Re: [MBZ] R-12 versus R-134

2014-10-09 Thread MG via Mercedes
The bit about air is what I was taught years ago so I wasn't too 
comfortable with what he said. I ended up putting a can of oil 
with 134 and some extra cooling thing. It only added 1 oz of each 
product so it took the edge off the vacuum and from there I went 
with the ES.


Manfred


Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 06:47:48 -0400
From: Mitch Haley mi...@mitchellhaley.com

I like this answer on Amazon better, if it's still sealed don't 
mess with it, if
it got air in it pull a vacuum to get rid of the air. Air is not 
a refrigerant,

at the very least it's an impediment to refrigerant flow:

Q: Do you need to suck moisture out from the system? or to suck 
vacuum to check

leak? The description said to Not pull vacuum?
A:
Only if you have a leak and your system is empty. Then you will 
need to pull a
vacuum on it after you have repaired the leak. Other wise you can 
put a can of
stop leak in it and then change it back to the normal amount 
needed. Hopes this

answers your question.

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] R-12 versus R-134

2014-10-08 Thread Mitch Haley via Mercedes

MG via Mercedes wrote:

Mitch, it was a guy who answered the phone that is posted on this website.

http://autorefrigerants.com/co00033.htm


Looks like a salesman, registered to the home of Randy Hill of Alpena, Michigan.

It looks like this is Enviro-Safe Inc:
http://www.es-refrigerants.com/resources/faq/w/id/11/details.asp



I like this answer on Amazon better, if it's still sealed don't mess with it, if 
it got air in it pull a vacuum to get rid of the air. Air is not a refrigerant, 
at the very least it's an impediment to refrigerant flow:


Q: Do you need to suck moisture out from the system? or to suck vacuum to check 
leak? The description said to Not pull vacuum?

A:
Only if you have a leak and your system is empty. Then you will need to pull a 
vacuum on it after you have repaired the leak. Other wise you can put a can of 
stop leak in it and then change it back to the normal amount needed. Hopes this 
answers your question.



___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] R-12 versus R-134

2014-10-07 Thread Mitch Haley via Mercedes

David  Kristin Gilmore via Mercedes wrote:

On 10/6/2014 8:17 AM, Dan Penoff via Mercedes wrote:
(snip)

 In the interest of full disclosure, my oldest son's 300E 2.6 still has 
R12 in it, and I have a can on the shelf. It could probably stand to be 
topped off, but I don't have a manifold gauge set that will do R12.


I use an Harbor Freight R12 can tapper/hose with R134A gauge set, minus the 
removeable R134A couplers. My two Snap-On R12 manifolds sit in a box somewhere, 
3 of the four gauges having lost their oil-filledness.


Mitch.

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] R-12 versus R-134

2014-10-07 Thread Mitch Haley via Mercedes

Curly McLain via Mercedes wrote:
   G Mann:   Frost this morning.  You don't need any AC  Save the 
money.  44 lb of propane/butane could make a nice weinie roast out of 
your bus.


You can't put 44lb of propane/butane in a 44lb R12 system.
More like 15lb, but that's about what some of the less honest folks fill a BBQ 
cylinder to these days.
You can still make a pretty good fuel/air bomb out of 44lb of R12 when mixed 
with aerosol'd mineral oil.


Found something I hadn't heard of before on Amazon yesterday, not ES but sounds 
like the same thing, except they claim it works with synthetic oil.
If it was ES that told Manfred to fill an AC system with air, those idiots need 
to go out of business so they can quit telling people idiotic stuff (I'm hoping 
it was a reseller and not the people you get when you call the phone number on 
the can)
Red-Tek on Amazon is more than twice what I paid for a can of R410a earlier this 
year, but affordable compared to R12.

http://www.amazon.com/RED-TEK-Refrigerant-Cylinder-Equiv/dp/B00DJDYQFA

You'd probably move more BTUs with 30-35lb of R406a than with 15lb of 
hydrocarbons. Looks like Autofrost is no more, the only R406a I found in 25lb 
cans was on alibaba, only $40k for 1140 30lb cans. If the stuff is still legal 
for sale, one could get rich moving a container of those for $150 each.
Yikes, further searching tells me the Chinese are selling R410a as a R12 
substitute and sometimes calling it R406a!!! R410a pressures are through the 
roof, you can't even replace R22 with it.


If I needed 30 lb of R406a, I might be tempted to blend my own if the 
constituent  parts are all readily available.

Mitch.

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] R-12 versus R-134

2014-10-07 Thread Rich Thomas via Mercedes

but laughter is the best medicine!

--R


On 10/6/14 7:27 PM, Meade Dillon via Mercedes wrote:

Coughing?  No no, laughter is what REALLY hurts recovering from that
surgery.  Been there twice, brother.  First time was full deal, gave me a
nice long zipper scar.  Took a couple three days to feel safely mobile,
then a week of gingerly limping around the house.

Max Dillon,
Charleston SC

On Oct 6, 2014 4:01 PM, Mitch Haley via Mercedes mercedes@okiebenz.com
wrote:

(5 hours post-op and giving up all thoughts of suicide, except when I

cough.

Don't ever cough the same day you have hernia surgery)


___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.




___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] R-12 versus R-134

2014-10-07 Thread Mitch Haley via Mercedes

Rich Thomas via Mercedes wrote:

but laughter is the best medicine!


Found out this morning that Max was right, laughter hurts much worse than 
coughing.

Mitch.

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] R-12 versus R-134

2014-10-07 Thread Jim Cathey via Mercedes
just put it into the system after you let it fill to atmospheric 
pressure with air.


No way.  El stupido, just like leaving it with N2 in it.
Feed into a vacuum, accept no substitutes!

He also told me that it doesn't form acids if there is a bit of 
humidity in there with the air.


Probably, yes.  There is no chlorine/fluorine to peel off.
But a used system may have residue in it that could go acidic
in the presence of moisture.  Keep the drier!

You could also leave the 134 in and just add the Enviro-safe to bring 
it up to the needed output since Enviro-safe mixes with 134 or 12 
without any problems.


Yes, I believe you can 'top-off' with HC refrigerants, if
you wish.


Don't try to add enough to get rid of the bubbles.


The sight glass is nearly useless with anything _except_ pure R12.

