Re: Does iocharset option be supported in OpenBSD mount?

2006-01-27 Thread Guido Tschakert

Armand Chen wrote:

Hi all :-)

After I switched to OpenBSD, there are still some data in my old NTFS
partition. I've made the NTFS support into kernel, and successfully
mounted the NTFS partision.

The problem is, some filename of the data is encoded other than
ISO8859-1. In other UNIX-like systems, I could use savior option like
this:

Code:

mount -t ntfs -r -o iocharset=ENCODING /dev/DEVICEPARTITION /mnt



But the iocharset seems not be supported in OpenBSD, because the system told me:

Code:

mount_ntfs: -o iocharset: option not supported



Does this option be unsupported or just there exists some tweaks whick
I don't know?

Thx you guys and hope there would be someone to give me some hints :-)





Hi,

don't know if there's a port for openbsd but the tool convmv does 
exactly what you want. Convert Filenames from one encoding to another 
encoding.


guido



Re: MS Security VP Mike Nash remarks on MS vs OpenBSD security.

2006-01-27 Thread Martin Schröder
On 2006-01-27 01:42:13 +1100, Shane J Pearson wrote:
 What an incredible load of tripe!...

This belongs on advocacy.



state of sasyncd + udpencap port state

2006-01-27 Thread Martin Hedenfalk

Hello all,

I have two questions:

1) What is the state of sasyncd in 3.8? (I'm currently running stable 
without any patches). The only hint that there would be known bugs or 
that sasyncd would be incomplete is this email: 
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/openbsd/2005-10/1804.html.


2) I have an IPsec tunnel from a soekris box (with custom kernel) 
through a NAT. I ping through the tunnel and the replies come back to 
the soekris. UDP encapsulation works fine until I reboot the NAT box. 
After rebooting the NAT box, the IPsec gateway continues to send back 
replies on the old port (51884), but the NAT box has chosen another 
source port, obviously.


tcpdump on the NAT box after reboot:
09:51:49.835997 217.13.255.140.64819  217.13.255.183.4500: udpencap: 
esp 217.13.255.140  217.13.255.183 spi 0x5ACCA1E0 seq 241 len 132
09:51:49.837076 217.13.255.183.4500  217.13.255.140.51884: udpencap: 
esp 217.13.255.183  217.13.255.140 spi 0x89134FAD seq 192 len 132


Before reboot, the NAT machine (217.13.255.140) sent packets with source 
port 51884 and everything worked fine.


Why is 217.13.255.183 (the IPsec gateway) still sending back replies to 
the old port (51884) instead of the new port 64819?


The issue is resolved after the SA expires and a new SA is set up.

Thanks for any help or hints!
/Martin



Re: MS Security VP Mike Nash remarks on MS vs OpenBSD security.

2006-01-27 Thread Henning Brauer
* Will H. Backman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-01-26 23:15]:
 By sending carefully crafted sequence of IP packet fragments, a remote
 attacker can cause a system running pf with a ruleset containing a
 'scrub fragment crop' or 'scrub fragment drop-ovl' rule to crash.
 
 1: Has this been verified to actually cause a panic on OpenBSD

yes.

-- 
BS Web Services, http://www.bsws.de/
OpenBSD-based Webhosting, Mail Services, Managed Servers, ...
Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity.
(Dennis Ritchie)



Re: MS Security VP Mike Nash remarks on MS vs OpenBSD security.

2006-01-27 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006, Rob W wrote:

 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/16375 is minor but important enough to
 report?
 
 A way to remotly crash a OpenBSD box is minor?

If the number of systems affected is low, the answer may be yes. This
problem only exists if you enable specific scrubbing options in pf. 

As a rule of thumb, you can look at the fraction of machines affected
multiplied but the severity of the problem. This gives some 
indication if something is going to hit errata. 

We are not hiding things, just follow src-changes to get everything.

-Otto



Re: MS Security VP Mike Nash remarks on MS vs OpenBSD security.

2006-01-27 Thread Joachim Schipper
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 10:07:33AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
 On Thu, 26 Jan 2006, Rob W wrote:
 
  http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/16375 is minor but important enough to
  report?
  
  A way to remotly crash a OpenBSD box is minor?
 
 If the number of systems affected is low, the answer may be yes. This
 problem only exists if you enable specific scrubbing options in pf. 
 
 As a rule of thumb, you can look at the fraction of machines affected
 multiplied but the severity of the problem. This gives some 
 indication if something is going to hit errata. 
 
 We are not hiding things, just follow src-changes to get everything.

Or Full-Disclosure or one of the like, for a more generic security list.
See http://lists.grok.org.uk.

It doesn't have much OpenBSD content, of course... ;-)

Joachim



Squid and named DNS

2006-01-27 Thread Kiraly Zoltan
I have an OpenBSD gateway which share the Internet and use Squid.
Squid proxy work transparent, OpenBSD PF allow this thing :

rdr pass on fxp0 proto tcp to port www - 127.0.0.1 port 3128

I use Squid to filter web content like ad and pop-up (adzaper), I don't
use Squid for cache.

The problem is, when i use Squid  many webpage open slow, for example
sometimes i wait much in Firefox at Waiting for www.pagexy.com...
message. Without Squid all page open faster.

I use named on gateway. I have this settings in /var/named/etc/named.conf

acl clients {
192.168.10.0/24;
::1;
};

options {
forward only;
forwarders { 193.231.249.1; };
version ; // remove this to allow version queries

listen-on{ any; };
listen-on-v6 { any; };

allow-recursion { clients; };
};

I hear Squid don't really like named, is true? or anyone use Squid with
named and don't have problems, any idea?

Thank you very much !



