 192.168.1.254 view.
I have the std image with two changes.
1. dhcpd is giving addresses to internal network.
2. smc-ultra network cards with smc.ultra.o driver from the previous RC
(and the needed 8390.o) are handling the internal and external traffic.
Bering is run from a floppy drive by a 486/33MHz PC with 20M memory.

Traffic goes through without problems so far only problem is that
none of the logs are available from the Weblet.
I have done this two times now with same results.
Previous working version was the Bering-uClibc 2.0 Beta 3. I have been
running this since it was released.
I extracted the disk form the windows .exe at 
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=13751

-M

BTW. If this is double post for someone, I posted this earlier but the 
address was on the CC field and the post didn't show up on the 
SourceForge mailing list archive so I'm now re-posting it.



---
This SF. Net email is sponsored by: GoToMyPC
GoToMyPC is the fast, easy and secure way to access your computer from
any Web browser or wireless device. Click here to Try it Free!
https://www.gotomypc.com/tr/OSDN/AW/Q4_2003/t/g22lp?Target=mm/g22lp.tmpl

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html