Re: MD: Long Play ATRAC

2000-03-10 Thread Ralph Smeets


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 I called video direct. According to the Sony Press release, the 5+
 hour recording mode is real and can only be used with compatible
 players (e.g. MDS-JB940).
 
 So it's confirmed, Sony just expanded the format. To me this is Sony's
 answer (in Minidisc form) to solid state players. It has approximately
 the same bit rate (MDS-JB940: 73kbps, MP3 players (in one hour mode):
 64kbps), but with a 5 hour capacity.
 
 Fantastic! (or Dammit!, depending upon how you like having all your
 equipment made obsolete in a single stroke).
 
 I guess we know what the hot new feature for the Sep 2000 portables
 will be!
 
 And, an interesting ATRAC3 vs. MP3 quality contest is about to begin.
 
 Rick

Hmmm,

memory stick technology used on a MD

Cheers,
Ralph - Sharp? Hello? What are you going to do?
-- 
===
Ralph SmeetsFunctional Verification Centre Of Competence -  CMG
Voice:  (+33) (0)4 76 58 44 46   STMicroelectronics
Fax:(+33) (0)4 76 58 40 11   5, chem de la Dhuy
Mobile: (+33) (0)6 82 66 62 70 38240 MEYLAN
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  FRANCE
===
  "For many years, mankind lived just like the animals. And then 
   something happened that unleashed the powers of our imagination: 
   We learned to talk."
-- Stephen Hawking, later used by Pink Floyd --
===
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Long-Play Mode on the JB940 JB530

2000-03-10 Thread Ralph Smeets



  ===
  = NB: Over 50% of this message is QUOTED, please  =
  = be more selective when quoting text =
  ===

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 "Daryl O." wrote:
 
  I've just accessed the link from the community page to Video Direct
  Distributors' page regarding the new Sony MDS-JB940, and one feature
  particularly piqued my interest:  a long-play mode that "[c]aptures up to 5
  hours, 20 minutes of stereo music on a single 80-minute MiniDisc."  Does
  anyone know anything about this?  Discs recorded in this special long-play
  mode couldn't possibly be compatible with older decks, right?
 
 I have a Sony MDS-JE530 deck, and this unit has Pitch Control. This
 means you can play back slightly faster or a lot slower, 1/16 of the
 original speed is no problem at all. (I mean for the deck, not for the
 listener :-)
 I have a computer with a digital connection to my deck (duplex), so if I
 have a wave file (16 bits 44100 Hz, stereo), I can convert it to 11025
 Hz, and play it back as if it is a normal 44100 Hz wave file.
 Effectively playing it back at 4x normal speed. When I record this on my
 deck, I can play the recording back at the right speed with Pitch -24
 (1/4 of normal speed). The quality is still surprisingly good. No noise!
 
 I see (hear!) three problems with this:
 - 1. With the conversion from 44.1 to 11.025 kHz you lose all the sounds
 above +/- 5500 Hz,
 - 2. ATRAC reduces the high sounds also. I mean if you have a 5 kHz
 tone, than ATRAC will treat it as a 20 kHz tone.
 - 3. Recording at 1/4 of the normal speed, also means only 1/4 of the
 information that is normally recorded can be stored.
 
 My guess is that the JB940 only has problem 1 and 3 in long-play mode.
 If the recording in long-play mode is achieved by converting the
 compressed (ATRAC) data, than problem 2 doesn't exist.
 
 So, I think that long-play tracks can be played back in all decks, but
 only decks with pitch control  are able to play it back at the right
 speed. :-)
 
 I also think recording in long-play mode would be great for portable
 units. Imaging recording 10 hours of lectures in mono on a single
 74min59sec MD. If Sony would sell such a unit (without end search button
 of course), it would make MD famous even in the USA ;-)
 
 Niels

Hoi Niels,

According to Rick, it uses ATRAC3. So ALL of the problems you describe don't
apply. 

Cheers,
Ralph - One of the other Dutchman on the list!

