Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: Directions for video engine support (CedarX)

[Quink]

On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 1:22 AM, Simos Xenitellis 
simos.li...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Stefan Monnier
monn...@iro.umontreal.ca wrote:
 The way I understood all these was that there are short-term and
 long-term goals for better support with the video engine.

 As an end user, I think that having mainline support (not just for the
 kernel, but the rest of the stack as well) for something like Kodi (nee
 XBMC) would be great.

 Ever since the first Android TV sticks came out, I have hoped to use one
 of those beasts as a media-center.  But so far I haven't been able to do
 that: when using GNU/Linux the video playback sucks for lack of VPU
 support, and when using Android I'm faced with the problem that there's
 no DVD player software available in Android (there are lots of players
 which advertise support for playing DVDs, but they actually don't
 support playing from an optical drive).


In Android, the Android image would need to implement the MediaCodec
(as in http://developer.android.com/reference/android/media/MediaCodec.html
)
class for CedarX in order to provide support for hardware
decoding/encoding to the apps.

It's MediaCodec in Anrdoid 4.1 or newer.
It was Stagefright in previous versions of Android.

I wonder it's not the appropriate place to talk about Android. The Android
media interface has already implemented with hardware decoding, and it
should
work out of box.


In terms of Kodi for Android, if MediaCodec is configured properly for
the Allwinner SoC,
then Kodi should work out of the box.

I have tested Kodi on Android. It relies on openmax, not the media
interface,
as far as I know.

It should be possible to retrofit the libvdecodec.so/libvencoder.so
libraries
(found on https://github.com/allwinner-zh) into an existing Android image
in order to get MediaCodec working properly for Kodi.

Quink, do you have any instructions for that?

Simos


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
linux-sunxi group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to linux-sunxi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: Directions for video engine support (CedarX)

[Quink]

You can mount the optical drive manually.

On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 11:35 PM, Stefan Monnier monn...@iro.umontreal.ca
wrote:

  The way I understood all these was that there are short-term and
  long-term goals for better support with the video engine.

 As an end user, I think that having mainline support (not just for the
 kernel, but the rest of the stack as well) for something like Kodi (nee
 XBMC) would be great.

 Ever since the first Android TV sticks came out, I have hoped to use one
 of those beasts as a media-center.  But so far I haven't been able to do
 that: when using GNU/Linux the video playback sucks for lack of VPU
 support, and when using Android I'm faced with the problem that there's
 no DVD player software available in Android (there are lots of players
 which advertise support for playing DVDs, but they actually don't
 support playing from an optical drive).


 Stefan

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 linux-sunxi group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to linux-sunxi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
linux-sunxi group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to linux-sunxi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: What open source community is this?

[Quink]

Sorry Simos, I just want to invite some students in local community to join
sunxi
and take part in GSOC. That email has nothing to do with the CedarX.
It's so sad that there are so many misunderstand. If we have more tolerant
attitudes, technical discussing should not become a flashpoint, and we can be
more
open too.

On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 2:14 AM, Manuel Braga mul.br...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Fri, 13 Mar 2015 19:31:47 +0200 Simos Xenitellis
 simos.li...@googlemail.com wrote:
  On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Manuel Braga mul.br...@gmail.com
  wrote:
   Hi.
  
   What open source community is this?
   When others decide at our back, don't say what are their plans, and
   ask us to help them, and then expect us to accept the result.
  
   Simos, i am repented to have answered to your private emails asking
   for help. I did in good fate, in the hopes that we all could
   collaborate (not fight) to create great software for this hardware.
  
   In that private exchange, i repeated multiple times that technical
   discussing should be made in public, but Simos i see nothing.
  
  
   And is not nice to find this.
   https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/szdiy/goBZ5nZOEbU
   (And no, is not a GEM driver, what is need, as i said to you, and
   explained forward)
   If this was the plan, why not present this in mailing list.
  
   Why this behavior, why this secretism, where is the open?
   I don't understand.
   Why don't you write in this mailing list, what you writed to me,
   and go directly to the point.
  
  
   Simos, one last thing.
   With binaries blobs, you will no get the proper driver that you
   wish.
  
 
  Fuck my life.[non-native speakers: it's an expression like what
  have I done to deserve this].

