Re: Bug: lyx-qt 1.3.0pre3 cannot use ISO-8859-15
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 03:53:22PM +0100, Nabil Hathout wrote: |What is the Xlib symbol name for oe ? Lower case ? What is your $LANG | | How can I know the name of this symbol ? I cannot type the lower case | (AltGr-S-g) ; this is what says /usr/local/lyx-qt/bin/lyx-qt -dbg key | | Do you look for 'odiaeresis'? No... the keysym is #ifdef XK_LATIN9 #define XK_OE 0x13bc #define XK_oe 0x13bd #define XK_Ydiaeresis 0x13be #endif /* XK_LATIN9 */ oe, OE It is the oe ligature. -- Lgb
Re: Bug: lyx-qt 1.3.0pre3 cannot use ISO-8859-15
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 03:53:22PM +0100, Nabil Hathout wrote: |What is the Xlib symbol name for oe ? Lower case ? What is your $LANG | | How can I know the name of this symbol ? I cannot type the lower case | (AltGr-S-g) ; this is what says /usr/local/lyx-qt/bin/lyx-qt -dbg key | | Do you look for 'odiaeresis'? No... the keysym is #ifdef XK_LATIN9 #define XK_OE 0x13bc #define XK_oe 0x13bd #define XK_Ydiaeresis 0x13be #endif /* XK_LATIN9 */ oe, OE It is the oe ligature. -- Lgb
Re: Bug: lyx-qt 1.3.0pre3 cannot use ISO-8859-15
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 03:53:22PM +0100, Nabil Hathout wrote: | > > What is the Xlib symbol name for oe ? Lower case ? What is your $LANG | > | > How can I know the name of this symbol ? I cannot type the lower case | > (AltGr-S-g) ; this is what says "/usr/local/lyx-qt/bin/lyx-qt -dbg key" | | Do you look for 'odiaeresis'? No... the keysym is #ifdef XK_LATIN9 #define XK_OE 0x13bc #define XK_oe 0x13bd #define XK_Ydiaeresis 0x13be #endif /* XK_LATIN9 */ oe, OE It is the oe ligature. -- Lgb
Third Prerelease of LyX 1.3.0
This is the third prerelease of LyX 1.3.0. The first and second prerelase did not have too many problems so it is hoped that this prerelease will be more or less equal to the final release. Howerver as with all preleases and new version of a program, you should backup your documents before trying it out. If not you might have problems going back to an earlier version if so desired. Please report all installation and execution problems to [EMAIL PROTECTED] So that we can try to get it fixed before 1.3.0 final. This prerelease can be found at: Tarball: ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/pre/lyx-1.3.0pre3.tar.gz rpm for RH-8.0: ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/pre/lyx-1.3.0pre3-1.src.rpm ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/pre/lyx-1.3.0pre3-1.i386.rpm -- Lgb
Third Prerelease of LyX 1.3.0
This is the third prerelease of LyX 1.3.0. The first and second prerelase did not have too many problems so it is hoped that this prerelease will be more or less equal to the final release. Howerver as with all preleases and new version of a program, you should backup your documents before trying it out. If not you might have problems going back to an earlier version if so desired. Please report all installation and execution problems to [EMAIL PROTECTED] So that we can try to get it fixed before 1.3.0 final. This prerelease can be found at: Tarball: ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/pre/lyx-1.3.0pre3.tar.gz rpm for RH-8.0: ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/pre/lyx-1.3.0pre3-1.src.rpm ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/pre/lyx-1.3.0pre3-1.i386.rpm -- Lgb
Third Prerelease of LyX 1.3.0
This is the third prerelease of LyX 1.3.0. The first and second prerelase did not have too many problems so it is hoped that this prerelease will be more or less equal to the final release. Howerver as with all preleases and new version of a program, you should backup your documents before trying it out. If not you might have problems going back to an earlier version if so desired. Please report all installation and execution problems to [EMAIL PROTECTED] So that we can try to get it fixed before 1.3.0 final. This prerelease can be found at: Tarball: ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/pre/lyx-1.3.0pre3.tar.gz rpm for RH-8.0: ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/pre/lyx-1.3.0pre3-1.src.rpm ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/pre/lyx-1.3.0pre3-1.i386.rpm -- Lgb
Prerelease #2 of LyX 1.3.0
I have just uploaded the tarball and the rpms to ftp.devel.lyx.org. A lot of small fixes has been applied since (the unannounced) first prerelease. Even if I am not aware of any serious problems with pre2, you should be careful to backup your documents before trying this one out. The rpms are created against the xforms rpms that can be found in the same dir as the prerelease. Reports on installation and running this will be greately appreciated. Be it failure or success reports... ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/pre/lyx-1.3.0pre2.tar.gz ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/pre/lyx-1.3.0pre2-1.i386.rpm ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/pre/lyx-1.3.0pre2-1.src.rpm -- Lgb
Prerelease #2 of LyX 1.3.0
I have just uploaded the tarball and the rpms to ftp.devel.lyx.org. A lot of small fixes has been applied since (the unannounced) first prerelease. Even if I am not aware of any serious problems with pre2, you should be careful to backup your documents before trying this one out. The rpms are created against the xforms rpms that can be found in the same dir as the prerelease. Reports on installation and running this will be greately appreciated. Be it failure or success reports... ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/pre/lyx-1.3.0pre2.tar.gz ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/pre/lyx-1.3.0pre2-1.i386.rpm ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/pre/lyx-1.3.0pre2-1.src.rpm -- Lgb
Prerelease #2 of LyX 1.3.0
I have just uploaded the tarball and the rpms to ftp.devel.lyx.org. A lot of small fixes has been applied since (the unannounced) first prerelease. Even if I am not aware of any serious problems with pre2, you should be careful to backup your documents before trying this one out. The rpms are created against the xforms rpms that can be found in the same dir as the prerelease. Reports on installation and running this will be greately appreciated. Be it failure or success reports... ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/pre/lyx-1.3.0pre2.tar.gz ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/pre/lyx-1.3.0pre2-1.i386.rpm ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/pre/lyx-1.3.0pre2-1.src.rpm -- Lgb
Re: QT compile problems.
Aide Florent [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Hi, | | translations. By making the french translation up to date you will get | more/all the english strings into french. | | I looked into the fr.po file but everything is correctly translated... | Maybe the po file needs to be regenerated to reflect the new strings ? fuzzy: #: src/frontends/qt2/QDocumentDialog.C:276 #, fuzzy msgid Papersize and Orientation msgstr Orientation #: ../src/frontends/qt2/ui/PaperModuleBase.ui:84 #, fuzzy msgid Paper size msgstr Taille : #: ../src/frontends/xforms/forms/form_document.fd:170 #, fuzzy msgid Use Class Defaults|#C msgstr Valeurs par Défaut de la Classe|#f fuzzy means that the translation is suspect and that the entries must be checked and verified (by removing the fuzzy mark) by an translator. -- Lgb
Re: linux magazine about lyx
Tuukka Toivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | If nobody noticed, there was an article about LyX in the latest Linux | Magazine. It looked like it would have continuation in later issues. | (I think there's probably many Linux Magazines, this one looked like the UK | one). http://www.linux-magazine.com/issue/25 Is the closest I got. -- Lgb
Re: QT compile problems.
Aide Florent [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Hi, | | translations. By making the french translation up to date you will get | more/all the english strings into french. | | I looked into the fr.po file but everything is correctly translated... | Maybe the po file needs to be regenerated to reflect the new strings ? fuzzy: #: src/frontends/qt2/QDocumentDialog.C:276 #, fuzzy msgid Papersize and Orientation msgstr Orientation #: ../src/frontends/qt2/ui/PaperModuleBase.ui:84 #, fuzzy msgid Paper size msgstr Taille : #: ../src/frontends/xforms/forms/form_document.fd:170 #, fuzzy msgid Use Class Defaults|#C msgstr Valeurs par Défaut de la Classe|#f fuzzy means that the translation is suspect and that the entries must be checked and verified (by removing the fuzzy mark) by an translator. -- Lgb
Re: linux magazine about lyx
Tuukka Toivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | If nobody noticed, there was an article about LyX in the latest Linux | Magazine. It looked like it would have continuation in later issues. | (I think there's probably many Linux Magazines, this one looked like the UK | one). http://www.linux-magazine.com/issue/25 Is the closest I got. -- Lgb
Re: QT compile problems.
Aide Florent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Hi, | | > translations. By making the french translation up to date you will get | > more/all the english strings into french. | | I looked into the fr.po file but everything is correctly translated... | Maybe the po file needs to be regenerated to reflect the "new" strings ? fuzzy: #: src/frontends/qt2/QDocumentDialog.C:276 #, fuzzy msgid "Papersize and Orientation" msgstr "Orientation" #: ../src/frontends/qt2/ui/PaperModuleBase.ui:84 #, fuzzy msgid "Paper size" msgstr "Taille :" #: ../src/frontends/xforms/forms/form_document.fd:170 #, fuzzy msgid "Use Class Defaults|#C" msgstr "Valeurs par Défaut de la Classe|#f" fuzzy means that the translation is suspect and that the entries must be checked and verified (by removing the fuzzy mark) by an translator. -- Lgb
Re: linux magazine about lyx
Tuukka Toivonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | If nobody noticed, there was an article about LyX in the latest Linux | Magazine. It looked like it would have continuation in later issues. | (I think there's probably many Linux Magazines, this one looked like the UK | one). http://www.linux-magazine.com/issue/25> Is the closest I got. -- Lgb
Re: QT compile problems.
Aide Florent [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Do spill ... | | here it is: | | http://hector.homeip.net/lyx-130cvs1.png | | you can see the document parameter dialog, obviously there are many portions | which remain in English whereas some others are obviously (too mee) French... | | There are many menus where this problem arises. | | Can I help here ? Yes, you probably can. Most of these issues is because of missing translations. By making the french translation up to date you will get more/all the english strings into french. -- Lgb
Re: QT compile problems.
Aide Florent [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Do spill ... | | here it is: | | http://hector.homeip.net/lyx-130cvs1.png | | you can see the document parameter dialog, obviously there are many portions | which remain in English whereas some others are obviously (too mee) French... | | There are many menus where this problem arises. | | Can I help here ? Yes, you probably can. Most of these issues is because of missing translations. By making the french translation up to date you will get more/all the english strings into french. -- Lgb
Re: QT compile problems.
Aide Florent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > Do spill ... | | here it is: | | http://hector.homeip.net/lyx-130cvs1.png | | you can see the document parameter dialog, obviously there are many portions | which remain in English whereas some others are obviously (too mee) French... | | There are many menus where this problem arises. | | Can I help here ? Yes, you probably can. Most of these issues is because of missing translations. By making the french translation up to date you will get more/all the english strings into french. -- Lgb
Re: On compiling lyx 1.2.1 in SuSE 8.1 - a failure
Lars Forseth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Hi! | | I have tried to compile lyx 1.2.1 on my new SuSE 8.1. But it failes. Can | anyone explain this? | | Below my signature you will find the output of configure an make in one of my | failures. Did you try this with a clean tree? The configure results for the compiler look really wrong. -- Lgb
Re: On compiling lyx 1.2.1 in SuSE 8.1 - a failure
Lars Forseth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Hi! | | I have tried to compile lyx 1.2.1 on my new SuSE 8.1. But it failes. Can | anyone explain this? | | Below my signature you will find the output of configure an make in one of my | failures. Did you try this with a clean tree? The configure results for the compiler look really wrong. -- Lgb
Re: On compiling lyx 1.2.1 in SuSE 8.1 - a failure
Lars Forseth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Hi! | | I have tried to compile lyx 1.2.1 on my new SuSE 8.1. But it failes. Can | anyone explain this? | | Below my signature you will find the output of configure an make in one of my | failures. Did you try this with a clean tree? The configure results for the compiler look really wrong. -- Lgb
Re: Linux outline processor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Christian Ridderström wrote: | | On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Steve Litt wrote: | If you write long documents, use Linux, and need an outline processor, you | might like the new VimOutliner 0.2.0. It uses VI keystrokes plus some | enhanced commands to perform outliner functions such as indent, exdent, | collapse, expand -- either by individual trees or outline wide. | | | Since I'm an emacs-lover... you don't happen to know of an outliner for | emacs that's good with LyX :-) (Don't think I could handle the vi | keymapping...) | | Emacs has an outline mode (ESC x outline-mode RETURN). It sounds like you | know that. I've never tried to use it with Lyx. Once in Lyx format, you | lose the body/tree/subtree emacs markings (*, **, ***). To make LyX work with the emacs-server should be possible without too much work... hopefully... Or perhaps someone we help create the InsetEditor that we need (for other things than LP as well) -- Lgb
Re: Linux outline processor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Christian Ridderström wrote: | | On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Steve Litt wrote: | If you write long documents, use Linux, and need an outline processor, you | might like the new VimOutliner 0.2.0. It uses VI keystrokes plus some | enhanced commands to perform outliner functions such as indent, exdent, | collapse, expand -- either by individual trees or outline wide. | | | Since I'm an emacs-lover... you don't happen to know of an outliner for | emacs that's good with LyX :-) (Don't think I could handle the vi | keymapping...) | | Emacs has an outline mode (ESC x outline-mode RETURN). It sounds like you | know that. I've never tried to use it with Lyx. Once in Lyx format, you | lose the body/tree/subtree emacs markings (*, **, ***). To make LyX work with the emacs-server should be possible without too much work... hopefully... Or perhaps someone we help create the InsetEditor that we need (for other things than LP as well) -- Lgb
Re: Linux outline processor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Christian Ridderström wrote: | | > On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Steve Litt wrote: | > > If you write long documents, use Linux, and need an outline processor, you | > > might like the new VimOutliner 0.2.0. It uses VI keystrokes plus some | > > enhanced commands to perform outliner functions such as indent, exdent, | > > collapse, expand -- either by individual trees or outline wide. | > > | > | > Since I'm an emacs-lover... you don't happen to know of an outliner for | > emacs that's good with LyX :-) (Don't think I could handle the vi | > keymapping...) | | Emacs has an outline mode (ESC x outline-mode RETURN). It sounds like you | know that. I've never tried to use it with Lyx. Once in Lyx format, you | lose the body/tree/subtree emacs markings (*, **, ***). To make LyX work with the emacs-server should be possible without too much work... hopefully... Or perhaps someone we help create the InsetEditor that we need (for other things than LP as well) -- Lgb
Re: LyX Code Editor
Norman Kabir [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | LyX is a phenomenal text editor. | | Has anyone considered building a code editor on top of LyX? I think it | would be very useful to be able to mingle formulas, text, images and | source code. Well... LyX has been used for (and is still beeing used?) literal programming, which is just what you seem to want. | A filter could generate proper *.c or *.java files from the appropriate | blocks in the documentation. And source code would be as beatiful as | documents created with LyX. A better code environment would be needed. -- Lgb
Re: LyX Code Editor
Norman Kabir [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | LyX is a phenomenal text editor. | | Has anyone considered building a code editor on top of LyX? I think it | would be very useful to be able to mingle formulas, text, images and | source code. Well... LyX has been used for (and is still beeing used?) literal programming, which is just what you seem to want. | A filter could generate proper *.c or *.java files from the appropriate | blocks in the documentation. And source code would be as beatiful as | documents created with LyX. A better code environment would be needed. -- Lgb
Re: LyX Code Editor
Norman Kabir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | LyX is a phenomenal text editor. | | Has anyone considered building a code editor on top of LyX? I think it | would be very useful to be able to mingle formulas, text, images and | source code. Well... LyX has been used for (and is still beeing used?) literal programming, which is just what you seem to want. | A filter could generate proper *.c or *.java files from the appropriate | blocks in the documentation. And source code would be as beatiful as | documents created with LyX. A better code environment would be needed. -- Lgb
Re: Small poll - Results
slitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| John -- has anyone started character styles yet? This is just a wild guess,
| but could it be accomplished by a translation to
| \begin{\whatever}\begin{\whichever}text to
| format\end{\whichever}\end{\whatever}?
|
| So maybe in the LyX file, it would look like this:
|
| I want character styles
|
| \begin{\charstyle{shout}}
| big time
|
| \end{\charstyle{shout}}
| , because they're so vital to today's authoring.
or...
I want character styles \shout{big time}, because they're so
vital to today's authoring.
| Then, assuming shout is defined as Largest and Bold, perhaps LyX could
| translate the begin to \begin{LARGE}\begin{bfseries} and end to
| \end{bfseries}\end{LARGE}
|
| Does that look doable to you?
\newcommand{shout}{...}
I want character styles \shout{big time}, because they're so
vital to today's authoring.
I really, really do not want this feature as just a new hack (which
actually would be quite ease), but us to prepare the core of lyx
properly for this...
--
Lgb
Re: Small poll - Results
slitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| John -- has anyone started character styles yet? This is just a wild guess,
| but could it be accomplished by a translation to
| \begin{\whatever}\begin{\whichever}text to
| format\end{\whichever}\end{\whatever}?
|
| So maybe in the LyX file, it would look like this:
|
| I want character styles
|
| \begin{\charstyle{shout}}
| big time
|
| \end{\charstyle{shout}}
| , because they're so vital to today's authoring.
or...
I want character styles \shout{big time}, because they're so
vital to today's authoring.
| Then, assuming shout is defined as Largest and Bold, perhaps LyX could
| translate the begin to \begin{LARGE}\begin{bfseries} and end to
| \end{bfseries}\end{LARGE}
|
| Does that look doable to you?
\newcommand{shout}{...}
I want character styles \shout{big time}, because they're so
vital to today's authoring.
I really, really do not want this feature as just a new hack (which
actually would be quite ease), but us to prepare the core of lyx
properly for this...
--
Lgb
Re: Small poll - Results
slitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| John -- has anyone started character styles yet? This is just a wild guess,
| but could it be accomplished by a translation to
| \begin{\whatever}\begin{\whichever}text to
| format\end{\whichever}\end{\whatever}?
|
| So maybe in the LyX file, it would look like this:
|
| I want character styles
|
| \begin{\charstyle{shout}}
| big time
|
| \end{\charstyle{shout}}
| , because they're so vital to today's authoring.
or...
I want character styles \shout{big time}, because they're so
vital to today's authoring.
| Then, assuming shout is defined as Largest and Bold, perhaps LyX could
| translate the begin to \begin{LARGE}\begin{bfseries} and end to
| \end{bfseries}\end{LARGE}
|
| Does that look doable to you?
\newcommand{shout}{...}
I want character styles \shout{big time}, because they're so
vital to today's authoring.
I really, really do not want this feature as just a new hack (which
actually would be quite ease), but us to prepare the core of lyx
properly for this...
--
Lgb
Re: Including CVS $Log$ tag in LyX doxument
Daniel Clark/Cambridge/IBM [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| I think what maybe I didn't explain well enough is that $Log$ expands to
| multiple lines, and CVS takes anything before $Log$ as the language's
| comment character. So the suggestions you give end up expanding to things
| that are syntax errors, for example:
|
| \newcommand{\cvsver}{$Log$}
|
| expands to:
|
| \newcommand(\cvslog){$Log: Account-Management.lyx,v $
| \newcommand(\cvslog){Revision 1.8 2002/09/24 16:23:31 dclark
| \newcommand(\cvslog){Trying to get CVS Log tag to work
| \newcommand(\cvslog){}
|
| Which is why this problem seems to be somewhat difficult.
