RE: [maemo-developers] Re: N800 Developer Programme Application

2007-01-14 Thread Russ Nelson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 > Announcing it "so late" (was it the same/next day after the product
 > launch?) should not be a problem. Active community members and
 > developers do not need to be "created" overnight, they existed before
 > the developer program was launched. If I understand the program schedule
 > correctly the lucky ones shall get notified rather soon.

Why wait?  It only creates fear, uncertainty, and doubt.  Leave that
to your competitors!

Announce the list today, so that we can buy our N800's immediately,
discount or not.

-- 
--my blog is athttp://blog.russnelson.com   | You can do any damn thing
Crynwr sells support for free software  | PGPok | you want, as long as you
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315-323-1241   | don't expect somebody else
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213  | Sheepdog  | to pick up the pieces.
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


RE: [maemo-developers] Re: N800 Developer Programme Application

2007-01-12 Thread Dave Cridland

On Fri Jan 12 08:37:08 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hi,

You are right about this. One fact is, that release schedule has 
been a

trade secret - hence no "end user roadmap with release dates".


Yes, but I think you (or rather Nokia) is falling into the trap of 
closely coupling software and hardware. Some of the N800's, from what 
I'm reading via IRC, shipped with one version of software, others 
shipped with a later version. The 770 was the same over a longer 
period.


I think if Nokia made more releases [and not all of them need be 
stable], the connection between software and hardware would be 
reduced, and the hardware releases would require less synchronization 
with software work. Competitors would be able to gain less 
information from the software changes, because they'd not be able to 
detirmine if they related to a new device or not. You'd also make the 
gadget folk and the developer community much happier.


Of course there are exceptions - webcams, different CPUs, etc all 
have software impact - but fundamentally these are (or ought to be) 
low-level features and specific apps. And equally, there's the issue 
of your third party closed app licenses, such as Opera, but that's 
realtively simple to tie into hardware releases, and who knows, maybe 
the orphaning of 770's wrt new Opera might cause a surge of 
development on open source alternatives.



Anyone could have made sure his application will work the day
Bora/IT-2007 goes public.


True, but for the most part Bora could have gone public completely 
independently of the N800 release. By tying the hardware and software 
together so closely, Nokia is forced to keep software details rather 
more secret.


Another thing is the developer program. I'm not too happy with it 
myself
and I agree we should have at least posted the deadline after which 
the
notifications are sent. I still hope we will at least announce that 
the

selection is over.


One of the major problems is that details are slipping out 
unofficially, and the entire community seems to be carefully 
interpreting every word anyone connected with Nokia says, in the hope 
of gleaning some information from it. In this case, your last 
sentence does not use the subjunctive, and furthermore uses the word 
"that", which has been seen by some to imply that the selection is 
over.


Dave.
--
Dave Cridland - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 - acap://acap.dave.cridland.net/byowner/user/dwd/bookmarks/
 - http://dave.cridland.net/
Infotrope Polymer - ACAP, IMAP, ESMTP, and Lemonade
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: [maemo-developers] Re: N800 Developer Programme Application

2007-01-12 Thread Frantisek Dufka

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Another thing is the developer program. I'm not too happy with it myself
and I agree we should have at least posted the deadline after which the
notifications are sent. I still hope we will at least announce that the
selection is over.


With the way it is done it may be that it will take a while and there 
may be be more rounds. Some contacted people may already have the 
device, some may not be interested (this is one problem with the 'we 
call you' method). So it would be good to annouce both start and end. It 
would let people know when they should check their spam folders to fish 
the mail out from other, less interesting discounted offers :-) Also 
last time developers from countries where N770 was not sold at all got 
their devices month later and differently (I hope they won't be 
forgotten now too) so the whole process may indeed take a while. The 
best would be some page with counter like 'x devices still available' or 
occasional mail to mailing list telling us how it goes. Thanks.


Frantisek
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


RE: [maemo-developers] Re: N800 Developer Programme Application

2007-01-12 Thread Jakub.Pavelek
Hi,

You are right about this. One fact is, that release schedule has been a
trade secret - hence no "end user roadmap with release dates". What we
could do with this limitation was e.g. Herring. Everyone in the open
have had Herring available for month(s). It was (clearly?) communicated
that this is the stabilization branch towards the next ITOS release.
Anyone could have made sure his application will work the day
Bora/IT-2007 goes public.

Its true Herring did not have it all. Applications and multimedia were
out of scope, user friendliness was not good, yet connectivity and
desktop framework (Hildon, D-Bus, etc.) has been ready and available. I
would hope we will do the same next time, just better ;)

Another thing is the developer program. I'm not too happy with it myself
and I agree we should have at least posted the deadline after which the
notifications are sent. I still hope we will at least announce that the
selection is over.