Re: MS Security VP Mike Nash remarks on MS vs OpenBSD security. (offlist)

2006-01-27 Thread Rob W

From: Chris Zakelj [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is a denial of service, not a security exploit.  Crashing a box
causes headaches, but the data within is still out of the reach of those
who would like to steal it.
It isn't important that people can crash your box remotely and make the 
services provided unavailable?


The data may be out of reach, but I think that denial of service attacks 
also are important.


_
Ta' pe udsalg eret rundt pe MSN Shopping:  http://shopping.msn.dk  - her 
finder du altid de bedste priser




Re: Safety of a shutdown when no user could log in

2006-01-27 Thread Nick Holland
Nick Holland wrote:
 ...much bigger, if we get the 1G physical disk limit overcome in 
 OpenBSD). 

er... 1T physical disk limit...

(hey, some of us old timers were really wowed by the first 1G drives.
Or the first 20M drives...  We get our staggering amount of storage
units confused easily. :)

Nick.



Re: Safety of a shutdown when no user could log in

2006-01-27 Thread Eric Johnson
On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 06:43:35 -0500
Nick Holland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Nick Holland wrote:
  ...much bigger, if we get the 1G physical disk limit overcome in 
  OpenBSD). 
 
 er... 1T physical disk limit...
 
 (hey, some of us old timers were really wowed by the first 1G drives.
 Or the first 20M drives...  We get our staggering amount of storage
 units confused easily. :)

I was really impressed when we got two 150 MB drives for the old
PDP-11/70.  $15,000 each and $15,000 for the disk controller.

We had so much space we didn't know what to do with it all.

Eric Johnson



Re: Squid and named DNS

2006-01-27 Thread Alexander Bochmann
Hi,

...on Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 12:10:22PM +0200, Kiraly Zoltan wrote:

  I use Squid to filter web content like ad and pop-up (adzaper), I don't
  use Squid for cache.
  The problem is, when i use Squid  many webpage open slow, for example
  sometimes i wait much in Firefox at Waiting for www.pagexy.com...
  message. Without Squid all page open faster.

I assume that with your contentfilter setup squid won't 
pass data until it's been fully loaded - otherwise the 
content filter can't be shure to block the transmission 
if it detects anything harmful. So you will see a considerable 
delay more or less by design.

Not using caching is also counterproductive, as you'll 
have the system scanning everything all over again.

  I hear Squid don't really like named, is true? or anyone use Squid with
  named and don't have problems, any idea?

That sounds like a bit of crap to me, in what way should 
squid not like named? Ok, both can be memory hogs, 
depending on their configuration, so if you're low on memory 
you wouldn't want to have both on the same box, but that's 
about it...

I doubt DNS is your problem, but your setup is probably 
suboptimal. Squid does it's own DNS caching, so letting 
it access a server that is forward-only itself (basically 
another cache level) at least won't do much good.

Alex.



Re: Squid and named DNS

2006-01-27 Thread Michael C. Ibarra

Hi;

I am not sure what you are saying here, but if you think you are  
having a DNS isse, then try adding this to your squid.conf:

dns_testnames localhost
Have you disabled caching?  If this does not work, then you should  
probably bring this up in the squid-users list,  
	[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Good luck,

-mike


Quoting Kiraly Zoltan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:


I have an OpenBSD gateway which share the Internet and use Squid.
Squid proxy work transparent, OpenBSD PF allow this thing :

rdr pass on fxp0 proto tcp to port www - 127.0.0.1 port 3128

I use Squid to filter web content like ad and pop-up (adzaper), I don't
use Squid for cache.

The problem is, when i use Squid  many webpage open slow, for example
sometimes i wait much in Firefox at Waiting for www.pagexy.com...
message. Without Squid all page open faster.

I use named on gateway. I have this settings in /var/named/etc/named.conf

acl clients {
192.168.10.0/24;
::1;
};

options {
forward only;
forwarders { 193.231.249.1; };
version ; // remove this to allow version queries

listen-on{ any; };
listen-on-v6 { any; };

allow-recursion { clients; };
};

I hear Squid don't really like named, is true? or anyone use Squid with
named and don't have problems, any idea?

Thank you very much !




Re: Strange behaviour of ``ifconfig -alias''

2006-01-27 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Fri, 27 Jan 2006, Alexander Hall wrote:

 Hi!
 
 I just noticed (the hard way) a strange behaviour of ifconfig. In short, if I
 supply a netmask when removing an alias with ``-alias address'', it is not,
 as one would expect, ignored, but rather used as the netmask for the primary
 address of the interface.
 
 While it would not be necessary to supply the netmask when removing an alias,
 I cannot see that this behaviour would be expected. I would rather expect an
 error or that the netmask was ignored.
 
 Or am I totally wrong?

alias/-alias is a _parameter_ and should come after the address. 
It would be better if ifconfig would be more strict, but its argument
parsing code is a nightmare

-Otto

 
 Example follows:
 
 $ ifconfig xl0
 xl0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
 lladdr 00:06:5b:36:f8:e1
 groups: egress
 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex)
 status: active
 inet6 fe80::206:5bff:fe36:f8e1%xl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1
 inet 192.168.2.130 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.2.255
 $ sudo ifconfig xl0 inet alias 192.168.2.140 netmask 255.255.255.255
 $ ifconfig xl0
 xl0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
 lladdr 00:06:5b:36:f8:e1
 groups: egress
 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex)
 status: active
 inet6 fe80::206:5bff:fe36:f8e1%xl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1
 inet 192.168.2.130 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.2.255
 inet 192.168.2.140 netmask 0x broadcast 192.168.2.140
 $ sudo ifconfig xl0 inet -alias 192.168.2.140 netmask 255.255.255.255
 ifconfig: SIOCAIFADDR: File exists
 $ ifconfig xl0
 xl0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
 lladdr 00:06:5b:36:f8:e1
 groups: egress
 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex)
 status: active
 inet6 fe80::206:5bff:fe36:f8e1%xl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1
 inet 192.168.2.130 netmask 0x broadcast 192.168.2.130
^^
  madness
 
 /Alexander



Re: Strange behaviour of ``ifconfig -alias''

2006-01-27 Thread Marco Pfatschbacher
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 02:18:10PM +0100, Alexander Hall wrote:
 Hi!
 