-- 
===
Ralph SmeetsFunctional Verification Centre Of Competence -  CMG
Voice:  (+33) (0)4 76 58 44 46   STMicroelectronics
Fax:(+33) (0)4 76 58 40 11   5, chem de la Dhuy
Mobile: (+33) (0)6 82 66 62 70 38240 MEYLAN
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  FRANCE
===
  "For many years, mankind lived just like the animals. And then 
   something happened that unleashed the powers of our imagination: 
   We learned to talk."
-- Stephen Hawking, later used by Pink Floyd --
===
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Portable MD-recorder with Digital Output????

2000-03-10 Thread PrinceGaz


Hi,

The MZ-1 had a digital output but that is ancient history now (was it
the first MD device ever produced?)

A few days ago I thought up a possible reason modern MD kit does
not support an optical digi-out.  The latest units operate on 1.5V yeah?
An LED does, or at least did need a forward voltage of about 2V to
pass any current so they would need a voltage-multiplier circuit, a
not particulary efficient thing to up the voltage (conversion to AC, step
up via diodes and capacitors, rectification and smoothing to DC).

Given all the extra circuitry to generate lets say 3V, the need to have a
way to turn it on and off (else it will suck the life from your battery), and
the fact they want you to buy a home-deck as well as a portie to double
their sales, they aren't gonna stick an optical-out on modern ultra-slim
low voltage units.  My guess is the MZ-1 probably ran on about 6 volts
and drew a horrendous amount of current :-)  I know a few of you guys
have one still, does it double as a hotplate while recording g

Cheers,
PrinceGaz -- "if it harms none, do what you will"
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Website: http://website.lineone.net/~princegaz/
ICQ: 36892193

Earn a minimum of $20 per hour by watching ads on the net!
Visit http://www.bepaid.com/users.rhtml?REFID=10164669

From: "Gilbert Hangartner" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Hi!
 Does anyone know of a portable Minidisk recorder featuring a digital
 output??? This once existed, but there must still be currently sold
 models having this, no? I looked up at lot of manufacturers, but
 couldn't find.
 Greetings Gilbert


-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Long-Play Mode on the JB940

2000-03-10 Thread PrinceGaz


Hi guys,

Well it seems Sony *may* actually listen to some comments on this
list (actually I'd bet a pound for a penny they do-- but always just lurk),
but for once have actually implemented a common request.

Whether the "long-play" mode(s), be it 2x or 4x existing recording
length, plus mono at double stereo length I assume, it could have
been done in two ways-

1. LP mode simply acts as an automatic 200% or 400% pitch adj,
which means some older decks can cope but quality will suffer, it
would be fine for voice recording where readability is more important
than fidelity, though.

2. The ATRAC algorithm is used at a lower bit-rate allocation, about
140kbps for 2x length or 70kbps for 4x length.  This will give better
overall sound but be totally incompatible with all existing MD units
unless ATRAC was originally developed with variable bitrates in
mind and decoders can cope with it, rather like how an MZ-1 can
happily play back R-Type 4.5 ATRAC.  Even if incompatible now,
I would prefer this implementation (you can bet other units would
all start supporting playback at various bitrates, even if they cannot
support recording at those rates).  Sharp etc would be forced to
follow as Sony are market leaders in MD.

Either way, I'd love to record about 10 hours of mono audiobook
material on one disk (4x length, mono) even 5 hours would be nice,
and as someone said it would be ideal for lectures, hungover uni
students would love it :-)

Cheers,
PrinceGaz -- "if it harms none, do what you will"
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Website: http://website.lineone.net/~princegaz/
ICQ: 36892193

Earn a minimum of $20 per hour by watching ads on the net!
Visit http://www.bepaid.com/users.rhtml?REFID=10164669


-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: MD: Portable MD-recorder with Digital Output????

2000-03-10 Thread Simon Barnes


PrinceGaz wrote:

 A few days ago I thought up a possible reason modern MD kit does
 not support an optical digi-out.  The latest units 
 operate on 1.5V yeah?
 An LED does, or at least did need a forward voltage of about 2V to
 pass any current so they would need a voltage-multiplier 
 circuit, a
 not particulary efficient thing to up the voltage 

Sorry, Gaz, I don't buy this. As far as I have seen, most portables still
use at least 3V batteries, and I expect they use ~3V logic parts, but I
wouldn't be suprised if they used a boost regulator to smooth out the
voltage droop as the battery discharges. When they have an external single
cell pack, this will be voltage multiplied. I think many portables DO have
LEDs, certainly, my MZR90 has one to indicate recording.

