Re: [LegacyUG] Master Location List & Internet Map

[Cathy]

And you all missed:

From: Renee Zamora <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 11:19 PM
Subject: Legacy 7's Secret is Out
To: Legacy Mailing List 


A little while ago Geoff told us that they had another surprise 
in-store for what's coming out in Legacy 7.  Geoff finally told us 
what it is at the South Davis Regional Family History Fair today. I 
have written about it on Renee's Genealogy Blog - "Legacy 7's Secret 
is Out" - http://rzamor1.blogspot.com/2008/03/legacy-7s-secret-is-out.html


Has it been a great week for Legacy or what!
--
Renee Zamora

Legacy 7 is linked to Microsoft Virtual Earth

Cathy

At 11:37 AM 18/03/2008, you wrote:


I'll chime in on this and agree with Google as well. What I really
like about Google is the ability to save locations there too. I can
create a world map of where all my ancestors lived and migrated to.
It's such fun to toy around with.

On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 5:13 PM, ronald ferguson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  No doubt, like me, they started using others before Google had 
them and it would be a heck of a job to change :-)

>
>  I do agree with you about their quality though.
>
>
>  Ron Ferguson





Legacy User Group guidelines: 
  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] Second wife won't show

[Cathy]

Is the individual (A) a spouse themselves in the Descendant Report or 
a real descendant?


If they're a spouse, their other spouses won't show.

You don't have to tag anybody to run a Descendant Report.

The other thing to check, if the individual (A) is a real descendantm 
is that you don't actually have two copies of him/her.


Cathy

At 11:25 AM 18/03/2008, you wrote:

I'm printing a descendant's report.   The second wife for one 
particular individual does not show in the report.   In all other 
cases where there are multiple spouses, all spouses are 
reported.   I have checked to make sure she's tagged, that she's not 
marked private, etc.   Can anyone suggest why this is happening?





Legacy User Group guidelines: 
  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

RE: [LegacyUG] Charting Print Question

[Connie]

Hi Ron,
Thanks for the reply My main concern is the size Legacy is currently
saving the chart as (as you will note the sizes I list in prior messages).
'If' the main need is to send via email or place online, then these file
sizes are just fine... but if you want to print a clear 17" x 11" (size
listed in Chart per my trial file) preferably at 300 dpi or better, it can't
be done with the file size automatically saved currently with the exception
of the pdf file option which saves at the actual size listed by Chart. 
The transparency issue is only a secondary concern.

Connie 


-Original Message-
On Behalf Of ronald ferguson

Of the formats you list BMP, JPEG, TIFF do not preserve transparency. I
don't know about PSD as I'm a Gimp man and not Adobe but you are correct in
that PNG does.
_


> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: [LegacyUG] Charting Print Question
> Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 16:59:41 -0700
>
>
>
> I've not had any replies to my posts on the Charting Beta List, so thought
I
> would try here... Can anyone explain what I may be doing wrong?
> Connie
>
> -
> My original post the 'Chart Beta List' on Mar 8, 2008
>
> Maybe this has been covered before and I missed it but... I've just
checked
> into the saving options/formats and am confused...
>
> I created a very simple chart of 8 people (2 generations). I did not
select
> to use any background... Per Charting the chart size listed onscreen is
17"
> x 11".
>
> I then proceeded to save the chart in all the available formats and find
> some interesting differences...
>
> Saved as .pdf the chart size is close to what is shown in Charting;
16.471"
> x 10.724" at 300 Resolution. The .pdf format also preserves transparency
(as
> no background was chosen within Charting).
>
> BUT if I save in any other available format (bmp, jpeg, tiff, png, psd)
> using the option to save with the lowest compression/largest file size,
the
> size is reduced to 1587 pixels x 1040 pixels (converts to 5.29" x 3.465"
at
> 300 Resolution. Additionally the background is solid (white) even though
> none was selected when drawing the chart and all but jpeg format allow
> transparency...
>
> Why the differences?
> As a side note... clicking on the calculate button (for file size) does
> nothing...
>
> Connie
>
> -
> The one reply I received from John on the Beta List Mar 9, 2008
> John wrote:
> What version are you using?
> Version 1.0.049 clicking on calc did not work for me Version 7.0.074 which
I
> assume is the current Beta release, gives me Calculated File Sizes for all
> file types.
>
> I'm seeing unexpected file sizes as well Version 7.0.0.74
> 3x5 landscape
>
> As reported by Adobe Photoshop
> Type Calculated Size 3x5 landscape
> PDF 248,159 4.63in x 2.70 in
> BMP 345,042 1.479 x .863 300.125 pixels/inch 444x259 pixels
> JPEG 100% 18,875 1.48 x .863 300 pixels/inch 444x259 pixels
> JPEG 50% 8,654 1.48 x .863 300 pixels/inch 444x259 pixels
> JPEG 1% 3,788 1.48 x .863 300 pixels/inch 444x259
> pixels Very Blurry
> Tiff 2,810 1.48 x .863 300 pixels/inch 444x259 pixels
> PSD 63,606 1.48in x 0.863in 300 pixels/inch 444x259
> pixels
>
> Attaching LWC file and small tiff
> John
>
> -
> My latest post Mar 15, 2008 to the 'Chart Beta List' of which there has
been
> no reply:
> Just wondering if anyone is checking the chart list anymore... or should I
> direct my observations to the general Legacy list??
>
> I posted a week ago about my findings of chart printing sizes which I
think
> would be a major concern (unless I have somehow overlooked something, but
> have no idea as there has only been one response from John), besides John
> zero discussion
>
> As it stands now, I can print out a chart with adequate DPI by saving as a
> .pdf file and then opening in Adobe PhotoShop, but not everyone has Adobe.
I
> have seen on the regular Legacy list this question come up as well... but
> have noticed no replies there either.
>
> Am I missing a setting from within Chart to save in a size large enough
for
> a quality print??? (besides pdf)
>
> Connie




Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] private persons in Legacy Charting

[JLB]

Thank-you.  I had set that right as I said in my original posting.  
However, I found something else:  My family file under Local 
Settings/Temp.  And for some reason Legacy Charting searched, found and 
opened that under C-drive in the list of files, but did not show the 
family file in its usual location under Legacy/Data.  So I was working 
with the wrong file.  I have no idea how it ended up in a Temp folder 
and wonder if this is something created by Legacy Charting the first 
time I opened it last week?  Is anyone else finding their family file in 
a strange location?


JL
JLog - simple computer technology for genealogists
http://www3.telus.net/Jgen/jlog.html

John Magyari wrote:

Check settings in 2 locations

1) Help & Options -> General ->   Then check suppress options
2) Home -> Privacy Options ->   Then check suppress options

john

JLB wrote:
I'm a little behind the times here, just getting into the new Legacy 
Charting today.  It's wonderful but I'm having a problem getting rid 
of ex-spouses whose like-ability factor went downhill some time ago 
and would not be wanted on a wall for regular viewing.  I have the 
Privacy Options set to exclude Private persons and have marked the 
offensive persons as Private in Legacy, rebooted the computer and all 
that and damn, they're still there.  Any known cure?


