Re: A weird spacing problem
Robert, For what it's worth, the following code runs without spacing issues on 2.18.2 Note that I commented out one of the overrides. -Greg % \version "2.18.2" PartPOneVoiceOne = { \clef "treble" \key c \major \time 3/4 fis'8) c''8\rest \override NoteColumn #'force-hshift = #-2.5 fis'!2| fis'!2.^~| fis'8 [\override NoteColumn #'force-hshift = #-1 f'!8 ] d'2| } PartPOneVoiceTwo = { \clef "treble" \key c \major \time 3/4 8 d'8 \rest < d' f'! >4 _(< c' es'! >4 | \override NoteColumn #'force-hshift = #-2.5 4 c'4 b4_~)| b2.| } PartPTwoVoiceOne = { \clef "bass" \key c \major \time 3/4 \once \override NoteColumn.X-offset = #-4 \stemDown 8 e8 \rest < es fis a >2| \once \override NoteColumn.X-offset = #-4 \stemUp f4 a4 gis4| s2.| } PartPTwoVoiceTwo = { \clef "bass" \key c \major \time 3/4 << \stemDown {8 d8 \rest s4 } \\ { a8 s8 2 } >> | %\override NoteColumn #'force-hshift = #-5 es2.| \override NoteColumn #'force-hshift = #-2 \stemDown < es g >2.| } \score { \new PianoStaff \with { \override VerticalAxisGroup.staff-staff-spacing = #'((basic-distance . 12)) connectArpeggios = ##t } << \new Staff = "upper" << \new Voice = "PartPOneVoiceOne" \PartPOneVoiceOne \new Voice = "PartPOneVoiceTwo" \PartPOneVoiceTwo >> \new Staff = "lower" << \new Voice = "PartPTwoVoiceOne" \PartPTwoVoiceOne \new Voice = "PartPTwoVoiceTwo" \PartPTwoVoiceTwo >> >> } % Hi Valentin, > Thanks for your interest in my problem > The piece, as you can see in the screenshot, is a piano score with two > voices in each staff and occasionally a third voice by << { } \\ { } >> or > \partcombine. > I triple-checked my source code, first by hiding successively each voice, > and see what happens, and then to comment out and successively reopen all > lines, 55 in each voice, in my score. Compared with the original > everything is OK except the passage (only 3 bars) shown in the screenshot. > Thereafter, in the last 7 bars of the piece everything is again perfect. > > Overall there are several instances where I needed "\once \override > NoteColumn #'force-hshift = #x" , and a few "\once\override > NoteColumn.X-offset = #x”. > I use LilyPond 2_19_83-1 with TeXShop as the editor. Usually it works > perfectly. > I include the problematic part of the score. It is certainly not a *M*WE > but it works for me and it shows the problem. It also shows that its origin > does not ly in the previous bars. > Thanks again for your interest. > Best regards, > Robert > > > On 3 Jun 2020, at 14:14, Valentin Villenave > wrote: > On 6/3/20, Robert Blackstone wrote: > Hi Robert, > Unless you post some code, it’s gonna be difficult to help you. You > should first double check your source files in case there’s some > \override affecting the DotColumn object somewhere? > Cheers, > -- V. I’m vainly struggling with a weird spacing problem
Re: A weird spacing problem
On 6/3/20, Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote: > When I set piano four part I let Lilypond do all the work. Hear hear! (Even for more than four parts, btw.) > I have taken the liberty of recoding the section using four-part voicing. Yeah, so did I! That sure was tempting wasn’t it? :-) Cheers, -- V.
Re: A weird spacing problem
On 6/3/20, Robert Blackstone wrote: > Overall there are several instances where I needed "\once \override > NoteColumn #'force-hshift = #x" , and a few "\once\override > NoteColumn.X-offset = #x”. Ouch. That’s pretty brutal. May I ask why you felt the need to use all these? This alters drastically the layout, and basically amounts to force your own spacing decisions onto LilyPond’s. Frankly, I’ve written (and transcribed) very complex piano scores, and not once have I needed to mess with Lily’s own idea of where the NoteColumn objects should begin and end; of course \voiceThree and \voiceFour internally rely on that, but with some fairly sane (and tame) predefined values. If you need some non-standard alignments, I’d recommend using the simplest of tricks like invisible rests and duration multipliers instead: upperI = \relative { fis'8 r fis2 fis2.~ fis8 f d2 } upperII = \relative { 8 r s32 4*15/16( s4*3/4 c b)~ 2. } lowerI = \relative { \oneVoice 8 r 2 \voiceOne s4*3/4 f a gis s2. } lowerII = \relative { s2. es } \new PianoStaff << \accidentalStyle PianoStaff.neo-modern \new Staff = "up" << \time 3/4 \new Voice { \voiceOne \upperI } \new Voice { \voiceTwo \upperII } >> \new Staff = "dn" << \clef bass \new Voice { \voiceOne \lowerI } \new Voice { \voiceTwo \lowerII } >> >> \layout { \context { \Staff \consists #Merge_rests_engraver } } Cheers, -- V.
Re: A weird spacing problem
Am Mi., 3. Juni 2020 um 19:27 Uhr schrieb Robert Blackstone : > > Hi Valentin, > > Thanks for your interest in my problem > > The piece, as you can see in the screenshot, is a piano score with two voices > in each staff and occasionally a third voice by << { } \\ { } >> or > \partcombine. > I triple-checked my source code, first by hiding successively each voice, and > see what happens, and then to comment out and successively reopen all lines, > 55 in each voice, in my score. Compared with the original everything is OK > except the passage (only 3 bars) shown in the screenshot. Thereafter, in the > last 7 bars of the piece everything is again perfect. > > Overall there are several instances where I needed "\once \override > NoteColumn #'force-hshift = #x" , and a few "\once\override > NoteColumn.X-offset = #x”. > > I use LilyPond 2_19_83-1 with TeXShop as the editor. Usually it works > perfectly. > > I include the problematic part of the score. It is certainly not a MWE but it > works for me and it shows the problem. It also shows that its origin does not > ly in the previous bars. > > Thanks again for your interest. > > Best regards, > Robert > > > > On 3 Jun 2020, at 14:14, Valentin Villenave wrote: > > On 6/3/20, Robert Blackstone wrote: > > I’m vainly struggling with a weird spacing problem > > > Hi Robert, > Unless you post some code, it’s gonna be difficult to help you. You > should first double check your source files in case there’s some > \override affecting the DotColumn object somewhere? > > Cheers, > -- V. > > Hi Robert, there are a lot unrelated warnings cluttering the log. I'd not use pitched rests but normal rests with an override for staff-position. Also, \voiceXxx Though, that's unrelated. The culprit seems to be your \override NoteColumn.X-offset = #-4 (and some forgotten(?) \once ... ) A minimal would be: << { \once \override NoteColumn.X-offset = #-4 d'2. } { \voiceThree b4 } >> The negative X-offset will push all other stuff to the left including the dots. Cheers, Harm Makes no sense to me
RE: A weird spacing problem
Robert, When I set piano four part I let Lilypond do all the work. I have taken the liberty of recoding the section using four-part voicing. Mark From: lilypond-user [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Robert Blackstone Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2020 10:27 AM To: Valentin Villenave Cc: Lilypond-User Mailing List Subject: Re: A weird spacing problem Hi Valentin, Thanks for your interest in my problem The piece, as you can see in the screenshot, is a piano score with two voices in each staff and occasionally a third voice by << { } \\ { } >> or \partcombine. I triple-checked my source code, first by hiding successively each voice, and see what happens, and then to comment out and successively reopen all lines, 55 in each voice, in my score. Compared with the original everything is OK except the passage (only 3 bars) shown in the screenshot. Thereafter, in the last 7 bars of the piece everything is again perfect. Overall there are several instances where I needed "\once \override NoteColumn #'force-hshift = #x" , and a few "\once\override NoteColumn.X-offset = #x”. I use LilyPond 2_19_83-1 with TeXShop as the editor. Usually it works perfectly. I include the problematic part of the score. It is certainly not a MWE but it works for me and it shows the problem. It also shows that its origin does not ly in the previous bars. Thanks again for your interest. \version "2.19.49" \header { } \new PianoStaff << \new Staff = "upper" << \time 3/4 \key c \major \new Voice = "soprano" { \voiceOne \relative c'' { fis,8 r \once \override NoteColumn.force-hshift = #2.2 \once \override Accidental.X-extent = #'(1 . 0) \once \override Accidental.extra-offset = #'(3 . 0) fis!2 | fis2.~ | fis8 f d2 | } } \new Voice = "alto" { \voiceTwo \relative c'' { 8 r 4 ( | c b~) | b2. | } } >> \new Staff = "lower" << \time 3/4 \key c \major \clef bass \new Voice = "tenor" { \voiceOne \relative c { s2. | f4 a gis | s2. | } } \new Voice = "bass" { \voiceTwo \relative c { 8 d\rest 2 | ees2. | | } } >> >> \layout { indent = #0 } %{ convert-ly.py (GNU LilyPond) 2.19.80 convert-ly.py: Processing `'... Applying conversion: 2.19.2, 2.19.7, 2.19.11, 2.19.16, 2.19.22, 2.19.24, 2.19.28, 2.19.29, 2.19.32, 2.19.40, 2.19.46, 2.19.49 %} %{ convert-ly.py (GNU LilyPond) 2.19.80 convert-ly.py: Processing `'... Applying conversion: The document has not been changed. %}
Re: A weird spacing problem
Hi Valentin, Thanks for your interest in my problemThe piece, as you can see in the screenshot, is a piano score with two voices in each staff and occasionally a third voice by << { } \\ { } >> or \partcombine.I triple-checked my source code, first by hiding successively each voice, and see what happens, and then to comment out and successively reopen all lines, 55 in each voice, in my score. Compared with the original everything is OK except the passage (only 3 bars) shown in the screenshot. Thereafter, in the last 7 bars of the piece everything is again perfect. Overall there are several instances where I needed "\once \override NoteColumn #'force-hshift = #x" , and a few "\once\override NoteColumn.X-offset = #x”.I use LilyPond 2_19_83-1 with TeXShop as the editor. Usually it works perfectly.I include the problematic part of the score. It is certainly not a MWE but it works for me and it shows the problem. It also shows that its origin does not ly in the previous bars.Thanks again for your interest. Horizontal-spacing-problem_ly.tex Description: Binary data Best regards,RobertOn 3 Jun 2020, at 14:14, Valentin Villenavewrote:On 6/3/20, Robert Blackstone wrote:I’m vainly struggling with a weird spacing problemHi Robert,Unless you post some code, it’s gonna be difficult to help you. Youshould first double check your source files in case there’s some\override affecting the DotColumn object somewhere?Cheers,-- V.
Re: A weird spacing problem
On 6/3/20, Robert Blackstone wrote: > I’m vainly struggling with a weird spacing problem Hi Robert, Unless you post some code, it’s gonna be difficult to help you. You should first double check your source files in case there’s some \override affecting the DotColumn object somewhere? Cheers, -- V.
A weird spacing problem
Dear all, I’m vainly struggling with a weird spacing problem that I’ve never seen before: the dot belonging to, for instance, c’2. is widely separated from the note itself. (See screenshot). In this section the horizontal note spacing is also rather capricious. ( \time 3/4 for the entire piece. No problems until bar 46 - and after bar 49 unti the end (bar 55 ) I’ve no idea what could have caused this. And I’ll be very grateful for any suggestion. Best regards, Robert Blackstone
Re: A spacing problem
Hi Robert, That's really interesting. You use a TeX editor for lilypond, presumably for syntax highlighting and checking? I had some vague idea lilypond was loosely based on TeX in the original days, but I did not think it is compatible now. I though the '\' notation was the only surviving archaeological DNA fragment. I use vim with point and click in Ubuntu. When you get it all up and running and add snippet packages and so on, it is a pleasure to use. As a long time emacs user, I find the present emacs lilypond mode is very buggy and effectively unusable, for me anyway, and messes up indenting quite badly. A pity. Although I have used emacs forever, I have never spent time coding emacs, so it's not really my area to fix it. With a little love from some kind developer, that would also e a very good environment. On your point re compiling - Frescobaldi is not compiling, it's lilypond. So that is a curious thing. Perhaps you lilypond command settings in Frescobaldi are different to what you set up in TeXShop. Andrew On Fri, 5 Jul 2019 at 23:00, Robert Blackstone wrote: > > BTW, I use TeXShop for my input and I am very happy with it. For several > reasons I never liked Frescobaldi. TeXShop accepts my little tricks and It > is more forgiving than Frescobaldi. As an example, the present > “problem-score” is compiled by TeXShop in a few seconds. Frescobaldi does > not compile it at all for some error that I don’t understand and which > TeXShop ignores. > > ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: A spacing problem
Hi Andrew, Thanks for your comment and advice. Am I using barchecks on every bar? Yes, I do. Every bar in my score ends with | followed by the bar-number . (For example : g’1 |%P1V1-5) BTW, I use TeXShop for my input and I am very happy with it. For several reasons I never liked Frescobaldi. TeXShop accepts my little tricks and It is more forgiving than Frescobaldi. As an example, the present “problem-score” is compiled by TeXShop in a few seconds. Frescobaldi does not compile it at all for some error that I don’t understand and which TeXShop ignores. In the present case the console in TeXShop gives a lot of warnings about missing barchecks but these warnings exclusively concern the lyrics. They don’t affect the compilation of the score. When I comment out the Lyrics Voice in the score the problem is still there, in one bar only (I could solve the three others by adding and/or displacing line breaks.) Anyway, thanks again for your interest in my problem. Best regards, Robert Blackstone > On 5 Jul 2019, at 10:22 , Andrew Bernard wrote: > > Hi Robert, I know this is like computer phone support asking you if the modem > is plugged in and turned out, but are you using barchecks on every bar? Saves > a multitude of problems. > > May I make the polite suggestion that it is very often, in my experience, the > act of making an MWE, even if difficult, that many times resolves the problem > for you? Or at least a binary chop approach? > > You could mail me the score if it is not secret and I will look at it for you > also. > > > Andrew > > ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: A spacing problem
Hi Robert, I know this is like computer phone support asking you if the modem is plugged in and turned out, but are you using barchecks on every bar? Saves a multitude of problems. May I make the polite suggestion that it is very often, in my experience, the act of making an MWE, even if difficult, that many times resolves the problem for you? Or at least a binary chop approach? You could mail me the score if it is not secret and I will look at it for you also. Andrew ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: A spacing problem
Hi Ben, Thanks for your quick response. And my apologies for my late reaction. I would have included an MWE if I had believed that I could somehow demonstrate the problem with it, but I'm convinced that it is sort of a mass action inside my score. I could perhaps have sent you the complete score but I don’t think that’s a good idea. To give some impression: here is a brief description: Upper staff a vocal Voice with Lyrics, Lower staff a Bass Voice with BC-figures. \time 4/4 with a few changes to 8/4. Somewhere down the stretch of it I had to add for two adjacent bars a third voice in the bass line. The score has 82 bars in four sections, the first three ending with a double bar-line, the final one with the usual \bar “|.” . After sending my question to the list I continued my trouble-shooting and I succeeded in getting rid of 3 of my 4 problem-spots by introducing and/or some line breaks. The remaining one has resisted my efforts till now. Best regards, Robert Blackstone > On 4 Jul 2019, at 13:58 , Ben <mailto:soundsfromso...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > On 7/4/2019 7:45 AM, Robert Blackstone wrote: >> Dear all, >> >> Presently I’m vainly struggling with a nasty spacing problem: an empty >> fragment of a new bar sticking out of the last bar of a system. >> Dear all, >> >> Presently I’m vainly struggling with a nasty spacing problem: an empty >> fragment of a new bar sticking out of the last bar of a system. >> In the piece I’ve been working on it happens 4 times. (See screenshots) >> I have carefully checked the note durations in each bar and there seems to >> be nothing wrong with any of them. >> >> What can I do to avoid or remedy this? >> >> I’ll be very grateful for any advice. >> >> Best regards, >> Robert Blackstone >> >> > .png> >> >> >> NB in the third screenshot with the text “ohi-me v’apri”, the b-flat in the >> bass belongs to a separate voice. (<< {\stemDown as,2 des2 } \\ {s2. >> \stemUp bes4 } >> |%P2V1-30} >> > > Hi Robert, > > I noticed you included some inline images in your email. Would it be possible > for you to share some of your code so we can see what you have going on? > Maybe a tiny example? > It's not easy to tell from just the images. > Thanks! > ___ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@gnu.org <mailto:lilypond-user@gnu.org> > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user > <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user> ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: A spacing problem
On 7/4/2019 7:45 AM, Robert Blackstone wrote: Dear all, Presently I’m vainly struggling with a nasty spacing problem: an empty fragment of a new bar sticking out of the last bar of a system. Dear all, Presently I’m vainly struggling with a nasty spacing problem: an empty fragment of a new bar sticking out of the last bar of a system. In the piece I’ve been working on it happens 4 times. (See screenshots) I have carefully checked the note durations in each bar and there seems to be nothing wrong with any of them. What can I do to avoid or remedy this? I’ll be very grateful for any advice. Best regards, Robert Blackstone NB in the third screenshot with the text “ohi-me v’apri”, the b-flat in the bass belongs to a separate voice. (<< {\stemDown as,2 des2 } \\ {s2. \stemUp bes4 } >> |%P2V1-30} Hi Robert, I noticed you included some inline images in your email. Would it be possible for you to share some of your code so we can see what you have going on? Maybe a tiny example? It's not easy to tell from just the images. Thanks! ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
A spacing problem
Dear all, Presently I’m vainly struggling with a nasty spacing problem: an empty fragment of a new bar sticking out of the last bar of a system. Dear all, Presently I’m vainly struggling with a nasty spacing problem: an empty fragment of a new bar sticking out of the last bar of a system. In the piece I’ve been working on it happens 4 times. (See screenshots) I have carefully checked the note durations in each bar and there seems to be nothing wrong with any of them. What can I do to avoid or remedy this? I’ll be very grateful for any advice. Best regards, Robert Blackstone NB in the third screenshot with the text “ohi-me v’apri”, the b-flat in the bass belongs to a separate voice. (<< {\stemDown as,2 des2 } \\ {s2. \stemUp bes4 } >> |%P2V1-30}___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
clef spacing problem with staff scaling
Dear all, I have a problem with spacing a small snippet of music. Of course I could manually add some extra space each time after the Clef, but I wonder if there is a better solution. In my opinion, this spacing behaviour should clearly adapt to the staff size... Cheers, musicus\version "2.19.65" \score { \layout { #(layout-set-staff-size 15) } \new Staff { g' a' } } \score { \new Staff { g' a' } } \score { \layout { #(layout-set-staff-size 40) } \new Staff { g' a' } } \score { \layout { #(layout-set-staff-size 80) } \new Staff { g' a' } } \score { \layout { #(layout-set-staff-size 15) } \new Staff \with { \remove Time_signature_engraver }{ g' a' } } \score { \new Staff \with { \remove Time_signature_engraver }{ g' a' } } \score { \layout { #(layout-set-staff-size 40) } \new Staff \with { \remove Time_signature_engraver }{ g' a' } } \score { \layout { #(layout-set-staff-size 80) } \new Staff \with { \remove Time_signature_engraver }{ g' a' } } ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: top-markup-spacing problem
2016-03-14 16:13 GMT+01:00 Sharon Rosner: > Sharon Rosner wrote >> Oh man, sorry for that! > > I should add that between my first and second message I've already found a > possible workaround - adding an empty score using Devnull. But this solution > is far from ideal as it confuses lilypond into using different sets of > flexible vertical spacing values. So for example instead of > mark-markup-spacing, it would score-markup-spacing etc. > > Sorry again for the confusion, > Sharon > Hi Sharon, I'd call it a bug, please report. Here a smaller example: \version "2.14.2" %% up to "2.19.38" #(set-default-paper-size "a6") \paper { annotate-spacing = ##t %% settings to ease comparability of pages: print-first-page-number = ##t oddHeaderMarkup = \markup \box \oddHeaderMarkup evenHeaderMarkup = \markup \box \evenHeaderMarkup bookTitleMarkup = \markup \fromproperty #'header:title %% #'-syntax to make it compile with v2.14 top-markup-spacing #'basic-distance = 8 top-markup-spacing #'minimum-distance = 8 top-markup-spacing #'padding = 0 % negative padding to ignore skyline top-markup-spacing #'stretchability = 0 % fixed position } val = 5 %% header on first page \header { title = \markup \box \line { "1 - Hey" \with-color #red \draw-line #`(0 . ,val) } } \pageBreak %% top-level markup on second page \markup \box \line { "2 - Hey" \with-color #red \draw-line #`(0 . ,val) } A possible workaround might be to topalign toplevel-markups: #(define-markup-command (vup layout props arg) (markup?) (let* ((mol (interpret-markup layout props arg))) (ly:stencil-aligned-to mol Y UP))) %% top-level markup on second page \markup \vup \box \line { "2 - Hey" \with-color #red \draw-line #`(0 . ,val) } Cheers, Harm ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: top-markup-spacing problem
Sharon Rosner wrote > Oh man, sorry for that! I should add that between my first and second message I've already found a possible workaround - adding an empty score using Devnull. But this solution is far from ideal as it confuses lilypond into using different sets of flexible vertical spacing values. So for example instead of mark-markup-spacing, it would score-markup-spacing etc. Sorry again for the confusion, Sharon -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/top-markup-spacing-problem-tp188527p188530.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: top-markup-spacing problem
> … missing … > >> attached files > > :-) Simon Oh man, sorry for that! Sharon markup_margins.ly Description: Binary data markup_margins.pdf Description: Adobe PDF document ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: top-markup-spacing problem
On 14.03.2016 15:53, Sharon Rosner wrote: The … missing … attached files :-) Simon ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
top-markup-spacing problem
Hi all, I’ve run into a problem when setting top-markup-spacing. When the markup is a score title, lilypond uses the basic-distance as the distance between the top margin and the top of the markup. When manually adding a top-level markup, however, the distance is calculated between the top margin and the base-line of the markup. The attached files show the problem (notice the difference between the positions of the titles on pages 1 & 2). Is this a bug? Would there be any way to override this (apparently incorrect) behaviour? Thanks Sharon___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Chord names vertical spacing problem (since 2.14?)
Hello, I have a problem with the vertical spacing of multiple lines containing only chord names. They used to be very close to each other, now it seems that it leaves a blank vertical space between lines (as if there was a staff in between). I think (but I might be wrong) that it only happens since I have updated to 2.14.2. Here is a tiny example : \chords { c4:min f:min7 \break c4:min f:min7 } ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Chord names vertical spacing problem (since 2.14?)
Chani chani.xy at gmail.com writes: I have a problem with the vertical spacing of multiple lines containing only chord names. They used to be very close to each other, now it seems that it leaves a blank vertical space between lines That is true. Vertical spacing was re-written for 2.14. It seems that the old 'between-system-space' was ignored between systems with no staves, just lyrics and chord names. Was there any way to adjust the spacing between lines? The new 'system-system-spacing' is included between lines of chord names, but the default is inappropriately large. You can reduce it: \paper {system-system-spacing #'basic-distance = #5 system-system-spacing #'minimum-distance = #0 } ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: single part spacing problem
2010/8/17 胡海鹏 - Hu Haipeng hhpmu...@163.com: Hello, When I extract the timpani part from my overture (I have not made cues), a fatal problem comes--spacing issues. No matter what staff size I set, the warning couldn't fit music on page always appears. How to sove it? Hi! There used to be spacing issues couldn't fit music on page (I personally reported a few of them), but they are all solved now (IIRC). I see you are using 2.13.24, where these bugs were present. Please upgrade to 2.13.30, the result is fine with this version. Cheers, Xavier -- Xavier Scheuer x.sche...@gmail.com ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re:Re: single part spacing problem
Thanks. But when I used 30, my full score was fattened from 34 pages to 38, and there are many warnings saying (de)crescendo too small, in fact they are not small; and a programming error in harp part in 2.13.24 increased to several: no note heads for the line spanner on neighbor line? Confused. Anyway, I'll try the single part now. Regards Haipeng ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
single part spacing problem
Hello, When I extract the timpani part from my overture (I have not made cues), a fatal problem comes--spacing issues. No matter what staff size I set, the warning couldn't fit music on page always appears. How to sove it? Regards Haipeng a simplified version (without rehearsal and top texts) \version 2.13.24 crpap = { \set crescendoText = \markup { \italic Cresc. poco a poco } \set crescendoSpanner = #'text \override DynamicTextSpanner #'style = #'dotted-line } offCr = { \unset crescendoText \unset crescendoSpanner \revert DynamicTextSpanner #'style } timpani = \relative c { \clef bass \key c \major \time 4/4 % introduction % initial, bars 1-6 R1^3 in G, C E | \time 5/4 r8 \repeat tremolo 12 c32\mp\ \repeat tremolo 12 c c8\!\f r4 | \time 4/4 R1 | \time 5/4 r8 \repeat tremolo 12 e32\mp\ \repeat tremolo 12 e e8\!\f r4 | \repeat tremolo 24 g,32\p\ \repeat tremolo 16 g | c8-\!\f r^E to D r4 r r2 | % part 1 % rehearsal 1, bars 7-20 \time 9/8 R1*9/8*3 | \time 5/4 R1*5/4*3 | g4.\mf d'4 g,4. d'4 | g,8\mp\ d' g, d' g, d' g, d' g, g- | \time 9/8 c4.-\!\sf^D to F g4\f g16 g g g c8 g- | c4.- g4 c16 c c c g8 g- | c4.- g4 \repeat tremolo 4 c32\p\ \repeat tremolo 12 c | \time 5/4 f8-\!\sf^C to D r r4 r8 \repeat tremolo 8 f32\mp\ f8\!\f r4 | r \repeat tremolo 8 f32\mp\ f8\!\f r r2 | r2 d16\mf d d8 d16\f d d8-\sf r4\fermata \bar || % rehearsal 2, bars 21-37 R1*5/4*9^G to A, F to E | \repeat tremolo 12 a32\mf e'4 a,4. a4 | d4. a4\ d4. d4\!\p | R1*5/4*6^A to Bb, D to B, F to Eb | % rehearsal 3, bars 38-51 \time 3/4 R2.*7 | r2 r8 b\f | \time 5/4 ees4. bes4\mf ees4. bes4 | ees4.\ bes4 ees4. bes4 | ees4.\!\f bes4 ees4.^to E b4 | e4. b4 e4.\ e4\! | R1*5/4^Bb to G, E to D | d4\mf\ d8 d d d4 d8 d d | % rehearsal 4, bars 52-65 \time 9/8 g,4.\!\f d'4 d16 d d d g,8 d'- | g,4.- d'4 g,16 g g g d'8 d- | g,4. d'4 d16 d d d g,8 d'- | g,4.- d'4 g,16 g g g d'8 d- | g,16 g g g g8 d'16 d d d d8 g,16 g g g g8 | d'4 d8 g,4 d'8 d4 d8 | \repeat tremolo 24 g,32\ \repeat tremolo 12 g | \repeat tremolo 24 g \repeat tremolo 12 g | \repeat tremolo 24 g \repeat tremolo 12 g | \repeat tremolo 24 g\!\p \repeat tremolo 12 g | g8 r r r4 r8 r4 r8 | \time 5/4 g16 g g8 g g g g16 g g8 g g g | g16\ g g8 g g g g r2 | g4\!\pp^B to Bb, D to Eb r r r2\fermata \bar || % part 2 % rehearsal 5, bars 66-82 \key ees \major \time 4/4 R1*17 | % rehearsal 6, bars 83-108 R1*15 | \repeat tremolo 24 ees'32\p\ ees8- ees-\! | \tag #'score { { \repeat tremolo 32 bes32 } \\ { s8\f s\mp\ s2 s4\! } | } \tag #'midi { { \repeat tremolo 64 bes64 } \\ { s8\f s\mp\ s2 s4\! } | } ees4\f r r2 | R1*7 | \tag #'score { { \repeat tremolo 32 g,32- } \\ { s2.\mf\ s4\p } | } \tag #'midi { { \repeat tremolo 64 g64- } \\ { s2.\mf\ s4\p } | } % rehearsal 7, bars 109-120 R1*5^Bb to C, Eb to D | R1^\fermataMarkup | R1*3 | \tag #'score { \repeat tremolo 32 g32-\p | \repeat tremolo 32 g\ | \repeat tremolo 32 g\fermata\!\pp \bar || } \tag #'midi { \repeat tremolo 64 g64-\p | \repeat tremolo 64 g\ | \repeat tremolo 64 g\fermata\!\pp \bar || } % part 3 % rehearsal 8, bars 121-130 \key c \major \time 3/4 \repeat tremolo 24 g32 | \repeat tremolo 24 g | \repeat tremolo 24 g | \repeat tremolo 24 g | \time 4/4 \repeat tremolo 32 g\cresc | \repeat tremolo 32 g | \time 3/4 \repeat tremolo 24 g | \repeat tremolo 24 g | \time 5/4 \repeat tremolo 24 g-\f\ \repeat tremolo 16 g | c8-\!\sf r r4 r r2 | % rehearsal 9, bars 131-146 \time 9/8 R1*9/8*3 | \time 5/4 R1*5/4*3 | g4.\mf d'4 g,4. d'4 | g,8\mp\ d' g, d' g, d' g, d' g, g- | \time 9/8 c4.-\!\sf^D to F g4\f g16 g g g c8 g- | c4.- g4 c16 c c c g8 g- | c4.- g4 \repeat tremolo 4 c32\p\ \repeat tremolo 12 c | \time 5/4 f8-\!\sf r r4 r8 \repeat tremolo 8 f32\mp\ f8\!\f r4 | r \repeat tremolo 8 f32\mp\ f8\!\f r r4 r8 \repeat tremolo 4 c32\mp\ | \repeat tremolo 4 c c8\!\f r4 r \repeat tremolo 8 c32\mp\ c8\!\f r | r2 r4 r8 g16\mf g g8 g16\f g | g8-\sf r r4 r r2 | % rehearsal 10, bars 147-167 R1*5/4*8 | f'4.\mf c4 f4. c4 | R1*5/4 | R1*5/4 | c4. g4 c4. g4 | R1*5/4 | R1*5/4 | f'4.\mp\cresc c4 f4.^to D c4 | d4. d4 g,8\!\f d'\mf\ d d g, | c4\!\f r r r2 | R1*5/4 | g4.\mp\cresc g4 c4. c4 | c4. c4 d4 d8- d- d- | \tag #'score { \repeat tremolo 24 g,32\!\sf\ \repeat tremolo 16 g \bar || } \tag #'midi { \repeat unfold 10 g\!\sf\ \repeat unfold 10 g \repeat unfold 10 g \repeat unfold 10 g \bar || } % coda % rehearsal 11, bars 168-188 \time 3/4 \repeat tremolo 24 g\!\pp | \repeat tremolo 24 g | \repeat tremolo 24 g | \repeat tremolo 24 g | \repeat tremolo 24
Re: vertical spacing problem
Thank you for the solution! -- Marek http://gregoriana.sk 2010/5/17 -Eluze elu...@gmail.com Marek Klein wrote: Hi, I have problem with the attached vocal score and I couldn't reproduce it with tiny example... i added 2 more options, maybe these could help: \paper { % page-count = 2 ragged-bottom = ##f ragged-last-bottom = ##f } ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
vertical spacing problem
Hi, I have problem with the attached vocal score and I couldn't reproduce it with tiny example... I get 2-paged layout http://gregoriana.sk/gg/wp-content/uploads/lasso-qui_manducat2v1.pdf with the next to last row commented out (\markup), There seems to be lot of space at the bottom of the second page, but if I add the \markup, output is on 3 pages http://gregoriana.sk/gg/wp-content/uploads/lasso-qui_manducat2v2.pdf \version 2.13.19 Is this a bug? Marek \version 2.13.19 #(set-global-staff-size 16.5) date = #(strftime %Y-%m-%d (localtime (current-time))) \header{ composer= \markup \center-column {Orlando di Lasso \small (1532 - 1594)} title=Communio: Qui manducat copyright= \markup {Marek Klein, gregoriana.sk, \date} } %5 global={ \key f \major %\autoBeamOff } %%% MusicSopranA = \relative c''{ R1 R1 R1 | r2 c2 | c2( d | e) e( | d) d | c c~ | %str141 c e( | g2. ) g4 | g2 e( | f e4 f | f8 e d2 cis8 b | cis d4 cis!8) d2~ | d r4 c | bes a( b c~ | c4 b) c2~ | c r4 g | a8( bes c a bes c d4~ | d c) d bes | %142 a2 a | r r4 d~( | d8 c d e f4. e16 d | c8 bes c4) bes d~( | d8 c c2) b4 | c a c d~ | d cis d2 | r4 c c c~ | c c c2 | r4 c4.( b16 a b!4) | c1 | c2. g4 | a1\fermata \bar |. | } MusicAlt = \relative c'' { R1 R1 R1 | g2 g( | a4. g8 f e d4) | g g2( c4~ | c bes8 a bes4) bes | a2 g | %str141 c,2 c' | c4 c c8( g c4~ | c8 b16 a b!4) c c~ | c bes g a~( | a8 g16 f g4) a2 | r4 a bes2 | a4.( bes8 c4) g~( | g8 f e f g4) a g4.( f8 e f g4) | a2 g | r2 r4 d | a' a f f~ | %142 f4 c r2 | r a'2( | bes) a~ | a f4 d | a'4( g8 f g2) | r a | a4 a2 g4 | g2 g | a g4 a | a2 r4 d, | g a2( g4~ | g8 f f2) e4 | f1\fermata | } MusicTenorA = \relative c' { c2 c~( | c4 d2) e4~ | e e4.( d8 c4~ | c4) b c c~ | c a2 f4 | r g c2 | g1 | R1 | %str141 e'2( g~ | g4) g g2 | g,4. g8 g'2 | a4 f r2 | r2 e2 | e( g) | d( e | d4 c d2) | d2( c) | R1 | e2 g | e( d) | %142 r4 f4.( e8 d4) | c( bes a2) | g r | R1 | R1 | e'2( f | e d | e c) | c r4 c | c2( d | c) c~ | c1~ | c1\fermata | } MusicTenorB = \relative c' { R1 R1 | c2 c( | d2 e4. d16 e | f4 c2 b4) | c2 e( | g2.) g4 | e f4.( e16 d e8 f | %141 g8 a g4. f8 e d | e1) | d2 r4 c~ | c d e c | d2 r | a2 g4 g'~( | g8 f16 e f4) g2 | r2 r4 f4 | d4 g4.( f8 e d | e c f2 e8 d | c2) d4 bes | a2( bes) | %142 c4 a d8( e f g | a4) d, r2 | r4 d4.( c8 d e | f4 e8 f d e f g | f8 e d c d2) | c( a) | r4 a2 b4 | c4.( d8 e4) e | f( e8 d e4) e | f2 g4.( f8 | e4) f f, g | a2 g4. g8 | f1\fermata | } MusicBas = \relative c { r2 f | f( g | a) a( | g) r4 c, | f4.( e8 d2) | c1 | R1 | a'2( c~ | %str141 c4) c c2~ | c1 | r2 c( | a4 bes c a | bes2) a | R1 | r2 c2 | g4 a( g f) | g2 r | a c | a( g) | R1 | %142 f2 d4.( e8 | f4 g2 fis4) | g2 r | a2( bes) | a2( g) | a4.( g8 f4 d) | a'2 fis4 g | c,2 r4 c | f8( g a bes c bes a g | f8 g a4) g g | c, f2 e4 | f2 c | f1\fermata | } %%% TextSopranA = \lyricmode { et bi -- bit, et bi -- bit san -- gui -- nem me -- um, in me ma -- net, et e -- go in e -- o, di -- cit Do -- mi -- nus, di -- cit Do -- mi -- nus, di -- cit Do -- mi -- nus, di -- cit Do -- mi -- nus. } TextAlt = \lyricmode { et bi -- bit san -- gui -- nem me -- um, san -- gui -- nem me -- um, san -- gui -- nem me -- um, in me ma -- net, in me ma -- net, et e -- go in e -- o, di -- cit Do -- mi -- nus, di -- cit Do -- mi -- nus, di -- cit Do -- mi -- nus, di -- cit Do -- mi -- nus. } TextTenorA = \lyricmode { et bi -- bit san -- gui -- nem, et bi -- bit, et bi -- bit san -- gui -- nem, san -- gui -- nem me -- um, in me ma -- net, et e -- go in e -- o, di -- cit Do -- mi -- nus. } TextTenorB = \lyricmode { et bi -- bit san -- gui -- nem me -- um, san -- gui -- nem me -- um, in me ma -- net, in me ma -- net, et e -- go in e -- o, di -- cit, di -- cit Do -- mi -- nus, di -- cit Do -- mi -- nus, di -- cit Do -- mi -- nus. } TextBas = \lyricmode { et bi -- bit, et bi -- bit san -- gui -- nem me -- um, in me ma -- net, et e -- go in e -- o, di -- cit, di -- cit Do -- mi -- nus, di -- cit Do -- mi -- nus, di -- cit Do -- mi -- nus. } %%% \book { \score { \new ChoirStaff \new Voice = sopran { \set Staff.instrumentName = Sopran \set Staff.shortInstrumentName = S \global \MusicSopranA } \new Lyrics \lyricsto sopran { \TextSopranA } \new Voice = alt { \set Staff.instrumentName = Alt 1 \set Staff.shortInstrumentName = A1 \global \MusicAlt } \new Lyrics \lyricsto alt { \TextAlt } \new Voice = tenora { \set Staff.instrumentName = Alt 2 \set Staff.shortInstrumentName = A2 \clef G
Re: vertical spacing problem
Marek Klein wrote: Hi, I have problem with the attached vocal score and I couldn't reproduce it with tiny example... i added 2 more options, maybe these could help: \paper { % page-count = 2 ragged-bottom = ##f ragged-last-bottom = ##f } -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/vertical-spacing-problem-tp28577461p28577755.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Lyrics spacing problem - overlapping syllables
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 11:03:13PM +0100, Mats Bengtsson wrote: Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote: Now taking a second look, I don't think it's a bug, only a limitation of the lyrics engraving procedure: it doesn't take notes into acount, only resolves lyrics overlapping (when two syllables would overlap.) Well, if the limitation leads to undesired output, then why not call it a bug? He's probably using the Offical Bug-LilyPond Terminology (tm), which states that problems which require extra code are missing features, whereas problems in existing code are bugs. (where 5-line fixes are still considered no extra code. Or something like that) It's taken years for this to catch on, so don't complain about it now! :) Cheers, - Graham ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Lyrics spacing problem - overlapping syllables
Yes, I knew that warning and inserting the spacing item padding was the first thing which I tried. However, without any success - the insertion of the line \once \override Score.SeparationItem #'padding = #3 into the music is ignored by the spacing engine. Using still the same example as above, the code here replaces only the variable notyOKriste: notyOKriste = \relative c' {\time 12/8 a'4 c8 a4 g8 f4 e8 f4. c'4 d8 f4 e8 d4 bes8 c4 c8 d4 c8 a4 d,8 f16[ \melisma e d8 c] \melismaEnd \once \override Score.SeparationItem #'padding = #3 d4. \bar || } I am rather new to Lilypond and therefore I always try to think first that the error is on my side - perhaps I am inserting the separationitem code into wrong place...? However, the syllable alignment which overlaps the neighboring note problem is most probably a bug: since the code of the lyric spacing is already present in Lilypond, and since it does not produce the desired output, I still think this issue qualifies as a bug in the strict sense of the word. I tried also the trick with the null markup on the last note of the melisma with the melisma ending just the note before as suggested by Mats, but this code does not work on my setup. During the compilation, the Lilypond stops at the line Analysing... and produces nothing (but still giving no error). -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Lyrics-spacing-problem---overlapping-syllables-tp21665565p21726627.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Lyrics spacing problem - overlapping syllables
You could also try to put invisible but non breaking spaces as a syllable, aligned to the left: Bert Jiri Zurek (Prague) wrote: Yes, I knew that warning and inserting the spacing item padding was the first thing which I tried. However, without any success - the insertion of the line \once \override Score.SeparationItem #'padding = #3 into the music is ignored by the spacing engine. Using still the same example as above, the code here replaces only the variable notyOKriste: notyOKriste = \relative c' {\time 12/8 a'4 c8 a4 g8 f4 e8 f4. c'4 d8 f4 e8 d4 bes8 c4 c8 d4 c8 a4 d,8 f16[ \melisma e d8 c] \melismaEnd \once \override Score.SeparationItem #'padding = #3 d4. \bar || } I am rather new to Lilypond and therefore I always try to think first that the error is on my side - perhaps I am inserting the separationitem code into wrong place...? However, the syllable alignment which overlaps the neighboring note problem is most probably a bug: since the code of the lyric spacing is already present in Lilypond, and since it does not produce the desired output, I still think this issue qualifies as a bug in the strict sense of the word. I tried also the trick with the null markup on the last note of the melisma with the melisma ending just the note before as suggested by Mats, but this code does not work on my setup. During the compilation, the Lilypond stops at the line Analysing... and produces nothing (but still giving no error). ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Lyrics spacing problem - overlapping syllables
Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote: You could also try to put invisible but non breaking spaces as a syllable, aligned to the left: That's more or less what I proposed in my earlier reply to this thread. Take a look at it again. /Mats Bert Jiri Zurek (Prague) wrote: Yes, I knew that warning and inserting the spacing item padding was the first thing which I tried. However, without any success - the insertion of the line \once \override Score.SeparationItem #'padding = #3 into the music is ignored by the spacing engine. Using still the same example as above, the code here replaces only the variable notyOKriste: notyOKriste = \relative c' {\time 12/8 a'4 c8 a4 g8 f4 e8 f4. c'4 d8 f4 e8 d4 bes8 c4 c8 d4 c8 a4 d,8 f16[ \melisma e d8 c] \melismaEnd \once \override Score.SeparationItem #'padding = #3 d4. \bar || } I am rather new to Lilypond and therefore I always try to think first that the error is on my side - perhaps I am inserting the separationitem code into wrong place...? However, the syllable alignment which overlaps the neighboring note problem is most probably a bug: since the code of the lyric spacing is already present in Lilypond, and since it does not produce the desired output, I still think this issue qualifies as a bug in the strict sense of the word. I tried also the trick with the null markup on the last note of the melisma with the melisma ending just the note before as suggested by Mats, but this code does not work on my setup. During the compilation, the Lilypond stops at the line Analysing... and produces nothing (but still giving no error). ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Lyrics spacing problem - overlapping syllables
After reading some more threads about the lyrics alignment, I have got the impression, that the problem of a syllable overlapping with the last note(s) of the preceding melisma could be solved by adding an extender to the melismatic syllable. The extender should last up to low c of the last bar of the music. Strangely enough, this does not help, as the extender does not extend up to the last note of the melisma (c), but it is cut off before (on a d already), possibly by the next syllable extend. This looks as suggesting that the syllable -mme should be sung not on the last note (d) only, but already on the note preceding it (on the c). This is unexpected behavior and I am starting to think that this might be a bug in the Lilypond. Am I right? This is the same example as above, but with the extender added to the melisma-syllable: \version 2.12.1 \paper { #(set-paper-size b5) line-width = 14.6\cm indent = 0.0 ragged-right = ##t ragged-last = ##t } notyOKriste = \relative c' {\time 12/8 a'4 c8 a4 g8 f4 e8 f4. c'4 d8 f4 e8 d4 bes8 c4 c8 d4 c8 a4 d,8 f16[ \melisma e d8 c] \melismaEnd d4. \bar || } oKriste = \lyricmode { Ó Kri -- ste do -- bro -- ti -- vý, na nás vel -- mi na -- las -- ka -- vý, čímť se o -- pla -- tí __ mme? } \score { \new Voice = cantus { \notyOKriste } \new Lyrics \lyricsto cantus { \oKriste } \layout { \context { \Score \remove Bar_number_engraver } \context { \Lyrics \consists Separating_line_group_engraver %aby lyrika nesla do taktovych car. \consists Bar_engraver \override BarLine #'transparent = ##f %\override LyricSpace #'minimum-distance = #3.0 } } } end of the musical example http://www.nabble.com/file/p21703981/ExtenderSyll.png ExtenderSyll.png -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Lyrics-spacing-problem---overlapping-syllables-tp21665565p21703981.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Lyrics spacing problem - overlapping syllables
Lyrics syllables should not overlap in any case, LilyPond should automatically increase the note dinstance if needed. So it seems to me as a bug. Bert Jiri Zurek (Prague) wrote: After reading some more threads about the lyrics alignment, I have got the impression, that the problem of a syllable overlapping with the last note(s) of the preceding melisma could be solved by adding an extender to the melismatic syllable. The extender should last up to low c of the last bar of the music. Strangely enough, this does not help, as the extender does not extend up to the last note of the melisma (c), but it is cut off before (on a d already), possibly by the next syllable extend. This looks as suggesting that the syllable -mme should be sung not on the last note (d) only, but already on the note preceding it (on the c). This is unexpected behavior and I am starting to think that this might be a bug in the Lilypond. Am I right? This is the same example as above, but with the extender added to the melisma-syllable: \version 2.12.1 \paper { #(set-paper-size b5) line-width = 14.6\cm indent = 0.0 ragged-right = ##t ragged-last = ##t } notyOKriste = \relative c' {\time 12/8 a'4 c8 a4 g8 f4 e8 f4. c'4 d8 f4 e8 d4 bes8 c4 c8 d4 c8 a4 d,8 f16[ \melisma e d8 c] \melismaEnd d4. \bar || } oKriste = \lyricmode { Ó Kri -- ste do -- bro -- ti -- vý, na nás vel -- mi na -- las -- ka -- vý, čímť se o -- pla -- tí __ mme? } \score { \new Voice = cantus { \notyOKriste } \new Lyrics \lyricsto cantus { \oKriste } \layout { \context { \Score \remove Bar_number_engraver } \context { \Lyrics \consists Separating_line_group_engraver %aby lyrika nesla do taktovych car. \consists Bar_engraver \override BarLine #'transparent = ##f %\override LyricSpace #'minimum-distance = #3.0 } } } end of the musical example http://www.nabble.com/file/p21703981/ExtenderSyll.png ExtenderSyll.png ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Lyrics spacing problem - overlapping syllables
Am 28.01.2009 um 13:19 schrieb Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool): Lyrics syllables should not overlap in any case, LilyPond should automatically increase the note dinstance if needed. So it seems to me as a bug. It's a known issue in section 2.1.3. Melismata are not detected automatically, and extender lines must be inserted by hand. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Lyrics spacing problem - overlapping syllables
Am 28.01.2009 um 13:28 schrieb James E. Bailey: Am 28.01.2009 um 13:19 schrieb Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool): Lyrics syllables should not overlap in any case, LilyPond should automatically increase the note dinstance if needed. So it seems to me as a bug. It's a known issue in section 2.1.3. Melismata are not detected automatically, and extender lines must be inserted by hand. Oh wow, I feel dumb. This is something completely different. There actually isn't any overlap. The text mme? is centered under the notehead, as it should be, but because it's so long a syllable, I'm guessing he wants the note moved to the right, so that the text could not be considered to be part of the preceding note. In that case, I would suggest, \once \override LyricText #'self-alignment-X = #-1. The text won't be centered under the notehead, but padding a notehead is beyond my ability. And it's what I would do if it bothered me. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Lyrics spacing problem - overlapping syllables
Indeed, my problem is completely different than automatic insertion of extenders. Indeed, I want Lilypond that it adds some padding automatically to the notehead whenever there is long syllable under it, so that the physical extent of the printed letters of that syllable does not overlap with neighboring notes. If it overlaps, then it might wrongly suggest to the singer, that the syllable belongs to a different notehead than it is ment to belong. The left-aligned lyrics is not a solution (it is only a dirty solution) since what I am aiming at is vowel-centered alignment in all cases ( http://www.nabble.com/Lyrics---align-first-vowel-of-a-syllable-under-the-notehead-td21600612.html as I suggest in another thread ). So, I still think it is a bug. If there is no disagreement, I will put this into bug announcements forum. But I will wait for a couple of days because someone can still come correcting my view. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Lyrics-spacing-problem---overlapping-syllables-tp21665565p21706169.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Lyrics spacing problem - overlapping syllables
Now taking a second look, I don't think it's a bug, only a limitation of the lyrics engraving procedure: it doesn't take notes into acount, only resolves lyrics overlapping (when two syllables would overlap.) You should change the alignment of the syllable a bit (not to the left, but like 0.3 or some other fraction) Bert Jiri Zurek (Prague) wrote: Indeed, my problem is completely different than automatic insertion of extenders. Indeed, I want Lilypond that it adds some padding automatically to the notehead whenever there is long syllable under it, so that the physical extent of the printed letters of that syllable does not overlap with neighboring notes. If it overlaps, then it might wrongly suggest to the singer, that the syllable belongs to a different notehead than it is ment to belong. The left-aligned lyrics is not a solution (it is only a dirty solution) since what I am aiming at is vowel-centered alignment in all cases ( http://www.nabble.com/Lyrics---align-first-vowel-of-a-syllable-under-the-notehead-td21600612.html as I suggest in another thread ). So, I still think it is a bug. If there is no disagreement, I will put this into bug announcements forum. But I will wait for a couple of days because someone can still come correcting my view. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Lyrics spacing problem - overlapping syllables
Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote: Now taking a second look, I don't think it's a bug, only a limitation of the lyrics engraving procedure: it doesn't take notes into acount, only resolves lyrics overlapping (when two syllables would overlap.) Well, if the limitation leads to undesired output, then why not call it a bug? One possible workaround is to insert an invisible syllable at the last note of the mellisma (or rather to shorten the mellisma by one note and add the invisible syllable to the end note of the true mellisma): \version 2.12.1 \paper { #(set-paper-size b5) line-width = 14.6\cm indent = 0.0 ragged-right = ##t ragged-last = ##t } notyOKriste = \relative c' {\time 12/8 a'4 c8 a4 g8 f4 e8 f4. c'4 d8 f4 e8 d4 bes8 c4 c8 d4 c8 a4 d,8 f16[ \melisma e d8 \melismaEnd c] d4. \bar || } oKriste = \lyricmode { Ó Kri -- ste do -- bro -- ti -- vý, na nás vel -- mi na -- las -- ka -- vý, čímť se o -- pla -- tí -- \markup \null mme? } \score { \new Voice = cantus { \notyOKriste } \new Lyrics \lyricsto cantus { \oKriste } \layout { \context { \Score \remove Bar_number_engraver } \context { \Lyrics \consists Separating_line_group_engraver %\override LyricSpace #'minimum-distance = #3.0 } } } /Mats You should change the alignment of the syllable a bit (not to the left, but like 0.3 or some other fraction) Bert Jiri Zurek (Prague) wrote: Indeed, my problem is completely different than automatic insertion of extenders. Indeed, I want Lilypond that it adds some padding automatically to the notehead whenever there is long syllable under it, so that the physical extent of the printed letters of that syllable does not overlap with neighboring notes. If it overlaps, then it might wrongly suggest to the singer, that the syllable belongs to a different notehead than it is ment to belong. The left-aligned lyrics is not a solution (it is only a dirty solution) since what I am aiming at is vowel-centered alignment in all cases ( http://www.nabble.com/Lyrics---align-first-vowel-of-a-syllable-under-the-notehead-td21600612.html as I suggest in another thread ). So, I still think it is a bug. If there is no disagreement, I will put this into bug announcements forum. But I will wait for a couple of days because someone can still come correcting my view. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user -- = Mats Bengtsson Signal Processing School of Electrical Engineering Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM Sweden Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463 Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260 Email: mats.bengts...@ee.kth.se WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe = ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Lyrics spacing problem - overlapping syllables
James E. Bailey wrote: ... padding a notehead is beyond my ability. And it's what I would do if it bothered me. See Known issues and warnings of http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond/Horizontal-spacing-overview#Horizontal-spacing-overview /Mats ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Lyrics spacing problem - overlapping syllables
Please, look at the last note of the piece: the last syllable of the following piece (-mme) is overlapping with the melisma preceding it. How to instruct Lilypond to make some more room for the syllable to shift it away from the foregoing ending melisma? I tried the Spacing lyrics from the Documentation but it is not helpful since the LyricSpace #'minimum-distance affects only the space between words and not between the syllables of the same word. For this reason, I removed the minimum-distance line from the layout. Also, I do not think it is Lyric spacing (or Lyrics padding) problem, rather, it is the problem of music spacing: the Lilypond should be aware of the fact that there is longer syllable under the given notehead. The notehead should be padded from both sides to make the whole syllable to fit so that the syllable does not extend under the adjacent noteheads. \version 2.12.1 \paper { #(set-paper-size b5) line-width = 14.6\cm indent = 0.0 ragged-right = ##t ragged-last = ##t } notyOKriste = \relative c' {\time 12/8 a'4 c8 a4 g8 f4 e8 f4. c'4 d8 f4 e8 d4 bes8 c4 c8 d4 c8 a4 d,8 f16[ \melisma e d8 c] \melismaEnd d4. \bar || } oKriste = \lyricmode { Ó Kri -- ste do -- bro -- ti -- vý, na nás vel -- mi na -- las -- ka -- vý, čímť se o -- pla -- tí -- mme? } \score { \new Voice = cantus { \notyOKriste } \new Lyrics \lyricsto cantus { \oKriste } \layout { \context { \Score \remove Bar_number_engraver } \context { \Lyrics \consists Separating_line_group_engraver %\override LyricSpace #'minimum-distance = #3.0 } } } http://www.nabble.com/file/p21665565/JistK_10_SpirituSelfContained.pdf JistK_10_SpirituSelfContained.pdf -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Lyrics-spacing-problem---overlapping-syllables-tp21665565p21665565.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: spacing problem
I've just found a wonderful example which demonstrates what I want to fix. Look at the fourth and fifth quarter: It's *really* ugly. On the other hand I'm not sure whether this is a different spacing bug. Joe? Werner inline: bad-spacing.png___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: spacing problem
Did you try setting \override Score.SpacingSpanner #'average-spacing-wishes = ##f /Mats Quoting Werner LEMBERG [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I've just found a wonderful example which demonstrates what I want to fix. Look at the fourth and fifth quarter: It's *really* ugly. On the other hand I'm not sure whether this is a different spacing bug. Joe? Werner ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: spacing problem
Did you try setting \override Score.SpacingSpanner #'average-spacing-wishes = ##f It gives exactly the same result with both ##f and ##t. Such formatting must never happen IMHO. Werner ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: spacing problem
Isn't this too small in tight situations? Note heads might (almost) touch... In tight situations, the rods take over the spacing. I think there is a small threshold that makes sure they don't touch. Where shall I look? BTW, is there a documentation how rods and springs interact? IMHO, this should be configurable. You could look into the Note_spacing class, which could decide to add some more fixed width if the left side is a dotted note, or perhaps scale up the fixed width for notes longer than 1/8th. OK. Will have a look and try something. (If you do anything, please make sure it does the right thing for polyphonic situations too.) Please elaborate. I'm quite lost here and currently can't see the big picture. I am not sure if you should use durations rather than dottedness. Should a dotted 64th need a lot of space to accomodate for the dot, or should it be treated like a very short note? A dotted, beamed note gets automatically more horizontal space due to the dot(s); I think nothing should change in this case. This holds for beamed notes in general. Regarding flagged notes, I'm not sure, but many flagged notes in succession are rather rare. The additional space I envision should be applied to notes only which don't have a beam or a flag. Werner ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: spacing problem
Am 13.08.2008 um 08:17 schrieb Werner LEMBERG: I am not sure if you should use durations rather than dottedness. Should a dotted 64th need a lot of space to accomodate for the dot, or should it be treated like a very short note? A dotted, beamed note gets automatically more horizontal space due to the dot(s); I think nothing should change in this case. This holds for beamed notes in general. Regarding flagged notes, I'm not sure, but many flagged notes in succession are rather rare. Not in vocal music, where \autoBeamOff is the norm. The additional space I envision should be applied to notes only which don't have a beam or a flag. Werner ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: spacing problem
A dotted, beamed note gets automatically more horizontal space due to the dot(s); I think nothing should change in this case. This holds for beamed notes in general. Regarding flagged notes, I'm not sure, but many flagged notes in succession are rather rare. Not in vocal music, where \autoBeamOff is the norm. I know, but for this it's not of great importance since the main guide for a singer is the text which always dominates the horizontal alignment of notes in tight situations. Werner ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: spacing problem
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 3:17 AM, Werner LEMBERG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In tight situations, the rods take over the spacing. I think there is a small threshold that makes sure they don't touch. Where shall I look? BTW, is there a documentation how rods and springs interact? Look at simple-spacer.cc to see how the aggregrate works. (If you do anything, please make sure it does the right thing for polyphonic situations too.) Please elaborate. I'm quite lost here and currently can't see the big picture. If one stave has a dotted note and another has not, the result should probably be something average between both. If you put the adjustments in the Note_spacing routines (which should get called per staff), this should happen automatically I am not sure if you should use durations rather than dottedness. Should a dotted 64th need a lot of space to accomodate for the dot, or should it be treated like a very short note? A dotted, beamed note gets automatically more horizontal space due to the dot(s); I think nothing should change in this case. This holds for beamed notes in general. Regarding flagged notes, I'm not sure, but many flagged notes in succession are rather rare. The additional space I envision should be applied to notes only which don't have a beam or a flag. see Spring Note_spacing::get_spacing (Grob *me, Item *right_col, Real base_space, Real increment) which tries to compensate for the symbol width using Drul_arraySkyline skys = Spacing_interface::skylines (me, right_col); Real distance = skys[LEFT].distance (skys[RIGHT]); Try looking at the result to see how dots influence the spacing params. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: spacing problem
Where shall I look? BTW, is there a documentation how rods and springs interact? Look at simple-spacer.cc to see how the aggregrate works. Aah, so rods are horizontal constraints which can't compressed further. (If you do anything, please make sure it does the right thing for polyphonic situations too.) Please elaborate. I'm quite lost here and currently can't see the big picture. If one stave has a dotted note and another has not, the result should probably be something average between both. If you put the adjustments in the Note_spacing routines (which should get called per staff), this should happen automatically OK. Will test that. Thanks for the hints. Werner ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: spacing problem
It's not specific to dotted notes but to notes which have longer durations, and which get squeezed far too much -- the same problem occurs for, say, half notes and whole notes. I simply want to control these squeezing values globally. The spacing is controlled by 2 values in the end: the ideal length of the spring, and the width of the fixed part (the remaining is the stretchable part). I guess you want to increase the fixed width for these notes (which also decreases the stretching in case of loose lines - the springs are symmetric in stretch and shrink). You could experiment with Spacing_spanner::musical_column_spacing to tweak the fixed length. You mean a factor for base_note_space (at least this is what I understand at looking at this code)? What about making it configurable? Werner ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: spacing problem
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 6:33 AM, Werner LEMBERG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's not specific to dotted notes but to notes which have longer durations, and which get squeezed far too much -- the same problem occurs for, say, half notes and whole notes. I simply want to control these squeezing values globally. The spacing is controlled by 2 values in the end: the ideal length of the spring, and the width of the fixed part (the remaining is the stretchable part). I guess you want to increase the fixed width for these notes (which also decreases the stretching in case of loose lines - the springs are symmetric in stretch and shrink). You could experiment with Spacing_spanner::musical_column_spacing to tweak the fixed length. You mean a factor for base_note_space (at least this is what I understand at looking at this code)? What about making it configurable? It already is to some extent; look at lily/spacing-options.cc -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: spacing problem
You mean a factor for base_note_space (at least this is what I understand at looking at this code)? What about making it configurable? It already is to some extent; look at lily/spacing-options.cc I can't see anything in this file which influences the minimum value of a note's fixed-length part. get_duration_space() is obviously not what I'm looking for; it rather produces a default value which can still be squeezed by a spring, right? Werner ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: spacing problem
You're looking for whatever goes into the 2nd argument of the Spring constructor. On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Werner LEMBERG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You mean a factor for base_note_space (at least this is what I understand at looking at this code)? What about making it configurable? It already is to some extent; look at lily/spacing-options.cc I can't see anything in this file which influences the minimum value of a note's fixed-length part. get_duration_space() is obviously not what I'm looking for; it rather produces a default value which can still be squeezed by a spring, right? Werner -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: spacing problem
I can't see anything in this file which influences the minimum value of a note's fixed-length part. get_duration_space() is obviously not what I'm looking for; it rather produces a default value which can still be squeezed by a spring, right? You're looking for whatever goes into the 2nd argument of the Spring constructor. Hmm. In file note-spacing.cc, function Note_Spacing::get_spacing, which is used in Spacing_Spanner::musical_column_spacing, I see this code: Real distance = skys[LEFT].distance (skys[RIGHT]); Real min_dist = max (0.0, distance); ... Spring ret (max (0.0, ideal), min_dist); ... return ret; It seems to me that `distance' can even become zero. I can't say whether this can cause problems due to lack of knowledge of the source code. On the other hand, musical_column_spacing contains this code in case the above one isn't called: spring = Spring (max (base_note_space, options-increment_), options-increment_); This looks better, however it means that *all* notes, regardless of its duration, have a minimum width of `spacing-increment' (which is the Scheme parameter assotiated with `increment_'); the default value is the width of a note head. Can this be correct? Isn't this too small in tight situations? Note heads might (almost) touch... IMHO, this should be configurable. Werner ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: spacing problem
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 5:26 PM, Werner LEMBERG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You're looking for whatever goes into the 2nd argument of the Spring constructor. Hmm. In file note-spacing.cc, function Note_Spacing::get_spacing, which is used in Spacing_Spanner::musical_column_spacing, I see this code: Real distance = skys[LEFT].distance (skys[RIGHT]); Real min_dist = max (0.0, distance); ... Spring ret (max (0.0, ideal), min_dist); ... return ret; It seems to me that `distance' can even become zero. I can't say whether this can cause problems due to lack of knowledge of the source code. On the other hand, musical_column_spacing contains this code in case the above one isn't called: spring = Spring (max (base_note_space, options-increment_), options-increment_); This looks better, however it means that *all* notes, regardless of its duration, have a minimum width of `spacing-increment' (which is the Scheme parameter assotiated with `increment_'); the default value is the width of a note head. Can this be correct? Isn't this too Yep. small in tight situations? Note heads might (almost) touch... In tight situations, the rods take over the spacing. I think there is a small threshold that makes sure they don't touch. IMHO, this should be configurable. You could look into the Note_spacing class, which could decide to add some more fixed width if the left side is a dotted note, or perhaps scale up the fixed width for notes longer than 1/8th. (If you do anything, please make sure it does the right thing for polyphonic situations too.) I am not sure if you should use durations rather than dottedness. Should a dotted 64th need a lot of space to accomodate for the dot, or should it be treated like a very short note? -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: spacing problem
AFAIK, the spacing engine does not treat dotted notes specially. You may want to isolate the file to just the dotted note and set breakpoints in gdb in notespacing.cc to get a better idea of what is happening. It's not specific to dotted notes but to notes which have longer durations, and which get squeezed far too much -- the same problem occurs for, say, half notes and whole notes. I simply want to control these squeezing values globally. Werner ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: spacing problem
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 3:18 AM, Werner LEMBERG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's not specific to dotted notes but to notes which have longer durations, and which get squeezed far too much -- the same problem occurs for, say, half notes and whole notes. I simply want to control these squeezing values globally. The spacing is controlled by 2 values in the end: the ideal length of the spring, and the width of the fixed part (the remaining is the stretchable part). I guess you want to increase the fixed width for these notes (which also decreases the stretching in case of loose lines - the springs are symmetric in stretch and shrink). You could experiment with Spacing_spanner::musical_column_spacing to tweak the fixed length. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: spacing problem
On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 11:34 -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 3:18 AM, Werner LEMBERG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's not specific to dotted notes but to notes which have longer durations, and which get squeezed far too much -- the same problem occurs for, say, half notes and whole notes. I simply want to control these squeezing values globally. The spacing is controlled by 2 values in the end: the ideal length of the spring, and the width of the fixed part (the remaining is the stretchable part). I guess you want to increase the fixed width for these notes (which also decreases the stretching in case of loose lines - the springs are symmetric in stretch and shrink). Actually, we can now control the stretching independently of the fixed width. For example, in Note_spacing::get_spacing, the compression strength of the spring depends on something that is not quite the fixed width because we don't count flags for their full width. Joe ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: spacing problem
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 7:23 PM, Joe Neeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The spacing is controlled by 2 values in the end: the ideal length of the spring, and the width of the fixed part (the remaining is the stretchable part). I guess you want to increase the fixed width for these notes (which also decreases the stretching in case of loose lines - the springs are symmetric in stretch and shrink). Actually, we can now control the stretching independently of the fixed width. For example, in Note_spacing::get_spacing, the compression strength of the spring depends on something that is not quite the fixed width because we don't count flags for their full width. Well, yes - I'm not saying that the fixed part of the spring exactly equals the fixed size of the symbol. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
spacing problem
Please have a look at the attached PDF file, generated from this code: \version 2.11.53 #(ly:set-option 'point-and-click #f) \header{ tagline = ##f } \relative c'' { d4 r d8[ d d d] | d4 r d r | d4 r d8[ d d d] | d4 r d r | d4 r d8[ d d d] | d4 r d r | d4 r d8[ d d d] | d4 r d r | d4 r d8[ d d d] | r4 des2. | r2 d4 r | } \paper { paper-height = 5.0\cm ragged-right = ##f indent = 0.0\cm } This is the `natural' spacing as provided by lilypond. However, IMHO, the horizontal spacing of the dotted half note is too small. How can I increase it? I've nothing found in the manual which controls this squeezing. Please don't give educated guesses but hard facts -- I tried a lot, and I wasn't successful. Werner notehead-barline.pdf Description: Adobe PDF document ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: spacing problem
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 11:15 AM, Werner LEMBERG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please have a look at the attached PDF file, generated from this code: [snip] This is the `natural' spacing as provided by lilypond. However, IMHO, the horizontal spacing of the dotted half note is too small. How can I increase it? I've nothing found in the manual which controls this squeezing. Hi Werner, You can tweak the 'extra-spacing-width property like so: \version 2.11.53 #(ly:set-option 'point-and-click #f) \header{ tagline = ##f } \relative c'' { d4 r d8[ d d d] | d4 r d r | d4 r d8[ d d d] | d4 r d r | d4 r d8[ d d d] | d4 r d r | d4 r d8[ d d d] | d4 r d r | d4 r d8[ d d d] | r4 \override NoteHead #'extra-spacing-width = #'(0 . 3) des2. | \revert NoteHead #'extra-spacing-width r2 d4 r | } \paper { paper-height = 5.0\cm ragged-right = ##f indent = 0.0\cm } There is an example in LM 4.4.3 using DynamicText, and the property description is in LM 4.5.1. HTH, Patrick ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: spacing problem
You can tweak the 'extra-spacing-width property like so: [...] Thanks. I was unclear, sorry: I want to control it globally -- all such occurrences are bad; IMHO a dotted half note must never have so little vertical space (but this is both a matter of taste and the circumstances: within a part it might be fine; within a score it is horrible). Werner ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: spacing problem
Hi, AFAIK, the spacing engine does not treat dotted notes specially. You may want to isolate the file to just the dotted note and set breakpoints in gdb in notespacing.cc to get a better idea of what is happening. On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 4:05 PM, Werner LEMBERG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You can tweak the 'extra-spacing-width property like so: [...] Thanks. I was unclear, sorry: I want to control it globally -- all such occurrences are bad; IMHO a dotted half note must never have so little vertical space (but this is both a matter of taste and the circumstances: within a part it might be fine; within a score it is horrible). -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: solved: Staff spacing problem with piano centered dynamics
Hi Jim, 2008/7/17 jimmy2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I still wish I knew how to force staves of a particular system to be closer. I tried various commands which seemed like they should work, but with no effect. Have a look at the headword for NR 1.8 `Text' (http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/user/lilypond/Text.html#Text). The second system has a forced distance of 12 staff spaces using \overrideProperty Score.NonMusicalPaperColumn #'line-break-system-details. Section 4.5.3 `Explicit staff and system positioning' (http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/user/lilypond/Explicit-staff-and-system-positioning.html#Explicit-staff-and-system-positioning) shows you how to tweak the spacing between staves. Regards, Neil ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: solved: Staff spacing problem with piano centered dynamics
2008/7/17 Jim Cline [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi Neil, thanks for the info! I had plowed through section 4.5.3 previously, but the explicit example you mentioned looks like it will be more helpful--Jim Unfortunately, that section is undermined by the formatting of the examples, since every system should appear as six bars wide; I can't blame you if you found it slightly confusing. :) Just a word of warning: if you're using the centred dynamics template, the dynamics spanner is like an invisible stave, so it must be included in the list of offsets in #'line-break-system-details. Regards, Neil ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Staff spacing problem with piano centered dynamics
After months of work, I just finished setting a long piece for piano, using the example LES NÉRÉIDES given in http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.5/examples.html as a template. This uses dynamics between the two staves, \score { \new PianoStaff \new Staff = upper \upper \new Dynamics = dynamics \dynamics \new Staff = lower \clef bass \lower ... The problem is that whenever dynamics are present, they tend to create much more extra space between the staves than is necessary, leading to very nonuniform looking systems (see http://www.nabble.com/file/p18454033/example.jpg example.jpg ). I have tried everything I could find in the documentation and on this forum which seemed to be relevant, and nothing has had any effect on this unwanted extra vertical space. I will greatly appreciate any advice! --Jim -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Staff-spacing-problem-with-piano-centered-dynamics-tp18454033p18454033.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Staff spacing problem with piano centered dynamics
What LilyPond version do you use? Don't expect an example written for version 2.5 to provide optimal layout in a later version, especially not if it uses such strange tricks as this particular example. To find a relevant example to use as a starting point, look at the Templates section of the manual for your version of LilyPond. Note also that the vertical alignment handling has been significantly revised and improved in the latest development version, 2.11.x, which by now is at least as bug free as the stable 2.10.33 version. /Mats Quoting jimmy2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: After months of work, I just finished setting a long piece for piano, using the example LES NÉRÉIDES given in http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.5/examples.html as a template. This uses dynamics between the two staves, \score { \new PianoStaff \new Staff = upper \upper \new Dynamics = dynamics \dynamics \new Staff = lower \clef bass \lower ... The problem is that whenever dynamics are present, they tend to create much more extra space between the staves than is necessary, leading to very nonuniform looking systems (see http://www.nabble.com/file/p18454033/example.jpg example.jpg ). I have tried everything I could find in the documentation and on this forum which seemed to be relevant, and nothing has had any effect on this unwanted extra vertical space. I will greatly appreciate any advice! --Jim -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Staff-spacing-problem-with-piano-centered-dynamics-tp18454033p18454033.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Staff spacing problem with piano centered dynamics
Hi Mats, I am using version 2.11.46. The layout I was using appeared to correspond to that of 2.10 (in fact, I'm no longer sure I used Les Nereides, I may have just gotten the template from the proper place for 2.10). I have now fixed the layout to follow the 2.11 documentation, http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.11/Documentation/user/lilypond-learning/Piano-templates#Piano-templates The only differences I noticed between the two versions was the addition of \override DynamicLineSpanner #'Y-offset = #0 in 2.11 and the omission of the lines \override DynamicText #'extra-offset = #'(0 . 2.5) \override Hairpin #'extra-offset = #'(0 . 2.5) \override VerticalAlignment #'forced-distance = #7 which were present in 2.10. Anyway I have tried all combinations of the above, and there is still no effect on the problematic systems. I have attached the layout section in case you can spot something that I have missed. Thanks! --Jim On Tue, 15 Jul 2008, Mats Bengtsson wrote: What LilyPond version do you use? Don't expect an example written for version 2.5 to provide optimal layout in a later version, especially not if it uses such strange tricks as this particular example. To find a relevant example to use as a starting point, look at the Templates section of the manual for your version of LilyPond. Note also that the vertical alignment handling has been significantly revised and improved in the latest development version, 2.11.x, which by now is at least as bug free as the stable 2.10.33 version. /Mats Quoting jimmy2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: After months of work, I just finished setting a long piece for piano, using the example LES NÉRÉIDES given in http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.5/examples.html as a template. This uses dynamics between the two staves, \score { \new PianoStaff \new Staff = upper \upper \new Dynamics = dynamics \dynamics \new Staff = lower \clef bass \lower ... The problem is that whenever dynamics are present, they tend to create much more extra space between the staves than is necessary, leading to very nonuniform looking systems (see http://www.nabble.com/file/p18454033/example.jpg example.jpg ). I have tried everything I could find in the documentation and on this forum which seemed to be relevant, and nothing has had any effect on this unwanted extra vertical space. I will greatly appreciate any advice! --Jim -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Staff-spacing-problem-with-piano-centered-dynamics-tp18454033p18454033.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user \score { \new PianoStaff \new Staff = upper \upper \new Dynamics = dynamics \dynamics \new Staff = lower \clef bass \lower \new Dynamics = pedal \pedal \layout { \context { \type Engraver_group \name Dynamics \alias Voice % So that \cresc works, for example. \consists Output_property_engraver \override VerticalAxisGroup #'minimum-Y-extent = #'(-1 . 1) \override DynamicLineSpanner #'Y-offset = #0 pedalSustainStrings = #'(Ped. *Ped. *) pedalUnaCordaStrings = #'(una corda tre corde) \consists Piano_pedal_engraver \consists Script_engraver \consists Dynamic_engraver \consists Text_engraver \override TextScript #'font-size = #2 \override TextScript #'font-shape = #'italic % \override DynamicText #'extra-offset = #'(0 . 2.5) % \override Hairpin #'extra-offset = #'(0 . 2.5) \consists Skip_event_swallow_translator \consists Axis_group_engraver } \context { \PianoStaff \accepts Dynamics % \override VerticalAlignment #'forced-distance = #7 } } } \score { \new PianoStaff \new Staff = upper \upper \dynamics \new Staff = lower \lower \dynamics \new Dynamics = pedal \pedal \midi { \context { \type Performer_group \name Dynamics \consists Piano_pedal_performer } \context { \PianoStaff \accepts Dynamics } } } ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Spacing problem
Hello, I'm now getting some spacing errors with noteheads. I attach an image. Is this some positioning bug in 2.11? (In 2.10 I didn't notice it.) If not, is there some possible workaround for cases like these? (Both are produced at beam endings, so maybe if there is some method for increasing space between beams, that could also help.) Thank you, Adam Siska Ádám +36 (70) 207-63-85 http://apocalypse.rulez.org/~sadam inline: ScreenShot.tiff___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Spacing problem
On 7/26/07, Siska Ádám [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I'm now getting some spacing errors with noteheads. I attach an image. Is this some positioning bug in 2.11? (In 2.10 I didn't notice it.) If not, is there some possible workaround for cases like these? (Both are produced at beam endings, so maybe if there is some method for increasing space between beams, that could also help.) The pic helps, but very hard to debug without seeing the input code. Can you produce a minimal example that, for example, shows just those two measures? -- Trevor Bača [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Spacing problem
Hello, I've sent the score to the list a few time ago, but it didn't arrive for me, although normally I get a copy of my own messages posted to the list. Did it arrive, or is there some restrictions for attachment type and/or size on this list? Thank you, Adam Siska Ádám +36 (70) 207-63-85 http://apocalypse.rulez.org/~sadam Trevor Bača wrote: On 7/26/07, Siska Ádám [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I'm now getting some spacing errors with noteheads. I attach an image. Is this some positioning bug in 2.11? (In 2.10 I didn't notice it.) If not, is there some possible workaround for cases like these? (Both are produced at beam endings, so maybe if there is some method for increasing space between beams, that could also help.) The pic helps, but very hard to debug without seeing the input code. Can you produce a minimal example that, for example, shows just those two measures? ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
weird horizontal-spacing problem
I'm a beginner with lilypond, have learnt a lot from the documentation, but here's a problem I can't solve. I'm writing the score of a piano song, with lyrics between the staves. The music has verbose performance instructions at various points, which I've done like this: f bes \emptyText ees ^ Immer staerker und lebhafter f Mostly this works fine. But the text above appears in the last line of the song, and the result is a really ugly large horizontal space in the music, seehttp://www.zen22109.zen.co.uk/screenshot-1.jpg For the .ly file see http://www.zen22109.zen.co.uk/geheim__.ly I've marked the relevant bit with % HERE IS THE PROBLEM I've searched the online documentation, and the only helpful thing I've found is \emptyText, which doesn't work here, and a statement somewhere that lilypond has no way of adjusting horizontal spacing (!!) Comments and attempts to diagnose: * inserting text earlier in the score works perfectly * the problem does not go away if I use \ragged-right, see http://www.zen22109.zen.co.uk/screenshot-2.jpg * the problem goes away if I don't print the lyrics: spacing is then OK * the problem goes away if I comment out the text: % ^ ... So it's not purely a lyrics problem. * I don't use \lyricsto because the upper stave has some sections in a single voice and other sections in two voices, so there's no unique voice to attach the lyrics to. I hope it's not some really stupid beginner's mistake . . . well actually I hope it _is_, because then it'll be easy to fix. Any help will be much appreciated, David Griffel ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: weird horizontal-spacing problem
It indeed seems as if you have hit a weird bug. I send a copy to the bug-lilypond mailing list and note that the following short example shows the same bug: \version 2.9.14 \score{ \new GrandStaff \new Staff = trebleStaff \relative c' { \key aes \major \time 2/4 {f8 bes \emptyText ees ^Immer staerker und lebhafter f } \\ { d, bes' bes aes } } \new Lyrics \lyricmode {zu,8 und nur ein } \layout{ragged-right = ##t } } However, the bug also seems related to the fact that you don't use \lyricsto. You can easily use \lyricsto even in a situation like this where the sopranos occasionally split into divisi. See the first example of Sect. Divisi Lyrics in the manual (just leave out the lyrics for the split part). See also the section on Explicitly Instantiating Voices. Actually, here comes a modified version of the previous example using \lyricsto, which also shows how to do the settings to get bar numbers every 5th bar line (all settings like these have to be done within a context, they can't be done at the top level of the \score block. \score{ \new GrandStaff \set Score.barNumberVisibility = #(every-nth-bar-number-visible 5) \override Score.BarNumber #'break-visibility = #end-of-line-invisible \new Staff = trebleStaff \new Voice = upper \relative c' { \key aes \major \time 2/4 f2 {\voiceOne f8 bes \emptyText ees ^Immer staerker und lebhafter f } \new Voice { \voiceTwo d, bes' bes aes } \oneVoice f2 } \new Lyrics \lyricsto upper {zu,8 und nur ein } \layout{ragged-right = ##t } } /Mats David Griffel wrote: I'm a beginner with lilypond, have learnt a lot from the documentation, but here's a problem I can't solve. I'm writing the score of a piano song, with lyrics between the staves. The music has verbose performance instructions at various points, which I've done like this: f bes \emptyText ees ^ Immer staerker und lebhafter f Mostly this works fine. But the text above appears in the last line of the song, and the result is a really ugly large horizontal space in the music, seehttp://www.zen22109.zen.co.uk/screenshot-1.jpg For the .ly file see http://www.zen22109.zen.co.uk/geheim__.ly I've marked the relevant bit with % HERE IS THE PROBLEM I've searched the online documentation, and the only helpful thing I've found is \emptyText, which doesn't work here, and a statement somewhere that lilypond has no way of adjusting horizontal spacing (!!) Comments and attempts to diagnose: * inserting text earlier in the score works perfectly * the problem does not go away if I use \ragged-right, see http://www.zen22109.zen.co.uk/screenshot-2.jpg * the problem goes away if I don't print the lyrics: spacing is then OK * the problem goes away if I comment out the text: % ^ ... So it's not purely a lyrics problem. * I don't use \lyricsto because the upper stave has some sections in a single voice and other sections in two voices, so there's no unique voice to attach the lyrics to. I hope it's not some really stupid beginner's mistake . . . well actually I hope it _is_, because then it'll be easy to fix. Any help will be much appreciated, David Griffel ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user -- = Mats Bengtsson Signal Processing Signals, Sensors and Systems Royal Institute of Technology SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM Sweden Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463 Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe = ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
spacing problem
I have two drumvoices, both are in 5/8. voiceTwo has five eights, this is easy. voiceOne has six eights in the same time, made with \times 5/6. The layout is ugly, the spacing of the notes isn't equidistant in neither voice nor are the first and last notes aligned vertically. How to fix this? mfg ar -- E-Learning in der Schule: http://www.dbg-metzingen.de/Menschen/Lehrer/Q-T/Rittershofer/E-Learning/ ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: spacing problem
Andreas Rittershofer wrote: I have two drumvoices, both are in 5/8. voiceTwo has five eights, this is easy. voiceOne has six eights in the same time, made with \times 5/6. The layout is ugly, the spacing of the notes isn't equidistant in neither voice nor are the first and last notes aligned vertically. The first notes should be aligned but not the last ones, right? Did you take a look at the last example in the section on Polymetric notation? I tried a variation of that example adopted to your situation and noticed that the spacing was a bit uneven if the total score didn't fill the first line, but if you set raggedright=##t or fill the score with more music, the spacing looks really good as far as I can see. /Mats ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Spacing Problem
Yes, well, the original sheet where I saw the problem was broken at 2 measures. Breaking it at 1 measure wouldn't look good. But I suppose everything will space wider ... I don't have a problem with the breaking of the measures though. The problem is the inconsistent spaces of the 8th notes (as you can see from the output of the code I posted). There's one 8th note in consecutive series of 8th notes that had the spacing about the same as 16th note, as I said, this is immediately noticeable. And gives me pauses when I try to read through it. From: Jack O'Quin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Michael Lakes [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Spacing Problem Date: 21 Sep 2004 09:54:47 -0500 Michael Lakes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Yeah, fixed note spacing base on note duration would not be good. I thought of that as a fix for this problem, which would look better than what's currently produced. Notes in a measure probably should have the same spacing if they're the same notes. This case, the 8th note seems to have half the space compare to other 8th notes which is immediately noticeable. I tried some of those parameters but doesn't seem to get the output I want. It seems not possible to produce fixed outputs proportional to the duration ... I've had good results printing jazz charts in 4- or 8-bar lines by inserting a few \break commands in strategic places. This does make most 32-bar standards easier to read. Lily does a good job of dividing the intervening measures in sensible ways. Very rarely, I add a \noBreak somewhere. I see no reason to force each measure to exactly the same width. My band members really like these charts, BTW. They are easier to read than most printed Fake Books. Thanks to all who created this great program... -- joq _ Get ready for school! Find articles, homework help and more in the Back to School Guide! http://special.msn.com/network/04backtoschool.armx ___ lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Spacing Problem
New attempt to answer the original question! I played a bit with your example. If you really want all the 8th notes spaced as if there was a regular set of 16th notes in another voice, you can easily fake that using an invisible voice with all 16th notes, as shown in the second bar of my example below. However, I'm still convinced that it's not good typesetting practice to typeset all eighth notes of a bar (or even of a single beam) with equal spacing. Consider for example the more extreme case in the third bar of my example. Do you really prefer the equal spacing that I have faked in the fourth bar? If you really want to claim that the layout is incorrect, you should read http://lilypond.org/web/about/automated-engraving/ and then go to your collection of music and really check how it's done in well typeset scores. \version 2.2.2 \score { \notes\relative c'''{ {a8 a a a a a a a}\\ {a,16 a a a a a a a a8 a16 a a a a a} {a'8 a a a a a a a}\\ {a,16 a a a a a a a a8 a16 a a a a a}\\ {\hideNotes \repeat unfold 16 d16} \break {a'8 a a a a a a a}\\ {a,8[ a32 gis a b ] \repeat unfold 12 a16} {a'8 a a a a a a a}\\ {a,8[ a32 gis a b ] \repeat unfold 12 a16}\\ {\hideNotes\repeat unfold 16 d32} } } /Mats Michael Lakes wrote: Hello again, There seems to be incorrect spacing for the code below. The 8th notes in the middle of the measures don't have the same spacing as other 8th notes. Is there any way to correct this? I tried some of the spacing parameters but didn't seem to do work ... Oh, is it possible to make the spacing of the notes fixed (like 8th notes always get 1cm, 16th notes get .5cm)? \version 2.2.2 \score { \notes { \relative c'''{{a8 a a a a a a a}\\{a,16 a a a a a a a a8 a16 a a a a a}} \relative c'''{{a8 a a a a a a a}\\{a,16 a a a a a a a a8 a16 a a a a a}} \relative c'''{{a8 a a a a a a a}\\{a,16 a a a a a a a a8 a16 a a a a a}} } } _ Get ready for school! Find articles, homework help and more in the Back to School Guide! http://special.msn.com/network/04backtoschool.armx ___ lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user -- = Mats Bengtsson Signal Processing Signals, Sensors and Systems Royal Institute of Technology SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM Sweden Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463 Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe = ___ lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Spacing Problem
Ah, didn't even think about using the invisible notes! This works perfectly for the piece (it's a little different than what I posted, but the rythm and note durations are the same). Thanks a lot! eh, yes, I agree equal spacing wouldn't be correct in most cases. But I'm looking at a very specific case (maybe shows automated music engraving is very hard to achieved? props to the developers). However, I do think equal note duration in a measure should get equal spacing. But, there're two voice in the measure ... correct spacing in one means incorrect spacing for another. Maybe some compromise needs to be reach. The default Lilypond output group the 8th notes too close making the note look like 16th note relative to the other 8th notes. Thanks for the answer, it's greatly appreciated! From: Mats Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Michael Lakes [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Spacing Problem Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 10:34:05 +0200 New attempt to answer the original question! I played a bit with your example. If you really want all the 8th notes spaced as if there was a regular set of 16th notes in another voice, you can easily fake that using an invisible voice with all 16th notes, as shown in the second bar of my example below. However, I'm still convinced that it's not good typesetting practice to typeset all eighth notes of a bar (or even of a single beam) with equal spacing. Consider for example the more extreme case in the third bar of my example. Do you really prefer the equal spacing that I have faked in the fourth bar? If you really want to claim that the layout is incorrect, you should read http://lilypond.org/web/about/automated-engraving/ and then go to your collection of music and really check how it's done in well typeset scores. \version 2.2.2 \score { \notes\relative c'''{ {a8 a a a a a a a}\\ {a,16 a a a a a a a a8 a16 a a a a a} {a'8 a a a a a a a}\\ {a,16 a a a a a a a a8 a16 a a a a a}\\ {\hideNotes \repeat unfold 16 d16} \break {a'8 a a a a a a a}\\ {a,8[ a32 gis a b ] \repeat unfold 12 a16} {a'8 a a a a a a a}\\ {a,8[ a32 gis a b ] \repeat unfold 12 a16}\\ {\hideNotes\repeat unfold 16 d32} } } /Mats Michael Lakes wrote: Hello again, There seems to be incorrect spacing for the code below. The 8th notes in the middle of the measures don't have the same spacing as other 8th notes. Is there any way to correct this? I tried some of the spacing parameters but didn't seem to do work ... Oh, is it possible to make the spacing of the notes fixed (like 8th notes always get 1cm, 16th notes get .5cm)? \version 2.2.2 \score { \notes { \relative c'''{{a8 a a a a a a a}\\{a,16 a a a a a a a a8 a16 a a a a a}} \relative c'''{{a8 a a a a a a a}\\{a,16 a a a a a a a a8 a16 a a a a a}} \relative c'''{{a8 a a a a a a a}\\{a,16 a a a a a a a a8 a16 a a a a a}} } } _ Get ready for school! Find articles, homework help and more in the Back to School Guide! http://special.msn.com/network/04backtoschool.armx ___ lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user -- = Mats Bengtsson Signal Processing Signals, Sensors and Systems Royal Institute of Technology SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM Sweden Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463 Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe = _ FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar get it now! http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/ ___ lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Spacing Problem
Yeah, fixed note spacing base on note duration would not be good. I thought of that as a fix for this problem, which would look better than what's currently produced. Notes in a measure probably should have the same spacing if they're the same notes. This case, the 8th note seems to have half the space compare to other 8th notes which is immediately noticeable. I tried some of those parameters but doesn't seem to get the output I want. It seems not possible to produce fixed outputs proportional to the duration ... Thanks though. From: Mats Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Michael Lakes [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Spacing Problem Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 12:52:28 +0200 Have your read http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.2/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/Horizontal-spacing.html I guess the main authors of LilyPond would say that they didn't implement it to be able to produce such an ugly layout, you may still be able to get fixed note spacing by adjusting these parameters. /Mats Michael Lakes wrote: Hello again, There seems to be incorrect spacing for the code below. The 8th notes in the middle of the measures don't have the same spacing as other 8th notes. Is there any way to correct this? I tried some of the spacing parameters but didn't seem to do work ... Oh, is it possible to make the spacing of the notes fixed (like 8th notes always get 1cm, 16th notes get .5cm)? \version 2.2.2 \score { \notes { \relative c'''{{a8 a a a a a a a}\\{a,16 a a a a a a a a8 a16 a a a a a}} \relative c'''{{a8 a a a a a a a}\\{a,16 a a a a a a a a8 a16 a a a a a}} \relative c'''{{a8 a a a a a a a}\\{a,16 a a a a a a a a8 a16 a a a a a}} } } _ Get ready for school! Find articles, homework help and more in the Back to School Guide! http://special.msn.com/network/04backtoschool.armx ___ lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user -- = Mats Bengtsson Signal Processing Signals, Sensors and Systems Royal Institute of Technology SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM Sweden Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463 Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe = _ On the road to retirement? Check out MSN Life Events for advice on how to get there! http://lifeevents.msn.com/category.aspx?cid=Retirement ___ lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Spacing Problem
Michael Lakes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Yeah, fixed note spacing base on note duration would not be good. I thought of that as a fix for this problem, which would look better than what's currently produced. Notes in a measure probably should have the same spacing if they're the same notes. This case, the 8th note seems to have half the space compare to other 8th notes which is immediately noticeable. I tried some of those parameters but doesn't seem to get the output I want. It seems not possible to produce fixed outputs proportional to the duration ... I've had good results printing jazz charts in 4- or 8-bar lines by inserting a few \break commands in strategic places. This does make most 32-bar standards easier to read. Lily does a good job of dividing the intervening measures in sensible ways. Very rarely, I add a \noBreak somewhere. I see no reason to force each measure to exactly the same width. My band members really like these charts, BTW. They are easier to read than most printed Fake Books. Thanks to all who created this great program... -- joq ___ lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: vertical spacing problem
D Josiah Boothby wrote: Hello, all, I'd like to change either the vertical spacing or the global staff size after page one, and can't figure out a way to do that. If I have the spacing such that p.1 fits three systems, p.2 has a glaringly large white space at the bottom. To see what I'm talking about, you can download from the following urls the first two pages of the score (in .png or .pdf, depending on your preference). Maybe you can try to put in the paper secion the lines interscoreline= 0.0 \cm interscorelinefill= 1.0 This is not what you ask, but makes the staffs spaced to fill the whole page. I hope it helps NANCHO ___ lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Spacing Problem
Have your read http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.2/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/Horizontal-spacing.html I guess the main authors of LilyPond would say that they didn't implement it to be able to produce such an ugly layout, you may still be able to get fixed note spacing by adjusting these parameters. /Mats Michael Lakes wrote: Hello again, There seems to be incorrect spacing for the code below. The 8th notes in the middle of the measures don't have the same spacing as other 8th notes. Is there any way to correct this? I tried some of the spacing parameters but didn't seem to do work ... Oh, is it possible to make the spacing of the notes fixed (like 8th notes always get 1cm, 16th notes get .5cm)? \version 2.2.2 \score { \notes { \relative c'''{{a8 a a a a a a a}\\{a,16 a a a a a a a a8 a16 a a a a a}} \relative c'''{{a8 a a a a a a a}\\{a,16 a a a a a a a a8 a16 a a a a a}} \relative c'''{{a8 a a a a a a a}\\{a,16 a a a a a a a a8 a16 a a a a a}} } } _ Get ready for school! Find articles, homework help and more in the Back to School Guide! http://special.msn.com/network/04backtoschool.armx ___ lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user -- = Mats Bengtsson Signal Processing Signals, Sensors and Systems Royal Institute of Technology SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM Sweden Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463 Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe = ___ lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Spacing Problem
Hello again, There seems to be incorrect spacing for the code below. The 8th notes in the middle of the measures don't have the same spacing as other 8th notes. Is there any way to correct this? I tried some of the spacing parameters but didn't seem to do work ... Oh, is it possible to make the spacing of the notes fixed (like 8th notes always get 1cm, 16th notes get .5cm)? \version 2.2.2 \score { \notes { \relative c'''{{a8 a a a a a a a}\\{a,16 a a a a a a a a8 a16 a a a a a}} \relative c'''{{a8 a a a a a a a}\\{a,16 a a a a a a a a8 a16 a a a a a}} \relative c'''{{a8 a a a a a a a}\\{a,16 a a a a a a a a8 a16 a a a a a}} } } _ Get ready for school! Find articles, homework help and more in the Back to School Guide! http://special.msn.com/network/04backtoschool.armx ___ lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
vertical spacing problem
Hello, all, I'd like to change either the vertical spacing or the global staff size after page one, and can't figure out a way to do that. If I have the spacing such that p.1 fits three systems, p.2 has a glaringly large white space at the bottom. To see what I'm talking about, you can download from the following urls the first two pages of the score (in .png or .pdf, depending on your preference). http://students.washington.edu/josiah/lilypond/ricercare-page1.png http://students.washington.edu/josiah/lilypond/ricercare-page2.png http://students.washington.edu/josiah/lilypond/ricercare-pages-1-2.pdf The following is from my .ly, and I haven't been successful at trying to set the global staff size more than once, and same with setting the Staff.minimumVerticalExtent. \version 2.2.6 #(set-global-staff-size 14) global = \notes { \set Staff.minimumVerticalExtent = #'(-5 . 5) ... } ___ lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Staff Lyrics vertical spacing problem
On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 10:09:19AM +0200, Mats Bengtsson wrote: I suppose that you used the property Staff.minimumVerticalExtent, which affects the spacing around each stave, no matter if it's one stave out of several in a full orchestral score or if it's the only stave. The distance between score lines is affected by a paper variable called interscoreline, as described in Section 4.6.5 Page layout of the manual. You may want to reduce that instead. /Mats Thanks to all of you for your answers. Reducing interscoreline made it in a very convenient way :-) -- Alexis Graham Percival wrote: On 12-Aug-04, at 11:58 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I experience some little glitches by trying to reduce the overall vertical spacing on a very simple song containing a line of lyrics and only one staff. When I reduce verticalExtent, it looks like the first two lines of Staff are closer than the other lines... I have seen no way to reduce the vertical Extent for all the lines without the two first ones being closer than the succeeding ones. [...] ___ lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Staff Lyrics vertical spacing problem
On 12-Aug-04, at 11:58 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I experience some little glitches by trying to reduce the overall vertical spacing on a very simple song containing a line of lyrics and only one staff. When I reduce verticalExtent, it looks like the first two lines of Staff are closer than the other lines... I have seen no way to reduce the vertical Extent for all the lines without the two first ones being closer than the succeeding ones. The other staff lines might be forced to be farther apart due to articulations, text, dynamics, etc. Certainly the verticalExtent property is supposed to affect all lines. What happens if you set verticalExtent to a really small number (ie 0), or a really big number (say, 10) ? Does the problem remain? If the problem remains, could you send us a small example that demonstrates this? P.S : please CC me the answer since I am not on the list ! Don't worry; policy on this list is to CC everybody, even when we know that they're on the list. :) Cheers, - Graham ___ lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
cc'ing was: Re: Staff Lyrics vertical spacing problem
Graham Percival wrote: Don't worry; policy on this list is to CC everybody, even when we know that they're on the list. :) Does anyone have a problem with my not cc'ing people that I know are on the list? Paul Scott ___ lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Staff Lyrics vertical spacing problem
I suppose that you used the property Staff.minimumVerticalExtent, which affects the spacing around each stave, no matter if it's one stave out of several in a full orchestral score or if it's the only stave. The distance between score lines is affected by a paper variable called interscoreline, as described in Section 4.6.5 Page layout of the manual. You may want to reduce that instead. /Mats Graham Percival wrote: On 12-Aug-04, at 11:58 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I experience some little glitches by trying to reduce the overall vertical spacing on a very simple song containing a line of lyrics and only one staff. When I reduce verticalExtent, it looks like the first two lines of Staff are closer than the other lines... I have seen no way to reduce the vertical Extent for all the lines without the two first ones being closer than the succeeding ones. The other staff lines might be forced to be farther apart due to articulations, text, dynamics, etc. Certainly the verticalExtent property is supposed to affect all lines. What happens if you set verticalExtent to a really small number (ie 0), or a really big number (say, 10) ? Does the problem remain? If the problem remains, could you send us a small example that demonstrates this? P.S : please CC me the answer since I am not on the list ! Don't worry; policy on this list is to CC everybody, even when we know that they're on the list. :) Cheers, - Graham ___ lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user -- = Mats Bengtsson Signal Processing Signals, Sensors and Systems Royal Institute of Technology SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM Sweden Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463 Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe = ___ lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Staff Lyrics vertical spacing problem
On 13-Aug-04, at 1:21 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: Graham Percival writes: P.S : please CC me the answer since I am not on the list ! Don't worry; policy on this list is to CC everybody, even when we know that they're on the list. :) Unless the header Mail-Followup-To: header indicates that sender does not want copies, of course. Yes, true. But that's automatically taken care of by any modern email client. Paul: I don't think that anybody minds not being cc'd if they subscribe to the list; it's just that it's easier for us to simply hit the reply to all key instead of wondering if somebody is on the list or not and trimming accordingly. And since we know that that's the policy, we don't mind receiving two copies instead of one. Cheers, - Graham ___ lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Staff Lyrics vertical spacing problem
Hi, I am a newcomer to the marvelous word of lilypond, and first, I would like to thank you for such a great program ! I experience some little glitches by trying to reduce the overall vertical spacing on a very simple song containing a line of lyrics and only one staff. When I reduce verticalExtent, it looks like the first two lines of Staff are closer than the other lines... I have seen no way to reduce the vertical Extent for all the lines without the two first ones being closer than the succeeding ones. Could you help me with that ? Is there a sort of added vertical extent from the second line ? I can not find a way to further reduce the space between the bottom of a lyrics line and the top of the next line of Staff that works for the after-first line of lyrics... Thanks in advance, -- Alexis P.S : please CC me the answer since I am not on the list ! ___ lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Figured bass spacing problem
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I've changed this in 1.7 CVS, by introducing alignBassFigureAccidentals. It defaults to off, which produces your desired notation. Is this the official notation? I think so yes. Certainly it's much better than the old rendering. If an accidental is there without a number, it applies to the 3rd of the chord and the accidental should be centered. To be pedantic, I also think that instead of: 7 5 3 6 It should be: 7 5 6 3 This applies for things like,b7 (B 6 5 6 as well, i.e. the 6 should be vertically centered in the gap left for figured bass (a bit up from where it is in the ASCII art). People don't seem to agree on the proper format of the figures. Can you provide me with definite references? -- Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen ___ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Figured bass spacing problem
On Thursday 24 July 2003 11:32 am, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I've changed this in 1.7 CVS, by introducing alignBassFigureAccidentals. It defaults to off, which produces your desired notation. Is this the official notation? I think so yes. Certainly it's much better than the old rendering. If an accidental is there without a number, it applies to the 3rd of the chord and the accidental should be centered. To be pedantic, I also think that instead of: 7 5 3 6 It should be: 7 5 6 3 This applies for things like,b7 (B 6 5 6 as well, i.e. the 6 should be vertically centered in the gap left for figured bass (a bit up from where it is in the ASCII art). People don't seem to agree on the proper format of the figures. Can you provide me with definite references? Use Piston's Harmony. Also, what could 6 5 6 possibly mean? Either you have the interval of the 6th or you don't. DaveA -- The biggest losers of all are the winners of an unjust war. Bush lied. Thousands died. Only the winning part is over. It is necessary that WMD be found, so they will be. dra@ http://www.openguitar.com ___ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Figured bass spacing problem
On Thu, 24, Jul, 2003 at 06:20:02PM -0400, David Raleigh Arnold spoke thus.. 6 5 6 possibly mean? Either you have the interval of the 6th or you don't. No no no! I'm talking about layout - that's for two different fingerings: (pretend there's a bass clef at the start) ,----, ' ||' '--||' ' |,' '--,---X-' ' X ' '' '' '' 6 6 5 (Note I'm not intending the gap between the 6 and 5, it's the limitations of ASCII art); I'm trying to show the 6 in the middle. Rather than 6 56 which places the 6 far too far away from the stave to be readable. Having said that, I've checked various editions and some do this: 66 5 And if the bass is above the stave (as in the OUP edition of Continuo Playing According to Handel) some do this: 6 56 which makes sense, i.e they are stacked so that the numbers start closest to the stave. However before suggesting anything I'm off to the Uni library tomorrow to look in the music section and try and find some definitive references. Hope this makes more sense. Mark -- Mark Hymers markh at linuxfromscratch dot org 'I regret nothing?' That's not a song, that's an idiots charter. Andy Hamilton, Old Harry's Game ___ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Figured bass spacing problem
On Thursday 24 July 2003 08:00 pm, Mark Hymers wrote: On Thu, 24, Jul, 2003 at 06:20:02PM -0400, David Raleigh Arnold spoke thus.. 6 5 6 possibly mean? Either you have the interval of the 6th or you don't. No no no! I'm talking about layout - that's for two different fingerings: (pretend there's a bass clef at the start) ,----, ' ||' '--||' ' |,' '--,---X-' ' X ' '' '' '' 6 6 5 (Note I'm not intending the gap between the 6 and 5, it's the limitations of ASCII art); I'm trying to show the 6 in the middle. Rather than 6 56 which places the 6 far too far away from the stave to be readable. Having said that, I've checked various editions and some do this: 66 5 And if the bass is above the stave (as in the OUP edition of Continuo Playing According to Handel) some do this: 6 56 which makes sense, i.e they are stacked so that the numbers start closest to the stave. However before suggesting anything I'm off to the Uni library tomorrow to look in the music section and try and find some definitive references. Hope this makes more sense. Sorry to make you type that mess, but I really didn't get it. DaveA -- The biggest losers of all are the winners of an unjust war. Bush lied. Thousands died. Only the winning part is over. It is necessary that WMD be found, so they will be. dra@ http://www.openguitar.com ___ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Figured bass spacing problem
On Thu, 17, Jul, 2003 at 06:52:14PM +0200, Han-Wen Nienhuys spoke thus.. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The problem is that when I'm trying to display an accidental without a number it doesn't line up properly. So, for example (#=sharp, b=flat !=natural): 4# b instead of 4# b I've changed this in 1.7 CVS, by introducing alignBassFigureAccidentals. It defaults to off, which produces your desired notation. Is this the official notation? I think so yes. Certainly it's much better than the old rendering. If an accidental is there without a number, it applies to the 3rd of the chord and the accidental should be centered. To be pedantic, I also think that instead of: 7 5 3 6 It should be: 7 5 6 3 This applies for things like· 6 5 6 as well, i.e. the 6 should be vertically centered in the gap left for figured bass (a bit up from where it is in the ASCII art). That said however, the accidental change on its own is a wonderful improvement. Many thanks, Mark -- Mark Hymers markh at linuxfromscratch dot org I once absent-mindedly ordered Three Mile Island dressing in a restaurant and, with great presence of mind, they brought Thousand Island Dressing and a bottle of chili sauce. Terry Pratchett, alt.fan.pratchett ___ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Figured bass spacing problem
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The problem is that when I'm trying to display an accidental without a number it doesn't line up properly. So, for example (#=sharp, b=flat !=natural): 4# b instead of 4# b I've changed this in 1.7 CVS, by introducing alignBassFigureAccidentals. It defaults to off, which produces your desired notation. Is this the official notation? (No expert on figured bass) -- Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen ___ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: clusters: note spacing problem and other things
David Pirotte wrote: ly2dvi (GNU LilyPond) 1.5.13 As others have stated, your syntax is completely wrong. But you should also notice that 1.5.13 have problems with the position of dots - c.f. the bug mailing list. If you don't need any of the new development functions, you really should downgrade to the latest stable release - 1.4.8. -Rune ___ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
clusters: note spacing problem and other things
Hello ;; -- I am new user of lilypond. I am a composer, a young composer, and I hope that I will be able to write my music with lilypond. But modern music is quite demanding and so much more difficult to typeset then ancient music. Is there any other composers of classical contemporary music on this list? I hope that lilypond developpers are also willing to make it a modern typesetter alternative to commercial software (which are not good enough anyway). It would be so nice! So, please and in advance, pardon my requests: it will not be to point out things that lilypond can not do, but just things I need to be able to do, hoping that these requests will help others (or that people on the list can help me of course). As a lilypond beginner, I obviously probably will ask stupid question(s) to ... ;; -- ly2dvi (GNU LilyPond) 1.5.13 So, here is a couple of little problems I encountered, very small example to start with 1. the following compiles ok \score { \notes \context Staff = Cl { \property Staff.instrument = Cl Sib \time 8/4 \clef violin {r2. r2.} } \context Staff = staffB { \time 8/4 \clef bass \relative a, {a2. a2. b2. c2. a2is a2. b2. c2. a2is} } \paper {} } but does not produce the expected display results: even the r2. and the a2. does not produce the result expected, (the dot is in the note, and not after the note) or is it my xdvi? (it seems i have xdvik, should i get another xdvi? ;; -- 2. the following does not compiles \score { \notes \context Staff = Cl { \property Staff.instrument = Cl Sib \time 8/4 \clef violin {r2. r2.} } \context Staff = staffB { \time 8/4 \clef bass \relative a, {a2. a2. b2. c2. a2is. a2. b2. c2. a2is.} % a2is. instead of a2is } \paper {} } clusters in general are not 'displayed' properly, note spacing problems. a strange thing is that if I do not have {a2. a2. b2. c2. a2is. ...} but {a2. b2. c2. a2is. ...} then the cluster is really badly 'computed' is there a special feature for clusters? ;; -- 3. i wanted to call staff using numbers to, but is seems not possible: \score { \notes \context Staff = Cl1 { ... \context Staff = Cl2 { ... does not compile: is it the expected behavior? can't we use numbers in staff names ;; -- 4. i would like to define a piano always with 3 staff, with clef as is: \violin \bass \bass -15 how can i define a clef twice octava bassa ? (the \bass clef with the number 15 sligthly below and right) ;; -- thanks a lot for help and understanding david ___ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user