Br,

--jakub



>From: ext Igor Tkach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>I think it is kinda late not because of the need to create 
>community (great community already exists). By the time the 
>device becomes availble to all you probably want to have most 
>important existing apps ported and tested. My impression is 
>that this is not the case right now. Some work can be done 
>with scratchbox environment, but in my experience it is not 
>quite the same as running apps on the device itself.
>
>Program schedule you mention - is it published somewhere and I 
>just missed it or is it kept secret? (I apologize for being 
>annoying, I'm just eager to get my hands on n800, so I would 
>like to know if I should wait for the discount:)
>
>On 1/11/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >What's the point to announce such a program so late and with
>> so little details? To irritate people? I would like to have my
>> >discount right now, if I'm eligible, so that I could buy the device 
>> >right away, or to know that I'm not eligible so that I could plan 
>> >$399 into my budget for gadgets. At the very least it would be nice 
>> >to know the time frame for the program.
>> >
>> Hi,
>>
>> Announcing it "so late" (was it the same/next day after the product
>> launch?) should not be a problem. Active community members and 
>> developers do not need to be "created" overnight, they 
>existed before 
>> the developer program was launched. If I understand the program 
>> schedule correctly the lucky ones shall get notified rather soon.
>>
>> Br,
>>
>> --jakub
>>
>
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: [maemo-developers] Re: N800 Developer Programme Application

2007-01-11 Thread Igor Tkach

I think it is kinda late not because of the need to create community
(great community already exists). By the time the device becomes
availble to all you probably want to have most important existing apps
ported and tested. My impression is that this is not the case right
now. Some work can be done with scratchbox environment, but in my
experience it is not quite the same as running apps on the device
itself.

Program schedule you mention - is it published somewhere and I just
missed it or is it kept secret? (I apologize for being annoying, I'm
just eager to get my hands on n800, so I would like to know if I
should wait for the discount:)

On 1/11/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>What's the point to announce such a program so late and with
so little details? To irritate people? I would like to have my
>discount right now, if I'm eligible, so that I could buy the
>device right away, or to know that I'm not eligible so that I
>could plan $399 into my budget for gadgets. At the very least
>it would be nice to know the time frame for the program.
>
Hi,

Announcing it "so late" (was it the same/next day after the product
launch?) should not be a problem. Active community members and
developers do not need to be "created" overnight, they existed before
the developer program was launched. If I understand the program schedule
correctly the lucky ones shall get notified rather soon.

Br,

--jakub


___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: [maemo-developers] Re: N800 Developer Programme Application

2007-01-11 Thread Kai Schindelka

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the point to announce such a program so late and with 
so little details? To irritate people? I would like to have my 
discount right now, if I'm eligible, so that I could buy the 
device right away, or to know that I'm not eligible so that I 
could plan $399 into my budget for gadgets. At the very least 
it would be nice to know the time frame for the program.


Announcing it "so late" (was it the same/next day after the product
launch?) should not be a problem. Active community members and
developers do not need to be "created" overnight, they existed before
the developer program was launched. If I understand the program schedule
correctly the lucky ones shall get notified rather soon.


Many thanks for the clarification. Well, if I should be one of the lucky 
I would be happy indeed. The 770 is already great, and I would really 
like to get to know it's successor and work with it. At least the news 
managed to clearly rise the priorities for my 770 activities above the 
others - which will never hurt anyway.


Regard, Kai
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


RE: [maemo-developers] Re: N800 Developer Programme Application

2007-01-10 Thread Jakub.Pavelek
>What's the point to announce such a program so late and with 
>so little details? To irritate people? I would like to have my 
>discount right now, if I'm eligible, so that I could buy the 
>device right away, or to know that I'm not eligible so that I 
>could plan $399 into my budget for gadgets. At the very least 
>it would be nice to know the time frame for the program.
>
Hi,

Announcing it "so late" (was it the same/next day after the product
launch?) should not be a problem. Active community members and
developers do not need to be "created" overnight, they existed before
the developer program was launched. If I understand the program schedule
correctly the lucky ones shall get notified rather soon.

Br,

--jakub
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: [maemo-developers] Re: N800 Developer Programme Application

2007-01-10 Thread Igor Tkach

What's the point to announce such a program so late and with so little
details? To irritate people? I would like to have my discount right
now, if I'm eligible, so that I could buy the device right away, or to
know that I'm not eligible so that I could plan $399 into my budget
for gadgets. At the very least it would be nice to know the time frame
for the program.


On 1/10/07, Kai Schindelka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Correct. But since the selection criteria are quite unclear it looks
> like everybody fears that he might not be detected. Since I'm interested
> in participating, too, I would be happy to at least have some private
> Nokia email adress where I can write a short summery what I do and what
> I plan to do on Nokia 770. I'm currently building up a repoitory of my
> software but there are still some smaller problems to solve to make
> everything smooth and with such unclear election criteria I now either
> must publish unfinished or buggy software in hury at at leats have a
> chance or have to fear to just stay "unseen".

I second that. But if I understood Carlos Guerreiro on this list
correctly, primarily developers that are already active in FOSS projects
contributing to Maemo stand a chance. With only minor contribution
possibilities (compared to being a member of a full-fledged project) and
a focus on administrative tools and usability I'm hesitating to push
things out the door now I for myself still consider unstable anyhow.
Let alone talk about ideas.
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: [maemo-developers] Re: N800 Developer Programme Application

2007-01-10 Thread Kai Schindelka

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Correct. But since the selection criteria are quite unclear it looks 
like everybody fears that he might not be detected. Since I'm interested 
in participating, too, I would be happy to at least have some private 
Nokia email adress where I can write a short summery what I do and what 
I plan to do on Nokia 770. I'm currently building up a repoitory of my 
software but there are still some smaller problems to solve to make 
everything smooth and with such unclear election criteria I now either 
must publish unfinished or buggy software in hury at at leats have a 
chance or have to fear to just stay "unseen".


I second that. But if I understood Carlos Guerreiro on this list
correctly, primarily developers that are already active in FOSS projects
contributing to Maemo stand a chance. With only minor contribution
possibilities (compared to being a member of a full-fledged project) and
a focus on administrative tools and usability I'm hesitating to push
things out the door now I for myself still consider unstable anyhow.
Let alone talk about ideas.
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers