Re: IBM T60 - APM issues
On 6/27/07, atstake atstake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 27 Jun 2007 11:58:04 +0200, Artur Grabowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If the T60 is anything like the X60, it doesn't have APM, only ACPI. I recompiled the kernel with this (removing the disable and the #) and still can get halt -p working. Is there something I'm missing? acpi0 at mainbus? acpitimer* at acpi? acpihpet* at acpi? acpiac*at acpi? acpibat* at acpi? acpibtn* at acpi? acpicpu* at acpi? acpidock* at acpi? acpiec*at acpi? acpiprt* at acpi? acpitz*at acpi? Here's my new dmesg | grep acpi. Thanks for any help. OpenBSD 4.1 (GENERIC.acpi) #0: Thu Jun 28 21:03:45 DST 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC.acpi acpi0 at mainbus0: rev 2 acpi0: tables DSDT FACP SSDT ECDT TCPA APIC MCFG HPET SLIC BOOT SSDT SSDT SSDT SSDT acpitimer0 at acpi0: 3579545 Hz, 24 bits acpihpet0 at acpi0: 14318179 Hz acpiprt0 at acpi0: bus 0 (PCI0) acpiprt1 at acpi0: bus 0 (AGP_) acpiprt2 at acpi0: bus 2 (EXP0) acpiprt3 at acpi0: bus 3 (EXP1) acpiprt4 at acpi0: bus 4 (EXP2) acpiprt5 at acpi0: bus 12 (EXP3) acpiprt6 at acpi0: bus 21 (PCI1) acpiec0 at acpi0: EC__ acpibtn0 at acpi0: LID_ acpibtn1 at acpi0: SLPB acpibat0 at acpi0: BAT0: model: 92P1141 serial: 1159 type: LION oem: SONY acpibat1 at acpi0: BAT1: not present acpiac0 at acpi0: AC unit online acpitz0 at acpi0, critical temperature: 127 degC acpitz1 at acpi0, critical temperature: 99 degC
Re: bgpd and multihop
* Jon Morby [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-06-29 02:56]: I've just updated one of our routers from an end of May snapshot to a Jun 28th snapshot and have noticed that we seem to be having problems with our multihop sessions since the upgrade. errr... I'm inlcined to say impossible, since there weren't many changes at all in bgpd since then, and nothing that remotely touches nexthop verification. check your routes, something must be different. bgpctl sh nex on both machines might give insight -- Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] BS Web Services, http://bsws.de Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services Dedicated Servers, Rootservers, Application Hosting - Hamburg Amsterdam
Which address is used when sending via CARP?
Hi all, using the following setup: # ifconfig vlan0 vlan0: flags=8943UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500 lladdr 00:13:d4:de:cf:88 vlan: 16 priority: 0 parent interface: sk0 groups: vlan inet6 fe80::213:d4ff:fede:cf88%vlan0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x7 inet 134.102.176.251 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 134.102.176.255 # ifconfig carp0 carp0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500 lladdr 00:00:5e:00:01:0a carp: MASTER carpdev vlan0 vhid 10 advbase 1 advskew 0 groups: carp inet6 fe80::200:5eff:fe00:10a%carp0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xc inet 134.102.176.250 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 134.102.176.255 - When the machine sends packets out, the carry 134.102.176.251 as source address, not 134.102.176.250. Is this expected behavior? How can i change that? I noticed that the route to the 134.102.176.0/24 network points to vlan0, not carp0. Is this correct? Thanks for any info, Heinrich -- Heinrich Rebehn University of Bremen Physics / Electrical and Electronics Engineering - Department of Telecommunications - Phone : +49/421/218-4664 Fax :-3341
Re: bgpd and multihop
* Jon Morby [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-06-29 11:20]: On 29 Jun 2007, at 08:47, Henning Brauer wrote: * Jon Morby [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-06-29 02:56]: I've just updated one of our routers from an end of May snapshot to a Jun 28th snapshot and have noticed that we seem to be having problems with our multihop sessions since the upgrade. errr... I'm inlcined to say impossible, since there weren't many changes at all in bgpd since then, and nothing that remotely touches nexthop verification. check your routes, something must be different. bgpctl sh nex on both machines might give insight I know ... whether it's just something that has now cropped up because it's the first time these several of these boxes have been rebooted in months ... The addition of nexthop qualify via bgp seems to have overcome things .. however the next hops should be learnt by ospf and are reachable (otherwise the bgp sessions wouldn't actually be up, which they are) well, as said, bgpctl sh nex will tell what is going on, maybe bgpctl sh fib is required too -- Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] BS Web Services, http://bsws.de Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services Dedicated Servers, Rootservers, Application Hosting - Hamburg Amsterdam
Re: bgpd and multihop
On 29 Jun 2007, at 08:47, Henning Brauer wrote: * Jon Morby [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-06-29 02:56]: I've just updated one of our routers from an end of May snapshot to a Jun 28th snapshot and have noticed that we seem to be having problems with our multihop sessions since the upgrade. errr... I'm inlcined to say impossible, since there weren't many changes at all in bgpd since then, and nothing that remotely touches nexthop verification. check your routes, something must be different. bgpctl sh nex on both machines might give insight I know ... whether it's just something that has now cropped up because it's the first time these several of these boxes have been rebooted in months ... The addition of nexthop qualify via bgp seems to have overcome things .. however the next hops should be learnt by ospf and are reachable (otherwise the bgp sessions wouldn't actually be up, which they are) Regards, Jon Morby FidoNet Registration Services Ltd web: www.fido.net tel: +44 (0) 845 004 3050 fax: +44 (0) 845 004 3051
Re: bgpd and multihop
On 2007/06/29 10:15, Jon Morby wrote: On 29 Jun 2007, at 08:47, Henning Brauer wrote: * Jon Morby [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-06-29 02:56]: I've just updated one of our routers from an end of May snapshot to a Jun 28th snapshot and have noticed that we seem to be having problems with our multihop sessions since the upgrade. errr... I'm inlcined to say impossible, since there weren't many changes at all in bgpd since then, and nothing that remotely touches nexthop verification. check your routes, something must be different. bgpctl sh nex on both machines might give insight I know ... whether it's just something that has now cropped up because it's the first time these several of these boxes have been rebooted in months ... The addition of nexthop qualify via bgp seems to have overcome things .. however the next hops should be learnt by ospf and are reachable (otherwise the bgp sessions wouldn't actually be up, which they are) Are the nexthops in subnets where you receive the same exact prefixes by both BGP and OSPF? I have found ospfd sometimes doesn't overwrite routes installed by bgpd. That's not new though..
update of free wireless cards?
Hi, I am about to but a second hand thinkpad x40 which looks pretty good _and_ has APM support (!!). Of course OpenBSD will be installed on it. Now, the German ebayer is a nice person and I can actually choose what's going to be the wireless card! Until now I have only tried intel chips, so that you have to install the firmware and everything is working fine. But if I can choose, I'd like to have a 100% blob-less system. And also to show the vendors that they have a public! I have been googling, clustying and reading man pages to find a recent update of the list of wireless cards which would fulfill this and I have found out that the wireless devices that either do not require firmware, or that have runtime firmware that OpenBSD is allowed to distribute are: * atu (4) - Atmel AT76C50x USB IEEE 802.11b wireless network device * ral (4) - Ralink Technology IEEE 802.11a/b/g wireless network device (2nd gen 802.11 Ralink) * rum (4) - Ralink Technology USB IEEE 802.11a/b/g wireless network device * zyd (4) - Zydas ZD1211 USB IEEE 802.11b/g wireless network device Is this the whole list of blob-less devices? And another question: How do these devices compare to the intel pro ones? Are they as powerful? Thanks for your attention...
Re: update of free wireless cards?
Vim Visual [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: And another question: How do these devices compare to the intel pro ones? Are they as powerful? I have both ral and rum devices here, and we're quite happy with them. In my experience at least they are quite reliable. They are rather inexpensive too, the USB versions can can usually be had for 50 euros or less, mini-PCIs even less. Since you mention Intel parts, wpi in my Thinkpad R60 has a tendency to almost, but not quite, resetting it self at apparently random intervals, losing the link. Nothing that can't be handled with a new ifconfig up mumble plus dhclient mumble, and the recent revisions in -current is noticeably better, but still a bit irritating. I was at the point of considering some minor surgery on the Thinkpad to put a rum mini-pci in there instead, but the Damien Bergamini did some magic which made the wpi behave a little better. - P -- Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/ http://www.datadok.no/ http://www.nuug.no/ Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic delilah spamd[29949]: 85.152.224.147: disconnected after 42673 seconds.
Re: update of free wireless cards?
Hi Peter, I have both ral and rum devices here, and we're quite happy with them. In my experience at least they are quite reliable. They are rather inexpensive too, the USB versions can can usually be had for 50 euros or less, mini-PCIs even less. Ops, sorry, I was meaning internal devices! I am looking for an internal wireless card. Since you mention Intel parts, wpi in my Thinkpad R60 has a tendency to almost, but not quite, resetting it self at apparently random intervals, losing the link. Nothing that can't be handled with a new ifconfig up mumble plus dhclient mumble, and the recent revisions in -current is noticeably better, but still a bit irritating. yes, I also have observed this behaviour in some machines... it's indeed irritating! I was at the point of considering some minor surgery on the Thinkpad to put a rum mini-pci in there instead, but the Damien Bergamini did some magic which made the wpi behave a little better. iwi is not that lucky, I think... but I should shut up because I have not check it in detail Thanks for your comments Pau
acpi vs asus m6v notebook
4.1-current fresed yesterday. see attached dmesg after boot. in GENERIC ACPIVERBOSE and ACPI_ENABLE enabled. if i turn off the notebook and turn it on again it sees the battery, but the model is not read correctly (should be M6V) and there are no useful info about it: # sysctl -a | grep ^hw\.sensors hw.sensors.acpibat0.volt0=unknown (voltage), UNKNOWN hw.sensors.acpibat0.volt1=unknown (current voltage), UNKNOWN hw.sensors.acpibat0.amphour0=unknown (last full capacity), UNKNOWN hw.sensors.acpibat0.amphour1=4294.97 Ah (warning capacity) hw.sensors.acpibat0.amphour2=4294.97 Ah (low capacity) hw.sensors.acpibat0.amphour3=unknown (remaining capacity), UNKNOWN hw.sensors.acpibat0.raw0=unknown (battery unknown), UNKNOWN hw.sensors.acpibat0.raw1=unknown (rate), UNKNOWN hw.sensors.acpibat1.volt0=unknown (voltage), UNKNOWN hw.sensors.acpibat1.volt1=unknown (current voltage), UNKNOWN hw.sensors.acpibat1.amphour0=unknown (last full capacity), UNKNOWN hw.sensors.acpibat1.amphour1=4294.97 Ah (warning capacity) hw.sensors.acpibat1.amphour2=4294.97 Ah (low capacity) hw.sensors.acpibat1.amphour3=unknown (remaining capacity), UNKNOWN hw.sensors.acpibat1.raw0=unknown (battery unknown), UNKNOWN hw.sensors.acpibat1.raw1=unknown (rate), UNKNOWN i have just one battery, so acpibat1 should be ignored. if i just reset the notebook without a poweroff then there are no batteries seen at all. other mistery: if i make a halt -p then somtimes the machine is powered off and sometimes it is powered off but after 1-2 secs it is powered on again. strange ah? i really don't care about the halt -p but to see the battery's state is important. i don't like to fly with closed eyes. please give me vectors how i could solve this problem? thank you bdz OpenBSD 4.1-current (GENERIC) #1: Thu Jun 28 18:29:46 GMT 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC cpu0: Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1.73GHz (GenuineIntel 686-class) 1.73 GHz cpu0: FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,TM,SBF,EST,TM2 real mem = 1073049600 (1023MB) avail mem = 1029996544 (982MB) mainbus0 at root bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+ BIOS, date 06/08/05, BIOS32 rev. 0 @ 0xf0010, SMBIOS rev. 2.3 @ 0xf8dd0 (36 entries) bios0: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. M6V pcibios0 at bios0: rev 2.1 @ 0xf/0x1 pcibios0: PCI IRQ Routing Table rev 1.0 @ 0xf4750/272 (15 entries) pcibios0: PCI Interrupt Router at 000:31:0 (Intel 82801FB LPC rev 0x00) pcibios0: PCI bus #3 is the last bus bios0: ROM list: 0xc/0x1 acpi0 at mainbus0: rev 0 acpi0: tables DSDT FACP APIC MCFG OEMB SSDT acpitimer at acpi0 not configured acpi device at acpi0 from table DSDT not configured acpi device at acpi0 from table FACP not configured acpi device at acpi0 from table APIC not configured acpi device at acpi0 from table MCFG not configured acpi device at acpi0 from table OEMB not configured acpi device at acpi0 from table SSDT not configured acpiprt0 at acpi0: bus 0 (PCI0) acpiprt1 at acpi0: bus 3 (P0P3) acpiprt2 at acpi0: bus 1 (P0P1) acpiprt3 at acpi0: bus 0 (P0P4) acpiprt4 at acpi0: bus 0 (P0P5) acpiprt5 at acpi0: bus 0 (P0P6) acpiprt6 at acpi0: bus 0 (P0P7) acpiec at acpi0 not configured acpicpu at acpi0 not configured acpitz at acpi0 not configured acpiac at acpi0 not configured acpibat0 at acpi0: BAT0: model: \M^?\M^?\M^?\M^?\M^?\M^?\M^?\M^? serial: type: LIon oem: ASUSTEK acpibat1 at acpi0: BAT1: model: \M^?\M^?\M^?\M^?\M^?\M^?\M^?\M^? serial: type: LIon oem: ASUSTEK acpibtn at acpi0 not configured acpibtn at acpi0 not configured cpu0 at mainbus0 cpu0: unknown Enhanced SpeedStep CPU, msr 0x06120d2606000d26 cpu0: using only highest and lowest power states cpu0: Enhanced SpeedStep 1733 MHz (1308 mV): speeds: 1733, 800 MHz pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1 (no bios) pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 Intel 82915GM/PM/GMS Host rev 0x03 ppb0 at pci0 dev 1 function 0 Intel 82915PM/GM PCIE rev 0x03 pci1 at ppb0 bus 3 vga1 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 ATI Radeon Mobility X600 rev 0x00 wsdisplay0 at vga1 mux 1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation) wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (80x25, vt100 emulation) azalia0 at pci0 dev 27 function 0 Intel 82801FB HD Audio rev 0x04: irq 5 azalia0: host: High Definition Audio rev. 1.0 azalia0: codec: Realtek ALC880 (rev. 5.0), HDA version 0.9 azalia0: codec: 0x14f1/0x2bfa (rev. 0.0), HDA version 0.9 azalia0: codec[1]: No support for modem function groups azalia0: codec[1]: No audio function groups audio0 at azalia0 uhci0 at pci0 dev 29 function 0 Intel 82801FB USB rev 0x04: irq 4 uhci1 at pci0 dev 29 function 1 Intel 82801FB USB rev 0x04: irq 5 uhci2 at pci0 dev 29 function 2 Intel 82801FB USB rev 0x04: irq 6 uhci3 at pci0 dev 29 function 3 Intel 82801FB USB rev 0x04: irq 5 ehci0 at pci0 dev 29 function 7 Intel 82801FB USB rev 0x04: irq 4 usb0 at ehci0: USB revision 2.0 uhub0 at usb0: Intel EHCI root hub, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 1 ppb1 at pci0 dev 30 function 0 Intel 82801BAM Hub-to-PCI
Setting up a virtual hosting machine w. SSH/SFTP accounts - pitfalls/experiences?
Hello, Someone far more experienced than me challenged my take on virtual hosting setups. I am accustomed to having virtual users, not real users, doing stuff with MySQL backends etc. My ideas now seem to have corrupted that what made me choose OpenBSD in the first place. I would like to setup a multi user (real accounts) hosting machine without using any MySQL/web-gui kind of user management. For you perhaps intuitive and elementary stuff, for me a bold and new undertaking. So I would really like some advise on this from those of you that have been working with non-virtual hosting setups all along. 1) What kind of permission scheme is sane for non-jailed user accounts (SSH+SFTP) These are website owners that need nothing fancy but being able to edit their site(s), manage their e-mail and edit their zone-files. All of this is now virtual (and with regular FTP chrooted). My setup so far consists of the user accounts in /home - owned by username:username and chmodded 700. In their homedir there is a `ln -s` to their /var/www/home/username webspace. That webspace is chowned username:www and chmodded 770 so httpd can access/write to their dir as well. Is that advisable / workable? Other ideas? 2) Chroot jails / limited shells - do's and don'ts I understand the implications of chroot jails. I understand they are not worth the risk. Which is a shame really as they bring certain functionality (or limits if you will) that I would consider nice to have. How do you prevent people from snooping around the system, looking for that sloppy permissioned file / gathering intelligence about your clientbase? All by setting permissions manually? How do you prevent them from compiling and installing all sorts of things? Is it possible/maintainable at all without chrootjails for your users? 3) Mail setups I can find lots of setups with virtual mailusers. I have been succesfully using a Courier-imap/Postfix/MySQL setup for several years now, connected to a webbased mailmanagement tool. If I was to drop all that in favor of a more 'core' OpenBSD setup - what would be a nice maintainable (both for users and myself) way to offer single users multiple domains / mailboxes? 4) Other considerations Any advice on what to avoid and what to certainly do/check/follow up on is appreciated. I will certainly miss stuff that might present a problem down the road. For instance things like cronjobs- do you limit their use by custom scripts or do you just monitor abuse? I am aware of things like 'accounting', 'quota' and 'ulimit' - any other handy utils I might check? Thanks, Matt
Re: Intel Core 2
On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 15:34:05 +0100, Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Lead is still permitted for some equipment (notably network infrastructure), http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32002L0095:EN:HT ML annex 7: - lead in solders for servers, storage and storage array systems (exemption granted until 2010), - lead in solders for network infrastructure equipment for switching, signalling, transmission as well as network management for telecommunication, For some reason I thought this only applied to telecommunications and medical equipment because of reliability concerns and long installed life. Are those the same reasons for including servers and storage? I suspect a lot of RoHS compliant parts will make it into exempted equipment just because of availability and difficult quality control but I would not expect this to cause any significant problems. I have not seen an exception for CdS photocells although many manufacturers have petitioned for one. Unfortunately there are a lot of esoteric applications for which they have no substitute short of complete reengineering and in some cases not even then. I expected at least the hermetically sealed ones to be exempted. http://sales.hamamatsu.com/en/products/solid-state-division/compound-semicond uctors/cds.php
Re: FTP traffic counting
--- Juan Miscaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am using OpenBSD 4.0 and I am counting bytes with labels for most protocols but with ftp-proxy I do not know how to proceed. How can I do this? These are the rules I have in pf.conf: nat-anchor ftp-proxy/* rdr-anchor ftp-proxy/* rdr pass on $INT \ inet proto tcp \ from any \ to any port ftp \ - 127.0.0.1 port 8021 anchor ftp-proxy/* pass out on $EXT \ inet proto tcp \ from ($EXT) \ to any port 21 \ keep state I can add a label for port 21 but how do I track the data ports? I thought of the 'user' keyword where I could set it to 'proxy' and set up a label but I need an explicit rule for that. Any other ideas? Juan Get news delivered with the All new Yahoo! Mail. Enjoy RSS feeds right on your Mail page. Start today at http://mrd.mail.yahoo.com/try_beta?.intl=ca
Re: openbsd 4.0 installed, need to add network interface after install
1- Check the hardware compatability list to make sure the lan card is supported. 2- Take a look and make sure the lan card is seated in it's slot properly. I have had this happen a few times with smaller cards not seating all the way (it's probably because of my fat paws). 3. Temporarily boot from another operating system's live CD, e.g. FreeBSD 6.2 disc 1 (select fixit mode to get a shell) For a Linux view try Ubuntu 6.06.1, or Fedora 7 for a more bleeding-edge kernel. These two require you to wait for a graphical environment to start though. These will show you if another OS recognises the card(s) you have. Also, under Linux, lspci -v gives useful info about the PCI cards you have installed. In theory, you should be able to do this with OpenBSD too: http://mj.ucw.cz/pciutils.shtml However it doesn't work for me: # pkg_add ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/4.0/packages/i386/pciutils-2.2.1.tgz pciutils-2.2.1: complete # lspci -v lspci: obsd_init: /dev/pci open failed ktrace and kdump just show: ... 4341 lspciCALL open(0x3c002b8b,0x2,0) 4341 lspciNAMI /dev/pci 4341 lspciRET open -1 errno 1 Operation not permitted ... Regards, Brian.
