Re: 3.9 sightings :: ot
On 4/24/06, Karsten McMinn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: the partys starting over here in the west (usa). props if you can recognize my first server getting the honors. my thanks and my raised glass to Theo and the team. Mine arrived on Friday safely wrapped in my favorite t-shirt, the 2.9 Secret Service shirt. Greg
Re: Problem Compiling Stevens' Socket Source Code
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 08:33:39PM -0401, Ray Lai wrote: On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 12:10:14AM +0200, Tobias Ulmer wrote: Here's a patch that removes all(?) warnings/errors from the intro chapter if you followed the instructions in the readme... diff -ru unpv13e.orig/intro/byteorder.c unpv13e/intro/byteorder.c --- unpv13e.orig/intro/byteorder.c Thu Nov 14 04:33:33 2002 +++ unpv13e/intro/byteorder.c Tue Apr 18 04:39:40 2006 @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ else printf(unknown\n); } else - printf(sizeof(short) = %d\n, sizeof(short)); + printf(sizeof(short) = %zd\n, sizeof(short)); Use %zu for sizeof(), since it returns size_t, an unsigned type. -Ray- My mistake, thanks Ray :) Tobias
Re: 3.7: weird IP address problem
Hello, On Mon, 24.04.2006 at 15:30:55 -0400, Matthew Closson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [ wrong IP address ] What could that be, and why can't I see this address anywhere? I'd rather not reboot only to make a change in IP numbers effective... Can you send us the output of ifconfig ifname0 for example if you had an fxp card then: unfortunately, I can't. But there were two IP addresse on there: The remaining, correct IPv4 address, and some IPv6 address. I've now also deleted that IPv6 address, but it's still no-go. Also did you do this? ifconfig ifname delete inet alias aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd I did: ifconfig ifname inet aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd -alias and: ifconfig ifname inet aaa.bbb.ccc.eee which looks similar according to the manual. At least, the latter should overwrite any remnants of the original assignment. Trying to delete the already non-listed address yields: ifconfig: SIOCDIFADDR: Can't assign requested address I wasn't trying to delete an alias, but instead change the main address to the (former) alias, and then delete the original address. route add default gw aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd What? The default gateway is already set, but to a quite different machine. As for the 'arp' and 'route' suggestions: * No suspicious information turns up there. I only see remote machines in these displays anyway. * The problem now persists for several weeks. Enough time for arp to time out in any case. Best, --Toni++
Re: advantages/disadvantages of kernel pppoe(4) vs userland pppoe(8)?
-Urspr|ngliche Nachricht- Von: Bihlmaier Andreas [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: 24.04.06 17:16:44 An: misc@openbsd.org Betreff: Re: advantages/disadvantages of kernel pppoe(4) vs userland pppoe(8)? On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 11:44:25AM +0200, holger glaess wrote: Jonathan Thornburg wrote: huge snip hi i also customer of arcor and an wrap embedded router ( take a look at www.pcengines.ch ) your laptop should be powerful enough for router / dhcp server / caching dns server and dyndns client too . i use the kernel pppoe right now and at the past the userland pppoe. from my feeling are the kernel pppoe faster an more lightweight as the userland pppoe. just you have to care about mtu/mss size at the firewall-code and by sysctl for the fullspeed. What exactly do you mean by and by sysctl for the fullspeed? I'm running kernel pppoe myself on an old pIII box. Of course I had to take care of the mtu issue, but never touched any sysctl variable. Please enlighten me. hi sorry i talk about this ( not mtu ) net.inet.tcp.mssdflt=1440 this sysctl have to the same value like this at firewall rule scrub on $ext_if all max-mss 1440 you need both ! if don4t setup this you get trouble with connection to some websites and some other services this are more confortable with the userland pppoe holger ( i think this is the biggest diffrence to the userland pppoe ) i work with this setup since months with any kind of trouble. holger Regards, ahb
Re: 3.7: weird IP address problem
Hello Ste, On Mon, 24.04.2006 at 22:49:48 +0100, Ste Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've noticed the same thing before with aliases. Down and upping the interface combined with a route flush sh /etc/netstart should fix the problem I am glad that you can confirm the problem. I'm sure a reboot would fix it, too, but I'd rather get at the root cause of it, and eliminate it there. To preserve the status quo, I abstained from rebooting the box, so I can conduct some further testing if anyone has good suggestions on what else to try. probably wouldn't do this over ssh though. That's part of the problem. ;-) Best, --Toni++
Re: 3.7: weird IP address problem
Hi, On Mon, 24.04.2006 at 15:39:36 -0400, Brian A. Seklecki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Also, is it still ARP'ing for the old address (tcpdump(8) will show). no ARP. It's going straight to the target machine, but with the wrong sender IP (so it doesn't ever get any replies for packets it originated). Best, --Toni++
Re: 3.7: weird IP address problem
Toni Mueller wrote: Hello, On Mon, 24.04.2006 at 15:30:55 -0400, Matthew Closson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [ wrong IP address ] What could that be, and why can't I see this address anywhere? I'd rather not reboot only to make a change in IP numbers effective... Can you send us the output of ifconfig ifname0 for example if you had an fxp card then: unfortunately, I can't. But there were two IP addresse on there: The remaining, correct IPv4 address, and some IPv6 address. I've now also deleted that IPv6 address, but it's still no-go. Also did you do this? ifconfig ifname delete inet alias aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd I did: ifconfig ifname inet aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd -alias and: ifconfig ifname inet aaa.bbb.ccc.eee which looks similar according to the manual. At least, the latter should overwrite any remnants of the original assignment. Trying to delete the already non-listed address yields: ifconfig: SIOCDIFADDR: Can't assign requested address I wasn't trying to delete an alias, but instead change the main address to the (former) alias, and then delete the original address. route add default gw aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd What? The default gateway is already set, but to a quite different machine. U, bit outa my league, but seems like in order to get to a gateway on another machine, you must first go through an interface (ie gateway) on your own machine. At least there seems to be something of that nature in any routing tables I've seen. Most likely in order to go anywhere you must first go through your non-existent IP address. I think that default gateway makes more than one entry in the routing tables. As for the 'arp' and 'route' suggestions: * No suspicious information turns up there. I only see remote machines in these displays anyway. * The problem now persists for several weeks. Enough time for arp to time out in any case. Best, --Toni++
Congress readies broad new digital copyright bill
Congress readies broad new digital copyright bill by Declan McCullagh http://news.com.com/Congress+readies+broad+new+digital+copyright+bill/2100-1028_3-6064016.html Quote: For the last few years, a coalition of technology companies, academics and computer programmers has been trying to persuade Congress to scale back the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. Now Congress is preparing to do precisely the opposite. A proposed copyright law seen by CNET News.com would expand the DMCA's restrictions on software that can bypass copy protections and grant federal police more wiretapping and enforcement powers. ...
