[leaf-user] IPSec errors, kernel/userland version mismatch?

2007-03-30 Thread James Neave
Hi,

I've been asked to add VPN capabilities to our router here at work.
It's currently Bering-uClibc 2.3.1.

I keep getting this error in the /var/secure log when starting up or
connecting to the VPN:

Connecting:
ERROR: L2TP-PSK[2] 5.6.7.8 #3: pfkey write() of SADB_ADD message 5 for
Add SA [EMAIL PROTECTED] failed. Errno 22: Invalid argument

Starting the service:
ipsec_setup: /usr/lib/ipsec/eroute: pfkey write failed, returning -1
with errno=22.
ipsec_setup: Invalid argument, check kernel log messages for specifics.

All I can find with Google is that this suggests a kernel
module/userland tools version mismatch.

gateway# uname -r
2.4.31
gateway# ipsec --version
Linux Openswan U2.4.5/K1.0.9 (klips)
See `ipsec --copyright' for copyright information.

Erm, I *guess* that's a version mismatch. If it is, where can I grab
ipsec.lrp version 2.4.31?

Or is the version of the kernel not the same as the version of its
modules?

Regards,

James.

The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.  
It is intended solely for the addressee.  Access to this email by anyone else 
is unauthorised.

If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or 
any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it is prohibited and may 
be unlawful.

The contents of an attachment to this email may contain software viruses that 
could damage your own computer systems.  Whilst The Spur Group of Companies has 
taken every precaution to minimise the risk, we cannot accept liability for any 
damage that you sustain as a result of software viruses.


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV

leaf-user mailing list: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
Support Request -- http://leaf-project.org/


Re: [leaf-user] IPSec errors, kernel/userland version mismatch?

2007-03-30 Thread James Neave
 connecting from any IP address:
193.175.198.98 %any: PSK  MySecretKey 
# (Line above only works on recent versions of Openswan).

# There is a subtle difference with the following
# (see also 'man ipsec.secrets') which affects NATed
# clients that use a PSK:
193.175.198.98 : PSK MySecretKey



 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:leaf-user-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James Neave
 Sent: 30 March 2007 12:55
 To: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 Subject: [leaf-user] IPSec errors, kernel/userland version mismatch?
 
 Hi,
 
 I've been asked to add VPN capabilities to our router here at work.
 It's currently Bering-uClibc 2.3.1.
 
 I keep getting this error in the /var/secure log when starting up or
 connecting to the VPN:
 
 Connecting:
 ERROR: L2TP-PSK[2] 5.6.7.8 #3: pfkey write() of SADB_ADD message 5
for
 Add SA [EMAIL PROTECTED] failed. Errno 22: Invalid argument
 
 Starting the service:
 ipsec_setup: /usr/lib/ipsec/eroute: pfkey write failed, returning -1
 with errno=22.
 ipsec_setup: Invalid argument, check kernel log messages for
specifics.
 
 All I can find with Google is that this suggests a kernel
 module/userland tools version mismatch.
 
 gateway# uname -r
 2.4.31
 gateway# ipsec --version
 Linux Openswan U2.4.5/K1.0.9 (klips)
 See `ipsec --copyright' for copyright information.
 
 Erm, I *guess* that's a version mismatch. If it is, where can I grab
 ipsec.lrp version 2.4.31?
 
 Or is the version of the kernel not the same as the version of its
 modules?
 
 Regards,
 
 James.
 
 The information in this email is confidential and may be legally
 privileged.  It is intended solely for the addressee.  Access to this
 email by anyone else is unauthorised.
 
 If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
 distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on
it
 is prohibited and may be unlawful.
 
 The contents of an attachment to this email may contain software
viruses
 that could damage your own computer systems.  Whilst The Spur Group of
 Companies has taken every precaution to minimise the risk, we cannot
 accept liability for any damage that you sustain as a result of
software
 viruses.
 
 


-
 Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
 Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
share
 your
 opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash

http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDE
V


 leaf-user mailing list: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
 Support Request -- http://leaf-project.org/

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV

leaf-user mailing list: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
Support Request -- http://leaf-project.org/


Re: [Leaf-user] ipsec errors

2002-03-09 Thread joey officer

i did not find that specific line in the net ipfilter list command, however
I did change the setting in the networ.conf file.  however I still did not
find that line in the above command.  I got to thinking about the specific
problem i'm having and thought I might try to give a little more information
.. here goes

the machines are mostly stock dachstein, running udhcpd (instead of
dhcpd/dhclient), w/ slightly modified subnets.  Both machines are routing as
designed, and all machines can ping the other gateway, internet is working
fine).  Although the ip address for each gateway is dynamic, they have
stayed the same for atleast the last 2 months, so I have based my works on
the assumed fact that these IPs will stay the same for a while longer.  At
any rate, for testing purpose they have stayed the same.

subnet-home--home-internet-office--subnet-of
fice
192.168.3.0/2466.25.44.147-66.25.18.71192.168.1.0/24

IPSec loads without any noticable errors, except something out abour
rp_filter should be 0, but reads 1 (or vice versa).  If I understand
correclty, once both machines are at this point I could ping the office
subnet from the home subnet, and the opposite, however this does not work.
So then I tried ' ipsec auto --up office ' .. and then this just hangs.
sits for awhile (reading the logs says something about itializing office on
MAIN).  After a minute or so, I ctrl-break this and am unable to go any
further.

Thats about where I am .. and am stuck...

joey


- Original Message -
From: Charles Steinkuehler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; LRP Support
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 5:46 PM
Subject: Re: [Leaf-user] ipsec errors


  Where do I check to see if protocol 50 packets are being allowed
through?
  I'll be working more on it this weekend.. I'd really like to get this
  working so I'll try just about anything.. even possibly step/by/step
 support
  via phone (I'd beg someone to call my 800 number for a little
 assistance...

 The primary source is the output of net ipfilter list, which shows you
 exactly how your firewall rules are setup.  You're looking for a line
 allowing protocol 50, preferrably with non-zero byte/packet counts:

 1843  356K ACCEPT 50   -- 0xFF 0x00  eth0 snip

 You open protocol 50 traffic with the following in network.conf:
 EXTERN_PROTO0=50 0/0

 Of course, you can change the 0/0 (the entire internet) to the address (or
 network) of your remote VPN link, if it's static.

 Charles Steinkuehler
 http://lrp.steinkuehler.net
 http://c0wz.steinkuehler.net (lrp.c0wz.com mirror)


 ___
 Leaf-user mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



Re: [Leaf-user] ipsec errors

2002-03-09 Thread Upnet Joe

yes u gota problem Sir:
now u do this:
echo 1  /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/eth0/rp_filter
echo 0  /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/ipsec0/rp_filter

then:
ipsec setup --restart

I don't know how u setup your /etc/ipsec.conf... if u have it auto=add line
to your conn.. then ready to go.. u almost there...


good luck

Upnet Joe.
- Original Message -
from: joey officer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Charles Steinkuehler [EMAIL PROTECTED]; LRP Support
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2002 11:21 AM
Subject: Re: [Leaf-user] ipsec errors


 i did not find that specific line in the net ipfilter list command,
however
 I did change the setting in the networ.conf file.  however I still did not
 find that line in the above command.  I got to thinking about the specific
 problem i'm having and thought I might try to give a little more
information
 .. here goes

 the machines are mostly stock dachstein, running udhcpd (instead of
 dhcpd/dhclient), w/ slightly modified subnets.  Both machines are routing
as
 designed, and all machines can ping the other gateway, internet is working
 fine).  Although the ip address for each gateway is dynamic, they have
 stayed the same for atleast the last 2 months, so I have based my works on
 the assumed fact that these IPs will stay the same for a while longer.  At
 any rate, for testing purpose they have stayed the same.


subnet-home--home-internet-office--subnet-of
 fice

192.168.3.0/2466.25.44.147-66.25.18.71192.168.1.0/24

 IPSec loads without any noticable errors, except something out abour
 rp_filter should be 0, but reads 1 (or vice versa).  If I understand
 correclty, once both machines are at this point I could ping the office
 subnet from the home subnet, and the opposite, however this does not work.
 So then I tried ' ipsec auto --up office ' .. and then this just hangs.
 sits for awhile (reading the logs says something about itializing office
on
 MAIN).  After a minute or so, I ctrl-break this and am unable to go any
 further.

