Re: Digital Video Question

2003-01-09 Thread Mayuresh
A word of caution. DivX can be extremely CPU intensive.
This list from discreet might help, though I think it hasn't been updated
for sometime now.
http://www.discreet.com/support/codec/
_
Regards,
Mayuresh

- Original Message -
From: "Chris Aernoudt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 10:04 PM
Subject: RE:  Digital Video Question


>
> Avi is not really a specific format, it depends 100% on the codec you
> use...
> If you want to play safe, you can use cinepak or one of the older indeo
> formats (but they suck in this day and age)
> I'm not sure if indeo 5.x works standard on 98... it does if they have a
> +- recent version of mediaplayer...
>
> If you're willing to make'em install stuff, go with divx, gives you the
> best quality and the smallest files - plus the setup is tiny.
>
> HTH,
> Chris
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Paul Steven
> Sent: donderdag 9 januari 2003 17:03
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:  Digital Video Question
>
> Hi there
>
> Simply question hopefully! I want to include a video intro in a director
> projector I am creating. The playback spec is PC only however must
> include
> win 98 as a minimum. What is the best format to create or convert the
> digital video to in order that the user does not need any additional
> plugins
> such as Quicktime. Would an AVI work fine or does it require Video For
> Windows still as it used to do years ago when I last used an AVI in a
> project. If AVI is the way to go, should I be aware of any codec issues?
>
> The other alternative I thought of was to create separate bitmaps for
> each
> frame however there are 250 frames and they are all 800 by 400 pixels in
> size. As the projector will be running from a CD-ROM I would imagine it
> would not run fast enough without stuttering.
>
> Any wise words or tips much appreciated!
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Paul

[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to 
http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi  To post messages to the list, email 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Lingo-L is for 
learning and helping with programming Lingo.  Thanks!]



Re: Cross-post: Mac preferences help

2003-01-09 Thread grimmwerks
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Phil Gross wrote:

> 
> In the Director docs, and under Windows, the Preferences are under the Edit menu. 
>The NFR copy of DirMX Macromedia sent me for Mac has the Preferences under the 
>Director menu.


That is correct; on Mac os X all preferences are under the application's 
menu.

[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to 
http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi  To post messages to the list, email 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Lingo-L is for 
learning and helping with programming Lingo.  Thanks!]



Cross-post: Mac preferences help

2003-01-09 Thread Phil Gross
I'm trying to document some basic elements of Director, and could use some help if 
anyone has a different version of DirMX than I have.

In the Director docs, and under Windows, the Preferences are under the Edit menu. The 
NFR copy of DirMX Macromedia sent me for Mac has the Preferences under the Director 
menu.

I'd be forever grateful if someone could verify this on a download version or, better 
yet, a commercial CD, for the Mac.

Bonus points, has anyone received their purchased CDs for DirMX?

Many thanks,
-Phil

[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to 
http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi  To post messages to the list, email 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Lingo-L is for 
learning and helping with programming Lingo.  Thanks!]



Re: queue()-ing sounds

2003-01-09 Thread Buzz Kettles
At 4:53 PM +1100 1/9/03, you wrote:

Hi,

I am authoring on a Mac but I remember from a couple of years ago that
PCs used to have a latency issue when playing sounds (i.e.. there was a
delay between the command and the sound when using puppetSound).

 I understand that using the queue() command eliminates this delay
because it preloads a part of the sound. However I was wondering if this
still holds when the play() command is used in the line directly after
the queue() command.

e.g..

 sound(1).queue( member(soundCastMember) )
 sound(1).play()

I have quite a number of sound effects (I guess eventually a dozen or
two or three or four). So far their individual duration is between 0.3
sec and 1.5 sec. Which sound plays will depend on what the user has just
done, so I don't think queuing a whole lot of sounds, and therefore
pleloading them, would work because I never know what sound will be
needed next. (Also, partly because it is a web project, just preLoading
all the sounds with something like preLoadMember is probably not a good
idea because of loading delays at the beginning of the movie)

Unfortunately I don't have a PC to test this on and the Mac does not
seem to have this latency issue.

To sum up, my questions are:

1) Will using queue() followed by play() as in the example above solve
the latency issue or does there need to be some time between the two
commands to allow for the bit of preload.


If one calls play immediately, there's really very little difference 
from the single line sound().play(member(soundCastMember))

- the real advantage of queue comes when you do

sound().queue(memberA)
sound().queue(memberB)
sound().queue(memberC)
sound().play()

or

sound().setPlaylist([[#member: memberA], [#member: memberB], 
[#member: memberC]])
sound().play()

2) And is latency still an issue on PCs?


The latency issue was largely resolved by two things:
1. MACR's creation of the directSound Xtra (included with the Windows product).
2. MS now includes directSound as standard within their contemporary 
operating systems.

So

1. Remember to include the DirectSound Xtra in your Window projector 
and Director will default to use it if it's available.  Also include 
Macromix.x32 to fall back on if it's not (this is the one with the 
latency).

2. Finally, add this line in your prepareMovie handler to handle the 
case of directSound not being available (is the WinOS = NT):
 if the soundDevice = "Macromix" then the soundDevice = "QT3Mix"
-- if directSound is unavailable, the soundDevice will drop to 
Macromix, and in this case you can substitue the QT3Mix soundDevice 
if QuickTime is present.  It's better than Macromix, but not as good 
as directSOund, since it's dependent on QuickTime.
3. Be sure to include the QTAsset.x32 Xtra, which contains the QTMix 
soundDevice within it.

This will get you low latency unless you're on an NT system that 
doesn't have QT installed.



3) As a follow on: Does puppetSound need to load the whole sound before
it can play (whereas queue() just preLoads the first 1.5 sec by default?
- though most of my sounds are no longer than this anyway.)


not really - puppetSound is now just an alias
-> the code just calls sound.play()

hth
-Buzz



Cheers,
John
[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go 
to http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi  To post messages to the 
list, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]  (Problems, email 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]). Lingo-L is for learning and helping with 
programming Lingo.  Thanks!]

[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi  To post messages to the list, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]  (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo.  Thanks!]



Re: bluring images

2003-01-09 Thread andi
hi

this might help
http://www.lingoworkshop.com/code/imaging_animfx.asp

[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to 
http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi  To post messages to the list, email 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Lingo-L is for 
learning and helping with programming Lingo.  Thanks!]



Re: The long date

2003-01-09 Thread Buzz Kettles
At 3:39 PM -0600 1/9/03, you wrote:

On Thursday, January 9, 2003, at 03:12 PM, Mendelsohn, Michael wrote:


Anyway, are these results below totally standard throughout international
systems, no matter if you're in the USA or Great Britain, where it's
DD/MM/ vs. MM/DD/?


Yes, the systemDate and date objects are one hundred percent 
standard. IIRC this was intro'd with Dir8, probably precisely 
because it is so very very useful.

Actually, it was d7, & yes, because it is nmuch more useable.

hth
-Buzz



You can get to all the date items thus:

  put now.day
  put now.month
  put now.year

Mix 'n' match. Enjoy!

-- WthmO

[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go 
to http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi  To post messages to the 
list, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]  (Problems, email 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]). Lingo-L is for learning and helping with 
programming Lingo.  Thanks!]

[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi  To post messages to the list, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]  (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo.  Thanks!]



Re: The long date

2003-01-09 Thread Howdy-Tzi
On Thursday, January 9, 2003, at 03:12 PM, Mendelsohn, Michael wrote:


Anyway, are these results below totally standard throughout 
international
systems, no matter if you're in the USA or Great Britain, where it's
DD/MM/ vs. MM/DD/?

Yes, the systemDate and date objects are one hundred percent standard. 
IIRC this was intro'd with Dir8, probably precisely because it is so 
very very useful.

You can get to all the date items thus:

  put now.day
  put now.month
  put now.year

Mix 'n' match. Enjoy!

-- WthmO

[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi  To post messages to the list, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]  (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo.  Thanks!]


RE: The long date

2003-01-09 Thread Mendelsohn, Michael
Hi Howdy-Tzi...

Thanks for replying to yet another one of my interesting posts.

Anyway, are these results below totally standard throughout international
systems, no matter if you're in the USA or Great Britain, where it's
DD/MM/ vs. MM/DD/?

now = the systemDate
put now
-- date( 2003, 1, 9 )
put now.year
-- 2003

Regards,
Michael M.
[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to 
http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi  To post messages to the list, email 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Lingo-L is for 
learning and helping with programming Lingo.  Thanks!]



Re: The long date

2003-01-09 Thread Howdy-Tzi
On Thursday, January 9, 2003, at 09:37 AM, Mendelsohn, Michael wrote:


I know I may be opening a can of worms here, but why is it that the 
long
date in the following code works in authoring mode but not in projector
mode?

As Dave suggested, uses systemDate. If you put the systemDate.seconds 
you even get the time (in seconds) since midnight for that day.

Look into using date() objects in the Lingo docs too. A hell of a lot 
better than long/short date if you need to actually perform 
calculations.


 Warren Ockrassa | http://www.nightwares.com/
 Director help | Free files | Sample chapters | Freelance | Consulting
   Author | Director 8.5 Shockwave Studio: A Beginner's Guide
   Published by Osborne/McGraw-Hill
   http://shop.osborne.com/cgi-bin/osborne/0072195622.html

[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi  To post messages to the list, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]  (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo.  Thanks!]


Re: The long date

2003-01-09 Thread Dave Mennenoh
Use the systemDate, which produces a date object which will work in all
situations...

Dave

[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to 
http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi  To post messages to the list, email 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Lingo-L is for 
learning and helping with programming Lingo.  Thanks!]



Re: bluring images

2003-01-09 Thread Andreas Gaunitz P11
It's definitely possible but you need to laern imaging lingo. That's 
not too much to ask, it's simple and useful.

Check out the ducumentation for blurimage xtra. They talk a little 
about how blur is obtained:
http://www.smoothware.com/blurimage.html


-A.


hi, folks
i have to make a script that blurs an image according to a custom 
slider. it´s for simulating the way lenses work on telescopes, 
putting things out and on focus. could it be done with imaging 
lingo? if so, could you please just point me the right direction? 
what kind of image property could achieve such thing? i must say 
that i´m not really familiar with imaging lingo.
thanks a lot in advance,
q


[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go 
to http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi  To post messages to the 
list, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]  (Problems, email 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]). Lingo-L is for learning and helping with 
programming Lingo.  Thanks!]

[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi  To post messages to the list, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]  (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo.  Thanks!]



baSystemTime...was The long date

2003-01-09 Thread Mendelsohn, Michael
Thanks, Brad, for the Buddy API tip.  It was right in front of me all this
time.

Anyone on the list know if baSystemTime works reliably the same no matter
what country you are in, and, in Windows at least, no matter how the
computer's date is formatted? Like  MM/DD/ or /DD/MM, etc?




>buddyapi baSystemTime(%Y) will always give 
>you what you need but I don't know if it's cross platform or not.
>BuddyApi-> www.mods.com.au
[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to 
http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi  To post messages to the list, email 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Lingo-L is for 
learning and helping with programming Lingo.  Thanks!]



RE: The long date

2003-01-09 Thread Daniel Plaenitz
At 12:09 09.01.2003 -0500, you wrote:

Hi Brad...

Thanks for responding.

As half of what I'm doing is going to be distributed to Europe, and they
format the date differently from the US (my system), will temporarily
changing the itemDelimiter do anything to screw up
either-side-of-the-Atlantic systems regarding date?

For instance, put the short date (US) returns
-- "1/9/2003"
But is there a chance that this could be something like
-- "2003/9/1"
somewhere else, or maybe something different?


IIRC 2003.01.09 would be the ISO normed date format, the date is written 
like this in China.
On a German system the date format is like this:

put (the short date)
-- "09.01.2003"



Maybe I should make a linear list out of the items in the short date and
search for the one that has a length of 4?  Would it always be 4, i.e. could
some far off place like Lesotho, Belarus or the Canary Islands return 03
instead of 2003?


Why would you want to do labourous and difficult calculations like 
this?  lingo has that comfortable date() data type, just do

put the systemdate
-- date( 2003, 1, 9 )

or

put (the systemdate).year
-- 2003
put (the systemdate).month
-- 1
put (the systemdate).day
-- 9


regards
daniel plaenitz
[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi  To post messages to the list, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]  (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo.  Thanks!]


bluring images

2003-01-09 Thread Quixadá
hi, folks
i have to make a script that blurs an image according to a custom slider. 
it´s for simulating the way lenses work on telescopes, putting things out 
and on focus. could it be done with imaging lingo? if so, could you please 
just point me the right direction? what kind of image property could 
achieve such thing? i must say that i´m not really familiar with imaging lingo.
thanks a lot in advance,
q


[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi  To post messages to the list, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]  (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo.  Thanks!]


RE: The long date

2003-01-09 Thread Brad Hile
Michael wote:
> Thanks for responding.
>
> As half of what I'm doing is going to be distributed to Europe, and they
> format the date differently from the US (my system), will temporarily
> changing the itemDelimiter do anything to screw up
> either-side-of-the-Atlantic systems regarding date?

Hi Michael and your welcome, nice to be the one offering advice for a change
;)
Couldn't say about Euro time formats ( I'm in Oz which follows the
US/English )
Looping through the date for a 4 char item should work as the short date is
always formatted the same way AFAIK - could be wrong though.
An alternative may be to use the date object or buddyapi baSystemTime(%Y)
will always give you what you need but I don't know if it's cross platform
or not.
BuddyApi-> www.mods.com.au

Hope some of this helps

Brad


[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to 
http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi  To post messages to the list, email 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Lingo-L is for 
learning and helping with programming Lingo.  Thanks!]



Re: Digital Video Question

2003-01-09 Thread David Burgoyne
More tips for mpg.

Form testing on fairly ancient machines

use mpg at 352 x 288 as this is the standard windows mpg1 format,
every other size was prone to tearing/artifacts under test

data rate about 1800 ish (cant remember the units but your compressor
will be similar I expect)

whatever size your video is eg 640x480 or whatever, compress to
352x288 then scale that back to 640x480 and you get NO change in aspec
ratio (you can only use this trick with director :-) )

Makes it very easy when your video arrives as 400x400

HTH Dave

- Original Message -
From: "Brad Hile" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 4:45 PM
Subject: RE:  Digital Video Question


> Paul Steven wrote:
> > Simply question hopefully! I want to include a video intro in a
director
> > projector I am creating. The playback spec is PC only however must
include
> > win 98 as a minimum. What is the best format to create or convert
the
> > digital video to in order that the user does not need any
> > additional plugins
> > such as Quicktime. Would an AVI work fine or does it require Video
For
> > Windows still as it used to do years ago when I last used an AVI
in a
> > project. If AVI is the way to go, should I be aware of any codec
issues?
> >
> > The other alternative I thought of was to create separate bitmaps
for each
> > frame however there are 250 frames and they are all 800 by 400
pixels in
> > size. As the projector will be running from a CD-ROM I would
imagine it
> > would not run fast enough without stuttering.
>
> I've had no problem with mpg format using the DirectMediaXtra
> (www.xtras.tabuleiro.com) in a similiar scenario to the one you
describe.
> Bloody nice xtra too that I have used time and again.
> Tips:
> Ensure your using an older windows codec
> Keep the data rate down (if their running 98 they may be using older
> machines/cd drives, but you know your target better than me)
> Don't go with bitmaps ..
> Encode your video at a smaller size and stretch the video sprite to
the
> desired size
> Don't use the DirectMediaXtra fullscreen option unless you want to
lock out
> user interaction
>
>
> That's about it really
> HTH
> Brad
>
>
> [To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go
to http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi  To post messages to the list,
email [EMAIL PROTECTED]  (Problems, email
[EMAIL PROTECTED]). Lingo-L is for learning and helping with
programming Lingo.  Thanks!]
>
>
__
__
> This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs
SkyScan
> service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service
working
> around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com
>
__
__



This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working
around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com

[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to 
http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi  To post messages to the list, email 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Lingo-L is for 
learning and helping with programming Lingo.  Thanks!]



RE: The long date

2003-01-09 Thread Mendelsohn, Michael
Hi Brad...

Thanks for responding.

As half of what I'm doing is going to be distributed to Europe, and they
format the date differently from the US (my system), will temporarily
changing the itemDelimiter do anything to screw up
either-side-of-the-Atlantic systems regarding date?

For instance, put the short date (US) returns 
-- "1/9/2003"
But is there a chance that this could be something like 
-- "2003/9/1"
somewhere else, or maybe something different?

Maybe I should make a linear list out of the items in the short date and
search for the one that has a length of 4?  Would it always be 4, i.e. could
some far off place like Lesotho, Belarus or the Canary Islands return 03
instead of 2003?

Thanks for any feedback.

- Michael M.





>> I know I may be opening a can of worms here, but why is it that the 
>> long date in the following code works in authoring mode but not in 
>> projector mode?
>>
>> on beginSprite(me)
>>   pSp = sprite(me.spriteNum)
>>   r = (the long date).item[3]
>>   rr = "(c)" & r && "Factory Mutual Insurance Company.  All rights 
>> reserved."
>>   pSp.member.text = rr
>> end
>>
>> In #author, it's 2003.
>> In #projector, it's nothing.
>>
>> Any thoughts are appreciated.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Michael M.
>>
>
>Hmm doesn't work in mine!
>I suspect you may have picked up SPACE as the itemdelimter 
>somewhere but even then it's item[4]
>
>But this will do what you need:
>OLDitemdelimiter=the itemdelimiter
>the itemdelimiter="/"
>put (the short date).item[3]
>the itemdelimiter=OLDitemdelimiter

[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to 
http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi  To post messages to the list, email 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Lingo-L is for 
learning and helping with programming Lingo.  Thanks!]



Re: Digital Video Question

2003-01-09 Thread Charlie Fiskeaux II
An AVI will work fine on Windows with no additional installations or Xtras
to buy.  Cinepak is the universal codec to use if you do choose to go with
AVI, but be forewarned, the quality is pretty poor compared with newer
formats & codecs.  The one thing on your side is that Cinepak plays back
pretty smoothly, even on older machines, so the only consideration regarding
your desired 800x400 size is that it will be a large file.  If you need more
playback smoothness and smaller filesize, you could compress it at 400x200
and stretch it (or even 600x300), as was previously suggested.

Charlie Fiskeaux II
Media Designer
The Creative Group
www.cre8tivegroup.com
859/858-9054x29


- Original Message -
From: "Paul Steven" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 11:02 AM
Subject:  Digital Video Question


Hi there

Simply question hopefully! I want to include a video intro in a director
projector I am creating. The playback spec is PC only however must include
win 98 as a minimum. What is the best format to create or convert the
digital video to in order that the user does not need any additional plugins
such as Quicktime. Would an AVI work fine or does it require Video For
Windows still as it used to do years ago when I last used an AVI in a
project. If AVI is the way to go, should I be aware of any codec issues?

The other alternative I thought of was to create separate bitmaps for each
frame however there are 250 frames and they are all 800 by 400 pixels in
size. As the projector will be running from a CD-ROM I would imagine it
would not run fast enough without stuttering.

Any wise words or tips much appreciated!

Thanks in advance

Paul

[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to
http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi  To post messages to the list, email
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Lingo-L is
for learning and helping with programming Lingo.  Thanks!]

[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to 
http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi  To post messages to the list, email 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Lingo-L is for 
learning and helping with programming Lingo.  Thanks!]



RE: Digital Video Question

2003-01-09 Thread Brad Hile
Paul Steven wrote:
> Simply question hopefully! I want to include a video intro in a director
> projector I am creating. The playback spec is PC only however must include
> win 98 as a minimum. What is the best format to create or convert the
> digital video to in order that the user does not need any
> additional plugins
> such as Quicktime. Would an AVI work fine or does it require Video For
> Windows still as it used to do years ago when I last used an AVI in a
> project. If AVI is the way to go, should I be aware of any codec issues?
>
> The other alternative I thought of was to create separate bitmaps for each
> frame however there are 250 frames and they are all 800 by 400 pixels in
> size. As the projector will be running from a CD-ROM I would imagine it
> would not run fast enough without stuttering.

I've had no problem with mpg format using the DirectMediaXtra
(www.xtras.tabuleiro.com) in a similiar scenario to the one you describe.
Bloody nice xtra too that I have used time and again.
Tips:
Ensure your using an older windows codec
Keep the data rate down (if their running 98 they may be using older
machines/cd drives, but you know your target better than me)
Don't go with bitmaps ..
Encode your video at a smaller size and stretch the video sprite to the
desired size
Don't use the DirectMediaXtra fullscreen option unless you want to lock out
user interaction


That's about it really
HTH
Brad


[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to 
http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi  To post messages to the list, email 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Lingo-L is for 
learning and helping with programming Lingo.  Thanks!]



RE: Digital Video Question

2003-01-09 Thread Chris Aernoudt
Avi is not really a specific format, it depends 100% on the codec you
use...
If you want to play safe, you can use cinepak or one of the older indeo
formats (but they suck in this day and age)
I'm not sure if indeo 5.x works standard on 98... it does if they have a
+- recent version of mediaplayer...

If you're willing to make'em install stuff, go with divx, gives you the
best quality and the smallest files - plus the setup is tiny.

HTH,
Chris

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Paul Steven
Sent: donderdag 9 januari 2003 17:03
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:  Digital Video Question

Hi there

Simply question hopefully! I want to include a video intro in a director
projector I am creating. The playback spec is PC only however must
include
win 98 as a minimum. What is the best format to create or convert the
digital video to in order that the user does not need any additional
plugins
such as Quicktime. Would an AVI work fine or does it require Video For
Windows still as it used to do years ago when I last used an AVI in a
project. If AVI is the way to go, should I be aware of any codec issues?

The other alternative I thought of was to create separate bitmaps for
each
frame however there are 250 frames and they are all 800 by 400 pixels in
size. As the projector will be running from a CD-ROM I would imagine it
would not run fast enough without stuttering.

Any wise words or tips much appreciated!

Thanks in advance

Paul

[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to
http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi  To post messages to the list, email
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo.  Thanks!]



[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to 
http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi  To post messages to the list, email 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Lingo-L is for 
learning and helping with programming Lingo.  Thanks!]



RE: The long date

2003-01-09 Thread Brad Hile
Mike wrote:
> Hi list...
>
> I know I may be opening a can of worms here, but why is it that the long
> date in the following code works in authoring mode but not in projector
> mode?
>
> on beginSprite(me)
>   pSp = sprite(me.spriteNum)
>   r = (the long date).item[3]
>   rr = "(c)" & r && "Factory Mutual Insurance Company.  All rights
> reserved."
>   pSp.member.text = rr
> end
>
> In #author, it's 2003.
> In #projector, it's nothing.
>
> Any thoughts are appreciated.
>
> Regards,
> Michael M.
>

Hmm doesn't work in mine!
I suspect you may have picked up SPACE as the itemdelimter somewhere but
even then it's item[4]

But this will do what you need:
OLDitemdelimiter=the itemdelimiter
the itemdelimiter="/"
put (the short date).item[3]
the itemdelimiter=OLDitemdelimiter

Brad


[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to 
http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi  To post messages to the list, email 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Lingo-L is for 
learning and helping with programming Lingo.  Thanks!]



Digital Video Question

2003-01-09 Thread Paul Steven
Hi there

Simply question hopefully! I want to include a video intro in a director
projector I am creating. The playback spec is PC only however must include
win 98 as a minimum. What is the best format to create or convert the
digital video to in order that the user does not need any additional plugins
such as Quicktime. Would an AVI work fine or does it require Video For
Windows still as it used to do years ago when I last used an AVI in a
project. If AVI is the way to go, should I be aware of any codec issues?

The other alternative I thought of was to create separate bitmaps for each
frame however there are 250 frames and they are all 800 by 400 pixels in
size. As the projector will be running from a CD-ROM I would imagine it
would not run fast enough without stuttering.

Any wise words or tips much appreciated!

Thanks in advance

Paul

[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to 
http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi  To post messages to the list, email 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Lingo-L is for 
learning and helping with programming Lingo.  Thanks!]



The long date

2003-01-09 Thread Mendelsohn, Michael
Hi list...

I know I may be opening a can of worms here, but why is it that the long
date in the following code works in authoring mode but not in projector
mode?

on beginSprite(me)
  pSp = sprite(me.spriteNum)
  r = (the long date).item[3]
  rr = "(c)" & r && "Factory Mutual Insurance Company.  All rights
reserved."
  pSp.member.text = rr
end

In #author, it's 2003.
In #projector, it's nothing.

Any thoughts are appreciated.

Regards,
Michael M.



[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to 
http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi  To post messages to the list, email 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Lingo-L is for 
learning and helping with programming Lingo.  Thanks!]