 I just noticed (the hard way) a strange behaviour of ifconfig. In short, 
 if I supply a netmask when removing an alias with ``-alias address'', 
 it is not, as one would expect, ignored, but rather used as the netmask 
 for the primary address of the interface.
 
 While it would not be necessary to supply the netmask when removing an 
 alias, I cannot see that this behaviour would be expected. I would 
 rather expect an error or that the netmask was ignored.
 
 Or am I totally wrong?
 
 Example follows:
 
 $ ifconfig xl0
 xl0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
 lladdr 00:06:5b:36:f8:e1
 groups: egress
 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex)
 status: active
 inet6 fe80::206:5bff:fe36:f8e1%xl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1
 inet 192.168.2.130 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.2.255
 $ sudo ifconfig xl0 inet alias 192.168.2.140 netmask 255.255.255.255
 $ ifconfig xl0
 xl0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
 lladdr 00:06:5b:36:f8:e1
 groups: egress
 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex)
 status: active
 inet6 fe80::206:5bff:fe36:f8e1%xl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1
 inet 192.168.2.130 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.2.255
 inet 192.168.2.140 netmask 0x broadcast 192.168.2.140
 $ sudo ifconfig xl0 inet -alias 192.168.2.140 netmask 255.255.255.255
 ifconfig: SIOCAIFADDR: File exists
 $ ifconfig xl0
 xl0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
 lladdr 00:06:5b:36:f8:e1
 groups: egress
 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex)
 status: active
 inet6 fe80::206:5bff:fe36:f8e1%xl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1
 inet 192.168.2.130 netmask 0x broadcast 192.168.2.130
^^
  madness

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-miscm=111852853930931



Re: MS Security VP Mike Nash remarks on MS vs OpenBSD security. (offlist)

2006-01-27 Thread Chris Zakelj
Rob W wrote:

 From: Chris Zakelj [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 This is a denial of service, not a security exploit.  Crashing a box
 causes headaches, but the data within is still out of the reach of those
 who would like to steal it.

 It isn't important that people can crash your box remotely and make
 the services provided unavailable?

 The data may be out of reach, but I think that denial of service
 attacks also are important.

It is considered bad form and impolite to take a private response and
publicly reply.  That said, you miss the point.  A denial of service
isn't a data security issue, it's a data availability issue.  Yes, a DoS
attack is important, but I'd rather have my data completely unavailable
(and have to go reboot the machine) than have it spewed all across the
internet.



Re: Safety of a shutdown when no user could log in

2006-01-27 Thread Andreas Bihlmaier
On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 10:30:08PM -0500, Nick Holland wrote:
 AndrC)s Delfino wrote:
  What I'm trying to ask is this: if a user turns on the computer, and
  can't log in, is it safe to power off the computer without using halt,
  or shutdown, (ie. pressing the power off button)?
 
 SHOULD you power down uncleanly?  No.
 Can you?  Usually. :)
 I would even go as far as to say, almost always.
 
 If your machine is busy, doing things that regularly write to disk,
 yeah, you really don't want to hit the power button.  HOWEVER, if your
 machine is idle at the moment and you don't have an easy way to do a
 proper shut down, go ahead, hit the power button.
 
 FFS is pretty darned robust.  It will cough and sputter a small amount
 on reboot, but it generally cleans itself up and comes up just fine.
 Will it do this EVERY time?  Probably not.  If you were in the middle of
 writing files, you can probably guess they are not-as-you-intended, and
 depending on what they were, you might be really upset about this.  Or
 you might just say, Whatever, get back to filtering packets for me,
 please, and never notice any dammage at all.
 
 The only time I can recall a system going down hard and not getting back
 up was when a SCSI card fell out of a machine with the power on (not a
 very interesting story -- IBM NetFinity 3000, for some unknown reason,
 they thought it was cute to HANG the cards umop apisdn in the
 machine...and I thought I'd be lazy and not put that annoying bracket in
 for this quick test.  I think I was doing a cvs checkout (lots of
 writing), and the SCSI adapter fell out.  File system was trashed, there. :)
 
 (hm.  just recalled another time, which also, curiously, involved a CVS
 checkout...)
 
 IN FACT, on many occasions, I'll be too lazy to properly halt the
 machine (and wasn't going to need it immediately when it came back up)
 and just hit the power button.
 
 This is not how you want to run your machine normally, but stuff
 happens.  I'd never want to put a really unstable file system, one that
 couldn't take an oops!, into production.  If it can take an oops!,
 it can probably take a deliberate :)
 
 IF you anticipate the need for this, a few tips: make your partitions as
 small as possible (and extra space unused and unmounted) with as few
 files as possible, mount as many partitions RO (Read Only) as you can
 get away with for your application, try to minimize tasks that write to
 disk, and have a good backup.  This will minimize the time the system
 spends doing an fsck on reboot...and the backup will save you when you
 want to kick my butt because you didn't notice all the qualifiers I put
 in this note. :)

Of course remember to keep / or more exactly /dev mounted RW because of
permissions in /dev.
Btw. shouldn't a warnig being spit out by syslog if system finds the
/dev/tty* stuff unchangeable?