 Also me, what we all have done to deserve all this problems caused by
 this video engine.


 
  Manuel, you are quoting an email that I sent to Quink BEFORE I
  consulted you. In that email it says I asked Manuel Braga for some
  input and will come back to you.
  That email shows my BEFORE knowledge.
 
  In that email I suggested to Quink to try for GSOC because his G+
  profile mentions
  that he is either a Uni student or a recent graduate (so his
  colleagues might find it interesting).

 Odd, in our private exchange, i got the impression that you told me
 that he(Quink) was someone else. Maybe you and Quink should explain
 better, who is who and what do are expecting from the rest of us.
 As i asked you to do, in our private exchange.


 (By the way, i don't know how GSOC handles binary globs)


  He should not have forwarded my email (it's etiquette not to forward
  private mails) but anyway, I do not hold grudges.
  @Quink: We are still good.
 
  What I see here is that you have been influenced by the negative vibes
  and interpreted that mail in the most negative/wrong way.

 Is not that email.
 What is negative here is the secretism floating around. And this is not
 healthy for an supposed open source community.

 
  Simos

 And i repeat again.
 Why don't you write in this mailing list, what you wrote to me, and go
 directly to the point. The others also have the right to know, and i
 don't see what is wrong with its content, that should not be public.


 --
 Manuel Braga

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 linux-sunxi group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to linux-sunxi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
linux-sunxi group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to linux-sunxi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: What open source community is this?

[Quink]

I'm an employee of allwinner, and I joined this mailing list before joined
the company. I speak for myself here. I have a Cubieboard2 (I bought it to
do real-time vibration control as a graduate students.) runing Linux and
want to playback video on that, and I saw some people have the same idea
too. I want to find a workable solution, that's all.

So, if we can get all of the source code from allwinner, and work out the
complete open source solution, that is the best.

If we can't, I want to find out just a workable solution. The graphic card
AMD radeon 545v didn't work well with open source driver until Linux kernel
3.13. Before that, I have to use my laptop too, with AMD private driver. It
seems that no one takes the cedar binaries as a solution, no matter whether
it has been cleaned of not.

If Cedrus is the only workable solution, I will try to figure out how to
contribute to this project.

On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 5:03 AM, Manuel Braga mul.br...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Sun, 15 Mar 2015 23:51:03 +0800 Quink wantl...@gmail.com wrote:
  Sorry Simos, I just want to invite some students in local community
  to join sunxi
  and take part in GSOC.

 And everyone are welcome to join sunxi. And the GSOC idea is not bad,
 please do invite students.

  That email has nothing to do with the CedarX.
  It's so sad that there are so many misunderstand. If we have more

 I agree, let's resolve this misunderstanding.
 Simos for whatever reason, still didn't make public what he wrote to me
 in our private exchange. And this is making me suspicious.

 Maybe you Quink, could help here.
 By telling, who are you?, and your connection to allwinner?, if any.
 What is you want to do?
 And, what kind of help are expected from linux-sunxi?


  tolerant attitudes, technical discussing should not become a
  flashpoint, and we can be more

 Your technical question that was made in your last email is unanswered
 because was part of an email that started with a flashpoint.
 Let's keep the technical discussing, separated from flashpoints.

  open too.

 Yes, let's all be open.

 --
 Manuel Braga

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 linux-sunxi group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to linux-sunxi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
linux-sunxi group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to linux-sunxi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [linux-sunxi] Derailed thread

[Quink]

I have communicated with the author of source code of libvdecoder.so.
The code has been rewrote completely, has no relationship with FFmpeg,
except some function names. This is a silly mistake, but maybe it's true.
Does anybody know how to prove that?

If the LGPL violations of libvdecoder.so can be cleaned up, how can we use
the shared library on open source sunxi kernel, and even mainline kernel?
I don't what's the low level part in the kernel that libvdecoder.so depends
on,
a thin VPU driver and some special memory management modules? If those
parts can be solved, does the cedar + openmax + gstreamor openmax plugin
workable?

On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 11:01 PM, Luc Verhaegen l...@skynet.be wrote:

 On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 01:38:30PM +, Manuel Braga wrote:
  Hi,
 
  That was a joke mail, in response to the joke that allwinner gave us
  when allwinner added the LGPL license to source code that includes a
  binary accused of being in noncompliance.