Re: 3.7: weird IP address problem
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006, Toni Mueller wrote: Hello, I have a box that once had two IP addresses on one interface. I deconfigured one of them using ifconfig -alias. Now, when I want to use any (?) program on that box to go over this interface, it wants to use the addresses which is no longer present. I double-checked to ensure that there is no NAT in the way, and also used all netstat and ifconfig otions I know to convince myself that the old address is gone. I also tried to 'ifconfig ifname inet the-one-and-only-address' just in case there would be a different handling of addresses assigned with and without using -alias, but to no avail. What could that be, and why can't I see this address anywhere? I'd rather not reboot only to make a change in IP numbers effective... Does it work when you force the source address to the desired address? With ping, use -I address, with ssh use -b address. 3.7 contains some route caching that might play a role. Forcing a source address might have the effect of clearing that cache. Also, double check the routing table with route -n show, to rule out wrong reverse lookups and remaining route entries for the old address. -Otto
Re: 3.7: weird IP address problem
Hello Otto, On Tue, 25.04.2006 at 10:46:37 +0200, Otto Moerbeek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does it work when you force the source address to the desired address? With ping, use -I address, with ssh use -b address. yes, it does work when I specify the correct address with ping, but doesn't when I don't specify an address. 3.7 contains some route caching that might play a role. Forcing a source address might have the effect of clearing that cache. Nope. I did it in this sequence: 1. ping with forced source address - success 2. ping without forced source address - failure Some important programs don't have an option to specify a source address... Also, double check the routing table with route -n show, to rule out wrong reverse lookups and remaining route entries for the old address. I always use -n because I don't have DNS on that network anyway, and it goes faster, and is more true, too. The routing table does not show any appearance of the wrong address, only some mac addresses for hosts, and some link#n entries for directly attached networks. Best, --Toni++
Re: 3.7: weird IP address problem
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006, Toni Mueller wrote: Hello Otto, On Tue, 25.04.2006 at 10:46:37 +0200, Otto Moerbeek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does it work when you force the source address to the desired address? With ping, use -I address, with ssh use -b address. yes, it does work when I specify the correct address with ping, but doesn't when I don't specify an address. 3.7 contains some route caching that might play a role. Forcing a source address might have the effect of clearing that cache. Nope. I did it in this sequence: 1. ping with forced source address - success 2. ping without forced source address - failure Some important programs don't have an option to specify a source address... Indeed, I looked up what changed and that was a case of caching a route used with forwarding, which does not apply here. Also, double check the routing table with route -n show, to rule out wrong reverse lookups and remaining route entries for the old address. I always use -n because I don't have DNS on that network anyway, and it goes faster, and is more true, too. The routing table does not show any appearance of the wrong address, only some mac addresses for hosts, and some link#n entries for directly attached networks. I'm out of suggestions. -Otto
Re: 3.7: weird IP address problem
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 12:25:26PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote: On Tue, 25 Apr 2006, Toni Mueller wrote: Hello Otto, On Tue, 25.04.2006 at 10:46:37 +0200, Otto Moerbeek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does it work when you force the source address to the desired address? With ping, use -I address, with ssh use -b address. yes, it does work when I specify the correct address with ping, but doesn't when I don't specify an address. 3.7 contains some route caching that might play a role. Forcing a source address might have the effect of clearing that cache. Nope. I did it in this sequence: 1. ping with forced source address - success 2. ping without forced source address - failure Some important programs don't have an option to specify a source address... Indeed, I looked up what changed and that was a case of caching a route used with forwarding, which does not apply here. Also, double check the routing table with route -n show, to rule out wrong reverse lookups and remaining route entries for the old address. I always use -n because I don't have DNS on that network anyway, and it goes faster, and is more true, too. The routing table does not show any appearance of the wrong address, only some mac addresses for hosts, and some link#n entries for directly attached networks. I'm out of suggestions. Upgrade from 3.7 to 3.9. It may be fixed in 3.9 (I remember stuff that was fixed where packets where sent out with the wrong source address if you had more than one network configured (alias with a different network than the main address)). -- :wq Claudio
How will OpenBSD Defend against Virtual Rootkits?
This question comes to mind as a result of my reading just now VM Rootkits: The Next Big Threat? By Ryan Naraine March 10, 2006 http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,193,00.asp Dave Feustel -- Lose, v., experience a loss, get rid of, lose the weight Loose, adj., not tight, let go, free, loose clothing
Anyone using ATI Radeon XPRESS 200 Graphics Chipset on 3.8 ?
Hi, Is ATI Radeon XPRESS 200 Graphics Chipset fully supported on 3.8? Anyone using it successfully? My Motherboard is http://www.directron.com/rs482m4ild.html amd64 athlon processor. Actually it was taken to replace a Debian Backupserver. Sarge amd64 did not detect the 120GB SATA Hard disks. NetBSD 3.0 also did not detectthe disks. OpenBSD 3.8 Detected it without Problems :-) But finding it difficult to configure X to get Color Depth of 24 :-( Any pointers to get X running fine is highly appreciated :-) Thankyou so much Kind Regards Siju
REPOST: console on 3.9-current question
I was surprised that no one replied on this list about this issue...so I wanted to repost it ONE time. Someone out there must also be seeing this and if its normal..I would like to know...(and if its normal..why) REPOST: After further testing, its not only the console, but also over SSH. (on the same LAN segment) - so that would eliminate a few possibilities. I noticed this awhile back on 3.9-current and it is still there in the latest snapshot I tried (4/22)...I am hoping someone has seen this.. I installed from the snapshot and didnt customize a thing. When the machine is done loading (IBM rack server)...I simply logged in (as root at the moment). I am not running serial or headless. I have a normal monitor/keyboard (PS2) plugged in. When I type at the console to begin to setup the machine, the characters do not follow me in real time as I type. Its like I am on an overseas long distance 300 baud dialup line. There is quite a delay and sometimes I can type several words and then a few seconds later - they show up. This does not happen on the same machine if I install 3.8. I have (4) identical machines (make/model/ram/cpu/hard drives) and they all work fine with 3.8 - it is only past 3.8 that I noticed this. Any thoughts? -JD
Re: Anyone using ATI Radeon XPRESS 200 Graphics Chipset on 3.8 ?