Any OpenSBD users in Manchester UK?
Hi, I have to come to U.K from 6th July to 15th July. It would be great if I can find a few OpenBSD users there and see how your implementations are :-) Please let me know your contact details off list. Also let me know if you need something from India :- if i can afford it I'll get it for you. I have never seen other architectures except x86, amd64, PPC ( thanks to e-mac ). Yes I saw a sparc system once but it was not connected to anything and a few people were around it in an institute trying to make heads and tails out of lump of metal and find the place where to connect the keyboard because it had no serial/ps2/usb ports. It would be great if I can see those other architectures like sparc64, VAX, arm etc and spend some time learning from experienced users :- I think this would be the best opportunity for that. Those things are rare if at all existent in this part of the sub continent. I have a tight schedule since I am coming there as part of my Job so I don't even know if I'll get free time on weekends but surely don't want to miss the chance of seeing you people and these machines if the Lord permits :-) If the trip were to Paris I would have gone to the house of Johan Sanchez :-) who has a whole lot of different architectures. And if the trip were to Canada I would stay at Theo's place and give him some bright Ideas ;-) Germany? Henning of course :- US? Nick or JCR :-)) Thank you so much Kind Regards Siju
Re: bgpd and multihop
On 29 Jun 2007, at 11:12, Stuart Henderson wrote: I know ... whether it's just something that has now cropped up because it's the first time these several of these boxes have been rebooted in months ... The addition of nexthop qualify via bgp seems to have overcome things .. however the next hops should be learnt by ospf and are reachable (otherwise the bgp sessions wouldn't actually be up, which they are) Are the nexthops in subnets where you receive the same exact prefixes by both BGP and OSPF? I have found ospfd sometimes doesn't overwrite routes installed by bgpd. That's not new though.. Yup .. most likely ... certainly qualifying via bgp seems to have solved things for the time being
Re: bgpd and multihop
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 11:12:15AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2007/06/29 10:15, Jon Morby wrote: On 29 Jun 2007, at 08:47, Henning Brauer wrote: * Jon Morby [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-06-29 02:56]: I've just updated one of our routers from an end of May snapshot to a Jun 28th snapshot and have noticed that we seem to be having problems with our multihop sessions since the upgrade. errr... I'm inlcined to say impossible, since there weren't many changes at all in bgpd since then, and nothing that remotely touches nexthop verification. check your routes, something must be different. bgpctl sh nex on both machines might give insight I know ... whether it's just something that has now cropped up because it's the first time these several of these boxes have been rebooted in months ... The addition of nexthop qualify via bgp seems to have overcome things .. however the next hops should be learnt by ospf and are reachable (otherwise the bgp sessions wouldn't actually be up, which they are) Are the nexthops in subnets where you receive the same exact prefixes by both BGP and OSPF? I have found ospfd sometimes doesn't overwrite routes installed by bgpd. That's not new though.. ospfd will remove bgpd routes if the same network is distributed via bgp and ospf. This should work since some time now. So if you still can reproduce it I would like to know how because that is a bug. -- :wq Claudio
Re: Any OpenSBD users in Manchester UK?
I have never seen other architectures except x86, amd64, PPC ( thanks to e-mac ). Yes I saw a sparc system once but it was not connected to anything and a few people were around it in an institute trying to make heads and tails out of lump of metal and find the place where to connect the keyboard because it had no serial/ps2/usb ports. It would be great if I can see those other architectures like sparc64, VAX, arm etc and spend some time learning from experienced users :- Hi siju, You probably wont see any of their systems on display running OpenBSD, but if you're in the UK and into old kit how about a trip over to Bletchley Park? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bletchley_Park They should even have a Colossus on display dating back to '44. Again, this probably wont run OpenBSD. :) -- ~michael www.bsdqed.com
Re: bgpd and multihop
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 10:15:14AM +0100, Jon Morby wrote: On 29 Jun 2007, at 08:47, Henning Brauer wrote: * Jon Morby [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-06-29 02:56]: I've just updated one of our routers from an end of May snapshot to a Jun 28th snapshot and have noticed that we seem to be having problems with our multihop sessions since the upgrade. errr... I'm inlcined to say impossible, since there weren't many changes at all in bgpd since then, and nothing that remotely touches nexthop verification. check your routes, something must be different. bgpctl sh nex on both machines might give insight I know ... whether it's just something that has now cropped up because it's the first time these several of these boxes have been rebooted in months ... The addition of nexthop qualify via bgp seems to have overcome things .. however the next hops should be learnt by ospf and are reachable (otherwise the bgp sessions wouldn't actually be up, which they are) There were some ospfd changes in the last month so it could be that you actually have a ospfd regression and not a bgpd one. Could you try to provide more information especially about the nexthop? -- :wq Claudio
acpiprt patch not committed?
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.tech/13150 why this patch has not been committed?
Re: update of free wireless cards?
Vim Visual [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ops, sorry, I was meaning internal devices! I am looking for an internal wireless card. the ordinary PCI bus versions are about the same price or slightly cheaper. - P -- Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/ http://www.datadok.no/ http://www.nuug.no/ Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic delilah spamd[29949]: 85.152.224.147: disconnected after 42673 seconds.
Re: Any OpenSBD users in Manchester UK?