 This was not a joke email. Its contents was very serious, and it should
 be interpreted as such. Allwinner needs/needed to know what it had just
 done, and that it has to fullfill its obligations.

 The fact that I did so, _after_ the facts had been often and openly
 discussed, and after allwinner had been explained their obligations
 countless times, does make it less than serious.

 The contents however is nothing to be laughed about.

   try to get the support of something like the SFC so that they can
   evaluate the merits of pursuing.
   And then the SFC would do the talking.
 
  I heared (but don't have the details), and this looks to be true. SFC
  or someone from SFC is aware of this issue. But maybe others can make
  this more clear.
 
  But nobody is here to sue, (why do i have to keep saying this)
  i think  i can speak for all and say that we want to resolve this in a
  friendly way, but for that, there most be dialog between parties.
  Not excuse to ignore the issues.
 
  And Simos look at the news, with SFC and vmware, look at the time it
  took and no result.

 People tried talking to VMWare for 7-8 years. We have been trying to
 talk to Allwinner at least since 2012 (i am sure that LKCL would be
 happy to divulge his conversations with allwinner if it comes to legal
 action). Allwinners case is pretty open and shut, especially since they
 actively use both the kernel and uboot, and the symbols in cedar are
 clearly visible. And unlike VMWare Allwinner has its _whole_ business to
 lose.

 When there is any legal action, it could be a lot swifter. Perhaps
 Allwinner should act quickly and do so in an all encompassing way. If
 not, it stands to lose quite a lot.

 Luc Verhaegen.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 linux-sunxi group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to linux-sunxi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
linux-sunxi group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to linux-sunxi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Re: Re: [linux-sunxi] how to build an linux image for A31S

[Quink]

If the serial port is usable, maybe you can boot into fel mode by press '2'
in serial
terminal and then power on the device.

On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Code Kipper codekip...@gmail.com wrote:

 On 9 March 2015 at 03:56, li lijiamin...@163.com wrote:
  Hi pere canadell,
 
  the device is http://linux-sunxi.org/VidOn_Box, but i can't find the
 image
  for it.
  Best Regards,
  stone
 Hi Stone
 I don't think you'll have any chance of getting anything other than VidOn's
 firmware onto this device without doing some serious hardware
 modifications.
 There is no sdcard to boot from or OTG to get the device into fel mode.
 I have this hardware and I'm still trying to find a way to get it to boot
 into
 fel mode. For now only serial debug is possible.
 BR,
 CK

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 linux-sunxi group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to linux-sunxi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
linux-sunxi group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to linux-sunxi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [linux-sunxi] Allwinner GPL violations: definitive proof.

[Quink]

cedarx2.0 is a refactoring of cedarx1.0. The job is finished about just
three month ago and not used by most vendors yet. Some work is still needed
to port cedarx2.0 to linux. The directory of cedarx2.0 in Android SDK is
frameworks/av/media/liballwinner. The directory of cedarx1.0 in Android SDK
is frameworks/av/media/CedarX-Projects. Most part of cedarx2.0 is open
source. It's not the same situation compared with cedarx1.0. Maybe it is not
a big step and not enough, it is a right direction.

On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 2:57 PM, Siarhei Siamashka 
siarhei.siamas...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Wed, 4 Mar 2015 19:56:53 -0800 (PST)
 oia...@gmail.com wrote:

  I think we need to bring this back to simple.

 Thanks for sharing your opinion. But first of all, please start
 playing by the rules yourself. This is a technical mailing used by
 free software developers. And the subscribers are expected to
 respect Proper conduct, as explained in the linux-sunxi wiki:
 http://linux-sunxi.org/Mailing_list

 Which means making sure that you don't violate:
 http://linux.sgms-centre.com/misc/netiquette.php

 And in particular, the Make sure your lines are no longer than 72 to
 76 characters in length rule.

  1) as FOSS not out to harm allwinnertech all FOSS want is
  conformance with license.
 
  Reality here the two worst laws to break as a hardware vendor
  is copyright and trademark.   Serous-ally.   Both you can enforce by
  customs both can cause product destruction.   This is pure nightmare
  because what would happen if a developer of the work decided to take
  the customs path a stack of product for one of allwinner customers
  would get to the board be ruled as contain copyright infringing work
  then crushed.   This has happened to gameconsoles and other items in
  the past.   The buyer is left out of pocket.
 
