Re: MD: MZ-R90 Charging Weirdness

2000-09-29 Thread las


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 You make a good point.  I think I'll take that advice.

 Thanks for the perspective.  I was only looking at the trees.

 Leland

Like I said before, we used to include the stepdown transformers at our cost
when we sold a unit.  There were are probably still are internet dealers that
will tell you that you don't need one.  I can't understand how they could say
that since I know that the Denon (Sharp clone) that I have will not work if you
use the 100 volt transformer in the US.

I accidentally forgot to use it once and that's how I found that out.  But it is
a good thing, since it protects the unit.

Unfortunately several of the places on the net were you could get a really good
deal either went out of business or stopped importing to the US. Sawada D. comes
to mind.  They had great prices but communications were a little difficult.  If
you didn't specifically order the transformer, you didn't get one.

For a while there were "Mini Disc Wars".  One company offered a warranty and the
other specifically stated no warranty.  After a while they no warranty place had
to cave in.

Larry.



-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



MD: Broken URLs

2000-09-29 Thread Dan Frakes


"Michael Burger" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not really...the people who are getting broken up URLs have their 
windows set smaller, and the line is wrapping. Usually, if they're 
using higher resolutions and bigger window sizes, or maximize the 
window in question, the link will come through just fine.

For the most part, it has nothing to do with window size. Mail servers 
automatically "break" lines at pre-set lengths. Different servers can 
break at different lengths. If an un-bracketed URL has been broken, 
window width won't help.

A bit of FYI that would help everyone if everyone would heed: if you're 
going to send URLs in email, the "official" standard (it's in an RFC) is 
to enclose the URL in angle brackets:

http://inserturlhere.com

The angle brackets tell your email/web client where the URL starts and 
where it ends. On modern clients, this will allow readers to always use 
your URLs, even if they have hard breaks in them.
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Etown Sharp MS-722 : $169.50

2000-09-29 Thread Graham Baker


No I think the problem is that the line is wrapped by the sender - no
matter how large I make my read window the link remains wrapped to two
lines and doesn't work...
I think that's a function or 'feature' of Outlook Express - I have the
same problem when sending lng links

GB

- Original Message -
From: Michael Burger [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Not really...the people who are getting broken up URLs have their
 windows set smaller, and the line is wrapping.  Usually, if they're
 using higher resolutions and bigger window sizes, or maximize the
 window in question, the link will come through just fine.


-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Broken URLs

2000-09-29 Thread Mike Burger


I'm afraid I'll have to beg to differ, here.

I personally run 3 mail servers, onsite, here at my personally owned and 
operated iSP, a 4th at my full time job, and 2 more at the ISP I helped 
set up a year before I started mine.

Mail servers simply send whatever you feed them...they don't do any 
breaking up of lines.  The sender's mail program may or may not break 
lines up as they wrap them, assuming the sender has their mail program 
set to do so at a regularly spaced interval.

When I read the messages in a WYSIWYG type mailer, and expanded the size 
of the window, I was able to view and click on the entire link as it came 
through.  When I left the window at it's original size, or when I read 
that same message on a text only console based mailer, the line got broken.

You are right, however, that if they've already gotten a broken URL, they 
probably won't be able to follow it without a little manual cut and paste.

On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, Dan Frakes wrote:

 
 For the most part, it has nothing to do with window size. Mail servers 
 automatically "break" lines at pre-set lengths. Different servers can 
 break at different lengths. If an un-bracketed URL has been broken, 
 window width won't help.
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: MZ-R90 Charging Weirdness

2000-09-29 Thread J. Coon



  ===
  = NB: Over 50% of this message is QUOTED, please  =
  = be more selective when quoting text =
  ===

It is not a good idea to use 100 volt equipment on 120 volts.  Look for
a step down transformer so you get the right voltage.

Nathan White wrote:
 
 Its almost brand new... Only been charged a few times...
 
 Nathan White
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 3:45 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: MD: MZ-R90 Charging Weirdness
 
 I have used Sony 100V adapters in the US (my voltage is 120) for years with
 no problems.  The R-90 has the ability to detect higher than appropriate DC
 voltage (it should give the "Hi DC in" error message).  So I doubt that is
 the problem.  You could test this by buying a 120 V transformer from an
 electronics store and return it if it doesn't solve the problem.  I suspect
 the battery is having trouble accepting a charge.  It might have gone bad.
 Do you have another battery you could try?  Buying a spare is not a bad idea
 anyway.
 
 Regards,
 
 Leland
 -
 To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
 "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 -
 To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
 "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
Jim Coon
Not just another pretty mandolin picker.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If Gibson made cars, would they sound so sweet?

My first web page  

http://www.tir.com/~liteways
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Broken URLs

2000-09-29 Thread Graham Baker


I didn't know that - thanks for the info - I have often wondered how to
include long links...
GB

- Original Message -
From: Dan Frakes [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 http://inserturlhere.com

 The angle brackets tell your email/web client where the URL starts and
 where it ends. On modern clients, this will allow readers to always
use
 your URLs, even if they have hard breaks in them.


-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Etown Sharp MS-722 : $169.50

2000-09-29 Thread Mike Burger



  ===
  = NB: Over 50% of this message is QUOTED, please  =
  = be more selective when quoting text =
  ===

That can happen...personally, I don't/won't use OE...even the full 
Outlook handles that stuff better.  

I do know that when I read those 
messages in different email programs I use (one was Netscape's mailer, 
another was one called PMMail), the links expanded just fine.

On Fri, 29 Sep 2000, Graham Baker wrote:

 
 No I think the problem is that the line is wrapped by the sender - no
 matter how large I make my read window the link remains wrapped to two
 lines and doesn't work...
 I think that's a function or 'feature' of Outlook Express - I have the
 same problem when sending lng links
 
 GB
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Michael Burger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  Not really...the people who are getting broken up URLs have their
  windows set smaller, and the line is wrapping.  Usually, if they're
  using higher resolutions and bigger window sizes, or maximize the
  window in question, the link will come through just fine.
 
 
 -
 To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
 "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



MD: More Info about Xitel MD-Port AN1 and DG1

2000-09-29 Thread Peter Forest


Yesterday, some members ask for more informations about the MD-Port AN1 and
DG1 from Xitel.

This is some information, I hope this will help !

MD-Port DG1 and AN1 compatibility information

The MD-Port AN1 is compatible and works with all MD recorders regardless of
model or brand.

Due to the recording mechanisms of some MD recorders, the MD-Port DG1 is
known not to be compatible with the units from Sharp, JVC, or the Sony MZ-R3
and MZR-50. It may also not function with home recording MD decks.


Xitel's MD-Port DG1 has been tested and is compatible with Sony MZ-R37,
MZ-R55, MZR-70, MZ-R90, and MZ-R91 recorders.
The DG1 may be compatible with other brands or models, however they have not
been tested and Xitel therefore cannot guarantee all function will be
supported.

MD-PORT DG1

Xitel's MD-Port DG1 is the ultimate way to digitally record tracks ripped
from CDs or music files downloaded from the Internet to Minidisc. It comes
with MusicMatch Jukebox Plus - a powerful program for ripping, encoding, and
playing all your MP3 files.

The DG1 works simply by plugging into a USB port. After a few simple steps,
you'll be ready to record digitally through the optical output with studio
fidelity. Nothing sounds better!

The DG1 is not compatible with certain MiniDiscs recorders.

MD-PORT AN1

The MD-Port AN1 is an advanced USB interface that lets you record track
ripped from CD's, or music files - like MP3's - downloaded from the Internet
to MiniDiscs. It's designed for seamless use with
ALL MiniDisc recorders, and includes great software to rip, encode and make
your own compilations.

The AN1 operates simply by plugging into a USB port. After a few simple
steps in Windows, you'll be ready to record. There's no easier way to
liberate MP3's from your PC!

By the way, we are now distributor for Xitel so if you have any questions or
if you need any information, simply send us an email at :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Regards,

Peter - www.kheopsminidisc.com

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



MD: Boomboxes from outside the US?

2000-09-29 Thread ExquisiteDeadGuy


Since we're on the boombox topic, are there any MD boombox/portable stereos 
available where MD is more popular, like Europe or Japan? 

Perhaps those of us who are hard up for these things could import one from 
Europe if it could be converted to US voltage/frequency stepping?

Just a thought and a question. :o)

~Zach
A HREF="http://members.aol.com/zachr330"The Cutting Edge of Nothing 
Significant/A
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: More Info about Xitel MD-Port AN1 and DG1

2000-09-29 Thread Jonathan Irwin


On Fri, 29 Sep 2000, Peter Forest wrote:

 Due to the recording mechanisms of some MD recorders, the MD-Port DG1 is
 known not to be compatible with the units from Sharp, JVC, or the Sony MZ-R3
 and MZR-50. It may also not function with home recording MD decks.

This is interesting.  Does anybody have any ideas as to why this might be
the case?  It should be transmitting a normal SPDIF signal (using an
internal TOSlink transmitter), but evidently it is not because of the
compatibility problems.  Any ideas what it is sending (or not sending)
that is causing this?