-- Jim


___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] R-12 versus R-134

2014-10-07 Thread MG via Mercedes
Mitch, it was a guy who answered the phone that is posted on this 
website.


http://autorefrigerants.com/co00033.htm

Manfred


Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 05:31:32 -0400
From: Mitch Haley mi...@mitchellhaley.com

If it was ES that told Manfred to fill an AC system with air, 
those idiots need
to go out of business so they can quit telling people idiotic 
stuff (I'm hoping
it was a reseller and not the people you get when you call the 
phone number on

the can)

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] R-12 versus R-134

2014-10-06 Thread Rick Knoble via Mercedes
‎  Original Message  
From: archer75--- via Mercedes
Sent: Sunday, October 5, 2014 11:55 PM
To: Mercedes Discussion List;

Big snip
global cooling which was why the government took away R-12

R-12 was taken off the market because it eroded the ozone layer in the upper 
atmosphere. It was lauded as a perfect coolant because it is extremely stable. 
That attribute was it's downfall, because it was so stable, it didn’t degrade 
until it reached the upper atmosphere (perhaps stratosphere?) where it's 
molecules were split into their base atoms and the chlorine contained within 
caused the destruction of the ozone. I'd be more than happy to provide 
footnotes to back these facts up, but I just don't feel like looking it up 
right now. 

How does this relate to Mercedes? Our older, beloved Mercedes use this ozone 
depleting aerosol as a refrigerant to keep us cool in the summer time and our 
windshields clear of fog in spring and fall. As R-12 becomes less and less 
available, an adequate substitute needed to be found. I believe that substitute 
to be Enviro Safe. It is essentially the Jim Cathey test blend, with a pine 
scent added to identify any leaks. It is flammable, however I think that the 
possibility of the car being incinerated like the Mercedes in the movie 
Arbitrage is slim. 

(mores Mercedes content)
The R-134a that has been used in Mercedes for nearly two decades is set to be 
replaced, however independent testing by Daimler showed it to be flammable. 

http://www.emercedesbenz.com/autos/mercedes-benz/corporate-news/mercedes-benz-independent-study-finds-new-refrigerant-to-be-dangerous/

http://www.motorauthority.com/news/1086548_mercedes-wins-french-court-ruling-in-r134a-refrigerant-case

Rick 
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.


___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] R-12 versus R-134

2014-10-06 Thread Dan Penoff via Mercedes
It would be interesting to know what percentage of vehicles out there still 
have R12 systems. With the push to convert to R134a over the years as well as 
the relative ease to do so, I have to believe the total number of cars still 
using R12 has got to be a pretty small percentage of the total with AC.

That being said, with my recent foray into AC on the S500, I found a lot of 
doom and gloom or overblown warnings against the use of propane based 
refrigerants. While there has got to be some danger due to flammability, I have 
to believe the risk is minimal due to the limited volume and the fairly narrow 
requirements to cause ignition.

In the interest of full disclosure, my oldest son's 300E 2.6 still has R12 in 
it, and I have a can on the shelf. It could probably stand to be topped off, 
but I don't have a manifold gauge set that will do R12.

Dan

Sent from my iPad

 On Oct 6, 2014, at 7:40 AM, Rick Knoble via Mercedes mercedes@okiebenz.com 
 wrote:
 
 ‎  Original Message  
 From: archer75--- via Mercedes
 Sent: Sunday, October 5, 2014 11:55 PM
 To: Mercedes Discussion List;
 
 Big snip
 global cooling which was why the government took away R-12
 
 R-12 was taken off the market because it eroded the ozone layer in the upper 
 atmosphere. It was lauded as a perfect coolant because it is extremely 
 stable. That attribute was it's downfall, because it was so stable, it didn’t 
 degrade until it reached the upper atmosphere (perhaps stratosphere?) where 
 it's molecules were split into their base atoms and the chlorine contained 
 within caused the destruction of the ozone. I'd be more than happy to provide 
 footnotes to back these facts up, but I just don't feel like looking it up 
 right now. 
 
 How does this relate to Mercedes? Our older, beloved Mercedes use this ozone 
 depleting aerosol as a refrigerant to keep us cool in the summer time and our 
 windshields clear of fog in spring and fall. As R-12 becomes less and less 
 available, an adequate substitute needed to be found. I believe that 
 substitute to be Enviro Safe. It is essentially the Jim Cathey test blend, 
 with a pine scent added to identify any leaks. It is flammable, however I 
 think that the possibility of the car being incinerated like the Mercedes in 
 the movie Arbitrage is slim. 
 
 (mores Mercedes content)
 The R-134a that has been used in Mercedes for nearly two decades is set to be 
 replaced, however independent testing by Daimler showed it to be flammable. 
 
 http://www.emercedesbenz.com/autos/mercedes-benz/corporate-news/mercedes-benz-independent-study-finds-new-refrigerant-to-be-dangerous/
 
 http://www.motorauthority.com/news/1086548_mercedes-wins-french-court-ruling-in-r134a-refrigerant-case
 
 Rick 
 Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
 
 
 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 
 To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
 
 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
 
 All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
 individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has 
 no control over the content of the messages of each contributor.

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] R-12 versus R-134

2014-10-06 Thread Meade Dillon via Mercedes
Last week when I installed the new condenser in The White Whale (R-12
system converted by PO), I charged the system with just one can of R-134,
and to my pleasant surprise that was enough pressure for the system to work
and blow cool air.  Temps here don't really require AC now, so I'll
probably leave it alone until next summer.  I've got a few cans of one of
the hydrocarbon-based refrigerants, need to come up with a plan for
installing that.  Instructions say it should not be installed into a
vacuum, so I need to figure out how this Enviro Safe should be installed.

Max Dillon,
Charleston SC
___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] R-12 versus R-134

2014-10-06 Thread Kaleb C. Striplin via Mercedes
The hydrocarbon refrigerants work great and are perfectly safe. I just don't 
use them anymore because I have both an r12 and a r134 machine. I also have 
another r12 machine and a dual 12/134 machine I need to sell.

Sent from my iPhone

 On Oct 6, 2014, at 7:17 AM, Dan Penoff via Mercedes mercedes@okiebenz.com 
 wrote:
 
 It would be interesting to know what percentage of vehicles out there still 
 have R12 systems. With the push to convert to R134a over the years as well as 
 the relative ease to do so, I have to believe the total number of cars still 
 using R12 has got to be a pretty small percentage of the total with AC.
 
 That being said, with my recent foray into AC on the S500, I found a lot of 
 doom and gloom or overblown warnings against the use of propane based 
 refrigerants. While there has got to be some danger due to flammability, I 
 have to believe the risk is minimal due to the limited volume and the fairly 
 narrow requirements to cause ignition.
 
 In the interest of full disclosure, my oldest son's 300E 2.6 still has R12 in 
 it, and I have a can on the shelf. It could probably stand to be topped off, 
 but I don't have a manifold gauge set that will do R12.
 
 Dan
 
 Sent from my iPad
 
 On Oct 6, 2014, at 7:40 AM, Rick Knoble via Mercedes mercedes@okiebenz.com 
 wrote:
 
 ‎  Original Message  
 From: archer75--- via Mercedes
 Sent: Sunday, October 5, 2014 11:55 PM
 To: Mercedes Discussion List;
 
 Big snip
 global cooling which was why the government took away R-12
 
 R-12 was taken off the market because it eroded the ozone layer in the upper 
 atmosphere. It was lauded as a perfect coolant because it is extremely 
 stable. That attribute was it's downfall, because it was so stable, it 
 didn’t degrade until it reached the upper atmosphere (perhaps stratosphere?) 
 where it's molecules were split into their base atoms and the chlorine 
 contained within caused the destruction of the ozone. I'd be more than happy 
 to provide footnotes to back these facts up, but I just don't feel like 
 looking it up right now. 
 
 How does this relate to Mercedes? Our older, beloved Mercedes use this ozone 
 depleting aerosol as a refrigerant to keep us cool in the summer time and 
 our windshields clear of fog in spring and fall. As R-12 becomes less and 
 less available, an adequate substitute needed to be found. I believe that 
 substitute to be Enviro Safe. It is essentially the Jim Cathey test blend, 
 with a pine scent added to identify any leaks. It is flammable, however I 
 think that the possibility of the car being incinerated like the Mercedes in 
 the movie Arbitrage is slim. 
 
 (mores Mercedes content)
 The R-134a that has been used in Mercedes for nearly two decades is set to 
 be replaced, however independent testing by Daimler showed it to be 
 flammable. 
 
 http://www.emercedesbenz.com/autos/mercedes-benz/corporate-news/mercedes-benz-independent-study-finds-new-refrigerant-to-be-dangerous/
 
 http://www.motorauthority.com/news/1086548_mercedes-wins-french-court-ruling-in-r134a-refrigerant-case
 
 Rick 
 Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
 
 
 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 
 To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
 
 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
 
 All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
 individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has 
 no control over the content of the messages of each contributor.
 
 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 
 To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
 
 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
 
 All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
 individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has 
 no control over the content of the messages of each contributor.

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] R-12 versus R-134

2014-10-06 Thread Meade Dillon via Mercedes
Kaleb,

Any tips or tricks when adding the hydrocarbon stuff?  Did you pull a
vacuum prior to putting it in, or top up the system?

Max Dillon,
Charleston SC
___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] R-12 versus R-134

2014-10-06 Thread G Mann via Mercedes
There you go... global warming issues linked to Mercedes content... Well
now.. First social comment . I believe recent studies of the ozone layer
have shown the removal of R12 from use has had little effect on the ozone
layer, if any. Leading to the likely conclusion that bad science was the
cause of bad social engineering by government.
End of personal comment;

Mercedes content:  I just purchased a new Mercedes [to me new] which uses
R12. The R12 charge for my new Mercedes is 42 lbs. Thus, I have skin in
this game because the system is currently empty and purged, needing refill.

It is a  Mercedes built Setra bus, 40 ft long, curb weight 44,900 lbs. And
no, it can not be converted to 134 easily.
It is 1988 manufacture, so it even qualifies as an old Mercedes ... and
no Gary.. I doubt you have parts for it.. but if you do.. contact me.

I would be keenly interested in constructive experience with alternate and
cheaper materials that preform as well as R12.

[Custom motor coach, for those interested]

Grant...

On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 9:55 PM, archer75--- via Mercedes 
mercedes@okiebenz.com wrote:


 Gerry wrote:
 I posted this to see if there were filters for such issues on the mercedes
 list.
 The existence of such filters on Yahoogroups is being investigated by
 several members of a Yahoogroups list I belong to, and I had hoped to post
 a failure to deliver notice here in the hopes that some of the computer
 experts on this list could determine how and/or by whom the message was
 blocked.

 The government has proposed laws to control the content of submissions on
 the internet which are opposed by many, left wing and right wing.

 It isn't surprising that most members objection to the posting is because
 of its content rather than the fact that it is not about Mercedes.
 Personally, I have a wait and see attitude toward global warming;
 especially since I remember that during the 1970s all the rage was about
 global cooling which was why the government took away R-12 and have caused
 us Mercedes owners all sorts of air conditioning troubles. (Mercedes
 content.)
 Gerry...an observer, not a partisan or activist.

   Peter wrote:
This is trash promulgated by a non-scientist with a right wing
 agenda.
You should know better than to parrot viral garbage racing around the
internet before you do due diligence.
 ..
   Actually your vitriolic rant is what is garbage. I am a scientist and
 am
   on an email list of many leading scientists who discuss the
   mis-information behind the climate hysteria, not the least of which is
   that the climate models are increasingly divergent from what is
 actually
   happening.
  
   From a posting on that list,
   --

 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com

 To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

 All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those
 individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner
 has no control over the content of the messages of each contributor.

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] R-12 versus R-134

2014-10-06 Thread Jim Cathey via Mercedes

The R12 charge for my new Mercedes is 42 lbs. Thus, I have skin in
this game because the system is currently empty and purged, needing 
refill.


This system sounds like it needs thorough testing before you
subject the world to a potential leak of that magnitude!  :-)

I believe a decade or so is a long enough test.  That quantity
would be not so easy to come up with, probably a commercial
HC refrigerant source would be more practical, you could get
it in those BBQ-tank sized containers.

I think the R290/R600a combination works pretty well.

-- Jim


___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] R-12 versus R-134

2014-10-06 Thread Dan Penoff via Mercedes
That's what nitrogen is good for. Pull it down with a vacuum, charge it to 200 
PSI with nitrogen, then see if it leaks down. Dye would be handy here, too.

Are you sure it's 42 pounds? That seems like a lot.

I would suspect that 42 pounds of R13 would cost a small fortune, however, I 
don't think I would want 42 pounds of propane in my vehicle, either...

Dan

Sent from my iPad

On Oct 6, 2014, at 10:19 AM, Jim Cathey via Mercedes mercedes@okiebenz.com 
wrote:

 The R12 charge for my new Mercedes is 42 lbs. Thus, I have skin in
 this game because the system is currently empty and purged, needing refill.
 
 This system sounds like it needs thorough testing before you
 subject the world to a potential leak of that magnitude!  :-)
 
 I believe a decade or so is a long enough test.  That quantity
 would be not so easy to come up with, probably a commercial
 HC refrigerant source would be more practical, you could get
 it in those BBQ-tank sized containers.
 
 I think the R290/R600a combination works pretty well.
 
 -- Jim
 
 
 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 
 To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
 
 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
 
 All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
 individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has 
 no control over the content of the messages of each contributor.

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] R-12 versus R-134

2014-10-06 Thread Curt Raymond via Mercedes
Wasn't there some concern that the BBQ tank gas weren't dry enough for this 
kind of job? I'd presume a 42 lb system would have a pretty dammed significant 
dryer though.

You want to talk chance of fire, I'm not sure how excited I'd be to drive 
around with 10+ gallons of high pressure hydrocarbons but R134a burns pretty 
good so I guess it can't be that big a deal...

-Curt



 From: Jim Cathey via Mercedes mercedes@okiebenz.com
To: G Mann g2ma...@gmail.com; Mercedes Discussion List 
mercedes@okiebenz.com 
Sent: Monday, October 6, 2014 10:19 AM
Subject: Re: [MBZ] R-12 versus R-134
 

 The R12 charge for my new Mercedes is 42 lbs. Thus, I have skin in
 this game because the system is currently empty and purged, needing 
 refill.

This system sounds like it needs thorough testing before you
subject the world to a potential leak of that magnitude!  :-)

I believe a decade or so is a long enough test.  That quantity
would be not so easy to come up with, probably a commercial
HC refrigerant source would be more practical, you could get
it in those BBQ-tank sized containers.

I think the R290/R600a combination works pretty well.

-- Jim





___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.
___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] R-12 versus R-134

2014-10-06 Thread G Mann via Mercedes
Current quotes on 42 lbs. of R12 are running in the $3000+ range.. so.. I
like your comment of charging the system with nitrogen first. The vehicle
came with a full set of huge AC vac pumps and filters to charge the
system.. package deal.

And yes, I did both a double take.. and a double check.. it really does
hold 42 lbs.. Ouch...  Go big or Go home.. hahah...

On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 7:30 AM, Curt Raymond via Mercedes 
mercedes@okiebenz.com wrote:

 Wasn't there some concern that the BBQ tank gas weren't dry enough for
 this kind of job? I'd presume a 42 lb system would have a pretty dammed
 significant dryer though.

 You want to talk chance of fire, I'm not sure how excited I'd be to drive
 around with 10+ gallons of high pressure hydrocarbons but R134a burns
 pretty good so I guess it can't be that big a deal...

 -Curt


 
  From: Jim Cathey via Mercedes mercedes@okiebenz.com
 To: G Mann g2ma...@gmail.com; Mercedes Discussion List 
 mercedes@okiebenz.com
 Sent: Monday, October 6, 2014 10:19 AM
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] R-12 versus R-134


  The R12 charge for my new Mercedes is 42 lbs. Thus, I have skin in
  this game because the system is currently empty and purged, needing
  refill.

 This system sounds like it needs thorough testing before you
 subject the world to a potential leak of that magnitude!  :-)

 I believe a decade or so is a long enough test.  That quantity
 would be not so easy to come up with, probably a commercial
 HC refrigerant source would be more practical, you could get
 it in those BBQ-tank sized containers.

 I think the R290/R600a combination works pretty well.

 -- Jim





 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com

 To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

 All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those
 individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner
 has no control over the content of the messages of each contributor.
 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com

 To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

 All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those
 individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner
 has no control over the content of the messages of each contributor.

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] R-12 versus R-134

2014-10-06 Thread Curt Raymond via Mercedes
I think you missed Mr. Cathey's sarcasm. :)

Some of the big capacity must be for bringing the system to the front of a 
motor coach, those lines are long. Still 42# seems like a lot, 42oz would be 
almost 3#, 42# is around 10 gallons of propane...

-Curt



 From: Dan Penoff via Mercedes mercedes@okiebenz.com
To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com 
Sent: Monday, October 6, 2014 10:28 AM
Subject: Re: [MBZ] R-12 versus R-134
 

That's what nitrogen is good for. Pull it down with a vacuum, charge it to 200 
PSI with nitrogen, then see if it leaks down. Dye would be handy here, too.

Are you sure it's 42 pounds? That seems like a lot.

I would suspect that 42 pounds of R13 would cost a small fortune, however, I 
don't think I would want 42 pounds of propane in my vehicle, either...

Dan

Sent from my iPad

On Oct 6, 2014, at 10:19 AM, Jim Cathey via Mercedes mercedes@okiebenz.com 
wrote:

 The R12 charge for my new Mercedes is 42 lbs. Thus, I have skin in
 this game because the system is currently empty and purged, needing refill.
 
 This system sounds like it needs thorough testing before you
 subject the world to a potential leak of that magnitude!  :-)
 
 I believe a decade or so is a long enough test.  That quantity
 would be not so easy to come up with, probably a commercial
 HC refrigerant source would be more practical, you could get
 it in those BBQ-tank sized containers.
 
 I think the R290/R600a combination works pretty well.
 
 -- Jim
 
 
 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 
 To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
 
 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
 
 All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
 individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has 
 no control over the content of the messages of each contributor.




___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.
___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] R-12 versus R-134

2014-10-06 Thread G Mann via Mercedes
All sarcasm accepted... I've certainly taken some lately for taking on this
project... ;)))

If you truly want to find out who your friends are.. buy a 40ft. Mercedes
motor coach and ask them to help you work on it.. hahaha..

Oil thread anyone.. it holds 28 quarts.. Coolant.. 33 gallons ..
Transmission... 8 gallons.. you get the picture... it's big..
Grant...

On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 7:38 AM, Curt Raymond via Mercedes 
mercedes@okiebenz.com wrote:

 I think you missed Mr. Cathey's sarcasm. :)

 Some of the big capacity must be for bringing the system to the front of a
 motor coach, those lines are long. Still 42# seems like a lot, 42oz would
 be almost 3#, 42# is around 10 gallons of propane...

 -Curt


 
  From: Dan Penoff via Mercedes mercedes@okiebenz.com
 To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com
 Sent: Monday, October 6, 2014 10:28 AM
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] R-12 versus R-134


 That's what nitrogen is good for. Pull it down with a vacuum, charge it to
 200 PSI with nitrogen, then see if it leaks down. Dye would be handy here,
 too.

 Are you sure it's 42 pounds? That seems like a lot.

 I would suspect that 42 pounds of R13 would cost a small fortune, however,
 I don't think I would want 42 pounds of propane in my vehicle, either...

 Dan

 Sent from my iPad

 On Oct 6, 2014, at 10:19 AM, Jim Cathey via Mercedes 
 mercedes@okiebenz.com wrote:

  The R12 charge for my new Mercedes is 42 lbs. Thus, I have skin in
  this game because the system is currently empty and purged, needing
 refill.
 
  This system sounds like it needs thorough testing before you
  subject the world to a potential leak of that magnitude!  :-)
 
  I believe a decade or so is a long enough test.  That quantity
  would be not so easy to come up with, probably a commercial
  HC refrigerant source would be more practical, you could get
  it in those BBQ-tank sized containers.
 
  I think the R290/R600a combination works pretty well.
 
  -- Jim
 
 
  ___
  http://www.okiebenz.com
 
  To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
 
  To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
  http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
 
  All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those
 individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner
 has no control over the content of the messages of each contributor.




 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com

 To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

 All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those
 individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner
 has no control over the content of the messages of each contributor.
 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com

 To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

 All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those
 individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner
 has no control over the content of the messages of each contributor.

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] R-12 versus R-134

2014-10-06 Thread Curt Raymond via Mercedes
So enquiring minds what to know, how big an engine? I'm going to guess 10l 
diesel pusher.

Pictures, the snowmobile guys always say Indy loves pics!

-Curt



 From: G Mann g2ma...@gmail.com
To: Curt Raymond curtlud...@yahoo.com; Mercedes Discussion List 
mercedes@okiebenz.com 
Sent: Monday, October 6, 2014 10:47 AM
Subject: Re: [MBZ] R-12 versus R-134
 


All sarcasm accepted... I've certainly taken some lately for taking on this 
project... ;)))


If you truly want to find out who your friends are.. buy a 40ft. Mercedes motor 
coach and ask them to help you work on it.. hahaha.. 


Oil thread anyone.. it holds 28 quarts.. Coolant.. 33 gallons .. 
Transmission... 8 gallons.. you get the picture... it's big.. 

Grant...





On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 7:38 AM, Curt Raymond via Mercedes 
mercedes@okiebenz.com wrote:

I think you missed Mr. Cathey's sarcasm. :)

Some of the big capacity must be for bringing the system to the front of a 
motor coach, those lines are long. Still 42# seems like a lot, 42oz would be 
almost 3#, 42# is around 10 gallons of propane...

-Curt



 From: Dan Penoff via Mercedes mercedes@okiebenz.com
To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com
Sent: Monday, October 6, 2014 10:28 AM
Subject: Re: [MBZ] R-12 versus R-134



That's what nitrogen is good for. Pull it down with a vacuum, charge it to 200 
PSI with nitrogen, then see if it leaks down. Dye would be handy here, too.

Are you sure it's 42 pounds? That seems like a lot.

I would suspect that 42 pounds of R13 would cost a small fortune, however, I 
don't think I would want 42 pounds of propane in my vehicle, either...

Dan

Sent from my iPad

On Oct 6, 2014, at 10:19 AM, Jim Cathey via Mercedes mercedes@okiebenz.com 
wrote:

 The R12 charge for my new Mercedes is 42 lbs. Thus, I have skin in
 this game because the system is currently empty and purged, needing refill.

 This system sounds like it needs thorough testing before you
 subject the world to a potential leak of that magnitude!  :-)

 I believe a decade or so is a long enough test.  That quantity
 would be not so easy to come up with, probably a commercial
 HC refrigerant source would be more practical, you could get
 it in those BBQ-tank sized containers.

 I think the R290/R600a combination works pretty well.

 -- Jim


 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com

 To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

 All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
 individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has 
 no control over the content of the messages of each contributor.




___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has 
no control over the content of the messages of each contributor.
___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has 
no control over the content of the messages of each contributor.

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] R-12 versus R-134

2014-10-06 Thread Dan Penoff via Mercedes
That's what I would figure. It's all in the lines just to traverse the coach. 
That's a lot of volume.

Dan

Sent from my iPad

 On Oct 6, 2014, at 10:38 AM, Curt Raymond curtlud...@yahoo.com wrote:
 
 I think you missed Mr. Cathey's sarcasm. :)
 
 Some of the big capacity must be for bringing the system to the front of a 
 motor coach, those lines are long. Still 42# seems like a lot, 42oz would be 
 almost 3#, 42# is around 10 gallons of propane...
 
 -Curt
 
 From: Dan Penoff via Mercedes mercedes@okiebenz.com
 To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com 
 Sent: Monday, October 6, 2014 10:28 AM
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] R-12 versus R-134
 
 That's what nitrogen is good for. Pull it down with a vacuum, charge it to 
 200 PSI with nitrogen, then see if it leaks down. Dye would be handy here, 
 too.
 
 Are you sure it's 42 pounds? That seems like a lot.
 
 I would suspect that 42 pounds of R13 would cost a small fortune, however, I 
 don't think I would want 42 pounds of propane in my vehicle, either...
 
 Dan
 
 Sent from my iPad
 
 On Oct 6, 2014, at 10:19 AM, Jim Cathey via Mercedes mercedes@okiebenz.com 
 wrote:
 
  The R12 charge for my new Mercedes is 42 lbs. Thus, I have skin in
  this game because the system is currently empty and purged, needing 
  refill.
  
  This system sounds like it needs thorough testing before you
  subject the world to a potential leak of that magnitude!  :-)
  
  I believe a decade or so is a long enough test.  That quantity
  would be not so easy to come up with, probably a commercial
  HC refrigerant source would be more practical, you could get
  it in those BBQ-tank sized containers.
  
  I think the R290/R600a combination works pretty well.
  
  -- Jim
  
  
  ___
  http://www.okiebenz.com
  
  To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
  
  To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
  http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
  
  All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
  individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner 
  has no control over the content of the messages of each contributor.
 
 
 
 
 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 
 To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
 
 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
 
 All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
 individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has 
 no control over the content of the messages of each contributor.
 
 
___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] R-12 versus R-134

2014-10-06 Thread Rich Thomas via Mercedes

pics of the beast plzz

--
On 10/6/14 10:47 AM, G Mann via Mercedes wrote:

All sarcasm accepted... I've certainly taken some lately for taking on this
project... ;)))

If you truly want to find out who your friends are.. buy a 40ft. Mercedes
motor coach and ask them to help you work on it.. hahaha..

Oil thread anyone.. it holds 28 quarts.. Coolant.. 33 gallons ..
Transmission... 8 gallons.. you get the picture... it's big..
Grant...



___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] R-12 versus R-134

2014-10-06 Thread Rick Knoble via Mercedes
Sent: Monday, October 6, 2014 12:37 PM
Subject: Re: [MBZ] R-12 versus R-134

‎Original Message  
From: Meade Dillon via Mercedes
Sent: Monday, October 6, 2014 7:54 AM
To: Mercedes
Reply To: Meade Dillon
Subject: Re: [MBZ] R-12 versus R-134

Any tips or tricks when adding the hydrocarbon stuff?  Did you pull a
vacuum prior to putting it in, or top up the system?

No vacuum, or very light vacuum. Dry system. Invert the can. It flashes off 
into a gas the instant it enters the system, so there is no chance of the 
compressor getting a slug of liquid refrigerant. 

Rick 
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.


___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] R-12 versus R-134

2014-10-06 Thread Craig via Mercedes
On Mon, 6 Oct 2014 12:41:22 -0500 Rick Knoble via Mercedes
mercedes@okiebenz.com wrote:

 Any tips or tricks when adding the hydrocarbon stuff?  Did you pull a
 vacuum prior to putting it in, or top up the system?
 
 No vacuum, or very light vacuum. Dry system. Invert the can. It flashes
 off into a gas the instant it enters the system, so there is no chance
 of the compressor getting a slug of liquid refrigerant. 

Could one not add (part of) a can to a system with a hard (well, as hard
as you can get on an A/C system) vacuum with the engine off? That way when
starting the engine and the A/C compressor, it wouldn't be a vacuum, but
no air and moisture would have been introduced into the system.


Craig

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] R-12 versus R-134

2014-10-06 Thread Rick Knoble via Mercedes
Original Message  
From: Craig via Mercedes
Sent: Monday, October 6, 2014 12:56 PM
To: Mercedes Discussion List
Reply To: Craig
Subject: Re: [MBZ] R-12 versus R-134

On Mon, 6 Oct 2014 12:41:22 -0500 Rick Knoble via Mercedes
mercedes@okiebenz.com wrote:

 Any tips or tricks when adding the hydrocarbon stuff?  Did you pull a
 vacuum prior to putting it in, or top up the system?
 
 No vacuum, or very light vacuum. Dry system. Invert the can. It flashes
 off into a gas the instant it enters the system, so there is no chance
 of the compressor getting a slug of liquid refrigerant. 

Could one not add (part of) a can to a system with a hard (well, as hard
as you can get on an A/C system) vacuum with the engine off? That way when
starting the engine and the A/C compressor, it wouldn't be a vacuum, but
no air and moisture would have been introduced into the system.


‎I would assume so. I will ask the guy at Enviro-Safe via email this evening. 

Rick 
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] R-12 versus R-134

2014-10-06 Thread Meade Dillon via Mercedes
Ok!  Never mind my other email.

Sounds like one should first pressurize the system with dry nitrogen to
test for leaks, bleed that off, then fill with ES.

Max Dillon,
Charleston SC

On Oct 6, 2014 1:41 PM, Rick Knoble via Mercedes mercedes@okiebenz.com
wrote:

 Sent: Monday, October 6, 2014 12:37 PM
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] R-12 versus R-134

 ‎Original Message
 From: Meade Dillon via Mercedes
 Sent: Monday, October 6, 2014 7:54 AM
 To: Mercedes
 Reply To: Meade Dillon
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] R-12 versus R-134

 Any tips or tricks when adding the hydrocarbon stuff?  Did you pull a
 vacuum prior to putting it in, or top up the system?

 No vacuum, or very light vacuum. Dry system. Invert the can. It flashes
off into a gas the instant it enters the system, so there is no chance of
the compressor getting a slug of liquid refrigerant.

 Rick
 Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] R-12 versus R-134

2014-10-06 Thread David Kristin Gilmore via Mercedes

On 10/6/2014 8:17 AM, Dan Penoff via Mercedes wrote:
(snip)

 In the interest of full disclosure, my oldest son's 300E 2.6 still has 
R12 in it, and I have a can on the shelf. It could probably stand to be 
topped off, but I don't have a manifold gauge set that will do R12.


 It is my understanding that one doesn't need a gauge set in this 
situation.  Aren't there bubbles showing in the sight glass if the 
system is low?  Adding refrigerant (with the compressor running) until 
the bubbles go away restores cooling.  Or at least that is the way I 
always did it.  I think.  It's been a long time.


 I'd go through and tighten all the connections first.

 Dave Gilmore, Cameron WV


Hunters dream of woods and beasts, judges of cases, and runners of 
races.


___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] R-12 versus R-134

2014-10-06 Thread Meade Dillon via Mercedes
Coughing?  No no, laughter is what REALLY hurts recovering from that
surgery.  Been there twice, brother.  First time was full deal, gave me a
nice long zipper scar.  Took a couple three days to feel safely mobile,
then a week of gingerly limping around the house.

Max Dillon,
Charleston SC

On Oct 6, 2014 4:01 PM, Mitch Haley via Mercedes mercedes@okiebenz.com
wrote:

 (5 hours post-op and giving up all thoughts of suicide, except when I
cough.
 Don't ever cough the same day you have hernia surgery)

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] R-12 versus R-134

2014-10-06 Thread MG via Mercedes
I called and talked with the guy about that a couple of weeks 
ago. He said to just put it into the system after you let it fill 
to atmospheric pressure with air. He also told me that it doesn't 
form acids if there is a bit of humidity in there with the air. 
You could also leave the 134 in and just add the Enviro-safe to 
bring it up to the needed output since Enviro-safe mixes with 134 
or 12 without any problems. Don't try to add enough to get rid of 
the bubbles. You will probably need only one more can of the 
Enviro-safe to bring the system up to what it needs. The low side 
should be under 30lbs.


Manfred


Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2014 08:40:02 -0400
From: Meade Dillon dillonm...@gmail.com

Last week when I installed the new condenser in The White Whale (R-12
system converted by PO), I charged the system with just one can 
of R-134,
and to my pleasant surprise that was enough pressure for the 
system to work

and blow cool air.  Temps here don't really require AC now, so I'll
probably leave it alone until next summer.  I've got a few cans 
of one of

the hydrocarbon-based refrigerants, need to come up with a plan for
installing that.  Instructions say it should not be installed into a
vacuum, so I need to figure out how this Enviro Safe should be 
installed.


Max Dillon,
Charleston SC

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] R-12 versus R-134

2014-10-06 Thread Dan Penoff via Mercedes
Hmm.  Good point.  All I would need is a can tap and a hose... I could probably 
find a set for cheap locally or on eBay...

Thanks!

Dan


On Oct 6, 2014, at 7:11 PM, David  Kristin Gilmore via Mercedes 
mercedes@okiebenz.com wrote:

 On 10/6/2014 8:17 AM, Dan Penoff via Mercedes wrote:
 (snip)
 
 In the interest of full disclosure, my oldest son's 300E 2.6 still has R12 in 
 it, and I have a can on the shelf. It could probably stand to be topped off, 
 but I don't have a manifold gauge set that will do R12.
 
 It is my understanding that one doesn't need a gauge set in this 
 situation.  Aren't there bubbles showing in the sight glass if the system is 
 low?  Adding refrigerant (with the compressor running) until the bubbles go 
 away restores cooling.  Or at least that is the way I always did it.  I 
 think.  It's been a long time.
 
 I'd go through and tighten all the connections first.
 
 Dave Gilmore, Cameron WV
 
 
Hunters dream of woods and beasts, judges of cases, and runners of races.
 
 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 
 To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
 
 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
 
 All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
 individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has 
 no control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] R-12 versus R-134

2014-10-06 Thread G Mann via Mercedes
Correct.. Diesel [of course] 450 HP [new], Allison B500 automatic [new],
with braking retarder, air ride suspension with 3 ride height
adjustments... diesel fired engine and coach preheat [Webastco] ...3 axle
coach.. steerable tag axle. On board TV and sound systems [more than one]
.. Huge AC system... 8 ea new 12Rx22.5 tires.. air brakes [new] etc etc
etc..

Picture, as discovered.. with dust..where it has been setting for 6 yrs
after owners heart attack.  if it will clear this system..


​
And of course, no project this size would be complete without a picture of
the budget planning room. [sarcastic humor content, of course]



Respectfully..

Grant...
​

On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 8:20 AM, Rich Thomas via Mercedes 
mercedes@okiebenz.com wrote:

 pics of the beast plzz

 --
 On 10/6/14 10:47 AM, G Mann via Mercedes wrote:

 All sarcasm accepted... I've certainly taken some lately for taking on
 this
 project... ;)))

 If you truly want to find out who your friends are.. buy a 40ft. Mercedes
 motor coach and ask them to help you work on it.. hahaha..

 Oil thread anyone.. it holds 28 quarts.. Coolant.. 33 gallons ..
 Transmission... 8 gallons.. you get the picture... it's big..
 Grant...



 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com

 To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

 All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those
 individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner
 has no control over the content of the messages of each contributor.

-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Setra Motor Coach.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 36942 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: 
http://mail.okiebenz.com/pipermail/mercedes_okiebenz.com/attachments/20141006/83cc6a0a/attachment.jpg
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Room full of Money.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 18532 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: 
http://mail.okiebenz.com/pipermail/mercedes_okiebenz.com/attachments/20141006/83cc6a0a/attachment-0001.jpg
___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] R-12 versus R-134

2014-10-06 Thread G Mann via Mercedes
I am advised the post with picture is waiting for moderator approval..
Please stand by... or not..

Tyvm..

Grant...

On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 9:24 AM, G Mann g2ma...@gmail.com wrote:

 Correct.. Diesel [of course] 450 HP [new], Allison B500 automatic [new],
 with braking retarder, air ride suspension with 3 ride height
 adjustments... diesel fired engine and coach preheat [Webastco] ...3 axle
 coach.. steerable tag axle. On board TV and sound systems [more than one]
 .. Huge AC system... 8 ea new 12Rx22.5 tires.. air brakes [new] etc etc
 etc..

 Picture, as discovered.. with dust..where it has been setting for 6 yrs
 after owners heart attack.  if it will clear this system..


 ​
 And of course, no project this size would be complete without a picture of
 the budget planning room. [sarcastic humor content, of course]



 Respectfully..

 Grant...
 ​

 On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 8:20 AM, Rich Thomas via Mercedes 
 mercedes@okiebenz.com wrote:

 pics of the beast plzz

 --
 On 10/6/14 10:47 AM, G Mann via Mercedes wrote:

 All sarcasm accepted... I've certainly taken some lately for taking on
 this
 project... ;)))

 If you truly want to find out who your friends are.. buy a 40ft. Mercedes
 motor coach and ask them to help you work on it.. hahaha..

 Oil thread anyone.. it holds 28 quarts.. Coolant.. 33 gallons ..
 Transmission... 8 gallons.. you get the picture... it's big..
 Grant...



 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com

 To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

 All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those
 individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner
 has no control over the content of the messages of each contributor.