Why isn't verbatim doing what you want?
\begin{verbatim}
$Log$
\end{verbatim}
what happens if you put this in a ERT?
--
Lgb
Re: Including CVS $Log$ tag in LyX doxument
Tuukka Toivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On 24 Sep 2002, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| \begin{verbatim}
| $Log$
| \end{verbatim}
|
| what happens if you put this in a ERT?
|
| I don't use CVS, but trying with hand: when this is saved, it'll look in
| .lyx file something like this:
|
| \latex latex
| $Log$
you should insert the \begin{verbatim} parts as well.
| When CVS modifies this, it'll replace it with multiple lines:
|
| \latex latex
| $Log version string$
| Some other
| lines here
|
| When this is now loaded back to LyX, the lines are concatenated. When it's
| again saved, the result is:
|
| \latex latex
| $Log version string$Some otherlines here
|
| ...and now CVS probably doesn't understand it anymore.
What version of LyX is this?
mmm ... I see what happens, but am not sure what to do about it.
what if you put a newcommand in the preamble
\newcommand{mylog}{
\begin{verbatim}
$Log$
\end{verbatim}
}
and put \mylog in ert somewhere in the document?
--
Lgb
Re: Including CVS $Log$ tag in LyX doxument
Daniel Clark/Cambridge/IBM [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| I think what maybe I didn't explain well enough is that $Log$ expands to
| multiple lines, and CVS takes anything before $Log$ as the language's
| comment character. So the suggestions you give end up expanding to things
| that are syntax errors, for example:
|
| \newcommand{\cvsver}{$Log$}
|
| expands to:
|
| \newcommand(\cvslog){$Log: Account-Management.lyx,v $
| \newcommand(\cvslog){Revision 1.8 2002/09/24 16:23:31 dclark
| \newcommand(\cvslog){Trying to get CVS Log tag to work
| \newcommand(\cvslog){}
|
| Which is why this problem seems to be somewhat difficult.
Why isn't verbatim doing what you want?
\begin{verbatim}
$Log$
\end{verbatim}
what happens if you put this in a ERT?
--
Lgb
Re: Including CVS $Log$ tag in LyX doxument
Tuukka Toivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On 24 Sep 2002, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| \begin{verbatim}
| $Log$
| \end{verbatim}
|
| what happens if you put this in a ERT?
|
| I don't use CVS, but trying with hand: when this is saved, it'll look in
| .lyx file something like this:
|
| \latex latex
| $Log$
you should insert the \begin{verbatim} parts as well.
| When CVS modifies this, it'll replace it with multiple lines:
|
| \latex latex
| $Log version string$
| Some other
| lines here
|
| When this is now loaded back to LyX, the lines are concatenated. When it's
| again saved, the result is:
|
| \latex latex
| $Log version string$Some otherlines here
|
| ...and now CVS probably doesn't understand it anymore.
What version of LyX is this?
mmm ... I see what happens, but am not sure what to do about it.
what if you put a newcommand in the preamble
\newcommand{mylog}{
\begin{verbatim}
$Log$
\end{verbatim}
}
and put \mylog in ert somewhere in the document?
--
Lgb
Re: Including CVS $Log$ tag in LyX doxument
Daniel Clark/Cambridge/IBM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I think what maybe I didn't explain well enough is that $Log$ expands to
| multiple lines, and CVS takes anything before $Log$ as the language's
| comment character. So the suggestions you give end up expanding to things
| that are syntax errors, for example:
|
| \newcommand{\cvsver}{$Log$}
|
| expands to:
|
| \newcommand(\cvslog){$Log: Account-Management.lyx,v $
| \newcommand(\cvslog){Revision 1.8 2002/09/24 16:23:31 dclark
| \newcommand(\cvslog){Trying to get CVS Log tag to work
| \newcommand(\cvslog){}
|
| Which is why this problem seems to be somewhat difficult.
Why isn't verbatim doing what you want?
\begin{verbatim}
$Log$
\end{verbatim}
what happens if you put this in a ERT?
--
Lgb
Re: Including CVS $Log$ tag in LyX doxument
Tuukka Toivonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 24 Sep 2002, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| >\begin{verbatim}
| >$Log$
| >\end{verbatim}
| >
| >what happens if you put this in a ERT?
|
| I don't use CVS, but trying with hand: when this is saved, it'll look in
| .lyx file something like this:
|
| \latex latex
| $Log$
you should insert the \begin{verbatim} parts as well.
| When CVS modifies this, it'll replace it with multiple lines:
|
| \latex latex
| $Log version string$
| Some other
| lines here
|
| When this is now loaded back to LyX, the lines are concatenated. When it's
| again saved, the result is:
|
| \latex latex
| $Log version string$Some otherlines here
|
| ...and now CVS probably doesn't understand it anymore.
What version of LyX is this?
mmm ... I see what happens, but am not sure what to do about it.
what if you put a newcommand in the preamble
\newcommand{mylog}{
\begin{verbatim}
$Log$
\end{verbatim}
}
and put "\mylog" in ert somewhere in the document?
--
Lgb
Re: libXpm causing problems?
Takashi Soma [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I have the same problem. I found that eps files by GNUPLOT works fine | but not by IDL. What do you mean by IDL? In any case, even EPS files from gnuplot are not rendered ok. They are converted to xpm (don't know why) and an error occurs when they are to be loaded. There is a twist: I have installed LyX on two machines, both RH 7.0. This Xpm pixmap error appears in both. On the same day I installed LyX on a Debian Alpha, and it works properly, but I cannot find a difference between them. j. b. oliveira | IDL is a programming environment marketed by Research Systems Inc. | (www.researchsystems.com). Cygwin Lyx 1.2 accepts EPS file from IDL but | Linux Lyx 1.2 gives Xpm pixmap error for the same EPS file. Why? Help | me! We then need a eps file from IDL, and perhaps also a xpm generated from it. Without this it is pretty much impossible... -- Lgb
Re: libXpm causing problems?
Takashi Soma [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I have the same problem. I found that eps files by GNUPLOT works fine | but not by IDL. What do you mean by IDL? In any case, even EPS files from gnuplot are not rendered ok. They are converted to xpm (don't know why) and an error occurs when they are to be loaded. There is a twist: I have installed LyX on two machines, both RH 7.0. This Xpm pixmap error appears in both. On the same day I installed LyX on a Debian Alpha, and it works properly, but I cannot find a difference between them. j. b. oliveira | IDL is a programming environment marketed by Research Systems Inc. | (www.researchsystems.com). Cygwin Lyx 1.2 accepts EPS file from IDL but | Linux Lyx 1.2 gives Xpm pixmap error for the same EPS file. Why? Help | me! We then need a eps file from IDL, and perhaps also a xpm generated from it. Without this it is pretty much impossible... -- Lgb
Re: libXpm causing problems?