JL
JLog - simple computer technology for genealogists
http://www3.telus.net/Jgen/jlog.html



Legacy User Group guidelines:   
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:   
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp








Legacy User Group guidelines:   
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:   
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp










Legacy User Group guidelines: 
  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] Master Location List & Internet Map

[MagnoliaSouth]

I'll chime in on this and agree with Google as well. What I really
like about Google is the ability to save locations there too. I can
create a world map of where all my ancestors lived and migrated to.
It's such fun to toy around with.

On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 5:13 PM, ronald ferguson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  No doubt, like me, they started using others before Google had them and it 
> would be a heck of a job to change :-)
>
>  I do agree with you about their quality though.
>
>
>  Ron Ferguson
>
>  _
>
>  For Genealogy, Software and Social visit:
>  http://www.fergys.co.uk
>  New Blog: Open Legacy Family File with Open Office
>  View the Grimshaw Family Tree at:
>  http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/
>  For The Fergusons of N.W. England See:
>  http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
>  _
>
>
>
>  > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  > To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
>  > Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Master Location List & Internet Map
>  > Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 19:52:20 +
>
> >
>  > Pity they don't use Google maps - they're the best
>  >
>  > --
>  > Rodney HALL
>  > Heywood, Lancashire
>  >
>  > Suaviter sed fortiter
>  > Agreeably but powerfully
>  > ~
>  > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  > http://rmhh.co.uk/
>  > http://rmhh.org.uk/
>  > ~~
>  >
>  >
>  > -Original Message-
>  > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mary Young
>  > Sent: 17 March 2008 15:47
>  > To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
>  > Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Master Location List & Internet Map
>  >
>  > Wish Legacy wasn't tied to MapQuest, IMHO it's not the best ... and
>  > very poor for UK.
>  > Regards
>  > Mary Young
>  >
>
>  _
>  The next generation of Windows Live is here
>  http://www.windowslive.co.uk/get-live
>
>
>
>
>  Legacy User Group guidelines:
>http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
>  Archived messages:
>http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
>  Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
>  To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>
>
>
>



Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] private persons in Legacy Charting

[John Magyari]

Check settings in 2 locations

1) Help & Options -> General ->   Then check suppress options
2) Home -> Privacy Options ->   Then check suppress options

john

JLB wrote:
I'm a little behind the times here, just getting into the new Legacy 
Charting today.  It's wonderful but I'm having a problem getting rid 
of ex-spouses whose like-ability factor went downhill some time ago 
and would not be wanted on a wall for regular viewing.  I have the 
Privacy Options set to exclude Private persons and have marked the 
offensive persons as Private in Legacy, rebooted the computer and all 
that and damn, they're still there.  Any known cure?


JL
JLog - simple computer technology for genealogists
http://www3.telus.net/Jgen/jlog.html



Legacy User Group guidelines:   
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:   
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp








Legacy User Group guidelines: 
  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] Second wife won't show

[WALTER D. CONNER]

I don't know what version you are running, Legacy 6 I assume. I sent a similar 
question a week ago about my problem with Legacy 5 Deluxe not printing some 
people in the Name Index of Descendants Report. I found that when I do not 
suppress details of living people, it prints OK. If I select suppress details 
of living people, many people, including myself, do not print in the Name 
Index.  This may be something you would want to check out in your version.

Walt Conner





Legacy User Group guidelines: 

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages: 

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

[LegacyUG] Second wife won't show

[frankanedc]

I'm printing a descendant's report.   The second wife for one particular 
individual does not show in the report.   In all other cases where there 
are multiple spouses, all spouses are reported.   I have checked to make 
sure she's tagged, that she's not marked private, etc.   Can anyone 
suggest why this is happening?

Re: [LegacyUG] Master Location List & Internet Map

[Mary Young]

On 3/17/08, John Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Depends on where you are and how you use the maps.
Yes, I agree. Try putting "Balnakeil, Scotland" into Google Maps, the
result is virtually blank!!
Then try streetmap.co.uk - lochs, hut circles, contours, the full monty.
Regards
Mary Young
Edinburgh, Scotland



Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

[LegacyUG] private persons in Legacy Charting

[JLB]

I'm a little behind the times here, just getting into the new Legacy 
Charting today.  It's wonderful but I'm having a problem getting rid of 
ex-spouses whose like-ability factor went downhill some time ago and 
would not be wanted on a wall for regular viewing.  I have the Privacy 
Options set to exclude Private persons and have marked the offensive 
persons as Private in Legacy, rebooted the computer and all that and 
damn, they're still there.  Any known cure?


JL
JLog - simple computer technology for genealogists
http://www3.telus.net/Jgen/jlog.html



Legacy User Group guidelines: 
  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

RE: [LegacyUG] Charting Print Question

[ronald ferguson]

Connie,

Of the formats you list BMP, JPEG, TIFF do not preserve transparency. I don't 
know about PSD as I'm a Gimp man and not Adobe but you are correct in that PNG 
does.


Ron Ferguson

_

For Genealogy, Software and Social visit:
http://www.fergys.co.uk
New Blog: Open Legacy Family File with Open Office
View the Grimshaw Family Tree at:
http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/
For The Fergusons of N.W. England See:
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
_



> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: [LegacyUG] Charting Print Question
> Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 16:59:41 -0700
>
>
>
> I've not had any replies to my posts on the Charting Beta List, so thought I
> would try here... Can anyone explain what I may be doing wrong?
> Connie
>
> -
> My original post the 'Chart Beta List' on Mar 8, 2008
>
> Maybe this has been covered before and I missed it but... I've just checked
> into the saving options/formats and am confused...
>
> I created a very simple chart of 8 people (2 generations). I did not select
> to use any background... Per Charting the chart size listed onscreen is 17"
> x 11".
>
> I then proceeded to save the chart in all the available formats and find
> some interesting differences...
>
> Saved as .pdf the chart size is close to what is shown in Charting; 16.471"
> x 10.724" at 300 Resolution. The .pdf format also preserves transparency (as
> no background was chosen within Charting).
>
> BUT if I save in any other available format (bmp, jpeg, tiff, png, psd)
> using the option to save with the lowest compression/largest file size, the
> size is reduced to 1587 pixels x 1040 pixels (converts to 5.29" x 3.465" at
> 300 Resolution. Additionally the background is solid (white) even though
> none was selected when drawing the chart and all but jpeg format allow
> transparency...
>
> Why the differences?
> As a side note... clicking on the calculate button (for file size) does
> nothing...
>
> Connie
>
> -
> The one reply I received from John on the Beta List Mar 9, 2008
> John wrote:
> What version are you using?
> Version 1.0.049 clicking on calc did not work for me Version 7.0.074 which I
> assume is the current Beta release, gives me Calculated File Sizes for all
> file types.
>
> I'm seeing unexpected file sizes as well Version 7.0.0.74
> 3x5 landscape
>
> As reported by Adobe Photoshop
> Type Calculated Size 3x5 landscape
> PDF 248,159 4.63in x 2.70 in
> BMP 345,042 1.479 x .863 300.125 pixels/inch 444x259 pixels
> JPEG 100% 18,875 1.48 x .863 300 pixels/inch 444x259 pixels
> JPEG 50% 8,654 1.48 x .863 300 pixels/inch 444x259 pixels
> JPEG 1% 3,788 1.48 x .863 300 pixels/inch 444x259
> pixels Very Blurry
> Tiff 2,810 1.48 x .863 300 pixels/inch 444x259 pixels
> PSD 63,606 1.48in x 0.863in 300 pixels/inch 444x259
> pixels
>
> Attaching LWC file and small tiff
> John
>
> -
> My latest post Mar 15, 2008 to the 'Chart Beta List' of which there has been
> no reply:
> Just wondering if anyone is checking the chart list anymore... or should I
> direct my observations to the general Legacy list??
>
> I posted a week ago about my findings of chart printing sizes which I think
> would be a major concern (unless I have somehow overlooked something, but
> have no idea as there has only been one response from John), besides John
> zero discussion
>
> As it stands now, I can print out a chart with adequate DPI by saving as a
> .pdf file and then opening in Adobe PhotoShop, but not everyone has Adobe. I
> have seen on the regular Legacy list this question come up as well... but
> have noticed no replies there either.
>
> Am I missing a setting from within Chart to save in a size large enough for
> a quality print??? (besides pdf)
>
> Connie
>
>
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>
>
>

_
The next generation of Windows Live is here
http://www.windowslive.co.uk/get-live


Legacy User Group guidelines:
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

[LegacyUG] Charting Print Question

[Connie]

I've not had any replies to my posts on the Charting Beta List, so thought I
would try here... Can anyone explain what I may be doing wrong? 
Connie

-
My original post the 'Chart Beta List' on Mar 8, 2008

Maybe this has been covered before and I missed it but... I've just checked
into the saving options/formats and am confused...

I created a very simple chart of 8 people (2 generations). I did not select
to use any background... Per Charting the chart size listed onscreen is 17"
x 11".

I then proceeded to save the chart in all the available formats and find
some interesting differences...

Saved as .pdf the chart size is close to what is shown in Charting; 16.471"
x 10.724" at 300 Resolution. The .pdf format also preserves transparency (as
no background was chosen within Charting).

BUT if I save in any other available format (bmp, jpeg, tiff, png, psd)
using the option to save with the lowest compression/largest file size, the
size is reduced to 1587 pixels x 1040 pixels (converts to 5.29" x 3.465" at
300 Resolution. Additionally the background is solid (white) even though
none was selected when drawing the chart and all but jpeg format allow
transparency...

Why the differences? 
As a side note... clicking on the calculate button (for file size) does
nothing...

Connie

-
The one reply I received from John on the Beta List Mar 9, 2008
John wrote:
What version are you using?
Version 1.0.049 clicking on calc did not work for me Version 7.0.074 which I
assume is the current Beta release, gives me Calculated File Sizes for all
file types.

I'm seeing unexpected file sizes as well Version 7.0.0.74
3x5 landscape

As reported by Adobe Photoshop
TypeCalculated Size   3x5 landscape
PDF248,159   4.63in x 2.70 in
BMP   345,042   1.479 x .863 300.125 pixels/inch 444x259 pixels
JPEG 100% 18,875 1.48 x .863 300 pixels/inch 444x259 pixels
JPEG 50% 8,654   1.48 x .863 300 pixels/inch 444x259 pixels
JPEG  1% 3,788  1.48 x .863 300 pixels/inch 444x259 
pixels Very Blurry
Tiff   2,810  1.48 x .863 300 pixels/inch 444x259 pixels
PSD   63,606  1.48in x 0.863in 300 pixels/inch 444x259 
pixels

Attaching LWC file and small tiff
John

-
My latest post Mar 15, 2008 to the 'Chart Beta List' of which there has been
no reply:
Just wondering if anyone is checking the chart list anymore... or should I
direct my observations to the general Legacy list?? 

I posted a week ago about my findings of chart printing sizes which I think
would be a major concern (unless I have somehow overlooked something, but
have no idea as there has only been one response from John), besides John
zero discussion

As it stands now, I can print out a chart with adequate DPI by saving as a
.pdf file and then opening in Adobe PhotoShop, but not everyone has Adobe. I
have seen on the regular Legacy list this question come up as well... but
have noticed no replies there either.

Am I missing a setting from within Chart to save in a size large enough for
a quality print??? (besides pdf)

Connie




Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

RE: [LegacyUG] Chart Program Problen

[ronald ferguson]

Sorry, Geoff - I must have missed that.


Ron Ferguson

_

For Genealogy, Software and Social visit:
http://www.fergys.co.uk
New Blog: Open Legacy Family File with Open Office
View the Grimshaw Family Tree at:
http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/
For The Fergusons of N.W. England See:
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
_



> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Chart Program Problen
> Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 15:09:19 -0700
>
> That is correct.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Geoff Rasmussen
> Millennia Corporation
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> www.LegacyFamilyTree.com
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 2:54 PM
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Chart Program Problen
>
> Hi Ron, Hi Geoff,
>
> who of you both is wright now???
>
> I understood Geoff's reply that suffix and prefix will be coming and can be
> chosen then.
>
> Eva v. B.

_
Get Messenger on your mobile, text MSN to 63463 now!
http://mobile.uk.msn.com/pc/messenger.aspx 


Legacy User Group guidelines:
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

RE: [LegacyUG] Reports - > Pedigree Chart -> Alternate Names

[Brian Lightfoot]

I'm leaning in the direction that the ability to add Alternate Names to the
Index is desirable under certain circumstances. For example, Alternate Names
are not just spelling variations or nicknames but sometimes people go
through the legal process to completely change their birth name. In those
cases, Alternate Names might prove helpful in trying to figure out how the
son of John Stinkelbaum was named John Smith. I'm also leaning in the
direction that Legacy had similar thoughts and the option on the Index is
supposed to be there. It's just that the created Chart is flawed.