On 4/25/06, Siju George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Is ATI Radeon XPRESS 200 Graphics Chipset fully supported on 3.8? Anyone using it successfully? My Motherboard is http://www.directron.com/rs482m4ild.html amd64 athlon processor. Actually it was taken to replace a Debian Backupserver. Sarge amd64 did not detect the 120GB SATA Hard disks. NetBSD 3.0 also did not detectthe disks. OpenBSD 3.8 Detected it without Problems :-) But finding it difficult to configure X to get Color Depth of 24 :-( Any pointers to get X running fine is highly appreciated :-) Sorry I missed the dmesg :-( -- OpenBSD 3.8 (GENERIC) #247: Sat Sep 10 15:53:26 MDT 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC real mem = 1039593472 (1015228K) avail mem = 879919104 (859296K) using 22937 buffers containing 104165376 bytes (101724K) of memory mainbus0 (root) cpu0 at mainbus0: (uniprocessor) cpu0: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3400+, 2193.98 MHz cpu0: FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SSE3,NXE,MMXX,FFXSR,LONG,3DNOW2,3DNOW cpu0: 64KB 64b/line 2-way I-cache, 64KB 64b/line 2-way D-cache, 512KB 64b/line 16-way L2 cache cpu0: ITLB 32 4KB entries fully associative, 8 4MB entries fully associative cpu0: DTLB 32 4KB entries fully associative, 8 4MB entries fully associative pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1 pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 ATI RS480 Host rev 0x10 ppb0 at pci0 dev 1 function 0 ATI RS480 PCIE rev 0x00 pci1 at ppb0 bus 1 vga1 at pci1 dev 5 function 0 ATI Radeon XPRESS 200 rev 0x00 wsdisplay0 at vga1 mux 1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation) wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (80x25, vt100 emulation) pciide0 at pci0 dev 17 function 0 ATI IXP400 SATA rev 0x80: DMA pciide0: using irq 11 for native-PCI interrupt pciide0: port 0: device present, speed: 1.5Gb/s wd0 at pciide0 channel 0 drive 0: ST3120827AS wd0: 16-sector PIO, LBA48, 114473MB, 234441648 sectors wd0(pciide0:0:0): using BIOS timings, Ultra-DMA mode 6 pciide0: port 1: device present, speed: 1.5Gb/s wd1 at pciide0 channel 1 drive 0: ST3120827AS wd1: 16-sector PIO, LBA48, 114473MB, 234441648 sectors wd1(pciide0:1:0): using BIOS timings, Ultra-DMA mode 6 pciide1 at pci0 dev 18 function 0 ATI IXP400 SATA rev 0x80: DMA pciide1: using irq 5 for native-PCI interrupt ohci0 at pci0 dev 19 function 0 ATI IXP400 USB rev 0x80: irq 4, version 1.0, legacy support usb0 at ohci0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0 at usb0 uhub0: ATI OHCI root hub, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 4 ports with 4 removable, self powered ohci1 at pci0 dev 19 function 1 ATI IXP400 USB rev 0x80: irq 4, version 1.0, legacy support usb1 at ohci1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1 at usb1 uhub1: ATI OHCI root hub, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 4 ports with 4 removable, self powered ehci0 at pci0 dev 19 function 2 ATI IXP400 USB2 rev 0x80: irq 4 usb2 at ehci0: USB revision 2.0 uhub2 at usb2 uhub2: ATI EHCI root hub, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub2: 8 ports with 8 removable, self powered ATI IXP400 SMBus rev 0x81 at pci0 dev 20 function 0 not configured pciide2 at pci0 dev 20 function 1 ATI IXP400 IDE rev 0x80: DMA (unsupported), channel 0 configured to compatibility, channel 1 configured to compatibility atapiscsi0 at pciide2 channel 0 drive 1 scsibus0 at atapiscsi0: 2 targets cd0 at scsibus0 targ 0 lun 0: SONY, CD-RW CRX230E, QYS1 SCSI0 5/cdrom removable pciide2: channel 1 ignored (not responding; disabled or no drives?) vendor ATI, unknown product 0x437b (class multimedia unknown subclass 0x03, rev 0x01) at pci0 dev 20 function 2 not configured ATI IXP400 ISA rev 0x80 at pci0 dev 20 function 3 not configured ppb1 at pci0 dev 20 function 4 ATI IXP400 PCI rev 0x80 pci2 at ppb1 bus 2 skc0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 D-Link Systems DGE-530T rev 0x11: irq 5 skc0: Marvell Yukon (0x1) sk0 at skc0 port A: address 00:0f:3d:88:9e:d4 eephy0 at sk0 phy 0: Marvell 88E1011 Gigabit PHY, rev. 3 re0 at pci2 dev 3 function 0 Realtek 8169 rev 0x10: irq 5, address 00:16:17:20:2a:a6 rgephy0 at re0 phy 7: RTL8169S/8110S PHY, rev. 2 pchb1 at pci0 dev 24 function 0 AMD AMD64 HyperTransport rev 0x00 pchb2 at pci0 dev 24 function 1 AMD AMD64 Address Map rev 0x00 pchb3 at pci0 dev 24 function 2 AMD AMD64 DRAM Cfg rev 0x00 pchb4 at pci0 dev 24 function 3 AMD AMD64 Misc Cfg rev 0x00 isa0 at mainbus0 com1 at isa0 port 0x2f8/8 irq 3: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo pckbc0 at isa0 port 0x60/5 pckbd0 at pckbc0 (kbd slot) pckbc0: using irq 1 for kbd slot wskbd0 at pckbd0: console keyboard, using wsdisplay0 pmsi0 at pckbc0 (aux slot) pckbc0: using irq 12 for aux slot wsmouse0 at pmsi0 mux 0 pcppi0 at isa0 port 0x61 spkr0 at pcppi0 sysbeep0 at pcppi0 lpt0 at isa0 port 0x378/4 irq 7 dkcsum: wd0 matches BIOS drive 0x80 dkcsum: wd1 matches BIOS drive 0x81 root on wd0a rootdev=0x0 rrootdev=0x300 rawdev=0x302 --- Thankyou so much Kind Regards Siju -- Siju Oommen George, Network Consultant. HiFX IT MEDIA SERVICES PVT. LTD.
Re: 3.9 sightings :: ot
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 08:45:15PM -0700, Karsten McMinn wrote: the partys starting over here in the west (usa). props if you can recognize my first server getting the honors. my thanks and my raised glass to Theo and the team. My personal one arrived yesterday wrapped in a nice Stop Blob T here in Winnipeg, MB, Canada. (still waiting for this fiscal's budget to go through at work for the work sets... grrr.) When I see the white packages every 6 months in the mail box, I shake it and listen for the sounds of broken tabs. Not a single one this time! ;) Thanks to the whole OpenBSD team! G
Re: How will OpenBSD Defend against Virtual Rootkits?
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 07:32:41AM -0500, Dave Feustel wrote: This question comes to mind as a result of my reading just now VM Rootkits: The Next Big Threat? By Ryan Naraine March 10, 2006 http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,193,00.asp Not much that can be done. As has always been said, if someone has physical access to the box, Game Over. VMs just give someone a new way to have physical access to the box. Now, if only we could do away with the myth that an OS can really find problems within itself (such as malware scanners that claim to fix problems on infested machines). Since that won't go away, I guess it isn't surprising that people expect that a guest OS can detect or deal with a problem on the host OS. Nick.
[OT] Re: How will OpenBSD Defend against Virtual Rootkits?
Dave Feustel wrote: This question comes to mind as a result of my reading just now VM Rootkits: The Next Big Threat? By Ryan Naraine March 10, 2006 http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,193,00.asp Dave Feustel http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SEP_field ;-) --sdg
Ethereal Problems
From http://www.incidents.org/ Yes, if you use Ethereal, it is time to upgrade. According an advisory posted by Frsirt, 28 vulnerabilities has been identified in Ethereal which could be exploited by remote attackers to compromise a vulnerable system or cause a denial of service. Thanks for removing it from ports a long time ago. -- Will
Re: How will OpenBSD Defend against Virtual Rootkits?
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006, Nick Holland wrote: On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 07:32:41AM -0500, Dave Feustel wrote: This question comes to mind as a result of my reading just now VM Rootkits: The Next Big Threat? By Ryan Naraine March 10, 2006 http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,193,00.asp Not much that can be done. As has always been said, if someone has physical access to the box, Game Over. VMs just give someone a new way to have physical access to the box. Now, if only we could do away with the myth that an OS can really find problems within itself (such as malware scanners that claim to fix problems on infested machines). Since that won't go away, I guess it isn't surprising that people expect that a guest OS can detect or deal with a problem on the host OS. Yeah, it's sad but true. A related myth is that running an OS inside a VM increases security. I would argue to opposite: Instead of having the potential to exploit bugs in hardware, os and userland code, I get the extra oppurtunity to exploit bugs in the VM layer as well! -Otto
OT - Get off the computer! ;)
My 3.9 CDs came in Saturday but I can't get my 3yo son off the computer long enough to do the upgrade. :/ http://tyson.homeunix.org/pics/bjet_1.jpg http://tyson.homeunix.org/pics/bjet_2.jpg II Joshua 24:15 Choose you this day what OS you will use; whether the OS of the free, functional, and secure, or the OS of the Blobs in whose land ye dwell: but as for me and my house, we will use OpenBSD. Thanks OpenBSD -- Terry http://tyson.homeunix.org
Re: OT - Get off the computer! ;)
On 2006/04/25 08:31, Terry wrote: My 3.9 CDs came in Saturday but I can't get my 3yo son off the computer long enough to do the upgrade. :/ http://tyson.homeunix.org/pics/bjet_1.jpg http://tyson.homeunix.org/pics/bjet_2.jpg My 2.75yo has an old summit48 (not quite working right) and a handful of patch leads that proves a reasonably good distraction, though the FC array I've got formatting on the kitchen table seems to interest him more for some reason...
Re: REPOST: console on 3.9-current question
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 06:41:58AM -0500, J.D. Bronson wrote: I was surprised that no one replied on this list about this issue...so I wanted to repost it ONE time. Someone out there must also be seeing this and if its normal..I would like to know...(and if its normal..why) I just got my CDs last night and haven't yet upgraded anything. We still have a while before the official release. Now there are plenty of people running current and testing, but still not nearly as many as are running release or stable. I'm pretty sure if the devs were working at 300 baud they would have done something about it. Ditto if reports of same were flooding in. So maybe at this time it's just you and maybe a couple of others who haven't said anything on the lists. In the meantime, perhaps you could try to debug a bit. Since you have identical machines you've got a nice opportunity to compare 3.8 and 3.9 behavior. Start with comparing simple stuff like all the nice numbers in top (interrupts?). Is the whole machine sluggish, or just console interaction? Check plus39.html and see if anything jumps out at you as possibly causing this problem. Compare dmesg between versions to see if anything significant went missing or appeared. In other words, poke around. I'll be upgrading to 3.9 soon on a small variety of hardware, and if I see anything similar I'll try to figure it out and post here... -- Darrin Chandler| Phoenix BSD Users Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://bsd.phoenix.az.us/ http://www.stilyagin.com/ |
tape,seagate,trouble
Hello I have some trouble with a seagate tapebackup (Seagate STTM20). It's an ide type. With OpenBSD mt gives the ouput: ioctl MTIOCGET: ivalid argument mt rewind works fine. When i try mt status under NetBSD it says: SCSI tape drive, residual=0 ds=3Mounted er=0 blocksize: 512 (0, 0, 0, 0) density: 0 (0, 0, 0, 0) current file number: 0 current block number: 0 Under NetBSD dump/restore works fine, but not under OpenBSD. The bios on the motherboard doesn't find the seagate, it says not detected. I have tried pnp and not pnp in bios without any differents. My dmesg says: iide1 at pci0 dev 15 function 1 VIA VT82C571 IDE rev 0x06: ATA133, channel 0 configured to compatibility, channel 1 configured to compatibility wd0 at pciide1 channel 0 drive 0: ST340014A wd0: 16-sector PIO, LBA48, 38166MB, 78165360 sectors wd0(pciide1:0:0): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 5 atapiscsi0 at pciide1 channel 1 drive 0 scsibus0 at atapiscsi0: 2 targets cd0 at scsibus0 targ 0 lun 0: _NEC, DVD_RW ND-3550A, 1.04 SCSI0 5/cdrom removable atapiscsi1 at pciide1 channel 1 drive 1 scsibus1 at atapiscsi1: 2 targets st0 at scsibus1 targ 0 lun 0: Seagate, STT2A, 8A51 SCSI2 1/sequential removable st0: drive empty or not ready cd0(pciide1:1:0): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 2 st0(pciide1:1:1): using PIO mode 4, DMA mode 2 uhci0 at pci0 dev 16 function 0 VIA VT83C572 USB rev 0x81: irq 11 usb0 at uhci0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0 at usb0 uhub0: VIA UHCI root hub, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci1 at pci0 dev 16 function 1 VIA VT83C572 USB rev 0x81: irq 11 usb1 at uhci1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1 at usb1 uhub1: VIA UHCI root hub, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci2 at pci0 dev 16 function 2 VIA VT83C572 USB rev 0x81: irq 10 usb2 at uhci2: USB revision 1.0 uhub2 at usb2 uhub2: VIA UHCI root hub, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub2: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci3 at pci0 dev 16 function 3 VIA VT83C572 USB rev 0x81: irq 10 usb3 at uhci3: USB revision 1.0 uhub3 at usb3 uhub3: VIA UHCI root hub, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub3: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered pcib0 at pci0 dev 17 function 0 VIA VT8237 ISA rev 0x00 vr0 at pci0 dev 18 function 0 VIA RhineII-2 rev 0x78: irq 11 address 00:11:2f:b4:14:99 rlphy0 at vr0 phy 1: RTL8201L 10/100 PHY, rev. 1 isa0 at pcib0 isadma0 at isa0 pckbc0 at isa0 port 0x60/5 pckbd0 at pckbc0 (kbd slot) pckbc0: using irq 1 for kbd slot wskbd0 at pckbd0: console keyboard, using wsdisplay0 pcppi0 at isa0 port 0x61 midi0 at pcppi0: PC speaker spkr0 at pcppi0 sysbeep0 at pcppi0 lpt0 at isa0 port 0x378/4 irq 7 lm0 at isa0 port 0x290/8: W83627THF npx0 at isa0 port 0xf0/16: using exception 16 pccom0 at isa0 port 0x3f8/8 irq 4: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo fdc0 at isa0 port 0x3f0/6 irq 6 drq 2 fd0 at fdc0 drive 0: 1.44MB 80 cyl, 2 head, 18 sec biomask ff6d netmask ff6d ttymask ffef pctr: user-level cycle counter enabled dkcsum: wd0 matches BIOS drive 0x80 root on wd0a rootdev=0x0 rrootdev=0x300 rawdev=0x302 syncing disks... OpenBSD 3.8-stable (ORION) #0: Sat Apr 22 23:58:14 CEST 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/ORION cpu0: Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 2.26GHz (GenuineIntel 686-class) 2.27 GHz cpu0: FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,CNXT-ID real mem = 535601152 (523048K) avail mem = 481816576 (470524K) using 4278 buffers containing 26882048 bytes (26252K) of memory mainbus0 (root) bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+(00) BIOS, date 09/26/05, BIOS32 rev. 0 @ 0xf0010 pcibios0 at bios0: rev 2.1 @ 0xf/0x1 pcibios0: PCI IRQ Routing Table rev 1.0 @ 0xf5a50/192 (10 entries) pcibios0: no compatible PCI ICU found: ICU vendor 0x1106 product 0x3227 pcibios0: Warning, unable to fix up PCI interrupt routing pcibios0: PCI bus #1 is the last bus bios0: ROM list: 0xc/0xf400 0xcf800/0x1800 cpu0 at mainbus0 pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1 (no bios) pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 vendor VIA, unknown product 0x3168 rev 0x82 ppb0 at pci0 dev 1 function 0 VIA VT8377 PCI-PCI rev 0x00 pci1 at ppb0 bus 1 vga1 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 Nvidia GeForce4 MX 420 rev 0xa3 wsdisplay0 at vga1 mux 1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation) wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (80x25, vt100 emulation) pciide0 at pci0 dev 15 function 0 VIA VT8237 SATA rev 0x80: DMA pciide0: using irq 10 for native-PCI interrupt pciide1 at pci0 dev 15 function 1 VIA VT82C571 IDE rev 0x06: ATA133, channel 0 configured to compatibility, channel 1 configured to compatibility wd0 at pciide1 channel 0 drive 0: ST340014A wd0: 16-sector PIO, LBA48, 38166MB, 78165360 sectors wd0(pciide1:0:0): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 5 atapiscsi0 at pciide1 channel 1 drive 0 scsibus0 at atapiscsi0: 2 targets cd0 at scsibus0 targ 0 lun 0: _NEC, DVD_RW ND-3550A, 1.04 SCSI0 5/cdrom removable atapiscsi1 at pciide1 channel 1 drive 1 scsibus1 at atapiscsi1: 2 targets st0 at scsibus1 targ 0 lun 0:
Re: firewall pf rules multiple dhcp servers
On Monday 24 April 2006 19:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i have a firewall hook up to my cable modem my external interface has a dynamic address from the dhcp server at my isp i have a dhcp server on the firewall for two subnets subnet a local network subnet b wireless network i need the external interface to request and recieve offers from the dhcp server at the isp and the local and wireless network to request and recieve offers from the dhcp server on the firewall when a request is made from the local network both the internal and the external dhcp server responds my pf rules I don't think the pf rules are useful as I read something about dhcp working at the bpf level and not pf. It looks like you simply need to configure your dhcp server correctly to listen on only the internal and wireless networks. Your external nic would then get it's info from your ISP, and the others from your local server (their requests wouldn't get forwarded to your ISP without running a relay). Chris
Re: firewall pf rules multiple dhcp servers
On Tuesday 25 April 2006 13:04, Chris Smith wrote: nic would then get it's info from your ugly grammar error should be its instead of it's, sorry for that
Re: 3.9 sightings :: ot
On 4/25/06, Gordon Grieder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 08:45:15PM -0700, Karsten McMinn wrote: the partys starting over here in the west (usa). props if you can recognize my first server getting the honors. my thanks and my raised glass to Theo and the team. My personal one arrived yesterday wrapped in a nice Stop Blob T here in Winnipeg, MB, Canada. (still waiting for this fiscal's budget to go through at work for the work sets... grrr.) When I see the white packages every 6 months in the mail box, I shake it and listen for the sounds of broken tabs. Not a single one this time! ;) I hadn't had a broken tab until 3.8 when just about everyone was broken, and they were even wrapped in a tshirt. But these sets are fine again. Whew. Greg
Re: tape,seagate,trouble
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 06:00:51PM +0200, Mats wrote: Under NetBSD dump/restore works fine, but not under OpenBSD. The bios on the motherboard doesn't find the seagate, it says not detected. I have tried pnp and not pnp in bios without any differents. this is probably the atapi tape drive bug that was fixed during the 3.9 development cycle. wait for 3.9 and upgrade (or ask me for a patch if you absolutely cannot wait) Juha
Re: 3.7: weird IP address problem
Upgrade from 3.7 to 3.9. It may be fixed in 3.9 (I remember stuff that was For the sake of clarity, upgrade to 3.8 first, *then* 3.9.
Re: Congress readies broad new digital copyright bill
yo texnika, where are you from in ukraine? I don't believe you should worry about that stupid DMCA shit... As far as I know things are actually pretty loose when it comes to copyright in Ukraine! No offense, but I think you're crazy! On 4/25/06, Alexey E. Suslikov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Congress readies broad new digital copyright bill by Declan McCullagh http://news.com.com/Congress+readies+broad+new+digital+copyright+bill/2100-10 28_3-6064016.html Quote: For the last few years, a coalition of technology companies, academics and computer programmers has been trying to persuade Congress to scale back the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. Now Congress is preparing to do precisely the opposite. A proposed copyright law seen by CNET News.com would expand the DMCA's restrictions on software that can bypass copy protections and grant federal police more wiretapping and enforcement powers. ...
Re: advantages/disadvantages of kernel pppoe(4) vs userland pppoe(8)?
Hi, I'm about to setup up ADSL at home for the first time, using the following network topology: ADSL+---+ +--+ +--+ to - | DSL |--- | firewall | - | ethernet | ISP | modem | pppoe | + router | | switch | +---+ | + nat| +--+ +--+ | || V VV to other computers The firewall/router/nat box is (will be when I get this setup) an old 486 laptop with 2 pcmcia ethernet cards, running 3.9-stable. (Yes, I've ordered a CD; until it arrives I'm using 3.8-stable.) I already have the (external) DSL modem, and from talking to other Unix-savvy customers of my ISP (arcor.de), their setup is that the DSL modem talks pppoe to me (in this case to my firewall/router/nat box). From looking at the FAQ section 6, it seems I have two basic options available doing this in OpenBSD: pppoe(4) in the kernal, and pppoe(8) in userland. My question is, what are the relative advantages/disadvantages of these? The obvious tradeoff is performance: I expect pppoe(8) to be slower due to the extra kernel/user-space crossings for each packet. My ADSL is 6M bits/sec downstream, 0.5M upstream. But are there other significant differences in * support for pppoe features? * ease of configuration? * reliability? I haven't been using pppoe(4) or pppoe(8) for very long, but I ended up going with pppoe(8) because it will automatically populate /etc/resolv.conf. I don't know of a trivial way to get pppoe(4) to do this. See this thread, for instance: http://groups.google.com/group/lucky.openbsd.misc/browse_thread/thread/8e91d354b340cb1c/334c6880e7cf3a38?lnk=stq=openbsd++pppoe+resolv.confrnum=15hl=en#334c6880e7cf3a38
Re: Anyone using ATI Radeon XPRESS 200 Graphics Chipset on 3.8 ?
Is ATI Radeon XPRESS 200 Graphics Chipset fully supported on 3.8? No, not if I remember correctly. Anyone using it successfully? For about a year... But finding it difficult to configure X to get Color Depth of 24 :-( Any pointers to get X running fine is highly appreciated :-) I had to hack on radeon(4) in X.Org 6.8.2 to add support for the GPU (and fix a nasty cache flush bug). I could dig out the patch if you feel adventurous... 3.9 (X.Org 6.9.0) works fine with the XPRESS 200 chipset. Have you ordered your CD's yet? :-)
Re: tape,seagate,trouble
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 06:00:51PM +0200, Mats wrote: Hello I have some trouble with a seagate tapebackup (Seagate STTM20). It's an ide type. With OpenBSD mt gives the ouput: ioctl MTIOCGET: ivalid argument mt rewind works fine. When i try mt status under NetBSD it says: SCSI tape drive, residual=0 ds=3Mounted er=0 blocksize: 512 (0, 0, 0, 0) density: 0 (0, 0, 0, 0) current file number: 0 current block number: 0 Under NetBSD dump/restore works fine, but not under OpenBSD. The bios on the motherboard doesn't find the seagate, it says not detected. I have tried pnp and not pnp in bios without any differents. My dmesg says: st0 at scsibus1 targ 0 lun 0: Seagate, STT2A, 8A51 SCSI2 1/sequential removable st0: drive empty or not ready cd0(pciide1:1:0): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 2 st0(pciide1:1:1): using PIO mode 4, DMA mode 2 Hmm, since you typo'ed the command that doesn't work, debugging might be difficult. Are you sure you are not trying anything strange, and that $TAPE is either unset or set to something appropriate? Joachim
Re: Tape drive DLT VS160
Yea it would normally be mt comp on or mt compress on Yes, but probably on FreeBSD not OpenBSD :( Any other sugestions ? Regards, Darek
Re: tape,seagate,trouble
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 09:24:57PM +0300, Juha Erkkila wrote: On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 06:00:51PM +0200, Mats wrote: Under NetBSD dump/restore works fine, but not under OpenBSD. The bios on the motherboard doesn't find the seagate, it says not detected. I have tried pnp and not pnp in bios without any differents. this is probably the atapi tape drive bug that was fixed during the 3.9 development cycle. wait for 3.9 and upgrade (or ask me for a patch if you absolutely cannot wait) Thanks a lot Juha. It's ok for me to wait for the 3.9 release. Even if it takes a little more time to get it here in Sweden. // Regards
Re: tape,seagate,trouble
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 11:14:50PM +0200, Joachim Schipper wrote: On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 06:00:51PM +0200, Mats wrote: Hello I have some trouble with a seagate tapebackup (Seagate STTM20). It's an ide type. With OpenBSD mt gives the ouput: ioctl MTIOCGET: ivalid argument Hmm, since you typo'ed the command that doesn't work, debugging might be difficult. Are you sure you are not trying anything strange, and that $TAPE is either unset or set to something appropriate? $TAPE is unset. The tape is winding so I have contact. I will try again when I have the 3.9 release. But thanks for your suggestions anyway (and excuse eventually bad english). // Regards from Sweden
Re: firewall pf rules multiple dhcp servers
who cares :) On 4/25/06, Chris Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tuesday 25 April 2006 13:04, Chris Smith wrote: nic would then get it's info from your ugly grammar error should be its instead of it's, sorry for that
Re: Verizon PC5740 card (Curitel Communications) wireless WAN card
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 22:59:32 -0400 Ray Lai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It works quite well now except that almost everytime I pull out the card, OpenBSD freezes. I guiltily admit that this may be due to me using an instable window manager (fvwm 2.5). I supposed I could try killing the window manager next time. Try doing that in console mode instead of X, you'll probably get a kernel panic. Follow the instructions. (I should know better). OK I did that but since I'm out of town right now I don't have a serial cable and am way too lazy go to Fry's right now or to type out trace and ps output... but here is the fault itself. I will capture the trace and ps when I get back home. Apr 25 17:29:12 pollen /bsd: umodem0: at uhub4 port 1 (addr 2) disconnected Apr 25 17:29:12 pollen /bsd: ucom0 detached Apr 25 17:29:12 pollen /bsd: umodem0 detached Apr 25 17:29:12 pollen /bsd: uhub4 detached Apr 25 17:29:12 pollen /bsd: usb4 detached Apr 25 17:29:12 pollen /bsd: ohci1: 1 scheduling overruns Apr 25 17:29:12 pollen /bsd: ohci1: resume detect Apr 25 17:29:12 pollen /bsd: ohci1: unrecoverable error, controller halted Apr 25 17:29:12 pollen /bsd: ohci1: blocking intrs 0x18 ohci0 detached uhub6: at usb5 (addr 1) disconnected uhub6 detached uvm_vault(0xd060e200, 0xdeadc000, 0, 1) - d kernel: page fault trap, code=0 Stopped at usbd_do_request_flags_pipe+0xe: mov0x254(%eax),%eax CP -- Chris Paul Sentinare Messaging Solutions 106 Maywood Drive, Boulder Creek, CA 95006 web: http://www.sentinare.com phone: +1 (877) 727-9786 The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. Sentinare Messaging Solutions, Inc. is a California Corporation.
Re: tape,seagate,trouble
Mats wrote: On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 09:24:57PM +0300, Juha Erkkila wrote: On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 06:00:51PM +0200, Mats wrote: Under NetBSD dump/restore works fine, but not under OpenBSD. The bios on the motherboard doesn't find the seagate, it says not detected. I have tried pnp and not pnp in bios without any differents. this is probably the atapi tape drive bug that was fixed during the 3.9 development cycle. wait for 3.9 and upgrade (or ask me for a patch if you absolutely cannot wait) Thanks a lot Juha. It's ok for me to wait for the 3.9 release. Even if it takes a little more time to get it here in Sweden. // Regards if you order now from: https://https.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/order.eu you might get your 3.9 CD's before release date :~) It's worth it. Fred -- https://https.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/order
Finally got my 3.9 CDs... Congratz to the artists for the artwork
I was beginning to think that us up in Canada had been forgotten, but then yesterday I got my CDs. I just wanted to say thanks for another great release. I have 2 more things to say: 1) for the first time the little pins holding the CDs were all intact on delivery...WOOT 2) the artwork is REALLY nice I find (the CD covers case cover), and the song is pretty cool too. Congratz to whoever did those. Jean-Daniel
Re: REPOST: console on 3.9-current question
On 4/25/06, J.D. Bronson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was surprised that no one replied on this list about this issue...so I wanted to repost it ONE time. Someone out there must also be seeing this and if its normal..I would like to know...(and if its normal..why) REPOST: After further testing, its not only the console, but also over SSH. (on the same LAN segment) - so that would eliminate a few possibilities. I noticed this awhile back on 3.9-current and it is still there in the latest snapshot I tried (4/22)...I am hoping someone has seen this.. I installed from the snapshot and didnt customize a thing. When the machine is done loading (IBM rack server)...I simply logged in (as root at the moment). I am not running serial or headless. I have a normal monitor/keyboard (PS2) plugged in. When I type at the console to begin to setup the machine, the characters do not follow me in real time as I type. Its like I am on an overseas long distance 300 baud dialup line. There is quite a delay and sometimes I can type several words and then a few seconds later - they show up. This does not happen on the same machine if I install 3.8. I have (4) identical machines (make/model/ram/cpu/hard drives) and they all work fine with 3.8 - it is only past 3.8 that I noticed this. Any thoughts? -JD From http://openbsd.unixtech.be/report.html: [quote] Current version problem reports If your problem is with the current source tree rather than a release or stable tree, 1. Test the problem at least twice, with source updated a few days apart. [endquote] Or try a new current snapshot.. You now even have the choice between non-PAE and very-close-to-PAE ones ;) ==Adriaan==
nfe0: tx v1 error 0x6001
Anyone else get these errors with the nfe driver? Not really sure what to do to troubleshoot the problem. This seems to happen during heavy traffic times. nfe0: tx v1 error 0x6001 nfe0: watchdog timeout nfe0: tx v1 error 0x6001 nfe0: tx v1 error 0x6001 Here's my dmesg if it helps... dmesg OpenBSD 3.9-current (GENERIC) #695: Mon Apr 17 14:37:08 MDT 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC cpu0: AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2600+ (AuthenticAMD 686-class, 256KB L2 cache) 2.09 GHz cpu0: FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36, MMX,FXSR,SSE real mem = 536375296 (523804K) avail mem = 482394112 (471088K) using 4278 buffers containing 26923008 bytes (26292K) of memory mainbus0 (root) bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+(23) BIOS, date 05/14/03, BIOS32 rev. 0 @ 0xfb490 apm0 at bios0: Power Management spec V1.2 apm0: AC on, battery charge unknown apm0: flags 70102 dobusy 1 doidle 1 pcibios0 at bios0: rev 2.1 @ 0xf/0xdf84 pcibios0: PCI IRQ Routing Table rev 1.0 @ 0xfdeb0/208 (11 entries) pcibios0: PCI Exclusive IRQs: 5 11 pcibios0: no compatible PCI ICU found pcibios0: Warning, unable to fix up PCI interrupt routing pcibios0: PCI bus #2 is the last bus bios0: ROM list: 0xc/0xa000 0xcc000/0x4000! 0xd/0x1800 cpu0 at mainbus0 pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1 (no bios) pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 NVIDIA nForce2 PCI rev 0xa2 NVIDIA nForce2 rev 0xa2 at pci0 dev 0 function 1 not configured NVIDIA nForce2 rev 0xa2 at pci0 dev 0 function 2 not configured NVIDIA nForce2 rev 0xa2 at pci0 dev 0 function 3 not configured NVIDIA nForce2 rev 0xa2 at pci0 dev 0 function 4 not configured NVIDIA nForce2 rev 0xa2 at pci0 dev 0 function 5 not configured pcib0 at pci0 dev 1 function 0 NVIDIA nForce2 ISA rev 0xa3 nviic0 at pci0 dev 1 function 1 NVIDIA nForce2 SMBus rev 0xa2 iic0 at nviic0 iic1 at nviic0 asbtm0 at iic1 addr 0x2d wbenv0 at iic1 addr 0x2e: W83L784TS-L ohci0 at pci0 dev 2 function 0 NVIDIA nForce2 USB rev 0xa3: irq 11, version 1.0, legacy support usb0 at ohci0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0 at usb0 uhub0: NVIDIA OHCI root hub, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 3 ports with 3 removable, self powered ohci1 at pci0 dev 2 function 1 NVIDIA nForce2 USB rev 0xa3: irq 5, version 1.0, legacy support usb1 at ohci1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1 at usb1 uhub1: NVIDIA OHCI root hub, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 3 ports with 3 removable, self powered ehci0 at pci0 dev 2 function 2 NVIDIA nForce2 USB rev 0xa3: irq 11 usb2 at ehci0: USB revision 2.0 uhub2 at usb2 uhub2: NVIDIA EHCI root hub, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub2: 6 ports with 6 removable, self powered nfe0 at pci0 dev 4 function 0 NVIDIA nForce2 LAN rev 0xa1: irq 11, address 00:e0:18:db:d5:96 rlphy0 at nfe0 phy 1: RTL8201L 10/100 PHY, rev. 1 auich0 at pci0 dev 6 function 0 NVIDIA nForce2 AC97 rev 0xa1: irq 5, nForce2 AC97 ac97: codec id 0x414c4720 (Avance