What will you be doing here in UK? Hi, I have to come to U.K from 6th July to 15th July. It would be great if I can find a few OpenBSD users there and see how your implementations are :-) Please let me know your contact details off list. Also let me know if you need something from India :- if i can afford it I'll get it for you. I have never seen other architectures except x86, amd64, PPC ( thanks to e-mac ). Yes I saw a sparc system once but it was not connected to anything and a few people were around it in an institute trying to make heads and tails out of lump of metal and find the place where to connect the keyboard because it had no serial/ps2/usb ports. It would be great if I can see those other architectures like sparc64, VAX, arm etc and spend some time learning from experienced users :- I think this would be the best opportunity for that. Those things are rare if at all existent in this part of the sub continent. I have a tight schedule since I am coming there as part of my Job so I don't even know if I'll get free time on weekends but surely don't want to miss the chance of seeing you people and these machines if the Lord permits :-) If the trip were to Paris I would have gone to the house of Johan Sanchez :-) who has a whole lot of different architectures. And if the trip were to Canada I would stay at Theo's place and give him some bright Ideas ;-) Germany? Henning of course :- US? Nick or JCR :-)) Thank you so much Kind Regards Siju
Re: Any OpenSBD users in Manchester UK?
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 06:06:59PM +0530, Siju George wrote: I have to come to U.K from 6th July to 15th July. It would be great if I can find a few OpenBSD users there and see how your implementations are :-) I'm not 100% sure on the dates, but I believe you will just miss the Manchester BSD User Group meeting :( No, I'm not in the UK. Here's the web page: http://www.bsdgroups.org.uk/manchester/ -- Darrin Chandler| Phoenix BSD User Group | MetaBUG [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://phxbug.org/ | http://metabug.org/ http://www.stilyagin.com/ | Daemons in the Desert | Global BUG Federation
Re: Setting up a virtual hosting machine w. SSH/SFTP accounts - pitfalls/experiences?
On 6/29/07, Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In their homedir there is a `ln -s` to their /var/www/home/username webspace. That webspace is chowned username:www and chmodded 770 so httpd can access/write to their dir as well. Is that advisable / workable? Other ideas? You don't want the www user being able to write to your web space. Think about it. DS
Re: Setting up a virtual hosting machine w. SSH/SFTP accounts - pitfalls/experiences?
Darren Spruell schreef: On 6/29/07, Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In their homedir there is a `ln -s` to their /var/www/home/username webspace. That webspace is chowned username:www and chmodded 770 so httpd can access/write to their dir as well. Is that advisable / workable? Other ideas? You don't want the www user being able to write to your web space. Think about it. DS Just did - blush Thanks for pointing that out. So that should be chmod 750. Matt
Re: Any OpenSBD users in Manchester UK?
Thank you so much Darrin and Michael for your responses :-) Hope I will be lucky enough to have time and oppourtunity. On 6/29/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What will you be doing here in UK? Well... Well.. Now who told you to ask that question? :-) I carefully avoided that in the previous mail ! I am coming there to install a BSD firewall for a client. They need a GUI, that is a must. So it is not our favourite OS. It is pfSense :-) I will have to train them how to use it too. Besides we did develop some demo application for them in MS technologies. So will be doing the demo installation of that as well and some training on that too. Ok keep it secret. it is classified information :-) Thanks for asking any ways Kind regards Siju
Re: Setting up a virtual hosting machine w. SSH/SFTP accounts - pitfalls/experiences?
On 6/29/07, Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2) Chroot jails / limited shells - do's and don'ts I understand the implications of chroot jails. I understand they are not worth the risk. Which is a shame really as they bring certain functionality (or limits if you will) that I would consider nice to have. How do you prevent people from snooping around the system, looking for that sloppy permissioned file / gathering intelligence about your clientbase? All by setting permissions manually? How do you prevent them from compiling and installing all sorts of things? regarding the info about client database, it depends what kind of backend are you using, if it is flat files than permissions are sane way to protect them IMO. regarding compiling, IMO not worth the hassle to try to prevent that, it is not really hard to compile the code on other machine + lack of compiler makes it painfull for you to follow -current. regarding all sorts of junk that they might throw at you, well, i use ulimit. it works. 3) Mail setups I can find lots of setups with virtual mailusers. I have been succesfully using a Courier-imap/Postfix/MySQL setup for several years now, connected to a webbased mailmanagement tool. If I was to drop all that in favor of a more 'core' OpenBSD setup - what would be a nice maintainable (both for users and myself) way to offer single users multiple domains / mailboxes? i like virtual mail users. 4) Other considerations Any advice on what to avoid and what to certainly do/check/follow up on is appreciated. I will certainly miss stuff that might present a problem down the road. For instance things like cronjobs- do you limit their use by custom scripts or do you just monitor abuse? IMO not worth the effort to restrict usage of crontab. (afterall it is fairly simple to setup ssh keys and a cronjob on local machine that will execute some code/script/whatever) I am aware of things like 'accounting', 'quota' and 'ulimit' - any other handy utils I might check? logcheck (never set it up on OBSD tho, just linux). -- almir
Re: Any OpenSBD users in Manchester UK?
Hmm, are there no competent OpenBSD user/programmer/administrator/whatever in the UK? They should inform me, I been into OpenBSD since 2.6 and now they have to import someone from a different timezone just to do that while I am here basically several hours by train -). That is not classified anymore. Just be careful, security here might be a tougher one in the airport due to a foiled terrorist attack earlier today at the heart of Central London. Thank you so much Darrin and Michael for your responses :-) Hope I will be lucky enough to have time and oppourtunity. On 6/29/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What will you be doing here in UK? Well... Well.. Now who told you to ask that question? :-) I carefully avoided that in the previous mail ! I am coming there to install a BSD firewall for a client. They need a GUI, that is a must. So it is not our favourite OS. It is pfSense :-) I will have to train them how to use it too. Besides we did develop some demo application for them in MS technologies. So will be doing the demo installation of that as well and some training on that too. Ok keep it secret. it is classified information :-) Thanks for asking any ways Kind regards Siju
Re: openbsd 4.0 installed, need to add network interface after install
Stuart, I'm far from a guru, but looking at your dmesg I don't see a lan card there at all. Here are the first few steps: 1- Check the hardware compatability list to make sure the lan card is supported. 2- Take a look and make sure the lan card is seated in it's slot properly. I have had this happen a few times with smaller cards not seating all the way (it's probably because of my fat paws). The linksys lne100tx card is listed twice, once as 4.x, and another time with no version. My lne100tx cards are both v5.1. I have tried both. Neither work. No lights on back. Nothing. Is it possible for the pci slot to be bad? btw, for an add on card, you probably won't see anything in the systems bios, that is unless bios systems have gotten much more functional than they were last time I looked. Understood. Thanks so much for your input. JohnM -- john mendenhall [EMAIL PROTECTED] surf utopia internet services
Re: Setting up a virtual hosting machine w. SSH/SFTP accounts - pitfalls/experiences?
3) Mail setups I can find lots of setups with virtual mailusers. I have been succesfully using a Courier-imap/Postfix/MySQL setup for several years now, connected to a webbased mailmanagement tool. If I was to drop all that in favor of a more 'core' OpenBSD setup - what would be a nice maintainable (both for users and myself) way to offer single users multiple domains / mailboxes? i like virtual mail users. I am curious about this statement here. Care to provide more details? I used to do and am still doing a lots of it in QMail that is changing for postfix now and was actually going to add MySQL backend for that to make my life easier to manage multiple domains and obviously multiple users. I am curious at the replay as it may look like you have something more efficient? I was actually looking to just possibly use the postmap with hash may be, or may be the built db tools. Wasn't sure however if that would be best then MySQL. Obviously much smaller setup. Simpler is always better anyway. So, I would appreciate just a bit more suggestion, or details on your statement, so that may be something better I haven't thought of yet might be best. I am sure not oppose to use MySQL however. As for any web tools, I could care less. CLI is plenty good for me and anyone else here. SSH access does wonders... (:
Re: openbsd 4.0 installed, need to add network interface after install
Brian, 1- Check the hardware compatability list to make sure the lan card is supported. 2- Take a look and make sure the lan card is seated in it's slot properly. I have had this happen a few times with smaller cards not seating all the way (it's probably because of my fat paws). 3. Temporarily boot from another operating system's live CD, e.g. FreeBSD 6.2 disc 1 (select fixit mode to get a shell) For a Linux view try Ubuntu 6.06.1, or Fedora 7 for a more bleeding-edge kernel. These two require you to wait for a graphical environment to start though. These will show you if another OS recognises the card(s) you have. I booted an ultimate boot disk, with several small linux distros on them. None of them found the card. I reseated the card. No go. I tried another card I had, same model. Nothing. I am doing this in a 1U box, so there is a pci 1u riser card. Could it be the riser is bad? Or, could the pci slot itself be bad? What is the best way to test the pci slot? Thanks! JohnM -- john mendenhall [EMAIL PROTECTED] surf utopia internet services
Re: Setting up a virtual hosting machine w. SSH/SFTP accounts - pitfalls/experiences?
On 6/29/07, Daniel Ouellet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 3) Mail setups I can find lots of setups with virtual mailusers. I have been succesfully using a Courier-imap/Postfix/MySQL setup for several years now, connected to a webbased mailmanagement tool. If I was to drop all that in favor of a more 'core' OpenBSD setup - what would be a nice maintainable (both for users and myself) way to offer single users multiple domains / mailboxes? i like virtual mail users. I am curious about this statement here. Care to provide more details? I used to do and am still doing a lots of it in QMail that is changing for postfix now and was actually going to add MySQL backend for that to make my life easier to manage multiple domains and obviously multiple users. I am curious at the replay as it may look like you have something more efficient? I was actually looking to just possibly use the postmap with hash may be, or may be the built db tools. Wasn't sure however if that would be best then MySQL. Obviously much smaller setup. Simpler is always better anyway. So, I would appreciate just a bit more suggestion, or details on your statement, so that may be something better I haven't thought of yet might be best. I am sure not oppose to use MySQL however. As for any web tools, I could care less. CLI is plenty good for me and anyone else here. SSH access does wonders... (: what excatly are you curious about? :) if you have relativelly few users the postfix hashes should do the trick, there is one annoyance tho, after every edit you have to run postmap (easily solvable by wrapper scripts). i tend to use mysql, maybe it is because i'm used to it. if you have trully big setups you might wanna look at ldap, from what i've heard/read it should perform well under heavy read intensive operations. -- almir
path traversal exploits
The unarj v2.43 archiver we have for use with clamav virus scanning does not really work. The same is true for the newer 2.65 version released by the author. The problem is unarj is unable to extract with paths, hence it will overwrite files and stuff won't actually be scanned. At the moment, I've got a working port of 2.65 patched to extract with full paths. The last problem to solve is preventing path traversal exploits. I suspect that just searching for double dot .. in the to be created path string is not enough but since I've never done this sort of thing, I'm not sure where/what to ask. I would like to find a standardized, well tested way to test strings for potential path traversal sequences. Searching with google has been fruitless. If you'd be so kind as to drop kick me in the right direction, possibly example code, it would be much appreciated. Kind Regards, JCR
Re: openbsd 4.0 installed, need to add network interface after install
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 03:16:36PM +0200, St?phane Chausson wrote: Brian Candler wrote, On 29/06/07 14:43: Also, under Linux, lspci -v gives useful info about the PCI cards you have installed. In theory, you should be able to do this with OpenBSD too: http://mj.ucw.cz/pciutils.shtml However it doesn't work for me: # pkg_add ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/4.0/packages/i386/pciutils-2.2.1.tgz pciutils-2.2.1: complete # lspci -v lspci: obsd_init: /dev/pci open failed From the pkg_info of pciutils, you have to set machdep.allowaperture=2 via sysctl(8) I set it to 0 and got the same error as the one you show Thank you, that fixed it. (However I couldn't modify this value using sysctl while the system was running; I had to put it in /etc/sysctl.conf and reboot) # lspci -v ... 01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ (rev 10) Subsystem: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RT8139 Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 32, IRQ 5 I/O ports at b800 Memory at fe5ffc00 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) Capabilities: [50] Power Management version 2 01:08.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82562EZ 10/100 Ethernet Controller (rev 02) Subsystem: GVC/BCM Advanced Research Unknown device 2181 Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 32, IRQ 10 Memory at fe5ee000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) I/O ports at bc00 Capabilities: [dc] Power Management version 2 (Those are rl0 and fxp0 respectively) So maybe the OP can do this too and see if any network cards are reported. Regards, Brian.
Re: Setting up a virtual hosting machine w. SSH/SFTP accounts - pitfalls/experiences?
Daniel Ouellet schreef: 3) Mail setups I can find lots of setups with virtual mailusers. I have been succesfully using a Courier-imap/Postfix/MySQL setup for several years i like virtual mail users. I am curious about this statement here. Care to provide more details? The setup I have been using for a long time now is based on this document: http://postfix.wiki.xs4all.nl/index.php?title=OpenBSD_PostfixAdmin_Guide I've succesfully used that on everything up to (and including) 4.1, although there are some small changes. Namely the courier-auth libs are now different packages. However I have never liked the sasl2 / imap connection setup - it seems a bit dodgy. Then again I am not anywhere near able to come up with something better. Any new mailboxes / aliases / etc are immediately available, which is nice and convenient. Downside is MySQL has now become a point of failure for maildelivery. Matt
Re: openbsd 4.0 installed, need to add network interface after install
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 12:40:56PM -0700, John Mendenhall wrote: I booted an ultimate boot disk, with several small linux distros on them. None of them found the card. I'd personally go with a full-sized Linux distro, as it's more likely to have a complete driver set, but it does seem more like a hardware issue now. I reseated the card. No go. I tried another card I had, same model. Nothing. I am doing this in a 1U box, so there is a pci 1u riser card. Could it be the riser is bad? Or, could the pci slot itself be bad? Yes it's possible. (But then again, I think you said the motherboard had an on-board NIC too, and that wasn't working either?) What is the best way to test the pci slot? If you remove the motherboard from its case, can you insert a PCI card directly, not using the riser? If you have a PCI card which definitely works in another unit (say something which appears as fxp0 in another box), so much the better. Given that your on-board LAN isn't working either, maybe the motherboard has a serious fault. But you might not be able to return it until you can prove that *Windows* can't find any network cards either :-) Regards, Brian.
Re: Setting up a virtual hosting machine w. SSH/SFTP accounts - pitfalls/experiences?
Almir Karic wrote: if you have trully big setups you might wanna look at ldap, from what i've heard/read it should perform well under heavy read intensive operations. I always see a lots of LDAP talks and some documents on it for many things including managing multiples users on multiples servers as a way to make life easier. To be honest. I never set one up yet. Doesn't know much about it either. Always been on my list of things to learn and explore. I guess I never came across a very good document that explain it so well to me with pro/cons to trigger my interest to try it yet. Lots on the net for sure. It just haven't grab me yet. May be that's the best things after slice bread and I am missing out. I don't know. May be if someone have a reference they ever come across that really trigger their interest and turn them to it, I would love to read it. I would very much appreciate the pointers to much reading. My ignorance on that subject always makes me think that it could be done with SQL, what ever flavor you like, so why yet use an other database LDAP? See my total dark side to it. (; I never came across a reason or reading to push me to learn it and see it as better then other solutions. I am more then open to be put in the 21th century and learn it however if that's so blind of me. Best, Daniel
Re: Setting up a virtual hosting machine w. SSH/SFTP accounts - pitfalls/experiences?
On 6/29/07, Daniel Ouellet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Almir Karic wrote: if you have trully big setups you might wanna look at ldap, from what i've heard/read it should perform well under heavy read intensive operations. I always see a lots of LDAP talks and some documents on it for many things including managing multiples users on multiples servers as a way to make life easier. To be honest. I never set one up yet. Doesn't know much about it either. Always been on my list of things to learn and explore. I guess I never came across a very good document that explain it so well to me with pro/cons to trigger my interest to try it yet. Lots on the net for sure. It just haven't grab me yet. May be that's the best things after slice bread and I am missing out. I don't know. May be if someone have a reference they ever come across that really trigger their interest and turn them to it, I would love to read it. I would very much appreciate the pointers to much reading. My ignorance on that subject always makes me think that it could be done with SQL, what ever flavor you like, so why yet use an other database LDAP? See my total dark side to it. (; I never came across a reason or reading to push me to learn it and see it as better then other solutions. I am more then open to be put in the 21th century and learn it however if that's so blind of me. http://www.ldapman.org/articles/intro_to_ldap.html IMO good intro to ldap. if you just want to deploy a not-huge mail server you probably won't see any advantages of ldap over mysql. what you can do with ldap (IMO) much better than with mysql is ACL, i found the 'self' to be pretty nice, example: access to attrs=userPassword,shadowLastChange by dn=cn=admin,dc=my,dc=domain write by anonymous auth by self write by * none -- almir
Re: openbsd 4.0 installed, need to add network interface after install
On 6/29/07, Brian Candler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Given that your on-board LAN isn't working either, maybe the motherboard has a serious fault. But you might not be able to return it until you can prove that *Windows* can't find any network cards either :-) that's simple, create a screen session with (multiple) windows in it and show them ifconfig -A in each of those. :) -- almir
Re: Setting up a virtual hosting machine w. SSH/SFTP accounts - pitfalls/experiences?
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 09:41:49PM +0200, Almir Karic wrote: i like virtual mail users. I don't. But that's me. if you have relativelly few users the postfix hashes should do the trick, there is one annoyance tho, after every edit you have to run postmap (easily solvable by wrapper scripts). i tend to use mysql, maybe it is because i'm used to it. if you have trully big setups you might wanna look at ldap, from what i've heard/read it should perform well under heavy read intensive operations. Err... No. NOTHING outperforms flat files. LDAP is good, but not that good. The more users that you have, the *more* likely you are to use postfix's builtin maps (esp btree). The way that ISP's often do it: Keep customer data in a Postgres database (views, forigen keys, ACID, triggers, stored procedures, functions,. this is what a database is for) Support staff and customers can web into this and manipulate accounts. Heck, even give the account's lassie a button where she can suspend services for non-payment. Customer data != OS data. Have scripts that pull data from (materialised) views periodically, use that data to generate the postfix maps. Diff the new maps to the live