-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Setra Motor Coach.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 36942 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: 
http://mail.okiebenz.com/pipermail/mercedes_okiebenz.com/attachments/20141006/afd3edd7/attachment.jpg
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Room full of Money.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 18532 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: 
http://mail.okiebenz.com/pipermail/mercedes_okiebenz.com/attachments/20141006/afd3edd7/attachment-0001.jpg
___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] R-12 versus R-134

2014-10-06 Thread Dan Penoff via Mercedes
You just replied to it.  The links are at the bottom.

And man, is that thing a beast!

I like the money room.  I need to gets me one of those

Dan


On Oct 6, 2014, at 12:46 PM, G Mann via Mercedes mercedes@okiebenz.com wrote:

 I am advised the post with picture is waiting for moderator approval..
 Please stand by... or not..
 
 Tyvm..
 
 Grant...
 
 On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 9:24 AM, G Mann g2ma...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Correct.. Diesel [of course] 450 HP [new], Allison B500 automatic [new],
 with braking retarder, air ride suspension with 3 ride height
 adjustments... diesel fired engine and coach preheat [Webastco] ...3 axle
 coach.. steerable tag axle. On board TV and sound systems [more than one]
 .. Huge AC system... 8 ea new 12Rx22.5 tires.. air brakes [new] etc etc
 etc..
 
 Picture, as discovered.. with dust..where it has been setting for 6 yrs
 after owners heart attack.  if it will clear this system..
 
 
 ​
 And of course, no project this size would be complete without a picture of
 the budget planning room. [sarcastic humor content, of course]
 
 
 
 Respectfully..
 
 Grant...
 ​
 
 On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 8:20 AM, Rich Thomas via Mercedes 
 mercedes@okiebenz.com wrote:
 
 pics of the beast plzz
 
 --
 On 10/6/14 10:47 AM, G Mann via Mercedes wrote:
 
 All sarcasm accepted... I've certainly taken some lately for taking on
 this
 project... ;)))
 
 If you truly want to find out who your friends are.. buy a 40ft. Mercedes
 motor coach and ask them to help you work on it.. hahaha..
 
 Oil thread anyone.. it holds 28 quarts.. Coolant.. 33 gallons ..
 Transmission... 8 gallons.. you get the picture... it's big..
 Grant...
 
 
 
 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 
 To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
 
 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
 
 All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those
 individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner
 has no control over the content of the messages of each contributor.
 
 
 
 -- next part --
 A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
 Name: Setra Motor Coach.jpg
 Type: image/jpeg
 Size: 36942 bytes
 Desc: not available
 URL: 
 http://mail.okiebenz.com/pipermail/mercedes_okiebenz.com/attachments/20141006/afd3edd7/attachment.jpg
 -- next part --
 A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
 Name: Room full of Money.jpg
 Type: image/jpeg
 Size: 18532 bytes
 Desc: not available
 URL: 
 http://mail.okiebenz.com/pipermail/mercedes_okiebenz.com/attachments/20141006/afd3edd7/attachment-0001.jpg
 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 
 To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
 
 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
 
 All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
 individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has 
 no control over the content of the messages of each contributor.

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] R-12 versus R-134

2014-10-06 Thread Craig via Mercedes
On Mon, 6 Oct 2014 06:40:06 -0500 Rick Knoble via Mercedes
mercedes@okiebenz.com wrote:

 global cooling which was why the government took away R-12
 
 R-12 was taken off the market because it eroded the ozone layer in the
 upper atmosphere. It was lauded as a perfect coolant because it is
 extremely stable. That attribute was it's downfall, because it was so
 stable, it didn’t degrade until it reached the upper atmosphere
 (perhaps stratosphere?) where it's molecules were split into their base
 atoms and the chlorine contained within caused the destruction of the
 ozone. I'd be more than happy to provide footnotes to back these facts
 up, but I just don't feel like looking it up right now. 

Those are the facts as I heard them in graduate school.

However,

  The average molecular weight of our atmosphere is 28.97. [1]

  The molecular weight of hydrochloric acid is 36.46.  [2]

  The molecular weight of chlorine gas 70.90

  The molecular weight of R-12 (CCl2F2) is 120.91.

  The heavier the gas, the more likely it will be closer to the earth.

The folks who had R-12 removed forgot about the antarctic volcano that is
spewing hydrochloric acid as well as the fact that during the antarctic
winter, there is no ionizing radiation from the sun to make ozone.


Craig

1. http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/molecular-mass-air-d_679.html

2. From Los Alamos National Laboratory Chemistry Division
   Periodic Table of the Elements

   Hydrogen1.008 g/mol
   Carbon 12.01  g/mol
   Fluorine   19.00  g/mol
   Chlorine   35.45  g/mol

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] R-12 versus R-134

2014-10-06 Thread Curly McLain via Mercedes
   G Mann:   Frost this morning.  You don't need any AC  Save the 
money.  44 lb of propane/butane could make a nice weinie roast out of 
your bus.


___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


[MBZ] R-12 versus R-134

2014-10-05 Thread archer75--- via Mercedes
 
Gerry wrote:
I posted this to see if there were filters for such issues on the mercedes 
list. 
The existence of such filters on Yahoogroups is being investigated by several 
members of a Yahoogroups list I belong to, and I had hoped to post a failure 
to deliver notice here in the hopes that some of the computer experts on this 
list could determine how and/or by whom the message was blocked.

The government has proposed laws to control the content of submissions on the 
internet which are opposed by many, left wing and right wing. 

It isn't surprising that most members objection to the posting is because of 
its content rather than the fact that it is not about Mercedes.
Personally, I have a wait and see attitude toward global warming; 
especially since I remember that during the 1970s all the rage was about global 
cooling which was why the government took away R-12 and have caused us Mercedes 
owners all sorts of air conditioning troubles. (Mercedes content.)
Gerry...an observer, not a partisan or activist.

  Peter wrote:
   This is trash promulgated by a non-scientist with a right wing agenda.
   You should know better than to parrot viral garbage racing around the
   internet before you do due diligence.
..
  Actually your vitriolic rant is what is garbage. I am a scientist and am
  on an email list of many leading scientists who discuss the
  mis-information behind the climate hysteria, not the least of which is
  that the climate models are increasingly divergent from what is actually
  happening.
 
  From a posting on that list,
  --

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.