  Its basically a common mistake since FOSS does not act often that
  it does not have teeth.   The reality most FOSS developers know they
  have the teeth to put a company out of business so try negotiation.
 
  https://libav.org/shame.html  you will notice all the ones here are
  fairly much software companies.  Developers don't have very effective
  teeth to go after software companies.  Also remember even if the
  infringement is preformed by a sub-company the fact its on your device
  can make that device destroyable and you will be expected to get the
  compensation out the sub company that provided you with the infringing
  software.

 As a matter of fact, Allwinner does not make devices. It makes chips.

 It is the Allwinner's customers who are making devices. And the unique
 situation with (at least older) Allwinner based devices is that these
 devices can be running 100% free software. Very few other hardware
 vendors are able to match this level of freedom (even Intel based
 devices are typically shipping with proprietary BIOS firmware).

 And by the way, I'm not sure if you paid attention to the discussion in
 this thread, but there is also a reverse engineered hardware video
 decoder implementation available, which is 100% free software. This
 means that you don't really need to use any blobs from Allwinner to
 play your video.

 And to complement the perfect software freedom, some of the device
 manufacturers are even making open source hardware (if you have
 ever heard about this concept). For example, you can check

 https://www.olimex.com/Products/OLinuXino/open-source-hardware

  The reality is you are better to break patent law than trademark or
  copyright as hardware company.
 
  Something Allwinner take on board is release the source after the
  fact is an extremely bad idea.   If you go to Intel and Amd you will
  notice they release the open source code before the chip ship.   This
  means the chips cannot be destroyed at customs.

 The SoC chips obviously do not contain the kernel code or userland
 software.

  You are only able to catch up with the source release after the
  fact because at this stage the FOSS developers are being kind.

 Look, you have blatantly violated the netiquette rules in this
 mailing list. And now you are only able to catch up with the rules
 after the fact. The ignorant people like you can only get away with
 their misconduct because the free software developers here are being
 kind. Just be grateful that nobody suggests to get you banned yet.

  Siarhei Siamashka the case of the firmware not using the Linux
  kernel firmware loader what promises that we will not have that happen
  again.  Is there staff training to make sure this does not happen
  again.

 How can we be sure that your violation of the netiquette rules will
 not happen again?

  Siarhei Siamashka there are compliance tools.
  http://www.linuxfoundation.org/programs/legal/compliance/tools
  Are you using them.  If not please start using them.   If you are
  using them please open bug reports for the cases that these issues
  got missed.

 Are you now telling me to do your homework? 

Re: Re: [linux-sunxi] Allwinner documentation (hardware datasheet, user manual) for A10, A10s, A13, A20, A31, A31s

[Quink]

You are right. China have suffer too much from idealism. Now they come to
the other way. Don't say something too beautiful to them, they don't
believe that and think you are a cheater.

On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 08:11:40AM -0700, jacky lau wrote:
 I agree with you and Jhon Yi. Developing a soc is not too hard now, getting 
 customers is harder and more important. I hope the market will force all 
 China Soc company more open. But before that happen, I don't think they 
 will become more open.
 They don't have experience in working with the open source community, if you 
 want 
 them to be more open, you need to do more communicate with them. And 
 remember, to them, neither the law nor the spirit of free software, but 
 making 
 money is paramount. Tell them they will get more customers, make more money 
 and prove it, then they will follow.
 
 在 2014年10月11日星期六UTC+8下午10时53分48秒，Jon Smirl写道：
 
  On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 10:31 AM, jacky lau i90...@gmail.com 
  javascript: wrote: 
   A big client will buy thousands of chips once. Are there any relation 
   between big client and user manual publishing? No. So they don't think 
  it's 
   necessary to open their private property. When you are a big client, you 
  are 
   VIP, all document and source code is open to you. And if publish all 
   technical documentation, competitors will know some technical secret 
  (e.g. 
   bug;) they don't want them to know. 
   Open world is beautiful, but they will not actively participate if there 
  is 
   no return. Why some China soc company publish some documents and source 
  code 
   now? I think this is mainly for marketing. But no matter how, VIP 
  priority. 
 
  Right now Allwinner is only good for tablets and STBs because 
  Allwinner supplies turnkey solutions. If documentation were more open 
  other applications could be developed. If customer can't get software 
  working for these other applications, they won't buy thousands of 
  chips. So if Allwinner wants to survive past the end of the tablet fad 
  they have to start developing these other markets. Otherwise when the 
  tablet fad is over it will be the end of Allwinner. 
 
  You also over estimate the value of technical secrets.  What is the 
  point of putting a secret h.264 encode/decode unit on the chip if half 
  of your customers can't get it working?  Obviously Rockchip knows how 
  to make h.264 encode/decode since they have a similar unit on their 
  chip. And so does Freescale, TI, ST, etc. -- there is no big secret in 
  making h.264 hardware for people familiar with how to do it (hint, it 
  is an ISO standard).  So by keeping the documentation secret you hide 
  nothing significant from your competitors and much, much worse -- you 
  keep your own customers from using the hardware they bought.  Think 
  about it --- which is more important - hiding something form a 
  competitor that they probably already know, or getting your customers 
  to ship and buy more chips? 
 
  Bottom line - which one brings cash in the door - secret documentation 
  or getting as many customers as possible to ship? 
 
 
   
   在 2014年10月6日星期一UTC+8下午8时55分30秒，RFat写道： 
   
   Hi Kevin, 
   
   Publishing the user manuals will certainly increase Allwinner's chips 
   popularity. 
   
   I was wondering if there is a rough estimate as to when the A80's 
  manual 
   will be made available? 
   
   Thanks! 
   Raanan 
   
   On Monday, September 29, 2014 12:46:53 PM UTC+3, 
  ke...@allwinnertech.com 
   wrote: 
   
   Hi All, 
   
   I have put the documents on github, and the url is 
   https://github.com/allwinner-zh/documents.git 
   Thanks Simos, Henrik and Luc's suggestion. And other documents will be 
   upated to here when released. 
   
   
    
   Best Regards, 
   kevin.z.m 
   
   
   
   From: HenrikNordström 
   Date: 2014-09-29 08:46 
   To: linux...@googlegroups.com 
   CC: sh...@allwinnertech.com; Meng Zhang 
   Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] Allwinner documentation (hardware 
  datasheet, 
   user manual) for A10, A10s, A13, A20, A31, A31s 
   sön 2014-09-28 klockan 02:18 +0200 skrev Luc Verhaegen: 
   
Why didn't someone from Allwinner send these documents in 
  him/herself? 
   
   The current person discussion the matter with Allwiner was Simos, who 
  is 
   part of the linux-sunxi community. Allwinner sent current versions of 
   the documents to Simos for distribution in the community. What is 
  wrong? 
   
   Mailing the full set of documents as attachments directly to the 
   mailinglist is not appropriate. And for some strange and unknown 
  reason 
   Allwinner do not appear to have a public document archive for this 
  kind 
   of documents themselves, and seems to only distribute them via email 
  to 
   their customers when requested. 
   
   The real question is why AW do not make the documents available in 
   public themselves, and likewise why they do not have a public git 
   repository for SDK sources 

Re: [linux-sunxi] A80 mixed OS (Linux / RTOS)

[Quink]

Such a big plan. I just did a small project with (Real-time patch for linux
kernel) + (processor affinity) + (super loop) on A20.
Since A20 has two A7, a real time process can occupy a processor and leave
the other for other tasks. With out a working
main line kernel, it seems like you have a lot of work to do to customize
the kernel.

On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 4:46 AM, javqui wavetofind...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi,
 I'm working on a couple of projects requiring the classic Micro controller
 features (low power, deterministic real time processing) and the classic
 UX, flexibility and functionality of Linux /android.

 Most SoCs today provide many high level external hardware interfaces (like
 Camera, USB, HDMI, etc) but some projects require additional drivers and
 interfaces to handle different external hardware. Usually we solve the
 interconnectivity with extra MCUs, FPGAs or other specialized chip
 interfaces available.

 Sometimes, we design product boards with two solutions: a Cortex A SoC
 like Allwinner/rockchip/Omap series and a small MCU Cortex M like the STM32
 series, but with a powerful A80, it could change forever.

 I will receive my first Optimus board soon, and I want to customize the
 kernel to create a classic Linux running on the powerful 4x A15+ GPU and
 Nucleus (or Free RTOS) on one or two of the A7 of the Allwinner A80 Soc. (I
 made similar kernel works with MTK SoCs in the past, but never try to run
 two operating systems in the same chip at the same time)

 Both projects require continuous operation and deterministic real time
 response on the low power processor(s) (RTOS on A7).
 User interaction (Linux on the A15 + GPU side ) is only eventual, so
 termal issues by running almost all processors at the same time
 occasionally,  should not be a problem.

 If anyone anticipate a significant barrier to build a kernel of this type,
 please share it here, I will really appreciate. I will share the results
 and evaluation test here

 Additionally I will really appreciate if someone could help me to get the
 A80 user manual, (please contact me by email). Both projects require access
 to low level A80 features for special hardware interfaces and the user
 manual is a must for both projects and future product projects related with
 the A80. I want to switch almost all my projects to Allwinner A80.

 Javqui

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 linux-sunxi group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to linux-sunxi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
linux-sunxi group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to linux-sunxi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: Help adding I2C child node

[Quink]

Make sure other devices didn't occupy the I2C bus exclusively. This is what
happened on
my Cubieboard2 when I trying to add a mma8451. It didn't work until I
removed the HDMI
module which used the same I2C bus. I'm not clear about the details.

On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 11:27 PM, bruce bushby bruce.bus...@gmail.com
wrote:

 Quick update in case it help somebody else.

 Big thank you to selsinork for some valuable tips and pointers.

 As it turns out, you don't need a DTS entry to add an I2C child
 node/device. I removed my DTS child node entries in case they were
 breaking things, booted the board and then manually added the device
 and kernel driver.

 Although my driver still doesn't work, I am able to see the debug
 messages which is great.


 Shell session: First I confirm I can see and query the I2C device
 using i2ctools, then instantiate the device and then load the
 module...which fails, but at least explains where it's failing.

 # lsmod
 Module  Size  Used byNot tainted
 #
 #
 #
 # i2cdetect -y 0
  0  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  a  b  c  d  e  f
 00:  -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
 10: -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
 20: -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
 30: -- -- -- -- 34 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
 40: -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
 50: -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
 60: -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 69 -- -- -- -- -- --
 70: -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 77
 #
 #
 #
 # i2cget -y 0 0x69 0x75
 0x71
 #
 #
 #
 # echo mpu9250 0x69  /sys/bus/i2c/devices/i2c-0/new_device
 [   55.362493] i2c i2c-0: new_device: Instantiated device mpu9250 at 0x69
 #
 # modprobe inv-mpu-iio
 [   77.347200] inv-mpu-iio 0-0069: Unable to read axis_map_x
 [   77.352699] i2c i2c-0: inv_mpu_probe failed -22
 [   77.357254] inv-mpu-iio: probe of 0-0069 failed with error -5
 #




 Bruce





 On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 2:54 PM, bruce bushby bruce.bus...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  Hi
 
  As a hobby I've been playing with an Olimex A20-SOM and trying to
  attach a Drotek Invensense MPU9250 break out board.
 
  So far my uboot is working and I can boot my build via dhcp + nfs. I
  added the i2ctools to the build and I'm able to run i2cdetect -y 0
  and I can see my devices on i2c0
 
  #
  # i2cdetect -y 0
   0  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  a  b  c  d  e  f
  00:  -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
  10: -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
  20: -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
  30: -- -- -- -- 34 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
  40: -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
  50: -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
  60: -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 69 -- -- -- -- -- --
  70: -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 77
  #
 
 
  The drotek breakout board:
  http://www.drotek.fr/shop/en/home/466-imu-10dof-mpu9250-ms5611.html
 
  includes ms5611 altimeter which is why you see address 0x34
 
 
  A very kind Daniel Baluta provided a patched version of the inv_mpu
  drivers enabling them to compile for the 3.16+ kernels. (rather then
  3.4)
 
  Now I have a module  (inv_mpu_iio) that loadsbut it is not
  associated with my i2c0 0x69 device, nor has it created any /sys
  device files:
 
  #
  # lsmod
  Module  Size  Used byNot tainted
  inv_mpu_iio62968  0
  #
  # dmesg | grep inv
  [1.187348] i2c i2c-0: client [inv_mpu_iio] registered with bus id
 0-0069
  [   22.452739] i2c-core: driver [inv_mpu_iio] registered
  #
 
 
  First question: Does my DTS child node look ok?
 
 
  i2c0: i2c@01c2ac00 {
  pinctrl-names = default;
  pinctrl-0 = i2c0_pins_a;
  status = okay;
 
  mpu@69 {
  compatible = inv_mpu_iio;
  reg = 0x69;
  };
  };
 
 
  Something has worked because I can cat this file:
  # cat /sys/devices/soc@01c0/1c2ac00.i2c/i2c-0/0-0069/name
  inv_mpu_iio
  #
 
  This is the driver I am using:
  https://github.com/BruceBushby/inv_mpu
 
 
  inv_mpu_core.c  ...contains the probe function:
 
  static int inv_mpu_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
  const struct i2c_device_id *id)
  {
  struct inv_mpu_state *st;
  struct iio_dev *indio_dev;
  int result, err;
  pr_debug(Invensense MPU probe started.\n);
 
 
 
 
  Sadly I don't see any module debug messages.even though I've
  enabled various DEBUG in my kernel config:
 
 
  CONFIG_I2C_DEBUG_CORE=y
  CONFIG_I2C_DEBUG_ALGO=y
  CONFIG_I2C_DEBUG_BUS=y
  CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG=y
  CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO=y
  CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL=y
 
 
 
 
  Any ideas?
 
 
 
  Thanks
  Bruce

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 linux-sunxi group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to linux-sunxi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
linux-sunxi group.
To 

回复: [linux-sunxi] Optimus Board

[quink]

power off the board, connect the board via serial port, unplug the otg wire, press 2 in serial terminal, power on, the board will boot into FEL mode. plug in the otg wire, open Phoenix, done. 原始邮件 主题：Re: [linux-sunxi] Optimus Board发件人：RFat 收件人：linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com抄送：yrz...@gmail.com,raan...@gmail.comSome progress to report:I finally managed to flash the Optimus Board (OB) through the USB 3. It is done using the PhoenixSuit and without installing the USB drivers (I found all the necessary software at PCDuino8 site). Despite not managing to install the usb driver on windows the PhoenixSuit managed to communicate to the board after doing one very important step: apparently the OB does not have a FEL button and what you need to do is enter the u-boot it loads (hitting any key right on boot time) and then running a command "efex" the device will suddenly be identified on windows and bingo.PCduino site have several interesting images: an android, a linux kernel which waits to boot from an sdcard (the board will not do this otherwise - or at least I didn't managed to get it to..), and well nothing less than a UBUNTU(!) which actually works with visual interface and everything (it says it is a buggy version - but still impressive). The command line says cubie so perhaps it comes from there?? There are no sources for these images.I hope this info may be useful to some of you.On Friday, September 5, 2014 7:19:15 PM UTC+3, RFat wrote:Thanks for your reply. I still could not get any progress; I tired following the dd instruction you sent in the SDK page as well as two methods described in pcduino8 page. I also got some stuff from Merrii (as Jhon suggested). I published it in a newer post on this forum.The mmc does work once the android finish loading, so it may not be an incompatibility issue between the sdcard and the mmc controller - but who knows.I'll update if I have any news (and would appreciate any ideas..)Thanks again.On Friday, September 5, 2014 6:52:56 PM UTC+3, Jon Smirl wrote:On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Chen-Yu Tsai we...@csie.org wrote:
 Hi,

 On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 8:44 AM, Jhon Yi yrz...@gmail.com wrote:
 If this doesn't work, the only solution is to ask Merrii, or at least
 let them provide one bootable sdcard then dd out the content and
 search for the position.

 2014-09-05 4:55 GMT+08:00 RFat raa...@gmail.com:
 Hi Jhon,

 Thanks for your suggestion. I tried:
 dd if=boot0_sdcard_sun9iw1p1.bin of=/dev/mmcblk0 bs=1024 seek=X

 where X = 0, 4, 8, ..

 See http://linux-sunxi.org/SDK_build_howto

 and the board never showed any response - it is just booting from the nand
 (I presume..). Was this what you were suggesting?