Brian

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of RICHARD
SCHULTHIES
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 8:31 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Reports - > Pedigree Chart -> Alternate Names

I see the situation now. I have duplicated the index,
and the check mark is ignored by the program. I do see
why having the Index reference the AKAs might be
desirable. It would not put the AKA on the Pedigree
chart part (which is 'footprint challenged'), but only
the index (plenty of room). 
As a matter of practice, I personally always delete
all e-mails with HTML and/or attachments unless
pre-warned by a friend. I had a computer fried by a
worm hiding in an HTML that looked innocent, never
again.
Rich in LA CA
--- Brian Lightfoot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I believe the original poster was talking about
> creating a Pedigree Chart
> from the Reports option in Legacy, not the Pedigree
> tab. Go to the menu item
> at the very top of the page and select "Reports"
> then select "Report Menu
> (Charts)" (or click on the Reports icon on the
> toolbar). Then click on the
> Pedigree tab of the various types of report options.
> As is typical of all
> the various reports, there is another option to
> include an Index of names
> that can appear on the report.
> 
> The problem that he was reporting was that within
> such an Index of names,
> there is another option to include Alternate Names.
> Cathy reported that it
> should be disabled but isn't. So if you put a check
> mark on the Alternate
> Names option, you'd expect the created index to
> include Alternate names but
> they never show up.
> 
> My question is why would one NOT want Alternate
> Names to be included on this
> type of report (or for just about any type of
> report).
> 
> I guess if you had the chance to view the original
> poster's exact documents
> that he attached, you would have known exactly where
> he was looking. Hope
> that helps.
> 
> 
> Brian
> 




Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

RE: [LegacyUG] Master Location List & Internet Map

[John Carter]

Depends on where you are and how you use the maps.

If you're in the US and want to find a street less than 5 years old,
Google (first) and MapQuest (second) are the best choices.  Yahoo and
MapsOnUs have a lot of maps, but do not update US maps as often as Google
or MapQuest.

MapsOnUs gives better directions than Yahoo in some areas - they are less
likely than Yahoo to send someone 10 miles out of the way when giving
directions to my house.

John

> Pity they don't use Google maps - they're the best
>
> --
> Rodney HALL
> Heywood, Lancashire
>
> Suaviter sed fortiter
> Agreeably but powerfully
> ~
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://rmhh.co.uk/
> http://rmhh.org.uk/
> ~~
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mary
> Young
> Sent: 17 March 2008 15:47
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Master Location List & Internet Map
>
> Wish Legacy wasn't tied to MapQuest, IMHO it's not the best ... and
> very poor for UK.
> Regards
> Mary Young
>
>
>
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
>http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages:
>http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>
>
>
>





Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

RE: [LegacyUG] Chart Program Problen

[Geoff Rasmussen]

That is correct.

Thanks,

Geoff Rasmussen
Millennia Corporation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.LegacyFamilyTree.com


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 2:54 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Chart Program Problen

Hi Ron, Hi Geoff,

who of you both is wright now???

I understood Geoff's reply that suffix and prefix will be coming and can be 
chosen then.

Eva v. B.

Or how would you understand this?:

Geoff Rasmussen
Wed, 05 Mar 2008 18:59:16 -0800

This option will be coming. When it's there, you will go to: Appearance tab>

Box Items button > click on "Name" in the Items to display section, 
andselect the option on the right. Thanks, Geoff RasmussenMillennia 
Corporation





Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

RE: [LegacyUG] Master Location List & Internet Map

[ronald ferguson]

No doubt, like me, they started using others before Google had them and it 
would be a heck of a job to change :-)

I do agree with you about their quality though.


Ron Ferguson

_

For Genealogy, Software and Social visit:
http://www.fergys.co.uk
New Blog: Open Legacy Family File with Open Office
View the Grimshaw Family Tree at:
http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/
For The Fergusons of N.W. England See:
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
_



> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Master Location List & Internet Map
> Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 19:52:20 +
>
> Pity they don't use Google maps - they're the best
>
> --
> Rodney HALL
> Heywood, Lancashire
>
> Suaviter sed fortiter
> Agreeably but powerfully
> ~
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://rmhh.co.uk/
> http://rmhh.org.uk/
> ~~
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mary Young
> Sent: 17 March 2008 15:47
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Master Location List & Internet Map
>
> Wish Legacy wasn't tied to MapQuest, IMHO it's not the best ... and
> very poor for UK.
> Regards
> Mary Young
>

_
The next generation of Windows Live is here
http://www.windowslive.co.uk/get-live


Legacy User Group guidelines:
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] Chart Program Problen

[kurland]

Hi Ron, Hi Geoff,

who of you both is wright now???

I understood Geoff's reply that suffix and prefix will be coming and can be 
chosen then.


Eva v. B.

Or how would you understand this?:

Geoff Rasmussen
Wed, 05 Mar 2008 18:59:16 -0800

This option will be coming. When it's there, you will go to: Appearance tab> 
Box Items button > click on "Name" in the Items to display section, 
andselect the option on the right. Thanks, Geoff RasmussenMillennia 
Corporation


- Original Message - 
From: "Al Mallory" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: 
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 6:11 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Chart Program Problen



Here is the previous request and Geoff's reply. He doesn't say when,
but sounds like it will be in the final release (?)

Al
Whitby Ontario
---

Geoff Rasmussen to LegacyUserGroup

show details Mar 5 (12 days ago)


Reply


This option will be coming. When it's there, you will go to: Appearance 
tab

Box Items button > click on "Name" in the Items to display section, and

select the option on the right.

Thanks,

Geoff Rasmussen
Millennia Corporation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.LegacyFamilyTree.com


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 7:43 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy Charting Pre-Release Edition Now Available
For Free Download

Hi, developers of Legacy Charting Pre-Release Edition,

that's a very, very nice program.
But I am looking for the possibility to include in names  the suffix and
the title. (I put all my "von, van, Baron, Counts" in the suffix field and
need to show them) Is there a way to do that?

Thank in advance for advice
Eva v. Buchholtz





On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 10:59 AM, Tom Weiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have been unable to find an answer in the archives to this 
prefix/suffix

issue - would really like to fix this!

Tom



On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Jessica Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:


> It was replied to by Geoff I believe it was, and he stated it was
> being corrected in an update/future version.
> An email was released previously that had update information in it,
> and I believe this was covered, but I could be incorrect, as I've read
> dozens of LUG emails today.
>
> And your email did go through, I read it, along with several
> responses, in the last day or two.
>
> Jess M
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 12:46 PM, Tom Weiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Second try with this post - the first never showed up in the User 
> > Group.