Incidentally, when I was looking inside an MZR30 the other day, I noticed
the mic/optical input jack socket was clearly labelled "Sharp".

simon
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Sony's new Internet Audio Recording Interface

2000-03-10 Thread Ralph Smeets


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 100MHz SDRAM is cheap these days-- I got 128Mb for ukp80 inc vat and shipping
 more than enough for Windoze98 and some theoretical ATRAC encoder I would
 think.  I would say I'm a bit puzzled as to why my machine is nearly 20% slower
 when I disable the motherboard's 1Mb cache as it is also only running at 100MHz.
 Is the cache SRAM and have fewer (or no) wait states?  Reply privately if you wish.

SRAM has no wait states. SDRAM has. SDRAM is only fast when you load/save
executive adresses. SRAM is always fast.

Cheers,
Ralph
-- 
===
Ralph SmeetsFunctional Verification Centre Of Competence -  CMG
Voice:  (+33) (0)4 76 58 44 46   STMicroelectronics
Fax:(+33) (0)4 76 58 40 11   5, chem de la Dhuy
Mobile: (+33) (0)6 82 66 62 70 38240 MEYLAN
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  FRANCE
===
  "For many years, mankind lived just like the animals. And then 
   something happened that unleashed the powers of our imagination: 
   We learned to talk."
-- Stephen Hawking, later used by Pink Floyd --
===
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



MD: Great deals on MD media!

2000-03-10 Thread Matt Rooke


 === The original message was multipart MIME===
 === All non-text parts (attachments) have been removed ===

Visit www.transco.co.uk http://www.transco.co.uk/  for great deals on MD
media.

MD80 as low as 0.85 pence each + VAT ( 1.00 inc VAT)

MD74 as low as 0.75 pence each + VAT ( 0.88 inc VAT)





 === MIME part removed : text/html; ===

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Portable MD-recorder with Digital Output????

2000-03-10 Thread Magic


From: Simon Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2000 9:51 AM
Subject: RE: MD: Portable MD-recorder with Digital Output


 Sorry, Gaz, I don't buy this. As far as I have seen, most portables still
 use at least 3V batteries, and I expect they use ~3V logic parts, but I
 wouldn't be suprised if they used a boost regulator to smooth out the
 voltage droop as the battery discharges. When they have an external single
 cell pack, this will be voltage multiplied. I think many portables DO have
 LEDs, certainly, my MZR90 has one to indicate recording.

As I understand it, portables don't have optical output because it would
encourage piracy. Suddenly you have the ability to make a near perfect copy
of a disc. It would also be slightly pointless as under normal circumstances
you would have probably made a digital recording to the MD, and to then make
a recording from that disc would mean SCMS would prevent you anyway! It
would add a lot onto the price of the unit too I would expect - it would
probably make a portable with optical output cost more than a portable
without it and a cheap Hi-Fi MD unit which would actually be a better
option.

 Incidentally, when I was looking inside an MZR30 the other day, I noticed
 the mic/optical input jack socket was clearly labelled "Sharp".

I think Sharp invented the dual-purpose socket didn't they?

Magic
--
"Creativity is more a birthright than an acquisition, and the power of sound
is wisdom and understanding applied to the power of vibration."

Location : Portsmouth, England, UK
Homepage : http://www.mattnet.freeserve.co.uk
EMail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Sony's new Internet Audio Recording Interface

2000-03-10 Thread Magic


From: PrinceGaz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2000 3:26 PM
Subject: Re: MD: Sony's new Internet Audio Recording Interface


 Who cares, Nick only ever issues a very mild warning after eg, prattling
on about
 gun-control for days so this topic has to be okay.
 BTW I hope M Schumacher does well in the first F1 race of the season in
Sydney
 this weekend.

I think there is only going to be one way to get this solved and that is for
somebody to write an ATRAC encoder on the PC based upon the ASIC system.
Unfortunately I lack the expertise to write something that complex - is
anyone else on this list up to the challenge?

I think it can be done, there's no real reason why it wouldn't work, the
only issue is whether it would work fast enough for real-time orr faster
performance. I've seen many processes categorically stated that a PC could
not do in real-time including MPEG decoding, controlling MIDI instruments,
networking (yes, at one point this was 'impossible'), making a CD, printing
a document, voice dictation, the list is virtually endless. After a lot of
research and development all of these are now virtually second nature to
every PC user! I see no reason why ATRAC Encoding could not be the same.
There will be sceptics at first and it would probably take a few attempts to
get it right, but I'm sure it can be done. I only wish I had the knowledge
to write it myself (but then Sony would probably be after me for copying
their system without permission).

Magic
--
"Creativity is more a birthright than an acquisition, and the power of sound
is wisdom and understanding applied to the power of vibration."

Location : Portsmouth, England, UK
Homepage : http://www.mattnet.freeserve.co.uk
EMail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Sony's new Internet Audio Recording Interface

2000-03-10 Thread Magic


- Original Message -
From: Stainless Steel Rat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MD-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2000 3:46 AM
Subject: Re: MD: Sony's new Internet Audio Recording Interface

 But your Mazda Miata (your "consumer sports car") needs a lot of
 supertuning to even think about competing with my "stock" Shelby Cobra
 GT-350.  The analogy is not all that good, though.

I never was very good with analogies.

The point is that the ATRAC chip in the MD only has one task to perform and
it is very good at it. The Pentium chip in the PC has a lot of tasks to
*oversee* - it is not actually performing all of them, it has other systems
to do that. The graphics card is handling the display, the sound card is
handling processing sound (even 3D positioning in some cases) and there are
also extra processor/controller chips handling other aspects of system
operation. This means the main CPU isn't actually doing as much as you would
think until you need to perform a lot more calculations - it spends a lot of
time "idle". The effect of this is that it has a lot more "time" to spare on
running intense calculations that you would expect it to. I still maintain
that it is not impossible for a real-time or faster ATRAC encoder to be
produced, I just wonder what the system specification would be in order for
it to run fast enough. My reckoning is that the spec. would be a lot lower
than some would have us believe.

Magic
--
"Creativity is more a birthright than an acquisition, and the power of sound
is wisdom and understanding applied to the power of vibration."

Location : Portsmouth, England, UK
Homepage : http://www.mattnet.freeserve.co.uk
EMail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Sony's new Internet Audio Recording Interface

2000-03-10 Thread Ralph Smeets


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 The point is that the ATRAC chip in the MD only has one task to perform and
 it is very good at it. The Pentium chip in the PC has a lot of tasks to
 *oversee* - it is not actually performing all of them, it has other systems
 to do that. The graphics card is handling the display, the sound card is
 handling processing sound (even 3D positioning in some cases) and there are
 also extra processor/controller chips handling other aspects of system
 operation. This means the main CPU isn't actually doing as much as you would
 think until you need to perform a lot more calculations - it spends a lot of
 time "idle". The effect of this is that it has a lot more "time" to spare on
 running intense calculations that you would expect it to. I still maintain
 that it is not impossible for a real-time or faster ATRAC encoder to be
 produced, I just wonder what the system specification would be in order for
 it to run fast enough. My reckoning is that the spec. would be a lot lower
 than some would have us believe.
 
 Magic

And all that is tied together with a 33Mhz PCI bus (Which has an
average performance of 33MB/s (PCI is ONLY fast when in burst mode. I/O with
soundcards etc. is single-byte based!, unless the CPU invokes DMA transfer, but
even then -in most cases-, the PCI bus is occupied and the CPU can't do
anything!) 

Cheers,
Ralph - Wondering at what speed the ATRAC-R-type DSP is running
-- 
===
Ralph SmeetsFunctional Verification Centre Of Competence -  CMG
Voice:  (+33) (0)4 76 58 44 46   STMicroelectronics
Fax:(+33) (0)4 76 58 40 11   5, chem de la Dhuy
Mobile: (+33) (0)6 82 66 62 70 38240 MEYLAN
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  FRANCE
===
  "For many years, mankind lived just like the animals. And then 
   something happened that unleashed the powers of our imagination: 
   We learned to talk."
-- Stephen Hawking, later used by Pink Floyd --
===
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: MD: Great deals on MD media!

2000-03-10 Thread Simon Barnes


Matt Rooke advertised:

 MD80 as low as 0.85 pence each + VAT ( 1.00 inc VAT)
 
 MD74 as low as 0.75 pence each + VAT ( 0.88 inc VAT)

he omitted to mention the 5.45 + VAT = 6.40 UKP minimum postage charge, and
this price is for 50 off. It's still quite a good deal, certainly compared
to the prices I've seen elsewhere in the world.

simon
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Sony's new Internet Audio Recording Interface

2000-03-10 Thread Stainless Steel Rat


* "Magic" [EMAIL PROTECTED]  on Fri, 10 Mar 2000
| I think there is only going to be one way to get this solved and that is for
| somebody to write an ATRAC encoder on the PC based upon the ASIC system.
| Unfortunately I lack the expertise to write something that complex - is
| anyone else on this list up to the challenge?

Emuating an ASIC in software?  No, that is a bad idea.  Remember when I
said that emulation is slow?

| I think it can be done, there's no real reason why it wouldn't work, the
| only issue is whether it would work fast enough for real-time orr faster
| performance. I've seen many processes categorically stated that a PC could
| not do in real-time including MPEG decoding, controlling MIDI instruments,
| networking (yes, at one point this was 'impossible'), making a CD, printing
| a document, voice dictation, the list is virtually endless.

Five or six years ago, the average desktop PC could not manage MPEG
decoding at reasonable frame rates (16-24fps) at reasonable resolution (420
scan lines) in real time, and they were not fast enough to burn CD-Rs.  As
for the rest, I do not know where you get your information, but the Corvus
Constellation worked just fine for 1MHz Apple ][s, MIDI has always had
computer control capability, etc.  Right about now, were I you I would
seriosuly question my sources.
-- 
Rat [EMAIL PROTECTED]\ Warning: pregnant women, the elderly, and
Minion of Nathan - Nathan says Hi! \ children under 10 should avoid prolonged
PGP Key: at a key server near you!  \ exposure to Happy Fun Ball.
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Portable MD-recorder with Digital Output????

2000-03-10 Thread Stainless Steel Rat


* "Magic" [EMAIL PROTECTED]  on Fri, 10 Mar 2000
| As I understand it, portables don't have optical output because it would
| encourage piracy. Suddenly you have the ability to make a near perfect copy
| of a disc.

Two words: SCSM.  Oh, wait, that's just one acronym.

I figure the real reason is that consumers simply do not want to pay for a
feature they never use.
-- 
Rat [EMAIL PROTECTED]\ Ingredients of Happy Fun Ball include an
Minion of Nathan - Nathan says Hi! \ unknown glowing substance which fell to
PGP Key: at a key server near you!  \ Earth, presumably from outer space.
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: MD: Portable MD-recorder with Digital Output????

2000-03-10 Thread Simon Barnes


While I'd really like to agree with Rat for a change,

   * "Magic" [EMAIL PROTECTED]  on Fri, 10 Mar 2000
   | As I understand it, portables don't have optical output 
   because it would encourage piracy. 

 I figure the real reason is that consumers simply do not 
 want to pay for a feature they never use.

I'm not convinced the manufacturers spend a lot of time consulting consumers
about what they'd like. It's more like they could save a little money and no
one would notice. Bearing in mind that the optical out could be inline with
the headphone socket, just like the optical in/mic, I think the cost
difference might be quite small (to us), but significant to them when they
are making a shed-load.

simon
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Portable MD-recorder with Digital Output????

2000-03-10 Thread Stainless Steel Rat


* Stainless Steel Rat [EMAIL PROTECTED]  on Fri, 10 Mar 2000
| Two words: SCSM.  Oh, wait, that's just one acronym.
Ahem.  SCMS.
-- 
Rat [EMAIL PROTECTED]\ When not in use, Happy Fun Ball should be
Minion of Nathan - Nathan says Hi! \ returned to its special container and
PGP Key: at a key server near you!  \ kept under refrigeration.
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Long Play ATRAC

2000-03-10 Thread Brent Harding



  ===
  = NB: Over 50% of this message is QUOTED, please  =
  = be more selective when quoting text =
  ===

Wow, that could be an answer, one md with a 5-hour show on would be cool.
How can they do those pretaped radio shows without having someone at the
station to switch disks? I know that on a local channel sometimes before
the commercials kick in, I hear a low pitched noise for a couple seconds
before the commercials begin. I kind of thought it was recorded because I
heard a bunch of station ID's in a row with about a second of music
overlapping into the next one, and it said something like "coming up in the
9 o'clock hour" about 20 after 8 before going dead until about 9.
Wonder if that really shows that minidisc could be to blame for something
like that happening, know casettes can't jump like that, and hard drives
have no ability to mess up like that.
Much less, would they want to store a 6-midnight saturday show on a hd with
all the other things, more than likely running wave files, it'd take a lot
of space.
At 09:31 AM 3/10/00 +0100, you wrote:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 I called video direct. According to the Sony Press release, the 5+
 hour recording mode is real and can only be used with compatible
 players (e.g. MDS-JB940).
 
 So it's confirmed, Sony just expanded the format. To me this is Sony's
 answer (in Minidisc form) to solid state players. It has approximately
 the same bit rate (MDS-JB940: 73kbps, MP3 players (in one hour mode):
 64kbps), but with a 5 hour capacity.
 
 Fantastic! (or Dammit!, depending upon how you like having all your
 equipment made obsolete in a single stroke).
 
 I guess we know what the hot new feature for the Sep 2000 portables
 will be!
 
 And, an interesting ATRAC3 vs. MP3 quality contest is about to begin.
 
 Rick

Hmmm,

memory stick technology used on a MD

Cheers,
Ralph - Sharp? Hello? What are you going to do?
-- 
===
Ralph SmeetsFunctional Verification Centre Of Competence -  CMG
Voice:  (+33) (0)4 76 58 44 46   STMicroelectronics
Fax:(+33) (0)4 76 58 40 11   5, chem de la Dhuy
Mobile: (+33) (0)6 82 66 62 70 38240 MEYLAN
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  FRANCE
===
  "For many years, mankind lived just like the animals. And then 
   something happened that unleashed the powers of our imagination: 
   We learned to talk."
   -- Stephen Hawking, later used by Pink Floyd --
===
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



MD: Problems with Aiwa MD-X7

2000-03-10 Thread Mike Sentany


I own an Aiwa book-shelf MD system (MD-X7). For the past couple of days, every time I 
insert a minidisc (I tried all my minidiscs actually) it always said "TOC REE R". Does 
anyone had the same problem? Any suggestions at all?

Thanks,
Mike
ps: I tried to reset the system but it didn't do anything

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



MD: Repliance: What's the best way to record for the longest time?

2000-03-10 Thread bharding


 === The original message was multipart MIME===
 === All non-text parts (attachments) have been removed ===

Brent Harding sent you a question using the repliance free service.
To answer, click on the following link, or cut and paste it in
your web browser:

http://www.repliance.com/view.php?id=580code=DF6CAAC8E

You will be instantly redirected to a page where you
can answer that question.

If your email software is HTML compliant. This page is already
displayed below.

Ask for a Click!
Send your own question for free at http://www.repliance.com

 === MIME part removed : text/html; ===

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: md-l-mimedigest V2 #559

2000-03-10 Thread Philip Thong


Does anyone have ATRAC software for the computer?? I want a copy

Phil


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: List operation

2000-03-10 Thread Dan Frakes


"David W. Tamkin" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Shawn Lin wrote,

I was on a list like that once too, where Reply-to was to 
the sender. VERY little traffic on that list, LOTS of 
questions, never an answer! Even when I'd search through their 
archives... all questions and no answers.

That certainly is not my experience with reply-to-sender lists. 
Generally people have known how to use their reply-to-all 
commands to respond publicly when they wished to, and RTS lists 
are as busy as RTL lists, except that they don't carry items 
that were intended privately but accidentally sent to the whole 
list. A poster who specifically wants public replies can always 
point Reply-To: to the list on his or her post, and an RTS list 
leaves it unmo- lested. If people did not do that on the list 
Shawn remembers, then they may well have preferred private 
replies.

I didn't want to respond again to this thread, given its off-topic 
nature, but I feel a second note is warranted here.

As I mentioned before, I'm a ListMom, and have managed well over 50 lists 
(probably closer to 70). Some have had over 10,000 members. I also am a 
member of a ListMom group that manages and discusses many more lists 
(many of the members of that group have 50 or more lists of their own). 
Shawn is *absolutely* correct in his description of reply-to-sender 
lists. I don't say this to "prove anyone wrong," but to add some 
perspective other than the "well, I'm on a list and..." anecdotal 
accounts.


Among those who manage mailing lists for a living, or as part of their 
job, there are clear "personalities" for mailing lists. In general, and 
with few exceptions:

Reply-to-sender lists get less traffic, fewer answers sent to the list, 
and are generally less informative on the whole. On the other hand, they 
get less off-topic mail and less idle chatter. The exception to this rule 
is the organized and disciplined list where the sender summarizes all 
replies and posts a response summary to the list so that everyone 
benefits from the replies. But such lists are *very* rare.

Reply-to-list lists get more traffic, more answers to the list, and are 
generally more informative on the whole. However, they get much more 
off-topic mail and much more idle chatter. Once in a while they get a 
"supposed-to-be-private" response to the list. The exception to this rule 
is the moderated list where ListMoms review posts and cut out the 
off-topic and "noisy" posts.

If incoming Reply-To: addresses were preserved somewhere, I 
could rename that to Reply-To: and have the full RTS format I 
like while the RTL crowd could get it the way they please.

While some lists don't include the original Reply-To header for each 
message, the From header is usually sufficient to reply privately to the 
original author, and most email clients allow you to reply to that 
address fairly easily. The number of email users who have a Reply-To 
address that is different from their From address is very small... too 
small to justify changing a list's management style just for them ;-)
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Portable MD-recorder with Digital Output????

2000-03-10 Thread Stainless Steel Rat


* Simon Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]  on Fri, 10 Mar 2000
| I'm not convinced the manufacturers spend a lot of time consulting consumers
| about what they'd like.

No, but they do listen when, say, 10 out of a hundred ask, "what use is
this?" and the remaining 90 say nothing.
-- 
Rat [EMAIL PROTECTED]\ If Happy Fun Ball begins to smoke, get
Minion of Nathan - Nathan says Hi! \ away immediately. Seek shelter and cover
PGP Key: at a key server near you!  \ head.
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Sony's new Internet Audio Recording Interface

2000-03-10 Thread Magic


From: Ralph Smeets [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2000 12:28 PM
Subject: Re: MD: Sony's new Internet Audio Recording Interface

 And all that is tied together with a 33Mhz PCI bus (Which has an
 average performance of 33MB/s (PCI is ONLY fast when in burst mode. I/O
with
 soundcards etc. is single-byte based!, unless the CPU invokes DMA
transfer, but
 even then -in most cases-, the PCI bus is occupied and the CPU can't do
 anything!)

Can't argue with that,  however, I would point out that you can do MPEG
video encoding on a P3-400MHz system at 320x240 resolution in true colours,
and that's *with* a 16 bit stereo audio stream and no hardware encoder (my
450MHz manages 16fps unassisted). I still find it hard to believe that a
machine that can manage that wouldn't be able to do ATRAC encoding fast
enough.

 Cheers,
 Ralph - Wondering at what speed the ATRAC-R-type DSP is running

At a guess I'd say 35 MHz with 70MHz on-chip

Magic
--
"Creativity is more a birthright than an acquisition, and the power of sound
is wisdom and understanding applied to the power of vibration."

Location : Portsmouth, England, UK
Homepage : http://www.mattnet.freeserve.co.uk
EMail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Portable MD-recorder with Digital Output????

2000-03-10 Thread Rodney Peterson


I thought the point was SarCasMS

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Portable MD-recorder with Digital Output????