 For me, sometimes it responds, sometimes it doesn't.
 Maybe the mmc controller is picky about cards, or the I/O pins
 are undervolted. Without a user manual and schematics ATM,
 it is hard to tell.

I have had this problem on another CPU. Notes from that board

100ohm series resistor on all of the MMC lines with 10K pull ups


 When I did get a response and boot0 was loaded, boot0 then complained
 it couldn't initialize mmc0, and halted.


 ChenYu

 If anyone else have a suggestion - I'll be grateful



 On Thursday, September 4, 2014 3:01:34 AM UTC+2, Jhon Yi wrote:

 I suggest that you'd better ask Merrii to give you the parameters.
 Otherwise you could first try to dd the boot0 to a clean sd card from
 8kB and see if there is any print out from the serial port (just set



 the serial port of you computer to 115200n8), if not work, move up 4kB
 every trial until you see the right output. Do the seem thing to uboot
 begin from the end of boot0, until you find something meaningful. Plus
 good luck.

 2014-09-04 5:00 GMT+08:00 RFat raa...@gmail.com:
  Hi everyone,
 
  I just got the Optimus board (by Merrii). Seems like a nice hotrod..
 
  I am trying to get u-boot running from the sdcard and I saw the
  binaries:
 
  u-boot-sun9iw1p1.bin
  boot0_sdcard_sun9iw1p1.bin
 
  in the SDK that poped up recently (A80_SDK_20140728).
 
  I guess I should be DD-ing these files to the sdcard but I am not sure
  how.
  There must be specific values for the seek option -- does anyone have a
  clue
  (I am not sure whether I am asking a trivial or a hard question..)
 
  Moreover, this board does not have a FEL or U-boot buttons like other
  boards
  - will it always look for something readable in the sdcard and then
  moves on
  the the nand?
 
  I guess everyone is very excited about the availability of these A80
  boards
  and this mysterious SDK - the sunxi community is about to have crazy
  power
  from a crazily modest device (ah, the late 80's of Acron paid off..)
 
  Thanks!

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to linux-sunxi...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit 

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: GPL Violations round-up

[Quink]

Speaking something wrong is worse than do nothing. If you are
too serious about this problem, Aw will keep their mouth tight.
Relax and try to communicate with them. Maybe Aw has made
some improvements that we didn't know. Just blame his students
 is not a good teacher.


On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 9:35 PM, Stefan Monnier monn...@iro.umontreal.ca
wrote:

  So please stop attacking AW in this way.

 FWIW, I agree with Luc that it's important to bring this up and make
 sure that there's some positive movement on that front.
 Even if it's limited to splitting the blob into a Free glue code
 linked to a binary blob.

 And it doesn't have to get all fixed right away before we can do
 anything else.  But there's a need to establish some understanding
 between the two parties about this issue.


 Stefan

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 linux-sunxi group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to linux-sunxi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
linux-sunxi group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to linux-sunxi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [linux-sunxi] Getting Linux

[Quink]

What operating system do you have on your PC? The other partition is in the
format of ext3/ext4.


On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 1:15 AM, jason.854...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi,

 I recently bought a Jesurun A19 Android media player that is based on the
 Allwinner A20 SOC.

 I would like to run either Linux or the stock android ROM from an SD card.
 However, I'm struggling to make progress.

 Here's what I've done so far:

 I tried various SD Card bootable Linux distributions build for the
 Cubieboard. I eventually found one (Cubieez) that (mostly) works with the
 Jesurun A19. However, networking (both wired and wireless) doesn't work.

 I did however, manage to extract the stock android image from the internal
 NAND chip by running dd on the Linux command line.

 I then tried flashing the image to an SD card. When I put the SD card in a
 PC, it recognises and mounts the first partition (which appears to be in
 FAT format). This has enabled me to access various boot files including
 script.bin.

 Unfortunately, I cannot access any of the other partitions. As far as I
 can tell, the image doesn't have a standard partition table.

 I tried replacing the cubieez script.bin with the script.bin file that I
 extracted from the stock Android image. However, networking still isn't
 working.

 I'm rapidly running out of ideas. Can anyone help?

 Thanks,

 Jason

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 linux-sunxi group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to linux-sunxi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
linux-sunxi group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to linux-sunxi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.