> >
> > I welcome the addition of the charting program to Legacy and will
upgrade
> > when version 7 comes out. However.when I tried to chart my family
tree,
> > the displayed chart did not display name prefixes (like Gen., Pres, 
> > etc)

and
> > suffixes (like Jr., II, etc). Am I doing something wrong, or is there 
> > a
> > glitch in the program?  I had the same problem in uploading gedcom 
> > files

to
> > ancestry.com and could never solve that.
> >
> > Tom
> >
>
>
>
> > Legacy User Group guidelines:
> >http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> > Archived messages:
> >http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
> > Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> > To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
>   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages:
>   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>
>
>
>



Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
 Archived messages:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
 Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
 To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp




Legacy User Group guidelines:
  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp







Legacy User Group guidelines: 
  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

RE: [LegacyUG] Master Location List & Internet Map

[Rodney Hall]

Pity they don't use Google maps - they're the best

-- 
Rodney HALL 
Heywood, Lancashire

Suaviter sed fortiter
Agreeably but powerfully 
~
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://rmhh.co.uk/
http://rmhh.org.uk/
~~


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mary Young
Sent: 17 March 2008 15:47
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Master Location List & Internet Map

Wish Legacy wasn't tied to MapQuest, IMHO it's not the best ... and
very poor for UK.
Regards
Mary Young





Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] Printing Descendant Book Reports with Second Families

[Susan Daily]

It probably won't sound so good, since it will list these children
under the first marriage, and they didn't come into the picture until
after the first wife died. So chronologically, it would look pretty
odd.

But you are right, it is an option to get them to some how print out
in the descendants report.

Susan

On 3/17/08, Bruce Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Another option is to add the step children to the first marriage (as
> well as to the second marriage) and indicate the Relationship to the
> Mother (for the first marriage)  as whatever makes sense to you..
> This works for me for Family Group Sheets but I don't know if it will
> print on a Descendant Book Report or Descendant Narrative..
>
> On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 10:46 PM, Wynthner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > The easy way is to just do a descendant Book Report or Descendant Narrative
> > Report on the husband- both families should then show on the report.
> >
> >



Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] Starting Person

[Hope Bagot Bees]

Go to Options - Set Preferred Startup Family and Select a family from 
the Name List to find yourself.  You will now be Self and the patriarch 
will change to husband.   If you want to set relationships from 
yourself, go to Tools - Set Direct Line as preferred and choose yourself 
here.


Hope this helps.
Elizabeth


Christina wrote:

Hi,

I just started recently building my family in Legacy. I started with 
the patriarch of the family, not myself and noticed that on the 
"Family" tab it shows that he is "Self" which I assume is suppose to 
be me. Hmm is there anyway to just change that to Husband, as it shows 
his wife under wife?


Now that I confused you.. hehe

- Christina

--
Nobody is Perfect
I am Nobody
Therefore I am Perfect

Legacy User Group guidelines:
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





Legacy User Group guidelines: 
  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] Starting Person

[Heather Stovold]

Go to (on the menu) - Tools/Set Relationships

Click the Clear Button - Make sure you are the person showing in the box
(click the Change button and pick yourself if you aren't), then click the
Set Relationships button.

Now you are self, and it will show the relationships of everyone to you.
(If you import a Gedcom, or a few other big changes like that, you may need
to reset it by doing this afterwards for them)

Also - if you like using the "ancestral colours" (blue for paternal
grandfather's line... green for paternal grandmother's line, etc) - you
can set that to start with you from  Tools/Apply Ancester colours.   I think
you might have to go into the settings to display it too.

btw - I have those both setup to start with my son - so that I see
relationships etc with my husbands line as well  just a preference for
me though

On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 11:50 AM, Christina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I just started recently building my family in Legacy. I started with the
> patriarch of the family, not myself and noticed that on the "Family" tab it
> shows that he is "Self" which I assume is suppose to be me. Hmm is there
> anyway to just change that to Husband, as it shows his wife under wife?
>
> Now that I confused you.. hehe
>
> - Christina
>
> --
> Nobody is Perfect
> I am Nobody
> Therefore I am Perfect
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
>
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages:
>http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
> Online technical support: 
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> To unsubscribe: 
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>




Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] Starting Person

[MagnoliaSouth]

Hi Christina!

Go to Tools > Relationships

The name in the top box is the "self" person. To change it, just click the
change button and select yourself. :)

On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 11:50 AM, Christina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I just started recently building my family in Legacy. I started with the
> patriarch of the family, not myself and noticed that on the "Family" tab it
> shows that he is "Self" which I assume is suppose to be me. Hmm is there
> anyway to just change that to Husband, as it shows his wife under wife?
>
> Now that I confused you.. hehe
>
> - Christina
>
> --
> Nobody is Perfect
> I am Nobody
> Therefore I am Perfect
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
>http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages:
>http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>




Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] Starting Person

[John Carter]

Self is the current reference point for relationships.  You can change the
person relationships refer to.

Select yourself as the current person, then click Tools -> Set
Relationships -> Change

John

> Hi,
>
> I just started recently building my family in Legacy. I started with the
> patriarch of the family, not myself and noticed that on the "Family" tab
> it
> shows that he is "Self" which I assume is suppose to be me. Hmm is there
> anyway to just change that to Husband, as it shows his wife under wife?
>
> Now that I confused you.. hehe
>
> - Christina





Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

RE: [LegacyUG] Chart Program Problen

[ronald ferguson]

Tom, 

It does not have the facility for this - nor does Tree Draw for that matter. No 
mention has been made as to whether or not it will ever be included.


Ron Ferguson

_

For Genealogy, Software and Social visit:
http://www.fergys.co.uk
New Blog: Open Legacy Family File with Open Office
View the Grimshaw Family Tree at:
http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/
For The Fergusons of N.W. England See:
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
_







Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 10:59:40 -0400
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Chart Program Problen


I have been unable to find an answer in the archives to this prefix/suffix 
issue - would really like to fix this!



Tom


On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Jessica Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

It was replied to by Geoff I believe it was, and he stated it was
being corrected in an update/future version.
An email was released previously that had update information in it,
and I believe this was covered, but I could be incorrect, as I've read
dozens of LUG emails today.

And your email did go through, I read it, along with several
responses, in the last day or two.

Jess M




On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 12:46 PM, Tom Weiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Second try with this post - the first never showed up in the User Group.
>
> I welcome the addition of the charting program to Legacy and will upgrade
> when version 7 comes out. However.when I tried to chart my family tree,
> the displayed chart did not display name prefixes (like Gen., Pres, etc) and
> suffixes (like Jr., II, etc). Am I doing something wrong, or is there a
> glitch in the program?  I had the same problem in uploading gedcom files to
> ancestry.com and could never solve that.
>
> Tom
>



_
Latest news and results from MSN’s Dancing on Ice 2008 Special
http://entertainment.uk.msn.com/tv/realitytv/dancing-on-ice/ 


Legacy User Group guidelines:
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] Chart Program Problen

[Al Mallory]

Here is the previous request and Geoff's reply. He doesn't say when,
but sounds like it will be in the final release (?)

Al
Whitby Ontario
---

Geoff Rasmussen to LegacyUserGroup

show details Mar 5 (12 days ago)


Reply


This option will be coming. When it's there, you will go to: Appearance tab
> Box Items button > click on "Name" in the Items to display section, and
select the option on the right.

Thanks,

Geoff Rasmussen
Millennia Corporation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.LegacyFamilyTree.com


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 7:43 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy Charting Pre-Release Edition Now Available
For Free Download

Hi, developers of Legacy Charting Pre-Release Edition,

that's a very, very nice program.
But I am looking for the possibility to include in names  the suffix and
the title. (I put all my "von, van, Baron, Counts" in the suffix field and
need to show them) Is there a way to do that?

Thank in advance for advice
Eva v. Buchholtz





On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 10:59 AM, Tom Weiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been unable to find an answer in the archives to this prefix/suffix
> issue - would really like to fix this!
>
> Tom
>
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Jessica Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > It was replied to by Geoff I believe it was, and he stated it was
> > being corrected in an update/future version.
> > An email was released previously that had update information in it,
> > and I believe this was covered, but I could be incorrect, as I've read
> > dozens of LUG emails today.
> >
> > And your email did go through, I read it, along with several
> > responses, in the last day or two.
> >
> > Jess M
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 12:46 PM, Tom Weiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Second try with this post - the first never showed up in the User Group.
> > >
> > > I welcome the addition of the charting program to Legacy and will
> upgrade
> > > when version 7 comes out. However.when I tried to chart my family
> tree,
> > > the displayed chart did not display name prefixes (like Gen., Pres, etc)
> and
> > > suffixes (like Jr., II, etc). Am I doing something wrong, or is there a
> > > glitch in the program?  I had the same problem in uploading gedcom files
> to
> > > ancestry.com and could never solve that.
> > >
> > > Tom
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > > Legacy User Group guidelines:
> > >http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> > > Archived messages:
> > >http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
> > > Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> > > To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
> >
> >
> >
> > Legacy User Group guidelines:
> >   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> > Archived messages:
> >   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
> > Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> > To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
>  Archived messages:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
>  Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
>  To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

[LegacyUG] Starting Person

[Christina]

Hi,

I just started recently building my family in Legacy. I started with the
patriarch of the family, not myself and noticed that on the "Family" tab it
shows that he is "Self" which I assume is suppose to be me. Hmm is there
anyway to just change that to Husband, as it shows his wife under wife?

Now that I confused you.. hehe

- Christina

-- 
Nobody is Perfect
I am Nobody
Therefore I am Perfect




Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] Master Location List & Internet Map

[Mary Young]

Wish Legacy wasn't tied to MapQuest, IMHO it's not the best ... and
very poor for UK.
Regards
Mary Young



Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

RE: [LegacyUG] Reports - > Pedigree Chart -> Alternate Names

[RICHARD SCHULTHIES]

I see the situation now. I have duplicated the index,
and the check mark is ignored by the program. I do see
why having the Index reference the AKAs might be
desirable. It would not put the AKA on the Pedigree
chart part (which is 'footprint challenged'), but only
the index (plenty of room). 
As a matter of practice, I personally always delete
all e-mails with HTML and/or attachments unless
pre-warned by a friend. I had a computer fried by a
worm hiding in an HTML that looked innocent, never
again.
Rich in LA CA
--- Brian Lightfoot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I believe the original poster was talking about
> creating a Pedigree Chart
> from the Reports option in Legacy, not the Pedigree
> tab. Go to the menu item
> at the very top of the page and select "Reports"
> then select "Report Menu
> (Charts)" (or click on the Reports icon on the
> toolbar). Then click on the
> Pedigree tab of the various types of report options.
> As is typical of all
> the various reports, there is another option to
> include an Index of names
> that can appear on the report.
> 
> The problem that he was reporting was that within
> such an Index of names,
> there is another option to include Alternate Names.
> Cathy reported that it
> should be disabled but isn't. So if you put a check
> mark on the Alternate
> Names option, you'd expect the created index to
> include Alternate names but
> they never show up.
> 
> My question is why would one NOT want Alternate
> Names to be included on this
> type of report (or for just about any type of
> report).
> 
> I guess if you had the chance to view the original
> poster's exact documents
> that he attached, you would have known exactly where
> he was looking. Hope
> that helps.
> 
> 
> Brian
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of RICHARD
> SCHULTHIES
> Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2008 11:27 PM
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Reports - > Pedigree Chart
> -> Alternate Names
> 
> I am completely confused? I have Deluxe. When I am
> in
> the main page: 
> Home-Family-Pedigree-Descendant-Chronology-Index-
> Research Guidance.
> and am using Pedigree, there are NO index choices
> under this. It is a different sub program. Choosing 
> Index in the list will not affect the Pedigree one.
> I can see the desire to have both names (standard
> and
> AKA), appear your personal pedigree, but the format
> for that report/screen is unchangable in that way.
> IMHO, it is not a bug, but a work around would be
> editting the name to be very long and include both,
> then Print the pedigree report, and return the name
> to
> the previous name.
> I have been wrong before. Please be more specific if
> I
> am not discussing the place your problem is.
> Good luck
> Rich in LA CA 
> --- Brian Lightfoot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> 
> > Don'tcha jes luv it! That was a perfect example of
> > how Internet messages
> > fail to convey tonal inflections, etc. If you and
> I
> > were speaking
> > face-to-face, I would have immediately understood
> > what and how you spoke the
> > words "should be".
> > 
> > Now the big question is if the bug is merely that
> > the chart option is not
> > being disabled or is Legacy actually intending
> > Alternate Names to be
> > included on the Index but they are failing to
> > appear.
> > 
> > Can anyone think of good reasons to include
> > Alternate Names on a Pedigree
> > Chart Name Index? I think I can.
> > 
> > 
> > Brian
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > On Behalf Of Cathy
> > Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2008 8:43 PM
> > To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> > Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Reports - > Pedigree Chart
> > -> Alternate Names
> > 
> > Oh help.
> > The variety of ways one can read "should be"
> > 
> > I meant "should be and isn't"
> > 
> > C
> > 
> > At 11:00 AM 17/03/2008, you wrote:
> > 
> > >I agree with your assessment that his biggest
> > problem seems to be that he
> > >has only one name for his chart and I'm not sure
> if
> > he is expecting a
> > >Pedigree Chart to go out on the Internet and try
> to
> > fill in the information
> > >for him or what.
> > >
> > >But I also believe that he is pointing out that
> the
> > option to include
> > >Alternate Names is available from the Pedigree
> > Chart options within Legacy.
> > >Contrary to your statement that the option should
> > be greyed out, it isn't.
> > >And that is a bug. Unless Legacy believes
> Alternate
> > Names should be
> > >included, in which case, it still ain't working.
> > >
> > >Brian
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Legacy User Group guidelines: 
> >http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> > Archived messages: 
> >   
> >
>
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
> > Online technical support:
> > http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> > To unsubscribe:
> > http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyL

Re: [LegacyUG] Chart Program Problen

[Tom Weiss]

I have been unable to find an answer in the archives to this prefix/suffix
issue - would really like to fix this!

Tom

On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Jessica Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> It was replied to by Geoff I believe it was, and he stated it was
> being corrected in an update/future version.
> An email was released previously that had update information in it,
> and I believe this was covered, but I could be incorrect, as I've read
> dozens of LUG emails today.
>
> And your email did go through, I read it, along with several
> responses, in the last day or two.
>
> Jess M
>
> On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 12:46 PM, Tom Weiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Second try with this post - the first never showed up in the User Group.
> >
> > I welcome the addition of the charting program to Legacy and will
> upgrade
> > when version 7 comes out. However.when I tried to chart my family
> tree,
> > the displayed chart did not display name prefixes (like Gen., Pres, etc)
> and
> > suffixes (like Jr., II, etc). Am I doing something wrong, or is there a
> > glitch in the program?  I had the same problem in uploading gedcom files
> to
> > ancestry.com and could never solve that.
> >
> > Tom
> >
>  > Legacy User Group guidelines:
> >
> > http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> > Archived messages:
> >http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
> > Online technical support: 
> > http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> > To unsubscribe: 
> > http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
>   
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages:
>   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
> Online technical support: 
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> To unsubscribe: 
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>
>
>
>




Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] Possible to search sources

[Mary Figgins]

Thank you for the help.  I was able to find the search and replace under Search 
on the toolbar.  I had never really looked at it.  I thought all the search 
options were under the search button.  You know what they say about "assuming."

Mary Beth Figgins

Jenny M Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ron Taylor wrote
>Dawn is correct.  I have used search and replace to find items in the 
>sources.  You must know which of the fields contains the data you want 
>and then search and replace with the same data so that nothing is 
>changed.  As the search works you will see the records that are located 
>with the data you specify.

I've just made a few tests and I find that you are (partly) right - I 
hadn't noticed before that it does (usually) mention where the 
correction is being made.

However, I tried looking for text in Dates-Death, Notes-Marriage, in 
Citation-Details and in Citation-Text.  In the first 2 cases I could 
indeed see whose record contained the text I was replacing.  In the 
latter 2 cases there was no indication of where the Sources were used 
with those Details or that Text.

The OP wanted to know how to find a certain name within a Source.  It 
looks as though the S & R method of finding it might depend on where the 
name was written.
-- 
Jenny M Benson



Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





   
-
Looking for last minute shopping deals?  Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.



Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

RE: [LegacyUG] Marriage-Centric Charts

[Eric W. Galloway]

But not my father's and mother's descendants, only mine...oh well,
thank you all for your help though!



Legacy User Group guidelines:
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

RE: [LegacyUG] Marriage-Centric Charts

[Eric W. Galloway]

No I was asking for an hourglass-ish report that shows my parents
ancestors and their descendants (for at least a couple generations).  A
number of the commercial sites do this and I had hoped that Legacy
Charting would as well.

Your solution only shows me as a descendant of my parents, and puts me
at the center of the chart, not at all consistent with my goals.

Thank you for your thought on it though...

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ronald
ferguson
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2008 1:26 PM
To: legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Marriage-Centric Charts


Eric,

It may not exactly answer your question, but if, for example I select me
and the Bow-Tie chart it shows me at the centre and my father's
ancestors pn the left and my mother's on the right. Isn't that what you
are asking for?


Ron Ferguson




Legacy User Group guidelines:
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] Sorting on birthdate

[Jenny M Benson]

Valerie Garton wrote
I am interested in your comment about FTM. Does that mean that you 
could look at the index/or whatever it was called view and search all 
the columns ?


What do mean exactly by "search all the columns?"  FTM 2005 gives you an 
Index View which is simply a list of names with birth and death dates. 
By clicking on the column heads you can select which field (either Name 
or Birth, not Death) the list is sorted by (only 1 sort criterion).


But, this view is just a small extra window which opens over the normal 
family view and you can only search it by scanning visually down the 
list for the information you want.  It doesn't look as though you could 
print this list.

--
Jenny M Benson



Legacy User Group guidelines: 
  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] Possible to search sources

[Jenny M Benson]

Ron Taylor wrote
Dawn is correct.  I have used search and replace to find items in the 
sources.  You must know which of the fields contains the data you want 
and then search and replace with the same data so that nothing is 
changed.  As the search works you will see the records that are located 
with the data you specify.


I've just made a few tests and I find that you are (partly) right - I 
hadn't noticed before that it does (usually) mention where the 
correction is being made.


However, I tried looking for text in Dates-Death, Notes-Marriage, in 
Citation-Details and in Citation-Text.  In the first 2 cases I could 
indeed see whose record contained the text I was replacing.  In the 
latter 2 cases there was no indication of where the Sources were used 
with those Details or that Text.


The OP wanted to know how to find a certain name within a Source.  It 
looks as though the S & R method of finding it might depend on where the 
name was written.

--
Jenny M Benson



Legacy User Group guidelines: 
  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

RE: [LegacyUG] Reports - > Pedigree Chart -> Alternate Names

[ronald ferguson]

It ism't their Server - so they can't!


Ron Ferguson

_

For Genealogy, Software and Social visit:
http://www.fergys.co.uk
New Blog: Open Legacy Family File with Open Office
View the Grimshaw Family Tree at:
http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/
For The Fergusons of N.W. England See:
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
_



> Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 22:58:18 -0700
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Reports -> Pedigree Chart -> Alternate Names
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
>
> It is obvious, since both HTML and attachments do come thru to the list, that 
> such are permitted by the software.
> If the LUG management really doesn't want this then they have only one 
> choice...
> change to program software that simply doesn't accept postings containing 
> HTML or attachments.
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message 
> From: ronald ferguson 
> To: legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2008 7:04:32 PM
> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Reports -> Pedigree Chart -> Alternate Names
>
>
> John,
>
> Your last e-mail was 231KB. Please think of the people who have to pay for 
> dial-up by the download size and remember that no attachments and no html is 
> permitted on LUG. That includes embedded images btw.
>
> An URL for the rules of etiquette is given at the bottom of all emails. 
> Furthermore Cathy gave you the answer.
>
> Ron Ferguson
>
>
> 

_
Live Search Charades - guess correctly and find hidden videos
http://www.searchcharades.com/


Legacy User Group guidelines:
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

RE: [LegacyUG] Searching on a couple's given names

[ronald ferguson]

Ron

I'm afraid that your SQL codings do not work in OpenOffice Base as it does not 
use Access SQL but HSQL. I haven't really got time to look at this one today 
but will transcribe it shortly.