2000-03-10 Thread Magic


From: Stainless Steel Rat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MD-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2000 3:07 PM
Subject: Re: MD: Portable MD-recorder with Digital Output



 * "Magic" [EMAIL PROTECTED]  on Fri, 10 Mar 2000
 | As I understand it, portables don't have optical output because it would
 | encourage piracy. Suddenly you have the ability to make a near perfect
copy
 | of a disc.

 Two words: SCSM.  Oh, wait, that's just one acronym.

 I figure the real reason is that consumers simply do not want to pay for a
 feature they never use.

Had you read the rest of my post you would have realised I stated this as
one of the reasons optical out on a portable would be a waste of resources.

Magic
--
"Creativity is more a birthright than an acquisition, and the power of sound
is wisdom and understanding applied to the power of vibration."

Location : Portsmouth, England, UK
Homepage : http://www.mattnet.freeserve.co.uk
EMail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Sony's new Internet Audio Recording Interface

2000-03-10 Thread Magic


From: Stainless Steel Rat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MD-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2000 3:05 PM
Subject: Re: MD: Sony's new Internet Audio Recording Interface


 Emuating an ASIC in software?  No, that is a bad idea.  Remember when I
 said that emulation is slow?

I didn't say emulate the ASIC, I said devise a system based up it. The
Windows caluclator is based upon an actual calculator, but it isn't an
emulation. I have been arguing for a while that the best way to reproduce a
system is not necessarily be emulation.

 Five or six years ago, the average desktop PC could not manage MPEG
 decoding at reasonable frame rates (16-24fps) at reasonable resolution
(420
 scan lines) in real time, and they were not fast enough to burn CD-Rs.  As
 for the rest, I do not know where you get your information, but the Corvus
 Constellation worked just fine for 1MHz Apple ][s, MIDI has always had
 computer control capability, etc.  Right about now, were I you I would
 seriosuly question my sources.

If you go back far enough you'll find the idea of a computer in a chip was
laughed at. The idea of a computer was itself rediculous until Charles
Babbage came along.

My point is that things move on, systems get better and can do more things,
and so it is not impossible for a computer to do this task. It's no more
challenging than any other "impossible" task a computer has ben asked to
perform. I am 100% sure it can be done and I'm quite sure that the systems
we currently have would be fast enough. If they aren't now then by the time
such a system hit the market with the appropriate modifications made to an
MD they very probably would be!

Magic
--
"Creativity is more a birthright than an acquisition, and the power of sound
is wisdom and understanding applied to the power of vibration."

Location : Portsmouth, England, UK
Homepage : http://www.mattnet.freeserve.co.uk
EMail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Sony's new Internet Audio Recording Interface

2000-03-10 Thread Stainless Steel Rat


* "Magic" [EMAIL PROTECTED]  on Fri, 10 Mar 2000
| I didn't say emulate the ASIC, I said devise a system based up it. The
| Windows caluclator is based upon an actual calculator, but it isn't an
| emulation. I have been arguing for a while that the best way to reproduce a
| system is not necessarily be emulation.

The software guts of the Windows calculator are totally unlike those in the
IC of a pocket calculator.  They do the same thing, but they go about it in
different ways.  There are things that can be done in an ASIC that are just 
plain stupid to do the same way in software on a general purpose processor.

Counting on your fingers is really easy for humans.  Counting on fingers is 
not a good way to write mathematical software.

[...]
| If you go back far enough you'll find the idea of a computer in a chip was
| laughed at. The idea of a computer was itself rediculous until Charles
| Babbage came along.

Actually, it was laughed at well through Babbage's life and death.  None of 
his engines were ever built.

| My point is that things move on, systems get better and can do more things,
| and so it is not impossible for a computer to do this task.

Tell me where I once stated that a desktop machine five years from now
would be unable to perform ATRAC encoding in real time.  I will save you
the trouble: I never did.  I said that a desktop machine today cannot
perform ATRAC encoding in real time because it has to do in slow software
what a dedicated DSP can do in a fast ASIC.
-- 
Rat [EMAIL PROTECTED]\ Happy Fun Ball contains a liquid core,
Minion of Nathan - Nathan says Hi! \ which, if exposed due to rupture, should
PGP Key: at a key server near you!  \ not be touched, inhaled, or looked at.
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]