Jonathan



-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



MD: computer to MD - digital vs analog

2000-09-29 Thread Timothy P. Stockman


Lately, there has been some discussion and speculation on MD-L about analog
vs digital for computer to MD transfers.  Below I've enumerated the
technical advantages and disadvantages.

The advantages of analog are:
1) it *always* works
2) easy level adjustments

The disadvantages of analog are:
1) many computers/soundcards have poor internal signal grounding, not to
mention a *lot* of high-frequency hash (which leads to noise) and/or
undersized coupling capacitors (which produces phase shift and poor
frequency response).
2) possible ground problems between the computer and the MD which causes
mains leakage and resultant hum.
3) unreliable connections due to the low contact pressure of the mini-phone
plugs.
4) an extra D/A and A/D conversion.

Digital transfer has the advantages (when it works):
1) No added noise, distortion, phase errors or poor frequency response.
2) No ground problems with optical.  Even if coaxial is used, ground
problems will not cause noise, as with analog.

Digital transfer has the disadvantages:
1) Possible incompatibility problems.  For example, the S/PDIF from the
DIO2448 is not accepted properly by the MDS-PC2.
2) Bad connections or ground problems may cause intermittent dropouts or
pops.
3) Due to lack of  "flow control" on S/PDIF, high CPU activity may cause
dropouts or pops.

For me, the advantages of digital make it worth the hassle.

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: computer to MD - digital vs analog

2000-09-29 Thread Steve Corey


Digital transfers are ALWAYS better.  If a certain digital format
doesn't work for you (the DIO2448 to MDS-PC2 for example) find another
way to do it.
As for these points:

 The advantages of analog are:
 1) it *always* works
 2) easy level adjustments

I would say, that analog *always* works, except when it doesn't.  Like
when levels aren't properly set, which leads to the second point: 
Digital transfers don't have to worry about levels.  Except when they
do.  Like when there is a volume control on the digital signal.  I
understand why someone would put a level adjustment on a digital signal,
but it is the wrong thing to do.  The whole point of digital transfers
is a bit-for-bit exact copy of the source.  The only volume control
should be at the analog playback section.  All other sections before
that should have no level controls AT ALL.  (I'm talking about signal
transfers, not signal processing like eq.)  Do you remember the days of
analog gear?  Every single piece of equipment had to be calibrated to a
test signal, in order to get a good recording.  With digital transfers,
those headaches are no more, except now when some insane person decides
that a digital transfer should have some sort of level control.  NO NO
NO!
 
 Digital transfer has the disadvantages:
 1) Possible incompatibility problems.  For example, the S/PDIF from the
 DIO2448 is not accepted properly by the MDS-PC2.
 2) Bad connections or ground problems may cause intermittent dropouts or
 pops.
 3) Due to lack of  "flow control" on S/PDIF, high CPU activity may cause
 dropouts or pops.
 
 For me, the advantages of digital make it worth the hassle.

I've been doing digital transfers of various types for going on 15 years
now, and I've only recently ever had problems.  Is this progress? Ah
well.  enough raving for now.

-steve
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



MD: Recommend Portable

2000-09-29 Thread markaren


I'm new to the list. I'm a photographer who wishes to purchase a MD
portable recorder. I plan to record live audio to accompany my photos.
My approach would likely involve a binaural mic setup, perhaps clipped
to the visor of my ballcap etc. I need help selecting a unit to serve my
purposes. I intend to dupe the audio down to a 4 track tape deck, add
music, narration or effects and mix...then burn the whole mess to an
audio CD. I would like the unit to accept inputs too, for example if I
wanted to " borrow" some audio from a CD player, cassette while
traveling. So here goes my list:
INPUTS
* analog line level inputs ( RCA)?
* stereo mic / binaural mic input
* line level adjustment  OUTPUTS
* stereo line out ( adapt to RCA for tape deck etc)
RECORD
* be able to erase in the field, and re-record
* fade desirable, not required
POWER
* AA backup aux pack,  or better yeta unit that will accept AA
alkalines as a primary power source if necessary. 
REMOTE
easy to use- illuminated

Does such a unit exist and where would you recommend I purchase one?
Thankyou for your help. Mark Dottle

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



MD: Iomega's new Digital Music Device

2000-09-29 Thread James Jarvie


Check out this URL.  Also be sure to check out the
responses to the article...a couple of enlightened MD
users responded.

http://www.zdnet.com/products/stories/reviews/0,4161,2631991,00.html

James

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Photos - 35mm Quality Prints, Now Get 15 Free!
http://photos.yahoo.com/
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: MD: Recommend Portable

2000-09-29 Thread Peter Forest


Basically, with the use you want to do with your MD recorder, my first
suggestion is the Sharp MS-722. This is the advantage of this unit :