Ron Ferguson

_

For Genealogy, Software and Social visit:
http://www.fergys.co.uk
New Blog: Open Legacy Family File with Open Office
View the Grimshaw Family Tree at:
http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/
For The Fergusons of N.W. England See:
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
_







From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Searching on a couple's given names
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 19:52:31 -0600





Using MS Access or Open Office, you can utilize the following SQL query to find 
marriages given any portion of the husband and/or wife names.



SELECT tblMR.IDMR, tblMR.IDIRHusb, tblMR.HusbSurname, tblMR.HusbGivenName, 
tblMR.IDIRWife, tblMR.WifeSurname, tblMR.WifeGivenName
FROM tblMR
WHERE (((tblMR.IDIRHusb)<>0)
 AND ((tblMR.IDIRWife)<>0)
 AND ((tblMR.HusbSurname)Like "*" & [Enter any part of Husband 
Surname: ] & "*")
 AND ((tblMR.HusbGivenName)Like "*" & [Enter any part of Husband Given 
Name: ] & "*")
 AND ((tblMR.WifeSurname) Like "*" & [Enter any part of Wife 
Surname: ] & "*")
 AND ((tblMR.WifeGivenName) Like "*" & [Enter any part of Wife Given 
Name: ] & "*"))
ORDER BY tblMR.IDMR;

Hope this helps.  Perhaps such a query will be included in v7 as it is quite 
simple and could easily be augmented with tagging.



Ron Taylor





_
Get Messenger on your mobile, text MSN to 63463 now!
http://mobile.uk.msn.com/pc/messenger.aspx 


Legacy User Group guidelines:
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

RE: [LegacyUG] Reports - > Pedigree Chart -> Alternate Names

[Brian Lightfoot]

I believe the original poster was talking about creating a Pedigree Chart
from the Reports option in Legacy, not the Pedigree tab. Go to the menu item
at the very top of the page and select "Reports" then select "Report Menu
(Charts)" (or click on the Reports icon on the toolbar). Then click on the
Pedigree tab of the various types of report options. As is typical of all
the various reports, there is another option to include an Index of names
that can appear on the report.

The problem that he was reporting was that within such an Index of names,
there is another option to include Alternate Names. Cathy reported that it
should be disabled but isn't. So if you put a check mark on the Alternate
Names option, you'd expect the created index to include Alternate names but
they never show up.

My question is why would one NOT want Alternate Names to be included on this
type of report (or for just about any type of report).

I guess if you had the chance to view the original poster's exact documents
that he attached, you would have known exactly where he was looking. Hope
that helps.


Brian



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of RICHARD
SCHULTHIES
Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2008 11:27 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Reports - > Pedigree Chart -> Alternate Names

I am completely confused? I have Deluxe. When I am in
the main page: 
Home-Family-Pedigree-Descendant-Chronology-Index-
Research Guidance.
and am using Pedigree, there are NO index choices
under this. It is a different sub program. Choosing 
Index in the list will not affect the Pedigree one.
I can see the desire to have both names (standard and
AKA), appear your personal pedigree, but the format
for that report/screen is unchangable in that way.
IMHO, it is not a bug, but a work around would be
editting the name to be very long and include both,
then Print the pedigree report, and return the name to
the previous name.
I have been wrong before. Please be more specific if I
am not discussing the place your problem is.
Good luck
Rich in LA CA 
--- Brian Lightfoot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Don'tcha jes luv it! That was a perfect example of
> how Internet messages
> fail to convey tonal inflections, etc. If you and I
> were speaking
> face-to-face, I would have immediately understood
> what and how you spoke the
> words "should be".
> 
> Now the big question is if the bug is merely that
> the chart option is not
> being disabled or is Legacy actually intending
> Alternate Names to be
> included on the Index but they are failing to
> appear.
> 
> Can anyone think of good reasons to include
> Alternate Names on a Pedigree
> Chart Name Index? I think I can.
> 
> 
> Brian
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Cathy
> Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2008 8:43 PM
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Reports - > Pedigree Chart
> -> Alternate Names
> 
> Oh help.
> The variety of ways one can read "should be"
> 
> I meant "should be and isn't"
> 
> C
> 
> At 11:00 AM 17/03/2008, you wrote:
> 
> >I agree with your assessment that his biggest
> problem seems to be that he
> >has only one name for his chart and I'm not sure if
> he is expecting a
> >Pedigree Chart to go out on the Internet and try to
> fill in the information
> >for him or what.
> >
> >But I also believe that he is pointing out that the
> option to include
> >Alternate Names is available from the Pedigree
> Chart options within Legacy.
> >Contrary to your statement that the option should
> be greyed out, it isn't.
> >And that is a bug. Unless Legacy believes Alternate
> Names should be
> >included, in which case, it still ain't working.
> >
> >Brian
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Legacy User Group guidelines: 
>http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages: 
>   
>
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
> Online technical support:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> To unsubscribe:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
> 
> 
> 
> 




Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp








Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] Printing Descendant Book Reports with Second Families

[Bruce Jones]

Another option is to add the step children to the first marriage (as
well as to the second marriage) and indicate the Relationship to the
Mother (for the first marriage)  as whatever makes sense to you..
This works for me for Family Group Sheets but I don't know if it will
print on a Descendant Book Report or Descendant Narrative..

On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 10:46 PM, Wynthner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The easy way is to just do a descendant Book Report or Descendant Narrative
> Report on the husband- both families should then show on the report.
>
>
>
> - Original Message 
> From: W Gurney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> I would like to print a Descendant Book Report or a Descendant Narrative
> Report when a female family member had died and her husband remarries and
> has several more children by his second wife. I would like to include the
> children from the second marriage in the report but if I start with the dead
> female's line the second family does not appear. I note the "other spouses"
> box IS checked in the report options box. Does anyone know how to get the
> husband's second family to print so I can show the half brothers and sisters
> to the original family?
>
> Thanks
>
>  
> Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
>
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
>  Archived messages:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
>  Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
>  To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

RE: [LegacyUG] Sorting on birthdate

[Kirsten Bowman]

Valerie:

In my old version of FTM (v11) there is an Index View rather similar to
Legacy's Name List but the window only shows name plus birth and death date.
You do have the option of sorting the list by name *or* by date of birth.  I
haven't used the program for years except to print charts but as I recall,
the search capability was very basic.  Later versions may have improved on
that--heaven knows there have been enough of them!

Kirsten

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Valerie
Garton
Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2008 10:36 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Sorting on birthdate


BRAVO:

Yes this is exactly what I have been asking for.

I am interested in your comment about FTM. Does that mean that you could
look at the index/or whatever it was called view and search all the
columns ?

Regards from Valerie in sunny Sydney.
Researching: BEDDY, CULLODEN, DYAS and ROWAN in Belfast, Dublin, Wicklow
& Wexford
Guild of One-Name Studies No: 4825 for CULLODEN & HIGGINSON





Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp