RE: [LegacyUG] Proper placement of place names
Jackie I agree but I'd like to clarify your statement at the end of first paragraph " ... and it does help identify someone as being from a particular family". This is where errors can occur. Blood/marriage lines can be identified this way but it can also merely mean that the family were retainers/servants of a particular noble family. This ties in with another topic I started about a Master Occupations List. Families would carry on a particular occupation for generations and if you can track this and get back to the medieval it helps to separate the nobility from the worker. Carol > From: jskin...@gmail.com > To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com > Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Proper placement of place names > Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 18:03:29 -0600 > > > Of course, for those of us who dabble in the medieval, this runs right > into the question of the so-called by- names - the infamous "of > Hereford", "of Gloucester" etc. They aren't true surnames - nor are they > true locative names. In many cases they only indicate where a family's > seat of power was at some point in time - but the family may carry it > for some period of time and it does help identify someone as being from > a particular family. > > Even the term "of" as opposed to "de" which some use alternately in > their genealogy can be an important term - if used correctly they can > indicate a time period for the individual so called. (And of course > there is always the debate about what to do with the Welsh Ab and Ap or > Verch and Ferch in the name field.) > > I know what I do with these terms - and my guess is that others treat > them differently. > > That's what's nice about Legacy. It can be molded for a person's > personal tastes and needs. As with most genealogy, there is nothing > iron-clad. > > Jackie > > On 2/12/2012 4:22 PM, Jerry wrote: > > Hard to understand why you wouldn't use a residence event and you could > > forget the "OF." If "OF" has been used correctly, it ALWAYS means the > > person lived there. Jerry > > > > Carl Cox wrote: > > > >> > >> < >> there is no Event and no Source!>> > >> > >> The software I use on my web site requires a GEDCOM input, and does not > >> handle events and sources well, if at all. I strive for accuracy, but if > >> anyone desires more details, I am glad to supply them. I chose my > >> display software because it displays much like Legacy, with families, > >> notes, ancestors and descendants. The family who looks at the web site > >> are mostly interested in the content, not the provenance. Also, the new > >> FamilySearch web site is not yet ready for sources, and probably will > >> never accept events, unless a new GEDCOM standard is accepted. > >> > >> A census does not give the birthplace, except for the state, so if you > >> feel justified in putting the city and you cannot find birth evidence, > >> it is more accurate to use 'of'. > >> > >> Carl > >> > >> > >> Legacy User Group guidelines: > >> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp > >> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: > >> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ > >> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: > >> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ > >> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp > >> Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and > >> on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). > >> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp > >> > > Legacy User Group guidelines: > > http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp > > Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ > > Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ > > Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp > > Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on > > our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). > > To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp > > > > > > > > Legacy User Group guidelines: > http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp > Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: > http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ > Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: > http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ > Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp > Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on > our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). > To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp > > Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.co
Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy 7.5 and source citation import?
Laura, Yes, The information is carried forward from FTM to Legacy and appears in the . It seems that the check boxes, Assigned Sources> Edit Detail> Tag/Comments, are not auto populated. In my example only the source name appears in the narrative report. If the check boxes are selected, the source name and detail appear. I purchased Legacy v7.5 Deluxe upgrade and opted for the download verses the CD and so far all other functions work perfectly. On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 16:22:43 -0600 Laura Johnson writes: > Leonard, > > I am a previous user of FTM16 (and still do a gedcom backwards to the > program for various charts, etc that Legacy does not do). > > All fields of the source transferred correctly to Legacy from the FTM16 gedcom. Did you use the > following gedcom options when exporting the file? > > Destination:FTW > Gedcom: 5.5 > Character set: Ansi > Abbreviated tags check marked Get Free Email with Video Mail & Video Chat! http://www.juno.com/freeemail?refcd=JUTAGOUT1FREM0210 Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy 7.5 and source citation import?
I logged a bug in June, 2010 (ticket [04A-13A13DF1-6EE4]) that sounds very similar to this, if I understand correctly. In my case, I was testing the export from Legacy and then re-import to Legacy. The source database has a mixture of Basic and SourceWriter sources. The problem was with the checkbox that says "Add this Detail to the Source Citation on Reports". This is an option in Legacy for Basic sources, and the export and re-import work fine when checked. However, there is no such user option for individual SourceWriter sources. (Yes, there is for the Text/Comments tab, but not for the source details tab.) For SW sources, any populated source detail fields are critical and such an option would make no sense. The bug was that the import, which can only create Basic style sources, did not automatically turn on this flag for those sources that had originated as SourceWriter sources, and thus those sources had incomplete citations in the target database. Setting the global default in Options > Customize > Sources is also not the answer, since this would mess up any Basic sources for which you don't want the source detail text included. My workaround, in fact, was to revisit as many of my Basic sources as possible and remove any text from the Source Detail field that I didn't want to see on the citations. Then I could at least set the global default. Does this sound like the same bug? Of course, mashing a SourceWriter style of source (or the equivalent in another system) into a Basic source will still garble the order of the contents of the citation, even if all the information is present. The extent of the garbling depends on the template. But at least the content should be present! Ward - Original Message - From: "Laura Johnson" To: Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2012 5:22 PM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy 7.5 and source citation import? Leonard, I am a previous user of FTM16 (and still do a gedcom backwards to the program for various charts, etc that Legacy does not do). My sources transferred correctly without any problems. All fields of the source transferred correctly to Legacy from the FTM16 gedcom. Did you use the following gedcom options when exporting the file? Destination:FTW Gedcom: 5.5 Character set: Ansi Abbreviated tags check marked On 2/12/2012 2:54 PM, gambol wrote: > Paul and Ron, FTM v16 uses a straight forward two screen templet similar > to Legacy's basic source approach. V16 was discontinued in 2008 when > Ancestry tried to invent the wheel, but there is little difference > between the two programs when selecting an existing source or > adding/creating a new source. From FTM v16 to Legacy this part works as > it should. Both FTM and Legacy require knowledge of correct source > format. When a source citation is entered from scratch, and not from a > GEDCOM, the check boxes under the text and comments "add this > text to the source citation" work and the source and citation information > appear as they should in the printed reports. > > Paul, your comment leads me to believe that Legacy does not automatically > populate these text/comment boxes when importing a GEDCOM file. It could > be that FTM does not keep the data in a correctly named GEDCOM field. > Interestingly, there were not GEDCOM errors noted. > > Leonard > > > > > On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:56:22 -0700 "Paul Gray" > writes: >> I can't really comment on the data transfer between FTM and Legacy. >> >> But, if I understand you correctly, the missing information is on >> the edit source detail screen, under the text and/or comments tab. >> Have you checked, under the text and comments boxes, the "add this >> text to the source citation" boxes? >> >> Paul Gray >> >> >> >> >> >> From: Ron Ferguson [mailto:ronfergy@tiscali.co.uk] >> Sent: February-12-12 12:35 PM >> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com >> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy 7.5 and source citation import? >> >> Leonard, >> >> Am I correct in thinking that FTM16 has a template system for its >> sources similar to Legacy’s Source Writer? If so the problem is >> that a GEDCOM does not recognise the layout – it is the same with >> the Legacy version. I suspect that the best you can hope for is some >> sort of Basic Sourcing. >> >> Maybe there is someone who has transferred similar files who can >> advise you, but I cannot think of an easy way round the problem >> >> >> From: gambol >> Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2012 5:29 PM >> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com >> Subject: [LegacyUG] Legacy 7.5 and source citation import? >> >> When I import a GEDCOM file from Family Tree Maker v16, the FTM >> source Citation Page and Citation Text fields do not property appear >> in the footnote/endnote when generating a Legacy v7.5 narrative >> report. >> >> In Legacy's Show List of Assigned Sources, the page and text >> information does appear under the Text/Comment tab and in the Source >> Detail Text and Detail Comments fields, but does not under the
Re: [LegacyUG] Proper placement of place names
Of course, for those of us who dabble in the medieval, this runs right into the question of the so-called by- names - the infamous "of Hereford", "of Gloucester" etc. They aren't true surnames - nor are they true locative names. In many cases they only indicate where a family's seat of power was at some point in time - but the family may carry it for some period of time and it does help identify someone as being from a particular family. Even the term "of" as opposed to "de" which some use alternately in their genealogy can be an important term - if used correctly they can indicate a time period for the individual so called. (And of course there is always the debate about what to do with the Welsh Ab and Ap or Verch and Ferch in the name field.) I know what I do with these terms - and my guess is that others treat them differently. That's what's nice about Legacy. It can be molded for a person's personal tastes and needs. As with most genealogy, there is nothing iron-clad. Jackie On 2/12/2012 4:22 PM, Jerry wrote: > Hard to understand why you wouldn't use a residence event and you could > forget the "OF." If "OF" has been used correctly, it ALWAYS means the person > lived there. Jerry > > Carl Cox wrote: > >> >> <> there is no Event and no Source!>> >> >> The software I use on my web site requires a GEDCOM input, and does not >> handle events and sources well, if at all. I strive for accuracy, but if >> anyone desires more details, I am glad to supply them. I chose my >> display software because it displays much like Legacy, with families, >> notes, ancestors and descendants. The family who looks at the web site >> are mostly interested in the content, not the provenance. Also, the new >> FamilySearch web site is not yet ready for sources, and probably will >> never accept events, unless a new GEDCOM standard is accepted. >> >> A census does not give the birthplace, except for the state, so if you >> feel justified in putting the city and you cannot find birth evidence, >> it is more accurate to use 'of'. >> >> Carl >> >> >> Legacy User Group guidelines: >> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp >> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: >> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ >> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: >> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ >> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp >> Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on >> our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). >> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp >> > Legacy User Group guidelines: > http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp > Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: > http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ > Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: > http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ > Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp > Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on > our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). > To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp > > Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy 7.5 and source citation import?
Leonard, I am a previous user of FTM16 (and still do a gedcom backwards to the program for various charts, etc that Legacy does not do). My sources transferred correctly without any problems. All fields of the source transferred correctly to Legacy from the FTM16 gedcom. Did you use the following gedcom options when exporting the file? Destination:FTW Gedcom: 5.5 Character set: Ansi Abbreviated tags check marked On 2/12/2012 2:54 PM, gambol wrote: > Paul and Ron, FTM v16 uses a straight forward two screen templet similar > to Legacy's basic source approach. V16 was discontinued in 2008 when > Ancestry tried to invent the wheel, but there is little difference > between the two programs when selecting an existing source or > adding/creating a new source. From FTM v16 to Legacy this part works as > it should. Both FTM and Legacy require knowledge of correct source > format. When a source citation is entered from scratch, and not from a > GEDCOM, the check boxes under the text and comments "add this > text to the source citation" work and the source and citation information > appear as they should in the printed reports. > > Paul, your comment leads me to believe that Legacy does not automatically > populate these text/comment boxes when importing a GEDCOM file. It could > be that FTM does not keep the data in a correctly named GEDCOM field. > Interestingly, there were not GEDCOM errors noted. > > Leonard > > > > > On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:56:22 -0700 "Paul Gray" > writes: >> I can't really comment on the data transfer between FTM and Legacy. >> >> But, if I understand you correctly, the missing information is on >> the edit source detail screen, under the text and/or comments tab. >> Have you checked, under the text and comments boxes, the "add this >> text to the source citation" boxes? >> >> Paul Gray >> >> >> >> >> >> From: Ron Ferguson [mailto:ronfergy@tiscali.co.uk] >> Sent: February-12-12 12:35 PM >> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com >> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy 7.5 and source citation import? >> >> Leonard, >> >> Am I correct in thinking that FTM16 has a template system for its >> sources similar to Legacy’s Source Writer? If so the problem is >> that a GEDCOM does not recognise the layout – it is the same with >> the Legacy version. I suspect that the best you can hope for is some >> sort of Basic Sourcing. >> >> Maybe there is someone who has transferred similar files who can >> advise you, but I cannot think of an easy way round the problem >> >> >> From: gambol >> Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2012 5:29 PM >> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com >> Subject: [LegacyUG] Legacy 7.5 and source citation import? >> >> When I import a GEDCOM file from Family Tree Maker v16, the FTM >> source Citation Page and Citation Text fields do not property appear >> in the footnote/endnote when generating a Legacy v7.5 narrative >> report. >> >> In Legacy's Show List of Assigned Sources, the page and text >> information does appear under the Text/Comment tab and in the Source >> Detail Text and Detail Comments fields, but does not under the >> Output tab. The result is when viewing a narrative report, the >> footnote/endnote appears with only the Source List Name. The Detail >> Text information does not, which of course is needed to located the >> detail information within the source. >> >> An example of one of my FTM file census citations: Census, 1900 CT, >> New Haven Co, Waterbury Township, District 418, p.8, date, state. >> In Legacy's narrative report only the source, Census, 1900 CT, >> appears. >> >> MY work-around is to copy the Detail Text to the Source Detail field >> on a source citation by source citation basis. This is acceptable >> for a small file, but not for my family file with 40,000 + >> individuals; each with an average of three source citations per >> person. Is there an option I am missing, or is this an anomaly with >> FTM's GEDCOM file generation algorithm. >> >> >> Is there help? >> >> Leonard Middlebrooks >> > > 53 Year Old Mom Looks 33 > The Stunning Results of Her Wrinkle Trick Has Botox Doctors Worried > http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/4f38274d4f5cc10b1176st02vuc > > > Legacy User Group guidelines: > http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp > Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: > http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ > Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: > http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ > Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp > Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on > our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). > To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp > > > Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyu
RE: [LegacyUG] Proper placement of place names
Hard to understand why you wouldn't use a residence event and you could forget the "OF." If "OF" has been used correctly, it ALWAYS means the person lived there. Jerry Carl Cox wrote: > > >> > >The software I use on my web site requires a GEDCOM input, and does not >handle events and sources well, if at all. I strive for accuracy, but if >anyone desires more details, I am glad to supply them. I chose my >display software because it displays much like Legacy, with families, >notes, ancestors and descendants. The family who looks at the web site >are mostly interested in the content, not the provenance. Also, the new >FamilySearch web site is not yet ready for sources, and probably will >never accept events, unless a new GEDCOM standard is accepted. > >A census does not give the birthplace, except for the state, so if you >feel justified in putting the city and you cannot find birth evidence, >it is more accurate to use 'of'. > >Carl > > >Legacy User Group guidelines: >http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp >Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: >http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ >Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: >http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ >Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp >Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on >our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). >To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp > Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
RE: [LegacyUG] Legacy 7.5 and source citation import?
Hi again, Trying to understand exactly what the import has done. Is your Master Source in Legacy just --> Census, 1900 CT? And, is this consistent with the FTM equivalent of Master Source, or is your FTM master source at a lower level e.g. including county, township, district? Is there any information in source detail at all, or is all of the detail in text and or comments? I am trying to get at whether the information in Legacy is in the same spot as it would be if you were inputting it from scratch. I suspect not, as the information you are copying from the detail text to source detail seems like it should have been in source detail all along. So, is the real issue (ignoring for now the cause) that Legacy ends up with what should be in source detail in the source detail text field. Paul Gray -Original Message- From: gambol [mailto:gam...@juno.com] Sent: February-12-12 1:55 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy 7.5 and source citation import? Paul and Ron, FTM v16 uses a straight forward two screen templet similar to Legacy's basic source approach. V16 was discontinued in 2008 when Ancestry tried to invent the wheel, but there is little difference between the two programs when selecting an existing source or adding/creating a new source. From FTM v16 to Legacy this part works as it should. Both FTM and Legacy require knowledge of correct source format. When a source citation is entered from scratch, and not from a GEDCOM, the check boxes under the text and comments "add this text to the source citation" work and the source and citation information appear as they should in the printed reports. Paul, your comment leads me to believe that Legacy does not automatically populate these text/comment boxes when importing a GEDCOM file. It could be that FTM does not keep the data in a correctly named GEDCOM field. Interestingly, there were not GEDCOM errors noted. Leonard On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:56:22 -0700 "Paul Gray" writes: > I can't really comment on the data transfer between FTM and Legacy. > > But, if I understand you correctly, the missing information is on the > edit source detail screen, under the text and/or comments tab. > Have you checked, under the text and comments boxes, the "add this > text to the source citation" boxes? > > Paul Gray > > > > > > From: Ron Ferguson [mailto:ronfergy@tiscali.co.uk] > Sent: February-12-12 12:35 PM > To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com > Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy 7.5 and source citation import? > > Leonard, > > Am I correct in thinking that FTM16 has a template system for its > sources similar to Legacy’s Source Writer? If so the problem is that a > GEDCOM does not recognise the layout – it is the same with the Legacy > version. I suspect that the best you can hope for is some sort of > Basic Sourcing. > > Maybe there is someone who has transferred similar files who can > advise you, but I cannot think of an easy way round the problem > > > From: gambol > Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2012 5:29 PM > To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com > Subject: [LegacyUG] Legacy 7.5 and source citation import? > > When I import a GEDCOM file from Family Tree Maker v16, the FTM source > Citation Page and Citation Text fields do not property appear in the > footnote/endnote when generating a Legacy v7.5 narrative report. > > In Legacy's Show List of Assigned Sources, the page and text > information does appear under the Text/Comment tab and in the Source > Detail Text and Detail Comments fields, but does not under the Output > tab. The result is when viewing a narrative report, the > footnote/endnote appears with only the Source List Name. The Detail > Text information does not, which of course is needed to located the > detail information within the source. > > An example of one of my FTM file census citations: Census, 1900 CT, > New Haven Co, Waterbury Township, District 418, p.8, date, state. > In Legacy's narrative report only the source, Census, 1900 CT, > appears. > > MY work-around is to copy the Detail Text to the Source Detail field > on a source citation by source citation basis. This is acceptable for > a small file, but not for my family file with 40,000 + individuals; > each with an average of three source citations per person. Is there > an option I am missing, or is this an anomaly with FTM's GEDCOM file > generation algorithm. > > > Is there help? > > Leonard Middlebrooks > 53 Year Old Mom Looks 33 The Stunning Results of Her Wrinkle Trick Has Botox Doctors Worried http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/4f38274d4f5cc10b1176st02vuc Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytr
Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy 7.5 and source citation import?
Paul and Ron, FTM v16 uses a straight forward two screen templet similar to Legacy's basic source approach. V16 was discontinued in 2008 when Ancestry tried to invent the wheel, but there is little difference between the two programs when selecting an existing source or adding/creating a new source. From FTM v16 to Legacy this part works as it should. Both FTM and Legacy require knowledge of correct source format. When a source citation is entered from scratch, and not from a GEDCOM, the check boxes under the text and comments "add this text to the source citation" work and the source and citation information appear as they should in the printed reports. Paul, your comment leads me to believe that Legacy does not automatically populate these text/comment boxes when importing a GEDCOM file. It could be that FTM does not keep the data in a correctly named GEDCOM field. Interestingly, there were not GEDCOM errors noted. Leonard On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:56:22 -0700 "Paul Gray" writes: > I can't really comment on the data transfer between FTM and Legacy. > > But, if I understand you correctly, the missing information is on > the edit source detail screen, under the text and/or comments tab. > Have you checked, under the text and comments boxes, the "add this > text to the source citation" boxes? > > Paul Gray > > > > > > From: Ron Ferguson [mailto:ronfergy@tiscali.co.uk] > Sent: February-12-12 12:35 PM > To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com > Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy 7.5 and source citation import? > > Leonard, > > Am I correct in thinking that FTM16 has a template system for its > sources similar to Legacy’s Source Writer? If so the problem is > that a GEDCOM does not recognise the layout – it is the same with > the Legacy version. I suspect that the best you can hope for is some > sort of Basic Sourcing. > > Maybe there is someone who has transferred similar files who can > advise you, but I cannot think of an easy way round the problem > > > From: gambol > Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2012 5:29 PM > To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com > Subject: [LegacyUG] Legacy 7.5 and source citation import? > > When I import a GEDCOM file from Family Tree Maker v16, the FTM > source Citation Page and Citation Text fields do not property appear > in the footnote/endnote when generating a Legacy v7.5 narrative > report. > > In Legacy's Show List of Assigned Sources, the page and text > information does appear under the Text/Comment tab and in the Source > Detail Text and Detail Comments fields, but does not under the > Output tab. The result is when viewing a narrative report, the > footnote/endnote appears with only the Source List Name. The Detail > Text information does not, which of course is needed to located the > detail information within the source. > > An example of one of my FTM file census citations: Census, 1900 CT, > New Haven Co, Waterbury Township, District 418, p.8, date, state. > In Legacy's narrative report only the source, Census, 1900 CT, > appears. > > MY work-around is to copy the Detail Text to the Source Detail field > on a source citation by source citation basis. This is acceptable > for a small file, but not for my family file with 40,000 + > individuals; each with an average of three source citations per > person. Is there an option I am missing, or is this an anomaly with > FTM's GEDCOM file generation algorithm. > > > Is there help? > > Leonard Middlebrooks > 53 Year Old Mom Looks 33 The Stunning Results of Her Wrinkle Trick Has Botox Doctors Worried http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/4f38274d4f5cc10b1176st02vuc Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
RE: [LegacyUG] Any reports of problems with the latest update??
Nannette; I'm sorry to hear you're having problems too. I'm glad I had a backup. Unfortunately it was an older backup so I lost a some of my recent work, but it was better than nothing. I haven't checked my sources and photos yet. I hope I haven't lost any of them. From: Nannette Fretwell [mailto:nannet...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2012 2:38 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Any reports of problems with the latest update?? Diane, I too had all my source documentation, transcriptions and photos stripped away with this last update. Now I'm doing backups after each sourcing entry series. What a frustrating situation. Nannette Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
RE: [LegacyUG] Any reports of problems with the latest update??
Ron; Thank you for the reply, but I ran check/repair immediately after noticing the problem with the data. It didn't find any problems. From: Ron Ferguson [mailto:ronfergy@tiscali.co.uk] Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2012 4:38 AM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Any reports of problems with the latest update?? Diane, I suggest that you run File>File Maintenance>Check Repair, repeatedly until you it stops reporting errors, and then check again. Also closing Legacy and turning off the machine can sometimes eradicate similar problems. If neither of these suggestions work, then please come back to us. Ron Ferguson http://www.fergys.co.uk Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
RE: [LegacyUG] Legacy 7.5 and source citation import?
I can't really comment on the data transfer between FTM and Legacy. But, if I understand you correctly, the missing information is on the edit source detail screen, under the text and/or comments tab. Have you checked, under the text and comments boxes, the "add this text to the source citation" boxes? Paul Gray From: Ron Ferguson [mailto:ronfergy@tiscali.co.uk] Sent: February-12-12 12:35 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy 7.5 and source citation import? Leonard, Am I correct in thinking that FTM16 has a template system for its sources similar to Legacy’s Source Writer? If so the problem is that a GEDCOM does not recognise the layout – it is the same with the Legacy version. I suspect that the best you can hope for is some sort of Basic Sourcing. Maybe there is someone who has transferred similar files who can advise you, but I cannot think of an easy way round the problem From: gambol Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2012 5:29 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: [LegacyUG] Legacy 7.5 and source citation import? When I import a GEDCOM file from Family Tree Maker v16, the FTM source Citation Page and Citation Text fields do not property appear in the footnote/endnote when generating a Legacy v7.5 narrative report. In Legacy's Show List of Assigned Sources, the page and text information does appear under the Text/Comment tab and in the Source Detail Text and Detail Comments fields, but does not under the Output tab. The result is when viewing a narrative report, the footnote/endnote appears with only the Source List Name. The Detail Text information does not, which of course is needed to located the detail information within the source. An example of one of my FTM file census citations: Census, 1900 CT, New Haven Co, Waterbury Township, District 418, p.8, date, state. In Legacy's narrative report only the source, Census, 1900 CT, appears. MY work-around is to copy the Detail Text to the Source Detail field on a source citation by source citation basis. This is acceptable for a small file, but not for my family file with 40,000 + individuals; each with an average of three source citations per person. Is there an option I am missing, or is this an anomaly with FTM's GEDCOM file generation algorithm. Is there help? Leonard Middlebrooks Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy 7.5 and source citation import?
Leonard, Am I correct in thinking that FTM16 has a template system for its sources similar to Legacy’s Source Writer? If so the problem is that a GEDCOM does not recognise the layout – it is the same with the Legacy version. I suspect that the best you can hope for is some sort of Basic Sourcing. Maybe there is someone who has transferred similar files who can advise you, but I cannot think of an easy way round the problem From: gambol Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2012 5:29 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: [LegacyUG] Legacy 7.5 and source citation import? When I import a GEDCOM file from Family Tree Maker v16, the FTM source Citation Page and Citation Text fields do not property appear in the footnote/endnote when generating a Legacy v7.5 narrative report. In Legacy's Show List of Assigned Sources, the page and text information does appear under the Text/Comment tab and in the Source Detail Text and Detail Comments fields, but does not under the Output tab. The result is when viewing a narrative report, the footnote/endnote appears with only the Source List Name. The Detail Text information does not, which of course is needed to located the detail information within the source. An example of one of my FTM file census citations: Census, 1900 CT, New Haven Co, Waterbury Township, District 418, p.8, date, state. In Legacy's narrative report only the source, Census, 1900 CT, appears. MY work-around is to copy the Detail Text to the Source Detail field on a source citation by source citation basis. This is acceptable for a small file, but not for my family file with 40,000 + individuals; each with an average of three source citations per person. Is there an option I am missing, or is this an anomaly with FTM's GEDCOM file generation algorithm. Is there help? Leonard Middlebrooks Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] Am I totally missing this?
Michele - In the Ancestor Book menu go to Report Options and then format. You will find Use Short Locations toward the bottom of the left column. Kay - Original Message - From: To: Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2012 9:52 AM Subject: [LegacyUG] Am I totally missing this? I am doing an Ancestor Book for a friend. I did 5 generations of his direct line to get him started. I am trying to print it out but I can’t find an option to use the short locations. I know it has to be there somewhere but I can’t find it! michele Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] Am I totally missing this?
Thank you, Julia Michele -Original Message- From: julia _ Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2012 12:55 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Am I totally missing this? I see it under the Format tab of the Report Options (left side, second from the bottom). Julia > From: cranberryf...@cobridge.tv > To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com > Subject: [LegacyUG] Am I totally missing this? > Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:52:06 -0500 > > I am doing an Ancestor Book for a friend. I did 5 generations of his > direct line to get him started. I am trying to print it out but I > can’t find an option to use the short locations. I know it has to be > there somewhere but I can’t find it! > > michele > > > Legacy User Group guidelines: > http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp > Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: > http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ > Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: > http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ > Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp > Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) > and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). > To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp - No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 10.0.1424 / Virus Database: 2112/4805 - Release Date: 02/12/12 Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
RE: [LegacyUG] Am I totally missing this?