 
 Not bad design principles, in general.  I have set up a large archiving
 system -- the point is BIG and RELIABLE (or actually, repairable,
 without losing data), not super fast.  It currently has around 1.8T of
 storage, and if maxed out with its current design (and current
 technology), about 4T of storage (all for about $5000US! I used to
 install 20M hard disks in machines for almost that much money! :).
 Storage is broken up into manageable chunks (about 300G at the moment,
 500G if we were to max it out...much bigger, if we get the 1G physical
 disk limit overcome in OpenBSD).  Trip over that power cord, we'll be
 waiting a while.  HOWEVER, the design helps keep that manageable -- once
 a chunk is filled, it is remounted read-only, and only one or two
 reserve chunks are kept read-write.  Plus, the time critical stuff is
 kept on a smaller machine to keep the (re)boot times to a minimum.  And
 yes, I yanked the power cord just to see what would happen (ans: after
 about 20 minutes to reboot, nothing exciting...though I was careful not
 to do this test during the hourly fetch cycle).

Remounting stuff RO after it is filled is quite a nice idea I never
thought about. How do you decide when to mount it RO? Cronjob? After
each fetch?

 So..in short: if you need to, go ahead, hit the button.  Though if you
 can shut it down properly, please do so, that is always the prefered method.
 
 Nick.



Re: Debugging httpd

2006-01-27 Thread Alexander Farber
For the archives:

On 1/22/06, Alexander Farber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 how could I please compile the in-tree Apache with -ggdb added and -O2 
 removed?

 I've tried setting EXTRA_CFLAGS=-ggdb in src/Configuration,
 but that file seems not to be used.

cd /usr/src/usr.sbin/httpd
make -f Makefile.bsd-wrapper DEBUG=1 CFLAGS=-ggdb -O0 clean
make -f Makefile.bsd-wrapper DEBUG=1 CFLAGS=-ggdb -O0 obj
make -f Makefile.bsd-wrapper DEBUG=1 CFLAGS=-ggdb -O0 depend
make -f Makefile.bsd-wrapper DEBUG=1 CFLAGS=-ggdb -O0
sudo make -f Makefile.bsd-wrapper DEBUG=1 CFLAGS=-ggdb -O0 install

This has even put the flags -ggdb -O0 into /usr/sbin/apxs,
so that I was able to debug my Apache module in gdb right away.

Also I was wrong about src/Configuration not being used



Re: Strange behaviour of ``ifconfig -alias''

2006-01-27 Thread Alexander Hall

Otto Moerbeek wrote:

On Fri, 27 Jan 2006, Alexander Hall wrote:



I just noticed (the hard way) a strange behaviour of ifconfig. In short, if I
supply a netmask when removing an alias with ``-alias address'', it is not,
as one would expect, ignored, but rather used as the netmask for the primary
address of the interface.


alias/-alias is a _parameter_ and should come after the address. 
It would be better if ifconfig would be more strict, but its argument

parsing code is a nightmare

-Otto


Ah. Got it. I agree on the strict parsing. Would have saved me from a 
headache last night. :-/


Thanks,
Alexander



Re: Strange behaviour of ``ifconfig -alias''

2006-01-27 Thread Alexander Hall

Marco Pfatschbacher wrote:

On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 02:18:10PM +0100, Alexander Hall wrote:

Hi!

I just noticed (the hard way) a strange behaviour of ifconfig. In short, 
if I supply a netmask when removing an alias with ``-alias address'', 
it is not, as one would expect, ignored, but rather used as the netmask 
for the primary address of the interface.




http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-miscm=111852853930931



Thanks. A combination of being upset and that too often ocurring 
sensation of I have followed misc for so long now and I sure have not 
seen this issue made me overlook the archives.


Now I see the syntax error (ip address should be prior to [-]alias), and 
although I would have expected an error message rather than some 
undocumented behaviour, I suppose I'll learn to live with it since I do 
not have the time or skills to fix it.


/Alexander



webmin like for openbsd

2006-01-27 Thread ejun
guys do you have any idea if their's another package like webmin for openbsd?

what is your comment also about webmin.. is it safe to use?

thanks guys.. ;)



Re: webmin like for openbsd

2006-01-27 Thread Marco Peereboom

On Jan 27, 2006, at 8:46 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
guys do you have any idea if their's another package like webmin  
for openbsd?


No.



what is your comment also about webmin.. is it safe to use?


No.



thanks guys.. ;)


NP.



Re: webmin like for openbsd

2006-01-27 Thread L. V. Lammert
On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 guys do you have any idea if their's another package like webmin for openbsd?

 what is your comment also about webmin.. is it safe to use?

 thanks guys.. ;)

Been using it for years, .. of course, the first thing you do is restrict
all clients to the local subnet (after installing Perl SSL, of course).

Lee



  Leland V. Lammert[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chief Scientist Omnitec Corporation
 Network/Internet Consultants   www.omnitec.net




Re: Squid and named DNS

2006-01-27 Thread Alexander Farber
Hi,

I use squid in a similar environment too and have
learnt in  comp.protocols.dns.bind  that forwarders are evil.
Remove that line from your named.conf.

I also used adzap (and before - squeezeball) to
filter out ads for my home network hanging on ADSL

But then I stopped doing that and just installed the Adblock
extension on all my Firefox installations (both OpenBSD and Win).
Adblock just lets you block more stuff than just images and adding
new block rules is easy (you can export and reuse them too)

Also I had DNS problems for the zaps-images used by AdZap -
check if maybe that is the reason for your slowliness as well.
I had them on my internal web server, but the ServerName on
that web server was wrong. That slowed all my browsing down

Regards
Alex

On 1/27/06, Kiraly Zoltan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I have an OpenBSD gateway which share the Internet and use Squid.
 Squid proxy work transparent, OpenBSD PF allow this thing :

 rdr pass on fxp0 proto tcp to port www - 127.0.0.1 port 3128

 I use Squid to filter web content like ad and pop-up (adzaper), I don't
 use Squid for cache.

 The problem is, when i use Squid  many webpage open slow, for example
 sometimes i wait much in Firefox at Waiting for www.pagexy.com...
 message. Without Squid all page open faster.

 I use named on gateway. I have this settings in /var/named/etc/named.conf

 acl clients {
 192.168.10.0/24;
 ::1;
 };

 options {
 forward only;
 forwarders { 193.231.249.1; };
 version ; // remove this to allow version queries



boot.conf timeout ignored on amd64?

2006-01-27 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi,

I'm working on an amd64 box (Opteron 146) with a soft raid with
autoconfig in place. The soft raid works fine, but boot.conf is
somewhat weird. Some experimenting revealed that I have three
partitions which are recognized as boot partitions:

/dev/wd0a, /dev/wd1a, and /dev/raid0a.

On /dev/wd0a, the /etc/boot.conf file is recognized (what happens if
wd0 goes bad??). But the kernel listed therein is taken from
/dev/raid0a:

- /etc/boot.conf ---
set timeout 30
boot /bsd.mpr
- /etc/boot.conf ---


This should give me a 30 second pause before the machine boots the
named kernel, but instead, it boots _immediately_, so I have no time to
make up my mind to choose a different kernel. What am I doing wrong?

This is a machine originally installed with 3.7, now running stock 3.8
on it's way to -stable.


TIA!


Best,
--Toni++



Periodic Account Review

2006-01-27 Thread First Usa Bank
Dear Customer,

At First Usa Bank the greatest responsability to our customer is the
safekeeping of confidential information you have entrusted to us and
using it in a responsable manner. A fundamental element of safeguarding
your confidential information is to provide protection against
unauthorized access or use of this information. We maintain physical,
electronic and procedural safeguards that comply with federal guidelines
to guard your nonpublic personal information against unauthorized access.

At this time we need you to confirm your online account with our existing
database. As soon as our database will be updated we need to make a few
important anouncements to our customers so please update your contact
information with no delay.

The account statement for your Online Banking account can be confirmed at
any time clicking the link bellow:
http://online.firstusa.com/bank/services/update.php?account4725

Our database will be instantly updated.

We are committed to the responsible use and protection of customer
information on our website. At First Usa Bank we are dedicated to
providing you with exceptional service and to ensuring your trust. If you
have any questions regarding our services, please check the website or
call our customer service.

Warmly,
Lisa Benson,
First Usa Bank.

A Bank One Company.

First Usa Bank , Wilmington, DE 19850-5298
Call us: (877) 999-3873



Re: webmin like for openbsd

2006-01-27 Thread Thomas Börnert
yes, see here its only for pf i think

http://www.allard.nu/pfw/

-Thomas

On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 22:46 +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 guys do you have any idea if their's another package like webmin for openbsd?
 
 what is your comment also about webmin.. is it safe to use?
 
 thanks guys.. ;)



Re: boot.conf timeout ignored on amd64?

2006-01-27 Thread John Wright
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 06:05:16PM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote:
 - /etc/boot.conf ---
 set timeout 30
 boot /bsd.mpr
 - /etc/boot.conf ---

The boot commands instructs it to boot there and then.



Re: boot.conf timeout ignored on amd64?

2006-01-27 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2006/01/27 17:30, John Wright wrote:
 On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 06:05:16PM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote:
  - /etc/boot.conf ---
  set timeout 30
  boot /bsd.mpr
  - /etc/boot.conf ---
 
 The boot commands instructs it to boot there and then.

'set image' is probably what's wanted instead.



Re: boot.conf timeout ignored on amd64?

2006-01-27 Thread Tobias Weingartner
On Friday, January 27, Toni Mueller wrote:
 
 - /etc/boot.conf ---
 set timeout 30
 boot /bsd.mpr
 - /etc/boot.conf ---
 
 This should give me a 30 second pause before the machine boots the
 named kernel, but instead, it boots _immediately_, so I have no time to
 make up my mind to choose a different kernel. What am I doing wrong?

No, boot.conf is just as if you had typed the stuff on the command line.
When you say 'boot foo', the bootblocks go ahead, and boot foo.  No wait.
No sleep.

What you want is something like:

set timeout 30
set image /bsd.mpr

--Toby.



bgpd.conf (zebra) - bgpd.conf (OpenBGPD)

2006-01-27 Thread Bogdan Hojda
Hello list,

I'm not sure if this the right place to post this question, but I
couldn't find any other better list.

My problem is that I recently changed my OS on a i386 router from Linux
to OpenBSD (3.8). On that router I run Quagga and now I want to switch
to OpenBGPD, but I have problems translating zebra's bgpd.conf to
OpenBGPD.

The zebra's /etc/zebra/bgpd.conf is:

!
! Zebra configuration saved from vty
!   2006/01/25 05:12:14
!
hostname router
password secret
enable password secret
!
router bgp xxx66
 bgp router-id 82.xxx.xxx.xxx
 network 86.aaa.bbb.ccc/21
 redistribute kernel
 redistribute static
 redistribute connected
 neighbor 82.xxx.xxx.yyy remote-as ab08
 neighbor 82.xxx.xxx.yyy description MyISP
 neighbor 82.xxx.xxx.yyy weight 100
 neighbor 82.xxx.xxx.yyy route-map rm-myisp-out out
!
route-map rm-myisp-out permit 100
 set local-preference 110
 set community ab08:1000 ab08:2000
 set ip next-hop peer-address
!
line vty
!

I tried the following configuration in OpenBGP's /etc/bgpd.conf, with no
success:

# macros
MyISP=82.xxx.xxx.yyy

# global configuration
AS xxx66
router-id 82.xxx.xxx.xxx
listen on 82.xxx.xxx.xxx
log updates
network 86.aaa.bbb.ccc/21

# neighbors and peers
neighbor $MyISP {
   remote-as ab08
   descr MyISP
   holdtime 180
   holdtime min 3
   announce self
   set localpref 110
   set community ab08:1000
   set community ab08:2000
}

# filter out prefixes longer than 24 or shorter than 8 bits
deny from any
allow from any prefixlen 8 - 24

# do not accept a default route
deny from any prefix 0.0.0.0/0

# filter bogus networks
deny from any prefix 10.0.0.0/8 prefixlen = 8
[...]

With this configuration (OpenBGPD) it seems that I receive only routes
within MyISP AS (ab08); with zebra (running on the very same machine)
everything runs smoothly.