"Takashi Soma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > I have the same problem. I found that eps files by GNUPLOT works fine | but >> > not by IDL. >> >> What do you mean by IDL? In any case, even EPS files from gnuplot >> are not rendered ok. They are converted to xpm (don't know why) >> and an error occurs when they are to be loaded. >> >> There is a twist: I have installed LyX on two machines, both RH >> 7.0. This "Xpm pixmap" error appears in both. On the same day >> I installed LyX on a Debian Alpha, and it works properly, but I >> cannot find a difference between them. >> >> j. b. oliveira >> >> > | IDL is a programming environment marketed by Research Systems Inc. | (www.researchsystems.com). Cygwin Lyx 1.2 accepts EPS file from IDL but | Linux Lyx 1.2 gives "Xpm pixmap" error for the same EPS file. Why? Help | me! We then need a eps file from IDL, and perhaps also a xpm generated from it. Without this it is pretty much impossible... -- Lgb
[Paolo.Saggese@libero.it] Feedback from www.lyx.org
I forwarded your message to the lyx mailinglist, to possibly get some wider attention and discussion. ---BeginMessage--- Paolo Saggese ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) entered the following feedback message on the LyX home page: Hi. Congratulations for the job done. LyX is really a great piece of software. Here (see: http://borex.lngs.infn.it ) we are using it extensively to write scientific articles, reports, etc. We have a problem, though. We have several collaborators from Russia who needs to write documents is Russian language (Cyrillic chars), usually mixed with some english text, math formulas, etc. Problem is, it looks like it is really hard to properly set up Russian (Cyrillic) keyboard map in LyX and, even worse, we have not been able to find any easy way to switch back and forth from english to russian when writing mixed language documents (almost all are such). Oddly enough, with some older versions of LyX we had found a way (although not perfect) to to that somehow, while with the latest versions it seems to be just impossible! :-( Why could not LyX just use the system's keyboard maps and encodings? In KDE, Gnome and even plain X with whatever wm on it there are several confortable utilities to simply switch keyboard maps back and forth on the fly to and from (almost) any language with just a mouse click or some hotkey combination. Most applications works that way without any problem. If LyX could simply do the same, it would be great! Instead, unfortunately, switching the keyboard layout that way simply makes LyX input the wrong characters or none at all. :-( What is the current situation and the plans for the near future? Thanks for your attention. Ciao e grazie, Paolo. -- http://borex.lngs.infn.it/saggese You can still escape from the GATES of hell: Use Linux! ---End Message--- -- Lgb
[Paolo.Saggese@libero.it] Feedback from www.lyx.org
I forwarded your message to the lyx mailinglist, to possibly get some wider attention and discussion. ---BeginMessage--- Paolo Saggese ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) entered the following feedback message on the LyX home page: Hi. Congratulations for the job done. LyX is really a great piece of software. Here (see: http://borex.lngs.infn.it ) we are using it extensively to write scientific articles, reports, etc. We have a problem, though. We have several collaborators from Russia who needs to write documents is Russian language (Cyrillic chars), usually mixed with some english text, math formulas, etc. Problem is, it looks like it is really hard to properly set up Russian (Cyrillic) keyboard map in LyX and, even worse, we have not been able to find any easy way to switch back and forth from english to russian when writing mixed language documents (almost all are such). Oddly enough, with some older versions of LyX we had found a way (although not perfect) to to that somehow, while with the latest versions it seems to be just impossible! :-( Why could not LyX just use the system's keyboard maps and encodings? In KDE, Gnome and even plain X with whatever wm on it there are several confortable utilities to simply switch keyboard maps back and forth on the fly to and from (almost) any language with just a mouse click or some hotkey combination. Most applications works that way without any problem. If LyX could simply do the same, it would be great! Instead, unfortunately, switching the keyboard layout that way simply makes LyX input the wrong characters or none at all. :-( What is the current situation and the plans for the near future? Thanks for your attention. Ciao e grazie, Paolo. -- http://borex.lngs.infn.it/saggese You can still escape from the GATES of hell: Use Linux! ---End Message--- -- Lgb
[Paolo.Saggese@libero.it] Feedback from www.lyx.org
I forwarded your message to the lyx mailinglist, to possibly get some wider attention and discussion. --- Begin Message --- Paolo Saggese ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) entered the following feedback message on the LyX home page: Hi. Congratulations for the job done. LyX is really a great piece of software. Here (see: http://borex.lngs.infn.it ) we are using it extensively to write scientific articles, reports, etc. We have a problem, though. We have several collaborators from Russia who needs to write documents is Russian language (Cyrillic chars), usually mixed with some english text, math formulas, etc. Problem is, it looks like it is really hard to properly set up Russian (Cyrillic) keyboard map in LyX and, even worse, we have not been able to find any easy way to switch back and forth from english to russian when writing mixed language documents (almost all are such). Oddly enough, with some older versions of LyX we had found a way (although not perfect) to to that somehow, while with the latest versions it seems to be just impossible! :-( Why could not LyX just use the system's keyboard maps and encodings? In KDE, Gnome and even plain X with whatever wm on it there are several confortable utilities to simply switch keyboard maps back and forth on the fly to and from (almost) any language with just a mouse click or some hotkey combination. Most applications works that way without any problem. If LyX could simply do the same, it would be great! Instead, unfortunately, switching the keyboard layout that way simply makes LyX input the wrong characters or none at all. :-( What is the current situation and the plans for the near future? Thanks for your attention. Ciao e grazie, Paolo. -- http://borex.lngs.infn.it/saggese You can still escape from the GATES of hell: Use Linux! --- End Message --- -- Lgb
Re: Does LyX 1.2.0 support character styles?
Thomas Templin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| For my own documents i am using a file with a lot of \newcommand's
| like
| \newcommand{\company} [1] {\textbf{#1}}
yes...
| and then
| \newcommand{\redhat} {\company{RedHat}\xspace}
but this would be a combination of what I call (static)
abbreviations and character styles.
| so what I get are two things. First a Character style \company and
| an acronym \redhat,
nahh... redhat is not an acronym. PINE is an acronym (a recursive
acronym even ... Pine Is Not Elm)
| a better example should be DNA for
| Desoxyribonucleinacid :).
| This could be placed somwhere in the ~/.lyx path or the user LaTeX
| path and then nested to a character pulldown menu and a shorttag
| pulldown menu in LyX.
To have these defined as LaTeX (be it character styles, acronyms or
abbreviation), is something I would be against. I do not want LyX to
be any more (La)TeX specific than it already is. To be able to import
these kind of definitions might be good though.
| The only problem is that this tags will not be used for a html
| output with pdflatex (up to now).
We need to translate them into some LyX specific format.
| May be a standalone preamble file could be an other way to get this
| behaviour. Then the files could be packed into a tgz file
| including the original lyx file and the preamble file.
Naahh... not unless we have to.
| Another
| benefit would be to use a user customizable editor for the
| preamble. To my opinion the pramble window is at least a painfull
| thing. :) (German: Ich finde, dass Arbeiten mit dem Präambel
| Fenster ist zumindestens als schmerzhaft zu bezeichnen.)
Abbrevs, acronyms and character styles will not be settable from the
preamble... unless you also use ERT of course...
--
Lgb
Re: Does LyX 1.2.0 support character styles?
Thomas Templin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| For my own documents i am using a file with a lot of \newcommand's
| like
| \newcommand{\company} [1] {\textbf{#1}}
yes...
| and then
| \newcommand{\redhat} {\company{RedHat}\xspace}
but this would be a combination of what I call (static)
abbreviations and character styles.
| so what I get are two things. First a Character style \company and
| an acronym \redhat,
nahh... redhat is not an acronym. PINE is an acronym (a recursive
acronym even ... Pine Is Not Elm)
| a better example should be DNA for
| Desoxyribonucleinacid :).
| This could be placed somwhere in the ~/.lyx path or the user LaTeX
| path and then nested to a character pulldown menu and a shorttag
| pulldown menu in LyX.
To have these defined as LaTeX (be it character styles, acronyms or
abbreviation), is something I would be against. I do not want LyX to
be any more (La)TeX specific than it already is. To be able to import
these kind of definitions might be good though.
| The only problem is that this tags will not be used for a html
| output with pdflatex (up to now).
We need to translate them into some LyX specific format.
| May be a standalone preamble file could be an other way to get this
| behaviour. Then the files could be packed into a tgz file
| including the original lyx file and the preamble file.
Naahh... not unless we have to.
| Another
| benefit would be to use a user customizable editor for the
| preamble. To my opinion the pramble window is at least a painfull
| thing. :) (German: Ich finde, dass Arbeiten mit dem Präambel
| Fenster ist zumindestens als schmerzhaft zu bezeichnen.)
Abbrevs, acronyms and character styles will not be settable from the
preamble... unless you also use ERT of course...
--
Lgb
Re: Does LyX 1.2.0 support character styles?
Thomas Templin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| For my own documents i am using a file with a lot of \newcommand's
| like
| \newcommand{\company} [1] {\textbf{#1}}
yes...
| and then
| \newcommand{\redhat} {\company{RedHat}\xspace}
but this would be a combination of what I call (static)
"abbreviations" and character styles.
| so what I get are two things. First a Character style \company and
| an acronym \redhat,
nahh... redhat is not an acronym. PINE is an acronym (a recursive
acronym even ... Pine Is Not Elm)
| a better example should be DNA for
| Desoxyribonucleinacid :).
| This could be placed somwhere in the ~/.lyx path or the user LaTeX
| path and then nested to a character pulldown menu and a shorttag
| pulldown menu in LyX.
To have these defined as LaTeX (be it character styles, acronyms or
abbreviation), is something I would be against. I do not want LyX to
be any more (La)TeX specific than it already is. To be able to import
these kind of definitions might be good though.
| The only problem is that this tags will not be used for a html
| output with pdflatex (up to now).
We need to translate them into some LyX specific format.
| May be a standalone preamble file could be an other way to get this
| behaviour. Then the files could be packed into a tgz file
| including the original lyx file and the preamble file.
Naahh... not unless we have to.
| Another
| benefit would be to use a user customizable editor for the
| preamble. To my opinion the pramble window is at least a painfull
| thing. :) (German: Ich finde, dass Arbeiten mit dem Präambel
| Fenster ist zumindestens als schmerzhaft zu bezeichnen.)
Abbrevs, acronyms and character styles will not be settable from the
preamble... unless you also use ERT of course...
--
Lgb
Re: Keyboard is stuck
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Sun, Jul 21, 2002 at 12:08:40PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | | I'm using lyx 1.2 for a couple of weeks now and is is great. However today I | started writing a text and got a strange behaviour. Everytime I press a key | for the second time , e.g. mm nothing happens. This happens for all keys | including backspace, space and so on. | | | This is the third or so report on this, but we couldn't find out the | | problem. Try fiddling with your X key repeat settings ... | | WorkArea: Key is `l' [108] | WorkArea: Keysym is `l' [108] | Using keysym [B] | Workarea Diff: 0 | | | This diff should NOT be 0 ! | | exactly! a bug in the xserver! | This seems a hasty conclusion ... perhaps... but the bug that makes the diff be 0 is not one of LyX's | I did have a look at this earlier, and I found that on my laptop I | only see this when comming out of suspend. Which implies a bug in the | XServer. But anyway, we might be able to handle it, but it is very | hard without having separate events for key pressed and key released. | (a bug in XForms IMHO) | | FL_KEYRELEASE is in 0.89+ according to the source. But it is never called... | Since you can | reproduce this, could you look further ? This whole code makes me very | nervous - where is the guarantee of monotonicity for xke-time ? It is a timestamp... I can, as said, only reproduce it on a box that comes out of suspend... there I have no keyrepeat working in any program because of this diff thing, also it impossible to cut/copy and paste anything in any program... | This makes LyX totally unusable for people seeing this problem How many are that? -- Lgb
Re: Keyboard is stuck
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Sun, Jul 21, 2002 at 12:08:40PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | | I'm using lyx 1.2 for a couple of weeks now and is is great. However today I | started writing a text and got a strange behaviour. Everytime I press a key | for the second time , e.g. mm nothing happens. This happens for all keys | including backspace, space and so on. | | | This is the third or so report on this, but we couldn't find out the | | problem. Try fiddling with your X key repeat settings ... | | WorkArea: Key is `l' [108] | WorkArea: Keysym is `l' [108] | Using keysym [B] | Workarea Diff: 0 | | | This diff should NOT be 0 ! | | exactly! a bug in the xserver! | This seems a hasty conclusion ... perhaps... but the bug that makes the diff be 0 is not one of LyX's | I did have a look at this earlier, and I found that on my laptop I | only see this when comming out of suspend. Which implies a bug in the | XServer. But anyway, we might be able to handle it, but it is very | hard without having separate events for key pressed and key released. | (a bug in XForms IMHO) | | FL_KEYRELEASE is in 0.89+ according to the source. But it is never called... | Since you can | reproduce this, could you look further ? This whole code makes me very | nervous - where is the guarantee of monotonicity for xke-time ? It is a timestamp... I can, as said, only reproduce it on a box that comes out of suspend... there I have no keyrepeat working in any program because of this diff thing, also it impossible to cut/copy and paste anything in any program... | This makes LyX totally unusable for people seeing this problem How many are that? -- Lgb
Re: Keyboard is stuck
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Sun, Jul 21, 2002 at 12:08:40PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | | > >> I'm using lyx 1.2 for a couple of weeks now and is is great. However today I | > >> started writing a text and got a strange behaviour. Everytime I press a key | > >> for the second time , e.g. "mm" nothing happens. This happens for all keys | > >> including backspace, space and so on. | > > | > | This is the third or so report on this, but we couldn't find out the | > | problem. Try fiddling with your X key repeat settings ... | > > | > >> WorkArea: Key is `l' [108] | > >> WorkArea: Keysym is `l' [108] | > >> Using keysym [B] | > >> Workarea Diff: 0 | > > | > | This diff should NOT be 0 ! | > | > exactly! a bug in the xserver! | This seems a hasty conclusion ... perhaps... but the bug that makes the diff be 0 is not one of LyX's | > I did have a look at this earlier, and I found that on my laptop I | > only see this when comming out of suspend. Which implies a bug in the | > XServer. But anyway, we might be able to handle it, but it is very | > hard without having separate events for key pressed and key released. | > (a bug in XForms IMHO) | | FL_KEYRELEASE is in 0.89+ according to the source. But it is never called... | Since you can | reproduce this, could you look further ? This whole code makes me very | nervous - where is the guarantee of monotonicity for xke->time ? It is a timestamp... I can, as said, only reproduce it on a box that comes out of suspend... there I have no keyrepeat working in any program because of this diff thing, also it impossible to cut/copy and paste anything in any program... | This makes LyX totally unusable for people seeing this problem How many are that? -- Lgb
Re: Keyboard is stuck
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 03:27:26PM +0200, Thorsten Fischer wrote: I'm using lyx 1.2 for a couple of weeks now and is is great. However today I started writing a text and got a strange behaviour. Everytime I press a key for the second time , e.g. mm nothing happens. This happens for all keys including backspace, space and so on. | This is the third or so report on this, but we couldn't find out the | problem. Try fiddling with your X key repeat settings ... WorkArea: Key is `l' [108] WorkArea: Keysym is `l' [108] Using keysym [B] Workarea Diff: 0 | This diff should NOT be 0 ! exactly! a bug in the xserver! | What xforms version are you using ? | Lars, I don't understand why we have the break; inside the if. | Shouldn't we be setting last_time_pressed ? | Can you look at this please ? I did have a look at this earlier, and I found that on my laptop I only see this when comming out of suspend. Which implies a bug in the XServer. But anyway, we might be able to handle it, but it is very hard without having separate events for key pressed and key released. (a bug in XForms IMHO) -- Lgb
Re: Keyboard is stuck
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 03:27:26PM +0200, Thorsten Fischer wrote: I'm using lyx 1.2 for a couple of weeks now and is is great. However today I started writing a text and got a strange behaviour. Everytime I press a key for the second time , e.g. mm nothing happens. This happens for all keys including backspace, space and so on. | This is the third or so report on this, but we couldn't find out the | problem. Try fiddling with your X key repeat settings ... WorkArea: Key is `l' [108] WorkArea: Keysym is `l' [108] Using keysym [B] Workarea Diff: 0 | This diff should NOT be 0 ! exactly! a bug in the xserver! | What xforms version are you using ? | Lars, I don't understand why we have the break; inside the if. | Shouldn't we be setting last_time_pressed ? | Can you look at this please ? I did have a look at this earlier, and I found that on my laptop I only see this when comming out of suspend. Which implies a bug in the XServer. But anyway, we might be able to handle it, but it is very hard without having separate events for key pressed and key released. (a bug in XForms IMHO) -- Lgb
Re: Keyboard is stuck
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 03:27:26PM +0200, Thorsten Fischer wrote: > >> I'm using lyx 1.2 for a couple of weeks now and is is great. However today I >> started writing a text and got a strange behaviour. Everytime I press a key >> for the second time , e.g. "mm" nothing happens. This happens for all keys >> including backspace, space and so on. > | This is the third or so report on this, but we couldn't find out the | problem. Try fiddling with your X key repeat settings ... > >> WorkArea: Key is `l' [108] >> WorkArea: Keysym is `l' [108] >> Using keysym [B] >> Workarea Diff: 0 > | This diff should NOT be 0 ! exactly! a bug in the xserver! | What xforms version are you using ? > | Lars, I don't understand why we have the "break;" inside the if. | Shouldn't we be setting last_time_pressed ? > | Can you look at this please ? I did have a look at this earlier, and I found that on my laptop I only see this when comming out of suspend. Which implies a bug in the XServer. But anyway, we might be able to handle it, but it is very hard without having separate events for key pressed and key released. (a bug in XForms IMHO) -- Lgb
Re: LyX 1.2.0 won't link
Niklas Werner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | This is easy to solve, once you know it | compile with CXXFLAGS=-O -whatever-else-you-want | somehow the code is broken as to give above error when optimising more | than -O ;-( More likely the compiler than the code... -- Lgb
Re: LyX 1.2.0 won't link
Niklas Werner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | This is easy to solve, once you know it | compile with CXXFLAGS=-O -whatever-else-you-want | somehow the code is broken as to give above error when optimising more | than -O ;-( More likely the compiler than the code... -- Lgb
Re: LyX 1.2.0 won't link
Niklas Werner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | This is easy to solve, once you know it | compile with CXXFLAGS=-O -whatever-else-you-want > | somehow the code is broken as to give above error when optimising more | than -O ;-( More likely the compiler than the code... -- Lgb
Re: channeling this list to archives and newsgroups
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Based on the forwarded message below, I think it is necessary that you | inform list subscribers that the list is to be publicly archived at a | place where their addresses will be in full view for crawlers, in | particular to email address collectors that sell the addresses to | spammers and whatnot. | In contrast, at mail-archive.com, they do everything they can to | 1) hide email addresses | 2) disallow crawlers. | In general, the decent thing to do is first discuss it with existing | subscribers before you channel the lyx lists to newsgroups and | mailarchives. In particular, let them know the risks as far as | spamming and viruses are concerned. I completely disagree, the lyx lists have always been open with no guarantees to what might happen with the messages you send there. This has not changed now. btw. there is no risk to subscribing to any lyx list... but there is to run a badly setup system. -- Lgb
Re: channeling this list to archives and newsgroups
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Based on the forwarded message below, I think it is necessary that you | inform list subscribers that the list is to be publicly archived at a | place where their addresses will be in full view for crawlers, in | particular to email address collectors that sell the addresses to | spammers and whatnot. | In contrast, at mail-archive.com, they do everything they can to | 1) hide email addresses | 2) disallow crawlers. | In general, the decent thing to do is first discuss it with existing | subscribers before you channel the lyx lists to newsgroups and | mailarchives. In particular, let them know the risks as far as | spamming and viruses are concerned. I completely disagree, the lyx lists have always been open with no guarantees to what might happen with the messages you send there. This has not changed now. btw. there is no risk to subscribing to any lyx list... but there is to run a badly setup system. -- Lgb
Re: channeling this list to archives and newsgroups
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Based on the forwarded message below, I think it is necessary that you | inform list subscribers that the list is to be publicly archived at a | place where their addresses will be in full view for crawlers, in | particular to email address collectors that sell the addresses to | spammers and whatnot. > | In contrast, at mail-archive.com, they do everything they can to > | 1) hide email addresses | 2) disallow crawlers. > | In general, the decent thing to do is first discuss it with existing | subscribers before you channel the lyx lists to newsgroups and | mailarchives. In particular, let them know the risks as far as | spamming and viruses are concerned. I completely disagree, the lyx lists have always been open with no guarantees to what might happen with the messages you send there. This has not changed now. btw. there is no risk to subscribing to any lyx list... but there is to run a badly setup system. -- Lgb
Re: important question about indent
Jacek Pop³awski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Hello Lyx gurus! | I am Lyx user for many years, so you may be suprised I don't know so simple | stuff, but... | I asked this questions few months ago, but I still don't know answer, so here I | go again: | let's say I want to create simple document: | --- | This is title. | And this is first line of text. | Then second one. | --- | So - just 3 lines of text. Now I want to make first line section. I am | selecting first line, then select section instead standard. | Result looks like that: | --- | 1 This is title. | And this is first line of text. | Then second one. | --- | Why second line (And this...) is moved left? | Only way to fix that I found is to disable indent in Document Style. | How can you do this? What's the reason next line to section (or other thing) is | indented? This is usually good typography in english texts. -- Lgb
Re: important question about indent
Jacek Pop³awski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Hello Lyx gurus! | I am Lyx user for many years, so you may be suprised I don't know so simple | stuff, but... | I asked this questions few months ago, but I still don't know answer, so here I | go again: | let's say I want to create simple document: | --- | This is title. | And this is first line of text. | Then second one. | --- | So - just 3 lines of text. Now I want to make first line section. I am | selecting first line, then select section instead standard. | Result looks like that: | --- | 1 This is title. | And this is first line of text. | Then second one. | --- | Why second line (And this...) is moved left? | Only way to fix that I found is to disable indent in Document Style. | How can you do this? What's the reason next line to section (or other thing) is | indented? This is usually good typography in english texts. -- Lgb
Re: important question about indent
Jacek Pop³awski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Hello Lyx gurus!
>
| I am Lyx user for many years, so you may be suprised I don't know so simple
| stuff, but...
| I asked this questions few months ago, but I still don't know answer, so here I
| go again:
>
| let's say I want to create simple document:
>
| ---
| This is title.
| And this is first line of text.
| Then second one.
| ---
>
| So - just 3 lines of text. Now I want to make first line "section". I am
| selecting first line, then select "section" instead "standard".
>
| Result looks like that:
>
| ---
| 1 This is title.
| And this is first line of text.
| Then second one.
| ---
>
| Why second line ("And this...") is moved left?
| Only way to fix that I found is to disable indent in Document Style.
| How can you do this? What's the reason next line to section (or other thing) is
| indented?
This is usually good typography in english texts.
--
Lgb
Re: Build Failed: Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.2.0 is there!
fb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Hi All, | I am using RedHat 7.0 and so thought I needed to rebuild the new LyX 1.2.0 | Things seemed to go well ... until the end when the build process | aborted with: | % source='insetexternal.C' object='insetexternal.lo' libtool=yes \ | % depfile='.deps/insetexternal.Plo' tmpdepfile='.deps/insetexternal.TPlo' \ | % depmode=gcc /bin/sh ../../config/depcomp \ | % /bin/sh ../../libtool --mode=compile g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. | -I../../src -I./../ -I../.. -I../../boost -isystem /usr/X11R6/include | -O2 % -march=i386 -mcpu=i686 -c -o insetexternal.lo `test -f | insetexternal.C || echo './'`insetexternal.C | % g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../src -I./../ -I../.. | -I../../boost -isystem /usr/X11R6/include -O2 -march=i386 -mcpu=i686 | -c insetexternal.C | % -Wp,-MD,.deps/insetexternal.TPlo | % g++: Internal error: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus) | Do I need a new version of XForms on RH7.0, new ImageMagick, or what | else to | do the build sucessfully (without upgrading RedHat)? What version of gcc? Have you upgraded it? -- Lgb
Re: Build Failed: Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.2.0 is there!
fb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Hi Andre, | g++ --version says: 2.96 then what does rpm -qa | grep gcc say? -- Lgb
Re: Build Failed: Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.2.0 is there!
fb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Hi Lars, | Here is the answer : | % rpm -qa | grep gcc | gcc-java-2.96-54 | gcc-g77-2.96-54 | gcc-c++-2.96-54 | kgcc-1.1.2-40 | gcc-2.96-54 | gcc-objc-2.96-54 | gcc-chill-2.96-54 | I think I must upgrade my gcc yes? Yes. For RH-7.0 it seems that this is the latest version: gcc-2.96-85.i386.rpm gcc-c++-2.96-85.i386.rpm gcc-chill-2.96-85.i386.rpm gcc-g77-2.96-85.i386.rpm gcc-java-2.96-85.i386.rpm gcc-objc-2.96-85.i386.rpm Just get those packages and do rpm -Uvh gcc*.rpm on them. (or just up2date if you have that setup) -- Lgb
Re: Build Failed: Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.2.0 is there!
fb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Hi All, | I am using RedHat 7.0 and so thought I needed to rebuild the new LyX 1.2.0 | Things seemed to go well ... until the end when the build process | aborted with: | % source='insetexternal.C' object='insetexternal.lo' libtool=yes \ | % depfile='.deps/insetexternal.Plo' tmpdepfile='.deps/insetexternal.TPlo' \ | % depmode=gcc /bin/sh ../../config/depcomp \ | % /bin/sh ../../libtool --mode=compile g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. | -I../../src -I./../ -I../.. -I../../boost -isystem /usr/X11R6/include | -O2 % -march=i386 -mcpu=i686 -c -o insetexternal.lo `test -f | insetexternal.C || echo './'`insetexternal.C | % g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../src -I./../ -I../.. | -I../../boost -isystem /usr/X11R6/include -O2 -march=i386 -mcpu=i686 | -c insetexternal.C | % -Wp,-MD,.deps/insetexternal.TPlo | % g++: Internal error: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus) | Do I need a new version of XForms on RH7.0, new ImageMagick, or what | else to | do the build sucessfully (without upgrading RedHat)? What version of gcc? Have you upgraded it? -- Lgb
Re: Build Failed: Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.2.0 is there!
fb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Hi Andre, | g++ --version says: 2.96 then what does rpm -qa | grep gcc say? -- Lgb
Re: Build Failed: Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.2.0 is there!
fb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Hi Lars, | Here is the answer : | % rpm -qa | grep gcc | gcc-java-2.96-54 | gcc-g77-2.96-54 | gcc-c++-2.96-54 | kgcc-1.1.2-40 | gcc-2.96-54 | gcc-objc-2.96-54 | gcc-chill-2.96-54 | I think I must upgrade my gcc yes? Yes. For RH-7.0 it seems that this is the latest version: gcc-2.96-85.i386.rpm gcc-c++-2.96-85.i386.rpm gcc-chill-2.96-85.i386.rpm gcc-g77-2.96-85.i386.rpm gcc-java-2.96-85.i386.rpm gcc-objc-2.96-85.i386.rpm Just get those packages and do rpm -Uvh gcc*.rpm on them. (or just up2date if you have that setup) -- Lgb
Re: Build Failed: Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.2.0 is there!
fb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Hi All, > | I am using RedHat 7.0 and so thought I needed to rebuild the new LyX 1.2.0 | Things seemed to go well ... until the end when the build process | aborted with: > | % source='insetexternal.C' object='insetexternal.lo' libtool=yes \ | % depfile='.deps/insetexternal.Plo' tmpdepfile='.deps/insetexternal.TPlo' \ | % depmode=gcc /bin/sh ../../config/depcomp \ | % /bin/sh ../../libtool --mode=compile g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. | -I../../src -I./../ -I../.. -I../../boost -isystem /usr/X11R6/include | -O2 % -march=i386 -mcpu=i686 -c -o insetexternal.lo `test -f | insetexternal.C || echo './'`insetexternal.C | % g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../src -I./../ -I../.. | -I../../boost -isystem /usr/X11R6/include -O2 -march=i386 -mcpu=i686 | -c insetexternal.C | % -Wp,-MD,.deps/insetexternal.TPlo | % g++: Internal error: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus) > | Do I need a new version of XForms on RH7.0, new ImageMagick, or what | else to | do the build sucessfully (without upgrading RedHat)? What version of gcc? Have you upgraded it? -- Lgb
Re: Build Failed: Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.2.0 is there!
fb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Hi Andre, > | g++ --version says: 2.96 then what does "rpm -qa | grep gcc" say? -- Lgb
Re: Build Failed: Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.2.0 is there!
fb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Hi Lars, | Here is the answer : > | % rpm -qa | grep gcc | gcc-java-2.96-54 | gcc-g77-2.96-54 | gcc-c++-2.96-54 | kgcc-1.1.2-40 | gcc-2.96-54 | gcc-objc-2.96-54 | gcc-chill-2.96-54 > > | I think I must upgrade my gcc yes? Yes. For RH-7.0 it seems that this is the latest version: gcc-2.96-85.i386.rpm gcc-c++-2.96-85.i386.rpm gcc-chill-2.96-85.i386.rpm gcc-g77-2.96-85.i386.rpm gcc-java-2.96-85.i386.rpm gcc-objc-2.96-85.i386.rpm Just get those packages and do "rpm -Uvh gcc*.rpm" on them. (or just up2date if you have that setup) -- Lgb
Re: lyx ingnores second keystrokeHHH
Martijn Brouwer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 02:32, John Levon wrote: On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 11:10:29AM +0200, Martijn Brouwer wrote: Sometimes LyX refuses I encouter the problem that lyx refuses every second identical keystroke. So 'willing' becomes 'wiling'. The problem What are your key repeat settings ? What does lyx -dbg key show ? | I did not encounter the problem for a few days but here it comes: | first keystroke: | Workarea event: KEYBOARD | WorkArea: Key is `f' [102] | WorkArea: Keysym is `f' [102] | Using keysym [B] | Workarea Diff: 0 | KeySym is f[102] State is [16] | action first set to [-1] | meta_fake_bit is [0] | action now set to [-1] | Key [-1][f] | second identical keystroke: | Workarea event: KEYBOARD | WorkArea: Key is `f' [102] | WorkArea: Keysym is `f' [102] | Using keysym [B] | Workarea Diff: 0 | Workarea: Purging X events. | How to interpret this? Is LyX purging X events? Yes, sometimes when the timestamp difference between two X events is very small we purge events. What X server is you using and what kind of computer do you have? speed etc. -- Lgb
Re: lyx ingnores second keystrokeHHH
Martijn Brouwer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Wed, 2002-05-29 at 12:25, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Martijn Brouwer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 02:32, John Levon wrote: On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 11:10:29AM +0200, Martijn Brouwer wrote: Sometimes LyX refuses I encouter the problem that lyx refuses every second identical keystroke. So 'willing' becomes 'wiling'. The problem What are your key repeat settings ? What does lyx -dbg key show ? | I did not encounter the problem for a few days but here it comes: | first keystroke: | Workarea event: KEYBOARD | WorkArea: Key is `f' [102] | WorkArea: Keysym is `f' [102] | Using keysym [B] | Workarea Diff: 0 | KeySym is f[102] State is [16] | action first set to [-1] | meta_fake_bit is [0] | action now set to [-1] | Key [-1][f] | second identical keystroke: | Workarea event: KEYBOARD | WorkArea: Key is `f' [102] | WorkArea: Keysym is `f' [102] | Using keysym [B] | Workarea Diff: 0 | Workarea: Purging X events. | How to interpret this? Is LyX purging X events? Yes, sometimes when the timestamp difference between two X events is very small we purge events. What X server is you using and what kind of computer do you have? speed etc. | XFree 4.1.0 from SuSE 7.3 running on a 1000 Mhz Athlon with 128 Mb RAM, | so it is not due to computer speed. (If you doubt this I stop using LyX | ;-) ) The problem also occurs when there are a few seconds between both | keystrokes. When I encounter the problem it occurs for every keystroke | that is identical to the previous one. And this is right after a boot? (I have seen similar problems on a laptop running XFree 4.2.0, then it was a suspend problem.) -- Lgb
Re: lyx ingnores second keystrokeHHH
Martijn Brouwer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 02:32, John Levon wrote: On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 11:10:29AM +0200, Martijn Brouwer wrote: Sometimes LyX refuses I encouter the problem that lyx refuses every second identical keystroke. So 'willing' becomes 'wiling'. The problem What are your key repeat settings ? What does lyx -dbg key show ? | I did not encounter the problem for a few days but here it comes: | first keystroke: | Workarea event: KEYBOARD | WorkArea: Key is `f' [102] | WorkArea: Keysym is `f' [102] | Using keysym [B] | Workarea Diff: 0 | KeySym is f[102] State is [16] | action first set to [-1] | meta_fake_bit is [0] | action now set to [-1] | Key [-1][f] | second identical keystroke: | Workarea event: KEYBOARD | WorkArea: Key is `f' [102] | WorkArea: Keysym is `f' [102] | Using keysym [B] | Workarea Diff: 0 | Workarea: Purging X events. | How to interpret this? Is LyX purging X events? Yes, sometimes when the timestamp difference between two X events is very small we purge events. What X server is you using and what kind of computer do you have? speed etc. -- Lgb
Re: lyx ingnores second keystrokeHHH
Martijn Brouwer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Wed, 2002-05-29 at 12:25, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Martijn Brouwer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 02:32, John Levon wrote: On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 11:10:29AM +0200, Martijn Brouwer wrote: Sometimes LyX refuses I encouter the problem that lyx refuses every second identical keystroke. So 'willing' becomes 'wiling'. The problem What are your key repeat settings ? What does lyx -dbg key show ? | I did not encounter the problem for a few days but here it comes: | first keystroke: | Workarea event: KEYBOARD | WorkArea: Key is `f' [102] | WorkArea: Keysym is `f' [102] | Using keysym [B] | Workarea Diff: 0 | KeySym is f[102] State is [16] | action first set to [-1] | meta_fake_bit is [0] | action now set to [-1] | Key [-1][f] | second identical keystroke: | Workarea event: KEYBOARD | WorkArea: Key is `f' [102] | WorkArea: Keysym is `f' [102] | Using keysym [B] | Workarea Diff: 0 | Workarea: Purging X events. | How to interpret this? Is LyX purging X events? Yes, sometimes when the timestamp difference between two X events is very small we purge events. What X server is you using and what kind of computer do you have? speed etc. | XFree 4.1.0 from SuSE 7.3 running on a 1000 Mhz Athlon with 128 Mb RAM, | so it is not due to computer speed. (If you doubt this I stop using LyX | ;-) ) The problem also occurs when there are a few seconds between both | keystrokes. When I encounter the problem it occurs for every keystroke | that is identical to the previous one. And this is right after a boot? (I have seen similar problems on a laptop running XFree 4.2.0, then it was a suspend problem.) -- Lgb
Re: lyx ingnores second keystrokeHHH
Martijn Brouwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 02:32, John Levon wrote: >> On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 11:10:29AM +0200, Martijn Brouwer wrote: >> >> > Sometimes LyX refuses I encouter the problem that lyx refuses every >> > second identical keystroke. So 'willing' becomes 'wiling'. The problem >> >> What are your key repeat settings ? What does lyx -dbg key show ? >> | I did not encounter the problem for a few days but here it comes: > | first keystroke: | Workarea event: KEYBOARD | WorkArea: Key is `f' [102] | WorkArea: Keysym is `f' [102] | Using keysym [B] | Workarea Diff: 0 | KeySym is f[102] State is [16] | action first set to [-1] | meta_fake_bit is [0] | action now set to [-1] | Key [-1][f] > | second identical keystroke: | Workarea event: KEYBOARD | WorkArea: Key is `f' [102] | WorkArea: Keysym is `f' [102] | Using keysym [B] | Workarea Diff: 0 | Workarea: Purging X events. > | How to interpret this? Is LyX purging X events? Yes, sometimes when the timestamp difference between two X events is very small we purge events. What X server is you using and what kind of computer do you have? speed etc. -- Lgb
Re: lyx ingnores second keystrokeHHH
Martijn Brouwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Wed, 2002-05-29 at 12:25, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> Martijn Brouwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> | On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 02:32, John Levon wrote: >> >> On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 11:10:29AM +0200, Martijn Brouwer wrote: >> >> >> >> > Sometimes LyX refuses I encouter the problem that lyx refuses every >> >> > second identical keystroke. So 'willing' becomes 'wiling'. The problem >> >> >> >> What are your key repeat settings ? What does lyx -dbg key show ? >> >> >> | I did not encounter the problem for a few days but here it comes: >> > >> | first keystroke: >> | Workarea event: KEYBOARD >> | WorkArea: Key is `f' [102] >> | WorkArea: Keysym is `f' [102] >> | Using keysym [B] >> | Workarea Diff: 0 >> | KeySym is f[102] State is [16] >> | action first set to [-1] >> | meta_fake_bit is [0] >> | action now set to [-1] >> | Key [-1][f] >> > >> | second identical keystroke: >> | Workarea event: KEYBOARD >> | WorkArea: Key is `f' [102] >> | WorkArea: Keysym is `f' [102] >> | Using keysym [B] >> | Workarea Diff: 0 >> | Workarea: Purging X events. >> > >> | How to interpret this? Is LyX purging X events? >> >> Yes, sometimes when the timestamp difference between two X events is >> very small we purge events. >> >> What X server is you using and what kind of computer do you have? >> speed etc. > | XFree 4.1.0 from SuSE 7.3 running on a 1000 Mhz Athlon with 128 Mb RAM, | so it is not due to computer speed. (If you doubt this I stop using LyX | ;-) ) The problem also occurs when there are a few seconds between both | keystrokes. When I encounter the problem it occurs for every keystroke | that is identical to the previous one. And this is right after a boot? (I have seen similar problems on a laptop running XFree 4.2.0, then it was a suspend problem.) -- Lgb
Re: 1.2.0 crashes on older file, problem changing a graphics file,a cursor position problem, and some hebrew problems
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 12:52:47AM +0300, Amir Seginer wrote: I have several problems with the new 1.2.0 version. Some of these are | Which 1.2.0 version ? The one on ftp.devel.lyx.org of course. a) When I open a file created by Lyx-1.1.6fix4 (which has many figures) and start scrolling down, Lyx crashes. | How are we supposed to debug this without an example file ... or at least a backtrace... -- Lgb
Re: 1.2.0 crashes on older file, problem changing a graphics file,a cursor position problem, and some hebrew problems
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 12:52:47AM +0300, Amir Seginer wrote: I have several problems with the new 1.2.0 version. Some of these are | Which 1.2.0 version ? The one on ftp.devel.lyx.org of course. a) When I open a file created by Lyx-1.1.6fix4 (which has many figures) and start scrolling down, Lyx crashes. | How are we supposed to debug this without an example file ... or at least a backtrace... -- Lgb
Re: 1.2.0 crashes on older file, problem changing a graphics file,a cursor position problem, and some hebrew problems
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 12:52:47AM +0300, Amir Seginer wrote: > >> I have several problems with the new 1.2.0 version. Some of these are > | Which 1.2.0 version ? The one on ftp.devel.lyx.org of course. >> a) When I open a file created by Lyx-1.1.6fix4 (which has many figures) >> and start scrolling down, Lyx crashes. > | How are we supposed to debug this without an example file ... or at least a backtrace... -- Lgb
Re: compilation errors in solaris 8
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Hi! | I tried to compile and install the program on a sun ultra 5 under solaris 8. | The c compiler is sun ver. 3.0 and the c++ compiler is the one contained in the | forte developer 6 update 2. How recent is that compiler? | Configuration is ok but the compilation fails with the following messages: This is with what version of LyX? 1.1.6? -- Lgb
Re: compilation errors in solaris 8
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Hi! | I tried to compile and install the program on a sun ultra 5 under solaris 8. | The c compiler is sun ver. 3.0 and the c++ compiler is the one contained in the | forte developer 6 update 2. How recent is that compiler? | Configuration is ok but the compilation fails with the following messages: This is with what version of LyX? 1.1.6? -- Lgb
Re: compilation errors in solaris 8
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Hi! > | I tried to compile and install the program on a sun ultra 5 under solaris 8. | The c compiler is sun ver. 3.0 and the c++ compiler is the one contained in the | forte developer 6 update 2. How recent is that compiler? | Configuration is ok but the compilation fails with the following messages: This is with what version of LyX? 1.1.6? -- Lgb
Re: 1.2.0pre5 install problems
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Mon, 13 May 2002, Herbert Voss wrote: what happens after edit-reconfigure and restart of LyX? | There's no reconfigure on the edit menu! Only cut, copy, paste, and | emphasize. | When the program opens there is only a file menu. When I open a new or old | doc, then only edit and document menus appear. | It really seems crippled. Hoping this provides a further clue. And you did run a make install? -- Lgb
Re: [test]
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Wednesday 08 May 2002 11:07 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes: | Does this work both ways? Yes it does. (cool) Thanks to whoever set this up. Ok, there is a newserver up and running with a gateway to the lyx mailing lists now. gmane.editors.lyx.devel(lyx-devel) gmame.editors.lyx.general (lyx-users) gmane.editors.lyx.cvs (lyx-cvs) gmame.editors.lyx.announce (lyx-announce) gmane.editors.lyx.documentation (lyx-docs) the newsserver is at news.gmane.org (port 119, the standard nntp port) It requires a authorization for the first post in each group. | Shouldn't this go on the web site? Sure, just add it there. -- Lgb
Re: 1.2.0pre5 install problems
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Mon, 13 May 2002, Herbert Voss wrote: what happens after edit-reconfigure and restart of LyX? | There's no reconfigure on the edit menu! Only cut, copy, paste, and | emphasize. | When the program opens there is only a file menu. When I open a new or old | doc, then only edit and document menus appear. | It really seems crippled. Hoping this provides a further clue. And you did run a make install? -- Lgb
Re: [test]
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Wednesday 08 May 2002 11:07 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes: | Does this work both ways? Yes it does. (cool) Thanks to whoever set this up. Ok, there is a newserver up and running with a gateway to the lyx mailing lists now. gmane.editors.lyx.devel(lyx-devel) gmame.editors.lyx.general (lyx-users) gmane.editors.lyx.cvs (lyx-cvs) gmame.editors.lyx.announce (lyx-announce) gmane.editors.lyx.documentation (lyx-docs) the newsserver is at news.gmane.org (port 119, the standard nntp port) It requires a authorization for the first post in each group. | Shouldn't this go on the web site? Sure, just add it there. -- Lgb
Re: 1.2.0pre5 install problems
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Mon, 13 May 2002, Herbert Voss wrote: > >> what happens after edit->reconfigure and restart of LyX? > | There's no reconfigure on the edit menu! Only cut, copy, paste, and | emphasize. > | When the program opens there is only a file menu. When I open a new or old | doc, then only edit and document menus appear. > | It really seems crippled. Hoping this provides a further clue. And you did run a "make install"? -- Lgb
Re: [test]
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Wednesday 08 May 2002 11:07 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes: >> | Does this work both ways? >> >> Yes it does. (cool) >> >> Thanks to whoever set this up. >> >> Ok, there is a newserver up and running with a gateway to the lyx >> mailing lists now. >> >> gmane.editors.lyx.devel(lyx-devel) >> gmame.editors.lyx.general (lyx-users) >> gmane.editors.lyx.cvs (lyx-cvs) >> gmame.editors.lyx.announce (lyx-announce) >> gmane.editors.lyx.documentation (lyx-docs) >> >> >> the newsserver is at >> >> news.gmane.org (port 119, the standard nntp port) >> >> It requires a authorization for the first post in each group. > | Shouldn't this go on the web site? Sure, just add it there. -- Lgb
Re: Rotating images
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Friday 03 May 2002 12:45 pm, Wayan wrote: Dear LyX-users, could you please explain me how to omit the blank area from rotating images? I have imported an eps/ps figure created by xmgrace. Without rotate command, the image will be landscape... If the rotate command activated, lyx1.2 add a blank area. Let's see the following scheme: | To achieve something similar here I opened the paragraph dialog with the | cursor on the caption and added -0.3in to the Vertical spaces Above input. I wonder what the difference in in the latex output. i.e. what creates the space. -- Lgb
Fifth prerelease of LyX 1.2.0
Ok, this will hopefully be the last (or next to last) prerelease before 1.2.0 proper is released. Since pre4 several small problems have been fixed, and a few bigger ones, but nothing major. There are still some small glitches, but nothing really bad. (knock wood) This prelease can be found at: ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/lyx-1.2.0pre5.tar.gz But as always, this is a prelease and some caution is warranted. Backup your docs before trying this out. Please also read the README and UPGRADING. -- Lgb
Re: Rotating images
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Friday 03 May 2002 12:45 pm, Wayan wrote: Dear LyX-users, could you please explain me how to omit the blank area from rotating images? I have imported an eps/ps figure created by xmgrace. Without rotate command, the image will be landscape... If the rotate command activated, lyx1.2 add a blank area. Let's see the following scheme: | To achieve something similar here I opened the paragraph dialog with the | cursor on the caption and added -0.3in to the Vertical spaces Above input. I wonder what the difference in in the latex output. i.e. what creates the space. -- Lgb
Fifth prerelease of LyX 1.2.0
Ok, this will hopefully be the last (or next to last) prerelease before 1.2.0 proper is released. Since pre4 several small problems have been fixed, and a few bigger ones, but nothing major. There are still some small glitches, but nothing really bad. (knock wood) This prelease can be found at: ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/lyx-1.2.0pre5.tar.gz But as always, this is a prelease and some caution is warranted. Backup your docs before trying this out. Please also read the README and UPGRADING. -- Lgb
Re: Rotating images
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Friday 03 May 2002 12:45 pm, Wayan wrote: >> Dear LyX-users, >> >> could you please explain me how to omit the blank area from rotating >> images? I have imported an eps/ps figure created by xmgrace. Without >> rotate command, the image will be landscape... If the rotate command >> activated, lyx1.2 add a blank area. Let's see the following scheme: > | To achieve something similar here I opened the paragraph dialog with the | cursor on the caption and added "-0.3in" to the Vertical spaces Above input. I wonder what the difference in in the latex output. i.e. what creates the space. -- Lgb
Fifth prerelease of LyX 1.2.0
Ok, this will hopefully be the last (or next to last) prerelease before 1.2.0 proper is released. Since pre4 several small problems have been fixed, and a few bigger ones, but nothing major. There are still some small glitches, but nothing really bad. (knock wood) This prelease can be found at: ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/lyx-1.2.0pre5.tar.gz But as always, this is a prelease and some caution is warranted. Backup your docs before trying this out. Please also read the README and UPGRADING. -- Lgb
[Jens Thos Jens.Thos@web.de] RE: Non-English math? texts
I forwarded your message to the LyX users list. I think you can get some help there. ---BeginMessage--- Hi! I modified amsmaths.inc, amsmath-plain.inc and amsmaths-seq.inc. Now LyX offers me Satz instead of Theorem etc., but if I compile the DVI-file, there's the Theorem again !?! Can you help? Shall I mail you the modified files? Jens -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Lars Gullik Bjonnes Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 11:32 AM To: Jens Thos Subject: Re: Non-English math? texts Jens Thos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Can't I directly modify the ams*.* files? If so, which of them? You can, but that will be a solution for you only. all of them I guess... ---End Message--- -- Lgb
[Jens Thos Jens.Thos@web.de] RE: Non-English math? texts
I forwarded your message to the LyX users list. I think you can get some help there. ---BeginMessage--- Hi! I modified amsmaths.inc, amsmath-plain.inc and amsmaths-seq.inc. Now LyX offers me Satz instead of Theorem etc., but if I compile the DVI-file, there's the Theorem again !?! Can you help? Shall I mail you the modified files? Jens -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Lars Gullik Bjonnes Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 11:32 AM To: Jens Thos Subject: Re: Non-English math? texts Jens Thos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Can't I directly modify the ams*.* files? If so, which of them? You can, but that will be a solution for you only. all of them I guess... ---End Message--- -- Lgb
["Jens Thos" <Jens.Thos@web.de>] RE: Non-English math? texts
I forwarded your message to the LyX users list. I think you can get some help there. --- Begin Message --- Hi! I modified amsmaths.inc, amsmath-plain.inc and amsmaths-seq.inc. Now LyX offers me "Satz" instead of "Theorem" etc., but if I compile the DVI-file, there's the "Theorem" again !?! Can you help? Shall I mail you the modified files? Jens -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Lars Gullik Bjonnes Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 11:32 AM To: Jens Thos Subject: Re: Non-English math? texts "Jens Thos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Can't I directly modify the ams*.* files? If so, which of them? You can, but that will be a solution for you only. all of them I guess... --- End Message --- -- Lgb
Re: lyx
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Or Lars. I did one several years ago... | Well dg eeet up ! I just got Licks smacked in my forehead... so I do not thing so. You english speaking cretins are not able to hear the difference between LyX and Licks. -- Lgb
Re: lyx
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 06:59:13AM -0500, bcr wrote: hello. i've been using lyx for a while now, love it, and am just about to start my thesis. I cant wait. But i tried to convince a friend to use lyx, and i felt pretty stupid. because I cont know how to pronounce it. how do you pronounce lyx? | Consensus is (for english speaker) : | licks try to meake the 'e' sound a bit more like 'y' | to rhyme with Weetabix | We really need Matthias do us an .au : | Hi, my name is Matthias Ettrich, and I pronounce LyX LyX | Or Lars. I did one several years ago... -- Lgb
Re: lyx
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Or Lars. I did one several years ago... | Well dg eeet up ! I just got Licks smacked in my forehead... so I do not thing so. You english speaking cretins are not able to hear the difference between LyX and Licks. -- Lgb
Re: lyx
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 06:59:13AM -0500, bcr wrote: hello. i've been using lyx for a while now, love it, and am just about to start my thesis. I cant wait. But i tried to convince a friend to use lyx, and i felt pretty stupid. because I cont know how to pronounce it. how do you pronounce lyx? | Consensus is (for english speaker) : | licks try to meake the 'e' sound a bit more like 'y' | to rhyme with Weetabix | We really need Matthias do us an .au : | Hi, my name is Matthias Ettrich, and I pronounce LyX LyX | Or Lars. I did one several years ago... -- Lgb