Logic ALC650) ac97: codec features 20 bit DAC, 18 bit ADC, Realtek 3D audio0 at auich0 ppb0 at pci0 dev 8 function 0 NVIDIA nForce2 PCI-PCI rev 0xa3 pci1 at ppb0 bus 1 dc0 at pci1 dev 6 function 0 Lite-On PNIC rev 0x20: irq 11, address 00:a0:cc:22:cd:f6 mtdphy0 at dc0 phy 1: MTD972 10/100 PHY, rev. 8 em0 at pci1 dev 7 function 0 Intel PRO/1000 (82542) rev 0x03: irq 5, address 00:03:47:08:f1:b5 ral0 at pci1 dev 8 function 0 Ralink RT2560 rev 0x01: irq 11, address 00:14:85:b6:5c:8e ral0: MAC/BBP RT2560 (rev 0x04), RF RT2525 xl0 at pci1 dev 9 function 0 3Com 3c905B 100Base-TX rev 0x24: irq 5, address 00:50:04:05:44:be exphy0 at xl0 phy 24: 3Com internal media interface fxp0 at pci1 dev 10 function 0 Intel 8255x rev 0x02, i82557: irq 11, address 00:a0:c9:d8:1c:f1 inphy0 at fxp0 phy 1: i82555 10/100 PHY, rev. 0 pciide0 at pci0 dev 9 function 0 NVIDIA nForce2 IDE rev 0xa2: DMA, channel 0 configured to compatibility, channel 1 configured to compatibility wd0 at pciide0 channel 0 drive 0: WDC WD400BB-00CAA0 wd0: 16-sector PIO, LBA, 38166MB, 78165360 sectors wd0(pciide0:0:0): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 5 atapiscsi0 at pciide0 channel 1 drive 0 scsibus0 at atapiscsi0: 2 targets cd0 at scsibus0 targ 0 lun 0: MITSUMI, CD-ROM FX54++W, U01L SCSI0 5/cdrom removable cd0(pciide0:1:0): using PIO mode 0 ppb1 at pci0 dev 30 function 0 NVIDIA nForce2 AGP rev 0xa2 pci2 at ppb1 bus 2 vga1 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 NVIDIA GeForce2 MX rev 0xa1 wsdisplay0 at vga1 mux 1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation) wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (80x25, vt100 emulation) isa0 at pcib0 isadma0 at isa0 pckbc0 at isa0 port 0x60/5 pckbd0 at pckbc0 (kbd slot) pckbc0: using irq 1 for kbd slot wskbd0 at pckbd0: console keyboard, using wsdisplay0 pcppi0 at isa0 port 0x61 midi0 at pcppi0: PC speaker spkr0 at pcppi0 lpt0 at isa0 port 0x378/4 irq 7 npx0 at isa0 port 0xf0/16: using exception 16 pccom0 at isa0 port 0x3f8/8 irq 4: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo pccom1 at isa0 port 0x2f8/8 irq 3: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo fdc0 at isa0 port 0x3f0/6 irq 6 drq 2 fd0 at fdc0 drive 0: 1.44MB 80 cyl, 2 head, 18 sec biomask ff65 netmask ff65 ttymask
pppoe(4) chap/md5 vs. chap/microsoft: SOLVED (kinda)
Ladies and gentlemen, nevermind. Finally, I used ppp(8) with pppoe(8) and it works fine with MS-CHAP. Sorry for the noise. Best regards, Yuri Spirin Hello, misc. I have a connection to ISP that requires PPPoE. No hardware like DSL modem/router, just Ethernet cable from ISP. I setting up PPPoE on my 3.8-release router using pppoe(4). # ifconfig pppoe0 create # cat /etc/hostname.pppoe0 pppoedev fxp2 !/sbin/ifconfig fxp2 up !/usr/sbin/spppcontrol \$if \ myauthproto=chap \ myauthname=mylogin \ myauthkey=mypassword !/sbin/ifconfig \$if inet 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.1 netmask 0x !/sbin/route add default 0.0.0.1 up All the way like in man 4 pppoe. # sh /etc/netstart # spppcontrol pppoe0 pppoe0: phase=establish myauthproto=chap myauthname=mylogin hisauthproto=chap hisauthname= And connection is never up, just hangs on 'establish' phase. # tcpdump -neti fxp2//0:a0:c9:8c:75:67 is my MAC, //0:13:7f:8d:e5:1a is ISP server MAC 0:a0:c9:8c:75:67 ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 8863 32: PPPoE-Discovery code Initiation, version 1, type 1, id 0x, length 12 tag Service-Name, length 0 tag Host-Uniq, length 4 \000~\227o 0:13:7f:8d:e5:1a 0:a0:c9:8c:75:67 8863 60: PPPoE-Discovery code Offer, version 1, type 1, id 0x, length 40 tag Service-Name, length 0 tag Host-Uniq, length 4 \000~\227o tag AC-Name, length 4 k7-1 tag AC-Cookie, length 16 I'p[:eC E\221z\025\221+pk 0:a0:c9:8c:75:67 0:13:7f:8d:e5:1a 8863 52: PPPoE-Discovery code Request, version 1, type 1, id 0x, length 32 tag Service-Name, length 0 tag AC-Cookie, length 16 I'p[:eC E\221z\025\221+pk tag Host-Uniq, length 4 \000~\227o 0:13:7f:8d:e5:1a 0:a0:c9:8c:75:67 8863 60: PPPoE-Discovery code Confirm, version 1, type 1, id 0xf6aa, length 32 tag Service-Name, length 0 tag AC-Cookie, length 16 I'p[:eC E\221z\025\221+pk tag Host-Uniq, length 4 \000~\227o 0:a0:c9:8c:75:67 0:13:7f:8d:e5:1a 8864 32: PPPoE-Session code Session, version 1, type 1, id 0xf6aa, length 12 LCP: Configure-Request, Magic-Number=204725418, Vendor-Ext 0:13:7f:8d:e5:1a 0:a0:c9:8c:75:67 8864 60: PPPoE-Session code Session, version 1, type 1, id 0xf6aa, length 21 LCP: Configure-Request, Max-Rx-Unit=1492, Auth-Prot CHAP/Microsoft, Magic-Number=-421802100, Vendor-Ext 0:a0:c9:8c:75:67 0:13:7f:8d:e5:1a 8864 31: PPPoE-Session code Session, version 1, type 1, id 0xf6aa, length 11 LCP: Configure-Reject, Auth-Prot CHAP/MD5, Vendor-Ext 0:13:7f:8d:e5:1a 0:a0:c9:8c:75:67 8864 60: PPPoE-Session code Session, version 1, type 1, id 0xf6aa, length 12 LCP: Configure-Ack, Magic-Number=204725418, Vendor-Ext 0:13:7f:8d:e5:1a 0:a0:c9:8c:75:67 8864 60: PPPoE-Session code Session, version 1, type 1, id 0xf6aa, length 21 LCP: Configure-Request, Max-Rx-Unit=1492, Auth-Prot CHAP/Microsoft, Magic-Number=-421802100, Vendor-Ext 0:a0:c9:8c:75:67 0:13:7f:8d:e5:1a 8864 31: PPPoE-Session code Session, version 1, type 1, id 0xf6aa, length 11 LCP: Configure-Reject, Auth-Prot CHAP/MD5, Vendor-Ext 0:13:7f:8d:e5:1a 0:a0:c9:8c:75:67 8864 60: PPPoE-Session code Session, version 1, type 1, id 0xf6aa, length 21 LCP: Configure-Request, Max-Rx-Unit=1492, Auth-Prot CHAP/Microsoft, Magic-Number=-421802100, Vendor-Ext 0:a0:c9:8c:75:67 0:13:7f:8d:e5:1a 8864 31: PPPoE-Session code Session, version 1, type 1, id 0xf6aa, length 11 LCP: Configure-Reject, Auth-Prot CHAP/MD5 0:13:7f:8d:e5:1a 0:a0:c9:8c:75:67 8864 60: PPPoE-Session code Session, version 1, type 1, id 0xf6aa, length 21 LCP: Configure-Request, Max-Rx-Unit=1492, Auth-Prot CHAP/Microsoft, Magic-Number=-421802100, Vendor-Ext 0:a0:c9:8c:75:67 0:13:7f:8d:e5:1a 8864 31: PPPoE-Session code Session, version 1, type 1, id 0xf6aa, length 11 LCP: Configure-Reject, Auth-Prot CHAP/MD5 0:13:7f:8d:e5:1a 0:a0:c9:8c:75:67 8864 60: PPPoE-Session code Session, version 1, type 1, id 0xf6aa, length 21 LCP: Configure-Request, Max-Rx-Unit=1492, Auth-Prot CHAP/Microsoft, Magic-Number=-421802100, Vendor-Ext 0:a0:c9:8c:75:67 0:13:7f:8d:e5:1a 8864 31: PPPoE-Session code Session, version 1, type 1, id 0xf6aa, length 11 LCP: Configure-Reject, Auth-Prot CHAP/MD5, Vendor-Ext 0:13:7f:8d:e5:1a 0:a0:c9:8c:75:67 8864 60: PPPoE-Session code Session, version 1, type 1, id 0xf6aa, length 21 LCP: Configure-Request, Max-Rx-Unit=1492, Auth-Prot CHAP/Microsoft, Magic-Number=-421802100, Vendor-Ext 0:a0:c9:8c:75:67 0:13:7f:8d:e5:1a 8864 31: PPPoE-Session code Session, version 1, type 1, id 0xf6aa, length 11 LCP: Configure-Reject, Auth-Prot CHAP/MD5, Vendor-Ext 0:13:7f:8d:e5:1a 0:a0:c9:8c:75:67
Re: nfe0: tx v1 error 0x6001
Hi, Bob Bostwick (Lists) wrote: Anyone else get these errors with the nfe driver? Not really sure what to do to troubleshoot the problem. This seems to happen during heavy traffic times. nfe0: tx v1 error 0x6001 nfe0: watchdog timeout nfe0: tx v1 error 0x6001 nfe0: tx v1 error 0x6001 yes, I get similar messages with nfe(4). In my case it's a couple of times watchdog timeout followed by a single tx v1 error 0x6001 line. I get these messages always right after booting my machine. The nfe(4) interface begins working about 20 seconds after the initial login prompt appears (after or short before the tx v1 error 0x6001 line is shown), but after this deferred interface startup, all problems are gone. Just in case anybody wants to debug this issue, my dmesg is attached. regards, Andreas OpenBSD 3.9-current (GENERIC) #0: Mon Apr 24 18:35:45 CEST 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC cpu0: AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2600+ (AuthenticAMD 686-class, 512KB L2 cache) 1.93 GHz cpu0: FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,MMX,FXSR,SSE real mem = 536375296 (523804K) avail mem = 482365440 (471060K) using 4278 buffers containing 26923008 bytes (26292K) of memory mainbus0 (root) bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+(6e) BIOS, date 07/17/03, BIOS32 rev. 0 @ 0xfb990 apm0 at bios0: Power Management spec V1.2 apm0: AC on, battery charge unknown apm0: flags 70102 dobusy 1 doidle 1 pcibios0 at bios0: rev 2.1 @ 0xf/0xd8e4 pcibios0: PCI IRQ Routing Table rev 1.0 @ 0xfd820/192 (10 entries) pcibios0: PCI Exclusive IRQs: 3 5 10 11 pcibios0: no compatible PCI ICU found pcibios0: Warning, unable to fix up PCI interrupt routing pcibios0: PCI bus #2 is the last bus bios0: ROM list: 0xc/0xd000 0xd/0x1800 cpu0 at mainbus0 pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1 (no bios) pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 NVIDIA nForce2 PCI rev 0xc1 NVIDIA nForce2 rev 0xc1 at pci0 dev 0 function 1 not configured NVIDIA nForce2 rev 0xc1 at pci0 dev 0 function 2 not configured NVIDIA nForce2 rev 0xc1 at pci0 dev 0 function 3 not configured NVIDIA nForce2 rev 0xc1 at pci0 dev 0 function 4 not configured NVIDIA nForce2 rev 0xc1 at pci0 dev 0 function 5 not configured pcib0 at pci0 dev 1 function 0 NVIDIA nForce2 ISA rev 0xa3 nviic0 at pci0 dev 1 function 1 NVIDIA nForce2 SMBus rev 0xa2 iic0 at nviic0 iic0: addr 0x2f 04=00 06=02 07=00 0c=00 0d=07 0e=84 0f=00 10=ca 11=10 12=00 13=60 14=14 15=62 16=01 17=06 iic1 at nviic0 ohci0 at pci0 dev 2 function 0 NVIDIA nForce2 USB rev 0xa3: irq 11, version 1.0, legacy support usb0 at ohci0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0 at usb0 uhub0: NVIDIA OHCI root hub, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 3 ports with 3 removable, self powered ohci1 at pci0 dev 2 function 1 NVIDIA nForce2 USB rev 0xa3: irq 3, version 1.0, legacy support usb1 at ohci1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1 at usb1 uhub1: NVIDIA OHCI root hub, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 3 ports with 3 removable, self powered ehci0 at pci0 dev 2 function 2 NVIDIA nForce2 USB rev 0xa3: irq 5 usb2 at ehci0: USB revision 2.0 uhub2 at usb2 uhub2: NVIDIA EHCI root hub, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub2: 6 ports with 6 removable, self powered nfe0 at pci0 dev 4 function 0 NVIDIA nForce2 LAN rev 0xa1: irq 11, address 00:0c:76:ff:b6:f0 icsphy0 at nfe0 phy 1: ICS1893 10/100 PHY, rev. 1 ppb0 at pci0 dev 8 function 0 NVIDIA nForce2 PCI-PCI rev 0xa3 pci1 at ppb0 bus 1 emu0 at pci1 dev 9 function 0 Creative Labs SoundBlaster Live rev 0x05: irq 10 ac97: codec id 0x83847609 (SigmaTel STAC9721/23) ac97: codec features 18 bit DAC, 18 bit ADC, SigmaTel 3D audio0 at emu0 Creative Labs PCI Gameport Joystick rev 0x05 at pci1 dev 9 function 1 not configured pciide0 at pci0 dev 9 function 0 NVIDIA nForce2 IDE rev 0xa2: DMA, channel 0 configured to compatibility, channel 1 configured to compatibility wd0 at pciide0 channel 0 drive 0: SAMSUNG SV1203N wd0: 16-sector PIO, LBA48, 114498MB, 234493056 sectors wd0(pciide0:0:0): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 5 pciide0: channel 1 disabled (no drives) ppb1 at pci0 dev 30 function 0 NVIDIA nForce2 AGP rev 0xc1 pci2 at ppb1 bus 2 vga1 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 ATI Radeon 9600 Pro rev 0x00 wsdisplay0 at vga1 mux 1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation) wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (80x25, vt100 emulation) ATI Radeon 9600 Pro Sec rev 0x00 at pci2 dev 0 function 1 not configured isa0 at pcib0 isadma0 at isa0 pckbc0 at isa0 port 0x60/5 pckbd0 at pckbc0 (kbd slot) pckbc0: using irq 1 for kbd slot wskbd0 at pckbd0: console keyboard, using wsdisplay0 pmsi0 at pckbc0 (aux slot) pckbc0: using irq 12 for aux slot wsmouse0 at pmsi0 mux 0 pcppi0 at isa0 port 0x61 midi0 at pcppi0: PC speaker spkr0 at pcppi0 lpt0 at isa0 port 0x378/4 irq 7 lm0 at isa0 port 0x290/8: W83627HF npx0 at isa0 port 0xf0/16: using exception 16 pccom0 at isa0 port 0x3f8/8 irq 4: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo fdc0 at isa0 port 0x3f0/6 irq 6 drq 2 fd0 at fdc0 drive 0: 1.44MB 80 cyl, 2 head, 18 sec biomask eb6d netmask eb6d ttymask fbef pctr: user-level cycle
Re: firewall pf rules multiple dhcp servers
On 4/25/06, jacek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/25/06, Chris Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tuesday 25 April 2006 13:04, Chris Smith wrote: nic would then get it's info from your ugly grammar error should be its instead of it's, sorry for that who cares :) The programmer in me says it should be it's and to hell with 'standard english'. So there.