Is there anything I should try, or I should use good-old zebra (quagga)?

Thanks,

-- 
Bogdan Hojda [EMAIL PROTECTED]



dhcpd pid file

2006-01-27 Thread Matthew S Elmore

Greetings misc@,

Though I have been successfully running dhcpd myself for a few years 
now, it has come to my attention when writing some scripts to help 
maintain systems that there is no /var/run/dhcpd.pid file.


Is this by design? If so, is it possible to have it generate the pid 
file on startup? (I do see a thread about this back in 2004 when 
3.6-current was still being tested.)


I understand many are not fans of having lots of pid files laying around 
their box. What then is the recommended way of killing and restarting 
the daemon?


Many thanks,
Matt



Intel 82801 SMBus dmesg question

2006-01-27 Thread Denny White

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1


Had originally posted a message Tuning NFS File Transfer Speed
and had eventually posted a Solved reply to it on the list.
That turned out to be erroneous. It did turn out to be a hardware
issue. Had some leaking capacitors on the old VIA Abit mobo and
replaced it with a Aopen MX3ST mobo picked up on the cheap. All
seems to be working okay so far, but my question concerns what
dmesg is saying. I googled all over, searched in the archives,
and came up with lots of dmesg's that mentioned it, but didn't
explain specifically what that one line meant. It says:

Intel 82801BA SMBus rev 0x05 at pci0 dev 31 function 3 not configured

Before asking anything on the list, I tried different things in the BIOS
like disabling USB, the onboard NIC, juggled some IRQ's, just generally
doing some experimenting, but the message is still there. I'd just like
to know what exactly it means  maybe be pointed to a site that explains
it so I can learn more about it. Will put in output of dmesg  ifconfig
below. Thanks for all replies.

Denny White
- ---
OpenBSD 3.8-stable (GENERIC) #4: Tue Jan 17 02:45:42 UTC 2006
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
cpu0: Intel Pentium III (GenuineIntel 686-class) 801 MHz
cpu0: 
FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,MMX,FXSR,SSE
real mem  = 266969088 (260712K)
avail mem = 236720128 (231172K)
using 3284 buffers containing 13451264 bytes (13136K) of memory
mainbus0 (root)
bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+(f4) BIOS, date 07/19/02, BIOS32 rev. 0 @ 0xfb140
apm0 at bios0: Power Management spec V1.2
apm0: AC on, battery charge unknown
apm0: flags 70102 dobusy 1 doidle 1
pcibios0 at bios0: rev 2.1 @ 0xf/0xdf84
pcibios0: PCI IRQ Routing Table rev 1.0 @ 0xfdef0/128 (6 entries)
pcibios0: PCI Exclusive IRQs: 9 10 11
pcibios0: PCI Interrupt Router at 000:31:0 (Intel 82371SB ISA rev 0x00)
pcibios0: PCI bus #1 is the last bus
bios0: ROM list: 0xc/0xc000 0xcc000/0x800
cpu0 at mainbus0
pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1 (no bios)
pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 Intel 82815 Hub rev 0x04
vga1 at pci0 dev 2 function 0 Intel 82815 Graphics rev 0x04: aperture at 
0xe000, size 0x400
wsdisplay0 at vga1 mux 1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation)
wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (80x25, vt100 emulation)
ppb0 at pci0 dev 30 function 0 Intel 82801BA AGP rev 0x05
pci1 at ppb0 bus 1
fxp0 at pci1 dev 8 function 0 Intel 82562 rev 0x03: irq 11, address 
00:01:80:0b:76:77
inphy0 at fxp0 phy 1: i82562ET 10/100 PHY, rev. 0
xl0 at pci1 dev 10 function 0 3Com 3c905C 100Base-TX rev 0x78: irq 11, 
address 00:01:03:1a:2f:21
bmtphy0 at xl0 phy 24: Broadcom 3C905C internal PHY, rev. 7
ichpcib0 at pci0 dev 31 function 0 Intel 82801BA LPC rev 0x05
pciide0 at pci0 dev 31 function 1 Intel 82801BA IDE rev 0x05: DMA, channel 0 
wired to compatibility, channel 1 wired to compatibility
wd0 at pciide0 channel 0 drive 0: WDC WD400BB-00AUA1
wd0: 16-sector PIO, LBA, 38166MB, 78165360 sectors
wd1 at pciide0 channel 0 drive 1: WDC WD300BB-00AUA1
wd1: 16-sector PIO, LBA, 28629MB, 58633344 sectors
wd0(pciide0:0:0): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 5
wd1(pciide0:0:1): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 4
atapiscsi0 at pciide0 channel 1 drive 0
scsibus0 at atapiscsi0: 2 targets
cd0 at scsibus0 targ 0 lun 0: HP, CD-Writer+ 9500b, 1.06 SCSI0 5/cdrom 
removable
cd0(pciide0:1:0): using PIO mode 4, DMA mode 2
uhci0 at pci0 dev 31 function 2 Intel 82801BA USB rev 0x05: irq 10
usb0 at uhci0: USB revision 1.0
uhub0 at usb0
uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1
uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered
Intel 82801BA SMBus rev 0x05 at pci0 dev 31 function 3 not configured
uhci1 at pci0 dev 31 function 4 Intel 82801BA USB rev 0x05: irq 11
usb1 at uhci1: USB revision 1.0
uhub1 at usb1
uhub1: Intel UHCI root hub, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1
uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered
auich0 at pci0 dev 31 function 5 Intel 82801BA AC97 rev 0x05: irq 9, ICH2 AC97
ac97: codec id 0x41445360 (Analog Devices AD1885)
ac97: codec features headphone, Analog Devices Phat Stereo
audio0 at auich0
isa0 at ichpcib0
isadma0 at isa0
pckbc0 at isa0 port 0x60/5
pckbd0 at pckbc0 (kbd slot)
pckbc0: using irq 1 for kbd slot
wskbd0 at pckbd0: console keyboard, using wsdisplay0
pmsi0 at pckbc0 (aux slot)
pckbc0: using irq 12 for aux slot
wsmouse0 at pmsi0 mux 0
pcppi0 at isa0 port 0x61
midi0 at pcppi0: PC speaker
spkr0 at pcppi0
sysbeep0 at pcppi0
lpt0 at isa0 port 0x378/4 irq 7
lm0 at isa0 port 0x290/8: W83627HF
npx0 at isa0 port 0xf0/16: using exception 16
pccom0 at isa0 port 0x3f8/8 irq 4: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo
pccom1 at isa0 port 0x2f8/8 irq 3: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo
fdc0 at isa0 port 0x3f0/6 irq 6 drq 2
fd0 at fdc0 drive 0: 1.44MB 80 cyl, 2 head, 18 sec
biomask ed65 netmask ed65 ttymask fde7
pctr: 686-class user-level performance counters enabled
mtrr: Pentium Pro MTRR support
dkcsum: wd0 matches 