- Very robust and solid.
- Slide-In door for Minidisc (easy to enter and remove minidiscs)
- Rechargeable battery include (6-10 hours autonomy, 3 hrs to charge)
- Battery case for 1 AA battery supplied (for a couple hour more)
- Very intuitive and easy to use, all button are on top of the unit and
button are big so easy to use.
- Analog and digital line input (stereo jack)
- Analog output (only stereo jack for headphone, no line out)
- Stereo/Mono mic input (stereo jack)
- Line lever adjustement, really easy to adjust and very visual screen
- Manually fade only
- Always record at the end of the disc but you can easily move, erase,
divide and edit each   recorded part of the minidisc. If you have a 2
minutes sound at the end and you want it in the middle, simply move it, and
VOILA ! It's done !
- The rechargeable battery include is better than AA battery and it's a
lithium battery; intelligent battery that only charge what it needs. May
last 1-2 years easily. With the battery case you can add one more AA battery
for longer recording or playing.
- The unit charge by itself when the AC adaptor is plug in the wall and when
the unit is on Stop Mode.
- Remote control provided with the unit. Everything is allowed except
recording option with the remote. The remote is illuminated. However, if you
let the unit in rec/pause, you will be able to use the remote for the other
option (play and pause to stop and go the recording).

You can buy this unit from Etown (www.etown.com) or Mercata
(www.mercata.com). The price is really good and low (about $170 or even less
sometimes).

If you absolutely want a line out (not only a headphones output), you will
maybe prefer for the same (or so) amount, this unit from Sony : MZR-37.
However, be careful when purchase this unit and look for all accessories.
Sometimes it's really cheap when you look at it but there is a lot of extra
to pay after and you don't really save at all... What I dislike of the
MZR-37 Sony Units is : Clam Shell Door (very weak and fragile for me...) and
also the button are small and not so easy to use. However, the remote is
very useful (i'm not quite sure if it is illuminated).

If you have any question, simply send me an email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Peter - www.kheopsminidisc.com

INPUTS
* analog line level inputs ( RCA)?
* stereo mic / binaural mic input
* line level adjustment  OUTPUTS
* stereo line out ( adapt to RCA for tape deck etc)
RECORD
* be able to erase in the field, and re-record
* fade desirable, not required
POWER
* AA backup aux pack,  or better yeta unit that will accept AA
alkalines as a primary power source if necessary.
REMOTE
easy to use- illuminated

Does such a unit exist and where would you recommend I purchase one?
Thankyou for your help. Mark Dottle

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Recommend Portable

2000-09-29 Thread Ed Heckman


At 9/29/00 5:29 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] increased the world's knowledge by 
typing:

I'm new to the list. I'm a photographer who wishes to purchase a MD
portable recorder. I plan to record live audio to accompany my photos.

I'm very, very impressed with the new Sony MZ-R900. It will meet all of 
your needs except for fade in and out. That's only available on the new 
Sony decks such as the JE640 and JB940. Fortunately, the decks do allow 
you to apply the "Scale Factor Edit" feature to recordings you've already 
made.

The major drawback to the R900 is that it's currently only available in 
Japan. There are three retailers I know of that you can purchase it 
through. I bought mine from Japan Direct http://www.japan-direct.com/. 
They were the most expensive, but they ship very fast and they're very 
easy to work with. Two others are Hat-In http://www.hat-in.com/ and 
Hyperjack http://www.iris.ne.jp/cgraph/hyperjack/HYPERPLmd/. I don't 
have any direct experience with the other two. IMHO the R900 is good 
enough that it's worth the extra effort to order it from Japan.

You can find an excellent review of the R900 at 
http://www.ece.utexas.edu/~youn/mzr900.html.

HTH.



 Ed "What the" Heckman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+--+
| Problems loom large when men don't.  |
|-- Robert James Bidinotto |
+--+
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Boomboxes from outside the US?

2000-09-29 Thread Leon


There are quite a few CD/MD (or CD/MD/cassette) boomboxes available in
Japan.  It's actually a pretty hot market.

Some of them lets you use battery (Kenwood's Rampage does, I think), some
don't.  Sony has just announced a new model that doesn't feature MDLP - this
must have been featured on the MDCP.

Panasonic's current one, RX-MDX5 I think, actually costs less than the
SJ-MR100, and features HDES encoding.

exquisitely corny,
Leon


 
 Since we're on the boombox topic, are there any MD boombox/portable stereos
 available where MD is more popular, like Europe or Japan?
 
 Perhaps those of us who are hard up for these things could import one from
 Europe if it could be converted to US voltage/frequency stepping?
 
 Just a thought and a question. :o)
 
 ~Zach

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]