I see it under the Format tab of the Report Options (left side, second from the bottom). Julia > From: cranberryf...@cobridge.tv > To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com > Subject: [LegacyUG] Am I totally missing this? > Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:52:06 -0500 > > I am doing an Ancestor Book for a friend. I did 5 generations of his > direct line to get him started. I am trying to print it out but I > can’t find an option to use the short locations. I know it has to be > there somewhere but I can’t find it! > > michele > > > Legacy User Group guidelines: > http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp > Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: > http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ > Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: > http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ > Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp > Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) > and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). > To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
RE: [LegacyUG] Proper placement of place names
Thank you to all that responded to my question, both privately and via the UG mailing list. It was extremely helpful! Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
RE: [LegacyUG] Proper placement of place names
<> The software I use on my web site requires a GEDCOM input, and does not handle events and sources well, if at all. I strive for accuracy, but if anyone desires more details, I am glad to supply them. I chose my display software because it displays much like Legacy, with families, notes, ancestors and descendants. The family who looks at the web site are mostly interested in the content, not the provenance. Also, the new FamilySearch web site is not yet ready for sources, and probably will never accept events, unless a new GEDCOM standard is accepted. A census does not give the birthplace, except for the state, so if you feel justified in putting the city and you cannot find birth evidence, it is more accurate to use 'of'. Carl Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
[LegacyUG] Sourcing Naturalization records
Hello, I am wondering how others source naturalization records. There are frequently several pages to an individual's record, The petition for naturalization, declaration of intentions,oath,witness statement, the certificate itself etc. All from many different places throughout the U.S. Now I am creating an event called Naturalization and adding each document as a source separately. So I have up to 5 documents added to the Naturalization event and frankly, a source for each document is getting quite confusing and redundant. Example: declaration of intentions from New York, Texas,California,Louisiana,Washington. and the same for the other naturalization documents. I understand each location has its own unique source data Would it be better or typical to combine each document into one .jpg and creating one source, "Eastern District Court of New York Naturalization Records" rather than "Petition for Naturalizations of Eastern District Court of New York Naturalization Records" "Declaration of Intentions of Eastern District Court of New York Naturalization Records" "Oath and Allegiance of Eastern District Court of New York Naturalization Records" then the same for the Southern District, and the others states. I understand its a personal preference, how do others handle this. Thanks for the advice, Brian Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] Flip-Pal scanner stitched image question
I use my very old Adobe Photoshop Essentials v. 2 and have no trouble opening and editing a stitched photo. - Original Message - From: Paula Ryburn To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2012 2:26 PM Subject: [LegacyUG] Flip-Pal scanner stitched image question Probably off-topic, but... If you have a Flip-Pal scanner and have produced a "stitched" file... Have you been able to edit that stitched file in your image editor? My camera's software hung / crashed when I tried to open the stitched file. Just trying to see if anyone else has experienced this phenomenon and can help me figure out how to get rid of it. Thanks, --Paula in Texas Researching: Adair Baker Beasley Benson Betz Bigley Blagrave Burton Chapman Clement Clough Coppernoll Costine Daulton Dinwiddie Doody Ellis Exline Field Floran Floyd Gates Goodale Gordon Gump Hale Harbaugh Hind Hopkins Hughes Hurdle Jones Klein Koyle Laswell McDonald Misner Passwaters Pelton Roberts Roche Ryburn Sanford Short Singer Sullivan Weller Williams Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] Proper placement of place names
On 12/02/2012 04:26, Carl Cox wrote: > > My use of my Legacy file must be different from others. The place I am > using them will not display events nor sources, so I need a way to > indicate the first place I find a location for a person, and 'of'' works > well. But I appreciate how others use the Legacy capability. > I am intrigued now as to where you are using these "of locations" if there is no Event and no Source! -- Jenny M Benson Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
