Re: [leaf-user] Cable Modem speeds with Bering-uClibc

2007-03-03 Thread Andrew Haninger
On 2/27/07, George Metz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Motorola modems seem to, occasionally, have an issue with a connection
 that can't autodetect on the other end. In the example I gave, if I let
 my PC autodetect, it comes up at 100BaseTX full duplex, and everything
 works great. If I force settings to 100BaseTX full duplex, and don't let
 the modem autonegotiate with the PC, it runs like a slug in molasses,
 traveling uphill.
Well, I recently found my 3c5x9cfg.exe/FreeDOS bootfloppy and popped
it into a PC with a couple of the cards from my old 486 LEAF box.

First of all, it appears that I was mistaken about the cards that I
had. There were three 3C509's and only one 3C509B. This made no
difference before, so I hadn't paid any attention.

I ran one of the 3C509's and the 3C509B card through the config
utility. The 3C509 had no option for full duplex or Plug and Play
whereas the 3C509B had an option for both, as expected. Plug and Play
was disabled and Full Duplex was enabled. Probably putting the modem
on the 3C509B card would have made a difference.

I'll probably mess around with this a bit more over this weekend but
just end up keeping the 486 as a backup.

I'll write again when I find out whether or not using the B card makes
any difference so that people in my situation will have some other
options besides replacing their othewise-working box.

Andy

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV

leaf-user mailing list: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
Support Request -- http://leaf-project.org/


Re: [leaf-user] Cable Modem speeds with Bering-uClibc

2007-02-27 Thread George Metz


Andrew Haninger wrote:
 On 2/26/07, George Metz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Any number of things could cause that. My concern is, sometimes
 Motorolas don't handle forced duplex settings well, and sometimes
 half-duplex will make things problematic to begin with.

 Okay, more of my confusion: Why would setting the duplex on the card
 with the 3Com software be any different from setting it with ethtool?
 Is setting it on the card cleaner?

Nope, just me not making myself very clear. :)

Motorola modems seem to, occasionally, have an issue with a connection 
that can't autodetect on the other end. In the example I gave, if I let 
my PC autodetect, it comes up at 100BaseTX full duplex, and everything 
works great. If I force settings to 100BaseTX full duplex, and don't let 
the modem autonegotiate with the PC, it runs like a slug in molasses, 
traveling uphill.

 It has solved the problem, pretty much. Speeds are much, much better and:
 

snip!

 No errors!
 Thanks, everyone! (Sorry for being a pain in the ass.)

Excellent, and no worries, glad you've got good speeds going on. :)

George

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV

leaf-user mailing list: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
Support Request -- http://leaf-project.org/


Re: [leaf-user] Cable Modem speeds with Bering-uClibc

2007-02-26 Thread Tony
Exactly Bob, and this was why Andrew, I suggested using the DOS utility
to force half-duplex, full duplex with testing performed each time.

And as far as the networking terms go, errors = bad.  Pretty simple.  As
you can see with your test, every one of those errors are overruns.

3: eth0: BROADCAST,MULTICAST,NOTRAILERS,UP mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast
qlen 1000
   link/ether 00:20:af:17:57:b2 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff

   RX: bytes  packets  errors  dropped overrun mcast
   741077003  1773743  18161   0   18161   0
   TX: bytes  packets  errors  dropped carrier collsns
   438580149  852431   0   0   219 2150

4: eth1: BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000
   link/ether 00:20:af:3f:53:d4 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff

   RX: bytes  packets  errors  dropped overrun mcast
   440479032  855735   42710   42710
   TX: bytes  packets  errors  dropped carrier collsns
   680103683  783492   0   0   0   4193

Andrew, you've spent this much time with this, what's another 20 minutes
with the DOS utility (which was designed for that card) to change the
settings?

Tony





Bob Coffman Jr - Info From Data wrote:
 One thing to check is that your NICs are negotiating duplex properly.  


 -
 Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
 Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
 opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
 http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
 
 leaf-user mailing list: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
 Support Request -- http://leaf-project.org/

   


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV

leaf-user mailing list: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
Support Request -- http://leaf-project.org/


Re: [leaf-user] Cable Modem speeds with Bering-uClibc

2007-02-26 Thread Bob Coffman Jr - Info From Data
I half understand duplex (don't bother explaining it - I'll look it up for
myself) but I don't understand how duplex could be negotiated improperly?

I speak from experience!  I had EXACTLY the same problem, Internet was slow
through the Leaf box, directly connected PC bypassing the router, it was
fast.  But in testing (ie Leaf not connected to cable modem) it was fast.
It was an older box, like yours, with older cards, like yours, and it turned
out that duplex was negotiated incorrectly.  Once I solved that, it was
fine.

- Bob  


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV

leaf-user mailing list: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
Support Request -- http://leaf-project.org/


Re: [leaf-user] Cable Modem speeds with Bering-uClibc

2007-02-26 Thread George Metz
Andrew Haninger wrote:
 I half understand duplex (don't bother explaining it - I'll look it up
 for myself) but I don't understand how duplex could be negotiated
 improperly?

Any number of things could cause that. My concern is, sometimes 
Motorolas don't handle forced duplex settings well, and sometimes 
half-duplex will make things problematic to begin with.

Example: I have an SB5120. I was testing my father's rather old Wireless 
B Linksys router because he was getting constant network drops on his 
DSL. I hooked it up, and it ran okay, but I saw some of the same drops. 
Upgraded the firmware to the latest and greatest, and suddenly there's a 
dropdown to configure it for 10 or 100, full or half, but no autodetect. 
So, since my downstream is 30Mbit/sec, I set it to 100 Full... and it 
started running like a slug. 100 Half didn't help any either.

So I hooked up my PC to the modem direct, and discovered that the SB5120 
doesn't like forced duplex modes. 100 Full and Half ran like a slug, but 
autodetect would configure for 100 full and it ran like a champ. So, 
it's possible that you've got a similar problem. The difficulty in 
determining that is that it could just be the firmware on my modem that 
caused that, and every cable provider does their own firmware releases.

You can always try connecting the laptop and forcing 10 full and 10 half 
to see if the performance is similar to what you're getting out of the 
LEAF box. If you are, then the problem is that the modem doesn't like 
the forced settings. If not, then it's probably something on either the 
cards or the motherboard.

Out of curiosity, have you tried switching which card is connected 
where? In other words, Eth0 internal and Eth1 external?

 For what it's worth, I've acquired a replacement box that has PCI
 slots in it and I'll set up my LEAF box with 3c905's (10/100) which
 should (hopefully) solve the problem.

Probably will. I myself had switched over to 3c905Cs when I finally got 
rid of the 486 system.

George

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV

leaf-user mailing list: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
Support Request -- http://leaf-project.org/


Re: [leaf-user] Cable Modem speeds with Bering-uClibc

2007-02-25 Thread Izzy Blacklock
Andrew Haninger wrote:

Hello.

I'm using Bering-uClibc (not sure which version since the box is
headless) with Linux 2.4.32. It's running on a 486 with four 3c509's
in it. One is connected to a Motorola Surfboard 4200 cable modem.

When I get online with my Windows laptop using my LEAF box as a
gateway, my downloads are poor (50-60kB/s) but when I connect my
Windows laptop directly to the modem, they are more reasonable
(200-400kB/s). Before I cry to my Internet provider, I'd like to
eliminate my system from the list of possible problems.

I've used this exact same 486 in a different setup where it was
actually a router behind another commercial router which was connected
to a cable modem with much better speeds.

When connecting the modem directly to my laptop, I notice that I get
an IP address from a completely different network range than what my
LEAF box gets. When I plug my LEAF box back in, it gets the same IP
address as it had before. I've tried changing the MAC address of my
eth0 adapter to the MAC address of my laptop's ethernet adapter and
then my LEAF box gets the same IP address that my laptop got, but my
speeds are still poor.

Is there anything that I can do to eliminate the possibility that my
Linux box is causing the problem? Does anyone know what the problem
could be?

If you need any additional information, just ask.

Thanks.

Andy

  

What are you using to download? Do you maybe have ports that need to be 
forwarded to your laptop when it's behind the router?

If this isn't a simple port issue, then perhaps there is an issue with 
one of your NICs on the router.  It's possible this old box is starting 
to ware out - it's got to be over 10 years old after all.  It's about 
the only thing I can think of if you were getting better performance 
from this same router before.  Unless something else has changed 
(different software or hardware?).  Changing it's position in a network 
shouldn't make a difference to the speed traffic passing through it. 

...Izzy


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV

leaf-user mailing list: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
Support Request -- http://leaf-project.org/


Re: [leaf-user] Cable Modem speeds with Bering-uClibc

2007-02-25 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Andrew,

It may be a duplex mismatch, you can check the link errors with 'ip -s
link'

Eric

Hello.

I'm using Bering-uClibc (not sure which version since the box is
headless) with Linux 2.4.32. It's running on a 486 with four 3c509's
in it. One is connected to a Motorola Surfboard 4200 cable modem.

When I get online with my Windows laptop using my LEAF box as a
gateway, my downloads are poor (50-60kB/s) but when I connect my
Windows laptop directly to the modem, they are more reasonable
(200-400kB/s). Before I cry to my Internet provider, I'd like to
eliminate my system from the list of possible problems.

I've used this exact same 486 in a different setup where it was
actually a router behind another commercial router which was connected
to a cable modem with much better speeds.

When connecting the modem directly to my laptop, I notice that I get
an IP address from a completely different network range than what my
LEAF box gets. When I plug my LEAF box back in, it gets the same IP
address as it had before. I've tried changing the MAC address of my
eth0 adapter to the MAC address of my laptop's ethernet adapter and
then my LEAF box gets the same IP address that my laptop got, but my
speeds are still poor.

Is there anything that I can do to eliminate the possibility that my
Linux box is causing the problem? Does anyone know what the problem
could be?

If you need any additional information, just ask.

Thanks.

Andy

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV

leaf-user mailing list: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
Support Request -- http://leaf-project.org/


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV

leaf-user mailing list: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
Support Request -- http://leaf-project.org/


Re: [leaf-user] Cable Modem speeds with Bering-uClibc

2007-02-25 Thread Andrew Haninger
On 2/25/07, Bob Coffman Jr - Info From Data [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 One thing to check is that your NICs are negotiating duplex properly.
Sorry. I'm definitely a power-user, but I'm not that familiar with
some of these networking topics.

I half understand duplex (don't bother explaining it - I'll look it up
for myself) but I don't understand how duplex could be negotiated
improperly?

For what it's worth, I've acquired a replacement box that has PCI
slots in it and I'll set up my LEAF box with 3c905's (10/100) which
should (hopefully) solve the problem.

Andy

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV

leaf-user mailing list: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
Support Request -- http://leaf-project.org/


[leaf-user] Cable Modem speeds with Bering-uClibc

2007-02-24 Thread Andrew Haninger
Hello.

I'm using Bering-uClibc (not sure which version since the box is
headless) with Linux 2.4.32. It's running on a 486 with four 3c509's
in it. One is connected to a Motorola Surfboard 4200 cable modem.

When I get online with my Windows laptop using my LEAF box as a
gateway, my downloads are poor (50-60kB/s) but when I connect my
Windows laptop directly to the modem, they are more reasonable
(200-400kB/s). Before I cry to my Internet provider, I'd like to
eliminate my system from the list of possible problems.

I've used this exact same 486 in a different setup where it was
actually a router behind another commercial router which was connected
to a cable modem with much better speeds.

When connecting the modem directly to my laptop, I notice that I get
an IP address from a completely different network range than what my
LEAF box gets. When I plug my LEAF box back in, it gets the same IP
address as it had before. I've tried changing the MAC address of my
eth0 adapter to the MAC address of my laptop's ethernet adapter and
then my LEAF box gets the same IP address that my laptop got, but my
speeds are still poor.

Is there anything that I can do to eliminate the possibility that my
Linux box is causing the problem? Does anyone know what the problem
could be?

If you need any additional information, just ask.

Thanks.

Andy

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV

leaf-user mailing list: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
Support Request -- http://leaf-project.org/