Re: Hebrew in Jpilot

2005-01-21 Thread solomon
oops - sorry

-- 
Shlomo Solomon
http://come.to/shlomo.solomon
Sent by KMail 1.7.1 (KDE 3.2.3) on LINUX Mandrake 10.1



=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Hebrew in Jpilot

2005-01-21 Thread solomon
Sorry I didn't answer earlier. I was away from my computer for a couple of 
days.

On Tuesday 18 January 2005 23:31, Amit Aronovitch wrote:
 Hmm... one more thing you might wish to try before giving up:

 Try rpm --query --list pilot-link-devel.
 One of the files listed should be someprefix/include/pi-version.h

I found pi-version.h and followed your instructions but still got the same 
error message, so as I wrote earlier, I guess I'll wait for 0.99.8 and hope 
it'll be soon ;-)

-- 
Shlomo Solomon
http://come.to/shlomo.solomon
Sent by KMail 1.7.1 (KDE 3.2.3) on LINUX Mandrake 10.1



=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Bank HaPoalim vs. Mozilla update

2005-01-21 Thread Ori Idan
I tried to do trasfer severl times, The field did not dissapear but the 
message was not endless loop, I could do the transfer without many problems.

As for the menus being reversed, I use firefox and usually a simple 
refresh displayes them the right direction.

I find Bank Hapoalim support for Non IE browsers enough for me, I hear 
the situation with other banks is much worse.

--
Ori Idan
Ilya Konstantinov wrote:
Alon Altman wrote:
Bank HaPoalim works fine for me in Mozilla. What problems did you 
notice?

There are problems with certain functionalities.
For example, when doing a fund transfer, if you select Bank Hapoalim 
as the target bank, the Shem Mutav field should disappear. On 
Mozilla, it doesn't. More over, if you focus this field, it'll cause 
an endless loop of message boxes saying something along the lines of 
Shem Mutav not required for this bank.

There are other functionalities of the site which simply don't work on 
Mozilla.

Regardless, expect the site's menus to be *always* reversed (no matter 
how many times you press Reload) on Mozilla 1.8, ever since bug 246700 
was fixed.

For more detailed info, everyone is invited to track this bug:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163659
(No need to vote on this -- The way to influence it to talk to the bank.)
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]


=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Bank HaPoalim vs. Mozilla update

2005-01-21 Thread Ilya Konstantinov
Ori Idan wrote:
I tried to do trasfer severl times, The field did not dissapear but 
the message was not endless loop, I could do the transfer without many 
problems.

On Firefox 1.0, the messages are shown in an endless loop. Once you step 
into the field, you have no choice. Maybe you have some customization 
that prevents endless loops of messages?

As for the menus being reversed, I use firefox and usually a simple 
refresh displayes them the right direction.

I especially mentioned Mozilla 1.8 (not yet released). Firefox 1.0 did 
not include the fix for bug 246700 yet. Firefox 1.1 will include the 
fix. With this fix, the menus will always be reversed.

I know the reason why they are reversed in the first place (no, it's not 
an issue of their site being Visual). The site owners won't take care of 
it, though.

I find Bank Hapoalim support for Non IE browsers enough for me, I hear 
the situation with other banks is much worse.
Currently, major parts of it are usable. However, with their attitude, 
many more things can break unexpectedly. For example, they may decide 
all of a sudden to improve their Over-va-shav page, and in the 
process will make it broken on Mozilla -- simply because they'll never 
check it on Mozilla.


=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Bank HaPoalim vs. Mozilla update

2005-01-21 Thread Dan Kenigsberg
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 01:28:59PM +0200, Ilya Konstantinov wrote:
 I especially mentioned Mozilla 1.8 (not yet released). Firefox 1.0 did 
 not include the fix for bug 246700 yet. Firefox 1.1 will include the 
 fix. With this fix, the menus will always be reversed.
 
 I know the reason why they are reversed in the first place (no, it's not 
 an issue of their site being Visual). 

I'm intrigued. Would you share this knowledge with us?

-- 
Dan Kenigsberghttp://www.cs.technion.ac.il/~dankenICQ 162180901

=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Bank HaPoalim vs. Mozilla update

2005-01-21 Thread Ilya Konstantinov
Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 01:28:59PM +0200, Ilya Konstantinov wrote:
 

I especially mentioned Mozilla 1.8 (not yet released). Firefox 1.0 did 
not include the fix for bug 246700 yet. Firefox 1.1 will include the 
fix. With this fix, the menus will always be reversed.

I know the reason why they are reversed in the first place (no, it's not 
an issue of their site being Visual). 
   

I'm intrigued. Would you share this knowledge with us?
I pointed people at the relevant bug article to spare the list for OT 
traffic:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163659

As to the issue you're intrigued with, please see comment #12:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163659#c12

=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: dichotomy ?

2005-01-21 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
followup, as the thread came up anyway

On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 02:08:56PM +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
 On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 07:15:42AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Maxim's suggestion on using html for the draft seems interesting.
  It's a long time I am looking for a good pretext to learn writing
  HTML (without that, I lack the motivation to persevere).
 
 There are a number of filters that conver plain text with markup to
 HTML or RTF. Check the latex-html route or the wiki/pod route. 

I lately needed to write an FAQ html document as HTML. I figured that I
liked the structure that LaTeX gives me. I wrote a simple \quest macro
that formats the question (a subsection), labels it, and gives it an
optional long version. So my document looks like:

\quest{label}{Why is there A}
{When I run B after C has been stopped, why do I get A?}

Naturally I defined logical markup for everything. e.g: 
\newcommand{\pathname}[1]{\mbox{\texttt{#1}}}

With hyperref I can add external links. I rather not use
convertor-specific jargon if I can avoid it. hyperref is well-suported.

Docbook and XML formats always seem to nme as over-verbose. 

As for the convertor, latex2html was not available as a debian package
on my system (non-fre?) so I tried some others.

The one I most liked was something called hevea, written on ocaml. It
can easily generate clean html output. Works well. The only way to
remove its footer, though, is using a (empty?) footer include file.

But I eventually had a little thing I could not tweak it to do (don't
remember exactly what), so I tried some others. The one I ended up using
in the end is tex4ht .

A bit uglier than hevea, and the html code is not as good, but happened
to be just what I needed.

-- 
Tzafrir Cohen | New signature for new address and  |  VIM is
http://tzafrir.org.il | new homepage   | a Mutt's  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ||  best
ICQ# 16849755 | Space reserved for other protocols | friend

=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]



rant: changing color depth

2005-01-21 Thread Offer Kaye
rant
Year: 2005
Desktop: KDE 3.3.1
OS: Mepis Linux
Ability to change color depth: nil. nada. ziltch. Unless I want to
edit some obscure text file and restart X (which means logging out,
which means all of my open applications get closed down).

I mean, come *on* people! What are we, in the dark ages?! 
I just spent the better part of 30 minutes trying to find a way to do
something that on Windows I can do with a right-click-select
tab-select number from drop down list! This isn't rocket science, is
it?! *This* is how Linux is supopsed to work as a desktop friendly
OS?! Give me a break!

Please tell me I'm wrong and there is a simply, user friendly way to
do this... Please tell me Google search has let me down this once...
/rant

Can't some developer save this frustrated user? :-)

-- 
Offer Kaye

=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: rant: changing color depth

2005-01-21 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 03:42:48PM -0500, Offer Kaye wrote:
 rant
 Year: 2005
 Desktop: KDE 3.3.1
 OS: Mepis Linux
 Ability to change color depth: nil. nada. ziltch. Unless I want to
 edit some obscure text file and restart X (which means logging out,
 which means all of my open applications get closed down).

You always have a simpler workaround, you know: start a second X server
with different settings.

Now, what parameter do I need to pass to X to get a different color
depth? xserver(1x) does not mention any.

If you need a lower color depth you can try it in a nested server
(Xnest). You can also try Xvnc.

-- 
Tzafrir Cohen | New signature for new address and  |  VIM is
http://tzafrir.org.il | new homepage   | a Mutt's  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ||  best
ICQ# 16849755 | Space reserved for other protocols | friend

=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: rant: changing color depth

2005-01-21 Thread Matan Ziv-Av
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 03:42:48PM -0500, Offer Kaye wrote:
rant
Year: 2005
Desktop: KDE 3.3.1
OS: Mepis Linux
Ability to change color depth: nil. nada. ziltch. Unless I want to
Why would you want to change colour depth?
Anyway, X protocol does not allow this, since applications have 
structures which are dependent on colour depth, and screen (virtual) 
size, and there is no way to announce a change. Even if an extension to 
the protocol to allow this was written, it would still leave all 
programs which do not support this extension.
If you want to do this, I guess that adding support to the few main 
toolkits (QT, GTK, etc.) and in the WM (to kill applications with no 
support) is the minimum amount of work needed.


You always have a simpler workaround, you know: start a second X server
with different settings.
Now, what parameter do I need to pass to X to get a different color
depth? xserver(1x) does not mention any.
X --help  shows the following options (among others):
-pixmap24  use 24bpp pixmaps for depth 24
-pixmap32  use 32bpp pixmaps for depth 24
-fbbpp n   set bpp for the framebuffer. Default: 8
-depth n   set colour depth. Default: 8
-gamma f   set gamma value (0.1  f  10.0) Default: 1.0
-rgamma f  set gamma value for red phase
-ggamma f  set gamma value for green phase
-bgamma f  set gamma value for blue phase
-weight nnnset RGB weighting at 16 bpp.  Default: 565
-layout name   specify the ServerLayout section name
-screen name   specify the Screen section name
For X 3.3 it was a -bpp option.

--
Matan Ziv-Av. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]