 Thats about where I am .. and am stuck...

 joey


 - Original Message -
 From: Charles Steinkuehler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; LRP Support
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 5:46 PM
 Subject: Re: [Leaf-user] ipsec errors


   Where do I check to see if protocol 50 packets are being allowed
 through?
   I'll be working more on it this weekend.. I'd really like to get this
   working so I'll try just about anything.. even possibly step/by/step
  support
   via phone (I'd beg someone to call my 800 number for a little
  assistance...
 
  The primary source is the output of net ipfilter list, which shows you
  exactly how your firewall rules are setup.  You're looking for a line
  allowing protocol 50, preferrably with non-zero byte/packet counts:
 
  1843  356K ACCEPT 50   -- 0xFF 0x00  eth0 snip
 
  You open protocol 50 traffic with the following in network.conf:
  EXTERN_PROTO0=50 0/0
 
  Of course, you can change the 0/0 (the entire internet) to the address
(or
  network) of your remote VPN link, if it's static.
 
  Charles Steinkuehler
  http://lrp.steinkuehler.net
  http://c0wz.steinkuehler.net (lrp.c0wz.com mirror)
 
 
  ___
  Leaf-user mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
 


 ___
 Leaf-user mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user


___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



Re: [Leaf-user] ipsec errors

2002-03-09 Thread joey officer

i did the below, and restarted ipsec, and got an error about eth0, so i
changed it back, then I started scanning the /var/log/syslog and noticed
that port 500 was being denied :

Mar 9 14:46:43 firewall kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0 PROTO=17
66.25.18.71:500 66.25.44.147:500 L=204 S=0x00 I=31 F=0x T=62 (#41)

now I modifed was able to get this to stop being denied on one side, but I
cannot do it on the home side.  I have a feeling I am just one step away,
can someone push me in the right direction...

joey

- Original Message -
From: Charles Steinkuehler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; LRP Support
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 5:46 PM
Subject: Re: [Leaf-user] ipsec errors


  Where do I check to see if protocol 50 packets are being allowed
through?
  I'll be working more on it this weekend.. I'd really like to get this
  working so I'll try just about anything.. even possibly step/by/step
 support
  via phone (I'd beg someone to call my 800 number for a little
 assistance...

 The primary source is the output of net ipfilter list, which shows you
 exactly how your firewall rules are setup.  You're looking for a line
 allowing protocol 50, preferrably with non-zero byte/packet counts:

 1843  356K ACCEPT 50   -- 0xFF 0x00  eth0 snip

 You open protocol 50 traffic with the following in network.conf:
 EXTERN_PROTO0=50 0/0

 Of course, you can change the 0/0 (the entire internet) to the address (or
 network) of your remote VPN link, if it's static.

 Charles Steinkuehler
 http://lrp.steinkuehler.net
 http://c0wz.steinkuehler.net (lrp.c0wz.com mirror)


 ___
 Leaf-user mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



Re: [Leaf-user] ipsec errors

2002-03-09 Thread guitarlynn

On Saturday 09 March 2002 10:21, joey officer wrote:
 i did not find that specific line in the net ipfilter list command,
 however I did change the setting in the networ.conf file.  however I
 still did not find that line in the above command.  I got to thinking
 about the specific problem i'm having and thought I might try to give
 a little more information .. here goes

 IPSec loads without any noticable errors, except something out abour
 rp_filter should be 0, but reads 1 (or vice versa).  If I understand
 correclty, once both machines are at this point I could ping the
 office subnet from the home subnet, and the opposite, however this
 does not work. So then I tried ' ipsec auto --up office ' .. and then
 this just hangs. sits for awhile (reading the logs says something
 about itializing office on MAIN).  After a minute or so, I ctrl-break
 this and am unable to go any further.


The rp_filter has to do with the network.conf setup, turn off 
eth0_IPSPOOF to fix this. 

ipsec barf will check the connection attempt(s) and give you any
errors there. Also, did you add leftfirewall=yes and 
rightfirewall=yes assuming these boxes are both being run with 
fiter=firewall or router. 

Personally, it sounds like the RSA authentication problem. 
ipsec barf or cat /var/log/auth.log should show the point 
of failure.

-- 

~Lynn Avants
aka Guitarlynn

guitarlynn at users.sourceforge.net
http://leaf.sourceforge.net

If linux isn't the answer, you've probably got the wrong question!

___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



Re: [Leaf-user] ipsec errors

2002-03-09 Thread joey officer

I modified the eth0_IP_SPOOF=NO  now, but that does not fix the error of
being denied.. which I posted a little while ago...

any other thoughts
joey

- Original Message -
From: guitarlynn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: joey officer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2002 6:21 PM
Subject: Re: [Leaf-user] ipsec errors


 On Saturday 09 March 2002 10:21, joey officer wrote:
  i did not find that specific line in the net ipfilter list command,
  however I did change the setting in the networ.conf file.  however I
  still did not find that line in the above command.  I got to thinking
  about the specific problem i'm having and thought I might try to give
  a little more information .. here goes

  IPSec loads without any noticable errors, except something out abour
  rp_filter should be 0, but reads 1 (or vice versa).  If I understand
  correclty, once both machines are at this point I could ping the
  office subnet from the home subnet, and the opposite, however this
  does not work. So then I tried ' ipsec auto --up office ' .. and then
  this just hangs. sits for awhile (reading the logs says something
  about itializing office on MAIN).  After a minute or so, I ctrl-break
  this and am unable to go any further.


 The rp_filter has to do with the network.conf setup, turn off
 eth0_IPSPOOF to fix this.

 ipsec barf will check the connection attempt(s) and give you any
 errors there. Also, did you add leftfirewall=yes and
 rightfirewall=yes assuming these boxes are both being run with
 fiter=firewall or router.

 Personally, it sounds like the RSA authentication problem.
 ipsec barf or cat /var/log/auth.log should show the point
 of failure.

 --

 ~Lynn Avants
 aka Guitarlynn

 guitarlynn at users.sourceforge.net
 http://leaf.sourceforge.net

 If linux isn't the answer, you've probably got the wrong question!

 ___
 Leaf-user mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



Re: [Leaf-user] ipsec errors

2002-03-08 Thread Charles Steinkuehler

 can someone point out the obvious mistake that I have made..

How about starting with:

 Mar 8 13:25:08 firewall ipsec__plutorun: ipsec_auto: fatal error in
 office: (/etc/ipsec.conf, line 25) duplicated parameter auto
 Mar 8 13:25:08 firewall ipsec__plutorun: ipsec_auto: fatal error in
shop:
 (/etc/ipsec.conf, line 39) duplicated parameter auto

...and...

 conn office
snip
 auto=add
 auto=start

Try with just *ONE* auto= line and see what you get...

Charles Steinkuehler
http://lrp.steinkuehler.net
http://c0wz.steinkuehler.net (lrp.c0wz.com mirror)


___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



RE: [Leaf-user] ipsec errors

2002-03-08 Thread Joey Officer

Ok, I've modified the config and am no longer getting any errors, however I
cannot get to the other machine.  I've tried to ping, and also tried to do a

traceroute -i eth0 -f 20 192.168.1.1

and have gotten only the * * * as output from the traceroute.  At anyrate..
I'm not seeing any erros, and am wondering if there is something I am
missing... any thoughts...

joey


-Original Message-
From: Charles Steinkuehler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 12:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; LRP Support
Subject: Re: [Leaf-user] ipsec errors

 can someone point out the obvious mistake that I have made..

How about starting with:

 Mar 8 13:25:08 firewall ipsec__plutorun: ipsec_auto: fatal error in
 office: (/etc/ipsec.conf, line 25) duplicated parameter auto
 Mar 8 13:25:08 firewall ipsec__plutorun: ipsec_auto: fatal error in
shop:
 (/etc/ipsec.conf, line 39) duplicated parameter auto

...and...

 conn office
snip
 auto=add
 auto=start

Try with just *ONE* auto= line and see what you get...

Charles Steinkuehler
http://lrp.steinkuehler.net
http://c0wz.steinkuehler.net (lrp.c0wz.com mirror)


___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



Re: [Leaf-user] ipsec errors

2002-03-08 Thread Charles Steinkuehler

 Ok, I've modified the config and am no longer getting any errors, however
I
 cannot get to the other machine.  I've tried to ping, and also tried to do
a

 traceroute -i eth0 -f 20 192.168.1.1

 and have gotten only the * * * as output from the traceroute.  At
anyrate..
 I'm not seeing any erros, and am wondering if there is something I am
 missing... any thoughts...

Check the output of ipsec look, and make sure you're allowing protocol 50
packets through the firewall.  If you only allow the UDP keying traffic, the
tunnels will get put in place, but the data packets (protocol 50) won't get
through, so no traffic can flow...

Charles Steinkuehler
http://lrp.steinkuehler.net
http://c0wz.steinkuehler.net (lrp.c0wz.com mirror)


___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



RE: [Leaf-user] ipsec errors

2002-03-08 Thread Joey Officer

Where do I check to see if protocol 50 packets are being allowed through?
I'll be working more on it this weekend.. I'd really like to get this
working so I'll try just about anything.. even possibly step/by/step support
via phone (I'd beg someone to call my 800 number for a little assistance...

Joey


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Charles
Steinkuehler
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 4:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; LRP Support
Subject: Re: [Leaf-user] ipsec errors

 Ok, I've modified the config and am no longer getting any errors, however
I
 cannot get to the other machine.  I've tried to ping, and also tried to do
a

 traceroute -i eth0 -f 20 192.168.1.1

 and have gotten only the * * * as output from the traceroute.  At
anyrate..
 I'm not seeing any erros, and am wondering if there is something I am
 missing... any thoughts...

Check the output of ipsec look, and make sure you're allowing protocol 50
packets through the firewall.  If you only allow the UDP keying traffic, the
tunnels will get put in place, but the data packets (protocol 50) won't get
through, so no traffic can flow...

Charles Steinkuehler
http://lrp.steinkuehler.net
http://c0wz.steinkuehler.net (lrp.c0wz.com mirror)


___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user


___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



Re: [Leaf-user] ipsec errors

2002-03-08 Thread William Brinkman

All,

If I remember correctly, and please correct me if I am
wrong, the documentation with the ipsec lrp with the
Dachstein CD says that using the leftfirewall=yes or
rightfirewall=yes will automatically append the
scripts to allow protocol 50 through.  If I remember
from the first post, the office connection had the
left and rightfirewall commented out.

Just another thought - Bill

--- Charles Steinkuehler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
  Where do I check to see if protocol 50 packets are
 being allowed through?
  I'll be working more on it this weekend.. I'd
 really like to get this
  working so I'll try just about anything.. even
 possibly step/by/step
 support
  via phone (I'd beg someone to call my 800 number
 for a little
 assistance...
 
 The primary source is the output of net ipfilter
 list, which shows you
 exactly how your firewall rules are setup.  You're
 looking for a line
 allowing protocol 50, preferrably with non-zero
 byte/packet counts:
 
 1843  356K ACCEPT 50   -- 0xFF 0x00  eth0
 snip
 
 You open protocol 50 traffic with the following in
 network.conf:
 EXTERN_PROTO0=50 0/0
 
 Of course, you can change the 0/0 (the entire
 internet) to the address (or
 network) of your remote VPN link, if it's static.
 
 Charles Steinkuehler
 http://lrp.steinkuehler.net
 http://c0wz.steinkuehler.net (lrp.c0wz.com mirror)
 
 
 ___
 Leaf-user mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email!
http://mail.yahoo.com/

___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



[Leaf-user] IPSEC ERRORS

2002-02-09 Thread malik menzong

Hi everyone.
I am using Oxygen 1.8.0 and I am trying to configure ipsec on it. since the 
ipsec module i have is too big (494K) to put on a disk. I have two ways of 
actually mounting it:
I either load the cd and pick the option that load ipsec tools or I copy the 
ipsec pkg on a floppy and then I mount it once I have my router up.
Few error that I keep on getting:
when I type: ipsec auto --up trial
I get: whack: Pluto is not running (no /var/run/pluto.ctl)
I dont think that I need a seperate package for pluto. That is not what the 
Freeswan doc says.

when boot from cd, I type: ipsec setup --status
I get: ipsec is running but... no pluto running!
/var/run/ipsec.info missing

that is even when i boot with the cd.

with the cd booting also I get:
/usr/local/ipsec/klipsdebug:trouble opening PF_KEY family socket with ERROR: 
unknown file open error 97

Another question is that is it necessary that I modify my Kernel to include 
KLIPS. I did not think so since I am using ipsec as a package 
(ipsec509.lrp). But I might be wrong.

Thanks for any help




_
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com


___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user