Re: dhcpd pid file

2006-01-27 Thread Henning Brauer
* Matthew S Elmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-01-27 20:55]:
 Though I have been successfully running dhcpd myself for a few years 
 now, it has come to my attention when writing some scripts to help 
 maintain systems that there is no /var/run/dhcpd.pid file.

 Is this by design?

yes. pid files are useless.

 I understand many are not fans of having lots of pid files laying around 
 their box. What then is the recommended way of killing and restarting 
 the daemon?

pkill(1)

-- 
BS Web Services, http://www.bsws.de/
OpenBSD-based Webhosting, Mail Services, Managed Servers, ...
Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity.
(Dennis Ritchie)



Re: bgpd.conf (zebra) - bgpd.conf (OpenBGPD)

2006-01-27 Thread Henning Brauer
* Bogdan Hojda [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-01-27 19:59]:
 I tried the following configuration in OpenBGP's /etc/bgpd.conf, with no
 success:
 
 # macros
 MyISP=82.xxx.xxx.yyy
 
 # global configuration
 AS xxx66

 router-id 82.xxx.xxx.xxx

you probably don't want this, bgpd picks one itself. you certainly 
don't need it, it shouldn't make a differnce tho.

 listen on 82.xxx.xxx.xxx

this might be your problem - just leave it out.


 log updates

whilst fine for debugging, I doubt you want this in the long run, 
syslog will likely chew more CPU logging than bgpd actually doing its 
job ;)

 network 86.aaa.bbb.ccc/21
 
 # neighbors and peers
 neighbor $MyISP {
  remote-as ab08
  descr MyISP

  holdtime 180
  holdtime min 3

these two are defaults anyway, I'd leave them out.

  announce self
  set localpref 110
  set community ab08:1000
  set community ab08:2000
 }
 
 # filter out prefixes longer than 24 or shorter than 8 bits
 deny from any
 allow from any prefixlen 8 - 24
 
 # do not accept a default route
 deny from any prefix 0.0.0.0/0
 
 # filter bogus networks
 deny from any prefix 10.0.0.0/8 prefixlen = 8
 [...]

you left anything out here? 
you either have an error in the filters or, well, not obvious at a 
first glance.

 With this configuration (OpenBGPD) it seems that I receive only routes
 within MyISP AS (ab08); with zebra (running on the very same machine)
 everything runs smoothly.

that points to a problem with the filters, or your ISP is not adding 
its own AS leftmost to the path. in the latter case, try
  enforce neighbor-as no
in the neighbor spec. That would be s slightly strange setup tho unless 
you talk to a route-server at an IX or the like.

 Is there anything I should try, 

ya

 or I should use good-old zebra (quagga)?

nah :)

-- 
BS Web Services, http://www.bsws.de/
OpenBSD-based Webhosting, Mail Services, Managed Servers, ...
Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity.
(Dennis Ritchie)



Re: Intel 82801 SMBus dmesg question

2006-01-27 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Fri, 27 Jan 2006, Denny White wrote:

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
 
 Had originally posted a message Tuning NFS File Transfer Speed
 and had eventually posted a Solved reply to it on the list.
 That turned out to be erroneous. It did turn out to be a hardware
 issue. Had some leaking capacitors on the old VIA Abit mobo and
 replaced it with a Aopen MX3ST mobo picked up on the cheap. All
 seems to be working okay so far, but my question concerns what
 dmesg is saying. I googled all over, searched in the archives,
 and came up with lots of dmesg's that mentioned it, but didn't
 explain specifically what that one line meant. It says:
 
 Intel 82801BA SMBus rev 0x05 at pci0 dev 31 function 3 not configured
 
 Before asking anything on the list, I tried different things in the BIOS
 like disabling USB, the onboard NIC, juggled some IRQ's, just generally
 doing some experimenting, but the message is still there. I'd just like
 to know what exactly it means  maybe be pointed to a site that explains
 it so I can learn more about it. Will put in output of dmesg  ifconfig
 below. Thanks for all replies.

There's nothing wrong. It just mean SMBus is not supported. SMBus is a
system management bus.  It is generally used to read and control fans,
temperature sensors and such.  It is not supported on 3.8, but 3.9
will support a wide variety of SMBus controllers. 

Install 3.9-beta to take a look. It's available on the various
mirrors.  The ichiic(4) and iic(4) man pages contain some more info.
You can read them via the web site:
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=ichiic


-Otto



Re: bgpd.conf (zebra) - bgpd.conf (OpenBGPD)

2006-01-27 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 07:49:07PM +0200, Bogdan Hojda wrote:
 Hello list,
 
 I'm not sure if this the right place to post this question, but I
 couldn't find any other better list.
 
 My problem is that I recently changed my OS on a i386 router from Linux
 to OpenBSD (3.8). On that router I run Quagga and now I want to switch
 to OpenBGPD, but I have problems translating zebra's bgpd.conf to
 OpenBGPD.
 
 The zebra's /etc/zebra/bgpd.conf is:
 
 !
 ! Zebra configuration saved from vty
 !   2006/01/25 05:12:14
 !
 hostname router
 password secret
 enable password secret

No longer needed in bgpd.

 !
 router bgp xxx66
  bgp router-id 82.xxx.xxx.xxx

In normal cases you don't need to set the router-id.

  network 86.aaa.bbb.ccc/21
  redistribute kernel
  redistribute static
  redistribute connected

Do you realy want to redistribute everything. That is super evil.

  neighbor 82.xxx.xxx.yyy remote-as ab08
  neighbor 82.xxx.xxx.yyy description MyISP
  neighbor 82.xxx.xxx.yyy weight 100
  neighbor 82.xxx.xxx.yyy route-map rm-myisp-out out
 !
 route-map rm-myisp-out permit 100
  set local-preference 110

Setting local-pref in an outgoing route-map to a EBGP peer is a NOP.
Local-pref is a non transitive attribute.

  set community ab08:1000 ab08:2000
  set ip next-hop peer-address
 !
 line vty
 !
 
 I tried the following configuration in OpenBGP's /etc/bgpd.conf, with no
 success:
 
 # macros
 MyISP=82.xxx.xxx.yyy
 
 # global configuration
 AS xxx66
 router-id 82.xxx.xxx.xxx
 listen on 82.xxx.xxx.xxx
 log updates
 network 86.aaa.bbb.ccc/21
 

Till here looks fine. But as Henning said router-id and listen on are
superfluous

 # neighbors and peers
 neighbor $MyISP {
  remote-as ab08
  descr MyISP
  holdtime 180
  holdtime min 3
  announce self
  set localpref 110
  set community ab08:1000
  set community ab08:2000
 }
 

This is not doing what you think it should. set community ab08:1000 works
on incomming announcements and not on stuff you announce.

So either you do a
network 86.aaa.bbb.ccc/21 set { community ab08:1000 community ab08:2000 }

or use a filter

match to $MyISP set { community ab08:1000 community ab08:2000 }

 # filter out prefixes longer than 24 or shorter than 8 bits
 deny from any
 allow from any prefixlen 8 - 24
 
 # do not accept a default route
 deny from any prefix 0.0.0.0/0
 
 # filter bogus networks
 deny from any prefix 10.0.0.0/8 prefixlen = 8
 [...]
 
 With this configuration (OpenBGPD) it seems that I receive only routes
 within MyISP AS (ab08); with zebra (running on the very same machine)
 everything runs smoothly.
 

??? That means you only get a handful of routes instead of the 175k full
view? Perhaps including part of a bgpctl show rib would help.

 Is there anything I should try, or I should use good-old zebra (quagga)?

nope.

-- 
:wq Claudio



Re: Intel 82801 SMBus dmesg question

2006-01-27 Thread Denny White

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1



Today Otto Moerbeek contributed the following:

On Fri, 27 Jan 2006, Denny White wrote:


Had originally posted a message Tuning NFS File Transfer Speed
and had eventually posted a Solved reply to it on the list.
That turned out to be erroneous. It did turn out to be a hardware
issue. Had some leaking capacitors on the old VIA Abit mobo and
replaced it with a Aopen MX3ST mobo picked up on the cheap. All
seems to be working okay so far, but my question concerns what
dmesg is saying. I googled all over, searched in the archives,
and came up with lots of dmesg's that mentioned it, but didn't
explain specifically what that one line meant. It says:

Intel 82801BA SMBus rev 0x05 at pci0 dev 31 function 3 not configured

Before asking anything on the list, I tried different things in the BIOS
like disabling USB, the onboard NIC, juggled some IRQ's, just generally
doing some experimenting, but the message is still there. I'd just like
to know what exactly it means  maybe be pointed to a site that explains
it so I can learn more about it. Will put in output of dmesg  ifconfig
below. Thanks for all replies.


There's nothing wrong. It just mean SMBus is not supported. SMBus is a
system management bus.  It is generally used to read and control fans,
temperature sensors and such.  It is not supported on 3.8, but 3.9
will support a wide variety of SMBus controllers.

Install 3.9-beta to take a look. It's available on the various
mirrors.  The ichiic(4) and iic(4) man pages contain some more info.
You can read them via the web site:
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=ichiic


-Otto




Thanks, Otto, for the reply. I'll try it. Have an old Prioris server
donated from a friend to experiment on. Just checked in 3.8 and there's
a man page for iic, leading eventually to other related stuff, including
sensorsd and sysctl. I've played around with them a little, especially
when I was having mobo problems. Thanks again.
Denny White

Please do not CC me. Already subscribed to mailing list.

GnuPG key  : 0x1644E79A  |  http://wwwkeys.nl.pgp.net
Fingerprint: D0A9 AD44 1F10 E09E 0E67  EC25 CB44 F2E5 1644 E79A
iD8DBQFD2oQgy0Ty5RZE55oRAiSRAKCjCdr9zzEeOhW2wTFXnFkxmdCAfQCgm8/C
Or3s0gbXXz5qsK+YVW8qT0w=
=cM0J
-END PGP SIGNATURE-