ones, and install the new ones if there is a difference, on all of the MTA boxes in your mail farm. When you have (tens of) thousands of users, your CPU is going to be busy with spam and virus filtering, and SQL is just way to slow. LDAP is faster, but it is just as much work to set up as is some perl/shell scripts to set up maps. But you have introduced a weak point, namely LDAP must be online for you to receive mail. Repeat the above for passwd, httpd.conf, ftpusers, ftpchroot, sshd_config, quota.user, mailman, courier, mysql wont help you with half of the services that you'll end up offering, so why bother? And just so you don't think that I'm anti SQL, I work as an SQL Data Analyst. Before that, I worked as a sysadmin, and before that, I worked as a sysadmin for a national ISP. Just take the time to think about what it is that you want to achive, and work back from there, using the bare minimum of stuff, because stuff goes wrong. e.g: you place all of your trust in a database, and a new release comes out, that enforces strict practices that your schema does not adhere to. You upgrade, can't serve requests for week while you alter all of your data, your name is mud. If you use flat files, kill the update cronjobs so that things run as they are, fix your data, and then you can insert new customers. But your existing customers are unaware that there was a problem at your end as the vast bulk of business went on as normal. SQL is complex, and complex equals unreliable. It has its place, but be careful where you use it. -- Craig Skinner | http://www.kepax.co.uk | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: openbsd 4.0 installed, need to add network interface after install
I am doing this in a 1U box, so there is a pci 1u riser card. Could it be the riser is bad? Maybe, you could remove the bracket from a PCI card and try it with the case lid off and no riser for a test (and other slots if you have any).. Have a look for leaky capacitors while you're there, if you haven't already seen your fair share, look at http://badcaps.net/ident/
Intel xeon fails to boot with 4.1 release
Trying to set up a fairly heavy duty web server I encountered boot problems with this fairly new machine using the release CD ROM. Using the -c command at the boot prompt I already see error messages, before it gives me the UKC ... UVM_PAGE_PHYSLOAD: unable to load physical memory segment 5 segments allocated, ignoring 0x7fa9a - 0x7fad0 Increase VM_PHYSSEG_MAX and repeats this two more times for ranges like: 0x7fb1a - 0x7fb2c There is also a message: RTCBios diagnostic error 1 The system also fails to boot under 3.9 with a ton of virtual memory warnings, however, it does boot with 4.0 CD release, so the dmesg is given below. When using 4.0, however, I go through the motions of fdisk and disklabel of sd0 -- assigning the entire disk to OpenBSD. It looks like it works, but when I reboot - dang, Windows server comes back. Suggestions anyone? OpenBSD 4.0 (RAMDISK_CD) #39: Sat Sep 16 19:34:26 MDT 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/RAMDISK_CD RTC BIOS diagnostic error 1 cpu0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU 5130 @ 2.00GHz (GenuineIntel 686-class) 2 GHz cpu0: FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,TM2,CX16 real mem = 2141388800 (2091200K) avail mem = 1946718208 (1901092K) using 4256 buffers containing 107171840 bytes (104660K) of memory RTC BIOS diagnostic error 1 mainbus0 (root) bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+(00) BIOS, date 10/02/06, SMBIOS rev. 2.5 @ 0x7fa42000 (67 entries) bios0: Intel MP Server pcibios at bios0 function 0x1a not configured bios0: ROM list: 0xc/0x9000 0xc9000/0x1000 0xca000/0x1000 cpu0 at mainbus0 pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1 (no bios) pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 vendor Intel, unknown product 0x25d8 rev 0x92 ppb0 at pci0 dev 2 function 0 vendor Intel, unknown product 0x25f7 rev 0x92 pci1 at ppb0 bus 1 ppb1 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 Intel 6321ESB PCIE rev 0x01 pci2 at ppb1 bus 2 ppb2 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 Intel 6321ESB PCIE rev 0x01 pci3 at ppb2 bus 3 ppb3 at pci2 dev 1 function 0 Intel 6321ESB PCIE rev 0x01 pci4 at ppb3 bus 4 ppb4 at pci2 dev 2 function 0 vendor Intel, unknown product 0x3518 rev 0x01 pci5 at ppb4 bus 5 em0 at pci5 dev 0 function 0 Intel PRO/1000 PT (80003ES2) rev 0x01: irq 5, address 00:15:17:0f:06:5e em1 at pci5 dev 0 function 1 Intel PRO/1000 PT (80003ES2) rev 0x01: irq 11, address 00:15:17:0f:06:5f ppb5 at pci1 dev 0 function 3 Intel 6321ESB PCIE-PCIX rev 0x01 pci6 at ppb5 bus 6 ppb6 at pci0 dev 3 function 0 Intel 5000 PCIE rev 0x92 pci7 at ppb6 bus 7 ppb7 at pci0 dev 4 function 0 Intel 5000 PCIE rev 0x92 pci8 at ppb7 bus 8 ppb8 at pci0 dev 5 function 0 Intel 5000 PCIE rev 0x92 pci9 at ppb8 bus 9 ppb9 at pci0 dev 6 function 0 Intel 5000 PCIE rev 0x92 pci10 at ppb9 bus 10 ppb10 at pci0 dev 7 function 0 Intel 5000 PCIE rev 0x92 pci11 at ppb10 bus 11 vendor Intel, unknown product 0x1a38 (class system subclass miscellaneous, rev 0x92) at pci0 dev 8 function 0 not configured pchb1 at pci0 dev 16 function 0 Intel 5000 Error Reporting rev 0x92 pchb2 at pci0 dev 16 function 1 Intel 5000 Error Reporting rev 0x92 pchb3 at pci0 dev 16 function 2 Intel 5000 Error Reporting rev 0x92 pchb4 at pci0 dev 17 function 0 Intel 5000 Reserved rev 0x92 pchb5 at pci0 dev 19 function 0 Intel 5000 Reserved rev 0x92 pchb6 at pci0 dev 21 function 0 Intel 5000 FBD rev 0x92 pchb7 at pci0 dev 22 function 0 Intel 5000 FBD rev 0x92 ppb11 at pci0 dev 28 function 0 Intel 6321ESB PCIE rev 0x09 pci12 at ppb11 bus 12 uhci0 at pci0 dev 29 function 0 Intel 6321ESB USB rev 0x09: irq 11 usb0 at uhci0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0 at usb0 uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci1 at pci0 dev 29 function 1 Intel 6321ESB USB rev 0x09: irq 5 usb1 at uhci1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1 at usb1 uhub1: Intel UHCI root hub, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci2 at pci0 dev 29 function 2 Intel 6321ESB USB rev 0x09: irq 11 usb2 at uhci2: USB revision 1.0 uhub2 at usb2 uhub2: Intel UHCI root hub, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub2: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci3 at pci0 dev 29 function 3 Intel 6321ESB USB rev 0x09: irq 5 usb3 at uhci3: USB revision 1.0 uhub3 at usb3 uhub3: Intel UHCI root hub, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub3: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered ehci0 at pci0 dev 29 function 7 Intel 6321ESB USB rev 0x09: irq 11 usb4 at ehci0: USB revision 2.0 uhub4 at usb4 uhub4: Intel EHCI root hub, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub4: 8 ports with 8 removable, self powered ppb12 at pci0 dev 30 function 0 Intel 82801BA AGP rev 0xd9 pci13 at ppb12 bus 13 vga1 at pci13 dev 12 function 0 ATI ES1000 rev 0x02 wsdisplay0 at vga1 mux 1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation) ichpcib0 at pci0 dev 31 function 0 Intel 6321ESB LPC rev 0x09: PM disabled pciide0 at pci0 dev 31 function 2 Intel 6321ESB SATA rev 0x09: DMA, channel 0 wired to compatibility, channel 1 wired
